I expected nothing less than you. You are a true defender of the dogma to the end. Who needs to understand? Anything that says AGW is bad must be true, anything that says it will be good is false. Such is the way of us true believers.
There's a hole on the top of the globe and CO2 is plugging the hole? Do you even know how to calculate the amount of warming we'll get with a doubling of CO2? Hint: it has to do with black body radiation not a hole in a jar. The amount of CO2 we've added to the atmosphere is measure in parts per million, it's miniscule.
Have you noticed a difference? Thanks for caring 3. It just doesn't seem there is reason to take yet another AGW comment section seriously. Most people don't think, they just choose a side that matches their political ideology. So hey, why not join them?
Massive scale? The composition of the atmosphere has been changed a fraction of a tenth of a percent. The overall change in composition has been very small, my dear Oregonian. What do you think, very very small changes in the composition of the atmosphere are going to destroy humanity?
And this article did spur science. In November, the results of a double blind study will be published with 23000 participants. That will help clarify the matter, and if it turns out that VitaminD is a problem, we'll all be better off.
This is why reproducibility in science is so important. If he comes up with some good results, the study can be reproduced by other, more skeptical groups. In this case, it would be interesting to see if all those vitamin deficiency tests uncovered high levels of deficiency in the population. If it didn't, then I'm going back to my original state of not worrying about vitamin D.
ok, so can you rewrite your original statement now so that it becomes at least somewhat more true?
We've never had a computer that could beat humans at a game anywhere close to as complicated as this. And it learned to do it entirely on its own. No one taught it how to play. This is a huge advance.
I would also point out that you might want to rework the statement "This is a huge advance" and "it learned to do it entirely on its own", and might also want to consider the wording on your point "anywhere close to as complicated as this," since the problem is not just "complicated == branching_factor." See what you can do.
However, there's a worry that there is a god of the gaps argument emerging, as various tasks that were believed to require GI have been shown to be achievable without this.
This has happened when it was shown that the task is simpler than previously thought. For example, with the Turing test........Turing never expected it to be so easy to trick the average human being. Likewise, with computer chess, all you need is a really powerful tree searching computer. No intelligence needed.
They are not interested in a company that does ride sharing AND self driving. If they wanted a self driving car company, they would invest in a self driving car company.
I think part of the problem is they'd prefer to invest in a self-driving car company that doesn't kill people.
The problem with Los Angeles: everyone there wants public transportation, but no one wants to ride it. They want the other people to ride it, so the roads will be clear.
Nah, it's not just paper resumes. Recruiters have been like this for over a decade: they talk to you, tell you how wonderful you are, then suddenly disappear and stop answering emails. There are a thousand different variations of this scenario, but when it comes to politeness, recruiters are scum.
Slashdot Mirror
I expected nothing less than you. You are a true defender of the dogma to the end. Who needs to understand? Anything that says AGW is bad must be true, anything that says it will be good is false. Such is the way of us true believers.
There's a hole on the top of the globe and CO2 is plugging the hole? Do you even know how to calculate the amount of warming we'll get with a doubling of CO2? Hint: it has to do with black body radiation not a hole in a jar. The amount of CO2 we've added to the atmosphere is measure in parts per million, it's miniscule.
Have you noticed a difference? Thanks for caring 3. It just doesn't seem there is reason to take yet another AGW comment section seriously. Most people don't think, they just choose a side that matches their political ideology. So hey, why not join them?
Massive scale? The composition of the atmosphere has been changed a fraction of a tenth of a percent. The overall change in composition has been very small, my dear Oregonian. What do you think, very very small changes in the composition of the atmosphere are going to destroy humanity?
What an argument! I am astonishes at your devotion to dogma, to the point of death wishes! Your idols approve
And a side of hash browns? I can ask the cook, they're freshly salted.
To quote this asshole [slashdot.org],
What a genius he is.
Which means they have data to back it up. They may be wrong, of course, in which case their assertions will be disproved
I'm glad to see you accept the dogma: there can be no incorrect interpretation of the data.
Hey now, we don't want any arguments against dogma here. The scientific priests have spoken, and it was peer reviewed.
That page you linked to looks like an advertisement.
Big Data is Watching.
Apparently they're voting by voting. That's what you can do sometimes.as sharehooders.
Not to mention the doctor in question got paid no more than 170k in total over 5 years. He's not exactly rolling in the dough.
And this article did spur science. In November, the results of a double blind study will be published with 23000 participants. That will help clarify the matter, and if it turns out that VitaminD is a problem, we'll all be better off.
This is why reproducibility in science is so important. If he comes up with some good results, the study can be reproduced by other, more skeptical groups. In this case, it would be interesting to see if all those vitamin deficiency tests uncovered high levels of deficiency in the population. If it didn't, then I'm going back to my original state of not worrying about vitamin D.
Do you think this system would prevent counterfeiting of goods?
Building a 2 mile tunnel under Hawthorne doesn't sound nearly as expensive, actually, for a lot of reasons.
We've never had a computer that could beat humans at a game anywhere close to as complicated as this. And it learned to do it entirely on its own. No one taught it how to play. This is a huge advance.
I would also point out that you might want to rework the statement "This is a huge advance" and "it learned to do it entirely on its own", and might also want to consider the wording on your point "anywhere close to as complicated as this," since the problem is not just "complicated == branching_factor." See what you can do.
How exactly does one sign a sticker using blockchain?
However, there's a worry that there is a god of the gaps argument emerging, as various tasks that were believed to require GI have been shown to be achievable without this.
This has happened when it was shown that the task is simpler than previously thought. For example, with the Turing test........Turing never expected it to be so easy to trick the average human being. Likewise, with computer chess, all you need is a really powerful tree searching computer. No intelligence needed.
They are not interested in a company that does ride sharing AND self driving. If they wanted a self driving car company, they would invest in a self driving car company.
I think part of the problem is they'd prefer to invest in a self-driving car company that doesn't kill people.
Obviously that will have to change before they go large scale, but I doubt this one line will cost that much.
A 3.5 mile tunnel in Los Angeles sounds like a very expensive project, actually.
The problem with Los Angeles: everyone there wants public transportation, but no one wants to ride it. They want the other people to ride it, so the roads will be clear.
Good idea, a sticker sounds really hard to forge.
Nah, it's not just paper resumes. Recruiters have been like this for over a decade: they talk to you, tell you how wonderful you are, then suddenly disappear and stop answering emails. There are a thousand different variations of this scenario, but when it comes to politeness, recruiters are scum.