You're doing two things - one, talking about centrally-macro-planned economics and development, and two, talking about places that are already at relatively high density compared to nearby areas. I don't know why this is hard.
It's not hard, all you have to do is build more housing. People commuting from outside will cause more traffic problems than people commuting five minutes to work.
Snap out of it. The real world doesn't work like that.
It really does: build enough housing and the price of housing will go down. We know how to build dense cities, it's something we can do.
Improvement of battery life on laptops would be nice. I'm planning to work on that myself but I have three other projects I need to get through first, so it might take a few years before I get around to it. Hopefully someone else will have done it by then.
MSNBC is the news source that has turned into the Fox News of the left. Checking right now, there are a bunch of headlines that are clearly anti-Trump (not counting ones that could be considered neutral): "Is loyalty in Trump world a one way street?" "Trump's Criminal Enterprise is Crumbling" "White House Looking Like a Criminal Enterprise."
CNN isn't overtly biased in the same way as those two, they've just gone the way of Buzzfeed.
You can't build housing where housing is already, all the time.
Yes you can? It's called an "apartment complex." There's plenty of space for more housing even in Manhattan. Even in central Tokyo.
Cities are building office spaces, which attract people, without building housing. I would call it dumb but it pushes their property values up. If they wanted housing costs to be lower, they should have built more housing units.
Have you ever heard of any area of the country that was not NIMBY? I've lived in small cities with 500 people, to large cities with millions, and they all don't want to build new housing. They all want everything to stay the same as when they moved there.
It doesn't matter how much money everyone has: If you have five million people and housing for only 3 million, there are going to be people without housing.
Quote from the first page of your link: ".... states are not required to participate in the program..." In other words, they can be tested, but most states don't.
Not just prices....It will solve the problem of net neutrality. If one ISP is blocking Facebook (that might make the world a better place but free speech is bettet) you can go to another one that supports net neutrality.
I can't blame them. They have a sympathetic government regulator, so it is logical for them to try to get as much as they can while the kitchen is open. I don't blame them, I just want them to die in a fire.
I'm sorry, it sounds like you are trying to deny the extermination of people. You can word it how you want, but I know what you are really trying to say. The Party will now have your post removed from the internet as indecent.
If all you do is reduce your calorie count, and continue to reduce e it more and more, you're going to end up in worse state than you were originally. You need to get the proper nutrition with your diet.
Your going to claim that body processes are static? Did you even read the linked article? It's unfortunate you are so blind to evidence right in front of your face, but otherwise you seem like a cool guy.
No, you've never struggled with weight loss, and you lack even basic research on the topic (and you have a cognitive bias because anytime you find evidence to the contrary you give an excuse to ignore that evidence, without even investigation). Body processes aren't static: if you drop 300 calories from your diet your body will adjust (mainly noticed by having no energy and wanting to sleep a lot), and you won't actually lose weight. Is it *possible* to lose weight? Of course, but it's not easy , and the limiting factor is knowledge not "will power."
It's definitely not enough and you fail to understand metabolism. As soon as you reduce your diet 100 calories, your body will adjust it's processes and you will not lose weight.
Yeah anyone can starve themselves to death but that's not healthy either, and as soon as you stop starving, you'll gain it right back. Figuring out how to lose without starving, that's not easy
I can't speak for anyone else. I was born with certain congenital heart problems. To deal with that, I've focused on exercise and health, and will certainly live longer than most of my ancestors. As for mental problems, I didn't want to exercise. Who does? Sure I had the intention, but after work I would just go home and sit on the couch. Finally I made a plan to exercise a little each day, and standing up once and sitting back down was enough to count as exercise. That was enough for my peculiar mental state to eventually increase y strength and energy. So yeah I have problems but I try to work around them. I say nothing about any other mental problems I may have.
Go is a fun language, and it's great for writing custom servers and deployment tools. That said, it just doesn't have the library support that Java has, and I would not recommend using it for standard enterprise software for that reason. It also has backwards compatibility problems when compared to Java.
Ha! Of course! Meaningless measurements are the sign of the true believer in dogma. There is no indication of how wide or long your layers are, just thickness. Well done.
Slashdot Mirror
You're doing two things - one, talking about centrally-macro-planned economics and development, and two, talking about places that are already at relatively high density compared to nearby areas. I don't know why this is hard.
It's not hard, all you have to do is build more housing. People commuting from outside will cause more traffic problems than people commuting five minutes to work.
Snap out of it. The real world doesn't work like that.
It really does: build enough housing and the price of housing will go down. We know how to build dense cities, it's something we can do.
Improvement of battery life on laptops would be nice. I'm planning to work on that myself but I have three other projects I need to get through first, so it might take a few years before I get around to it. Hopefully someone else will have done it by then.
MSNBC is the news source that has turned into the Fox News of the left. Checking right now, there are a bunch of headlines that are clearly anti-Trump (not counting ones that could be considered neutral): "Is loyalty in Trump world a one way street?" "Trump's Criminal Enterprise is Crumbling" "White House Looking Like a Criminal Enterprise."
CNN isn't overtly biased in the same way as those two, they've just gone the way of Buzzfeed.
You can't build housing where housing is already, all the time.
Yes you can? It's called an "apartment complex." There's plenty of space for more housing even in Manhattan. Even in central Tokyo.
Cities are building office spaces, which attract people, without building housing. I would call it dumb but it pushes their property values up. If they wanted housing costs to be lower, they should have built more housing units.
Have you ever heard of any area of the country that was not NIMBY? I've lived in small cities with 500 people, to large cities with millions, and they all don't want to build new housing. They all want everything to stay the same as when they moved there.
It doesn't matter how much money everyone has: If you have five million people and housing for only 3 million, there are going to be people without housing.
Do you have paper records in your machines to verify the votes?
Quote from the first page of your link: ".... states are not required to participate in the program..." In other words, they can be tested, but most states don't.
If he presents verifiable evidence, it doesn't matter if the FSB itself presents it.
Not just prices....It will solve the problem of net neutrality. If one ISP is blocking Facebook (that might make the world a better place but free speech is bettet) you can go to another one that supports net neutrality.
I can't blame them. They have a sympathetic government regulator, so it is logical for them to try to get as much as they can while the kitchen is open. I don't blame them, I just want them to die in a fire.
I'm sorry, it sounds like you are trying to deny the extermination of people. You can word it how you want, but I know what you are really trying to say. The Party will now have your post removed from the internet as indecent.
Better would be to not have so many bugs in the first place. Most of these are preventable with a little knowledge.
If all you do is reduce your calorie count, and continue to reduce e it more and more, you're going to end up in worse state than you were originally. You need to get the proper nutrition with your diet.
Your going to claim that body processes are static? Did you even read the linked article? It's unfortunate you are so blind to evidence right in front of your face, but otherwise you seem like a cool guy.
No, you've never struggled with weight loss, and you lack even basic research on the topic (and you have a cognitive bias because anytime you find evidence to the contrary you give an excuse to ignore that evidence, without even investigation). Body processes aren't static: if you drop 300 calories from your diet your body will adjust (mainly noticed by having no energy and wanting to sleep a lot), and you won't actually lose weight. Is it *possible* to lose weight? Of course, but it's not easy , and the limiting factor is knowledge not "will power."
It's definitely not enough and you fail to understand metabolism. As soon as you reduce your diet 100 calories, your body will adjust it's processes and you will not lose weight.
You should go reply to the guy who was talking about JavaScript. I was replying to someone who was talking about Java.
A calorie deficit is not enough. You need to have a good balance or the weight will just pop back.
Yeah anyone can starve themselves to death but that's not healthy either, and as soon as you stop starving, you'll gain it right back. Figuring out how to lose without starving, that's not easy
I can't speak for anyone else. I was born with certain congenital heart problems. To deal with that, I've focused on exercise and health, and will certainly live longer than most of my ancestors. As for mental problems, I didn't want to exercise. Who does? Sure I had the intention, but after work I would just go home and sit on the couch. Finally I made a plan to exercise a little each day, and standing up once and sitting back down was enough to count as exercise. That was enough for my peculiar mental state to eventually increase y strength and energy. So yeah I have problems but I try to work around them. I say nothing about any other mental problems I may have.
I think that sentence was aimed at people run their own data centers. Many of these computers (most?) don't even have a web browser installed.
I think you replied to the wrong comment.
Go is a fun language, and it's great for writing custom servers and deployment tools. That said, it just doesn't have the library support that Java has, and I would not recommend using it for standard enterprise software for that reason. It also has backwards compatibility problems when compared to Java.
Ha! Of course! Meaningless measurements are the sign of the true believer in dogma. There is no indication of how wide or long your layers are, just thickness. Well done.
My political ideology is anarchism. It's better than communism.