Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Is Giving Up On the Cryptocurrency Mining Market (latimes.com)

"Nvidia's nine-month crypto gold rush is over," reports the Los Angeles Times. An anonymous reader quotes their report: "Our core platforms exceeded our expectations, even as crypto largely disappeared," founder and Chief Executive Jensen Huang said Thursday on a conference call. "We're projecting no cryptomining going forward...." Nvidia said it had expected about $100 million in sales of chips bought by currency miners in the fiscal second quarter. Instead, the total was $18 million in the period, and that revenue is likely to disappear entirely in future quarters, the company said.

Investors are expressing their concern at the sudden collapse of what had looked like a billion-dollar business. Three months ago, Nvidia said it generated $289 million in sales from cryptocurrency miners, but warned that demand was declining rapidly and might fall by as much as two-thirds. Even that prediction was too optimistic.

176 comments

  1. Dedicated to the cause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASIC! ASIC! ASIC!

    1. Re: Dedicated to the cause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These article headlines spin the situation: "Nvidia gives up on cryptocurrency mining market" makes it sound like the cryptocurrency mining market has failed somehow, and Nvidia, sadly, can't help them any longer.

      If we're going to spin things, wouldn't it be more reasonable to say "Nvidia abandoned its core gaming market; comes crawling back"?

  2. Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can we call cryptocurrency dead yet? And blockchain?

    Lot of suckers lost money, but my sympathy is limited because it was such a stupid idea to begin with.

    1. Re:Is it dead yet? by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the very beginning, one man paid for two pizzas using 10,000 bitcoins, which at the highest price would have been $80,000,000

      https://www.investopedia.com/n...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Is it dead yet? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least he still has his Beanie Baby collection to retire on.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    3. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of people are in the green, crypto wasn't anything new last year

    4. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the Magic the Gathering Online Exchange (mtgox.com) still online?

    5. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a currency it is dead, and has always been a bad investment. Blockchain as a tech has potential for logistics tracking. But that essentially has no requirements for crypto coins to be used at all.

    6. Re:Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crypto is basically digital gold. It's not going anywhere. There will always be demand for it. How much demand is the question.

      With Bitcoin you have:
      Bearer Ecash
      Permissionless, Censorship proof
      Fungible
      Digital Commodity, Stateless

      With Ethereum
      You have all of that plus smart contracts.

    7. Re:Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah just the HODL suckers lost. I myself made out like a bandit last Dec. As more of those suckers were screaming HODL, i was SELL SELL SELL. I've not had any itching to reenter that market.

    8. Re: Is it dead yet? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As a currency it is dead

      That pronouncement would be a bit premature.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ETH isn't even "digital cash"! It's time on a massive computing network. Nothing more, nothing less.

      People don't buy it as a hedge against inflation. Or at least they shouldn't. They buy it because that is (or will be) one hell of a computer!

    10. Re: Is it dead yet? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with these logistical tracking in the block chain ideas is (among other things) how do you ensure that the physical item matches the coin? How do I ensure that when the coin is given to me, the physical item also is given (and if you have a technique that works, why not just use that instead of the block chain)? Furthermore, what happens if the key for the item's entry in the chain is lost, does that mean the item must also be destroyed? Upon further investigation, adding block chain just adds a layer of complexity with little benefit. Block chain is not going to prevent UPS from losing my packages.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Alaska was bought for peanuts.

    12. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mt Gox went down a couple years ago. The owner was sentenced in relation to not securing the system enough, causing people to lose a bunch of money. He got popped like 3 times.

    13. Re: Is it dead yet? by ath1901 · · Score: 1

      The problem with these logistical tracking in the block chain ideas is (among other things) how do you ensure that the physical item matches the coin?

      You put a sticker with a serial number on the item?

    14. Re: Is it dead yet? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Good idea, a sticker sounds really hard to forge.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Is it dead yet? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      On december 15th 2017, one Bitcoin was worth USD$17,900.

      10,000 Bitcoins * $17,900 = USD$179,000,000.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin hash rate is still rapidly rising, so somebody is selling mining equipment, but It's not Nvidia.

    17. Re: Is it dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rfid tag is adhered to the item, the value is in the transparency. Knowing you got what you paid for. The blockchain is giving people more incentive to act honestly in the logistics chain then to be dishonest. Can you cheat the system, of course you can look at the 51% attack the point is to make you utilize a lot of resources to act dishonestly. When someone is given the option to make more money doing good for society rather then doing bad the majority will be good actors.

    18. Re: Is it dead yet? by z3alot · · Score: 1

      Presumably he's describing a system where the sticker is signed by a blockchain entry, or something, which can be checked automatically by a scanner.

    19. Re: Is it dead yet? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How exactly does one sign a sticker using blockchain?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re: Is it dead yet? by z3alot · · Score: 1

      You could 1. generate a key pair, 2. put the public key as metadata in the unforgable blockchain entry, and 3. sign whatever message is needed to be tied to this entry with the private key. This scheme ensures no unauthorized message is associated to the same blockchain entry (a property verifiable by anyone), but is vulnerable to an attack needing say an identical message on a different physical object (someone copying the sticker, as you suggest). Depending on the particular needs, this may or may not be sufficient.

    21. Re: Is it dead yet? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Do you think this system would prevent counterfeiting of goods?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. The true cost of mining by xack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining, it has also produced millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining, which will now be in a third world waste dump now as they are too hard to recycle. meanwhile bona fide users of graphics cards have had their supplies disrupted, had their prices more than doubled and have had to wait an extra year for new hardare to come out because nvidia was too busy making mining cards to do r&d. Anyone who made “money” from mining should have it seized under environmental protection laws.

    1. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NVidia were doing R&D, Quadro RTX boards for ray-tracing
      "Prices aren’t cheap, and start at around $2,300 for the Quadro RTX 5000 with 16GB of RAM, the Quadro RTX 6000 rises to $6,300 for 24GB of memory, and finally, the Quadro RTX 8000 is a whopping $10,000 for twice the RAM at 48GB."
      https://www.theregister.co.uk/...
      https://www.nextplatform.com/2...

    2. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You’re a retard.

    3. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're gonna be like that, how much millions of tonnes of greenhouses gasses have been produced to playing porn and cat videos, and trolls posting on Slashdot? Anyone who viewed porn should have it seized under environmental protection laws.

    4. Re:The true cost of mining by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Finite currencies have their own problems. They are subject to deflation, and wild price swings. There is a reason all major governments moved away from a gold standard.

    5. Re:The true cost of mining by gman003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      GPU production did not substantially increase. Both AMD and Nvidia looked at cryptocoins, realized they were almost certainly a bubble that could pop at any time, and accordingly made no long-term investments to increase production. They pretty much maxed out their contracts with chip foundries (neither make their own chips - Nvidia uses TSMC and Samsung, AMD uses GlobalFoundries and TSMC), but they could never keep up with such an absurd demand spike with existing infrastructure.

      Further, the GPUs are hardly useless now. They're already starting to appear on the secondhand market, and be snatched up by gamers. I myself am contemplating getting a second card, if they get cheap enough. The really useless mining hardware are the ASICs - which are pretty tailor-made for the purpose of mining, although I suspect the Bitcoin ASICs might be able to be repurposed to brute-force SHA-256 passwords.

      And finally, the headline is a bit inaccurate. Nvidia isn't "giving up". They're just letting shareholders know not to expect another quarter of massive sales volume, because they expect the remaining crypto miners to mostly buy ASICs, not general-purpose cards. (And the glut of used cards is probably going to hurt at least their low-end sales for a year or two - given a choice between this year's $200 card, and last year's $800 card, used, for $200, lots of people will pick the latter.)

    6. Re:The true cost of mining by careysub · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which is why hyperinflation from "printing" too much money has been a persistent problem with all fiat currencies around the world, hitting every nation repeatedly, including of course the United States. We desperately need blockchain to finally rein in the incessant hyperinflation!

      Oh wait... this hasn't happened. Only a few failed (or near-failed) states have actually experienced anything like this. Never mind.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    7. Re:The true cost of mining by theM_xl · · Score: 1

      That being that it's hard to hide what you're doing with people's money if it's easy enough for them to UNDERSTAND it.

    8. Re:The true cost of mining by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Further, the GPUs are hardly useless now. They're already starting to appear on the secondhand market, and be snatched up by gamers.

      A lot of the GPUs *are* useless to gamers because they don't have video circuitry on them or video outputs. So they're pretty much only good for GPU computing. I suppose they could be sold to the scientific computing market, but I suspect demand for GPUs there isn't as high as gamings, so it's likely folks won't get too much money back.

      I wish the GPU card manufacturers hadn't started making these cards without the video circuitry and ports. This is the cheapest part of the card, and at least if they had proper video outputs the cards would be useful second hand to gamers and folks who want to drive really high resolution displays. What a waste.

    9. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this. When does the seizing begin!?!

    10. Re:The true cost of mining by m00sh · · Score: 2

      Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining, it has also produced millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining, which will now be in a third world waste dump now as they are too hard to recycle. meanwhile bona fide users of graphics cards have had their supplies disrupted, had their prices more than doubled and have had to wait an extra year for new hardare to come out because nvidia was too busy making mining cards to do r&d. Anyone who made “money” from mining should have it seized under environmental protection laws.

      Actually NVidia got lots of money by selling their cards for cryptocurrency mining which they then used to hire more engineers to do R&D for their next generation of cards.

      Like almost every company that was producing chips for mining, they are now pivoting to AI.

    11. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right this 2% inflation is killing me

    12. Re:The true cost of mining by gman003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right, I forgot about those.

      They might still be useful in SLI/Crossfire configurations. Only one GPU needs video outputs for that to work. Do mining-specific cards still have the SLI edge connector?

    13. Re:The true cost of mining by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

      There are dozens of other human activities which produce nothing but greenhouse gases.

      it has also produced millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining

      Unlike gamers who make their GPUs go through 0-100% use cycles, with temperatures ranging from 18 to 100C, most miners, on the the other hand, reduce voltage by default (this greatly increases efficiency) and keep their GPUs constantly loaded, under constant moderate temperatures (below 70C) which does not affect the GPU core lifespan in any significant way. Also mining rigs are usually open and well-ventilated, unlike gamers' PCs which are filled with dust and operate under extreme temperatures.

      which will now be in a third world waste dump now as they are too hard to recycle

      Or they might be resold.

      meanwhile bona fide users of graphics cards have had their supplies disrupted, had their prices more than doubled and have had to wait an extra year for new hardare to come out because nvidia was too busy making mining cards to do r&d.

      NVIDIA has never stopped R&D and they did not allocate any significant additional resources to producing cards meant for miners.

      Anyone who made âoemoneyâ from mining should have it seized under environmental protection laws.

      People waste money and resources on far more negative things.

    14. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

      Where did THAT come from?

      , it has also produced millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining

      Citation needed. This is simply false. It's the typical case of incomplete information being blown completely out of proportion and twisted to carry someone's agenda.
      While a graphics card used 24/7 would indeed carry a higher risk of becoming defective (by the way, this is the only correct information being flung around like poo by cryptohaters), there isn't much talk about everything else which counterbalances this risk.
      The vast majority of miners take better care of their cards than regular gamers. The mining cards are undervolted and have power limits set. They are also better cooled than their gaming counterparts, located in open cases and with plenty airflow around them. I suggest researching this topic a bit before vomiting nonsense, but I guess it's simpler to vomit nonsense, isn't it? Fuck being objective.

      , which will now be in a third world waste dump now as they are too hard to recycle.

      What you fail to mention is that a GPU is much easier to recycle than, say, a mobile phone or a tablet, or a laptop, or a TV for that matter. A GPU's cooling solution has two main components: Aluminium and plastic. Both can be easily separated and melted. What remains is a 200-grams PCB which is flat and has components that can easily be separated.

      meanwhile bona fide users of graphics cards have had their supplies disrupted, had their prices more than doubled and have had to wait an extra year for new hardare to come out because nvidia was too busy making mining cards to do r&d. Anyone who made “money” from mining should have it seized under environmental protection laws.

      Again, you're either misinformed or carry an agenda.
      nVidia wasn't the main perpetrator here. They clearly mentioned, more than once, that they can and would ramp up chip production if needed. The issue was integrators (Gigabyte, Asus, MSI and the like) were reluctant to boost chip orders and build many cards, out of fear they're going to be left with huge overstocks. Price jacking happened solely at third party sellers and was boosted by Vnand prices going up like crazy. For THAT you gotta blame Apple, they're buying about 20% of ALL vNand production every year. Guess what they put it in? Yeah, that phone you're carrying.

      As I kept saying for quite some time now, it's easier to talk out of your ass and fling misinformation around like poo.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    15. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 1

      How dare you bring truth to the table? Boo!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    16. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 2

      A lot of the GPUs *are* useless to gamers because they don't have video circuitry on them or video outputs.

      Define "a lot". Headless GPUs represent a tiny minority, mainly because all serious miners shied away from them, knowing their resale value was zero, or close to that. Some suckers still bought them but the totl amount is probably low single digit percentage of all, and I'm generous here.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:The true cost of mining by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

      Sink the profits into building solar farms, it should work out fine.

      millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining

      Right, just wore out all those wires? Maybe melted some solder? Or could it be, those cards on eBay were just superseded by the more efficient generation. For the right price, I will be happy to pick up a cast-off 580, thanks.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    18. Re:The true cost of mining by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of the GPUs *are* useless to gamers because they don't have video circuitry on them or video outputs. So they're pretty much only good for GPU computing.

      That's like saying that CPUs are only good for CPU computing. I'm seeing a lot of "hidden" applications for GPU computing these days, e.g. video and photo editors that are taking advantage of OpenCL and related tech behind the scenes. As a sibling post mentions, things like SLI should be useful for gamers and others that only use GPUs to process what's immediately visible. Games might also offload physics modelling etc. to GPUs.

      Today, it seems completely backwards that GPUs used to be limited for display only. Why build those nice parallel processor arrays if you can't actually use them for general computing? Fortunately, some clever people worked around those limitations by putting general data into image textures. Eventually, the industry gave in and formalized the idea into OpenCL and CUDA.

      You can forget about cryptocurrencies and see all these companies talking about data mining and AI. Things like tensor cores neither for gaming nor cryptos. That said, such companies are probably not interested in random second-hand GPUs, but the point is that GPU computing is huge and professional and not going away.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    19. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Keynesian economics won out over the Austrian school, which is closer to Bitcoins economics. That doesn't mean it's the only way. You can't imagine a global economy based on Bitcoin. For one. it would be a lot less volatile ironically.

    20. Re:The true cost of mining by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      I've never understood why people think graphics cards "wear out" due to use.

    21. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are "bona fide graphics card users"? Do you mean gamers? I doubt if the market for professional graphics cards was disrupted. Those cards are pricey. Gamers didn't get their cheap bling cards is all.

    22. Re:The true cost of mining by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Right, I forgot about those. They might still be useful in SLI/Crossfire configurations. Only one GPU needs video outputs for that to work. Do mining-specific cards still have the SLI edge connector?

      Well it's not needed for mining so if you were making an extremely stripped down single-purpose version I don't see how that'd survive.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would have predicted, in 1910, that Germany, then a massive industrial powerhouse and world power, would be a wreck of hyperinflation fifteen years later? It can happen to the USA very easily - Just start a stupid war. AC

    24. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like... what you can do with it is a lot more flexible if it's not tied to anything tangible or even unique like a bitcoin.

      Ages ago, people paid banks to hold their gold in secured vaults. Later, those banks loaned out the gold for a profit and hoped they'd have enough gold in reserve for anything anyone would want to withdraw. Later, people learned about this and demanded interest for holding their gold in banks instead of paying for the service, they got a cut of the action.

      Thing is, a bank can only loan out whatever gold it has and no more -- at least until checks and paper money were invented. Then, so long as people believed they could get an amount of gold with that paper or check, the bank could loan out as much imaginary money as it felt it could so long as the interest would allow them to hold some gold in reserve for the people who wanted to withdraw actual gold at any given time. Now, we don't base anything on gold and it's all fiat money, so banks can loan out 10 times or more depending on regulations of what they have in accounts.

      We have an economy based on debt. It's really hard to go back to gold or the digital equivalent of gold like bitcoin which is deflationary by nature and finite (at least until it or another currency forks to allow for more of it to be mined). We have to have inflation and loans to continue the status quo, and digital currencies don't allow for that flexibility -- they also don't lend well to the types of things governments do to regulate the economy -- like manipulating the money supply via interest rate changes.

    25. Re:The true cost of mining by mikael · · Score: 1

      Only because every single bank started printing or even just making handwritten currency notes in order to keep their customers happy due to the high inflation of the economy. Which was being caused by banks printing currency as fast as they could In the end the solution to the hyperinflation was to issue a new standard set of bank notes and stop the banks from printing money.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    26. Re:The true cost of mining by hwihyw · · Score: 1

      The first Big Mac cost $0.45, the first model T $850, cost of a suit in 1930 $30. Today, what kind of hamburger can you buy for $0.45 what kind of car you can buy for $850, and suit you can buy with $30? No inflation here, no sir. Just orderly theft of your purchasing power. Forget 1930's, compare house prices from today to 2000, did we run out of land? Did the population double? triple? Don't worry, people with ability to print infinite money will be responsible. Just as I would be responsible if I had the power to mint infinite Bitcoins.

    27. Re:The true cost of mining by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      I wish the GPU card manufacturers hadn't started making these cards without the video circuitry and ports

      These cards are for the deep learning market, now going vertical and no sign of stopping. Gamers don't need to feel left out, they benefit from the extra volume, which adds capacity the fab lines and contributes to bringing down the price of their next gaming GPU.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:The true cost of mining by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      They were never for miners, they are for deep learning, engineering, scientific computing.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    29. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The compute cards could still be used in render farms and in other GPGPU applications. Those are still in the minority though, mostly sold in the Chinese (read: not US) market.

      Most of what will hit the American and European second-hand markets will be fully-functional video cards.

    30. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot of the GPUs *are* useless to gamers because they don't have video circuitry on them or video outputs."

      Hasn't been true since roughly Windows 7/Server 2008 R2. You can render with one GPU and output through another GPU which has video output.

    31. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they moved away because they could spend money they didn't have.

    32. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are subject to deflation

      Or inflation, in the case of economic contraction. It's almost as though inflation/deflation was based on the size of the economy in addition to the supply of currency.

    33. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bitcoin which is deflationary by nature

      assuming indefinite economic expansion.

    34. Re:The true cost of mining by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of other human activities which produce nothing but greenhouse gases.

      Posting on Slashdot, for example.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    35. Re:The true cost of mining by kriston · · Score: 1

      I have struggled to understand the environmental impact of cryptomining, but I took a hard look at physical gold mining companies like AngloGold and Barrick.

      By far, the cryptomining "industry" produces far fewer greenhouse gases and resource consumption (by electricity) than traditional, physical gold mining.

      In short, it's a wash. Both are equally damaging to our environment. At least cryptomining doesn't scar the landscape like physical gold mining does.

      --

      Kriston

    36. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have all of your assets seized with all of the greenhouse gasses youre spewing

    37. Re: The true cost of mining by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, there are objective problems with a gold standard as you mention, but whether or more t it is addressed objectively better or worse, those reasons are not why governments moved to fiat currency. They moved because they were bankrupt and wanted to print their way out of the problem.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    38. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to know the answer, it's because - well, they do. The fans on them do, at least. But those are easy to replace.

      The problem with used GPUs from miners was, prior to the crypto crash at least, that the cards being sold as "used" tended to be cards that someone had tried to overclock, over-volted in the process, and then fried. They weren't being fried by use (that's sort of ridiculous), they were being fried by being mistreated. It's probably like that there were also cards that suffered cooling failures making it into the "used GPU" supply. (There are also rumors of miners somehow loading custom firmware/microcode to GPUs, thereby making them useless for games, but I have no idea how true that is.)

      These days, as people with mining rigs try and recoup the costs, used graphics cards are pretty safe, although there are probably a few lemons still in the market.

    39. Re:The true cost of mining by teg · · Score: 2

      Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

      Where did THAT come from?

      There were a couple of articles about Bitcoin and emissions last year.

    40. Re:The true cost of mining by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      "GPU production did not substantially increase"

      FTS:

      "Nvidia said it generated $289 million in sales from cryptocurrency miners"

      Your statement and Nvidia's statement really don't match up do they, sure they didn't build new production but they certainly would of gone to full capacity at a time when normally it would have been quiet with gamers waiting for the next gen'.

      And any gamer with savvy won't touch an ex-miner-card because they've been 'ragged'. A card would have to be 90% off of SRP before I'd even consider it. And it's a bad time to get a card when the next generation is about to come out and new memory chips are coming out that are literally more than twice as fast as the previous gen memory chips.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    41. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that exactly what you'd expect them to do so that the cards couldn't be sold second hand? Sneaky but effective...

    42. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physical gold has real value due to other uses. Random bit strings not so much.

    43. Re:The true cost of mining by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That being that it's hard to hide what you're doing with people's money if it's easy enough for them to UNDERSTAND it.

      You know economics and accounting are actually professional fields. When you are bleeding out do you also reject life threatening surgery because you don't know exactly how it works?

      Let's not cater to ignorance, lest we still be hitting each other over the head with sticks while making grunting noises because no one is interested in this "fire thing" that was too confusing to understand.

    44. Re:The true cost of mining by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      people wouldn't have to resort to cryptocurrencies.

      People aren't resorting to cryptocurrencies because of inflation. They attempt instantly to convert to a stable tradable currency, often the USD. What kind of an idiot would swap hyperinflation for insane instability?

      Because even cryptocurrencies developed by 15 year olds have set number of coins that can be mined

      Then the immediate following year those 15 year olds take a high-school economics class and find out why deflation at scale is an incredibly bad thing for an economy and why central banks work to keep inflation rates where they do.

    45. Re:The true cost of mining by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of other human activities which produce nothing but greenhouse gases.

      Yeah I know. So we should just give up now. Excuse me I need to go turn on the heater and the AC at the same time because someone else somewhere is wasting power so clearly there's no reason at all for me not to do the same.

      People waste money and resources on far more negative things.

      Next time you post about this topic remember the scales that are involved. I may waste a bit of power by leaving the bathroom light on, but cyptomining has achieved zero and uses more power than the nation of Austria. There's few useless activities that people do at scale that if stopped could power the homes, industry and commercial activities of 10million people at once.

    46. Re:The true cost of mining by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Historically, states have a 100% failure rate. The dollar only stopped being backed by gold 50 years ago, the only question is whether it was the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end.

    47. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      There arent many of those portless cards in the wild, and most of the people that bought them are still mining with them. However, they are still good for GPGPU and cracking rigs and the such. I mined, made a little bit of extra money after paying off my hardware costs. now waiting for the market to fall out so I can grab a bunch of cheap used cards and PSU's.. Everyone thinks that miners abuse the cards, when infact 90% of the miners keep them cooler than a gamer would or could cooped up in their tiny cases. Youre better off buying a used card from a miner than you are from some chinese shop. atleast you know the card works and will be what is claimed.

    48. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I do not believe they have the SLI connectors cut out on the headless cards. But with the new DX and Vulcan you dont really need it anymore, you can even do cross vendor in some cases, and with time it is only going to get better.

    49. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Except nvidia said "Check out this card we made for you miners!"

    50. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      MrLogic, your logic is flawed. The average temp of a gpu mining stays at 55-60c, the average temp of a gpu gaming is 75-85c. Using only one algorithm on the card means you're effectively only using about 20% of the GPU at any one time. Not to mention miners undervolt the card to keep it running cool. most big miners dont even overclock the cards. Anybody that doesn't buy old mining gpu's is a fool. I don't suggest buying the cards some gamer decided to mine with when he wasnt gaming, because that card has been abused, as most gamers don't understand the importance of keeping your hardware cold.

    51. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is less like life-threatening surgery and more like, "Oh and while you're only here for a checkup I also took the liberty of removing one of your kidneys. Thank you, and don't forget to schedule your proctal exam for next week!"

    52. Re:The true cost of mining by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      The difference is miners run their systems 24/7. And I'd like to see the evidence that miners actually run their cards cooler than gamers, you can assume all you like but miners know they haven't got long to mine before asic miners will make their system useless for mining.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    53. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you would be surprised how many of the big miners are using renewable energy to power their miners. I know a guy in Washington that has a farm which is 100% hydro electricity. And from what hes told me there are a few others in the area, and around the world.

    54. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      (There are also rumors of miners somehow loading custom firmware/microcode to GPUs, thereby making them useless for games, but I have no idea how true that is.)

      Semi-true. AMD cards do require a custom BIOS, but its just tightening memory timing, and it actually boosts performance in video games. The part about making them useless for gamers is a lie though. I wouldn't believe another word that person told me if I was you.

    55. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they can be used with (Intel) muxless switchable graphics, like Optimus in notebooks.

    56. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inflation helps people with debts. You effectively knock that 2% off your interest rate. If you can borrow below 2%, you're being paid to borrow money.

      It's simple, really. You are given present dollars and pay back in future dollars (which have a lower purchasing power by 2% now).

    57. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Im not assuming, I mine, and I know a lot of miners. Go to any miner forum or IRC channel and ask a few questions. If your card is running 24/7 at 80c youre degrading your gpu sure, but when running them cool at 55-60c and being undervolted and under clocked. You not only preserve the life of the VRM you also preserve the life of the silicon. Its like overclocking your cpu, you can run for years on an overclocked cpu as long as the voltage is low and the temp is low. there is no difference in a CPU and GPU as far as power and degradation is concerned.

    58. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your understanding of the word "ironic" is, not unironically, even worse than your understanding of the word "volatile."

    59. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steady and controlled inflation plays a role in economics. It is a motivator for people to spend money now rather than a year from now. You say they are stealing purchasing power, but if they gave it back to you (deflation) then spending would slow to a trickle as people hold onto money in anticipation that it will be worth more in the future. This is terrible for the economy.

    60. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd shy away from buying used gfx cards right now. On miner rigs these things run 24x7 for months or even years and the silicon and everything else on the cards must be pretty beaten up. They can't be considered your average used gfx card of years ago. They are in much worse condition and probably are going to fail sooner than later.

    61. Re:The true cost of mining by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Do mining-specific cards still have the SLI edge connector?

      Most certainly. Miners would build multi-bay PCI buses for this specific purpose. One CPU can mine using 16 or so graphics cards, as it's mainly just doling out the work to the GPUs.

      If I had several GPU cards, then I'd definitely strap them all together with SLI connectors. In mining, it's a race to solve the next block, so a set of strapped cards would mean more parallel compute power, and thus better chances.

    62. Re:The true cost of mining by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I was actually referring to the AMD Instinct (7nm, no video)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    63. Re:The true cost of mining by ewibble · · Score: 1

      so banks can loan out 10 times or more depending on regulations of what they have in accounts

      Technically banks can not loan out any more money than they have, the can not just say they have extra money. It does work out that the amount of money in the economy is 10 time more however. Here is a simplified example: Say there is $100 or gold coins in the economy that is all in a bank (say there is only 1 bank). the bank can lend out say 90% so now there is $190, then that $90 goes back into the bank so the bank can lend 90% out of that. Keep going for ever. So the total amount of money in the economy is 100 (1 + 0.9 + ... + 0.9^n + ...) = 100 * 1/(1-0.9) = 100 * 10 = 1000. 10 times more than you started with. It has nothing to do with fiat currency you could just as easily do it with gold coins as long as you trust the bank to give you your gold back when you need it. So effectively the banks are creating money, but at no point can they say I have $100 of net deposits on my books I can lend out $101.

    64. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Clicked the Nature article. It says Some estimate that the combined electricity consumption for bitcoin and ethereum mining, which together represent 88% of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization (G. Hileman and M. Rauchs http://doi.org/cj22; 2017), has already reached a staggering 47 terawatt-hours per year and is on the rise”. Checking source, it says As a reference, it is estmated that Bitcoin alone currently consumes about 10.41 TWh per year, which is close to the yearly energy consumpton of Uruguay, a country with 3.3 million inhabitants” (Filter error: That's an awful long string of letters there - this was supposed to be the PDF URL but Slashdot won't allow it).

      Clicked the Forbes article: So all of the hysteria about cryptocurrency energy use is going to go away in the next few months.”

      Clicked the The Guardian article. It quotes the same source as seen elsewhere, from Digiconomist (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption). The issue with it is that it is controversial, with other estimates, within the very same article (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption#validation) showing a much lower value.

      Now I'm not going to say Bitcoin and altcoins aren't large energy consumers, but putting things into perspective, my own (Eastern European) country consumes in one year more than the highest cryptocurrency estimates worldwide. I'm not overly concerned about either.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    65. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 1

      nVidia never said that because nVidia never made such cards. They were all made by integrators and they were all GTX 1060 cards. nVidia just sold the chips to integrators.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    66. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You country consumes more than miners. So it's not an issue? What? What kind of logic is that? What about miners who live in your country? They contribute to the usage.

      Your post legit makes no sense.

    67. Re: The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He runs his rigs using 100% hydro electric? Excuse me if I call bullshit.

    68. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Umm. SLI is not used in mining rigs. It actually hinders performance in most algorithms. You should really lookup this stuff before you comment about it.

    69. Re:The true cost of mining by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      You dont think the partners just did that on their own did you? You realize that the P106-100 is not the same chip as the P106. Very very close, but far from the same.

    70. Re:The true cost of mining by war4peace · · Score: 1

      If they requested it, nVidia provided it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    71. Re:The true cost of mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steady and controlled inflation plays a role in economics. It is a motivator for people to spend money now rather than a year from now. You say they are stealing purchasing power, but if they gave it back to you (deflation) then spending would slow to a trickle as people hold onto money in anticipation that it will be worth more in the future. This is terrible for the economy.

      In that scenario, what would you expect to happen if the the value of the money was frozen? (meaning no inflation or deflation) like how the speed of light is a fixed number, the value of a dollar could for example be fixed to some amount of gold

  4. NVidia is terrible by themusicgod1 · · Score: 2

    NVidia not making profit here? Let's look at why. 1) You need to be able to understand what the hardware/software stack below you is doing in the cryptocurrency world. Because more often than not, that one black box that you don't understand is where your bitcoin / other cryptocurrency is going to get stolen from. And yet Nvidia is actively hostile to those of us who live and die by drivers that are FLOSS. Nevermind that NVidia drivers are buggy as hell, we can't fix the official ones.
    2) NVidia has been openly hostile to cryptocurrency miners, expressing publicly that they would prefer their cards go to gamers. They are not content to shut up and take our money, they didn't want it.
    3) Their contact/support blocks tor users Which, guess what? There's a significant overlap with cryptocurrency users, given the concern we have over our privacy.
    tl; dr nvidia didn't care when one of the biggest windfalls ever hit them, and now the market is starting to move past them. Good.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:NVidia is terrible by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      sounds like butt-hurt miner talk

      nvidia doesn't need a market that has small saturation point

      bitcoin too illiquid to be useful as money because of its bottlenecked architecture.

      maybe someday someone will design a cryptocurrency that is actually useful to the masses, but that day is not now

    2. Re:NVidia is terrible by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      "sounds like butt-hurt miner talk"

      Actually not really. I'm a free software guy...and *their stuff will not work with only free software*. I was locked out of using their product. I could have poured megadollars into nvidia equipment, were that a free software option....but they did not make that an option, and lost out. I did my cryptocurrency mining back in, what, 2010? 2011? I'm frustrated from helping other people mine, and go through troubleshooting nvidia crap. Trying to bring cryptocurrency mining 'to the masses' as it were. It's just not happening with nvidia being the platform of choice.

      "nvidia doesn't need a market that has small saturation point"

      Sure. But that is mutual. There's no compelling reason why cryptocurrency miners have to use proprietary hardware, it just so happens that they choose to for mostly self-defeating reasons.

      "maybe someday someone will design a cryptocurrency that is actually useful to the masses, but that day is not now"
      Likewise: only 54% of people are on the internet. Though linux/android cellphones/handheld robots are actually useful 'to the masses'...it took a lot to get there. Cryptocurrency makes the internet more valuable, and there's a lot more of that that needs to happen before the remaining 46% will find it worth taking advantage of the internet.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:NVidia is terrible by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      nvidia doesn't need a market that has small saturation point

      They will take any market they can get. The problem is, miners don't want nVidia GPUs because they are less power efficient for the hashing load than AMD. Why exactly that is... I only looked at that superficially, but it seems one big point is that nVideo optimized their architecture heavily for the most popular gaming GPU load, that is, 32 bit floating point. For double, half or integer, AMD delivers better ops per watt.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re: NVidia is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sent from your open source i7 processor, I guess

    5. Re:NVidia is terrible by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no they will not take a niche market with no future. bitcoin is deeply flawed for it's claimed purpose. there are alternative better scaling crypto coin architectures in the works. BTC will finally auger into the ground because of its flaws.

    6. Re: NVidia is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name an open source professor we can buy and use to run windows or Linux you dolt.

      I'll wait.

    7. Re: NVidia is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Processor*

    8. Re: NVidia is terrible by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      Say what you will about the black box that is intel CPUs, at least you can get free software that runs on them that is more or less feature complete.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  5. Impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is because people are finally realizing how impractical cryptocurrencies are. There are simply too many variables. Too many things that can go wrong. Security measures continue to prove ineffectual as more and more high profile thefts persist. And let's not forget that for something that was supposed to "set people free" from fiat currencies, they fail to realize that government controls the manufacture of the technology and the infrastructure on which it depends (i.e. power grids, communication transport).

    If people truly want a new way of doing things, look to the old ways: commodities, practical skills, and the bartering and trading of such.

    1. Re:Impractical by MikeDataLink · · Score: 0

      If people truly want a new way of doing things, look to the old ways: commodities, practical skills, and the bartering and trading of such.

      I know right! And we should go back to horse and carriage too! I bet you voted for Trump.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    2. Re:Impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, I think the point was "government bad" so it's unlikely the OP voted for anyone. Or are you one of those delusional people that think we just need to "get the right people in there?"

      How precious.

    3. Re:Impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think any of those thefts have anything to do with problems inherent to cryptocurrency?

      All of those thefts take place due to weaknesses OUTSIDE of the blockchain environment: exchange hacks and/or social engineering, mostly. Someone compromises some OTHER part of your machine, snags your Ethereum keyfile, and then brute-forces your password, they're in. Someone "hacks" the exchange because their security is weak and accesses your account that way, they're in.

      Someone from out of the blue reverse-engineers your Ethereum wallet keyfile, bruteforces your password, and steals your ETH that way? Not happening. Ever. Closest we had to that was the DAO hack in 2016 where the contract itself was flawed (due to flaws in the Solidity programming language, really).

      You are no more likely to lose your crypto than you are to have your credit card credentials stolen by skimmers. In fact, I would say that security is far better on most major crypto projects than credit cards. Even for something old and crufty like Bitcoin!

    4. Re:Impractical by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      This is because people are finally realizing how impractical cryptocurrencies are.

      The problem is cryptocoins have very few legitimate applications beyond resale to the next bigger fool. Once the fool pool is depleted, the value has nowhere to go but down. It will probably never reach $0 though, as there will always be illegal uses (money laundering, drug money, ransomware, etc.) propping up the value.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    5. Re:Impractical by aticus.finch · · Score: 2

      This is because people are finally realizing how impractical cryptocurrencies are.

      The problem is cryptocoins have very few legitimate applications beyond resale to the next bigger fool. Once the fool pool is depleted, the value has nowhere to go but down. It will probably never reach $0 though, as there will always be illegal uses (money laundering, drug money, ransomware, etc.) propping up the value.

      Also, there are new fools being born every minute. The fool pool can never be depleted because the supply of fools is virtually infinite.

    6. Re: Impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure, government bad. You'll just build and fund your own roads, schools, hospitals, emergency relief, court systems, jails, all those things then?

      You're fucking delusional. Go live in Somalia

    7. Re: Impractical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension fail.

  6. Ok, Slashdot- set me straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complete layman's understanding of the subject here, so, EILI5....

    I know that some currencies are moving to proof-of-stake vs. proof-of-work, does that take hardware out of the equation completely?

    Also, I've read that some mining has now been taken over by dedicated hardware, the ASIC mining rigs. Isn't this a classic case of dedicated hardware (ASIC) vs. general purpose platform (GPU)?

    It seems that over time the general-purpose platform would win (especially with the constantly increasing performance of GPUs) since, theoretically, an open platform could advantage of software/algorithmic efficiency increases much more quickly.

    Don't get me wrong- I'm stoked that I'm going to be able to do 4k 60fps gaming finally, but I just can't shake the feeling that crypto is going to be a thorn in this gamers' side for quite a while longer.

  7. thank god cause now i can afford a video card!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good grief, izn't being a gamer tough enuf alredy?? ;~)

  8. Yes, yes! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Let it die already! Or at least move to coins a bit more practical then proof-of-work with their race to build ever more specialised hardware.

    1. Re:Yes, yes! by llZENll · · Score: 1

      Totally agree, the notion of wastefully burning energy to verify transactions is absurd. What if bitcoin didn't crash, and people kept mining and mining more and more, until it was basically the only way to make money, and every single person was mining. Eventually it causes so much pollution it is what kills off all of the animals, destroys the environment, and ends civilization on earth. Might make for a good drama, it clearly illustrates the conflict between greed and the environment.

    2. Re:Yes, yes! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Bubbles are a well understood economic phenomenon. The price of something is rising, so people want to buy it as an investment, which drives the price up higher, which causes more people to want to invest. It could be what's happened w ith bitcoin. How many people are actually spending bitcoin on goods and services, rather than just hoarding it to watch their wealth grow?

      I dabbled in mining myself on a tiny scale as a hobby, never intending to make any money off it. I eventually made enough to just barely pay off the cost of the hardware, but most of that is still sitting unused. I spent some on a new graphics card - for gaming, not mining - and donated a little more to an open-source project.

    3. Re:Yes, yes! by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      We could only be so lucky..

  9. then why the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are the previous generation (launched early '17) graphics cards still selling for above the original launch msrp? an example: 1050ti launch msrp 139. still selling for a crypto-inflated 169-199+ when they should be under 99 by now with the next gpu chips on the verge of release. and this isn't even a "mining" card, it's what some gamers have been resorting to because the pricing of the higher-end cards is even worse than this.

    1. Re:then why the hell... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Crypto-boom is still felt. Prices are going down slowly from being much higher than MSRP. Additionally there's a large amount of unsold stock, because higher prices blocked people who were planning to update from updating. And now, the same people are waiting for the next gen and not updating. All while no manufacturer wants to sell at a much lower price than everyone else and crash the market for everyone.

      So we end up in status quo.

    2. Re:then why the hell... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      are the previous generation (launched early '17) graphics cards still selling for above the original launch

      Previous gen is now back at roughly MSRP, which is still distorted. Prices should fall rapidly over the coming weeks with perhaps a bit of overshoot, maybe great value for games. RX 580 remains highly respectable, especially for Vulkan/DX12 games. Current gen Vega 64 is running about 10% over MSRP right now, way down from what it was. I'm one of those fuck nVidia guys (with good reason) so I don't much care what they cost, but for what it's worth, nVideo MSRP is following about the same trajectory.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  10. Is this some kind of parody? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

    If you want to troll you have to use some figure that sounds like someone somewhere might actually believe it. According to you the atmosphere is 100% CO2 at this point. I'm still breathing pretty well.

    it has also produced millions of graphics cards that are now useless due to being fried alive by mining

    This also seems rather absurd; I have a friend with a dedicated mining rig and something like 16 cards - why would miners "Fry them alive"?? The longer the cards last the more money they make so the miners treat the GPU's like tender infants and take great pains to cool them properly. There is no reason those cards will not last 10x longer than a GPU in the average PC sold to someone in a dusty house.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The longer the cards last the more money they make so the miners treat the GPU's like tender infants and take great pains to cool them properly.

      If the next gen of cards produces a significant boost in performance, they'll upgrade anyway. If the GPUs have any life left in them, that's money left on the table.

      What you may mean is they have to take great pains to cool them so they last until the next gen is out (since they run 24/7 at max speed.) But that makes them last longer than they otherwise would, not longer than in someone's normal computer. Heck, the "average" GPU probably is used for decoding Netflix streams.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's not how mining works. You need fast hashes that profit more than electric costs. PoW chains have difficulty increases.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If the GPUs have any life left in them, that's money left on the table.

      Or, you sell them, and no money is left on the table.

      What you may mean is they have to take great pains to cool them so they last until the next gen is out

      Oh come on, how could they time that??? Bullshit. They keep the whole rig as cool as they can so they can overclock things as much as possible. But in the end the cards are still working and can be sold, to help pay for upgrades when more powerful cards arrive. In reality though they may skip a generation or two because working card already paid for mean your overall cost of mining is lower the longer you can use them.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "If you want to troll you have to use some figure that sounds like someone somewhere might actually believe it. According to you the atmosphere is 100% CO2 at this point. I'm still breathing pretty well."

      Heh, you're the one who doesnt know what they're talking about. Humanity produces thousands of millions of tons of co2 alone every year https://www.statista.com/stati... . If bitcoin mining did produce millions of tons of green house gases (I have no idea how much it produced) it certainly wouldn't change much let alone leave us with an atmosphere that "is 100% CO2 at this point"

      Maybe make sure you know what you're talking about before you go calling people trolls.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    5. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh shit, that graph was just for the US so the parent really was most like spot on. Way to go dumbass.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    6. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Humanity produces thousands of millions of tons of co2 alone every year.

      From the electricity used by GPU's??? Really????

      Idiot. Come back when you get out of high school and have better reading comprehension.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      False, most miners do not overclock anything. They undervolt, and in some cases underclock. But anything that results in lower hashpower/watt? Such as overclocking? No! Not unless they have a horribly detuned card (like an R9 290) that can be both undervolted AND overclocked while using less power/producing less heat. Then they might overclock.

      That's definitely a no-go with RX Vega, and probably with 1060s and 1070s too.

    8. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Since he specifically did not state that those billions all came from mining, I suggest that you go back to K-12 to remedy your reading comprehension.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    9. Re: Is this some kind of parody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what an idiot, responding to exactly what was said.

      Ha. He should learn to read between the words, and see that even though it was an unimaginably stupid comment, you're still right somehow. Of course

      Or maybe you're just a pompous moron?

    10. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      No, for Bitcoin, for example, it's "only" tens of millions of tons, although it comes from ASICs these days. Ethereum is perhaps a third of that. I think the point is that of all the human activities, this is one of the things that can be trivially lower in its footprint - traditional banking has vastly lower energy costs per transaction.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Miners don't upgrade all of their cards as soon as new ones comes out. You would never turn a profit if you did that. There are still warehouses full of 970/980 rigs running to this day. Sure they have added a bunch of rigs with 580's and 1070's. That does not mean they stopped using the old cards. Have you ever even talked to a miner? Let alone one that has more than 1 mining rig?

    12. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Actually its a mix of all of them, Undervolt the core, and underclock it, then overclock the memory. A lot of cryptocurrencies are memory bound(ethash for one) meaning you need that memory timing tight, and memory clock high. You however need very little core power, so it gets tuned down.

    13. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      There is no reason those cards will not last 10x longer than a GPU in the average PC sold to someone in a dusty house.

      Did you ever see those tiny screws on the card fan cover? They are there to taken off to clean the cooling hardware once in a while. It gets pretty packed with dust after a while indeed. After a cleanup, the cards are as good as new.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    14. Re:Is this some kind of parody? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Some one already commented on this but I thought your comment was so rich I can't help myself. At no point did I say GPUs did that. I very clearly state, humanity in general does. It literally reads as such in your own post where you quote me saying "humanity" and not "GPU". They're not even spelled similarly. Clearly you're the one with a reading comprehension problem. I mean really, twice in a row with this shit really looks bad for you.

      Pro-tip: If you're going to act like a jackass by calling people names and questioning their intellect you had better make sure you know what you're talking about otherwise you look so much worse than the pettiness you are trying to dish out.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  11. Poor nvidia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means they wonâ(TM)t make as much off their video cards.

  12. "Our core platforms exceeded our expectations, even as crypto largely disappeared"

    Crypto has not disappeared, it's just you can barely break even with it nowadays. The reason it's not as profitable as it was in the past 12 months is not even due to the depreciation of crypto-currencies, it's because mining difficulty has increased several-fold (it's increased/decreased automatically following the changes in network hashing rate). It's quite possible that the next crypto-craze will again make mining profitable.

  13. It's a fad/bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't listen to the Mining cultist, that sh*t was and always will be, a fad and the only reason it ever had any value, is because some dumbasses attributed value to it.
    Now it's going away and they are crying.

  14. The cost of video cards is still pretty high by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I got a 1060 for $270 with a 20% off coupon on top of that about 2 years ago. Nowadays I'm lucky if I can find one for $300 (assuming it's not a refurb or one of the b grade ones like PNY or eVGA). I have seen a few RX580s for 8gb though. I'm looking forward to seeing what Intel does in a few years, but they're a long way off...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The cost of video cards is still pretty high by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to seeing what Intel does in a few years, but they're a long way off...

      Probably expand their partnership with AMD, it's just more cost effective than putting in all the R&D necessary to come up with something competitive with vega/navi. Isn't that weird?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  15. Understanding Bitcoin by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some Twitter wag gave the best explanation of Bitcoin I've ever seen:

    "Imagine if keeping your car idling 24/7 produced solved Sudokus you could trade for heroin."

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Understanding Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's wrong on so many levels.

      car != ASIC

      heroin != cash, unless you're crazy enough to sell it

      Why is anyone discussing Bitcoin here anyway? Nobody has mined Bitcoin with video cards for years. ASICs took over.

    2. Re:Understanding Bitcoin by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      car != ASIC

      Those of us who have been around Slashdot a while know that there are car analogies for every technology. Without exception. But keep coming back. It works if you work it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Understanding Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if your car can only drive on one road, in one direction, then it would be an apt analogy.

    4. Re:Understanding Bitcoin by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe if your car can only drive on one road, in one direction, then it would be an apt analogy.

      Did you even read the analogy? The car is idling. It's not driving anywhere. It's up on blocks. Stationary.

      Fuck, do I have to explain everything to the Anonymous Coward? As much as he's on here, you'd think he'd have developed some reading skills by now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Understanding Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good grief.

      Put wheels on the car and get in it, you can drive it. Anywhere.

      ASICs only ever do one thing, period. Nothing you do changes that. Want to play Witcher III with a BTC ASIC? Sorry, doesn't work.

      Bad analogy is still bad.

  16. I never knew they bought into it by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they were surprised when the crypto-mining folks bought up all their cards, then looked into their APIs and what the crypto-minors needed, guessed at the market, and said "Nah. 1% does this shit, the rest of em want to run over pedestrians in some GTA variant".

  17. "We project no cryptomining" by Chas · · Score: 1

    So they're short selling.

    When mining jumps on the new devices, swallows the entire available supply, burps, and screams for more, while regular owners are asked to pay $1000 for a mid-range device, they can laugh all the way to the bank.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:"We project no cryptomining" by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      First post I've read that makes much sense.

  18. Good! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    HOPEFULLY the price of video chips/cards comes down. And hopefully this whole crypto-mining garbage goes away.

    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As your fairy godmother, I am giving you one for one on that.

  19. Expecing 100m in sales, yet cant keep stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if nvidia was expecting 100m in sales but only made 18m they should have done something about their supply of chips. Even at the extremely inflated prices what cards did exist were flying off the shelves. The only one they have to blame for not making that 100m target is themselves and the supply of chips/cards that they and their board OEMs had out on the market.

  20. Nvidia Mining? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

    My understanding was that Nvidia's kit was terrible for GPU mining. That might be outdated, but I know it was the case in 2013.

    1. Re:Nvidia Mining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're out of date.

      NV hardware is still bad for CryptoNight tokens like XMR, but you can do well with it mining stuff like ETH and ZEC.

  21. I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 miners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 miners

  22. Nobody didn't see this coming by kriston · · Score: 1

    Nobody didn't see this coming, unless they were wildly misinformed and/or stupid.

    --

    Kriston

  23. "We're projecting no cryptomining going forward... by rokh00 · · Score: 1

    "We're projecting no cryptomining going forward...." Heh, then they obviously don't know too much about cryptomining since there's no projecting what cryptomining be like from one month to the next.

  24. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by luther349 · · Score: 1

    miner will think they will get near new prices for there burned out cards.

  25. Re:"We're projecting no cryptomining going forward by luther349 · · Score: 2

    its all tied to bitcoin even all the clone currency's. people would mine the easier clone currency to buy bitcoin. but now that bitcoin has crashed hard and levelling off its over. see the miners where not dumb they where pumping up the price of bitcoin to cash out before the wall street traders invaded the currency. they knew once they invaded they would cash the currency short selling and they did.

  26. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big lol to all the stupid nerds here trying to defend Bitcoin

  27. Re:"We're projecting no cryptomining going forward by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    They're predicting that the cryptominsers won't use NVidia hardware. That seems a reasonably safe bet, and rather than spending more of their research and production on chpsets or cards aimed at a very small market segment for NVidia. New, politically exciting markets may be interesting to examine or even participate in, but they're not necessarily _profitable_.

  28. Deflation is a good thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know inflation is about as healthy as a pathogenic outbreak or a literal explosion, yes?

    Stability aka "stagnation" IS long-term survival. Anything that isn't stable, WILL die. At the very least, when some resource runs out.
    And that deflation you are talking about is only there to balance out the inflation. Unlike now, where there is only inflation, aka everybody but some gamblers getting poorer every day!

  29. Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATI to double down on GPU mining.
    This is a stupid long term move by NVidia, and will be as memorable as "no one will ever need more than 640K of RAM".

  30. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Define burned out? Youre better off buying a used mining card than a used gaming card.

  31. What are you smoking ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining

    it. According to you the atmosphere is 100% CO2 at this point.

    Hardly, carbon cycle is natural 750 gigaton per year, as for human it is around 30 gigaton (or that order of magnitude). A million tons CO2 is not even a sizzling drop on a hot stone in the sahara.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  32. fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the prices in my country are EXACTLY the same as they were since march, *uck them, the new wow expansion works on my rig, no need to buy a new computer and nvidia card in another 2 years, it will be 12 years old by then

    f them
    f them
    and then f them again

  33. FPGA Miners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That and most algorithms you could mine with GPU cards, you can now mine with FPGA miners.

    These net you 40x increase in hash rate over a 1080ti in most cases off of roughly the same power consumption, and most miners who made anything during the initial phase of GPU mining alt coins have moved / invested profits to keep mining with FPGA on alt coins.

  34. Nobody uses nvidia cards for crypto mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMD has been the #1 choice for the last 3 years. You still cannot buy a Vega 56 or Vega 64 at MSRP or less, they are still inflated and out of stock.

  35. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by luther349 · · Score: 1

    stop it mining card are run full tilt all there lives by the time there for sale there half dead. they have way more stress then a gaming card. only someone trying to pawn off that junk would call them better.

  36. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    You realize lower core voltage and adequate cooling(no hot cold cycles) your hardware lasts 10x as long right? Learn something before you spout your bullshit. Also "Full tilt" you realize when it is bashing it is literally using a tiny fraction of the circuitry on the silicon right? This is the problem with slashdot. People who have no fucking clue how shit works wants to chime in and tell someone they're wrong about something. Moron.

  37. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by luther349 · · Score: 1

    whatever you say reseller.

  38. Re:I'll buy the GTX1080 card from you for $50 mine by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I horde electronics. You would never catch me selling a GPU. In fact I hope a lot of the population is as dumb as you so I can get a bunch of cheap cards and PSU's. Have fun buying your $2000 Consumer(lol) GPU. You are why Nvidia thinks they can sell the 2080 for double what the 1080 debuted at.