It's normal for them to lie, exaggerate, and not tell the truth. For an example, look at what they were saying around the time they were trying to get Apple to unlock the iPhone for them.
You can say anything you want, but they haven't presented any evidence. There's not really a how, either, just some vague stuff. Compare that to the level of detail we have about stuxnet, or NSA spying, for example (which DHS also lied about fwiw)
It may be true or it may be not true.....But we've had false stories about nuclear reactors being hacked before, which turned out to be standard, untargeted malware, on a non-control computer. Regardless, the DHS has been trying for over a decade to get power over the Internet, including things like the "internet kill switch." The information they release is targeted and framed to convince people to give them that power. Furthermore, we know government agencies frequently lie, and it's only gotten worse as the president has set the example.
We have success stories in America too, like Vermont and parts of Utah (note that these are not particularly dense population areas). I assume eventually this will be solved everywhere, but it will take a while.
They aren't broke until the creditors stop giving them money. I say "giving" because they aren't getting it back. California is broke but they spend plenty of money. And why not?
There are more than 8 million reasons, if each reason is a square kilometer. By comparison, The UK is a mere 242 thousand, and it's going to take 15 years
That really doesn't make sense.......there are also more people in America, too. If you're going to make a comparison, you should talk about population density. But that isn't convincing either, because even with America's population density, most people are in regions that could be covered by fiber reasonably. We may have to compromise on remote places like Coulterville, California; but honestly I think we could even get fiber to them.
You got an MBA. It is no surprise at all you are more interested in socializing than learning. The empty-headed MBA is basically a stereotype by now. I also expect you cheat, lie, and steal.
Even in the old days, you wouldn't use an Encyclopedia to get a general overview of a topic that you were unfamiliar with. For a topic you cared about, you would look for something more in-depth.
Wikipedia is better than the old days because of the citations, and because of its greater breadth. However, it's not an authority on anything, and is often wrong. If it's a topic you care about, you need to look at the sources and citations. You can't use it for anything more than an entry-point to knowledge.
If you really care about security, I don't think you want to give up types and static checking the way Python does. Therefore, I suggest that from a security perspective, if companies start caring about security, they will not select Python.
Maybe I'm more prone to have my programming projects involve data crunching than the average person.
When I was in college, computers were starting to get fast enough that you didn't have to worry about CPU time. At that time, I thought, "I mostly won't have to worry about efficiency in the real world." But somehow, in practice, every job I've had in the real world, I've had to pull out the timers and start optimizing things. Performance still matters, especially when you are serving it to a million different users.
Slashdot Mirror
It's normal for them to lie, exaggerate, and not tell the truth. For an example, look at what they were saying around the time they were trying to get Apple to unlock the iPhone for them.
The calculations are tough I admit, but the aesthetic of confusion makes up for it.
You can say anything you want, but they haven't presented any evidence. There's not really a how, either, just some vague stuff. Compare that to the level of detail we have about stuxnet, or NSA spying, for example (which DHS also lied about fwiw)
The vagueness of the article only gives it more the appearance of a lie. There is no evidence there, just vague allusions and scare threats.
What could possibly be enough of a surprise at this point? A nuclear strike somewhere?
It may be true or it may be not true.....But we've had false stories about nuclear reactors being hacked before, which turned out to be standard, untargeted malware, on a non-control computer. Regardless, the DHS has been trying for over a decade to get power over the Internet, including things like the "internet kill switch." The information they release is targeted and framed to convince people to give them that power. Furthermore, we know government agencies frequently lie, and it's only gotten worse as the president has set the example.
Yeah, maybe Alaska gets the cut. I'm sorry but they're used to it.
We have success stories in America too, like Vermont and parts of Utah (note that these are not particularly dense population areas). I assume eventually this will be solved everywhere, but it will take a while.
I meant "would" but mistyped :)
They aren't broke until the creditors stop giving them money. I say "giving" because they aren't getting it back. California is broke but they spend plenty of money. And why not?
That's why you check the citations.
There are more than 8 million reasons, if each reason is a square kilometer. By comparison, The UK is a mere 242 thousand, and it's going to take 15 years
That really doesn't make sense.......there are also more people in America, too. If you're going to make a comparison, you should talk about population density. But that isn't convincing either, because even with America's population density, most people are in regions that could be covered by fiber reasonably. We may have to compromise on remote places like Coulterville, California; but honestly I think we could even get fiber to them.
There's no reason the US shouldn't have this, too. Or at least your local state, if you prefer things at the state level.
The OS takes what the IoT wants to communicate and makes such data secure, sending it in a modern way out to the user.
I'm not sure this means anything......
Don't discount the skill of being an entertainer.
You got an MBA. It is no surprise at all you are more interested in socializing than learning. The empty-headed MBA is basically a stereotype by now. I also expect you cheat, lie, and steal.
Even in the old days, you wouldn't use an Encyclopedia to get a general overview of a topic that you were unfamiliar with. For a topic you cared about, you would look for something more in-depth.
Wikipedia is better than the old days because of the citations, and because of its greater breadth. However, it's not an authority on anything, and is often wrong. If it's a topic you care about, you need to look at the sources and citations. You can't use it for anything more than an entry-point to knowledge.
Why is she different than any other entertainer?
If you really care about security, I don't think you want to give up types and static checking the way Python does. Therefore, I suggest that from a security perspective, if companies start caring about security, they will not select Python.
Maybe I'm more prone to have my programming projects involve data crunching than the average person.
When I was in college, computers were starting to get fast enough that you didn't have to worry about CPU time. At that time, I thought, "I mostly won't have to worry about efficiency in the real world." But somehow, in practice, every job I've had in the real world, I've had to pull out the timers and start optimizing things. Performance still matters, especially when you are serving it to a million different users.
It's a dirty cliché that shows a lack of thought........but somehow gets clicks.
It all gets exposed to RF radiation. All the time.
I will argue that in this case, there is a simple answer: both are insecure.
Also, unless there are bugs in the software using the hardware, which there is
I think the problem is part of your phone is still falling but part of it is not