Slashdot Mirror


Russian Hackers Reach US Utility Control Rooms, Homeland Security Officials Say (wsj.com)

"Russian hackers [...] broke into supposedly secure, "air-gapped" or isolated networks owned by utilities (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source) with relative easy by first penetrating the networks of key vendors who had trusted relationships with the power companies," reports The Wall Street Journal, citing officials at the Department of Homeland Security. "They got to the point where they could have thrown switches" and disrupted power flows, said Jonathan Homer, chief of industrial-control-system analysis for DHS. The hacking campaign started last year and likely is continuing. From the report: DHS has been warning utility executives with security clearances about the Russian group's threat to critical infrastructure since 2014. But the briefing on Monday was the first time that DHS has given out information in an unclassified setting with as much detail. It continues to withhold the names of victims but now says there were hundreds of victims, not a few dozen as had been said previously. It also said some companies still may not know they have been compromised, because the attacks used credentials of actual employees to get inside utility networks, potentially making the intrusions more difficult to detect.

The attackers began by using conventional tools -- spear-phishing emails and watering-hole attacks, which trick victims into entering their passwords on spoofed websites -- to compromise the corporate networks of suppliers, many of whom were smaller companies without big budgets for cybersecurity. Once inside the vendor networks, they pivoted to their real focus: the utilities. It was a relatively easy process, in many cases, for them to steal credentials from vendors and gain direct access to utility networks. Then they began stealing confidential information. For example, the hackers vacuumed up information showing how utility networks were configured, what equipment was in use and how it was controlled. They also familiarized themselves with how the facilities were supposed to work, because attackers "have to learn how to take the normal and make it abnormal" to cause disruptions, said Mr. Homer. Their goal, he said: to disguise themselves as "the people who touch these systems on a daily basis."

371 comments

  1. At some point... by toonces33 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They just ought to sever all internet connections in and out of Russia.

    1. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump's treason in the open is absurd. He can't even credibly walk it back, he blew it again. The treason won't stay in him, it keeps coming out through his bitch traitor mouth that can't stop. #Stable Genius Traitor

    2. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point these people need to stop using MODBUS. It was designed in the 70s. It has 0 concept of 'secure'.

    3. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all fart as well, but grabbing someones face a letting rip on it is not good manners.

    4. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antarctica is still OK. I think that's the only continent that the USA hasn't pissed off.

      Nope

      .

    5. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we did that we couldn't blame "Russian hackers" for literally everything.

    6. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is how they are so sure these are Russian hackers? They could be American hackers.

    7. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every nation spies on every other nation.

      Not really, you're a bit naive in that respect.

    8. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they dont it means they are too poor to be able to

    9. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people would pay a lot for this. You might have a place in the market

    10. Re:At some point... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      If the Russians could skip air-gap inside secure US facilities, you think air gap around their borders will be of any use?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    11. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      empty vodka bottles behind the server racks.

    12. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No reason the boogeyman needs to be anyone/thing specific, the important thing is merely to have one.

    13. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because you think USA with its 10^15 debt is rich ?

    14. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might help deal with the Putin Defense Force we see on Slashdot every time a story with Russia or Trump in the title appears.

    15. Re: At some point... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it; the Russians have been doing this to us (and us to them, and everyone to everyone else) for so long that I'm sick of it; obviously implementing proper security isn't the way to go about this anymore.

    16. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about 'blaming Trump'.
      If he, and others, don't get past their fragile egos and engage with reality we're all going to pay the price.

    17. Re: At some point... by polar+red · · Score: 1

      the banks have that money, and the "democracy" by the balls.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    18. Re:At some point... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Russian proxy always equals Russian hackers. Everyone knows that.

    19. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People sleep with other peopleâ(TM)s girlfriends all the time, so I guess you donâ(TM)t mind if I sleep with yours.

    20. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sever the connections from your country as well because you are doing it as well. You are either ignorant or arrogant.

    21. Re:At some point... by painandgreed · · Score: 0

      Every nation spies on every other nation. This has been going on since before the invention of writing. Blaming Trump is absurd.

      True, and that Trump, the leader and spokesperson for the country is doing nothing once they have been caught is effectively telling them to increase their efforts till they are at least told to stop. However, it's worse than that as he has actually encouraged them to step up their efforts literally back on the campaign trail. At best, he does this because it is self serving over the concerns of the country.

    22. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought he was a clown? Then he was Hitler. Then he was ineffective. Now he is somehow a Russian agent.

      You people will never fucking stop or learn, eh? Just shift the narrative. Must be nice to parrot the MSM talking points, you certainly have the backing of the largest and most influential corporate weapon in history.

    23. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Implying proper security has EVER been tried

    24. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok Ivan

    25. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we did that we couldn't blame "Russian hackers" for literally everything.

      Only the things they literally did. Sorry not everyone is a Trump supporter with the ability to be in complete denial and lack a fundamental understanding of every single thing that's happening in the world.

    26. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 400 pound geniuses sitting on their mother's bed. You forgot that possibility. Back to Siberia you go!

    27. Re:At some point... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      1st, do they post about their conquests? If so, they are probably Americans, but sometimes they are russians and some linquistic oddities can give them away.
      2nd, Russian Troll and intrusion detection and countersecurity operations are ongoing, if not very successfully, given the ease of attack and difficulty of defense.

    28. Re:At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always with the naysaying. The station wagons full of hard drives will be easy to spot by even the shittiest intel agents.

    29. Re:At some point... by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the internet is to be able to route around obstacles, like severed connections in and out of Russia.

    30. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He asked them to share data about any illegal activities our government/politicians might be involved in. Any normal person should want to know those things, otherwise the government isnâ(TM)t being run âoeby the people and for the peopleâ.

    31. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww. Still pissed about 2016 eh? Maybe you should find a politician who will keep his campaign promises. Then maybe you will have a chance in 2024.

      Remember, Obama's true legacy is President Trump.

    32. Re: At some point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up drinkypoo.

  2. Unpossible! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't believe it. Deep state. Carter Page. Witch hunt.

    It's probably best to just end all investigations towards anything related to Russia.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    1. Re:Unpossible! by datavirtue · · Score: 0

      “To make peace with an enemy,” he wrote, “one must work with that enemy, and that enemy becomes one’s partner.”
      --Barack Obama quoting Nelson Mandela the other day.

      https://www.newyorker.com/news...

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:Unpossible! by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Doent pass the smell test.

      Hackers reached the point whee they could throw switches... but apparently didn't throw any switches. Bullshit.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re: Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would make a terrible black hat

    4. Re:Unpossible! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just because I can bring down the internet doesn't mean I do it right away. Timing is everything when you're doing a hack.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Unpossible! by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Congratulations! You just described one of the main reasons for NAFTA, the TPP, and other global, multilateral trade deals. The simple fact is the more countries are tied by trade, the fewer wars they have. Another "peace dividend" that President Orange Bumblefuck doesn't even remotely grasp, and hence, pissed all over.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Unpossible! by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      Great. We get world peace for the price of a "War on Infringers Of All Those Anti-societal Treaty Terms"?

      Can't we just have the best of both worlds?

      Well, IMHO, the first step would be to stop negotiating all of those treaties in anti-democratic secrecy. I don't care if the communications of negotiations between the countries would be kept secret, but really, publish the current working draft terms periodically so that society can also be represented. The theory that a nation's government represents the interests of its citizens perfectly has been proven wrong, over and over, with various recent treaty negotiations being good evidence.

    7. Re: Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doesn't pass the smell test."

      Nor do you Ivan.

    8. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets fuck all the blue collar workers here so we can export industrial capacity to nations who have a cost basis of pennies compared to our dollars.

    9. Re: Unpossible! by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      It's a shame to see you besmirch the good name of your buddy with your silly username... but I suppose I'd feel differently if you'd ever typed anything interesting...

    10. Re: Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. This whole thing does appear to be an attempt to move the zeitgeist against Russia, sure, but it is both plausible and likely that Russians would:

      1- Gain access to medical, financial, military, amd infrastucture.
      2- Install redundant C&C servers for all intrusions
      3- Not do anything immediately.

      Russian infiltration is real. Chinese infiltration was real and may still be. Israeli infiltration is less common but real. Why would a nation state establish a weapon with no immediate intention of using it? That is a silly question, given that this appears to be the intent behind a large number of recent weapons created, certainly including the most devastating nuclear, chemical, and, in the past, biological weapons.

      So no, I wouldn't expect them to throw any levers. Nor would I doubt there existence merely because the media hates them right now.

    11. Re:Unpossible! by chill · · Score: 1

      On July 5, 1993, the New Yorker published a cartoon by Peter Steiner that became an instant classic. The caption is "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."

      Fast forward to 2018 and we have millions of bots acting as megaphones, and foreign actors waging a protracted cold war. Exactly which democratic society are you claiming would be able to be represented?

      Speaking for the United States, as a representative democracy we elect people to do this. They aren't *supposed* to take everything back to the popular for a vote. I think Switzerland may be one of the only places that practices direct democracy at a level above township.

      The people should definitely be *informed*, so I'm all for publishing these things, but as far as "represented" goes... we elect people to do that. Do they do a good job? Not that I've ever seen, but it *is* their job.

      Treaties negotiated by the Executive are subject to ratification by the Senate before becoming law -- in the U.S., at least. Review the proposed treaties and speak to your elected Senator if you have issues.

      I will agree that "fast track" powers, frequently spoken about in the U.S., are evil and should never be used.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:Unpossible! by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Back in 1910 most intellectuals of the time believed because the countries are so connected by trade, war was impossible. And even if it did happen, they reasoned, it would end quickly because people would not tolerate the losses on the stock market.

      We all know how that turned out.

    13. Re:Unpossible! by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      We more or less agree. You jump on my use of "represented" but I merely meant that periodically publishing the draft text during negotiations enables indirect representation via

      > speak to your elected Senator if you have issues.

      (OK, it's probably not "Senator" but some other politician or political appointee; and I believe other indirect means like public protest could also be effective) during the negotiations, and it will be more likely that the final text will be more palatable/beneficial to the public.

    14. Re:Unpossible! by chill · · Score: 1

      You're right, we're agreeing here. :-)

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    15. Re: Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's normal. It's like MAD, we hack their stuff, they hack our stuff, but nobody wreaks anything, because if we fucked up their shit they'd fuck up our shit.

    16. Re:Unpossible! by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what Chamberlain and Hitler did in Munich? They worked together, and came up with an agreement about Czechoslovakia. They succeeded in creating peace for their time, I'm sure it'll work now.

    17. Re:Unpossible! by mcswell · · Score: 1

      If you're going to wage a war, it's bad to start out by shooting a single bullet (not that that hasn't ever happened). Better to test out your weapons up to but not including shooting the other side, then--when your side is massed up with all their guns pointing at the enemy, and hopefully the enemy is not all aiming back--you all shoot together. The Romans knew that, and it's been the principle of many an Army (and Navy) since then.

  3. Build a wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Around the Internet. No reason to communicate with or route traffic through enemy territory. USA first. Eastern hemisphere are scum.

    1. Re:Build a wall by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's what your government wants you to want, so they can more easily control what you can and what you cannot see!

      (No matter your conspiracy theory, I can always field one that's more insane!)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. *** HACKED BY THE CHINESE *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *** ***

  5. lies by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It may be true or it may be not true.....But we've had false stories about nuclear reactors being hacked before, which turned out to be standard, untargeted malware, on a non-control computer. Regardless, the DHS has been trying for over a decade to get power over the Internet, including things like the "internet kill switch." The information they release is targeted and framed to convince people to give them that power. Furthermore, we know government agencies frequently lie, and it's only gotten worse as the president has set the example.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re: lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be air-gapped, but wasn't for ease of remote administration. The Utility got hacked, and now they are in full CYA mode. Ohh look!!!! The Russians did it!!!

    2. Re:lies by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      And, taking advantage of the president is the Republican party.

      We need an October Surprise.

      All the fucked up shit so far has come and gone as news.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:lies by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe you should read the article.

    4. Re: lies by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What could possibly be enough of a surprise at this point? A nuclear strike somewhere?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re: lies by phantomfive · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The vagueness of the article only gives it more the appearance of a lie. There is no evidence there, just vague allusions and scare threats.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re: lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine the response of the US populance as Russian hypersonic missiles are raining down imminent fiery death:

      "Fake news! Fake news!"
      "Sure, blame the Russians"
      "But Hillary!"
      and, of course:
      "This is fine"

    7. Re: lies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems quite specific to me.

      The Russian hackers, who worked for a shadowy state-sponsored group previously identified as Dragonfly or Energetic Bear, broke into supposedly secure, âoeair-gappedâ or isolated networks owned by utilities with relative ease by first penetrating the networks of key vendors who had trusted relationships with the power companies, said officials at the Department of Homeland Security.

      We have who, where, how and by what method. Interestingly it's similar to the technique used by the US to sabotage Iranian enrichment facilities.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: lies by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You can say anything you want, but they haven't presented any evidence. There's not really a how, either, just some vague stuff. Compare that to the level of detail we have about stuxnet, or NSA spying, for example (which DHS also lied about fwiw)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re: lies by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Is it normal for them to release evidence to the public?

      The Struxnet stuff only came out because other people got hold of it and dissected it. If you follow security blogs you can see that the same thing happens with Russian malware found in the wild. And really, it seems odd to give weight unverifiable blog posts about Struxnet, but not to somewhat reputable journalists.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump telling the truth for an entire week. That would be a biiiiiiig surprise.

    11. Re:lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be true or it may be not true.....But we've had false stories about nuclear reactors being hacked before, which turned out to be standard, untargeted malware, on a non-control computer. Regardless, the DHS has been trying for over a decade to get power over the Internet, including things like the "internet kill switch." The information they release is targeted and framed to convince people to give them that power. Furthermore, we know government agencies frequently lie, and it's only gotten worse as the president has set the example.

      The problem is vagueness. They don't even say when this happened, it may have been 6+ years ago before a lot of new requirements have been implemented in the US. Often in these cases we see penetration of malware that could theoretically be used to exploit but not practically. They also say 'control room' penetration, which are typically plant control rooms, but describe grid switch vulnerability which are not controls from plant control rooms but rather grid control centers. There is no reason they should not be clear on this very important distinction.

    12. Re: lies by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      It's normal for them to lie, exaggerate, and not tell the truth. For an example, look at what they were saying around the time they were trying to get Apple to unlock the iPhone for them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re: lies by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Almost anything, if the timing is right.

      Americans have a short attention span.

      Stomping on the base just a week before elections would be a good start.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    14. Re:lies by houghi · · Score: 1

      We have at least one confirmed story.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re: lies by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't even know what you mean by "stomping on the base"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. Cheap, crappy security by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Hackers only break in when security sucks. Unfortunately, that is the standard-situation these days.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Cheap, crappy security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, this is what happens then the CEO of ProtonBoom Energy Industries says his high school nephew is a real wiz on those computers.

    2. Re:Cheap, crappy security by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      That works both ways. Remember Stuxnet.

      Every goddam government is screwing every other goddam government.

      Only the USA is making their incompetence public in order to give the 3-letters more power.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  7. Air-Gapped by Kobun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This submission might as well be an advertisement for implementing zero trust security in facilities. I wonder how many of these so-called isolated control networks were still directly connected to the public internet. Even if they weren't, the years old attack through the office network still apparently works.

    2. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vladimir Putin's Ears need a new air gap -- one produced by a 50 caliber rile.

    3. Re:Air-Gapped by mikeiver1 · · Score: 1

      Kind of thought the very same thing. They are not air gaped if "trusted" vendors can remote into the network to access the building controls/ energy management systems from the outside. There is literally no way to stop this sort of attack short of having a completely self contained network with no outside internet connections and connected via dedicated fibres run with the high tension lines connecting the various generating plants and sub stations. So this will not happen. Get a generator and make sure you have a big propane tank to feed the beast if the Gas gets turned off too.

    4. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the power plug air gapped too?

      If the power source is not independent from the grid, then its not completely Air-Gapped.

    5. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's all about the practical exception. I have seen how it plays out.

      Somebody who knows what they are doing writes up security guidelines, and convinces all the important people that they need their systems to be "air-gapped."

      But, of course, a non-technician's understanding of that term is just a bit off. Just enough to let corporate politics ruin it. They make one exception for one vendor, which totally destroys the meaning of "air gap," but the distinction is seen as so highly technical as to be irrelevant. It really is something the vendor needs to support the system, a practical necessity, and a harmless exception that doesn't really change anything (in their non-technical minds). So they keep calling it "air gapped" even though it's not. They point at the fact that "enough" of the system is still separated "enough" that it can still be thought of as air-gapped. It doesn't need to be perfect in order to be good enough. And it just slides further and further from there.

      The technicians that voice their objections are seen as hinderances rather than protectors. Their recommendations seem like sky-high and utterly needless costs. Gross overkill for no good reason.

      And it all falls apart.

      Don't worry, consultants and third-party vendors will should all the blame. Nobody at the top will suffer because of any of this, so everything's fine.

    6. Re:Air-Gapped by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Air gapped could be some contractor standard. Contractors walking in and out with the work computing to other networks?
      More of a two way sneaker net than a secure computer with updates in day and hours.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No internet shitposting machine should ever be connected to an intranet at any medium sized or up company.

      The only way for data to legitimately travel from the rest of the world to the intranet should be through carefully filtered and limited data only links when necessary (with tunneling through them being an instant firing offence). Any software or non standard data which has to be imported should be first signed off by sysadmin, with physical paper trail. Any remote access should happen with company supplied laptops, with no wlan and locked down so the only USB peripherals they can use is a VPN server.

      This is only common sense, something completely alien to the IT industry.

    8. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of an RFP in which I was recently involved; as usual the potential client was vetting us to make sure our development practices met their security bar. At first, I approved.

      After I annoyed the reviewer by giving information that was clearly pertinent to what he was asking (though not the simple one-word answer he was looking for), one of my co-workers explained to me that everyone understood that this was just a bullshit song-and-dance we had to perform before we could do business.

      Nobody takes this stuff seriously. The clients just want to find a vendor that delivers with a right price, and all this business about screening them for good security practices is seen as a meaningless requirement they must meet so they can turn around and tell THEIR clients how diligent they are.

      The security of our most critical systems is a joke because the responsible people, at each link in this chain, don't take the vetting process seriously.

    9. Re: Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Iowa there is one power cooperative that was considering giving open remote network access to a POE Lighting vendor. The vendor in question was completely security illiterate.

    10. Re:Air-Gapped by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Air-gap is defined as being the empty space between a managers ears.

    11. Re: Air-Gapped by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      At the very least just give them a VLAN instead of putting them on the intranet. Switches are a big black box of NSA inserted exploits and bugs but it's better than nothing.

    12. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technicians that voice their objections ...

      The lesson here: Include an instruction to shut-down the computer if it detects a valid internet gateway. Ideally, don't list the command/software in the equipment description.

    13. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power plants do have their own air-gapped networks. The power company owns the utility poles, which makes it very convenient to run fiber to anywhere there is power ran.

    14. Re: Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $n are a big black box of NSA inserted exploits and bugs

      What does not fit $n? The ultimate is underhanded code ala the underhanded C competition and blob drivers/firmware. Not even opensource systems can be trusted.

    15. Re:Air-Gapped by pots · · Score: 1

      I read that and assumed that this was similar to Stuxnet - they compromised the trusted vendor, who had physical access, and when the vendor went to work on the machine they brought with them some kind of compromised software update or something. It was a compromised USB key that was used for Stuxnet.

    16. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beside not being fixed since 2007.
      I will make a bet their backup and recovery systems are also not air-gapped or flat out defective by design or omission.
      Just try that on a BSD system with immutable in all the right places. BSD usually does not do automount or autoplay.

    17. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now just how would you feel if someone wrote the same thing about Trump? It's not so nice to threaten world leaders like that. You need a midnight visit from the KGB to straighten you out.

    18. Re:Air-Gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? There's an air gap. Sure. It's filled with Wifi, but it is still an airgap. I know I'm right, because I'm a millennial, and I am always right.

  8. Air gapped, but not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are clearly not talking about a Stuxnet type hack, so if they could flip switches the networks were not air-gapped.

    1. Re:Air gapped, but not by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The malware becomes self aware after a number of hours when the contractors ends their work?
      Social engineering and advance malware. So advanced. So powerful. Just like any other malware that takes over home computer everyday of week and flips email.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. I'll be one of the few with AC if this keeps up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got backup generators, battery backup (serious battery backup, not the kind that keeps your computer running for a few min after the power goes out either, though I've got some of those as well, for things like modems, but a more serious battery backup which can last a day or more depending on whats hooked up to it), gas, and solar. Use it whenever the power goes out up here in NH. Keeps my internet up and if that goes out I've still got my ham radio gear and others within my community to communicate with. It'll actually be a good thing because we can then take over and rid ourselves of this failed socialist state. Freedom at last! Freedom at last!

  10. FFS learn how to write good software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop paying contractors who can't create a web application for $2.1B (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-24/obamacare-website-costs-exceed-2-billion-study-finds), adopt formal methods, write good software like your life depends on it.

    Successful hack = another guy found a bug in your code.

    1. Re:FFS learn how to write good software by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      This bit jarred with me:

      The attackers began by using conventional tools -- spear-phishing emails and watering-hole attacks, which trick victims into entering their passwords on spoofed websites -- to compromise the corporate networks of suppliers, many of whom were smaller companies without big budgets for cybersecurity.

      Who decides the budget? Do the DHS officials suggest a figure or refer the executives to a preferred vendor? "PwC says they'll do it for $10 million."

      Just introducing 2FA and tightening up access and procedures would go a long way but before that the executives and IT people have to accept the need. Staff training an optional extra.

  11. Re:Quick Change Topics! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our last bit of blaming 12 Russians for hacking the DNC server was called out in less than a day. They know the FBI hasn't looked at the server and Crowstrike is unwilling to testify that Russia hacked it.

    Amazing. Every single word in those two sentences was wrong.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lies and decete by the anti-Trump fake news media to slander Russia which is USA's top #1 ally. Just look at how Germany and Cana-duh disrespect america and treat it unfairly and you see who is our real friends.

    1. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Da, I agree totally with all friend comrade dude American says.

  13. Re:Yeah right... by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    500,000 Iraqi civilians dead
    4,424 US Soldiers Killed
    35k seriously wounded (life all fucked up)
    Ignited a platform for radicalism to flourish in 70 countries

    One of those agencies (CIA) was recently caught red handed spying on the US Senate. The world is so fucked up it barely made the news.

    https://news.vice.com/article/...

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  14. Stop calling them "hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're Russian military operatives. Name them for what they are. The term "hacker" is for someone who is creative with things, and wants to learn how things work to a very fine detail so they can make them do interesting things. These military operatives have a different goal: to exploit systems and learn weaknesses in our networks so they can someday launch an invasion or retaliatory attack. These goals are not the same as that of a hacker.

    1. Re:Stop calling them "hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the libtard. They are really Clinton-Soros paid hackers working for Correct the Record to destroy America.

  15. âRussianâ(TM) by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    So what country is spoofing Russian IPs?

  16. Re:Yeah right... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    We just had a story last week about the FBI crying that they might need to legislate crypto back doors. Coincidence?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  17. "FAKE NEWS!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's good people on both sides of the attacks. On both sides! Like Me and Ivanka and the Russians on that side, and the Charlottesville Nazis on this side! We have to let them take over our infrastructure or the poor people who aren't as elite as I am will get to keep their rights.

  18. You know you're joking by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and maybe trolling but Trump's poll numbers didn't budge an inch even after that downright terrifying display in Helsinki. What I find especially odd is most of his supporters are old enough to have been cold warrior types. It'd be one thing if Putin wasn't ex-KGB. There wasn't much in Russia to fear (they were pretty blasted out by WWII) but their KGB seemed to know damn well what they were doing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you so afraid of? What is so terrifying about the US and Russia improving relations and bringing a little more piece to the world?

    2. Re: You know you're joking by dave420 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That the way Trump wishes to do it is indistinguishable from someone who is compromised and being used. That's the scary part.

    3. Re:You know you're joking by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That's not true about his polls.

      He went from -9 or -10 three weeks ago to -11 or so now.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The same media that so easily drives you and the rest of the weak minded into terrified frenzies of paranoid, xenophobic outrage every time Trump scratches his nuts has been almost completely tuned out be the rest of the country. The media in general has a 14% trustworthiness rating among conservatives and a 37% rating among independents, and CNN specifically has a 33% trustworthiness rating among its own viewers. They went full-"Literal Hitler" in the first week of his candidacy and no one on the right ever listened to them again. Absolutely *none* of the fake, apocalyptic outrage spewed forth over every retarded """scandal""" from Megyn Kelly to Gonzo Curiel to Khzir Khan to Pussygate to Pissgate to Flynn to Charlottesville to Manafort to Wolff to Shitholegate to Children In Cages to Helsinki ever moved his poll numbers a millimeter. All it's ever done is drive the left further and further into its hateful, irrational rage, which - if you can believe it - is a big part of Trump's PR strategy and has been from the start.

    5. Re: You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, remember those 8 years when you mocked Fox News viewers for being gullible idiots who'd believe any crazy conspiracy theory they were fed if it gave them a new reason to hate Obama?

      Well guess what, now it's your turn to be the idiot!

    6. Re: You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a few men talking quietly in the corner of a bar is indistinguishable from a gang of terrorists planning to blow up the building.

      What you're experiencing is known in psychiatry as a "paranoid delusion". Get help.

    7. Re:You know you're joking by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and maybe trolling but Trump's poll numbers didn't budge an inch even after that downright terrifying display in Helsinki.

      That's because he is down to more or less just his psycho base supporters. An alarmingly large group but they support him no matter how crazy he gets. He could start a nuclear war and they would cheer him on the whole way and probably try to find some way to blame Obama or Clinton for it.

      What I find especially odd is most of his supporters are old enough to have been cold warrior types.

      His supporters are not that old as a general proposition. He has too many of them for that to be the case though certainly a fair number of them are older. Heck I'm old enough to have been around during the later decades of the cold war and the people that really lived through the middle of it are drawing social security now. Trumps supporters are more diverse than just old people.

    8. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it took 3 solid weeks of the most hysterical Hitler-baiting since Actual Hitler was alive to drop his approval rating a small fraction of the margin of error?

      Well, according to gallup his approval rating the day he was elected was 34%, or 8 points below where they have him now, so I can't wait to find out how they plan on closing that gap...

    9. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because he is down to more or less just his psycho base supporters.

      You say that to comfort yourself and mentally reinforce your moral superiority, but if Trump's base alone gets him to 45%, that should scare the shit out of you.

    10. Re:You know you're joking by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm using the 538 rolling average, so it's at least slightly resistant to both error and movement.

      It seems to take at least a week for any change.

      The 10-11 threshold seems to be pretty relevant though, it's when generic (midterm) polling starts to break 9% and Republicans start to maybe sort of not rubber stamp everything about Trump. 9% poll lead puts the senate in the realm of possible for the democrats (obviously individual races will have effects, and likely the real life gap will need to be a touch higher, but it starts to look like the realm of typical polling deviation), and the house quite likely (even with typical polling errors against).

      Your link has his day one approval at 40, with 42 now (favorables aren't a great measure of approval IMO).

      I suspect a significant portion of the 40% are quite into the baiting that's happening. Also, the trade war was/is a notable bump to popularity, so the fact that it moved at all as it escalates is notable.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      favorables aren't a great measure of approval IMO

      Overlay the huffpo (or anywhere else) chart for Trump's 'favorability' and 'approval' and they match essentially perfectly. They tracked each other for Obama too, except Obama always had a 5-ish point buffer of people who liked him personally but not as president. Trump has no such luxury, probably the opposite in fact.

      As for the rest, you're obsessing WAY too hard over arbitrary cutoffs and tiny variations in already-fuzzy numbers.

    12. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and maybe trolling but Trump's poll numbers didn't budge an inch even after that downright terrifying display in Helsinki.

      That tells us that the reason Trump was elected were not related to foreign policy, even though many Trump's issues seem to revolve around foreign policy. Russia seems to still suffering from PTSD from the Tsars and the communists and they appear as a black box due to the unhealthy concentration of power and a cult of silence. There has to be a treatment program for the condition somewhere and a recommended approach to pacify a violent patient. Maybe Trump subconsciously recognizes the issue and reacts to it, without even knowing the reason.

    13. Re:You know you're joking by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      What I find especially odd is most of his supporters are old enough to have been cold warrior types. It'd be one thing if Putin wasn't ex-KGB. There wasn't much in Russia to fear (they were pretty blasted out by WWII) but their KGB seemed to know damn well what they were doing.

      What I find odd is that the old white leaders of the Dems today were all giving Russia big wet sloppy kisses while Putin was still KGB and while Russia literally was a communist dictatorship with gulags and everything.

    14. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree, great comment.

    15. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because he is down to more or less just his psycho base supporters. An alarmingly large group but they support him no matter how crazy he gets.

      Actually it's because the public has become immune to the constant Russia hysteria. When a CNN producer (John Bonifield) and a news anchor (Van Jones) are caught on video saying that "there's nothing to the Russia collusion", and "we talk about it all the time for ratings", people tend to stop believing the collusion narrative.

      Since Trump came into office, the US is exporting weapons to Ukraine and cutting into Russia's profits on energy exports, it becomes difficult to accuse him of working for Russia as those are actions that were directly in his power that work against Russia.

      Sources:
      https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...
      http://thehill.com/homenews/me...
      http://dailycaller.com/2017/12...
      https://www.bloomberg.com/news...
      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/0...

    16. Re:You know you're joking by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      You say that to comfort yourself and mentally reinforce your moral superiority, but if Trump's base alone gets him to 45%, that should scare the shit out of you.

      It is both true, and shit-scaring.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:You know you're joking by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      My mind baulks at how anyone can control anything across an true air gapped network. Unless the people controlling it are fucking morons and left wireless gear in there. Also doesn't matter what the fuck the attack, air gapped is meant to be gapped, nothing goes onto it that hasn't been scanned, you only plug in clean computer without wireless anything, all applications checked, all data checked. Work hard enough to create a proper airgapped network nothing gets on, the only way something gets on is down to people, incompetence, bribe and at budget time 'FALSE FLAG'. Don't thing they would do it on purpose, nothing to do with blaming Russians but in the US they are now the favourites and every-fucking-thing to do with contractors wanting multi-million dollar contracts to secure networks. Hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts, would they fuck up networks on purpose to get paid millions to secure them, hmm, let me think, yes abso-fucking-lutely.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re: You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "there's nothing to the Russia collusion"

      I'm inclined to believe this of Trump personally though he and his circle have acted so damned suspiciously over contacts with Russians that it's hard to dispel all doubt.

      It makes as much sense, maybe more, to suggest that Trump has been influenced or controlled by Russia for the past 30 years.

      The question of collusion with Trump and his campaign is only part of the total pattern of Russian interference which is still coming to light.

    19. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what I find odd is that this kind of blatant lie apparently helps in some way.

    20. Re:You know you're joking by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Trump's poll numbers didn't budge an inch even after that downright terrifying display in Helsinki.

      I know. I don't know if everything is to be blamed on Russia or not, but I know one of their goals is to divide the US. If people can watch a president talk all tough on Twitter, then show up and fold like a cowardly wet paper towel, sell out our country, and talk about how strong our greatest adversary is, and still like the president, then I'm inclined to believe that Russia's machine is doing its job.

      It'd be one thing if Putin wasn't ex-KGB.

      "There is no such thing as a former KGB man." - Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, responding to Prime Minister Sergei Stepashin, who called himself a former KGB officer.

      "My notion of the KGB came from romantic spy stories. I was a pure and utterly successful product of Soviet patriotic education." - Putin

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    21. Re: You know you're joking by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      What is so terrifying about the US and Russia improving relations and bringing a little more piece to the world?

      Despite what the president tells you on Twitter, Putin's goal is not peace and improved relations. Putin wants to break apart NATO, he wants to break apart the EU, he wants to disrupt democratic governments and would rather deal with autocrats and dictators. These are his goals, not happy fun times and unicorns. He is working to achieve them, and has been for decades. One of the ways his intelligence services help accomplish this are by creating divisions in other countries. Look at Brexit. Look at Trump's election. It's working. He's been playing a long game, also.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    22. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because he is down to more or less just his psycho base supporters.

      You say that to comfort yourself and mentally reinforce your moral superiority, but if Trump's base alone gets him to 45%, that should scare the shit out of you.

      It should be motivation to fix the problem. Also, I don't think you know what "moral superiority" means. Morality doesn't factor into Trump's base just like it doesn't for Trump himself. My personal hatred of them has nothing to do with morals and everything to do with basic cognitive function. They lack the ability form rational thoughts, process information in a useful way, or learn in any capacity. People like that are not just worthless, they're an active drain on the world. They have a negative value.

      Trump's base simply repeat what they hear from Trump and each other while squawking fake news whenever something doesn't fit into their misguided world view. They are exceptionally stupid people. Believing InfoWars, for example, makes you an idiot. Period. There is no other way to look at that. These are empirical facts that have nothing to do with morality or superiority. Trump and his base will never believe this which is why it's pointless to argue with them. Even this reply isn't for them, it's mainly for myself . I don't think for a second it will change anything and many of us aren't trying anymore. Wasted effort on a group that is fundamentally incapable of change. The upside is that since they refuse to adapt soon they'll have no jobs, no money, no food, and no way to survive. This is the inevitable outcome of the current course. Of course just like Trump, his base are far too stupid to understand that.

    23. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because he is down to more or less just his psycho base supporters.

      Deplorables, to be exact.

    24. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obsessing way too hard on trump being a good guy or someone who is good for the country.

    25. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Most of his supporters were very young or not born during the cold war. It is a myth that the old will die out leaving a "liberal" survivor majority. Trump, Tea party and Republicans are doing a bang up job developing converts. Those conversions just take some time after school to happen so the average age of reds tends to be higher than the population at large.

      Unfortunately schools are not really educating effectively or there would be less conversions and more critical analysis of positions of both reds and blues. As it stands now, I have no faith in the US population showing sobriety in the face of ANY insanity from our government. Completely manipulated and vapid patsy pushovers.

    26. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they were NOT you filthy lying trash. Dems had us at the brink of total nuclear annihilation with the USSR you stinking lying piece of skat.

      Historical revisionism of the type you are attempting is beyond vile. EVERY American should be shouting and beating down stinking filthy lying pieces of trash like YOU whenever this lying happens. Democrats were NOT in any way sympathizers with the USSR. Krushchev visited the US during the Eisenhower years. Eisenhower was Republican.

      It is more than odd. It is despicable vile behavior on your part.;

    27. Re:You know you're joking by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's true.

      Bernie isn't a D, but he did take his wife to Lenin's tomb for their honeymoon.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:You know you're joking by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm wondering how that happened too. My guess is that the malware was designed to be incorporated into some software update. The update would of course have been scanned, but somehow got under the radar. It may be that the update (if that's how it came across) was uploaded to the air-gapped system as source code, and that the malware itself was also source code, and undetectable in that form to the scanner.

      The other thing that's difficult (for me) to understand is how the malware was controlled once it was on the air-gapped system. It must have been autonomous (like Stuxnet, I guess), although various malware instances could have cooperated inside the air-gapped system. But reporting results back out would have been difficult, I would think. Unless it sent some kind of signal across the power lines?

      All this is speculation on my part, I'm afraid.

    29. Re:You know you're joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's base is ~30% -- it floats above with GOP partisanship but that isn't really his base, they just support him because "better than Clinton and at least he is white". They would much rather support someone with a modicum of sanity but the GOP was not prepared for him in the primaries and fielded so many candidates that the mainstream support was so divided that even a clown like Trump was able to get better numbers than most of them. If it had been Trump vs Cruz from the beginning it would have shaken out differently. Unless Pence accepts being second fiddle for a second term it is unlikely that Trump will manage to retake the primaries in 2020, even with incumbent advantage.

  19. Re: Quick Change Topics! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I will keep it simple: what YEAR did the FBI examine Your Highness mail server?

    2016.

    https://motherboard.vice.com/e...

    Here is some more background on Trump's "Where is the server?" lie:

    https://www.politifact.com/tru...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. Moscow Donald colludes with Russia' attack America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moscow Donald clumsily attempts to cover up his collusion with Russia's attacks on our elections, so he can protect them from the consequences of their ongoing attacks on the United States of America.

    And fuck all the abject traitors who look the other way just because he is as uneducated and racist as they are.

  21. Shouldn't be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several years ago I was at an IT Security dinner/presentation and they laid out some of the details behind a cyberattack on an airline. The hackers didn't go after any airline networks directly. Rather, they compromised an airline parts supplier and injected malware into webpages (or documents, I forget) and eventually 'caught' an airline when someone inside the airline visited the compromised site and was themselves infected.

    I've tried to explain this to people in my industry. They don't have to be even trying to get you, just someone in your industry.

    This and the massive Target breach are why vendor, their networks, and their devices should not be trusted (from a security standpoint at least).

    1. Re:Shouldn't be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Informative. Few people would expect a vendor site that they visit to be the delivery mechanism for such an attack.

    2. Re:Shouldn't be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's exactly what happened here:

      "The attackers began by using conventional tools -- spear-phishing emails and watering-hole attacks, which trick victims into entering their passwords on spoofed websites -- to compromise the corporate networks of suppliers, many of whom were smaller companies without big budgets for cybersecurity. Once inside the vendor networks, they pivoted to their real focus: the utilities. It was a relatively easy process, in many cases, for them to steal credentials from vendors and gain direct access to utility networks."

  22. Here's a whacky idea by sjames · · Score: 2

    How about ACTUALLY air-gapping the control network. If they want remote monitoring (not control), they can put a polling device on the control network. It can send all the data via a serial port with the RX connections removed to another machine on the internal network that can be reached via VPN.

    1. Re:Here's a whacky idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you want is called a "data diode". One way link.

    2. Re:Here's a whacky idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How about ACTUALLY air-gapping the control network.

      I have a better idea. Pratice good security rather than proposing something that ultimately gives you a false sense of security. As TFS points out these hackers breached supplier's machines and networks. That now gives them the ability to drop in a payload that will happily breach the air-gap next time someone makes a service call.

      The upside about air-gapping is how effective it is, the downside is that it's like a warm blanket making you feel cosy without actually fixing the core problem that your house's central heating system is broken. Companies need to practice layered security at every level. That network layout that isn't airgapped is part of security. That USB stick that vendor plugs in is part of security. That code review you aren't doing because of your over-reliance on vendors and lack of knowledge is part of security. That receptionist who buzzed him in is part of security.

      Air-gaps do nothing when vendor systems are breached because at the first sign of a problem you will kindly ask that vendor to come over to your side of the gap.

    3. Re:Here's a whacky idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      The vendor coming to your side of an air gap involves a laptop that has no other network connection. If you close the air gap, you are not air-gapped.

    4. Re:Here's a whacky idea by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      I/O is just one of the problems, the bigger one is patching. The update software has not been thoroughly reviewed before it is brought to an air gaped system. I would be surprised if virus scans were being performed on all media brought into the building.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    5. Re:Here's a whacky idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The vendor coming to your side of an air gap involves a laptop that has no other network connection.

      Otherwise known as a security risk.

      You misunderstand. I'm not saying don't air-gap. I'm saying don't "air-gap and be done with it". Your network architecture is a small part of overall security. Airgapping makes people incredibly complacent.

    6. Re:Here's a whacky idea by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      As long as you have a connection, serial port or otherwise, it's not "air-gapped." If it can be remote-controlled by employees, it can be remote-controlled by Russians.

      In any case, in these days of wifi built in to everything, what's the use of an air gap?

    7. Re:Here's a whacky idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      Nobody's going to remote control anything through a cut RX line. Read more carefully.

    8. Re:Here's a whacky idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a complicated issue, what most people on this site don't realize is that most of the IT work done at an electrical utility - is not done by an IT professional, nor do they have one on staff. All of these solutions are outside of their expertise / ability.

    9. Re:Here's a whacky idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's not complicated at all. It's a simple matter of yet another corporation endangering everyone by spending money on CxO bonuses rather than on necessary safety and security.

    10. Re:Here's a whacky idea by sjames · · Score: 1

      Defense in depth is needed, but first, they need to address the case that's much much worse than stopping at air-gapping: Assuming they're protected by an airgap when they actually aren't.

  23. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off ivan, go back to sucking putin's cock

  24. Cyber Security Unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sleep well fellow Americans, Trump promised:

    "Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded and safe"

    I the future hacking elections and critical infrastructure will be well guarded against such exposure in the fake news. I for one welcome our corporate slumlords. Gold plated crap is the new black.

  25. Re:Long-term narrative by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's no really good evidence that the Russian government is involved with any of the hacking, except to say "That's something they would do". It's the fallacy of the reversed conditional,

    I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia.

  26. Re:Trump let utilities get hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake news. Ignore the Putin behind Trump's body-curtain.

  27. Suppose that were true by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Suppose Russia isn't constantly trying to hack the US.
    We have daily news reports saying they are, that essentially they are fighting a cyber war against us and that's been going on for years, but we'll assume for a moment that is false.

    Nobody is doing anything about it, of course. Obama nor Trump fired a barrage of missiles in a counter-attack, nor really made any big deal about it - they're still doimg trade deals, selling the Russians a significant portion of our Uranium, etc.

    So Putin sees that nobody really cares about the reported attacks. Nobody seems all that bothered about it - not enough to demand any counter-attack.

    Suppose you're Putin, or Russian intelligence, or head of Russia's cyberwarfare command. You see that constant statements that you're attacking the US don't lead to any significant response. You see that you COULD attack the US with impunity and they wouldn't do anything about it.

    What would YOU do if you were Putin, or head of Russia's cybercommand, and you knew you could get away with attacking the US as much as you wanted?

    If it were me, seeing that nobody cares whether Russia attacks us or not, I'd go right ahead and attack. We're getting blamed for it anyway.

    So either Putin and his commanders are stupid, and not taking advantage of the situation, or you're mistaken.

    As it happens, I'm a career security professional. Knowing about hacks is my job. I work at a company founded by Misha Govshteyn. Guess where Misha is from. Mr. Govshteyn and I will tell you, Russia is hacking the hell out of the US all day long. Only China sends more attacks.

    1. Re: Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      selling the Russians a significant portion of our Uranium, etc.

      0.0001% is significant when the US imported millions of pounds from Russia in the past year?

      Yeah, that whole Uranium bullshit fails the whiff test when you look at the US uranium imports from Russia.

      So don't be an idiot raymorris. Do it smart and test the facts.

      What we learned is that you fell for it.

    2. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Uranium bit was a red herring. It was signed off by a ton of people and overblown.

      As for as Russian attacks go, I think people need to segregate issues a bit.

      1. Russia did manipulate our elections with propaganda and it is plausible but not proven that those manipulations were enough to cause enough voters to vote for Trump or not for Hillary where it mattered. That is the simple truth, though it isn't spoken much. Usually people say the outcome wasn't changed, and you can no more 100% know that than know that it wasn't. The numbers were close, and there was a lot of manipulation.

      2. Russia is going to do it again, but that is almost totally irrelevant. Now that we've shown we will bend over and take it, particularly if it benefits one party, it likely won't be limited to Russia.

      3. We need to be on a (cyber) wartime footing with respect to these things. Foreign manipulation needs to be addressed and mitigated. Voting machine secured. Voting registrations roles not carelessly purged, etc, etc. If we have to fight cyber attacks with cyber attacks we must do so, since the alternative is worse. We can't, however, lie, though exposing actual illegal dealings in Russia's politicians is fair game at this point. The emails uncovered were technically not lies. They just uncovered every rock they could find while the republican side got to skim by with revealing nothing. Basically it was a bit like a set of scales. Each side has things that perhaps don't show them in the best light. One side gets everything loaded on the scale, while the other side gets almost nothing, while ten times as much is hidden behind the curtain. That kind of disparity is bound to make the results less than ideal. Also you gotta assume the Russian's didn't alter the emails since if alterations could have been proved they might not have been accepted as well.

      4. Most importantly we need an attitude from every elected official that the truth matters. If your representative or senator has acted in a way that indicates its okay to lie if it benefits their party, and you know someone else on the ballot who is at least honest, then seriously consider voting for them, regardless of party.

      5. In addition to 4, we need a constitutional amendment, or maybe a law that states if you run for at least national office all confidentiality agreements protecting you are null and void and attempting to silence a story about a candidate with money is itself a felony. Furthermore all your government records are automatically made available. And just in case someone whines that it wouldn't be fair, well why wouldn't it? It would be the same for everyone. Don't like the spotlight, don't run for public office.

    3. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not enough to demand any counter-attack." -- Are you seriously some kind of moron who can't read, though? We've attacked Russia hundreds of times in the interim. The difference is we didn't BUY PUTIN with KOMPROMAT,
      because he's not a fucking dumbass traitor who launders money for people he doesn't control like a douchebag headed for FEDERAL US PRISONS.

    4. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So either Putin and his commanders are stupid, and not taking advantage of the situation, or you're mistaken.

      There are, of course, more potential explanations.

      For example, if Putin was not hacking and then, one day, decided to "take advantage of the situation" and start hacking... the US could easily produce a response, with or without public acknowledgment.

    5. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were me, seeing that nobody cares whether Russia attacks us or not, I'd go right ahead and attack. We're getting blamed for it anyway.

      So either Putin and his commanders are stupid, and not taking advantage of the situation, or you're mistaken.

      Then, I am so glad that it is not you. You see, the game is not who stands last alive upon the pile of the skulls. War and conflict are not an end into themselves, they are instruments of profit (or alternately, of survival, when in desperate situation). So, the generals may salivate all day seeing a gaping hole in unaware potential adversaries' defences, but if there is no sensible goal for a conflict, it will not start just on pretence of "opportunity", especially if it leaves opponent still capable of recovery (and revenge) and humiliated, eager to stage a payback. The only victory one can have against USA is to make it more Canada-like. Considering how main difference between them and you is an even harsher weather, demanding humanity and solidarity for survival, I think climate changes will sort you out (while simultaneously corrupting them in the process). OTOH, dry hot climate didn't help make Mexico a model society, so perhaps things are not progressing in direction I would prefer.

    6. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China significantly curtailed it's attacks against the US a few years back when the Obama administration publicly issued indictments for a number of top Chinese cyber warfare generals using photos in the indictments that were hacked from said general's personal photos on their laptops.

      Whatever anyone may wish to criticise Obama for, it's hard to honestly deny based on the facts that that was a master stroke that had a real and significant impact on reducing Chinese cyber attacks against the US. The US knew they were never going to ever be able to follow through with those indictments but the chilling effect on the Chinese generals of seeing images hacked from each of their personal computers on publicly unsealed indictments was sufficient to force change.

      It is in fact precisely why focus has moved away from Chinese state sponsored hacking towards Russian state sponsored hacking. Pretty much all Chinese attacks on the US now are Chinese individuals/criminal syndicates rather than state sponsored attacks, the days of China trying to hack US military apparatus are now largely over as a result of the US-China Cyber agreement that resulted from the above counter hacking actions. The amount of stories about China hacking the US hasn't reduced simply because the press got bored, or because Russia became a bigger problem, but because there was genuine success in showing China that it can work both ways and forcing them to curtail their attacks on the US.

      Whether the same can be achieved with Russia of course is anyone's guess, it maybe that there's simply no will in the current administration to tackle it, or it may be that Russia is simply a harder target to counter-attack.

    7. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is doing anything about it, of course. Obama nor Trump fired a barrage of missiles in a counter-attack, nor really made any big deal about it - they're still doimg trade deals, selling the Russians a significant portion of our Uranium, etc.

      Firing a barrage of missiles at a country having a nuclear arsenal would be stupid. However, Obama imposed pretty heavy economic sanctions on Russia in response. Trump of course did nothing, but since he has been a Russian asset for decades that is not surprising, and Republican congress have been playing their childish anti-Obama games.

      Oh, and selling Uranium to Russia is just a Fox fairytale. Fox is a confidence scam, and you are the mark.

    8. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before, it was China that was hacking everything and everyone.

    9. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China couldn't be sending more attacks than the Russians, the news doesn't report that so it must be false. /s

    10. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting comment.

      I'm a sysadmin at a small company that has very high profile customers. Customers and partners that the Russians have had issues with.

      I can tell you that the Russians, whether Fancy Bear or some other group, are constantly trying to gain access to us and our customers/partners. It is non stop. In the last two years(interestingly enough, this really ramped up in the summer of 2016) we have seen way more phishing attempts, etc; I have been privy to info from one of our partners, an American organization that the Russians really don't like, showing how they were compromised and by who. They acquired this from the FBI and Mandiant.

      This is real and they will stop at nothing to weaken and contain the US. For all the chest thumping the MAGA crowd does, they are laying down and letting the Russians and Chinese have their way with the US as they please.

      Weakening and containing the US is their goal, and by all indications they are achieving it, with the help of Donald Trump and the Republican party. Trumps love fest with Putin, and inviting him here, etc is beyond despicable.

    11. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose Russia isn't constantly trying to hack the US.
      We have daily news reports saying they are, that essentially they are fighting a cyber war against us and that's been going on for years, but we'll assume for a moment that is false.

      Nobody is doing anything about it, of course. Obama nor Trump fired a barrage of missiles in a counter-attack, nor really made any big deal about it - they're still doimg trade deals, selling the Russians a significant portion of our Uranium, etc.

      Why would you assume there was no response just because you didn't see it? A barrage of missiles would be a completely inappropriate response to a hack (unless they were trying to hack missile systems, then we could give them a few samples). Also, we didn't sell any Uranium to Russia, you know that's a lie. We sold some mining rights to a small percentage of Uranium ores which, when mined, would stay in the US or be sold as legally allowed.

      If Putin etc. were not actually attacking, they would be far better off to stay that way. If the claims of attacks are false, of course there's no counterattack, just propaganda. If someone else is doing it and Russia is being blamed, the differences in methods would be noticed as soon as Russia actually did attack. The only logical conclusion is that Russia and others are attacking.

    12. Re:Suppose that were true by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The nuclear war that could have arisen from the Bay of Pigs was averted, arguably because Kennedy knew what missiles were where.

      Theory: What if everyone is tolerant of cyber spying, because it actually makes us all safer, by avoiding the "accidental wars"?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    13. Re:Suppose that were true by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Is this what you mean by Trump did nothing.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    14. Re:Suppose that were true by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      You see that constant statements that you're attacking the US don't lead to any significant response.

      In your hypothetical world, does this include the President of the United States America traveling to see you, telling everyone how strong you are, and completely discounting the conclusions of the combined intelligence community, including his own DNI, and Congress, by saying on international TV that he doesn't see any reason why you would be attacking us? I mean, is the president talking all tough like he's some kind of badass when he's laying in his bed messing with his phone, but when he actually gets face to face with you he folds like a wet paper towel? Hypothetically, I mean.

      Cause that would be wack.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re: Suppose that were true by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, do it smart. Post anonymously without any citations to back up your claims.

      Do it smart!

      http://www.worldstopexports.co...
      http://www.worldstopexports.co...

      I'd like to know why the US and Russia are trading uranium at all. Why are we trading uranium with each other? Do we send them natural uranium and they send it back to us enriched?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    16. Re: Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, do it smart. Post anonymously without any citations to back up your claims.

      Why would I provide Raymorris a citation? I literally pointed out sections of the US constitution for him to read and he still misrepresented them. Then there's the time he misrepresented the number of subscribers EPB of Chattanooga had for its internet service.

      Do it smart!

      http://www.worldstopexports.co...
      http://www.worldstopexports.co...

      Exactly. The data is available. You would also want to look up total Uranium reserves though those are estimates.

      I'd like to know why the US and Russia are trading uranium at all. Why are we trading uranium with each other? Do we send them natural uranium and they send it back to us enriched?

      Uranium is a valuable product, available on the world market. If you want to restrict free trade, go ahead and try that argument.

      At least it will potentially be more honest than the claims that seem to think they sent literal convoys of Uranium.

    17. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was averted because when Kennedy was told and shown where those missiles were, he didn't say "nuh uh FAKE NEWS. You just hate me cause I won the election."

      Instead, as a wise leader should, he listened to his experts and with the knowledge of the missiles you mentioned, made a choice that wasn't necessarily all about him and his feelings.

      Today is nothing like those days.

    18. Re:Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ridiculous uranium story? Really? News flash...Russia already has uranium stockpiled so they don't need any more for weapons. Spent nuclear fuel isn't good for weapons and the Russians can burn it in their plants which is a win all around.

      The real problem is that our power plants are controllable by any general internet connections. That's the obvious problem that should be solved.

    19. Re: Suppose that were true by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Uranium is a valuable product, available on the world market. If you want to restrict free trade, go ahead and try that argument.

      Way to miss the point. This is the relationship I'm wondering about:

      US: hey, we've got some uranium to sell, anyone want it?
      Russia: hell yeah, I'll take some. What do you want for it?
      US: hmm. How about uranium, you got any of that?
      Russia: hell yeah I got some uranium to trade.
      US: OK, I'll trade you some uranium for some uranium.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    20. Re: Suppose that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very insightful, Comrade Li Feng.

  28. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this before, or after it was wiped, you know, "with a cloth"?

  29. Re:Yeah right... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    I remember the WMDs and didn't believe the claims then. Most people in the US and UK did. Unfortunately many people are easily persuaded to believe lies, even obvious ones, specially if they want to believe (and people love a good war if it's a long way away).

    In this case, the evidence that the Russian state interferes in the USA is piling up. From the fake adverts, fake websites and fake friends with fake names spreading the Russian state's messages, to the sore thumb trolls here going on about Syria, through the US Government's closure of Russian missions and expulsion of diplomats to the current indictments of 26 Russian nationals (so far) including 12 members of the GRU, not including the NRA's go-to gun girl Maria Butina, there's a lot of it about.

    If it is being manufactured, it's being done with so much attention to detail that the Russians can't cope. Here, the DHS has been spinning its web of lies with executives of utilities in secret since 2014 and now they've told the Wall Street Journal so they'll have had to manufacture 4 years of meetings and minutes and book flights and hotels and maybe make some actual changes as a cover.

    Inexplicably for made-up evidence, interviewees provided with it have suddenly remembered meetings with Russian persons of interest which they had previously denied or completely forgotten about.

    Against the might of the US Deep State, the Russian state's attempts to offer different explanations have all fallen apart, leaving the single idea that it's a foreign plot (cf. MH17, Skripals). All we're left with are the indignant denials from Trump, sorry, Putin on down that the Russian state would possibly have interfered in another country; if you listen very carefully it can be detected in the background radiation of many internet forums.

    Denials are tricky to get right though. If you deny something too often or too strongly, that will attract the attention you wanted to deflect. No Puppet!

  30. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1, Funny

    How humiliating it would be to be of the millineal generation and have people like you as peers.

  31. All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg stole the Winklevoss twins' code for Fakebook (figures as he is a thieving low jew too).

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer Â- so I wasnÂ't lying Â- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveÂ" Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread, infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... profiting by it (and that 3,000 jews employed there did not show up for work that day knowing about it beforehand).

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS are going to destroy the U.S. Dollar and dumping it for other world currencies and gold to destroy the United States.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis.

    Zucker now FIRED @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    Bernie Madoff (who made off with everyone's money, especially construction union pensions) shows the thieving nature of the JUDEN!

    Eric Schmidt had to step down @ JEWgle (a jew).

    Adam Schiff (gosh s

    1. Re:All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For christ's sake, get a life. Or get help. Preferably both.

    2. Re:All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jew don't you killers of Jesus ever dare use his name in vain. I notice the post you reply to shut you up fast in your history from the start. Your talmud calls us goy pigs to be raped, robbed, and killed too? Fuck off and STFU jew.

    3. Re: All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing quite like a 20-page rant against the Jews to get every neck-bearded basement-dwelling mouth-breather to give a stiff-armed salute of support.

    4. Re: All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd history of 1,000's of years shows jews kicked out of nations and their belief non-jews are goy pigs to be robbed, raped, and stolen from. No jew denies it. Hard to defy fact that's from their own belief system and history is why.

    5. Re: All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jews believe you're superior? You can't even accept your CROOKED NOSES cutting them off in rhinoplasty.You can't accept your hooknose selves. Nobody accepts you after facts on you. Some "superiority". Self proclaimed easy to do when you seize all communication and education through money you steal.

    6. Re:All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it APK you don't like jews, just claim your work.

    7. Re:All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypocrite why don't you take your own advice? Whoever put that down cites others and nothing more. Follow the money.

  32. Account is a front? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a troll account, cutting and pasting one liners from emails with smartquotes in them.

    However, it looks more like a bot from the posting account.

    So I suspect its one of these 'multiple personality fronts', where one person runs 20 accounts using specialized software, pretending to be 20 people and only has a lot of one line quick responses to be posted everywhere via cut and paste.

  33. IBM researchers did this like, a decade ago? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yup, here's a report from 2007.

    https://www.forbes.com/2007/08...

    That nothing has been done to fix this shit is the real story.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:IBM researchers did this like, a decade ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, here's a report from 2007.

      https://www.forbes.com/2007/08...

      That nothing has been done to fix this shit is the real story.

      This story might be referring to an event that happened several years ago. There is no mention of it being recent.

    2. Re:IBM researchers did this like, a decade ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, here's a report from 2007.

      https://www.forbes.com/2007/08...

      That nothing has been done to fix this shit is the real story.

      So, one 'possible' penetration and no actual successful operations hacks have taken place in all those years, on a vast grid with tens of thousands potential targets, and you assume nothing has been done?

      Knowing the incredible number of hack attempts that continues to escalate, maybe the impressive thing is how few penetrations of significance, and with such limited success we've seen.

    3. Re:IBM researchers did this like, a decade ago? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yup, here's a report from 2007.

      https://www.forbes.com/2007/08...

      That nothing has been done to fix this shit is the real story.

      So, one 'possible' penetration and no actual successful operations hacks have taken place in all those years, on a vast grid with tens of thousands potential targets, and you assume nothing has been done?

      Knowing the incredible number of hack attempts that continues to escalate, maybe the impressive thing is how few penetrations of significance, and with such limited success we've seen.

      Good point. I have no mod points to promote.

  34. Sorry Comrade by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Newbie Russian hacker, he thought voltage machine was the same as voting machine.
    we are saying sorry
    do not worry, we will have it all good by November , yes.
    Please give out best to the Donald

  35. At some point...null design. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IP protocol doesn't either.

  36. Kill switch wouldn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given these worms and attacks are autonomous the damage is already done when the system is compromised.

    This is probably *not* some generic worm, given the original infection was spear phishing particular security contractors. They were clearly known and targeted.

    I do think they (DHS etc) always want more powers and the budget that goes with them. Obviously given the current President that would be unwise for Congress to grant that power. Trump doesn't brief Congress and Senate, they read the Russian press to find out what he agreed to, like the rest of us.

    I am more concerned about the attack on the election vendor systems, the details of which were not revealed. Exactly what voting software code was obtained in that? I find it appalling they still have voting machines out there without paper audit trails to verify against.

  37. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05...

    That is a bit of news from the time it happened, not a few days ago, after they needed to show they did have access to the server.

    Washington (CNN)The Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election, a senior law enforcement official told CNN Thursday.

    SO, which story do you actually believe? The one where they rebuffed attempts to inspect the server, or the one that they're using now, that they had the servers the whole time?

    Personally, if you believe ANYTHING coming from the "Intel Community" either way you're an idiot. They lie. They lie straight faced in front of congress about all sorts of things, spying on Americans to there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This isn't a "Right vs Left" issue, because both sides have been on both sides of hating and defending the "intel community"

    And until people grow up, and see that, we're never going to get anywhere. So, please stop with the re-written history, it is embarrassing .

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  38. Squirrels and Storms by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    Hackers are no match for mother nature in making the power go out. Outages from storms actually kill people every year. Spend the money on more tree-trimming if you want to protect the people.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  39. Russia is under sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Nobody is doing anything about it, of course."

    Except Russia is under sanctions, and a lot of their attempts to influence the elections are about removing those sanctions. So the basic premise for your claim is false.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act

    "So either Putin and his commanders are stupid, and not taking advantage of the situation, or you're mistaken."
    And this one is a false dichotomy. Neither is true, Putin is not stupid and we are not mistaken.

  40. Get rid of these vendors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The system need to be all open source and audited by multiple separate security companies. Almost all of the scada vendors they are using our non-US companies. This crap software relies either for both the commissioning and the serving of the application on Microsoft Windows or at least on the serving of the application. That is the biggest weak point! If you don't have the source code for 100% of the entire operation you have no clue on what it really does end of story. You got to be stupid to install this crap that they are using then you got most of your wind turbines running codesys runtimes which yes great they are a German so I guess we can trust the 3S company. But what vendors are they using to add all of the potocol support and various outher libaries that they burry in all of that proprietary unknown coding. I wouldnt trust any of these industrial automation systems even turely air gapped. All it takes is for one of their licenses to mess up and your entire process shuts down. If you don't have the source code for 100% of your operation you don't truly own it they own you. Here we don't allow any Microsoft or Apple products on our networks at all even for nonproduction networks it is not a risk that we can take. There are plenty on industrial solutions out there that are open source and reliable and lots of hardware vendors that publish their firmware coding for their hardware.

    1. Re:Get rid of these vendors by PPH · · Score: 1

      The system need to be all open source and audited by multiple separate security companies.

      Yeah, right. Lets see how well that will work.

      Utility software (SCADA, etc) is covered by NDA agreements. It is customized for a particular utilities' system by the vendor and once set up, they don't want you taking that configuration information and entering into a maintenance contract with a third party.

      There is also something to the fact that many of these systems are a real shit-show. And they don't want customers banding together, comparing notes and putting pressure on the vendor to clean up their act.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  41. Re:Long-term narrative by GrimSavant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's a remarkable bit of denial, an excellent exemplar of why I have decreasing faith that this will end well. There is plenty of evidence that the Russians were involved in all sorts of various hacking and active measures and whatnot, but if you simply refuse to believe that evidence, then you can just deny everything and believe whatever you want to believe or whatever you are told to believe. That is one of the end goals of the concerted campaign of propaganda that the Russians been running since the Soviet era: true information no longer matters anymore and the ability to assess facts and adjust beliefs in response to facts is utterly withered.

    To the particular point, the prior indictments against the Russian nationals are far more detailed than standard indictments, they are so called "speaking indictments." The most recent one this month against the GRU hackers detailed the particular methods they used and quite a bit of the timing of the attacks. And it sounds like western intelligence had high end source in the Russian government that Trump was told about prior to the inauguration confirming that the top levels of the Russian government, including Putin, were orchestrating the attacks. But again, if you can simply deny that information out of hand, and call it "fake news", then what point is there in providing any more information? What will be believed short of reality providing a swift kick to the groin?

  42. Re: Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you feel about the inappropriate influence of Israel?

  43. that's how power plants work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " -- to compromise the corporate networks of suppliers, many of whom were smaller companies without big budgets for cybersecurity. Once inside the vendor networks"

    Utilities/Power plants buy their equipment from vendors like General Electric. That is a small company without a big budget? Small companies do not make multi-million dollar generation turbines. If your talking a small vendor like "Jay's plumbing" that comes in once in a while for the odd job, they don't have the same access. Even general electric isn't let in the system without a reason, which is often scheduled and not just a cold call. The credentials/connection is only valid for a certain amount of time.

    1. Re:that's how power plants work ? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Even general electric isn't let in the system without a reason,

      Your old SCADA version is about to expire and will cease to function X weeks after this time. Please provide access to our maintenance representative before this time in order to have an update installed. We will invoice you for the update once it is installed.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:that's how power plants work ? by zlives · · Score: 1

      ummm no

  44. Re: Quick Change Topics! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, if you believe ANYTHING coming from the "Intel Community" either way you're an idiot. They lie. They lie straight faced in front of congress about all sorts of things, spying on Americans to there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This isn't a "Right vs Left" issue, because both sides have been on both sides of hating and defending the "intel community"

    The FBI is not the "Intel Community". They're law enforcement, no less than your local cops. They have about the same record of integrity, too, which is saying, "so-so". But they take the whole, "national security" thing pretty seriously. And that includes all the Trump appointments, and his director of national intelligence and his attorney general. And while you're being Inspector Gadget finally trying to get the dirt on Hillary Clinton, there is a legal noose tightening around Trump's neck. Indictments, convictions, guys in jail.

    And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.

    So, the question you have to ask yourself is if you believe Donald Trump or people appointed by Republicans to be FBI director, attorney general, FISA judges, etc etc. You can either trust people that have actually earned trust or a guy who changes his story about what he actually said on live fucking camera four times between Monday and Thursday.

    Not you, ArchMike. It's too late for you. The question is for other people reading this. You're already too far gone down the 4chan hole looking for pizza and crisis actors. The question is for the grown folks.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  45. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The millineal generation
    Phrase. Literal
    A generation consisting of 1/1000th of a Neal.

  46. 26 Indictments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far 26 Russians have been indicted for their role in hacking the elections by Muellers probe alone.

    Trump won't ask for them to be handed over, and Putin will not hand them over right now. But these are old men and the next regime will throw them under the bus. Or perhaps some deal will be brokered where Putin gains some advantage for himself by handing them over.

    Plus they cannot travel, cannot live their lives outside of Russia. Sooner or later they cross Asia, America, Africa, Europe and they get arrested. Forget the bucket list of life, these people can only live in a small country and never leave its "safety".

    So this new lot might think they'll never get caught, that they will be protected by Putin, but Putin is old, and they are young, and they will be charged and prosecuted in absentia, then imprisoned later in their lives and die in prison.

    Perhaps they should reflect on that.

    1. Re:26 Indictments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Plus they cannot travel, cannot live their lives outside of Russia. Sooner or later they cross Asia, America, Africa, Europe and they get arrested. Forget the bucket list of life, these people can only live in a small country ..."

      At 17,125,200 square kilometers (6,612,100 sq mi),Russia is the largest country in the world by area, covering more than one-eighth of the Earth's inhabited land area,

    2. Re: 26 Indictments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet those foreign beaches are so attractive, Spain, Bulgaria, Maldives, Turkey. All potential traps for the travelling Russian hacker.

      Not only hackers. You saw how Mueller nailed the GRU guys by name. I expect he also has the names and activities of even the lowliest Putinbot. Mueller knows if you've been naughty or nice.

    3. Re:26 Indictments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far 26 Russians have been indicted for their role in hacking the elections by Muellers probe alone.

      Trump won't ask for them to be handed over, and Putin will not hand them over right now.

      Concord showed up in court and wanted to declare themselves not guilty. Muller is refusing discovery saying they don't deserve to see the evidence against them. Sounds like Muller made that up.
      Another company didn't exist at the time of the "crime". Muller made that one up.

      The recent 12, Putin said he would make all of them available for questioning in Moscow. He even said he would extradite them if shown evidence that they looked guilty. Muller declined and handed case over to DOJ.

      So other than you outright lying, sure 26 indictments, no evidence and a refusal to go to trial against one of them that showed up to court to defend themselves.
      Innocent until proven guilty. These are all PR indictments with no actual proof behind them and no intention to try them.

    4. Re: 26 Indictments so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yet those foreign beaches are so attractive, Spain, Bulgaria, Maldives, Turkey. "

      That's why they stole back Crimea, they have beautiful beaches and cheap sparkling wine.

  47. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy classics... A wild Cowboy reference has appeared! (Why can't we go back to talking bout him rather than politicians everyday...? This Is SLASHDOT, not your water cooler at work)

  48. Access procedure ?? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Who gives vendors access that survives a single on-site visit ? I can remember back in the day activating vendor access ID's with a new PWD every time they were onsite, and freezing the same ID's when they left the site. They were not allowed remote access unless an engineer was onsite at the time and that remote access was physically disconnected when the incident ended and the onsite personnel left the site.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  49. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can fuck off too with your ageist bullshit

  50. Re:Moscow Donald colludes with Russia' attack Amer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump will spend the rest of his life having nightmares in prison.

  51. that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First note the weasel words:

    Even so, what CrowdStrike gave the FBI is likely better than if it had seized and analyzed a physical box.

    Then the canards:

    "You have that image from the machine live in the network including its memory content, versus a server that someone physically carries into the FBI headquarters. It's unplugged, so there's no memory content because it's powered down.

    As if the FBI has to have the hardware transported to a lab to analyze it. They have agents with functioning legs who could examine the servers while they are powered on.

    And finally the crux of the issue:

    "To keep it simple, let's say there's only one server. CrowdStrike goes in, makes a complete image including a memory dump of everything that was in the memory of the server at the time, including traffic and connections at the time," Rid said.

    The FBI wouldn't trust CrowdStrike to make such an image. Not one involving multiple servers allegedly hacked by high level foreign intelligence operatives. Not when the FBI has long had access to sophisticated malware, malware that other nation-states could also use, malware that could be missed by civilian tools.

    Not only does this stand out for people who have bullshit detectors after 2002, it should upset partisan Democrats who are true believes in Russiagate. Why, there could have been the old KGB telnet handle from Pootie Poot himself buried in some encrypted memory, if only the FBI had access to the hardware to analyze it....

    1. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The FBI wouldn't trust CrowdStrike to make such an image.

      Of course they would. The FBI uses contractors all the time. Especially for what the president calls "the cyber".

      https://www.reuters.com/articl...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For a plethora of reasons that you apparently don't understand a digital snapshot is *way better than working on the machine.
      (forensics on the machine itself is actually thing #1 you *shouldn't do)
      I'm sure the FBI would rather create their own image if they could have - but I doubt they'd have any problem with trusting Crowdstrike.
      Crowdstrike isn't some fly by night outfit.
      They're respected in the field and have a large pile of clients on both sides of the aisle.
      FireEye and ThreatConnect looked at the data as well.

      Keep flinging BS maybe though - somebody will buy it.

    3. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratzo hovers in threads like this to make sure his viewpoint is all over, and his one or two lackeys follow and upvote him. There isn't much reason to debate someone who makes up his mind so early about things, before any real information is even known.

    4. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      For a plethora of reasons that you apparently don't understand a digital snapshot is *way better than working on the machine.

      There's a plethora of reasons why you shouldn't lecture people about not understanding something when you don't bother to read, as the false dichotomy of "use CrowdStrike image" or "FBI moves servers to their office" was addressed the first time. Of course the FBI would use images of the server for analysis - but images they they created, by using agents with functioning legs to go to the server while it's powered on.

      Crowdstrike isn't some fly by night outfit.

      Yeah.

      The CrowdStrike report, released in December, asserted that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine's war with Russian-backed separatists.

      But the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) told VOA that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. Ukraine's Ministry of Defense also has claimed combat losses and hacking never happened.

      They are.

      The FBI has never examined the DNC's computer servers - an omission that is beyond preposterous. It has instead relied on the reports produced by Crowdstrike, a firm that drips with conflicting interests well beyond the fact that it is in the DNC's employ. Dmitri Alperovitch, its co-founder and chief technology officer, is on the record as vigorously anti-Russian. He is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which suffers the same prejudice. Problems such as this are many.

      So you're relying on a hack firm that is massively biased, both for being rabidly anti-Russian and for being hired by the DNC, which at the same time was one and the same Hillary's campaign. A campaign that knew the Uranium One deal was a liability for her, one that also ensnared John Podesta, Hillary's campaign manager. So it was time for some good old fashioned Swiftboating, and to project Hillary's Russian problems onto her opponent. As further proven by the Hillary campaign paying for the Steele Dossier - colluding with foreign intelligence agents. Something Mueller is equally uninterested in looking at as he is in analyzing the DNC servers.

    5. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI wouldn't trust CrowdStrike to make such an image.

      Of course they would. The FBI uses contractors all the time.

      Except according to Democrats, if the hack of the DNC was tantamount to hacking our election and our democracy, why would Democrats leave the analysis to a small, privately funded organization rather than the publicly funded FBI, which Democrats claim to be the premiere law enforcement institution of our time.

      Neither you or anyone else will ever make sense of that no matter how hard you try. It's little inconveniences like this that make everything Mueller is doing a complete joke.

      If Democrats wanted the American people to take any of this seriously, they could have started by being open, transparent, and cooperative with the FBI, so skeptics, such as myself, couldn't so easily dismiss their flimsy claims. Next . . .

    6. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's little inconveniences like this that make everything Mueller is doing a complete joke.

      Five convictions and counting.

      Manafort trial in a week. Mariia Butina in custody. Trump lawyers trying to negotiate with Mueller so the president doesn't have to answer any questions about obstruction of justice.

      The noose is tightening on this "complete joke", and it's got Trump shook as hell.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI wouldn't trust CrowdStrike to make such an image.

      Of course they would. The FBI uses contractors all the time.

      To use a third-party contractor for the analysis, especially something so important, wasn't the "best practice", according to James Comey.

      I wonder why best practice wasn't followed in such an important case . . .

      Why would the Democrats prevent the FBI from following best practice, and why did Obama's FBI accept this? Those honest with themselves and the facts know the answer.

    8. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Five convictions and counting.

      Actually, 5 pleas and 0 convictions.

      Nice talking point (even if inaccurate), but none are related to collusion or election hacking.

      The noose is tightening on this "complete joke", and it's got Trump shook as hell.

      After 2 years of investigating, you'd think they'd have a whole trove of evidence to present to the American people. Instead they have nothing on Trump or associates related to "collusion" or "election hacking", which is the very purpose of the Mueller investigation.

      Oh, and who can't indict 12 random Russian agents? For the crime-of-the-century that's been made of all this, you have nothing substantive to show for it.

      And, if you did, I think we both know it would be out in the open by now. Instead, all we have are lame justifications about "5 convictions", which isn't fooling anyone who wasn't already fooled. A joke indeed!

    9. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 5 pleas and 0 convictions.

      I apologize. It looks like just 1 conviction, at this point, for lying to the FBI. Of course, as we know, it's easier to plea than go bankrupt and lose anyway. Mueller and the Democrats need their talking points.

      Maybe because they've already done the hard time of 30 days and are out of jail already that I didn't notice that "conviction".

      You let us know when you have something related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about.

    10. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Actually, 5 pleas and 0 convictions.

      A guilty plea is the same as a conviction.

      Look it up for yourself.

      After 2 years of investigating

      The Mueller investigation started in the last week of May, 2017. Are you rounding 14 months up to "2 years"?

      I'm getting the impression that you're just trying to pretend that none of this will touch your crush, President Trump. I think it's best that you continue to make yourself believe that. Also, if one of your remaining teeth should fall out, put it under your pillow and Jared Kushner will put a MAGA hat there for you.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Of course, as we know, it's easier to plea than go bankrupt and lose anyway.

      If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be granted to you. Even if you're a treasonous piece of shit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      You let us know when you have something related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about.

      Memory problems? Or did your attempts to forget Helsinki merely work too well?

    13. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guilty plea is the same as a conviction. Look it up for yourself.

      Wrongo. The defendant makes their plea during the arraignment in the beginning of the trial.

      I've looked it up for you because you're too incompetent to do it yourself:

      A criminal proceeding at which the defendant is officially called before a court of competent jurisdiction, informed of the offense charged in the complaint, information, indictment, or other charging document, and asked to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or as otherwise permitted by law.

      Conviction happens at the end of the trial:

      The outcome of a criminal prosecution which concludes in a judgment that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.

      After 2 years of investigating

      The Mueller investigation started in the last week of May, 2017. Are you rounding 14 months up to "2 years"?

      No, I'm rounding up if anything. The investigation into Russia collusion started as early as late Spring 2016, so it's been going on for over 2 years, and the FBI officially announced the DNC hack investigation 2 years ago today. Again, some simple research goes a long way.

      Also, if one of your remaining teeth should fall out, put it under your pillow and Jared Kushner will put a MAGA hat there for you.

      Awww, neat! I didn't know that. I'll have to try that sometime! Great contribution to the discussion!

    14. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Critical thinking problems? Mueller is a professional liar and propagandist. And as a federal prosecutor, could obtain indictments against Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, as federal grand juries are selected by and under the complete control of said prosecutor.

      The fact that the came out with the latest faux indictments immediately before the summit tells anyone with a couple of functioning neurons that this was done to maintain the Russiagate narrative. Nothing more, nothing less. And note that Putin immediately called Mueller's bluff by offering to hand over the indicted Russian officials if the FBI provides evidence to back up their claims, which everyone knows Mueller isn't going to do.

    15. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You let us know when you have something related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about.

      Memory problems [nytimes.com]? Or did your attempts to forget Helsinki merely work too well?

      Not that I expect people like you to be able to follow the conversation, but my statement was in reference to guilty pleas and convictions.

      Anybody can charge 12 random Russians. You let me know when you have a guilty plea or conviction related to collusion or election hacking or anything even close.

      Again, after 2 years banging on about this garbage you have absolutely nothing . . .

    16. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Five convictions and counting.

      Pleas, not convictions. Pleas that have nothing whatsoever to do with Russian hacking or collusion with Trump. This has been pointed out to you before, so by continuing to use this talking point you're like a 90's dittohead who just. can't. stop. blaming Clinton for Ruby Ridge, right after it's been pointed out to him that happened before the '92 election, when Bush was still president and Clinton was still governor of Arkansas - far away from Idaho.

      A guilty plea is the same as a conviction.

      Laughable. Before a conviction, defense attorney's can challenge jury selection, call their own witnesses, present their own evidence or challenge the prosectuion's, before making their case to a jury - none of which applies to a plea deal. Which the government obtains in most federal cases because if you don't take the plea deal, you are threatened with a draconian sentence. Which is why people who are later found to be completely innocent plead guilty to crimes they didn't commit.

      The Mueller investigation started in the last week of May, 2017. Are you rounding 14 months up to "2 years"?

      FBI witch hunt/psyop didn't start with Mueller.

      If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be granted to you.

      Only after you've gone into bankruptcy, as you could have "afforded" one beforehand. Unless the government seizes your assets under the claim that they were gained as the result of crime - they've done that before, too. And no public defender is going to have the same resources as the DOJ.

      Even if you're a treasonous piece of shit.

      Common man, you can stop hating on Hillary, she lost the election almost two years ago, move on. Because that's what this is - a gigantic case of Swiftboating, to project Hillary's Russia problems onto her campaign opponent, on an infinity greater scale than the original Swiftboaters who projected Bush's cowardice onto John Kerry.

    17. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      You let us know when you have something related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about.

      Memory problems [nytimes.com]? Or did your attempts to forget Helsinki merely work too well?

      Not that I expect people like you to be able to follow the conversation, but my statement was in reference to guilty pleas and convictions.

      Anybody can charge 12 random Russians. You let me know when you have a guilty plea or conviction related to collusion or election hacking or anything even close.

      Moving the goalposts I see... from "something" to "convictions." Too bad. I've let you know of the something.

      Again, after 2 years banging on about this garbage you have absolutely nothing . . .

      And not even moving them consistently. An extremely detailed indictment is hardly "absolutely nothing."

    18. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Mueller is a professional liar and propagandist.

      Former head of the FBI for 12 years, appointed by the Trump DOJ, endorsed by Republicans back when this whole process started.

      I totally believe you...

      The fact that the came out with the latest faux indictments immediately before the summit tells anyone with a couple of functioning neurons that this was done to maintain the Russiagate narrative. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Preach brother! You've disproven the indictment by timing and irrelevant hyperbole alone! All who disagree with you have less than a couple of functioning neurons!

      I totally believe that too...

      And note that Putin immediately called Mueller's bluff by offering to hand over the indicted Russian officials if the FBI provides evidence to back up their claims, which everyone knows Mueller isn't going to do.

      Link please. Because the tale is that Putin offered to allow Mueller to observe interviews conducted by Russian officials in Russia if the Russians could question "U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul and 10 other 'U.S. officials and intelligence agents.'" Trump refused.

      I mean, you've only totally gotten that one wrong... so I totally believe that other stuff.

    19. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moving the goalposts I see... from "something" to "convictions." Too bad. I've let you know of the something.

      The "something" in my statement was in response to another conversation with another poster who tried to claim there were 5 convictions related to collusion/hacking. Of course, that poster was wrong.

      You're failure to follow the conversation, even after being notified of your error, isn't me moving the goalposts -- it's you being so incompetent that you can't follow a simple conversation. The alternative is you are obstructing the argument because you are too incompetent to defend your position.

      Either way, you are incompetent, and I'm done wasting my time with you. Anyone with any intelligence can easily read my statements and determine their veracity.

      An extremely detailed indictment [cloudfront.net] is hardly "absolutely nothing."

      I say again, you let us know when you have evidence related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about. (Hint: an indictment is not evidence, it's an allegation)

    20. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Former head of the FBI for 12 years, appointed by the Trump DOJ, endorsed by Republicans [usatoday.com] back when this whole process started.

      You say that like its supposed to mean something. It means nothing when the FBI has been a ratfucking outfit since its inception, and establishment Republicans (who tended to endorse Hillary if they weren't running themselves) hate Trump. And just as Flint still doesn't have clean water, Mueller still hasn't bothered to examine the DNC server, the alleged hacking of which he's now issuing indictments for. You simply cannot fit that square peg in a round hole.

      Preach brother! You've disproven the indictment by timing and irrelevant hyperbole alone! All who disagree with you have less than a couple of functioning neurons!

      Your attempt to substitute lazy hand waving and sarcasm for an actual response is noted.

      Because the tale is that Putin offered to allow Mueller to observe interviews conducted by Russian officials in Russia

      Yes, interrogate the accused Russians with other Russians present.

      If the Special Counsel really wants to get to the bottom of this, Putin went on, he should team up with Russian law enforcement to catch these hypothetical meddlers.

      Roh roh.

      if the Russians could question "U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul and 10 other 'U.S. officials and intelligence agents

      That's how quid pro quos work - all the while calling out Mueller's bluff and pointing out how hypocritical the US is in "meddling" with other countries. Now, if you want to go on kicking the football for the same people that lied you into the Iraq war, now with even less evidence (and by less I mean zero), go ahead - but try not to drag the rest of the world into nuclear war while you're at it, mmmkay?

    21. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      You say that like its supposed to mean something. It means nothing when the FBI has been a ratfucking outfit since its inception, and establishment Republicans (who tended to endorse Hillary [washingtonpost.com] if they weren't running themselves) hate Trump. And just as Flint still doesn't have clean water, Mueller still hasn't bothered to examine the DNC server, the alleged hacking of which he's now issuing indictments for. You simply cannot fit that square peg in a round hole.

      Because it does, as opposed to the things said by your "can't go a day without lying in really obvious ways" Trumpocracy. Also Mueller has no connection to the DNC server -- dude left the FBI 3 years before that. Try to keep up.

      Your attempt to substitute lazy hand waving and sarcasm for an actual response is noted.

      It met the measure of your attacks against the indictment. No need to waste time fighting your handwaving and sarcasm with a carefully constructed response.

      That's how quid pro quos work - all the while calling out Mueller's bluff and pointing out how hypocritical the US is in "meddling" with other countries.

      You seem to keep forgetting that Trump rejected the quid pro quo. Shouldn't Trump be calling Mueller's bluff? Oh wait, he can't -- Michael McFaul had diplomatic immunity and is no longer a government employee so Trump can't do jack to accept the deal (nevermind his own party crucifying him for even considering it).

      Now, if you want to go on kicking the football for the same people that lied you into the Iraq war, now with even less evidence (and by less I mean zero), go ahead - but try not to drag the rest of the world into nuclear war while you're at it, mmmkay?

      Viewed your link, didn't see any evidence that Mueller lied me into the Iraq war. However, I am seeing evidence of Trump lying us into a 1930s-style trade war. Rah rah, you moron.

    22. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also Mueller has no connection to the DNC server -- dude left the FBI 3 years before that. Try to keep up.

      You got that right. Nobody investigating claims of election hacking seems to want to directly analyze the actual server that was hacked -- either because they're afraid of what they'll find or because the DNC wiped it immediately after their private contractor, Crowdstrike, did their "analysis".

      One important part of Mueller's job, as special prosecutor, is to investigate the DNC hack. The investigatory part of the Mueller probe is taken up by the FBI and his investigators are regular FBI agents. It is absolutely Mueller's job to order the FBI to analyze the server that is the foundation of his special council and his indictment of Russian agents.

      The fact that the FBI did not follow the "best practice", as Comey described it, of analyzing the server themselves is telling. Why did the DNC deny the FBI access, and why did the Obama FBI, and now Mueller, accept the private third-party analysis of something Democrats claim is equivalent to hacking our democracy? It can't be important enough to warrant years of investigations and political upheaval on one hand, but not important enough to allow the premier law enforcement agency of our time to do the analysis. You simply can't have it both ways.

      I'd ask you to keep up, but you aren't even in the race . . .

    23. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      The "something" in my statement was in response to another conversation with another poster who tried to claim there were 5 convictions related to collusion/hacking. Of course, that poster was wrong.

      Hardly. As others have pointed out, guilty pleas result in convictions. Your lack of understanding of how the judicial system operates is your problem, not ours.

      I say again, you let us know when you have evidence related to the collusion or election hacking we hear so much about. (Hint: an indictment is not evidence, it's an allegation)

      That describes the evidence that Mueller has. Which is quite a bit more than "absolutely nothing."
      "Having evidence" and providing you with copies of the original documents are two quite different things.

      Moving the goalposts once more... and still can't be consistent about it.

    24. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      I'd ask you to keep up, but you aren't even in the race . . .

      You're right. I declined to participate in your wild goose chase.

      "'It's bunk through and through,' says [Jake] Williams, who's also an instructor at the SANS Institute and a former operator with the NSA's Tailored Access Operations unit, via Twitter."

    25. Re:that Vice piece is a joke though by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You're right. I declined to participate in your wild goose chase.

      You mean you're going to play the stubborn jackass card when confronted with the massive plot holes in your storyline. As the AC said, you. simply. can. not. at the same time say that the Russian's waged a potent cyberattack on an election yet at the same time say having the FBI examine the target of said cyberattack is of no importance. It simply can't be done.

      Not only does this stand out for people who have remedial bullshit detectors after Iraq, it should upset partisan who are true believers in Russiagate. Why, there could have been the old KGB telnet handle from Pootie Poot himself buried in some encrypted memory, if only the FBI had access to the hardware to analyze it....

      Also Mueller has no connection to the DNC server -- dude left the FBI 3 years before that. Try to keep up.

      And now you're just babbling incoherently. That Comey should have immediately subpoenaed the servers as soon as the DNC made the allegation does not change the fact that Mueller should have immediately subpoenaed them as soon as he was appointed.

      It met the measure of your attacks against the indictment.

      Continued delusions are noted.

      Shouldn't Trump be calling Mueller's bluff? Oh wait, he can't -- Michael McFaul had diplomatic immunity and is no longer a government employee so Trump can't do jack to accept the deal (nevermind his own party crucifying him for even considering it).

      McFaul is a non sequitur. As for calling Mueller's bluff, Trump could have told him to put up or STFU with evidence of collusion or be fired. But given how the media and Democrats started throwing around not just obstruction of justice charges but the "I" word for just discussing Mueller's termination, that would just be playing into their hands.

      Viewed your link, didn't see any evidence that Mueller lied me into the Iraq war.

      Is your partisan blindness fusion powered? Mueller is right there, on video, lying about WMD's. Doesn't get clearer than that.

    26. Re: that Vice piece is a joke though by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Doesnâ(TM)t rebut the article about âoethe server,â canâ(TM)t be bothered to listen to the words Mueller actually used (hint: did not say Iraq had WMDs, and the highlighted supplement only indicated a capability to produce a WMD), constantly changing the topic of discussion to the servers - as if that was the only Russian hacking, and posting walls of text.

      Sorry, youâ(TM)re so wrong that not even Faux News agrees with your analysis of the Puton âoeoffer.â Partisan my ass. Moron.

  52. While you're at it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... adopt formal methods, write good software like your life depends on it.

    And while you're at it: Discard "rapid prototyping" methods, no matter how formal they look.

    Start by putting a stake in the heart of Agile.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  53. Stuxnet by scsirob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda odd to see the outrage over this. A few years ago USA used the exact same tactics to penetrate Iranian nuclear facilities, releasing the Stuxnet virus which damaged a lot of critical infrastructure. Back then there were plenty of people here gloating over this and being proud of the accomplishments.

    My guess is that this is happening all over the world, by all major regimes, in all vulnerable areas. Anger or pride only depends on if your country is the hacker or the victim.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you mind if the Mafia broke into these facilities? That is who runs Russia today. I have no qualms about a democratic country hacking the nuclear bomb factories of either a Mafia state or a state run by religious kooks neither of whom will ever willing cede power to their people in free and fair elections.

    2. Re:Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on which team you're rooting for, of course. People're just cheering their team getting closer to the winner's circle, however perceived.

      It's why nationalism can be dangerous (obligatory: nationalism also has positives).

    3. Re: Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction Stuxnet infiltrated a bunch of networks, not damaged. It was designed to only activate when it saw the particular configuration of equipment in the Iranian facility.

    4. Re:Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ANOTHER user of the word "odd" followed by anti-US blather.

      Listen and get this. There will be a vastly different reaction to some setback in the life of some god awful goat farmer in the far reaches of the world versus an attack on the US. It's just a fact of life and there is nothing odd about it at all.

      You read about a break in that happened in some faraway place ...well that's just terrible...next page. Someone is breaking into your house you call the cops. Different situation, different response. Nothing odd at all. Nothing immoral. Nothing inhuman. Nothing strange or unwarranted or anything that merits a sideways attack on the sensibilities of Americans

  54. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non sequitur.

    You have presented no reason to believe you but plenty of evidence to show you do not know or possibly care about reason. Doesn't help you started with a discussion with your personal faith instead of presenting evidence or reasoning.

  55. Better Russians than Democrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democrats are the number 1 enemy. Anyone who is against them is our friend. Anyone who isn't is our enemy! #MAGA

  56. Nonsense by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    The article itself is incoherent nonsense written by someone who has little or no understanding of network security.

    OTOH, I do believe that Russia and China and other states are more than likely probing USA infrastructure control systems among many other things because the USA has effectively declared a cold war on those states and is developing cyber-weapons to use against them. Russia and China would be foolish not to develop countermeasures.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  57. Entire city lose water supply? by myid · · Score: 1

    Suppose someone broke into a power company, and shut off all power to a city. Would water stop running into everyone's home in the city, because the water company's water pumps stopped working?

    A July 13 CBS news article says

    Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats warned of an impending, potentially devastating cyberattack on U.S. systems, saying the country's digital infrastructure "is literally under attack" and warning that among state actors, Russia is the "worst offender."

    Speaking at a scheduled event at the Hudson Institute, he adopted the language of former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet who, in the months ahead of the 9/11 attacks, warned that the "system was blinking red." Coats, citing daily attacks from Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, said, "Here we are, nearly two decades later, and I'm here to say the warning lights are blinking red again."

    It's a good idea to have an emergency supply of food and water.

  58. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of those agencies (CIA) was recently caught red handed spying on the US Senate. The world is so fucked up it barely made the news.

    https://news.vice.com/article/...

    The reason that didn't make the news was because it wasn't true. It only made the brainwashing websites.

  59. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, if those power plants had been running that HOSTS file management software written by that titan of software development APK, none of this would have happend.

    JUST SAYING.

  60. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get it on your emails though. It destroys them.

  61. Re: Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An alternative you neglected is that Okian Warrior and phantomfive are Russian sockpuppet accounts pretending to be Americans.

  62. Teenagers can do that. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    "Airgapped". ... Bullshit. Either your disconnected or your not. Secure setups are the ones that aren't connected, have no wireless or landline connection and nobody knows about. Anything else can be broken into by teenagers with access to shodan, the secretaries phone number and two or three raspberry pis.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Teenagers can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airgapped computers sometimes need updates as well. More efficient code, better control systems, more accurate readouts. New hardware models being supported by the PLC.

      Even if they're airgapped, sometimes you have to walk the update over to the computer by plugging in a USB stick. And then they have you. Stuxnet did this, infecting the internet-facing computers in order to control the updates to the airgapped machines. This of course meant their infection of the public machines had to go unnoticed, which of course it did.

      Being airgapped is no guarantee of safety. If Stuxnet could do it, the Russians can do it.

  63. Well known fact WSJ = FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carlos Slim, Mexican billionaire owns the WSJ.

  64. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.

    Source please.

    So, the question you have to ask yourself is if you believe Donald Trump or people appointed by Republicans to be FBI director, attorney general, FISA judges, etc etc.

    Considering that throughout my life I've generally hated all American politicians as Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same corrupt coin (though there are a few exceptions), I support the guy that the political establishment hates. To be clear, as the media hires politicians and intelligence agents to be their reporters and political commentators, I consider them to be part of the political establishment and biased in the extreme.

  65. all i see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is 'power companies' some blabla and 'mr Homer'.

  66. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no really good evidence that the Russian government is involved with any of the hacking, except to say "That's something they would do". It's the fallacy of the reversed conditional,

    I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia.

    Or China.

    Why would (e.g.) any NATO member go after the utility company? I'm sure some allies would perhaps try to glean government information on, say, treaty negotiation positions; but they have no desire to go after civilian infrastructure.

  67. Pope Ratzo is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you are too stupid to realize 3 hacks took place and keep attempting to confuse them, doesn't mean the rest of us are that stupid.

    1) Sydney Blumenthall - Hacked by Guccifer 2.0 a Romanian, not a Russian
    2) John Podesta - His password was "password" probably EVERYONE hacked him including Russians.
    3) DNC server - Muller made indictments based on this hack. FBI has not looked at this server, Crowdstrike did and they are unwilling to say Russia hacked it.

    So #3, No the FBI did not examine it EVER. Muller made up indictments on no facts. Putin called him out on it saying he was hand over those people if Muller showed evidence. Muller already declined because he doesn't have any.

    Clinton's server never had emails leaked from it. FBI DID look at her server and said 5 countries hacked it, but have not let out ANY details. The public has not seen anything from this server to date except what the state department released publically.

    Pope Ratzo is attempting to say Clinton's private email server is the same as the DNC server that the Russians were indicted on. He is lying, as usual, or again is too stupid to realize there is a difference. At this point I don't care, Poperatzo is a lying shill and too stupid to post anything even remotely believable anymore. I'm not sure why he even bothers, he just makes himself look dumber each time.

    1. Re:Pope Ratzo is a moron by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      It doesn't change your narrative, but a quick update. The IG report and Congressional testimony has revealed that all except four of the emails on Clinton's server were forwarded to an entity outside of the US. It was reported to Strozk, who ignored it. Then led the investigation down the "no harm, no foul" road.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  68. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting. However, it's not an armed conflict between East & West that is looming, but an unification. This was already foretold by the surprisingly hasty substitution of the One World Trade Center for the Twin Towers.

  69. PopeRatzo is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.

    Said no one ever.

    PopeRatzo is literally making shit up and can't back it up. Is it because he knows he is lying or is he just stupid? I don't think it matters at this point, he has done his best to prove he is a moron. Mission accomplished!

    1. Re:PopeRatzo is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.

      PopeRatzo is literally making shit up and can't back it up. Is it because he knows he is lying or is he just stupid?

      “The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

      "review of the system performed by CrowdStrike, a third-party cybersecurity firm."

      https://www.politifact.com/tru...

  70. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will be believed short of reality providing a swift kick to the groin?

    Even that can be denied if you're motivated enough. See the separation of children at the border and the WTF denials of those facts afterwards.

  71. US/Russia relations by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you so afraid of?

    If you have to ask that question then you know fuck-all about US/Russia relations over the last 80 years.

    What is so terrifying about the US and Russia improving relations and bringing a little more piece to the world?

    What's terrifying is HOW Trump is trying to do it. Peaceful cooperation with Russia is a reasonable goal but not at any cost or by abandoning countries that actually are friendly to the US. Russia is NOT a friend to the US and pretending that the interests of those two countries have somehow magically aligned because Trump is in the White House is absurd.

    1. Re:US/Russia relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask that question then you know fuck-all about US/Russia relations over the last 80 years.

      And you know what was really effective at bringing peace for those 80 years? Vitriolic hatred and distrust fueled by the media and government. Oh wait...

      abandoning countries that actually are friendly to the US.

      If we're out to dinner and I ask you to pay your half of the check, I'm not "abandoning" you. Europe relies heavily on us for defense - freeing up huge amounts of money for them to use internally - without contributing a proportional amount. Trump's merely calling them out on their freeloading. Any threats to leave NATO are an obvious negotiating ploy, but even if we did that wouldn't mean we were "abandoning" Europe. NATO wasn't a thing in 1917 or 1941.

      pretending that the interests of those two countries have somehow magically aligned because Trump is in the White House is absurd.

      Pretending the US has *no* common interests with Russia and that exchanging nuclear middle fingers for another few decades is in any way beneficial for anyone except the defense industry and the CIA is "absurd" and childish, black and white thinking.

    2. Re:US/Russia relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know what was really effective at bringing peace for those 80 years? Vitriolic hatred and distrust fueled by the media and government. Oh wait...

      Let me guess. You weren't alive during the Cold War were you? It was a tad more complicated than some propaganda fueled "hatred". It was a world wide geopolitical power struggle that continues to this day. Failure to understand that is foolish in the extreme.

      Any threats to leave NATO are an obvious negotiating ploy,

      Given how Trump is behaving with regards to Russia it is not at all obvious that it is a negotiating ploy. Trump is behaving like someone who is compromised by and beholden to the Russians rather than the leader of our country. His statements about and actions towards Russia are just frighteningly absurd.

      Pretending the US has *no* common interests with Russia and that exchanging nuclear middle fingers for another few decades is in any way beneficial for anyone except the defense industry and the CIA is "absurd" and childish, black and white thinking.

      Nice attempt to make a juvenile straw man regarding a seriously complex situation. Nobody is pretending the US has no common interests with Russia. But there are a LOT of issues where US interests and Russian interests are seriously far apart and not likely to achieve detente any time soon. Trump certainly is not going to make that happen. And if you think we are threatening each other with nuclear weapons you certainly weren't around during the Cold War. Things are FAR calmer than they were in those days.

    3. Re:US/Russia relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... the interests of those two countries have somehow magically aligned because Trump is in the White House is absurd."

      Absurd? Sure, I agree. But I think that was rather the point of getting an unwitting asset into the presidency. The only surprising thing is the revelation that the asset may not have been unwitting after all.

      1) https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-u-s-intelligence-official-russia-has-turned-trump-into-unwitting-asset-172058187.html

      2) https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-acting-like-russian-asset-experts-say-2018-7

    4. Re:US/Russia relations by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Do you not know, being a friend is a two way street. the USA is friend to no one and as publicly stated the US governments demands that it must dominate the entire globe in every sphere of human activity, starting off with the military industrial complex and nuclear weapons targeted at every single other country on the globe

      From the rest of the planet's viewpoint it's not fuck Russia, it's fuck the war warmongering USA. Yeah, you guys are the enemies of peace on this planet, not Russia and not China, USA number one killers on the planet no one else even close, please fucking abandon us, leave us the fuck alone, start eating yourselves alive. This would be the average viewpoint of the rest of the planet.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:US/Russia relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increasing defense spending by NATO countries is good for Russia? Calling out allies for buying shit from Russia is good for Russia?

      Somehow your comment is Informative? Maybe to bubble enclosed morons.

    6. Re:US/Russia relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS that it is the US. Russia is owned and operated as a mafia run company. The US, at least, has some choice in their leaders.

    7. Re:US/Russia relations by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      NATO wasn't a thing in 1917 or 1941.

      But it has been since 1949, and it held the Soviet Union back since then. That's what Putin wants to change.

      Trump's merely calling them out on their freeloading.

      No, Trump is only grandstanding, playing to his base. You can tell by his recent NATO meetings when he talked about getting everyone to agree to do more. Well, he lied. He didn't. They didn't agree to anything more than what they agreed to during Obama's term, which was to increase defense spending to 2% of their GDP by 2024. That agreement did not change, but Trump was still trying to sell his meeting as some sort of success. Literally nothing changed, and Trump is saying he won something.

      Trump is the APK of international politics.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  72. Americans are STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story simply proves Americans are stupid and easily manipulated.
    Simple facts:
    1) Russians convinced American employees to type their user names / passwords into fake web sites. Moronic American employees were easily fooled, and fell for it.
    2) American utility companies claim their facilities are "air-gapped". Now we have discovered there is "vendor access" so clearly the "air-gap" claim was false. The US Federal Government should be putting company executives in jail for failing basic security. Instead of doing the right thing, the US Feds whine like a 3 year old about the Russians.

    The USA is a nation full of stupid ignorant morons.

  73. Re:Long-term narrative by swb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm always curious why contemporary Russia wants to be so adversarial with the United States. It made sense with the Soviet Union given the ideological nature of the Soviet Union and Communism, but makes much less sense with a basically capitalist economy and the dismantling of the Party ideological machine.

    India and Brazil have more people and comparable GDPs to Russia, yet they don't have the kind of adversarial relationship with the US Russia does. Sure, there are disagreements and diplomatic conflict, but not "plotting-to-destabilize" levels of conflict.

    It's not even like the Russians are operating from a position of parity with the US. A vastly smaller and weaker economy, a much less capable and weaker military force, not to mention an entire laundry list of internal problems.

    From a rational perspective, you would think that the Russians would want to be allies given some level of European-ish cultural overlap, the value of US trade and investment, and the relative benefits of security cooperation, especially given Russia's exposure to the Middle East and various central Asian nations of a dubious nature.

    I know there are some shop-worn explanations about Russia's "need for security", Putin's need for an enemy to justify a strong-man state and so on, but these somehow seem trite or incomplete.

  74. I am APK the LORD of HOSTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am APK the great "LORD of HOSTS", a.k.a. AlecStaar or Alexander Peter Kowalski.

    See subject & APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux h t t p : / / I . a m . a . f u c k i n g / a s s h o l e . r e t a r d . z i p (remove spaces between characters & download).

    I am the godlike creator of various GUI front-ends for other people's configuration files.

    Calling people ne'er-do-wells or Jealous JOWIEs is how I think I win every argument

    When people state the truth about me I get really mad and accuse them of projecting which is something I do all the time.

    Don't call me out on anything unless you are willing to prove you too can write some strings to a file programmatically

    Spamming and being a general pain in the ass is what I do

    Listen as I relive my glory days of being a college athlete in the early 80s

    You must be conspiring with the Jews and Soros if you disagree with me

    Bask in my greatness as I can do a ping as a non root user.

    Watch as I whine about my work being flagged as malware by anti-virus software.

    Witness my descent into madness

    APK

  75. Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I looked into Putin's dead, soulless eyes and saw a kindred golem out to enrich himself and destroy the world." - Donald Trump

  76. Serious question by jwymanm · · Score: 0

    I assume most major countries against USA try to hack us. How come we just hear about Russia in the news?

    1. Re:Serious question by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Because that's the current enemy du jour. Make no mistake, I don't want to see the Russians hacking into our systems and they should be secure. But the US has de-industrialized and given to China a huge amount of IP as well as physical assets so we didn't have to be bothered doing work for ourselves, including the manufacturing of most of our drugs. How can this end well? We have met the enemy, and he is us.

    2. Re:Serious question by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

      Because Russia and China are the two largest and most dangerous? BTW, you would have heard about China if you had been paying attention.

  77. Re: Quick Change Topics! by swillden · · Score: 1

    And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.

    I can't find any evidence of the Trump Justice Department saying that.

    What we do know is that back in 2016 the DNC hired the respected cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike to determine if their mail servers had been hacked, and how, and by whom -- and to make sure the attackers were booted out. CrowdStrike made forensic images of the servers for analysis and provided copies to the FBI. James Comey said during his January 2017 testimony before Congress that "We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this my folks tell me was an appropriate substitute."

    There is one problem with the CrowdStrike-provided images, which is that although no one questions CrowdStrike's competence or integrity, they did not maintain proper legal chain of custody documentation. This means that information obtained from the images would be easily challenged in any criminal or civil court proceeding.

    In any case, I'm sure the FBI still has copies of the CrowdStrike-created server images. I'm not sure why they'd want to keep three of them, in particular, though it would obviously make sense to have more than one and to store the copies in different locations to protect against loss.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  78. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, if you believe ANYTHING coming from the "Intel Community" either way you're an idiot. They lie. They lie straight faced in front of...

    So you're going to listen to fucking Trump? I'd trust ANYONE over Trump.

  79. Re:Long-term narrative by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'm always curious why contemporary Russia wants to be so adversarial with the United States.

    That's not the goal, that's the means. The goal is to reduce the power of American hegemony.

    India and Brazil have more people and comparable GDPs to Russia, yet they don't have the kind of adversarial relationship with the US Russia does. Sure, there are disagreements and diplomatic conflict, but not "plotting-to-destabilize" levels of conflict.

    As long as there are no repercussions, why wouldn't they?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  80. NO COLLUSION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NO COLLUSION! NO COLLUSION!

    The fact that half the people from his election team have been charged with crimes involving Russia is not relavant!

  81. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    There is plenty of evidence that the Russians were involved in all sorts of various hacking and active measures and whatnot

    Sure, and what were the effects of all that hacking and meddling? 50k USD spent on Facebook advertisements (compared to ~1.3 billion spent by Trump and Hillary),and to quote Mueller's boss Rosenstein, there was not a single hacked voting machine, nor any evidence of collusion.

    To the particular point, the prior indictments against the Russian nationals are far more detailed than standard indictments, they are so called "speaking indictments." The most recent one this month against the GRU hackers detailed the particular methods they used and quite a bit of the timing of the attacks.

    The best part about all these indictments is that if the people in question never show up for trial, the Mueller investigation never has to present any evidence, so it's feasible to suggest that it's so flimsy as to be laughed out of court. Indictments /= convictions.

    Funnily enough, lawyers representing some of the companies named in the previous round of indictments showed up in court to start discovery (where the prosecution presents its evidence so that a defense can be mounted), and Mueller wasn't ready to go to trial and present what evidence he had, if indeed he has any, and he asked for an extension. That should make it pretty clear that all he wants is headlines to look like he's doing something. My suspicion is that he was attempting to derail Trump's meeting with Putin as the last rounds of indictments were announced on the Friday afternoon before Trump's Monday morning summit with Putin.

    https://www.politico.com/story...

    if you can simply deny that information out of hand, and call it "fake news", then what point is there in providing any more information? What will be believed short of reality providing a swift kick to the groin?

    Fake news is the wrong term to use as it's not even news to begin with. Everyone with more than two brain cells knows that every major country is constantly trying to hack everyone else, but as the "news" you're presenting is completely irrelevant to the point you're trying to make, I can understand Okian Warrior's (mis)use of the term.

  82. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    I figured even you would have the self-respect not to link to Vice...

    Figured wrong, I clearly did. ;)

  83. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should have known you were the AC douchebag traitor that posted that.
    How is your Russian?

  84. WHAT A BUNCH OF BULLSHIT & how/why... ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I too can appear to be "from Russia" in SECONDS via bouncing thru proxies OR hosting a site there to appear so) - ATTRIBUTION is difficult BECAUSE of those possibles!

    * You have to be REALLY STUPID to NOT see WHO (what group/sect) is REALLY behind this - "globalists" (really MOSTLY composed of JEWS which even Dr. Steve Pieczenik A JEW HIMSELF has ADMITTED on FILM, who own media/hollywood/banking/gov't they INFILTRATED (as all other areas also via thievery gangup or BLACKMAIL they call 'good business' resulting in them being BANISHED OUT of so many nations in the past 2,000++ yrs. it's not funny (not just germany))

    They are REALLY desperate we don't make good w/ Russia (Nathan Rothchild SPECIFICALLY vowed to destroy czarist & future RUSSIAs because the Czar RESISTED THEM as Putin also does (Jews HATE Christianity & they MORESO hate anything that's in their way ala CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICS like the USA))!

    They're "teaming up" w/ CHINA (a "NO GOD" communist state) & KNOW the US ALONE can takeout China (navally ESPECIALLY which is WHY China went after pacific submarine info hacking it from the gov't. very RECENTLY or bribing dirtbags)!

    APK

    P.S.=> HOWEVER - NO QUESTIONS ASKED: The USA + RUSSIA TOGETHER would DEFINITELY ANNIHILATE China (the Jews lackey, or so THEY think (don't understimate the Chinese - they're not STUPID like JEWS think of ALL "Goyim" non-jews)... apk

  85. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    The FBI is not the "Intel Community"

    Word games from "Mr. Establishment" himself... color me surprised at your 'semantic creativity.'

  86. All FAKE news comes from FAKE JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg stole the Winklevoss twins' code for Fakebook (figures as he is a thieving low jew too).

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer Â- so I wasnÂ't lying Â- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveÂ" Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread, infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... profiting by it (and that 3,000 jews employed there did not show up for work that day knowing about it beforehand).

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS are going to destroy the U.S. Dollar and dumping it for other world currencies and gold to destroy the United States.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis.

    Zucker now FIRED @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    Bernie Madoff (who made off with everyone's money, especially construction union pensions) shows the thieving nature of the JUDEN!

    Eric Schmidt had to step down @ JEWgle (a jew).

    Adam Schiff (gosh s

  87. PopeRatzo as AC is a moron too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From your fucking link, perhaps read it first,

    When Comey was asked if FBI got access to DNC server "He said they did not, but obtained access from a review of the system performed by CrowdStrike, a third-party cybersecurity firm."

    Right there, black and white. They DID NOT get access to server. They got a review from Crowdstrike, which now claims Russia did not hack the DNC server.
    Funny politifact rates Trump's claim as false and gives backup showing it true. Can you point to a SINGLE person with proof Russia hacked the DNC server. Unfortunately you are limited to Crowdstrike personnel and they say it didn't happen.

    PopeRatz is posting as AC because he is afraid to ruin his reputation even worse posting shit that contradicts what he says hoping no one reads it. We now know he lies on purpose.

  88. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia hacking the election is deliberate confusion between Russia meddling in the election through psy-ops via social media and Russia hacking into a few states' voter registrations. It's a misinformation campaign because Russia did not hack the election nor change a vote. The problem I have with this is that it is a well substantiated argument that Russia did these things. And two years in, we are still fighting over whether those are facts instead of discussing how to protect the integrity of our elections. The GOP is all too happy to demand voter ID laws to fight voter fraud that has no evidence of existing on a wide scale, why drag our feet on this particular issue?

    Mueller is on to something because he has more than a dozen indictments and 3 guilty pleas. The guilty pleas are for lesser crimes meaning he is after something larger.

    I don't see the pressing of the Russia narrative as promoting conflict with Russia. Nobody gains by war with Russia. Nobody gains from conflict with Russia (they have a lot of non-Middle Eastern oil!) Everyone gains from playing nice with Russia... except the folks that don't, such as Ukraine, Georgia (the country), and all of Russia's neighbors looking nervously over the boarder. But what does Russia have to gain from meddling in our election? You're witnessing it. We're hopelessly divided because people won't listen to basic facts. We can't coordinate a response. We're weaker politically, Russia stronger politically. The more destabilized we get, the better it is for Russia. The dream scenario is the whole thing devolves into a civil war and Russia has a free hand to expand it's boundaries, grow its influence, install puppet regimes, rebuild the USSR only better, and eventually overtake the USA as the world's super power.

    Elections are the weak spot. People are malleable, they don't question anything they agree with.

  89. Impersonating me? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell us of your MILLION$ (of lies) "phantasies" https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & you admit IMPERSONATING ME https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous too... pitiful!

    WHO'S "DESCENDING INTO MADNESS"? Not I - you clearly are!

    * Accept fact: You CAN'T STOP ME &/or "downmodbomb" me via your SOCKPUPPET alternate /. accounts you FARM downmodpoints with - I just systematically methodically RUN YOU DRY of those, lol - every SINGLE time & out of "FrUsTrAtiOn" you begin your f'd up rants when I run you out of those downmodpoints.

    APK

    P.S.=> You impersonating me proves you wish you were me & imitation is the sincerest form of flattery - but you = poor imitation. Your STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous proves you FEAR me also... apk

  90. I am APK the LORD of HOSTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am APK the great "LORD of HOSTS", a.k.a. AlecStaar or Alexander Peter Kowalski.

    See subject & APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux h t t p : / / I . a m . a . f u c k i n g / a s s h o l e . r e t a r d . z i p (remove spaces between characters & download).

    I am the godlike creator of various GUI front-ends for other people's configuration files.

    Calling people ne'er-do-wells or Jealous JOWIEs is how I think I win every argument

    When people state the truth about me I get really mad and accuse them of projecting which is something I do all the time.

    Don't call me out on anything unless you are willing to prove you too can write some strings to a file programmatically

    You must be conspiring with the Jews and Soros if you disagree with me

    Spamming and being a general pain in the ass is what I do

    Listen as I relive my glory days of being a college athlete in the early 80s

    See me lash out at one person for 2 weeks straight and claim everyone who mocks my retarded ass is actually them

    Bask in my greatness as I can do a ping as a non root user.

    I demand your age sex and location so that I can threaten to show up and kick your ass and will call you a pussycake but am actually too scared to actually do anything but be a keyboard warrior.

    Watch as I claim I am world class and a winner but in reality I am a fucking loser.

    Witness my descent into madness

    APK

  91. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you don't appear to understand is that Russia longs for prominence on the world stage. Putin has an ego and it is not satisfied by merely being dictator-in-effect of Russia, nor even adequately assuaged by annexing neighboring countries.

    The US, on the other hand, has held the center of the world stage for certain since World War II. Our dominance has slowly receded, until this presidency where we are actively trying to get off the stage.

    There are three world powers: the US, Russia and China.

    China seems to be more interested in domestic affairs, though their activities to further it can have international impact, such as the espionage aimed at the US and Europe.

    The US has flaunted our power on more than one occasion. We coerced allies -- twice -- into invading Iraq. And Afghanistan. And Bosnia. And places in Africa. We also invaded Panama. And Grenada. We worked to overthrow regimes in South America.

    During the Cold War, the Soviet Union was also active on the world stage. Long years in Afghanistan fighting against US backed resistance. They participated in the Iran/Iraq proxy war. But following the Cold War they went into a serious slump. They lost prestige and they want it back. And, for Putin, this ego stroking is a personal thing. But unlike Trump he is intelligent, clever and calculating. Which is why he plays Trump so well.

    Of course, he is far from unique. Trump talked big, bold talk leading up to his first visit to China. They had him eating of their hand and all the bravado was forgotten. Of course, he gets back to the US and those manipulating him here for their own ends did their best to redirect him on reversals that concerned them.

    And that is the biggest issue with managing Trump. When you have one-on-one time with him it is easy-peasy to get him to agree to pretty much anything. Getting him to actually stick with an agreement when he's gone and has another whisperer speaking into his ear... that's different. And that seems to be where Putin differs: he has Trump singing pro-Russian songs no matter where Trump is or who he talked to last.

    Which itself is a strong evidence for Putin having something material on Trump.

  92. Seconded! by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Stuxnet was brought into an air-gapped Iranian facility just like this article describes. It was brought in via a Siemens PLC or controller (not sure which) that ran Siemens Step 7 OS on it.

    The industrial controls world (like Siemens operates in) is a target rich environment to say the least. This is not an industry that is used to worrying about security and hackers. Nobody should be surprised by this.

  93. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    No. You obviously can't comprehend the statement you quoted. I clearly indicated that I don't trust them, and/but I made no reference to Trump's truthiness. That kind of cognitive dissonance is why people like you come off as idiots when it is pointed out. You should try thinking in non-binary.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  94. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Da, My Russian is a bit rusty. Though I got my Russian Troll money! Go Putin! Yay! You should sign up, it pays really well!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  95. Impersonating me AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell us of your MILLION$ (of lies) "phantasies" https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & you admit IMPERSONATING ME https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous too... pitiful!

    WHO'S "DESCENDING INTO MADNESS"? Not I - you clearly are!

    * Accept fact: You CAN'T STOP ME &/or "downmodbomb" me via your SOCKPUPPET alternate /. accounts you FARM downmodpoints with - I just systematically methodically RUN YOU DRY of those, lol - every SINGLE time & out of "FrUsTrAtiOn" you begin your f'd up rants when I run you out of those downmodpoints!

    APK

    P.S.=> You impersonating me proves you wish you were me & imitation is the sincerest form of flattery - but you = poor imitation. Your STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous proves you FEAR me also... apk

    1. Re:Impersonating me AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are so worried about this "stalking" then why don't you go start reporting every incident of this supposed stalking to your local police and show them the complete chain. Everyone here would welcome it as they would eventually lock you up and then you might actually get the treatment you so desperately need.

  96. Re: Quick Change Topics! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    There is one problem with the CrowdStrike-provided images, which is that although no one questions CrowdStrike's competence or integrity, they did not maintain proper legal chain of custody documentation. This means that information obtained from the images would be easily challenged in any criminal or civil court proceeding.

    Signed, forensic images of computer system have been accepted as legal evidence for over a decade.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  97. How So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump sent weapons to Ukraine, is busy attacking Russian proxies in Syria and Iran, straight up killed Russian mercs in Syria, has maintained and increased sanctions. Where in any of that actual concrete shit helps Putin.

    You're all like 'OMG, Trump called Putin to say congrats on his election victory, must be the kompromat'. Ridiculous.

  98. Re: Quick Change Topics! by swillden · · Score: 1

    There is one problem with the CrowdStrike-provided images, which is that although no one questions CrowdStrike's competence or integrity, they did not maintain proper legal chain of custody documentation. This means that information obtained from the images would be easily challenged in any criminal or civil court proceeding.

    Signed, forensic images of computer system have been accepted as legal evidence for over a decade.

    Sure, if chain of custody was maintained and documented.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  99. Re:Long-term narrative by butchersong · · Score: 1

    Russia does not wish to be owned by the same forces that traditionally steer the US, EU and most of the rest of the "in the club" world. Mostly the impetus is self preservation on from Putin and his inner circle mixed with a general sense of nationalist pride. This means that their actions tend to undermine the order that those forces seek to establish. Think of their wish to move a pipeline through Syria and all the crap fallout that has happened over the last few years in that country.

  100. Richard A. Clarke by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Richard A. Clarke was warning people about this issue since 2002. This is nothing new. Utilities were always a major security risk since security was not considered important.

  101. Nation states don't have friends by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Do you not know, being a friend is a two way street. the USA is friend to no one

    No nation state really has friends. Friend is a term of convenience and nation states in reality do not have friends. The US and Canada are about as close to "friends" as any two countries can get but I assure you that is only because of interests that happen to align. The US and western Europe are "friends" and if you don't understand why then you need to go study your history before posting any more drivel.

    as publicly stated the US governments demands that it must dominate the entire globe in every sphere of human activity, starting off with the military industrial complex and nuclear weapons targeted at every single other country on the globe

    Citation needed.

    From the rest of the planet's viewpoint it's not fuck Russia, it's fuck the war warmongering USA.

    Warmongering US? As opposed to Russia which just invaded Crimea and is actively supporting a dictator in the Syrian Civil war? The same Russia that sells 20% of the world military hardware? Yeah spare me the notion that the US is worse that Russia on the warmongering.

  102. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  103. Proposed Edit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: source may be complete BS;

  104. Re: Quick Change Topics! by swillden · · Score: 1

    Sure, if chain of custody was maintained and documented.

    The chain of custody on the forensic images has not been questioned.

    Well, maybe by Hannity or Alex Jones or someone. Not by anyone who doesn't froth.

    Unfortunately I don't recall where I read about the chain of custody issues. I don't read (or watch/listen to) Hannity or Alex Jones or anyone like that, though. Most of my news comes from the NYT and The Economist. If i can find a reference, I'll post it.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  105. Every electric provider=like any other business by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    It is all the same, the manager starves the puppies and wonders why bad things happen. All businesses are so focused on costs that they ignore the quality products that are clearly better. It is called the drive to the bottom...

    --
    Your Average Joe
  106. National security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canâ(TM)t the DHS clamp down on the ridiculous national security shortfalls of the utility companies? Surely they can force them to fix this amateur hour stuff?

  107. PopeRatzo continues moronic posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chain of custody on the forensic images has not been questioned.

    Crowdstrike, paid by Hillary, are the ones who gave the FBI the information. Hillary is the one claiming Russians!
    So if Trump is accused of something, he has Ivonka's company research the servers before handing over an analysis to the FBI, that is fine?

    PopeRatzo is attempting to reach king moron of /.. He is currently tied with Creimer. I'm not sure how I could post something dumber than he currently is.

  108. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is a glowing example of misinfo.

    Trump did not lie about the server. The goveenment has not examined the server. THE ARTICLE ADMITS THIS, first saying that they provided "a copy", and then saying that is the best way to do it. No, the FBI having the original, instead of crowdstrike, would make sense. The FBI is certainly capable of inaging the server AND maintaining chain of custody.

    https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/5/dnc-email-server-most-wanted-evidence-for-russia-i/

    http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/312767-fbi-never-examined-hacked-dnc-servers-report

    Imwan Aran's plea deal being cited as his factual innocence is also nonsense. I have a hard time determining if the laptop he left as he fled the country (he failed) or the server he had access to were really investigated, but even if they were, it is reasonable to suspect that an IT expert who had everyone over a barrel might, in fact, have a lot more going on. Especially with a sweetheart plea deal.

  109. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI the Iraq WMD lies came from the office of special plans. A specially created neocon run outfit that did nothing but cook up phony Intel for the administration. Still, don't trust the joker's like Brennan.

  110. newer != better by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    I worked in the power industry about 15 years ago, and there was always resistance to anything newfangled. There was one exception. The ability of the HMI (we called them MMI back then) to communicate with the outside world was seen as a godsend. You could remotely tap the datalogs and see trends in things like air intake differential pressure, oil temperatures, mag sensors. All of these things would provide us with valuable information, and it was even better if you could correlate it across multiple sites. Back then it was all read only though.

    I don't know when they started letting things get changed remotely. I'm not surprised at all. It was always a PITA to have to send a field tech out to a site to do a system update. So I guess it was only matter of time before the ability to write changes became a desirable feature. But even on an air-gapped system, if you have somebody there to make updates without proper vetting, you're still hosed. Just MITM between the mother-ship sending the update and the onsite guy with permissions to change things. It's not a real-time attack, but it could still be devastating.

  111. Fix this shit NOW, DAMNIT! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why is this so difficult!?

  112. Re: Quick Change Topics! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Personally, if you believe ANYTHING coming from the "Intel Community" either way you're an idiot. They lie. They lie straight faced in front of congress about all sorts of things, spying on Americans to there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This isn't a "Right vs Left" issue, because both sides have been on both sides of hating and defending the "intel community"

    You're right, that's less of a "right vs left" issue and more of an "America vs Russia" issue. That's one of their goals - to get Americans to distrust each other and our own institutions. People need to remember who the real enemy is, it is not other Americans. The intelligence community in the US is full of people who genuinely love the country and want to see it do well, and they don't deserve these buckets of scorn. They aren't perfect, and sometimes they do something that I don't agree with, but to suggest that the entire community cannot be trusted is playing directly into Putin's hand. Watch out, in your quest to be Ultimate Patriot #1 you might realize that you're just another apparatchik.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  113. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laughable nonsense.

  114. Re: Quick Change Topics! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Word games from "Mr. Establishment" himself... color me surprised at your 'semantic creativity.'

    The FBI has an intelligence branch, but the FBI itself is law enforcement, not intelligence.

    Here, in chronological order:

    Office of Naval Intelligence, USN, DOD
    Coast Guard Intelligence, USCG, Homeland Security
    Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Dept. State
    Central Intelligence Agency, independent
    25th Air Force, USAF, DOD
    National Security Agency, DOD
    Defense Intelligence Agency, DOD
    National Reconnaissance Office, DOD
    Intelligence and Security Command, US Army, DOD
    Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, DOE
    Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, USMC, DOD
    National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, DOD
    Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Treasury
    Intelligence Branch, FBI, DOJ
    Office of National Security Intelligence, DEA, DOJ
    Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Homeland Security

    The head of the intelligence community is Dan Coats, DNI.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  115. Re: Quick Change Topics! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Do they require you to move to Arkhangelsk or is that optional?

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  116. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    'Cause you apparently have lots of money to burn!

    “You delete 33,000 e-mails. And then you acid wash them, or bleach them, as you would say—a very expensive process,” Trump continued, again just before reiterating his call for that prosecutor.

  117. "easily researched facts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easily researched facts

    Listening to Hannity or Alex Jones doesn't qualify as "research" in the real world

  118. of course they would NOT by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    See the part on sophisticated malware and high level foreign intelligence operatives you passed by. And not when CrowdStrike has a record of half-assing their reports. Apologists keep going on and on about memory dumps when an exploit could live in another location than system memory, like encrypted swap space, firmware, backup server, firewall....

    The FBI uses contractors all the time.

    Not for something this important, they don't. This would be like ISIS kidnapping Malia Obama in the Mall of America and the FBI just "deciding" to leave the search and rescue operation to Paul Blart. It just wouldn't happen in a serious investigation.

    But Mueller's probe was never about being a serious investigation. It's a psyop, just like the one he helped run against Iraq fifteen years ago - but this time without any evidence.

    1. Re:of course they would NOT by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I think I'd pay to see that movie. "Paul Blart, Hostage Negotiator!"

  119. Not so odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democrats were bending over for the Russians for decades when they [Russia] were communist pigs. Russia today is very far from optimal or free, but they once again tolerate religion and have elections that while extremely corrupt and rigged still actually allow other parties on the ballot. Russia no longer pretends that everybody equally owns everything (the permanent Marxist big lie) and now people own private property - but sadly they have the oligarchs and corruptocrats.

    Now that Russia is no longer officially a communist dictatorship, the Dems hate them and have moved their love to the Communist dictator-for-life who runs China.

    It's simple really: The Dems are like addicts. They love their fellow addicts and want everybody to join them in addiction, but get repulsed by and do not want to be around people who have successfully kicked the habit. Drunks do not like to hang out with former drunks who have cleaned up their act. Drug users do not want to hang out with former users who are now clean. Put another way: leftism is a cult, and Russia is a country that has escaped from the cult of Karl Marx therefore the people still in the cult ("progressive" Democrats) want nothing to do with them - they [the Russians] are now considered heretics.

  120. USA incapable of preventing Russian intrusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the translation into reality

  121. Only morons hook critical stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to a computer network.

    Oh, and the "trusted vendor" bovine excrement excuse is the sort of thing they must tattoo onto the private parts of people as part of giving them MBA degrees. It's a hyper-stupid concept right up there with "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM".

    The idea is that the insanely irresponsible and overpayed clown who, out of laziness, hooks important stuff to the net can point at somebody else when everything comes crashing down: "it wasn't ME! I did the responsible thing! The failure was at my trusted vendor who I TRUSTED because he was a trusted vendor who told me I could trust him and all his employees and suppliers, and their employees and suppliers, and their employees and suppliers, and their employees and suppliers, and their employees and suppliers..."

  122. Re: Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okian Warrior, get off the sauce! None of the US uranium went to Russia. We bought millions of pounds from them.

  123. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    I already live here. Its awesome!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  124. You constantly stalk or impersonate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You constantly stalk or impersonate me & SAY THAT BULLSHIT? LOL, please - you're a whackjob, no questions asked!

    * Seek professional psychiatric help freak (you need it)...

    APK

    P.S.=> ... & GROW UP! Oh, by the way, a QUESTION: HOW DID EATING YOUR WORDS TASTE (lol) https://linux.slashdot.org/com... ? ... apk

  125. TWO SCHOOPS!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you won't admit that DOnny Two Scoops did Russian Collusion AND IS PUTIN's LITTLE BITCH BOY!?!?!

  126. A trump supporter explains why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like and continue to like President Trump:

    1) I like that the the President can make the press and liberals go ballistic. Highly entertaining to watch.
    2) I like that establishment types absolutely hate him.
    3) I like that every effort to take him down is failing. The old liberal playbook doesn't work on this guy.
    4) I like that nobody saw any of this coming. The smartest guys in the room don't seem so smart anymore.

    A word on the 'scariness' factor. I'm not scared in the least. If the republic can't survive a Trump Presidency, it isn't very strong. I just don't see him as this big threat. He's mostly doing stuff I heartily approve of. Sure, he says some crazy stuff now and then. I'm of the opinion that this is just Trumps way of tweaking his political opponents. Seems to me that he's figured this out way more than people give him credit for.

    Also, can we just stop with the Russia, Russia, Russia? It's getting pretty tired and old.

    1. Re:A trump supporter explains why... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Run along, Ivan. No need for your trolling here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  127. Liars Gotta Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liars Gotta Lie!

    "...the Dems today were all giving Russia big wet sloppy kisses while Putin was still KGB..."

    Sure. And so was your Mom.

    But let's suppose, just for a moment, that you were telling the truth (just for fun). Would that change, diminish, excuse, or in any way make acceptable what just happened in Helsinki? No. No it would not.

    Your argument is as empty as your head.

  128. Air gapped by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I guess âoeair gappedâ now means âoewe disabled ssh password logins and require a keyâ?

  129. fucking idiots gonna fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ARE idiots and you demostrated it clearly in that post. YOU guys got the orangutard elected, not us. It does not logically follow that because YOU elected a moron, that it is US who are the idiots. You can't even say that because we pissed you off, you elected a dumbass to spite us. That STILL doesn't mean we are idiots nor is it our turn to be idiots. At most that could mean we're assholes, but an asshole isn't necessarily an idiot. As for the rest of your drivel, you have demonstrated on too many occasions that you were and still are idiots who believe any conspiracy fox news throws at you especially if it meant you can hate on Obama He isn't president and yet you STILL gotta name drop. trump won. GET OVER IT. You got exactly the shitty bed you asked for and now you get to lay in it. This fucked up situation we're in is completely your man's fault and you damned well know it. You don't care but you fucking know. Cutting your own damned nose off to spite someone else's face, not even your own- you're past that phase, is a defining characteristic of an idiot, ya fucking idiot.

  130. Re: Quick Change Topics! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Sure, if chain of custody was maintained and documented.

    Like with any expert witness, you're going on testimony of the forensic cybersecurity guy.

    "Chain of custody" is for physical evidence when in the custody of the police. Expert witness testimony doesn't require a "chain of custody". It just requires someone who has expertise. Trump & The Russians (a new boy band!) can put their own expert witnesses on the stand. I hear Trump is looking for a 400 lb kid in his parents basement right now.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  131. Good for the goose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't everything be the russian's fault? Your team keeps telling us everything is Obama's fault. Or Hillary's. Or the Dems. Or anyone else that isn't "my side".

    Fuck you guys.

  132. Found the Ivan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guess you're the Ivan in this post. You obviously don't know what site you're on and how long those 2 have been here. They may be assholes, P5 is just nice about it, but they've been spewing derp on here for years. That is one hell of a long game. Too long. So IF they were russian sockpuppets, that had to come about very recently. You'd probably know something about that, Ivan. But they're not. They still say the same shit, in the same manner they always have, and as usual they're both wrong.

  133. No you ain't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you ain't. You're an old bastard like me. Gen X at the youngest. Wanna know how I know? If it were a millenial then the quote would have been:

    "I know I'm right, because I'm a millenial, and have a wifi scanner app on my phone."

    You'd know that if you actually interacted with any millenials. Instead you just hear other old farts shit on them on faux news and go with it.

  134. A wire = NOT AIR GAPPED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you ACTUALLY stop typing? You bitched about air gapped systems and then came up with a "solution" that immediately connected it to a network. It does not matter if it is one way comms via a data diode. Air gapped means air gapped. NO outside connections. Technically that includes your power. If you have telemetry that must go outside that network, you have a real, breathing person read the source data, turn around, and type it into the internet computer or carry it on an HDD, or whatever method works best for you. Any other method does not constitute an air gap. We don't even allow you to use the HDD or flash drive method. We have a person who makes the TPS reports and passes them out to those who need the info. The reason few places do this is because it requires that you hire 2 or 3 dedicated persons. CEOs hate that shit. Remember, IT is a waste of money until everything stops working in thier eyes. For the power people it additionally keeps them from micromanaging power to maximize their bonus. They want by the second use demand to pinch those pennies, I mean be efficient. We've made power without precise metering for over 100 years. The power folks can fuck off. Securing your shit is possible if you stop buying the board a new yacht every quarter.

    1. Re:A wire = NOT AIR GAPPED by sjames · · Score: 1

      You got stuffed into your locker a lot in high school, didn't you?

  135. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow you cite a bunch of numbers then use the phrase "One of those agencies" where you mentioned ZERO agencies prior. As if you wished to somehow argue that some agency had anything to do with those statistics but couldn't even bring yourself to actually form the words of actual accusation much less even argue the point.

    Pathetic.

    But enough to trigger an alt-response no doubt.

  136. Re: Yeah right... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    The documented proof came from the CIA. I know Vice is biased but everyone is. The best journalists to grace this country always leaned left and did not hide it. They were fair in that they did not skip the transgressions of the party that claimed to be aligned with thier views. They were real leftists who saw how corporatism was on the rise and the effect it had and has on the world. Disclaimer: I lean right because I HATE being told how to live and I hate social propaganda spread by communists and radicals who penetrated and destroyed the democratic party and subsequently paved a smooth road for a dictator.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  137. Re: Yeah right... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    What? The CIA got caught red handed padding fake evidence for WMD to help lead us to the Iraq war. As I pointed out, they keep committing crimes against humanity...the most recent of which warranted military tribunals and public executions.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  138. Re:WHAT A BUNCH OF BULLSHIT & how/why... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't think of any other way to determine origin, therefore there is no other way. Typical NPD.

    Have a look at the original security alert. It's pretty high level, but it looks at the indicators they used to identify the source of the attacks. It's not just geolocation via IP.

    Oh, and your 'Jewish' conspiracy is ridiculous. This sort of behaviour is typical of people who have no real success to justify their sense of self worth, so they have to rely on 'race'. Loser's need to be racist because they have nothing else to be proud of.

    Pick three points from your list and I'll disprove them, but I'm not going to wade through your 'gish gallop' of bullshit.

    APK. Ignorant. Can't admit it, therefore is never going to learn. Typical NPD. Racist. Typical loser.

  139. Maybe warn all of them next time? by sabbede · · Score: 1
    WTF is this: "DHS has been warning utility executives with security clearances about the Russian group's threat to critical infrastructure since 2014."

    I don't know how many utility executives have security clearance, or why they would have it given that they don't work for the government, but clearly not all do and thus went for FOUR DAMN YEARS WITHOUT BEING WARNED!

    Does that seem wise to anyone? No? I'm not surprised.

  140. Aw, poor little Juden shekelboy, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Don't worry - the "Golden Calf" of your shekels dries up! I give folks what they want vs. your machinations, lol & THUS I always will win... & you KNOW it.

    * Heck - you're PROVING IT via your EASILY NULLIFIED "Bitch Tactics 'efforts'" which I easily prove are you in seconds by posting your PUNY threats... lmao!

    (You really ARE too STUPID to live... time to FIRE UP THE OVENS again & Zyklon B showers).

    Ever see Dr, Strange? Keep it up, that's EXACTLY what I want "JudenMammu" - you're MY prisoner.

    LASTLY Don't speak for "Everyone" JUDE - you're the HATED minority ALL THRU HISTORY only fooling YOURSELVES, lol - self deluded morons & thieves.

    APK

    P.S.=> Dance little Jude, dance - to MY TUNE as I see you lose all that STOLEN GOLD/SHEKELS, lol - slowly (oh, SO slowly, painfully, as your kind fell into your OWN trap of debt, lol)... apk

  141. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it sounds like western intelligence had high end source in the Russian government that Trump was told about prior to the inauguration [nytimes.com] confirming that the top levels of the Russian government, including Putin, were orchestrating the attacks. But again, if you can simply deny that information out of hand, and call it "fake news", then what point is there in providing any more information? What will be believed short of reality providing a swift kick to the groin?

    Maybe we'll believe the evidence if we ever see any. With something as important and politically charged as a Presidential election, you don't get to say "trust us".

    Just saying "trust us" isn't evidence. Evidence is evidence, and you and those who've already made up their mind have done so with no evidence.

  142. And the US doesn't do this to other nations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty hypocritical of the US to be pointing the finger at other nations for meddling.

    Didn't the US get caught red-handed intercepting Angela Merkle's phone calls a few years ago? Spying on Israel, too?

    Isn't one of the CIA's primary tactics the disruption and overthrow of foreign governments?

    Don't you start wars on a whim and kill from drones flown by pilots sitting in air conditioned luxury on the other side of the globe?

    Payback is a bitch.

  143. LOL! MOMMY HELP ME (golden wine)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hohohohoho see the CLASSIC proof of that here soyboys as you DRINK the golden wine https://politics.slashdot.org/... straight from MY tap (of GOLDEN piss), all natural ingredients, naturally filtered (of ME pissing right into your shitbag mouths & funniest part is, you help me DO it - you LIKE it, lol!).

    Do you LIKE the taste? Obviously yes - just like folks like my hosts engine, anything I put out, even piss, is GOOD (unlike "your kind").

    Above all else though? Hey - MOMMY LOVES YOU!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hahahahaha (I think this is the BEST overall letting you SHEMALE soyboys destroy yourselves for GOLD (ask SuckerBERG about that - he's the expert as is all his kind are - heading into ZylonB & Furnace time again judging by what's happening - the PRICE of it is that, always, they don't learn)... apk

  144. Nuclear Plant Control Systems by nessman · · Score: 0

    The only way a hacker is getting to the controls of a nuclear power plant is through a fusillade of bullets by armed plant security (and the on-duty force at any given time puts most small city police departments to shame).

  145. Re:Long-term narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people in charge were raised into the cold war ideology and assumptions. Also the civil society is still in its infancy (lack of press freedom, corruption), the government is still relatively weak (can't save 50000 people from a forest fire, organized crime) and people who look for new national ideology an easy prey (religions, political fringe movements). They are balancing on an edge and try to blame it on foreign influences to bolster the people in power.

  146. Re: Quick Change Topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a Russian hiding under my bed!