The answer to this depends on where you are in your career, and what kind of qualifications that you have.
If you're coming straight out of school with a relatively vanilla degree (math, CS, etc) you should be able to do one page. Talk about your coursework and skills, but emphasize any research or work experience. You're trying to stand out from a stack of similarly vanilla right-out-of-school resumes. The goal of the resume isn't to get you the job - it is to convince someone that it is worth his or her time to interview you.
If you are a few years (or decades) on in your career, a few more pages detailing work experience can be helpful. Remember, though, that resume review is often viewed as a chore. If yours is too long, it will show that you can't express yourself concisely.
That said, there are always exceptions. If you want to quote liberally from your Nobel or Fields citation, feel free to go long. If you want to go into boring depth about your high-school science fair project, you had better either have a Wes^h^h^hIntel win or be under 20.
Most SecurID implementations will only authenticate a specific token code once within its validity window. A replay attack (even within the time validity window) will fail after the first good authentication.
There are still man-in-the-middle vulnerabilities, but no worse than with a challenge-response
In no particular order - ymmv, but my 6-year-old favors the following:
http://www.howstuffworks.com/ http://www.spacek ids.com/ (a little commercial, but not too bad) http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/ (was better for the kids before January, but still lots of great archival stuff) http://www.exploratorium.org/ http://www. mos.org/ (Boston's Museum of Science)
It was announced on NANOG.....
on
Root Zone Changed
·
· Score: 5, Informative
....the day before. See the message.
Granted not much warning, but it wasn't silent.
Is it everything the community could wish for? Of course not. Is it everything that you plan on releasing? I hope not. Is it a gutsy step by a technology company trying to open up parts of its IP? Absolutely.
There's been a lot of people whining here about the pieces that aren't open-released yet. Remember that many of those are not Real's to release, but rather incorporate technologies that they themselves have licensed. They say that they are trying to resolve these issues - give them the benefit of the doubt here.
If the community is going to jeer anything less than full source release of all commercial software, it's going to be really hard to convince commercial software developers to release anything.
It might be helpful to draw a distinction between companies providing regular daycare and companies providing emergency backup daycare.
Here on Wall St. (yes, home of much of the world's software creation), the latest perk is emeregency backup child care. Limited to 10-15 uses per year, it lets employees come to work when the babysitter is sick (not when the kid is).
This has been an amazingly popular service throughout the industry (and throughout many others). The care is top-notch (far better than your average day care center), and the expense to the company is mitigated by the limits on use. But it still spares the company from missed deadlines when a key developer would otherwise miss work unexpectedly.
On the non-tech side of the company, it doesn't take too many salvaged deals that would have been lost due to unexpected employee absences to make the service pay for itself.
Right. And all VCRs are sold to illegally duplicate rented movies:-)
There is a legitimate purpose here - if I build a new card, I write one driver (for Linux), and voila, I have a driver for Solaris. I wrote it - I can release it under whatever license I want.
If Sun is shipping a GPL'd driver binary-only as an example, that would be bad. Otherwise, I don't see the issue.
The cellphone market in the US has shifted so that customers choose a service provider and then choose from whatever phones are offered with the plan that they want.
Here in New York City, I cannot even buy a phone from one of the CDMA services (Sprint) and get it reprogrammed to work with the other (Verizon). So you wind up in a situation where the phone is just a (relatively cheap) accessory to the service that you are purchasing.
Until the US converges on a technology standard and we get portability of handsets among providers, the handset manufacturers will continue to play second fiddle.
How many Nokia/Ericsson/Motorola ads did you see in this morning's paper? How many ATT/Sprint/Vertizon/VoiceStream/SBC?
if the obvious cures (hikes, bikes, movies, sleep) don't do it, pick some other programming task - the one-day kind. Focus on it. Start it. Complete it. Hey - even document it.
There's nothing like a completed project to motivate you on the next one.....
IIRC these were possibly connected to leakage of tritium and various nasty chemicals into the ground. There was speculation that this led to contamination of the local water supplies.
I don't recall any allegations of this being directly related to the lab's research, just to poor handling of hazardous material. The scandal led to the replacement of the lab's management team.
I've had lots of luck with Pair networks. They seem to have a good pricing structure (only pay for features you need) and have been very reliable - in 2 1/2 years of service the biggest outage was a planned one when they moved their data center a couple of miles:-)
Slashdot Mirror
The answer to this depends on where you are in your career, and what kind of qualifications that you have.
If you're coming straight out of school with a relatively vanilla degree (math, CS, etc) you should be able to do one page. Talk about your coursework and skills, but emphasize any research or work experience. You're trying to stand out from a stack of similarly vanilla right-out-of-school resumes. The goal of the resume isn't to get you the job - it is to convince someone that it is worth his or her time to interview you.
If you are a few years (or decades) on in your career, a few more pages detailing work experience can be helpful. Remember, though, that resume review is often viewed as a chore. If yours is too long, it will show that you can't express yourself concisely.
That said, there are always exceptions. If you want to quote liberally from your Nobel or Fields citation, feel free to go long. If you want to go into boring depth about your high-school science fair project, you had better either have a Wes^h^h^hIntel win or be under 20.
Most SecurID implementations will only authenticate a specific token code once within its validity window. A replay attack (even within the time validity window) will fail after the first good authentication.
There are still man-in-the-middle vulnerabilities, but no worse than with a challenge-response
In no particular order - ymmv, but my 6-year-old favors the following:
k ids.com/ (a little commercial, but not too bad). mos.org/ (Boston's Museum of Science)
http://www.howstuffworks.com/
http://www.space
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/ (was better for the kids before January, but still lots of great archival stuff)
http://www.exploratorium.org/
http://www
....the day before. See the message. Granted not much warning, but it wasn't silent.
Well done.
Is it everything the community could wish for? Of course not. Is it everything that you plan on releasing? I hope not. Is it a gutsy step by a technology company trying to open up parts of its IP? Absolutely.
There's been a lot of people whining here about the pieces that aren't open-released yet. Remember that many of those are not Real's to release, but rather incorporate technologies that they themselves have licensed. They say that they are trying to resolve these issues - give them the benefit of the doubt here.
If the community is going to jeer anything less than full source release of all commercial software, it's going to be really hard to convince commercial software developers to release anything.
How many /.-ers have ever written anything in Fortran? Sounds like a poll topic to me.....
It might be helpful to draw a distinction between companies providing regular daycare and companies providing emergency backup daycare.
Here on Wall St. (yes, home of much of the world's software creation), the latest perk is emeregency backup child care. Limited to 10-15 uses per year, it lets employees come to work when the babysitter is sick (not when the kid is).
This has been an amazingly popular service throughout the industry (and throughout many others). The care is top-notch (far better than your average day care center), and the expense to the company is mitigated by the limits on use. But it still spares the company from missed deadlines when a key developer would otherwise miss work unexpectedly.
On the non-tech side of the company, it doesn't take too many salvaged deals that would have been lost due to unexpected employee absences to make the service pay for itself.
NASA is prototyping a parachute-slowed vehicle to handle emergency exit from the Space Station.
Not as cool as jumping with no vehicle, but it will work a lot higher and start with a lot more horizontal velocity.
Right. And all VCRs are sold to illegally duplicate rented movies :-)
There is a legitimate purpose here - if I build a new card, I write one driver (for Linux), and voila, I have a driver for Solaris. I wrote it - I can release it under whatever license I want.
If Sun is shipping a GPL'd driver binary-only as an example, that would be bad. Otherwise, I don't see the issue.
The cellphone market in the US has shifted so that customers choose a service provider and then choose from whatever phones are offered with the plan that they want.
Here in New York City, I cannot even buy a phone from one of the CDMA services (Sprint) and get it reprogrammed to work with the other (Verizon). So you wind up in a situation where the phone is just a (relatively cheap) accessory to the service that you are purchasing.
Until the US converges on a technology standard and we get portability of handsets among providers, the handset manufacturers will continue to play second fiddle.
How many Nokia/Ericsson/Motorola ads did you see in this morning's paper? How many ATT/Sprint/Vertizon/VoiceStream/SBC?
if the obvious cures (hikes, bikes, movies, sleep) don't do it, pick some other programming task - the one-day kind. Focus on it. Start it. Complete it. Hey - even document it.
There's nothing like a completed project to motivate you on the next one.....
There was a big to-do a couple of years ago about a cluster of unusual cancers near
Brookhaven National Laboratory (site of the RHIC).
IIRC these were possibly connected to leakage of tritium and various nasty chemicals into the ground. There was speculation that this led to contamination of the local water supplies.
I don't recall any allegations of this being directly related to the lab's research, just to poor handling of hazardous material. The scandal led to the replacement of the lab's management team.
See http://www.oer.dir.bnl.gov/ for more information on their cleanup efforts.
I've had lots of luck with Pair networks. They seem to have a good pricing structure (only pay for features you need) and have been very reliable - in 2 1/2 years of service the biggest outage was a planned one when they moved their data center a couple of miles :-)
Much of Apache and Perl are actually object-oriented under the covers, to at least a reasonable degree.
Don't confuse use of an OO language with design of OO software.