Now if only Microsoft would make Windows Update compatible with non-IE browsers. What was that about extremely low termperatures in hell?
Oh, and Gmail - when will they support Opera? Sooner than question #1 i hope.
Or at least the option for incandescent. With dimmers. Indirect or non-glaring fluorescent if you must. Proper, decent, non-irritating lighting and be sooo important. Nothing i hate worse in an office than row after row of bright, harsh, cold, glaring fluorescent. Just my 60 Hz worth, of course.
Gee, i wonder if the FAA issues 'vanity plates'?
I also wonder if the license plate will be made of
low-drag material. Do they have to display inspection stickers on the windshield? So many
questions come to mind. Ponderous.
Yes, but HE had not done it before and his use and integration of the various hardware etc. was certainly interesting. Sounds like great fun to me and he learned a lot that can be applied for Balloon 2.0. Bah, why must some people always find reasons to cut down a perfectly interesting and fun project?
Slashdot Mirror
Headline: "Satan launches new Vatican satellite radio and television service" -or- "Crowds cheer as Satan boosts Vatican into orbit"
Now if only Microsoft would make Windows Update compatible with non-IE browsers. What was that about extremely low termperatures in hell? Oh, and Gmail - when will they support Opera? Sooner than question #1 i hope.
They would have been forced to issue a recall a long time ago. Ok, quite a lot of recalls.
Or at least the option for incandescent. With dimmers. Indirect or non-glaring fluorescent if you must. Proper, decent, non-irritating lighting and be sooo important. Nothing i hate worse in an office than row after row of bright, harsh, cold, glaring fluorescent. Just my 60 Hz worth, of course.
in 1943 at Philadelphia harbor. Of course there were a few 'minor' problems.
Gee, i wonder if the FAA issues 'vanity plates'? I also wonder if the license plate will be made of low-drag material. Do they have to display inspection stickers on the windshield? So many questions come to mind. Ponderous.
Yes, but HE had not done it before and his use and integration of the various hardware etc. was certainly interesting. Sounds like great fun to me and he learned a lot that can be applied for Balloon 2.0. Bah, why must some people always find reasons to cut down a perfectly interesting and fun project?