You can't directly buy a fractional share on the stock market, but there are companies like ShareBuilder.com and FolioFN.com who only go to the market during "trading windows" where they group all of their customers purchases and sales together in order to avoid unneeded market activity costs and they can divide the shares into fractional numbers among the customers. Whatever less-than-a-share fraction goes unallocated ends up being owned by the company as part of the cost of doing business.
Re:Pre-IPO getting less shares owners selling less
on
Google Slashes IPO price
·
· Score: 5, Funny
View the Complete prospectus.
Remember, as with all investments, past search results are no guarantee of the quality of future returns.
At this hour, nobody really knows how much Google as a whole is worth. That's the whole point of this Dutch Auction system that hasn't quite finished being played out yet.
Once Google's on the market, we'll be able to multiply the share price by shares outstanding to get a "market cap" number that'll be an approximation of Google's total value... but clearly an indicator that'll be bouncing that fast can't tell us too much info perfectly either.
Sure, we'd all want this to be simple, but nothing ever is on Wall Street.
Additionally, there's also the local government's willingess to fund the teams. Here in the USA, the USOC doesn't get direct government funding, but they get a special law that makes the Olympic rings trademark stronger than the usual trademark.
Ever think that both situations could be true? That some threats are made-up to serve other purposes by corruption in the government, but other threats are real terrorists?
E-Tickets are really just named tickets with a PIN so that the agent pulls up the right info for you quickly and doesn't confuse you with a similarly named person also at the airport today... effectively they're saying that the paper ticket is a tool of yesteryear that has no real need today.
Actually, most "non-refundable" tickets simply mean you can't get your cash back. However, you can trade your not-going-to-be-used ticket back to the airline for what's effectlively a "store credit" worth the value you paid for the ticket minus a $50-$75 cancelation fee to cover the risk that your ticket might not be resold.
So, on most US airlines, for a modest fee you can convert a ticket for person A on flight B to a ticket for person C on flight D.
I had an interesting situation when I parked under the Prudential Center tower in Boston last week. The security officer wanted to look in my trunk and see a photo ID. I went to my wallet for my driver's license, but before that card came up from the pile of cards I hit my customer card from BJ's Wholesale Club. That was good enough for him and he sent me along.
At this point, even the airlines will thank you for not flying them.
Chicago's O'Hare airport is so overbooked that the FAA is threatening to cancel flights in advance simply because even if the condiditions are clear and perfect all day, there's no way all the planes can take off on time because of the schedule being too tight.
The current airline system just wasn't designed for the volume of users it currently has. The old-line airlines are failing, while new line airlines like JetBlue and Southwest are stepping forward with simpler flight schedules and pricing models. They appear to be the wave of the future there.
The various post-9/11 inquiries from the government and the media all seem to have agreed that we were close to breaking up the attacks before they happened, but we didn't connect the dots in time. MSNBC-TV recently aired a special edition of their Hardball program where they spotlighted twelve seperate things that could have prevented the attacks had any of them gone perfectly, but they didn't.
For all the attacks that happen or that we hear about after being broken up, there's got to be dozens of plots that are being aborted or lose key personel to arrest before they had time to mature into being specific enough to pick an exact target.
As scary as it is for our "free" government to be fighting a "secret" war, we have to remember that a government-like entity without any homeland is already fighting against us that way.
It's not that there's a 2002 simulcast going on... it's just that on day one they had 24 hours with less than 24 hours of material. The channel is going to have to repeat some things at times just to fill the day, and because no sane person watches the same TV channel 24/7.
HD content is only available from events at the venues that have HD cameras installed. Since very few of those events have happened so far, NBC doesn't have much to work with yet.
If you're an AdSense publisher that is. All of us who run Google ads can install a tool that gives us access to a preview of what ads Google will run next to a page so that we can decide if we want to put the ad code on the page or not. The thing is, the tool isn't limited to our own sites, and apparently isn't very well secured in any way.
Google is very strict about where they allow their ads to be shown. For example, Google will not feed ads to sites that express extreme political views, or deal with taboo topics such as internet gambling.
So, I'm wondering if they approved this project. If they haven't, then Google will be pulling the plug very shortly...
It's a 24/7 feed. The 2002 Opening Ceremony was shot in HD, and on the opening ceremony day there are few if any other events to cover. Since they can only rerun the 2004 ceremony so many times, they had to dip into the archives a bit just to fill time...
Clearly, the three application to a session limitation and lack of networking were not features designed to make the OS simpler. They are limitations put in to intentionally criple functionality as that when a user sees a "starter edition" error message, they can also be presented with "That functionality is in the Home version. Please step up by paying..."
Three is clearly an arbitrarly chosen number based on research and testing... the marketing people were then given the number to work with and then spin it.
The "world feed" is comprised of the best available shot of the race at the moment as judged by a hopefully unbiased director who is accountable to all of the networks using that feed.
As a result, all of the countries who have a major compeitor in the event send a crew focused on their competitors. The world feed is then able to pick and choose... NBC's camera 3 or CBC's camera 2 or BBC's camera 5 are at his disposal, but he doesn't have a direct ability to give an order to any of the camera operators, he can only ask the national directors who actually hire the cameramen to do so.
If NBC didn't have as much resources as they did, the world would not have much coverage of the events the USA competitor wins.
I suggest you avoid NBC's main network coverage and watch the highlights of those "major events" on SportsCenter or some other outlet. Instead, watch some of NBC's other feeds like USA or MSNBC where they have more airtime to fill and therefore stick to the events.
Although I haven't seen it myself yet, I expect that the digital version of NBC's coverage to be very close to the style you're looking for. See, NBC-HD can only cover the events that the world feed has selected for HD coverage, and to make it to a 24/7 show it will have to repeat itself. The best coverage from a geek point of view, not surpriingly, is going to be the one that you must be a geek who has bought uncommon gadgets to see.
Can you just think how boring the coverage would be if the USA sent PBS as our national TV representives at the games? Since what NBC is doing is being made available to other nations' media outlets through a content sharing relationship, a lower quality USA feed would effect a lot of smaller nations' TV outlets.
NBC plays a big role in the internal "world feeds" that those smaller networks need in order to do anything at all.
Only NBC would be able to put streaming video games coverage on the Internet for USA consumption, only the CBC can do it for Canada, etc.
Just like sports leagues who try to limit distribution of their games to their local marketplace by teams, the Olympic carves the world's broadcast rights up by territory too. They just have larger zones to play with.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't directly buy a fractional share on the stock market, but there are companies like ShareBuilder.com and FolioFN.com who only go to the market during "trading windows" where they group all of their customers purchases and sales together in order to avoid unneeded market activity costs and they can divide the shares into fractional numbers among the customers. Whatever less-than-a-share fraction goes unallocated ends up being owned by the company as part of the cost of doing business.
View the Complete prospectus.
Remember, as with all investments, past search results are no guarantee of the quality of future returns.
At this hour, nobody really knows how much Google as a whole is worth. That's the whole point of this Dutch Auction system that hasn't quite finished being played out yet.
Once Google's on the market, we'll be able to multiply the share price by shares outstanding to get a "market cap" number that'll be an approximation of Google's total value... but clearly an indicator that'll be bouncing that fast can't tell us too much info perfectly either.
Sure, we'd all want this to be simple, but nothing ever is on Wall Street.
If an upset was widely predicted, it's not an upset anymore...
Additionally, there's also the local government's willingess to fund the teams. Here in the USA, the USOC doesn't get direct government funding, but they get a special law that makes the Olympic rings trademark stronger than the usual trademark.
Ever think that both situations could be true? That some threats are made-up to serve other purposes by corruption in the government, but other threats are real terrorists?
E-Tickets are really just named tickets with a PIN so that the agent pulls up the right info for you quickly and doesn't confuse you with a similarly named person also at the airport today... effectively they're saying that the paper ticket is a tool of yesteryear that has no real need today.
Actually, most "non-refundable" tickets simply mean you can't get your cash back. However, you can trade your not-going-to-be-used ticket back to the airline for what's effectlively a "store credit" worth the value you paid for the ticket minus a $50-$75 cancelation fee to cover the risk that your ticket might not be resold.
So, on most US airlines, for a modest fee you can convert a ticket for person A on flight B to a ticket for person C on flight D.
I had an interesting situation when I parked under the Prudential Center tower in Boston last week. The security officer wanted to look in my trunk and see a photo ID. I went to my wallet for my driver's license, but before that card came up from the pile of cards I hit my customer card from BJ's Wholesale Club. That was good enough for him and he sent me along.
Dental records can confirm an identity, but they'd still need whose records to seek in the first place before they can play that game.
At this point, even the airlines will thank you for not flying them.
Chicago's O'Hare airport is so overbooked that the FAA is threatening to cancel flights in advance simply because even if the condiditions are clear and perfect all day, there's no way all the planes can take off on time because of the schedule being too tight.
The current airline system just wasn't designed for the volume of users it currently has. The old-line airlines are failing, while new line airlines like JetBlue and Southwest are stepping forward with simpler flight schedules and pricing models. They appear to be the wave of the future there.
The various post-9/11 inquiries from the government and the media all seem to have agreed that we were close to breaking up the attacks before they happened, but we didn't connect the dots in time. MSNBC-TV recently aired a special edition of their Hardball program where they spotlighted twelve seperate things that could have prevented the attacks had any of them gone perfectly, but they didn't.
For all the attacks that happen or that we hear about after being broken up, there's got to be dozens of plots that are being aborted or lose key personel to arrest before they had time to mature into being specific enough to pick an exact target.
As scary as it is for our "free" government to be fighting a "secret" war, we have to remember that a government-like entity without any homeland is already fighting against us that way.
It's not that there's a 2002 simulcast going on... it's just that on day one they had 24 hours with less than 24 hours of material. The channel is going to have to repeat some things at times just to fill the day, and because no sane person watches the same TV channel 24/7.
A: Take this "test" feature offline. It wasn't that useful anyway.
B: Require that an AdSense publisher have a cookie linking them to an AdSense account, and kill off any account that doesn't play by the rules.
C: Limit the number of requests per day in the same way they limit the Google API.
That doesn't answer the question. It implies that the author of this program hasn't asked for permission... but we don't know that for sure yet.
HD content is only available from events at the venues that have HD cameras installed. Since very few of those events have happened so far, NBC doesn't have much to work with yet.
Actually, there is sorta...
If you're an AdSense publisher that is. All of us who run Google ads can install a tool that gives us access to a preview of what ads Google will run next to a page so that we can decide if we want to put the ad code on the page or not. The thing is, the tool isn't limited to our own sites, and apparently isn't very well secured in any way.
Out of the FAQ...
"Who gets money?
adbar uses the "test" adsense mode, so advertisers don't pay Google and Google doesn't pay anyone"
Somehow, I sense that Google's going to be pulling thier new test-viewer feature offline for more security to be added tomorrow.
Google is very strict about where they allow their ads to be shown. For example, Google will not feed ads to sites that express extreme political views, or deal with taboo topics such as internet gambling.
So, I'm wondering if they approved this project. If they haven't, then Google will be pulling the plug very shortly...
It's a 24/7 feed. The 2002 Opening Ceremony was shot in HD, and on the opening ceremony day there are few if any other events to cover. Since they can only rerun the 2004 ceremony so many times, they had to dip into the archives a bit just to fill time...
Clearly, the three application to a session limitation and lack of networking were not features designed to make the OS simpler. They are limitations put in to intentionally criple functionality as that when a user sees a "starter edition" error message, they can also be presented with "That functionality is in the Home version. Please step up by paying..."
Three is clearly an arbitrarly chosen number based on research and testing... the marketing people were then given the number to work with and then spin it.
The "world feed" is comprised of the best available shot of the race at the moment as judged by a hopefully unbiased director who is accountable to all of the networks using that feed.
As a result, all of the countries who have a major compeitor in the event send a crew focused on their competitors. The world feed is then able to pick and choose... NBC's camera 3 or CBC's camera 2 or BBC's camera 5 are at his disposal, but he doesn't have a direct ability to give an order to any of the camera operators, he can only ask the national directors who actually hire the cameramen to do so.
If NBC didn't have as much resources as they did, the world would not have much coverage of the events the USA competitor wins.
I suggest you avoid NBC's main network coverage and watch the highlights of those "major events" on SportsCenter or some other outlet. Instead, watch some of NBC's other feeds like USA or MSNBC where they have more airtime to fill and therefore stick to the events.
Although I haven't seen it myself yet, I expect that the digital version of NBC's coverage to be very close to the style you're looking for. See, NBC-HD can only cover the events that the world feed has selected for HD coverage, and to make it to a 24/7 show it will have to repeat itself. The best coverage from a geek point of view, not surpriingly, is going to be the one that you must be a geek who has bought uncommon gadgets to see.
Can you just think how boring the coverage would be if the USA sent PBS as our national TV representives at the games? Since what NBC is doing is being made available to other nations' media outlets through a content sharing relationship, a lower quality USA feed would effect a lot of smaller nations' TV outlets.
NBC plays a big role in the internal "world feeds" that those smaller networks need in order to do anything at all.
Only NBC would be able to put streaming video games coverage on the Internet for USA consumption, only the CBC can do it for Canada, etc.
Just like sports leagues who try to limit distribution of their games to their local marketplace by teams, the Olympic carves the world's broadcast rights up by territory too. They just have larger zones to play with.