Quake3 is more of a enhancement from Doom by the same publisher. People could argue that Duke Nukem was a Doom rip-off but the fact is that its gameplay is significantly different with many new twists. The problem with snood is that with the exception of different graphics and sounds, the game play concept is identical.
Exactly. It's a fun game, but IMHO the author has a lot of nerve to ask for money for this game, let alone receive recognition for a great game. C'mon, it's a total rip-off..
... (The above being a dramatic estimate for Win2K, obviously I'm sure you could weed out particulars but the big picture remains the same beast). I think MS should just release it. It will be years before anyone (particularly a gov't org) is ready to make any sense of it, and more specifically, ready to apply changes. If they're extra paranoid then release it after stripping comments and being run through a code scrambler to get those vars nice and confusing:).
Seems ironic that a 'open standards' site would not be W3C compliant.
http://www.linuxbase.org/
Let's see.. 1 error, 26 warnings! woo-
Quake3 is more of a enhancement from Doom by the same publisher. People could argue that Duke Nukem was a Doom rip-off but the fact is that its gameplay is significantly different with many new twists. The problem with snood is that with the exception of different graphics and sounds, the game play concept is identical.
Exactly. It's a fun game, but IMHO the author has a lot of nerve to ask for money for this game, let alone receive recognition for a great game. C'mon, it's a total rip-off..
... (The above being a dramatic estimate for Win2K, obviously I'm sure you could weed out particulars but the big picture remains the same beast). I think MS should just release it. It will be years before anyone (particularly a gov't org) is ready to make any sense of it, and more specifically, ready to apply changes. If they're extra paranoid then release it after stripping comments and being run through a code scrambler to get those vars nice and confusing :).