Slashdot Mirror


User: aristotle-dude

aristotle-dude's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,438
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,438

  1. Re:High price justifcation now? on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    How well does that CPU chip run your software?

    I think you need a motherboard with a motherboard chipset "and" a BIOS of some sort.

    Phil Shiller has stated that OS X will only run on Apple Branded hardware.

    To justify purchasing a mac, I would assume that they will provide premium GFX cards, premium soundcards and "full" compatibility and an advanced BIOS with "extra" features and I would assume and expanded power management system.

    The CPU is only a small part of any hardware architecture.

    Even if you could hack it to boot your frankenPC, where would you get the drivers from?

    Where did all these noobs come from and why are they posting on slashdot?

  2. Re:Why switch if on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1

    This is now. They are switching because of the "future".

  3. Re:How to sell current systems?? on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    Is that G5 now useless? No. They are not moving the current Intel chips but what will be available next year.

    Is everyone who need to get their "work" done going to wait a year?

  4. Re:What will the devkits for XBox 360 run on? on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    The same thing they run on now.

    Apple will "begin" the transition in mid 2006 so there will be plenty of G5's to go around for some time.

    Try Google next time.

  5. Re:Apple to Users: Go Fuck Yourselves on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    If the vendor decides to do that then they are screwing themselves out of potential sales.

    It is in their best interest given that Intel macs are at least a year away "and" Apple is committed to releasing "future" PPC based macs this year and in 2006.

    From the keynote, note, both Adobe and MSFT are committed to delivering universal binary versions of their products.

    It is in their best interest to maximize their potential marketshare with minimal efforts.

  6. Re:A lesson to Linux - MacOS X switchers on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    You mean like using Rosetta to run G3 compatible binaries out of the box?

    Or running programs compiled in the new Universal Binary Format?

    Linux is great as a server and if you want Linux to be competitive on the desktop, you should be taking notes on what Apple does and supporting the LSB.

  7. Re:Microsoft Wins on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    I was worried about that too but RTFA. Both MSFT's MBU and Adobe are supporting the Universal Binary format.

    Unlike us "fans", businesses only care about profits. If it is profitable to continue support for OS X, then they will do it.

  8. Re:Apple to Users: Go Fuck Yourselves on Apple Switching to Intel · · Score: 1
    Get your head out of your ass!

    RTFA. The Universal Binary will work on "both" platforms and the Rosetta emulation will allow for PPC software to run on Intel as long as it does not require Altivec.

  9. Re:Only difference between a Mac and a PC is the C on Apple Switching To Intel Chips In 2006 · · Score: 1
    "That's nice, but I'm only talking about those things that are necessary to support OpenDarwin and thus OS X.

    And since Mac OS X and OpenDarwin run on systems without Open Firmware, the absence of Open Firmware would not prevent Mac OS X from booting up on a partly-OpenDarwin kernel."

    That's nice. OpenDarwin is a testbed for technologies, not a shipping commercial OS.

    Laptop users need working power management support. Perhaps that is why Linux is not popular with laptop owners.

    Apple users expect consistent behaviour of their macs which include Firewire booting and Scheduled power ups. The current BIOS and ACPI do not support those features so a basic/primitive PC would not cut it.

  10. Re:Only difference between a Mac and a PC is the C on Apple Switching To Intel Chips In 2006 · · Score: 1
    You are forgetting Open firmware which allow us to boot off firewire devices and the Power management subsystem which allow us to "schedule" power on and power off from within the OS.

    Those two low level systems make ACPI and Bios look prehistoric by comparison.

    As for the rest of your comment, it's not worth commenting on.

  11. Re:Activation is the real problem on Final Windows 2000 Update · · Score: 1

    I'm not talking about binaries, although that would be useful too but it will not even search text source files.

  12. Re:pavelmachek offered job at Apple on Apple Switching To Intel Chips In 2006 · · Score: 1
    You mean, he "had" a job offer.

    Blogging about it is stupid even if I believe his story in the first place. Maybe they are expanding their Xserve line? Does the Xserve raid use ACPI and BIOS with the Xscale processor?

  13. Re:That's not what Jobs said last month Mod UP on Apple Switching To Intel Chips In 2006 · · Score: 1

    Finally, some sanity. I cannot believe that the WSJ and CNET have degenerated to "NY Post" style journalism.

  14. Re:Activation is the real problem on Final Windows 2000 Update · · Score: 1
    That's right, the CD's are different.

    If you purchase your MSDN through a Volume/Select license agreement, you receive a Volume key and Corporate CD as well as the Retail versions.

  15. Re:Activation is the real problem on Final Windows 2000 Update · · Score: 1
    If you are working with MSDN and XP in a corporate lab environment, you would use the Corporate version of XP which does not require activation.

    Having said that, I miss the stability of 2000Pro, not to mention that search actually "worked" in Win2k.

  16. Re:I've been accused... MOD parent as Funny. on Genetic Testing For Geekiness? · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the laughs.

    That was an excellent piece of dry humour.

  17. Re:Don't know about Einstein on Genetic Testing For Geekiness? · · Score: 1

    He was not just a loner. He could not properly dress himself. That is why he had many identical outfits. It is also said that he could not tie his own shoes.

  18. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) Mod UP! on A Coffeeshop's Weekends Without Wi-Fi · · Score: 1
    I agree with you wholeheartedly. I think these coffee shops should remove "free" WiFi access altogether. There is no need to be "constantly" connected.

    I'm sure there are plenty of "for pay" hotspots to serve the needs of the business traveller.

    I have to say I really hate those blackberries (a.k.a. Crackberries). To me it is extremely rude for anyone to use one of those devices at a restaurant.

  19. What is Sirus? on Sirius in Negotiations With Apple · · Score: 1
    Seriously. I'm a Canadian and I've only "heard" about it on slashdot and other sites.

    What is so great about it and is it available in Canada or outside of North America for that matter?

    I would not want to pay extra for a feature on an iPod if it is useless when I travel to europe.

  20. Re:Crazy on Mad as Hell, Switching to Mac · · Score: 1
    MS Office for Mac of course. It's not the same codebase as Office for windows, it is written by the Mac Business Unit programmers and often provide features that do not appear in the windows version until the next version or appear as a separate app.

    One example of the latter would be One Note whose functionality is integrated into the mac version of Word in Office 2004.

    Some of the transparency/layer effects found in the Mac version will not appear on windows until the Longhorn version of Office.

    I think the issue is that most cheap X86 box vendors try to bundle cheap/substandard ram with the system.

  21. Re:The writing was on the wall. on Apple to Use Intel Chips? · · Score: 1
    So tell us how to run all that G4 and G5 optimized software at native speed on your mythical hardware and OS.

    It's the software dummy. Porting the OS will not make the software run.

    What are you going to do with it? Play with the dock? Use Safari?

    Jcr is or was an Apple employee and he said it's not going to happen.

  22. Re:Wow! what an insult on Apple to Use Intel Chips? · · Score: 1

    Wow you are falling for a hoax by none other than Paul Thurrott. He claims to be the one that broke the story being reported on the WSJ.

  23. Re:At the very least... on Stanford Accelerator Uncovers Archimedes' Text · · Score: 1
    So the invading hordes of barbarians which brought down the Roman Empire had nothing to do with lost records? I did not realize those barbarians were christians. Do tell?

    Are you saying all the ancient works we have today preserved themselves?

    Do you know that "The Da Vinci Code" is a work of fiction?

    Since you have no idea, why did you feel the need to post here?

  24. Re:Coverup on Stanford Accelerator Uncovers Archimedes' Text · · Score: 1
    *sarcasm*
    Oh I'm sure the marauding barbarian hordes which brought down the western roman empire causing a total collapse of society had nothing to do it it.
    *sarcasm*

    Nice troll. It was the church that preserved all the ancient texts we have today concerning Ancient Rome and Greece. Really, if your conspiracy theory had any merit, we would not know anything about this Archimedes fellow or his other works.

    Look around you, most democracies today are loosely modeled on the Roman and Greek experiments with democracy.

    I do not hate you because I know that you attack out of ignorance. Humans instinctively fear the unknown and attack what they fear.

  25. Re:Great for gamers on Microsoft Developing Windows for Low-End Machines · · Score: 1

    If you had bothered to RTFA, you would have known this was patently false. It is not a general purpose operating system. You cannot run third-party software on it. It is intended to be a shell for thin client computing in an enterprise environment.