Slashdot Mirror


A Coffeeshop's Weekends Without Wi-Fi

Glenn Fleishman writes "Victrola Cafe and Art in Seattle is a popular coffeeshop that offers free Wi-Fi--except on the weekends. In an experiment, the cafe started shutting down its Wi-Fi network on Saturdays and Sundays after watching their culture erode: the shop became full (and was turning away customers) with six-to-eight hour Wi-Fi squatters, many of whom didn't even purchase anything. Their second Sunday without Wi-Fi was one of their best revenue days in some time. I don't propose a Wi-Fi (or free Wi-Fi) backlash, but it's interesting how with some time under their belt, the clash of inward facing technology and outward facing culture hit these particular entrepreneurs' limit."

513 comments

  1. Their own fault.. by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lesse, they don't want to enforce the "buy something or get out" rule? Their loss...

    1. Re:Their own fault.. by pdbaby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This pretty much sums up all the discussion required on this news article, doesn't it? Go slashdot user brevity and succinctness!

      In all seriousness though, whatstops wifi users from sitting in a car outside? or in the shop nextdoor?
      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    2. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      um, what part of "one of their best revenue days" is so hard to understand?

      I think they've done well. an attitude of "buy or get out" would be devastating to any sense of culture. terribly vulgar. not because of the principle, but just the impossibilty of implementing it without leading to bad customer service.

      and weekends aren't so important as weekdays for people to have internet for business purposes, and are much more likely to be kids using it for fun, so it makes sense.

    3. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >In all seriousness though, whatstops wifi users from sitting in a car outside? or in the shop nextdoor?

      self-respect?

    4. Re:Their own fault.. by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The people who were gonna buy will buy anyways and the people who weren't, won't..

      I'm not saying that you post a bunch of signs on the walls and stuff, but if you see someone squating day after day you come up to them, tap them on the shoulder and say, "Excuse me sir, can you PLEASE SOD OFF YOU WORTHLESS PLACE TAKING PIECE OF SOD?!?!"! Well, ok, maybe not quite like that.

    5. Re:Their own fault.. by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      Obviously they're showing 0 self-respect by not only using the wifi and not paying the company but taking up space in the shop: no self-respect, no manners...

      Am I the only one whose local coffee shops offer bottomless tea/coffee?

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    6. Re:Their own fault.. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      self-respect?

      Doesn't stop them from squatting inside for 8 hours...

    7. Re:Their own fault.. by pi_rules · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In all seriousness though, whatstops wifi users from sitting in a car outside? or in the shop nextdoor?
      Well, nothing. However, to the shop owner their -space- is the resource that they're limited in. It isn't so much that they're sucking bandwidth but that they're occupying a chair/table and removing space for paying customers.

      Definately not ethical, but it would most likely be of little concern to the shop owner.
    8. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In all seriousness though, whatstops wifi users from sitting in a car outside? or in the shop nextdoor?

      The wifi cafe I go to has a pay service (cards available at the counter), but last time I was in there the system was down, and the guy suggested that I could still connect to the system in the neighboring coffee house (which was free).

      Despite the for-money nature of the service, I've always sort of assumed that I'd be asked to leave if I came in and camped out with my laptop without buying any food (for which they are no doubt getting a much larger profit margin).

      And I know it's pronounced "why-fie", but for some reason "whiffy" just seems more suitable.

    9. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Their own fault.. by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      an attitude of "buy or get out" would be devastating to any sense of culture

      Um... what culture is that, now? The one where the people who don't buy anything sponge off of the merchant's not free (to them) service? The one that burns up bandwidth that the merchant put there as a value to their customers?

      vulgar

      No, vulgar is using a merchant's services without participating in the implied contract: be our customer. Do those same people feel comfortable showing up there every morning to wash up in the merchant's restrooms, ask for some coffee for free, and then go on their way?

      It's not about whether the merchant would have to get into the awkward mode of policing their users for those that have or have not bought coffee... it's about the people who do buy it pointing out that the leeches are, well, leeches. And extracting a little social pain from them so that they get it, and don't wind up with an even stronger sense of entitlement than they already seem to have.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:Their own fault.. by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      one way would be to have some kind of rolling password system with the current code given either on a display (visible only inside the coffee shop) or on receipts

      i'm not sure bandwidth is really the issue here anyway.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Their own fault.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      > The people who were gonna buy will buy anyways and the people who weren't, won't..

      And now they've gotten rid of the people who won't buy, made more room for people who will buy (as can be seen by the higher revenue) and it makes for a better atmosphere ("The staff "loves it," she said, and regular customers are "coming up to us and thanking us.")

      Exactly, how is it their loss?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    13. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      Impossiblity of implementing?

      What's wrong with integrating the point of sale system with the wireless access point? Use something like publicip.net and nocat.net

      Print out a password on their receipt good for whatever period of time is reasonable. Don't ask the employees to enforce it, just let the thing be automated so no one feels like they're being picked on.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    14. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      imo you should either offer free wifi or not. making users jump through hoops with passwords and timed purchases is bad.

      this is a coffee shop. they might have just bought an airport express and plugged it in the corner. they probably don't have IT staff.

      so what's wrong with integrating the point of sale system with the wireless access point? nothing, so long as it's as easy as flipping a switch and costs nothing to set up and run.

    15. Re:Their own fault.. by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Stop thinking like a geek for 1 minute.

      If there was some sort of simple system that could be set up for a very reasonable fee that would essentially work well from the outset that didn't require them to shut down the connection completely and still encouraged users to buy products with a minimum of hassle, don't you think there'd be a little bit of money to be made in supplying that type of system?

      You can now go back to thinking like a geek.

    16. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      imo you should either offer free wifi or not. making users jump through hoops with passwords and timed purchases is bad.

      Jump through hoops? I'm not sure you understand the technology involved. The customers don't even have to set up a WEP key. Just connect to the open access point. When you open up a browser window, it asks you for the key on your receipt. Hardly jumping through hoops.

      this is a coffee shop. they might have just bought an airport express and plugged it in the corner. they probably don't have IT staff.

      That's neither here nor there. They are in business to make money. Starbucks makes money using t-mobile to do this. If they want to compete they should do some research, or pay someone that is in IT.

      so what's wrong with integrating the point of sale system with the wireless access point? nothing, so long as it's as easy as flipping a switch and costs nothing to set up and run.

      Right, because we should all make money without putting forth any effort whatsoever.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    17. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      are you sure you meant to reply to me? I don't follow your point.

      anyway, I'll use this to add something I forgot earlier - why wifi should be free or not at all. if you use a timed-password system with POS integration, then does that mean you've paid for access? it makes it feel like that to me. so you've gone from customers being happy about the extra customer service, to apparently setting up a whole new product with its own customer service requirements to deal with their demands. for example, if the net connection goes down for half an hour, do you get another password to make sure you get all your time? do you guarantee a minimum speed? can you advertise you offer free wifi anymore without radio-ad-style disclaimers? if you're now charging for the service, since you're making purchase a requirement, are you now officially an ISP? is YOUR ISP going to have problems with you reselling service? are you bound by any ISP laws? do you need to keep logs? etc etc etc etc etc...

    18. Re:Their own fault.. by Burz · · Score: 0, Troll

      How old are you, twelve?

      Do you really expect people to keep returning for coffee and relaxation with a contentious atmosphere like that?

      There's a two-way street involved: If you don't want "squatters" then stop using public spectrum to lure them.

    19. Re:Their own fault.. by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use WiFi, I buy coffee when I am at the coffee shop on the weekend. Lots of coffee and also food. If they do not have WiFi, I leave and go somewhere else. And I'm only going to buy a finite amount of coffee and I am going to buy it where they have WiFi.

      So, a rule like this would screw some "ethical" WiFi users.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    20. Re:Their own fault.. by wrf3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was at the beach two weeks ago. Found a Starbucks that offered one hour of access for $3 with the password printed on the receipt. Trivially easy to log in. The one hour limit kept my wife from going ballistic we me spending to much time on the net.

      They even managed to sell me some coffee. It was a win-win-win situation.

    21. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty clear it was aimed at you.

      Yes, there are a lot of things to think about and lots of technical issues to handle when setting up a service like this. And that opens the door for someone to make a bundle guiding these wifi hotspot providers through the obstacle course.

      You seem to be unable to remove your geek goggles and look at this through the eyes of a business person. There is money to be made here, whether through the development of an easily installable system or the service of such a system.

      Your concerns are right on the money. Now instead of throwing your hands up and giving up, perhaps it might be worth someone's while to provide consulting to these coffee houses.

    22. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      I guess we just have different ideas about what coffee houses should be like. you're thinking McDonalds-style megabusinesses with faceless employees working on a production line with enough money for the lastest computer systems. I'm thinking of a local shop run by the owner charging sensible prices for sensible drinks and a focus on atmosphere and relaxation rather than commerce.

      you've proven to me that it CAN work, I'm just not sure whether I'd WANT it to work if it requires Starbucks.

    23. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      I just don't understand why you keep accusing me of wearing geek goggles. surely then I'd be in favour of these systems and point out some open source already project working on it? :-)

      I'm looking at it through the eyes of someone who thinks of coffee houses as relatively simple places that focus atmosphere rather than just pure business opportunity.

      the world cannot be divided into geeks and businessmen. some of us are real people. and when us real people think of restaurants we don't think of McDonalds. and when us real people think of customer service at coffee houses we don't think of an IT support desk.

    24. Re:Their own fault.. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      yep. i was just in the coffe shop thinking i could come back on the weekend with my laptop and give myself a break from home.

      Surely they could think of a better solution. Throwing the baby out with the bath water.

    25. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that opens the door for someone to make a bundle guiding these wifi hotspot providers through the obstacle course.

      Sure, there's a market for a product that a service that doesn't bring in more revenue for the company.

    26. Re:Their own fault.. by iocat · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If they can now get rid of people who take up space with their irritating, thoughtful, public, journal-writing, we may be able to really get some things done.

      Seriously, though, who ever *wants* to use wifi in a coffee shop? I'd much rather be in my office, using a real keyboard and mouse, or in my house, lounging around on the couch while surfing. I reserve free/pay coffee shop wifi for desperate times -- business trips; times when work is way too hectic an environment, etc. Six or eight hours on a laptop keyboard? I'd be dead.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    27. Re:Their own fault.. by quietpenguin · · Score: 1

      funny.

      i actually had to do this once when i lost internet access unexpectedly due to someone else not paying the bill. it was a fun trick.

      i was most surprised that in building with about 15 apartments i was apparently the only person with WiFi (hadn't lived there long, and didn't live there long.)

    28. Re:Their own fault.. by Mad+Hughagi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. The draw for these shop owners is a certain crowd who aren't keen with having teenage h4XX0rs skipping class to take up seats in their poo-poo atmosphere. The majority of their market doesn't show up when a minority of others is there, in terms of profit.

      Seems like they need to restrict or make it uncomfortable for campers. Get out in 20 minutes or ex-biker muffin-maker in the back comes out front to ask you to leave real nice-like. That sort of thing is standard at coffee shops in Northern Ontario.

      Of course in todays sanitary and non-confrontational profit maximization society this can be implemented through some sort of MAC address based accounting system so that people can avoid any personal interaction and drain their wallets like mega while making a set piece for the passerby.

      Which still doesn't solve the initial problem. They need to find out where the cash cows go when they aren't attending My_Little_Coffee_Shop(TM)... if it is to WIFI-less places they will just lose business unless they take it down, at least in the current market.

      --
      UBU
    29. Re:Their own fault.. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Actually, I expect that the people the merchant is trying to attract, and for whom the services are intended will indeed be welcome, and should feel comfortable. It's those people, who obviously like the place where they buy their coffee and read their e-mail, that ought to spare the merchant from having to speak up. The freeloaders obviously have no shame, so it's appropriate to at least talk about it in a forum where they might grasp the reality of the no-free-lunch concept.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    30. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one whose local coffee shops offer bottomless tea/coffee?

      Where do you live, and are there any good houses for sale there?

    31. Re:Their own fault.. by lpp · · Score: 1
      I'm thinking of a local shop run by the owner charging sensible prices for sensible drinks and a focus on atmosphere and relaxation rather than commerce.
      Yes, and TFA is about the "local shop" you describe and how offering the free Wi-Fi was screwing the "atmosphere and relaxation" they were shooting for. As a result, in order to regain the lost "atmosphere and relaxation" they had to institute the policy mentioned.
    32. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      which is why if you read my posts you'll see I agree completely with their policy.

    33. Re:Their own fault.. by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe I'm square, but at home, the coffee is cheaper (but just as good-I get the beans from them), the chairs are more comfortable, and when I tire of it all, I can lay down and nap. I never understood sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop for an hour, much less several.

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    34. Re:Their own fault.. by norton_I · · Score: 1

      Remember, it isn't *just* about short-term revenue. It sounds like his main concern is the change in atmosphere when you are saturated with (potentially) reclusive WiFi users. There are lots of ways that they could extract money from the people who sit there for 8 hours using the network (turning them into "ethical" users), but that doesn't fix the atmosphere problem. In the long run, that will drive them out of business since they will be just like Starbucks with higher operating costs.

      This "solution" is certainly not ideal, but I haven't thought of a better idea yet (including in the posts on the link and here on /.)

    35. Re:Their own fault.. by shmlco · · Score: 1
      There's a two-way street involved: If you don't want "squatters" then stop using public spectrum to lure them.

      It's a service provided FOC to their CUSTOMERS. They are a business, after all.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    36. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      Sure, there's a market for a product that a service that doesn't bring in more revenue for the company.

      This slashdot article does not prove that wifi service will not bring in more revenue.
      All it proved is that freeloaders leaving made room for paying customers.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    37. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for you for having to drink Starbucks coffee.

    38. Re:Their own fault.. by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      You didn't read the article, did you? It seems to me that people like you are a part of what they wanted to get rid of.

      Since SO many seem to have missed it, from TFA:

      Strongin said that the five-year-old cafe added free Wi-Fi when it seemed their customers wanted it a couple of years ago. It initially brought in more people, she said, but over the past year "we noticed a significant change in the environment of the cafe." Before Wi-Fi, "People talked to each other, strangers met each other," she said. Solitary activities might involve reading and writing, but it was part of the milieu. "Those people co-existed with people having conversations," said Strongin.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    39. Re:Their own fault.. by DarthTaco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I never understood sitting in a coffee shop" It's called the rule of: doing what makes you happy. I don't understand why certain things make certain people happy, but then I don't have to. I just know what makes me happy. And that happens to be coffee shops and book stores. For you it isn't (at least the coffee shop part). It's really not a mystery.

    40. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      if you use a timed-password system with POS integration, then does that mean you've paid for access?

      No. It means you bought a cup of coffee and are a paying customer. As such you enjoy the benefits of a paying customer. Just like countless other places put up signs like "bathrooms are for paying customers only"

      so you've gone from customers being happy about the extra customer service, to apparently setting up a whole new product with its own customer service requirements to deal with their demands.for example, if the net connection goes down for half an hour, do you get another password to make sure you get all your time?

      You don't owe them anything. They paid for a cup of coffee not internet access. Internet access is free for paying customers. Unless you want to charge. Sometimes the bathrooms are out of order too. If you want you can use your own discretion and give the cashier the ability to click a button and generate another access key.

      do you guarantee a minimum speed?

      Absolutely, and if their interet connection slows down, promptly refund their $0.00 they paid for the service.

      can you advertise you offer free wifi anymore without radio-ad-style disclaimers? if you're now charging for the service, since you're making purchase a requirement, are you now officially an ISP? is YOUR ISP going to have problems with you reselling service? are you bound by any ISP laws? do you need to keep logs? etc etc etc etc etc...

      On approved credit, some restrictions apply, check your state and local laws and internet provider for details.

      Why should this be any different than anything else you do to run a business. Because it is IT related, you don't have to do any research? What about about tax laws? What about health regulations? What about employee wages/benefits? What happens if the coffee is too hot for someone's lap?

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    41. Re:Their own fault.. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure now they just have to purchase a computer to use as a server, hire someone to set it up, and find some way to print out receipts with passcodes.

      Or they could do what they did in the story and simply turn the wi-fi off, have several of their "regular" patrons thank them, make their employees happy, and have a record setting weekend's revenues.

      It would appear, my friend, that at least one coffee shop has demonstrated that it does more business without wi-fi than with it. Apparently this particular business had more people buying coffee when the booted the geeks and their laptops.

      Now this particular business could go through the expense of setting up some sort of pay as you go wi-fi system, but there is no guarantee that such a system would be a good investment. Especially considering that the business sells more coffee with the wi-fi turned off.

    42. Re:Their own fault.. by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      Best be careful with the term "implied contract" - it's the same term that television networks use when they complain about time-shifting and ad-removal technologies.

      I realize that the situation is quite different, but in many ways it's the same. As consumer technology gives us more power over how we receive information or where we receive information, we need to keep in mind how it affects other, possibly remote and unseen.

      It seems that some effort should go into making people aware of the effects of that technology, even if the person or entity is at a distance removed.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    43. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      This story only proves that a company had bad business practice left unchecked for five years. It caused them to build up an abundance of freeloaders taking up space.

      It would appear, my friend, that at least one coffee shop has demonstrated that it does more business without wi-fi than with it. Apparently this particular business had more people buying coffee when the booted the geeks and their laptops.

      They didn't boot geeks and their laptops, they booted freeloaders with laptops. They also booted legitimate customers with laptops. If the new ambiance of no laptops draws a better crowd on the weekends, great.
      I'm curious what this would do for the weekdays.

      Now this particular business could go through the expense of setting up some sort of pay as you go wi-fi system, but there is no guarantee that such a system would be a good investment. Especially considering that the business sells more coffee with the wi-fi turned off.

      Time=money and it takes money to make money. Sometimes risks pay off.
      It doesn't take a lot of horsepower to run this type of software and there is open source software pieces to help. I know how I would do it if I owned a coffee shop :)

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    44. Re:Their own fault.. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      They didn't boot geeks and their laptops, they booted freeloaders with laptops. They also booted legitimate customers with laptops. If the new ambiance of no laptops draws a better crowd on the weekends, great. I'm curious what this would do for the weekdays.

      No, they booted everyone with laptops, and they made more money. Now, it's possible that they might have made more money still by requiring that wi-fi users actually buy something, but that's hardly a given. Heck, from the article it would appear that there is quite a bit of evidence that it's the lack of technology that is making this coffee shop more profitable. Apparently some people want to go to a coffee shop to shoot the breeze and drink coffee, not to check their email.

    45. Re:Their own fault.. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      This is so funny - even here in France we feel obliged to buy a "Café WC" at the bar if we want to use a café toilet. Those squatters bring an odd image to mind - what do they do: Wander around town, laptop open, until they get a WiFi signal, then zoom in a squat? We should call this new speicies the "olfacitia oberraritus" or something...

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    46. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      But it is a given that booting only the freeloaders would have been better for business than not booting anyone.

      Apparently some people want to go to a coffee shop to shoot the breeze and drink coffee, not to check their email.

      Agreed. And some people want do want to use the internet in a coffee shop. The article didn't prove that a happy middleground was unattainable. An article proving or disproving that would be interesting.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    47. Re:Their own fault.. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      ..."olfacitia oberraritus" could also be used to describe a toilet-detector : )

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    48. Re:Their own fault.. by zorander · · Score: 1

      Oh noes! Wouldn't want to screw them!

      Seriously. The company doesn't care if you're ethical or not. To keep the company alive, it has to make a profit. They don't have the money or time to take the time to discern ethical from unethical wireless users. Do you know how much coffee you must sell in a day to pay rent in any large city? If they're not moving it, then they need to do something about it. Since a significant amount of their wireless users were 'unethical', it's probably the case that few of them were 'ethical'and they're much better off opening up the space for people just there for the coffee/atmosphere than wasting their money pleasing you and a few other 'ethical' wifi users.

    49. Re:Their own fault.. by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      ...if we want to use a café toilet. Those squatters bring an odd image to mind


      Maybe not so much odd as disgusting...
    50. Re:Their own fault.. by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      Its more interesting to watch the world go by, and it relaxes me to watch the traffic moving past, rather than being trapped in my box apartment with only the TV in the background. Plus you get to mentally undress the hot chicks that come in! (This is slashdot, right, closest anyones getting)

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    51. Re:Their own fault.. by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
      You might be surprised at how far the presumptions extend when the social contract and the service industry intersect. Do you really not know what the response to that challenge will be? "I'm taking my business elsewhere."

      It's twisted.

      In fact, it's a bit like your post with further reflection. The important thing isn't to appreciate the way the cafe threw a cool bonus into the environment. What's really important is to note what chumps/morons they are for simply turning it off periodically to keep the place the way they want it to be instead of roaming the place like cops.

    52. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heck, from the article it would appear that there is quite a bit of evidence that it's the lack of technology that is making this coffee shop more profitable.


      Sorry, but I live in the real world. In the real world, people are lazy. Say I had a coffee shop that I always go to because:\


      A) I like coffee


      and


      B) I like free Wi-Fi


      If on a given weekend I showed up to no free Wi-Fi, I would probab;y have my coffee (all the while simultaneously thinking how pissed I was at the lack of Wi-Fi abd how glad I was to be out of the house).


      I would probably keep going back to that coffe shop on the weekends (to be out of the house), until someone told me about another coffee shop offering free Wi-Fi. At that point, the original coffe shop would lose business.


      What I am trying to say, in case it was lost on someone, is that the GAIN of customers is felt on opening weekend (more space for paying customers). The loss of such a decision will be felt over the course of weeks following, when the paying customers who need Wi-Fi find other venues to patronage.

    53. Re:Their own fault.. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      With all due respect to small business, this objection to Starbuck's doesn't fly. Starbuck's treats its employees very well, who certainly aren't faceless drones, who have good pay and good advancement opportunities, generous educational benefits and health coverage. It's a much nice place to work than a McDonald's, and frankly, I think they treat their people better than a typical indie cafe treats its people (the sullen art-school students without health insurance).

      Now, the best cafes in the world aren't Starbuck's. I don't like their house coffees, I think their frou-frou drinks are absurd (Vanilla Caramel Soy blah blah blah), and I refuse to call "small, medium and large" "tall, grande, and venti". But their capuccino and latte's are pretty damn good, better than a lot of indie places. And as far as generally being decent corporate citizens, they don't get a lot better. I'm not fond of globalization and homogeneity, but I can think of a lot more worthwhile targets to pick on than Starbuck's.

    54. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Why is that better than simply TURNING THE FUCKING THING OFF?

      Are you guys high? Do you really think these poor slobs want to waste the time they need to spend making your soy mocha telling ingrate nerds to get the fuck out within earshot of some Yuppie who went there to to get away from assholes?

      Guess what brainiacs. They don't need your advice. The WiFi goes. Happiness reigns. Slashdot will discuss how things could have been better.

    55. Re:Their own fault.. by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      The whole point for these people is that they are sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop, other people can see them sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop and they can tell their friends that they spent time sitting around in a coffee shop with a laptop.

      Sitting around in a coffee shop with a laptop is in itself a fashion statement; it has nothing to do with drinking coffee and nothing to do with sitting in front of a laptop doing interesting stuff.

      The probably spend their time updating their boring blogs (a tautology, maybe ?) where they write about sitting about in a coffee shop with a laptop.

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    56. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at home. Sitting alone at the computer all day is LONELY. So I head down to the coffee shop every once and a while just to get some minimal social interaction and see other people.

      You're right; if I had to choose one or the other for eight hours a day, I personally would choose the privacy and comfort of my home. But it's nice to have a choice.

    57. Re:Their own fault.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      But not everyone is at home. When I'm in a different city, or just far enough that going home for a coffee break is uneconomical, I'd rather use a cafe.

    58. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, you don't get it. The parent poster is expressing the very same sentiment you're expressing with an extra bonus that's escaping you: "It's not about whether the merchant would have to get into the awkward mode of policing their users for those that have or have not bought coffee..."

      Yes it is. They have better things to do with their time than teaching grown-ups how to behave -- like making coffee. That's why they capped the WiFi. It's also why the poster you responded to made note of how crappy it would be to hang out in a cafe full of nasty employees who had to run around nagging freeloaders.

    59. Re:Their own fault.. by evildogeye · · Score: 1

      I get bored working at home and even in the office. The atmosphere of a coffee shop offers a nice change of pace a couple days a week.

      When I go into the coffee shop nearby, there is usually:

      1) Good Music
      2) Cute girls
      3) Someone else to cook food for me
      4) Interesting people to observe and make fun of.

      And then, of course, there is the endless fun that can be had by sniffing someones IM conversations. In my heart, I know that one day I will read these words: "OH MY GOD!!! The hottest guy is sitting next to me."

    60. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've posted 7 times on this story, and not a single pro-Apple comment. rokzy, I'm really impressed!

    61. Re:Their own fault.. by whoopass · · Score: 1

      Working on your laptop is a pretty solitary thing. I can either - work on my laptop at home and feel bad, or work on my laptop over coffee at a coffee shop, get a little less done, but meet and talk to people. Quite a few times I've bumped into friends, caught up, etc. at my local coffee shop.

      One thing that does seem strange is that if there is a person there working on their laptop that you'd like to talk to, it is somewhat more difficult to start up a conversation.

      Oh well, still better than working at home alone.

    62. Re:Their own fault.. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, they booted everyone with laptops

      No. Just those who wanted continuous Internet. Surfing porn, P2P, Slashdot, yes, they needed that. To do email, download it all (I have no sympathy if you use webmail) and read and reply to it at leisure, send it off later. Write your documents, spreadsheets, blog, whatever and upload later too.

    63. Re:Their own fault.. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I have a reputation.

      but if you notice, in one of the posts I did say "airport express" instead of some generic wireless hub.

    64. Re:Their own fault.. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      : ) my dumb. And yes, in many French cafés one still has to squat.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    65. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six or eight hours on a laptop keyboard

      Dude, one word:

      GENTOO

      Nuff said

    66. Re:Their own fault.. by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i'm not sure bandwidth is really the issue here anyway.
      Maybe, if one defines bandwidth as "available seating for paying customers".
    67. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have no children at home or you would know an hour at a coffee shop alone is like a tropical vacation to the single with no kids geek.

    68. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been my experience that the... how should I say it... "view" has always been better at a coffee shop.

      If you are wondering what I mean when I say "view" then you probably need get out from behind the keyboard and interface with some females.

    69. Re:Their own fault.. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Best be careful with the term "implied contract"

      You're right. That phrase has a lot of baggage associated with it, mostly because of how I use my TiVo. That said, I probably should have been clearer: I think I mean to refer more to an unspoken social contract, wherein people running popular businesses (like favorite coffee shops) are understood not to be running charities. While it's fashionable for businesses to do "community outreach" type stuff (so that Wal-Mart can defuse complaints about their size, for example), WiFi at the coffee shop is, specifically, about making the experience of patronizing that business a better one for the customers. The merchant may come across as peevish by complaining about a leech that never so much as buys a cup of coffee burning up all of their bandwidth grabbing Star Wars rips while using someone else's IP address, so it's up to the wider culture to make that sort of nonsense feel as inappropriate as it is.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    70. Re:Their own fault.. by timster · · Score: 1

      Well, we have that sort of thing here in Denton, TX, and I can get you a deal on a truly wonderful house for less than a million dollars. If you're a liberal, don't fret -- our precinct was almost a tie between Gore and Nader in 2000. And if you're a conservative there's churches all over the place.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    71. Re:Their own fault.. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The probably spend their time updating their boring blogs (a tautology, maybe ?)

      I beleive the word you're looking for is "redundancy."

    72. Re:Their own fault.. by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Soy milk isn't "frou-frou". Some people actually use it as a replacement for cattle mucus.

    73. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a home in the $100k neighborhood, with bus service to the coffee shops in bourge-ville?

    74. Re:Their own fault.. by circusboy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem like they care who uses the wireless, just that if you're going to hang out *in* the coffeeshop, they would prefer that you were sociable is a "local" sort of way.

      this doesn't seem unreasonable, to me, the most important part of picking a coffeeshop to hang out at, is the rest of the people there. if you're in seattle and need a quite place to hook up, I understand that there is this really neat library...

      bear in mind of course that seattle is the one place where starbucks does qualify as "local coffeeshop" (sort of) and they use t-mobile hotspots. i appreciate, as much as anybody access to free wireless, but I also appreciate that if you open a coffeeshop, it is not so you can serve a lot of people coffee, it's so you can have a place where people you like to see can congregate.

      I think it's very important to remember that.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    75. Re:Their own fault.. by exKingZog · · Score: 1

      Actually I like sitting in a coffee shop, so long as it's during the week (in a quiet period), and I've got nothing in particular to do. I seem to be far more creative there, maybe due to lack of home distractions.

      --
      "If he were a plant, people would roll him up and smoke him."
    76. Re:Their own fault.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Maybe I'm square, but at home, the coffee is cheaper (but just as good-I get the beans from them), the chairs are more comfortable, and when I tire of it all, I can lay down and nap. I never understood sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop for an hour, much less several."

      Well, I've never been much of one to drink much coffee...but, I think the reasoning would be analagous to a bar. Why go out and drink at a bar, when you can have it at home...cheaper, etc.?

      I'd dare say...just do you can be 'social'...and be out around people. Hell....it even gives you the possibility of meeting someone new...be it a new friend or someone to get laid....(the bar works better for the latter).

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    77. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they've done well. an attitude of "buy or get out" would be devastating to any sense of culture. terribly vulgar.

      Then why not just "buy or no wi fi"? Still, it's their solution, and I don't see why "free" has to mean "always free all the time". Long as they're up-front about it. Kind of annoying that they would turn it off completely, but it's their shop, and if they retain a decent culture and still have business, that's their prerogative.

    78. Re:Their own fault.. by JoAnywhere · · Score: 1

      I do use Cafe Wifi fairly regularly. I travel for work a lot. Sometimes if I fly into a city and can't check into my hotel before my meeting, but have spare time then its off to the nearest cafe for a latte and hopefully some wifi access. And yes - I do make my determination of which cafe to use based on its wifi availability (free, paid, none in decreasing order of preference). btw - 'latte' defines the drink, the concept of a large or extra large latte is ludicrous Cheers Jo

    79. Re:Their own fault.. by murdocj · · Score: 1
      Lesse, they don't want to enforce the "buy something or get out" rule? Their loss...

      This is rated +4 insightful????? How about "it's bad for business to piss off customers"? Seems like they had a tough problem and they came up with a good, thoughtful solution.

    80. Re:Their own fault.. by mwood · · Score: 1

      I'll turn it around, then: why sit around drinking expensive coffee when your purpose was to meet people?

    81. Re:Their own fault.. by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      Its not mucus. Its pus and antiboitics. Rotten blood and enzymes boiled to perfection. And it is deeeeelicious. I only use soy sometimes because of the lactose intolerance thing. And soy has less carbs.
      But milk tastes much better.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    82. Re:Their own fault.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " I'll turn it around, then: why sit around drinking expensive coffee when your purpose was to meet people?"

      The coffee is just an excuse to 'be' there....easy to strike up a conversation with something in your hand....etc.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    83. Re:Their own fault.. by mwood · · Score: 1

      Golly, haven't you heard? Batch is dead. Everything must be interactive and real-time, even if it doesn't need to be, even if it makes no sense for it to be, even if you could do it better the other way.

    84. Re:Their own fault.. by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Yes it sums-up the whole article. That ruins our entire discussion thread! We need an option to moderate "-1 OnTopic".

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    85. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A coffee shop near me offers free wi-fi, they are open for about 12 hours a day, and have 6 sets of keys they cycle though each day. Every two hours, the wi-fi key changes, if you want to get the key - you need to buy something.

      If you've been there for an hour or two, the'll give you the new key (esp if you got a key at like, quater-to the key change-over ), but if your'e going onto your 5th hour, you'll need to buy something new to get the other key.

      yeah, there are still ways for dishonest customers to get around this - but works pretty good.

    86. Re:Their own fault.. by mwood · · Score: 1

      Think of it as an economical compromise. By simply flipping a switch twice a week they get maybe 70-80% of the effect that they'd really like for essentially no effort. I think it's a clever solution. They'll lose a few actual customers, but apparently not as many as they had had to turn away when some seats were filled by moochers.

    87. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you'd be living in what amounts to being Dallas and Fort Worths step-brother...one that many Dallasites refer to as Pachouliville, USA. If it weren't for Rubber Gloves and Hailey's, I'd never venture out there...neither would most sensible people, liberal or otherwise.

    88. Re:Their own fault.. by kinaidos · · Score: 1

      Paris cafés with any serious clientele have implicit buy or leave policies. So it hardly seems plausible to claim that this somehow is devastating to any sense of culture or vulgar. The real problem is that to implement such a policy requires some sort of wait-staff. Coffee shops tend to be minimally staffed, and it isn't feasible to try to enforce any sort of buy or leave policy. If there were anything like real culture going on in cafés this wouldn't be a problem anyways. Sociability would drive the laptop zombies away. They seem to be a solitary breed, not amenable to conversation. So perhaps the solution is for others to lean over the shoulders of the squatters and pry into what it is they are doing. If it doesn't eventually drive the sqatters away, at least it could help mitigate the obnoxiousness of their hermit like presence.

      --
      Stephanie says / she wants to know / why she's given half her life to / people she hates now.
    89. Re:Their own fault.. by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Technological means will not avail you, for (kr|h)ackers gleefully waste away while pobing your puny defenses.

      Tattooed biker turned barristo asking l33t to either spring for a muffin or scram will work much better.

      There will come a day when the coffee shop won't have to offer wifi. There will be enough of it floating in from outside that Mad Max will have to put his apron down to clear the room of black-haired technophiles.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    90. Re:Their own fault.. by Tmack · · Score: 1
      I have been to shops that give wep keys on the reciept, changing every few hours or daily (never stay long enough to find out, and its different each time I go). Also, I have seen other suggestions on a /. post from a while ago about setting up such a hot-spot including a manditory proxy setup that requires a user login before being allowed through. Have the user type in their reciept number or some code identifying that specific reciept, and have the computer running the proxy tie into the register/POS's database such that the sale activates the code as a valid proxy login that expires a set time after the reciept's timestamp.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    91. Re:Their own fault.. by drwho · · Score: 1
      Sitting around in a coffee shop with a laptop is in itself a fashion statement; it has nothing to do with drinking coffee and nothing to do with sitting in front of a laptop doing interesting stuff.

      Maybe that's the case: It would certainly explain the great prevalence of new, high-end Apple laptops seen at cafes. Along with European-styled glasses, and metrosexual haircuts.

      Back in 2000, it was pretty hip to be on the net and sucking down an espresso-chocolate drink on the sidewalk gawking at all the girls staring at you, and talking about them on some chat thing (irc, aol, etc) as you did so, occasionally sneaking a pic with the built-in camera as you did so of the latest fashionable young thing showing her marvelous legs as she ambled by as you did. But it's now five years on, and it's not so special any more.

      Maybe having that laptop connected to an LCD projector and showing a pirated copy of star warz episode III would be worthy of attention. But I wouldn't want to have to lug around all the batteries you'd need to power such a toy.

    92. Re:Their own fault.. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness though, whatstops wifi users from sitting in a car outside? or in the shop nextdoor?

      On a well run hotspot, a username and password on your coffee reciept, good for (say) an hour for every five dollars or so.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    93. Re:Their own fault.. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      i guess you've never worked in customer service. if you have to constantly confront customers, the employees are 1) spending valuable time either tracking how long folks have been sitting around and getting them to leave 2) risking physical confrontation with pissed-off weirdos, 3) risking a verbal confrontation that is just bad for business.

    94. Re:Their own fault.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who live the good life are far from worried about the opinions of people who think Plano is a nice place to live.

    95. Re:Their own fault.. by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Starbuck's treats its employees very well, who certainly aren't faceless drones, who have good pay and good advancement opportunities, generous educational benefits and health coverage.

      I think you came near to the original poster's point in your post. Starbucks employees usually aren't sullen art student types. They're not as angsty, and they are certainly NOT avant-guard like so many mopey or snobbish indie coffee house employees are. That's how Starbucks has a different "atmosphere."

    96. Re:Their own fault.. by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      I tend to use such places as an excuse to avoid computers for a bit :)

      --
      Me (Blog)
    97. Re:Their own fault.. by tarpy · · Score: 1

      Then again, how many of these places do that?

      I have a TMO Hotspot account that I use for when I travel, and find myself in the coffee shop of whatever border's is closest frequently to check email/etc.

      I've never ever been asked to buy something, but if I'm there for longer than 30 min, I tend to grab a coffee or something.

      Then again, I think it's different for these places that offer pay wifi. With TMO, Border's gets a cut or fee for every time I get on the network at their location, so I don't feel so bad.

    98. Re:Their own fault.. by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Some of the posts on this topic were so irksome that I must have skimped on clairity when I chimed in. There is a natural tendency for people to take things for granted and treat privileges like rights. I wasn't saying the cafe is wrong to turn it off. I was saying they turn it off instead of asking people to leave because people are assholes. The staff have more important things to do than teach adults manners. They don't owe anyone a WiFi equiped livingroom. Yet some people apparently think they do. So why is it so great to note their lack of a "manners enforcement" policy to correct the problem? It's naive and at best a kind of backhanded form of sympathy.

    99. Re:Their own fault.. by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 1

      No children, raised and gone. I need a better class of coffee shop out here in the newly minted burbs (ten years ago was the deep sticks), because the crowd at the coffee shop is made up of kids that I would have strangled as a parent.

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    100. Re:Their own fault.. by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 1

      I know about the 'view'. See reply to previous post. The 'view' is young enough to be my kid, but shallow and uninteresting. Besides, my interface is proprietary to my wife.

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    101. Re:Their own fault.. by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Because at home my wife screams at me every 10 minutes telling me how much she hates her life and hates me. Plus, I'm screaming back telling her that she is more of a pain to live with than Satan and Hitler combined.

      This slightly inhibits the amount of work I can do at home.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  2. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last, a reason to talk to people!

  3. Solution? by Xshare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Easy Solution: Make people buy something to use wifi, and propose a 2-hour limit, or however much you deem necessary.

    1. Re:Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And a very simple way to do it with minimal additional investment is to print a current WEP encryption code on the receipt (or a separate piece of paper), which will be good for two hours. Drop a code and then add a new one every 30 minutes or so. (Most routers can support a number of simultaneous codes. This could be done manually--it's only 16 times per day--or automatically.)

      A more advanced way is to give each purchaser a password (unique, or time-limited like above), then run everyone through a magical Linux router that maps all web pages to an "Enter your password" page until a password has been entered for that particular MAC address, then allow unlimited access for that MAC for whatever time seems reasonable. That's what our local university does, although without a time limit, to ensure only students use their wireless network.

      Boundless Wifi sells solutions that do these kinds of things for businesses.

    2. Re:Solution? by Delta-9 · · Score: 1

      Then you would have that SOB buying a pack of gum for $0.99 every 2 hours. I completly agree with this decision based on their rationale. They are not providing the wireless for people to sit there and take up space by themself for 4 hours (w/ or w/out a coffee purchase).

      They wanted to facilitate a more enjoyable coffee shop experience and they realized that wifi on the weekend was taking away from that atmosphere.

    3. Re:Solution? by Bake · · Score: 1

      So, then limit the free access to people who make purchases of X dollars...

      It's just a matter of finding a line and sticking to it.

    4. Re:Solution? by biobogonics · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Easy Solution: Make people buy something to use wifi, and propose a 2-hour limit, or however much you deem necessary

      Please. You can't fix social problems with technological solutions.

    5. Re:Solution? by numbski · · Score: 1

      I agree to an extent, but I think throwing the baby out with the bathwater isn't the way to deal with it. Perhaps it is, but why give up business X to business Y when you can have both? (There's a rhetorical answer to that, which is to keep the type of environment they want, which is a valid argument.)

      A technological solution that is available however is very simple, and integrates well. The linksys wrt54g is to a point now that you can load just about anything on it. There are several captive portal solutions, all of which have one way or another to mesh with your register system. If you have an older register system, you are pretty much SOL. The technological answers are there, it's just a matter of whether or not it is worth the time and effort to set up, or if you'd prefer not to have the laptop users. In this case, the answer is that they don't want the laptop users. Fair enough. Just don't argue that there's no way to do it and keep everyone happy. There is.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    6. Re:Solution? by Harker · · Score: 1
      Easy Solution: Make people buy something to use wifi, and propose a 2-hour limit, or however much you deem necessary

      Please. You can't fix social problems with technological solutions.


      That is not necessarily a technical solution, but rather a social one:

      "Hey you! Yea, you! You've been sitting there for 3 hours surfing the net, and haven't had a single cup of coffee. Pack it up and leave. No, I'm sorry, buying a cup now won't do. Please leave."

      Yea, it is chasing a potential customer away, but really, if they were, they would have bought something already.

      Looking at that, one can imagine why I never did well in the CS industries. :P

      H.
      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    7. Re:Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps not, but they CAN fix a revenue problem with technological solutions.

    8. Re:Solution? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It sounds like they were giving up business when they were running wifi on the weekends. The low-lives were coming in with their gear and taking up space and not buying a damn thing. When you're turning away paying customers because the place is full of sponges due to the wifi, the wifi goes off. "Their second Sunday without Wi-Fi was one of their best revenue days in some time." sums it up nicely.

    9. Re:Solution? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Isn't turning off the wi-fi a technological solution?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:Solution? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem isn't that wifi users are taking up space without paying for it. The problem is that laptop users are taking up space without contributing to the vibe that the coffee shop is trying to generate.

      Coffee shops are meant to be a highly social place, while the life of the computer addict is a solitary one. It sounds like they were ending up with a shop without energy, silent but for the tappity-tap-clicking of laptops. Even if the sea of laptops was purchasing goods at the same rate as the original, chatty crowd, I can see why they'd want the old atmosphere back.

      Bah. Within ten years, there will be dirt-cheap wifi everywhere, and people will go back to going to coffee shops for the old reason: to get laid.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:Solution? by grub · · Score: 1


      ZyXel has an access point with a small printer (like a cash register) which will print out access codes good for X minutes (programmable by the operator) for each tap of a button. We have one at work we were trying out for guest workers but haven't put it in operation yet.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    12. Re:Solution? by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      And are you also going to require that in addition to making purchases of X dollars, that they spend Y minutes conversing with Z other customers each?

      Even if the wi-fi junkies buy lots of coffee, that still doesn't solve the problem of the erosion of the atmosphere in the shop. Dozens of people independently sitting around looking at screens and not interacting with one another is evidently not what the people running the shop deem desirable.

    13. Re:Solution? by dotgain · · Score: 2, Interesting
      but really, if they were, they would have bought something already.
      Exactly. A REAL customer is one who _wants_ to buy something from you, not one who only does so when you require.

      I'm not a cafe owner, but to be honest I can't believe there are people so shameless they'll bowl on up to a cafe and hop on the lan before getting a drink.

      "Just because I can!"?? Fuck you. I just spilt a long-long-long black in your crotch. Just because I can.

      I used to work at a video shop, pre 2000. We had a policy, if you didn't like a film, for whatever reason, tell us, we'll let you hire another (of same or lesser price bracket) no charge. No ifs or buts. Sure we'll ask you why you didn't like the film, but any reason was good enough for us.

      Why wasn't it abused? Because people were reasonable. Nobody seemed to have the gall to return day after day to say "nah, didn't like that either". Try that sort of thing now...

    14. Re:Solution? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I had points right now. That's a nice little one-stop-shopping device that looks ideal for that sort of use.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    15. Re:Solution? by bitflip · · Score: 1

      It is more correct to say that "social and technological issues cannot be decoupled" (I wish I remember where I stole that phrase). Technology is nothing without people using it. The most successful technologies are the ones that make it easier to for people to do what they were going to do, anyway.

      For example, people have talked to each other throughout the ages. Phones make that easier. People have been traveling for just as long. Cars and railroads make it easier. People have been buying and selling things to each other forever, eBay just makes it easier.

      Without the interaction of society and technology, both amount to little. In this case, the shop chose to use technology (free WiFi) to influence people (we like free stuff). They ran into a social issue (some people abuse free stuff), and chose a technological solution (change the tech so its not free at the times its most likely to be abused). Whaddya know? It works.

      While I realize its heresy on /., "RTFM" is not the way to have any technology adapted by the masses. The technology should fit the user, not the other way around.

    16. Re:Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dozens of people independently sitting around looking at screens and not interacting with one another is evidently not what the people running the shop deem desirable.

      THen why'd they put in free WiFi???

    17. Re:Solution? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      You can get laid in a coffee shop?! Utah must be a more exciting place than I've been led to believe.

  4. Drats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they caught on to us!!!!

    -Anonymous Coward

  5. easier solution... by killa62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An esasier solution would be to just have hourly changing codes to enter that would be given to people who boutght something, that way, squatters would have to buy stuff every hour and therefore not be squatters anymore.

    1. Re:easier solution... by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you couldn't get anything done that way. When I go online anywhere, it's going to take me almost an hour just to situate myself! I don't want to be interruped, not only to change the code (presumably an encryption key) but also go and purchase something.

      It'd be better if I could buy seven cups of coffee for seven hours of MUDdin^H^H^H^H^H^Hbrowsing the internet.

    2. Re:easier solution... by MisterSarcastic · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, that's a much easier solution than hitting the switch on weekends.

      --
      I'm -so- there.
    3. Re:easier solution... by Delta-9 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a cyber-cafe and not a coffee shop (w/ complimentary internet access to check your email). They obviously want a coffee shop feel, not a cyber-cafe feel.

    4. Re:easier solution... by twostar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, everyone's suggesting these complex (for a normal coffee shop) solutions when they've already found one. Pulling the plug works fine for them, why is everyone up in arms. Dear god don't take the free internet away!

    5. Re:easier solution... by loraksus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Easiest would be to just have no power plugs. Your average laptop doesn't last that long.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    6. Re:easier solution... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Solution 1: Implement system that requires a system to generate codes, have some kind of login mechanism and so on

      Solution 2: Flip the switch on the wireless router on weekends.

      You have some strange ideas about "easier"

    7. Re:easier solution... by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      In what way possible is that easier than pulling the plug on the access port? They would have to setup a much more complicated setup, as the current setup is probably not more than an open cheap wireless access point to a reasonable highspeed internet connection, of some seperate sever that is gating internet access using a web interface code entering page that excepts a code that is printed and registered with the system with a purchase at the till. This is not a simple system to implement independently and yes there are commercial solutions but it will probably an order of magnitude or more higher in cost than simple system they already have.

      It makes sense to see if the unlimited internet access is really a problem on weekends (which it is) before even thinking about implementing this by shutting off the internet access and seeing what happens.

    8. Re:easier solution... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you say and am not thinking that a log in system is in any way easier than pulling the plug but I do think that one would be a good idea. I do not have a phone line atm (temporary rented house) so I just ponce off the free wi-fi at the local computer mart. I know that I am free loading and am grateful to be able to but I can see the other side in that if someone is paying for something they can expect a return. I think a system whereby you get a login code printed on each receipt (so each purchase earns time) from a till that is connected to the router would be a great idea and is not beyond the realms of possibility given that most of the wi-fi routers now are really Linux boxes. I am going to purchase a drink every now and then so I would not be disadvantaged and anyone that thinks that they are entitled to a free ride can rumage through the rubbish bin for other people receipts.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    9. Re:easier solution... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Seriously, everyone's suggesting these complex (for a normal coffee shop) solutions when they've already found one.

      That's because there are better solutions. Such as those proposed here. Solutions that don't piss off your loyal customers that also like to use wifi in the coffee shop. People that hang around a coffee shop for other reasons often tend to buy more of your food. The trick is to discourage the freeloaders. There are many ways to do it.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    10. Re:easier solution... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Hey, anyone who still insists on using the net during the weekend can always use their cell-phone to connect ... but that would cost $$$.

      Providing free access on weekends, resulting in non-paying customers displacing paying customers, was costing the store money in terms of lost sales AND inconveniencing the paying customers.

    11. Re:easier solution... by msuzio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, apparently not. They did it. They made more money and had more happy people. Technology loses, sorry. It's not always this forward march towards inevitable happiness. You can back off a bit, take some time where you shut off the 'net, and be happy without being a total Luddite.

      Why in the world would they *want* to try a different, more complex, less likely to work solution when just shutting the darn thing off seems to be working fine? If some people don't like it, that's OK... they can go somewhere else. It's not the end of the world. If they lose enough customers, I guess they'd change their minds. Considering that many of the wi-fi users were not generating the revenue to justify the business they were driving off I think they might have made the right decision.

    12. Re:easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about generating a random code which is printed on a reciept that gives you an hours (or whatever) worth of access. You could have a central proxy server authenticates the code and locks it to the MAC address of the laptop, each code is throw-away (only works once). Therefore after the given period the access would cease and a squatter would have to get up to buy another coffee to get another code from a reciept.

    13. Re:easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if somebody came in with a spare battery ?

    14. Re:easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do the math:

      2 * not that long = ___________

    15. Re:easier solution... by bconway · · Score: 1

      You're confused. People who use the free bandwidth without buying anything aren't "loyal customers." They're loiterers.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    16. Re:easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I was using my laptop in a Barnes and Nobel Starbucks when my battery ran out. I couldn't find a power outlet in the Coffee section of the store so I plugged into one in the Magazine section. I kept the cord and laptop behind some books - out of the way and mostly out of site. I browsed the magazine section while I was waiting for the battery to recharge. I was promptly told by a member of the Barnes and Nobel team to unplug my laptop becuase their electrical system was not built to support that kind of use by customers and it was a liability issue for them.

    17. Re:easier solution... by barzok · · Score: 1

      Local building codes might have something to say about that.

    18. Re:easier solution... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Local building codes require that you put in power outlets?

      At least in the "consumer" space, the only thing I've seen power plugs in older joints would be for the occasional vacuum cleaner. However, a group of us thought it would be fun to sit down with some SLA batteries and have a game fest at our local establishment....

      Couldn't be FPS, but most older (1ghz or so) laptops are decent enough at RTS games.

      --
      Karnal
    19. Re:easier solution... by coaxial · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You (and the apparently the mods) have a bizzare definition of "easier". Let's see:

      1. Adding a firewall seperate from the WLAN router.
      2. Creating a system to generate random passwords.
      3. Modify the firewall so that it stays synced with the password generator.
      4. Replace/Modify the point-of-sale system so that it can distribute a unique password to each customer.


      Cost: $$$$$

      Versus

      Unplug the router every Friday at close, plug the router back in every Monday at open.

      Cost: 0

      Yeah. Option one is way easier.
    20. Re:easier solution... by tidge · · Score: 1

      and people who would use the free bandwidth AND buy some coffee are now going elsewhere.

    21. Re:easier solution... by valintin · · Score: 1

      "Hey Killa62, how's it going? Are you going to be hanging out today? Can I use your code? Cool! Hey check out this site... "

      Now assuming I just socially engineered your code, kicking me out would also create bad will with the person or persons I might know. You might even come back in a few hours to see if I'm still hanging out.

      Maybe it's different because I live in a small town but I could spend all weekend in a coffee shop and get a code and coffee every two hours with out spending a dime. Usually I'm too busy to do that, but then I'd just give my code to some other towney.

    22. Re:easier solution... by c_monster · · Score: 1

      An easier solution would be to just have hourly changing codes

      How exactly is that easier than turning off the WiFi router on weekends? Who's going to update the codes? Who's going to print up the six zillion little slips of paper with "this hour's code"? Who's going to set up the router to kick off 'expired' machines without interrupting legitimate users?

      Besides, according to TFA "The staff doesn't want to have to enforce the cafe's unspoken policy of making a purchase to use the space (and the Wi-Fi)..."

      --
      Read the full text my book Perl for the Web
    23. Re:easier solution... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could just flip the breaker.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    24. Re:easier solution... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      One problem I see with this is somebody who buys something 5 minutes before the code changes -- he doesn't get 1 hour of access, he gets 5 minutes.

      I like other people's idea of just not having power outlets more, but assuming you wanted to continue with the one-hour-access-with-purchase idea, what you'd want to do is hook the wifi system into the cash register in such a way that each transaction generates a valid, unique code that would give you access to the system, and it'd print that code onto each receipt. Then when you buy a coffee, you look at your receipt, plug it into your laptop, and that gives you wifi. An hour after generation, the code expires.

  6. Finding a soluable median by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously what they ought to do is give time-limited wifi passkeys that can be "charged" when the customer buys a product. That way they don't get lingerers/squatters who are only there for the wifi without having to pay.

    The higher the receipt, the longer the passkey works. It's a decent system, if not a little burdensome for freeloaders.

    The question becomes, How easily or feasible would it be to put such a system into practice?

    1. Re:Finding a soluable median by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      If you could get some programming into the cash register, it would be easy to generate a password that prints on the receipt, and sets the AP to allow that password to work for N minutes.

      The hard part is identifying the customer. It's unlikely most would know what their MAC address is, and you can't hand out encryption keys like this since you'd have to change the encryption key for everyone at the same time. Instead, you'd have to have something that determines whether a MAC is known, if its not known, then all the page requests get redirected to the buy-something-and-login site, where they enter their receipt key, it tells them how much time they have, and a URL to keep track of it. Then, a cron job makes the system forget expired MAC addresses.

      Doing it this way seems to be the best balance of security, functionality, privacy, and not spending 20 minutes holding up the line while explaining how to log into their system.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Finding a soluable median by michrech · · Score: 1

      You can do it with these:

      "HotSpot" Gateways
      http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=349
      http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=173
      http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=402

      "HotSpot" Ticket Printer
      http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=282

      All they have to do, if they have the printer, is hit a button and it dynamically creates a user account/password and prints it up.

      ---
      telnet://sinep.gotdns.com -- It's a BBS -- Read my journal.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    3. Re:Finding a soluable median by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Maybe authentication via RADIUS to validate the passcode?

      Granted, it would require a custom RADIUS server.

    4. Re:Finding a soluable median by thogard · · Score: 1

      Talk about doing it the hard way.
      The register will have a transaction number. Thats all you need if you prevent people from taking too many guesses.

      Of course the easy solution is get people to enter their own order on their own lap tops.

    5. Re:Finding a soluable median by mackman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just about the money. It's about the atmosphere. Nothing kills the mood in a coffee house more than a bunch of people working on their laptops. Maybe during weekday afternoons it's ok, but I think killing WiFi in the evenings and on weekends is a great idea.

    6. Re:Finding a soluable median by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Thats all you need if you prevent people from taking too many guesses.

      Two problems. First, the receipt numbers are usually sequential. Once you've bought your cup of coffee, you just keep using bigger numbers.

      Also, how do you get the transaction number from the register to the AP/firewall/whatever?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:Finding a soluable median by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      The question becomes, How easily or feasible would it be to put such a system into practice?
      I played with such a system, though I do forget its name, a few years ago. It was fairly simple: You'd get a ticket that had a number on it, and when you started up you'd be redirected to the 'login' page no matter where you tried to go where you had to enter your code. That fixed you up with a proper route on the gateway and now you were on the internet for a while.

      It was something like $40 for the software. Pretty cheap, but you had to have a spare computer to act as the gateway and it had to run Linux. We've just stepped outside the realm of the average coffee shop owner/employee by a LONG shot.

      It's simply far cheaper for them to jack in a cheap Linksys WAP and let it run free. If you're in there, you're on the network.

      Technological solutions are great, and all, but there's a cost/benefit that needs to be considered, and this is one of the times where "wetware" is a better solution.

      You see a freeloader in your shop? Tell them to bugger off and not come back again, and if they DO come back again they'd better be a paying customer. It is that simple, and trust me, you will NOT get a backlash from regular customers when you toss somebody out for such actions. They are either silent, or sometimes even vocally approving of your actions. Yes, I have tossed people from retail establishments simply for rude behavior. Not from a bar, but a greenhouse. I don't imagine tossing somebody freeloading from a coffee shop would be any different. The regulars will applaud you, and the bottom line will not suffer. It may even improve because it shows that you won't tolerate assholes (or freeloaders) in your shop.
    8. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I'm missing something, you'd have to get a radius client installed on everyone's wince and palmos handhelds, powerbook and thinkpad. Hence the 20 minutes holding up the line trying to explain to people how to log in ;)

    9. Re:Finding a soluable median by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      It's not just about the money. It's about the atmosphere

      The "Atmosphere" ? You mean the noisy chatter? Seriously, what do you mean?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    10. Re:Finding a soluable median by thogard · · Score: 1

      Your making the wrong assumptions.
      The wifi is there to get people in the shop to buy coffee. Its currently free with no accountability. The idea is to get rid of the people who set up shop there and never buy anything.

      You have someone in the morning check the current recipt number and enter that into a wifi router via a web page. Maybe you could even let the thing accept the 1st one after 6:00am or whenever opening time is. Once thats done, you only allow a number to be used once and it must be within a limited range of others. Sure its easy to bypass this but once someone is known to bypass it a few times, the staff will know who they are and they can ask them to leave. 99% of people won't bypass so it will work good enough and its a low cost solution.

    11. Re:Finding a soluable median by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Easy and hard. Best bet would be to filter out all MAC addresses like colleges do, then allow certain ones when a purchase is made. If you're going to be buying wifi time, then you should know your MAC address anyway. It's not like it's not printed on your system or card (if PCMCIA). Now this is still cumbersome so they could do it with one of those coffee card things so you only need to give them the address once.

      Hell, automatically redirect any http requests from an invalid MAC address to a local page where they can order their next beverage.

    12. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good answer. Reasonable solution. No OS or browser proselytizing. Short and sweet. Are you new around here? ;-)

    13. Re:Finding a soluable median by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what he means is perfectly clear, at least to me. Especially if you read the article, the point is crystal: "Before Wi-Fi, 'People talked to each other, strangers met each other,' she said. Solitary activities might involve reading and writing, but it was part of the milieu. 'Those people co-existed with people having conversations,' said Strongin." IOW, the atmosphere of people communicating face to face. But what do I know? I sit in a NOC all day staring at a monitor.

      It reminds me of an old joke- 'The best way to kill a party is to turn on the TV.'

    14. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To some (many?) people that's a desirable atmosphere, those people include the owner of said shop. It's not my thing, but who are we to tell him which crowd to cater to?

    15. Re:Finding a soluable median by Razzak · · Score: 1

      Not very. Let's see what you need:

      1) A dedicated server to manage access permissions.
      2) A database of customer MACs
      3) A unique identifier for each customer (even if this is just a magnetic swipe card, you've got to buy the machine and eat the cost of each card per customer)
      4) A POS device that is networked with the server
      5) Someone who can actually set all this up
      6) Someone on-site who can fix it (with an open access point, fixing it is as easy as unplugging the WAP).

      Way too much trouble for a system where there is high transaction volume and low transaction dollar value.

    16. Re:Finding a soluable median by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      A soluable median? You mean something we can mix in their drinks to either get them to stay or come back? That sounds like a great idea!

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    17. Re:Finding a soluable median by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Lets elaborate. On each receipt, there could be a passcode. For any unauthenticated traffic, all traffic gets diverted to a advert. With current deals, special offers, "buy here" and the rest of that fudge.

      Leechers only get that screen. Legit users can click "access net", type in their passcode and a database links their MAC address (or something more secure) with their timed access.

      Quite.

    18. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe during weekday afternoons it's ok, but I think killing WiFi in the evenings and on weekends is a great idea.

      So, essentially, very few people will ever use the wi-fi service because it'll be down during all the normal peak-useage times. So, why the fuck do you even want/need wi-fi at all then?

    19. Re:Finding a soluable median by mr_exit · · Score: 1

      How about a system that is totally transparent for users?

      Monitor the MAC addresses that are connecting to the network and then ban them for 5 hours after they have been connected for an hour. You could even modify the max connection time for different times of the day or give the staff controll of it if the cafe unexpectidly fills up.

      transparent to the users and the good customers won't even know there is access controll at all

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
    20. Re:Finding a soluable median by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      'People talked to each other, strangers met each other,'

      I suppose if thats the kind of coffee shop the guy wants to have, hes entitled to it .. however, myself ... I goto coffee shops to work. however I make sure to buy plenty of stuff to "pay my rent" :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    21. Re:Finding a soluable median by Valar · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is easier than that. You don't need two and three. The POS device prints a password on the receit. The customer pulls out his laptop and opens a browser-- his MAC is not authorized and he gets redirected to a page that lets him type in his password. He types in the password, and it authorizes his MAC address for a certain amount of time.

    22. Re:Finding a soluable median by giantq · · Score: 0

      What do you have to do to get thrown out of a greenhouse? Piss in the azeleas?

    23. Re:Finding a soluable median by aaronl · · Score: 1

      That isn't a joke. TV is probably the worst thing to ever happen to social interaction. When I go to a party and people sit and the TV comes on, I get my things together and get ready to leave. There isn't any point in wasting my time at a "party" when people are sitting in silence in front of that damned box. Go ahead, try to talk in that situation and you get "ssshhh, I can't hear the TV".

      Similar is true with these coffee shops. You go to a shop to meet people, to see performers, or to talk. You can sit at home and be antisocial on the Internet, and not be taking up a spot that a customer might have.

      IOW, you're damn right!

    24. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the people in the article's problem is that after people show up in the morning, they can't get any more business because nobody leaves. I suspect that there are as many "paying" problem customers as there are ones who show up and take over a table without buying anything.

    25. Re:Finding a soluable median by kevcol · · Score: 1

      however I make sure to buy plenty of stuff to "pay my rent"

      Oh I agree- I have certainly sat for hours at a cafe while sucking up the DSL before as well. I also make sure I pay plenty to do it. Funny thing is, the last time I did that, I was there about 5 hours. I bought 3 bevvys which were about $3.5-$4 and had a lunch salad. With the offering to the tip jar, I spent about $20, which paid for most of the month's DSL. And the thing of it was, I got a slight sneer from the counter when I said "Thank you- goodbye!"

    26. Re:Finding a soluable median by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between the din of conversation and someone who brought his office to a coffee shop. Who wants to sit near the lone guy sitting at a table with four seats, shouting into his constantly ringing cell phone about TPS reports; who really should have just ordered coffee to go and stayed at the office. I find these guys are also the ones who stay for 2 hours minimum, and order a solitary cup of coffee; while trying to get as many free refills as possible.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    27. Re:Finding a soluable median by kevcol · · Score: 1

      I was there about 5 hours

      I should note, my DSL was out that weekend, and it was the independent coffee shop in town (the type with the 'Friends don't let friends drink at Starbuck' stickers. ;-) and on a verrrry slow Sunday- there was never more than 1 other customer there than me that whole time. :-)

    28. Re:Finding a soluable median by macshit · · Score: 1

      Is killing wifi enough, though? There are certainly enough people who camp out with their laptops even without wifi access, and I think it has the same off-putting effect on the vibe of a cafe (I've a few particular people in mind actually, that seem to show up at about 8am, grab the best seat, and sit there working on their laptop all day long).

      I'm not sure what makes a bunch of people camped out with a laptop worse than those reading books or studying (I've certainly sat down and read all day in a cafe before), but it definitely makes a place feel less inviting if you walk in and there are tons of people staring at laptops -- and I'm a slashdot reader and life-long hacker!

      [Let's not forget, though, that there is something far worse: The Guy With The Loud Annoying Voice Droning On Endlessly. Death is too good for that guy.]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    29. Re:Finding a soluable median by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      It's not just about the money. It's about the atmosphere The "Atmosphere" ? You mean the noisy chatter? Seriously, what do you mean?

      The atmosphere of people who might interact, as opposed to the atmosphere of 20 unwashed gnomes of dorkdom hunched over their iBooks and Thinkpads silently reading fark or /.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:Finding a soluable median by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Which makes this gadget a brillant device. :-)

    31. Re:Finding a soluable median by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I find these guys are also the ones who stay for 2 hours minimum, and order a solitary cup of coffee; while trying to get as many free refills as possible.
      Simple solutin:
      1. give the freeloader plenty of refills on his coffee
      2. freeloader gets up to "get rid of all that coffee"
      3. while he's in the can, reformat his hard drive
      4. ... wait a few minutes ...
      5. seat paying customers
      6. PROFIT!
      simple, permanent solution ...
    32. Re:Finding a soluable median by thegoogler · · Score: 1

      actually, cafe ladro in seattle has this exact system, you get 65 minutes for a $3 purchase, and like 90 for a $5+ one. it works great at keeping to many people from just camping in there

    33. Re:Finding a soluable median by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, give em a card for cheap, where mac addr is registered, and then have some software updates the wifi-base stations settings for which mac addresses are allowed or not.

      Whether this is the best solution is discussable, especially the card for cheap thing. About several macaddreses, most people only have one, some have two, because work and private laptop. Could allow people to registerer two macs or more, but not allow more than one/two (pdas??) being on air at the same time.

  7. "Free" attracts the cheap by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Well, well, no surprise here. "Free" wifi surely attracts the cheap folks who either cannot afford or will not shell out $50+ for high-speed bandwidth.

    1. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      Uh, if they can afford a laptop with a wireless card, why can't they afford the internet?

    2. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by helioquake · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how the real cheap folks (college students, etc.) priortize.

      I have a laptop with a wireless card, too. But I never paid my $$$ for it. It just sometimes comes with a job.

    3. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by icecow · · Score: 1

      Because some of the smarter, poorer ones gashed themself $700 for a laptop!

      --
      Stop invalid scientific research. Ask your local scientists to feed their lab rats with a phytoestrogen-free chow.
    4. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Simple if you prioritize then you will need to take the consequences with your actions. So if I use all my money on a shiny computer but I don't have enough for Internet access then it is the consequence for my choice. If I choose a less shiny computer and internet access with a Cat 5 cable I have to take the consequence that if I am in a wi-fi area I cannot work.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that, but keep in mind that not everybody does that. Or Daddy buys the computer, but does not pay for cable internet.

    6. Re:"Free" attracts the cheap by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

      The "cheap" folks who have their iBook, iPod and i??? with them? Sounds like they have to go to the coffee shop and use free WiFi as they've spent all their money on iCandy.

  8. hangouts by theagentsheadquarter · · Score: 1

    Coffeeshops are certainly nice places to hang out. I can see how the addition of free internet would easily cause problems in such an environment. I, personally, enjoy buying a $3.00 drink and sitting for two hours. I can't see how they can possibly make much revenue with such customer habits. Hopefully this works out for them

    1. Re:hangouts by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Coffeeshops are certainly nice places to hang out. I can see how the addition of free internet would easily cause problems in such an environment. I, personally, enjoy buying a $3.00 drink and sitting for two hours.

      That's why Starbucks does so well. It certainly isn't their coffee, which is overroasted and overpriced. They provide something that has been lost in America's suburban sprawl: an agreeable public space. You can meet someone at a Starbucks, maybe conduct a little business, hang out, etc.

      Before it became an absolute necessity to have a car, there were many more such places in an average community. Even if they didn't offer wifi. Now they're all gone and paved over, lost in a wasteland of McMansions and twirly suburban streets where nothing is within walking distance of anything else. So if you offer people a stupid coffeeshop as a respectable substitute, it's hugely successful.

    2. Re:hangouts by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, lots of people buy Starbucks coffee to go. Some of them must be under the impression it tastes good.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:hangouts by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Before it became an absolute necessity to have a car...
      Since when is it a necessity to own a car? I'm 34 years old, have a doctorate and am gainfully employed and never owned a car or even had a drivers license. I just choose to live and work in reasonably civilized places like Montreal, NYC, and Washington, DC which have reasonable subway systems. Those who chose to live in god-awful suburbia get what they deserve.

    4. Re:hangouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those who chose to live in god-awful suburbia get what they deserve.

      Like peace and quiet and reasonably priced goods and services?

    5. Re:hangouts by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I'm 34 years old, have a doctorate and am gainfully employed ...

      Ah, but do you have kids? It becomes a lot harder to go without a car when you have children and need to take them and their stuff everywhere. (Not impossible, but much harder). Also, the small amount of space/high cost of living, of a city becomes much less attractive, too.

    6. Re:hangouts by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Live in a big city in a neighbourhood where the places we need to take the kids (school, swimming, ballet, library) are all in walking or biking distance. The housing costs more than an equivalent suburban house, but I make it up on car payments, gas and insurance. And I live down the street from a very nice cafe without wifi, where I can go and relax for half an hour before telecommuting to work.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  9. Solution... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    I always though a good solution would be to give a code on the back of the recipt that would give you free wifi for 20 minutes, with the clock automatically starting from the time of purchase. Set the minimum price that gets the code to a medium coffee and a cookie. Yum. Cookies.

    1. Re:Solution... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      A local gas station did this for their car wash. If your purchase was over a certain dollar amount it printed a key on the receipt that would bypass the coin drop.

  10. How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In an experiment, the cafe started shutting down its Wi-Fi network on Saturdays and Sundays after watching their culture erode: the shop became full (and was turning away customers) with six-to-eight hour Wi-Fi squatters, many of whom didn't even purchase anything.

    Considering that most people have Internet at home, on campus, or at work, this is just a rude thing to do. Coffee shops provide Wifi so you can relax with a cup of coffee in a comfortable atmosphere while still being able to get that little extra bit of work done. There's no way that's accomplished by squatting in the coffee shop for 8 hours on end. If that's you, get some manners, and get a life.

    1. Re:How rude by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 1

      I agree: If that's you, get some manners, and get a life.

      Those people are rude. But, by and large, people don't do business (or homework) on Saturdays and Sundays. And if they're committed enough that they do, then they should be committed enough to buy their own internet access and their own espresso machine.

    2. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      But, by and large, people don't do business (or homework) on Saturdays and Sundays.

      For the most part, that's true. However, there are quite a few professions (e.g. Real Estate Agencies, Salesmen, Computer Programmers(!)) where weekend work is common. And don't forget businessmen who travel. They'll often fly in on a Sunday. Many hotels now have Wifi, but it is kind of nice to be able to relax at a cafe with a cup of coffee and/or lunch.

    3. Re:How rude by dedeman · · Score: 1

      I would think that it may be more a scene of sociability. Some people like to be out and about, at the coffee shop, with the wifi, with the cell phone, with the $5 coffee, looking nice, adult, studious, and sophisticated.

      I mean, how cool is it to be reading myspace/lj on a shiny new wireless HP (or apple) at the coffee shop?

      It's the same reason that malls are clogged with kids during the summer/weekends. Who the hell else has 6 or 8 hrs straight to kill at a coffee shop, much less on the internet?

      And no, I'm not new here.

    4. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow. Just wow. Only on Slashdot is it now "rude" to decline to offer a free service. How the hell do you fit that gigantic sense of entitlement through the door?

    5. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow. Just wow. Only on Slashdot is it now "rude" to decline to offer a free service. How the hell do you fit that gigantic sense of entitlement through the door?

      Go read the parent post again. The people "squatting in the coffee shop for 8 hours" are the rude ones.

    6. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow. Only on Slashdot is it now "rude" to decline to offer a free service.

      You need to reread. I didn't say that the coffee shop is rude. I said that the squatters who sit all day without buying anything are rude.

      Trust me, I'm about as anti-GroupThink(TM) as you can get around here. :-)

    7. Re:How rude by iphayd · · Score: 1

      I'm a full time, home-based consultant. My home is 30 miles away from the vast majority of my market. Coffee shops are the way I check my email, the way I IM people. They, and cell phones, allow me to run my business.

      Each part of town has a coffee shop I frequent. All are locally owned, all have _free_ WiFi.

      With that said, I _always_ buy something, when I'm in a coffee shop. Usually it is a fruit flavored soda water, as I don't drink coffee.

    8. Re:How rude by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I frequent a coffee shop by my college, and it has free WiFi, but seems to keep the social atmosphere, somehow. While there is always students plugging away on laptops, there still is a fair amount of activity in the outside smoking area, and in the shop itself.

      I think it is because there is always something social going on there (live music, poetry, etc...), that keeps people coming there for reasons other than free WiFi and homework. I generally go there for a cup of yerba and a BBQ Beef sandwich, with my laptop. But people still come by and talk, at which point I gladly shut down my computer, realizing that I am in a public/social place, not a private space, so I must meet the demands of my enviroment.

      Funny, and somewhat related, story. Yesterday I went to a Starbucks with my friend, we sat outside to smoke. The guy inside, his back to the window, was reading all of his buisness email. We were reading all of his buisness email. Some of it was rather sesative too, project notes, one about a possible merger. Very funny. Then he was reading /. an hour later... Even funnier.

      Does any company have a policy about reading email at hotspots? Not very secure when two people can read sesative documents behind your back.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to reread

      pwn3d!

    10. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm a full time, home-based consultant. My home is 30 miles away from the vast majority of my market. Coffee shops are the way I check my email, the way I IM people. They, and cell phones, allow me to run my business.

      Do you spend more than an hour or two in the coffee shop? Because if you do, you're really being rude. These businesses offer Wifi as a convenience to people such as yourself. Abusing that hospitality only ruins it for everyone. If you're just there for a little while though, then you have nothing to worry about. :-)

    11. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you're right. I misread that, my apologies.

    12. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Slasdot *hasn't* changed in that ass clowns such as yourself who totally misconstrue a post do so in order to post their own rant. Get a fucking clue, asswipe.

    13. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      No worries. Happens to the best of us. :-)

    14. Re:How rude by iphayd · · Score: 1

      I know the owners of every coffee shop I frequent. They are all happy that I am there, most will call me by name, and realize that I would not even frequent a coffee shop at all if it was not for the WiFi, considering I don't drink coffee.

      As for the cell phone (which I assume is part of why you call me rude) I always move to an area where my conversations will not interfere with the conversations of others, usually a hallway or outside.

    15. Re:How rude by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Coffee shops provide Wifi so you can relax with a cup of coffee in a comfortable atmosphere while still being able to get that little extra bit of work done

      No. Coffee shops provide coffee so you can drink it. Everything else is ancillary.

    16. Re:How rude by kjs3 · · Score: 1
      For-profit-companies offer "free services" in order that people purchase "paid services", which pay for the free services. If a certain class of douchebag (apparently, people like our AC here) show up and only use the free service and never "pay" for anything (cause, phuque, a cuppa coffee, how dare they expect me to pay for that), the free service goes away. Real simple. So maybe that means they aren't really "free services". But since people like our little AC aren't willing to pay for them anyway, it's not a particularly apropos distiction.

      Put another way: It's not an entitlement, asshole, to get free internet on the back of some mom and pop coffee store. Being a freeloader might seem kewl to you and the rest of your underemployed friends, but that doesn't mean said mom-and-pops should be vilified because they don't want to loose money. Go back to stealing bandwidth from unsecured APs in your flophouse, and quit trying to make the small business owner the bad buy.

    17. Re:How rude by srleffler · · Score: 1

      No, coffee shops provide coffee so you will give them money for it. Everything else is ancillary.

    18. Re:How rude by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "No. Coffee shops provide coffee so you can drink it. Everything else is ancillary."

      No. Coffee shops are not selling coffee. Nor are restaurants selling food. They are selling *service*.

      Anyone can make coffee with inexpensive equipment. Coffee shops are selling the service of preparing that coffee (or other beverage) and serving it in an inviting atmosphere.

      I put down $2.50 for Java, they let me hang out with friends or other associates for a few hours and use the internet. Sounds like a fair trade to me.

    19. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      As for the cell phone (which I assume is part of why you call me rude)

      No, I'm only talking about being in a coffee shop for more than an hour or two. A lot of people conduct all kinds of business from these shops. As long as you're not abusing the hospitality (e.g. hanging around for >2 hours at a time) then you're not really in the category I'm referring to as rude.

      People who do hang around for hours on end are rude because they are monopolizing the limited space that coffee shops provide. These shops need space for other customers otherwise they can't make money. That's my only point. I really don't mind people with cell phones, laptops, blackberries, whatever as long as they're not distirbing myself and other paying customers. :-)

    20. Re:How rude by bahwi · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I worked at a local coffeeshop that offered free wi-fi(I even hooked it up) we had several people who came in there daily, who never bought anything, stayed for 3 to 6 hours, and used the restroom without consideration, just for the internet. I finally asked them why not use it at home. Come to find out, they didn't have internet at home. You'd be surprised how many people can live without internet at home, but once they get a work laptop or something, come out to the coffeeshop, and they start getting their internet addiction on.

      Geeks are assumed to have internet at home, others it is more or less flaky.

    21. Re:How rude by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Dude, he made a mistake. Chill. He even apologized a few posts up. Don't get so worked up. It'll take years off your life. ;-)

    22. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another way Slashdot hasn't changed is that ass clowns such as yourself flip out and go into flame mode over simple misunderstandings.

    23. Re:How rude by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Well, technically you could water the plants with your coffee for all they care. They provide it so that you can give them money.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    24. Re:How rude by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but some nitwit modded him up. Does no one read the context post anymore?

    25. Re:How rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the original poster said, many get a "work" laptop (that implies free from your employer). Besides, it is not a matter of being able to "afford" internet access, as you put it. Many people can "afford" a newspaper or wired home phone, but prefer not to take them, opting for fast-food papers, tv-news and cell-phones.

  11. Business by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

    Is Business. They need to make a profit, and having people just sitting around not giving them their money isn't profitable. Such is capitalism.

    1. Re:Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. This is Slashdot, where "capitalism" is a dirty word.

  12. Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...leave it to a few miscreants to ruin it for the majority.

  13. Oh Great by katana · · Score: 1, Troll

    First you tell me that giving away WiFi doesn't actually bring more customers in. Next you'll tell me that making illegal copies of music doesn't help artists make money, or that you can't just give software away and make money on services.

    1. Re:Oh Great by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      In this case, it didn't work, at least, not in the long run. From the article: On the weekends, 80 to 90 percent of tables and chairs are taken up by people using computers. Many laptop users occupy two or more seats by themselves, as well. And tehy aren't buying anything. Ergo, free WiFi isn't bring more customers in, just more people.

    2. Re:Oh Great by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      My sister frequents cafes and often only picks the places where they have wi-fi. You're wrong, it does bring at least one customer in!

    3. Re:Oh Great by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
      you can't just give software away and make money on services.

      Oh? Tell that to Red Hat, et al.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Oh Great by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      Your sister in one person who actually purchases something from these shops versus many more who don't.

      Say the shop makes $3/hr profit from each seat in the place. Your sister contributes her $3 but 10 people are in there for 4 hours using the Wi-Fi and not buying anything. So the owner has your sister's $3 from the one hour she was there but has lost $120 from those 10 seats.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    5. Re:Oh Great by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Oh? Tell that to Red Hat, et al. He, he, he... If only that were true...

    6. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did and a copy of RHEL3 cost my employer over 1000USD.

  14. Coupon by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they give out a coupon good for N hours of wi-fi access with each purchase. The coupon would have an activation code that the user would type in when connecting to the network.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Coupon by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      It would have to be a one use password, or else that invites abuse. One guy gets the password and shares it with 5 of his friends..

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Coupon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy your coffee, and the sales girl asks you, "Do you want wifi?" If so, it's free, or for a marginal fee (just because, or perhaps for more legal power), and a unique temporary key is printed on the receipt. This'll stop people from going through the garbage for free access. Then, once a computer connects via a valid key, remember the MAC address so someone can't get on, once again, by going through the trash. Set the access limit for an hour or two, or proportional to the bill, or maybe with a minimum time to be nice, etc. Lastly, kick out people who somehow got on perhaps, and worry about your security.

      Might not be foolproof, but is surely vastly better than open access.

    3. Re:Coupon by bonehead · · Score: 1

      While that would certainly be functional, I think that a lot of folks are losing sight of one very important point here: These folks want to be in the coffee shop business, not the ISP business.

      I'm as guilty as anyone of looking to technology first when trying to solve a problem, but in truth the best and most elegant solution to a problem involves reducing the amount of technology involved, not adding another layer of complexity to what's already there.

      The coffee shop owners in this scenario found a solution that achieved there goal and was ultra simple to implement. A truly "elegant hack" if I've ever seen one.

    4. Re:Coupon by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Damn, that should have read: "... solution to a problem often involves reducing ..."

      My boss really needs to stop distracting me with his work related nonsense so I could catch these sorts of things.....

  15. coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this yet another syndrom associated with advancing technology? I can understand wanting to sneak in a few minutes of productivity during a quiet moment of opportunity but have always tried being discreet (and discrete). But I've seen the described behavior in a local Chicago coffee shop... squatters who were there at different times of the day as I passed through. Not only did they not really appear to be paying customers, they:

    • monopolized entire tables capable of seating four with: laptop, some analog of an iPod, spare battery(ies), headhphones, and typically paperwork
    • typically were buried in their headphones
    • made no eye contact with anyone

    I have a friend who has a startup refreshment shop, and foot traffic and available space for paying customers is precious. These shop owners aren't making any fortune with their stores, they (at least my friend) do it out of love of the job (interacting with long-time customers, meeting new people, becoming an established figure of the local community).

    I also have another friend who frequents a local Seattle coffee shop a lot. It seems from talking with him he is an honorable patron, but I do get the impression he doesn't interact much with anyone there.

    Cell phones, laptops, pdas, portable music devices... they all have driven a somewhat asocial behavior. In public it's mostly annoying, maybe a little rude, sometimes outright boorish, but in a coffe shop, good for the owners to shut down the wireless on weekends (for example...). Sounds like they made a right move based on the almost immediate response and thanks received from regulars.

    Frankly, the day cell phones and laptops, etc. become totally uncool in public can't come too soon for me. In the meantime (shameless plug) if you're looking for more social ways of using technology consider and look into BookCrossing.com. It's been mentioned here on slashdot before -- it's a cool way of using technology to share books (something a little less technical, and a lot more social).

    1. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by ScaryMonkey · · Score: 1

      I agree. People these days seem to barely remember a time before the invention of the Walkman made public spaces a collection of completely isolated individuals. In decades past it was not in the least unusual to start a conversation with the person sitting next to you on public transportation. To do that these days would immediately label you as some sad, desperate friendless slob; Clearly anyone cool enough to be worth talking to has *much* better things to do.

    2. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking to (unattractive) strangers has always been unpleasant for younger people. Now we have good ways to avoid it I'm not surprised the new generation are taking them, and I don't have a problem with that.

      A pleasant society is based on tolerance, and tolerating people's desire to not go making random acquaintances in every shop they spend 15 minutes in is the least we can all do...
      Besides, imagine if you made friends with everyone who you passed on the street. It might work in a population-250 town but for the rest of us it would be a nightmare of forgetting names and faces and social awkwardness.

    3. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I so agree.
      I like netting and using technology for social life (im, irc) in pleasant places like cafeterias or libraries where free connection is awailable. Having own music there just makes it better, and as it is a polite - and usually a delight I do buy and be a good customer.
      But all that eye-contact stuff, real-life socialisation with strangers just cant compare to good friends online. So let me do my netting and stay in my own virtual world even thou I might appear in public place. I ignore you, you ignore me, all is well.

    4. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      I wonder how effective a no-laptops (inside the shop) policy would be. Squatters using a palmtop device aren't such a nuisance; and because of the ergonomics probably won't squat for too long. Outside the shop, laptops welcome means precious tablespace inside isn't monopolized and you can still get your wi-fi fix if you want to. Though from obvious environmental constrains (glare, weather, noise) probably won't be optimal for extended use.

      Another approach might be to set up a laptop bar where patrons can plugin in and get a space much smaller than a table and then make the tables laptop free. As for making the squatters buy something, free salty chips or nuts might help matters. I doubt anyone would argue a no-outside food rule

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
    5. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by socalmtb · · Score: 1

      Right or wrong, I use the free WiFi at coffee shops as a remote office when travelling.

      I don't generally go for the enterainment devices, but have been known to sprawl paperwork across the table.

      My favorites are Panera Bakeries. Not only can I get coffee, but food too. If I have any meetings that I can control, i.e. I don't have to go to a client's office, I schedule them at these coffee shops and take all my meals there.

      That said, I'm never there on weekends and if I noticed that the entire facility was full - I'd go somewhere less crowded (chances are there'd be too much noise to get any work done anyway). However, any of the places I've been to have never even approached reaching maximum capacity while I was there.

    6. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since when is getting something to drink an invitation to be hit on by some jerk with a IQ of less than 50 ?

      I have better things to do than sit around and shoot the bull with stupid idiots who hang around coffee shops and can't figure out what to do with their lives.

      The only reason I would ever show up there is to get something to drink or when traveling, get wifi access so I can get my e-mail (via SSH tunnel of course).

      So just because you like to hit on people and think everything is a social event doesn't mean everyone is a happy go lucky party person.

    7. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by paulrsh · · Score: 1

      While I agree that squatters suck, this isn't about technology, it's about people.

      I meet tons of people in seattle coffee shops BECAUSE of their laptops. I also meet lots of folks because of their art or their book or whatever they're working on/doing. This is NOT about technology, it's about who you are.

      If you want to encourage eye contact and socializing in public places, just start looking at and meeting people in public places! By showing people that it's cool to talk to strangers you make everyone more comfortable talking to strangers. Was that so difficult? Oh, and if you're creepy, please disregard everything I just said. ;)

    8. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you score loads of chicks, man. Could you let me in on some tips?

    9. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Outside the shop, laptops welcome means precious tablespace inside

      Huh? If the weather is nice, tablespace on the terrace is more valuable than inside...

    10. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Maybe the folks that take entire tables and squat for 8+ hours at a time are 'fly-by-coffee-show-hours 'biznesses'. Aka spammers, scammers, phishers, etc. They have no real office, and they like the anonymous/less-tracable connectivity they get from the shop's wireless as opposed to using their home connection. Anyone notice any decrease in spam on the weekends the shop shut this down? :P

  16. Personally by Albinofrenchy · · Score: 1

    Personally I like to hang out in coffee shops for the smell. Although, how anyone could smell that sweet necter of the gods and not buy anything is a mystery to me.

    --
    "A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes." -Mahatma Gandhi
    1. Re:Personally by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Heh, I knew somebody would say this, and that's the only reason I came to look at the comments. So I could reply with the fact that the smell of a coffeeshop literally nauseates me.

      At least they don't have to worry about me squatting. Rude, rude squatters.

  17. Maybe something like a wifi "phone card"? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    Surely they can come up with a system that uses a purchaseable card with a set number of minutes of wifi usage.

    I suppose there might be a problem if you were in the middle of a download and the card expired, but caveat empty.

    1. Re:Maybe something like a wifi "phone card"? by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...caveat empty."

      Isn't that what your fuel gauge is for?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  18. Now we know what Step 2 is... by jhsiao · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Give away WiFi

    2. ???? -> Take away WiFi

    3. Profit!

    1. Re:Now we know what Step 2 is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one... thanks for the laugh

    2. Re:Now we know what Step 2 is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no mod points but that was f-ing brilliant.

  19. Ways to drive the geeks out by tyagiUK · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's quite a few ways to get rid of Wi-Fi geeks:

    Firstly, open the curtains, turn on the lights, and turn the aircon up above 20 degrees C. Do this every hour on the hour and the shop will clear to cries of "Nooooo, the Day Star!"

    Alternatively, confuse them by putting herbal sleep powder in the coffee and cola. They'll feel more drowsy, so buy more cola and coffee. Problem solved. Every few purchases, give them one infused with Penguin Mints (for added caffeine)

    --
    Contribute to the online videogame encyclopedia: GamerWiki
    1. Re:Ways to drive the geeks out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, confuse them by putting herbal sleep powder in the coffee and cola. They'll feel more drowsy, so buy more cola and coffee. Problem solved.

      Oh that's evil. *Googles for sleeping powder*

    2. Re:Ways to drive the geeks out by bahwi · · Score: 1

      1) Block out all IM traffic, E-Mail, SSH Sessions, Tunnels, and porn sites(YES! I'm serious! I worked at a coffee shop for a few years not long ago).

      2) Use that program they had a DEFCon a few years back that replaces all the images over a wifi network with goatse.

  20. wait a minute here by b17bmbr · · Score: 0, Troll

    a trendy coffee and art cafe worried about their profits. what's the world coming to? pissed about people getting something for free on the dime of someone else? damn. i thought they were the socially conscious type. guess they're evil capitalists too. life's over.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:wait a minute here by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Uh, when you run your own business you'll find there are these things called "bills", which have to be paid if you want to stay in business and not go bust. To help pay the bills you need to have "paying customers": ie, people who buy your products and/or services and pay more for them than it costs you to provide them.

      If your paying customers take up more of your products and/or services than it costs you to provide them then they become a liability, especially if what they consume isn't a limitless quantity, such as table space in a coffee shop, or parking spaces in a car park.

      In the case of coffee shops clearly it's dangerous to be in a situation where you coffee shop is full of people who take up the table space that two or more people would normally take and sit there for hours at a time and buy nothing more than one or two cups of latte when your business model needs your coffee shop to be full of people who come in with friends, have something to drink and maybe to eat and then move onto somewhere else after 20 minutes or so.

      Now, you may call people who just want to be able to sell enough cups of coffee and muffins to stay afloat "evil capitalists" but I call them realistic and pragmatic. I'd rather they were realistic and pragmatic and still in business than foolish and idealistic and out of business, because that would only leave the rest of us with nowhere but the Starbucks of the world to frequent.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:wait a minute here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to this!

      And I can tell you from personal experience, the margins in the cafe industry are damn small. And they're even smaller when you're as dedicated to coffee quality as Victrola is.

      They are in the opinion of many the best espresso in seattle (which is saying something) and that kind of dedication costs money.

      They have the right to at least try and make a bit of money, though that's certainly not what they're in it for.

    3. Re:wait a minute here by b17bmbr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      dude, apparently I should have added the tag. you missed the point totally. I think it is comical that a group of people who ostensibly would vote into gov't politicians that basically promote socialism would be concerned about profits. hell, i'm all for capitalism. I'm a teacher, I think we should privatize schools as well. the socialist model they use know isn't working too well. but that isn't going to happen anytime in the near future, what with the federal takeover (NCLB) and all. i just noted the irony, that's all.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  21. Torn by meganthom · · Score: 1

    I'm actually a bit torn on this issue. I understand the problems with squatters and would be frustrated if I were the coffee shop, but I love having the free wi-fi at our local coffee shops. I like the idea many are proposing with timed tickets and the like.

    Coffee shops are in a delicate predicament when it comes to users. My fiance was once asked to leave a coffee shop for playing a board game there. They had chess boards at the shop, and my fiance and his friends had each bought more than $10 worth of food and drinks. Unfortunately, they were there at the time the coffee shop was trying to transition to a wine bar for the evening, and they would have harmed the "atmosphere."

    Personally, I think what should really have us up in arms is the state of wifi at airports. They want something like $7/hour for their services! I know they can get it from business people, so it's a wise business decision (in a sense), but aren't airports bad enough these days? Give me a break. :-P

    --
    Live free or die
    1. Re:Torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They want something like $7/hour for their services!
      that would be nice. Here it's $5 for 15 minutes.
      Thanks Telstra!

    2. Re:Torn by Gogogoch · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that the wi-fi is a perk for the *customers*, and to encourage customers to visit. Not a free hand-out. Timed tickets and all that just sounds like an overly complex solution to the fact that people are abusing an honor system. I like their solution in turning it off so the public can rediscover what it is like to be limited to human interaction.

      But I am with you about airports. I was at one this week which advertised wifi and I niaively thought "how enlightened of them to put this on for the public". Of course I soon discovered $19.95 for - and get this - 24 hours of access. It is only through the most unfortunate of itineraries or air carrier problems that anyone would be in an airport for 24 hours. What a blatent rip-off.

  22. Nobody ever talks there. by johndierks · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I live just a few block from the Victrola, and they're right. Often times 75%-90% of the people in there have laptops open. Often time I'm guilty myself.

    It used to be a great place were you could go drink a great cup of coffee and probably meet a cute indy chick, but ever since WiFi, everyone is so buried in their iBooks updating their MySpace page that no one talks to each other.

    The best part is watching the the Seattle Craigslist Missed Connection page fill up with "You are a cute 20 that something redhead sitting over there in the corner. Damn I wish you'd close your iBook so I could talk to you." posts.

    1. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by ameoba · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you're hanging out where everyone has iBooks & MySpace accounds.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by fermion · · Score: 1
      First, I do understand your fustration. But the shop is not there to meet our needs, it is ther to turn a profit.

      So to question of if a coffe shop exists to let people meet or talk, or read a book, or work, or whatever is not the point. I think a coffee shop is flexible enough to be all of these things, and there are enough coffee shops around to meet everones needs. If one wants a meat market, go and find one. If one wants a hole, find a hole. What is silly is thinking that the cutie hiding in an iBook has any interest in a dork that has to go a coffee shop to chat up the birds, but chooses the one on the highest limb, and then does not have the tenacity to climb the tree to meet it.

      But when coffee shops did not have Wifi, because not only did it not exist, but few people had laptops, and the few that did werre not enobled enough to bring them out, coffee shops still had problems. People would go there to meet other people, and still not buy anything. The real issue is that a firm must do things that generate a profit. If WiFi brings in the customers, that is what it needs to do. If bringing in poor 20-something single people will do it, then that is what they will do.

      What is really shown in this article is that one should choose a model that is right for your location and customers, and not just copy what one reads in Forbes.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      "You are a cute 20 that something redhead sitting over there in the corner. Damn I wish you'd close your iBook so I could talk to you." posts.

      I really don't think that should stop a person from trying to talk anyway.

    4. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Hey, *jondiercs*! I know you are a really cute blond chick, I wish you would close your iBook and take a break from Slashdot so I could talk to you!

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    5. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 1

      If she actually had her iBook opened you should've tried IM'ing her over iChat and Bonjour ;-). In all seriousness, though, I work from El Diablo on Queen Anne all the time with my laptop, and I never cease to meet new or interesting people. It's all about taking the time to absorb your surroundings, I think.

      --
      No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    6. Re:Nobody ever talks there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, El Diablo rocks. Best coffee in town. (Except for that one tall barista dude who's way too cool to use a thermometer, so his lattes are always overheated or underheated, but you can't have everything, so hey.)

  23. How about a "Coffee Shop Wifi App"? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    Something that will prompt you with a menu, allows you to order, you pay with a credit card and get a wifi connection immediately or you pay the coffee girl when she brings you your order and you get the connection when she completes the transaction.

    Well, maybe I should have patented this before I wrote this post.

    1. Re:How about a "Coffee Shop Wifi App"? by pdbaby · · Score: 1
      Something that will prompt you with a menu, allows you to order, you pay with a credit card and get a wifi connection immediately or you pay the coffee girl when she brings you your order and you get the connection when she completes the transaction.


      Hurrah! You're slowly but surely paving the way towards a socially dysfunctional society of people too lazy to get up out of their seats or attract a waitresses attention. I, for one, salute you!
      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
  24. Lost their culture? Boo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh how sad! They lost their regular clientele of pot-smoking hippies who have nothing better to do than sit around in coffee shops, talking about how much they hate America and love Socialism.

    Stay in Capitol Hill, faggots. That way we can fence you in when you get too out of control.

  25. A solution to their problem.. by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

    IS there any sort of fix for their situation? Perhaps a transparent proxy of some sort that only allows any given user to use the 'net for a limited time after they've put in a fresh code.. Perhaps integrating the code generation into a computerized POS.. X dollar amount equals Y amt of access time..

    Does anyone know of a solution for this situation?? Also, is there an open source POS system anywhere out there? That'd be an incredibly useful thing for small business people.

  26. this is done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what some coffee shops do. You order something. They press a button, printing out a code that you tap into your browser for access for 2 or whatever hours.

  27. The purpose of the WiFi was by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to attract *paying* customers. Once again, the actions of a few spoil it for everyone else.

    Eventually, some sort of ettiquette will work it's way to the surface, as it has with bulletin boards or email. I make it a point to a) seek out coffee shops with free wifi (www.delocator.net) and buy something as a sign of appreciation for the free connection. Would it kill the freeloaders to buy a small cup of decaf at the very least?

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:The purpose of the WiFi was by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, email ettiquette has come a long way, ROFL.

      Hawthorne01 wrote:
      Eventually, some sort of ettiquette will work it's way to the surface, as it has with bulletin boards or email.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:The purpose of the WiFi was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it kill the freeloaders to buy a small cup of decaf at the very least?

      I don't know, but it sure as hell would kill me. Give me the blackest, meanest, hottest, most evil brew you can muster if you please.

    3. Re:The purpose of the WiFi was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eventually, some sort of ettiquette will work it's way to the surface, as it has with bulletin boards or email.
      You forget that bulletin board and email etiquette is usually *enforced*. Where it's not enforced, there is very little etiquette.

      As far as the coffeeshop is concerned, it has to become *easier* to be a paying customer than it is to be a squatter, because people (as a group) tend to follow the path of least resistance. Their solution (banning free wi-fi on the weekends) is extreme, but effective in altering the path of least resistance. Any other solution needs to do the same.

  28. Huh? by tomwhore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We here in Personal Telco Project ( http://www.personaltelco.net/ )country, that being Portland Oregon, have not seen this particular behavior go on. In fact we have seen the exact flip side in most of the cafes we help get nodes into.

    There are several coffe houses who can point to the day the PTP node went in as the day thier revenues went up, noticably.

    There are communities that can point to the day some one put up a neighborhood node to as the day folks started spreading the goodness.

    We have found that when folks put up a Free Wifi Node and all that it can entail (not just internet access but community based local content (web, daap, zeroconf, ftp, distro repositories , etc etc) the community of users are enriched and the people hosting the node are not abused to the point of wanting to turn it off.

    Maybe we are truly in the right place at the right time with the right mix of citizens, who are the riches of any city as b!x will tell you. Im not sure whats cooking up there in Seattle but i hope it gets better.

    -tomhiggins
    www.personaltelco.net

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    1. Re:Huh? by eggboard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I wrote up this story, I tried to make it clear that Victrola is in a unique position: the majority of coffeeshops have tons of transient business, and many of them see most traffic between 5 and 9 am. They want to fill seats after that. Victrola is more of a community center masquerading as a coffeeshop in the sense that it's a place that community forms, and thus they have a lot of dwell traffic all day. This is quite rare outside of libraries.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    2. Re:Huh? by johndierks · · Score: 1

      I think the article wasn't so much focusing on profits, but more on culture. Fun hip coffee shops have turned into places where people bury themselves in the internet. No one talks, no one interacts, most people have headphones on. What was a very social place has become a very unsocial place, due to Wi-Fi.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the right mix of citizens, who are the riches of any city as b!x will tell you

      As b!X will also tell you, that's actually a C.E.S. Wood quote.

    4. Re:Huh? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      I imagine the places you're putting the nodes in aren't having the overcrowding problem (and that the location mentioned in the article did see an increase in overall revenue when it installed wifi).

      Clearly, adding free wifi to a location is going to attract more customers. Even if you attract a lot of freeloaders too, as long as you're below your full capacity the increase is going to help profits. The situation only gets bad when you're above your full capacity and people who would be paying customers start leaving because there's nowhere to put them. In essence, the problem is not the wifi, it's that they don't have enough space to meet their needs at their peak time.

      A coffee shop I used to go to a lot in the days before wifi had lots of board games patrons could play, which generated a lot of business on weeknights. They also had a ban on playing any sort of games on weekend evenings, when they were constantly full and could benefit from high turnaround.

      If you've got empty tables, there's no reason to care if someone buys one cup of coffee and sits around for 8 hours.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:Huh? by tomwhore · · Score: 1

      We are seeing more and more social interaction augmentation with the use of Wifi in the cafes we have got nodes in. Some have grown groups of folks who come in to use the wifi and drink coffee rather than sit in an office all day. Others have folks who use the wifi to help meetup with thier freinds much as you might use a cell phone.

      Everyone who has a laptop and uses wifi in the open is not a pasty skinned twenty something with limited social skills, belive it or not ...Well if you dont just come to Portland OR and see for yourself.

      --
      Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone who has a laptop and uses wifi in the open is not a pasty skinned twenty something with limited social skills, belive it or not... You've never been to the Victrola, have you?

    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several coffe houses who can point to the day the PTP node went in as the day thier revenues went up, noticably.

      Proof? And also did this last? Maybe that day their revenues went up, but what about next week when all the tables are full of freeloaders?

    8. Re:Huh? by tomwhore · · Score: 1

      There is a node list on the PTP site. Walk into a few of the cafes listed there and ask around. The proof is there to actually see, not to speculate on or muse on some top heavy admin undoable limiting system, its really and actually in the field working.

      I know thats sort of a rare thing in slashrot threads, actual provable facts, but come to Portland OR and see it in action.

      --
      Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    9. Re:Huh? by mister_slim · · Score: 1

      I'm typing this in a personaltelco.net node, which I visit just about every day, and in a couple of months, I've seen no problems with freeloaders (besides me).

  29. Those who fill up their lives with stuff... by rewt66 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... find that they have less space in their lives for other people, less space for God (if religious), less space even for themselves. All they have is stuff - and emptiness.

    This isn't really OT. It's the background for this issue. Do the owners want the coffeeshop to be a place for people to be isolated with their stuff? Kudos to them for making it a place where people are gently pushed to break out of their self-imposed solitary confinement.

    A coffeeshop is so much more than a place that sells coffee...

    1. Re:Those who fill up their lives with stuff... by ElBuf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't quite get this.

      Where I live, I actually haven't found any coffee shops that give away WiFi. That's OK, I'm willing to pay on the rare occasions when I need it, and to buy a coffee that I don't really want, and to limit my stay if the place is busy. I figured that made me a pretty good citizen. Turns out I'm also obligated to make friends with everyone?

      Sorry, no offense to anyone, but I don't go there for that; if they didn't have WiFi, I probably wouldn't be there at all. If I was, computer or not, I'd drink my coffee and leave without talking to anyone, unless I ran into someone I knew (and I know and am friends with many people). Some people are extroverts, some aren't. It doesn't have anything to do with stuff.

      Does that somehow limit the ability of others to engage in conversation? Not that I can see, but maybe I'm missing something. If you sell coffee and WiFi, you attract people who need coffee and/or WiFi, and lot of them might not know that they are also supposed to be giving warm fuzzy feelings to the owners and the rest of the clientele.

      ElBuf

    2. Re:Those who fill up their lives with stuff... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Who are you to tell me how to live?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  30. lesse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all those squatters were fucking linux, movie pirating nerds who read slashdot. they should have kicked them out and shot them in the face with a gun and killed the the thieves.

  31. Will sort itself out by ortcutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This will all sort itself out when every cafe has free WIFI. Then you won't end up with some being busy while others aren't. I frequent a place that has WIFI and that is very laptop-friendly and I can say for sure that they do a lot of business because of it. Even the lingerers spend money because they want coffee and they get hungry and want donuts and bagels.

    1. Re:Will sort itself out by blowhole · · Score: 1

      Coffee shops always sell the worst food. I don't care to eat another organic tofu shit brownie evr again.

      Maybe if they sold Cheetos and Mountain Dew, they'd get the Wifi geeks to buy more.

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
  32. Best of both worlds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn that old smoking section into the geek section.
    If you only allow computers in half the shop, the paying customers will chase the deadbeats out.

    Hey dude, I see you're done with your coffee. How about moving on so I can enjoy /. with mine...

    No response, kick the chair out from under his ass...

  33. Filter them. by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    Buy something $10 or greater....authorize your MAC and/or receive a login/pass for 3 hours.

    Next problem?

  34. A possible solution -- intermittent WIFI by btempleton · · Score: 1

    Paying for access doesn't solve this cafe's problem, which is not so much the moochers as it is the environment where everybody just stares at a screen all day instead of socializing.

    I have come up with a solution that fixes both problems. An AP that does intermittent access, so that you can connect, but after enough time to do a basic session of E-mail or web research, it refuses you for 5 minutes.

    I outline more about the solution of intermittent wifi in this blog entry

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:A possible solution -- intermittent WIFI by updatelee · · Score: 1

      Thats a good idea, Still allow the person to surf the web, check their fav sites, get email, but not have people sitting there for 8h ...

    2. Re:A possible solution -- intermittent WIFI by Proteus · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go to a coffee shop that implemented this; and I'm not a freeloader (actually, my employer allows me to expense the stuff I buy while I work remotely, so I buy more than I might otherwise!).

      The reason is simple: what I do at the coffee shop is work remotely via VPN. A blocking cycle would completely prevent me from doing that.

      On the other hand, timed-ticket systems are relatively easy. My favorite local coffee shop gives an hour of access with purchase, and you can either buy more coffee or buy time directly if you want to extend it. It's implemented as a proxy system: when first you connect, you must open a web browser -- the first page that appears will always be the proxy login, where you enter the code given on your reciept. Your MAC can then access the network (any service) for the next hour.

      It seems a reasonable compromise, if one is worried about freeloaders. It also keeps the employees from having to hunt out people that aren't buying; it's self-enforcing. ;-)

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  35. Err little... gain little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was about to post another joke, which would go inevitably unread by most.

    I suppose /. has done this on intent, after oh so many useless posts -- many by yours truly, of course :-\

    Hence letting ACs without any points, as this discourages many... you don't post if you lose all hope of being read, even if you don't care about karma (like me).

    This is to maximize signal-to-noise ratio, I imagine -- the old efficiency thing in other clothes.

    Alas, this is bad.

    If you sow 1000 seeds and 20 germinate this is better than sowing only 50 and getting 15 germinated.

    Albeit less eficient.

  36. anyone know of this feature in a wifi router? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    If the 2 hr token code on receipts is too much trouble, one thought would be a wifi router that takes note of the mac address and gradually throttles down bandwidth or puts up a nag message on port 80 requests after the mac address has been in use for too long. Could even be a variable sized time window so that on those busy weekends you only get 1/2 hr but on a slow monday afternoon you get 4 hours.

    I don't know of any wifi routers that do this, but it seems like an easy idea to implement and wouldn't require anything from the cash register or employees.

    Sure, people can spoof their mac address and get another 2 hrs (or whatever) but it most people wouldn't bother and it sounds like they don't mind a few people hanging out, they just don't want a sea of laptops.

  37. Solution by dark+grep · · Score: 1

    Our two main carriers, Telstra and Optus, here in Australia have a soluttion to that - $10 per 15 minutes for WiFi access, thank you very much. There are other operators who charge less (but not much less), but they are very sparce. There are very, very few 'free' hotspots, no matter how much coffee you buy.

  38. Everyone has an opinion... by chia_monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny to see how everyone here is an expert in business, marketing, general human psychology, and the like. "Charge for this", "put up signs for that", "only allow this"...it's not that easy.

    There is a fine balance between welcoming people that will eventually turn into customers and attracting hordes of freeloaders, from enforcing a policy that keeps paying customers happy while they surf to appearing to be too harsh like you're running a police state in your store. Let's face it...each restaurant, each cafe, each location in a city has its own unique needs. The Panera Bread that offers free WiFi in a college town may need to have a monitor walk the store and ask abusers of the free WiFi to leave while the Panera in a DC suburb may have mindful users that monitor themselves as they come in, grab lunch, surf, and leave. Timed access codes may work for some places, purchase-required policies may be needed in others, and some may be able to offer it 24/7 without incident.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Everyone has an opinion... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      I don't think that anyone is saying that all wifi hotspot locations need to implement a standard usage policy. In the case of this particular coffee shop there is a problem with free wifi abuse with too many non-customer users coming in and taking up seat space that is intended for paying customers.

      So yeah, in this particular case it may make sense to go to a pay-as-you-go wifi system or some other setup that turns these users into customers or turns them away. The same may not hold true in your particular area.

      What we need is some common sense and some manners. Sadly both are in short supply.

    2. Re:Everyone has an opinion... by Vellmont · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      It's funny to see how everyone here is an expert in business, marketing, general human psychology, and the like. "Charge for this", "put up signs for that", "only allow this"...it's not that easy.

      So I guess you are the appointed expert? If you disagree with people, state your case. But you don't need to pull out the "you're not an expert, so you can't express an opinion" line.

      The whole concept of "experts" at least at most people see it is a big crock. Maybe you can have an expert in a field like science where there are testable theories and we can eventually get agreement. But who agrees on marketing, psychology, and business? You get me one "expert" that says one thing, and I'll find 5 other people that says the exact opposite. It's just a big dogfight, so let the people fight and don't pull out the "expert" line.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Everyone has an opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny to see how everyone here is an expert in business, marketing, general human psychology, and the like. "Charge for this", "put up signs for that", "only allow this"...it's not that easy.


      You, of course, know it's not that easy, because you are an expert.

      P.S. Screw off.

  39. Easy? by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

    I think not. Try implementing that.

    --
    My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    1. Re:Easy? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ok so each reciept has a one-use access code valued at 2 hours of time, valid for 24 hours from purchase, when you connect you get redirected to a secure page to log in and activate your code.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Easy? by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      I sit enlightened.

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    3. Re:Easy? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      implementing, it's trivial.

      Checkbox already does it. It's turnkey, painless, and simple. Print the access tickets in your web browser, set any timeframe you want on them, 30 minutes to a year. Hand em out to your paying customers. The non-customers can stare at a login screen. I've put a dozen of these things in various locations, site owners love em. Dont need to be a computer geek to know how to use it, and you can _easily_ restrict your wifi to customers, without all the fuss of encryption keys.

  40. Control excess WiFi access with bandwidth shaping by bit01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just set up bandwidth shaping so that each MAC address gradually starts slowing way down after an hour. Slow, not stopped, means they have a chance to finish their work and log off cleanly. They'll get the idea. I've seen this in other contexts; it works well and minimises arguments and overhead.

    ---

    Copyright is a privilege, not a right.

  41. Encryption Key by phorm · · Score: 1

    You don't need an encryption key, just a passworded proxy... preferably with an autoconfiguration URL so that users can easily set it up (and then enter a password).

  42. wifi'ers are like smokers ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would it kill the freeloaders to buy a small cup of decaf at the very least?

    That may not be good enough. In Hawaii there was a vote on outlawing smoking in buildings. One restraunt owner being interviewed pointed out that they had already done so voluntarily and it greatly improved business, contrary to the popular wisdom. They pointed out that they had much better table turnover without the smokers, and that the smokers were often only buying a coffee but occupying a table for a long time.

    Yes this is a restraunt not a coffee shop but the point is that wifi'ers, like smokers, occupy a finite resource, table space, disproportionately to their purchase. The wifi'ers can only be tolerated if table space is abundant.

    1. Re:wifi'ers are like smokers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so clearly, monday - friday, table space is abundant... I don't see an issue with pulling the plug on the free wifi on the weekends...
      I made a point to buy items(usually tea) at any place I went to use free wi-fi back when I was doing that... But my purchase to table space use was a lot lower than normal paying customers who would be in an out in a lot less time...this will probablly lead to a trend, where places offering free wifi cut off access on thier busiest days, so that the wi-fiers only come and make them look busy on the slow days ;)

    2. Re:wifi'ers are like smokers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that WiFi doesn't give you cancer... OR DOES IT? DUN DUN DUNNNNNN...

  43. Cafe in New Orleans Airport by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    There was a coffee shop in New Orleans airport that had something similar to this. You had to buy coffee and printed on the receipt was a code you punched in which gave you access to their "free" network. I of course was too cheap of a bastard to buy coffee.

    I think a 2 hour limit should be good enough for coffee. If someone blows through that two hours but is a legitimate customer, either the customer should have no problem buying another cup in 2 hours or the shop should have no problem saying "hey, you spent 2 hours on your cup. Please buy another or give your seat to paying customers"

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  44. Won't work... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    You can change the MAC address you send. People will use MAC addresses like proxies.

    I know one Cafe that has internet access for customers only. It is all wi-fi. All you need to do is get a good sniffer, sit there a while, find a MAC address, clone it as yours, and you have free access.

    A better option is to kick all the bums out, make it known they are not welcome. Or have an area where the bums can sit, that does not take up customer space.

    You know what they do in France? To sit in a cafe, you must pay. Even to drink a water. They sell the right to sit in a Cafe. If all the tables were by reservation only, that would take care of the Bums. Make it a small charge, like 50 cents for an hour, or free with purchase of beverage. Put a time stamp on the reciept that is color coded. When someone is more than one color code away from their time block, ask them to leave.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Won't work... by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      You know what they do in France? To sit in a cafe, you must pay. Even to drink a water.

      Indeed. Same thing in Holland. In fact, I was very surprised (from reading the comments here) that it is apparently possible to sit at a table in a U.S. cafe without ordering anything.

      JP

    2. Re:Won't work... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      >> it is apparently possible to sit a table in
      >> a U.S. cafe without ordering anything.

      Café's in the US are usually corporate or franchises and are staffed by low-wage workers who would rather be somewhere else. They aren't really interested in acting as security guards. They don't get tips for throwing people out.

      The other thing is, in America, some non-zero percentage of people carry guns. The default is to not confront anyone unless it is your job to do so, and you are also carrying a gun. I'm not exaggerating.

  45. Easy to understand. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Well, you have to understand that coffee is a premium product. If you just wanted caffeine then you could get it anywhere and cheaper than a coffeehouse. Before the big internet/starbucks revolution coffeehouses were a lot more social (the article goes into this). Sure some people would read books, but a stranger would come up to you and ask you if you want to play chess too.

    Or you'd find yourself involved into a conversation about philosophy.

    Not to mention, coffeehouses are image based, so some people are going to be turned off by a place populated with 10 people staring into their laptops taking up two seats, reaching for power cables, etc. Its like hanging out at kinkos. Might as well walk to the coffee place up the street.

    Call them snobs, or whatever, but thats how people act. I do it all the time with bars. If I'm in a place I dont like I suggest we take off. If I dont like the crowd, even though I'm not going to talk to them, I still dont want to hang around them. I dont want to listen to, say, 80s music, in a non-ironic way, etc. I'd rather spend my money elsewhere.

  46. Re:Control excess WiFi access with bandwidth shapi by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    So then you just change your MAC address!

  47. Why Why Why?!?!?! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Why would you willingly goto a place with lots of people sitting around on laptops?

    Those are the last people on the planet I want to be around to socialize with. That's my crowd for work or a confined to a LUG setting, and the upcoming WWDC of course :)

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  48. charge for wi-fi, give away the coffee... by voidstin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    works for The Office. They even have enough to spring for aerons and bose noise cancelling headphones. and i don't have to be guilted/forced into buying a muffin every 20 minutes.

    for extra geek cred, joss whedon wrote 'serenity' there.

    1. Re:charge for wi-fi, give away the coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could read that website, I'm sure I'd be horrified.

      Sounds like a technological dystopia to me. Why not just stay at home?

  49. About time, too by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    So I'm going to be a hypocrite on this one. I spent a lot of time writing my thesis on a laptop in a coffee house. But over time, I've started to really find the idea that you should turn up to a place that's (to some extent) meant to be a "third place" - that is, an escape from both home and work - and annex it as yet another place to do work. It's particularly annoying when people decide that not only are they going to camp out for 8 hours with their laptops, they're going to use the place as a mobile office, too. That is: make and receive lots of cell phone calls), give loud business presentations, have loud and uninteresting bull sessions.

    I'm not an extremist on this. Obviously people are going to homework, write papers and do work stuff while out. But there's definitely a class of people out there who need to Get an Office!
    If that's you, do us all a favor and stop pretending that your work is so damn interesting that we all want to hear about it, ok?

  50. Have you ever by SengirV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    tried to enforce that? IF, as they say, the place had reached capasity, then it would be a sea of people. Are you going to go around insulting peopole who actually purchased something and throw it away when done? Nothing like making your real customers feel like squatters to discourage repeat business. And the real squatters would simply lie and say they did buy something. It NEVER works out as simply as you think.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    1. Re:Have you ever by scat-cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should be obvious why they do it. During the week they do not get a lot of business, so offering free wi-fi would increase the business. And since most of the people who do use it would be on a lunch break or only have a little time, there would be no problem. Come the weekend, the crowd would be different. Residents of the area, not people working in the area. They do not need the gimmick of wifi to bring people in, their customer base already exists. Similar deal to happy hour and lady's night at bars. Get people in when business is slow. Charge extra when there is a draw.

  51. Some Precautionary Measures by mattdev121 · · Score: 1
    Nothing says, "Purchase a coffee or get off our network" like loading someone's computer with animal porn!

    Seriously, though. It could work ;)

    --
    mattdev@server$ touch /dev/genitals
    cannot touch `/dev/genitals': Permission denied
    1. Re:Some Precautionary Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a really good idea. If you make them go through a proxy, and after a certain period of time, all web requests instead return such a page, containing JS to spawn popups all over the screen containing more and more animal and goatse/tubgirl/lemonparty/etc porn. Watch and laugh as they quickly close the lid in case someone sees what's on their screen!!

    2. Re:Some Precautionary Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think they're using someone else's network connection in the first place?

  52. "Free" attracts EliteTorrent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Irony try downloading "Revenge of the Sith" while there.

  53. fast food by m85476585 · · Score: 1

    "It's just really really difficult. We've had so many heated debates about it. We want people to linger at the cafe. We're not a fast-food coffeeshop. We want people to feel comfortable staying here as long as they please," Strongin said.

    I would be more likely to stay if there is Wi-Fi.

    1. Re:fast food by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      The point is that they don't want to boot people out, but they don't want people to squat for wifi either.

  54. blank the power outlets by spasm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i've noticed that most of the coffeeshops i still like to go to just to drink coffee and hang out with people have limited numbers of people using laptops. i've also noticed that the reason not many people use laptops is the shop has few or no publicly accessible power outlets. ie your laptop use is limited to the life of your battery - the kind of people who want to spend six hours hunched over their laptop are go elsewhere.

    i'm waiting to see how long it takes places drowning in the 'six hour wifi session and one cup of coffee people' to just blank their power outlets off. way less hassle than trying to enforce purchase per hour rules or other annoyances.

    i'm kind of waiting for if you want to use your laptop, you're limited to battery life

    1. Re:blank the power outlets by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I saw exactly that, in Azabu-juban (a small part of Tokyo proper), in a Starbux near the hostel I booked. It was only a 6-minute walk from the hostel, but the plugs were blanked, labeled something like "No use customer".

      So, rather than go there with my 5-minute-battery-life, 40-month-old Vaio, I walked- about 15 minutes to the next nearby Sbux, in Roppongi (not exactly Roppongi Hills, but the piece of the area slightly to the west, near McDonalds, and by Don Quixote (the one that seems to have avoided burning up or burning down...).

      The Roppongi Starbux has VERy nice employees, and they are glad to have you there, as indicated by abundance of laptop-user available power outlets. But, they DO mentally photograph you and make sure you don't just sit down and squat away for hours. I made it a habit of purchasing my coffee and some thing to eat prior to going upstairs. Once I ordered, I tended to grab a table before losing a chance and ending up standing with my 30-lb backpack and holding my purchase.

      They seem to have things down very well there, and often it was PACKED, particularly in the evenings.

      I've also lived in the Portland, Oregon area, and per-block, I swear there must be numerically and variety-wise more coffee shops of corporate AND Mom-n-Pop type than in most places in the US.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:blank the power outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And amongst the hordes of people posting and reposting the same exact complicated pointless suggestions, here's someone who's actually managed to come up with a good idea.

      My hat is off to you, sir.

  55. well by Eugene · · Score: 1

    a good system will be given limited time access to customers who purchase at the store. therefor lock out the squatters. (maybe even implement a system where customer can order it via their wifi device. this way they don't need to even leave the chair and place order )

    the biggest challenge I see on those place is the implementation. a mom and pop place will not have the resource to implement a rated wifi service. so it's probably free or nothing design you see that's common everywhere.

    but again, this might come down to a culture/society issue.. why do people flock to free wifi spots? we are at the age that almost everyone has internet access in many places(home, work, school)why does it have to be a coffee shop? what does it provide that you can't get at home or other places? (for squatters, it certainly is NOT food/drinks) is it the *IN* thing to do?

  56. In Soviet russia, by killa62 · · Score: 0

    Profit makes you

  57. +1 funny? by Shihar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Please. You can't fix social problems with technological solutions."

    "Please. You can't fix social problems with technological solutions."

    Are you joking? I don't even know where to start. Let's start with this. You are at a computer somewhere in the world. If semiconductors were to vanish tomorrow, wherever you are, your government would collapse, the balance of power in the world would be thoroughly shaken from head to foot, and millions, if not billions of people would die within a year.

    Take the same number of people in New York, drop then in a forest the same size as New York, and watch how quickly society implodes upon itself without the technological infrastructure to support it.

    Clearly, technology is doing something. Technology and society are so tightly tied together that you can't untangle one from the other without destroying something.

    I know some times when we bang things out on the keyboard they sound really insightful and intelligent, but some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read, and decide if it really is insightful, or a load of thoughtless crap.

    1. Re:+1 funny? by Burz · · Score: 1

      You've made it clear to me.. technology can help with social problems.

      And it can create them, too.

    2. Re:+1 funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read... and check for errors while we're at it.

      Respectfully,

      Yet another Grammar Nazi

    3. Re:+1 funny? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      You are right. Or just turn off the electricity. For a month. This is how the world will end.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    4. Re:+1 funny? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      You are right. Or just turn off the electricity. For a month. This is how the world will end.
      You've never lived through a disaster, have you? I remember the ice storm, when much of the province lost electicity for weeks in the dead of winter (some places over a month). The sense of community, of people pulling together, was incredible. Too bad it takes a disaster to do that.

      Yes, the freeloaders are a social problem. The acceptable social solution is to kick them out. Loitering is against the law.

    5. Re:+1 funny? by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      You've never lived through a disaster, have you? I remember the ice storm, when much of the province lost electicity for weeks in the dead of winter (some places over a month). The sense of community, of people pulling together, was incredible.

      There's a difference between one area losing electricity for a month and the entire world losing electricity for a month. If just your area loses it, people from the outside that still have power will happily deliver you food to eat and fuel for your generator. If the entire world lost electricity... well, I'm sure you can imagine the difficulties we would face.

    6. Re:+1 funny? by Westacular · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Clearly, technology is doing something. Technology and society are so tightly tied together that you can't untangle one from the other without destroying something.

      Which is why a simple technological "fix" to a primarily social problem is rarely effective.

      Stated alternately: It's hard to entirely fix a social problem with a technological solution, but careful use of techonology can really, really help.

    7. Re:+1 funny? by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? I don't even know where to start. Let's start with this. You are at a BBQ somewhere in the world. If fire were to vanish tomorrow, wherever you are, your government would collapse, the balance of power in the world would be thoroughly shaken from head to foot, and millions, if not billions of people would die within a year.

      Take the same number of people in New York, drop them in a lake the same size as New York, and watch how quickly society implodes upon itself without the the capability for dry-kindling-ignition to support it.

      Does this mean you can always fix social problems with fire?

      Just because "technology allows X", doesn't mean "technology can cure Y". Sure, it allows us to live our lives a certain way (and that's great), but to confuse an empowering trend with the cure for all the world's ills is just naive.

      "I know some times when we bang things out on the keyboard they sound really insightful and intelligent, but some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read, and decide if it really is insightful, or a load of thoughtless crap."

      Sagelike advice indeed.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    8. Re:+1 funny? by Potor · · Score: 1
      The breakdown or sudden absence of technology will certainly cause social ills. But this is not an argument against the proposition that one cannot fix social problems with technological solutions.

      In other words, positing the possible breakdown of society through the absence of existing technology (as you do) does not logically contradict the denial of the possibility of fixing society through future technology.

      For that matter, name one social problem 'solved' by technology. Please.

      I know some times when we bang things out on the keyboard they sound really insightful and intelligent, but some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read, and decide if it really is insightful, or a load of thoughtless crap.
      Exactly.
    9. Re:+1 funny? by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      "Please. You can't fix social problems with technological solutions."

      Are you joking? I don't even know where to start. Let's start with this. You are at a computer somewhere in the world. If semiconductors were to vanish tomorrow, wherever you are, your government would collapse...


      Specious argument. Dig your self in deeper. It's primarily a people problem, something that narrow minded gadget loving geeks with a sense of entitlement are unable to understand.

    10. Re:+1 funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      There's a difference between one area losing electricity for a month and the entire world losing electricity for a month.

      I'd say the majority of the world doesn't have access to reliable power as it is so it wouldn't really affect anyone but First World nations.

    11. Re:+1 funny? by KiviPall · · Score: 1

      ...If semiconductors were to vanish tomorrow,

      i'ts about time!


      wherever you are, your government would collapse

      good! it is full of idiots!

      the balance of power in the world would be thoroughly shaken

      i'ts about time!

      and millions, if not billions of people would die within a year.

      i'ts about time!

    12. Re:+1 funny? by circusboy · · Score: 1

      there's a reason why the dolphins are #2 and not us...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    13. Re:+1 funny? by stlhawkeye · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I know some times when we bang things out on the keyboard they sound really insightful and intelligent, but some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read, and decide if it really is insightful, or a load of thoughtless crap.

      Take your own advice. Your post doesn't really refute the poster that you quoted. The person you quoted said that you can't fix social problems with technological solutions. Your examples all showed that if you remove technology, you create social problems. Those two things are not the same.

      If semiconductors were to vanish tomorrow, wherever you are, your government would collapse

      Do you have even the slightest shred of evidence to support this statement? Because I can think of a number of massive power failures that crippled cities but there was hardly a collapse of government.

      millions, if not billions of people would die within a year.

      Again, this may or may not be true, but this has nothing to do with solving a social problem. All you're suggesting here is that we are dependent on technology to make our society function. Yanking that out from under our feet doesn't prove that we solve social problems with technology. How has technology solved the poverty problem? Hunger? Drug abuse? Teenage pregnancy? Gang activity? Racism? Homophobia? Alcoholism? Mental health issues? The breakdown of the nuclear family? How is any of this solved with technology? None of these problems are exactly new, either. Technology accelerates society but solves it's problems? Perhaps only to introduce new ones. The automobile improved public health by eliminating the need for horses and their biological byproducts from cities, only to create a whole new type of air quality problem. The sewer system supports your argument more. With sewage and wastewater treatment our cities and homes are far, far cleaner and more sanitized, and technology was the solution. On balance, though, I think technology more often replaces social problems with new types of problems. It's definitely progress, but I quibble with your assertion that we solve social problems with technology. Perhaps in wellness and safety.

      Take the same number of people in New York, drop then in a forest the same size as New York, and watch how quickly society implodes upon itself without the technological infrastructure to support it.

      This doesn't support your argument at all. All you've said is that if you take people who've learned the ropes of life in an urban setting and dump them into a completely foreign environment, they're unlikely to cope well. Well, duh. I can prove that technology causes social problems by picking up a tribe of bushmen and dropping them off in Santa Monica and observe that they are unable to function.

      Clearly, technology is doing something. Technology and society are so tightly tied together that you can't untangle one from the other without destroying something.

      That's very true! But that doesn't refute the notion that social problems aren't fixed with technological solutions.

      I know some times when we bang things out on the keyboard they sound really insightful and intelligent, but some times we need to respect the preview button, read what we read, and decide if it really is insightful, or a load of thoughtless crap.

      Check your intellectual elitism at the door. Your post may have been insightful but you didn't really refute the person you are busily condescending towards here. He said, "You can't fix social problems with technolgical solutions." And I agree with you that this statement isn't true. Some social problems clearly can be addressed through technology, especially in medicine. However, you've failed to demonstrate that with even one relevent example. You've shown that society is dependent on technology, and nothing more.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  58. Get some manners. by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I can't stand coffee. I could see my self needing internet, and trying a coffee shop without buying anything (though I would first look at their pastry selection, and buy one if there were any). However if the shop is half full I'd walk right out, if not I ask if they mind. Even then I pay attention, when the shop gets half full I'm out anyway.

    When I'm just a body surrounded by empty seats it costs nothing. When I'm a non-paying body taking up a seat a customer could otherwise take I'm costing them. In fact you could argue that my presence makes it look like the place is more 'happening', which could attract customers.

    I consider this basic.

  59. Easier but won't work by mrklin · · Score: 1

    What's to prevent people from asking their neighbor: "Hey, what's the current connection code/SSID/key?"

    1. Re:Easier but won't work by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Looking like you're a cheap bastard in front of a stranger?

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Easier but won't work by Burz · · Score: 1

      But then you have people talking to each other at least. Could make a world of difference.

    3. Re:Easier but won't work by dotgain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We've already established that there's now a class of people who aren't bothered even slightly by that....

    4. Re:Easier but won't work by coaxial · · Score: 1

      You forget, people are usually helpful.

    5. Re:Easier but won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one of them is named Richard Stallman.

  60. Another solution by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could restrict browsers to only IE and AOL on Windows. Those who would be most likely to abuse the wifi are the tech "elite", so they'd have already self-selected themselves out of the user pool by using Linux and Firefox.

  61. Why the problem? Kick 'em out. by bettlebrox · · Score: 1
    It's simple, if you don't buy something you can't stay.

    If you buy something there is a 2 hour limit (unless you buy something else).

    I've been to many a place in both Boston/Cambridge & Dublin, that won't let you stay more then 2 hours unless you purchase something else.

    --

    I have a very small mind and must live with it.
    -- E. Dijkstra

    1. Re:Why the problem? Kick 'em out. by eggboard · · Score: 1

      This is where you hit the culture issue: this coffeeshop wants its mini-society to live by implicit rules and not become one of those places that has all kinds of explicit rules one must follow. Their baristas don't want to time customers and evict them. They want people to linger--but they want lingerers to be a little convivial.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    2. Re:Why the problem? Kick 'em out. by bettlebrox · · Score: 1
      What might happen if you set a time limit is that most people will follow it (if they see it posted).

      Other way to limit how long people stay might be some kind of bandwidth leveling. The longer your on the slower it gets .... :D

      --

      I have a very small mind and must live with it.
      -- E. Dijkstra

  62. Re:Control excess WiFi access with bandwidth shapi by bit01 · · Score: 1

    So then you just change your MAC address!

    Considered that. Only a small percentage will do it and they can be dealt with separately. Just disconnecting once an hour is going to be hassle and if the cofeeshop cared they could do client recognition with proxies and encrypted cookies etc.

    In any case it's tables they care about, not the network, and if they see somebody on a table for an extended period and the place is full they can do something about it.

    ---

    Keep your options open!

  63. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Put the encryption key on the receipt, and automate this process.

  64. Culture is the point by syzme · · Score: 1

    It seems like a lot of people are missing the point. To some degree this story is about a coffee shop with a wifi-squatter problem, but the original post seems to be about more than imposing network usage rules.

    More important is that constant internet access was destroying the coffee shop culture. This is interesting. Usually we say Internet==Good, more Internet==More Good, but this case provides a counter point.

  65. soi let me get this straight.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I ahve to buy something to use there restroom. Even though people HAVE to go to the bathroom.
    But if I want free Wi-Fi, I don't have to buy something? And then people use this service and not buy anything? I'm shocked I tells you, shocked!

    Generate a random code that give the user 1 hour of service for free. Put it on the reciept. Before issuing a number, ask if they need the service, if not, no number.

    I onow people who go to a fast food place, plug their laptop in, order a smal beverage, and then sit there all day working and drinking free refills. Absolutly rude.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:soi let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ahve to buy something to use there restroom.

      What planet do you live on? I've never seen a pay toilet in the us ever. As a mater of fact, it's a federal law, buisness that sell food/drink and are of a certain size, are required, BY law, to provide a 'public' restroom. public means Free for use by anyone, no charge. sorry, man if you live somewhere where they're charging you to use the toilet, but it's just something that we here in the us take for granted. if you serve food or drink you have a public restroom... gas stations sometimes have keys you need to ask for, but food service places would never get away with having a key, because then your hand becomes 'contaminated' as well as the customers.. some places go so far as to have a hallway design that eliminates the need for doors, because they don't want the door handles to contaminate peoples hands etc.

  66. Will be non-issue when free Wi-Fi is ubiquitous by whatthef*ck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A few decades ago, some restaurants and bars used to have prominent signs out front announcing that their premises were air-conditioned. Back then, not all places were, so on, say, a scorching July evening in a small town in the Kansas prairie, an air-conditioned bar or restaurant could reasonably expect to have an edge over the non-AC competition. I'm sure many proprietors noticed some of their "customers" lingering for hours over a half-eaten piece of pie or a single beer while they gabbed to their friends, obviously looking for a cheap or free way to escape the unbearable heat outside or in their homes.

    Nowdays, when virtually every place of public accomodation has AC, there are no doubt still people who might nurse a single latte for hours in the local coffee shop to escape an unbearably hot apartment, but they're not going to be numerous enough to be a burden on the system. After all, there are plenty of places with AC they can go to.

    The problem with Wi-Fi moochers is no doubt a real one now, but it will solve itself in time. Although it's not happening fast enough to suit me, the trends are toward free and ubiquitious Wi-Fi. When that day comes, and they're distributed among all of the bars, restaurants, coffee shops and libraries in a a given area, no one will worry about the one or two Wi-Fi moochers in their establishment at a given moment.

    1. Re:Will be non-issue when free Wi-Fi is ubiquitous by Zaulden · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. Mod parent up. The parallels between distributed AC and Wi-Fi are remarkably similar.

      --
      "Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so." - Ford Prefect
    2. Re:Will be non-issue when free Wi-Fi is ubiquitous by Planck0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, coffee-shop type places will still probably have a much higher percentage of campers. Coffee shops tend to have more comfortable chairs and tables than, for example, restaurants which is more condusive to using wi-fi.

      If this impacts a coffee shop's business negatively, then I can see one of three things happening:

      1. Owners will have to start closely monitoring for campers and start asking people to leave. All it takes it a few false accusations, though, and it could be even worse for their sales. People don't like being treated as criminals.
      2. Owners will start blocking wifi signals. I believe I remember reading somewhere that movie theatres could use aluminum-style wallpaper to block cell phone signals and I'm betting that the same thing could be used to block ubiquitous wifi. You still have glass, though, which I don't think there's any way to block.
      3. Owners will be able to purchase wifi "blockers" which would transmit continuous static on all the bands that a wifi signal uses. Since these frequencies are unlicensed and as long as they didn't exceed the power output on their signal that's defined by the FCC, I don't even think there would be anything illegal about this or even anything you could do to stop it. Naturally, someone is going to end up living right next door to a shop doing this and not be able to use their own wi-fi in their own apartment. This is when the lawyers will step in.
    3. Re:Will be non-issue when free Wi-Fi is ubiquitous by Kphrak · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod up your post, but I decided to reply instead to play Devil's Advocate.

      When that day comes, and they're distributed among all of the bars, restaurants, coffee shops and libraries in a a given area, no one will worry about the one or two Wi-Fi moochers in their establishment at a given moment.

      That's one way of looking at it. The other way is that coffeehouses are a lot more "hip" than the local McDonalds, and will still end up attracting more leeches even if restaurants get Wi-Fi. I notice posters above complaining about iPod-wearing hipsters with laptops, Wi-Fi, and a strong desire to live their interactionless lifestyle in a coffee shop all day. For this kind of person (and this is a reach; I haven't studied iPod-hipster psychology much), a coffee shop might be a place to be seen as well as to surf (or blog, these days). The fact that coffee is served there, of course, is incidental. The other reason why a coffee shop gets picked is that in a restaurant or bar, they usually ask you right away what you want. In a coffee shop, you go up to the counter and ask them. You can hide out all day in a comfortable seat and no one will bother you about any mundane issue such as actually ordering food or drink.

      All this leads up to a darker view of the future: When Wi-Fi is everywhere, Wi-Fi leeches will still gather in the places they want to be seen in. Mickey D's and Joe's Restaurant will have a few businessmen or college students using Wi-Fi in them, and the coffee shops will be jammed with the latest trend in unbearable coolness, madly leeching bandwidth for free.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
  67. The nerve of them.... by darealpat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wanting to turn a perfectly good internet cafe into a coffee shop!

    --
    For every present, there is a past
  68. Web Only Section by axonal · · Score: 1

    Why not do something similar to what has been done for people that smoke, create a WiFi section, and a non-WiFi section. People with laptops and etc, should go to the WiFi section of the coffee place. There, they could specifically do things like locking electrical outlets so people have to run off their battery. When the battery is out, they are done. Also, they could put this section in a part of the coffee house which doesn't restrict patronage. Thus all the customers that don't use WiFi get prime seating and service, etc.

    1. Re:Web Only Section by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      What if I want to go to the coffee shop and keep downing espressos in a nice environment while also using my laptop occasionally? Should I have to be herded into some wifi squatter's ghetto?

      (Economic note: if you're in an urban area, broadband is probably around, what, $50/mo? If you use the Internet a little bit every day, it's more economical to buy a cup of drip every day than pay for broadband.

      On the other hand, if you want to use the Internet for longer periods or, like me, enjoy drinking triple espressos, it quickly becomes very expensive to use a coffee shop as a source of 'free' Internet.

      Anyone who comes into a coffee shop and doesn't pay for something should be kicked out much faster than a few hours, unless they're with someone.)

  69. How about this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do like one of my local places does: print the key on the receipts.

  70. Kick those cheap bastards out by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    And make space for paying customers.

    WIFI squatters?

    "Hello sir, how about a nice warm boot to the ass on your way out?"

  71. Every ones talking about 2 hour vouchers by Zlib+pt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but can someone please give a free / simple way of doing that?

    Does anyone know one of those systems that only let ppl surf on the store webpage and to access the rest of the internet you have to put an username/password ?

    I've been looking for this for a long time, but haven't found none

    1. Re:Every ones talking about 2 hour vouchers by tweek · · Score: 1

      NoCatAuth

      http://nocat.net/

      Nice captive portal and highly configurable.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  72. Battery power only... by aquarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...seems to work for most places. Most people's computers only work for 1-2 hours (most batteries aren't in top condition). So unless people bring more than one battery (unlikely for broke WiFi squatters), you can get them to leave by just not providing plugs.

    Stupidly, some coffeehouses have plugs all over the place anyway. Often this is left over from a previous restaurant business, where they had a lamp on every table, etc.

    So if you want people to limit their stay, just limit the electricity!

    1. Re:Battery power only... by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      by not buying coffee, they can save up their nickels for more batteries.

      I could be called a squatter, but I buy at least 1 drink and 1 meal type thing every day I sit there with my three batteries and pack of smokes. Of course, this is a sidewalk in santa cruz so everyone interacts wether you want to or not.

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    2. Re:Battery power only... by Agelmar · · Score: 1

      I've heard a lot of technical solutions, some of them very creative. Is this really necessary though? Why not just put a little sign on the tables saying "Please limit time to X minutes when the shop is crowded, customer use only." and ask people who break the rules to kindly leave?

      The most technical solution is not always the best solution.

    3. Re:Battery power only... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Yes it's very stupid for them to have not had the foresight to spend many thousands of dollars to remove a useful set of power outlets that let them flexibly reposition their floor lighting.

      They should fire the guy who failed to sign that work order form.

    4. Re:Battery power only... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Building codes in many areas require a receptacle every X feet.

    5. Re:Battery power only... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there is nothing from preventing the shop owners from throwing the breakers to said outlets.

    6. Re:Battery power only... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Damn, true...

    7. Re:Battery power only... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Umm... dude, that makes *no* sense. There are certainly building codes that place a lower limit on the spacing between recepticles and the number of recepticles per circuit, but I have a hard time believing there are rules which *require* you to have recepticles installed.

    8. Re:Battery power only... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      They exist and they makes sense, the intent is to prevent use of extension cords by providing adequate receptacle coverage.

    9. Re:Battery power only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont be a dick, Thousands of Dollars????

      $2 each for plastic faceplates, would i think deal with the problem.

  73. Social problem, social solution by theorbtwo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems social problems beg for social solutions, and most of the solutions I've seen in the replies are different varities of how to make sure only paying customers get the wifi. That's not a bad idea, but it doesn't solve the problem of a lack of atmopshere. (BTW: rolls of tickets like fairs use come cheap. Don't let numbers be used twice, and lock out a MAC after a few wrong guesses.)

    Anyway, my solution: On the first hit to any page from a new MAC, or on a new token, go to a site for the coffee shop. Have a web-based chat there. Encourage your patrons to use it, post news there, etc. The idea is to get the geeks to come out of their shells for a bit. Try to get the "missed connections" stuff on there, and perhaps the cute girl on the iBook will see it in time.

    And if that doesn't work, well, perhaps turning off the wifi is a good idea.

  74. It's cheaper than home broadband by aquarian · · Score: 1

    Even if you buy a drink every time, WiFi squatting is often cheaper than broadband at home. Not everyone has to be online constantly, just an hour or two a few days a week.

    Plus, it's a pay as you go system, with no monthly bill to worrry about. As long as you can scrounge some change out of the couch for a cup of tea...

  75. Re:blank the power outlets-Wont stop madcor wifier by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    i'm kind of waiting for if you want to use your laptop, you're limited to battery life

    That won't stop the madcore wifi squatters from bringing a buncha batteries with them to power their laptop(s). Do they care if they have about 5 minutes of downtime (or so) to swap out a dead/dying laptop battery for a fresh one?

    If there is a will, there is a way (to exploit/abuse a common resource available to the general public at large [like email]).

  76. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    interesting how with some time under their belt, the clash of inward facing technology and outward facing culture hit these particular entrepreneurs' limit.

    I read this several times I don't really know what the heck it says???

    Inward facing technology?

  77. Wifi still good for the average little guy by joshstaiger · · Score: 1
    I can see how this might become a problem with extremely popular coffee shops in bigger cities such as Seattle, but for the average coffee shop free wi fi still has great benefit.

    I used to be a big fan of Starbucks, but lately I've completely stopped buying their coffee as they insist on charging $6/hr for their T-Mobile hotspot, while I can get free wifi at number of locally owned coffee shops around town.

    I bring a lot of business to these places, and always make sure to tip well. That's money they never would have seen without the wi-fi differentiator.

    --
    http://joshstaiger.org/

  78. In Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In Japan, there are an increasing number of locations with similar free WiFi. Most people seem to have the sense not to sit there for hours on without buying more than a single cup of coffee. That still seems to be cultrually associated with teenagers, who usually aren't the WiFi users anyhow. (And they hang out in places like McDonald's where an entire meal costs about the same as a cup of coffee elsewhere.)

    That said, there are occasionally some people that will occupy an entire table for 4 with papers etc. It's welcome when traffic is low and no one's really losing anything. But when business starts to pick up (weekends, lunch time, what not) they're usually, quite simply, asked to leave because there are more customers waiting to be seated. No one usually makes a fuss, and it works. The customer is packed up and gone, and business relations are still kept intact.

    One thing I can imagine in the U.S. though, is some people throwing a fit at such suggestions from the proprietors. I say kick them out and tell them they're not welcome back. Why not? It makes perfect business and social sense. It makes the frequenters happy knowing that the owners are interested in keeping the atmosphere good. No need for timed-keys activated on purchase, and when business is really slow, it's probably better to have someone in the shop working on a laptop than no one at all. (People attract people, an empty store repels people.)

    Post some rules. They don't need to read like legal documents, just point out the obvious. Such rules don't need to be intrusive either, just print them on the menu. Even chain operations can implement this, just make a manual. It's cheaper than reconfiguring the network. Just make sure that you point out the reason why you're asking/telling someone to leave. In most cases I suspect they'll be a bit embarrased that they were being a pain in the ass, and just move on. They're welcome back later.

    Again, a common sense solution to a common sense problem. It's not a technology problem, so don't bother applying technological solutions. They'll cause more trouble than they fix. K.I.S.S.!

  79. Fully Customizable solution by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 1
    PublicIP

    Can be tailored to almost any need, and is open source. Is very flexible.

    Requirements:

    • Just about any old or new PC with 2 NICs
    • A plain vanilla router on one NIC to connect to your provider (linksys, netgear etc...)
    • A Wi-fi AP or a regular hub on the the other NIC to connect clients
    All said and done.... if youve got an old PC lying around your investment is a little time, and maybe 50$ or so bucks for the AP and/or the router.

    If you need to buy a PC, any old refurb or a cheapo PC can be had for under 300$.

    With just a tiny bit of tinkering, you can modify it to make your Access point require a purchase (a coffee for 2 hours access?) --VISION, Enjoy

    --
    --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
  80. WiFi Cafe's by JonathanR · · Score: 1

    I frequent wifi cafe's as the coffee stays hotter longer.

  81. Re:blank the power outlets-Wont stop madcor wifier by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the idea is that it would be less of a hassle to just go somewhere that has power outlets (their house maybe?). Buying and carrying lots of laptop batteries is neither economical nor "coffee house cool".

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  82. Nooooooo, evil coffee shop! by darthwader · · Score: 3, Funny

    They can't do that. Internet access WANTS to be free. It's evil to force people to pay for something of value.

    The world will be a much better place when everyone gets everything they want for free. These "businesspeople" are just greedy bastards who are trying to opress the masses.

    And what's this with paying for the coffee? I don't have to pay for my coffee at work, so why should I have to pay for the coffee at the coffee shop? Coffee wants to be free, too.

    Anyone who opposes the Open Coffee and Open Wi-Fi movement is clearly a slave of Bill Gates. They must be stopped. Someone should do something about them. Me, I'm too busy looking for free broadband internet access to liberate my mp3s, movies, and software.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
  83. My experience by FuroTheRed · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The coffee shop I frequent started offering free wi-fi a few months after they opened up. I was away at school for a couple of months this spring, and when I came back, there was a sign requiring a purchase for access to the network. I don't think their business has suffered as a result; in fact, I've swung by a few more times than I otherwise might've, just to use the connection and see my friends who also stop by often. This, of course, leads to the undeniable urge to feed my caffeine habit, and thus, a purchase.

    The purchase rule they instituted seems to have stopped any squatting (except for my friend who uses the connection to play World of Warcraft in his car after hours- and even he buys things during the day!).

    I suspect that in the case of the coffee shop in question, the squatters were simply taking up space where the normal coffee-buyers would have otherwise sat. Probably, the ultimate solution would be to institute a buying policy, but a fairly lenient one. After all, sometimes I come in and I can only afford a couple of Cokes over the course of a few hours- but they know I buy stuff whenever I come in (a lot of times the more pricey stuff), and so they don't hassle me about it. That's the kind of thing that makes me want to come back to a business. I didn't even like coffee the first time I came in!

    --
    "Sometimes it takes more than an axe and a busload of strangers to work through your anger." -Rikk Estoban
  84. Customer ID is irrelevant by Burz · · Score: 1

    #3, that is.

    All you need is a POS macro for the "coupon printer". Even if your POS isn't normally configured to print an extra coupon segment, it should be easy to print a randomly-generated passkey as if it were a randomly-generated coupon. The passkeys would expire after 2 hours.

  85. WiFi Squatting by Jangospeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in L.A. it's especially annoying because we have lots of actors and screenwriters who use Starbucks as their production office. Personally, I don't think one cup of $4 coffee justifies using a whole table for your office all day, plus electricity. There should just be a time limit for everyone- to give customers a chance to come and go. One thought I had, can you get the WiFi signal if you sit outside the location? Why not have some overflow seating outside for the squatters? Of course, as was mentioned above, removing access to power outlets would probably eliminate a lot of this problem. Then again, maybe these coffee shops need to be redesigned to allow for more people, and for social gatherings- like bars. Have a fooseball table, a pool table, daycare, petcare, etc.

  86. Damn fine idea! by kimanaw · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Summer is upon us, Seattle's best time of the year, sunny, warm, and green. If you're so hung up w/ that damn laptop that you can't shut it off, kick back with a tall iced sweet tea, and enjoy the weekend, you shouldn't be allowed to enter the cafe, much less bogart the wifi.

    More power to 'em. In fact, I'd suggest that anyone entering w/ any electronic info device (yes, including cellphones) on the weekend be shown the exit and visited with a hail of derisive boos and laughter.

    --
    007: "Who are you?"
    Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
    007: "I must be dreaming..."
  87. Another consideration by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    Wifi turned off on weekends is good because gamers and casual users won't be endlessly taking up space. Furthermore, it's all about the atmosphere that distinguishes the better coffee houses from regular ones...and Wifi hurts rather than helps that atmosphere in most cases.

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  88. I Live down the street & it isn't the wi-fi .. by psuedo_samurai · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is the problem but the way the place is laid out. It has hard back chairs (libary style) with hardtop slate tables which each seat between 2-4 people. Reminds me of a restaurant evey time I walk in there. Perfect for studying, but no "community" feeling about it. Can you imagine walking up to another person's table at a restaurant and striking up a conversation? It would be a bit awkward.

    The owners lament about the erosion of culture being the cause is pure BS. Make no mistake, this is simply about $$$$, nothing else.

    Just up the street though is the non-profit Cafe Perkatory which is laid out like a living room with soft chairs, nice rug on the floor, and great Wi-Fi. And there is no complaints about erosion of culture there. Almost every time I walk into the place I am gauranteed to strike up a conversation with a new and interesting person.

    However, if Perkatory isn't your "Cup 'O Tea" then you can always try one of the hundreds of other weekend Wi-Fi enabled coffee shops in seattle which are conveinently listed here.

  89. I'm a coffeeshop and I can relate by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not a big famous coffeeshop but I have my share of customers. Even though I like to occasionally surf the web to see if I can chat with other coffeeshops (it's lonely being a coffeeshop), it's really affected my self-esteem. I feel very used, like people forgot why I'm here (hint: coffee, you idiot!). I suppose they were always here just because of some or other product, I felt like I was a part of giving coffee to my customers, via my slav..employees. Now they just come to hook up and tune out. I'm left watching the little lights on the router flash. I'm tempted to pour coffee in their fucking laptops, but pulling the plug on their connection has made them realize that I do matter and that I am in control.

  90. Different Business Model by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Change the priorities around if you want a different business model and still make some loot. Have a "WiFi hangout shop" that also has coffee and munchies on the side, plus maybe sell hardware??? Possibly get customers and be competitive by offering a faster connection than the "coffee shops with free wifi" guys. Charge by the hour or something like that, maybe make it a club you can join and get a month/yearly severe discount rate. Offer a choice, too, ethernet or wireless at the table. So much an hour (reasonable), and free coffee!

  91. Re:I Live down the street & it isn't the wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hah. I can tell you right now, it has very little to do with the $$$$.

    I'm friends with both Kyle, head barista trainer there, and Tony, head roaster there. Victrola Coffee is a place that is unbelievably dedicated to coffee. They are not in the business for making $$$, because the margins in Specialty Coffee are quite frankly absolute crap. They're in the business to make the best possible espresso period. Which is why they get consistently reviewed as one of the top if not the top cafe in seattle in terms of quality.

    They care about community and they care about coffee. If they were in it for the $$$$ they would be serving crap starbucks coffee and paying their Baristas minimum wage.

  92. Receipts... by OneFix · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not tie wifi access to a number printed on the receipts...I am sure there is a POS system out there that can print up a random serial number from a database...make it valid for the like a whole hour.

    All you would have to do is enter your code via a browser...If they wanted a new code, they would have to buy a new cup of coffee every hour or so...some hotels already have something similar for wifi access from rooms.

    1. Re:Receipts... by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Hotels have it every hour? I know in the Holiday Inn Express I stayed at, I had to get a code (which they changed daily) to access the network wirelessly at first. Then it just lets you on, probably authenticated mac. I had access the next morning, not sure how long it lasts since I left. Using SBC BTW, and they also had an ethernet port in every room. BTW, I don't like coffee. How about Panera? I'm sure there's plenty of wifi in that mall, including the sbc thing at barnes and nobles. Does SBC still have a free trial of their freedom link thing going for dsl customers?

  93. WiFi Do's and Don'ts Poster for Free Wifi Hotspots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's something the Boston Wireless Advocacy Group has done to try to help address that issue as per http://www.bostonwag.org/projects/etiquette.html:

    WiFi Do's and Don'ts

    BostonWAG created a set of guidelines for users of open wireless networks at venues such as cafes and restaurants

    The poster is being distributed to Boston area restaurants and cafes who provide complimentary WiFi. If your establishment provides complimentary WiFi and you'd like to display the poster, please email us at info@bostonwag.org

    Two sizes are available as a low res PDF:
    8 1/2" x 11" (standard size)
    11" x 17" (tabloid size)

    If you have etiquette tips and suggestions for a future poster or if you have a story about WiFi etiquette that you'd like to share, please email us at info@bostonwag.org.
  94. Missing the point - it's about culture by hcsteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think a lot of people here are missing one of the main points of TFA - the interpersonal culture of the coffee shop was disappearing. Instead of being a place where people interact "live" with other human beings, it was turning into a place full of people silently hunched over their laptops. I don't think it's an unreasonable decision to turn off the wifi (at least on the weekend).

    --
    If you were a hot dog, and you were starving, would you eat yourself?
    1. Re:Missing the point - it's about culture by rec9140 · · Score: 1

      missing one of the main points of TFA - the interpersonal culture of the coffee shop was disappearing.

      OK, I admit I am missing the point here.

      I don't care for coffee/espresso/latte/capucinno at all. So they better serve hot tea, sweet tea, hot chocolate, or pop, along with a selection of some sort of pastries.

      So I am not the target audience, but if I wanted a drink & a pastry and the choices come down to shop a and shop b, where shop a has no wifi, then shop B it is! And this stunt of off on weekends, would be a deal breaker too. I wouldn't want to have to keep track of if the wifi might be on or off at shop a v. shop b.

      I am not here to meet people, work or otherwise, I am here to get my drink/pastry and be LEFT ALONE! I don't want to talk to a bunch of strangers, make new friends or any of that other nonsense. This would hold true if I had my laptop with me or not. I don't want to talk to you people or interact in any form. I am going to quietly drink my drink, eat my pastry, and if I happen to need to browse for things, email etc. I will do that.

      For the so called "wifi squatters" I agree 10000% that if your going to take up space inside the shop then you NEED TO BUY SOMETHING! Thats what the shop is there for, free wifi is a benefit from that PURCHASE. That also doesn't mean one drink and then squatting for 8 hrs like its a Rent a Office. A purchase of something about every 2 hours or so would be about right. If your spending the day any way you need drinks at least.

      If the "meet culture" is all that important, put up a sign "NO GEEKS!" Or probably better just pull the wifi out. Your going to loose the business that finds the wifi to be the more important factor, like me, but these are the people who are least interested in your "culture" and most likely to be potential squatters.

      One person mentioned turning up the AC, PLEASE DO! I am sick and tired of freezing in offices and other places and the pat excuse "Its for the computers/equipment!" BS! My house is quite nicely heated from my equipment, and its not Antartica cold inside from the AC, and its not Sahara hot from the equipment either. I am sick and tired of living in a warm state and wearing a winter coat inside the office!

      --
      1311393600 - Back to Black
  95. good idea by js7a · · Score: 1
    How about, allow connections from no more than N MAC addresses, bumping the N+1th oldest when someone new comes online, reseting banned MACs after an hour or so.

    The only problem is that it should give warning, somehow, which could be hard.

    Pass-codes on the register reciepts is probably a better solution.

  96. Portland Airport by kencurry · · Score: 1

    Free wifi in the terminals - was awsome!

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  97. Germany by MistabewM · · Score: 1

    Did someone say something about Hitler? Nazi's?

    --
    "A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.'" - DNA
    1. Re:Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand:
      Having been to Germany many times - it's pretty clear this sort of behaviour wouldn't be tolerated there. Germans just wouldn't have it - you simply don't abuse the hospitality of a café. I think most Germans would find it hard not to show the proper respect and actually buy something. They really are very decent people.

  98. Re: who wants to use wifi in a coffee shop? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

    I'd say that the main reason (other than travel) to use wifi in the coffee house is if you don't have broadband at home. However, most people don't aquire a wifi card until they get broadband, unless their laptop comes with one.
    The other reason for using it is, say you want to get away from the office in the afternoon, but still need to be available. But in that case, I'd rather have wifi in a bar.

  99. Re:coffee shops should stay social (IMO) Mod UP! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    I agree with you wholeheartedly. I think these coffee shops should remove "free" WiFi access altogether. There is no need to be "constantly" connected.

    I'm sure there are plenty of "for pay" hotspots to serve the needs of the business traveller.

    I have to say I really hate those blackberries (a.k.a. Crackberries). To me it is extremely rude for anyone to use one of those devices at a restaurant.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  100. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see most of you open a coffee shop. Wi-Fi would be truly the least of your concerns. I'm not anti-Wifi but I don't think playing Wi-Fi fascist makes for good business either. There's a limit to everything...

    As a customer, I personally like the idea of folks actually being social in coffee shops and not staring into laptops, or on cell phones, or plugged into an ipod. Technology is cool. Just disconnect from it from time to time. You'll have more fun talking to real people and the owner makes a buck.

  101. its about time by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    I'm thrilled to see the everything should be free socialists take a defeat.

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  102. Victrola's roaster tells his side by slashdaughter · · Score: 1

    The epic story of Victrola's wifi issues as told by their master coffee roaster and self-confessed 'net junkie: http://tonx.org/index.php/archives/coffee-wi-fi-an d-the-decline-of-western-civilization/

    --
    "The U.S. Constitution - not perfect, but its better than what we have now"
  103. They're in Seattle... go figure by dvd_tude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe in Seattle there's so damn many coffeehouses that there's not much loyalty? It's a competitive market, so it's not a surprise to me that there are callous people who take advantage of the wireless freebie. Or, maybe that's how Seattle people are. I don't know.

    My own California experience with 802.11-enabled coffee places is very different: there does seem to be an ethic of supporting the establishment.

    Yes, I've done four-hour sits at Coffee Critic in Ukiah, CA using their access for work stuff, but I also buy lots of coffee there too (and good coffee it is - they roast it on-premises) and did so without the wireless "loss leader". I've easily bought enough product in a year there to pay for the AP, if not the bandwidth.

  104. Damn it! by smartsaga · · Score: 1

    Jus make them buy a Zyxel access point witch comes with a little printer. Just sell the damn coffee with "free" 30 minutes of WiFi access. The Zyxel prints out a code (receipt with a code), you open your broser and connect to their wireless. Then a page appears asking you to enter the password the cashier gave you when you bought the coffee (yes the printout from the Zyxel.)

    http://www.zyxel.com/product/model.php?indexcate=1 103876296&indexFlagvalue=1085450343 Damn it, losers!

    Your wireless are belong to us... get it?

    Have a good one.

    --
    ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
  105. Access code on purchase receipts by Alex_Rider · · Score: 1

    Have an access code/user name on the receipt that alows x hours of access, depending on purchace price. These expire after a month or so, so people can combine receipts and access codes. This can ensure that wi-fi 'freeloaders' have to pay up to play online.

  106. captcha this by BrodeCo · · Score: 1

    Victrola's wifi sucks, anyway...
    there are chunky concrete pillars you have to avoid, the signal is weak.

  107. An Hour To Get Situated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An hour seems pretty excessive, it takes me maybe a minute to sit down after getting a drink without a laptop, with laptop and school books, maybe 6 minutes. Perhaps you need to get an extra-strong coffee in order to move faster?

  108. But that will only happen with WiMax. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    When that day comes, and they're distributed among all of the bars, restaurants, coffee shops and libraries in a a given area, no one will worry about the one or two Wi-Fi moochers in their establishment at a given moment.

    However, it won't be WiFi (802.11x variants) that will make wireless Internet access available pretty much everywhere. It will take WiMax (802.16/802.20) for the ability to access the Internet wirelessly on a truly large metropolitan scale.

    But then, it raises new issues: imagine being able to access broadband Internet at every food eating establishment through WiMax--you're going to have big trouble trying to kick people out of restaurants, coffee shops, bars, and so on because they're hogging seating in eating establishment accessing the Internet through a laptop.

  109. Re: who wants to use wifi in a coffee shop? by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

    I often walk down the street just for a change of environment. And I find I snack a lot at home, so it's also a matter of controlling calories.

    So, not necessarily logical reasons, but they work for me.

  110. It worked in my office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terry Tate: Coffeeshop Linebacker

    Nothing deters WIFI squatters more than a blind-side closeline.

    "If you ain't drink'n joe, you hittin' the flo'"

  111. Re:Tragedy of the Commons... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    That's people for you. Assholes, really. They take an amazing amount of advantage of something that's there for everyone, and ruin it...for everyone. It's the American way, I guess.

  112. to go by opencity · · Score: 1

    The untold part of this story is cafes generally make their money in take out. If someone buys a cup of coffee an hour for 6 hours: $15 at best. + pastry or food.

    Starbucks gives away wifi and power and, though they suck, they did manage to shift the price of coffee beans, hot water and paper cups up 500%.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  113. These are the people that: by perlwannabe · · Score: 1

    Raise their self esteem by going to Walmart to buy all new underwear, and then wait all evening to sing "New York New York" at the karaoke bar.

  114. Why Wi-Fi in a cafe anyhow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I must really be out of touch.

    When I walk down to "my" local coffee house, I go for their wonderful chai, and the nightly live music .

    Only a complete loser would bring their computer to this place.

    Coffee houses are crucial part of our social scene, and to fill them up with self absorbed loners by offering them free Wi-Fi, doesn't exactly help the social or dating pool.

  115. They should turn it to thir advantage by Salamanders · · Score: 1

    Check out PlaceSite: http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~savage/ps/ a project from SIMS @ Berkeley, all about getting people in a Cafe to not fall victim to the zombie effect and actually talk to each other!

  116. Shutting down the WIFI... Every hour. by rew · · Score: 1

    If you shut down the WIFI every hour for say 10 to fifteen minutes, then it's enormously annoying for those who want to spend their whole day there, and not much of a problem for those who want to come in for a coffee and just read some emails.

    In a shop selling coffee, call it "coffee break".

    1. Re:Shutting down the WIFI... Every hour. by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  117. Re: who wants to use wifi in a coffee shop? by TWX · · Score: 1

    "However, most people don't aquire a wifi card until they get broadband, unless their laptop comes with one."

    That's not the experience that I have in coffee shops. I know of plenty of people in the 18-30 demographic that only own a laptop for their computer and only use Internet access where it's available free. Amusingly enough they're also the kind of people to take up space in a coffee house without buying much if anything because they're borderline-poor; they grew up not wanting for basics in life and now that they've never had to really work for them before they don't really plant roots to live or to get down to making a professional living of their own.

    The broken hinge on my laptop was probably the best thing to happen to me to keep me from falling into that lifestyle myself. When I'm out and about I don't concern myself with Internet access. I'm going on a trip to a science fiction convention tomorrow and I'll be taking a camera, a PDA to look at the pictures from the camera, and travel accessories, and I'll be away from mainstream computer use for about four days. I'm looking forward to it.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  118. How about a page... by vegaspctech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...with a password prompt and the message 'your server will gladly enter the password for you'? I'd wager that having to interact with the wait staff to get connected would dramatically reduce the number of leeches.

    --

    Making the world a better place, one psychotic episode at a time.

    1. Re:How about a page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have issues with people who touch my computer. Not even my spouse can touch it. I have a separate keyboard and mouse attached to my desktop for when my son plays games on my machine.

      I don't know why I am like that, but it would make me _really_ uncomfortable if I had to let them type it in.

      I suspect I am not alone, so that solution also alienates some legitimate users.

    2. Re:How about a page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There can't be that many customers with OCD or
      microphobia.

    3. Re:How about a page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be surprised. The area Victrola occupies a neighborhood of Seattle called Capitol Hill. This is the that neighborhood which once boasted the hip alternative place of artists and muses, but now, save a few small shops and hip clubs, has a failing main drag (Broadway) with empty store fronts and people with hundreds of dollars in piercing and body art panhandling on the corners. Many of the residents are polite and considerate, but there is a swelling of local self identified bohemians, that would assume snarking wi-fi from a cafe trying to do business is showing independent spirit and flouting the system. They would have no shame in leaning on the staff for passwords without purchase.

  119. I can think of a few by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I never understood sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop for an hour, much less several.

    Well one reason is free WiFi, if all you have is Dialup that looks pretty good.

    But also they could be there for more nefarious reasons, like gathing child porn or what have you (hate to bring up that boogeyman but you get the general idea).

    If I were doing a lot of P2P I think doing it a coffee shop would be a great idea...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  120. A friendly solution... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Every hour, make an announcement on the PA that the coffee shop would kindly like to remind people that if the tabels are full and you're done eating, please don't linger. I think if you guilt people into doing the right theing they generally will.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  121. dude... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Informative

    I never understood sitting in a coffee shop with a laptop for an hour, much less several.

    It's all about checking out the cute high/college/grad school girls hanging out there doing their reading.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:dude... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I got an internet connection, all the hottest girls are a click away!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:dude... by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      Yeah but dude, they're never as satisfying as the real thing. I'd much rather stare at a cute, fully dressed girl, sitting 10 feet from me, as watch the most hot and filthy of porn flicks.

      Unless of course you can sit in the coffee shop, stare at the cute girl, then break in and download her home made hot and filthy porn right off her laptop ;)

    3. Re:dude... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      for a quality experience, the girl has to be real....

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    4. Re:dude... by funshine · · Score: 1

      you sound creepy imo.

      HS to grad school is a pretty wide range, so i can only assume that you're older than all of them.

      --
      Choose your future, choose life...
      But why would I want to do a thing like that?
  122. Deidrich, Irvine, Orange County, California, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved the place. I am not a big coffee drinker, but sometimes I would like to go somewhere study, and maybe strike a conversation or two. Deidrich was a great place for a mixture of fun and business/study.

    Last week, I had a chance to come back. EVERY single place had a laptop. There they were, hogging every table (both sides to boot!) with headphones. Most of them playing games. It was like a notebook shop. No one is talking, no one is drinking coffee, no place to sit. I left.

    This is not a plug for that place, but since they started to have free wifi, I stopped bothering going there since I JUST CANT FIND A PLACE TO SIT! Moreover, the whole social, incindental chat effect is gone as well. But then again, maybe those 10% who monopolize the area, give 90 percent of profits?

  123. I cannot believe the nerve of some people. by antic · · Score: 1


    Do people who camp in a café with Wi-Fi and not buy anything feel embarrassed with what they're doing?

    There is a café over the road from my office and I occasionally meet there with clients. Our wireless network makes the distance and so I can use my own connection while I'm there. Still, because I am using their floorspace and furniture, I always buy a drink as payment for usage of the space.

    I would be embarrassed to have someone come up to me to request that I buy something, or leave because I'm using their space without payment.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  124. MOD PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant.

  125. A Modest Proposal - AKA The Solution by paulrsh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Giving people access codes based on purchases is incredibly lame and hurts the the natural warm vibe of a good coffeeshop.

    To All Coffee Shop Owners:
    - Give away wifi.
    - Gently enforce purchases with use of table space . Aka, more or less ban squatting.
    - VERY IMPORTANT: Create laptop zones and/or make laptoppers sit with each other and not hog 4 person tables. It'd probably help people meet each other and it'll conserve space. Alternatively, have lots of little tables that barely fit one laptop.

    Problem solved!!

    A Victrola Regular

  126. Social hackers vs. antisocial consumers by identity0 · · Score: 1

    What's ironic is that when our 2600 group in Memphis meets, we have a fun social gathering about technology, not hunched over our laptops quietly the whole time. This despite the stereotype of geeks as socailly awkward and non-geeks as outgoing. We show off our gadgets, sure, but we know we're there to meet people, not play with stuff that we could at home. We have discussions of technology that last for hours, unlike 'normal' patrons that just sit there with their laptops the whole time.

    The other irnoic thing is that even though we're good customers, every time we seem to find a good coffeeshop, it goes out of business within a short time - the meeting location in the back of 2600 magazine is sometimes out of business by the time the first magazine with that location comes out. It's gotten to the point where we don't send the magazine our new meeting address until we're sure that place will stay in business, so they don't fall to the "Memphis 2600 Jinx". I suspect it's just competition from the chain coffeeshops, but oh well.

    For those interested, the next meeting will be on Friday, June 3 (one week from today) at San Fransisco Bread Company on Germantown Rd. Address here. 6pm, IIRC.

    What's funny is that Krystals (a cheap burger place, similar to White Castle) has free Wifi now, but I hardly ever see anyone in there. I guess even wifi freeloaders can't stand their "food"...

  127. This isn't necessary by ning · · Score: 1

    Just go round and ask them, nicely and discreetly, to leave. It's not acceptable for some freeloader to sit there for hours on end taking up a seat that could be used by a paying customer. It's your coffee shop after all - you have the right to say who's allowed in and who isn't. Put a sign up warning people if you have to.

  128. Fun with = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Time=money and it takes money to make money.

    So then:

    It takes money to make time.

    Or:

    It takes time to make money. (Sometimes true, though not always)

    Or, lastly:

    It takes time to make time.

    W00t!!! I'm an AC!!!!111!!!

  129. zombie effect by cheesebikini · · Score: 1

    I'm told that 2 San Francisco cafes (Samovar Tea Lounge and Canvas Cafe) now nix the wi-fi on weekends.

    Jerry the manager at Canvas kicked out a guy who repeated the following routine for several days: he'd set up office, taking over a large table (even with a stapler), then he'd type and talk on the phone all day after buying 1 cup of coffee.

    Lee at A Cuppa Tea in Berkeley kicked out a woman who came in with a coffee from another store, sat down and got going on her laptop w/ zero purchase.

    But remember, these are extremes and exceptions. A minority of people will be pricks anywhere, using whatever technology is available.

    Beyond wi-fi squatting -- this sounds like a clear case of the Zombie Effect:
    http://ze.notlong.com/

    Now we'll refine social and technological techniques for discouraging antisocial behavior. Same old saga...

    -Sean

  130. Lack of 'free' Wi-Fi in the UK by jdtanner · · Score: 1

    I'd love to be in the situation where I could consider sitting down in a coffee shop for an eight hour stint with my laptop. However, because I live in the medieval UK (i.e. outside London) this is never going to happen :-(

    1. Re:Lack of 'free' Wi-Fi in the UK by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      It's all starbucks fault. I swear they take up half of London with their shit coffee and overpriced net access forced down our throats, you know what needs to be done - operation 'Saturate Starbucks With Your Own Free WiFi Until They Are Full of Squatters'

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  131. WRONG! thanks for playing. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Every resteraunt, fastfoodplace, coffeechop, etc I have seen have a sign thats says:
    "Restrooms are for customers only."

    I hvae seen pay toilets, but those are pretty rare.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  132. Don't be so proud of this technological marvel by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    technolgy is intergrated with are society, but it has in no way fixed any societal problems.
    WE adapted technology into the way we bahave, not the other wya around.

    My favorite farside has a guy sitting in a little flying saucer zipping through the sky. On the roof of this flying saucer is a spilling cup of coffee.
    the caption:
    "Technology changes, people don't."

    BTW, BILLIONS would not die. Most of the world would get along. A billion, at the worst. consider most people in the world never use a computer

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  133. Best idea I've seen. by Aldric · · Score: 1

    Also, they should kick people out if they sit all day and don't buy anything. Sure, they probably won't come back, but who cares?

  134. Poachers Discourage Paying Customers by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Shops in my area have been trying to discourage wi-fi poachers for several months. So many seats would be taken by laptop-toters that potential customers walked away because they couldn't find a place to sit.

    So, some have instituted time limits for laptop use without a purchase, while others have cordoned off a few tables for laptop use.

    It's a double-edged sword for the shops, who use wi-fi to draw in more customers, but too many poachers mean paying customers leave.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  135. The world would not explode without semiconductors by hqm · · Score: 1

    I think it is an overstatement that civilization would collapse without semiconductors. We'd be using a hell of a lot of vacuum tubes, yeah, but....

  136. Alternative Solution by cowbean · · Score: 1

    A coffee shop in Mountain View, CA, offers free wifi, but no power outlets. I think it's brilliant -- you can only wifi-squat for as long as you have battery power. Their coffee is not bad either.

  137. They can put up signs all they like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That bathrooms are for paying customers only. They can't stop me from using the bathroom if I'm not a paying customer.

    They can feel free to try, but the law is on my side.

    1. Re:They can put up signs all they like... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      That bathrooms are for paying customers only. They can't stop me from using the bathroom if I'm not a paying customer.

      They can feel free to try, but the law is on my side.

      They can't physically stop you, no, only the police have that legal right. But they can charge you with trespassing. They have the right to kick out whomever they want from their store.

  138. Free limited access by JungleBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the cafes I spend time at has a really nice way of limiting WiFi use. They have a little tape printer with three buttons, one for 30, 60, & 90 minutes. When you make a purchase, you ask for some wifi time, they hit a button and hand you a recipt. It has a randomly generated username and password that lasts for just the requested time. I rarely need more than 90 minutes (I usually hook up there before heading to the office). It's nice becuase it's still free, but they can still keep it reasonable with their business needs (only with a purchase, for limited time). This is by far the best setup I've found. Totally free and unlimited is nice, but if it's only on DSL and there are a bunch of WiFi campers, the throughput totally slows down. On the other hand some places charge hourly for wifi, even with a purchase, this just pisses me off.

    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  139. If they can find a table! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    The people who were gonna buy will buy anyways and the people who weren't, won't..

    And if you RTFA, you'll discover that their seats were all taken up, and people who wanted to buy couldn't get a seat and so left. Additionally, people who liked the vibrant culture of the old coffeehouse might have found the new Nerdville a little less appealing.

    Bottom line is that revenue went UP when the WiFi was turned off. So that means that regular customers either 1) now could actually get a table, 2) preferred the new environment, or 3) both.

  140. Coming next to your coffee shop ... by clone22 · · Score: 1

    cubes

    --
    Ask me about my vow of silence!
  141. This is a cultural issue by csoto · · Score: 1

    The effect of Coffee Shoppe Culture is a well-understood phenomenon. Basically, the place will attract whatever type of miscreant the culture the shop projects. Obviously "Free WiFi" was a principal attractant for this shop. Ergo, the huge number of loser pedophiles stacking the deck. If the place actually attracted people because of, hmm, let's say, GOOD COFFEE, then they wouldn't have to worry about this.

    I drink at Little City. First, I come for the coffee. I hang around and buy more stuff because of the WiFi and music.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  142. Until... by bradleyland · · Score: 2, Funny

    the yuppie leechers go out and spend $120 on a spare battery... to save fifty cents on a cup of coffee.

    Leeching, it's not just an activity, it's a way of life.

    1. Re:Until... by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      Although I agree with the principle of what you say,

      save fifty cents on a cup of coffee.

      When was the last time you bought a cup of coffee at a trendy metro coffeeshop?

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  143. That is the correct answer by doc_traig · · Score: 1


    Although my wife would likely disagree...

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  144. Use the free car wash model! by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

    I'd say it's beneficial to follow the free car wash model when it comes to WiFi access. When I get gasoline at my local pump an buy a fill-er-up, I get a free car wash good for anytime in the next week or so. The access code is right on the receipt.

    Using this analogy, buy something $5.00 or more, get a Wifi access code on the receipt for the rest of the day.

    Problem solved!

  145. OFFTOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're practically neighbors. I'm next door in Wise County.

  146. A Possible Solution by zentinal · · Score: 1
    I agree that an attitude of "buy or get out" could be fairly vulgar, if not handled correctly.

    But hey, we're geeks! There is a technological solution to everything.

    What if, when you purchase something (anything) there is one-time-only login code on your receipt. Make it good for an hour. Perhaps 90 minutes.

    When you buy something else, your login is renewed (or you're issued a new one).

  147. Computers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the hot chicks in coffee shops now are hunched over laptops. Completely unapproachable by filthy scum like me.

  148. alternative by zippoiii · · Score: 1

    Well, why not hand out two types of tokens. With a purchase, you get one valid for 45 minutes. Without one, you get one good for 15 minutes. After several rounds of having to ask for free access again, and again, I'd guess that most leechers would go somewhere else.

  149. You Got That Right by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    Anything with "Free" associated with it... the aholes will take advantage of everytime/anytime guaranteed. I guess these coffee shops figured their clientelle was above this. HA!

  150. Or go to another hotspot by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    You could always visit another hotspot. How's the coffee, though?

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  151. Yup. by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    The other day some chucklehead brought a bag of burger king to a coffeeshop I was at. Then got pissy when the owner asked him to leave.

    How much of an ingrate can some people be?

    --

    -

  152. Doesn't anybody get it? by chris234 · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is Slashdot, I admit. But it seems like so many comments are offering technical solutions for a now non-existant problem. The cafe had a problem, solved it by just turning off access, problem solved, business improved to boot! Why insist on suggesting schemes that won't help anything?

  153. How about a keystroke logger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. If I knew someone was going to type a password on my computer I would know exactly what they typed before they got 5 steps away.

    1. Re:How about a keystroke logger? by vegaspctech · · Score: 1

      And you would represent a probably insignificant minority and you would still have to had requested the password.

      --

      Making the world a better place, one psychotic episode at a time.

  154. Them darned geeks causing all the trouble. by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Yay enforcing the stereotype of computers and their users being antisocial!

    "I don't like going into a cafe, any cafe, including my own, and just seeing a sea of laptops and people not interacting."

    How would he know if they're interacting with anyone? Is interaction within the local sphere of strangers whose only thing in common is a love for espresso somehow a superior interaction technique than meeting people in online fora where you have something substantial in common with?

    Only to a neophyte whose only understanding of high speed internet was that "customers seemed to want it".

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  155. losing its culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about discussions about Linux and Japanamation?

  156. maybe a low-tech approach... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful



    You're totally right. An elegant solution would be expensive to do. How about a more crude implementation: 1. Buy 6 cheap netgear APs at Fry's for $10 each. 2. Configure each one with a different, but simple WEP. Use masking tape to label each one with its WEP.
    3. Connect each one to one of those cheap electric outlet timer gizmos so it runs for an hour then shuts off. Sync the timers so one there is always at least one running.
    4. Put all this junk behind the counter.
    5. Magic marker a sign that says, "Ask cachier to write the wi-fi password on your receipt." Attach to front of counter.

    The barrista can easily look at the APs to see which is turned on and give out the password taped on it. I agree that one hour is a little short. With this timer deal, you can even set it for 1.5 hours. Sure, over time, a crafty customer is going to collect all the passwords. You could change them each week and relabel the masking tape on the APs.

    Seth

    1. Re:maybe a low-tech approach... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      There's a bit of a fencepost problem with your solution though. If someone comes in at 0:00, he get's the password for the current WLAN. If someone comes in at 0:59 he should get the password for the next WLAN since we can assume it will take more than a minute to find a seat and get connected to the WLAN. If it takes less than a minute, he can wait the extra minute before going online. Now what happens if someone comes in at 0:30? They need the current password, but in order to give them the whole hour you have to give them the next password as well. In the best case you give them 1:30, which is fine, but now the customer will have to stop and reconfigure his connection in the middle of stay. That's potentially confusing, and could lead to a lot "Miss? Could you help me? I can't connect to the WLAN." Requiring a helpdesk is Bad Thing(tm).

  157. Free Wifi + no table service = recipe for trouble by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the tragedy of the commons rearing its ugly head.

    The smarter thing to do would be to integrate your point-of-sale system (which you can get linux-based) with your AP so that when someone buys something their AP access code prints on the receipt. Keying in the code gives you a 'dose' of internet access for, say, 15 mins.

    http://www.chillispot.org/ (I wonder if this would fit in a WRT54G distro?)

  158. Re:Control excess WiFi access with bandwidth shapi by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Just set up bandwidth shaping so that each MAC address gradually starts slowing way down after an hour. Slow, not stopped, means they have a chance to finish their work and log off cleanly.

    "Aw, fook! My Linux ISO download just got to 90% complete, and my transfer rate just got shot to shit. Oh well, I'm not going to quit now. I'll just sit here taking up space until it completes, no matter how long that takes."

  159. Only on Slashdot by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

    would an obvious suggestion to meet women get modded "informative."

    Priceless.

    Remember, when she's having trouble with her wireless connection...that's when you make your move! (and she doesn't have any problems, you can interfere with her signal...)

    (to Karma whore: the laundromat, grocery store, and park are also non-bar places to meet women...thank you! I expect a +5 in ten minutes! ha!)

  160. Stoopidity by drwho · · Score: 1

    How about just making it so you have to buy something to use the net? Or otherwise pay? Yeah, a system like that would cost a bit of money, but if they have that many laptop users they could make it back pretty quickly.

    But the prices shouldn't be too high: Buy a coffee, get 45 minutes, or something.

  161. Good! by Myuu · · Score: 1

    Interestingly enough I go to the coffee shop that I go to specifically because there is no wifi. If they installed it, I would get nothing done!

    Actually someone I knew went up to the waitress and requested they get it. My response was 'if you install it, I am not coming back'...

    --

    forget it.
  162. I was on of the people ripped off on Sunday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was there most profitable day according to the article. My wife and I came in, both with laptops to get out of the apartment and get a little studying done, I had a bunch of email from my family that I hadn't answered yet. We bought our coffee and pasteries and got a seat at a table. At the time we were a little surprised to get a table that easily. After we settled in and tried the internet and found out that weekends are now only half service (the sign is only visible once you get past the cash register). So we promptly poured out our coffee, neatly stacked our cups in the bucket and left.

    Yes, they did great business on Sunday. They certainly got my money and I only used the table for five minutes so I'm sure they are happy. I wonder how many other people came in, got coffee before they found out that the Wifi was off then left to go somewhere else. I won't ever be going back there. The idea that my emailing my family is not the 'right kind' of social interaction for their establishment pissed me off. Luckily there are other cafes that are not as full of themselves nearby.

  163. Even better solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they are so concerned about their "Culture" they should be more proactive. People wanting to hang out in their coffee shop should submit a sumary of the conversations held in their coffee shop to ensure the right kind of people are hanging out in their cafe. They could even supply note cards with sample topics for their patrons.

  164. Where are those? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Sacramento, CA has a lot of coffee shops. Rarely are cute girls seen studying, unless it's at one of the shops right near one of the colleges. The downtown area? It's the bikers. Java City at 18th & Capitol Ave right in downtown used to be a great place, but the groups of motorcycles *thundering* down the street (Really, some of these bikes are just too goddamn loud) and taking up all of the outside tables prevent anyone else from actually getting a seat.
    They're not a biker gang, but many of them attent a nearby methadone clinic. They have no jobs and nothing to do, so they sit there *all day long* - literally. Thanks to similar folks, Java City cancelled its $0.50 refill policy and got rid of the nice glass dishes as well.

    Point is, it's not always the WiFi geeks - people are generally mooches. :P

  165. Places do that.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Dana Street Roasting Company in Mountain View, CA has free wifi, but no power outlets. It does the job quite well. :-)

  166. Publish their pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should try sticking their pictures on a shame faced parasite board.

  167. Re:Control excess WiFi access with bandwidth shapi by bit01 · · Score: 1

    "Aw, fook! My Linux ISO download just got to 90% complete, and my transfer rate just got shot to shit. Oh well, I'm not going to quit now. I'll just sit here taking up space until it completes, no matter how long that takes."

    In practise what happens is that once the slowdown gets to zero either the download software times out or the user hangs around for ten minutes, sees no progress and because they don't want to waste their own time says "stuff this" and goes home.

    ---

    Any large public or private organisation paying recurring, per-seat licensing for software is being economically stupid.

  168. Re:I Live down the street & it isn't the wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more than that. Victrola never needed wi-fi to fill its chairs. It's a different coffee shop because of its community and atmosphere and great coffee and music at night. In most other cafes, particularly the chains, you need wi-fi to make the place more interesting and better utilize the space on off hours. These are things Victrola never needed. This ended up being combined with the fact that Capitol Hill is also the capitol of lazy kids who think society owes them something, and suddenly Victrola's culture was in trouble.

    I applaud Victrola's decision, even as a heavy user of free wifi in coffeeshops. You'd think I'd be against Victrola's decision, but I'm for it. The thing is, I can get free wifi many places in Seattle now. I want Victrola to emphasize what makes it different from all the other coffeeshops in town, and wifi was destroying that.

  169. think it through... by Generalisimo+Zang · · Score: 1

    Unless those people who don't use computers ALSO don't eat food that is shipped via large freight companies in trucks, and ALSO don't use electricity from a central grid, and ALSO don't depend on services like 911, then the loss of computers would seriously screw them.

    Imagine a Winter without a centrally-managed electrical grid, and without shipments of fuel.

  170. A question of etiquette... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm one of those people who camps for hours in a coffee shop with a laptop plugged in and writing code. I do it so that I can have a social life. Sure, it cuts down on productivity when a friend or acquaintance passes by, but by allowing myself to be interruptable this way I can get involved in a project without also becoming a recluse. Plus, whatever I'm working on (when it's one of my own special interest projects) is often a good conversation piece. The cafe that I frequent is close to a University, so sometimes what I may catch a glimpse of on someone else's screen may be a useful social lubricant.

    I make a point of rewarding the proprietor with numerous purchases of coffee and at least one full course meal in exchange for the few pennies worth of electricity that I've cost him. I like to sit at a bench so that I can dynamically vary the size of my footprint depending upon how busy the place is, and to accommodate the visits of friends.

    I think it is just part of the social contract to spend more the longer you are occupying space in an establishment, just as if you were to spend a whole evening at a bar you would be expected to have ordered a few drinks and not just one or none. Is it too much a stretch of the imagination for long staying coffee drinkers to adopt similar etiquette?

  171. One room WIFI/devices/cell, other room without. by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    How about limiting a room to computer and wifi use only. True, wifi would probably extend from one to the other, but it is easy to see computer users. Say, "sorry this room is computer/cell/device free". Heck, if that room had a cell phone blocker, I bet they would do LOADS of business.

    You aren't against the tech, it just has its place. That place is over in THAT room.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?