You're a bitch for thinking the USA is terrorists. I agree that fighting fire with fire isn't good. But lets think for a second we're commiting lives to help stop mass murders and as a result terrorists are blowing themselves up. If anything terror is the result of misguided faith. simple as that. stopping a bitch from killing thousands of people in a single day isn't terror its good:)
Forced to use IE??? why do people think this way?
on
New IE Holes Discovered
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Whos forced to use IE. Last time i checked
I can use whatever browser I want and when someone or some website tries to force me from using their product because i'm not using IE i can always work around it. So, why is it everyone always believes they are forced to use IE. Its a shitty browser simple solution stop using it. move on and be happy.
First of all the whitehouse.gov story was completely
bogus that robots.txt file was correct!!!!
non of those pages were valid they were all 404s but whitehouse.gov server doesn't response with 404s. So, it was a web admins quick and dirty hack to fix the problem and kindly save web crawlers the burden of indexing crap pages!! Ingence is bliss here on slashdot Ignant Ingant Ingant!!!!
Secondly, That story in time was bogus!!!
RAHHH!!!
Such unfounded Ingence!!
simple try to go to one of those links from whitehouse.gov they're broken. further check the http return code its 200. This looks more like
an incorrect usage of http response codes and someone was nice enough to let the webcrawlers no about it.
see!!
HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Server: Apache
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:15 GMT
Content-Length: 153
Content-Type: text/html
Location: http://www.whitehouse.gov/911/iraq/
ETag: "7fbd6f-1d5-3e8b0d9f"
Cache-Control: max-age=1970
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:15 GMT
Connection: close
and following the location:
HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Server: AkamaiGHost
Content-Length: 0
Location: http://www.whitehouse.gov/error-404.html
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:46 GMT
Connection: close
and a little further we get the 200, which should be 404;)
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Server: Apache
Last-Modified: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:29:19 GMT
ETag: "7432cf-4347-3f222dcf"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 17223
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:30:06 GMT
Connection: close
so at least there is some admin nice enough to spare the crawlers and search engines the burden of loggging all these mis represented 404 pages, while also saving them the trouble of three redirects.
this is a good robots.txt to fix a bad http server
are you on crack? of course this makes sense all he's saying is lets use open source because is more cost effective and better use of tax payers money!!!
cheez some people are so dense
Slashdot Mirror
You're a bitch for thinking the USA is terrorists. I agree that fighting fire with fire isn't good. But lets think for a second we're commiting lives to help stop mass murders and as a result terrorists are blowing themselves up. If anything terror is the result of misguided faith. simple as that. stopping a bitch from killing thousands of people in a single day isn't terror its good :)
Whos forced to use IE. Last time i checked
I can use whatever browser I want and when someone
or some website tries to force me from using
their product because i'm not using IE i can
always work around it. So, why is it everyone
always believes they are forced to use IE. Its
a shitty browser simple solution stop using it.
move on and be happy.
First of all the whitehouse.gov story was completely bogus that robots.txt file was correct!!!! non of those pages were valid they were all 404s but whitehouse.gov server doesn't response with 404s. So, it was a web admins quick and dirty hack to fix the problem and kindly save web crawlers the burden of indexing crap pages!! Ingence is bliss here on slashdot
Ignant Ingant Ingant!!!!
Secondly, That story in time was bogus!!!
RAHHH!!!
Such unfounded Ingence!!
i :wq :)
as of right now that path is not in robots.txt you're on crack
robots.txt is fine its the server that is screwed up those are dead links that their server responses with 200
simple try to go to one of those links from whitehouse.gov they're broken. further check the http return code its 200. This looks more like an incorrect usage of http response codes and someone was nice enough to let the webcrawlers no about it. see!! HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily Server: Apache Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:15 GMT Content-Length: 153 Content-Type: text/html Location: http://www.whitehouse.gov/911/iraq/ ETag: "7fbd6f-1d5-3e8b0d9f" Cache-Control: max-age=1970 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:15 GMT Connection: close and following the location: HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily Server: AkamaiGHost Content-Length: 0 Location: http://www.whitehouse.gov/error-404.html Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:29:46 GMT Connection: close and a little further we get the 200, which should be 404 ;)
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Server: Apache
Last-Modified: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:29:19 GMT
ETag: "7432cf-4347-3f222dcf"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 17223
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:30:06 GMT
Connection: close
so at least there is some admin nice enough to spare the crawlers and search engines the burden of loggging all these mis represented 404 pages, while also saving them the trouble of three redirects.
this is a good robots.txt to fix a bad http server
whatever solaris blows linux rules nuff said
are you on crack? of course this makes sense all he's saying is lets use open source because is more cost effective and better use of tax payers money!!! cheez some people are so dense
are you on crack?
libc is awesome and everything you just said is
bugos!!
give me some proof or stop bashing the holy
source
OEONE
I think you might want to try OEONE as an
alternate desktop environment