That was my thought. This ties into the security through obscurity method. There is a flaw in this theory. As more users switch, the bigger of a target for hackers.
Not necessarily.....
Why would you want something that looks like something instead of just using the real thing?
I do not have a poor impression of Linux and I am a system administrator.
Why would you want to use an insecure browser and dress it up like FireFox, when you can use a more secure browser that happens to be FireFox?
Which would you rather have when they cost the same?
A Ferarri or a car that looks like a Ferarri.
You would choose the Ferarri. That is why you should just use FireFox.
I bought cd's like they were going out of style for years, so I was a customer. Then I became enlightened that you could make your own cd's fot practically no cost at all. I do not need to spend 15-20 dollars anymore because it is not necessary.
Yes but there are alot of musicians that do not make any money. They do it because they love music. These days, you have to be a pretty little doll like britney spears, and show off your figure to make money. That is not my idea of music.
Musicians make music because they love music. They do not do it for money. I used to be a musician so I know. I do not know where you get this services idea from, but it is kinda off-base.
I believe the home audio recording act came out in 1992 which states you can make a copy of something you bought and give it to your friend. The only difference is that p2p in on a bigger scale, with more people but it is the same concept.
Slashdot Mirror
Apple has control over the hardware. They can cater the operating system to the hardware.
The one thing they cannot control is you unplugging the television. Pull the plug and the situation is rectified.
That was my thought. This ties into the security through obscurity method. There is a flaw in this theory. As more users switch, the bigger of a target for hackers.
Yes, it does.
This is almost a repeat of Divx. It flopped and so will this connect the dvd player to the net requirement.
Not necessarily..... Why would you want something that looks like something instead of just using the real thing? I do not have a poor impression of Linux and I am a system administrator. Why would you want to use an insecure browser and dress it up like FireFox, when you can use a more secure browser that happens to be FireFox?
Which would you rather have when they cost the same? A Ferarri or a car that looks like a Ferarri. You would choose the Ferarri. That is why you should just use FireFox.
"(When's the last time you saw an AMD ad on TV, hmm?)" The Tour De France
Mcafee scans rar files as well. Imagine that I wonder what antivirus programs the author used.
You better not buy any dvd's then.
There is no need for name calling.
There is no need for name calling. A simple I disagree would be sufficient.
The only reason that linux and apple do not have as many security holes is because they are obscure operating systems.
The riaa broke the law as well. Shouldn't we go after them?
Dvd shrink is not shareware, it is freeware. You should do a little more research, before making a idiotic statement like that.
By overcharging, the RIAA has stolen from the customer.
I bought cd's like they were going out of style for years, so I was a customer. Then I became enlightened that you could make your own cd's fot practically no cost at all. I do not need to spend 15-20 dollars anymore because it is not necessary.
You should wait until your xp computer freezes. You have to do a hard boot to get it running again.
Yes but there are alot of musicians that do not make any money. They do it because they love music. These days, you have to be a pretty little doll like britney spears, and show off your figure to make money. That is not my idea of music.
Common Law is isomething that is implied. This was never implied. It was a law. You should review the home audio recording act.
The musicians make music because they want to. The love music. It is not a service.
Musicians make music because they love music. They do not do it for money. I used to be a musician so I know. I do not know where you get this services idea from, but it is kinda off-base.
I agree. Why would we need five or six copies of something we already own, just because it is in another format? I have never understood this.
I believe the home audio recording act came out in 1992 which states you can make a copy of something you bought and give it to your friend. The only difference is that p2p in on a bigger scale, with more people but it is the same concept.
Yes, but there is a difference between a song and having my car fixed.