Slashdot Mirror


Plugin Lets Users Turn IE into Firefox

An anonymous reader writes "There is a new plugin available for IE that can make Internet Explorer resemble Firefox by adding tabbed browsing capabilities and an integrated search box. Moreover, the plugin improves IE's privacy and security by integrating a firewall designed to block out Internet exploits, phishing sites, spammers, spyware and worms, with a special HTTP filter that removes private data, and an anti-spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seconds"

542 comments

  1. Wrong Way by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I need is a Firefox-plugin that looks exactly like IE (including the lack of tabs and search box) while still providing the same level of security.

    1. Re:Wrong Way by locokamil · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try Maxthon.

      It's not half bad... and it can be configured to use either the IE or Gecko engine (which, unless I'm completely mistaken, is at the heart of Firefox).

    2. Re:Wrong Way by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      How's this skin?

    3. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy shit there are just sooooo many jokes to be made here... where to start? Ahh I give up.

      In soviet Russia, the overlords welcom YOU!

    4. Re:Wrong Way by iammaxus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oops, wrong link from Google. This is what you want: http://www.firefoxie.net/

    5. Re:Wrong Way by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      What I need is a Firefox-plugin that looks exactly like IE (including the lack of tabs and search box) while still providing the same level of security.

      You could set Firefox to open links in new windows instead of tabs, like in IE, and there is an plugin that lets you resize the search box next to the address bar, if you get this plugin you could feasibly set it to make the search bar non existant. Deleting the 'Bookmarks Toolbar Folder' will get rid of (I think) the links in that folder that show up below the address bar.

    6. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    7. Re:Wrong Way by Psiren · · Score: 1

      ...if you get this plugin you could feasibly set it to make the search bar non existant.

      Wouldn't it be easier to just customize the toolbar and drag the search bar off?

    8. Re:Wrong Way by midnightblaze · · Score: 1

      What's your reason for this? I myself cannot live without the tabs or the search box. If you never hit Ctrl+T, or select New Tab from the File menu, Firefox might as well not have tabs. And you can remove the search box by customizing the Navigation Toolbar.

    9. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, that's the final component I need for my 'Linux by stealth' installs.

      These days I have have adopted a very aggressive attitude to 'correctional computing'. When someone comes to me with a dead or dying Windows box I first decant all their data off the machine. Then I install a customised, stripped down, KDE with Redmond themes and all the MS icon set, rename icons to 'My Computer' and so on. It usually takes several days for them to get back to me with some query about how it isn't behaving quite like it used to. I tell them that's the 'new thing', it's a 'security patch' or something. I tell them that if they don't like it I can put the machine back the way it was, for 120 quid, which it what it costs to buy a legitimate Windows install. Nobody has ever changed back yet, and this week I completed my 50th 'stealth install'. All these users are older people who use their computers for web browsing and printing mostly, and I take my experiences so far as a kind of scientific 'evidence' that this class of users can't tell the difference. If you service machines for friends and family try this. Don't ask, just do what is good for them. After all they are putting their absolute trust in your computer knowledge, to do anything less is to fail them in.

    10. Re:Wrong Way by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... while providing the same level of security ...

      as IE??? That's how I read it at first :)

    11. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wanting to do this for a while. It's probably an idea that's been tossed around by quite alot of "us".

      Any links you can give us to help out? Other advice to make it easier? Icon sets, where?

      I manage quite alot of PC workstations here and have to re-image them constantly. I'd like to try this out on a few, maybe like 10 or so, and see how it works.

      (My only attempt so far is to remove all the links to IE and replace them with IE - looking icons to firefox.)

    12. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, in the real world, parent post would have been modded -1, Troll, but on slashdot it will be modded Funny or "Insightfull".

      Sigh...

    13. Re:Wrong Way by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless I can change the microsoft flag to the firefox icon I am not interested. Oh wait, I already have firefox.

    14. Re:Wrong Way by klokop · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Funny soi, but insightful?

      What'd I miss?

      --
      Passing silhouettes of strange illuminated mannequins
    15. Re:Wrong Way by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps to get people who only know how to use IE using firefox with the minimum of fuss. If they don't know it's not IE they won't complain and they'll get better security thrown in as a bonus. IMHO it'd be a great little plug in.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    16. Re:Wrong Way by DotWarner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I feel sorry for any of your victims who eventually purchase and want to install software, and the tech support agents who take the call. The software won't install, the customer won't be able to identify the version of Windows, and the agent may never be able to identify the problem.

      Perhaps you could identify common locations that are used to identify Windows versions and leave pointers to a text file explaining exactly what you've done. This would allow tech support to determine that the customer has been deceived and has wasted their money, and to point them back toward you for vengeance (and give you the chance to supply an OSS program that does the same thing for free).

    17. Re:Wrong Way by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you find the linux that works without me needing to persistantly edit config files, recompile applications, maintain complex version dependencies, and is generally a bugger to use quickly unless you have time to spare configuring it first, get back to me.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    18. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then they will believe IE is good and secure and will ignore alternatives. Not really that useful.

    19. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora, SuSE, Mandriva, Debian...

    20. Re:Wrong Way by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      For what use? To become more inefficient?

      Or was this meant to be funny??

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    21. Re:Wrong Way by bdeclerc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've been using Mandrake / Mandriva linux for years now without having to do any of the things you mention...

      Sure, on my own PC I've done all those things, but not because I needed to, but because I wanted to (same reason I've run Gentoo on that machine as well, an urge to learn stuff)

      The wife's PC has gone through about 5 Mandrake/Mandriva releases now, and I don't think I've had to edit any config files on it yet, let alone compile stuff or "maintain complex version dependencies", whatever you want that to mean...

      And it's not as if nobody *ever* needs to edit the registry on a Windows PC...

      Personally, I think you're just repeating what you heard somebody else say, just to sound cool...

    22. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this sort of thing would be for those that are already ignoring alternatives despite being an infected, pus-filled zombie because they've been running IE in Idiot Mode.

    23. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Haha! If they can't tell it's not windows, do you really think they'll understand anything tech support says to them?

    24. Re:Wrong Way by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      Then you could change the icon and the name of the Firefox application, and trick your users into using the more secure Firefox when they think, they think, they are using plain old IE. That way you can avoid the whole "I have to learn another browser" whining while still eliminating the number one security threat on Windows: Internet Explorer.

    25. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really need is a way of removing IE from WinXP and making Firefox the only browser in my system!

    26. Re:Wrong Way by fatcatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the man has a valid point.

      I love Linux. Use it on all of my servers and maintain hundreds of them for a living. I even have a stuffed Tux hanging from my rearview mirror. But Linux is a real pain in the ass on a workstation.

      On a server, I expect to recompile my software occasionally. It's a server. It's finicky. It takes time to do right. I don't mind that.

      But I won't do that on my workstation. Screwing with dependencies sucks. 9 times out of 10 when I go to install or upgrade some package, it requires a new version of x, which requires a new version of x, y, and z, which each require a new version of h-i-j-k-l-m-n-o-p, and half of the packages refuse to install and only break my system with I try to force them.

      Screw that.

      Hey, I'm not defending Windows. It sucks in it's own special way.

      Hmm. Now I don't know why I posted this, or what my point even was. Nevermind...

    27. Re:Wrong Way by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      none of the features, all of the problems.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    28. Re:Wrong Way by matth · · Score: 1

      78% gave up in i-clod cause they couldn't figure out how to work it! I know I did!

    29. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSE.

    30. Re:Wrong Way by spin2cool · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the distro you're looking for is Ubuntu.

    31. Re:Wrong Way by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      with mandrake erm, mandriva rather, I have never had the issues you describe here. As long as i stick to the default repositories (and perhaps andyrtr for some more updated stuff) I've had nearly no problems. Occasionally a library won't install or something, but then you can either wait a couple days till its fixed, or compile from source.

      --
      :x
    32. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      completely off-topic. the topic above is 100% troll, not insightful.

    33. Re:Wrong Way by chandip · · Score: 1

      News flash: New engine turns Lada in to Ferrari>


      YEH Right

      --
      the sig
    34. Re:Wrong Way by Greener · · Score: 1

      It's called Firefoxie. It's more involved than just adding an extension though.

    35. Re:Wrong Way by millermj · · Score: 1

      Give the Netscape 8 browser a whirl. It's Windows-only, unfortunately, but it can go back and forth between the Firefox and IE engines. Turn off what you don't need and you'll be set!

      --
      Did anyone bother to ask the customers what they want?
    36. Re:Wrong Way by Dolda2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      But I won't do that on my workstation. Screwing with dependencies sucks. 9 times out of 10 when I go to install or upgrade some package, it requires a new version of x, which requires a new version of x, y, and z, which each require a new version of h-i-j-k-l-m-n-o-p, and half of the packages refuse to install and only break my system with I try to force them.
      What distro are you using? Red Hat 9? Last I looked, Fedora Core, Mandrake, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, and probably all others as well, do have automatic dependency resolving systems. Ever heard of yum, apt, urpmi or portage?
    37. Re:Wrong Way by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Why? Why would you want to do that?!

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    38. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Linux system you're looking for is called FreeBSD.

    39. Re:Wrong Way by Cerv · · Score: 5, Funny

      it requires a new version of x, which requires a new version of x

      Oh dear, that's not good.

      --
      sig
    40. Re:Wrong Way by MikeFM · · Score: 1, Informative

      When last did you try Linux? 1996? Or maybe you're just a dork that doesn't know how to use the available tools.

      As compared to something like Windows where a fscked config means you need to call in expert outside help or just reinstall the whole OS and dependencies are damn near impossible to fix because the OS has NO system in place to work out such problems at all. Oh.. and just try to custom compile most Windows apps to your needs. Good luck. Either what you want is just impossible to get or you're required to run a huge bloated buggy program to get the couple small features you want. Good plan.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    41. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The bad thing is that that's a real situation.

    42. Re:Wrong Way by NatteringNabob · · Score: 0

      My experience is similar to yours except that I've found that Windows is a royal PITA as both a server and a workstation OS. I'm continually amazed that people pay Microsoft for Windows instead of the other way around.

    43. Re:Wrong Way by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Informative
      Screwing with dependencies sucks.

      How long has it been since you've used Linux?! Every distro I can think of will automatically fill dependencies. They also provide one central point to upgrade all your installed software. The early RPM-based distros where you had to hunt for your own packages were awful, but Linux and the BSDs are now lightyears ahead of Windows when it comes to software management.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    44. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of deception could, with time, have negative reprecussions, especially if all of their friends desperately want to waste their time sending nudges and winks with the latest, most bloated and crappy, MSN Messenger, that's the biggest headache, peer pressure acting upon idiots who find such distractions amusing and who feel left out if their friends can have a large flash fist knocking on their screens, and they can't.

    45. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I need in Windows (which I have to use and support at work) in order to be able to use Firefox as the default browser (which means on mine and potentially thousands of machines) is a capability added by the installation of Firefox (so it is updated and always a part of installing the program) which: allows for URL shortcuts on the desktop and in the start menu to be hard coded to go to one browser or the other (e.g., I.E. for the system ones (like Windows Update / Microsoft Update websites) and maybe links to online programs which only currently work in I.E., but Mozilla Firefox for all else).

      It would also be nice if Microsoft did not have their Outlook program force you to wait 10-15 seconds before opening a URL in an email if you have it set to open in Firefox (and yet it opens right away if it's set for I.E.). Yeah, that would be nice.

    46. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9 times out of 10 when I go to install or upgrade some package, it requires a new version of x, which requires a new version of x, y, and z, which each require a new version of h-i-j-k-l-m-n-o-p, and half of the packages refuse to install and only break my system with I try to force them.

      #apt-get upgrade

      Debian is good.

    47. Re:Wrong Way by mikerozh · · Score: 0

      Just use better linux distribution. I use debian on my servers and I use it on my primary desktop at work and home. I rarery have any problem with dependencies.

    48. Re:Wrong Way by brassman · · Score: 1

      How recent? How about Mandriva 10.1?

      URPMI got a little confused about the state of my Ethereal install recently, and All Hell Broke Loose(TM).

      I was a paying subscriber. When they asked me why I wasn't renewing, I told them "I've discovered apt. It's time for RPM-based distros to die."

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    49. Re:Wrong Way by eosp · · Score: 1

      good at work and stuff, or where people think Internet Exploder is more secure. To quote my employer, "Open source is the worst source of viruses! Anyone can go in and put anything they want in." My response: "So get the source and look through it. Or use a program called a virus scanner." His response: "So you're a competent enough programmer to find virus writers' practices?" I work at a programming company.

    50. Re:Wrong Way by croddy · · Score: 1
      some people think that "making product B look like product A" will make people switching from A to B feel more at home, and thus more likely to use product B.

      of course, this falls apart after about six seconds, because looking like product A entails an expectation that B will function like A. when it doesn't, the user has clearly been misled and is likely to just switch back to A.

      (incidentally, this is the same flaw seen in complaints that GNOME and KDE do not mimic Windows).

    51. Re:Wrong Way by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I dislike both KDE and Gnome. They are the wrong direction to go for a solid Linux GUI enviroment. Rather than staying with decades old and well proven Unix sensibilities they have tried to go the way of Windows and Mac OS where constant flux and geewhiz features are more important than usability. As if it really matters if UI chrome can have transparency or if the toolbar icons magnify when you hover over them. We are copying these stupid features instead of working on stability, flexibility, and ease of use?

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    52. Re:Wrong Way by Foofoobar · · Score: 2, Informative

      My mom runs fedora and she's a 65 yr old technophobe. It never crashes, she never needs to config things, recompile anything, etc.

      I don't know what your problem is.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    53. Re:Wrong Way by typical · · Score: 1

      So now we have FireFox, Foxie, and FireFoxIE. That's lovely. I think that people complaining about confusion being a problem are on pretty firm ground.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    54. Re:Wrong Way by typical · · Score: 1

      What distro are you using that doesn't auto-download and install all required packages?

      (I will grant that there is still one possibility -- if you're using third-party RPM repositories on a RPM-based system that aren't fully compatible with each other. Red Hat still doesn't have as large a *all tested with each other* set of packages as Debian does.)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    55. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But do you have a girlfriend?

    56. Re:Wrong Way by westlake · · Score: 3, Interesting
      These days I have have adopted a very aggressive attitude to 'correctional computing'

      When a "stealth install" blows up in someone's face and you find yourself in court, you will have reinforced all the negative stereotypes of the Geek. God help you if actually try to collect that 120 quid from an "older person," a pensioner, perhaps, who wants his Windows system back in order as you promised.

    57. Re:Wrong Way by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you service machines for friends and family try this. Don't ask, just do what is good for them. After all they are putting their absolute trust in your computer knowledge, to do anything less is to fail them in.

      THAT is a perfect example of the arrogance that relegates Linux to distant third place on the desktop. More of "the geek knows best". It is NOT your job to do what YOU THINK is best for them, but what you KNOW they asked you to do which is to FIX their WINDOWS machine. Doing otherwise is dishonest and if money or other compensation changes hand FRAUDULENT and should be punished at the very least by word being spread that you CANNOT be trusted to do as asked but insist on doing what you egotistically THINK should be done.

      I swear, sometimes it amazes me that the common end-users haven't lynched more geeks in anger over the abuse that they suffer at the hands of know-it-all nerds. Assuming you know better than the end-user whose requirements you are there to fulfill is insane grandiose self-importance. THIS is the sort of thing that kicked off Microsoft's ongoing issues over reliability of Windows 95 with the arrogance of assuming user data loss was no big deal and nuke and pave an acceptable regular task. It goes right back to the 640K RAM joke that endlessly pops up. Or any of dozens of systemic flaws in Unix that to this day are being worked around because of the arrogance of assumption by techies that they knew best and that what they wanted to produce superceded what was expected of them.

      If I was busy and farmed such repair work to someone who did this, and I paid so much as one penny compensation, there would be a lawsuit immediately for fraud if only to send a clear message. If plumbers did this, your toilet could end up in the kitchen; if electricians, you might get 312VDC service when you asked for 120VAC; and if general contractors did this, you might end up with your house being built facing another direction and on the wrong lot. All because someone thought they knew better than the customer. It is FIRST AND FOREMOST the job of the geek/nerd/techie to serve the end-users needs and desires and expectations, not defraud them out of pure unadulterated ego.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    58. Re:Wrong Way by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      how about a firefox pluggin that supports the programming API as MSIE, so that MSIE specific sites could function under firefox as well. Thats what I need =)

    59. Re:Wrong Way by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a solution, download "Firefox Setup 1.0.6.exe" from www.mozilla.org and install it. Then launch the default browser from the start menu, and voila, IE looks and acts just like firefox, with all the features and even the bugs!

      Mod me -1, I dare you!

    60. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, you can with microsoft's tweakui for xp.

    61. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I can change the Firefox lizard into the Microsoft Flag, I am not interested. Oh wait, I already have Internet Explorer. Too bad I can't use it safely.

    62. Re:Wrong Way by TheJorge · · Score: 1

      That people pay Windows for Microsoft? Who wants a Microsoft?

    63. Re:Wrong Way by Val314 · · Score: 1

      but dont download the Firefox from there... its apearantly Firefox 1.0.
      Goto www.getfirefox.com and get 1.0.6 (with many security fixes) there

    64. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, no... I think the distro you're looking for is called Mac OS X :-)

    65. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Disable tabs 2) Disable searchbox 3) Grow Balls 4) ... 6) Don't be a n00b

    66. Re:Wrong Way by isorox · · Score: 1

      But I won't do that on my workstation. Screwing with dependencies sucks.

      Hell yeah, but I live in the 21st century where we have package managers which automatically grab dependencies. I never compile stuff on my workstation (laptop), hell I've got a stock kernel. I just installed the distro and it worked. Same with my mythtv box, took 2 hours to set up, takes 10 seconds a day of preventative maintenence.

      I use linux because it just works.

    67. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exploding software. That's a new one, can I get that on sourceforge? On second thoughts, better don't tell where, I'm sure Osame Youknowwho would like the get hold on that.

      As for trying to collect the price for a legal XP, guess what... Unless you're going to pirate it, there's nowhere you're going to get it without paying.

    68. Re:Wrong Way by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      I think part of his point was that they didn't have a legitimate Windows disk.

      Ergo. they can say what they like in court.

      "Your honour, the plaintiff was running a pirate copy of Windows so I installed a licensed copy of KDE to get them going without breaking the law. When they asked me to install Windows I informed them that it was $120 to purchase. And here we are."

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    69. Re:Wrong Way by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    70. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you service machines for friends and family try this. Don't ask, just do what is good for them. After all they are putting their absolute trust in your computer knowledge, to do anything less is to fail them in.

      THAT is a perfect example of the arrogance that relegates Linux to distant third place on the desktop.


      You mean that a year ago, when my brother upgraded my mothers Win 3.11 to Win98, that's what relegates Linux to distant third place? Not only Linux geeks do this, ask *any* geek to reinstall your Windows machine, and you'll get whatever OS he has lying around if you don't bring your own.

      If I was busy and farmed such repair work to someone who did this, and I paid so much as one penny compensation, there would be a lawsuit immediately for fraud if only to send a clear message.

      You'd sue your family (or friends)? I'm glad I'm not related to you in any way.

      If plumbers did this, your toilet could end up in the kitchen; if electricians, you might get 312VDC service when you asked for 120VAC; and if general contractors did this, you might end up with your house being built facing another direction and on the wrong lot.

      And without any of the paperwork (for the house) and safety systems (for the plumbing and electricity) in order, because you get a friend who "knows a bit about pipes/cables/hosues" to do it, instead of paying full price for getting an authorized plumber/electrician/engineer to do it right.

      Hint: Getting it done right includes paying for the software in the first place. Now, you may have different standards, but if I refuse to pay for a product, I will not get surprised if I don't get that product. No matter if it's Windows, plumbing or electricity.

    71. Re:Wrong Way by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      What you call fraud, some call help. It's not a big job to cure a Windows machine from its deadly diseases. The job should be giving information to those users, to let them know why their machine ended up like that, what in that is their fault and what is not their fault, what are the ways and options of avoiding it to happen again, etc. People mostly do what they do based on very limited information and/or knowledge. Providing them with information and making them able to choose is (should be) an important task.
       

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    72. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's on RedHat 4.2, trying to make it behave *exactly* like Vista Server. Oh, and he could find a graphical way to configure it, so now he's stuck with editing .xBSODrc to make it a red screen of death.

    73. Re:Wrong Way by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Nice post, a little bit light on the bold and capitals though.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    74. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK by that argument, if some one calls me to fix there PC because they are having problems with their word processor and it turns out that they are using notepad am I not allowed to tell them to use Word because I percieve it as better than notepad?

      I am a windows technical specialist and I use Suse Linux at home because I see it as a better operating system, and I am more than happy to tell people to use linux.

    75. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about using Opera. Its fast, has more features than Firefox and IE combined and best of all it doesn't have a slavish following by every nerd in the world. It looks nothing like IE or Firefox but why have plastic surgery to look like the old man down the road when you are already the best looker out there.

    76. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ARE you TALKING like THIS?

    77. Re:Wrong Way by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you're deliberately deleting a working, legitimate Windows install, replacing it with Linux against the wishes of the user, then (when they complain) trying to charge then £120 for another version of Windows, because you deleted the one they already own?

      You, sir, are a fucking disgrace. You embody everything the public finds repellent about the "arrogant techie" stereotype, and are unethical, deceitful and (if any money or reward changes hands as a result of your "service") likely comitting fraud to boot.

      "All these users are older people who use their computers for web browsing and printing mostly, and I take my experiences so far as a kind of scientific 'evidence' that this class of users can't tell the difference."

      So that makes it alright? Supposing one of them goes and buys a new family-tree plotting app, or garden-design program (to choose two examples my aunty recently bought) - what happens then? They're faced with a long, expensive call to tech support, which likely still won't the problem that you caused them. Eventually they (stupidly) turn to you again, and what do you tell them?

      "Oh, right, yeah, that won't work - get your money back from the shop, if you can get them to believe that a version of 'Windows' won't run this certified 'Windows' application. Oh, and (if you're exceptionally lucky) here's a barely-maintained buggy-as-fuck butt-ugly hobby OSS version of something so pathetically niche that it'll never attract any kind of decent development community, to replace the version you just spent half your pension buying."

      "If you service machines for friends and family try this. Don't ask, just do what is good for them. After all they are putting their absolute trust in your computer knowledge, to do anything less is to fail them in."

      More like: "After all, they are putting their absolute trust in your computer knowledge, so to do this is to utterly and arrogantly violate that trust in the worst way possible."

      Look, if you're sick of fixing computers for family, friends or others, just fucking tell them. Give them a choice of either switching to (your special version of) Linux or compensating you for the time you waste fixing their Windows boxes.

      Alternatively, they can stop coming to you altogether and instead pay to have a computer shop fix it.

      Under no circumstances is it ever ethical to violate their trust, especially not because you think you've got away with it so far.

      For comparison, suppose you went to the doctor, and he told you you had gangrene. You'd expect some explanation of the options and some (pretty strong) recommendations, but ultimately it's your decision what happens.

      You wouldn't expect the doctor to simply club you unconscious, chainsaw off your leg and bandage the stump.

      "So what?" he might say - I've prevented it spreading to the rest of your system and killing you! You'll retain the use of your other limbs, and for anything you can't do with them, here's a half-arsed prosthetic replacement for your missing limb. Sure it might look a bit nasty, and doesn't always work too well, and sometimes breaks, but look - you can take the cover off and mess about with how it works inside! Ok, you're not a prosthetics expert, and so probably never will, but this clearly makes up for my complete lack of consultation before my arbitrarily rearranging your entire physiology!"

      Jesus. Whatever happened to professional ethics?

      You're the kind of person that gives us geeks a bad name.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    78. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be committing an offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

    79. Re:Wrong Way by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "You mean that a year ago, when my brother upgraded my mothers Win 3.11 to Win98, that's what relegates Linux to distant third place?"

      OS comparison is entirely beside the point, but no, that's not what did. Timing was what initially relegated Linux to third choice. What keeps Linux third choice is shocking (and completely unconscious) arrogance like yours.

      Basically, you seem to think there's your opinion, and the wrong one. Unfortunately, you're massively in the minority, and so destined to stay there.

      "Not only Linux geeks do this, ask *any* geek to reinstall your Windows machine, and you'll get whatever OS he has lying around if you don't bring your own."

      The sound shouting-down you're getting would indicate otherwise. Normal people would just ask for the Windows CD, and explain if you don't have it you either have to buy another one or use this (free) operating system that I'm recommending, and which can be made to look almost exactly just like your old one.

      "You'd sue your family (or friends)? I'm glad I'm not related to you in any way."

      You'd arrogantly and unnecessarily stitch up your own family (or friends) on a whim, and try to charge them £120 to rectify the damage you caused to their machine? I'm glad I'm not related to you in any way.

      "And without any of the paperwork (for the house) and safety systems (for the plumbing and electricity) in order, because you get a friend who "knows a bit about pipes/cables/hosues" to do it, instead of paying full price for getting an authorized plumber/electrician/engineer to do it right."

      So, if you know a "bit about pipes" and a mate asks you to replumb his kitchen sink, do you:

      i) Read up on it and do the best you can
      ii) Confess to him you don't have the skills needed, and advise him to go to a professional, or
      iii) Knock his entire house down, piss on the rubble then give him a spare portakabin you had lying around to live in, and ask him to buy a new house if he doesn't like it?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    80. Re:Wrong Way by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "OK by that argument, if some one calls me to fix there PC because they are having problems with their word processor and it turns out that they are using notepad am I not allowed to tell them to use Word because I percieve it as better than notepad?"

      Try actually reading the GP, and you'll see that (in fact) this is exactly what he's suggesting - you explain the situation, and present them with a choice.

      You don't unilaterally decide for them, as if they were some kind of young child or mental deficient.

      However, I find myself increasingly wondering if you are in fact a troll. Your vociferously defence of an ethically untenable position and your choosing not to bother even properly reading the (quite short) GP post bears all the hallmarks...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    81. Re:Wrong Way by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This is an interesting marketing slogan, but with a moment's thought it very obviously translates to "shit, 78% of users got bored and stopped playing after less than a day's playing - how can we try to spin this into a good thing?".

      I understand the motivation (and it's a valient effort), but it Just Doesn't Work.

      I've never played iClod, and I wish the organisers well, but this is not a good advert for their game.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    82. Re:Wrong Way by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      what if i'm tired of fixing their (family 'n friends) windows boxes for free because they are too ignorant to maintain some simple safety rules (don't click on that joke.exe, don't answer yes to something you didn't ask for in the first place -gator?, etc)

      i'd rather NOT fix their problems at all... if they want my help; they'll have to do it MY WAY!

    83. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or any of dozens of systemic flaws in Unix that to this day are being worked around because of the arrogance of assumption by techies that they knew best and that what they wanted to produce superceded what was expected of them.

      Remember that Unix was a research project by techies and for techies. It was marketing wonks at AT&T who started selling it to their customers, despite the "dozens of systemic flaws".

    84. Re:Wrong Way by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      What you do is absolutely fucking outrageous.

      Fraud, deceit, unauthorized modifications/repairs, you name it...

      You, Sir, will burn in hell!

    85. Re:Wrong Way by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      > What you call fraud, some call help. It's not a big job to cure a Windows machine from its deadly diseases.

      They used to say similar of lobotomy in last century.

      > Providing them with information and making them able to choose is (should be) an important task.

      Are you fucking illiterate? He said he did NOT provide them with info and choice.

    86. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not always work is the point. Or, software doesn't always catch up. Take for instance a recent upgrade I had using an RHEL4 derivative. I upgraded to PostgreSQL 8.0.3. Oops, none of the other programs can use the 8.0.3 libraries. So, now I'm forced to use a less secure version of Postgres, or not use Postgres with PHP, which was one of the points of having the DB in the first place. Or, spend 3 hours searching google to find a workaround, which is what I did.

      Boy am I glad apt saved me all of that hassle.

    87. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, most of the "know it all" geeks out here fix the friend/relatives/family members' PC because of emotional links. In other words, WE FIX A COMPUTER TO HELP SOMEONE WE CARE OF, NOT BECAUSE WE ARE PAID FOR IT!

      Since we care of them, we try to make the best for them. And the best for them is saying "This thing sux, here is a better sustitute. As easy to use, and withough this problem. try it for a week and then decide yourself", with all the honestity we have.

      THIS IS NOT A JOB. WE ARE NOT A REPAIR SERVICE, SO STOP TALKING ABOUT US LIKE ONE. WE DON'T MAKE MONEY COMMING ANOTHER TIME, AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER. PERIOD.

    88. Re:Wrong Way by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      You are a moron, for all the reasons contained in the attached responses. What you should rather be doing is reinstalling windows (so they still can run their present and future software), force them to ditch IE for Firefox and Outlook for Thunderbird, and force them to buy a damned antivirus. If you install Linux you should at least be warning them!! Installing 50 (or 200, or 2000 for that matter) linux boxes won't change the world in itself, and it certainly won't help it to spread : your customers don't have a clue anyways of what they're running, and certainly won't start a word-of-mouth in favor of it (since their software doesn't work anymore). Duh.

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    89. Re:Wrong Way by DimGeo · · Score: 1

      A better way to do it: re-install their windows or just fix it, install the latest patches and updates, turn on autoupdate, turn on windows firewall, install a free-as-in-beer av program and a free-as-in-beer firewall (and tell it NOT to disable the windows firewall), and you are done. I'm running such a machine exposed with an external IP and I've had no problems at all.

      The OS *has* to be the same for compatibility with third-party software. Even the browser for that matter. Just turn on the security to maximum and turn off the "accept active x" option or what ever the hell it's called.

      OK, maybe what you've done is wrong, but when they come asking why some program isn't working, you could just do what I described using their own copy of windows (they must have one on a CD or something) so that windowsupdate doesn't freak out.

    90. Re:Wrong Way by cloudmaster · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd like to point out that most users, when asked if they'd like to try another operating system that's more secure and more stable, would either say "what's an operating system" or "ok, that sounds great" - having no idea what they're agreeing to, but hearing "security" or "stabiilty" and not wanting to sound stupid. And then they'd still buy that gardening software, possibly the mac version.

      Choopping one's leg off isn't a good analogy, either, since that's pretty irreversible. Changing operating systems is rather minor, though.

      I don't particularly think it's a good idea to just randomly change OSs, but that also applies to changing versions of windows - if someone came in with Win 98, it'd be a good idea to bump them to Win 2K or XP for security update availability reasons. Reinstalling '98 would also result in that new peice of software not working, and would be just as likely to result in some kind of lawsuit (which leads to another ant about why people are such assholes recently, and think that the proper way to resolve most any dispute is to bring it into a court, but that's another topic)...

    91. Re:Wrong Way by Cyn · · Score: 1

      Must be all that [[[[G]NU]NU]NU] software. Recursive acronyms, now recursive dependancies.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    92. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of idiot wouldn't want a tabbed browser?

    93. Re:Wrong Way by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "I'd like to point out that most users, when asked if they'd like to try another operating system that's more secure and more stable, would either say "what's an operating system" or "ok, that sounds great" - having no idea what they're agreeing to, but hearing "security" or "stabiilty" and not wanting to sound stupid. And then they'd still buy that gardening software, possibly the mac version."

      You're right. However, if they (ostensibly) know what OS they're running and buy the wrong app, that's their fault for not reading up more. If they agree to switching OS, they can't complain if they don't like the result, because they had the choice to switch, and the opportunity to ask more questions before doing so (of course, a proper techie should explain the implications even so, but this is an acceptable minimum).

      "Choopping one's leg off isn't a good analogy, either, since that's pretty irreversible. Changing operating systems is rather minor, though."

      Minor for you, maybe. For me, after staggering home from work at 18:00 every day, still having to shower, put the tea on and see my significant other for some time that evening, maybe it's a bit more major. For a clueless elderly person with zero technical skills, it's a major deal, especially when their supposedly "trusted" techie is trying to charge them £120 to fix what he broke.

      If they can't afford to pay £120 (especially for no good reason), they can't do it themselves and the only person they know who can do the job refuses to because of his own stupidity, they're out of options - I'd say that's effectively pretty irreversible.

      "I don't particularly think it's a good idea to just randomly change OSs, but that also applies to changing versions of windows - if someone came in with Win 98, it'd be a good idea to bump them to Win 2K or XP for security update availability reasons."

      Fine, as long as you explain to them what you'd like to do to their equipment, and they agree. IT's their PC - merely knowing more or occasionally doing them a favour does not mean you own their machine, and doesn't give you the right to decide how it works over them.

      "Reinstalling '98 would also result in that new peice of software not working,"

      What? Do you mean with a slash-and-burn format-and-reinstall, instead of just reinstalling Windows over the top? Then yes, it'll stop the program working only until until you or they re-install it. If you installed it the first time you can install it the second. If they installed it the first time, they can do it. I don't see your point here.

      There's a world of difference between temporarily stopping a program working as an unavoidable side-effect of what they asked you to do, and knowingly allowing them to buy software which won't work on their machine because you're unnecessarily lied to them about what they're actually running.

      Or are you implying that every piece of software relseased in the last few years won't work on Win98? Hate to tell you, but that's completely inaccurate. And even if they do buy the WinXP-only version, they'll only have themselves to blame. They've been told what version of Windows they have at some point (or could ask a trustworthy techie friend) - they've bought the wrong thing through their own stupidity, not because they've been deliberately and needlessly mislead by someone they trusted.

      "and would be just as likely to result in some kind of lawsuit..."

      I don't think so. "A piece of software unavoidably needing reinstallation due to a problem with the machine that you asked them to fix" (or "the wrong piece of software you bought solely through your own stupidity") is very different to "someone you trust unnecessarily lying to you, and as a result breaking all your already-purchased programs and/or allowing you waste money on something they already know wouldn't work, solely because of their unnecessary action

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    94. Re:Wrong Way by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There are many such distributions, graphical tools offer you all the flexibility that most people will need, as do the graphical tools available in windows..
      If you want additional control, you have the ability to edit configuration files just as you can modify the registry on windows.
      However, that's where the similarities stop...
      Windows has no tools to manage version dependencies, whereas several such tools exist for linux and other unixes..
      The unix configuration files can be easily edited by scripts, the registry is much harder to automate.
      Also, windows doesn't give you the capability to modify the source code to suit your needs...

      Basically, both windows and linux cater to the non-technical end user, however linux also offers a lot of flexibility for technically minded users where windows falls short.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    95. Re:Wrong Way by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I think you may have gotten the wrong impression - I wasn't defending installing a new OS without asking. Though, I've done that on family machines, I've only done that after a backup, and given it to them with full discolsure (and a promise to install Win32 if they still want it) - not like the OP. Just installing Linux and KDE without telling the user, and pretending it's Windows, well, that's not quite right.

      To address the other point of confusion, yes, I was saying that lots of new software won't work on old versions of Windows. That garden program, for example, probably involves some kind of mixed media presentation. It's reasonable to develop that using media player / DirectX as a target, and it's reasonable to take advantage of the features in the newest version. You can't install the newest DirectX on '98, nor can you install the newest media player (IIRC). Sure, there are lots of new Win32 programs that will still work on '98 - but those programs will almost universally work with properly configured wine, too. Wine can be configured to open Win32 executables in most popular desktop environments. So, in the case of someone who came in with a '98 machine and went home with a Linux install, they probably aren't going to have any more problems than they would have before - and they'll probably *not* have to come back for another spyware-induced problem. Again, not that I'm condoning the deceptive use of that solution - I'm merely pointing out that it wouldn't *neccesarily* cause the massive problems that you made to sound unavoidable in the original reply. That was/is my point. :)

    96. Re:Wrong Way by Zyron · · Score: 1

      I've tried them all!

      And believe me, nothing even come close to
      Avant Browser.

      I usually have 60-120 windows open at the same time. That can't be done with any other browser, not even firefox - nor Opera. (Runs waay too slow)

      I occationally use Firefox, but it's quite bad for handling many tabs (don't even have background opening of tabs) - so I always return to Avant Browser http://www.avantbrowser.com/, my number one for the past 5 years!

    97. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with this at all? I am aware of FirefoxIE which this is basically looking like a total ripoff of, and with FoxIE you STILL have all the potential exploitation of IE with some clever workarounds or user ineptitude.
      There's all the extensions and theme items to make this and even FirefoxIE totally pointless, especially if you only incrementally want or need to spoof the IE look, feel, and functions. There's an extension to disable all tabs, and the likes of MoreButtons to add buttons IE has that Firefox does not natively. Bamm Gabriana made an excellent theme for Firefox and Mozilla to make them look dead nuts like IE ( at http://bamm.gabriana.com/ ) and has instructions and links for nearly all the rest of the spoofing work. I even edited the brand.dtd file (not rocket science believe me) to show the browser title name as "Microsoft Internet Explorer". As for Maxthon and others, just plugging into IE is like a bandaid stuck on a gushing chest wound.

    98. Re:Wrong Way by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Dunno what the actual limit is, but I've had 30+ windows open in my beloved old Netscape 3, and I think a dozen or so is merely "normal". [I don't care for tabs and prefer discrete windows.] So I have a clue how you feel when the browser gags on being really busy.

      Haven't tried Avant, but [reads FAQ] I see it's essentially a front end for IE, which has its own drawbacks. Even so, looks like it has some useful features for those times when a person is forced to use IE, so thanks for the pointer!

      The way Mozilla (and therefore presumably Firefox, which I dislike even more) hogs both the connection and the system focus as it takes forever to render stuff is enough to drive a person round the bend. It's pretty clear to me that Moz/FF is never tested on anything so lowly as a mere P3-550 with a paltry gig of RAM, cuz it clearly expects a whole lot more hardware than I can give it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    99. Re:Wrong Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, doesn't anyone realize that this is just trolling?

  2. right... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or they could just use firefox.

    1. Re:right... by Nykon · · Score: 1

      Actually by using the plug in you get the advantages of using FF (tabbed browsing, security,etc) but the benifits (yes there are actually benifits) of IE (sites that do not work properly or render proerly in anything but IE.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    2. Re:right... by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      or they could just use firefox.

      Yes, but much of the industry is "standardized" on Microsoft Internet Explorer. Some companies even sanction their employees browsers by allowing only specific software to run on employee systems. This is a nice workaround without having to offend your company's T&C by running something "open source" *gasp*.

    3. Re:right... by linguae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but there are certain occasions where Firefox is of no help (e.g., IE-only web pages, ActiveX stuff, etc.). An IE plugin with these security features would tremendously cut down on some of the major malware problems that many people are currently facing. All without having to switch browsers, too.

      Don't get me wrong, I love Firefox as much as the next Slashdotter, but don't we all want a more secure Internet Explorer for our Windows-using friends as well?

    4. Re:right... by lambent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know a number of people who refuse to use Firefox. I fought the good fight, told them they were being foolish, promised them newer and better capabilities ... but they simply refuse. One person simply refuses to switch because the browsers 'just don't look the same'.

      I know what's good for them, so if I could conceivably trick them into using a better tool, we can chalk up another victory for (more) secure browsing.

    5. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the question we have to ask ourselves is what do we value more? Useability and security or freedom to modify?

      If we value the first then we have no reason to try to get people away from IE if it is as secure and functional. If we value the second then we are right in still trying to get people to switch over to FF

    6. Re:right... by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't get me wrong, I love Firefox as much as the next Slashdotter, but don't we all want a more secure Internet Explorer for our Windows-using friends as well?

      This is going to sound completely selfish but I say no - because in the longterm, I want people to have more of an incentive to turn away from Microsoft - not keep using it. Or at least not give companies an excuse to design IE-only compatible websites.

      I think any other free alternative is better than a MS dominated future. Hell, MS didn't even make this plug-in so how can I trust them to secure the rest of their apps?

    7. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "told them they were being foolish"

      That's a good starting point...

    8. Re:right... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1

      The difference is you can use IE's broken rendering engine to go to all the sites that depend on it :p

    9. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be useful for web designers that don't want to sacrifice security while trying to create sites that look the same and are accessible by both browsers.

    10. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally don't care so much that Firefox is more secure. Hell, if people refuse to kick the habit, they have to deal with the consequences. However, as a web developer, it would be nice if I didn't have to develop web pages twice - once for IE and once for everything else.

      I personally don't give a damn what browser people use as long as it doesn't affect me. Everything else is their own problem. By using IE, they are contributing to the pollution of the web.

    11. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with you.

      We shouldn't want ill will to happen to users of IE browsers simply because we use something else. If this plugin makes IE safer, more secure, and cuts down on a ton of annoyances... why wouldn't we want someone to use it?

      You always see people touting Firefox as a viable alternative because of the EXACT FEATURES THIS ADDS to IE. Why not give people the option to use what they want instead of forcing them to change because we want them to? But at least give them some nudging towards making it a bit better experience for them (and us) in the end.

    12. Re:right... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      The thing I'm wondering is if all of the improved security in the plug-in would break the IE specific sites? I've got to believe that shutting off huge chunks of ActiveX stuff is going to mess at least a few pages up. Anybody see anything like this?

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    13. Re:right... by truesaer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, every fucking internal webpage in my company doesn't work with firefox. I really can't even explain how they've done it. They're not using ActiveX or other complex technologies, they've just managed to write such terrible code that it flat out doesn't work.


      So I have to use two browsers, one for regular browsing and one for internal website (expense reports, hr, timesheet, etc. etc). I'd love to be able to have tabs for IE so that I don't end up with multiple windows for intranet sites. I'll probably try this tomorrow.


      And no, I can't get them to change the sites. We're a "major" company, but not large in the sense that IBM or Intel or Microsoft are. Yet the buerocracy on stuff like this is extensive enough that suggesting a change would just go into a black hole. I'll have to wait until I'm a vice president or something to make this happen (ie, never).

    14. Re:right... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      ...don't we all want a more secure Internet Explorer for our Windows-using friends as well?

      Isn't half the issues with IE related to MS's bungling of internet standards to lock webpage designers into Windows only standards?

    15. Re:right... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Of course by "get the benefits" you mean "pay the extortion".

    16. Re:right... by fanblade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or they could just use firefox.

      IE is faster. So assuming this had all the same features and security (it doesn't, but hypothetically) why would you want Firefox again?

    17. Re:right... by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Try a proxy on your computer that runs the html through a cleaner-upper. Or, try Opera, or some other non-Mozilla-derived browser.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    18. Re:right... by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I love Firefox as much as the next Slashdotter, but don't we all want a more secure Internet Explorer for our Windows-using friends as well?

      I thought we wanted our Windows-using friends to dump Internet Explorer, as a first step in the process of dumping Windows.

      Well, at least I do.

    19. Re:right... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather have the one doing the innovating and speedy development than the one playing catchup all the time...

    20. Re:right... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Extensions? Free software? Same browser interface on your PC and your powerbook?

      Of course I don't use either, but I can see why people do. IE7 might finally be somewhat usable, but I can't really live without tabs or nicknames.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    21. Re:right... by LentoMan · · Score: 1

      ActiveX for mozilla/firefox: http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm Unfortunately it seems there are no version available for 1.0.6, but the 1.0.4 version might work anyway.

    22. Re:right... by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      "Actually, every fucking internal webpage in my company doesn't work with firefox. I really can't even explain how they've done it. They're not using ActiveX or other complex technologies, they've just managed to write such terrible code that it flat out doesn't work."

      well +1 for IE then, as it renders bad code better..

    23. Re:right... by Myen · · Score: 1

      Google for "IETabs". (The result you want should be pointing to the MozillaZine forums.) It sort of implements parts of what Netscape 8 had, but for Firefox.

      That basically implements a IE plugin with GUI hooks to open it in a new tab. The difference being 1) this is open source; 2) you would end up using Gecko most of the time, which is probably better security-wise.

    24. Re:right... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I thought we wanted our Windows-using friends to dump Internet Explorer, as a first step in the process of dumping Windows.

      Well, at least I do.


      While I wouldn't say that you are in the minority on Slashdot, there are still a good amount who would disagree. I myself actually *gasp* like Windows. Is it flawed? Sure, but for me it beats the alternative. Let us take for example my 802.11b wireless USB adapter. Had it running in windows in 5 minutes with no reboots and all I had to do was stick a CD in the drive and click a few times on the mouse. Contrast this with Linux. I recently installed Debian Sarge to see how Linux was coming along and to make sure some of my code was cross-platform as planned. It took me 3 days of work (granted I only had the patience for 2-3 hours a day) trying to get my wireless USB working. Finally after reading about 10 forums and editing a makefile I get it working. Am I interested in dumping Windows for that? Nope.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    25. Re:right... by Lord+Raze · · Score: 1
      Don't get me wrong, I love Firefox as much as the next Slashdotter, but don't we all want a more secure Internet Explorer for our Windows-using friends as well?

      Speaking as a Windows user, no I really don't want a more secure IE.

      Here's what I want:
      • A drastic reduction in Internet Explorer's market share, forcing web developers to stop building "IE only" websites
      • A complete end to my need for Windows Update
      • The complete inability to execute VBA and Win32-compiled code, as essentially all current malware takes one of these two forms
      • The end of Microsoft's web-browser hegemony
      • A more standards compliant world wide web for the day I switch all my desktops to Linux
      The vast majority of my web browsing takes place in Firefox/MacOS, with the minority taking place in a heavily fortified version of Firefox running on a stripped down version of 98SE.

      --
      -- "Have you ever seen your own brain?"
    26. Re:right... by uvavu · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not. There have been articles in almost every newspaper in the world about Firefox, as well as the problems which IE brings to users. If a user still has his head in the sand, let 'im suffer. As someone else hinted earlier, what we need is a plug-in for Firefox that could "lie" to the web pages published by those [wankers] who write IE-only code.

    27. Re:right... by cyberwench · · Score: 1

      It'd be a lot of help at my work. I can't get clearance to install Firefox, our IT guy doesn't actually know what it is despite me trying to explain it to him. (Personally, I think that's a REALLY bad sign.) So I'm stuck using IE, and I hate it. However, while I can't install programs, I can use plugins. So this may be just the thing I need. The lack of tabbed browsing and popups in IE combine to completely drive me up the wall. The lack of security's a bugger too, but it's the tabs that I really miss when I'm at work.

      --
      ~ Leilah
    28. Re:right... by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      Let us take for example my 802.11b wireless USB adapter. Had it running in windows in 5 minutes with no reboots and all I had to do was stick a CD in the drive and click a few times on the mouse. Contrast this with Linux.

      Well, so you're saying you prefer Windows over Linux because of vendor support. Fair enough. That's one of our chicken-egg problems, of course: vendors don't support Linux because there's not enough users because vendors don't support Linux, ad nauseaum. (I do understand the vendors concerns about the problems with supporting Linux (different distros, etc.))

      Vendor support is one aspect where Windows beats Linux hands down, and I'm sure we can think of others. However, the reason I pick Linux over Windows or Mac OSX, and I know I may well be in the minority here, is because it is free software (open source). I support this idea and that's why I use it even though driver support is lacking (heck, I'm porting GoboLinux in my iBook, talk about unsupported...) and encourage my friends to "dump Windows". I do respect those who think differently, of course.

      I think that for a long time Slashdot was a Linux-oriented site, and sometimes I forget that it has morphed into a more "generic tech site" as it grew.

    29. Re:right... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      Well, so you're saying you prefer Windows over Linux because of vendor support.

      Incorrect. My vendor for my card makes a native linux driver. Granted it may have been easier to install as a .deb or .rpm package, but having to do a "make all", "make install" is not uncommon for linux. This is what took me 2-3 days to get working, not some ndiswrapper or some other hack. Something that should have just worked, period.

      I will say in Debian's defense though that apt-get (and by extension Kynaptic) is one of the most useful things I have ever seen and I hope someone does something similar for Windows one day.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    30. Re:right... by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      Just curious. Why do you care what other people do?

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    31. Re:right... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      I use a mac. I haven't had any problems with anything important. (i tried to watch a music video once with no luck, and I think yahoo chat doesn't work)
      Between firefox and safari i've been able to get everything to work so far. One might think that IE for mac might work on ie only sites....but it's not the case

    32. Re:right... by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      Because we live in a society, because they're my friends and I wish the best for them. Individualism is at an all-time high, but we really are dependent on others, we affect and are affected by the environment around us. Call me idealistic, but I still think we can work towards a better world. And no, I do not approach this in a naive way -- I have my share of cynicism in my views. But alienating myself from the world around me is not an option.

    33. Re:right... by kurtmckee · · Score: 1
    34. Re:right... by kurtmckee · · Score: 1

      If you're not allowed to install Firefox, you might be able to run it off of a USB key -- investigate Portable Firefox.

    35. Re:right... by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      My advice: don't bother. I tend to be like that as well, but I've learned that you simply can't "save the world" by yourself. And people have to learn to take responsibility for their actions. If they choose stupidity, they should suffer the consequences.

      One important thing: tell them that you WON'T help them with spyware and viruses if they insist on using IE. And, later, keep your word and don't do it. Maybe they'll learn then, maybe they'll remain stubborn, but, trust me, preventing them from suffering the consequences of their stupidity is NOT helping them. Much the opposite.

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
    36. Re:right... by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      Wrong. That's like saying some doctor is better because he says you're healthy even though you are sick.

      Bad code should be fixed, and the browser should help in doing that, not hide errors.

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
    37. Re:right... by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

      > An IE plugin with these security features would tremendously cut down on some of the major malware problems that many people are currently facing. All without having to switch browsers, too.

      Or how about a Mozilla plugin to switch temporarily to using the IE rendering engine! Netscape has it, there must be a version for Firefox too
      http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/

    38. Re:right... by gargan · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go against the grain and agree with you here. I'm a tech at a small town computer shop and we manage a bunch of local church networks and stuff like that. Standardizing on IE is the easiest thing to do. I've tried switching individual users to firefox and all its gotten me is lots of phone calls with questions as to why this doesn't work or how to do such and such.

      I love firefox and use it myself, but I'm only one man and firefox is not really designed for corporate deployments and such just yet.

      --
      Emory: Uh..we're still..beta testing that.
      Oglethorpe: What you're testing is me and my patience!
    39. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately this plug-in is a pig. Yes, it does add features to IE similar to the ones in Firefox. It doesn't look bad, but it is considerably slower than a stock IE or Firefox install. There are also a number of behavior differences with regards to tabbed browsing and such that (along with the speed issue) makes using a FoxIE enabled IE even more frustrating for me than using a stock IE.

      I have been using Firefox for months, mainly for it's tabbed browsing (just what we hyper-browsing types need), but also for it's security benefits, and so on. But I have also been forced to stick with IE for certain applications that just don't work on Firefox (and probably never will). SP2 seems to have tightened up IE quite a bit, and since I regularly install patches security has been less of an issue for me than some. I have been waiting for months for someone to develop a plugin that gives IE some of the Firefox features that I love, but this plugin isn't going to do it. I'll be sticking with Firefox for now, thank you very much.

    40. Re:right... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Sounds a -lot- like where I work.

      Do you use Lotus Notes, and you have only one threaded mail view, which contains -all- messages, while filtered folders are restricted to flat views?

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  3. Hmm? by Saiyaman · · Score: 0

    Why use fake Firefox when you can use the real thing?

  4. Alternate download link by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Funny

    In case the main site is slashdotted, you can also download the program in question here.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
    1. Re:Alternate download link by Plug · · Score: 1

      The main site is slashdotted, and you could try here instead.

      The web page looks very much like a Mozilla Foundation/Corporation page. I wonder what their intentions really are?

    2. Re:Alternate download link by Plug · · Score: 1

      To reply to my own post, check out their knowledge base.

      Foxie is not a Firefox "rip-off". On the contrary, the Foxie Project was originally designed to bring all the great functionality of Firefox to Internet Explorer users. The fact is that the overwhelming majority of web users still use Internet Explorer as their default web browser.

      The reasons a person might choose IE over Firefox can vary from reluctance to switch browsers, imposed restrictions, personal preference, or the inherit problems of Firefox (such as bad memory handling and incompatibly with many web sites).

      Foxie was coded from scratch and represents months of hard work without any personal gain other then the satisfaction of creating a truly superior product. Both Firefox and IE users can enjoy using this product and exploit its many unique features completely free of charge.

      Lastly, to all the die-hard Firefox enthusiasts out there all I have to say is that imitation is the highest form of flattery!

    3. Re:Alternate download link by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Coral cache link.
      Really, would it be so hard to add a "Coralize Links" button to the Story Submission form?

      --
      put the what in the where?
    4. Re:Alternate download link by krang321 · · Score: 1

      I saw the screen shots of IE7, then realised that M$ have already realised it at http://www.getie7.com/

    5. Re:Alternate download link by typical · · Score: 1

      ...inherit problems of Firefox (such as bad memory handling...

      What on earth are they talking about?

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  5. Sheep in Fox clothing by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would I want to use this plugin to mimick FF, when I could just use the real thing?

    1. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by m50d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Faster startup and rendering. It's not worth it to me - better to render it slowly and correctly than fast and wrong, and I won't even start on security - but firefox can be a real dog on older machines.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Pleb'a.nz · · Score: 1

      Because, I'm constantly developing with Firefox, IE and Opera to get a working site across all platforms.

      IE is the only one that doesn't have tabs (and if it does) then it makes life much more organised on the taskbar.

    3. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by rob_squared · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because people LOVE their software. Actually, some of them are afraid of using new software. I've seen people use DeadAIM instead of Gaim and other such modified programs instead of using the program its trying to mimic.


      Not that I need for firefox to "take over the browser market," but it'd be nice if people would just take a chance.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear you, borther.

      It's like... like... choosing a guy over a girl for rough anal sex.

      Sure, with the guy you get the job done, but sheesh, you feel dirty afterwards.

      The latter, however, gets the job done AND makes you feel like a man.

      --
      Laugh, damn it! It's a joke!

    5. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by fribhey · · Score: 0

      isn't it a Fox in Sheep clothing?

      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
    6. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by wqksayi123 · · Score: 1

      My companies IT department will only support IE. (however, I do use "user agent switcher" to mimic IE to use Firefox!)

    7. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I want to use this plugin to mimick FF, when I could just use the real thing?

      For the very same reasons Jim Baker helped Tammy Faye apply extra layers of Maybeline at bedtime - delusion does have it's rewards you know...

    8. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh yeah... Last I checked gaim was missing the punt user button.

    9. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      So would this be considered a PLUGIN? or it might be an UPLOAD ;=0

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    10. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      IE might start up faster, but Firefox has been faster (and better) at rendering for quite some time now.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    11. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why sheep? It's a donkey. At least in Russia everybody calls IE so.

      It comes from Winnie-The-Pooh story. Donkey Eeyore in russian translation is "Oslik Ia", which sounds pretty close to IE.

    12. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      IE might start up faster, but Firefox has been faster (and better) at rendering for quite some time now.

      And Epiphany eats both of their lunches. (I still use Firefox mostly though....just love the way it looks).

    13. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Likewise, K-Meleon on Windows is actually pretty swift. And on KDE... well actually, us KDE users get shafted. :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    14. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that your computer boots up faster than Firefox can start? You might not know this, but IE is running from the time Windows loads. It's there, taking up some memory, regardless of whether you're using it or not. Firefox does not do this - look into Mozilla's "quick launch" option if you like keeping programs in memory when you're not using them - or just put a shortcut to firefox in your startup group, set to "start minimized", and don't ever exit it. Magically, you've got super-fast startup - and a reasonably recent version of Firefox will render faster, too.

    15. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by m50d · · Score: 1

      No way, konqueror is faster than anything else I've used (as long as you avoid javascript-heavy pages). Except links of course.

      --
      I am trolling
    16. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by m50d · · Score: 1

      Even with the quick launch option, mozilla and firefox still start much slower. And whilst I've seen many claims that firefox now renders faster, personal experience and the benchmarks I've seen don't agree with that.

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:Sheep in Fox clothing by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Konqueror is great on the whole, but it feels like Firefox still renders faster, even if Konqueror's interface is lightning fast. That's why I was excited when I heard that they were working a Gecko renderer into Konqueror... best of both worlds. Shame the project seems to have stagnated, like all other Mozilla integration promises. :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  6. But can it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filter slashdot dupes?

    1. Re:But can it... by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      What!!! alot of good that would be... I mean you would hardly ever see another article. :=0

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    2. Re:But can it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about filter stupid slashdot dupe jokes?

  7. Security of Firefox saves me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internal Server Error
    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    Please contact the server administrator and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

  8. Firefox? by breakbeatninja · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it has a bit more features and perhaps some better security enhancements than the vanilla Firefox installation.

    --
    shop.envescent.com - Computer hardware and more.
    1. Re:Firefox? by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

      Well, it is for Windows users. The rest of the features, spyware and malware blocking and etc, are needed to simulate running Firefox on.. well... any other operating system but Windows.

  9. Is it called Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does plugin removes IE and installs Firefox?

  10. Or you could use Firefox! by hattig · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But maybe this would be more acceptable for traditionally wary and skittish corporations?

    1. Re:Or you could use Firefox! by m50d · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine it's any easier to get a new plugin approved than a complete new browser. It shouldn't be, since most programs' plugins can execute arbitrary code.

      --
      I am trolling
  11. Woo Hooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Site is down.

    1. Re:Woo Hooo by hungrygrue · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Don't worry. I found another download site here: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ and, in case that goes down, here: http://www.ubuntulinux.org/

  12. Why not switch. . . by senortaco · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Or you could just switch to Firefox :)

  13. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that all it does?

  14. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already down... and I was ready to do it!

  15. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn wannabies...

  16. 10 seconds? I doubt it. by notdanielp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article's claims of "and an anti-spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seconds" are exceedingly hard to swallow.

    What heuristics are they using that can find and zap all unmentionables in 10 seconds? Has "anonymous reader" ever run a virus/spyware scan before?

    --
    The president has been kidnapped by ninjas!
    Are you a bad enough dude to rescue the president?
  17. How about a plugin that turns Firefox into IE... by ferrellcat · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I can make best use of my favorite Active X webapp... RemotelyAnywhere. (and yes, I know that RA uses Java as well, but the ActiveX interface is SO much nicer!)

  18. Misleading title. by RealisticCanadian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mods be damned, Scuttlemonkey's submissions are getting more and more similar to mass-media headlines. This title has the express purpose of starting a flamewar on the world's most popular anti-ms site.

    It makes IE look somewhat like firefox, and adds some lacking functionality that makes it work somewhat like firefox. The two are neither identical nor interchangable.

    --
    A couple fans told me that my last journal entry was mint; give it a shot. Hope you like.
    1. Re:Misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot needs a "flamewar" topic so that we can pile in / avoid as needed.

    2. Re:Misleading title. by DysenteryInTheRanks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am shocked that a Slashdot editor named "ScuttleMonkey" is not more dignified or intelligent in his postings. Now if you'll excuse, someone just threw poo at the back of my head.

    3. Re:Misleading title. by maelstrom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did someone named "DysenteryInTheRanks" just criticize someone named "ScuttleMonkey" for not being dignified, and is somehow surprised that someone threw poo at his head? :0

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  19. April fool's already? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    ;).

    Kind of silly not to just use Firefox, eh?

    --
    Loading...
  20. Nice, but by jcrash · · Score: 2, Funny

    any chance this has spyware, etc?

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
    1. Re:Nice, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It adds in a firewall, a spyware cleaner ("swift sweeper"), desktop search, foxie privacy cleaner, privacy shield (http/url filtering thing), groupmarks (maxthon/myie2 had this grouping of bookmarks/tabs already), and an infinity button (random sites at the click of a button!!).

      Seems like an awful lot, especially for just a 1.4 MB download. Something just seems fishy.
      "Too good to be true" seems to be echoing in my ear.

  21. Imagine a... by AVryhof · · Score: 1

    Beowulf cluster of first posts run on IE with this plugin

    1. Re:Imagine a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I modded you down, as Offtopic, 'cause your post was retarded and pointless. This note is really for any meta-mods who stroll by...

  22. Slashdotted already by afoxley · · Score: 1

    It's a conspiracy!

    1. Re:Slashdotted already by radiopillows · · Score: 1

      "YOU WERE NOT MEANT TO SEE THIS!"-Mozilla Corp. I kid. Much love for my Firefox.

  23. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdotted already

  24. Is it April 01? by sciop101 · · Score: 0

    Error 500

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  25. Wouldn't it be easier by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

    to just install Firefox?

  26. Dead by ack154 · · Score: 1

    500 Internal Server Error.

    That didn't take long at all...

    1. Re:Dead by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or maybe their Apache/Linux server is just mimicking IIS/Windows

  27. mmm.... by psallitesapienter · · Score: 1

    Is this for real?? The site has an internal (500) error. Probably hacked by M$... not.

  28. No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not April is it? No. What kind of joke is this?

    anyhow, FP!

    -- AC

  29. Or you could just use Firefox... by badmammajamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the point? There's numerous add-ons for IE that have been around for a long time now that give this kind of functionality. The only difference is that they don't try to emulate the look of firefox

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    1. Re:Or you could just use Firefox... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      You forgot the second half of your sig. The full quote is "Life is a sexually transmitted disease that is 100% fatal."

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    2. Re:Or you could just use Firefox... by gmaestro · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that refuses to let their employees use Firefox based on "security concerns." I was referred to my supervisors for it. Yes, this is incredibly stupid, but I have no say in the matter. I've been pretty happy using opera at work, but I'm definitely going to give this a try.

  30. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you wanna do that?

  31. Apparently they don't use the plugin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least not on their server(s)

  32. horray! by spyder913 · · Score: 1

    Yay! all the benefits of looking like FF without the improved website rendering or large library of useful plugins or automatic disabling of activex or ...

    1. Re:horray! by AcheronHades · · Score: 1

      You're saying Firefox has improved website rendering? Yes I know they are more standards compliant, but the majority of websites out there are designed and tested for IE first in mind. Off the top of my head I can think of 2 or 3 sites that do not render properly in Firefox, but work fine in IE. I cant think of any sites that are broken for IE but work for other browsers.

    2. Re:horray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he is saying is, Firefox renders pages correctly...IE does not. What did you not understand? I personally have not found any pages that FF can't render, but I have found countless pages that IE renders incorrectly.
      M$ is not following the standards, shy that is I have no idea? Care to explain that?

    3. Re:horray! by AcheronHades · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not follow standards but the majority of the people browsing the web DO use Internet Explorer. Because of this, the majority of websites are designed and tested to render on Internet Explorer, with other browsers such as Opera and Firefox taking a lower priority. Thats just how it is. Standards be damned, most people try to get their site to look right on IE first.

      There is a difference between rendering a page correctly, and rendering a page how the author intended. I am not saying its a good situation, but it's the situation we are in.

      Does it surprise you that much that web developers focus their energy on getting their page to render correctly in the dominant browser?

  33. Alternate Link by taskforce · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Alternate Link: here

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  34. Mom always said by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Funny

    that you can't polish a turd. I guess somebody thinks you can.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:Mom always said by AJWM · · Score: 1

      you can't polish a turd

      Sure you can. You can even add a gold handle and cabochon sapphires. The parallel here should be obvious -- deep down it's still a turd.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Mom always said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you can polish a turd, all right. You can make that fucker shine. And the best part is, most people are too stupid to realize that it's still a turd.

      Don't take my word for it, though. Ask the people in Hollywood, or in Microsoft, or in the recording industry, or anywhere that there are millions of dollars to be had by applying this principle. It's true.

    3. Re:Mom always said by jcenters · · Score: 1
      ...you can't polish a turd...

      You can if you freeze it.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    4. Re:Mom always said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt your mom had you in mind when she said it.

  35. Reply by zymano · · Score: 1

    There's more to FF than just tabbed browsing. I like the security.

    1. Re:Reply by brouski · · Score: 1

      There's more to /. than reading the headlines, as well.

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  36. Opera by bendu · · Score: 1

    and right now it's free!!! my.opera.com

  37. Its crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Crazybrowser for years, if this interests you crazy is also worth a look.
    http://www.crazybrowser.com/

  38. If its just like firefox... by bulio · · Score: 1

    Then why not just get Firefox? It'll give you everything this plguin has, and more.

  39. old news by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

    yeah its called firefox. It even adds an nifty little fox icon so you can start browsing in firefox mode right away. Simply delete the redundant blue 'e' from the desktop if it confuses you.

  40. Returning to IE by QuantumPion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used FireFox for a while, but I recently returned to using IE. The reason is that there were too many websites that displayed incorrectly or used plug-ins that weren't supported by FireFox. Also there were a lot of minor annoyances that weren't fixable with plug-ins alone.

    As a tech-savvy net browser, I am able to avoid/repair any spam or malware I might pick up with IE, so displaying pages correctly and avoiding the various small bugs of FireFox was what led me back to Microsoft. I'm sure there are many people out there who think like I do, and this plug-in will certainly bring more people back to IE from FireFox. Adding tabbed browsing and security fixes to IE will be the deciding factor in slowing the migration to third-party browsers. Why compromise surfing if plug-ins like this give all the functionality of FireFox to the correct** rendering capabilities and ease of use of IE?

    **I know that many web pages are indeed programmed "incorrectly" and suffer from many programming errors, which is probably the cause of Firefox's rendering issues. However, as the end user in no position to fix such problems on the web site's end, I have little alternative then to use IE's sloppy but visually correct rendering.

    1. Re:Returning to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      " However, as the end user in no position to fix such problems on the web site's end, I have little alternative then to use IE's sloppy but visually correct rendering."

      Way to be part of the problem. Thanks for not helping man.

      There's no reason for people to fix those pages if everyone just switches back to IE.

    2. Re:Returning to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not firefox rendering that needs correction it's the all the busted websites that only work with IE that need correction. Don't fool yourself, firefox will render a standard page properly, what it does not render properly are all the MS hacks needed to support IE

      Have you tried the most recent version of Firefox? It has gotten much better than it was at the beginning of the year....

    3. Re:Returning to IE by dxprog · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to know I'm not the only person out there who's used Firefox and still prefers IE, though I use IE because of speed and simplicity (couldn't care less about tabbed browsing).

      --
      DxBlog - It's where you want to be
    4. Re:Returning to IE by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      How come you didn't try another alternative? There are a few out there (although I can only think of opera right now) that might suit you a little better.

      Unfortunatly I don't know the capabilities of anything that's not IE or firefox but I'm sure you could find some sort of compromise.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    5. Re:Returning to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you could try Opera, since they're still giving away free registration codes today, making the browser free as in beer.

    6. Re:Returning to IE by yennieb · · Score: 1

      So in other words, as an end-user, you are powerless to stand against Microsoft's underhanded business practices. There is nothing "correct" about IE's rendering- it's wildly incorrect.

      Simply put, website developers spend more time making sure that their _content_ displays correctly in IE, not that IE correctly displays their content. There is a big difference.

      Basically, users like you are the major force slowing down web development, because any site that takes advantage of advanced (and STANDARDIZED) practices is killed by Microsoft's refusal to supply a browser that can render them.

      I just bought an excellent book- Professional CSS. Every chapter ends with a section "Dealing with Internet Explorer". High profile case-studies are included, and in some cases they spend more effort "dealing" with the worthless capabilites of IE than developing the site in the first place.

      Sure, if you need IE to access your bank account by all means use it. But refusing to use an alternate browser for general use just makes you a "tech-savvy" user contributing to the demise of tech-savvy websites.

    7. Re:Returning to IE by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      Newer Firefox versions have a tool called Reporter. If you click "Report Broken Website" in the help menu you can actually help to improve firefox and the broken websites.
      go for it!

      i for one don't know a single webpage that isnt displayed correctly in firefox.

      --
      IAAL
    8. Re:Returning to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I spend a number of hours surfing the web each days with Firefox, and I know of only _two_ sites which will not work with IE...and guess what? I avoid those site like the plague.

      No, I don't even load up IE to view them. Too much trouble!

    9. Re:Returning to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...my only grief with FireFox was indeed 'bad' pages with content that would not render completely or properly (if at all !) ..

      With little effort I found the IEView extension which allows my to right-click on the 'offending' page in IE & launch it in MaxThon or IE - try it, you'll like it & be able to return to speedier/better FireFox !

      I setup all my FireFox installations with IEView & TabBrowser Extension both which I find invaluable.

    10. Re:Returning to IE by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Actually the end user is, but most are scared about the ways to fix websites.

      I have seen 3 methods of varying effectiveness to fix broken websites.

      1) Complain to the webmaster. Believe it or not, more and more companies are fixing their sites to work right in other browsers. This is the best, because you are not locked into any browser this way, nor any OS.

      2) Use the power of your browser. Try changing your UID - Opera has F12 + UA.ini and FireFox has User Agent Switcher. Opera and FireFox both support (more or less) User CSS and User Javascript, which can fix a lot of sites. There are pages devoted to this. With Opera, broken sites reported via Help -> Report a site problem have fixes pushed to the browser once a week - no need for action. However, if that takes too long, Userjs.org has fixes as do the forums.

      3) On windows, use the most powerful web your way tool in existance, The Proxomitron. Grab a set if lazy, or customize yourself. Many sets include numerous automatic site fixes - once installed you don't even notice them. You can also get specific fixes written on request at various prox forums - the best being the Yahoo groups prox-list.

      4) Finally, look for a competitiors site! Let your wallet do the talking, believe me, companies will notice! Be sure to mail the company and tell them why you were unable to purchase their product or service.

      Now, none of the above are 100% guaranteed to fix all sites, but the vast majority can be fixed that way. Of course, if you don't mind being locked into Windows + IE forever, then your solution works as well. I just dislike being locked into one companies products, and try and find ways to be mobile if something gets unusable from them.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    11. Re:Returning to IE by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm glad to know I'm not the only person out there who's used Firefox and still prefers IE, though I use IE because of speed and simplicity (couldn't care less about tabbed browsing).

      There are a lot of people that do this, though I think it is unfortunate.

      As for speed, I'm OK with Firefox all the way down to a 400MHz Pentium II. Sure, IE is faster but for the IMO minor speed increase you get the malware risk. I'd rather spend another sub-second waiting for a page to render than spend an evening removing malware or weekend reinstalling the OS.

      As for simplicity, I use adblock and flashblock to hide the excessive ads. There are ad and flashblockers for IE too, but those aren't as elegant, IMO.

    12. Re:Returning to IE by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      **I know that many web pages are indeed programmed "incorrectly" and suffer from many programming errors, which is probably the cause of Firefox's rendering issues. However, as the end user in no position to fix such problems on the web site's end, I have little alternative then to use IE's sloppy but visually correct rendering.

      Why not use both? I have IE sitting on my Linux desktop. Anytime I have site that won't work, I use IE. For the rest I use Firefox. Firefox is a much better experiance, why not just you both?

    13. Re:Returning to IE by P0ldy · · Score: 1

      The alternative is to stop supporting sites who don't support any kind of open standard. You're essentially giving them incentive not to code properly.

  41. Now I need a plugin... by LegendOfLink · · Score: 1

    ...that makes my WinXP resemble my Linux box...but without all of those neat little security features and everything.

    1. Re:Now I need a plugin... by Professional+Slacker · · Score: 1
      There's a virtual desktop manager from Microsoft in the XP power toys
      <plug mode=fanboy target=stardock>
      Star Dock's Window Blinds get rid of a lot of the ugly
      And object dock because everybody (execpt OSX users) has dock envy
      </plug>


      It makes Windows bearable for those to lazy to setup WINE for gaming

      If you really want to go over the top you could install cygwin/X and KDE, but be warned it's slow and ugly.

      So do I get a prize or something?
      --
      A Free Market requires informed intelligent consumers, such people are rare, we're in trouble.
  42. IE 7 by fr1kk · · Score: 1

    I think its caclled IE 7. Even the shortcuts are the same, as well as tabs and search box in the upper right corner, with selectable search engines.

    --
    sig: Playfully doing something difficult, whether useful or not
  43. Really ? by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

    Does it remove the vulnerabilities and other bugs ?

  44. Momentary layout change? by stevejsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone else see that for a second (or maybe longer?) the format of Slashdot changed? "Read more" was replaced by the headline title, the right sidebars were gone...?

    I don't think it could have been a glitch in the rendering; it looked too orderly and intentioned. ...even, good!

    1. Re:Momentary layout change? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      How about next time it happens, take a screenshot? LOL

    2. Re:Momentary layout change? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      You're already using FoxIE? Or did you just have a deja-vu?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:Momentary layout change? by SamSim · · Score: 2, Funny

      *fwash* There was no alternate Slashdot layout. What you saw was light from the planet Venus, refracted through swamp gas.

    4. Re:Momentary layout change? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      And you need to run out and hire a CSS designer, 'cause: DAMN.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  45. Hardly "turn IE into firefox" by m50d · · Score: 1

    So, it's actually just another alternative IE shell, with the slight difference that it's loaded by the IE executable rather than being a separate executable and using the IE rendering dll. Tabbed browsing etc. can be had in plenty of such shells, e.g. slimbrowser, and most will include a "firewall" or similar, not that they're usually effective at stopping all the malware IE is all too happy to run but it's better than nothing if the user is an idiot. It doesn't fix the most fundamental problem with IE, its broken nonstandard rendering.

    --
    I am trolling
  46. Urgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so it still has the insanely buggy IE rendering engine, which has been holding webdevelopers back for the last five years.

    Firefox is specifically being popularized to further the state of webstandards, to promote openness and choice on the internet. (See the mission statement of the Mozilla Foundation.) Alternatives to Firefox that focus purely on such superficial features are about the worst thing that can happen. (Let's hope the 500 server error will remain for a long time to come.)

  47. Why bother? by FireFlie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see the point. If you want it to look, feel, and act like firefox, why not get firefox. Yes that is the redundant part. As for the office (scuttlemonkey's idea for a place where this can be useful): if you're equipment is being held so tightly that you can't install firefox, don't you think installing this will get you fired? Many companies keep really tight control over such equipment. Seriously, this is interesting for any ie fanboys, but I don't see any practical application for such an extension (nor do I envision a market for such a thing).

    1. Re:Why bother? by crina · · Score: 1

      ie fanboys? I didn't realize there were any...

    2. Re:Why bother? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
      > ie fanboys? I didn't realize there were any...

      Sure there are: virus writers, phishers, identity thieves, etc.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Why bother? by Wazukkithemaster · · Score: 1

      You dont see the practical application of improved security? Well... ok... You dont see the market for Windows software? Well... ok...

      --
      Live according to the Categorical Imperative. If the Categorical Imperative tells you not to live by it... ignore it
    4. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If someone is concerned about security, using internet explorer is not a good idea regardless of what plugins you have. If one is truely concerned with security, using widows is probably not the best idea. Well... ok...

    5. Re:Why bother? by Jacer · · Score: 1

      How about this idea. Firefox doesn't always render pages correctly, because a lot of them are designed with IE in mind. As Firefox gains market share, there are going to be less pages like this, but take my school for example. A lot of the registration and university management sites won't render properly in anything else, or I get error messages saying I'm not using a certified browser. So, let's go beyond that, maybe people in an office need access to intranet sites that won't render in anything but IE, but want to incorporate tabbed browsing to clean up their desktops thereby making them more efficent workers. The availablity of such a browser-plugin could be a godsend. I myself use Firefox for everything except managing my university stuff.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    6. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Boo hoo hoo. Firefox won't work with my skools web site. Waaaah.

      Grow up enough to realize: 1. There are more than two internet browsers in the world (netscape and opera for example). 2. The situation you are describing is remote at best, and will probably be true for like 5 people nationwide. 3. Grow up.

    7. Re:Why bother? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      as far as pages not rendering in non-IE browsers, firefox does have a UserAgent plugin that helps with that. True, it won't work for all IE-only sites, but I think it helps cut down on some of the failures (there's less and less of those all the time anyway). The plugin changes your user agent string so the site you are visiting thinks you are using IE. Then there's always the "open in IE" plugin I saw somewhere...

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    8. Re:Why bother? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      IF I visit a web site and it doesn't work with FF then I figure they won't want me there. I stop visiting that site. Sometimes I email them and tell them but my experience tells me that those people just don't care about anybody who isn't using windows and IE. Several have emailed me angry responses telling me that there was something wrong with me because I didn't use IE.

      If it's a business I don't shop there, if it's a hobby web site I don't believe in going places where you are not wanted.

      The only exception to this is the microsoft web sites where I have to go sometimes and I have to use IE because most of their pages don't work in FF.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Why bother? by tepples · · Score: 1

      IF I visit a web site and it doesn't work with FF then I figure they won't want me there. I stop visiting that site.

      What happens when the ten-year-old in your house finds that an ActiveX based game on cartoonnetwork.com won't load in Firefox and finds where you hid IE?

    10. Re:Why bother? by Jacer · · Score: 1

      I don't really have an option. I have to do my my registration/financial aide/bill play/housing/and even some courses on the interweb... Are you suggesting I transfer schools just so that I don't have to use IE?

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    11. Re:Why bother? by fanblade · · Score: 1

      If you want it to look, feel, and act like firefox, why not get firefox.

      Because we don't want it to act like Firefox. We want our browsers to act like IE in terms of speed and compatibility.

    12. Re:Why bother? by Jacer · · Score: 1

      Boo hoo hoo. Firefox won't work with my skools web site. Waaaah. So, wait. I'm supposed to grow up yet you're the one with the sarcastic mockery. Ok, I'll bite. The point I made was an extremly valid case example for the parent post who argued that a plug-in of this nature didn't really have a base of interested users. I expressed a few cases including my own that shows how it could be a useful tool. Furthermore, IE is the only certified browser. Opera seems to render things decently well, but I don't really want to stare ad banner ads while browsing around. So, it would seem that I'm more grown up, and you're just an AC troll.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    13. Re:Why bother? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Are you suggesting I transfer schools just so that I don't have to use IE?"

      I feel sorry for you. Your school has no respect for it's students, it has no respect for standards, it's management has no clue about how to build web sites, it's student's (or contractors) are unable to build web sites that work in more then one browser.

      Lucky for me I am not in school anymore, I would hate to have chosen such a clueless school. If they can't build a web site that works in more then one browser imagine how screwed up the rest of their stuff is.

      I am not saying you should leave, but if I were you I would ask the administration why your school is incapable of writing web sites that follow standards. It's a serious question and it should be answered.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    14. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this idea. Firefox doesn't always render pages correctly, because a lot of them are designed with IE in mind.

      And IE also doesn't always render pages correctly, because a lot of them are designed with web standards in mind...

    15. Re:Why bother? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      So you are going to let 10 year olds choose what technology you use to surf the web? Why not let them choose your car, which news papers you read, which magazines you subscibe to and what clothes you wear too?

      Why are you letting your kids dictate how you live your life and which products you use?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    16. Re:Why bother? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I know. I, and others, complained to my school (A state school no less) and the next year there was a whole new web site design that worked in all browsers.

      Remember you are paying them - feel free to complain.

      That said, be thankful your school isn't dictating what AV and firewall you use like LaSalle does.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    17. Re:Why bother? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Well, you could buy the better product. Or get it free from any of a number of promotions. They may still be giving out free reg codes, you should look.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    18. Re:Why bother? by typical · · Score: 1

      Websites that are incompatible with a webbrowser (and that includes IE, not just FF) are without fail crap. I don't think I've *ever* seen such a website existing in the competitive world (such as, say, search engines, or game review sites, and so forth). The only places this happens are when some idiot "developer" manages to get funding to do some intranet work and then policy gets pushed through to force people to use the guy's site.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    19. Re:Why bother? by typical · · Score: 1

      ...to act like IE in terms of speed and compatibility.

      Okay, I can understand IE being more compatible with IE, but faster rendering? Not on my Windows box at work, that's for sure.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    20. Re:Why bother? by Jacer · · Score: 1

      I go to a state school. They don't dictate what AV/firewall software to use, but they do provide site liscensing for McAfee. We pay for it w/ tuition I'll bet, but still.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  48. Next Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will patent Firefox.

  49. Plugin Control by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it remove disable all the plugins that were installed without my permission, including Genuine Advantage?

    1. Re:Plugin Control by Kalak · · Score: 1

      Winpatrol.

      Disables IE Plugins and some other good features as well.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
  50. What about fixing IE's broken rendering engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A big part of what makes Firefox good is its Gecko rendering engine, which happens to be much better at rendering web content according to w3c specifications than IE does.

    Does this plugin address any of that? I'm guessing not, since it wouldn't likely be possible to do that with IE through a simple plugin. At any rate, that makes this thing much less interesting IMO.

  51. But does it run extensions? by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

    You thought I was going to say Linux. Seriously, interface isn't what made FF popular. If it was that simple, Opera would have crushed FF a long time ago.

    It's customizability. One of Dreamweaver's most competitive features is the ability to write plugins for it in known languages -- JavaScript and XML. Guess what FF plugins are written in.

    A product with a locked featureset is going to suffer against a product you can upgrade piece by piece for free. There are people out there who hate this, but they're slowly figuring out they're the minority.

    Good luck improving IE 7. I'm a web designer and I welcome the adoption of standards. But even if FF is losing momentum, it's still going to be with us for some time -- or another cross-platform open-source alternative.

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    1. Re:But does it run extensions? by m50d · · Score: 1
      You thought I was going to say Linux. Seriously, interface isn't what made FF popular. If it was that simple, Opera would have crushed FF a long time ago.

      No, Opera failed (in that it hasn't conquered the internet) because of the ads/paying. That was all. FF is popular because it's an IE alternative and there's an insane level of fanboyism for it, particularly here. Partly it's that firefox is in many ways the open source poster child. Everyone and their dog is switching their grandma to firefox to get away from IE, wheras people didn't do that with Opera.

      It's customizability. One of Dreamweaver's most competitive features is the ability to write plugins for it in known languages -- JavaScript and XML. Guess what FF plugins are written in.

      Customisability isn't what makes the difference, if it was winamp would still be king of the media players. "You can get that through plugins" all too often becomes an excuse for not including features. You complain that you can't even drag tabs around in firefox and the response is "get tabbrowser extensions". And extensions have been responsible for most of the publicised flaws I've seen in firefox. A program which is designed to deal with remote data should not be running complete programming languages, and even sandboxed execution should be avoided whenever possible. Anything less is a security nightmare.

      A product with a locked featureset is going to suffer against a product you can upgrade piece by piece for free.

      New features are what new versions are for. Opera 8 added integrated bittorrent (I think). And you don't need to hunt down new versions of your 600 plugins when you upgrade.

      There are people out there who hate this, but they're slowly figuring out they're the minority.

      I don't care if I'm the last person thinking this, a product with more features is still better than one with less even if the one with less supports plugins. If I really need a feature I'll write the code to do it myself.

      But even if FF is losing momentum, it's still going to be with us for some time -- or another cross-platform open-source alternative.

      Hopefully it will be another cross-platform open-source alternative - one that's better.

      --
      I am trolling
  52. Slashdotted by jatemack · · Score: 0

    an anti-spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seconds"
    Try and download your copy today, from a site that can be slashdotted in less than 10 seconds!

    --
    // no
  53. Can it... by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can it replace the broken rendering engine with Gecko too? Simple PNG transparency support, unbroken absolute positioning, this kind of stuff?
    Does it support popup blocking? Find-as-you-type?
    well...

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Can it... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Popup blocking has been a part of IE since January or so, so there's no reason for a plugin to add a redundant function.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    2. Re:Can it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, on Windows XP with SP2 there is popup blocking, but Firefox can run on every Windows version. I assume that the person writing this plugin wanted it to run at least on every Windows version that Firefox can run on.

  54. would FF do the reverse? by ValuJet · · Score: 1

    and make a FF browser that looks like IE and uses their non-standard way of reading websites. I have to use IE for work related sites, but i use FF for everything else, it would be nice to have all of MS's hacks and non-standard code work in firefox. For those of us forced to use it.

  55. Not very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they wanted to make IE like firefox it would have to use 90% of your ram, freeze randomly, and crash at least once a week.

  56. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by spyder913 · · Score: 5, Funny

    format c: /q /x /y

  57. A wolf in sheeps clothing... by jbuzzell · · Score: 1

    is still a wolf.

  58. The firewall's working already! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    It's working already! I just tried to go to a site called "http://www.getfoxie.com/" and instead of a dangerous web site, I got a harmless "Internal Server Error" instead. Woot! Woot!

  59. All the cookies and security holes of IE by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    with the added features of Firefox!

    um, yeah.

    Now if they'd just fix the music.yahoo.com so it works properly in Firefox, this might not actually be appealing ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  60. Who is this for? by almostmanda · · Score: 1

    Who is going to use this? What demographic is this targetting? There's not a platform out there that supports IE but not FF. People who can't install Firefox on public/work machines due to lowered permissions won't be able to install this either. People who want Firefox will use Firefox. This plugin serves no purpose, and the "gets rid of ALL spyware in TEN seconds" line sounds like magical marketing-speak.

    1. Re:Who is this for? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Who is going to use this? What demographic is this targetting? There's not a platform out there that supports IE but not FF.

      Well, there is the Mac and Linux platforms ...

      but there's always Opera for that.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Who is this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE for Linux, are you stupid?

      Here, this is a clue stick, beat yourself with it until you are less of an idiot.

  61. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by op12 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's the website's claim:
    Yahoo Cache

    Oddly, Google does not have the page cached.

  62. link's dead by Jebediah_Mourn · · Score: 1

    site's already dead...slashdotted. :(

  63. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by notdanielp · · Score: 1

    Touche!

    --
    The president has been kidnapped by ninjas!
    Are you a bad enough dude to rescue the president?
  64. Yeah, That's what I want by dreadfire · · Score: 1

    I want to use make a crappy browser (IE) look like Firefox, instead of going to the website and downloading the 10 meg file and just use Firefox.

  65. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot. A much larger percentage us than you will find elsewhere have, in fact, never run a virus or spyware scan because we are not running Windows, so chances are very good that "anonymous reader" has not. Neither have I, in fact.

  66. But wait there's more! by Prospero's+Grue · · Score: 1
    ...Moreover, the plugin improves IE's privacy and security by integrating a firewall designed to block out Internet exploits, phishing sites, spammers, spyware and worms, with a special HTTP filter that removes private data, and an anti-spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seconds"

    Once the plugin changes IE to Firefox, and prevents you from ever having to worry about internet security again; you can use it to pay your bills on-line, clean your floors, intercept calls from your mother-in-law, throw out the old vegetables in your fridge, test your smoke detectors, rotate your tires, and remove that icky stuff that forms on your shower walls...

    ...that is, you could if the site wasn't slashdotted.

    Pity.

    --
    The opinion above is fiction. Any similarity to real opinions, including facts and logic, is purely coincidental.
  67. Perfect by Brain_Recall · · Score: 1
    I can see this being distributed as either a "good" worm or some piece of "good" spyware.

    But then I wonder, just what is a "good worm" or "good spyware." Good, maybe to John Q. Public, but maybe not to Microsoft (as it would be showing the major flaws in IE).
    Of course, the right of what software to install should be in the hands of the user, but what if this thing stopped zombies from being created? Would we be willing to break a few rules "for the better good?"

  68. It Won't Be Even Close... by DJCater · · Score: 1

    Maxthon does a similar thing. Is a browser even close to equalling Firefox just because it looks the same? If it doesn't run on Gecko, how is it even close? It won't render anything as well as Firefox does. I remember when Maxthon first came out and people shouted for the Firefox users to switch, after all, it was 'exactly the same', just 'better'.

    If it runs on Microsoft stuff, it ain't no good!

    --
    Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:It Won't Be Even Close... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1



      So Firefox for windows "ain't no good"?

      Personally, I was using Maxthon (MyIE) long before Firefox was released. My first browser was Netscape. I've used everything from Lynx to K-Meleon. Opera was my choice until they overloaded the interface. I've tried Firefox - I like Maxthon better. I can choose to surf as loose or tight as I want and switch on the fly. There are a large number of plugins that extend the massive array of built-in features. Best of all, it offers extreme customization options.

      Yeah, FF is a good browser, but it's not all that innovative and it has its own set of problems, just like all software. In the end it comes down to individual taste. Looking at the behavior of the Mozilla bunch lately, I can't even see switching to FF because Mozilla represents 'the good guys'. Not any more. Kind of sad really...

      billy - google? OK, I'm willing to listen...

    2. Re:It Won't Be Even Close... by DJCater · · Score: 1

      You've misunderstood (partly due to my poor wording.) "Runs on Microsoft" meant the browser runs on a Microsoft engine (I forget what it's called) and not Gecko, or the other good engines. This makes it bad whatever the front-end looks like. The underlying engine is holding back the web to it's numerous rendering problems and lack of support for many parts of many specs.

      --
      Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  69. Check out Avant Browser by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am the only hacker I know who actually prefers IE (security zones are a killer feature once you fix the stupid defaults), but I do miss tabbed browsing. A while ago, I went looking for tabbed browsing for IE and came across Avant Browser. It's an MDI interface for IE, each tab containing an IE web browser control. My only complaint is a user interface bug where it loses focus in the browser control itself when I alt-tab to a different application. I'll have to try this new plug-in and see if it's any better.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    1. Re:Check out Avant Browser by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      You could also try Maxthon. IE with most of the FF features.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    2. Re:Check out Avant Browser by jdray · · Score: 1

      I've been using AvantBrowser on my work computer for some time and I find it to be what IE should be. It's hard to get used to tabs at the bottom when I'm used to Firefox's tabs at the top, but other than that I'm quite pleased.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    3. Re:Check out Avant Browser by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      The whole "tabs at the bottom" thing was fixed as soon as I found out I could unlock and reposition the tab bar. :)

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  70. BugMeNot by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Does it include automatic BugMeNot capability?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  71. Am I the only one thinking this is a joke? by infonography · · Score: 1

    Ok the slashdot effect is well known but Google has only three pages cached and there isn't anything elsewhere.

    What would Admiral Ackbar do?

    Yell: It's a Trap!

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  72. Re:How about a plugin that turns Firefox into IE.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can use MeadCo's Neptune plugin which allows ActiveX to work in Opera and FireFox.

    http://www.meadroid.com/neptune//

  73. Niceness! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    All right, for all you "just use firefox" idiots, there are unfortunately times when you need to use IE (like for some non-standard compliant web based software - hell there are times when I need to fire up IE under wine on my main box, a debian machine). This is a nice compromise.

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  74. this is everywhere... by tont0r · · Score: 1

    fools gold looks like gold, but look on the inside, its crap. cubic zirconia looks like a diamond, but look on the inside, its crap. IE LOOKS like firefox but....

  75. Coral Cache by appavi · · Score: 1

    Site Slashdotted. Coral Cached
    http://www.getfoxie.com.nyud.net:8090/

  76. but the rendering! by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    unless it fixes the (bad) rendering and let's me use firefox plugins, i don't want it!

  77. Merry Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  78. Why stop at the browser.. by delire · · Score: 1


    Cross-dressing is nothing to be ashamed of. Plug-in the real you here.

  79. Trademark infringement? by Niten · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Trademark infringement, anyone? Did you see their logo? And the layout of their web page is clearly designed to blur the distinction between the Mozilla Foundation and whatever organization or company owns this project.

    It appears to me that this group is trying to piggy-back on the success of the Firefox name and image in order to further their own product.

    1. Re:Trademark infringement? by truesaer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll just bet you weren't saying this about Lindows when Microsoft was sueing them.

    2. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean this?

      Internal Server Error
      The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

      Please contact the server administrator and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
    3. Re:Trademark infringement? by rpozz · · Score: 1

      On http://www.getfoxie.com.nyud.net:8090/contact/ (actual site is /.ed):

      "If you're interested in contributing money to support the Mozilla Project, there are many ways to donate."

      Which does NOT link to a donation page for the Mozilla Project. Maybe a mistake when copying and pasting from the Firefox site? This smells like a scam. Has anyone actually tested this thing, and made sure it isn't full of spyware or any other crap?

    4. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. Quite different, really. "Windows" is a generic term in the GUI field that should have never been allowed to become a trademark. Indeed, if the courts weren't so blinkered to think Microsoft had pioneered "windows," and had a rightful monopoly on the market for "windows," the outcome might have actually been fair.

      In this case, the trademark was clearly invented by Mozilla to represent their browser product (remember the false starts?) and by using it to promote another product, the creators are merely trying to leverage the good will of the name. I think Linspire might have been trying to do the opposite to that- "Lindows" is almost mocking in its tone!

      I agree with others: smells like a scam.

    5. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, your post just reminds me of when I was in third grade and my family bought our second computer, a Macintosh Quadra (the first one was an ancient laptop with no hard drive). I knew nothing except that Macs had these nifty "windows" that had icons and stuff in them. So when we went to the store and bought software I always thought we could get the Windows version of software because "Macs have windows!".

      So perhaps I'm willing to side with you on the issue of "windows" being untrademarkable. But as far as "Lindows" being mocking in tone? I think that's only true if you already know something about Linux and have an anti-MS bias. Kinda like how to me a lot of things George W. Bush say make him sound like he's making fun of himself or his ideas, because I quite frankly have a bias against his ideas (I recognize this, and try to give him the fairest shot I can, though).

  80. Full mirror of article by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    here

    It wasn't obvious to me if you needed to be admin to install. If so, it kind of blows the argument of giving corporate types who are locked to IE an alternative.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Full mirror of article by yffe · · Score: 1

      And full mirror of whole site.

  81. Nothing New by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new... Maxthon (formerly known as myIE2) has been doing everything but the "firewall" for years. It uses the IE engine, but behaves like a separate browser.

  82. Perfect Anti-Spyware tool??? by whereizben · · Score: 1

    How can they possibly claim "an anti-spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seconds"??? I have never seen or heard of any anti-spyware, ad-ware, or virus tool that can remove absolutely everything. Now I can't get to the real site to see what it actually says, but the post does seem very misleading in that respect, because I don't think that it is possible to identify and remove all pests in 10 seconds!!! Or even ever!

  83. Mirror by sammykrupa · · Score: 1

    Mirror of Foxie!. Even the download link works!

  84. why not use Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone waste his time trying to patch a crappy browser instead of simply using a better one to begin with? I don't quite understand that.

  85. Pwned!!!! by Jubii · · Score: 1

    Poor server never saw it coming... :(

    --

    I planned on inserting something witty here but never got around to it.
  86. OK, have installed it. Report time: by Plug · · Score: 4, Informative

    There appears to be nothing in the EULA that makes it claim to be spyware/adware.

    It's heavily tied in with Ask Jeeves; it comes bundled with their desktop search, and you can't change the search button to go anywhere else.

    It comes with a desktop firewall, spyware cleaner and privacy shredder (cookie/temp files deleter) but I'll leave someone with a clean VM image to try those things on thankyou!

    While it would be nice to have tabs and a search box in IE, those are not the features of Firefox that make me use it. If you did something like "block ActiveX in IE", you'd get close, but then all those things that require IE wouldn't work.

    The adblocker works. It displays boxes with "Ad blocked" rather than no ad at all, and lets you show them by clicking on them.

    I look after a lot of people who need to keep using IE for various sites, but I still think that Firefox for general browsing and icons on the desktop for broken sites is the best option.

    Hats off to the Foxie people though; it's not OSS and it's likely to be funded/sponsored by a search engine, but will be interesting to see if it gets better. It might be worth throwing on the PCs of people who need to use IE for regular browsing.

  87. Firefox is much more than all that by PinkX · · Score: 0

    The rendering engine remains unchanged. Gecko, the rendering engine behind Firefox and all other Mozilla products/projects is what would make the real difference between them and any IE based piece of software.

    When someone creates a plugin which would let replace the broken rendering engine of IE (I don't remember how it's called) with Gecko then that would be newsworthy.

    1. Re:Firefox is much more than all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When someone creates a plugin which would let replace the broken rendering engine of IE (I don't remember how it's called) with Gecko then that would be newsworthy.

      Gecko isnt much better either. It has a bunch of problems on its own(which I dont have time to mention here). The reason I (a webdev) use firefox is not because of gecko but because of the extra stuff I can get for it like Adblock, Js debugger, tabs and all that other stuff. Replacing gecko with IEs rendering engine would solve nothing except you'd only have to deal with the problems of one browser and not two.
    2. Re:Firefox is much more than all that by PinkX · · Score: 1

      I do a lot of webdevelopment myself, and the Gecko engine is indeed a pretty good thing to justify its existence on its own.

      I agree with you on the existence of all the developer tools for Firefox, I use them myself. However I like my CSS and DOM stuff to work as intended, just as their specs told them to do. When using Firefox (or even Safari) I don't have to try out things a lot, as they just work as they should right after writing them. But with Internet Explorer is another thing altogether, I've found a bunch of bugs on the DOM parser that had made me use some ugly, non-standard stuff (like innerHTML) and hacking the CSS to make it work over Internet Explorer, and I'm not even using the selectors that IE ignores.

      And don't get me started on the different versions of Internet Explorer out there, those guys aren't even compatible with themselves, they can't agree on anything: IE6sp1 isn't the same on different Windows versions, so standards-driven web development is a nightmare.

      Regards.

  88. Placebo browser by porneL · · Score: 1

    Does it improve CSS rendering? Does it support Firefox extensions?

    Basic functionality and GUI aren't Firefox features worth copying.

    1. Re:Placebo browser by rnturn · · Score: 1

      "Does it improve CSS rendering?"

      That's the question I'm wondering about. (If there's an answer to this on the web site, I'll have to read about it laster. The site seems to have been fairly well slashdotted). I couldn't care less if the folks using IE that visit a web site have tabs available but it sure as heck would be nice to not have to arrange two different versions of the web site or include all sorts of CSS kludges to work around IE's rendering bugs. (Though I suppose it would still be necessary to have a bare-bones stylesheet for those who haven't obtained the plug-in yet.)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  89. A frosted turd is still a turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a turd and applying some frosting does not make it into chocolate cake. To make IE secure, you'd probably have to turn off the features that allow the FF plug-in to run.

  90. What good is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its main interest to me is for a customer who's choice in Digital camera means I have to leave his default browser set to IE. Otherwise the camera software breaks in annoying ways.

          If this can give him the same security as his co-workers and not break the camera software then it's great.
          Time will tell.

  91. Nice Work by mstyne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hahaha, slashdot.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  92. Re:OK, have installed it. Report time: by Plug · · Score: 1

    Have now run the spyware sweeper. Damned right it's fast; came up in 2 seconds, and with four hits. Asking for details on them included "host redirector" (windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts) and "search redirector" (registry entries, shown without values, probably as a result of installing Google Toolbar).

    Nothing at all like a "full" antispyware scanner like Spybot or MS/Giant AntiSpyware.

  93. now if they just had.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a plugin that lets users turn Windows into Linux

  94. firefox is definitely easier for tabbed browsing by Brown+Eggs · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I tend to use ctrl+T a LOT for generating new tabs. I don't like the fact that you have to use the little green plus on the foxie toolbar to add the tab. That, and foxie seemed to mixup the google toolbar and the foxie toolbar when I was trying to turn one (or the other) off. I had to turn off the foxie toolbar to turn off the google toolbar. Maybe this wasn't ready enough to be called an IE->Firefox plugin

  95. In the news.. by xWastedMindx · · Score: 1

    Getfoxie.com sued by the Mozilla Foudation for resemblance and stealing all likeliness. IE users become saddened that they have to continue using plain ole IE.

  96. Well that's cool and all but... by nicktripp · · Score: 1

    Does it also make IE standards compliant? Add transparent png support? No thanks.

  97. Re:Let's just fix the problem then. by GecKo213 · · Score: 1, Funny
    What I need is a Firefox-plugin that looks exactly like IE (including the lack of tabs and search box) while still providing the same level of security.

    Once we had that, then we could code a new type of worm that installed firefox through an IE exploit (Ironic!) that looked exactly like IE. Once that was done the worm could attempt to send itself out to a certain number of computers and then terminate completely and remove all traces of itself. It's Brilliant! The best thing is that no one would know!



    Of course then you may end up giving MS a big head. THey may think something like, "Look, we finally fixed most of it!"

    -- Afternoon Satire
    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  98. Enough!! by seriesrover · · Score: 3, Insightful
    of the "just use Firefox" comments. I pressume using this train on thought we should scrap WINE, OpenOffice and other "Linux emulating Windows" software.

    Just for one second PLEASE realize that there are legitimate reasons for this plugin. They might not be reasons you would choose, or it could be that are forced on you (businesses), but they are valid nonetheless.

    1. Re:Enough!! by bstadil · · Score: 1
      I pressume using this train on thought we should scrap WINE, OpenOffice and other "Linux emulating Windows" software.

      except Windows cost money and the Wine, OO.o etc. is free

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    2. Re:Enough!! by seriesrover · · Score: 1

      Well, its *not* free - it costs someone development time. But the criteria of which product to use isn't often done on cost. Infact, as history dictates, many products that have high adoption rates are quite expensive.

    3. Re:Enough!! by gitreel · · Score: 1

      Which would you rather have when they cost the same? A Ferarri or a car that looks like a Ferarri. You would choose the Ferarri. That is why you should just use FireFox.

      --
      Never have so few words meant so little to so many people.
    4. Re:Enough!! by seriesrover · · Score: 0, Troll
      what an excellent demonstration in words as to why the vast majority of non tech savvy users continue to have a poor impression of Linux et al. If the OSS community is serious about getting market dominance then it will stop underestimating MS and other rivals.

      You're statement is baffling in just about every way. A car that costs the same as a Ferarri and looks like a Ferrari IS a Ferrari. Thats what people care about. My wife doesn't like Mercedes because she doesn't like the tail lights. Telling her she is an idiot for liking other cars is not the way to get her to buy a Mercedes.

    5. Re:Enough!! by gitreel · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily..... Why would you want something that looks like something instead of just using the real thing? I do not have a poor impression of Linux and I am a system administrator. Why would you want to use an insecure browser and dress it up like FireFox, when you can use a more secure browser that happens to be FireFox?

      --
      Never have so few words meant so little to so many people.
    6. Re:Enough!! by seriesrover · · Score: 1

      as others have said - perhaps theres a company policy in place not to install "extra" applications, perhaps the user is weary of OSS, perhaps they're just familiar with the "blue e". You've got a good impression of Linux BECAUSE you're a SysAdmin. MS are meeting people (the non-tech savvy group) where they're at and delivering what they want, not what you think is the better browser. And lets not forget if FF ever had 90% market share it would be hacked far more.

    7. Re:Enough!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pressume using this train on thought we should scrap WINE, OpenOffice and other "Linux emulating Windows" software.

      Firstly, OpenOffice isn't Windows emulating software. Secondly, you can have Internet Explorer and Firefox installed side by side and use whichever one you like or both at the same time. The same is not true of operating systems. Your analogy is not just flawed, but ludicrous and uninformed.

      Just for one second PLEASE realize that there are legitimate reasons for this plugin.

      What reasons to use this are there that isn't covered by installing Firefox so that you have both browsers available?

    8. Re:Enough!! by dooglio · · Score: 1
      My wife doesn't like Mercedes because she doesn't like the tail lights. Telling her she is an idiot for liking other cars is not the way to get her to buy a Mercedes.
      But what if someone were to say, tell her to buy a Landrover instead? :-)
  99. IE7 by BlueFiberOptics · · Score: 1

    Looks like IE 7 came early, but not from Microsoft.

  100. err? by p!ngu · · Score: 0

    I can't see the website (down atm), but really folks, what is the point? From the description, this isn't exactly "IE as firefox", it's just a plugin for tabs, higher security, spyware removal, etc, all in one. How is that firefox? It's just taking on the features of ff...

  101. Cripple firefox please? by Ctawp · · Score: 1

    No you see, what I would really like is a plugin for firefox that cripple's its CSS rendering to that of IE... then not only do you never have to use IE, but you can preview the way your site is going to look to most of the world, even from OSX and Linux. =P

  102. Variant Trials by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've tried FireFox and Moz flavors, Opera, Maxthon, IE 7, and IE6 with MSN tabs.

    • FireFox - Nice, does most of what I want, some plug ins tend to fight one another and pop up blocking stopped working for me.
    • Opera - Sloooooow, and not entirely a nice UI for my tastes.
    • Maxton - (IE based) Fun, pop up blocking was erratic, and did not like to work with SharePoint in a page design mode.
    • IE 7 - Barebones. UI is currently crap, but it works with SharePoint.
    • IE 6 w/MSN Tabs - Almost good, but closing a single tab could result in the entire browser shutting down.

    Over all, for play browsing, I use FireFox, for work I use IE becaus, well we are a SharePoint shop and I am, after all, the SharePoint Evangelist.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  103. drumroll, please by revery · · Score: 1

    and what is the name of this plugin that provides all the features of firefox?

    [drumroll............]

    It's name is... ahem... Firefox....

  104. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    Consider that IE is the entry point for most spy and malware. Perhaps they mean that the browser can either intercept the malware, or at least remove it soon after installation.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  105. A firewall in a browser plugin? by Evro · · Score: 1

    The site is not responding right now, so maybe they clarify this point, but what's the purpose of putting a firewall, which traditionally does stuff like port filtering and rate limiting, at the browser level? Or are they just using the term "firewall" as a buzzword to indicate popup blocking, which really has nothing at all to do with a firewall?

    --
    rooooar
  106. Maxthon ain't half bad... by duguk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not even heard of Maxthon (by the makers of MyIE2 apparently) - I've just tried it for a good hour or so and its actually quite slick.

    Supports multiple proxies, autorefresh (these are available as addons to firefox), and has tabs (inc undo), switchable disable of activex, download and ad managers.

    Took me a while to find the Gecko engine, but there's details at their forums. Unfortuately its a bloody ActiveX plugin with the Gecko engine in, and its huge!

    I'm impressed - Its certainly better than IE - and suitable as a replacement for it, and very quick. Surprisingly, it actually runs WindowsUpdate faster than IE6 does on my PC [after Disabling Windows Advantage, naturally] :)

    There's some faults that let it down but working with IE, its probably the best they could do :) - and its good! [although theres no close button the right, which confused me somewhat :)]

    Having said that and having used it, I'm still going to stick with Firefox!

    Though I am going to keep it installed along with OffByOne - [thanks to Artifakt who i saw mentioned it yesterday] not many features (no iframes, even!) but small enough to run on a floppy! Comes in very useful occassionally!

    Duguk

    1. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by dargon · · Score: 1

      Didn't MyIE2 become Maxthon due to being caught embedding spyware and wanting to get away from the known bad name? I seem to recall something along this line but can't remember for certain if it was fact or just my over active imagination tweaking a partial memory.

    2. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by MixPix · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you talking about the close button on the tab bar? Maxthon does have that. Actually it has "close tab" and a "close all tabs" button. (Right click the maxthon window and enable the System Bar)

      Or you can just double click a tab to close it. That's a big seller for me. I hate having to right click just to close a tab.

      Maxthon also has the ability to open the last page that was viewed or if the brower crashes you can resume all of the paegs your were looking at!

      Just a question. Why not turn off active X and scripts if you want IE to be more secure??

    3. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by duguk · · Score: 1
      Ahh, thanks for the tips MixPix, very helpful! Double clicking on tabs is really useful! Thanks!
      Why not turn off active X and scripts if you want IE to be more secure??

      Um, because I want my webbrowser secure, not just 'more' secure ;)

      Plus, I've never actually encountered a website (that I use often enough) to warrent NOT using Firefox. Seriously!

      I can't think of any - ooh, except the UK Gov JobCentre site, and I found a way around it. At the very least I *ALWAYS* complain to the WebMaster that they don't know correct standards. Especially for a Gov site, its damn disgusting!

      I'm a webmaster myself, I know my codes' not always perfectly W3C standard, but at least the site is functional in any browser [and I work at a school, so don't go whinging that I'm a complainer, I know what its like, and I practice what I preach!] ;)

      Firefox just suits me perfectly, especially being able to make my own and use any scripts and extensions. I can't fault it.

      C'mon, why use IE? Apart from for WindowsUpdate of course ;)

      Dug
    4. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >but small enough to run on a floppy!

      What's a floppy?

    5. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Idealius · · Score: 2, Informative

      IAAT (I am a tech)

      I've used MyIE2 and it didn't bundle with spyware at the time (this was about a year ago.)

      I'm pretty sure you're thinking about Cool Web Search..

      Which changed to My Web Search..

      and is probably Nude Web Search by now.

      And yes that guy is a parasite from hell, and I would bet at least 30% U.S. homes have it installed as an IE toolbar and don't even realize it because it was installed as part of a hidden package from the 'HUGE NEW SUPER GREAT EMOTICONS FOR MSN' or from one of the MANY other packages distributed through partners with an appealing free product.

      Just another reason to switch to Firefox.

    6. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortuately its a bloody ActiveX plugin with the Gecko engine in, and its huge!

      That's what she said.... :P

    7. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Incoherent07 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was just "we don't want Microsoft to sue us". I used MyIE2 around that time (switched to Firefox shortly thereafter, after I couldn't make the Gecko engine thing work) and didn't have any spyware as a result of it.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please explain to a luddite like me why you would want a bloaty browser that contains two other browsers' engines (one of which is guaranteed to be installed with the OS) when you could much more easily install those 2 browsers side-by-side?

    9. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by rilian4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's still called CoolWebSearch or CoolWWWSearch and it is still a pain in the a$$ to remove and yes it is on at least 30% of US Homes.

      IAAT also and I just recently cleaned a home system of a colleague of multiple spyware/adware/malware and it took 4+ hours to get it clean. CoolWebSearch was a big part of the length of cleaning time. I ran 3 or 4 different removal tools, did 2 manual removal procedures and had to literally tear a registry key out of the registry by force to get the thing clean. This key had all the rights stripped out of it so that no user could automatically remove it. I had to go in manually and add admin group w/ full privelage to it in order to delete it.

      Anyone care to guess what OS this thing was running?

      Choices:
      1)windows 2000
      2)windows xp home
      3)windows xp pro
      4)MacOSX
      5)*nix


      If you guessed #2, you are absolutely correct!..Big shock, I know....

      -rilian

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    10. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Yes. One of the things about Maxthon is that you can simple higlight any text on the page and do a small "drag and drop" to part of the page and it'll open up a new tab with the google search results for the text you highlighted and dragged.

      I haven't found any firefox plugin that can do that.

      Maxthon is to Firefox as FireFox is to IE

    11. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the things about Maxthon is that you can simple higlight any text on the page and do a small "drag and drop" to part of the page and it'll open up a new tab with the google search results for the text you highlighted and dragged.

      You can do the same thing with less effort in Firefox without a plugin.

      1) Highlight the text.
      2) Right click.
      3) Click "Search web for "
      4) PROFIT!!!

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    12. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by MixPix · · Score: 1

      Heh, just thought I'd ask.

      Maxthon IMO is the best. I've never had a problem with IE, but I guess it's because I know what to look out for.

    13. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Funny
      >but small enough to run on a floppy!

      What's a floppy?

      Don't worry, they have pills for that now..

    14. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Suppafly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't MyIE2 become Maxthon due to being caught embedding spyware and wanting to get away from the known bad name?

      No, they changed the name because it had IE in it.

    15. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by TheJorge · · Score: 1

      Plus, I've never actually encountered a website (that I use often enough) to warrent NOT using Firefox. Seriously! I could say the same until I got hooked on Settlers of Catan Online... great game on the board, and now I don't need friends to play. I still cringe every time I have to go Start->Run->iexplore to start playing. (Like hell I'm going to have that icon lurking around somewhere)

    16. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by TheJorge · · Score: 1
      Or you can just double click a tab to close it. That's a big seller for me. I hate having to right click just to close a tab.

      I must say I prefer Firefox's middle-click open and close for tabs. It seems unlikely, but I do occasionally double-click when I meant to click twice.

    17. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      This thing here is aparently a pretty good tool specifically for removing cool web search. I haven't ever been infected with cool web but I have read in several magazines and some trustworthy webpages about this tool.

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    18. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Adversive · · Score: 1

      You didn't look very hard then. Super DragAndGo has been an 'official' plugin from Mozilla.org for at least a year.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?application=firefox&numpg=500&id=137

      I used MyIE2/Maxthon for a couple years before Firefox finally won me over. Every feature I used in MyIE is available in Firefox. MyIE is still insecure IE at it's core.

      --
      Adversive
      My cat's breath smells like cat food.
    19. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to do your spyware cleaning from safemode and with system restore *disabled*. BTW, this (courtesy of these folks) is starting to make CoolWebSearch look like a joy by comparison. Comes in 3 parts (as far as I can tell) spyware - Abetterinternet; Trojan - nail.exe; and some fun registry keys (most with aurora in the name) and other things I have yet to discover that keep the damned thing installed.

      And yes, the irony of their CRAPWARE being called a better internet is nauseating.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    20. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      The context search plugin allows you to highlight any text and the right click menu allows you to search in any of the engines you have installed in the search box. https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=240

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    21. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had Aurora/Abetterinternet last week on a users laptop. It is possible to get rid of it, but we spent so long working on it we wen't able to detail any sane, simple steps to remove it.

    22. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You can also middle click on the selected text, and it does an "i`m feeling lucky" search on google for it..

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      >>Or you can just double click a tab to close it. That's a big seller for me. I hate having to right click just to close a tab.

      >I must say I prefer Firefox's middle-click open and close for tabs. It seems unlikely, but I do occasionally double-click when I meant to click twice.

      It's not until anyone can easily configure trivial stuff like this themselves to get any interface just the way they're used to it that people will be able to make genuinely reasoned choices about which browser made by who they want to run.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    24. Re:Maxthon ain't half bad... by araemo · · Score: 1

      Most recently we discovered a company laptop w/ 180search and a ton of OTHER stuff installed. Symantec (once we got it working again) found something it labeled as a rootkit, and couldn't clean. 180search(or is it search180) was causing every program to have a memory error on launch, until we cleaned it off.. and the system was still hosed when we had gotten rid of everything we could think of. We had to reimage the laptop to get it clean.

  107. It's Like... by robwmc · · Score: 2, Funny

    A 16 year old putting on a fake mustache to buy beer.

  108. I have made IE work EXACTLY like Firefox, like so: by Drake42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) create an IE plugin. In side of this plugin put a full, decompressed, working firefox install
    2) when your site detects IE, try sending your page as data for the plugin you just had the user install.
    3) the plugin passes the rendering of the HTML to firefox which renders inside of the IE window. Your IE window appears to have all of the benefits of firefox while your users still think they're using IE.

    You laugh, but I've done it before and it works. The only problem is the big install and making sure that your site uses the plugin if its available.

  109. source code leaked by leighklotz · · Score: 1


    {
                  addTabs();
                  removeSpyware();
                  registerSearchBar(); // that ought to be enough
    }

    1. Re:source code leaked by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Additional code.

      //Taken out due to backwards compatibility reasons
      //fixcss()

  110. Re:right...or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or they could just use firefox.

    Or you could just keep your head up your ass and keep missing the points of the stories!

  111. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by ozbird · · Score: 1

    10 seconds per page, perhaps, or per web object? Those figures are believable - but would make the plug-in unusable.

  112. I need a plug-in to... by Tachikoma · · Score: 1
    Make my girl friend resemble my computer (functionality that is, not physically). Plug-in would provide on command:
    • make me a sandwich
    • do what i say when i say
    • don't talk so damn much
    You guys make the plug-in, I'll find a girlfriend.
    Ready....break!
    --
    i don't care
    1. Re:I need a plug-in to... by Ctawp · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to take a stab in the dark based off of your comment and your signature... You're a very very lonely man, aren't you? =) Erm... if your computer has the functionality to make you a sandwich, why do you need your (non-existent) girlfriend to do it for you? Fun? Earn brownie points?

    2. Re:I need a plug-in to... by bladx · · Score: 1

      is that what a girlfriend is for?

  113. IE-only web pages... by Draconix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Encouragement to use IE is the last thing we want to give Windows users. If IE weren't the dominant browser, web designers couldn't get away with making pages that only work in IE. If a web page uses ActiveX, and you're not using IE and Windows, you're out of luck.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    1. Re:IE-only web pages... by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      I also hear Mac users complain about borked sites and when I look at the code you can see that it doesn't even check for IE/Mac as opposed to IE/Windows.

      I know of cases where it has resulted in Mac users purchasing HOMES from sites which are compatible with Macintosh browsers. At that point 10-30% (don't forget firefox users on other platforms) is just too much market share to lose to lazy programmers designing your site.

      How freakin' stupid/lazy do you have to be to insist on turning away 10-30% when you can reach ALL major browsers with a little more research?

      I know from experience: I too used to create MS centric sites but a little bit of research and practice has allowed me to reach a far broader market.

      At this point I'll build sites that work with IE, Firefox, Safari, Opera, Konqueror, Lynx, cell phones, speech readers... all without needing the old "navigator.appName" check. That's right - it is often possible to code once for everybody. If you have an ActiveX only site it is simply time to do a little research and re-tooling.

    2. Re:IE-only web pages... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I've begun to stop supporting IE or if I support it at all it's some stripped down lame version compared to what Firefox, Safari, and even Opera users see. IE gets damn near the same look as Lynx.. maybe with background colors and a few similar limited touches. At the bottom of pages is a 'Get Firefox' link.

      Some of my recent websites are all but impossible to implement in IE so I just decided I wouldn't. I'm tired of holding back on my designs just to keep things equal across all browsers.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:IE-only web pages... by nicomen · · Score: 1

      Kudos! Just use the standards! ;)

      --
      Nicolas Mendoza
      Prepare for MSIE 7
    4. Re:IE-only web pages... by AngryElmo · · Score: 1

      I understand your frustration, but I hope you are not intentionally causing IE to get a lynx-like POT page...

    5. Re:IE-only web pages... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      If IE can't handle the stylesheets or Javascript I use for Firefox, Safari, and Opera with minimal changes then I'll just throw it a version that is grossly simplified. I'm not going to spend a lot of time trying to make things work for crappy browsers.

      Maybe IE7 will fix some of these bugs and make it work? Haha yeh right.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:IE-only web pages... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      10-30% !!
      get real

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:IE-only web pages... by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize it is surprising, but I didn't just pull those numbers out of my hat ;)

      Some popular sites reported broad shifts during the last year, (can be verified in news posts right here on slashdot) a few popular nerd sites now reporting IE use below 50%.

      But some major non-techie sites are also experiencing shifts. For an example the general public can appreciate check out the BBC where non-Windows/IE browsers comprise 23.6% of users:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/newmedia/technical /browser_support.shtml

      So yes, real!

  114. In other news... by shredluc · · Score: 1
    An undisclosed source has confirmed that the firefox browser comes with integrated spyware and phishing software.
    This stunning news has been reported by the superior R&D labs at Microsoft....

    Hold on....

    This just in.

    In a shocking twist, it has just been discovered that in fact, the browser was actually Internet Explorer, made by Microsoft. In an underhanded tactic, Microsoft contracted a shady company to develop a plugin designed to mimic the popular open source browser.
      With the plugin firmly embeded as a "Critical Update" anybody that has recently patched their IE browser would have this new "functionality." After a short period of inactivity, this plugin will start transmitting your vital and personal information.
    This will enable Microsoft to cry for the ban of the browser "firefox" since all browsers will look like it. After crushing the open source browser, Microsoft would release an "update" that removes the new plugin. Microsoft then will initiate a huge media campain claiming IE is the "Next Best Thing" and much more secure that the evil "Firefox.

    For more on this story please tune into /. tomorrow for the daily dupe.

  115. Sweeeet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait--so we get all the glamour of firefox with all the insecurities of IE? SCORE

  116. wake me up when there's a gecko plugin by drew · · Score: 1

    my life would be significantly easier if somebody wrote a plugin that allowed internet explorer to use the gecko renderer, and especially if there was some way to make it install on demand (e.g. gecko renderer activeX control). giving ie tabs and a search box are completely uninteresting to me, but give me a way to make pages i write look the same in ie as they do in firefox, and i will be a *very* happy camper.

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  117. Well, that's new... by Rogue+Jedi+X · · Score: 1

    Maxthon (formerly MyIE) does most of, if not all of those things and it's been around for years now. Link: http://www.maxthon.com/

  118. exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why try fixing a crappy browser when you can simply use a good one?

  119. Deepnet Explorer is even better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want firefox like capabilities but using IE... Try http://www.deepnetexplorer.com/ This amazing browser is built off IExplorer so it works for any webpage but with all the features including tabbed browsing as well as a nifty phishing identification system as well.

  120. One possible implementation for defanging ActiveX? by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it would be nice to have tabs and a search box in IE, those are not the features of Firefox that make me use it. If you did something like "block ActiveX in IE", you'd get close, but then all those things that require IE wouldn't work.

    Copy the MS HTML control, binary patch the copy so it has its own registry keys and profile and doesn't get confused with the original. That includes its own HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT!

    Using these patched keys, configure it so it will ONLY run ActiveX controls from %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\%GENSYM%\chrome - I guess it might be safe to make everything not in that directory "internet zone" and set its version of "internet zone" to disable scripting, the whole kit and caboodle.

    Now you can copy the controls you know are safe to use and necessary for to function as a web browser into that directory, and put a bare minimum of applications in its HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT.

    Then patch the IE "shell" and Outlook to use this control.

  121. MSN Toolbar does this already by rahuja · · Score: 1

    The MSN toolbar does this already. Thanks to the websites which allow only IE (sarcasm), I have to use it sometimes. The tabbed browsing experience with it is slow, buggy, and poorly designed - doesn't even come close to Firefox. Thankfully, the toolbar lets me choose which search engine to use, so I don't need both MSN and Google toolbars.

  122. It's horribly slow. by Sox2 · · Score: 1

    That's all i gotta say.

  123. terrible title by atlaz · · Score: 0

    The title of this article does not match its contents..... will it really "turn IE into Firefox"? Will I be able to use all of my firefox extensions with this new browser? Will it transform the source code from closed to open? Will it get rid of that annoying "E" icon?

    I think not.... Even the summary refutes this bad title:

    "new plugin available for IE that can make Internet Explorer resemble Firefox"

    Resemble..... not "into"

    ----
    next weeks slashdot:
    "New Plugin turns Windows into Linux!"

    --
    read more rants: thunt.net
  124. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    Actually, the majority of Slashdot visitors are Windows users. This was confirmed in the old IRC interview and in recent posts by Taco and others.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  125. Site is Slashdotted but.. by Badfysh · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..you can still get it from www.download.com

    --

    I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  126. Listick on a pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    The apparent aim of this plugin is to confuse people who were considering switching to Firefox to instead continue to use the fundamentally broken IE. It is either an attempt by Microsoft to muddy the waters, or an attempt by some spyware vendors to capitalize on the popularity of firefox.


    Why do I say this? First of all the URL for the site mimicks getfirefox.com. Secondly, the site itself (here is the Google cache) appears to have been lifted wholesale from getfirefox.com. Their logo is nearly identical (same colours, use of a stylized fox, etc) and they

    1. Re:Listick on a pig by Chexiepie · · Score: 1
      Looks like Microsoft got to our anonymous informant before he could finish his comment!

      CONSPIRACY.

  127. Next week... by OK+PC · · Score: 1

    A plugin that changes XP into Tiger!

    --
    Did you get that thing I sent ya?
  128. Plugin Lets Terrorists Turn Firefox into Firefox! by Leffe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why just modify the GUI when you can replace it entirely and still use the Worst Rendering Engine(tm) ever? Oh, wait, that is Lynx.

    Internet Explorer rendering in Firefox.

    NOTE: I haven't tried it out or anything (you'd probably have to read the entire thread and use the unstable branch of Firefox -- 1.0.5), so I can not guarantee anything.

  129. That's Awesome! by dshaw858 · · Score: 1

    Now I can download a program that improves my Internet Explorer to look, act, and feel just like Firefox! I mean, sure it won't be kept up to date, or really fix the security holes, but it's the look that matters!

    Or, I could just download Firefox.

    This is a cool project, but I have to say, I'd rather just use the real thing.

    - dshaw

  130. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now we just need to give IE the ability to be uninstalled, like any normal browser, and I'll be more than happy to do the obvious.

    P.S. For anyone taking this comment too seriously, yes, I already know how to get rid of IE and have been happy without it for many years.

  131. interesting reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about an IE plugin that automatically installs firefox and sets it as the default browser?

  132. Double Wrong Way by Mudcathi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd like a plugin for Firefox that automatically sends hate mail to webmasters who actively block anyone not using IE or Nutscrape Aggrivator.

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  133. Only one relevant question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of only one relevant question in response to TFA - Does the plugin make IE standards compliant? No?

    Ok, so we're still better off with FF. It's kinda sad really, that they chose to clone "popular features" rather than improving the technical merits of IE.

  134. Download Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.getfoxie.com is overloaded and returning 500s, but the actual download still seems to work:

    http://www.getfoxie.com/download/foxie-1.0.exe

    Also I'm about to change FoxIE's start page. It's stored in foxiecore.dll as a HTML resource called start.htm (use ResHacker or RedEdit or similar tool to replace).

  135. css by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are css bugs being fixed too? :)

  136. There is no magic pill by xmorg · · Score: 1

    There is no magic pill that can turn a body wracked with disease into a new person. you may patch it up a bit, you can even paint if up to make it look real nice, but underneath you still got the same sick body.

    What WOULD be nice, is a Firefox extension that could completly fool those few ancient IE only holdout websites thats will not let you advance to the next page because you are not using IE 5+

  137. 10 seconds? by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 0

    Come on now, that's ridiculous. It might as well be 10 years.

  138. It's less THAN not less then by sellers · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "...spyware tool that can identify and remove all pests in less then 10 second.."

    I believe proper grammer would be less than 10 seconds.

    (I'm such a jerk ! :) )

  139. they have hidden whois details too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is a sure sign of a company/individual with something to hide
    Domain name: getfoxie.com
     
    Registrant:
      Domain Listing Agent (NRPDB) getfoxie.com@domainlistingagent.com
      PO Box 927010
      San Diego, CA 92192-7010
      United States
      Phone: (858) 731-1701
    I have yet to find a legit business operation that uses a domain owner hiding service, its usually the seedy scammers who use those kinds of services because law-abiding responsible companys and users are not really concerned in hiding contact details, after all that in business is usually why you have a site, to promote yourself and provide a contact point for your customers not hide behind an equally suspicious company

    and they expect people to install their software ? LOL

  140. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Well format c: may only take about 10 secs to type in, but it takes considerably longer than 10 secs to run (unless your hard drive is ridiculously small).

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  141. Don't forget... by galimore · · Score: 1

    There's also a skin that lets Windows look like Mac OS X! Sorry kiddies, you don't get any of the security benefits.

    Seriously though... why would you want to skin I.E. to look like FireFox just so you can get the benefits that FireFox already provides? I'm a bit confused... Also, I find FireFox to be a bit snappier than I.E. generally speaking... I'd hate to think what happens to I.E. with the skin applied... wait, I take that back, maybe it *DOES* get faster. ;)

  142. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, but have you run a rootkit scanner?
    I run linux, and admittedly I haven't got around to it, but I do know of linux boxen getting cracked, so root kit scanners and tripwire stuff is almost as important on a *nix box as spybot/adaware on a windows box.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  143. And they said it couldn't be done... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Never let a Microsoft employee do what a frustrated developer can do. Of course, we've had 10 years of M$ showing us more of what they can't do. Leave it to an OSS developer to fix IE.

    What I really want now is a Firefox plugin that'll completely uninstall IE from my system, but still allow Windows to work. Perhaps Firefox could take over for Explorer since back in the lawsuit days, M$ claimed that removing IE would break Windows (like it wasn't broken already)

    And please don't flag this as flamebait as I'm using IE and Windows right now. :(

    PDA & Smartphone Optimized Sites
    Replacing my laptop with a Treo

  144. Idiots... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are OS X themes for Windows XP too, but that doesn't mean you will then have a real operating system. Anyone who uses this deserves what they get.

    1. Re:Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? Oh, you're confusing "pretty" with "functional." It's okay, Mac people do that all the time.

  145. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    Have you ever used /q on a format before?

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  146. more useful: IE in Firefox as Plugin by leckmi · · Score: 1

    check this out: http://ie-in-firefox.dr.ag/ Internet Explorer runs IN firefox as plugin, so you can open a tab with a site loaded in IE in firefox ;) very useful so you dont have to start IE in case you need it.

    --
    free 880 megs file hosting - www.FTPZ.US - best
  147. Huh? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want to use this? Why not just run FireFox?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  148. Try this... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    For the config files: I think this is in fact a more clean and simple way to do. I like it more than any gui and don't understand why poeple always think "it's grapical, so it must be better".

    But you even say that you don't want to configure the system *at all*. Then please leave the files of your *suse*-linux in their initial state and STFU!

    For the rest i could only say:
    cowsay "stepping out to take some fresh air"; emerge -uD world && cowsay "aaahh, that was wonderful!"

    The bottom line of all this is: You have to decide what you want.
    EITHER take it *preconfigured* and don't bitch about it
    OR accept that you have to make the descisions how you want your system to behave.

    You can't have both. not in windows, not on mac not on linux.
    The only diff of windows an linux here is, that windows hides the config files behind some idiotic gui that only offers half of the possibilities (because it expects that you are an average idiot) and cripples the other half because of only leaving things in that are "self explaining".

    I recommend the MATRIX to you, because it's the only thing i know, that you will accept and that does not ask you to configure it. ;)

    ---
    Okay, I should go to bed now...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Try this... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      For a server that's fine, but for a workstation I don't want to edit config files stored in a different folder for every distro, application or variation around.

      You'll find Windows has this thing called Group Policies for centrally controlling most aspects of the OS. On an application level, there is the app's own config.

      I'm not saying Windows is ultimate, I'm not saying Linux is useless. But I am saying Windows is far nicer to use as a workstation for those of us who don't have time to edit config files or customise applications by learning language xyz and finding the exact library to do what we want.

      On the other hand, when paid to get systems running precicely as specified, Linux is ideal because the time usually spent using the system can be spent in configuration, after which the box mostly runs itself (ie a server).

      In some places Linux excells, in others Windows excells. Similarly, OS X has its perfect uses, as does BSD.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  149. Re:firefox is definitely easier for tabbed browsin by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    I use the gestures extension more than keyboard shortcuts myself. Mostly because my desk is suckily designed, and the keyboard tray is both too high, and too small.

  150. Spybot, Adaware ... eat your heart out ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all pests
    Marvelous, stupendous ... BULLSHIT !

  151. I'll tell you the point- by conJunk · · Score: 1

    This is ideal for my office.

    I would love to get my users using firefox, because it would save me a lot of spyware related calls. However, that's impossible, because we have an internal document-retrieving website that uses links to documents on our network file servers. IE handles these fine (because they're MS servers), but firefox can't get the files.

    Something like this is the best of both worlds for me.

    1. Re:I'll tell you the point- by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      However, that's impossible, because we have an internal document-retrieving website that uses links to documents on our network file servers.

      Heh, I heard that argument the first time back in 1998. My response was to make the internal website link to the documents through the webserver instead of directly:

      <A HREF="\\SERVER\Path\Document.doc">linked document</A>

      becomes

      <A HREF="/Path/Document.doc">linked document</A>

      where Path is mapped from the filestore to the internal webserver, ie the webserver sees the filestore and serves all files to the browser.

      As an additional bonus, this also works as an Extranet without having to open up Windows filesharing ports to the outside - everything is tunneled through the HTTP connection. Just add SSL and a login and you have baseline security for external access.

      Triple bonus - if you give selected users write-access to the filestore, they can actually manage their own sub-websites just by adding an index.html (or Default.htm if they are so inclined) to any of their subdirectories - giving them the chance to spice their shit up if they want to add metadata not available in the document-retriever framework. This works just like the advanced folders views in WinXP, only more flexible.

      Quad-damage shield - you can use this to lock-out some users [1] from the filestore so they can't access it directly - only through the web interface. It's a pretty efficient way of implementing need-to-know. Sadly, it didn't keep us from being bought by Microsoft... :-(

      [1] Like Sales & Marketing.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:I'll tell you the point- by conJunk · · Score: 1

      You are 100% right, but that isn't the point :) It's not that I *can't* redo the hundreds of links to un-break the site, it's that I simply can not be bothered to slog through all that. :)

    3. Re:I'll tell you the point- by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you don't have a link template somewhere, then write a script.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  152. this is like... by lordsid · · Score: 0

    this is like lipstick on a pig. no matter what you do you aren't going to change how much it stinks.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  153. we killed the site by 834r9394557r011 · · Score: 1

    Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. --Nah' make them get firefox instead.

    --
    w00t
  154. what the..,. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why on earth would I want a china town rolex when I can get the real deal for free.

  155. But the kicker is... by Ripping+Silk · · Score: 1

    its NOT firefox...

    --
    this is not a flawless plan.. this is inspiration
  156. I can think of one good reason... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...freeking hardware. It's precisely because windows is the dominant OS that other OS users are constantly forced to suck hind tit when it comes to hardware and drivers. Don't know about you, but that got old a long time ago.

    Making IE "better" so that people stay on windows is just like giving an alcoholic another drink, you aren't doing them any favors in the long run. It's called being an "enabler". You are enabling Microsoft to keep postponing actually going to work and doing something worthwhile, and you are enabling the vast herds of MS users to stay dumbed down and to stay in the economic thrall of that criminal gang of bogus software peddlars.. The users aren't learning anything new, they aren't accomplishing anything new, all they are doing is continuuing the great sucking sound of peoples wallets emptying in the direction of a pack of already zillionaires, who long ago got a case of the eXtreme lazies. These poor people need to know THERE'S MORE BRANDS out there. You AREN'T helping them by giving them some crutch, by doing microsofts job for them. Would you keep people on one brand of car or camera or something? EGADS most people don't even know there's anything but windows and this is 2005, it's ABOUT TIME the vast herds started bingoing to HOW MUCH they have been getting ripped off by the convicted monopoly abuser.

  157. Misleading title... by wbren · · Score: 1

    When I first read the title of this story, I thought someone had finally written a Firefox extension that hacked all the computers on the local network and installed Firefox as the default browser on them. Thanks for getting my hopes up, Slashdot!

    --
    -William Brendel
  158. Bad experiences with Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Feature-wise, it's fine. Up there with IE, for sure.

    But as far as stability goes, it's just 100% pure ass. I run Firefox under both lunix and Windows, and IE under Windows. I've never, in years of using it, seen IE or crash or freeze up.

    With Firefox, I'm forced to restart the damn thing every couple days at best. The most common problem is that it'll just start eating up bigger and bigger chunks of memory until my whole system slows to a crawl. What kind of a browser would use 800 MBs of memory to display google.com, and nothing else? Firefox will, just give it some time.

    At least I can somewhat gracefully shut the thing down and restart it when it goes on a memory binge. Often, though, it'll just unceremoniously exit while trying to load a page. That wouldn't be so bad, but every setting and bookmark I've made since starting it gets lost. I've lost god knows how many bookmarks that way.

    And the worst is when it just fucking freezes. Locks up, doesn't respond, spins its wheels forever, totally ignoring any attempts I might make to get control back. Time to "kill -9", again losing any settings or bookmarks. And even after the signal of death, it somehow stays resident for minutes, so that I can't even start a new one, since a new instance would make me use a new profile. Same thing in Windows.

    1. Re:Bad experiences with Firefox by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      I've experienced this too. I use Firefox exclusively because I can't live without tabbed browsing, but it's definitely got some issues that need to be worked out. If it's left open for too long, it starts to gobble memory like crazy and my whole system slows down.

      I also have problems with popups. When I first started using Firefox, the popup blocking was great, but now it seems to be doing the exact opposite of what I want it to do - it doesn't block automatic popups (the kind I don't want), and it (sometimes) does block pop-ups from links I've clicked on.

      Furthermore, whenever a new window opens in Firefox (popup, or if I accidently click "Open link in new window") the browser stops responding for about a minute. It'll open the new window and work fine, it just takes a really damn long time, and I can't doing anything else during that time. It's pretty annoying.

      And then sometimes it just crashes out of nowhere. Firefox definitely has some stability issues. I suppose it could be one of the extensions I'm using, but I've only got 4 on here, they're fairly well known, and I keep them up to date, so that doesn't make sense... blah. I can't wait until these kinks are worked out, because then Firefox will be perfect.

  159. Virus?!? by pacoboyd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just wanted to let you all know that when I went to install this plugin to test it out, Anti-Vir definitely found a deleted a Keylogger. WARNING: Contains suspicious code HEURISTIC/Trojan.Keylogger! C:\PROGRAM FILES\FOXIE SUITE\SWEEPER.EXE File has been overwritten and deleted! No thanks, I'll pass.

  160. Right... (The Parody Remix) by kurtmckee · · Score: 1
    Yeah, but there are certain occasions where Internet Explorer is of no help (e.g., standards-compliant web pages, CSS stuff, etc.). A world-class browser that introduced proper MIME handling, didn't have extensive rendering bugs, and exposed a W3C-compliant DOM tree would tremendously cut down on some of the major headaches that many web designers are currently experiencing. All without having to sacrifice security, too.

    Don't get me wrong, I love Internet Explorer as much as the next malware author, but don't we all want a world-class browser for our friends as well?

    1. Re:Right... (The Parody Remix) by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Yeah we do.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  161. Javascript too? by hashhead · · Score: 1

    What about a magic plugin that'll make IE's version of JavaScript behave like Firefox (i.e. DOM compliant)?

    1. Re:Javascript too? by Zarf · · Score: 1

      What about a magic plugin that'll make IE's version of JavaScript behave like Firefox (i.e. DOM compliant)?

      If anybody ever finds this plug-in let me know. I'd like to be able to access my attributes array as ... well ... an array.

      --
      [signature]
  162. It's close... but... by wetdirtmud · · Score: 1

    My favorite feature between both Firefox and FirefoxIE is that FirefoxIE's 'Home' button has a chimney... what house/browser is complete with out it (well besides mine of course)?

  163. My recent horror story by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sunday night, I was browsing the web in IE via my Windows 2003 Server that hosts my web site (and is conveniently located next to my main computer). I had turned on JavaScript, ActiveX, and a few other things to make the browsing experience less annoying (I hated having to put every site I visited into the list of Trusted Domains). Since there's no free AV software for Windows 2003, I was running with a firewall, fully patched, but with no anti-virus running.

    Well, fate finally caught up to me. I was browsing a Google cache of a discussion group. Within seconds, the IE toolbar had been taken over, icons were installing on the desktop, and my computer rebooted, only to never come up again.

    The aftermath was really messy. I got about four hours of sleep that night, trying to clean and fix things. By the next day, I'd mounted the drives on another computer and cleaned it, but it still wouldn't boot. I then had massive problems with Windows Activation, getting stuck in Microsoft call center Hell. Eventually I managed to install the Windows 2003 Server setup from an inactivated Windows XP Pro installation and it worked.

    Needless to say, I've added additional security, as well as switching to Firefox. Going through that level of pain and suffering is the biggest motivator to moving away from Microsoft that I've experienced in a long time. My guess is that since the Windows 2003 Server browser is so locked down, they don't bother fixing holes.

    1. Re:My recent horror story by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

      You really frakked the daggit.

    2. Re:My recent horror story by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      You must have known you were going to see some responses to this. That is, assuming it's not trollery or flamebait.
      I was browsing the web in IE
      Okay, maybe you were on some IE-only site.
      via my Windows 2003 Server
      You're doing casual Web browsing on a server OS? Okay, maybe for a quick patch download.
      that hosts my web site
      You're doing casual Web browsing, on IE, on a server OS, on your live Web server?
      I had turned on JavaScript, ActiveX, and a few other things to make the browsing experience less annoying (I hated having to put every site I visited into the list of Trusted Domains).
      Casual Web browsing, IE, server OS, live Web server, deliberately defeating the enhanced security model?
      Since there's no free AV software for Windows 2003,
      you decided not to run one at all, on your live Web server on which you were doing casual Web browsing.

      (snip trials and tribulations)
      Going through that level of pain and suffering is the biggest motivator to moving away from Microsoft that I've experienced in a long time.
      It should be the biggest motivator to use the tools you have in the way they're meant to be used. You have a server OS and a workstation OS sitting right next to each other; try using the workstation OS for casual Web browsing and the server OS for hosting your Web site, instead of the other way around.
      My guess is that since the Windows 2003 Server browser is so locked down, they don't bother fixing holes.
      Your guess is mistaken. The Web browser in Server 2003 is IE 6, just like the one in XP. The only difference is the default "Enhanced Security Model" in Server 2003.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  164. Real DL link at Download.com by charnov · · Score: 1
    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  165. Question: by exeme · · Score: 1

    why bother?

  166. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by GlL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a tech who currently has 4 machines on his bench right now with spyware problems, I have these words of reality checking: 10 seconds my a$$!!! Who are these morons trying to fool here. To remove spyware/malware/trojans from a machine, it usually takes me 3 days without a format and reinstall, and I usually have to boot up with an NTFS Dos boot disk (Hirens)http://www.9down.com/modules.php?name=Down loads&d_op=viewdownloaddetails&lid=172&ttitle=Hire n's_BootCD_v7.2_With_keyboard_Patch and delete manually what the removal tools miss. I have found that deltree removal of all temp and content.ie5 directories knocks a day or so off of my scanning.

    --
    I'm a happy pessimist. I expect and prepare for the worst, when it doesn't happen I am pleasantly surprised.
  167. Direct link to download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site may be slashdotted, but you can still download the plugin from

    http://www.getfoxie.com/download/foxie-1.0.exe

  168. Looks like spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I do a regular spyware sweep, and almost never come up with any hits using Microsoft Antispyware and Adaware, but after installing this Adaware found possible Browser Highjack attempts from Adlogix. A dll and a few registry values/keys. Getting rid of this stuff now.

  169. Direct link to the program anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  170. It's still a turd by DanCentury · · Score: 1

    You could put a turd in a Snickers wrapper and it would still be a turd.

    That's the best analogy I could think of.

  171. Re:How about a plugin that turns Firefox into IE.. by jp10558 · · Score: 1

    Why not just use something like VNC??

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  172. So... by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

    Why not just use Firefox?

  173. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by realmolo · · Score: 1

    You're doing it the hard way. You need a Bart's PE boot CD, my friend.

  174. does it also fix the broken CSS? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0

    IE sucks, I have to design a ss just for that browser for all my verified sites.

    go suck on one MS

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  175. NetCaptor had firefox features first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two Windows web browsers built on the IE dlls that have tabbed browsing, popup blocking, and all that sort of stuff. They have been around lots longer and have had those features before Mozilla let alone Firefox had them. They are NetCaptor and CrazyBrowser, which actually is a free clone of NetCaptor. Mozillaquest.com has more about Netcaptor and comparisons between Netcaptor and Mozilla. Netcaptor was the first browser to have tabbed browsing. "NetCaptor from Stilesoft is a pretty slick browser for Windows. It is a browser user-interface (UI) built around an embedded IE engine. NetCaptor has many neat features such as tabbed-browsing, a collapsible sidebar, ad-blocking, and more. Interestingly, NetCaptor had the tabbed-browsing and collapsible sidebar features before Mozilla and Netscape had them."

  176. This Program is a Hoax! by jgallagher · · Score: 3, Informative

    This "foxie" installs iun6002.exe (desktop surveillance personal spyware) on your computer. I just ran Ad-Aware SE with the latest difinitions. Before I had installed this program I didn't have this nasty spyware installed. I could be worng but I don't think I am. Following links: http://www.lavasoftnews.com/ms/display_main.php?ta c=Favoriteman http://www.auditmypc.com/process/iun6002.asp http://www.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/microsoft.publ ic.inetserver.iis.security/2004-06/0260.html

    1. Re:This Program is a Hoax! by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      I just installed foxie and I don't have iun6002 (or any spyware) on my machine according to the latest AdAware SE...

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
  177. IE acting like firefox... by seabreezemm · · Score: 1

    what the hell would i want an immitator when i can have the real thing... This is like making love to cardboard cut out of supermodel when shes in your bed waiting...

    --
    Karma: a simple way of silencing those with unpopular views regardless how correct or just that view might be.
  178. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by myslashdotusername · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you don't scan the hard drive or the registry sure ;) if all you're doing is scanning the memory and IE's toolbar folders, and all 'downloaded files' before they're installed, then yeah it only takes '10 seconds' if it finds an adware that infects ie, then it can remove it from the registry/hd by searching for it then rather than the other way around. sure, you don't have as complete or through an examination, but most adware infects ie, so it leaves enough of a trace behind for a 'quick' scan to find out what spyware it is.

    for a browser integrated anti-spyware it's just right, for a 'stand alone' anti-spyware it falls far short of what is needed for compherehensive spyware protection.

    --
    Everyone whom you love, loves no one else. You must be special.
  179. One word: by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1
    Actually, every fucking internal webpage in my company doesn't work with firefox. I really can't even explain how they've done it. They're not using ActiveX or other complex technologies, they've just managed to write such terrible code that it flat out doesn't work.

    "FrontPage."

    And no, I can't get them to change the sites. We're a "major" company, but not large in the sense that IBM or Intel or Microsoft are. Yet the buerocracy on stuff like this is extensive enough that suggesting a change would just go into a black hole.

    Yeah! Amazing, ain't it? Steve Krug observed this phenomenon in Don't Make Me Think , that the larger the organization, the more cooks there are working on the stew, what with people trying to get their content as high as possible on the page, and other technicians, designers, and programmers all trying to shape their little God's Phosphorescent Green Acre in their image. What usually results is a site that's overloaded and ugly. And unless the culture of the company changes drastically, any attempt at redesign will have the same problem. It doesn't change because it's an effect of the political attitudes rather than a problem standing on its own.

    Where I work, I've noticed a thing vaguely similar but in ways startlingly different. The front-end that the customers see suffers the bloat because everyone wants to lay claim to or get something out of the page. The intranet is, by comparison, a joy. Individuals work on those pages, and they vary greatly by design and weight because individuals use different techniques, and the company maintains standard CSS.

    I've actually been given reason to set up a few small contest sitelets on that intranet, and true to my ethic I've tried to make them as small, light, and still somewhat attractive as possible. No Javascript, CSS, graphics where possible... and it works in IE, Safari, Firefox, etc. Folks seem to like it, too, because it's not blindingly slow. It could even lead to ...more work. And a hand in the main site redesign, for what good that'll do.

    Maybe you don't have to become a vice president before you get more control of how their web is designed...

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  180. You are full of crap. by voxel · · Score: 0

    It does not come with Ask Jeeves Desktop Search.

    I should know, I am the manager of the Ask Jeeves Desktop Search development group here at Ask Jeeves.

    AJDS isn't bundled with anything at this point in time.

    Makes you wonder what other parts of your posting are full of crap, or all of your postings you've ever made...

    What am I saying, I am probably talking to a troll right now... Damnit, I fell for the trap. ^H^H^H

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    1. Re:You are full of crap. by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Wrong - I'm testing it and it most certainly uses "Ask jeeves" in it search toolbar.

      Doesn't bother me - I never use the integrated toolbars anyway

  181. Imitation is Flattery - Firefox copied IE first!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "imitation-is-the-highest-form-of-flattery dept."

    That's right - Internet Explorer was copied by Firefox and runs exactly the same except for some improvements. That's it.

    So the only thing that IE is doing is giving a nod to Firefox for it's upgrades and says, "Thanks - we'll use those little enhancements too without sacrificing the look and feel of the original program WE created first!"

    The flattery is on Firefox's end mimicking IE, not the other way around!

    BROOKLYN

  182. haha by pear-i · · Score: 1

    haha might i add that internet explorer's 'fan site' also seem to resemble that of spreadfirefox's? Spread Internet Explorer them wannabes *shakes fists* if they really wanted a better browser they should just get it!

    1. Re:haha by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      That site has to be a joke... right?

    2. Re:haha by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

      Check the FAQ

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  183. what IE needs... by cahiha · · Score: 1

    What IE needs is a plugin for handling the text/html and related types using the Firefox rendering engine. That way, people will get most of the benefits of Firefox, while still not having to learn to click on anything other than the "e".

  184. Ferrari != Yugo by urlgrey · · Score: 1

    This seems akin to taking the body of a Ferrari and putting it atop a '78 Maverick!

    To say nothing about adding many, many layers of complexities into the mix....

    In short this strikes me as a classic example of a Very Bad Idea (tm).

    --
    Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
  185. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about just installing Firefox?

  186. Server plug-in by varebel · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should code a plug-in for their webserver to turn it into one that can handle a Slashdotting.

  187. Just Wondering by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    I don't use Microsoft Internet Explorer. Never have. (even though I Microsoft does have Internet Explorer 5 available for Solaris and HPUX -- which is what I would need).

    So I guess I am seeing "bad rendering" on pages. I am unclear on what I should be looking for, though.

    Currently, I use Mozilla 1.7.7 (desktop), lynx (server), and EudoraWeb (palm) as web browsers. What are the web-sites that make "IE" a must-have or must-use application?

    You are maybe the thousandth poster with this comment; but I still don't know what I am missing...

    Ratboy

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  188. IE-only proxies don't allow that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some workplaces run everything through a proxy which is configured to only work with IE. There is no option to use another browser. The result is people are stuck with IE and its insecurities. Having a wrapper for IE that permits the thing to still work through the proxy, but also improves security and usability is not a bad thing - it beats the only other choices: plain IE, and nothing.

  189. Another Browser! by ELProphet · · Score: 1
    Yay! Another browser to code for! Let's see:
    • IE 3-6 (7)
    • Firefox (Deer Park)
    • Opera
    • Netscape Navigator 5-8
    And each one renders just a little bit
    write in c!
  190. Re:I have made IE work EXACTLY like Firefox, like by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    You, mister, are totally crazy!
    I likes.

  191. or...just get Firefox. by that+IT+girl · · Score: 0

    If you want it to act like Firefox, for heaven's sake just get it. It's better anyway. HA.

    I'll bet Bill Gates secretly uses Firefox.

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
  192. Mod parent DOWN (overrated) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this has been done before, "show me the code."

    1. Re:Mod parent DOWN (overrated) by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems pretty dumb to do it that way to boot, which makes it seem unlikely.

      Why frustrate 90% of your visitors with an unnecessary 8MB download? Why front the bandwidth costs of pushing a copy of Firefox to a visitor that might not appreciate it?

  193. ActiveX Installer? by samj · · Score: 1

    For a second there I thought someone had actually made an ActiveX installer for Firefox. Pity. *That* would be newsworthy.

  194. and I thought... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    that someone was posting a /. article about IE7.

  195. Re: Alt. to Integrated Windows Authentication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our Intranet relies heavily on Integrated Authentication to identify users and grant them access to various pages within our site that are customized to them and their employee type. We pick up their login from the server variables collection. Is there an alternative to this technique that I could use that allow the pages to work in Firefox but NOT require any other input from them at all? Suggestions appreciated.

  196. Mistaken... by voxel · · Score: 0

    Ask Jeeves Desktop Search is not a "Toolbar", its an entire indexing and seach engine.

    http://sp.ask.com/docs/desktop/index.html

    It allows you to instantly find anything on your PC. It also has a very useful feature Google, Yahoo, Copernic do not have. Application Integration. Click "attach" in your favorite email program and search for your file with AJDS, one click and your file is attached.

    Its the power of instant desktop search integrated into every application on the desktop.

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  197. Great idea for work... by Future+Shock · · Score: 1

    Many of us work in offices that require IE - not just because IT might want it, but because internal support pages, including web email, ONLY work well with IE. I know at my company this is the case - I, a vetran Firefox user, has no alternative, because the internal sites that I need (raise a tech support issue, order equipment, online training, etc.) simply don't work well under Firefox. And using Firefox behind their firewall gives render issues on several sites tha I like...and web mail from home doesn't work either. So I am stuck with IE at work and even sometimes at home - I might as well dress it up, give it some mints, put some lipstick on it, and kiss it... FS

  198. Re:Imitation is Flattery - Firefox copied IE first by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

    Er, what's your point? IE was hardly the first web browser.

  199. Pointless by Lord+Raze · · Score: 1

    The IEview extension for Firefox now keeps an "always views this page in IE" list for you.

    Any web site that you must use IE for, need not stop you from doing all your web browsing in Firefox.

    --
    -- "Have you ever seen your own brain?"
  200. Might as well just download Firefox by bursch-X · · Score: 1

    It's free you know. And in contrast to IE does comply with most web standards.

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  201. Tits on a Bull... by sycodon · · Score: 1

    ...and just as useless.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  202. Will Make IE Compatability Testing Easier by coldcanofbeer · · Score: 1

    No matter how much better Firefox is than IE, if you develop web pages, you don't have a choice in the matter of whether you use IE.

    With the IE market share right now you better test your web pages to make sure they work with IE. Otherwise, you are going to lose customers.

    I look forward to using an IE that is more like Firefox. It won't make me switch from using Firefox as my principle browser, but it will make compatability testing easier.

  203. I love Maxthon! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having using Maxthon since version 1.14 (they're now up to Version 1.3.3), I actually really like this program, mostly because they include a lot of stuff in the program such as the very nice AD Hunter function that blocks most popups, popunders, Flash animation ads, many online ads in general and even ActiveX objects! Since running Maxthon I've had very little (if any) spyware/adware loaded on my system. :-) Also, Maxthon includes mouse gestures, which makes even a cheap two-button plus scroll wheel mouse very useful in web page navigation.

    If you've seen the Internet Explorer 7.0 betas it appears Microsoft pinched a lot of ideas from Maxthon, that's to be sure.

  204. You mean IE7? by idrism · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried IE7? It pretty much resembles Firefox. Tabbed browsing, search box, phishing filter, etc. No need for a plugin.

  205. You know... by raehl · · Score: 1

    I was really expecting that to be a bad porn-knockoff link. And then I clicked on it... what the hell? No boobies?

  206. Re:Huh? by thebatlab · · Score: 1

    I suggested to a client once that they just use FireFox. He proceeded to download it. He was promptly told by IT that he could not install it. With this, at least he can some of the benefits if he can't have them all.

  207. AskJeeves? What is this, 1998? by NaDrew · · Score: 1

    I installed it. It seems to work, though there's an AskJeeves search bar you can't get rid of without dropping the address bar as well. There doesn't appear to be a way to configure search provider, either. The tab implementation is faster and more integrated with IE than the MSN toolbar's.

    I'd also prefer the option to install without the weird Privacy Sweeper crap; my IE security settings, firewall, and AdMuncher take care of that, thank you. All I really need is tabs on IE for those rare times I can't get whatever site I'm on to work in Opera.

    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  208. Congratulations, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot. Why the microsoft would you want to defeat one of the main advantages of FX just so that is looks nifty and does a wee bit more? All you're doing is fueling closed source, proprietary software, while not getting the full benefits of FOSS. "Ignorance is expensive"

  209. Secret info about installer by noisymime · · Score: 1

    They actually just changed the Firefox installer to say something else and renamed firefox.exe to iexplore.exe

  210. hoorah! by bmgz · · Score: 1

    This solves EVERYTHING!

  211. Doesnt MAKE it firefox. by cra · · Score: 2, Informative

    Saying that the tabbed windows make IE into FireFox is like saying that a fat guy's man-tits makes him a woman. It doesn't, although in both cases some twisted people might think otherwise.

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  212. Great.... by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    Now if they could only make a plugin that prevents Windows explorer from crashing every time IE does.

  213. identify and remove all pests in less then 10 seco by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Ehm, wouldn't it be better to not have these pests atall? The thought of having malicious code running on my system for upto 9 seconds is bad, 9 seconds is more than enough to do serious damage...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  214. If this is not a scam I'll eat my (Red)Hat... by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

    1) Anonymous poster.

    2) Aimed at an audience reknowned for lack of security clue (average MS/IE users).

    3) Does something redundant (just get Firefox if you want Firefox's features) and pointless (trying to secure IE is like trying to waterproof a string-vest).

    --
    ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
    1. Re:If this is not a scam I'll eat my (Red)Hat... by windowpain · · Score: 1

      "3) Does something redundant (just get Firefox if you want Firefox's features)"

      The only problem is that some sites still require IE. Yeah, yeah, I know, we should just shun those sites, but sometimes that's not an option.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    2. Re:If this is not a scam I'll eat my (Red)Hat... by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      It is for me, if a site cannot implement a basic open standard correctly (ie. supporting as many browsers as possible) then I'm certainly not going to trust them to do anything else properly such as securing my card details or whatever else.

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
  215. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

    Yes, your linux box can probably be cracked, but I wouldn't say security software is "almost as important" as it is on Windows simply because there are many, many people trying to get into your Windows machines and install spyware in order to make money. There are none trying this on Linux because there aren't enough people using it and those who are probably know how to avoid spyware. As such, Linux users only really need to be worried if they've given themselves a specific reason to be targeted, since Linux boxen will normally be cracked individually by actual people rather than wholesale by random software.

  216. firefox -- slimbrowser by Gridpoet · · Score: 1

    I'm desperatley looking for a mod that will make firefox act more like slimbrowser for IE... I hate the fact that slimbrowser is built around IE but i just cant stop using it, the tab interface is so slick and streamlined it makes browsing so efortless.

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    This is MY galaxy...go find your OWN!

  217. dude - it's called CrazyBrowser!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.crazybrowser.com/

    a tabbed ie wrapper that i have been using for 2+ years (and its much easier to use the firefox IMO)

  218. Maxthon for searching by x-guru · · Score: 1

    I have used Maxthon (MyIE2) for 3+ years now. One of the greatest features is the configurable search tool. Through the preferences you can set up any URL with a variable param to be tied to a search keyword.

    For example, I have it configured so that typing "dic foo" into the address bar will pull up http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=foo.

    This is a truly awesome feature, and I use it for all kinds of stuff including google [g ] and babelfish [tr ].

    Of course, sometimes I have to reverse-engineer a web page to find the POST parameters and then turn the URL into a GET-based query.

    --x

  219. Foxie tries to infect with ISTbar by emzee · · Score: 1

    Foxie drops ISTbar.dldr onto your system - yes, even when you visit it with FF and get the alleged Internal Server Error from the site. Is it possible to edit the text that appears on the /. main page to warn of this?

  220. Re: nice math, freezin fat guy by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, make that 24.4% not 23.6%

  221. Security hazard too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I run a few Linux servers, and I don't have to compile/recompile anything... same with a workstation. The best part is for the longest time, all the user's applications update with a single command, unlike on Windows where you have to update every application individually, you don't know where a security hazard is going to bite you in the ass. Not even all applications can be located in Add/Remove Programs (such as some utilities you would just unzip and use without having to install). On a Linux workstation, you just have to install the applications you want, set it to automatically update, and you're golden.

    Windows is getting this in the future, but it's already here on Linux, so why wait? Also, I don't trust applications that run on Windows. It isn't MS's fault, but look at how many new versions of programs that run on Windows include spyware, and how many EULAs cover the companies' asses saying "This application may change functionality in the future" or "We are not responsible for what happens to your computer", so you can't really set your applications to automatically update on Windows anyway. Who knows what sort of spyware or adware future versions will have?

    On Windows I don't even want to be running the latest version of an application because of this, but on Linux I know that a program won't include this functionality in the future and have no problem automatically updating to the latest version of software.

  222. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Ah, I didn't see that, sorry.

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  223. umm ok? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    If you have to download this plugin and it makes IE just the same as firefox, why not just download firefox?!?

    I do this for friends and family out of kindness, I install firefox and then make the start icon the little blue E, so they don't get confused and still click on the same icon to browse the web, they hardly notice the difference and I no longer have to go by weekely to clean off the spyware (as long as i change some of the default behavior, like not allowing website to install software, etc..).

  224. Ask Jeeves lol by Euronymous1 · · Score: 0

    Tried it, Uninstalled it. Ask Jeeves what the fuck?

  225. Re:10 seconds? I doubt it. by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    Well, yes. You're right. A sensibly locked down linux box is pretty safe from automated[1] attacks. I don't believe any OS is immune from targeted[2] attacks. To protect form the latter requires a security conscious admin constantly monitoring for such activity. I'm pretty sure banks employ people whose only job is maintaining network security.

    [1] absolutely no sentient involvement.
    [2] deliberate, driven by a sentient being determined to break in.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  226. This is a joke right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oohh! You mean they made a plugin to properly support W3C standards? Oh, wait, its just security BS, which they have to fix using a bloody firewall and some features MS 'promises' to add eventually... Seriously, why the heck would I bother with a plugin that doesn't fix the most serious problem with IE, its inability to properly support web standards? I tried the test page they came up with, with the smiley face, and Opera came close, Firefox came close, but messed up a slightly different way but IE gave nothing but a huge red smear on the bottom of the screen, and that was after waiting 5 minutes or more for it to finish figuring out what it was doing, when the others took less than a minute... And that test is only for the, "most common CSS and other W3C standards *most* web developers are likely to use." A solid block of cement is more secure than a safe too, but I don't store valuables in one, because the whole point is to be able to use the damn thing, not just 'secure' the items inside from crooks. Same with a browser. It can be secure as Fort Knocks and still worthless, if you have to tie one arm behind your back, stand on your head and throw out half the feature theoretically available to you as a developer, just to make it work properly.

  227. Confirmed - Bundled Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found the same spyware on my computer after installing FoxIE. Anyone else with it wanna do a scan and verify?

    Removing it does not seem to impede FoxIE. The file does not reappear either.

  228. Such a plugin is useless to me... by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    Considering the IE DOM/CSS support is so screwed up it, making IE LOOK and ACT like Firefox won't replace IE's crappy support of basic standards. At least I can depend on Firefox. :P

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  229. -1 Ignorance by locokamil · · Score: 1

    If you'd read some of the discussion above before mouthing off, you would have seen that Maxthon uses the IE 6 Trident engine.

    Clearly, hardpressed coders such as yourself don't have to plan for another eventuality.

    1. Re:-1 Ignorance by ELProphet · · Score: 1

      Erm...

      I was complaining more about IE7's reported lack of standards support, than about THIS plugin in particular.
      You don't have to be an ass about it.