clean water is different than saying that water will run out.
In actuality, we can clean up the water rather quickly. Even here in the states, it will not take that long in spite of the damage that we have done. Probably the only 3 nations that are going to have SERIOUS issues are Russia (small number ), India ( medium ), and then CHina ( huge issues all around ).
and yet, the average price of a new in America is ~$35K. Yes, the $35K model 3 is on hold, but should be starting around the end of the year, into early next year.
We have real issues such as AGW, or hastened Extinction of species but then we have groups like this that turn minor issues into disasters.
Running out of gold? Ah nope. Likewise , we have plenty of timber, water, air, etc.
No, that is not a radical solution is what many small cities are now doing.
It makes sense for fiber from a CO to the building to be a monopoly, but then have the CO allow multiple companies to compete to provide services. This minimizes the REAL monopoly.
However, the GOP in many many states, have passed laws that prohibit just this. Hopefully, CONgress (yeah, right) will require that states roll those laws back.
My understanding is that Google invested $1B into SpaceX's Space Link so that they could own part of a GB space-based system. As such, they will have the ability to hook up anybody in America, if not the world, to the net for reasonable prices.
Still, I would rather have fiber, than sat.
that is not true. If it was truly gov. regulated, there would be net neutrality. In addition, any company would be able to offer services over the lines. They can not. This is about oligarchies and how detrimental they are.
We need to remove the monopolies along with allowing ANY local gov to run broadband, but then farm out services.
Net neutrality accomplishes NOTHING. I mean nothing. It is a true red herring that is taking us away from the real issue: that of basically unregulated monopolies controlling America's broadband.
These companies have absolutely NO reason to upgrade. They have monopolies that allow them massive profits. Comcast is small compared to Disney. Disney is in massive number of different businesses all over the world. Comcast only services about 1/10 of America. Thats it. And yet, Comcast competes against disney to buy whatever business they want.
What is needed is to destroy the monopolies. We need to have them compete against each other. In addition, we need to allow all local gov to compete against these companies if they want to. Right now, the GOP has pushed a number of laws that prohibits that, but it really makes sense that fiber to the home be owned by the closest gov (city, county or possibly state), while services are provided by a number of competing companies. If Comcast or Charter wish to go into an area and run their own fiber, let them. The same is true of any of the RBOCs, or CLECs. BUT, regardless, they have to provide open services. IOW, other companies can offer TV, internet, etc over the same fiber.
It is time for ppl on/. and the net in general to quit listening to the idiots that push the net neutrality red herring and fight to get REAL broadband.
The point was not to give hard numbers, but to say that even if we double atmosphere pressure, it will take many years before any amount is stripped back to today's value.
Yet, it is rated as a compact luxury car, just like the BMW Model 3s. The entry level of BM3 is basic just like Tesla. Yet, everybody calls it a compact luxury.
Actually, capital can come from all sorts of sources. It is just far too many assholes on wall street will only think that the capital MUST come from them. Musk has friends that would KILL to own Tesla and would be happy to either invest, loan, or even perhaps a partnership on a factory in Europe that produces Tesla for them.
Kendall, Shush.
Yeah, 1100100001000, you are right. Tesla is going to lose big. I trust that you have lots of shorts on it? You should go ahead and put everything that you own on it. After all, you are just like Montana Skeptic . You just KNOW that Tesla is going to lose big. By all means, put your money on the shorts.
nope. They are pre-sold, but they did not gear up the delivery system to handle that kind of load. Now, they are trying to make it cheap and fast to do.
BTW, the 'tent' makes total sense. First off, they are based where they have a nice moderate climate similar to what Europe has. Generally, no real weather extreme. But, here in COlorado, DIA, generally the top rated airport in America, has a large 'tent' for the main concourse. It outperforms the regular constructed island concourses. Likewise, we have plenty of sprung buildings (what you call a 'tent') around here, even though we run from 105F/41C to -30F/-35C. It would be too expensive to have weeks of 35+ C or -20- C to use spring buildings, but otherwise, they do just fine.
yes, no doubt ford has jacked up prices. So, while Tesla works hard to bring their prices down while still keeping 30+% profit margins, others car makers are having to raise their prices and still do not have those kinds of margins.
They are not the sole provider of service. There are other companies that deal with them, just like there are companies that deal with European cars or Japanes cars. BUT, not enough on the road to warrant but a few companies.
You can bet that more are coming though.
But the truth is, they need to little of maintenance that there will be a fraction of the companies out there.
Hey porky/red tide. While I just used a bit of grey matter to figure out that it was millions/billions of years, I did your work and found this from the same guy as this article.: The following is from this link
1) If there was life on the surface of Mars early on, the atmospheric changes were gradual enough that we have reason to believe it could have evolved to find a suitable niche where it may survive even to the present day.
2) If we decided to terraform Mars by artificially creating a dense atmosphere, it would survive for many millions of years today before we needed to replenish it.
Caffinated Bacon/Crimson Tsunami, you are a constant liar and a true coward.
Slashdot Mirror
clean water is different than saying that water will run out.
In actuality, we can clean up the water rather quickly. Even here in the states, it will not take that long in spite of the damage that we have done. Probably the only 3 nations that are going to have SERIOUS issues are Russia (small number ), India ( medium ), and then CHina ( huge issues all around ).
Of course, that is only if you look at the buying price. Once you add in the full costs of ownership, then this really becomes a great deal more affordable and is open to most of America.
A luxury Model 3 is within $1000 / year of what a Camry costs. TM3 is much more luxury and a great deal faster than even top Camry.
In the states, we see that Camry sales have been dropping for the last 3 years. Again, in the states, we see that Accord sales have also dropped this year.
and yet, the average price of a new in America is ~$35K. Yes, the $35K model 3 is on hold, but should be starting around the end of the year, into early next year.
We have real issues such as AGW, or hastened Extinction of species but then we have groups like this that turn minor issues into disasters. Running out of gold? Ah nope. Likewise , we have plenty of timber, water, air, etc.
And yet, Accord/camrey do not have high-end versions. Otoh, BMW 3 series has similar low-end config and then gets deck out just like the TM3.
No, that is not a radical solution is what many small cities are now doing.
It makes sense for fiber from a CO to the building to be a monopoly, but then have the CO allow multiple companies to compete to provide services. This minimizes the REAL monopoly.
However, the GOP in many many states, have passed laws that prohibit just this. Hopefully, CONgress (yeah, right) will require that states roll those laws back.
My understanding is that Google invested $1B into SpaceX's Space Link so that they could own part of a GB space-based system. As such, they will have the ability to hook up anybody in America, if not the world, to the net for reasonable prices. Still, I would rather have fiber, than sat.
exactly right.
This is why we need to allow real competition to take route. That means that local gov should also be able to compete .
that is not true. If it was truly gov. regulated, there would be net neutrality. In addition, any company would be able to offer services over the lines. They can not. This is about oligarchies and how detrimental they are.
We need to remove the monopolies along with allowing ANY local gov to run broadband, but then farm out services.
Net neutrality accomplishes NOTHING. I mean nothing. It is a true red herring that is taking us away from the real issue: that of basically unregulated monopolies controlling America's broadband.
/. and the net in general to quit listening to the idiots that push the net neutrality red herring and fight to get REAL broadband.
These companies have absolutely NO reason to upgrade. They have monopolies that allow them massive profits. Comcast is small compared to Disney. Disney is in massive number of different businesses all over the world. Comcast only services about 1/10 of America. Thats it. And yet, Comcast competes against disney to buy whatever business they want.
What is needed is to destroy the monopolies. We need to have them compete against each other. In addition, we need to allow all local gov to compete against these companies if they want to. Right now, the GOP has pushed a number of laws that prohibits that, but it really makes sense that fiber to the home be owned by the closest gov (city, county or possibly state), while services are provided by a number of competing companies. If Comcast or Charter wish to go into an area and run their own fiber, let them. The same is true of any of the RBOCs, or CLECs. BUT, regardless, they have to provide open services. IOW, other companies can offer TV, internet, etc over the same fiber.
It is time for ppl on
let see.
Top 10. Well above most all of Europe esp. Germany and France, and China is still inefficient.
Top 5 in average wealth per adult, though we do drop #24 on mean wealth.
Certainly not the wealthiest, or even close to the poor.
Nonsense. We have all of the Saturn's blue print. What we do not have, are the mods that floor engineers/mechanics made, to make this work.
Wrong. They subcontract initially, and then move things in-house over time.
Umm, Europeans have no space suits.
The point was not to give hard numbers, but to say that even if we double atmosphere pressure, it will take many years before any amount is stripped back to today's value.
Yet, it is rated as a compact luxury car, just like the BMW Model 3s. The entry level of BM3 is basic just like Tesla. Yet, everybody calls it a compact luxury.
do not forget that from the 40s through the mid 70s, a LOT of lead was released into the air harming our kids.
Actually, capital can come from all sorts of sources. It is just far too many assholes on wall street will only think that the capital MUST come from them. Musk has friends that would KILL to own Tesla and would be happy to either invest, loan, or even perhaps a partnership on a factory in Europe that produces Tesla for them.
Kendall, Shush.
Yeah, 1100100001000, you are right. Tesla is going to lose big. I trust that you have lots of shorts on it? You should go ahead and put everything that you own on it. After all, you are just like Montana Skeptic . You just KNOW that Tesla is going to lose big. By all means, put your money on the shorts.
nope. They are pre-sold, but they did not gear up the delivery system to handle that kind of load. Now, they are trying to make it cheap and fast to do.
At this time, they are staying in the 3000-4000 cars / week, but are modifying their lines again. Supposedly, they will be above 6000 cars / week by end of august. That will put them in the range of 300, 000 model 3 / year, along with another 50,000+ of each model S and model X.
BTW, the 'tent' makes total sense. First off, they are based where they have a nice moderate climate similar to what Europe has. Generally, no real weather extreme. But, here in COlorado, DIA, generally the top rated airport in America, has a large 'tent' for the main concourse. It outperforms the regular constructed island concourses. Likewise, we have plenty of sprung buildings (what you call a 'tent') around here, even though we run from 105F/41C to -30F/-35C. It would be too expensive to have weeks of 35+ C or -20- C to use spring buildings, but otherwise, they do just fine.
yes, no doubt ford has jacked up prices. So, while Tesla works hard to bring their prices down while still keeping 30+% profit margins, others car makers are having to raise their prices and still do not have those kinds of margins.
They are not the sole provider of service. There are other companies that deal with them, just like there are companies that deal with European cars or Japanes cars. BUT, not enough on the road to warrant but a few companies. You can bet that more are coming though.
But the truth is, they need to little of maintenance that there will be a fraction of the companies out there.
Hmmm. Lets see:
...
1) wiki The Tesla Model 3 is a mid-size (US) / compact executive (EU)[7] luxury all-electric four-door sedan manufactured and sold by Tesla, Inc.
2) Car and DriverHowever, in its current form (only models equipped to a price of $50,000 and up are available as of this writing), it is actually more of a compact luxury sedan competing with the BMW 3-series in size and price.
3) Top Gear What is it? Oh, just some sensibly priced electric BMW 3 Series rival from a little-known American start-up.
4) Motor Trend This shows the luxury compact cars, which includes Tesla model 3.
5) Edmunds There's 15 cubic feet of trunk space, again similar to what other entry-level luxury cars offer.
So, the gov, all the other car makers, and all the experts consider the TM3 to be a compact luxury car. You can claim whatever you want, but
The following is from this link
1) If there was life on the surface of Mars early on, the atmospheric changes were gradual enough that we have reason to believe it could have evolved to find a suitable niche where it may survive even to the present day.
2) If we decided to terraform Mars by artificially creating a dense atmosphere, it would survive for many millions of years today before we needed to replenish it.
Caffinated Bacon/Crimson Tsunami, you are a constant liar and a true coward.