Which is more likely:
- that there are two separate bits of code for doing more or less the same thing to more or less the same thing, only one of which has the break-removing feature. or
- that most of the editors and/or submitters are utter bubbleheads who don't know how/when to put paragraph breaks?
Watch the video? That would be almost as bad as reading the article.
You've probably forgotten the old TV sets that wouldn't work until you thumped them? Thing was, you had to thump them with just the right amount of force in just the right place.
Slashdot Mirror
He does. Have you considered learning the language of the place you live in? Or failing that, using google?
Right. Because Americans are so fucking awesome that all you have to is turn up anywhere else and they grant you instant citizenship.
Simple answer: timothy.
Appers! Appers! Appers!
Conspiracy theorists? They're all pissing in the same pot, you know.
Meh. That's so they don't feel bad for doing deals with him.
Because oy vey oy vey, you gotta make a living already...
Anybody can fly.
So long as it's on a roughly parabolic trajectory.
If you want speed, go for MongoDB. It doesn't use joins & it's webscale, plus it can even use /dev/nul as storage for ultra-high throughput.
Right. Because it's totally impossible that you might be building something that you're intending to sell to more than one customer.
If you wanted to return them you should have done it within 30 days.
Signed,
Britain.
I thought Uranus was brown?
In Soviet Russia, something about Natalie Portman forgot YOU!
Open source. That implies actual code being available.
Or it did before the sheep started applying the phrase to everything from fanfiction to cake recipes.
Which is more likely:
- that there are two separate bits of code for doing more or less the same thing to more or less the same thing, only one of which has the break-removing feature.
or
- that most of the editors and/or submitters are utter bubbleheads who don't know how/when to put paragraph breaks?
A better success rate that your fucking articles, you woad-smeared fixie-riding bald beardy bastard.
This has them. One, anyway.
http://science.slashdot.org/st...
Watch the video? That would be almost as bad as reading the article.
You've probably forgotten the old TV sets that wouldn't work until you thumped them? Thing was, you had to thump them with just the right amount of force in just the right place.
If that's what it means, it isn't what it says.
If there's such a word as unarboreal, elephants are definitely the most. Apart from whales.
The issue isn't that they couldn't fly without the autopilot, it's that they didn't realise they needed to because they thought it was on.
Well they realised, but too late.
As they say, "if you pay peanuts you get monkeys". Or possibly squirrels.
Thick people are less intelligent, claims report. Film at 11.
I'm Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra, you insensitive clod!
Is "ugly and creepy" a gender?
I'm not particularly gay but he was much better looking when he was Bruce.
Tuesday is about as far from Friday as you can get.
Also, first post (normalising for gender, social class and shoe size)