At one end you have very computing-centric issues like "how confident does this automated turret need to be about the identity of its target before opening fire?"
Depends. Is it the version for exporting to Israel?
Some companies e.g. Google say that when they decide who to promote, the person with authority who makes the decision doesn't see information about a candidate's protected statuses
For that to work the person making the decision would need to never have seen the candidates, let alone interacted with them in a working situation. In other words, the decision would be based on nothing at all.
It makes as much sense as insisting that a coach picks a team from people he's never watched playing.
You might as well draw straws.
However if it's Google there's no such thing as "too stupid to be true".
Of course the primary motivation behind the declaration - and the SJWs' support for it - is fear that algorithms might come up with results that some people don't like.
"Western countries" like UK and Australia do not have a large amount of African or South American populations.
Australians are descended from convicts, though. It's why they're good at rugby - running with an iron ball chained to your leg builds the strength for breaking tackles.
And no deliberately selecting targets when an accident is unavoidable.
Even if it decides to do nothing, that still amounts to hitting the default target.
To put it another way: it can swerve left and hit this, swerve right and hit that, or not swerve at all and hit something else. Whichever it does is still a choice.
Slashdot Mirror
You're the kind of person who, whenever dinosaurs are mentioned, says they aren't extinct because you saw two in a tree this morning.
In other words, a fucking grade-A class-1 shitcock assburger.
Like darkest Peru, where Paddington Bear comes from.
Including, apparently, their own management.
Tedious obsessives like you.
I for one welcome our new gastropod overlords.
Depends. Is it the version for exporting to Israel?
For that to work the person making the decision would need to never have seen the candidates, let alone interacted with them in a working situation. In other words, the decision would be based on nothing at all.
It makes as much sense as insisting that a coach picks a team from people he's never watched playing.
You might as well draw straws.
However if it's Google there's no such thing as "too stupid to be true".
It isn't, he's spouting shit as usual.
Of course the primary motivation behind the declaration - and the SJWs' support for it - is fear that algorithms might come up with results that some people don't like.
I figured there must be some trick like that. The subject field, here on our beloved slashdot, is not checked - try it.
For me anyway - Firefox on Linux.
Good luck with that. When you're done, try getting the carbon units to follow the Decalogue.
Australians are descended from convicts, though. It's why they're good at rugby - running with an iron ball chained to your leg builds the strength for breaking tackles.
I don't think it would help much if Germany gave back the bit they stole.
P.S. For Luxembourg, that'd be more like 870 metres.
That's because 90% of sci-fi is shitty.
#TODO: systemd quip here.
Even if it decides to do nothing, that still amounts to hitting the default target.
To put it another way: it can swerve left and hit this, swerve right and hit that, or not swerve at all and hit something else. Whichever it does is still a choice.
Yeah, with their compulsory ID cards. None of that in France, Germany, Belgium...
Oh wait. It's the other way round, and you're a fat moron.
Unless the bastards are made of asbestos, I think there's a pretty simple countermeasure.
Straight line or declining balance?
*froth* why not leave it to the market *froth froth* nanny-state *froth* death panels *froth*
(cayenne8 & SuperKendall are on holiday).
Galt's Gulch became Ayn's Atoll.
I suspect you don't quite understand how religions work.
When you quote something you should cite the source.
--
Powhatan, near modern-day Richmond, 1607.
You mispelled "French assholes".
Sow cut you're bawls of, write know.
It's a complex issue. There's a TED talk here that explains it pretty well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...