Slashdot Mirror


Floating Pacific Island Is In the Works With Its Own Government, Cryptocurrency (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: Nathalie Mezza-Garcia is a political scientist turned "seavangelesse" -- her term for an evangelist in favor of living off the grid -- and on the ocean. Mezza-Garcia spoke with CNBC's Matthew Taylor about what she sees as the trouble with governments, and why she believes tech startups should head to Tahiti. This seavangelesse is a researcher for the Blue Frontiers and Seasteading Institute's highly-anticipated Floating Island Project. The project is a pilot program in partnership with the government of French Polynesia, which will see 300 homes built on an island that runs under its own governance, using a cryptocurrency called Varyon.

"Once we can see how this first island works, we will have a proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees," she said. The project is funded through philanthropic donations via the Seasteading Institute and Blue Frontiers, which sells tokens of the cryptocurrency Varyon. The pilot island is expected to be completed by 2022 and cost up to $50 million. As well as offering a home for the displaced, the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation.

168 comments

  1. They forgot to mention AI. by ls671 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Along with a cryptocurrency, it has to use AI to keep the island afloat and manage it to be a winner.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:They forgot to mention AI. by Dorianny · · Score: 1
      You forgot to mention that the AI will be running on the Cloud.

      In all seriousness thou, I fail to see what benefits the floating AI controlled crypto-haven will have over your traditional island tax-haven. Many of those Islands are high enough above the current sea-levels to not have to worry about disappearing under the waves.

    2. Re:They forgot to mention AI. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The Seasteading institute proposed an idea some years back for a business ship in international waters, just of the US coast, so employees could live on the mainland but commute by ferry each day and work in a place free of things like a minimum wage, mandated health coverage or income tax. It didn't take.

    3. Re:They forgot to mention AI. by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      I haven't forgotten and am still waiting to compete with experienced IT workers stationed 24 miles of the coast of Southern California via a tether (currently MIA) as opposed to just the one stationed in French Polynesia minus the tether and running "off the grid" (also currently MIA) or the employees I currently have to wait a week for a response from who live in Bangalore India.

      I forget what the issue what with makes that 24 mile tether a problem but as an engineer that makes way more sense to me than waiting 15+ hours to get an answer to my technical question which is almost always a technical question in reply leading to 15+ more hours of wait time and ultimately solves nothing since they're simply parroting some IT/bug forum they failed to quote originally.

  2. BLOCKCHAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there nothing it can't do?

    1. Re:Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarians are hilarious. The funniest part is that they don't understand why they're so funny to the outside world.

    2. Re:Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm Tardchris! Have you bought a "I'm fat. Let's party." shirt? This is Slashdot, after all.

    3. Re: Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly. And big deal, I have an autonomous, floating, island in my toilet every morning.

    4. Re: Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately that island of yours will sink faster then Enron

    5. Re:Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarians are hilarious. The funniest part is that they don't understand why they're so funny to the outside world.

      We're talking about the people who want open borders for everyone else, but keep trying to establish exclusive islands and states for themselves, right?

    6. Re: Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they're just spoiled teenagers refusing to grow and live un a real society.

    7. Re:Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are spamming amazon and youtube affiliate links with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

  3. Defence by hvidstue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they have no way of defending themselves, they will be taken over by mafia or pirates as soon as they seem profitable. Sad reality of this world.

    1. Re:Defence by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      If they have no way of defending themselves, they will be taken over by mafia or pirates as soon as they seem profitable. Sad reality of this world.

      "the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation."

      Works as designed, unless you mean "beyond the influence of government regulation except for the regulations that we like," in which case one must ask "who gets to decide which regulations we like?"

      In a world beyond the influence of government regulation, I might become a big fan of "acutely aggressive acquisition."

    2. Re:Defence by Provocateur · · Score: 1, Funny

      You left out the dolphins. Armed dolphins (don't ask me if they're Soviet made weapons) who have been picking up all those signals. They would demand that we show them who this Alexa is, and that all package deliveries will be signed, floating island or not.
       
      And today's captcha is pacifier

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    3. Re:Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have no way of defending themselves, they will be taken over by mafia or pirates as soon as they seem profitable.
      Sad reality of this world.

      Is it impossible to purchase weapons now?
      I'm pretty sure if you're founding a nation (well, sort of) then you can decide to allow yourself weapons.

    4. Re:Defence by Rei · · Score: 1

      If they have no way of defending themselves, they will be taken over by mafia or pirates

      Or a 200kg (440lb) Tongan king leading an invasion force of prisoners and a brass band.

      (Though the island was tiny and unoccupied, there was nonetheless one casualty ;) )

      --
      Give a boy a gun and you arm him for a day. Teach him how to make a gun, and the whole metaphor breaks down.
    5. Re:Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200kg?? I was sure that you were talking about a renowned Slashdot collaborator that lives in Silicon Valley and I did a double-take and had to google for the Tongan king...

    6. Re:Defence by dk20 · · Score: 2

      That is when they will suddenly remember that they are citizens of some other country (the one they didnt want to pay taxes to) and would like to be rescued at great tax payer expense.

    7. Re:Defence by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      Having weapons means you'll automatically win, does it?

      Having weapons means no one will suddenly decide to join the "other side" because it has a bigger pay off, would it?

      Why, every small country always survive purely because of the availability of weapons! Because weapons are magic! Because they'll have weapons, they'll magically hold off other people who also have weapons, and also can keep trying and trying again.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    8. Re:Defence by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Why would they have no way of defending themselves? Do you think the libertarian anti-government types that will likely inhabit this settlement are somehow afraid of guns and will enact gun control legislation?

    9. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Libertarians just don't understand that a lack of government is impossible. As soon as one of these rich dudes noticed his neighbor is annoying, he'll form a home owner's association.

      Fifty years later, the home owner's association is executing people who aren't patriotic enough, and you've got people saying taxes are unconstitutional and the liberals have ruined everything and they need to start their own floating island with equally questionable poo disposal services.

    10. Re:Defence by brian.stinar · · Score: 2

      No, they'll be able to collect money from all of their citizens, to use for the common defense. This collected money will be collected through a compulsory transaction cost on all traded cryptocurrency, and used in a centralized fashion. Eventually, if those in control of this common fund want, they could use this for things other than physical defense, like education, social programs, or specific use cases. They might even levy charges against non-crypto-transactional things, like how big of a boat you have, or what other currencies you bring to their community.

      Oh wait, that's called "tax."

    11. Re:Defence by es330td · · Score: 1

      Will these dolphins be accompanied by sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads?

    12. Re:Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 1000 people with a few guns are going to stop RPG's, missiles, bombs, etc? What a fantasy.

    13. Re:Defence by nomadic · · Score: 1

      There is a large demographic of tech utopianists who are convinced since they own guns and like go target shooting every week that they are in fact useful in a firefight. Their self-regard is largely undeserved; most are suburban kids who have never been in an actual fight.

    14. Re:Defence by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Well, guns are useful in a firefight. Less useful, though, in a tank-fight, a bomb-fight, or a missle-fight. Ultimately, it would not matter if they were badly-trained or well-trained as a fire team.

      I do agree that they are deluding themselves.

    15. Re:Defence by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Torpedo. Or limpet mine.

      Might only need a small one, in the right place, but why not go full overkill just for comedy value.

    16. Re:Defence by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      OP (to whom I was responding to) wasn't talking about invasion by US Army. He was talking about "mafia and pirates". For defense against Somali pirates or Tony Soprano's goons, yes a thousand people with some guns is sufficient.

    17. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're either a fucking moron, or a dishonest piece of shit, if you can't comprehend the difference between Anarchist and Libertarian.

      What you described is anarchy. There is a massive difference between no government and small government. Literally no libertarian has ever argued for what you ascribe to them.

    18. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common good tax is perfectly in line with libertarian thinking.

      Building bombs to murder Iraqi citizens, while perfectly fine for Democratic liberals and Republican conservatives, is not something libertarians want to pay for, or consider part of the common good.

    19. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha yeah, next they'll tell us that a bunch of farmers with guns from the Korean War can stop Russia and America in Afghanistan! The absolute fools!

    20. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an awful lot of ancap libertardians around here.

    21. Re:Defence by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They are still floating around in French Polynesia.
      Good luck with your petty pirate fleet versus a frech frig or destroyer.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:Defence by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      No, because the dolphins would kill the sharks if they feel threatened.
      It is much better to have two squads: dolphins as scouts and sharks as infantry.
      Better keep them separated.

      (That is actually not a joke, the dolphins would kill a shark if they think it is attacking them)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:Defence by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You need more than "a gun" to defend against a pirate attack.
      You probably need something that originally was called a gun, not a simple hand arm.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    24. Re:Defence by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Soomali pirates have cheap boats.
      But they also have RPGs and state of the art assault rifles.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re: Defence by bsolar · · Score: 1

      Libertarianism includes Anarcho-Capitalism though, which advocates the elimination of the state in favour of privately operated courts, police and armed forces.

    26. Re:Defence by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      It sounds like they hope to rely on contracts with local governments for protection:

      https://www.blue-frontiers.com...

      "Pirates? Piracy is only a real problem in a few areas we are not going to. Regular crime can generally be handled by some combination of onboard security and government forces, widely depending on the location and agreements in place."

    27. Re:Defence by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      But they also have RPGs and state of the art assault rifles.

      While an RPG might be an issue, a "state of the art assault rifle" isn't really that big a deal. 5.56mm or 5.45mm (a glorified .22) isn't actually all that useful in that sort of situation. You'd generally be better off with a 12ga shotgun for close work, and a .30-06 (or 8mm Mauser, .303 Lee-Enfield, or any good hunting rifle) for distant work....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    28. Re:Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. they will be taken over by mafia or pirates as soon as they seem profitable.
      Sad reality of this world.

      Blimey, that's the first time I've heard USA being compared to mafia/pirates.

    29. Re:Defence by jythie · · Score: 1

      They are also used to the idea of firefights only destroying other people's territory. They forget that if a 'war' happens on your land, win or lose, you lose.

    30. Re:Defence by Papaspud · · Score: 1

      Or in this case- torpedoes... down she goes....

      --
      Everything above is my opinion....YMMV
    31. Re:Defence by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      That. Is. Fabulous. A city-state that can be destroyed by a torpedo. I wonder if it would be the world's first such instance?

    32. Re:Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor Island of Binimo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RgXL7byTF0 They just want their freedom!

    33. Re: Defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant to say voluntary instead of "private"

    34. Re:Defence by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You'd generally be better off with a 12ga shotgun for close work, and a .30-06 (or 8mm Mauser, .303 Lee-Enfield, or any good hunting rifle) for distant work....
      On a pirate boat? Or when you have entered the target?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    35. Re:Defence by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Nah. All they have to do is to pass some anti-piracy legislation. Like the DMCA. :)

  4. I've heard this one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this the plot to Bioshock?

    1. Re: I've heard this one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was a makeshift floating island called "the raft" in Stephenson's "Snow Crash"

    2. Re:I've heard this one before by spiritplumber · · Score: 1
      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    3. Re: I've heard this one before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Is a man not entitled to the HODL of his coin?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re: I've heard this one before by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There's a good China Meiville book that also explores this sort of city.

    5. Re:I've heard this one before by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      The urban myth about an man-made "island" that would be self-sufficient, and free of all government regulation, has been around since - at least - the 1970s.

    6. Re:I've heard this one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I remember an article in either Omni or Starlog magazine way, way back in the 70's or 80's.
      Only then, it was an island with no government regulation that was going to be the
      launchpad for an L5 space station.

      My capcha: canceled
      Appropriate for the magazines and the space station ("L5 in '95") and the island.

    7. Re:I've heard this one before by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You would need a quite big island, regardless of floating or not.
      I doubt 300 households (lets assume 2 adults and 1 or 2 kids) manage that.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:I've heard this one before by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but these are people who outright fetishize not learning from the past, so to them the failure of every attempt before is simply because those others were not as good as they are. Didn't you know everyone in the past was an idiot?

  5. They're own government? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Can we vote on which type? Maybe a monarchy?

    1. Re:They're own government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There, their, they're. Decisions, decisions. Which (or is it witch) one to use?

      Is it "there" – as in "over there" ? Nope.

      Is it "they're" – as in "they are having a good time" ? Nope.

      Or is it "their" – as in "it's their house" ? Hmmm. Let me get back to you on that.

    2. Re:They're own government? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they will adopt a variant of English where there==they're==their

    3. Re:They're own government? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Good thing you posted as an AC or your micro-aggressing bigoted post would have killed your karma! It should be zheirs or, xeirs, or some other all-gender-inclusive way of spelling...

      /sarc

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re: They're own government? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's going to be a lightly regulated capitalist economy, they'll have monarchs and serfs by different names whether anybody likes it or not.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  6. government regulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation.

    Uh huh. Just like SeaLand[1]? We already know how that plays out. One frigate and a platoon of Marines and it's all over.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand

    1. Re:government regulation? by careysub · · Score: 4, Informative

      And that's not the only one. The is also the "Republic of Minerva".

      Two key differences, it is not "beyond the influence of government regulation" since it is explicitly part of Frencb Polynesia which is in turn actually part of France. Some interesting points in the Wikipedia article about French Polynesia:

      "Political life in French Polynesia has been marked by great instability since the mid-2000s"

      Always a good sign... and

      "Despite a local assembly and government, French Polynesia is not in a free association with France... As a French overseas collectivity, the local government has no competence in justice, university education, security and defense. Services in these areas are directly provided and administered by the Government of France, including the National Gendarmerie (which also polices rural and border areas in European France), and French military forces. The collectivity government retains control over primary and secondary education, health, town planning, and the environment. The highest representative of the State in the territory is the High Commissioner of the Republic in French Polynesia"

      Overseas Collectivities are integral parts of France and the supreme local power is the French High Commissioner, and its ultimate head of state is President of France Emmanuel Macron.

      So the notion that this little project will be "beyond the influence of government regulation" is delusional (or else pure hype).

      But hey! It is being funded with an ICO! What could go wrong with that?

      My projection: the only thing floating here will be the money people invest in the cryptocurrency which will float away.

      In other news you can still send money to Mars One to see a colony be not built on Mars. Mars One really missed the boat (err... spaceship) in not creating the chance to invest in the new Martian cryptocurrency. But that may be coming if, their gullible (err... optimistic) contributors have dried up.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:government regulation? by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      If they anchor over 12 miles off the coast of the closest Island, they will be in international waters and outside of the jurisdiction of the French government. Although the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea gives France a 200 mile exclusive economic zone around the Islands. At the very least the French could forbid them from fishing or setting up anchored wind-turbines. This assumes that the French don't take the position that the whole installation is nothing more than a "stateless, flagless, or unregistered" vessel

    3. Re:government regulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea gives France a 200 mile exclusive economic zone around the Islands

      But they could do it like the Chinese do, claim such rights as ridiculous and start ramming French vessels. Enough ramming and maybe some more island building and the sea is theirs!

    4. Re:government regulation? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Technically 'SeaLand' can't move and had less than a dozen people on it but I'm 100% down with King Marduk I and whatever other octogenarians are still living on that WW2 era tree fort.

  7. Seasteading ist nonsense. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    The most feasible thing is building a community in the savanna or desert. Which is what most Projects of this kind do. If you have money enough to build and run a floating island, you'll have 5 times the money to do that. But I guess Peter Thiel has consumed to much like to realise that.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: Seasteading ist nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think youve missed the point. Any land is going to cost. Here they dont pay for ground, they make it out of an abundant resource already polluting the vast oceans

    2. Re: Seasteading ist nonsense. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. There is plenty of cheap land, but all of it remains under control of one government or another. I remember a group of Randists toying with the idea of building their own Laissez-faire City, and were in talks with a Latin American government to lease the necessary land for 100 years and free of most rules... but even there that government would not allow a complete freedom of prevailing laws of the land. On the high seas however... There are some rules there too, but it's not one government setting them or enforcing them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re: Seasteading ist nonsense. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Such a community was promoted a few years back as "Galt's Gulch Chile". Chile isn't a libertarian country, but it is one of the best countries for a middle class person to try to become rich, rating quite high on most rankings by libertarian economics.

      The promoters turned out to be con-men. Some of the people involved have regrouped and are attempting to build another Chile based project with a cryptocurrency based economy.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re: Seasteading ist nonsense. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Funny

      with a cryptocurrency based economy

      In other words: more con-men

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  8. Political Mish Mash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So these islands are designed to function "beyond the influence of government regulation" and yet they'll be used "to house climate refugees." So this person wants to be away from government regulation, such as regulation on carbon dioxide emissions, but is a climate change alarmist and is preparing for climate change refugees. This seems highly contradictory as one would normally expect such a person to be in favour of regulations to prevent climate change.

    Another contradiction is that she is "in favor of living off the grid" and yet the islands are "are designed to function as business centers." Off the grid generally means off the internet. How can you do business and be off the grid?

    They don't seem to know what they want or what problem it is they're trying to solve. This won't end well.

    1. Re:Political Mish Mash by aurispector · · Score: 1

      They *already* have to have some form of agreement regulating how the residents help contribute to maintaining the place, hence they have a rudimentary government. Disputes will arise, mechanisms for dealing with future disputes will be agreed upon and it goes from there.

      Beyond governing issues, the physical and logistical challenges of maintaining the islands will be enormous. It remains to be seen if they will be able to generate enough revenue to maintain it.

      And of course, all they have to do is piss off any nation with a navy and the entire thing gets seized.

      It will fail spectacularly and it will be a glorious moment of human hubris.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    2. Re: Political Mish Mash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget navies. These utopians must be aware that piracy on the high seas is now rampant. Even cruise ships have countermeasures designed to hold out until a friendly navy ship can help. If there aren't any friendly navies around I'm sure that any businesses they attract will need to consider private security...

      They might as well concede they need to essentially be a criminal enterprise like the fictional SPECTRE to actually succeed...

    3. Re:Political Mish Mash by Layzej · · Score: 1

      So this person wants to be away from government regulation, such as regulation on carbon dioxide emissions, ...and is preparing for climate change refugees. This seems highly contradictory as one would normally expect such a person to be in favour of regulations to prevent climate change.

      There are certainly people who reject science because of the regulatory implications. In that case they are selecting for facts based on a desired conclusion. That is the irrational position. Surely one should base a conclusion on the available facts.

      Nathalie Mezza-Garcia, on the other hand, accepts the best available science even though she is opposed to the regulatory implications. That is rational. In addition, she proposes an alternative to regulation. That is also rational.

      This is really the debate we should be having. What mix of mitigation/adaptation is appropriate? Her solution of zero mitigation may seem extreme, but it is at least rational.

    4. Re:Political Mish Mash by jythie · · Score: 1

      They probably would not even have to piss off a navy to fail. Just a couple of frauder websites, or kiddy porn distributors, and they might get their internet access cut, and that would probably ruin them.

  9. Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by Pollux · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If you don't want to live under a particular government," she said, "people will be able to just take their house and float away to another island."

    I think this organization does not quite understand the primary purpose of government: to provide protection of life, liberty, and property. Does this self-governing island have that ability? Who will citizens turn to if someone is murdered on their island? Or if someone invades their island? Or sinks it? Or if power fails? Food supplies fail? Water supplies fail? Currency becomes destabilized?

    I think I'll stick with my own home country, thank-you-very-much. Sure, they're far from perfect, but at least I know they can provide for me the securities I need.

    1. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currency becomes destabilized?

      Haha! That's impossible! They're going to be using cryptocoi...oh wait

    2. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by Rei · · Score: 2

      The reality is that the more "micro" the state, the more you can expect them to become a haven for "Bad Things(TM)". Think of all of the Fritzls and the like you'd have when people feel free that there's no authority out there to stop them. Any crime you can imagine, expect it to happen abundantly when the group size is small and there's reason to feel confident in a lack of repercussions.

      Floating microstates used to be common on the high seas, where a group of like-minded people decided that they had no interest in the laws and rules imposed on them by outside authorities, and that they were going to do whatever they wanted, in their own rational self-interest. These were known as "pirate ships".

      --
      Give a boy a gun and you arm him for a day. Teach him how to make a gun, and the whole metaphor breaks down.
    3. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except pirate ships did have rules and mechanisms for enforcing them.

    4. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Floating microstates used to be common on the high seas, where a group of like-minded people decided that they had no interest in the laws and rules imposed on them by outside authorities, and that they were going to do whatever they wanted, in their own rational self-interest. These were known as "pirate ships".

      Pirates actually had a rather complex and robust sociopolitical system of their own. They had formal systems of voting, minimum wage, dispute resolution, criminal investigation, foreign policy, extradition and more. Pirates were surprisingly political, they're not the drunken anarchists they're often portrayed as in fictional accounts. It's quite fascinating, and an example of how government is an unavoidable inevitability of human nature. Even when people try to escape it, it always comes back.

    5. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Who will citizens turn to if someone is murdered on their island? - The mob
      Or if someone invades their island? - The mob
      Or sinks it? - The sharks
      Or if power fails? - The mob but for different reasons
      Food supplies fail? - The sharks, but for different reasons
      Water supplies fail? - The mob but for different reasons
      Currency becomes destabilized? - France, hoping for a bailout.

    6. Re:Have they forgotten the purpose of government? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It is a floating island.
      They send a distress signal:
      MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY
      This is: Floating island
      My position: ....

      Any vessel receiving the distress is obliged to help or relay the distress ...

      If they are big enough they can handle local crimes themselves ...
      And: obviously, outside of war zones the rate of "murder" is quite low ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  10. Floating island community targeted by pirates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would lead to an increase in pirates and simultaneously prevent global warming. LOL the correlation remains intact!

  11. Blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Along with a cryptocurrency, it has to use AI to keep the island afloat and manage it to be a winner.

    And blockchain. They will be using a Blockchain to anchor it.

  12. Waste of money, energy by archer,+the · · Score: 4, Informative

    It would be better to spend the money replacing existing fossil fuel generation with renewable generation, and there's no point in switching to a monetary system that consumes 7 GW producing new money. Yes, there will be climate refugees, but it's cheaper to build a home on solid ground. Unless you really want your house floating around in a cat 4 or cat 5 hurricane...

    1. Re:Waste of money, energy by thomst · · Score: 1

      arche, the pointed out:

      Yes, there will be climate refugees, but it's cheaper to build a home on solid ground. Unless you really want your house floating around in a cat 4 or cat 5 hurricane...

      FWIW: in the Pacific, they're called "typhoons" ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
    2. Re:Waste of money, energy by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should go full-on fantasy and make it submersible.

  13. This is NOT autonomy. by phayes · · Score: 4, Informative

    As they will be setting up under French jurisdiction, they will be subservient to French laws and protections.

    France already lets many islands in Polynesia govern themselves -- as long as they don't have any impact on other islands & generally respect french laws so if it actually comes to pass this will be generally more of the same.

    There are islands in Polynesia where no non-inhabitant is allowed to stay the night. One in particular is about a 2 hour boat trip from Bora Bora. -- The islanders want to keep their culture pure but appreciate the tourist money.

    Another island not too far away saw a few boatloads of Gendarmes come ashore about 10 years ago to put an end to another society that was "attempting to return to their polynesian values" and were treating the women as chattel so there are limits and the french Government will not hesitate to intervene if they judge it necessary.

    Nothing new here...

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    1. Re:This is NOT autonomy. by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      As they will be setting up under French jurisdiction, they will be subservient to French laws and protections.

      So what you're saying is that they're on their own but get a 30% discount on baguettes?

    2. Re:This is NOT autonomy. by phayes · · Score: 1

      Whereas if they setup in the U.S. or one of it's overseas territories they'd get free Big Macs? For the more obese among us I can see the advantages.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:This is NOT autonomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France is not sovereign. They are under subjects of the European Union

      Sovereignty = Right to set up civil and criminal courts and enforce the death penalty, create currency that the sovereignty spends into circulation and demands in taxes, and adjudicates civil debts in that currency, and of course, raise an army.

      France does not have monetary sovereignty, and most civil laws are subject to EU regulations.

      You're right this will be like Polynesia. Just keep in mind that France is not sovereign.

  14. Libertarian Paradise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's going to be a Libertarian Paradise where everyone takes personal responsibility and it will be harmonious!

    *takes another drag*

    And every thing will be privately owned.

    *takes another drag*

    There will be no "takers". No government stealing of property with guns!

    *takes another drag*

    It will be the paradise that Ayn Rand envisioned in her children's book, "Atlas Shrugged".

    1. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      'Atlas Shrugged' is more of a young adult novel.

      (by the time you're 24 you have outgrown it)

    2. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I prefer that any day to you idiots who treat all adults as if they were perpetual children.

    3. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by thomst · · Score: 1

      Bing Tsher E noted:

      'Atlas Shrugged' is more of a young adult novel.

      (by the time you're 24 you have outgrown it)

      I was 17 when I read it - and I had already outgrown it by then ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
    4. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by ChatHuant · · Score: 2

      There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

      John Rogers

    5. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things that leaves me puzzled is how both left- and right-leaning people have enough sense to see Atlas Shrugged as presenting an overly idealistic/utopian view that would never work in reality but somehow left-leaning people seem to find it impossible to see the same in communism. It's doubly puzzling because Rand specifically wrote Atlas Shrugged to hold a mirror up to communism and it does that pretty well. Objectivism is the exact opposite of communism and, without too much thought, almost everyone recognises that it would not and could not work. And yet those same left-leaning people smart enough to reject objectivism can look at communism and completely miss its exact mirror-image problems.

    6. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      Empirical data shows that many adults cannot be trusted to be treated as adults.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    7. Re: Libertarian Paradise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayn Rand's inner circle was called _The Collective_,with meetings that bore a greater resemblance to Khmer Rouge Educational talk, than any speech in _The Fountainhead_.

  15. This can work by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right up until the moment the local Somali pirate variant shows up.

    1. Re:This can work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Look at me, look at me... I'm the President now."

    2. Re:This can work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you mean free-thinking sea capitalist

  16. Galt's Gulch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Galt's Gulch became Ayn's Atoll.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Waitaminute! by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hold on... Cryptocurrency? And "off the grid"? I don't think those two things go together.

    1. Re:Waitaminute! by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      Why? "Off the grid" generally means you provide your own power, so provided the currency being developed doesn't require power intensive mining there's no reason why it couldn't exist within the constraints of a limited capacity local power grid. Or flip it around entirely; everyone has their own home supply (solar and/or wind/water turbines, most likely) and you earn the currency based on how much excess power you are able to feed into the communal supply for things like street lighting, social facilities, water treatment works, and so on.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re: Waitaminute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off grid doesn't just mean the electrical grid. Crypto is pretty pointless when you are doing it on a small scale.

      Also, this all sounds like Scientology 2.0 to me.

    3. Re:Waitaminute! by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Cryptocurrency? And "off the grid"? I don't think those two things go together.
      You're right of course. Just think of all of the diesel fuel these guys are going to be churning through trying to fight global warming by generating arbitrary ones and zeroes. The least they could do is relocate from French Polynesia to someplace like northern Oregon where they can use that all waste heat to keep warm at night.

  18. Big Boss is rebuilding his army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like they're going to need some defense, and no better than the likes of Big Boss to help build up his army again.

  19. Where's the enabling technology? by shess · · Score: 1

    "If you're struggling to do business" - yes, this will become easier by limiting yourself to a market of 300 households! Oh, wait, no, they're thinking they're going to sell to the world, somehow? Do they have some sort of robotic manufacturing? Is there some sort of thing which enables them to not operate differently from the various other tax havens? No?

    "just live under your country's administration" - yes, this will become easier by removing yourself to a location which is entirely dependent on the outside world for basics such as food and water! Oh, wait, no, they have compact fusion plants? New solar desalinization technology? Food replicators? No?

    "proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees" - yes, they can come with their various boats (one for shorter trips and one for long-distance travels, another for entertaining) and use their iPhones to connect to the free satellite Internet and day-trade commodities using crypto coins ... wait, did anyone tell these people that climate refugees are generally quite poor in Western terms? Like maybe they don't even have a feature phone, and their advanced economic knowledge is maybe about getting a loan to purchase some chickens to provide eggs to their neighborhood? Do they have some sort of OLPC-type system to enable technological take-up in a way Western economies haven't?

    "This means there is stability, outside of fluctuating geopolitical influences, trade issues and currency fluctuations" - because cryptocurrencies and the Internet are SUPER DUPER DOUBLE-PLUS STABLE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS. These aren't so much enabling technologies as disabling technologies.

    "people will be able to just take their house and float away to another island" - or perhaps the island they are connected to will just disconnect them and cast them loose to sink or swim, either because their household isn't contributing enough rent, or just because they don't look "right". That sounds fun! It certainly won't be abused to force people to labor in the households of the islands super-rich!

    ---

    In my life I have gone from growing up on a rural farm to early retirement in silicon valley, and I frequently worry whether I've lost my connection to how regular humans operate. It's nice to see that there's a group of people out there striving to make me feel like I'm still quite grounded! It's like how kids think that milk comes from the grocery store, except the adult version where they have no comprehension about how anything they rely on to live works.

    1. Re:Where's the enabling technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming they wanted to sell something, what are the natural resources? So they can't build anything physical. All they have left is trading their cryptocurrency backed by what?

  20. sounds like smooth sailing by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    until the weather turns bad and the seas get rough, when the wind is doing 90 mph and the seas have swells and waves at 50 feet with occasional rogue waves close to 75 feet there is no safe place in the ocean

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:sounds like smooth sailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free market will take care of that! /s

  21. What's wrong with these retards ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with these delirious disconnected-from-reality pseudo-libertarian nerds ? Haven't they learned anything about how the human brain works ? Isn't the thousands of years of human history enough ?

    Any mildly sentient life form in the universe should know exactly how this is going to end. They can't possibly be that stupid. There's more to this that they let out. Most probably some scam to attract gullible "investors".

  22. A dream that is decades/centuries old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Manmade floating "island" states are not a new concept. If anything, people have thought about them for centuries, and talked about the implementation details for many decades now. They never happen because they're wildly impractical.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_cities_and_islands_in_fiction

  23. Subversives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As well as offering a home for the displaced, the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation.

    Subversives, bomb them! It's the only way to be sure.

  24. php bot asks by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    did you mean ===

    1. Re: php bot asks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equal, not identical.

    2. Re:php bot asks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No, he does not speak JavaScript or ECMAScript, sad, isn't it?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  25. Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    Why not just get a boat as register it in Liberia. You can still make up your own crypto currency.

    even better, don't get a boat but tell everyone you did get a boat. Call it your own country, so you don't have to register it. Then no one can determine the boat does not exist. take the money and run.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  26. Re:Have they forgotten the purpoUse of government? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    I think this organization does not quite understand the primary purpose of government

    Would that be "the primary purpose of government" as we wish it to be... or as it actually has been throughout history? Wee bit of a difference.

  27. *Sigh*, here we go again... by dogwallop1964 · · Score: 1

    It seems that every few years some group with lofty ideals tries to launch such a venture. And always for the same reasons: To get away from the corrupt governments of the world and build a utopia where unicorns and butterflies will frolic for all eternity. Well, I have bad news: Those governments were created and run by... humans! Yes, humans, just like those trying to re-imagine a perfect future. The problem is with human (i.e. animal) nature. We're animals, and unless we completely redesign our core humanity those floating communities will end up in much the same state as the very world they are trying to escape. Cheers

  28. who needs an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just pick that least used biodome and declare your independence from Mom and the pizza delivery guy. Don't leave out that router, though, or you'd be just another "dark continent", Kimo savvy

  29. Re:Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    That's... a really good and simple description of every ICO ever.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  30. Re:Have they forgotten the purpoUse of government? by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    No, not a "wee bit of difference" at all. Unlike what libertarians and other history-deniers would have us belief, most governments have done as "wished". The only governments that really did aim to screw over people constantly were the nomadic raider cultures like the Huns and the Mongols. Most other governments were actually about trying to look after the people they ruled over.

    Those that didn't were overthrown either internally, or by another government that had its shit together.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  31. Hold everything, did you say PACIFIC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, it's kind of overcrowded there already.

    Just ask China. They are looking to spread their defense to western Pacific, since there is an alliance of US-friendly nations stretching from Japan to the Philippines.

    So your cryptocurrency and self-governance fantasies could vanish, without any real defense in place.

  32. The Government Creates the Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing these libertarian folks don't want to believe is that governments create economies.

    Streets, sewers, power lines, courts, ports, contract laws, law enforcement to enforce them, schools to educate workers, blah blah blah. Stuff people who are not insane understand.

    These folks are giving their money to an ideal that's a fantasy, has never worked anywhere, and will fail, probably before it gets too far along.

    Oh, yeah, and there's storms, and these islands are surrounded by water. Big water. Ocean water.

  33. "climate" refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you are still pushing this propaganda.

  34. Of course. by hey! · · Score: 1

    Naturally it has a cryptocurrency. If it had been conceived fifteen years ago it's constitution would probably have been written in XML. Twenty-five years ago and it would have had a domain consisting of a common English noun and ".com".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  35. Sounds like a good idea to me by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Stick all the libertarian idiots on a floating pontoon in the middle of the Pacific, call it Rapture and wait for the whole thing to sink to the bottom of the sea.

  36. A dream that is decades/centuries old-space travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well much like space travel we have the technology and resources.* We just down't have the will. Where we are isn't unpleasant enough to motivate anyone to make such a drastic change, or financial commitment.

    *Yes we could, think of as a oil platform on a grand scale.

  37. Sealand by Xord · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Sealand off the UK coast. You can now become a Baron of Sealand for £29.99. https://www.sealandgov.org/

    1. Re:Sealand by jythie · · Score: 2

      At least Sealand actually exists. I think it says a lot that the only seastead around is one manufactured with government money and then claimed by a private individual.

  38. All cryptocurrencies and ICOs are scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are (any) fiat-currency and (any) cryptocurrency really equivalent, as cryptocurrency fans claim?
    For example, US Dollar and Bitcoin are really equals?
    Value/validity/authorization of US dollar is provided/guaranteed by US Government (and in-turn whole US Public)!
    Also, not to mention, US Dollars in any US Bank is insured by US Government!
    What authorization/guarantee/insurance is behind Bitcoin? Nothing!
    Sorry but that is the end of discussion then!

    Why do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is really hiding his identity, if Bitcoin is really such a great innovation?
    He is just someone does not like media/fan attention?
    Or, could it be really because Bitcoin (and all cryptocurrencies followed it) are actually Ponzi Schemes?
    (So he knew very well that law enforcement would come after him sooner or later?!)

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really money; isn't people issuing their own money, illegal already, in all countries?
    If so then, why they are still not banned in all countries?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    Also, since all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually financial scams (Ponzi Schemes), that means, they cannot be the solution for any of existing financial problems of our world!

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere (because people invested in cryptocurrencies, would try to stop anyone trying to ban cryptocurrencies)!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  39. "to house climate refugees" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looked like a cool idea until that was said. Since it is highly unlikely the rich backers believe in the climate change hoax, there is different REAL reason they are trying to build this

  40. Crap Political Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your turds represent the proletariat, and you are acting as the bourgeoisie when you tip the handle.

  41. Not Beyond The Reach by QuadEddie · · Score: 1

    French Territory, so they fall under french taxation agreements. If they were truly independent with an independent armed force to protect it, they could legitimately set up a business tax haven island that could attract billions.

  42. Wait.. what ? by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    "...we will have a proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees"

    I thought that is where they came from....

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  43. Next chapter by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    The next chapter in my life won't be to move to another area where there is more government involved. After all of the shenanigans with the Trump and Republican Party, the next move I make is to the interior of Alaska; somewhere far away from both people and government. Why would I want to move to some tiny, potentially crowded makeshift island to have even more interference in my life? As I get older and learn more, if you want true freedom, you must go to remote areas furthest from civilization. Then you won't (well mostly, at any rate) be bothered by government or people.

  44. Statists are the real comic relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You believe in a system (the state) with a track record of thousands of years of failure with not a single example of a long-lasting, successful, corruption-free entity, and which has killed billions of people.

    You're the funny one.

    Over the next 100 years, expect to see multiple new stateless societies as the world evolves beyond government.

    1. Re: Statists are the real comic relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoL... haven't been able to achieve that for "thousands of years" even thou it's been much easier to be disconnected and isolated in the past. I won't be holding my breath.

    2. Re:Statists are the real comic relief by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

      So, the folks, some of whom have managed to have stable societies for decades to hundreds of years are laughable, but the folks with zero track record who are rejecting what we've already learned are the ones who are going to have everything work better?

      I suppose it's possible, but I don't understand why someone would think this is the way to bet.

    3. Re:Statists are the real comic relief by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      As long as Libertarians want people to have guns, someone will organize those with guns to win over others with and without guns. And thus ends your stateless society. Enjoy.

  45. Rothbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Murray Rothbard already decisively answered your objections nearly 50 years ago.

    Read this book. You can download it for free:

    https://mises.org/library/new-liberty-libertarian-manifesto

  46. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defense is a market service just like anything else. The market supplies what the consumers demand without taxation.

    https://mises.org/library/private-production-defense

  47. Government's purpose is to enrich its masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government is nothing more than the mafia in a grand scale: a massive, well-armed protection racket that it forces you to pay and submit to. It exists to enrich and empower its elites and connected benefactors. It claims a full monopoly on the power of force in society. It is a criminal gang which people mysteriously treat as sacred.

  48. Seasteading.org is a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been following it since... 2012. There have been like three startups not including this stupid french polynesia one (which is like the third probably failed project, just from the Seasteading Institute.) Furthermore even that guy who sued gawker gave up on them, stating he no longer believed it was possible.

    Despite this, I don't think seasteading as a concept is a bad idea, just the people currently pushing it. Much like the AI/cryptocurrency jokes you see in other posts here, it is mostly being pushed as a 'libertarian' land scam, claiming freedom from legal responsibility while taking advantage of being in a 'safe' government's waters. The people starting the projects would own all the 'land' on the islands and would sell/lease this to the 'peasants' to recoup costs and pay investors. That is neither the way to generate a representative government, nor to found a self sustaining nation that is not even more ruthless than other existing libertarian/capitalist regions, assuming you were to first take care of the aforementioned jurisdictional issues.

    On the matter of independent governance: If you want that to happen TODAY, the first step is to get enough stateless individuals willing to die (sea is a harsh mistress) or fight for their chance at freedom and their own country. And then they would need to establish themselves outside of the EEZ borders of existing UN nations. Given the current 200 mile EEZ(set to be expanded to 300 or 400 nm. See: Argentina), not including claims over continental shelves that extend beyond that, finding a safe region to set up a seastead is difficult, and convincing both the manpower and personnel necessary to initially establish and continually support will be hard.

    I actually put a great deal of thought into a seastead based as a cooperative corporation with single share per citizen dividends with the initial platform anchored into pace over a seamount. The opportunities to do so are dwindling however, and if the Argentina EEZ expansion is used to ratify an extension to the UNCLOS EEZ distance for signatory nations, then all possible seamounts will be out of reach without direct conflict with UN backed nations, leaving the possibilities for a seastead outside of direct government influence floating over 4km deep waters with far higher minimum costs for anchoring in place, or stationkeeping capabilities to avoid drifting into 'sovereign territory'.

    Should there be interest in more detail on my proposals, reply to this post and I will either discuss more here or put up a new website about it on I2P.

    1. Re:Seasteading.org is a joke. by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      The great Pacific Garbage Patch seems to generally stay away from sovereign nations, provides a steady supply of plastic for expansion using semi-rigid tethered rafts/barges. It could make for a great R&D platform for plastic recycling, 3d printing, aquaponics, hydroponics, fish farming, algae farming, bio-fuel production, sea based poultry production and all types of other scientific and commercial endeavors. Just having a decent port for fuel and supplies could open up tourism to more areas. If it were properly planned, it could be a succesful, profitable venture in science and commerce, exploiting previously unused or wasted resources.

  49. Government creates nothing; it steals everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything government has, it has stolen from a real producer.

  50. Pirate ships were probably safer than land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless things were going badly it could be assumed the average pirate wouldn't kill another pirate while at sea on risk of being keelhauled or marooned himself, shares of the booty were generally pre-negotiated before tours, and only if supplies ran out/the hunt went badly would pirates come to turn against each other.

    While there are stories of the bad things that happened on pirate ships, or by pirate ships, the issues were more between 'sovereigns' (pirate ship vs established nation or other pirate ship) than between members of the pirate ship itself. Pirates, while they could be violent, were not generally internally unlawful. Discipline on a pirate ship was at least as important as a military vessel, although etiquette and manners outside of work were obviously not.

    That said, all we have to go on is historical record, and much of that record was made to look down on the uncivilized nature of savages, whether they be land based natives, or sea based 'free states'.

  51. Bullshit & Cruise Ships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. This is a scam. It is utter bullshit. You know it is bullshit. Why would you give this any credence at all. It is pure shit.

    Now then, let's look at the fact that this basically already exists in cruise ships. They're floating islands with anywhere from 300 - 2,000 "homes" or condominiums depending on the size of the ship. They also have everything one could need for day-to-day life. They have their own governments(company, captain, crew) and they have their own currencies. Electronic currency in the form of on board guest cards, as well as chips in the casinos.

  52. Re:Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? by jythie · · Score: 1

    Yes, but this is a boat that people will pay you to live on. That is their big dream : to be their own government that 'the right sort of people' pay to live in their country.

  53. Re:Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, while they advocate open borders for everyone else. If libertarians really hated the state as much as they hate the nation, they might actually be good for something.

  54. I would need to check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but geographically I believe it falls within the United States' Pacific Ocean 'turf'. Not necessarily what they legally control according to the UN/international treaty, but where they project by hook or crook(s).

  55. Free from government influence by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I assume that "free from government influence" means not paying taxes. The logical consequence is that such an entity should not benefit from free government protection from pirates. Will french navy send a bill each time them help here?

  56. I heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember another artificial island that was a failure.

  57. Re: Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? by slashnot007 · · Score: 1

    Or it's an imaginary boat you paid for that turns out doesn't exist

  58. China by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    China thanks you in advance for preparing some new artificial islands for them.

  59. Capsizing Island by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Hank Johnson will be vindicated.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  60. Occupancy Requirement? by Amigori · · Score: 1
    300 houses, on a fake island, with no natural resources (except fishing), and a requirement to import everything for daily life. This is only viable for wealthy investors, who won't actually live there.

    So you'll have a couple of maintenance folks and data-center geeks on a from-the-mainland shift-rotation schedule. The rich folks may stop by in their yacht once a year. They may not even stop in to check on their money-launde...er, offshore accounts.

    Climate refugees...hahaha! Waste. Of. Money.

    Oh, and the book: "Seasteading -- How Floating Nations Will Restore The Environment, Enrich the Poor, Cure the Sick, And Liberate Humanity from Politicians." Could the title be any more self-aggrandizing? These floating concrete blocks would accomplish nothing of these things. At least classic homesteading had natural resources and an available trading environment to work with.

    • Restore the Environment: Everything, everything needs to be imported. Its not like these building materials just appear. Just the concrete pumping ship will offset the "greenness" of this place for the first 5y. 90%+ of food will need to be grown on the mainland, and shipped in. Power? No signs of solar on those grass rooftops, so a really long extension cord to..Tahiti? They mention breakwater and wave generation, but will that be enough for the data center plus residents. Restore the environment by using a different resource location, and not counting the other location in the reported data. Kind of like US/EU and China.
    • Enrich the Poor: How exactly? They can't afford to live here. There won't be any service jobs. And a simple $50m cost / 300 units = $167k/unit. Even at $50k/unit, plus the remaining $35m made up by the business center side, still unaffordable for the fishermen. So how again??
    • Cure the Sick: Elysium style? 300 housing units doesn't equate to much of a need for anything more than an occasional visit by a General Physician. ...Got It! This will be one of those 'illegal' operations that aren't under any jurisdiction, and again, only rich folks go to.
    • Liberate Humanity from Politicians: Except when they move in. "No" politicians is very attractive to current/aspiring politicians. Call it a new market.
    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
  61. Forget the island by vlad30 · · Score: 1

    They have all been claimed or will be claimed if you make it viable try an asteroid plenty up there for the taking

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  62. One good typhoon by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    One good typhoon and one has to ask, were will the inhabitants go?

  63. So familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I can say is that this isn't the first Libertarian floating utopia project that's come along and it won't be the last. Its one of those perennial bad ideas like flying cars.

  64. No shitty 3rd world island with APKoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Subject: APKoin is better than all other cyypto coin guarantee to not loose value

    Get APKoin by spreading the word of "LORD of HOSTS" to all conrners of teh internet

    Get APKoin by "Kick stomping heart" FAKE SOYboy slashdot l[users] who dare defy brilliant APK

    Redeemable for ultra premium moose dik you can suck or take in ass

    Premium rewards like suk my MEGA MAN PENIS or lick my gaint ballz

    APK

    P.S.=> The Soros and ROTHSCHILD backed jew bankers want to destroy CRYPTO COIN because it can derail their plans to enslave great american worker. Trump was the first major disruption to they plans APKoins is the next... apk

  65. $50 million to build? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that in a real currency, like Varyon?

  66. So, do words mean anything any more? by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

    The project is funded through philanthropic donations ...

    This seems like a pretty expansive view of what the term "philanthropic" means.