One difficulty with that approach is that the software required for a third-party replacement component might be completely different to the software required for the component from the original manufacturer.
And yet it worked before the upgrade. It's not proof, but it's cause for suspicion.
Crocodilians are descendent from the precursors to, not only dinosaurs, but pterosaurs as well. Based on this connection, Gallup and Suarez (1987) examined crocodilians for their capacity, or lack thereof, to form learned taste aversions. Since crocodilians are descendent from the same creatures that gave rise to dinosaurs, this creates the opportunity to evaluate the tenability of the proposition that dinosaurs went extinct due to an inherent inability to learn to avoid eating toxic plants.
It claims we can conclude that dinosaurs didn't develop an aversion to foods that make them sick based on the fact that caimans (which have a common ancestor) don't.
Can we therefore conclude that pterosaurs didn't fly based on the fact that caimans don't?
Probably your brain is wired to see errors and mistakes. I only see meaning:D
Then it's fucking bullshit to say that you saw no errors as a rebuttal to someone who said there was one. Of course you didn't see something you weren't looking for, not that you'd see it anyway.
Bizarrely I just watched an episode of Horizon and they said 10% per billion[1] years. One thing's sure, your figure's a lot closer to theirs than either is to minus something.
[1] Ob: for a minute I was worried - I thought they said million!
Does transcoding fall under editing? Perhaps, but I'd say not.
In any case, he doesn't even mention file sizes. My reading was that he was just trying to find a way to make his humongous files upload faster, not addressing the issue of their being humongous in the first place.
Then again it seems nobody can ask questions properly these days.
Plus most recorders are optimised for speed rather than storage efficiency, since if you're recording live you miss it and it's gone.
Not the same thing but the same principle, I record analogue TV with an old PVR500. At DVD resolution it chucks out nearly 3G per hour, which is ridiculous. If only there was something that could crop it, chop it, normalise the sound and make the bitrate more sensible... they could call it mencoder or something.
Slashdot Mirror
DTNFY,RIYHOD
Underneath that, somebody else wrote "With every 10 gallons".
And if he'd called it "dataduplicate"?
Cripes-a-murgatroyd! We've got thegarbz quoting Shakespeare and now you're paraphrasing Donne.
How about meeting people with different interests? You might find them interesting because, well, they're different.
I wasn't always interested in buses, you know.
And yet it worked before the upgrade. It's not proof, but it's cause for suspicion.
Why would they sell it once when they can rent it an infinite number of times?
It claims we can conclude that dinosaurs didn't develop an aversion to foods that make them sick based on the fact that caimans (which have a common ancestor) don't.
Can we therefore conclude that pterosaurs didn't fly based on the fact that caimans don't?
It could equally be interpreted the other way. At best, it's sloppy writing.
s/the species/them/ and it's unambiguous.
P.S. another gem (p48) "gastro-intestinal track". No doubt you'll find some convoluted way to justify that too.
Then it's fucking bullshit to say that you saw no errors as a rebuttal to someone who said there was one. Of course you didn't see something you weren't looking for, not that you'd see it anyway.
Internet tough guy spotted.
Bizarrely I just watched an episode of Horizon and they said 10% per billion[1] years. One thing's sure, your figure's a lot closer to theirs than either is to minus something.
[1] Ob: for a minute I was worried - I thought they said million!
Did he announce this via twitter?
As Morrissey said, some magmas are hotter than others.
Maybe there was originally one for blankes and one for the kaffers?
Wrong. A stopped clock is right twice a day.
Does transcoding fall under editing? Perhaps, but I'd say not.
In any case, he doesn't even mention file sizes. My reading was that he was just trying to find a way to make his humongous files upload faster, not addressing the issue of their being humongous in the first place.
Then again it seems nobody can ask questions properly these days.
He didn't even do it himself, did he? I thought he pinched it from Claudia Winkleman.
Is it the one where they bury the turd for 20 million years in hot magma and then polish the resulting diamond?
Is anybody?
Sorry, I don't speak metric.
How many elephants squared per library of congress is that?
Plus most recorders are optimised for speed rather than storage efficiency, since if you're recording live you miss it and it's gone.
Not the same thing but the same principle, I record analogue TV with an old PVR500. At DVD resolution it chucks out nearly 3G per hour, which is ridiculous. If only there was something that could crop it, chop it, normalise the sound and make the bitrate more sensible... they could call it mencoder or something.
Like Hungarian voters, you mean?
Last time I had a jalfrezi it was the other way round.
No it doesn't. It just demonstrates the absence of total crappiness. You don't have to be best to be good enough.
For once, Alabama law agrees with science.