Indeed I just tried with my phone running 4.0 beta4 locked, and nothing mounted, then I unlocked it and retried and it automounted like a block device.
The next step from DARPA is asking Lada to reinvent the wheel to make it more military friendly, adding automatic braking and better resilience against bullets.
It seems the post has been removed at the moment... Was it a fake one?
I now get: Article is unavailable or has been removed, please try a new search.
The article was not found, or is no longer available. Please try a new search..
Multiple driver issues then, as running some OS in fusion isn't the same as in bare hardware, it's a whole new machine from the guest OS point of view. If you run windows on the bare hardware, it will use nvidia and all other real hardware drivers. If you run windows in fusion, it will use some "generic" hardware drivers. So I somehow doubt it's a specific driver problem if it happens both in fusion and on bare hardware.
Motorola RAZR phones, for example, won't charge on PCs unless the Motorola driver is present to do the handshake.
This only happens on windows, if you are running whatever other OS (Solaris, Linux, OpenBSD, MacOSX), it will charge on USB without any supplementary driver of any kind.
First test your DNS to see if it has the flaw. For example, OpenBSD is on the CERT list of concerned vendors but it doesn't show the flaw, so it does not need to be patched. I guess they just took a list of OSes packaging bind without checking anything.
Indeed I wrote a proof of concept about 15 years ago. But still heuristics cannot detect this kind of stuff if internal code and payload changes all the time. The idea is trivial, not the implementation. That's why antivirus still work the way they do.
Bypassing current antivirus process is almost trivial. Just change a few lines and the signature based antivirus will not detect your virus. Now, create a process that automatically changes the few lines in a random order, but create this process as a random evolving like the virus and payload itself. Random jumps (with next payload at good place) with random junk in between should be sufficient to bypass heuristics (who said goto was dead:)). Then you've just killed the whole antivirus industry as we know today.
Honestly, I tried many many SSL providers. And Thawte is by far he one who has the best support (free instant chat) and work with most mobile devices.
It's maybe more expensive than some others but I wouldn't go back because I never got any problem with them, which is something I couldn't say from others.
Do you really think that companies could afford running pirated, unsupported and unpatched software? Furthermore if pirated MS software is also fined by the EU.
It's amazing some people find this sum high. It just like EU told MS that they can continue infringe on laws as long as they give them about 10% of their benefits. If EU wants MS to comply fast, they just have to make a ban on MS products in Europe, so that selling MS products would be considered illegal and fined enough.
It is funny how these analogies are totally flawed..
"If I sat up in a window of a building, I might find that I could shoot an arrow through the sunroof of a Ford and kill the driver,"
And if I put a bomb in the basement of your IT company, I could destroy all your data. This is critical.
"But automobile seatbelts only prevent fatalities about 50 percent of the time. Are they worthless? Security products don't have to be perfect to be helpful in your defense."
If automakers could build seatbelts with 100% efficiency, they would. And they improved seatbelts by putting airbags.
"If we made seatbelts out of titanium instead of nylon, they'd be a lot stronger. But there's no evidence to suggest that they'd really help improve passenger safety."
They would be stronger, and raise the fatalities number. Seatbelts are voluntarily made distortable so they can help diffusing kinetic energy.
I find it really funny how companies succeed in making people think they may need this kind of crap.
2: implement it for people having lost a member
3: profit
The whole thing is pretty broken since you have no means to verify the root Belgian certificate (self signed) you are downloading.
Indeed I just tried with my phone running 4.0 beta4 locked, and nothing mounted, then I unlocked it and retried and it automounted like a block device.
And is still in use nowadays.
"Android, by contrast, pushes you to design everything as small, self-contained mini-applications."
Hey, that's called the Unix way.
Wow, amazing, they finally produced something like what has been done on my website more than 9 years ago:
http://www.octools.com/index.cgi?caller=articles/submersion/submersion.html
The next step from DARPA is asking Lada to reinvent the wheel to make it more military friendly, adding automatic braking and better resilience against bullets.
It seems the post has been removed at the moment... Was it a fake one?
I now get:
Article is unavailable or has been removed, please try a new search.
The article was not found, or is no longer available. Please try a new search..
I did not get any email from Thawte about this issue. How do I get my token then?
I just use a stand drill. I goes through all the platters and the circuitboard.
Fairly easy to find and purchase.
Multiple driver issues then, as running some OS in fusion isn't the same as in bare hardware, it's a whole new machine from the guest OS point of view.
If you run windows on the bare hardware, it will use nvidia and all other real hardware drivers.
If you run windows in fusion, it will use some "generic" hardware drivers.
So I somehow doubt it's a specific driver problem if it happens both in fusion and on bare hardware.
Motorola RAZR phones, for example, won't charge on PCs unless the Motorola driver is present to do the handshake.
This only happens on windows, if you are running whatever other OS (Solaris, Linux, OpenBSD, MacOSX), it will charge on USB without any supplementary driver of any kind.
It's funny they made a contest for this because it is just so trivial to analyze this if you have a few minutes to lose.
First test your DNS to see if it has the flaw. For example, OpenBSD is on the CERT list of concerned vendors but it doesn't show the flaw, so it does not need to be patched.
I guess they just took a list of OSes packaging bind without checking anything.
The reason most Firefox users use the most up to date version is that it's the only way to get rid of the annoying pop-ups.
Go to "preferences" -> "advanced" -> "updates", uncheck "check for updates to firefox" and no pop up anymore, very hard indeed
Indeed I wrote a proof of concept about 15 years ago. But still heuristics cannot detect this kind of stuff if internal code and payload changes all the time.
The idea is trivial, not the implementation. That's why antivirus still work the way they do.
And I will not accept... I am not interested working for companies writing poor software only to profit from their own errors.
Bypassing current antivirus process is almost trivial. Just change a few lines and the signature based antivirus will not detect your virus. Now, create a process that automatically changes the few lines in a random order, but create this process as a random evolving like the virus and payload itself. Random jumps (with next payload at good place) with random junk in between should be sufficient to bypass heuristics (who said goto was dead :)). Then you've just killed the whole antivirus industry as we know today.
Hey,why are the cops ringing at my door???
Honestly, I tried many many SSL providers. And Thawte is by far he one who has the best support (free instant chat) and work with most mobile devices. It's maybe more expensive than some others but I wouldn't go back because I never got any problem with them, which is something I couldn't say from others.
Except that most people are not able to catch phishing or spam more accurately than most filters. People also make errors...
Problems communicating between MS and non MS users? Isn't that the whole point of the suit?
If MS did follow standards, there would be no problems.
Do you really think that companies could afford running pirated, unsupported and unpatched software? Furthermore if pirated MS software is also fined by the EU.
It's amazing some people find this sum high.
It just like EU told MS that they can continue infringe on laws as long as they give them about 10% of their benefits.
If EU wants MS to comply fast, they just have to make a ban on MS products in Europe, so that selling MS products would be considered illegal and fined enough.
It is funny how these analogies are totally flawed..
"If I sat up in a window of a building, I might find that I could shoot an arrow through the sunroof of a Ford and kill the driver,"
And if I put a bomb in the basement of your IT company, I could destroy all your data. This is critical.
"But automobile seatbelts only prevent fatalities about 50 percent of the time. Are they worthless? Security products don't have to be perfect to be helpful in your defense."
If automakers could build seatbelts with 100% efficiency, they would. And they improved seatbelts by putting airbags.
"If we made seatbelts out of titanium instead of nylon, they'd be a lot stronger. But there's no evidence to suggest that they'd really help improve passenger safety."
They would be stronger, and raise the fatalities number. Seatbelts are voluntarily made distortable so they can help diffusing kinetic energy.