Slashdot Mirror


The Homemade Hard Disk Destroyer

Barence writes "All businesses have sensitive data they need to destroy when they replace PCs, but disposing of hard disks properly can be an expensive business. This has led one IT manager in the UK to come up with his own, homemade solution — Bustadrive. It uses a powerful 'hydraulic punch' to physically deform a hard disk, rendering it virtually unreadable, and requires nothing more than a pull of the lever on the front — similar to a drinks-can crusher. PC Pro tested the Bustadrive, and also sought the opinions of data destruction companies as to whether the device was really as effective as hoped, or just a fun way to mangle a hard disk or two."

497 comments

  1. Overkill? by Miros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not just use a degausser? or DBAN?

    1. Re:Overkill? by BobZee1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because using anything less than "Bustadrive" is just asking for a mocking. Come on! The only thing cooler is FIRE!!!

      --
      dumber people are doing harder things everyday
    2. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left DBAN erasing a drive on Friday and it's still going...

    3. Re:Overkill? by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The paranoid crowd will argue that either method might still be able to be recovered. I thought I saw an article once here that in the real world basically debunked this myth. Physical destruction just takes the process one step further. Plus it's quicker then running some type of a disk wiping program.

    4. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd just use my rifle and a few rounds of .308 Winchester (or .303 British, 7.5mm Swiss, 8mm Mauser, whatever). Problem solved...

      If you really want to go low tech, a sledgehammer would do fine.

    5. Re:Overkill? by Hyppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some places still require both. When it comes to extremely sensitive (classified, etc) data, "absolutely unreadable" must be absolute. Even if only one technician in the entire world, with a billion-dollar lab, is capable of recovering the data from a zero'd drive, it's too much of a risk. What if that one technician is Chinese?

    6. Re:Overkill? by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats probably because you used some silly setting like Gutmann. Just use pseudorandom and be done with it. (esp since gutmann isnt really relevant anymore....)

      Pseudorandom wipe can apparently do an 80gb drive (hooked up via usb) in about 40 minutes.

      If youre doing multiple passes, you may want to make sure that doing it via overwrites (rather than destruction) is really good enough for your data :)

    7. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      DBAN is good shit. I use it on my friends computers, and tell them they got a virus!

    8. Re:Overkill? by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where I used to work (~5 years ago), we used an erasure tool that wrote random data over the entire drive (10 times), then introduced the drive to "Mr. Band Saw" in the machine shop, to quarter the platters, on any DoD/DoE stuff

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    9. Re:Overkill? by Miros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone should suggest that the Mythbusters "put this to the test," assuming their production company has the financial resources to pay for even modest data recovery services.

      Even that might be effective. If you have like, a dozen drives, all of them similar, all of them wiped, one of which contains good data (or worse, a group of which once comprised like, a RAID 5 array so you need at least a few of them) you would be looking at a hypergeometric distribution, and the actual probable cost of recovering the data could grow extremely rapidly to something quite impractical. If instead, you had a big box full of used drives, five of which had been bent in half, it might actually be cheaper

    10. Re:Overkill? by emocomputerjock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you'll be called paranoid and accused of FUD.

    11. Re:Overkill? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      But in those cases you wouldn't turn it over to the drive destruction company in a readable state, anyway, and would still end up saving money using a device similar to this one after you wiped the data from the drive.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    12. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a whole lot of people know about DBAN. Disk wiping software is a known technology but not many people have actually sat down and looked for it. Plus, certain modes of DBAN take a very long time. The DoD 5220.22-M implementation of DBAN, for example, can take up to 24 hours (in my experience) to finish shredding a 500GB hard drive.

      Degaussers are very expensive because they're mostly used by the government and military.

      All things being equal, the point of intersection of speed, cost, and reliability appears to involve physical destruction of the drive, making use of physical advantage as appropriate.

    13. Re:Overkill? by mellon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A degausser weakens the magnetized regions, but it's still at least theoretically possible to read it if it's not done thoroughly enough. What I don't get is why you don't just take it apart and sand the platters clean. There's zero chance of reading it after that, and it's a lot less energy intensive than actually chunking the platters. Extra credit if you use the disk drive motor to spin the disk so that you can sand it without any actual effort...

    14. Re:Overkill? by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      If the drive is failing, DBAN often doesn't work properly. a Degausser would probably work, but this is likely much more effective in showing management that a drive has been destroyed...

    15. Re:Overkill? by Hyppy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Some disks contain information that is worth far more than the billion dollar lab or the one-in-a-billion scientist. Why do you immediately spout off with a trollish "Durhh, FUD?" Just because your scat porn collection and LiveJournal rants are useless to any intelligent being doesn't mean that everyone else's data is just as pitiful.

    16. Re:Overkill? by Hubbell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Buy a package or 2 of sparklers, scrape the magnesium off onto the hardisk (encased or not, if cased maybe 2-3packages), light a sparkler and stick the end into the pile. Done.

    17. Re:Overkill? by emocomputerjock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was agreeing with you.

    18. Re:Overkill? by jonadab · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because for a system administrator, paranoia is a basic job requirement. Consequently, when it comes to data security, there's no such thing as too much overkill. Even when you have subjected the drive to a thermite reaction, let it cool, and ground the whole resulting mess down to the consistency of talcum powder, you still have to scatter the ashes over at least a thousand square miles of ocean, just to be sure. Ideally, you'd scatter half the ashes over the central Pacific, some of them over the north Atlantic, and the rest over the southern ocean.

      Extra bonus points if you scrub the platters with fluorine trichloride before putting it through the thermite reaction.

      Even then, you'll never be fully comfortable with the job until you destroy the entire galaxy that the drive was in. Maybe the whole universe. You can't be too sure.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    19. Re:Overkill? by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which would be the better solution.

      A small terracotta pot without a hole in the bottom of it + a small amount of thermite is the cheapest way, thermite is cheap and reasonably easy to make.

      Nothing says "no data recovery" like a drive reduced to its elemental components.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    20. Re:Overkill? by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TBH they might not have to pay at all. I'm sure data recovery companies wouldn't mind showing on national TV what they are capable of getting from an apparently bricked hard drive. It would be an advertising opportunity.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    21. Re:Overkill? by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Which brings up the question. If a vendor replaces a raid drive, but doesn't give you the drive for destruction, is this a security risk? We have 40-50 TB of data in Raid drives.

    22. Re:Overkill? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      DBAN isn't an option if the controller board is shot.

      A degausser is fine, if you already have one(please note, whatever pitiful thing you used to use on tapes probably won't cut it, HDD platters are fairly high coercivity); but this little crusher, at a couple hundred pounds, is almost certainly cheaper than buying a HDD degausser if you don't have one.

    23. Re:Overkill? by Miros · · Score: 1

      I'm not an expert in this, but I feel like the answer has to be no; right? Even with parity information, just one drive from an array when the minimum array size is 3 couldn't contain enough information to reconstruct the other 2/3rds of the array, at least not in its entirety; right? Maybe it's possible to recover bits and pieces, but recovering random blocks of data is likely far from a surefire way to make money from the endeavor, unless the drive is just packed full of credit card numbers or something which seems unlikely

      I mean, practically speaking, lots of text data in a database, even a large database, is going to be contained into a relatively small amount of "space" on the array, an even smaller amount of space on an individual disk of the array, so it's always possible but it would still be winning the proverbial data recovery lottery, would it not? If you consider something larger which may be of value, such as some kind of... i dunno, top secret gigantic data set, then the chances are probably better.

      I think, "probably not" in a broad sense, but if you had enough time, and felt like spending it mining for gold, you could just hit pay-dirt somewhere in there.

    24. Re:Overkill? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's a security risk. If the disk fell into the wrong hands they my not be able to read everything from your system but they certainly could read bits of useful information. If it's from a RAID 5 or RAID 6 volume they may only get bits and pieces of data but something like a RAID 0 or RAID 1 volume could glean lots of useful data. Think of it sort of like a shredded classified document. RAID 5 or 6 means they may have a handful of the shreds of the document, and any of those could contain snippets of useful information like usernames, passwords, bank account numbers, etc. RAID 0 would mean you might have half or all of the shredded document. RAID 1 would pretty much guarantee that you have the full document.

    25. Re:Overkill? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on the flavor of RAID, and the depth of the hypothetical attacker's knowledge of your RAID setup.

      For exactly that sort of reason, though, most decent business vendors will(for a little extra, or if you prod the rep) offer an HDD warranty option where you don't have to send back the dead drive in order to receive a replacement, and can destroy it onsite as you wish. Simply giving you the drive back would be useless, since it is more or less impossible to determine whether or not the contents have been duplicated once it is out of your hands.

    26. Re:Overkill? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      Many corporations have degaussers. They're certainly not limited to the government & military. Our university has one that they use to wipe all disks before physically destroying the disk. You can buy a good quality degausser for a couple thousand dollars, about the same cost as a high end PC.

    27. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      A collegue of mine used to work at a financial institution where they had a special heat resistant receptacle for hard disk destruction. They put the stacks of hard disks down, put thermite packs on top, closed the lid, and punched the "ON" button. Said slag after cooldown was then put out for scrap metal.

      Another place didn't go with the thermite, but instead had an industrial grade shredder where the drives were tossed in, and parts the size of marbles came out the other end.

      Both methods work. The thermite is more thorough and fun to watch, but the industrial confetti also does the job well. In a business, I prefer the shredder, because it is more idiot resistant than highly reactive chemical processes.

    28. Re:Overkill? by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure it can. And then someone can use techniques such as MFM, SPM or STM to recover the disk. And then there is this patent which notes that data is often partially written off the track, and thus can't be wiped.

      I guess for most people's purposes something like DBAN will work well. But for the truly paranoid, you really need to read NIST's recommendation that you clear, purge and destroy. And by destroy, they mean that you use "Disintegration, Pulverization, Melting, and Incineration." At a "outsourced metal destruction or licensed incineration facility with the specific capabilities to perform these activities effectively, securely, and safely", no less.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    29. Re:Overkill? by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Bustadrive can apparently do it in 5 seconds. Hmm. Maybe there might be some reasons for this over DBAN.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    30. Re:Overkill? by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Most of it is RAID-5 or better. But depending on cluster size, wouldn't they be able to recover data? Think HIPAA regs, etc. Oh, and the vendor comes on site and does replacement, no intervention on our part.

    31. Re:Overkill? by rhp997 · · Score: 1

      Have you bought ammo recently? ($85 for my last box of .300!) Of course it's much more fun to shoot old PC parts, but hardly a low-cost alternative...

    32. Re:Overkill? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even then, you'll never be fully comfortable with the job until you destroy the entire galaxy that the drive was in. Maybe the whole universe. You can't be too sure.

      Just destroying the universe after the disk failed isn't enough. If many-worlds is true (and the paranoid sysadmin must consider this possibility), the fact that you destroyed the universe in this world doesn't guarantee that the data isn't destroyed in any other world. Indeed, you have to setup the universe-destroying device before writing the first bit of data onto the drive, and have it automatically triggered if it can't detect any accesses to the drive any more (after all, you might forget to activate it by hand in some of the universes). Only by setting it up before writing data you ensure that it will be in every universe where the disk contains any data, despite all the universe splitting going on.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    33. Re:Overkill? by ehren_m · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the best way to get red wine out of cotton? This guy: Thermite.

    34. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why Chinese? I was worrying about Homeland Security right wingers.

      Beside, just reformat a few times--first with reiser, then NTFS, then another Linux format, then whatever you want to use in the end. Pretty hard to unscramble all that.

    35. Re:Overkill? by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even if only one technician in the entire world, with a billion-dollar lab, is capable of recovering the data from a zero'd drive, it's too much of a risk. What if that one technician is Chinese?

      Oh, that's ok, my data isn't written in Chinese...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    36. Re:Overkill? by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is one simple thing about physical destruction. It is obvious to an observer that the drive is unusable. If someone has a pile of drives, one before DBAN, one after, it wouldn't be hard for someone to move some drives into the after pile either as a prank, or perhaps to get the information once it leaves the location. Physical destruction prevents this from happening, because almost anyone can tell the difference between a pile of scrap metal and a hard disk that looks like it might function.

    37. Re:Overkill? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where are you buying ammo?
      Plinking:
      300 win mag $22.95
      http://www.jgsales.com/product_info.php/products_id/3153

      Hunting
      $31.95
      http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/15754-5.html

    38. Re:Overkill? by mlts · · Score: 1

      You could always stick the drive into an oven past the Curie temperature for a while. This way, all magnetism is lost until the drive cools, and all the domains on the platters that were once storing platters would be long gone.

    39. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even then, you'll never be fully comfortable with the job until you destroy the entire galaxy that the drive was in. Maybe the whole universe. You can't be too sure.

      Wouldn't it be easier to just destroy all of your enemies?

    40. Re:Overkill? by ripnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just mark the drive 'fragile' and post it via CityLink (UK courier firm)... guaranteed that THAT data wont be seen again...

    41. Re:Overkill? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      But usually, a gamma ray burst, blasting away the whole solar system will be enough.

      Except of course if you got a super-massive black hole.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    42. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if that one technician is Chinese?

      What if that one technician is American?

    43. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then I guess all your bases are belong to us

    44. Re:Overkill? by chaim79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I consider this one of the best methods, you get three great things out of this: non-recoverable drives, frustrations worked out, and some really interesting conversation starters if you take it apart (the disk platter deforms in very interesting ways when hit!) For example: This Drive is no longer readable, and if you look at any of the photos that show the top of the drive, you can see how the disk platter deformed.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    45. Re:Overkill? by Anarchitect · · Score: 1

      This is so sadly true -- I work in a data processing facility for an eDiscovery firm. When our clients want their old drives destroyed, we run them over a large (no idea as to the specs, make, whatever) electromagnet for several minutes (long enough to heat the casing up) and THEN we ship 'em out at USD$10/per for physical destruction.

      I'd rather give them a single-pass random write and then take them to the range -- faster, cheaper, and much more fu.

      --
      QA implies some kind of quality to begin with.
    46. Re:Overkill? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Beside, just reformat a few times--first with reiser, then NTFS, then another Linux format, then whatever you want to use in the end. Pretty hard to unscramble all that.

      It's easy to unscramble reiser. You just have to offer it a reduced sentence in exchange for telling you where the body is ;)

      Thank you, I'll be here all night....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    47. Re:Overkill? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who are you trying to keep the data safe from? If it's a foreign government willing to do a molecular scale image of the entire disk with a scanning tunnelling electron microscope and then have a large team of people painstakingly apply heuristics and get back some small fraction of the stored data in a few years time and after spending several tens of millions of dollars on the project, then this is indeed good advice. If, on the other hand, you're worried about commercial data theft, then a single dd pass is enough.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    48. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advertising would invalidate the experiment, IMHO.

      -Hey wanna do free data recovery for our sexy geek show ?
      -Sure! We'll show the world we are the best ... three weeks later ...

      -We found ALL your data, plus these bonus pics of Jennifer Aniston! TADA!

      How can we know it's not a big ugly setup ? Jamie and Adam get tons of geek love and while I don't think they would sell out, I can't vouch for the massive enterprise that produces, distributes and promotes their show. I'm not saying they're crooked, I'm just saying I wouldn't trust them on this particular issue.

    49. Re:Overkill? by snemarch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That Gutmann paper is 10 years old - are those attacks still viable? Data density has increased quite a bit, and perpendicular recording has been introduced... does this have any effect other than making recovery a more time-consuming process?

      Personally I feel safe doing a single-pass wipe, but don't work for any TLA organizations :)

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    50. Re:Overkill? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Note that there are two dimensions to security. One is how big a problem it is if the secret leaks, the other is how long this is true for. Troop movements in Iraq, for example, could cost lives if they are leaked today, but if they are leaked next month then the data is irrelevant. The NIST recommendations that suggest destroying the drive are based in the principle that the secrets may be important in 20-50 years. They factor in attacks that are hypothetical now, but could become practical over this timeframe. For a commercial entity, this level of paranoia is rarely required. Most businesses don't have any data that would be a problem if it leaked even 5 years in the future - even credit card numbers have a shorter lifespan than that, so if someone recovered a five-year-old list of credit card numbers they wouldn't get anything of value.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    51. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just use my rifle and a few rounds of .308 Winchester (or .303 British, 7.5mm Swiss, 8mm Mauser, whatever). Problem solved...

      If you really want to go low tech, a sledgehammer would do fine.

      That's what I do.

    52. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Clearly, you have never worked with humans before.

      When dealing with "shiny bits of computer thingies", you could duct-tape a USB cable to a Chia Pet and people would think it's a Mac.

    53. Re:Overkill? by snemarch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With normal FS format options, that would only take care of a very small portion of the drive (FS metadata doesn't consume that much space) - it would be pretty easy extracting useful data using plain old software. A single-pass disk wipe would be a lot more useful :)

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    54. Re:Overkill? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      What if that one technician is Chinese?

      It's fine so long as your data's in binary.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    55. Re:Overkill? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      DBAN takes alot of time. You have to get a few dozen machines lined up, booted off the media, and it can literally take hours to do. (this is assuming all the hardware is still in good working order as well, if not, it takes even longer to get the machine functional, so you can nuke it.

      If you are replacing a few hundred machines at a location, this manual method would only take a half hour or so, DBAN would take days, perhaps weeks.

      My take, keep the hard drives, and dispose/return the rest of the equipment. Then, give them to a certified destruction company. (they do make full disk shredders.. they are nifty!)

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    56. Re:Overkill? by snemarch · · Score: 1

      Depends on what kind of data you're interested in and the raid stripe size. Even with a large stripe size like 512kb, you probably couldn't get much useful information for something like big technical CAD drawings. But even with a pretty small stripe size like 64kb, you could get a lot of useful information from a database.

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    57. Re:Overkill? by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time I needed to really kill a drive, I put it in the lathe, and turned the platters - nice snall swarf chips

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    58. Re:Overkill? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Overkill is an oxymoron. There's no such thing as TOO dead. :)

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    59. Re:Overkill? by Auraiken · · Score: 1

      If many worlds is true then would there not be a universe or subset that has to exist without the universe destroying device as just applying one would be the act of a choice and therefore cause a split?

    60. Re:Overkill? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      "But usually, a gamma ray burst,"

      That will only feed Andromeda.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    61. Re:Overkill? by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      for a few drives, sanding would be fine, but if you have hundreds of drives to dispose of, that could take quite a long time.

    62. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you'd have to make sure that your hd destroying device and automatic mechanism actually works. It might not in some of the universes, where for example some thief might steal the drive but not the self destruct mechanism.

    63. Re:Overkill? by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if that one technician is Binese?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    64. Re:Overkill? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The truly paranoid make sure it never gets written to disk unencrypted in the first place, and then use thermite anyway once a disk needs to be disposed of, because it's not only paranoid, it's fun!

      In fact, the truly paranoid will store a bit of thermite above the drive, ready to be triggered by some sort of alarm system. Several days of wiping it the way you describe may work, but all it takes is a bit of theft and you no longer have the chance.

      And of course, even if the thermite fails to trigger, it's a lot faster to wipe only wherever the key is stored. Even if that fails, they still need a passphrase.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    65. Re:Overkill? by GiMP · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can always melt it. A blast furnace will degauss it for you too, for no additional fee ;-)

    66. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like fun :)

    67. Re:Overkill? by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      If the many-worlds theory is true, then there already exist an infinite number of universes where the data is already known to the putative attacker...

      So you're damned already. Somewhere.

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    68. Re:Overkill? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, have a ceramics kiln at home. Can hit 2000Â with it. Won't melt down disks but is pretty good for scrambling contents. And warping them.

      Course, a big ol' grinder/shredder that can eat drives is also fun. I wonder how hard it would be to make one of those?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    69. Re:Overkill? by daw1234 · · Score: 1

      I did 4 drives recently with a sledge hammer. Took me forever and hurt my hands. Oh, and i knocked a big chunk out of the car park.

    70. Re:Overkill? by egburr · · Score: 1

      Only by setting it up before writing data you ensure that it will be in every universe where the disk contains any data, despite all the universe splitting going on.

      Except in those universes where the universe-destroying device failed to be triggered or failed to work.

      What you need is a multiverse-destroying device to destroy all the universes at once to ensure that there is no universe where that drive can survive.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    71. Re:Overkill? by jmac_the_man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, look! The guy in charge of DRM for the MPAA posts on slashdot!

    72. Re:Overkill? by jdoverholt · · Score: 1

      Our vendor (EMC2 via Dell) doesn't have to steal our data to make money, we give them enough of it on a regular basis. I would suggest that you might want to pick a more reputable vendor if this is a concern for you. Otherwise your question seems to have already been answered above.

    73. Re:Overkill? by ewenix · · Score: 1

      Because for a system administrator, paranoia is a basic job requirement. Consequently, when it comes to data security, there's no such thing as too much overkill. Even when you have subjected the drive to a thermite reaction, let it cool, and ground the whole resulting mess down to the consistency of talcum powder, you still have to scatter the ashes over at least a thousand square miles of ocean, just to be sure. Ideally, you'd scatter half the ashes over the central Pacific, some of them over the north Atlantic, and the rest over the southern ocean.

      It's always refreshing to know that I'm not the only one like this......

    74. Re:Overkill? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      I thought a monthly company bbq, with the HDs added to the coals after the wieners are done, would be a cost efficient AND popular disposal method. For extra bang, drop the hot drives into cold water.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    75. Re:Overkill? by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every drive at my place of work does not leave. They have a big ole shredder that eats drives and spits out rice grain sized pieces of metal. This is for all drives, not just classified materials ones. Is too easy to be safe this way.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    76. Re:Overkill? by foksoft · · Score: 1

      Even single disk from RAID array can provide lot of information.
      RAID 5 for example as also other variants uses block level striping. So as long as data someone is after does fit into such block, then it might be useful to have only one disk from raid array.
      And also if you have all disks from an array you have more recovery data (parity blocks) than if you use only one disk. So the guessing is much easier.
      But again are your data so critical for you to have such disk mechanically destroyed and not only data overwritten. Maybe few writes of random data.
      And if your data are so important not to fall into wrong hands (competitors, news reporters, ...) why they are not encrypted in the first place? Not whole disk but the really sensitive data. Your disks might be stolen and then none of secure wiping will help you.
      Of course there are occasional events where disk dies and it is not possible to wipe data as someone wrote. In such case mechanical destruction can be handy.
      Once I put together computer pieces without any case and connected it to old 5 1/4 disk drive. I wrote a batch file for reading text of the diskette, which was ripped open so anyone was able to see it spinning, and put it into display. The next morning I came to work the program didn't work. When I looked closely I saw white line on the disk. It was because only small part of the disk was accessed and because it was open then dust settling on the disk helped to destroy it. As those days my intention was not to destroy it put together small program that read everything in memory and then moved heads randomly so not only a small part of the disk was brushed off.
      But the point is that modern hard drives are more sensitive to dust than was old diskette. So why not to open the drive and run secure wipe on it and watch how it gets overwritten while it is being simultaneously brushed and have a fun.
      How long you will leave it running is up to you.

    77. Re:Overkill? by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Because for a system administrator, paranoia is a basic job requirement.

      This explains a lot about Slashdot.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    78. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the circuit boards emitted noxious chemicals when heated. Otherwise you could just heat the whole drive past the Curie temperature.

    79. Re:Overkill? by inviolet · · Score: 4, Funny

      [What if the one well-funded hacker who can recover the data is Chinese?]

      Oh, that's ok, my data isn't written in Chinese...

      Doesn't matter. They could still read images, sound recordings, schematics, spreadsheets of numbers...

      Well, they COULD, except the West uses a different binary encoding scheme than the Chinese. Over here everything is written as ones and zeros, but over there everything is written as ones and zewos. And I doubt they have the technology to convert.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    80. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 guage. nuff said.

    81. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry, the data on the disk is to all intents and purposes classical not quantum i.e. we can accurately describe the disks contents as bits not qubits. Since the disk is strongly decohered with its environment the only Everettian worlds containing any information regarding the disks contents are exceptionally improbable. Your objection does go through for the quantum case though, erasing data is not a unitary operation so none of the conventional quantum logic gates can implement it (since they are all unitary). The only way to erase data is in fact to write it into a degree of freedom which rapidly interacts (either classically or quantumly) with a much larger system, making data recovery intractable.

    82. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK we have solved here the creation of the Universe and the creationism thing : the universe has been created (so the big bang) by a system admin who wanted to destroy the data on one hard drive.

      Interesting theory.

    83. Re:Overkill? by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 1

      Undoing accidental down mod. Meant to mod funny.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    84. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some places still require both. When it comes to extremely sensitive (classified, etc) data, "absolutely unreadable" must be absolute. Even if only one technician in the entire world, with a billion-dollar lab, is capable of recovering the data from a zero'd drive, it's too much of a risk. What if that one technician is Chinese?

      That technician will just want to recover the data from another drive in an hour?

    85. Re:Overkill? by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Are the Chinese the new Soviets?

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    86. Re:Overkill? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe the random bits take a long time to reach the actual disk controller in India. Since they can't be compressed very well, in theory the PRNG could just be sent to India instead of its output stream. But you really want to generate your random numbers in this country, or it isn't secure.

    87. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you know the person that destroyed the disc actually did?
      Heck, it could have even been - heaven forbid, a different disc that was destroyed
      Never underestimate the Chinese

      The only safe way to protect the data to destroy the disc before it is used.
      If the data wasn't there in the first place, it can't be extracted

      Oh, you just wanted to have fun, slacking off breaking things, that's much better.
      May I suggest the security risk from the windows needs attention as well. Heavens - not only can people see who works inside the building, they can even see what they do!
      WINDOWS ARE A SECURITY RISK AND MUST BE DESTROYED!!!! NOW!!!
      Have fun...

      Also, Am I the only one who remembers when it was the Russians who wanted all our secrets...

    88. Re:Overkill? by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      While it's not that hard to take a drive apart with the right tools, doing so and then sanding the platters would take a LOT more effort than this machine. It's just a lever pull, which you can relegate even to employees who haven't mastered the finer motor control for using a screwdriver.

    89. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What if that one technician is Chinese?"

      Then he/she probably already works for Los Alamos and just copied the drive before it was decommissioned.

      This sounds like security-by-getting-lost-in-the-details-and-missing-the-big-picture.

    90. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Degausser might not be available, and DBAN is time consuming. 24 hours for DBAN on a big drive, and a second or two to pull this lever. Which one do you think I want to use?

      I'd buy this in a heartbeat.

    91. Re:Overkill? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      What's the best way to get red wine out of cotton? This guy: Thermite.

      Well, the wine is gone, isn't it? You didn't say you still wanted the cotton to be around!

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    92. Re:Overkill? by rsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the enhanced version on his homepage, he says that he didn't update the paper because it is practically unfeasable to try and restore overwritten data from a modern disk. In the epilogue he says:

      Any modern drive will most likely be a hopeless task, what with ultra-high densities and use of perpendicular recording I don't see how MFM would even get a usable image, and then the use of EPRML will mean that even if you could magically transfer some sort of image into a file, the ability to decode that to recover the original data would be quite challenging.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
    93. Re:Overkill? by rsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gutmann's paper was based on 1990-era technology. And even then you didn't need all 35 passes, just the ones that correspond to the encoding used on the disk. If I read the enhanced version of the paper correctly, restoring even plainly overwritten data from a modern disk is a hopeless task.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
    94. Re:Overkill? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      I can just picture this on a special MythBusters episode that's a collaboration between the Discovery Channel and Fashion TV or the Style Network.

      Adam: What's the best way to get red wine out of cotton? We're going to try several over-the-counter methods and a couple "homemade" solutions. When ... I mean IF they don't work, Frank Doyle has a special concoction that we'll be heading over to the Alameda bomb range to test that WILL get the red wine out of the cotton ... the same way we got that slab of cement out of the cement truck.

    95. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I drill a hole (some drives come with a removable strip actually opening a hole, I assume for this purpose), fill it with sand and gravel, jam in a screwdriver, and then just bend the screwdriver to rotate the platters a lap. I guess you could perhaps fill it with less sand, and try connecting a power-source and let it start rotating itself.

      Professionals may still get something out of it, but the regular dumpster-diver will NEVER find my collection of goatse-tailored pr0n! Muahaha.

    96. Re:Overkill? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      even credit card numbers have a shorter lifespan than that

      I think you are confusing the physical card with the numbers on them. The card gets replaced every 2-5 years, but I've never had a number change except when alerted that my number may have been compromised.

      Now the security number on the back of the card, that does change whenever a new card is issued. But given that there are places online that will happily charge your card without asking for that number, I fail to see how that number helps at all.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    97. Re:Overkill? by eldorel · · Score: 1

      But how much of that are they paying the tech?
      There are plenty of opportunities to mirror a drive onto a backup before he brings it back to the main office.

      Heck, a large number of Dell techs are just local work from home subcontractors. They mail your drive back to the main office.

    98. Re:Overkill? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Nothing says "cancer" like the fumes of an old, non-RoHS drive.

    99. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or worse: American!

    100. Re:Overkill? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      If you buy an IBM hard disk, it'll even do that for you!

    101. Re:Overkill? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      And by you NOT building it, you let the chump in the other universe who did build it deal with it.

      If shit goes wrong, just blame him.

    102. Re:Overkill? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like to see the Mythbusters come up with a handful of ways of making a drive unreadable...

    103. Re:Overkill? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Truly paranoid people make sure it never gets displayed unencrypted.

    104. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a wood splitter?

    105. Re:Overkill? by Wee · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've shot more than a few dozen drives. At a previous workplace, we had to come up with a policy for destroying drives on decommissioned machines (you never know where an SSN might have been left laying about). It was decided that overwriting the writable sectors followed by physical destruction of the controller board and at least four holes through each platter was acceptable.

      I'd just save them all up in a box and whenever I'd manage to make it out to the desert, I'd bring them with me. We'd shoot them all pretty well full of holes. I'd clean the target area up and send it all off to be recycled.

      We never offered certificates of destruction or anything. Writing the number of drives that were in the box and counting the husks as they went back in when we cleaned up was about the extent of it.

      The spec only said that the platters/controller had to be perforated, and didn't specify the method or device used. Some of the more fearful types found out I was shooting them and objected on moral grounds (or whatever). So the policy was amended such that the drives couldn't leave the premises unless all three steps had been performed. So we had to waste time with a drill to appease the leftists. We still shot them, though.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    106. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in the universes where your universe destroying machine fails!

    107. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should be more worried about any foreign intelligence agencies ripping any sensitive data via internet. Physical espionage is so last millenium.

    108. Re:Overkill? by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Discover just (18 months ago?) changed my card numbers. Something about switching to a new system.

      The mag strips is failing to be read more frequently now. What's up with that?

    109. Re:Overkill? by Unequivocal · · Score: 2, Funny

      In soviet russia the chinese are you.

    110. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't consider a 3.5" form factor drive destroyed until I've put at least 3 12ga slugs through the platters, or one through a 2.5" drive. In fact, I have two drives on my desk that need eradicated...

      It's not overkill; it's ensured-kill.

      brb, blowin' stuff up.

    111. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, duh.

    112. Re:Overkill? by Sproggit · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda && dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda && dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      If you are REALLY paranoid, try a couple more 'dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda && dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda' s.

      Zero'ng can (theretically) be circumvented by picking up residual data patterns ... but 2 or more random writes in between...

      I'd like a link on any scenario where it's been done...

    113. Re:Overkill? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Don't you need both the number and the expiry date? I don't think that date will stay relevant for that long.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    114. Re:Overkill? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Break into a Korean nuclear weapons testing facility and hide the disk in a bomb, then set it off.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    115. Re:Overkill? by drogers47 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My provincial goverment is using your quick and violent method, in fact, to destroy about 30,000 hard drives.

      Well, not exactly *your* method, using bullets. But the same idea.

      As they take each old computer out of service during a government-wide system upgrade, they:

      1. Remove the hard drive.
      2. Drill through it once, using a cordless drill. Right there in the office!

      Full munching and recovery of recyclable materials takes place later at a depot. The important thing is to keep citizens' private data private! It's leaks to the media which drives the paranoia, by the way.

    116. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is me or I am getting too old?
      Parent scored "5: Informative", and I through I read too much SF in my youth.

    117. Re:Overkill? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      In my limited experience, the expiration month has always remained the same, while the expiration year has always incremented by the same amount. So I would imagine it would be trivial to guess the new expiration date.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    118. Re:Overkill? by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Extra bonus points if you scrub the platters with fluorine trichloride before putting it through the thermite reaction.

      That would be chlorine trifluoride.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    119. Re:Overkill? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      This is an old geek's tale. All you need to do is overwrite the drive once with zeros and that's it.

      Data isn't written to drives in a series of ones and zeros along tracks like some sort of black/white paint pattern where you can just look at the overlaps or the differences in blackness/whiteness to see what might have been written underneath. Data is encoded and written as a complex analog signal that is later read and decoded. All you really have to do is make that signal sufficiently unreliable. By writing any pattern to the drive (well, I suppose writing the same pattern over the old pattern would be silly, but you get the idea) will render the original signal unrecoverable.

      Zeros make for a fairly quick pattern. Unless you cannot live with even the most remote possibility that someone might recover a random byte or two out of billions, anything more than one pass zero is a waste of time.

    120. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We take em apart here and take screwdrivers to the faces of the platters. This last step we do to scratch the plates...IMO its still readable, but you need some lab equipment. The idea is to destroy the platters...The platters can also be used as rear view mirrors in your cubicle or desk.

    121. Re:Overkill? by node+3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's a foreign government willing to do a molecular scale image of the entire disk with a scanning tunnelling electron microscope and then have a large team of people painstakingly apply heuristics and get back some small fraction of the stored data in a few years time

      Even that is impossible. The first problem is that an electron microscope can even read a drive in the first place. It can't. You need a magnetic reading device of some sort. You can't even read a normal, non-wiped drive with an electron microscope.

      The second problem is using the term "small fraction". Unless you mean really, really small, on the level of maybe a few random bytes out of a terabyte drive small, even with the best existing reading/recovery device, one pass zero is sufficient.

    122. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any reason to not use firearms. I've put 5-6 rounds through a hard drive with a 22-250 which uses a very small very fast round, and I couldn't imagine any way a person could get data off of that drive afterwords.

      Are most of these expensive destruction methods just overkill, or am I under estimating desperate hackers?

    123. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in the multiverse, there is ALWAYS a universe that has the hard disk having data on it. Better to delete the Sysadmin.

    124. Re:Overkill? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, if there is a problem then your gun will certainly fix it.

      The chances of you loosing the drive on the way are much higher than anybody recovering the data after a single pass. Unless you are allowed to shoot that rifle in the office of course, by now I would hardly be amazed.

    125. Re:Overkill? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to touch any platter that can spin up to 5400 RPM or higher which I cannot determine the speed of. Having seen one work in a glass bulb and knowing what one shattering drive did to the enclosure of a PC (pieces of metal stuck in the side) cured me from that idea.

    126. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have opened the drive and used an inexpensive propane torch to melt the aluminum platters on several different drives. It is quick, cheap and 100% unrecoverable. What else do you want?

    127. Re:Overkill? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Never mind cold water. Push those warm embers together, pile the hard drives (one deep) on top of them, and pour on the liquid oxygen. Data security problem solved! Now to solve the problem about retinal burns and certain strategic defense agencies misinterpreting your BBQ as a nuclear detonation event...

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    128. Re:Overkill? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Are most of these expensive destruction methods just overkill, or am I under estimating desperate hackers?

      Almost everyone would basically have to rely on what the drive controller says is on the drive. A single pass of zeros would stop 99.999% of the people out there. For those that are more sophiscated than that, a single random pass would stop 99% of them. Recovering the data off of a drive that's been through DBAN or similar would be impossible.

    129. Re:Overkill? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Shot them, meaning the Leftists or the drives?

      This particular leftist is heavily armed and likes shooting things. I dunno where your leftists would find moral objection to shooting old disk drives, unless you're doing it in a wildlife preserve or something.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    130. Re:Overkill? by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      Not even crushing the hard drive with the gravity of a black hole guarantees that the information is impossible to retrieve!

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    131. Re:Overkill? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Some places are just totally stupid, too.

      All it takes is one of those three inch N-50 magnets used in particle accelerators and nuclear reactors and that drive is 100% FUCKED. Dirt cheap, too, from United Nuclear.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    132. Re:Overkill? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The truly paranoid would never have it written to hard disk in the first place, it would all be committed to their memory.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    133. Re:Overkill? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      At an auction a few years ago I got a 1960's vintage Ampex degausser. It was on the bottom of a skid of gear I got for pennies. It's huge, larger than a 1980's laptop. It's big enough to degauss full 1/2" reels of computer tape.

    134. Re:Overkill? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Actually, a lot of things say cancer much more loudly. A pack of cigarettes, for example.

      A quart can of benzine.

      Gasoline fumes at the filling station may work for you.

    135. Re:Overkill? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I bought a Sun box one time at a University Auction. It had a full install of Solaris on it, and the root password was blank. It also had a Professor's account on it with all his data and files.

      Another time at the same University Auction, I bought an old Mac laptop. It had a full compliment of scientific software on it and children's medical data from research that had been conducted.

      Said 'University Auction' is at a place with modern brain-dead IT people. I am not sure they know how to 'wipe' the drives on any machine that doesn't have Billyware* on it.

      (*aka Gatesware)

      Another time, I bought a used laptop at that auction. Not only did it NOT have the hard drive removed, something they claimed was the case on all computers at that auction... it also had a Windows Install CD in the CD drive.

      It's a fun auction, you never know what you'll find. I got a 40mW laser there once too.

    136. Re:Overkill? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, worked at a college for 5 years before my current DOE related job. Totally different environments.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    137. Re:Overkill? by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Amazing. I had no idea they used plastic with magnetic dust affixed for platters. I've ripped apart a few drives, but the platters were always metal.

    138. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second DBAN, but it's time consuming.

                  And anyone who suggests a degausser has probably not tried it. They don't work! I mean, I think you can get specialized, expensive, ultra-high-power hard disk degaussers, but a regular TV degausser's not even close, and a tape degausser won't cut it either -- I used one for 10 minutes on one disk and it just caused a few bad sectors (so it managed to flip like 2 or 3 bits out of a 20GB hard disk.) Even for HD degaussers, they seem to recommend opening the hard disk case to expose the platters, and then reassemble it to see if the disk still reads when you're done!

    139. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at work we use a 3 pound hammer to do a lot of things. I think a 3 pound hammer would do just fine.
      You could also open it up and blowtorch the platters. butane torch and a screwdriver is about $30

    140. Re:Overkill? by tuxgeek · · Score: 1
      I prefer my method.

      Disassemble a pile of drives.
      Salvage the rare earth magnets.
      Remove the platters.
      Buff the shit out of the platters with a hand grinder fitted with a cup wire brush.
      Drill a hole into each platter near the edge.
      Hang a dozen platters from a finished tree branch using heavy fishing line.
      Sell the thing at my local farmers market as a bird scare for gardeners.
      Profit!

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    141. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what Obama is upto?

    142. Re:Overkill? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I typically run DBAN (if possible, assuming the drive is working), and then use thermite to destroy the drive... If you open it up and stuff thermite between the platters and add a generous helping around them and set it off, the drive will end up totally molten and form an alloy of the platter and the iron created by the thermite reaction.

      I used this method to destroy 3 drives, and it was impossible to tell how many drives went in to form the resulting lump of metal.

      Drives with aluminum cases turn to liquid almost instantly, the steel cased ones are a bit tougher but still melt.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    143. Re:Overkill? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Dear /.: Silly racism is not +1 Funny, it is just sad.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    144. Re:Overkill? by inviolet · · Score: 1

      [joke about how Chinese people usually cannot pronounce R versus L correctly]

      Dear /.: Silly racism is not +1 Funny, it is just sad.

      The word 'racism' is not the all-purpose curse you fancy it to be. If you include within it every respectful gest about race, then the word will no longer carry much weight on the topic of "serious social ills".

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    145. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly paranoid don't use computers.

    146. Re:Overkill? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Yes. Slagging someone over the fact that their native language does not include certain phonemes isn't funny though, it's just pathetic. Humour around race can be funny (Jon Stewart is pretty good at walking the line), but in this case, it's really not funny at all. It's just pointing fingers and shouting "DIFFERENT!".

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    147. Re:Overkill? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "Nothing says cancer like", not "nothing says cancer as loud as or more loudly than".

    148. Re:Overkill? by Wee · · Score: 1

      Shot the drives, obviously.

      There exist people who have a desire to remove firearms from the possession of all private citizens and it was these people that I had contact with. From what I could tell they tended toward the left side of things, politically speaking. In this particular instance, that wasn't possible and so they could only prevent my use of them for the purpose of deactivating hard disks. I didn't shoot drives in a nature preserve, rather it was the mere use of firearms to which they took issue. I never found out what exactly their objections were, beyond generally being afraid of things they knew little about.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    149. Re:Overkill? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Ah, but your brain is vulnerable to the Rubber Hose. Software can actually be hardened against this -- for example, by changing the key to something unmemorizable before you travel, and leaving it with a sufficiently trustworthy and paranoid friend.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    150. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur.

      Just to be double sure, we should destroy all who believes themselves to be a psychic.

      You know, just to be sure.

    151. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was agreeing with you.

      Well for the most part I agree, unless your trying to cover your porn surfing history... This be most important if you ever decide to run for office... Hmm wonder if anyone thought to check T. Kennedy's history.... oh wait he drowned that skeleton.... :)

    152. Re:Overkill? by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      there are tons of drives out there for scammers to read...from donated/recycle pcs that get sent over seas etc. the supply is vast enough that i doubt they are worried. unless you have national secrets or some extremely valuable data its all over kill. just overwrite once and be done. but its a good way to make your boss think you are doing something very "good" if you promise to destroy their data with extreme techniques... 35 pass etc always sounds impressive.

  2. I'll fuck it up good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use a hammer, then I pee on it.

    1. Re:I'll fuck it up good. by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      the topic is hard drive destruction, not sex.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:I'll fuck it up good. by evdubs · · Score: 1

      R. Kelly reads Slashdot?

    3. Re:I'll fuck it up good. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I hear it's more effective if the drive is powered up first.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  3. Zero Challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/06/189248

  4. Stand drill by Nikademus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just use a stand drill. I goes through all the platters and the circuitboard.
    Fairly easy to find and purchase.

    --
    I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
    1. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the price and effectiveness, a drill press can't be beat.

    2. Re:Stand drill by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to just taking ride to closest foundry and throwing disk to molten iron vat?

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    3. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn it... melt it down to nothingness... you won't be recovering anything then. Anyone who can start a bonfire can probably manage this...

    4. Re:Stand drill by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Funny

      I goes through all the platters and the circuitboard.

      IM IN UR GARAGE GOES THRU UR HDDRV.

    5. Re:Stand drill by BenevolentP · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whatever happened to just taking hike to closest Mt. Doom and throwing disk to molten lava hole?

    6. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea where the "closest foundry" is ... but I suspect it's really far away.

    7. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd guess the foundry people would object to contaminating their carefully selected alloy...

    8. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to just taking ride to closest foundry and throwing disk to molten iron vat?

      Most of us don't live in Pittsburgh.

      Oh, wait a minute, all the steel mills shut down in Pittsburgh...

    9. Re:Stand drill by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, haven't you read the Trilogy? It takes half a book just to cross Mordor, plus there's Orcs and shit. That's way more trouble than it's worth. And have you ever tried to find Middle Earth on a map? Sure, lots of people have theories, but what with continental drift and such, it's all pretty obscure. How can you be sure the volcano you use is *really* Mount Doom in this late, degenerate age?

    10. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a college, so granted, our data doesn't tend to be ubersensitive...I like to blast things with electricity. So I take our old drives out to the maintenance shop and crank up the welder to MaXiMuM PoWeR (375 AMP) and blow holes in the drives.

      Unless it's one o the newer 15kRPM drives, then you just take the top cover off and shatter the platter (they explode into a bunch of glass-like pieces when you try to pry them out).

    11. Re:Stand drill by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to just taking hike to closest Mt. Doom and throwing disk to molten lava hole?

      I would, but disregarding the occasional unpredictable eruptions and the grey little fucker that keeps bothering me whenever I go near, I just can't seem to let go of the disk when it comes down to it.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    12. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah a drill works but what is more fun is a nice rifle from about 50 yards away. I know this isnt an option to most people, but it is for me. I stacked 7 hard drives together and one shot from a 22-250 (using target crap bullets) made it into the last drive. It was also cool to see how the hole expanded as it got deeper. Hole starts off at .22 cal (about the size of a pencil eraser) by the end it was about 2 inches.

    13. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One does not simply taking hike into Mordor.

    14. Re:Stand drill by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      i think a few screw drivers and a nice hammer would due the trick, take cover off smash the platters, toss them in a fire put for good messure.

    15. Re:Stand drill by damburger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its emotionally draining, because just before the hard drive goes into the molten metal you realise it has Learned the Value of Human Life.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    16. Re:Stand drill by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Couple of holes, or even the bandsaw is not good enough. Yes, the harddisk doesn't work anymore after that, but it doesn't protect against someone disassembling the drive, putting the platters under an electron microscope or other type of scanner and analysing your ones-and-zeroes that way. It sounds far fetched, but that is the risk you want to protect against.

      I'm still wondering if there isn't a chemical process that can dissolve the magnetic material on the discs. Otherwise, I agree with the person suggesting sanding the platters.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    17. Re:Stand drill by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      Imitation +1 Funny Mod. Now with half the calories!

    18. Re:Stand drill by damburger · · Score: 1

      See below I posted regarding data being recovered from Columbia hard-disks; re-entry is a hell of a lot hotter than any bonfire you care to name. A fire might not thoroughly heat the drive enough; every little bit of it has to get to several hundred degrees to be sure of breaking down all the data.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    19. Re:Stand drill by necro81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You mean, after freezing and shattering it with liquid nitrogen?

    20. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we know that Hobbiton is on the same latitude as Oxford and Minas Tirith somewhere around Venice, I think it was. Or Milan. Or Marseilles. Something around that kind of level.

      And I think we know that Tol Erresea is Britain. So Mount Doom might well be somewhere in Romania.

    21. Re:Stand drill by vlm · · Score: 1

      I'd guess the foundry people would object to contaminating their carefully selected alloy...

      Modded as funny, but if it was a food grade stainless alloy, adding a bunch of lead solder is inappropriate, unless the foundry is in China.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    22. Re:Stand drill by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

      The folks in Accounting must love your expense and mileage reports.

    23. Re:Stand drill by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, haven't you read the Trilogy? It takes half a book just to cross Mordor, plus there's Orcs and shit. That's way more trouble than it's worth. And have you ever tried to find Middle Earth on a map? Sure, lots of people have theories, but what with continental drift and such, it's all pretty obscure. How can you be sure the volcano you use is *really* Mount Doom in this late, degenerate age?

      Because of all the Orcs and shit?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    24. Re:Stand drill by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I used to just throw the old disks into the next black hole, relying on Stephen Hawking being right that all information thrown into a black hole is gone forever. Now he says he was wrong, and all the information from my hard disks may eventually be returned from the black hole. Does anyone know if this device can also be used to destroy black holes?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    25. Re:Stand drill by thearkitex · · Score: 1

      One cannot just "take a hard drive" into Mordor!

    26. Re:Stand drill by lazyforker · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. You have to take the hard drive to the specific volcano where it was made - and they don't print that info on the drive!

    27. Re:Stand drill by AP31R0N · · Score: 2, Informative

      You broke my heart!

      i joyfully clicked that link, eager to see a frozen hard drive shatter like glass. But all i found was a T2 clip. Now i have blue-eyeballs and have to watch a few Will It Blend videos.

      Thanks for nothing!

      __

      i've always wanted to try using duct tape to strap an HD to a sledge hammer. If i used enough tape, the pieces would stay somewhat together. Eventually i'd have a duct tape bag full of HD bits.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    28. Re:Stand drill by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Imitation +1 Funny Mod. Now with half the calories!

      Half the calories and still no Karma!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    29. Re:Stand drill by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Christ, that was at the beginning of the third age.

      Mordor is a bedroom community now, and Mount Doom's a cheesy drive by tourist trap with a mini mall. The rent-a-cops do get all pissy when you throw shit in though.

    30. Re:Stand drill by hey! · · Score: 1

      That may be true in a world where people struggle to survive.

      In *our* world of high tech comfort, the danger, misery and uncertainty of the trip would have wealthy volunteers lining up to pay.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    31. Re:Stand drill by sheepofblue · · Score: 1

      In theory you could pull the platters and read them I would think. Drilling the platters then applying power to make them shatter though....

    32. Re:Stand drill by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      It's magnetic. Self-clean mode on your oven would probably do the job.

    33. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd insist that you simply give them the hard disk. They live right next to Mt. Doom.

    34. Re:Stand drill by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 1

      Use the platter as source metal when electroplating something else?

    35. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, I find a cheapo 3/4" drill with a 1/4" bit does the trick just fine. you could then proceed to fill the whole thing with sand for extra tin foil hattedness.

    36. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't they use the Giant Eagles at the beginning to just fly there?

      Would have made the trilogy a whole lot shorter, that's for sure!

    37. Re:Stand drill by c · · Score: 1

      >> How can you be sure the volcano you use is *really* Mount Doom in
      >> this late, degenerate age?

      > Because of all the Orcs and shit?

      No, it could just be a Republican convention.

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    38. Re:Stand drill by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      A drill wouldn't do it. It would do a good job of destroying the data it hit, but with proper recovery tools they could still spin up the disks and get much of the data. If they REALLY wanted to they might even be able to get the data before and after the hole on the same track.

      By deforming the disk so it won't spin, he's making it MUCH harder. I'm not sure a head has been invented to follow the contours of a bent disk, and I think deforming it may actually mis-align the surface enough that your head would also have to wobble in and out a little bit for one track.

      This would make it many times more difficult to retrieve data because there is just no way to adapt existing tools to read any of it (except maybe the inner-most tracks if they haven't been deformed and the thing can read at a really low speed.

    39. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in New Zealand. It's not hard to get to at all these days but it is expensive. The Orcs are a problem, but really just because they are trying to sell you souvenirs.

    40. Re:Stand drill by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      And then the guy who kept his porn in the disk comes along and goes "Nooo my preciousssssss. Nasty adminses stole it! Said datas were sensssitivesss. But I'll get you back, my precioussss."
      Sorry, that south park episode is to blame.

    41. Re:Stand drill by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Ah, and this post raises another important point: You can't assume you've found Mt. Doom just because there are Trolls around. You might say to yourself "Hey, where there's Trolls, there's Orcs, amiright?" but it's not that simple! Make sure you've seen honest-to-Sauron Orcs before you go tossing anything into volcanoes!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    42. Re:Stand drill by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 1

      One cannot simply walk in to Mordor

    43. Re:Stand drill by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could turn the lights off and feed it to a grue...

    44. Re:Stand drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to just taking hike to closest Mt. Doom and throwing disk to molten lava hole?

      I think you want "unmount Doom" instead. Any man who attempts to bring it to mount Doom would be unable to resist the compulsion to keep the disk for themselves.

       

    45. Re:Stand drill by mellon · · Score: 1

      Too true. :')

    46. Re:Stand drill by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Actually, the vaporization point of lead is lower than the melting point of quite a few metals, like tungsten, or titanium. Iron melts about 200C lower than the vaporization point of lead, and the vaporization point of iron is about 1100C higher than lead, so just keeping the foundry hot enough would likely remove the lead anyways.

      It'd be breathing the lead fumes that they'd complain about.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    47. Re:Stand drill by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      You know how the Eagles saved them in the end? Why couldn't they have just flown there in the beginning?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    48. Re:Stand drill by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      An industrial shredder also seems to do a good job.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  5. This is just a controlled hammer by wjh31 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just give the hard drive to your kid with a hammer, tell them to go nuts, come back 10 mins later with a dustpan and brush and you are sorted.

    1. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Miros · · Score: 3, Informative

      dont forget the safety goggles!

    2. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      You could also give it to some trainee employees with the same tool, works like a charm. Eventually you can also hover above the exposed platters with a strong magnet, just to be sure. (Yes, I witnessed this, lot's of fun).

      For folks that want to destroy huge number of HDD's on a regular basis, just get a proper degausser as those do not cost a fortune and get the job done well, without doubt. You may even be able to reuse the drives afterwards.

    3. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      If they're reusable afterwards, you didn't use a proper degausser.

    4. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if you like the kid, sure..

    5. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goggles do nothing!

    6. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good safety advice! Never go close to kids without protective gear.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until they go to town on drives you didn't want destroyed. "Look daddy, I fixed this one all by myself!"

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    8. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by egburr · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you'd had your protective gear on in the first place, there wouldn't be a kid to go near....

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    9. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Oh please.
      We all know
      The goggle do nothing!

    10. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had used protective gear in the first instance, there would not be any kids.

    11. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A proper magnet-screwing will make the magnet that controls the heads absolutely useless, and the entire drive will have been forcefully re-written with garbage due to the sheer magnetic forces.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't blame me, I didn't do it!

      That's sad on so many levels...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:This is just a controlled hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have thought of the safety gear ahead of time == no kids :)

  6. Underkill? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like you could fix it with... Pops-a-dent!

    Jokes aside, from the FA: "The Bustadrive, then, looks like itâ€(TM)ll thwart all but the wealthiest and most determined of hard disk hackers"

    So what they're saying is, this doesn't do the job as well as something like one of those DOD disc scraper/shredder things, but it is more fun, which I guess makes it news worthy?

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  7. lots of options out there! by farnham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My drill press makes for a very effective drive killer.

    Use what you got!

    --
    pending committee review
  8. 7.62mm holes by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have always preferred putting some 7.62mm holes through old hard drives at a distance of 50 to 100m. Just remove the electronics so you don't end up with circuit board debris all over and old hard drives make great targets.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:7.62mm holes by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used some hard drives for 9mm practice about 2 years ago... It makes a GREAT desk ornament, because of the funny faces people make when they see a hard drive with bullet holes.

    2. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 1

      Would you do this at a range? I'd imagine there might be a few that would take some issue with you shooting at something other than paper; it's pretty cool if they're cool with that. What were you using, an M1?

    3. Re:7.62mm holes by IBBoard · · Score: 5, Funny

      7.62mm seems like an unusual size for a drill bit, and what kind of drill are you managing to use at up to 100m? Seems like a longer distance than I've seen any normal pillar drill move over.

      I do agree that not removing the circuit board causes lots of debris, though, and is especially dangerous when it spins off at an angle!

    4. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 2, Informative

      7.62x51mm NATO, aka .308 Winchester, is a standard cartridge round developed before WWII which (contrary to my earlier post) is not shot from the M1 (which shoots far more common .30-06) but is shot from the far more entertaining M14.

    5. Re:7.62mm holes by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I have a large plot (40 acres) in northern Minnesota so that is where I do this. You are correct in that I don't know of any ranges that would allow you to shoot at what are termed garbage targets. Also to answer your last question I use either my SKS (a 1948 Romanian one) or my M91/30 (an unissued Russian main battle rifle from WWII accuracy grade 1 made at the Tula plant). Both are fairly accurate the SKS has 4 inch groups at 100 yards and the M91/30 has 1.5 inch groups at 100 yards. A buddy of mine has both a M1 Garand and a M1 carbine that he uses up at my property for the same thing.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    6. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 1

      Nice. I just wanted to also correct my own error before someone else does it for me, M1s fire .30-06, I was thinking of an M14 (which does shoot 7.62x51mm NATO). If you're familiar with both guns, you'll understand the "monday" error.

    7. Re:7.62mm holes by Weird_Hock · · Score: 1

      Although the 7.62mm is fun, I prefer 00 buck at somewhat closer range. More holes in minimum time!

    8. Re:7.62mm holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 7.62x39 are shot from the AK47 and SKS but WHOOOOOOSH anyway for missing the obvious joke

    9. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 1

      I actually just had to get rid of about 880 rounds of 7.62x54 which I had purchased by mistake (believing it to be 7.62x51; didn't read the page carefully enough). Ended up selling to to a guy for, I kid you not, $100, just to take it off my hands. Hungarian made surplus, still in one of those annoying as hell sealed tin cans with what could liberally be called a "can opener."

    10. Re:7.62mm holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Err wrong again. 7.62mm was developed AFTER world war II.
      Good catch though on your earlier monday mistake.

    11. Re:7.62mm holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh. I guess IBBoard's sense of humor was TOO dry for YOU.

    12. Re:7.62mm holes by damburger · · Score: 1

      Why waste your own ammunition? Put "Obama '12" stickers on them, tie them to your cars read end, and park in a red state.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    13. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 1

      buns! that was the same bug cropping up again. 1954 for the .308; thanks for the correction.

    14. Re:7.62mm holes by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      I knew a company that had sales meetings renting out the the local range. They'd line up the competitor's stuff and let the sales reps go at them with full auto (the range had a nice selection). The reps had a blast and a good story to take home, & it was cheaper and more interesting than your average dining and entertainment. The range policy was "you shoot it, you clean it up" and other than that they were fine with it. Then again they rented out the whole range... don't think they'd allow sending an HD down the line on a paper target holder... cant think how you'd do that and comply with any sort of range safety.

    15. Re:7.62mm holes by lasertech · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything in that caliber, but 12 gauge slugs are just as effective and almost as much fun.

    16. Re:7.62mm holes by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      There's ranges that let you bring whatever you want to shoot. There are some guidelines for safety reasons on what you can bring (no heavy metals, glass, etc). It's a nice change of pace from shooting paper targets.

    17. Re:7.62mm holes by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Why waste your own ammunition? Put "Obama '12" stickers on them, tie them to your cars read end, and park in a red state.

      Alternatively, if you don't live near any red states, drive into Massachusetts with the hard drive hidden behind one of those "My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car" bumper stickers ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    18. Re:7.62mm holes by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Mod -1, Whoosh ;)

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    19. Re:7.62mm holes by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Alright, but dogs CAN look up.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    20. Re:7.62mm holes by hey! · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, if you don't live near any red states, drive into Massachusetts with the hard drive hidden behind one of those "My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car" bumper stickers ;)

      Sure, because we've never seen one of *those* before. Good gracious you are a saucy fellow! The only conceivable way you could wound us more would be to write it in French, so we'll know the message is meant for us.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:7.62mm holes by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Why waste your own ammunition? Put "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" cartoons on them and leave them under a bridge in Boston.

    22. Re:7.62mm holes by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If I was trying to wound the pride of someone from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts I could think of much more effective ways to do it than by referencing a cheesy bumper sticker.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go watch Game Six again. I wonder if Bill Buckner will catch the ball this time? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:7.62mm holes by hey! · · Score: 1

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go watch Game Six again. I wonder if Bill Buckner will catch the ball this time? ;)

      Shows what *you* know. If sports were sex, Red Sox fandom back in the day would be BDSM.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re:7.62mm holes by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      These days, I'd say .308 is more common that .30-'06. Much to my chagrin, mind you.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    25. Re:7.62mm holes by Miros · · Score: 1

      Really? I have been finding it a lot easier to find .30-06 than .308; I've heard that part of the issue is that the military still uses a lot of .308 (M14s are still issued for certain things) which diverts a lot of production output from civilian use in the US. Then again, ammo is just getting absurdly expensive in the US as of late.

      I hear the Greek made .308 surplus is some of the better stuff on the market these days; of course still ending up with plenty of L/C and the like as well. What have you been finding?

    26. Re:7.62mm holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the somewhat more common 7.62x39mm NATO fired from the even more entertaining AK and SKS variants.

    27. Re:7.62mm holes by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sort of like the absolutely best scene in Die Hard, according to a friend and me.

      The gunfight in the computer room, with all sorts of Control Data-looking computers, just like we used to have to work with. That was a joy to watch.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given risk? by operator_error · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As the RTF states, data can be re recovered, given a financial budget & time.

    But I wonder. I posed the same question to a buddy awhile back, and he suggested baking the disks in an oven at 250 degrees C for an hour. The idea being that well, yeah, sure the magnetic platters can theoretically be recovered given time, budget, and determination. But still, the printed circuit board, etc. would be melted and thus ruined. Seems just as sensible, and more cost effective given readily available tools, (and sufficient ventilation!!!)

  10. Oblig... by rumith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nuke your old hard drive from the orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    1. Re:Oblig... by atramentum · · Score: 0

      Nuke your old hard drive from the orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      Fucking A.

  11. Destroy the data, not the drive by rcb1974 · · Score: 1

    By destroying the drive, you make it so that the drive cannot be re-used. Why not just secure erase the entire drive? I bet it takes less time to plug the machine in and boot off a CD than it does to open the case, remove the drive, and then smash it. Isn't there some free software that you can use to securely erase all the data on a drive with minimal effort?

    1. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bet it takes less time to plug the machine in and boot off a CD than it does to open the case, remove the drive, and then smash it.

      Not if you actually let the software RUN, it doesn't. Using DBAN on a 500 GB drive can take days, whereas this solution takes a few minutes at most. Your solution is only practical if you have one hard drive to destroy, and it is attached to a machine. The usual situation is the hard drive died and you replaced it with a good one, now need to make sure the dead one is REALLY dead before you toss it. Or, you have a batch of them that need to go because you're refreshing PCs.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by Tom · · Score: 1

      RTFA. This is about drives that they don't want to use again. They're being thrown out. They just want to make sure no dumpster-diving hacker gets all their data.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by u38cg · · Score: 1

      I recently ran shred /dev/sdb on a hard drive I wanted nuked and left it overnight. On a 60GB drive, it only managed 6 out of 25 passes, and I don't know for a fact that that drive allows access to sectors it has marked as bad.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by hydroponx · · Score: 1

      while ($i 10) { dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda $i++; }

    5. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by hydroponx · · Score: 1

      Ehh, apparently slashdot didn't like my less than symbol

    6. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Write it as &lt; to make it work: <

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by rcb1974 · · Score: 1

      RTFA. This is about drives that they don't want to use again.

      I understand that. My point is, by securely erasing the drive rather than destroying it, you're helping the environment by allowing someone else (probably in a 3rd world country that imports e-waste) to have a working hard disk rather than a dead one. If the hard disk arrives smashed, all they can do is just recycle the metals, probably in a very environmentally unfriendly way. If the hard disk arrives in working condition, they'll use/sell it. By selling it they can make money to buy food. So by exporting working electronics instead of dead ones you're doing the world a favor.

      Obviously, if the drive has already died of natural causes and cannot be secure erased, then the best way to ensure that no one resurrects the drive and recovers the data would be to destroy the drive..

    8. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Unless your hard disk has the secret plans to the Death Star on it, just run `hdparm --security-erase-enhanced /dev/sda`.

    9. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I can see doing it for bad drives, or ones that are so old they aren't useful for anything else. But for a 500GB drive it just seems to be a waste. And besides, you don't need to run DBAN - a single random pass would be good enough on a modern drive (which is pretty much any drive that's big enough to be useful, say 15GB+).

      It's actually a pretty big problem with donated computers. Since so many remove the drives before donating them, it's not uncommon to have piles of P4's sitting around with everything you need except to give them a second life - except for the hard drive.

    10. Re:Destroy the data, not the drive by Mauzl · · Score: 1

      Using DBAN on a 500 GB drive can take days, whereas this solution takes a few minutes at most.

      It takes days of machine time. It takes perhaps 15 minutes of effort.

  12. The Columbia test by damburger · · Score: 0

    Data from scientific experiments was recovered from the wreckage of the space shuttle Columbia. If your destruction process is less violent than an uncontrolled re-entry into Earths atmosphere, you haven't placed your data beyond recovery. Perhaps you could use thermite; however I suspect that method would cost more than $10 per drive if you wanted to be sure of melting every square millimetre of the disc.

    But I say we should just take off, and nuke the entire site from orbit. Its the only way to be sure...

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:The Columbia test by Miros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it would be easy to melt the disk into a nice puddle of slag, what might be harder is not burning the building down in the process.

    2. Re:The Columbia test by damburger · · Score: 1

      Hence the 'more than $10' comment. Thermite is a piece of piss to make and you would probably use less than $1 of it to destroy a hard drive. The cost would be the pit you would need to build, outside of your office building, where you could carry out the cremations.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    3. Re:The Columbia test by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't need to melt the platters. You just need to get them hot enough to no longer be magnetic - that is above the Curie temperature for the alloy, which will be somewhere around 200C or so. When the magnetic domains reform there is none of them to be in the same place as they were before with the exception of a few edges on grain boundaries. Get even hotter and you'll change the grain size or even completely change the crystal structure and get grains in completely different places and sizes when it cools down.
      That means heating the whole drive for long enough that the platters get hot and not just heating the outside of the thing the drive is in for a few minutes.

    4. Re:The Columbia test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do it outside?

    5. Re:The Columbia test by damburger · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the thermite is on top of the drive, it won't just heat the outside; it will rapidly melt the outside then fall into the interior of the drive. Thats the point. Youtube abounds with vidoes of thermite burning down through car engines, and hard drive cases are a lot less substantial.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    6. Re:The Columbia test by Miros · · Score: 1

      Interesting, this is in support of the guy who advocated putting a bunch of drives in an oven at 250C for an hour or so as a method of destruction; of what has been suggested so far, this just may be the easiest, most reliable, most practical effectively "safe" method.

    7. Re:The Columbia test by Barny · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't need a pit, just a good solid terracotta pot :)

      Your aim is not to melt the whole drive, just punch a hole in the top of the drive casing, pour in a small amount of thermite and a small burning wick.

      As pointed out, you don't need to melt the thing, just cook the platters to 1,000C or so to make the iron non-magnetic.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    8. Re:The Columbia test by NotOverHere · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what the Curie temperature of the magnetic coating happens to be? I would think that a potter's kiln or a blacksmith's forge would be effective.

    9. Re:The Columbia test by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my point is you don't have to actually get it that hot and could use an oven. That is of course less fun. Explosives will also work if that induces a shock wave through the platters. The wave front is likely to heat things up enough that large crystals become small and the magnetism is long gone before the small crystals form. When I did this sort of stuff with iron pellets I had a really big air gun (10 foot barrel by 1 inch bore) instead of explosives, but hitting them with things at mach 1 did the trick.
      Liquid metal (like the thermite) is of course a very corrosive thing and easily flows into any gap let alone melting it's way in. Even spilled mercury on an aircraft is likely to do some damage as it gets into the smallest crack and widens it.

    10. Re:The Columbia test by damburger · · Score: 1

      Complete annihilation means its easier to verify destruction of data (Is hard drive a liquid? Yes/No). Its also a morale booster, seeing as most people with the skills to fill up your hard drives with incredibly valuable data are generally total pyromaniacs.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    11. Re:The Columbia test by Barny · · Score: 1

      Good point, so use some extra.

      A good tip is, if there is burning melted iron pouring out the top of the hole you make, the drive ain't recoverable ;)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    12. Re:The Columbia test by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      You dont have to melt the whole thing, you just have to make sure that the drive exceeds the curie point at some point.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    13. Re:The Columbia test by damburger · · Score: 1

      To be really sure though, I would have thought its best to put as much distance between the Curie temperature and the temperature of your heat source as possible. Hence thermite - pretty much the cheapest and easiest way of getting 4 digits of centigrade.

      Also, you've touched on the main reason for thermite: FUN :)

      Data destruction is usually something that occurs at the end of a project. Why not celebrate your success with some massive overkill against your old drives?

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    14. Re:The Columbia test by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Hence the 'more than $10' comment. Thermite is a piece of piss to make and you would probably use less than $1 of it to destroy a hard drive. The cost would be the pit you would need to build, outside of your office building, where you could carry out the cremations.

      The article is about something built in the UK. Our population density is fairly high, I'd need to drive several miles to find anywhere appropriate and in this town the average traffic speed is about 6-8 mph.

    15. Re:The Columbia test by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You probably don't need more than 500C, maybe a lot less depending on the material but it could still be out of the range of a domestic oven. A gas torch of some kind would easily do the job, and yes thermite is even going to melt the things beyond any sort of magnetic recognition.

    16. Re:The Columbia test by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I really don't know where my tired brain got the 200C but I remember it as part of a beer fueled discussion with other engineers on the topic of destruction of hard drives. There was one magnetic material used in drives that this applied to but I'm not sure what is being used now.

    17. Re:The Columbia test by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      An air-acetylene torch works as well. just don't breathe the fumes.

    18. Re:The Columbia test by hydroponx · · Score: 1

      Who needs safety when you have thermite ?!

    19. Re:The Columbia test by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      So basically baking in an oven would do it? Perhaps not the same oven you bake your bread in, there's some nasty stuff in those drives, I suppose.

    20. Re:The Columbia test by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      Spilling Mercury on an Aircraft is almost as bad as a bomb (except slower) Mercury speeds up the oxidization of Aluminum to the point where you can just about watch it fall apart, spill that on an aircraft and they'll likely ground it for a good long time while they strip to the base structure and make sure every bit of aluminum isn't damaged. Good 'before and after' pics in this article.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    21. Re:The Columbia test by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Either of these would easily melt the drive, a cheep gas forge will reach 2500f and a kiln usually closer to 4k

    22. Re:The Columbia test by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      Try over 1000C. Hard drive platters use a cobalt alloy for the magnetic layer (according to Wikipedia), and the curie temperature of cobalt is 1121C, though it may be different for the specific alloy used. This is problematic because the melting point of the aluminum that makes up most of the platters is 660C.

    23. Re:The Columbia test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying my oven would work then? Baked drives, them's some good eats.

    24. Re:The Columbia test by dcam · · Score: 1

      So that is what happened to initech. They really should have fleshed that out more in the movie, it would have been a great subplot.

      --
      meh
    25. Re:The Columbia test by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Wrong number. The right number would depend on what the actual alloy is. Properties of alloys differ a great deal from pure materials and one of those is usually a lowering of melting point and other transformations as you add other things - maybe this isn't a good example anymore but consider the mix of tin and lead in solder and how the solder melts at a lower temperature than pure tin or pure lead - hopefully most readers here got to see that in school. Neither pure cobolt nor pure aluminium is used because there are better things for the job. So the answer would be that the temperature would vary depending upon what magnetic material is on the platters. In one of my other comments there is a link to a few examples.

  13. Dirtboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two holes in the case and a bucket of ocean water.

  14. Why people keep unencrypted data? by Czubaka · · Score: 1

    I keep wondering why do people keep disks with unencrypted data. I have all my disks encrypted with AES and I'm not worried when my laptop or server needs to be serviced.

    BTW, I had some disks with very confidential data. I decided to make a nice big bonefire. We had both hot sausages, cold beer and safe data :-)

    1. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by Miros · · Score: 1

      Where do you keep your keys? I've given that same idea a lot of thought, but I always run into a few issues. A) reduced disk performance [typically, unless you're using some very expensive hardware] B) more data storage devices whose failure could result in the complete loss of the data (i.e. whatever is storing your crypto keys)

    2. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the UK and I'm always losing things... and losing your keys is illegal in the UK, so no encrypted data for me.

    3. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you wrote "both" and then followed it with a list of THREE things instead of TWO, I can only assume that BOTH referred to the "hot sausages". So, you and your boyfriend got fat erections from watching hard drives burn. You are such a fucking dork.

    4. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Informative

      My university group manages about 500 systems, mostly various flavors of solaris & linux with a few other unixes tossed in. First off, trying to encrypt all the disks in all of those systems (some of which are HUGE) would be a massive undertaking. Then there's the issue of trying to find an encryption system that's compatible across all these systems, the additional overhead needed to do the encryption/decryption, and the process of storing the encryption keys for all these systems. It's simply not worth the effort in large environments like this.

    5. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      reduced disk performance [typically, unless you're using some very expensive hardware

      I haven't noticed any meaningful difference in disk performance with Truecrypt running AES. AES is fairly lightweight and easy to implement. Disk i/o is going to be the limiting factor long before the speed of decryption comes into play.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Disk i/o is going to be the limiting factor long before the speed of decryption comes into play.

      I used to think that. Now I have an SSD in my laptop, and I'm not sure anymore.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:Why people keep unencrypted data? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      First off, trying to encrypt all the disks in all of those systems (some of which are HUGE) would be a massive undertaking.

      But would be worth doing -- at the very least, you could start doing it for new systems.

      Then there's the issue of trying to find an encryption system that's compatible across all these systems,

      Why does it need to be the same system on all of them? LUKS works on Linux, Truecrypt on Windows... I'm not sure what there is for Solaris, though.

      the additional overhead needed to do the encryption/decryption,

      Negligible, if you're using hard disks. It might start to matter if you're using fast SSDs, or some ridiculous RAID, but plain vanilla hard disks are slow, and CPUs are fast.

      the process of storing the encryption keys for all these systems.

      That would be the real challenge -- maybe. At least on Linux, you could netboot them -- not secure, granted, but it means that if anyone runs off with a box without at least sniffing the network first, they'd have no keys. It also means you'd be able to update said keys without even walking to the box.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  15. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Raise the drive to the curie point. All magnetic domains are destroyed, and recovery is impossible with currently known methods.

  16. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Then you have to spend a day cleaning melted plastic off the sides of your oven and fumigating it. Hmm , I think I might be seeing a flaw in your friends plan...

  17. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by Hyppy · · Score: 1

    250C would destroy the PCBs, but I'm not sure whether or not just swapping them out would yield a readable drive.

  18. Chainsaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or use another similar tool. 'nuff said.

  19. The only way to be sure is by jointm1k · · Score: 1

    to throw the hdd into hot, molten lava.

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
    1. Re:The only way to be sure is by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "The hard drive cannot be destroyed by any means we here possess. It must be cast into the fiery chasm from whence it came. ... I now dub the The Fellowship of the Hard Drive."

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  20. Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by littlewink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wipe the drive with software. Do it several times with different programs if you're paranoid. Set up an assembly line to do it if you have many, with each individual responsible for a separate step. Test drives prior to re-release.

    People are so badly mistaken about how recoverable disk data is: they believe the same way they believe in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster. What a waste of good work.

    1. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment

      Using software is a waste of time.

    2. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by phil+reed · · Score: 1
      (1) Software can take hours.

      (2) If these drives are intended for scrap, there's no need to worry about re-release. (When was the last time you re-used a 10 gig drive?)

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      Heh. I think we still have some 1-3gb hard drives in use here. Universities area a bastion of ancient hardware.

    4. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before more people say "WASTE OF TIME", you are obviously doing it wrong.
      HDD erasers can easily run through the night on their own power. (or direct, or from battery charged from solar, or wind, whatever)
      How often will you really be erasing drives? How long will it take to replace a drive? (considering most companies do orders instead of going out to some computer store and buying it)

      Also, another thought is using 2 heads on one drive at the same time, told to write over specific sections. (or more, 3 could work, not sure about any more without adding extra complexity)
      This should, in theory, be able to half (roughly) the time it takes.
      Remember to set it up in the correct way to prevent spin collides.
      If you are smart enough, you could probably design a drive in this way that allows you to easily insert a platter and not have to care about anything until it is done.
      Now pop it out, place back in to original drive and format.

    5. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by mlts · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are wiping a hard disk to reassign within a company, and the hard drive isn't requiring top security, I've found that using HDDErase and DBAN are a good combo. HDDErase performs a complete erase on the controller level using ATA firmware commands (zeroing even the relocated sectors), then following up by usage of DBAN will put the chance of any recovery past anyone but the most determined.

      Bonus points if you use TrueCrypt or BitLocker, so to ensure that a HDD is wiped, you just do a quick format, or a once over with zeroes. If you format a BitLocker drive in Windows 7, the format command explicitly zeroes out the areas with the volume keys on it making it impossible to recover the rest of the volume (more info here http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc512654.aspx).

    6. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by HiThere · · Score: 1

      How about:
      Reformat the entire disk with different partition types, and a different file system. Possibly a different OS. If it's been Linux with ext3, install BSD with it's default file system, etc. Then create a few users on the system. And copy a few live-CDs to folders in the users systems.

      1) it's usable.
      2) it appears to not have been reformatted (though not heavily used).
      3) most of the stuff you want to hide has been overwritten with something plausible.

      ALTERNATIVE:
      a) Take a system that's been heavily used, but doesn't have anything you want to hide, and dd it's drive onto a mountable hard drive.
      b) Using a liveCD, dd the contents of the mountable hard drive onto the systems that you wish to overwrite.

      1) it's usable.
      2) it appears to not have been reformatted.
      3) most of the stuff you want to hide has been overwritten with something plausible.
      Problem:
      If the size of the new drive doesn't match the size of the old drive, something may not be hidden, or it may be obvious that something has been hidden.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Waste of Time, Money and Good Equipment by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You might consider donating them. For people who refurbish donated computers, harddrives are the hardest part to come by because so many remove the drive before donating the computer. 10GB is a bit small, but still useful.

  21. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by dbIII · · Score: 1

    he suggested baking the disks in an oven at 250 degrees C for an hour. The idea being that well, yeah, sure the magnetic platters can theoretically be recovered

    Not a chance. Once it goes above the Curie temperature it isn't magnetic anymore and when it cools down the magnetic domains are going to be arranged in completely different ways. Bullets, explosives etc also work since a shock wave through the material can raise the temperature at the wave front up to as high as the Curie temperature - which means it's not magnetic when the wave goes through and the magnetic domains that for afterwards have no reason to make them reform in a similar pattern.
    There has been speculation that magnetic dust could settle on the surface and mark where the magnetic domains were but that doesn't really sound likely since the drives spin.

  22. Gross Overkill by kingsack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A ball pean hammer applied vigorously to the drive spindle will render all but the most wealthy and determined effort to recover data fruitless and even then it is highly unlikely that all or even most of the data would be recoverable.

    1. Re:Gross Overkill by Kratisto · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. We assume that there are thousands of shadowy, cloaked data thieves digging through our garbage, and each and every one of them has a Magnetic Force Microscope and thousands of man hours at his disposal.

      --
      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
  23. Not eco friendly by superphysics · · Score: 1

    The method is not at all eco-friendly - there's the wasted disk. It could potentially be used by others if you simply used something like Eraser or DBAN (which wipes data to beyond recovery by most means)...

    --
    Life is too good to waste... Read!
    1. Re:Not eco friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Companies require physical destruction of the hard drive. Such as any place that deals with medical records.

    2. Re:Not eco friendly by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Some data storage disposal regulations, e.g defence data above a certain classification, mandates physical destruction of the media. However I doubt this guys equipment would meet that requirement as it usually means some form of extreme heating and very small pieces.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    3. Re:Not eco friendly by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree...

      There was an article on 2600 recently about ATA Security Specification. You can apparently use it to perform a secure wipe which is what the DoD uses these days. Two passes at different offsets (-10% and +10%) to prevent recovery of magnetic data from the 'edges' of the sectors with a scanning electron microscope or something crazy like that. Rather than the crazy 36-pass wipe or something they used back in the day.

      If it's good enough for the government spooks, its a good place to start for us.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    4. Re:Not eco friendly by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If it's good enough for the government spooks, its a good place to start for us.

      I agree, which is why I always begin my problem solving by handing a suitcase full of money to a person who claims they can solve the problem, and then never checking or asking what the money was used for or what the person did to solve the problem.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Not eco friendly by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Really... Who ever said anything about money. It's something that is built into the firmware of every hard drive sold since about the year 2000. The government uses ATA Secure Erase. It does what I described in the previous entry by overwriting with the head offset at -10% and +10% to erase the little bit on the edges.

      Ofcourse, if you have something REALLY incriminating then you're best off ensuring physical destruction. This is what the DoD does with any drive that's contained like top secret information or is it classified.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  24. Gutmann was wrong by feenberg · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no need to physically destroy a drive to prevent data from being read. The claims of Gutmann that it was possible to read overwritten sectors were never sustained by his sources. I investigated this years ago and reported in Can Intelligence Agencies Read Overwritten Data that he was very much overwrought. I see he has gone on to tilt at other windmills since he propagated that myth.

    1. Re:Gutmann was wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Physically overwritten sectors are (almost) certainly unrecoverable. But what about remapped 'bad' sectors? AFAIK these cannot be accessed in any way by software wiping tools, but could be accessed and potentially read by tweaked drive firmware. They might be overwritten if you use the drive's own firmare erase command if it supports this.

    2. Re:Gutmann was wrong by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      Good point if your harddisk has resell value. But for those that need to be scrapped, a thick screwdriver and a hammer will solve your problem in 15 seconds flat, far less than what you need to do a wipe. Also count in the time needed to re-educate your PHB about the finer Gutmann report details. Mega-hole in harddisk is within everyones grasp, even your favourite PHB.

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    3. Re:Gutmann was wrong by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

      The question becomes, is this method - or any method that results in the physical destruction of the drive - effective at preventing the use and recovery of the drive in the future? If it is, then why risk a non-desctructive method? I'll take a 100% success over a 99.9999% any day.

      --
      Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
    4. Re:Gutmann was wrong by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And how many of these are there? SMART can tell you how many sectors have been remapped, and I've only seen this over 50 on a hard drive that completely failed a few hours later. 50 512-byte sectors works out to be 25KB of data, taken at random from the data ever written to the disk. What is the probability of this being something useful? If you use encryption or compression on the disk - or the files - then these sectors will contain data that is completely meaningless without the relevant headers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Gutmann was wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every ATA/SATA drive made since around 2001 supports the "secure erase" feature. This will overwrite everything, including remapped sectors and the host protected area (HPA). NIST considers this to be as effective as degaussing. It has the added advantage that you can re-use or sell the erased drive. On Linux, you can activate this feature with hdparm's --security-erase switch.

      It's actually more effective than crushing or similar physical destruction techniques, as it will protect against "laboratory" attacks (magnetoscopy etc). The only physical technique which is completely effective against a determined attacker is incineration (even grinding can leave recoverable fragments if you don't know what you're doing; it's quite easy to end up with flakes of the magnetic medium which are large enough to extract data from).

      Physical destruction is primarily masturbation; it's done because it feels good rather than because it's particularly effective.

    6. Re:Gutmann was wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard disks have a special command which erases everything, including replaced sectors. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA#HDD_Passwords_and_Security

  25. Remove the magnets by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 0

    Remove and make use of the magnets.
    They are valuable and extremely powerful, so make sure you don't put them near your watch or cell phone.
    Here is a DIY knife hanger I made a few years ago:

    http://cablemodem.fibertel.com.ar/dalmiroy2k/3dg/HDDmagnet.JPG
    http://cablemodem.fibertel.com.ar/dalmiroy2k/3dg/HDDmagnet2.JPG

  26. Laziness producing waste by toby · · Score: 1

    Don't encourage him. :/

    --
    you had me at #!
  27. Blowtorch! by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

    I have an oxy-acetylene torch in my home workshop. I've used it to turn platters into molten slag.

    it's cheap too!

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:Blowtorch! by CannedTurkey · · Score: 1

      We've got a plasma cutter at work purchased exclusively for this purpose.

      --
      Ingredients: Turkey, Mechanically Separated Turkey, Water, Salt, Flavour.
  28. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by Peter+Steil · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not effective, I've successfully recovered drives where the PCB had been smashed, broken, etc. You just need to find the same model and replace with that.

  29. Easier home made method by will_die · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is an easier method (version that may make from work).
    There are commerical version that do alot better bending job, try http://www.garner-products.com/ for videos and pictures to gladden your hard drive destroying heart.

    1. Re:Easier home made method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My solution to this has always been:
      1. Pry the cover off the drive.
      2. Pry the platters off.
      3. Drive them to a remote location.
      4. Take a portable belt sander to 'em 'til you're down to bare metal. (Try to recover data from that!)
      5. Deposit each individual platter and the sanding belt in different trash bins.

      Works for a single drive, but not very cost-effective en masse.

  30. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Why not just turn it up to 400 degrees and totally melt the platters? No way they're recoverable then.

  31. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by jonatha · · Score: 1

    He'll need a hotter furnace (Curie temperature for iron is over 700C)...

    --
    The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
  32. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by IceFox · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. The board is not where the data is and replacing the board with a good one or swapping the disks into a case+board that is good is a common practice.

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  33. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slow news today?

  34. breaker bar by gorfie · · Score: 1

    I disposed of some old hard drives a few months back. I wiped all of them (not just formatted) but I wasn't satisfied. I found that a breaker bar (a large iron bar meant to break up rocks) performed well. Just hold the bar over the drive and let it drop - repeat. The IBM deskstar was truly easy to destroy - the casing deformed quickly and the platters literally shattered into hundreds of pieces. Quantum fireballs however were sturdy little beasts. I thought I had protected the surface of my garage floor but I found that the breaker bar pushed the hard drive through the cardboard protection and into the garage floor... oops. Eventually the casing opened and I was able to use pliers to tear the platters. Yes it was all overkill - but it certainly was satisfying. :)

    1. Re:breaker bar by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      You could just unscrew the drive cases to get in at the platters. Admittedly some drives make this difficult with deliberately shawn screw heads, but most don't.

      Usually it is a few screws on the top (including at least one under the labels), a few to get the controller board off, and another couple under there. Once you have the case open there may be a few more screws to take out so you can remove the heads and platters.

      You now have a set of platters that will shatter easily if that is your want and some rare earth magnets for shits and giggles.

      It is harder with 2.5" drives than 3.5", though only because most peopel don't have the neaded Torx4/5/6 screw driver heads handy.

  35. But.... by dieselpawn · · Score: 1

    Will it blend?!

  36. Mini-grind the platters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mini-grind the platters...

  37. Oops! by KevetS · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone did a 'hydraulic punch' on their web server...

    --
    This is my United States of whatever.
    1. Re:Oops! by KevetS · · Score: 1

      That's what SHE said!

      --
      This is my United States of whatever.
    2. Re:Oops! by eexaa · · Score: 1

      Is http://www.bustadrive.com/ their website?

      If so, someone should get hydraulically punched for creating webpages in MS Word.

  38. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by rumith · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to play the Terminator theme as you drop the hard drive into a pool of molten metal.

  39. It's all very well smashing/drilling holes by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    In the HD but some of us would like to retain a usable HD after the job is done as donating the PC's to the 3rd world is much nicer and cheaper than trying to conform with all the Gubment regs for recycling/scrapping them. Now obviously DBAN will work but what about degaussing will that screw up the pcb? Are there any other easy options that won't take ages to run?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:It's all very well smashing/drilling holes by thedonger · · Score: 1

      Hm, sounds a lot like cash-for-clunkers. The gubment gives you a few thousand bucks and keeps a ton of scrap metal and plastic per payout. No reuse there, either.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:It's all very well smashing/drilling holes by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      No it means that instead of me paying to scrap 200PC's according to Gubment regs I can give the equipment to the needy of another country for free where they will be very much appreciated even though if we are getting rid of them then they are sh1t as we got them as re-ferbs in the 1st place and kept them for 5 years.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  40. a few bags of sand is all you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a thermite pit

  41. Be poetic, use a Winchester. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The hard disks used to be called Winchester Drives (I vaguely recall IBM made a dual platter disk drive 30MB capacity on each platter, and allegedly Winchester 30-30 was a well known rifle and so the drive was named Winchester drive too), after a famed rifle. Well, it would be poetic justice to put a hard disk out of misery using its namesake.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  42. no good by juanhf · · Score: 1

    ah, vice grips and mechanical punch machines: all are very large, noisy, and expensive.

    try simply opening the drive and putting some sand in there. turn the drive back on for a few minutes and voila you have hard drive puree.

    much more affordable, smaller footprint, and assured destruction!

    just send royalties back to me if you use my method :-)

    you first saw it on /.

  43. Our local Computer Recycling Center... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    ...shreds the drives for free. Literally SHREDS the drive into tiny pieces, which fall into an enormous box full of other tiny pieces. You even get a certificate.

    My understanding is that they resell the raw materials.

    Whatever the case, it is both cheaper and more effective. You should look into it...

    1. Re:Our local Computer Recycling Center... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      I think the idea of this is to render the drives unreadable before you trust a crate of them to the guy with a van who says he's taking them directly to the recycling centre.

    2. Re:Our local Computer Recycling Center... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, see, we take them to the Center ourselves. You can even watch them go through the machine if you want.

    3. Re:Our local Computer Recycling Center... by greed · · Score: 1

      For free?

      Damn, I'd pay a dollar a drive to watch the shredder go!

  44. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1) Place drive in computer
    2) Host website on said computer
    3) Post link to website on slashdot
    4) one melted drive ;)

  45. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by damburger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Over temperature might not correspond to data bit temperature for a very long time. If, for example, materials on the platter or elsewhere on the hard drive ablate they could keep it below the Curie temperature for quite a while. This is just speculation of course, I have no idea what hard-drive platters have on them - but I don't think its as simple as dialing an oven above the Curie temperature and then assuming the jobs done after X hours.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  46. What's the Melting point? by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

    I live close to a kiln used for glass-blowing. How cool would it be to have a glass ornament with metal swirls of 1's and 0's?

    --
    Loading...
  47. Not new by Atticka · · Score: 1

    Garner-Products has been making drive crushers and degaussers for years.

    They make a drive press that can fold multiple drives in half, good times!

    --
    No sig here...
  48. Sometimes you DO need to destroy the drive... by bziman · · Score: 1

    Case in point -- I had a hard drive suffer a mechanical failure which prevented me from being able to read much of the disk -- enough to know that at least some of the data remained intact. This being the case, I don't know how reliable an attempt to write data (zeros or random data) would be. However, it is quite likely that much of the data on the platters remains perfectly intact, and would be accessible if one had the equipment to pop open the drive, and replace the failed read/write head.

    In a situation like this, bet your ass the drive needs to be thoroughly and physically destroyed.

  49. What about using a Gas or Charcoal Grill? by jrifkin · · Score: 1

    Just cook the drive on the grill for 15 minutes or so. The heat should demagnetize the drives. You might want to watch out for toxic fumes though.

    1. Re:What about using a Gas or Charcoal Grill? by hoarier · · Score: 1

      Just cook the drive on the grill for 15 minutes or so. The heat should demagnetize the drives. You might want to watch out for toxic fumes though.

      Mmm, data smoke!

      Yes, put your drives into a Blendtec.

  50. In the real world, fire is a bad solution by name_already_taken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which would be the better solution.

    A small terracotta pot without a hole in the bottom of it + a small amount of thermite is the cheapest way, thermite is cheap and reasonably easy to make.

    Ok, do that in your office and see how many minutes your job lasts once the fire's out.

    Even if we did it outside at my place of work, we'd get complaints from the neighbors. A mechanical/hydraulic crusher/bender thing could be made into something that looks like an office appliance.

    Nothing says "no data recovery" like a drive reduced to its elemental components.

    Except it's not. Burning is generally a process of rapidly combining reactants, not dividing them up. Plus, it's rather environmentally unfriendly - having a cloud of smoke go up is frowned upon in most places these days.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by BobZee1 · · Score: 0

      buzzkill. killjoy. You are no fun at all.

      --
      dumber people are doing harder things everyday
    2. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by polar+red · · Score: 0, Troll

      cancer is also no fun at all.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by steelfood · · Score: 2, Funny

      having a cloud of smoke go up is frowned upon in most places these days.

      Just do it right outside the door to your building, and blame it on the other people hanging around there.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We actually use thermite and sledgehammers at my work place to destroy old hard drives.

      A stack of 3 of them, a line across the platter area, and a large 20lb sledge to hit them afterwards.

      We've had issues in the past with hard drive processing places actually sending them overseas for disposal, but they end up getting recycled and reused.

    5. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bollocks.

      Get cancer and you can win the Tour de France.

      It's true, I saw it on the tee vee.

    6. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by polar+red · · Score: 1

      only when you aren't one way or another kicked out of health insurance.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    7. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by node+3 · · Score: 1

      having a cloud of smoke go up is frowned upon in most places these days.

      Oh shit, someone might frown at you!

    8. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Pardon my ignorance, but I've always assumed thermite was hard to get a hold of? Is it something you can just buy?

      And if so, where? My kids are teenagers, already, and I haven't really blown much stuff up with them yet.

    9. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Hattmannen · · Score: 1

      Actually in the case of thermite... (yes right now I'm being a besserwisser, but so is everyone else here, so I don't see shy I shouldn't be one as well :-p) Thermite can be made using several different metal oxides and mixing this with a metal powder. What this resulting mixture is is something that will burn with extreme heat because of its composition. It will also provide the reaction with oxygen, meaning that as soon as it's lit it can burn in an anaerobic atmosphere. The extreme heat that is generated from this reaction is actually enough to break up many compounds that comes in contact with it (or are nearby). E.g. water could be split into oxygene and hydrogene. So potentially, yes, a drive could be reduced to it's elemental components by burning thermite on it. And even if you don't succeed in breaking it up entirely, trying to recover data from a heap of metal is probably not so easy.

      --
      People are not wearing enough hats.
    10. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      You just need to combine powdered aluminum with powdered iron oxide. Should be possible to obtain.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    11. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Thermite is nothing exotic, basically a mixture of powdered aluminum and iron oxide (aka rust). You'll also need something hot to start the reaction, like some magnesium metal which burns pretty hot. It's not hard to make, though you may want to avoid buying all the ingredients at the same place.

    12. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned how to make it via a download of The Anarchist's Cookbook when I was 9 back on napster.

    13. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Just wiki thermite. It's simple to make, the stuff you need to buy to make it can be found at united nuclear.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      Really I was just being picky in my second point -- the drive's parts will not end up split into their elemental components. Even if they do, they'd rapidly recombine into new compounds, since the chemical reactions do not happen in isolation. Many elements are not found in pure forms in nature for this reason. Certainly much of the aluminum will oxidize, for example.

      I work with metallurgists and chemical engineers in the metals industry, and I'm pretty sure if you expose a hard drive to extremely high temperatures in air, most of the components are going to end up as oxides, not pure elements. In melting of metals one of the standard chemical processes that is done to the molten metal is deoxidation (in iron and steel, pieces of aluminum are thrown into the furnace because the aluminum has such an affinity for oxygen that it will soak it up from the iron or steel and form an oxide slag that can be scraped off the top of the melt.

      My suggestion to eliminate oxidation by removing the air from the foundry and having the workers wear space suits didn't go over all that well, although the engineers did have to admit that it would solve a lot of problems.

      I do like the new word you've taught me today "besserwisser".

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    15. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Look on ebay...
      You need iron oxide and aluminum powder, it's all there... Some magnesium ribbon could be useful as a fuse too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    16. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Burning magnesium eh?

      *cough* road flare *cough*

    17. Re:In the real world, fire is a bad solution by Hattmannen · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I seemed harsh. That was not my intention. And you are most certainly right. Most of the stuff will probably end up as oxides. Doesn't make it any easier to recover data from though. :-) Intresting that about aluminium being used as a deoxidizing agent. I didn't know about that method, although I can imagine it must be terribly effective. As I remember from primary school we learned that coal was often used in the old Swedish ironworks to purify the metal.

      --
      People are not wearing enough hats.
  51. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by vlm · · Score: 1

    Then you have to spend a day cleaning melted plastic off the sides of your oven and fumigating it. Hmm , I think I might be seeing a flaw in your friends plan...

    Then use a $20 walmart toaster oven. I have always meant to try this on a running hard drive. Thought it might make an interesting science fair experiment. Main problem seems to be melting the USB cable before the drive fails.

    In the military I was informed that they simply used a cutting torch, no muss, no fuss, no thermite steam explosions. I was also informed the main problem was to breach the case ASAP before pressure builds up inside, as the drive air filters won't vent quickly enough, so the first job w/ the torch was to blow out the drive shell by the air filter. Large installations (NSA?) simply used a ultra heavy duty recycling shredder and they weighed what came in must equal at least 90% of what came out the other end.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  52. Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 seconds in a microwave... Not too sure what it would do it the platters, but it would kill the electronics. Probably more effective with solid state devices. Just don't leave them in there too long.

  53. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot lower for alloys so it really depends on what it is. If we assume it's pure iron and a decades old drive then you are correct but small traces of other alloying elements have a dramatic effect (eg. for most stainless steel it's below room temperature in the extreme example).
    There's a discussion at http://www.ocforums.com/archive/index.php/t-454159.html of a few different magnetic materials used in drives and Curie points with a few links to where they got the source data from.

  54. There was an interesting bugtraq thread in 2005. by arcade · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me pull a bugtraq posting from 2005 out for perusal. There are other interesting tidbits in that thread too.

    http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2005/Jul/0464.html

    ===
    From: dave kleiman
    Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:30:30 -0400

    Here is a quote directly from Peter I received Saturday, he asked to have it
    passed on to the list.
    -Snip-
    >I'd love to hear some thoughts on this from security and data experts
    >out there.
    People should note the epilogue to the paper:
        Epilogue
        In the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the
    35-
        pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo
        incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis
        of drive encoding techniques. As a result, they advocate applying the
        voodoo to PRML and EPRML drives even though it will have no more effect
    than
        a simple scrubbing with random data. In fact performing the full 35-pass
        overwrite is pointless for any drive since it targets a blend of scenarios
        involving all types of (normally-used) encoding technology, which covers
        everything back to 30+-year-old MFM methods (if you don't understand that
        statement, re-read the paper). If you're using a drive which uses
    encoding
        technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you
        never need to perform all 35 passes. For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a
    few
        passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A
        good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected".
        This was true in 1996, and is still true now.
        Looking at this from the other point of view, with the ever-increasing
    data
        density on disk platters and a corresponding reduction in feature size and
        use of exotic techniques to record data on the medium, it's unlikely that
        anything can be recovered from any recent drive except perhaps one or two
        levels via basic error-cancelling techniques. In particular the the
    drives
        in use at the time that this paper was originally written have mostly
    fallen
        out of use, so the methods that applied specifically to the older, lower-
        density technology don't apply any more. Conversely, with modern high-
        density drives, even if you've got 10KB of sensitive data on a drive and
        can't erase it with 100% certainty, the chances of an adversary being able
        to find the erased traces of that 10KB in 80GB of other erased traces are
        close to zero.

    Peter.
    ===

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  55. Ugh... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    This brought to you by the same people who worry about md5 encryption not being good enough yet just have to leave the telenet process running, oh and they gotta have p2p apps installed on their top-secret hacker proof networks too...

    Please... Anyone who has kept up with the news in the last 20 years knows that this sort of data is stolen the easy way. Someone plugs in a thumb drive, hacks your wireless network or adds a packet sniffer. The only times it comes up that information was taken from an old drive is when that drive wasn't wiped at all or was in a lappy that got snatched...

    No one who really needs/wants your data is going to wait to steal your old wiped disks just hoping that 'Dr. NO' can recover the data.

    Physically destroying a perfectly good drive is wasteful and foolish. You're not making your data any more secure. You're just doing it because that's what you where taught and you believe it's necessary without really thinking about where the real problems are because those problems are much harder to deal with.

    1. Re:Ugh... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      md5 encryption

      MD5 is not encryption.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Ugh... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      MD5 is not encryption.

      You know what? Why don't you read the post and understand what is being said like a normal human being would instead of trying to be a total duche... You know exactly what I was saying and you just wanna troll some shit out because you got nothing better to do.

      In cryptography, MD5 (Message-Digest algorithm 5) is a widely used cryptographic hash function with a 128-bit hash value.
      Way to go man... you really have a wonderful point that MD5 is not encryption it's in fact a cryptographic hash function...

      Any other wisdom you'd like to share?

    3. Re:Ugh... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Those are two entirely different things. The entire point of encryption is that you can get the original back (for the correct value of "you"). The entire point of a cryptographic hash function is that you can't (nor can anyone else).

      Anyway, chill out. I'm not saying your entire post is wrong. I'm just pointing out a relatively minor error. Yes, I was being pedantic, but I didn't mean to make a big deal of it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Ugh... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Those are two entirely different things. The entire point of encryption is that you can get the original back (for the correct value of "you"). The entire point of a cryptographic hash function is that you can't (nor can anyone else).

      Anyway, chill out. I'm not saying your entire post is wrong. I'm just pointing out a relatively minor error. Yes, I was being pedantic, but I didn't mean to make a big deal of it.

      Look I've ran Linux Servers for a very very long long time and I know what a hash value is... I honestly just get tired of people expecting perfect spelling, grammar and that every little possible thing be correctly worded up on here or I get a 'you're doing it wrong' reply... I don't waste huge amounts of my time proof-reading when I make a post because no one is paying me to and I kinda expect that people can figure it out.

      Maybe I should switch to decaff or something....

      Anyhow, as far as having your top secret data grabbed. I think most governments or large corporations are going to seek out the simplest cheapest method. Most of the time this involves paying someone to give them access. This payment could be in the form of cash, hookers, drugs or threats about telling your boss something you don't want them to know. Point is grinding down the platters on your old drives or punching holes in them is pretty wasteful unless the drive is totally dead. A simple random number wipe is fine... (o god, here comes another post because I didn't say pseudorandom)

    5. Re:Ugh... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Not at all, random numbers are fine if you can get them.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:Ugh... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Not at all, random numbers are fine if you can get them.

      yes but they seem to be in sort supply or something... I've yet to figure that one out...

    7. Re:Ugh... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Look I've ran Linux Servers for a very very long long time and I know what a hash value is... "

      And we can tell you're new to Slashdot, so here's the obligatory "Expect to be corrected by pedants, grammar Nazis, semanticists, and much, much more."

      It's common on here. Don't get butt-hurt by it.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Ugh... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      "Expect to be corrected by pedants, grammar Nazis, semanticists, and much, much more. It's common on here."

      As long as they are all interested in looking at my Furry Fandom Pic's I guess I'm OK with that...

  56. Just use a hammer like Jeff murky does LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY dog destroyed my hard drive your honor .

  57. Nail Gun .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company that I work for has a crating department (we do exports). All the crates are built out of wood, and the best "tool" is a nail gun to assemble the crates. The other brilliant use for this is to nail hard drives to a piece of pine,,, 2 or 3, 3" nails works well....

    So when I am board and want to blow off some steam I go and nail some hard drives.... even this gets a bit boring so the next step is to make sculptures by nailing a few drives together.... aahhh good times...

  58. Grind it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a grinder, then the platters will come to dust, no amount of money can make it come back.

  59. Cost & Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not just use a degausser? or DBAN?

    The answers are cost and speed, respectively.

    A degausser strong enough to quickly and effectively erase today's high density hard drives costs quite a bit of money. One that can do one drive after another without a lengthy cool down period can cost thousands of dollars.

    DBAN takes hours per drive at best.

    A mechanical crusher such as the one described in the article is quick, effective and cheap. It can be used repeatedly with your arm strength as the only limitation. And, if that gets to be too much, you could use an electric motor to power it, rather than you arm.

    Think of the problem from a business perspective where you are trying to wipe/destroy numerous drives in a session, rather than the single drive from your home PC.

    Destroying 100 hard drives is a big and time consuming job with degaussers and DBAN. With a crusher, it's only a few minutes.

    1. Re:Cost & Speed by kextyn · · Score: 1

      A few minutes to destroy 100 hard drives? I didn't see much for details about the construction of the destroyer but it looks like a simple hydraulic automotive jack. If you've ever used one you'd know it's not a simple pull of a lever and you have a destroyed drive. It will take lots of pumping. I'm fortunate enough to have a very nice degauser at work which can do drive after drive and I believe it takes less than 30 seconds per drive (could be up to a minute...it's been a while since I've used it.) We have gone through hundreds of drives at once before and it took longer to fill out the destruction forms than to degauss the drive. The only reason to use something like this "deformer" is cost.

  60. degaussing not reliable by Wansu · · Score: 1

    I've passed neodymium magnets over magnetic media and been able to read them afterward. A TV degaussing coil rendered it "unreadable" but just how unreadable, I don't know. I'm sure DBAN is effective but not all disks can be erased by DBAN. I have an older SCSI DBAN can't write 1's too. Grinding the disk into dust is the only way be 100% sure.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:degaussing not reliable by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Degaussing seems to be the best method. The DoD seems to think so as well. You could also melt it...

  61. I already have a hard-disk destroyer. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I call it a BFH-10000. A Big Fuckin' Hammer (weighing 10 kg).

    Thor would be so proud.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  62. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by Kratisto · · Score: 1

    You can be sure the drive has reached the Curie temperature when it has melted into a glowing pool of metal. Apply thermite liberally.

    --
    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
  63. Easiest, Cheapest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mail it to yourself via registered mail and then refuse deliver. Once it enters the Post Office loop, it'll never be seen again.

    1. Re:Easiest, Cheapest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put it in the mailbox marked "Bomb, please destroy". Hopefully it'll meet a free and explosive end.

  64. using dd by spam4rakesh · · Score: 1

    what about using dd ? dd if=/dev/zero of=

    1. Re:using dd by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      This is what I've used for retired laptops at work.
      If the hard drive is in working condition or dying but still alive to run a little while then you can overwrite the whole thing in under an hour using a LiveCD.
      I've never seen any concrete claims that anyone can recover overwritten data.
      As far as I know The Great Zero Challenge is still going.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  65. sledge hammer by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Dead easy actually - Tolkien was no strategist by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Gandolf should just have handed the ring over one of the eagles, eagle flies off to Mt. Doom and disposes of the Preciouss while the Nazgul are looking for Frodo, nearly three volumes of tedium no longer need to be read.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Dead easy actually - Tolkien was no strategist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless the eagle is michael vick, in which case the power of the one ring is used to fund wargfighting matches

    2. Re:Dead easy actually - Tolkien was no strategist by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Gandolf should just have handed the ring over one of the eagles, eagle flies off to Mt. Doom and disposes of the Preciouss while the Nazgul are looking for Frodo, nearly three volumes of tedium no longer need to be read.

      All-seeing eye + mutant pterosaurs/dragons = dead eagles, ring in wrong hands.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Dead easy actually - Tolkien was no strategist by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      And that assumes the eagles can be trusted. Even if the eagle grabs Frodo, what will Frodo be able to do if the Eagle decides it wants the Precious for itself, and drops Frodo from a relatively high place, then flies down to grab the ring from his corpse?

      On the other hand, how fast are the dragons, really? Especially if Gandalf alone is enough to stop them, with that glowy white light -- Gandalf on eagleback, problem solved. (Of course, this assumes he could do that before he fought the Balrog and was reborn...)

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  68. Pretty easy actually by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    One screwdriver is usually all that's needed. Extract discs, rub firmly with fine glasspaper, break or bend with lump hammer, label and store in drawer for future reference. I find it takes about 5 minutes. Your co-workers may appreciate the drive magnets to amuse their kids.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  69. Install Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just install Windows a couple of times. That will almost guarantee unrecoverable data. :)

  70. 3...2....1....BOOM by ddusza · · Score: 0

    .308 rounds are great, but when you have a friend in the demolition or mining fields....:D

    --
    Don't fear the penguins
  71. Something just about any geek could do by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite i figure what a half pound or so should do the trick

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  72. This Dutch Machine shreds hard disks completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this machine that was demonstrated last week at a hacker conference. http://www.security.nl/artikel/30648/1/HAR_Video_-_Harde_schijven_shredden.html

    It completely shreds a harddrive.

    1. Re:This Dutch Machine shreds hard disks completely by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, seems real to me, and very on topic.

  73. whiner by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, do that in your office and see how many minutes your job lasts once the fire's out

    charred corpses don't terminate jobs

    Plus, it's rather environmentally unfriendly

    data processing including the manufacture and operation of hard drives is already environmentally unfriendly, and oxidizing metals is one way to get them back toward the more natural state for this world

    1. Re:whiner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain how a thermite reaction oxidizes the component metals in a hard drive. A thermite reaction is between the ingredients of the thermite... It's just the heat generated that melts/destroys the hard drive...

    2. Re:whiner by http · · Score: 1

      Do you think the steel and aluminum in the hard drive won't take part in the reaction? If so, why?

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    3. Re:whiner by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      charred corpses don't terminate jobs

      Nor do they sign paychecks.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:whiner by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      of course they will, and iron and aluminum oxides are a natural form

    5. Re:whiner by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Charred corpses don't sign paycheques either.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:whiner by KudyardRipling · · Score: 0

      Use powdered anhydrous ammonium perchlorate with thermite. It needs a strong oxidizer to combust the the metals (aluminium, magnesium, iron, chromium, etc).

      A black hole would have been my other choice but CERN is backordered at the moment.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Thermite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ebay for rust & powdered alu, and magnesium to set it off

    Done deal

  76. i get a new one if i have applecare? by royler · · Score: 1

    has anyone tested how readable a drive is after its been in the microwave for a little while?

    1. Re:i get a new one if i have applecare? by blg42 · · Score: 1

      3 seconds should kill the electronics. I'm not too sure what it would do to the data on the platters -- I can't imagine that the arcing would be good for them. You need about 3 seconds to make sure the magnetron kicks on, but I wouldn't leave it longer than that. I gotta go with the drill or hammer (for sheer stress relief). If you're really paranoid do a secure erase, put a different file system over it with a few random large files, then physically destroy it. If you have access to safely do so, I like the slag heap idea. Stress relief + thorough destruction = pure IT security goodness!

  77. Recovery cost, hide a tree in a forest. by JerryQ · · Score: 1

    I think it is generally recognised that the recovery cost for a bent platter would be huge.
    The environment where this would be useful, e.g. a PC shop is going to have a large bucket of these bent drives.

    The bad guy/gal with the mega budget is now going to have to staff the inside of the entire Hamalayas with white boiler suit clad minions to crack all of these on the off chance of finding the data pot of gold, or my facebook login.

    The reality of the problem this addresses is the PC shop taking in customer PCs and not having the embarrassment of the customer's identity being cloned in Nigeria where the disk wound up.

  78. Screwdriver by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    I just tried it with an old and broken drive from a laptop of mine. Took a standards screwdriver, bent the protective casing away and took a stab at the drive platters. Turns out this particular one was ceramic ( or maybe it's some form of glass I can't quite tell ) and was easily broken. Now if I really wanted to I could dissolve the coating in battery acid or melt it or whatever, but quite frankly I doubt an attacker would bother trying to read data of the 10x10mm pieces that are left.

  79. A Drill Stupid by cenc · · Score: 1

    I use just a good old fashion drill, and run the bit through the platter 3 or 4 times. One time is sufficient to make it likly way to expensive for even the most serious person to recover anything. An extra 3 or 4 holes is just for fun.

  80. Deathstar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply use IBM Deskstar drives, they will do the trick for you.

  81. Hammer and Shake by Dirty+Fool · · Score: 1

    Seriously, all it takes is a hammer and 5 minutes. Just put on some saftey glasses, take it out back, and go apeshit on it. Imagine it's someone you hate (you could even print a photo and tape it on) and go to town with the hammer. After some soild swings, give it a shake to make sure you can hear broken platters. Then hit it some more. I am sure some of the nerds out there could use a soild 5 minutes of pyhsical activity.

  82. what by Yaos · · Score: 0

    The picture on the website shows that it's only mangling the outside of the hard drive and is doing nothing to the platters.

  83. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reduce - Buy the biggest disks you can afford, they're worth repurposing and you won't have to spend as much on successors or the attendant labor.

    Reuse - Repurpose disks for other purposes. Use last years' disks as part of your backup solution. Secure-format them on a low-power machine and put them on eBay.

    Recycle - There must be SOMEONE willing to break the drives down and give you back the platters for destruction. There's significant aluminum in some of those drives.

    All this crushing, drilling, and shooting of drives is fun. But it's also extremely wasteful. I understand destroying the drives if lives are at stake, but otherwise, stop.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Reduce, Reuse, Recycle by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Crushing the drive does not prevent you recycling it afterwards.

  84. Thanks Slashdot! by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    Every now and then an article comes along that justifies my time spent on this website! This is one of them. A good article about destruction always hits the spot!@!

  85. Overkill? by Reason58 · · Score: 1

    This seems silly. Why wouldn't you just zero out the drive once and be done with it? Does anyone here have a documented case of someone being able to recover data from a drive like that?

  86. _you_ can't restore it after simple single zero dd by anton_kg · · Score: 1

    have you seen the challenge? http://16systems.com/zero.php
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutmann_method However, once the space is overwritten with other data, there is no known way to recover it. It cannot be done with software alone since the storage device only returns its current contents via its normal interface. Gutmann claims that intelligence agencies have sophisticated tools, among these magnetic force microscopes, that, together with image analysis, can detect the previous values of bits on the affected area of the media (for example hard disk). This has not been proven one way or the other, and there is no published evidence as to intelligence agencies' current ability to recover files whose sectors have been overwritten, although published Government security procedures clearly consider an overwritten disk to still be sensitive.[3] Companies specializing in recovery from damaged media cannot recover completely overwritten files
    In fact, physical damage got more chances for recovery then simple DD. So why do you still want to use a device for that?

  87. ARGH! Physical destruction is the wrong answer!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, everyone comes up with these elaborate schemes to physically destroy disks, as a means of destroying data. Let's say this one MORE time: Can your method provide with a consistent, known, and guaranteed level of data destruction?

    Consider the terms I used here.

    1) Consistent: Is this going to be the same for every drive?
    2) Known: How much effort in terms of hours and dollars is required to recover some or all of the data?
    3) Guaranteed: Oh, really? Prove it to me!

    With a software wipe, you can calculate (and measure) residual magnetism, and also account for 'hidden' areas on the disk (recovery sectors, etc.) With a hardware destruction method, what can you guarantee me?

    In fact, the gushing article from PCPro even shows the weaknesses of this method:
    "The Bustadrive, then, looks like it'll thwart all but the wealthiest and most determined of hard disk hackers"

    Whereas, to the best of anyone's (public) knowledge, a single random overwrite will wipe data beyond any hope of recovery. A pass with DBAN will wipe it completely out, and if you pay for EBAN support, you can even get a certificate guaranteeing the data destruction.

    Why are people so determined to destroy disks, rather than data? Even worse, people are eager to PAY for questionable disk destruction methods, rather than just simply destroy the data--what they want gone in the first place.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  88. There's only one simple question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it blend?

  89. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

    quick google for propane forge will be all you need. Those will even melt the Aluminum down and let you recast it into a shape of your choice.

  90. Hitachi / IBM Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that I love about some Hitachi/IBM drives is glass platters. Slam the drive on the ground, it takes a lot of force, and the platters shatter into thousands of pieces.

    It's quick, simple, cheap and completely effective. It's fun too but, after the tenth one, I usually feel a bit winded.

    1. Re:Hitachi / IBM Drives by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I for one will never forget the live demonstration by Patrick Norton on The Screensavers on TechTV of his first encounter with a glass-platter hard drive. Both he and his co-host, Leo Laporte were surprised at the shards of glass that flew out when he gave it one hit with a ball-peen hammer with enough force to dent a metal platter.

      I don't think either of them were wearing eye protection at the time, but luckily neither were injured.

      BTW, sandpapering-until-clear is more effective at destroying the data than a disk shredder. You can still reassemble a shredded or shattered disk with enough patience, but I'd say it's infinitely harder to reassemble the magnetic substrate (or reflective in the case of CDs and DVDs) when it's been reduced to powder.

      Of course, you still want to eliminate any afterimages present in the on-drive buffer memory.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  91. Law Enforcement by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    I worked in a warranty department a number of years back - the best return we had was from a local law enforcement agency who used the drive for target practice.

  92. Re:Tag this one paranoia by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    The fact that you've never heard of accessing data after a Guttman 35 pass only proves that the people who can access the data are really good at keeping their process secret.

  93. This newsposting shows how /. went mainstream. by coretx · · Score: 1

    Every self respecting geek that i know, is using microwave ovens for destroying data. It works, and it's dirt cheap.

  94. simple way to destroy discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not just use a propane torch to heat it up...very simple; avoids the trek through the orcs and shit to get to Mt. Doom (and then finding Mt. Doom has been dormant for quite some time)

  95. Too Small by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    I use a .458 Win Mag for this job. 500 grain soft points at 2100 fps does a great job of mangling platters and spraying so much debris through a drive that the data is gone.

  96. Golly by Murpster · · Score: 1

    If only there were a way to wipe all the data on a drive and re-use the hardware... derrrrp! I guess throwing away stuff that can still be useful is the American way though, and this would be a fun toy.

  97. News? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

    Is this really news? I'm fairly sure that I've seen this before, though for the life of me I can't find a link to back it up... Maybe I saw it in a dream. Damn you IT manager in the UK! Stealing ideas from my dreams!

    --
    Error: No error occurred
  98. Untitled Document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd never buy anything from a site that says "Untitled Document" in its title.

    1. Re:Untitled Document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was curious so I did a quick search on google.

        Results 1 - 10 of about 29,200,000 for "Untitled Document". (0.15 seconds)

      Evidently 29 million people can't remember to change the title in their webpage

  99. DIY disk demolition by macraig · · Score: 1

    I used a cast iron fireplace poker and shovel blade on two old drives in a pinch this weekend... wound up breaking the poker, too, though!

  100. A better and cheaper way: Big Shop Vise. by Dr.+Crash · · Score: 1

    When we have to decomission drives, we just use a big shop vise.

    Specifically, a McMaster-Carr P/N 4065A1, going for just $132.94
    and in stock now.

    It's also handy for crushing ... well, anything else. Or just
    holding onto something while you do evil unto it.

    And it doesn't just "bend the plate a little". It will easily squish the
    entire drive. Lengthwise. Disk-drive aluminium is no match for
    fifty pounds of nodular iron pushing high-carbon steel jaws.

    You do want to do this over a wastebasket, especially for laptop
    drives that use glass (not alumninium) disks. The shower of fine
    glass shards is a pain to sweep up out of the carpet. DAMHIK

    No, I am not making this up.

  101. oxy acetylene torch by codepunk · · Score: 1

    That's what I use to destroy drives, awful hard to recover anything from a molten lump.

    --


    Got Code?
  102. use a small torx head driver by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

    if your woried about the data on an old drive simply dismantle the drive. The platers are fun for craft projects the rare earth magnets are fun toys. (cant swipe my data if i am useing it to keep my table clean)

  103. Re:ARGH! Physical destruction is the wrong answer! by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    There's something to be said for physical destruction. For example, thermite:

    Consistent: Yes. Just cover the drive and let it go. There shouldn't be anything solid left.
    Known: Obviously impossible to recover.
    Guaranteed: I can absolutely guarantee that a pile of molten slag will not be recoverable. Do you disagree?

    Or sanding off the magnetic layer:

    Consistent: Yes, just make sure it looks the same. You can see the layer.
    Known: There's no magnetism left on the platter...
    Guaranteed: The data is dust. Bye-bye!

    Both of those are somewhat faster than a DBAN, especially on today's sizes.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  104. wow - waaay too time consuming by spineboy · · Score: 1

    drill then sledge hammer - about two minutes

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  105. Pick axe next time by spineboy · · Score: 1

    MIght be more fun spearing the drive with that -as it as a better weapon for going thru plate armor

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  106. I suggest we start a Sourceforge project... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    I suggest we start a Sourceforge project for such a device.
    Let's name it Grand Obliterating Device, or GOD.
    Or GNU's Obliterating device if you're a FOSS purist.

    bjd

    1. Re:I suggest we start a Sourceforge project... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I think to please RMS, it should be called GNU Grand Obliterating Device, or short GNU/GOD.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  107. The Question is... by FordPrefect276709 · · Score: 1

    ... will it blend ???

  108. Why not just do what I do? by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

    I take my damaged/unusable hard drives into a field and shoot holes in them, repeatedly. Effective and fun. You can even invite co-workers to help. Shooting hard drives is also a good way to use my old battle rifles. :)

  109. HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We bought a shredder for the hundreds of drives we decommission each month.

  110. Not Overkill by Pontiac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do work at a DOE site..

    The current method is now an industrial shredder.. Nothing left bigger than a dime..
    This goes for Hard Drives, Flash drives, cell phones.. Anything that can store data never goes out. till it's been through the shredder.
    See one in action

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    1. Re:Not Overkill by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You know, given the data density on hard drive platters now days, I'd think it wouldn't be too hard with a proper facility to recover random chunks of data, even if the platter piece were just barely smaller than a dime.

      My solution is cheap and effective, but very dangerous at the same time, because the magnets used can pull hard drives toward you at deadly speeds from ten feet away and will obliterate anything biological caught between, like fingers, hands, toes, noses, heads, etc. It will also screw up any CRT within twenty feet, and can actually disrupt the proper operation of inverters in LCD screens. It's called Supermagnet #42, and it's available at United Nuclear.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Not Overkill by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      It's called Supermagnet #42, and it's available at United Nuclear.

      Do you work for them or something? you've mentioned them 3 independent times now, you're starting to sound like the offspring of a broken record and a used-car salesman.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Not Overkill by tuxicle · · Score: 1

      Anything that can store data never goes out. till it's been through the shredder.

      Except the camera that took the video...

    4. Re:Not Overkill by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, I don't work for them.

      Just because someone espouses something doesn't mean they work for them - after all, it's not like every geek that touts Ubuntu works for Canonical, now do they?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  111. When I need to destroy a HDD I just ask... by VengefulDrX · · Score: 1

    Will it blend?

  112. Re:ARGH! Physical destruction is the wrong answer! by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    Why are people so determined to destroy disks, rather than data? Even worse, people are eager to PAY for questionable disk destruction methods, rather than just simply destroy the data--what they want gone in the first place.

    Our method is simple.. If it does not look like a pile of shredded metal n chips it's not "clean"
    There is no questioning if this drive had been wiped or not..

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  113. dBAN and a Drill Press by AngusSF · · Score: 1

    I dBAN drives, but for drives which won't spin up, or for clients who want physical damage to the media, I just drill a few holes through the platters. Cheap and efficient.

    --
    "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
  114. Re:Not 100%, but otherwise cost-effective given ri by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Exactly what I would suggest. Disassemble the drive to what ever level you wish - take out the magnets, remove the circuit boards, whatever.

    Take the drive platters + whatever bits of the drive are still attached to them, and place them in your self-cleaning oven.

    Turn the oven on to a self-clean cycle.

    Several hours later, when the oven has cooled off and unlocked itself, the patters will have hot-soaked long enough to have been well past the Curie point.

    No more data.

    AND you have a nice, clean oven (after a wipe down with a damp cloth).

  115. Re:ARGH! Physical destruction is the wrong answer! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Thermite? HELL YEAH!!! I can't argue with that one. :-)

    I can't see how sanding the layer off would be faster than DBAN though, given that you've got typically six or eight surfaces inside a drive that you need to access. That's a lot of dismantling before you can do the sanding. Also, probably pretty low on the 'healthy methods' scale.

    But fun, definitely. Both would be fun.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  116. FIRE!!!!! by el3mentary · · Score: 1

    I use a Small Flamethrower, seriously, it was in the shed for killing moss on the patio.

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  117. I have one... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Highly advanced technology from an alien culture left to my by my distant ancestors. It's called a hammer. But wait, there are better things to do with a defunct hard drive. Open it up for crimminy sake. It is full of super magnets and all sorts of other fun. In the process you'll destroy it and have a lot more fun.

  118. Nails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFS everybody... A couple of 6" nails and a hammer. Right through the platters.

    Done.

  119. regardless of what everyone thinks dd and tr work by gearloos · · Score: 1

    Regardless of what everyone thinks here on slashdot, that is not good enough for some of us simply because it doesn't fall into the most recent standards we have to use at work. They use D.O.D. and also a couple other, more stringent. So.. ya I know, this will do most anything you want to clean: #dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdiskX //write zero's to the whole thing. #tr '\0' '\377' /dev/zero | dd of=/dev/hdiskX //write 1's to the whole thing. #dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdiskX //write a bunch of random stuff...ya I know.. If your using older versions of AIX, pre 5.2 for example and some other OS's you may not have a /dev/random... well there are other methods to do that.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  120. Re:ARGH! Physical destruction is the wrong answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just took apart 5 drives mechanically and bent / scratched up the platters, took 5 min per drive. Way faster than using software especially when some of the drives are old and probably have some bad sectors that could cause software to have issues.

    I seriously doubt it's possible to straighten a bent and cracked platter out enough to get a drive head to read it without wiping the data, and even if they could the scratching probably ruined 99% of the rest of the data.

  121. Screwdriver and claw hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that's how I dispose of my old drives, anyhow. Use the screwdriver to open the drive and have at the spatters with the claw hammer for a few minutes and voila: your drive is reduced to an unreadable pile of bent fragments of platter and you feel calmer for having blown off some steam.

  122. There is no overkill by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    This is the contents of the special pack that the military used to destroy sensitive equipment. It was in some cases attached to the equipment.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite

    It's trivial to set up a system so that even with Hotplug you can still trigger it.
    http://www.engadget.com/tag/forensics

    This small gadget can do a number of interesting tasks by itself and is very cheap. It has enough inputs and outputs to set up a variety of sensors and can even be used with Zigbee and GPS devices.
    http://www.arduino.cc/

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  123. Waste of effort.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use dd with random input. Done, unrecoverable, no worries.

  124. Really? by elvis15 · · Score: 1

    As one of the comments in the article said, nothing is as much fun as a big hole punch and a mallet. That's what I use after we got tired of burning out drill bits, and all for under $20.

  125. But how do you USE the secure erase feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the drive has failed and won't spin up? I have several drives in that condition, some of which have sensitive data on them.

  126. SO GOD DAMNED SICK of these movies and devices by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Every few months someone shows a new machine churning up hard disks by the hundreds because some idiot beauracrat (sp?) or 'security manager' has deemed them unsafe to ever be used for anything else.
    It's nothing short of fucking disgusting.

    We do not have the resources on this planet to be damned well putting things like this through a mulcher because of idiot paranoia.

    I hope I don't need to tell anyone here that secure erase is not that difficult to do, this is wasting minerals and resources, money, time and it's costing the used disk market as well.
    Furthermore it's normally government, rather than impliment the drive in another installation it has to be ground up.

    It damn well sickens me.

  127. Basic Recipe by ScaledLizard · · Score: 1

    Remove disks from case, put into hot pot, stir well.

  128. Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just encrypt it with TrueCrypt and be done with it?

  129. The axe was the best method for me by kbdd · · Score: 1

    It is interesting that just last week I decided to get rid of about 15 hard drives I had piled up. I used an old fashion axe. It is easier than the hammer, a single blow cuts through all layers. I hit them one by one. It did not require much effort, the axe cut right through the cover and platters. After I was done, I thought it would have been more fun to pile them up and try to whack as many of them as I could in a single blow, but it was too late :(

  130. no one said it by someonestolecc · · Score: 1

    but will it blend?