"So for such a claim to NOT be outrageous, you'd have to also claim a vast conspiracy of scientists all over the world through the decades, sitting on most of their findings while publishing just enough to give an incremental step for the next breakthroughs."
"However, it would be kinda strange for an individual or crew capable of navigating a craft at least twenty four trillion miles to not know how to fly a spacecraft well enough to avoid crashing."
Oh yeah, you mean just like how humans managed to place a robot on Mars millions of miles away that never crashes? Or you mean like how we were so smart to build space ships to go thousands of miles into orbit & never explode?
Distance does not make your craft less likely to crash. If anything it makes it more likely, because the further away you go, the less likely you know what averse conditions you will encounter.
Lastly, what limited mind you have, thinking these alien creatures actually travelled a linear distance for trillions of miles. 1. It doesn't make sense from our current understanding of physics. Too much time would pass (multi-multi generations) to travel such distances. 2. We have new physics that suggests space can be folded; it is more than likely that they use some technology that can take advantage of this, as opposed to travelling for millenea to reach here & crash.
Heck, if it took millenea, do you think they would send so many damn space craft? Think about it. No, they would do like we do with Mars. Send out a probe. Then a robot, then perhaps a human or two... then learn from those lessons then send out 1 or 2 more crew missions for several decades more. With UFO's according to witnesses, even if like 0.5% of them are really UFO's, they're coming here by the dozens each year... from trillions of miles & for at the very least the last 6 decades (there's some theories out there they've been coming for hundreds or even thousands of years - but that's debatable).
Big deal 1 guy admits it, the video below shows 22 of 400 senior Government, NASA, Airfoce & other top Military personel admitting it on National/International television that aliens are real & Gov has been hiding it.
Hmmm... If those guys from PirateBay or Sealand were smart, they'd pick a spot right near smack in the middle of the North Pole & buy it from Russia...... with such centralized location with potential pipes going to Canada, US, Russia, Norway (North America, Asia, Europe), they'd have their redundancy fully covered!
On top of that just think of all the money they'd save on server cooling! hehe
CAT7 is available now, check out NORDX wiring standards. CAT7 is for 10 Gigabit Ethernet over copper; however do NOT treat it like CAT5. Also CAT6 (Gigabit) also should not be treated like CAT5. Be sure to read the specs of what you can and cannot do. Today CAT7 is about 4 times more expensive than CAT6. CAT6 is affordable by most people. Putting conduits like several suggested is a good idea, then you can use a pull string and pull new cabling in 2, 5 or 10 years down the road for a full end to end cabling upgrade.
Good luck... and if you want bonus pimp points, be sure to run those stream / river like Xmas lights (http://badtux.net/uploaded_images/fsm_christmas_l ights01-740463.jpg) , along side the CAT# wires, so that you can tell your n00b visitors... "See that? Those are my email packets going out to the Internet".
If your company is a small shop, 1 branch office kind of deal with 5 to 15 people, that might be ok.
But mid sized companies may have dozens (not 1) application, some of them DOS based still, others strictly windows binary front end. I have seen mid sized companies with 1500 people running over 200 different applications with about 7 of them being at least partially internally developed (running on windows) and then most of rest all MS based off the shelf stuff - some $50/user apps, others $10,000/user apps - no, not all of these have Linux counterparts - most don't.
Get a job in a mid-sized company in IT industry in North America / Europe for a year, and then come back and tell me Linux is a real alternative. Unless that company's IT shop was started up on Linux, the odds of Windows stuff getting converted or replace by Linux counterparts is quite simply unrealistic. That doesn't mean that if an effort is done to begin a migration that in 10 years it would not be possible to be 100% Linux shop; however, usually assigning that much (human) resources to accomplish the task is very hard to justify.
For 76 *ucking billion, I wanna see mach 5 jet engines on the back of the train in 2 years!
That sounds like a hella lot of waste for nothing, a long time from now!
In 10 years we'll have free energy & in 20, teleportation. 310 miles per hour will sound like walking compared to flying an F18 with the technology they'll have in 2025.
The article wasn't very clear as to the infrastructure used to provide this, but it would really have to be wireless, because their physical infrastructure is horrible at best and there's absolutely no way they'd be able to reach dozens of thousands of remote villages with dedicated RJ45 to each mud hut.
Many (although I have no idea of the percentages) of these villages already have cell phone coverage, so really, it could just be an upgrade of the cell towers in such cases. (Other options are massive Wimax deployments - whether the fixed or roaming flavour)
I seriously doubt that beyond offering the wireless access, they are also going to offer OLPF (one laptop per family)... so this Broadband for all, is actually only broadband for those who can afford a computer with a wireless card. In hundreds, possibly thousands of those remote villages, not even 1 person would qualify. At the very least the government should also subsidise Cyber Cafes in those villages if they really want the poor to have access, otherwise, they are only offering 1/2 the package - free airwaves, but no free or affordable PCs to use those airwaves.
According to this... (http://mungee.org/archives/2005/05/19/india-targe ts-pc-penetration-of-65-by-2008/),...In 2005, 14 out of 1,000 residents had a PC. That's 0.14 of a percent! Even if they meet their 2008 goal of 65/1000, that's still less than 1% of the population.
So really, this is just providing free internet for the richest 0.65% of the population who can afford computers, or 6.5 Million people (out of 1 billion).
Considering that probably a good 90% plus of those PC owners are in the major cities (Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, etc - about 10-20 cities)... and those cities only make up around 5% or less of India's landscape. This basically represents the following:
1. Using tax payers dollars to upgrade 95% of the cell towers throughout rural India, where extremely few people have computers & won't be able to make use of it anyway and even when they do, many remote villages only have power for 3 to 6 hours per day. Heck even Mumbai & Bangalore still have regular massive power outages monthly, if not weekly sometimes.
2. The 5% of the infrastructure cost upgrades to the urban cities will benefit the top 1% rich people who live there.
This doesn't sound to me like the most brilliant way to spend vast sums of money. Or if they are going to spend the money with the intent of getting the poor on the Internet, then they need to pony up the rest of the funds to provide free PCs as well (OLPC anyone?).
That said, with 4G technology and/or WiMAX + upcoming hand held PCs with enough power to run Windows Mobile 6 (or whatever Linux flavour cell OS) & some basic apps & the convergence of MP3 + Cell phone + basic PC functionality + ongoing declining prices of these handheld units, possibly within 5-10 years the poor may actually start to make use of this upgraded network... assuming they don't starve to death first.
One thing the government has done right historically is that long distance charges in India are extremely cheap... for foreigners like me (Canada), for Indian people living there, nobody talks for hours on the phone, because they have per minute billing for local calls... even if it is fractions of a cent per minute.
Why is this "10G" even news? 10 Gigabit (OC192) Has been around since at least 1999. In fact, engineers & scientists already have functioning proto-types of 100 Gigabit over fiber (basically DWDM - multiple colours of 10 Gigabit streams multiplexed).
The IEEE expects the standard to be ratified in mid 2008 for the fiber version & copper (CAT8?) to come out within a couple of years after that (late 2009 or 2010).
Those Internet2 people are just a tad behind... like 10 fold! If Internet2 = 10G, and Internet3 =100G, then really those Internet2 people should be working on Internet4 (Terabit baby!)!
Ummm... apparently the millions that shop at Costco (www.costco.com), would disagree with your philosophy. Even though the masses aren't exactly brilliant, most do not limit the definition of "cheap" to short term, but do consider the long term viability... or at least they do when the salesmen does the thinking for them and explains why Kodak is actually cheaper even if the initial price tag sounds higher.
I have real doubts they will be able to compete with that model. People's natural tendency is to seek the cheap (or easy) route now, giving far less weight to the long term.
I know I have a hard time bringing myself to, for instance, buy things in larger containers....I know it's cheaper in the long term, but I don't like putting out a bunch of cash now.
"I mean this is a perfectly clean form of electricity which wouldn't pollute anything and, in the event that it sank, would only deposit nuclear materials back where they came from, the Earth's Crust."
1. Nuclear isn't perfectly clean, fission results in this inconvinient thingy called TOXIC WASTE MATERIAL that 1st world nations love to ship to 3rd world countries for "safe" storage...1,000 episodes of the Simpsons later & you're still F'ing clueless.
2.In the event the nuclear plant sank at some random place in the ocean, so would this toxic waste material. So now our already fish depleeted oceans can enjoy immediate eradication of whatever species live there. Oh yeah baby - *ucking brilliant plan!
Adeptus.
PS. Lesson over, please carry on with your basket weaving activities.
List is very incomplete...
on
IT's Big Spenders
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Question the accuracy or completeness of this list. Cisco who spends an average of 3.2 Billion in R&D a year should have been right in the top 5. Also where are Nortel, Lucent, Juniper, and the Telcos?
I have 3 of them hooked up to 1 PC with 2 video cards. One of the video cards is a dual card and the other is a motherboard built in. It took a few hours of fiddling to make it work, but now I can actually drag windows around across 3 monitors. Why do I need those 3 monitors? For network monitoring tools. So where are the other 30? Well ok, I admit, it was a sensasionalist headline, but they do exist... sort of. I've got a virtual desktop software running on that PC which gives me 9 more virtual desktops, and since each desktop is 3 monitors wide, that alone accounts for 27 monitors! So that makes it 30... the remaining 3 are: 1) My main monitor where I actually do work. I managed to get the only 19" monitor in the company and I run it at some oddball high resolution of 1450x900 or something. It was the max I could make it go without getting fuzzy. 2) Those 3 monitors hooked up to 1 PC, in actual fact 1 of them is hooked up to a switchview device where 2 other computers are connected. So then I can switch to 2 other PCs I have, for a total of 4 PCs.
So in reality I have 4 PC's at my desk and 4 monitors, but end up with 4 PCs and 33 monitors! Mwahaha....
Now just wait until I install VMware and get like 3 OS's per machine!!!!!
Somebody make me some extra eyeballs. Adeptus
PS. At home I have a single 24"... paid a tonne for that, but man what a beauty, it doubles as a widescreen TV screen! Samsung "244T"
My experiences with 6 years of Telus ADSL are precisely the same as yours. I even went to 480% one month and didn't receive any warnings, though I do try to keep it below 200% usage. Some months I am at less than 20%, just depends what torrents are out and how much free time I have.
I also got a letter basically saying "we caught you downloading a copyrighted movie, but we won't give your personal info out".
Telus does get TONNES of flack from its customer base, but these 3 things they are doing right:)
Was the science of renegade Tesla whom worked way beyond mainstream science but ended up coming up with the Alternator that powers our cities and radio waves that are used not just for radio but for TV systems and communications, also junk science?
I suppose if you had lived in the time of gallileo, you would have also said his theory of the Earth rotating around the Sun to be herecy!
The only junk is in the closed mind of an individual unwilling to look at overwhelming evidence and follow like lemmings the status quo.
Quantum theory already allows for Zero Point Gravity to be a reality, only the mechanics to manipulate it are not yet invented by mainstream science.
It's like they say, "a closed mind, is a good thing to lose".
According to this public disclosure meeting in 2001, whereby high ranking government officials, very senior ex-military, black project staff, and ex-NASA employees pointed out... Zero point energy (aka. free energy) devices already exist, and have for decades, but are hidden by secret black project government programs due to the massive economic impact it would have on the world (i.e. no more need for OIL).
It's time USA citizens wrote their congress men and appealed for all of these senior government etc officials to have a chance to testify under oath as they have promised to do. To date the disclosure project has over 400 such officials willing to testify. This is not wacko conspiracy theorists coming up with crazy theories... it's about the largest government cover up in the history of the modern world.
Adeptus.
PS. If the above is not enough to motivate you, think about how a world without burning fossil fuels would end the global warming impact nearly overnight! The evidence is simply overwhelming. See the video for yourself.
Well maybe not every politician today is aware of Youtube, but in about 10 years for sure they will be. Youtube offers the masses editable broadcasting time which allows for clear messages to be sent instantly to millions. Traditional rallies are always at the mercy of the media (often in bed with political parties) to selectively display (or not) your protest & cause.
When the masses start taking action, like boycotting products / companies as a result of Youtube video messages, I think the politicians will start listening & watching.
Several companies including Starbucks already responded via Youtube to videos that people have posted on Youtube against their companies, some with merit, others with less... political campaigns are also increasingly going online as Generation Y (or Z or i?) watches less TV and more and more Youtube.
The Internet remains one of the few but very significant tool left that humanity has to make itself heard to its governments. It is a significant shift of power (to the people) that can not go ignored. Whenelse in history has a single non-elected person been able to influence an entire Nation so fast and so deeply as today with the Internet (and specifically Youtube)?
Go ahead and put it up on the auction block, and then contact the guy that gave you the offer as to where the auction is taking place and tell him that the starting price is $400. If there are no further bids he gets the domain, otherwise you sell to the highest bidder. Sounds pretty fair to me & a possible WIN/WIN although who gets the second WIN may not be the guy that contacted you;-)
Keep in mind that business.com and several other domains have sold for MILLIONS. That said, yours may not be worth even a small fraction of that. It's all about finding somebody who values it & is willing to pay for it. Things are only worth what somebody is willing to pay for them.
FYI, I made $5,000 once with a "pharmacy.xx" type of domain but I also had 200 other.xx domains that went nowhere (by xx I mean a country domain, i.e..ru). Overall, I lost something like $2,000 in my domain venture because I could not find buyers within 1 year, but back then there were no domain auctions.
1. Commit Crime 2. Jump inside get away car & drive off. 3. When police begin approaching, connect Laptop into getaway car computer system & insert bogus messages such that they propogate to the Police cars behind & anywhere around you. Wireless amplifiers here will be really useful. Suggested message could be "Bridge Out" which would bring every car on the road to a full STOP so you can just drive around them all. 4. PROFIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!
See picture of the 2 medals here, at the top of some person's hand. The medal pours out liquid honey filling the ENTIRE cupped hand (many times the volume of the medal itself), and if you let it sit there it would overflow the hand and start dripping on the floor.
Not when the medal sits on my hand untouched by anyone else for 4 minutes straight producing a volume of liquid over 5 times the size of the medal itself, without the medal deteriorating at all (i.e. some sort of chemical reaction)... AND the output is edible rose scented honey!
Slashdot Mirror
"There is no way they could keep a secret of this magnitude and cover it up for 60 years."
Yes, I think you are right...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk
Also, France and Mexico governments are now disclosing their information as of 2006.
The Truth will be here fairly shortly.
Adeptus
"So for such a claim to NOT be outrageous, you'd have to also claim a vast conspiracy of scientists all over the world through the decades, sitting on most of their findings while publishing just enough to give an incremental step for the next breakthroughs."
Oh, you mean like these guys? (The Disclosure Project)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk
Adeptus
"However, it would be kinda strange for an individual or crew capable of navigating a craft at least twenty four trillion miles to not know how to fly a spacecraft well enough to avoid crashing."
Oh yeah, you mean just like how humans managed to place a robot on Mars millions of miles away that never crashes? Or you mean like how we were so smart to build space ships to go thousands of miles into orbit & never explode?
Distance does not make your craft less likely to crash. If anything it makes it more likely, because the further away you go, the less likely you know what averse conditions you will encounter.
Lastly, what limited mind you have, thinking these alien creatures actually travelled a linear distance for trillions of miles.
1. It doesn't make sense from our current understanding of physics. Too much time would pass (multi-multi generations) to travel such distances.
2. We have new physics that suggests space can be folded; it is more than likely that they use some technology that can take advantage of this, as opposed to travelling for millenea to reach here & crash.
Heck, if it took millenea, do you think they would send so many damn space craft? Think about it. No, they would do like we do with Mars. Send out a probe. Then a robot, then perhaps a human or two... then learn from those lessons then send out 1 or 2 more crew missions for several decades more. With UFO's according to witnesses, even if like 0.5% of them are really UFO's, they're coming here by the dozens each year... from trillions of miles & for at the very least the last 6 decades (there's some theories out there they've been coming for hundreds or even thousands of years - but that's debatable).
Adeptus
Big deal 1 guy admits it, the video below shows 22 of 400 senior Government, NASA, Airfoce & other top Military personel admitting it on National/International television that aliens are real & Gov has been hiding it.
The Disclosure Project:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk
Yeah it's almost 2 hours long, but it will blow your mind!
I wonder how much longer they can keep denying the more than obvious.
Nuff said.
Adeptus
Hmmm... If those guys from PirateBay or Sealand were smart, they'd pick a spot right near smack in the middle of the North Pole & buy it from Russia... ... with such centralized location with potential pipes going to Canada, US, Russia, Norway (North America, Asia, Europe), they'd have their redundancy fully covered!
On top of that just think of all the money they'd save on server cooling! hehe
Adeptus
CAT7 is available now, check out NORDX wiring standards. CAT7 is for 10 Gigabit Ethernet over copper; however do NOT treat it like CAT5. Also CAT6 (Gigabit) also should not be treated like CAT5. Be sure to read the specs of what you can and cannot do. Today CAT7 is about 4 times more expensive than CAT6. CAT6 is affordable by most people. Putting conduits like several suggested is a good idea, then you can use a pull string and pull new cabling in 2, 5 or 10 years down the road for a full end to end cabling upgrade.
l ights01-740463.jpg) , along side the CAT# wires, so that you can tell your n00b visitors... "See that? Those are my email packets going out to the Internet".
Good luck... and if you want bonus pimp points, be sure to run those stream / river like Xmas lights (http://badtux.net/uploaded_images/fsm_christmas_
Adeptus
If your company is a small shop, 1 branch office kind of deal with 5 to 15 people, that might be ok.
But mid sized companies may have dozens (not 1) application, some of them DOS based still, others strictly windows binary front end. I have seen mid sized companies with 1500 people running over 200 different applications with about 7 of them being at least partially internally developed (running on windows) and then most of rest all MS based off the shelf stuff - some $50/user apps, others $10,000/user apps - no, not all of these have Linux counterparts - most don't.
Get a job in a mid-sized company in IT industry in North America / Europe for a year, and then come back and tell me Linux is a real alternative. Unless that company's IT shop was started up on Linux, the odds of Windows stuff getting converted or replace by Linux counterparts is quite simply unrealistic. That doesn't mean that if an effort is done to begin a migration that in 10 years it would not be possible to be 100% Linux shop; however, usually assigning that much (human) resources to accomplish the task is very hard to justify.
Adeptus.
For 76 *ucking billion, I wanna see mach 5 jet engines on the back of the train in 2 years!
That sounds like a hella lot of waste for nothing, a long time from now!
In 10 years we'll have free energy & in 20, teleportation. 310 miles per hour will sound like walking compared to flying an F18 with the technology they'll have in 2025.
Adeptus
The article wasn't very clear as to the infrastructure used to provide this, but it would really have to be wireless, because their physical infrastructure is horrible at best and there's absolutely no way they'd be able to reach dozens of thousands of remote villages with dedicated RJ45 to each mud hut.
e ts-pc-penetration-of-65-by-2008/), ...In 2005, 14 out of 1,000 residents had a PC. That's 0.14 of a percent! Even if they meet their 2008 goal of 65/1000, that's still less than 1% of the population.
Many (although I have no idea of the percentages) of these villages already have cell phone coverage, so really, it could just be an upgrade of the cell towers in such cases. (Other options are massive Wimax deployments - whether the fixed or roaming flavour)
I seriously doubt that beyond offering the wireless access, they are also going to offer OLPF (one laptop per family)... so this Broadband for all, is actually only broadband for those who can afford a computer with a wireless card. In hundreds, possibly thousands of those remote villages, not even 1 person would qualify. At the very least the government should also subsidise Cyber Cafes in those villages if they really want the poor to have access, otherwise, they are only offering 1/2 the package - free airwaves, but no free or affordable PCs to use those airwaves.
According to this... (http://mungee.org/archives/2005/05/19/india-targ
So really, this is just providing free internet for the richest 0.65% of the population who can afford computers, or 6.5 Million people (out of 1 billion).
Considering that probably a good 90% plus of those PC owners are in the major cities (Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, etc - about 10-20 cities)... and those cities only make up around 5% or less of India's landscape. This basically represents the following:
1. Using tax payers dollars to upgrade 95% of the cell towers throughout rural India, where extremely few people have computers & won't be able to make use of it anyway and even when they do, many remote villages only have power for 3 to 6 hours per day. Heck even Mumbai & Bangalore still have regular massive power outages monthly, if not weekly sometimes.
2. The 5% of the infrastructure cost upgrades to the urban cities will benefit the top 1% rich people who live there.
This doesn't sound to me like the most brilliant way to spend vast sums of money. Or if they are going to spend the money with the intent of getting the poor on the Internet, then they need to pony up the rest of the funds to provide free PCs as well (OLPC anyone?).
That said, with 4G technology and/or WiMAX + upcoming hand held PCs with enough power to run Windows Mobile 6 (or whatever Linux flavour cell OS) & some basic apps & the convergence of MP3 + Cell phone + basic PC functionality + ongoing declining prices of these handheld units, possibly within 5-10 years the poor may actually start to make use of this upgraded network... assuming they don't starve to death first.
One thing the government has done right historically is that long distance charges in India are extremely cheap... for foreigners like me (Canada), for Indian people living there, nobody talks for hours on the phone, because they have per minute billing for local calls... even if it is fractions of a cent per minute.
Adeptus
Why is this "10G" even news? 10 Gigabit (OC192) Has been around since at least 1999. In fact, engineers & scientists already have functioning proto-types of 100 Gigabit over fiber (basically DWDM - multiple colours of 10 Gigabit streams multiplexed).
l y/art.php?2642
The IEEE expects the standard to be ratified in mid 2008 for the fiber version & copper (CAT8?) to come out within a couple of years after that (late 2009 or 2010).
Siemens achieves 111 Gigabits over 2,400 kilometers
http://presszoom.com/story_127837.html
Bell & Lucent labs acheive 107 Gigabits over 2,000 kilometers
http://www.enterprisenetworksandservers.com/month
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_gigabit_Ethernet
Those Internet2 people are just a tad behind... like 10 fold! If Internet2 = 10G, and Internet3 =100G, then really those Internet2 people should be working on Internet4 (Terabit baby!)!
Adeptus
"I mean this is a perfectly clean form of electricity which wouldn't pollute anything and, in the event that it sank, would only deposit nuclear materials back where they came from, the Earth's Crust."
1. Nuclear isn't perfectly clean, fission results in this inconvinient thingy called TOXIC WASTE MATERIAL that 1st world nations love to ship to 3rd world countries for "safe" storage...1,000 episodes of the Simpsons later & you're still F'ing clueless.
2.In the event the nuclear plant sank at some random place in the ocean, so would this toxic waste material. So now our already fish depleeted oceans can enjoy immediate eradication of whatever species live there. Oh yeah baby - *ucking brilliant plan!
Adeptus.
PS. Lesson over, please carry on with your basket weaving activities.
Question the accuracy or completeness of this list. Cisco who spends an average of 3.2 Billion in R&D a year should have been right in the top 5. Also where are Nortel, Lucent, Juniper, and the Telcos?
source: http://www.ameinfo.com/114768.html
Adeptus
So the obvious question becomes: What exactly do you do with the remaining 3 seconds of your daily free time?
I have 3 of them hooked up to 1 PC with 2 video cards. One of the video cards is a dual card and the other is a motherboard built in. It took a few hours of fiddling to make it work, but now I can actually drag windows around across 3 monitors. Why do I need those 3 monitors? For network monitoring tools. So where are the other 30? Well ok, I admit, it was a sensasionalist headline, but they do exist... sort of. I've got a virtual desktop software running on that PC which gives me 9 more virtual desktops, and since each desktop is 3 monitors wide, that alone accounts for 27 monitors! So that makes it 30... the remaining 3 are:
1) My main monitor where I actually do work. I managed to get the only 19" monitor in the company and I run it at some oddball high resolution of 1450x900 or something. It was the max I could make it go without getting fuzzy.
2) Those 3 monitors hooked up to 1 PC, in actual fact 1 of them is hooked up to a switchview device where 2 other computers are connected. So then I can switch to 2 other PCs I have, for a total of 4 PCs.
So in reality I have 4 PC's at my desk and 4 monitors, but end up with 4 PCs and 33 monitors! Mwahaha....
Now just wait until I install VMware and get like 3 OS's per machine!!!!!
Somebody make me some extra eyeballs.
Adeptus
PS. At home I have a single 24"... paid a tonne for that, but man what a beauty, it doubles as a widescreen TV screen! Samsung "244T"
My experiences with 6 years of Telus ADSL are precisely the same as yours. I even went to 480% one month and didn't receive any warnings, though I do try to keep it below 200% usage. Some months I am at less than 20%, just depends what torrents are out and how much free time I have.
:)
I also got a letter basically saying "we caught you downloading a copyrighted movie, but we won't give your personal info out".
Telus does get TONNES of flack from its customer base, but these 3 things they are doing right
Adeptus
Was the science of renegade Tesla whom worked way beyond mainstream science but ended up coming up with the Alternator that powers our cities and radio waves that are used not just for radio but for TV systems and communications, also junk science?
I suppose if you had lived in the time of gallileo, you would have also said his theory of the Earth rotating around the Sun to be herecy!
The only junk is in the closed mind of an individual unwilling to look at overwhelming evidence and follow like lemmings the status quo.
Quantum theory already allows for Zero Point Gravity to be a reality, only the mechanics to manipulate it are not yet invented by mainstream science.
It's like they say, "a closed mind, is a good thing to lose".
Adeptus
According to this public disclosure meeting in 2001, whereby high ranking government officials, very senior ex-military, black project staff, and ex-NASA employees pointed out... Zero point energy (aka. free energy) devices already exist, and have for decades, but are hidden by secret black project government programs due to the massive economic impact it would have on the world (i.e. no more need for OIL).
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCLOIcFTSlE
It's time USA citizens wrote their congress men and appealed for all of these senior government etc officials to have a chance to testify under oath as they have promised to do. To date the disclosure project has over 400 such officials willing to testify. This is not wacko conspiracy theorists coming up with crazy theories... it's about the largest government cover up in the history of the modern world.
Adeptus.
PS. If the above is not enough to motivate you, think about how a world without burning fossil fuels would end the global warming impact nearly overnight! The evidence is simply overwhelming. See the video for yourself.
Get all your Tesla movies & research documents here:
http://btjunkie.org/search?q=Tesla&c=0&t=0&o=52
Adeptus
Well maybe not every politician today is aware of Youtube, but in about 10 years for sure they will be. Youtube offers the masses editable broadcasting time which allows for clear messages to be sent instantly to millions. Traditional rallies are always at the mercy of the media (often in bed with political parties) to selectively display (or not) your protest & cause.
When the masses start taking action, like boycotting products / companies as a result of Youtube video messages, I think the politicians will start listening & watching.
Several companies including Starbucks already responded via Youtube to videos that people have posted on Youtube against their companies, some with merit, others with less... political campaigns are also increasingly going online as Generation Y (or Z or i?) watches less TV and more and more Youtube.
The Internet remains one of the few but very significant tool left that humanity has to make itself heard to its governments. It is a significant shift of power (to the people) that can not go ignored. Whenelse in history has a single non-elected person been able to influence an entire Nation so fast and so deeply as today with the Internet (and specifically Youtube)?
Adeptus
Check these out...
... too funny.e lated&search= The Southpark Spoofe lated&search= Pornt tp%3A%2F%2Fblog.wired.com%2Fcultofmac%2F2007%2F03% 2Fnovell_launches.html Novelle lated&search= Linux?!
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8pyTl2JP6Y&NR - MAC User experiences...
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCmUAWn_DlU&NR [NOT APROPRIATE TO LISTEN TO AT WORK] A little crude, but funny as hell.
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxPXFptzQRY - For gamers
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-KWYYIY4jQ - 2 BRAND new APPLE PRODUCTS UNVEILED HERE!!!!!!
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8lW8ndh5BU&NR [NOT APROPRIATE TO LISTEN TO AT WORK] - Gay networking
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc4oP_ITqMc&NR [NOT APROPRIATE TO LISTEN TO AT WORK] - Gaming
7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjpn3L3bSJQ&NR MAC vs PC vs Linux
8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGxRhRinsBw&mode=r
9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8HNyiNbXmk&mode=r
10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVOnFdMf0RU&eurl=h
11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkFQVcl62qo&mode=r
Go ahead and put it up on the auction block, and then contact the guy that gave you the offer as to where the auction is taking place and tell him that the starting price is $400. If there are no further bids he gets the domain, otherwise you sell to the highest bidder. Sounds pretty fair to me & a possible WIN/WIN although who gets the second WIN may not be the guy that contacted you ;-)
.xx domains that went nowhere (by xx I mean a country domain, i.e. .ru).
Keep in mind that business.com and several other domains have sold for MILLIONS. That said, yours may not be worth even a small fraction of that. It's all about finding somebody who values it & is willing to pay for it. Things are only worth what somebody is willing to pay for them.
FYI, I made $5,000 once with a "pharmacy.xx" type of domain but I also had 200 other
Overall, I lost something like $2,000 in my domain venture because I could not find buyers within 1 year, but back then there were no domain auctions.
Good luck!
Adeptus
1. Commit Crime
2. Jump inside get away car & drive off.
3. When police begin approaching, connect Laptop into getaway car computer system & insert bogus messages such that they propogate to the Police cars behind & anywhere around you. Wireless amplifiers here will be really useful. Suggested message could be "Bridge Out" which would bring every car on the road to a full STOP so you can just drive around them all.
4. PROFIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!
See picture of the 2 medals here, at the top of some person's hand. The medal pours out liquid honey filling the ENTIRE cupped hand (many times the volume of the medal itself), and if you let it sit there it would overflow the hand and start dripping on the floor.
j pg
http://www.saibaba.ws/images/miracles/Halagappa2.
Not when the medal sits on my hand untouched by anyone else for 4 minutes straight producing a volume of liquid over 5 times the size of the medal itself, without the medal deteriorating at all (i.e. some sort of chemical reaction)... AND the output is edible rose scented honey!
I'd like to see you pull that one off.
Adeptus