Slashdot Mirror


User: spanky1

spanky1's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
143
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 143

  1. Re:Sendmail tuning? on Sendmail Performance Tuning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    use simple, robut and elegent programs

    Robut? You sound like Dr. Zoidberg on Futurama.

    But to stay on topic: We use sendmail at all of our locations because we enjoy the extremely powerful customizability. Yes, it is a little disconcerting trying to disect sendmail.cf, but once you get the hang of it it's not bad. I have never had to do any performance tweaks either.

  2. Re:Save Enterprise! on Still Hope for Farscape · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are you serious? Enterprise kicks ass! This is the first Star Trek series that I have gotten really into the first season. TNG and Voyager took me until the second season. DS9 I never really liked.

  3. Re:Dark Matter? on Ring Of Stars Found Around Milky Way · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it is called dark matter because there should be more matter in our galaxy than is currently visible/detectable. But finding more visible matter would seem to reduce the need for as much "dark" matter.

  4. Re:What's the big deal about show swapping? on DMCA Loophole For Peer-to-Peer TV Show Sharing? · · Score: 1

    Yes, I am aware of the 30-second skip feature that can be enabled. But I was talking about AUTOMATIC commercial skip.

  5. Re:Screw Tivo on DMCA Loophole For Peer-to-Peer TV Show Sharing? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, those are some nice features that Tivo users would also like to have. But will ReplayTV survive the law suits? AFAIK they are being sued because of this and other features like commercial skip.

    It really sucks that companies get screwed for innovating and giving people features they want.

  6. Re:What's the big deal about show swapping? on DMCA Loophole For Peer-to-Peer TV Show Sharing? · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think it boils down to the fact that networks make money on the commercials. They don't make any more money if you copy the videos and give them to your friends. Plus most people skip commercials when they record a show... a practice the networks HATE. That's why TiVo has never implemented an automatic commerical skip feature. ReplayTV has it, but they are getting harrassed because of it. Very lame.

  7. Re:Ummm... What's Wrong? on Network Solutions Take 2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm with you. As an admin we only use Netsol for our domains. Easy to manage and very reliable. I have had friends tell me to use godaddy.com or some other bargain registrar but no thanks. Maybe for home use but not for business use. I don't want some cheap ass registrar going out of business resulting in my domain being screwed up.

  8. Re:NOOOOO!!! on Network Solutions Take 2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Domain Name: GST.COM
    Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.


    Looks like they went over your dead body.

  9. Dual DVI on GeforceFX (vs. Radeon 9700 Pro) Benchmarks · · Score: 1

    Excellent! Does anyone know if this card will be available in Dual DVI format? I am currently using a Quadro4 NVS 200 because of its dual DVI capabilities but the 3D is, um, less than stellar.

  10. Re:Linus on Linux Kernel Code Humor · · Score: 1

    I just searched 2.4.20... nothing with that phrase. But there are a lot of lines with the word "wonder".

  11. ATI and bad drivers on Radeon 9700 Pro: ATI Ahead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about you, but I have been burned by ATI over and over again with regards to driver quality. I sincerely hope they are still not bad about drivers but I'm not going to risk it again.

    NVidia has always had top notch driver support, and they continue to support even the oldest TNT cards with driver updates. ATI tends to drop new driver support after a couple years.

    I'm waiting for the GeForce FX. I just hope I can get one with dual DVI.

  12. Re:Eh? on Radeon 9700 Pro: ATI Ahead · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Heh... funny, but a bit inaccurate. Neither the 386SX nor 386DX had a mathco. The SX had a 16-bit external bus while the DX had a 32-bit external bus. You're thinking of the 486SX vs 486DX (SX had no working mathco and the DX had a built-in mathco).

  13. Re:Crap... on Life in the Trenches: a Sysadmin Speaks · · Score: 1

    I can see your point but somewhat disagree. I have seen wishy-washy sysadmins who do not have strong opinions. It does not inspire confidence. I think strong experience-based opinions are very important. But you *also* need to be open minded to other possibilities and give them fair consideration. I don't see that as being a conflict. Cuz that's the way I am (as a network admin).

  14. Re:Dream Sysadmin Job? on Life in the Trenches: a Sysadmin Speaks · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be comfortable complaining about my job in that manner unless the interview was anonymous.

    But I think you are right: as a network admin I complain about management, users, etc. And who doesn't complain about pay or job security?

  15. Re:more expensive != better on Programmable Vacuum Fluorescent Display (VFD) · · Score: 1

    The VFD in my SliMP3 is dimmable. I was under the impression that VFDs were noticably brighter than regular LCDs. That's the main reason Slim Devices decided to use VFDs according to their info.

  16. Re:more expensive != better on Programmable Vacuum Fluorescent Display (VFD) · · Score: 1

    VFDs are much easier to read from a greater distance than backlit LCDs.

  17. SliMP3 on Programmable Vacuum Fluorescent Display (VFD) · · Score: 1

    I think this is the display that the incredible SliMP3 device uses. Except it uses only a 2-line display.

  18. Definition of "bible"... on Red Hat Linux 8 Bible · · Score: 1

    "A book considered authoritative in its field."

    That certainly would apply to many of the tech books with bible in the title.

    And who said the forbidden fruit were apples?

  19. HIPAA on Military Healthcare Data Stolen · · Score: 1

    Now if the government contractor was only following the government mandated HIPAA regulations....

  20. Re:Encryption? on Fixing Wireless Security By Pulling The Plug · · Score: 1

    Due to a flaw in the implementation of WEP, 128-bit encryption ends up being no more secure than 40-bit. More info here.

  21. Re:802.11 is broken on Fixing Wireless Security By Pulling The Plug · · Score: 1

    From what I have heard, most of the cheapass consumer devices aren't all that great. If you want a really secure WiFi implementation, go with Cisco equipment. Of course it's a bit cost prohibitive for home but a no-brainer for businesses.

    At my house I use some of the cheap stuff. But I would still enable WEP and MAC filtering even though they can be broken. You still lock your car door even though someone can slim-jim it or just bash your window.

  22. Re:Take them back... on Digital Rights Management on CD's This Christmas? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I want to know is how you would go about getting a refund. Most (if not all?) stores have a exchange-only-if-defective policy with music.

  23. Re:Security and uses of wireless. on Fixing Wireless Security By Pulling The Plug · · Score: 1

    Sorry to disappoint, but I am not racist. He may be, but his question was sound and didn't have any racist remarks in it.

  24. Re:Security and uses of wireless. on Fixing Wireless Security By Pulling The Plug · · Score: 1

    You are quite right that security concerns with WiFi should be based on what kind of traffic is being spewed out into the atmosphere.

    If it's HTTPS you don't have to worry about it because the HTTPS protocol already encrypts your data very well. Similarly, if it's data you really don't care about (like web browsing) then you don't really need to worry.

    The point is many businesses use wireless like it's a PRIVATE network. Wirless should be viewed as a PUBLIC network, even when you have WEP enabled and MAC filtering turned on. Best practice IMO is to use IPSec encryption (it's not flawed like WEP). Basically set up VPN endpoints on each side of the WiFi link.

  25. Re:Security is in the eyes of the beholder.(or adm on Fixing Wireless Security By Pulling The Plug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they would just reject all unknown mac addresses and accept from a known list WITH the added benifit of encypting all the traffic there would be NOTHING to worry about.

    A little too confident here? WEP encryption is flawed and hackable without too much effort. MAC addresses can be spoofed pretty easily.

    Wireless is very tempting, but it should be considered a "public" network. Run all of your traffic through encrypted IPSec tunnels.