Slashdot Mirror


Digital Rights Management on CD's This Christmas?

McDrewbie asks: "Has anyone discovered that the new CD's found under the tree or in their stocking don't play on their brand new CD player? My father got a Brookstone Wafer-thin CD system and several new CD's. Most play fine, however several ones from Sony (with CDextra software on them) and from Columbia, either don't play or play with some crackling and popping, yet play fine on our older CD player. Did these companies decide to quietly unleash DRM on the public this holiday season? Or is this just a problem with the new player (separate from it not being DRM capable)? What are other Slashdot readers experiencing today?"

529 comments

  1. DRM for a present by Speedy8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think that DRM for a present is worse then coal.

    1. Re:DRM for a present by jon787 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I gave my sister coal for christmas as a joke.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    2. Re:DRM for a present by gooberguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, you are right. I got a lump of coal for christmas and I can use it to heat my house. I bet those who got DRM are freezing to death. Poor bastards. Too bad they didn't get coal for christmas.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    3. Re:DRM for a present by Raul654 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you need to be donkey punched, followed by the life altering experience of waking up in a strange room covered in dog jizz

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    4. Re:DRM for a present by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      yea, you can at least burn coal for heat. cd's stink when burned.

    5. Re:DRM for a present by abradsn · · Score: 1

      You both got DRM for Christmas, huh?! :)

    6. Re:DRM for a present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet that was funny for about two seconds.

      No, on second thought, that probably wasn't funny at all.

    7. Re:DRM for a present by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I gave my sister coal for christmas as a joke."

      Did you tell her the coal will turn into diamond? Are you engaged now? Heh.

      (it's a joke, laugh.)

    8. Re:DRM for a present by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      No mod points, but LOL...

    9. Re:DRM for a present by KaiKaitheKai · · Score: 1

      Well, we're poor, so we are being bad for the coal. We need it. Badly. :)

    10. Re:DRM for a present by CommieOverlord · · Score: 4, Funny



      Well, you could burn the CDs. Plastic is just oil after all.

      Although, the various chemicals would probably kill you if you burned too many.

    11. Re:DRM for a present by Slashdotess · · Score: 3, Funny

      The RIAA execs who gave the DRM didn't need any coal, their coldbloodedness takes care of those problems.

    12. Re:DRM for a present by uncoveror · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed! If the disc won't play, it is defective. Take it back, and join the ever-growing boycott of the recording industry. When you take the disc back, demand a cash refund. Remember, the squeaky wheel gets the grease, and the customer is always right.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    13. Re:DRM for a present by iThomas · · Score: 1

      Are there any consumer groups kicking up stink on DRM? Or even taking it to court? As mentioned by others, this is a consumer issue and should be considered gouging. I don't know how many times I bought the same Beatles album, now DRM is here to spit in our faces. And they say music lasts a lifetime. DRM is bad business, support your independent label!

    14. Re:DRM for a present by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but at least now they can keep their coffee tables free of nasty beverage container damage.

    15. Re:DRM for a present by Spellbinder · · Score: 0

      they could burn their money...

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    16. Re:DRM for a present by macdaddy357 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Funny you should ask about taking it to court.

      If you bought any of the "copy protected" discs that won't play in your computer, Follow this link to the Milberg Weiss Law firm, and join Dickey V. Universal Music Group et. al, a class action suit against the manufacturers of these defective discs that frequently use the Compact Disc digital audio logo improperly.

      That comes off the links page of a consumer group boycotting the recording industry, for DRM, price gouging, and harassment of file traders. Dontbuycds.org A previous poster gave the link to that organization, but not to the class action suit, so , pay attantion mods, this post is not redundant!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    17. Re:DRM for a present by Zack · · Score: 1

      I actually did give a friend of mine coal for christmas this year as his actual present, complete with stoccking. Of course it was a piece off the Titanic, which next to his piece of the original transatlantic telegraph, but still made an amusing gift.

    18. Re:DRM for a present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or they could play a refreshing game of flying disc with their families...

    19. Re:DRM for a present by iThomas · · Score: 1

      Very interesting indeed, and thank you. Just too bad I don't do business in California or I would definitely be submitting my complaints. I will certainly be keeping an eye out for other cases though.

    20. Re:DRM for a present by operagost · · Score: 2
      Has anyone considered that it might be his spiffy new stereo that's (sort of) at fault? Better try some other CDs on it. It could just be that it's not very tolerant of defective discs. I know that I have on Santana greatest hits disc that sometimes plays well on my ca. 1996 car changer, but other times I'll hear popping. I think it's either out of balance, or the center hole is a little off so the changer doesn't always seat it properly. Meanwhile, an even older 1994 home changer played it fine, along with a 2000 DVD player.

      Anyway, it might be just that all those new CDs happen to be a little "off", so exchanging them might do the trick.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:DRM for a present by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      I received DVD's for Christmas including the Back to the Future Trilogy. Disk 1 IMO is defective. It plays and randomly (in the middle somewhere) plays garbage on my screen (no scratches on the disk.. looks in good condition). I've looked at the other two and they play just fine. Only disk one has a problem. Then at the end of the DVD (disk 1) I noticed a macrovision protection screen pop up.

      Macrovision for those who don't know is an older VHS copy protection scheme that screws up your video when you make dups of your tapes. How the heck did they get it on a DVD???

      BTW, my DVD player is a JVC I purchased 2 years ago. Pretty new still. I'm calling the vender for another copy. Hopefully the Macrovision didn't screw me over. I'm NOT purchasing another DVD player because they are paranoid. I'll simply burn a DVD without the Macrovision if I'm forced to.

      Pity, follow the rules and get shafted. Don't follow the rules.. well.. they will never know ;D

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    22. Re:DRM for a present by dhartman · · Score: 1

      Engaged? What are you from the hills? Marrying your sister. Jeesh. What next? Inbred human clones?

  2. Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get a refund & then d/l them to burn on CD-R...

    If the music companies want to mess around, play them at their own game! :)

    1. Re:Take them back... by spanky1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I want to know is how you would go about getting a refund. Most (if not all?) stores have a exchange-only-if-defective policy with music.

    2. Re:Take them back... by orangesquid · · Score: 2

      Customer walks into store with a CD from the store, a receipt, a couple other CD's, and two discmans.
      Customer: I'd like a refund on the CD I bought here.
      Employee: Sorry, we only refund CD's if they are defective.
      Customer: Well, I haven't scratched this or anything [shows bottom of CD], but look.
      Customer plays the other CD's just fine on both discmans, but attempts to play the CD from the store and both of them barf.
      Employee, fumbling: Well, ummm, if you take that to, uhhh, customer service...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    3. Re:Take them back... by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are the CDs labeled with a DRM sticker? If not, AFAIK, they're not following the standards of an audio CD. Hence, they're defective.

      They don't play in your CD player. Regardless of what they say to the above, I think you can make a very good case.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    4. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And keep taking them back..

      Take them back 50 times till you find the one that works.

      Companies won't do crap like that if they find out it costs them when they piss people off.

      - AC :)

    5. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No refunds on open merchandise" actually means nothing. They WILL exchange an open title (audio, video or CD-ROM) for a sealed version of the SAME title.

      How smart do you have to be, then, to take your brand-new SEALED copy to a different store to exchange it for whatever you want???

      I echo the sentiment that these measures are only to stop the Least Common Denominators among us... Anyone worried about the Bad Guys (errr... the Good Guys???) winning has a flare for the dramatic. Think logically... Review history...

    6. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thanks for the detailed battle plan. Santa must have brought you some smarts for Xmas, you clever little dickens.

    7. Re:Take them back... by apoupc · · Score: 2

      Bring the CD Player that doesn't play them correctly with you to the store so they can hear it if they won't give you a refund. If they will let you exchange it, get all the copies of the CD and open them up one by one until they give up and give you your money back. If they say its a problem with the CD player, have your other CDs at hand.

    8. Re:Take them back... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for the detailed battle plan. Santa must have brought you some smarts for Xmas, you clever little dickens.

      Isn't it funny how most trolls are from AC's or troll accounts? Trolls... the obnoxious little children who always have to get there way, who don't understand multiple points of view, and who do little more than take from the community.

      Be glad slashdot allows anonymity, and that you probably will never need to ask for a favor on here. In small villages, people like you often find themselves with the short end of the stick because they have to face up to their words and actions.

      The cynicism around here always seems to skyrocket right after holidays.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    9. Re:Take them back... by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How smart do you have to be, then, to take your brand-new SEALED copy to a different store to exchange it for whatever you want???

      Smart enough to forge the receipt of that store? I don't think they'd exchange it without you showing them the receipt as well.

    10. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That wont work at many stores. Their policy is that if it plays in their equipment, the CD is fine. The problem must be with your equipment. Too bad.

      Also, a discman probably wont have any hardware the makes it incompatable with copy protected CDs. It's stuff with CD-ROM drives (such as computers, MP3 discmans, car CD players, and high end component players) that have problems with them. The whole idea behind them is that if they can't play in a computer, they can't be copied.

    11. Re:Take them back... by swschrad · · Score: 1

      ... and be sure to put a whopping big thumbprint smear on each disk that fails as you pull it out of the CD player. shoot, sounds like so much fun it's worth getting the orange "we saw you with this" sticker on your CD player from the door wardens. until these weasels put "NOT a CD" stickers on their defective wares, we need to continue to try and train them.

      --
      if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    12. Re:Take them back... by Fez · · Score: 1

      >>How smart do you have to be, then, to take your brand-new SEALED copy to a different store to exchange it for whatever you want???
      >Smart enough to forge the receipt of that store? I don't think they'd exchange it without you showing them the receipt as well.


      I don't know what stores you go to, but many (Including Wal-Mart and Best Buy) will take back completely sealed merchandise without a receipt, and happily give you store credit. Doesn't matter where you bought it, if it scans back into their system they don't generally care. I imagine they care less this time of year, when they get tons of returns and not many with receipts.

      Columbia House once sent me Good Will Hunting with a sign-up order by accident. I didn't want it, but it was only $0.49. I wasn't about to go through the trouble of shipping it back to Columbia House. I took it to Best Buy, got over $30 for it, and picked up two less expensive DVDs that I had wanted.

    13. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really hit that nail on the head, what with your detailed analysis of the issue. Here's a clue for ya, since obviously you didn't get a brain for Xmas. Unless your using your full and proper name as your "nick", then your no less anonymous than an AC.

      Perhaps my viewpoint was that the parent poster was a complete and utter retard. Thats my view, why should it be suppressed? Maybe I actually have good karma but don't want to risk it cause some clueless ass-munch (such as yourself, see, I'm once agina making my view known, your an ass-munch) would mod it down as a troll or flame-bait.

      That's why we got the Post Anonymously checkbox, turd (again, I expressing my feelings, that you are the mental equivalent of fecal matter).

      Help me out with the small village thing though. I'm having trouble grasping the concept. I think you need to flesh it out a little.

    14. Re:Take them back... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      That wont work at many stores. Their policy is that if it plays in their equipment, the CD is fine. The problem must be with your equipment. Too bad.

      Also, a discman probably wont have any hardware the makes it incompatable with copy protected CDs. It's stuff with CD-ROM drives (such as computers, MP3 discmans, car CD players, and high end component players) that have problems with them. The whole idea behind them is that if they can't play in a computer, they can't be copied.


      Chances are the store will have a car audio player, or a high-end audio player, somewhere (places like Best Buy... for music and book shops, you're out of luck).

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    15. Re:Take them back... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      By anonymity, I referred to the fact that all AC's are indistinguishable. I do not care to track you down in real life. Handles let me keep track of what trolls are biting today versus yesterday. (Just out of curiosity, are you one of those trolls that always has to have the last word? Most trolls seem to be like that.)

      There are certain things like etiquette and unexpressed thoughts (as well as anger management) that are becoming less and less common. Should you choose to be less rude, you could perhaps write, ``Your comment lacked insight and added little that most users here did not already know.''

      Look up Gesellscheft and Gemeinscheft in a psychology book sometime. You'll then understand what I meant by a small village.

      It is quite curious that you refer to me in such a derogatory manner and think of me as unintelligent. I consider you an equal; I am nearly positive you hold a different opinion.

      Btw, personal insults aren't very creative. You would be a far more interesting troll if you were to tell me something like, ``Your head is shoved so far up your own ass that the flaming gerbils you keep shoving in are getting stuck between your ribs.''

      Last time I checked, fecal matter was smart enough not to feed trolls... or is it?

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    16. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha you dooforkeffigus. I betcha like sheep too.

    17. Re:Take them back... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      That wont work at many stores. Their policy is that if it plays in their equipment, the CD is fine. The problem must be with your equipment. Too bad.

      Chances are the store will have a car audio player, or a high-end audio player, somewhere (places like Best Buy... for music and book shops, you're out of luck).

      As a matter of fact, most stores (even the small shops) have a CD player to play it in. HOWEVER, if you show up with the player that won't play your CD, MOST (probly not all) stores will let you plug it in (or plug it in for you) and attempt to play it.

      Customer Service is all about giving the customer what they want/need. If you behave reasonably (even unreasonably, but there are limits) then the store will give you what you want. Especially if the player at issue is portable, they won't have any problem listening and saying "You're absolutely right. THe player plays other CD's, but not this one. Whether the CD is defective or not, it doesn't work for you."

      There are additional issues that may/may not come up.

      For example: Say the store owner says "This CD won't play in that player by design. THerefore, it is behaving within expected parameters, play it in a different player." They may even go on to provide a list of "tested" players (read "approved").

      The logical counter is to show them the Compact Disk insignia and say "It's nonstandard, because this player plays the standard (shows a standard CD) but not this one. THerefore the labeling is incorrect and the CD was probably bought under false pretenses."

      And the final counter to this, thus the store wins, is to say "We are not responsible for the labeling, packaging, and so forth. We only sell them. If you wish to pursue this, here is the number of our distributor (or whatever number they decide to provide). You should take it up with them. If they will give us a refund, we'll gladly extend it to you."

      So, the stores themselves have something to fall back on, if they *really* want to. I think it's highly unlikely that they would go this route right now, but given enough time they will. All it takes is a memo from the distributor informing the stores of these problems, and with more and more people taking the CD's back when they don't work, it's inevitable that this conversation will soon occur.

      Therefore, the only logical way to deal with it is to continue with the effort, and then do no further business with the store. Inform them that this is the case ("I won't be coming back, then, if you can't help me. I know it's not your fault, but this is my only recourse."), and find a different store. When you have exhausted all of your stores, then maybe you should consider making your own music? :)

      The most logical way to fight them is to boycott the record labels themselves. Go ahead and shop at your favorite music store, but don't buy any CD that is produced by an RIAA-protected label. You'll be buying indy stuff, though. Not that this is a bad thing. :)

      The RIAA will use the boycott to their advantage, saying "Look at our sales! Those pirates!". And we respond with "We're not pirating, we're boycotting and exercising our fair use rights. We continue to purchase CD's (shows receipts), but as you can see, your labels did not produce these CDs."

      At this time I should provide a link to a page that lists RIAA-protected labels. Does anyone have such a link? Or a list? I'll gladly post a webpage with the list...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:Take them back... by rusty+spoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the final counter to this, thus the store wins, is to say "We are not responsible for the labeling, packaging, and so forth. We only sell them. If you wish to pursue this, here is the number of our distributor (or whatever number they decide to provide). You should take it up with them. If they will give us a refund, we'll gladly extend it to you."

      Here in the UK that won't fly. When you buy from a store you are making a transaction with the store, not the store's suppliers.

      Where they get them from is not relevant. The contract is between you and the store. They should stop whining about their crummy suppliers and give a refund.

      If they do start this approach and seem unmovable on it then I'd suggest quietly telling them you are going to get very loud and angry if you don't get your own way - there's isn't a store in the land that wants a noisy and angry ex-customer in-store, They'll soon pay the refund and have you on your way ;-)

      Remember, when you buy stuff the contract is between you and the store - not you and the entire supply chain of the store.

    19. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember, when you buy stuff the contract is between you and the store - not you and the entire supply chain of the store.

      Agreed, that should be the case. In fact, if you were to use that as a legal argument here in the US, it just might work. In fact, since i"m not a lawyer, I can't tell you if there's any case history for this argument. However, consider this:

      While the contract may be between you and the store, the store is stuck between a rock and a hard place. They have to satisfy you, but they also have to satisfy their suppliers by actually selling shit. If we run the stores themselves out of business, we're digging our own grave on the matter because they'll be replaced by stores that will work more to satisfy the distributors than the customers, and things progressively get worse.

      I'm not saying that we have to keep the stores in business, but it's in our best interests to keep them in business and help them migrate to a preferred distribution system by supporting that distribution system within the store. If the store doesn't have an outlet for a distribution that we like (such as indy labels, or other non-RIAA protected labels, or labels that don't use copy protection schemes) then we don't shop there and let them fail, if that's what it takes.

      Considering that there are real people in these stores, and considering that they just want to work their day and go home to their families just like the rest of us, I really don't like the idea of holding them responsible for shit that they're not responsible for.

      OTOH, I consider music stores themselves to be obsolete, for the most part. I do my shopping online, so to speak, because I don't subscribe to the idea that getting a free copy of a song is piracy. Copyright laws (in the US) only state piracy when the person providing the copy is receiving a profit and *not* paying a royalty. I agree with this law, and I think that filesharing itself is ok, and I think that sharing music in this fashion is also ok. It's up to the record labels to figure out how to exploit the new technology and put out a product that I will pay for. Of course, this also means I'm immune to copy-protected CDs in the first place. :)

      Problem is, though, that the easiest way to deal with the problem and "fight back" is to just take the CD back as many times as needed. To do more would involve spending some time learning shit about distribution that most people just don't care about. In fact, I haven't bothered to learn myself, mostly because I decided to boycott RIAA and as a result have not felt the need to go to the music stores in the first place, even if they do carry indy labels. Furthermore, I've decided that I prefer to get music from the internet, because I don't have a home CD player. Nor do I have a home tv or dvd player. I use a computer for all of that. 17" monitor (not big, but tv's didn't used to be that big either), GNU/Linux with a dvd player and a server full of movies and music that were either purchased (before my boycott, in fact) or acquired by exercising my fair use rights puts all of this stuff at the touch of a button. Who needs a 200 disc changer when my server has 120GB's of storage space? MPlayer gives me more control over what I'm seeing than any commercial dvd player I've seen, and the dvd drive only cost $35. Of course, the computer itself cost a lot more, but for the value, it's worth it.

      My future prediction is that more people will benefit from a setup similar to mine (it can easily be adapted with a video card and a new sound card to a full-fledged home movie setup) and someone will make a product available that does this exact thing. (It may be me :) ) The internet is my preferred distribution mechanism, and any label that doesn't support it will not receive money from me, period.

      Sorry to get sidetracked, and to post as AC, but my username doesn't have enough karma for me to post under it. :)

      fucksl4shd0t

    20. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who needs a 200 disc changer when my server has 120GB's of storage space?

      Furthermore, a 200 disc changer can only play music to one person in the house at a time, in one room. A server means any client connected to the network can play any of the music at any time, provided the server can take the load.

      This is also an exercise of fair use rights, as long as I don't charge a fee to the clients, but since the clients are computers in the bedrooms, living room, kitchen, et al, I won't charge a fee. Of course, it's my own house and I can do what I want. Not that it's actually big enough, since it's a 2BR basement apartment. Heh. But my point is made. As the kids get bigger and we move into progressively larger places, they'll get their own rooms with their own computers, in which case they'll be hooked into the network and able to access the music and movies and other stuff. They won't fight over whose CDs are whose, because they'll all be on the server. When the living room client is turned on for background music, they won't complain that they never hear their music because it'll be on the generic playlist.

      This setup will solve ALL of the fights I had with my brother and my parents when I was a kid, except for the one about "Turn it down!". It may introduce new fights.

      Sorry I replied to myself, I couldn't help it upon rereading my post. :)

      fucksl4shd0t

    21. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely store policy isn't the be-all and end-all of the argument... does the US government have some kind of competition & consumer protection authority?

      In Australia it would be quite difficult for the stores to get away with this - if the goods were defective they would have to offer an exchange or store credit if not a refund. If they work 'as expected' then they are still being marketed and sold as CDs (regardless of whether they have some tiny logo or not) and should play in compatible CD players.

      The only way they could get away with it is if there was a very clear & obvious label on the package saying something like "this CD won't play in computers and DVD players" - which is hardly good for marketing.

      Frankly I think given a few complaints the ACCC might even consider calling DVDs 'defective' for refund purposes if they happen to be from the wrong region...

    22. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the contract may be between you and the store, the store is stuck between a rock and a hard place. They have to satisfy you, but they also have to satisfy their suppliers by actually selling shit.

      They also have to satisfy consumer protection authorities that they aren't selling faulty or fraudulently marketed products (e.g. a CD that won't play in some otherwise fully functional CD players).

      This should put them in a position of having to give you the exchange/refund but may not protect them when trying to claim it back from suppliers. Really it should, though - consumer protection laws should apply just as much to the wholesale as the retail part of the distribution chain, and the product has been identified by the consumer and accepted by the store as defective.

      I guess if they can't, however, there would be a lot of negative relationships created between stores and suppliers. Not likely to be so good for future marketing deals - except, of course, that the stores still need to have the latest CDs to sell...

      The CDs could just be returned to suppliers as defective... do they bother to list between, say 'scratched', 'broken', 'production fault', etc. or just return the ones they got back as 'defective'? A message from the suppliers saying "don't accept these reasons as being defective" is likely to go ignored if the stores are required to give a refund on those CDs anyway. And if the stores refuse to give a refund, hefty government fine time.

    23. Re:Take them back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I'm posting anonymously...

      My point wasn't that stores *should* get away with selling this stuff, but that we shouldn't hold them responsible when it's not their fault. The basic reason I feel this way is for the reason you cited: The stores can only get away with it if they post a notice or some sort telling the guy buying it about the "defect".

      Given enough people taking them back, THAT will be the result. There won't be any less production of copy-protected CDs, there won't be any massive RIAA getting reborn and actually serving us.

      The ONLY end result of taking the CDs back is to get a sign warning us about later. That's all.

      Therefore the effort is wasted, since it doesn't actually STOP anything. If you want it to stop, don't buy them at all if they have labels like this on them.

      There's a possibility that this is paralleled by the old "Explicit Lyrics" fight. "Explicit Lyrics" sold CDs, and when Tipper and her ilk figured it out they quit. (At least, I like to think that :) ) Hopefully the parallel isn't there, but I thought I'd throw that out there.

      In other posts I commented that the stores are stuck between a rock and ahard place, they're just people too, etc. That's my secondary reason for not wanting to just "take them back". Now, if you need to recover the loss of the money spent, by all means take them back! Or sell it on eBay or something. But if you intend to take them back thinking that it'll stop production of copy-protected CDs, then think again. It won't.

  3. which cd's? by tezzery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone care to offer some insight as to which cd titles are doing this? ... so I can save the trouble of buying them and skip right ahead to downloading the mp3's :)

    1. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably any CD that contains that CDextra feature or whatever.

    2. Re:which cd's? by linuxbaby · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're all listed at Fat Chuck's List of Corrupt CDs.

    3. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same here in Denmark.

      (sorry for my bad english - in advance)

      I got Robbie Willams, Escapology, with the "new feature". Returning it tomorrow.

      But the real problem is: Most of my family simply don't notice what the little sticker on the back says. So they will buy CDs as always, and will have DRM sneaked in under their noses.

      And the ugly part is, that it's "the country of freedom and liberty" who is sending the shit over here as well.

      Wake up America. What happened?

    4. Re:which cd's? by drDugan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "the country of freedom and liberty"

      not anymore: [[ from an AC slashdot post today
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=49046&cid=4962 648 ]]

      """

      here is a snapshot on how these fucks think:

      "If you don't violate someone's human rights some of the time, you probably aren't doing your job," said one official who has supervised the capture and transfer of accused terrorists. "I don't think we want to be promoting a view of zero tolerance on this. That was the whole problem for a long time with the CIA."

      found this in a quick search in TODAY's news. if you are not paranoid about our government, you're not listening.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A379 43-2002Dec25.html

      """

    5. Re:which cd's? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Grand Theft Auto : Vice City Greatest Hits played in my PowerMac. And Apple is very much against DRM (RIAA's DRM).

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    6. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just two thoughts. First, it wouldn't bother me in the least if nothing I owned could playback a Robbie Williams CD, let alone copy it. As part of our cultural exchange, I should inform you that here in America, family members that hate you generally give you socks or fruitcake for Christmas. Second, given that you're from Denmark: is it true that they actually broadcast hard core porn on TV at night? Here we only get infomercials, or half-hour commercials of people trying to sell us shit we'd never buy.

      So yeah, sorry about the DRM, but it sounds like you've got enough else to keep you busy. For some reason, the RIAA has hit Europe in general much harder with these 'copy protected' recordings than America, so not only do you get to pay more but you get the added bonus of beta testing their DRM schemes. Good luck!

    7. Re:which cd's? by intelligent+poster · · Score: 1

      where do you suppose the MP3's will be coming from if all the CDs have copy protection?

    8. Re:which cd's? by kasperd · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're all listed

      I bet they are not all on that list. The one I got for christmas says "COPY CONTROL" on the cover. So I assume it is YACCD (yet another corrupt CD), but it is not on the list. But then again, I didn't have time to test it yet.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    9. Re:which cd's? by kasperd · · Score: 2

      where do you suppose the MP3's will be coming from if all the CDs have copy protection?

      If the "CD" can be played it can be copied. It is as simple as that, there is no such thing as copy protection. What they usually do is make errors on the disc and hope for devices used for copying to be more sensitive to errors than players.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    10. Re:which cd's? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hurrah, you get to be the guy that puts it on the list. Take a penny, leave a penny.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:which cd's? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Apple HAS made some public noises vs DRM, but they only use the same drives that the rest of the PC industry use - and iMacs in particular have already have already had serious problems with DRM corrupted discs.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:which cd's? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Apple's have had problems because they don't support the RIAA's initiative. That was my point. My CD works, so there is no DRM on it. Otherwise my Mac would have been pissed off in some degree.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    13. Re:which cd's? by messiertom · · Score: 1

      Simple. Pop the CD in your favorite CD audio player, put a cable between the audio out of the player + the audio in of your sound card, and record away.

    14. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assessment of Apple is way off the mark. Apple doesn't even allow iPod owners to copy music from their iPod back to a computer using iTunes. They give lip service to the anti-DRM side but you can expect no principled stand.

      Obviously there are many ways around the iPod 'protection' but Apple has put up a simple barrier for the unsophisticated. By all accounts this restriction, was a last minute change to the iTunes software after they announced the iPod but hadn't shipped it.

      And their message, enclosed with each iPod, which exhorts users not to steal music, is tantamount to a statement that Apple considers each iPod purchaser a thief.

      The fact is that large corporations will always cave to pressure from other large corporations and even more importantly to government.

      The Microsoft trial had little to do with monopoly (where is it?) and much to do with reminding everyone that even the largest and wealthiest can't defend themselves from government run amuck. The message wasn't missed by any CEO. Government has a monopoly on the use of force and they will point their guns anywhere they damn well feel like.

      Much though I like Apple and OS X given the state of computing and governments encroachment into an industry that for many years was largely free, I was forced to conclude that Apple and OS X are worthless to me. I can only expect the rules, restrictions, and controls to get worse.

      Bottom line is that only free / open source software will allow us to continue to use our computers the way WE choose.

      True we will probably become criminals in doing so, but then that is the plan anyway.

      When everyone is a criminal and there are no objective laws governments get to exert maximum control via selective enforcement.

      Nothing new

    15. Re:which cd's? by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      The new U2 Best of 1990-2000 cd crashes my xbox, and my pc reboots after inserting it. >:( the last cd I'll ever buy. And it's also not on that list.

    16. Re:which cd's? by zonker · · Score: 0

      i wouldn't say they are 'very much' against it, rather they just haven't made any attempts at drm or made any major announcements as to their future intentions regarding drm...

    17. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it`s a shame and people still don`t get it..

    18. Re:which cd's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent poster is both a creep and a scumbag. I want to be safe. Capture the author and kill him.

    19. Re:which cd's? by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      I've played the said U2 disk on my computer with no problem, since I listen to most of my music first at work on my PC. You need to disable AutoPlay, or hold down the Shift key as you're inserting the disk - it sounds like the PC program that it's trying to launch is crashing your disk instead of any audio track protection.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    20. Re:which cd's? by commbat · · Score: 1

      and my pc reboots after inserting it.

      I'm kind of late with this, but just in case your checking back to see if anyone has something constructive to say... I once saw this at work (small computer shop - sales and repair) and it took me days to figure out that the owner had uninstalled some adaptec software (I think it was direct CD.) Reinstalling the software fixed the problem. hth

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
  4. Personally... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Or is this just a problem with the new player (separate from it not being DRM capable)? " .. I'd recommend getting a broadband connection and an iPod. That'll solve all your problems with defective media(intentionally or otherwise).

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Personally... by Kinniken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Or is this just a problem with the new player (separate from it not being DRM capable)? " .. I'd recommend getting a broadband connection and an iPod. That'll solve all your problems with defective media(intentionally or otherwise).

      lol, my father got one (the iPod). Sure beat DRM CDs ;-)

      BTW, it had a "Don't steal music" sticker to fight piracy. Take your pick between the different protection systems, I've made my choide :P

      --
      What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
    2. Re:Personally... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      ".. I'd recommend getting a broadband connection and an iPod. That'll solve all your problems with defective media(intentionally or otherwise). "

      Heh I don't think the moderators understood that I was being sarcastic.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what you get for paying for the bullshit music that's out there in the first place. and B, why in hell would you buy a cd player from brookstone?

  5. Crappy drive mechanisim? by aaronsb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Playing the "protected" cds in a CDROM drive would quickly reveal if they are truly copy protected.

    I've found that a lot of the stuff you can buy from the sharper image, brookstone, etc. is kind of cheesy. Maybe it's just a crappy drive mechanisim.

    1. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      I cannot begin hto describe the amount of crappy stuff at Sharper Image. It's novel stuff sure, but the novelty is completely compentated for by the lack of quality. It is that reason, and the fact that the crap is over priced that I'll *never* by anything there.

      They make a living selling novelty expensively, and because it's expensive you think it's quality when it's jsut novelty that you're buying. So you get jipped.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've found that a lot of the stuff you can buy from the sharper image, brookstone, etc. is kind of cheesy.

      I've felt the same way about their stuff the past couple years. It looks pretty cool in the catalogs, but there is a Sharper Image store down the road and much of the stuff, up close, looks like maybe a good idea manufactured cheaply. In some cases, a stupid idea, altogether. Catalogs can sell stuff you wouldn't normally buy, because some little deception (usually a hot babe holding/using it) used to redirect your attention from it's faults.

      That said... With all the crap the music industry has been doing lately, I'm less inclined to buy their products. Are they going to dismiss my few hundred $ a year, no longer spent, on music piracy? I don't even download MP3's (I haven't even had a system I could do anything with them until recently.) I'm more likely to visit the local used CD store and pick up old, pre-DRM music (which might become a hot collector's item if the current trend continues.)

      Some day on eBay:

      3034898724 Beatles Sgt Pepper Non DRM Current bid: $57.61

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is "gyped" not "jipped". The verb "gyp" comes from the race known as Gypsies who were (are?) known to be wandering tricksters, fortune tellers, and scam artists.

    4. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      I haven't bought a new CD in years. There's a bunch of used book and CD stores and near me that sell the kind of stuff I like. Yeah, these sales don't go to support the artists, which is a bummer, but they also don't support tyrannical record companies, either -- yet.

      I forsee the recording industry getting its way with used CD sales -- enacting a kind of "RIAA tax" on each used CD sold -- if the demand for DRM-free CD's out-strips the demand for new CD's. Governmentally mandated profits! I mean, why would anyone listen to the consumer anymore? Ignoring supply and demand worked for Communist Russia, it can work for RIAA.

      *sigh* No, the DRM CD's will probably sell as well as, if not better than, the DRM-free jobbers. Most people won't notice, and won't care about, the difference in functionality if the CD's sound the same. Not because they're "lusers" or "sheep" but because there won't be any change in how they listen to music.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    5. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Frying+Ferret · · Score: 1

      Not to get too off topic but damn that is racist. You are correct that "gyp" comes from gypsie, or roma. But that stereotype of them is like saying that Jews have lots of money and are bankers and swindlers.

    6. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Not to get too off topic but damn that is racist. You are correct that "gyp" comes from gypsie, or roma. But that stereotype of them is like saying that Jews have lots of money and are bankers and swindlers."

      Seeing as how nobody today pictures gypsies when using the term 'gyped', it cannot be classified as a racist comment.

      Besides, Gypsies really aren't a 'race' per se. It's a way of life.

    7. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And you're being overly politically correct to the point of being utterly and knowingly asinine. Are you scared with what you say is going to offend someone? Then don't talk. Shut up. Don't post. Afraid you are going to be offended? Don't read. Be ignorant.

      Personally on this gyp gypsie thing, whooppee doo. Gyp gypsie. Fine, maybe he/she/it shouldn't have used it. But then you throw in the big r word. It's rascist, you say. Did it feel like he was putting down gypsies with mal-intent and knowingly? No. Instead of explaining to him that maybe he might not want to use the word gyp since it's might offend someone, you say "damn that is racist." Balooney.

      You know what, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon was racist. So was SPIN, since it spells puts NIPS backwards, insulting an eastern culture/country. And then there's the whole mafia being italian thing. Blah blah blah. You know what? Stereotypes are frequently due to perception, and that perception comes out in language. Use of that language does NOT mean you are racist. The intent and purpose, aka context, leads you to conclude someone is racist, not just word usage.

      And he used word to put forward the idea of cheap, not to put down gypsies, you idiot. If he had said "damn asinine mobile moving grass eating gyp crap" then maybe you'd have a point.

      And don't give me this crap about silent racism. He isn't even commenting on race or relationships but on a product.

      You know what? Now that I think about it, hell, I think you're hiding someting. Maybe you're being racist because you didn't think he was a gypsie, and since it seems rather common to accept it as non-racist to insult one cultural or ethnic identity, e.g. nigger amongst blacks, maybe you feel gypsies don't have internet access, hence you are the one really ignorant of the stereotypes you seem to be trying to overcome. Well, hell then, he used the word in innocence, while you just are putting down gypsies!!! Damn you!!!!

      (Yes, the latter is an attempt at stupid humor through hysterical exclamations.)

      Yes, throw the R word around until it means nothing. Asshole. (Wait, am I using that and being, gasp, male homophobic? Anti-sodomy? My gosh. How awful of me.)

    8. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2
      Besides, Gypsies really aren't a 'race' per se. It's a way of life.

      Are you some kind of idiot? The original Gypsies are most definitely a race. The name for that race is "Roma" or "Romani". However, there are few of them left, as they have been persecuted throughout history, especially during the holocaust. (Hitler and his allies killed as many Gypsies as Jews, but it's not politically correct to mention any race except the Jews when talking about the Holocaust. {And, for the record, I'm Jewish, so don't bother accusing me of racism} ) In the '60s and '70s many hippies adopted the "Gypsy lifestyle", some even living in restored caravans, however, the original Gypsies were most definitely a race.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    9. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that the race is Roma or Romani, and their way of life is Gypsy. The dictionary definition of 'Gypsy' is a way of life. Go look it up if don't agree with me.

      As for the 'some kind of idiot' remark, grow up. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Trivia does not reflect my total intelligence.

    10. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by BrynM · · Score: 1

      Isn't there already a tax like this on CDs? I know there's one for DAT, Video Tapes, Cassettes and more.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    11. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by racermd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More specifically, the CD/Book you purchase at the used CD/Book store has already done it's damage when it came out of it's original shrinkwrap. It's now unable to generate revenue for the media companies, but it's also unable to generate revenue for the artist.

      I do have a small gripe, though. By buying the music that the major media companies "produce", you are still supporting them. Just because you bought yours second-hand doesn't mean that the media companies haven't recieved their money. It's the person that purchased it the first time that gave them the money ala First Sale. But your demand in the second-hand market may have given someone the courage to buy a CD they normally wouldn't normally have purchased, safe in the knowledge that they could easily sell it to the used CD store where the value of that CD has risen due to higher demand and recouping more of his/her original costs in purchasing the CD new.

      Yes, it's a bit of a stretch, but it does happen and is very much a factor in the valuation of new CDs of similar content.

      I do applaud your effort to minimize the impact your dollar (or other currency) has in supporting these blood-sucking lawyer-wannabes, however. If/when I purchase new music for my collection, I try to buy CDs directly from independent artists when they're performing locally. After that, I head to the used CD store. I *never* buy new CDs, except royalty-free blanks for my PC.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    12. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if "dipshit" is an "offensive" term, but it would seem to suit you quite well.

    13. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to get too off topic but damn that is racist. You are correct that "gyp" comes from gypsie, or roma. But that stereotype of them is like saying that Jews have lots of money and are bankers and swindlers.

      Actually, the vast majority of gypsies make their living by swindling. It's just their culture. Last year, a mother of a friend of mine was swindled by some gypsies. They did the classic, "We've got some asphalt sealant left over from another job, and we'll seal your driveway for $70." She agreed, and they "sealed" her driveway with some lovely crank case oil. Quite a mess when it rained. About 3/4 of the other people on their block fell for it as well.

      Gypsies have a system that's even more sophisticated than the Mafia. They travel across the country a few times a year to do their grafting. They never graft near where they live. Anything that they steal is across the country in 48 hours. Then, when they are not away grafting, they have quasi-legal front businesses, like palmistry or used cars.

      Gypsies steal. It's not a racist steoreotype, it's reality.

    14. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Just as a piece of trivia, people used to say "You jewed me down on that one." No, really.

      Besides, Gypsies really aren't a 'race' per se. It's a way of life.

      Gypsy also Gipsy Pronunciation Key (jps)
      n. pl. Gypsies

      1. A member of a people that arrived in Europe in migrations from northern India around the 14th century, now also living in North America and Australia. Many Gypsy groups have preserved elements of their traditional culture, including an itinerant existence and the Romany language.
      2. See Romany.
      3. gypsy One inclined to a nomadic, unconventional way of life.
      4. A person who moves from place to place as required for employment, especially:
      1. A part-time or temporary member of a college faculty.
      2. A member of the chorus line in a theater production.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    15. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that the racist part of the comment was probably the "Gypsies .. were (are?) known to be wandering tricksters, fortune tellers, and scam artists" part.

    16. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      That is one of the more well-written posts that I've read on /.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    17. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by MrPeach · · Score: 1

      {And, for the record, I'm Jewish, so don't bother accusing me of racism}
      Oh... my... god!!!
      You think because you're jewish, you can't be a racist??? WHAT A MORON!!!

    18. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2
      You think because you're jewish, you can't be a racist??? WHAT A MORON!!!

      no, genius, what I meant was it's pretty ridiculous to accuse me of hating my own race/religion.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    19. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Just as a piece of trivia, people used to say
      > "You jewed me down on that one." No, really.

      Your joking right... no... people STILL say that. Hell, I say that. "Jews are cheap" is quite a common stereotype even today, and like most stereotypes its based as much in fact as fiction, or at least common perception of fact.

      Never forget that just because we all live in the same land, we don't necissarily have all the same customs and ways of doing things. Based on ethnic background, religion etc people congregate differently and exchange ideas in little bubbles and that does translate into child rearing.

      So are Jews cheap? some are, some arn't. However, there is a definite pattern of certain types of cheapness, a consiousness as to how their money is spent and who it is spent on, and a control of that flow of money.

      One Jew we know is a nice guy, used to come over and hang out alot. Hes noted as cheap whenever it comes to certain things, he has a tendancy to go over the bill and divide it up at restraunts with an accuracy that most people avoid... at least in most circles I am in we just kinda try to pay about the same amount and leave it at that... noone ever calculates a tiop, we just leave enough so that we know we ovetipped at least a little. Whereas he will do so.

      Then he moved to NYC and pays exhorberant rates for a place in Manhatten and pays $60 for less than an eighth of pot. (good stuff, or so I hear, but for those who don't know... thats expensive... worst than colledge student prices)

      All in all, I like stereotypoes. Not because they are so useful in judging the character of an individual, but because they often do hold interesting insight into the patterns of interaction between people, and how certain groups of people are percieved by others.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    20. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>pick up old, pre-DRM music (which might become a hot collector's item if the current trend continues.)

      You mean vinyl?

    21. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people, including Jewish ones, have self-hate issues. A lot of great comedies are based on this fact. Being Jewish myself, I think what you said was incorrect - the only reason Jews get mentioned first is because their number killed was the greatest. But to say that it's "non-PC" to include other groups of people persecuted by Hitler is pretty ridiculous.

    22. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Don't laugh - that argument is made on MANY an occasion on liberal forums.

      Their argument is: racism = prejudice + power. And since the only people with the power in the society are white heterosexual WASP males, it's impossible for women to be racist (they're disenfranchised), or for blacks, Jews, Arabs, etc. to be racist.

      They charmingly then go on to say that this is FACT and is not to be questioned, or you're banned from their forums. Try www.mamatron.org and see what their policy is on "racism".

      Liberal arseholes.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    23. Re:Crappy drive mechanisim? by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Racial stereotypes are something that I don't like to see, because people have tended to use them to denigrate and hurt others, over something that is a not a matter of choice (e.g. you don't choose to be white, black, Jewish or Uzbeki). I don't like it any better when absorbed by the communities themselves (e.g. films by Greek comedians like 'Wog Boy' here in Australia, or 'My Big Fat Greek Wedding' in the US, to pick one particular often-stereotyped culture), as it just reinforces the idea that it's OK to stereotype people based on their race.

      Just a personal preference, I know many others don't agree with me. But seeing the victimisation of Westerners in Asia, and Indonesians, Afghanis and Iraqis here in Oz, just makes me hope that the day comes quickly where people won't assume that, just because their 'targets' are from a certain background, it's acceptable to attack those individual people as if they have all the terrible attributes that that they think the entire group possesses. Judge people by their own actions, not those of their ethnic grouping.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  6. Previous Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Corrupted Audio CDs category at the ODP has several background stories, many from /.

  7. I wonder... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Has anyone discovered that the new CD's found under the tree or in their stocking don't play on their brand new CD player?"

    I wonder if the RIAA realizes that they're pushing me towards MP3's when they pull shit like this. I mean seriously, they'll have no trouble blaming P2P music trading for their downfall if the MP3 is higher quality!

    1. Re:I wonder... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I wonder if the RIAA realizes that they're pushing me towards MP3's when they pull shit like this."

      I think Slashdot should start an event called "Music Return Day". Here's how it works: Get as many people to buy a known copy-restricted CD as possible. Then, locate a national store that'll accept returns on 'defective CDs' (Best Buy or Walmart maybe?) then, on a particular date, have everybody return that CD.

      Heh imagine slashdotting Equifax.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:I wonder... by Aggrazel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      [i]"I think Slashdot should start an event called "Music Return Day". Here's how it works: Get as many people to buy a known copy-restricted CD as possible. Then, locate a national store that'll accept returns on 'defective CDs' (Best Buy or Walmart maybe?) then, on a particular date, have everybody return that CD.[/i]

      Actually, my wife works at Target. She told me that there are several CDs with "known" issues that they'll take back and exchange for another CD with no questions asked, even though the normal exchange policy is for the same title only if opened. They are returned frequently for not working in people's players.

      I don't have a list of the titles, but from what I gather its becoming more and more common. To the point that it will probably annoy the corporate buyers enough that this stuff will stop before it gets too common, IMO.

    3. Re:I wonder... by interiot · · Score: 2

      If Target has a list of CD's that are known to not work, why don't they give that information to the consumer up front so they don't have to go through the hassle of coming back to return it?

    4. Re:I wonder... by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many people have CD players where it won't be a problem, but would be scared away by an up-front warning. Futhermore, some people won't bother to return the CD. Together, these probably outway the expense of processing returns for Target.

      It would be interesting to see if they'd show you the list if you asked.

    5. Re:I wonder... by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Why bother to make sure the chain will refund the item. If it's defective, make them give you a refund. If they don't, make a scene--they'll ask you to leave, but they can't make you leave you leave until a cop comes.

    6. Re:I wonder... by Psion · · Score: 2

      Caveat Emptor, my friend. You see, you're relying on a third party to protect you rather than going in aware of the risk yourself. Never assume someone else is going to go to the bother of protecting your interests -- they shouldn't and you have no right to expect it. Communities like this one are where we, as consumers, become aware of problems like this.

      Are there any sites devoted to listing "bad" CDs?

    7. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree, If the chain will refund the CD because it places the customer above the merchandise, then they don't deserve to be harrassed. Rather, try to refund the CD at a chain that is known for not accepting refunds. You'd be amazed what you can refund when you *properly* create a scene and demand a refund. I've refunded CDs countless times, open software, a USB NIC that was purchased 6 Months prior and was opened (and used). I felt I was being fair and that the store was at fault in each case (except the CDs, they all sucked and I didn't like them). Sometimes I settle for store credit, but I always demand cash, and I've never settled for anything less than store credit. I've even gotten CompUSA to refund shipping fees on open software that I ordered online.

      The key is to remain sincere, tell them exactly why you want to refund it, make it sound like it's their fault, and tell them that you spend enough money at their business to make you one of their best customers (which is true at COmpUSA). The final key is to decide what your solution is beforehand and then demand it. Then tell them why your *solution* is fair for them and for you.

      If their software is crap and doesn't install on your computer, then tell them that. If the music isn't what you expected (not expected genre, live Vs studio recording, whatever), then tell them that. Sometimes you have to be creative. For example, when I returned the USB Network adaptor, I blamed it because it wasn't supported in Linux. When they mentioned that the box doesn't say it's supported in Linux, I told them that the adaptor came with Linux (All LinkSys NICs came with TurboLinux at that time, TurboLinux shipped with a Non-USB kernel) and since it came with Linux, it was false advertising if it wasn't supported in Linux. The truth is that I had a Dlink USB adaptor that looked nicer.

    8. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I wonder if the RIAA realizes that they're >pushing me towards MP3's when they pull shit >like this. I mean seriously, they'll have no >trouble blaming P2P music trading for their >downfall if the MP3 is higher quality!

      Sadly enough the only way I was able to play the new Korn CD on my computer due to the enhanced CD format was by ripping the tracks to wav files.. Way to Go RIAA.. I have to embrace the very tech you fear to use your product!

    9. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is: act like a jerk so you can steal from them. Since they just want to get rid of your whiney ass, you can get your way.

      You've never earned a thing in your life, have you? I hate people like you

    10. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM delenda est!

  8. Also post them to the complete list of corrupt CDs by linuxbaby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The world's most complete list of music CDs that can't be copied or played on computers and many other electronics equipment, is at Fat Chuck's Corrupt CDs list.

    Please also post any new corrupt or DRM CDs you find on that complete list, there.

    (While you're at it, boycott the RIAA by buying independent CDs, instead!)

  9. Players Optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I play them all on my laptop, I haven't noticed any issues with new CDs this Xmas. (separate CD players have become optional for me) ;)
    -M:FP

  10. CD EXTRA defined by prisen · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Sony's website: CD EXTRA combines the worlds of Music and Multimedia. A traditional audio CD when placed in an audio CD player, CD EXTRA offers a free interactive multimedia experience when played in a computer's CD-ROM drive *. CD EXTRA offers the music fan a closer look at their favorite artists, with many CD EXTRAs containing exclusive content. Other CD EXTRAs contain Internet Service Provider Software which allows you to connect to the Internet.

    It's not DRM, AFAIK. I've got several Sony CD EXTRA CD's that are nothing more than multisession CD's that some audio CD players simply cannot handle. However, I don't think you can get the same CD offered in both CD EXTRA and non-CD EXTRA formats, so you may be out of luck when trying to play those particular discs in those particular audio CD players; in fact, some older CD-ROM drives can't even handle 'em.

    1. Re:CD EXTRA defined by Sho0tyz · · Score: 1

      This is true. I only have one CD-EXTRA disc. It's extremely lame. You put the disc into your CD-ROM and all it does is pop up a picture of the artist with a button to click which is just a link to his website. I'm not sure why this couldn't be accomplished just by printing the URL on the cover, but it doesn't seem to be any sort of copy protection to me. The disc plays fine on every CD player I have, and I was able to rip MP3's from it.

    2. Re:CD EXTRA defined by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      It's not DRM, AFAIK.

      Either that or it's incredible spin!

      From Sony's website: CD EXTRA combines the worlds of Music and Multimedia. A traditional audio CD when placed in an audio CD player, CD EXTRA offers a free interactive multimedia experience when played in a computer's CD-ROM drive *. CD EXTRA offers the music fan a closer look at their favorite artists, with many CD EXTRAs containing exclusive content **. Other CD EXTRAs contain Internet Service Provider Software which allows you to connect to the Internet***.

      * For violating the DRA you will hear sirens and cops shouting "Come out with your hands up!" in digital surround sound.

      ** If you defeat the copy protection, the artist and his/her lawyers will personally send you a court summons and other such legal related content.

      *** Every time you load the CD it automatically "phones home" and sends a record of your listening prefs to the home office.

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:CD EXTRA defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a minor (HA!) that at least some older CDROM drives will read the data tracks as audio. i was running an old Toshiba 8X thru an also old once high-end sound blaster then out to a 120 watt/chan
      (real RMS)amp and when the data-misread-as-audio hit a pair of med-decent JBL triax's the voice coils on the mid-range and tweeters of both were destroyed in the 20-30 seconds it took to kill the power.

  11. DRM sucks... by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, if it has DRM is it really a "CD"?

    Second - COMPLAIN!

    Regardless of it being DRM or a faulty player, you should be compensated. You bought a product (be it the CDs or the player) that does not work. Try complaining about the CD player first (and try the CDs in a few other machines too). Get your player and/or CDs replaced or get refunds.

    If it is DRM, they should have labelled it, and they deserve to take some shit for fucking over their customers.

    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    1. Re:DRM sucks... by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, that's so insightful!

      I've never read those sentiments anywhere before. I find your completely original outlook on these matters interesting, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Keep those stunningly fresh and new ideas coming!

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    2. Re:DRM sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you moderators are giving this guy +Insightful. Can't you see he is a RACIST??!!

      Mod him the fuck down and get his ugly white face banned off this website.

    3. Re:DRM sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you that dude that hangs out on #windows95 on Dalnet?

    4. Re:DRM sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this guy DOWN, not UP. he is a RACIST and has no right to hold an opinion in today's multicultural society.

    5. Re:DRM sucks... by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      ***This'll get modded down, but to Taco et al.. I have to say it. I grew up in Saudi Arabia and shit like this pisses me off...***

      Down with you, asshole, and your comments about a country I'm sure you can't locate on a map.

      Fuck you with a splintery broomstick!

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    6. Re:DRM sucks... by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if we censor this fuck, then we're accused of being "un-American" or some shit like that.

      Sometimes I hate being libertarian, we're _supposed_ to defend the rights of ignorant sister-kissing cousin-fscking inbred so-and-so's like this.

      Go to hell, do not pass go, don't collect $200 but please collect an ass-kicking on the way.

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    7. Re:DRM sucks... by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1

      FYI - My signature is because Saudi Arabia is anti-American. Not only are they anti-American, but they got rich off of us so they won't openly admit to hating us. Of course, being a racist, I've got a thing against all arabs, but Saudi Arabia is worse than most.

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    8. Re:DRM sucks... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The thing is, if we censor this fuck, then we're accused of being "un-American" or some shit like that.

      Maybe not "un-American", since shouting down unpopular opinions seems to be in vogue here nowadays.

      But really, you shouldn't censor people just for holding unpopular opinions, especially when they're not even expressing those opinions at the moment. Even a white supremacist might have something to teach you, as long as you know which topics to avoid. I might listen to a racist if he's talking about how to polish a gun or clean a deer, even though I know not to listen when the topic of race comes up.

      Sometimes I hate being libertarian, we're _supposed_ to defend the rights of ignorant sister-kissing cousin-fscking inbred so-and-so's like this.

      It amazes me how many people are attracted to libertarianism and yet don't understand the concepts behind it. Yeah, freedom for other people can sometimes suck, especially when they're expressing an unpopular opinion, but the censoring of unpopular opionions is the first step down a dangerous path.

      And to all the people complaining about the modding up of this guy's post- the moderation applies to the post, not its author. This particular post has no offensive content that I can see. (Although I wouldn't waste mod points on it, because it really doesn't merit an "Insightful".) And the guy is at least honest about who he is. I wish all racists would announce up front who they were.

    9. Re:DRM sucks... by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1

      ignorant sister-kissing cousin-fscking inbred so-and-so's like this

      Hmmm... that's a gross generalization of racists. Isn't that sort of like my gross generalization of the dirty-skins? I guess we're all very much alike afterall.

      You don't have to agree with all my opinions. But, you shouldn't let my opinions about race affect your thoughts on anything else I have to say. I mean, isn't that what tolerance is all about?

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    10. Re:DRM sucks... by helix400 · · Score: 1
      well, just take your sig off bold then

      =)

    11. Re:DRM sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he has every right to hold an opinion, even more than you do because you would ban someone else's opinion

    12. Re:DRM sucks... by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1

      I'm not unreasonable, and that's not such a bad idea (it looks kinda gaudy anyway)...

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    13. Re:DRM sucks... by Psion · · Score: 2

      [applauds] Excellent post, sir! I don't have mod points at the moment, so I'll risk going off-topic and tell you personally. Over the Internet. Er. Not so personally. Well, good post, anyway.

    14. Re:DRM sucks... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      But really, you shouldn't censor people just for holding unpopular opinions, especially when they're not even expressing those opinions at the moment. Even a white supremacist might have something to teach you, as long as you know which topics to avoid. I might listen to a racist if he's talking about how to polish a gun or clean a deer, even though I know not to listen when the topic of race comes up.

      So, the question is, would you listen to the racist if he said "If you use these bullets, they'll go into the nigger without breaking up his internal parts and still kill him dead as a doornail"? Keep in mind that if he's showing you how to polish a gun, he might be sharing hunting tips.

      The point behind the question is that my experience with racists shows that race always comes up in conversation, from simpe things like "I went to the gas station and sand nigger behind the counter carded me" to more complex things like "I ate a burger at this place but all the tables I saw looked like a nigger picnic. I won't go there until they clean the place up." Remove the race references and the statements themselves are making valid points that any one of us would say, the only difference being the racial references.

      You see, when you "believe" in something strongly enough, it permeates everything you do, think, and say. Like when you fall in love, all you can do is mention your new SO. Or when you first discover free software, you tell everybody about it.

      I've found that it's best to ignore racism. The more attention it's given the more it receives. People usually stop talking when they realize nobody's listening.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:DRM sucks... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      So, the question is, would you listen to the racist if he said "If you use these bullets, they'll go into the nigger without breaking up his internal parts and still kill him dead as a doornail"?

      Well I might be willing to put up with an offensive description if I'm really that desperate and the information isn't available elsewhere. I guess it's all a matter of what you're willing to put up with. As long as the topic is ammunition and not politics, I might put up with it, keeping in mind that he's an idiot if he talks like that.

      The point behind the question is that my experience with racists shows that race always comes up in conversation, from simpe things like "I went to the gas station and sand nigger behind the counter carded me" to more complex things like "I ate a burger at this place but all the tables I saw looked like a nigger picnic. I won't go there until they clean the place up." Remove the race references and the statements themselves are making valid points that any one of us would say, the only difference being the racial references.

      Yeah, that's usually true. However notice that in this case the guy managed to squeeze out an entire post with no references at all to chinks, wops, kikes, or sand niggers! And he still got a harsh reaction, which was entirely based on his username and signature- i.e. at who he was, not at what he was saying- which, in this particular case, happened to be completely mundane and inoffensive.

    16. Re:DRM sucks... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that's usually true. However notice that in this case the guy managed to squeeze out an entire post with no references at all to chinks, wops, kikes, or sand niggers! And he still got a harsh reaction, which was entirely based on his username and signature- i.e. at who he was, not at what he was saying- which, in this particular case, happened to be completely mundane and inoffensive.

      I was purposely ignoring that part, because it was extremely well-commented on. I'm actually surprised that my own posts get modded up, considering my username is fucksl4shd0t.

      Having been a long-time fan of SOD, I gotta love their blatant racism. There are cases where it's useful, and in their case it's useful as a social statement. Further research into SOD would reveal that 2 of 4 members have at least one anti-racism song on every album (Anthrax is the band, of course).

      You are absolutely correct that reacting harshly to someone because of who they are, or even what they're saying is generally a bad thing. Voltaire: "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

      If Bill Gates came in and posted an insightful criticism on the open source world, and the GPL, and free software, and he could be genuinely determined to be the *real* Bill gates at Microsoft, would he be modded away? Would he receive the same harsh criticism?

      I'm sick of the idea of "free speach for me, but not for you" that pervades our society. Many of the people who say they have freedom of speach turn around and try to prevent *me* from exercising my own freedom. But it's in the same amendment that says "Freedom of Religion, as long as it's christianity". Heh.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    17. Re:DRM sucks... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'll bite. First I'll point out that the whole subject of racism coming up here is offtopic completely, and if these guys really wanted to approach you they should have found a more appropriate place to discuss it.

      You don't have to agree with all my opinions. But, you shouldn't let my opinions about race affect your thoughts on anything else I have to say. I mean, isn't that what tolerance is all about?

      Are you really expecting tolerance? Racism itself is the antithesis of tolerance, and usually an extreme case of nontolerance. Now, I used to live in Texas, which is technically in the South. I did encounter racism every day, but it is important to note that I did not notice any particular "race" having more or less than any other. Ie Indians generally treated me the same way I've seen White Boys treat Black Boys. Same from Orientals (I won't try to distinguish between the different ethnics of orientals, I'm not good at it). POint is: White People aren't the only racists, they're just the ones who take most of the blame.

      Now, further more, I don't know what actions you take on account of your racism. If you actually do something to harm people over it, then I would have a problem with this. If you do something to help some people over others solely because of race, but it doesn't actually harm anyone, then I'm not sure there's a problem. (Harm includes, IMHO, infringing or removing completely someone else's rights and freedoms)

      If it is all talk, however, then I'm with Voltaire. I may not agree with it, but I'll defend your right to say it.

      As an exercise of the golden rule, of course I expect the same treatment in return. :)

      The problem with it being all talk, though, is that sincerity and integrity are usually lost when a person does all talk and no action. I complain about this all the time in other areas (such as the area in which you were actually posting originally :) ), so I don't honestly expect you to be all talk and no action on account of your racism. Only time will tell if we ever are in a position to be at odds with each other and what will actually happen.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:DRM sucks... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      If Bill Gates came in and posted an insightful criticism on the open source world, and the GPL, and free software, and he could be genuinely determined to be the *real* Bill gates at Microsoft, would he be modded away? Would he receive the same harsh criticism?

      I'm sure if Bill Gates bothered to show up here he'd be moderated up to 5 even if all he wrote was "FUCK YOU".

    19. Re:DRM sucks... by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      Why must everything turn political?!?!?!?!?!

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    20. Re:DRM sucks... by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

      "Sometimes I hate being libertarian..."

      Are you aware that you can change freely? You can even become an independent and use your own mind.

      There might be twelve-step programs available, I'm not sure. But the point is that if you hate it you have the power to change it.

      Peace

      With Nukes.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    21. Re:DRM sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...if a CD is a "compact disc", then even if DRM-crap is added it still remains a CD.

  12. The Next Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until the hack.
    Reburn.
    Problem fixed.

  13. try ripping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try ripping to .AIFF/.WAV files (on a mac if possible, they seem to work with more CDs). Burn your dad a CD-R copy and tell him to return any CDs that don't play. Problem solved.

    You could also download the files (dunno what kind of music it is) from YFFN (your favorite filesharing network) and burn from their, then take the originals back.

    Whatever the case, if you discover these CDs are damaged, DON'T retain posession of them, be sure to take them back or sell them on eBay.

  14. DRM ON CD'S by TREETOP · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Is it me or does the DRM sound a lot like the last desperate act of an industry on the ropes? How long before they realize that the average consumer does not care whether they make a profit or not? As I see it, technology is ripping into those profits like a hungry coyote into a bucket of KFC. And the middlemen do not like sharing. With anyone. Ever.

    1. Re:DRM ON CD'S by Helix150 · · Score: 2

      The thing is that sharing isnt hurting profits. There have been several studies (that arent funded by RIAA groups) that say people who download actually buy MORE music. And it makes sense... if your friend recommends a CD you're not going to spend money unless you know you'll like it, so you download it and test it. Not everyone, but some people do. Profits are down because fewer albums are released each year. not cuz of file sharing.

      File sharing isnt going to kill the music industry, but it might save it.

      --
      --IronHelix
    2. Re:DRM ON CD'S by m1a1 · · Score: 2

      As I see it, technology is ripping into those profits like a hungry coyote into a bucket of KFC.

      Actually a close look at the evidence suggests that technology hasn't touched their profits. As was mentioned in an article on both the reg and slashdot, if the industry released the same amount of cds per year today as they did several years ago, then each of those cds would only have to sell 3,000 copies (an utter failure) to have them right back where they were before P2P came about. Oh well, they have only themselves to blame.

    3. Re:DRM ON CD'S by rmohr02 · · Score: 2
      Profits are down because fewer albums are released each year. not cuz of file sharing.
      Well, there's also the fact that new music generally sucks.
    4. Re:DRM ON CD'S by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to mod that up... that's the real reason music sales are down. The vast majority of new music (I would venture to say around 95% of it) is total shit, and nobody wants to buy it.

      There IS good stuff out there, but it's not being picked up or promoted or advertised or played on the radio. You have to really hunt for it, and you're lucky if you can even find the stuff on CD anywhere.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    5. Re:DRM ON CD'S by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I stopped listening to the radio because most of the music that is "popular" really is terible music. I refuse to buy a CD unless most of the tracks are songs I like. I feel that we're getting ripped when we drop $20 on a CD with 18 songs, but only two of them are worth listening too.

      I can barely justify $15 for a CD that has a good amount of music. Ususally I just buy them used for $6-$11. That's a price I can justify, but I rarely buy.

      The whole copy protection issue is also BS and I'm not going to go into it now.

  15. Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by Bonker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Downloaded the manual from Diamond/Sonic-blue.

    I was quite gratified to see that while the Volt supports WMA format, it does not support copy protected WMA files. In fact, the manual walks the user through disabling copy protection in Media Player.

    Now if only the Volt supported Ogg Vorbis...

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by exhilaration · · Score: 3, Informative
      Now if only the Volt supported Ogg Vorbis...

      They're working on it.

    2. Re:Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2

      I hope so. The thing is schweet.

      I corresponded w/ a tech through email all thanksgiving (granted, he was in the UK...) and he helped a LINUX operator through some scary firmware re-flashing.

      Good folk -- my experience.

      Thank you, H. Fiennes!

      --
      Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    3. Re:Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by sumengen · · Score: 1

      iriver has better MP3-CD players, such as Chromex and slimx series.

    4. Re:Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Wrong. Diamond/Sonic-Blue, after holding out for a long time, finally capitulated to the RIAA. You are not disabling copy protection with media player. As soon as you update media player, as soon as you need new codecs for the old media player (and are forced to upgrade), as soon as you update windows with service packs, you have drm in media player.

      You are not disabling drm in media player. What you are doing is enabling RIAA/MPAA's version of limited fair use. If your hard drive crashes, you lose access to your files. Try ripping to more than one media player, try transferring that ripped mp3 file to someone else's computer with an updated version of media player and see if it plays.

      Also, the "unchecking" of drm default setting in media player will be disabled at a future date, and prior to that, some transfers will require the box to be checked or it won't work.

    5. Re:Got a Rio Volt MP3-CD player for christmas... by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Who would use Windows Media Player to rip their mp3s? That's doing touchup work on images in MS Paint.

  16. Let's review by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    1. Dad's new CD player doesn't play some of our Sony CD's that have CD-Extra on them.
    2. These CD's play fine on our other CD players.

    Conclusion: DRM!!1!! OMFG!!!1! D00d, that Sux0r!!1!

    In other news, my new Dell with Windows XP had trouble recieving Groupwise email the other day. Clearly M$ has decided to secretly break all other mail programs besides Outlook.

    1. Re:Let's review by NightRain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You obviously missed the question at the end of the article.

      Let me quote it for you . Did these companies decide to quietly unleash DRM on the public this holiday season? Or is this just a problem with the new player (separate from it not being DRM capable)? There. See how he asks whether the problem is related to DRM or if it's an issue with his player? You jump down the writers throat for no reason. Posting it in the context of some of the replies to this article would make sense. But straight off the article itself, as if the author is some sort of dweeb is a little rich

    2. Re:Let's review by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      OK... so why didn't the dumbass go down to the Brookstone store and return it? It would have taken less time for him to do that than to submit an "article" on Slashdot and hit reload for the next three hours waiting for a reply...

      --
      evil adrian
    3. Re:Let's review by greenrd · · Score: 2
      Well, let's consider. What's more likely - DRM, or a bug in the new CD player's digital-to-analog conversion circuits?

      If you don't know the answer to that question, perhaps you shouldn't be mocking something you don't understand.

    4. Re:Let's review by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      MAYBE THERE IS A PIECE OF DIRT ON THE LASER LENS.

      It would have been much easier for the poster of this "article" to just have taken the CD player back to where it came from -- to find out for sure -- than to post to Slashdot and sit there like a goddamned dork clicking his reload button for three worthless hours waiting for a bunch of idiots to answer...

      --
      evil adrian
    5. Re:Let's review by greenrd · · Score: 2
      Don't you think it's unlikely that a CD player would break in such a way that it still worked perfectly for some CDs and not others? In a consistent way. This seems like an implausible explanation to me.

    6. Re:Let's review by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. How many CD's did his father *get* for Christmas, anyway? I don't think he had nearly enough new CD's to test that would bring someone to, in any scientific sense, conclude "DRM!"

      --
      evil adrian
    7. Re:Let's review by iomud · · Score: 2

      Clearly M$ has decided to secretly break all other mail programs besides Outlook

      *cough*lotus notes*cough*

    8. Re:Let's review by NightRain · · Score: 2

      OK... so why didn't the dumbass go down to the Brookstone store and return it?

      Err, because he doesn't know if it's an issue with DRM on CD, or with the player itself...

    9. Re:Let's review by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      Reread my post... it's easier to just take it back to the store and try a different one than it is to reload your browser 300 times waiting for Slashdot opinions that, honestly, aren't going to help much.

      --
      evil adrian
    10. Re:Let's review by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      Can you expand on this?

    11. Re:Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mean! We want Nice Adrian back.

    12. Re:Let's review by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 2

      Several major record companies have committed themselves to implementing DRM technologies in their CD releases, and many more are experimenting. The general concensus amongst the industry is not whether the CD labels are going to DRM everything, but when. They have also steadfastly refused to indicate on the packaging if it is redbook or not, so when this event happens, we won't be informed about it except by communicating with other consumers. This "dumbass" poster was starting this dialog to see if such an event had begun.

      I look forward to that day. If the major record labels cut themselves off from this truly massive distribution and information method, similar to the radio in scope and potential effect on sales, then we will have a massive music source that is 100% independent. This will encourage purchasing independent or small label CD's, and perhaps revitalize the local music industry.

      Please, Please Bertleman... take your tail out of this advertising medium. Take your 20$ CD's and leave. I can't wait to have a pure independent music channel. That sounds wonderful.

      -C

      --
      This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    13. Re:Let's review by NightRain · · Score: 2

      Ah, I see where you are coming from. But I am thinking about a compatibility fault with that line of players rather than that player specifically. But even so, the question is still an interesting one worth asking, presuming it's anything more than a simple fault in one player

    14. Re:Let's review by Otter · · Score: 2
      I have several CDs that fail to play in the Linux box I usually use to play music in my office, but which work fine in other players, including computer CD drives. And they're way too old to have DRM issues (Van Halen live album, Superunknown). Someone here can probably explain this better, but I imagine there are marginal discs and marginal players and the intersection of the two doesn't work.

      Anyway, I don't get what the question is. Of course DRM CDs are out there -- as a bunch of posters have pointed out, there are extensive lists already. Macs have particular problems with one of the methods. So far, I've only hit one (the new J.Lo. album*) but I don't listen to a lot of new music.

      * Before someone vibes me about J.Lo.: if I listen to that Van Halen album (where Sammy Hagar covers Won't Get Fooled Again -- 'Meet the new boss. Ughhh! Same as the old boss. Wooooo!') at work, do you think I give a damn about your scorn? Hey, I was at 7 Seconds and Agent Orange shows when no one even knew punks still existed! J.Lo. rules. Although I confess I'm pessimistic about this Ben Affleck deal.

    15. Re:Let's review by B1FF · · Score: 0, Funny

      X-P3CT 2 H34R FR0M MY L4WY3R R3G4RD1N6 Y0UR TR4D3M4RK 1NFR1NG3M3NT!!!!!!!!!1

      --
      :WQ
      :wq
      ------ ------ ------
      ALL HA1L B1FF, TH3 M05T 31337 D00D!!!!!1
      ------ ------ -
    16. Re:Let's review by drfreak · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Mod parent up, please.

    17. Re:Let's review by fermion · · Score: 2
      And whether it is DRM, CD Extra, or some other crap from the music industry, the fact remains that discs that are marketed as CDs do not play on a consumer stand alone CD player. This is unacceptable. The notion that it would be acceptable to market a CD that is designed to not function on certain consumer CD players, even though the players themselves follow the standard is, in my mind, close to fraudulent. Combine that with the fact that many stores will no longer take accept opened CDs, and we have a situation that shows great disrespect to the customer. Such behavior will just decrease the likelyhood that people will buy CDs for present. Who wants to give a broken present?

      In addition, you analogy is flawed. You would find very few people who believe that one needs a special CD player to listen to a store bought CD. You would find very few people, at least who knows what Groupwise is, to expect an XP machine to receive Groupwise. However, that may be because no one expects XP to work in any reasonable fashion.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:Let's review by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2

      The point was that maybe the author should have eliminated the obvious possibilities before running to Slashdot screaming about secret DRM releases and how the end of freedom was nigh. Chicken Little and all of that.

    19. Re:Let's review by alonsoac · · Score: 1

      Still I think that it was important to note that the DRM conclusion is not based on any facts. The cd doesn't play so it means DRM is quietly unleashed? Maybe aliens are quietly fucking with our CD's to make us go nuts before they eat us? Or yeah, just possibly it's something not at all related to this wild guesseses, something more probable, maybe the cd player has some problem reading the CD because it has some extra info on it. But it could be anyone! Those recording companies sure can't be trusted, and that DRM shit was cooked down in hell. So while I'm bored and I can't play my CD's I'll just start a pointless discussion on Slashdot, that sure will keep some guys busy on these slow days.

      glad I have no karma to loose!

    20. Re:Let's review by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Which is why he _asked_ if that was the problem. Read.

    21. Re:Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. Dad's new CD player doesn't play some of our Sony CD's that have CD-Extra on them.
      >2. These CD's play fine on our other CD players.
      >
      >Conclusion: DRM!!1!! OMFG!!!1! D00d, that Sux0r!!1!
      >
      >In other news, my new Dell with Windows XP had trouble recieving Groupwise email the other day. Clearly M$ has decided to secretly >break all other mail programs besides Outlook.

      Moderation Totals: Flamebait=3, Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Funny=2, Overrated=2, Total=11.

      I can't f'ing believe moderators wasted 11 mod points on this post...

    22. Re:Let's review by avdp · · Score: 2

      I don't see how it's easier. You have to unplug everything, repack everything into the styrofoam molded box (hopefully you kept it), drive down to the store, line up with all the other people returning stuff (lots of people after xmas), fill out the forms - and then if you're lucky, the refund will show up on the credit card in a timely fashion.

      Again, how is this easier?

    23. Re:Let's review by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      I think it was SP6 for NT that broke Notes.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  17. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has slashdot become your CD player manufaturer's support site now or what?!

  18. -1 redundant by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only people they are keeping honest with this bull$hit are honest people. The only people they are annoying with this $hit are honest AOL users. Anybody with a /. account will say 'big deal, if I can hear it I can rip it, a hack will be out within hours, no problem etc.' I am not worried about this $hit for my sake, I am worried about this for the non-technical people, whom are 99% of the people I meet.

    DRM won't stop the 'criminals', it will merely annoy those who are honest.

    1. Re:-1 redundant by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      You're starting to sound suspiciously like some sort of gun rights advocate.

      What's next, 'If access to unrestricted recording technology is outlawed, only outlaws will have access to unrestricted recording technology'?

      Somehow that doesn't have the ring I was hoping for.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:-1 redundant by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      my views on gun ownership aside,

      I do not understand what substance there is to your last post. You basically stated the position of the RIAA, and the position for DRM. After your post, I can see RIAA's point, thanks for the argument. In fact, my 12X CD burner is really like having 12 cd players, after all as an outlaw I am the only one that has access to the unrestricted recording technology
      That would be the technology that lets me burn non-drm cd's. Thanks for your argument.

      as far as gun ownership is concerned.... I own several. You own none. If a criminal reads this post, who is he more likely to mug?

    3. Re:-1 redundant by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      The post was in the spirit of levity. I don't think any sort of substance was implied.

      as far as gun ownership is concerned.... I own several. You own none. If a criminal reads this post, who is he more likely to mug?

      Hard to say. I don't have a 12x CD Burner, (I don't have any). A smart criminal would probably go for the loot, despite the risks.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    4. Re:-1 redundant by noc007 · · Score: 1

      My sentaments exactly. I've seen it time and time again with anti-piracy. If you copy protect it, then someone will find a way around it. Please don't get me wrong; I veiw piracy as stealing. I encourage compaines to protect their intelectual property from being stolen, but not to the point that it gives us the shaft. If you're going to make a copy protected CD, then don't call it a CD. Lable it as something else, so we know that it probably wont be playable in our computers or CD/MP3 players without some modifications. The basic user will probably not know about the ways around it and will just get shafted. I'm a "try before you buy" customer. I usually download it first and try it out. Yes, that can be construed as stealing. If it's junk, then it's not worth my money. If it is woth it, then I go and buy a legit copy. IMHO, copy protection only slows down some piraters. However, it screws the legit people and I don't feel that is not fair. If it's a copy protected CD, it should say so. If it does not follow the CD specifications and industry standards, then it shouldn't be labled as CDs. If they can find an anti-piracy scheme that doesn't give the legit people the shaft, then great. Otherwise don't bother, you wont be getting my money.

    5. Re:-1 redundant by siloflow · · Score: 1

      It happened to me over Christmas Break already. My friend (completely non-technical) asked me why his Joe Strummer (RIP) cd wouldn't play in his cd player. For a SPLIT SECOND I actually thought about DRM Issues, but then I thought, nahh... Hellcat Records... they wouldn't do that. Now I saw this:

      http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.html

      Yep, that's it. Fuckin' Crazy.

  19. time to turn over a new leaf... by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1
    My father got a Brookstone Wafer-thin CD system and several new CD's

    Did these companies decide to quietly unleash DRM on the public this holiday season? Or is this just a problem with the new player (separate from it not being DRM capable)?

    Some people just choose to have things dictated to them and then wonder why it wasnt done exactly right. Boo-Hoo, I bought an overpriced metal box and some shiny disks and I cant even do what I want with them...

    Sooner or later you'll figure it out and stop asking obvious questions.

    1. Re:time to turn over a new leaf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WooHoo I found a retard!

    2. Re:time to turn over a new leaf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done! 50 points to Gryffindor!

  20. Last Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodbye.

    1. Re:Last Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good riddance.

  21. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by prewashedironman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, for a list of UK Cd's, There is the UK campaign for digital rights, with their list of cd's at the Campaign for digital rights

  22. Elvis Collection by phorm · · Score: 2

    My sister got the grandparents a CD with "The Best of Elvis." It doesn't play on the home CD player... it spins up, and then the player skips to the next disc. I haven't verified it on another player, but I'd imagine that it may be DRM?

  23. Rights? +10, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have NO rights. This is the United States of Amerika.

    Get Your War On

    Cheers,
    W00t

    1. Re:Rights? +10, Informative by jefdiesel · · Score: 1

      me live canada. me have plenty rights, and soon me have legalized marijuana to boot.

      me see huge rise in snack food and tie-dye industries. MMM me like cheetos.

      --

      I hate spyware and spies
  24. What's all this talk about "playing it their way"? by foolip · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Half of these comments are saying that it's no problem, since you can just download the music as mp3s (cough, vorbis!!, cough). While I would personally never (ever) buy a cd with copy protection, I think this mentality is sort of stupid. I actually believe that you should support the artists which you like. Yes, perhaps artists don't get very much when you buy a cd, but listen. You're not punishing the record labels buy not buying their stuff! Ok, perhaps they get less money, but it's not like it makes a difference (consumer power to hell). What would be nice to do is:
    1. Buy the disc, rip it (as ogg vorbis, not fscking mp3). I've yet to encounter a copy protected disc which can't be copied...
    2. Turn the disc back to the store, claiming it's useless. (it is, sort of)
    3. Send a check to the artists, and say that you like them, but hate their record label, and explain what you did.
    4. Send a letter to the record label, say that you hate them, and tell them what you did about it.

    I'll admit I've never actually done this myself (because none of the music I like has been copy protected so far). But, hey, doesn't it sound like something?

  25. DRM? More like bad pressing by Lucius+Sour · · Score: 2, Troll

    I'm just a part time nerd. My line of work is making records. Most of the time my blood, sweat and tears (it comes to that much of the time) gets mangled by bad pressing. CDs are virually worthless. On a long pressing run (on E. John or yet another Bleatles greatest hits) the unit cost is negligible. It has often been felt that long playing-time CDs (greatest-blah-album-ever type things) sound poor but the wisdom is that digits-is-digits. Until Studio Sound actually tested this assertion. Bugger me if it wasn't true. Something to do with narrow track widths, thin allyplate and jitter. Time was that we, the producers, used to get a test pressing, to make sure that the inevitable transition to consumer formats hadn't sucked all the life from our babies. After all, as Producers it's our job to give the company a saleable product. Not anymore.They just press 'em, ship 'em and stack 'em. I've heard such abortions (of recordings I bust my guts over) coming from pressing plants that any cack you hear is possibly just bad pressing. Then again, The Enemy (the bastard cokehead record execs) may just be trying a technological stay of their inevitable execution. Chop away. We who actually make the records can't wait for the day when all OUR profits aren't snorted. Happy New Year to all fellow techs (and good luck getting that cabbie job to record company executives.)

    --

    Hands up everyone who refuses to obey orders.

    1. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but this sounds like bullshit to me.

      has often been felt that long playing-time CDs (greatest-blah-album-ever type things) sound poor but the wisdom is that digits-is-digits. Until Studio Sound actually tested this assertion. Bugger me if it wasn't true. Something to do with narrow track widths,

      Bullshit. It doesn't matter how long the audio portion is so long as it's less than 80 (or 74) minutes. The track is the same width, regardless, it simply doesn't go all the way to the outside portion of the disk.

      This guy is just trying to sound like he knows what he's talking about.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by geirhe · · Score: 1
      The track is the same width, regardless, it simply doesn't go all the way to the outside portion of the disk.
      The specification says that the track widths are supposed to be equal.

      I don't have any problem with the idea that bad plants may make CDs that don't comply with the specifications, either in "track widths" (size of pits, I guess) or track jitter. That may lead to errors reading the CDs.

    3. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by sryx · · Score: 1

      Any one else understand what this guy just said? I got the jist of it (at least I think I did) but everything else confuses me the more I read it. Looks like maybe dyslexia is getting the best of me :P
      -Jason

    4. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      I would attribute it the post lacking organization and not having paragraphs or whitespace.

    5. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Doh! I shouldn't post when tired. Correct it to:

      "I would attribute it to the post lacking organization and not having paragraphs or whitespace."

    6. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      aha! I got one! you admitted that you master audio cd's right?

      can you please answer a question for me? Why are almost every audio CD out there mastered so crappily that they sound like utter garbage? I have several gold master CD's made back in the 1980's from supertramp, Queen, and ABBA (ok you can take me out and shoot me for the ABBA cd) that sount at least 100 times better than anything I can buy today. They are dynamic have a really low noise floor and over sound fantastic... take any CD from today and they might as well be on a cassette tape.. they have a high noise floor, are so compressed that everything is muddied and overall it sounds like I'm listening with earmuffs.

      I'm betting it's the fact that the one supertramp gold refrence master I have took 1 year to master while today an album takes what.... 2-3 days?

      why do CD's completely suck today compared to yeaterday and what they are capable of?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      You said it, it's compression plain and simple. Today's CDs have no dynamic range, in an effort to be the loudest song on the radio.

    8. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUH???

    9. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing by sconeu · · Score: 2

      I don't have any problem with the idea that bad plants may make CDs that don't comply with the specifications, either in "track widths" (size of pits, I guess) or track jitter. That may lead to errors reading the CDs.

      Oh, I agree. What I thought was BS was the OP's assertion that they used narrow tracks to make "LP" style CDs.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  26. Nothing is going to hurt CD sales like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....this violations of the Redbook standard.

    We said it before, we will say it again,
    The RIAA is EVIL!!!!!!!!!!

  27. Are /. submitters getting dumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that people can speculate on anything they know nothing about and get it posted to Slashdot as news (see yesterday's iTunes/OGG post).

    Folks, just becuase something happens to you, it doesn't mean it happens to everyone. It is quite possible that you don't know what you are doing.

  28. I bet the Japanese are laughing at us.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    "Those sirry Americans think they'll sell more products if they make them defective!"

    1. Re: I bet the Japanese are laughing at us.. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > "Those sirry Americans think they'll sell more products if they make them defective!"

      And a generation from now we'll all be listening to Japanese music.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  29. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny. I have many of those CDs downloaded or ripped them my self.

  30. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I used to work with a woman who swore up and down that ballsweat was something so yummy it should be bottled.

    Of course, this was back when I was filming pornos on real film -- before the days of video -- and the woman was a little messed up in the head. She used to come to work in a mink coat and fire engine red heels and yell out how she wanted to fuck the best boy. "Where's the best boy? I want to fuck the best boy."

    We told her, look, we're low budget and don't have a best boy.

    "What about a grip? I want to fuck the grip!"

    No grip, we told her. Just us camera guys, the producer, and Ray Ray the director. "Then Ray Ray," she'd scream. "Let me fuck a man named Ray Ray."

    But when she saw Ray Ray and got a whiff of his funk, she decided against it. Ray Ray also made her rethink her notion of bottled ballsweat. I don't know what Ray Ray had going on his body, but it was evil and foul smelling.

    Still, he directed the best pornos I'd seen up to that point. He liked camera angles and made the most of bad lighting in tiny little rooms.

    Ray Ray overdosed on cocaine and ovaltine and was found one morning by this fourteen year old daughter.

  31. Business plan for the music industry by Knytefall · · Score: 0

    1. Make corrupt, DRM-infested CDs.
    2. Resell electronic versions online using DRM-infested digital audio files.
    3. Piss off customers.
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

    1. Re:Business plan for the music industry by misterhaan · · Score: 1

      I believe step 4 involves buying legislation that specifically identifies anyone using a form of non-DRM media as a terrorist, or something to that effect.

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    2. Re:Business plan for the music industry by elluzion · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Collect all of the underpants"

    3. Re:Business plan for the music industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are these jokes still funny?

    4. Re:Business plan for the music industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

  32. Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the RIAA can burn in hell... They think that trying copy protection is going to work... Well first, its going to piss off people more, and we'll download more MP3's and they'll loose more money for wasting time developing this useless feature... Second, the DVD industry tried copy protection, and we all know that it did not work either(i.e. divx file format). So regardless of their useless attempts, geeks and techs will find a way around it, and they will be back to ground zero again to start over.

  33. Check it on a newer system. by AltGrendel · · Score: 2

    It's probably the size of the CD itself. I believe that the Elvis CD is actually an 80 minute CD and older players have problems with that.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Check it on a newer system. by phorm · · Score: 1

      The player isn't very old though. It's a 3-disc system which is less than a year old, shouldn't have any problem as it plays 80-min burned CD's.

    2. Re:Check it on a newer system. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      Used disc? Even if it's new, check for scratches right near the center - that's where it'll find the tracking info. If it can't, it'll skip the whole disc. Fog it with your breath, and wipe from the center out. Wipe the top too.

      I know it sounds like dealing with old Nintendos, but it solves most playing problems. :)

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  34. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have a Mac? I do, and that usually means I can copy "protected" CDs like anything else.

  35. Re:Fuck slashdot by Didion+Sprague · · Score: 2

    >> No grip, we told her. Just us camera guys, the producer, and Ray Ray the director. "Then Ray Ray," she'd scream. "Let me fuck a man named Ray Ray."

    This is off-topic, but why are the best comments -- the funniest -- oftentimes posted by Anonymous Cowards? This comment -- the whole thing about the grip and the bottled sweat -- is bizarre and disturbing. Isn't there some sort of "off-topic but interesting" mod option?

    On-topic, my question: now that DRM is more ubiquitous, how do figure out whether or not the CD is at fault or the player? I mean, how do you know whether or not the Brookstone player you mention is actually bad?

    I'm finding, actually, that while CDs are being mucked and fussed with, the quality of new CD players is actually going down. Components I bought years ago seem more rugged -- and able to play more CDs -- than recent stuff.

  36. Experiencing today.... by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Wishing I had more time off from work. Was a welcome break.

  37. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by manly_15 · · Score: 2

    2. Turn the disc back to the store, claiming it's useless. (it is, sort of)

    Unfortunately, many stores, such as HMV have stopped accepting returns on opened CD's, claiming that there is the possibility that they have been copied. At least we know that the CD stores are smart enough to know that any copy protection can and will be broken.

  38. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    RIAA will dork around with DRM just enough to drive people to P2P in retaliation.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  39. This is not "DRM" by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Informative

    The CDs in question are copy-protected. They are designed to play properly in a standard, dumb CD player, but not a "smart" CD player like the ones you find in your computer. Manufacturers are now starting to put CD ROM drives into CD players, which sounds like your problem.

    There are numerous copy protection schemes out there, but it sounds like Sony is using the one that has bad error correction info, which makes the disc sound like crap if the CD player pays attention to it. Dumb ones don't, and tend to play normally (until you get scratches on your CD!).

    Of course, anyone willing to spend about 10 minutes researching the issue can find the appropriate software/hardware to rip copy protected discs just fine. Copy protection will only stop the least sophisticated users from ripping the music. Just shows how stupid the record labels are.

  40. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by draggy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thank you for pluralizing the word "CD" correctly.

    --

    Let's not all suck at the same time please

  41. Re:To hell with OGG by foolip · · Score: 1

    Hrm. I was not advocating the ogg framework specifically (what's with all thes idiots who think .ogg means ogg is a audio format? Ever heard of the avi codec?).
    If you did not notice, we (at least I) don't give a shit what's "teh standard", we use what we believe is the best. And that sure as hell is not MP3 (several reasons: quality, patents, licensing).
    If I were to use the "standard", I'd be killing myself on WinXP, MS Word, MSN Messenger and fscking MP3s! I'd rather eat my own arm, thank you very much!

  42. don't give them money by mr_burns · · Score: 2

    If you don't like DRM CD's, then don't buy any CD's from any label which produces them. They'll get the message.

    If you disagree with the RIAA's politics or technological positions and you give their member labels money, you are a hypocrite. Take that money you were going to give to Sony and give it to a label which isn't a corrupt cabal of mobsters. One that will actually give the artists a fair cut of the money and not bootleg CD's under their nose. Or give it to the EFF.

    Don't be a hypocrite. Put your money where your mouth is. If you don't like DRM CD's, then boycott the labels that sell them.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    1. Re:don't give them money by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, this is a good theory, but we did this. We bought 10% fewer recordings last year from the major labels. And, of course, they have used that against us as a sign that we need far MORE DRM in our lives. It couldn't be a 25% reduction in albums produced, or a ridiculous price creeping far above that set around the world, or a rising anti-RIAA sentimentality. Of course it is Napster's fault.

      We can't just boycott the labels. We have to take power away from the labels and give it to the independents. How do we do this? By buying CD's from independent music labels and sharing the first 4 tracks, and refusing to share music from the major labels. Kazaa isn't just a way to avoid the distribution tax... it is a way to discover new music. We need to make sure that music is good, both in quality and in spirit. It would also be great if we could convince major artists to move away from the RIAA labels and strike it out on their own, but so long as they feel that their livelyhood is threatened I doubt that will happen. We'll have to make it happen on our own.

      -C

      --
      This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    2. Re:don't give them money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you disagree with the RIAA's politics or technological positions and you give their member labels money, you are a hypocrite.

      I like how we blame consumers for monopolistic practices. If you don't like how PG&E fucks you over by declaring bankruptcy, get's a government bailout and pays it's execs millions in bonuses, but you pay your electric bill, you're a hypocrite.

      Hey Einstein? If you want to have the artists CDs and not just crappy mp3 downloads, you have to buy it from the damn store. Therefore, you have to give money to the RIAA. It's not the fault of the consumer who doesn't have much of a choice.

    3. Re:don't give them money by mr_burns · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey Einstein? If you want to have the artists CDs and not just crappy mp3 downloads, you have to buy it from the damn store.

      Most record labels aren't majors or members of the RIAA. Same goes for CD releases. Most are on independent labels or the band self-released.

      I spend thousands of dollars a year on music. Shows, shirts, CD's...I spend more on music than I do on food. Not a dime goes to majors or RIAA.

      And you'd think I was missing out on the 'best' stuff but I'm not. While all those major and RIAA labels are wetting their pants writing songs to conform to clearchannel standards and mastering all the dynamics out of the CD (so theirs will be louder than the competition), the independents are recording music that they like. Music which stands on it's own merits.

      As a consumer of music, I have a choice of who I buy music from and why. I choose not to buy music from people who I feel are doing a disservice to musicians and our musical heritage. I actively buy great music from great bands and labels who are not evil.

      The major labels are not a utility like PG&E. They are companies who live and die by convincing consumers to give them money. When I can get music which is as good or better from people who treat their musicians and customers with respect there's no reason to pay somebody who acts without ethics or morals. In fact, I feel it's wrong to reward somebody for negative behavior. Rewards are for people who do good.

      So if you disagree with what the majors and the RIAA are doing and you give them money, you are a hypocrite. You are saying one thing but doing the other. We are not to blame for their behavior, but we are wrong to reward them for it.

      --
      "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    4. Re:don't give them money by xigxag · · Score: 2

      I think this will eventually happen on its own due to the labels' own self-sabotage.

      Already MdDrewbie's noticed that Sony's disks don't seem to play right on his CD player. What happens when the next Sony album comes out? If he's going to get inferior quality, why pay for it? Instead of buying the CD, he might simply download the mp3s from someone else who was able to successfully rip the tracks. Another law-abiding citizen may have been turned into a pirate. As the word spreads that certain CDs from certain companies are not properly playable, more people will desist from buying those products. And eventually they'll stop buying CDs altogether.

      Unfortunately, the artists will be caught in the crossfire.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    5. Re:don't give them money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if it's not clearly labelled as DRM, set your government onto them...

  43. Its as simple as this: by BesigedB · · Score: 1

    An audio cd should be compatible with any and all hardware and software that it is designed to play them.
    If it does not, IT SHOULD NOT BE RELEASED.

  44. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by foolip · · Score: 1

    I've also encountered this, and it's unfortunate. However, returning a disc because it is unplayable MUST be permitted, even by law or something. In any case, you can be sure to have a tough ride trying it :)

  45. Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by edgrale · · Score: 2

    But these "New DRM-CD" (Digital Restricted Media - Compact Disc) really sucks for people like me that have a MP3 capable cd-player (a Sony...) in their car.

    I bought it so I could convert my CDs to MP3 and burn them to a CD-R (or -RW) saving me from having to carry 10+ CDs. Now most of the new CDs wont play on my computer. Not only that but now my original are bound to get scratched, a car is the worst nightmare for a CD.

    What do I do? I ask the guy at the store if I can have them in MP3, if not then I buy something else. Hint: the list is growing smaller and smaller day by day.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by Apreche · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint. Violate the DMCA! Thousands of people do it every day without even realizing it! here's how it works. First buy a cd, then use some software from the net to bypass the copy protection (the illegal part!) and voi la! mp3s!
      And to make sure the RIAA doesn't get your money, you can return the CD after! Oh the wonders of technology!

      What get caught? Go to court? If that ever happens hooray! You can fight unless you get in the ring.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What do I do? I ask the guy at the store if I can have them in MP3, if not then I buy something else. Hint: the list is growing smaller and smaller day by day.

      1. Buy CD-RW.
      2. Download P2P file sharing app.
      3. (optional) Pay for a buy CD if you want to pay the record label for it.
      4. Download entire CD from P2P app.
      5. Burn to CD.
      6. Play in car.

    3. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by kasperd · · Score: 2

      And to make sure the RIAA doesn't get your money, you can return the CD after!

      I have been considering that idea before. Is that even illegal? Where I live making a copy for personal use is legal as long as the original is legal. And then we can return the original afterwards because it is corrupt. And since all the other discs they can find will also be corrupt, they will have no choice but paying the money back.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    4. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Also if you burn the CD yourself you can add the CD Text to the disc. Track names, album title etc.. it's rare to find CDs with them already.

    5. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup it's illegal, but only because of the DMCA. The illegal part is disabling the copy protection.

    6. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Yup it's illegal, but only because of the DMCA.

      I don't think the DMCA applies to me.

      The illegal part is disabling the copy protection.

      I didn't disable any copy protection. The protection just didn't work on all my drives.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    7. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by Spellbinder · · Score: 0

      for us it's even legal to copy sound from a family member or (close) friend
      internet ones don't count i fear =(((

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    8. Re:Not only that (Was: I wonder...) by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Even better, do this all (including the downloading and burning) at a big national chain, preferably teaching lots of other users at the same time.

  46. What would it take ... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ... to force record labels to change the term 'copy protection' to 'copy restriction'? (Note: Im not claiming to invent that term, somebody else on Slashdot coined the phrase and I have no idea who it is)

    There's got to be a legal justification for doing so. If they advertise it as 'protection', it sounds like they're made a superior product that'll play in anything. That sounds like false advertising to me. If they use the term 'restriction', then it's clear there may be playback issues.

    1. Re:What would it take ... by bbtom · · Score: 1

      The best way to force change is to do it. Similarly, the best way to crash a server is to post a link to it from the /. homepage. Now, apply the Slashdot effect to changing it to 'copy prevention' or 'copy restriction' rather than 'copy protec--n' (don't say it, and it won't be said... geddit?).

      So, if Slashdot and other media sources calls it 'copy prevention', then the power of language (which is a very strong power...

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  47. Umm... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    I can respect taking a John Hancock approach, but if you put a return address on that letter, they might send their thugs to throw you 8ss in jail...

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  48. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    daaaamn post more of that shit! I was getting a hard-on reading it!

  49. DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by jdclucidly · · Score: 2

    DRM ruined two gifts I gave this XMas:

    1. I gave a GE DVD Player to my boyfriend's parents. They came home to watch their new DVD's on their new player only to find that their newer Sony VCR nicely chokes on the DRM watermark fading in and out as it converts the RCA signal in to coax their older TV can use.
    2. I gave my boyfriend a Sony MiniDisc Recorder complete with USB link to his computer so that he can record his first "Live Bagpipe Marching Band CD" while he's performing.

      We got it connected to his computer and discovered that their damn software will only allow to transfer songs to your computer that you and only you put on the MiniDisc. There's a petition here to get Sony to enable this ability as many journalist would benefit from this feature. It's not made clear on the packaging that you cannot transfer songs to your computer that you record with a microphone.

    Lesson learned: do your homework before buying any electronics from MPAA or RIAA members. :( And especially avoid electronics manufactures that are also content distributors (read: Sony)

    1. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

      That's Macrovision at work. Go buy a $20 RF Modulator and your problem will go away.

      NetMD issue sucks - I own a NetMD player as well...

    2. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go buy a $20 RF Modulator and your problem will go away.

      Along with your picture quality.

      Even better, don't try to route your DVD player's signal through a VCR. This has been common knowledge for years now...

    3. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2

      Actually, the DVD/VCR issue is pretty much unavoidable without additional equipment. The DVD spec demands Macrovision encoding on a DVD player's video outputs. Macrovision exploits a specific trait common to the video inputs of all VCRs, regardless of age. So, unless you have some unusual piece of kit, running any DVD player through any VCR will cause Macrovision interference.

      There are ways around this problem. De-Macrovision boxes that sit between the DVD and VCR exist. Some DVD players can be fixed by mod chips, flash ROM updates, or hidden setup menus. Other than that, your best bet would be to find a way to avoid running the DVD through the VCR. A switch box and an RF converter would work. I mention a new TV only to point out that only the crappy ones don't have at least one non-RF input. But that's only an option if your budget is more Best Buy than Radio Shack.

      As for your MiniDisc problem... (sigh) Sony seems determined to run it into the ground, and yet it still survives. Baffling.

      All in all, though, Sony Electronics is still very much a theoretical evil. They can only impose DRM in exclusive or developing markets. Hence, MiniDisc, and Network Walkman products that only use MagicGate Memory Sticks. (Yes, I know there are hacks for purple Sticks, but what other product needs them?) In other markets, competition ensures that DRM is an all-or-nothing proposition. Either everybody standardizes on DRM, like CSS and Macrovision on DVDs, or nobody does. And free-market competition ensures that nobody makes DRM the feature that sets their product apart, since it will only serve as a big "DO NOT BUY" sticker next to the price tag.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by nobuzz · · Score: 1

      Sony doesn't stop you from transfering the songs over from MiniDisc to your computer, it just prevents you from transfering a digital copy directly via their software, you can hook a cable from the headphone jack to the line in on your soundcard and record it onto your computer. It works, there is very little degridation as long as you use decent quality cabling and sound card, it just needs to be done in real time.

    5. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      I gave a GE DVD Player to my boyfriend's parents.

      Ok, so I'm supposed to believe:

      you're a girl,

      you post to /.,

      and you're making enough and you're sweet enough to give nice techy presents to your "boyfriend's" folks.

      This is obviously a troll!

      Moderators, mod this troll down!

      Oh wait.

      I gave my boyfriend a Sony MiniDisc Recorder complete with USB link to his computer so that he can record his first "Live Bagpipe Marching Band CD" while he's performing.

      Her boyfriend is in a bagpipe band. False alarm; this truly is /. territory.

      Nevermind.

    6. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by porges · · Score: 1

      The DVD spec demands Macrovision encoding on a DVD player's video outputs.

      It should be noted that it's only required if the DVD has the Macrovision-enable bit on, or whatever. I have a number of DVDs that tape just fine -- for instance, the Prisoner DVDs.

    7. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could buy a $20 video stabilzer and the problem with not only go away, but you'll be able to back up your DVDs to videocasette as a side effect.

      And, before someone calls DMCA on this, DMCA is Digital. Macrovision is purely analog.

    8. Re:DRM ruined 2 gifts I gave by 40000 · · Score: 1

      ATRAC3 is better quality than mp3 for the same bit rate but the whole minidisc thing is spoiled by all the weird (digital) copy prevention stuff Sony puts into its products.
      I don't know why they bother because minidisc sharing is nothing like as common as mp3 sharing. If you were going to give a friend a copy of a CD then you might as well give them a CDR rather than a lossy compressed minidisc (digital or analogue i/o).

  50. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by pyite · · Score: 1

    Solid. It looks like, at least for now, that really nothing worth listening to is on that list. Ah well, I'll buy my cd or two a month and download my fifty or so a month from Etree's Free Network.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  51. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. Send a letter to the record label, say that you hate them, and tell them what you did about it.

    Send a letter saying you broke the law? I would advise aginst that.

  52. I'll bet... by lirkbald · · Score: 1

    you can still microwave DRM enabled CDs.

    Far more entertainment value than any music that may be on them.

  53. Making my life tougher by pokrefke · · Score: 1

    I bought my girlfriend a Rio S50 mp3 player for Christmas to use while she works out. I was trying to show her how to rip her cd's, when my trust Cd-n-Go software couldn't access freedb. No good ripping mp3's named 'Track 01', so...

    I fired up Windows Media Player and went directly to the options. I turned off DRM, ripped the cd, and transferred the songs to the player. The 'song' was 3.5 minutes of nothing. I listened to the mp3 in WinAmp - 3.5 minutes of silence. Windows Media Player will not allow you to make an mp3 is you turn off DRM.

    I was forced to install Real Player to rip the cd. Better than Media Player, but what an obtrusive piece of software. I hate it.

    I'm angry that my old standby, Cd-n-Go, can't access the cd database. It was a great program. Now I have to use Media Player or Real One? No thanks. I took it back.

    1. Re:Making my life tougher by misterhaan · · Score: 2

      if your only problem is that you couldn't access a track name database, then why don't you just read the titles from the cd case and enter them yourself? yes i agree it is annoying to have to do that, but it's been my experience that you can't trust whoever enters titles into these databases to get it right all the time anyway. and even if cd-n-go (i've enver used it) won't let you change the track names if it can't find it on freedb, you can always change filenames and id3 tags later!

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    2. Re:Making my life tougher by Ravensfire · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest CD-Ex. An excellent little program.

      --
      "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
    3. Re:Making my life tougher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather enter the names of the songs by hand then let the great, steaming, heap of goat shit that is Real Player foul my hard drive.

    4. Re:Making my life tougher by m1a1 · · Score: 2

      You know, you can always filename and ID tags after you rip with Cd-n-Go.

    5. Re: Making my life tougher by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > when my trust Cd-n-Go software couldn't access freedb

      Freedb was having lots of problems yesterday, presumably due to a Christmas-induced DDoS attack.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Making my life tougher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking idiot, shut the fuck up.

    7. Re:Making my life tougher by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      I was forced to install Real Player to rip the cd. Better than Media Player, but what an obtrusive piece of software. I hate it.

      If you're still using Winblows, and you haven't discovered CDex, then you've got more problems.

      Rule of thumb: if you depend on proprietary software, you will get screwed over.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  54. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if you really want to hear some hard shit, remind me to tell you the time when I was on the set filming with Bobby Short (a guy with a little stub dick who nonetheless got his share because he had a tongue like a powerdrill) and Mahalia Valentine (the actress who one day in 1973 shoved two bottles of Budweiser up into her nether regions, popped the bottle caps, and spit out first the caps into Bobby Short's open mouth and then told him to step aside while she blasted the two bottles -- empty! -- onto the brick wall opposite the camera.)

    Everyone had all sorts of questions. First, where was the beer? Where did it go? And then (of course) how did she manage to pop off the bottlecaps since they weren't screwoffs?

    This amazed everybody, and Mahalia might as well have been Houdini because it was a mysterious damn trick. Even Bobby couldn't believe it and thought she'd somehow hidden two open bottles inside of her and managed to make the switch.

    But we're like, Bobby, come on, dude, there's no way. It's bad enough she does this shit with two -- but do you honestly believe she did it with *four*? Fucking four bottles?

    Anyway, as is always the case with porn stars, Bobby Short died not long after in a Dixie Rest Stop on I-55 and Mahalia was killed by her boyfriend. So the secret is still a secret.

    But it's a famous secret.

  55. uhhh, wait a minute... by elluzion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Huge flaw in this logic.

    Before I get started, let me clarify that I definitely hate DRM. I pretty much despise large record labels. So I'm not supporting them or anything, but simply sending a check to the artist is crazy.

    First, where the hell are you going to send a check? Their fanclub? Do you know Timberlake's address? How about Snoop Dogg's address? How about Creed's address? Tim MCGraw? Whoever it is you listen to, you probably don't have any idea how to actually get money to them, unless they are local to you. And that's an altogether different story.

    Secondly, there are TONS of people other than the artist who should be compensated. I mean, just because the CD says "Metallica", it doesnt mean that you are hearing Lars playing the drums on every track. It is very common for artists to hire studio musicians for recording sessions. Especially if they need to meet deadlines while the bassist is in rehab, or jail, or whatever. It happens, a lot, and the session players deserve a cut as well.

    Aside from the actual music, there are the studio people. There's as much talent involved with skillful recording as there is with skillful playing. The cover art came from somewhere, and that person should be compensated. There are lots of people who attempt to make honest livings from the production of music and rely on CD sales for a income.

    What the RIAA would have you believe is that their job is making sure the revenue gets spread out to all of these people fairly. And we all know this is a bunch of BS.

    Really, the best thing to do is to support independant labels when you can. And when you can't, go MP3, Vorbis, whatever. This will (hopefully, if enough people do it) draw the talent away from the RIAA music nazis and empower the independant labels. Everyone benefits.

  56. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco can do the same thing with his trained anus, but he uses two kegs of Bud.

  57. Re:Fuck slashdot by StoryMan · · Score: 2

    >> Everyone had all sorts of questions. First, where was the beer? Where did it go? And then (of course) how did she manage to pop off the bottlecaps since they weren't screwoffs?

    Are you for real? Is this real? Or just fake?

    Still, this gets my vote as the thread-of-the-month.

    Nothing to do with DRM and DRM protected CDs, but it does seem a shame that most folks won't read this because it's mod'd at 0 and will probably soon be at -1.

  58. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bravo! encore! encore!! i'm just about to cum!!!

  59. Odd experience with a CD by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    I had one really odd experience that I can't explain. I use Exact audio Copy to rip CDs. Usually, I rip an image of the entire disc, so I can make a backup that is as close as possible to the original. For two particular CD (Front Line Assembly and Queens of the Stone Age), EAC was completely unable to rip the entire disc. This has never happened with any other CD I've tried. Faulty disc? No, I was able to rip the CDs track by track, just not the entire image. I don't think it was DRM (because I was able to rip individual tracks), but an odd experience anyway.

    1. Re:Odd experience with a CD by m1a1 · · Score: 2

      You should try clonecd by elaborate bytes. I don't remember how much it costs, but it is pretty affordable, and you can try it for free. I have never had a cd that it couldn't copy, and it has a built in virtual drive that you can use to mount images. Pretty slick all in all, and the most reliable program for getting exact copies that I know of.

    2. Re:Odd experience with a CD by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      I had that problem with the latest Coldplay CD. I couldn't copy the whole thing in either Linux or Windows (it actually read the image but then burnt a coaster). But I was able to rip it track by track. Very odd.

      Bob

  60. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    CD is an abbreviation. Therefore good usage can be to include an apostrophe for the plural. I've seen the issue go both ways. Personally, I think something like CEOs looks wrong. Recall that an apostrophe is used to indicate letters that are missing as well as the possessive. In fact, that usage trumps the possessive usage (itsit's).

  61. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hurry! i'm losing my hard-on!

  62. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    (its--it's). Goddamn hypertext. I tried to put brackets around the dash to make little arrows.

  63. Thank god for the ACCC! by m37r0 · · Score: 1

    Im from Oz, and was just reading an from a newspaper down here. http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/04/17/10190 20660614.html Excerpt : "The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has also warned local record companies that they must include warning stickers when copy protection is introduced." Good.

  64. multisession in copy protected CDs by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Some audio copy protection methods use an extra session on the disc to confuse computer-based CD players. This is based on the fact that computer CD players will read the LAST session first, while audio only CD players (except certain car players that are actually CD Rom drives) will play the FIRST session first.

    Corrupt data is added to that extra session so computers will go boink when reading it. This is why that magic marker work-around worked -- it prevented the computer from reading the extra session.

    Now a good way to make proper back-ups of your Audio CDs is to remove this extra session. This can be done quite easily if you are using a plextor CD-Rw because the DiscDupe software that comes with it will, when presented with an audio CD, do a bit for bit copy of the first session only. This means that the resulting backup will have the protection removed so you can excercise your home use rights and easily make more copies for the car, ogg encoding, etc.

    1. Re:multisession in copy protected CDs by Imperator · · Score: 2

      Of course, you've just had to pay an extra $.20 - $1 to actually listen to the CD you already purchased, depending on how much you pay for your CD-Rs.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    2. Re:multisession in copy protected CDs by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Of course, you've just had to pay an extra $.20 - $1 to actually listen to the CD you already purchased, depending on how much you pay for your CD-Rs."

      True, but I never use original discs for anything except to make copies to play on my other devices. So if I duplicated it, I would have done that anyway with a non-protected CD.

      And even if I wanted to only make OGGs for personal listening, I could just burn the copy to a CD-Rw, rip that, and then re-use the Rw for something else.

      Of course I see your overall point. We shouldn't have to post-process a product with our own money that's meant to be used without post-processing as soon as it's bought.

  65. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    Sounds ok, except:

    Telling the RIAA you hate them and what you did about it? You mean how you circumvented the copy protection and made an illegal copy of a disk you brought from them and later returned? Im sure thatll go down well... with Bubba your future cellmate.

    Writing no less than two letters, and arguing with the returns department, plus messing around trying to get around the DRM... It may be for the greater good, but I certainly understand why people may not be bothered with this proceedure and just prefer to type a track name into their favourite P2P app and press download...

  66. DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is slightly - OT, but at least it's a real life story as to how DRM is harmful to legitimate customers.

    I moved a couple of months ago. My GTA 3 disk was damaged in the move through my own carelessness. I contacted the producer of the game to find out how much a simple media exchange would cost. Want to know how much it'll cost? $18 + S&H. That's just for the disk. They can't throw a copy on the burner for me and do it for $5?

    I should have backed it up. I'm not sure if I could have or not. I didn't try with this particular game, but I've had to go to rather extreme measures to back up other games I have. You'd think I'd have the right to protect my $50 investment, but obviously I don't.

    I find this infurating. It's either a copyright issue or it isn't. Either I'm holding an $18 lump of plastic, or I'm holding an $.05 key to content I have licensed. They can't have it both ways.

    I can't believe that these industries are legally allowed to get away with customer gouging.

    1. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by BesigedB · · Score: 1

      GTA3 has copy protection on it. You cannt back it up without a 'good' cd burner and software which copys the cd EXACTLY

    2. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTA 3 comes in two disks, unless I forgot to download the third one.

    3. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Nethead · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I can't believe that these industries are legally allowed to get away with customer gouging.

      Let me get this right here: You bitch because they want to charge you $18 to replace the media for a thieft simulation game? I'd thank them for extending the game into the real world for you.

      If you don't like the policy, don't buy from them. You really don't NEED to play GTA, sucka.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "If you don't like the policy, don't buy from them. You really don't NEED to play GTA, sucka."

      Thank you for the totally unhelpful reply. I'm surprised that you didn't post that anonymously.

    5. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Badaro · · Score: 1

      Daemon Tools is a Virtual CD-ROM that works wonderfully with copy-protected discs. My personal experience is that getting a game to run with an ISO + Daemon is much easier then making a perfect copy of the disc.

      Also, if you need a good image creation software I recommend Blindwrite.

      []s Badaro

      --
      My sig became obsolete, and I lack the imagination to create a new one. :(
    6. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Nethead · · Score: 1, Troll

      Thank you for the totally unhelpful reply. I'm surprised that you didn't post that anonymously.


      I don't write anon posts, at least about video games. The idea of posting anon is to protect a person with unpopular political views from being fucked with by the state or within a work enviroment. I don't abuse the right to hide behind snide remarks about video games that simulate illegal activities. I just find it very funny that you bought something from a company that produces a product that promotes theft, and then you cry foul when they want to charge a bit more than you think is fair to replace the product that you damaged. And don't get your panties in a bunch over their use of copy protection methods. You could have found out if the game was protected before you bought it, and then decided if it was a wise investment at the time.


      I see no reason the game producer even had to offer you a replacement of their product at a reduced price. You bought it, you broke it, you should have to buy a new one. Just because you don't like the offer they made you, in good faith at that, doesn't mean that "there should be a law." They really owe you nothing. They are in the business to make a profit. To one-off send you a replacement disk, one that has to be pulled from stock, packaged and mailed to you will cost the about $25 in labor. They didn't set the company up to replace items, the produce, publish and distribute. Anything outside of that is a hassle and costs money. They were offering you a favor and you trashed them on slashdot.


      I suspect that you may have been playing GTA too long and really believe that it represents a valid and acceptable world view. Just so you are clear on it, Theft is wrong. The world doesn't owe you anything. You knew, or could have known the rules going in when you did business with them. Don't bitch now because you want to change the agreement you have with the company. Again, if you don't like the rules, don't buy from them. I hope this helps you, but I don't think you will feel that it does.


      This clue stick brought to you by the word: Smack!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    7. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I just find it very funny that you bought something from a company that produces a product that promotes theft..."

      Ooooookay. I didn't even bother reading the rest of that paragraph. You got some funny ideas about the difference between advertising and playing games. I suppose you think playing a Ninja Turtles game means I'm prone to hanging around in sewers. Maybe you need a smack from the reality stick?

      "I see no reason the game producer even had to offer you a replacement of their product at a reduced price. You bought it, you broke it, you should have to buy a new one."

      Because they refer to my use of the game as a license? Because they prevent me from backing it up for fear of piracy? Because the cost of the CD is negligible, so it's the content they're really selling? Derr.

      "To one-off send you a replacement disk, one that has to be pulled from stock, packaged and mailed to you will cost the about $25 in labor."

      Hardly. Even if somebody made $20 an hour the cost wouldn't come close. Never mind that I've already given them $50. You have some funny ideas about customer service. Perhaps people who wreck their cars should be forced to buy a new car instead of getting it repaired for a fraction of the cost?

      "I suspect that you may have been playing GTA too long and really believe that it represents a valid and acceptable world view. Just so you are clear on it, Theft is wrong."

      What does 'theft' have to do with wanting a replacement media for a reasonable price? Are you feeling okay?

      You win the award for the most absurd reply I've read today. Kudos! :)

    8. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "You could have found out if the game was protected before you bought it, and then decided if it was a wise investment at the time. "

      So you expect somebody to know ahead of time if they're going to break their disc? Your hair isn't pointy, is it?

      I can't speak for the dude that started this thread, but I've got a huge collection of CD's/DVD's and never damaged them. I can totally understand his situation where he accidentally broke one of them. Shit happens. Replacement media is cheap, and the game producer forcefully prevented him from making a backup. If they're going to take away your fair use right to make legitimate backups, then the least they can do is guarantee that you can cheaply replace your media if it goes bad. Charging half the cost of the game + S&H is ridiculous.

      As for your comments about the game promoting theft, pull your head out of your ass. The goal of the game is to vent and have a little fun, it's not to train people to steal cars. Don't believe me? Play the game then try to steal a car. You'll be surprised to find out that you don't know how to start it. You're making more of the game than it really is. Next you're going to tell me that Mario Sunshine promotes cleaning up of graffiti.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out www.gamecopyworld.com You could burn an non-perfect copy of GTAIII, then use a no-cd crack from their archives to back up your game. This should work for almost every game. Not promoting piracy, simply promoting people being able to excercise their fair use rights.

    10. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you still have gta3 installed (I am assuming you have the pc version), get the latest patch.

      after some customers complained about speed issues regarding the copy protection, they released a patch that removes it

    11. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Josuah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about going back to the store and asking for a replacement? It depends on where you got it, but when I purchased some GameCube games from Electronics Boutique, they said if a game cracks or breaks or whatever I can get a replacement from them for free. (Hardware is different, you can buy a 1 or 2 year warranty, which I did.)

      Another option is to get a pirated/cracked copy. I think this is one of those "gray" areas where you might feel it's morally okay to do this.

    12. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by haggar · · Score: 2

      Hey, I used Daemon Tools with a couple of images of game CDs, but my problem was that the music tracks woulnd't play. Sure, these tracks were ripped, but the games just wouldn't play them.

      --
      Sigged!
    13. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the latest gta3 patch eliminates the cd checks in the game. it caused too many issues on too many machines.

      so a regular bin/cue copy and the latest patch, install everything to hard drive, copy the music by hand, latest patch, and you're off.

    14. Re:DRM = Customer screwing.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "How about going back to the store and asking for a replacement? It depends on where you got it, but when I purchased some GameCube games from Electronics Boutique, they said if a game cracks or breaks or whatever I can get a replacement from them for free."

      Huh. I did not know that. Even if it's my own fault it broke?

      "Another option is to get a pirated/cracked copy. I think this is one of those "gray" areas where you might feel it's morally okay to do this."

      That's what I'm probably going to do. (Or find a used copy...)

      The way I see it, if they're going to lock up their product with a lock and key, and then make it a federal offense to break the lock, then they should at least make replacement media dirt cheap if I have the original media to return. I feel like the *AA and to a lesser extent the Game Industry are being given power to extort the consumers. I don't know if I'm being particularly rational or not, I'm not very happy about this. I just want to play my game. I've already put $50 into it.

  67. Those were the good old days..... by Kojote · · Score: 1

    Remember when you could just go buy a cd and if it would fit in the player it would work. Now a persons gonna have to actually think about what cd their buying to make sure they can even listen to it, to me thats gonna hurt sales cause impulse buyers like me are going to not be so spontanious...

    1. Re:Those were the good old days..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Good old days"? Break out the 8-tracks! No DRM there! :)

    2. Re:Those were the good old days..... by Kojote · · Score: 1

      Well...the early CD days were the good old days for me...I mean hell I'm only 21 I never owned an 8 track lol

  68. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, where the hell are you going to send a check? Their fanclub? Do you know Timberlake's address? How about Snoop Dogg's address? How about Creed's address? Tim MCGraw? Whoever it is you listen to, you probably don't have any idea how to actually get money to them, unless they are local to you. And that's an altogether different story.


    Look them up in Who's Who, then send it to their agents (whose addresses are usually listed in Who's Who.


  69. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by G-funk · · Score: 5, Informative

    It doesn't matter a whit what looks wrong to you, it's "CDs". "CD's, CEO's, UFO's" are all 100% wrong. There's no case to be made, no arguments to have, it's just plain old incorrect.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  70. No DRM in Linux =) by Trevelyan · · Score: 1

    My brother got an offspring CD for xmas, It refuses to work on his MS windows box, But my Linux reads it fine.
    I haven't bothered to much to look into why, but I noted it had this extra track out on its lonesome towards the edge of the disk.

  71. hmm DRM goofs by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since the problem described is obviously not DRM lets review what DRM is:

    Digital Rigths Management..

    What is the only True Successfull Working DRM system?

    Give Up?

    Its known under these abbrievations:

    RMS, FSF, GPL, Apache, JBoss, and etc..

    Its OpenSource!

    God help us if RIAA starts buying up OpenSource non profits!

    Now please can some post something that they actually ran through a logic rational rather than blindly repeat FUD..its damn anoying and remidns me of the darkness in Redmond..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:hmm DRM goofs by mrkurt · · Score: 2

      DRM == Digital Reach for your Money You == Troll

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
  72. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by jez9999 · · Score: 2

    Although I agree with you on the usage of apostrophes with regards to the abbreviations, I wouldn't say that your its/it's example is a good one. "it's" doesnt 'trump' "its" in usage, it has a completely different meaning.

  73. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick, man! Think of Ms. Portman nekkid. That'll put the lead back in your pencil.

  74. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

    Secondly, there are TONS of people other than the artist who should be compensated.

    That's very true, but then you list a bunch of people who don't get compensated by album sales anyway. Joe Studio Drummer could care less if the albums he's on sell one or a million copies - he won't see any extra cash, other than being able to charge higher prices next album because of his reputation.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  75. Re:Fuck slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah i also had a funky smelling friend named ray ray...
    i couldn't believe it when he told us he got a girl friend it was like "hey guys i got myself a chick"... my friend gagged at the thought and then spewed (i don't think it was from the announcement jus too much pot and booze)...

    yeah well anyways we couldn't believe smelly boy got a chick (she wasn't good looking or anything)..
    but still ..... we was like "damn.... ray-ray" which hole did this fat bitch come from???
    he just laughed it off....
    but seriously we couldn't handle his girl.. she was the horniest bitch out there.. she tried to fuck every-one of us.. i don't think any-one touched her... becuase of the fact she was fat and ray-ray had been pumping some bad smelling skunk in her muff... (dirty bastards)...
    but seriously it was bad shit man...

    yeah ray-rya broke up his fat hoe after he found out she slept with both his father and mother.. poor bastard...
    he's currently tryint to clean his act (his going hippy.. cos they all kinda smell funky like him.. thats some bad funk thou..)

    later bit69ches...

  76. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by m1a1 · · Score: 2

    I think this is wrong. First of all, most of the people in that whole set either worked on salary (the engineer, the producer, probably the session player) and they have already been compensated by the record company for that, regardless of the album's sales. Then there is the album cover-art designer. I don't mind them getting a cut of my cash assuming I actually get my copy of the cover art, but if you are fine with a burned cd then you don't have the cover art anyways, so let the starving artist starve.

  77. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 0

    The apostrophe in "it's" is there to indicate missing letters. The apostrophe in CD's is as well.

  78. Re:Making my life tougher Another Ripping Software by thomasgwillis · · Score: 1

    I personally use Exact Audio Copy, and have had no issues except when the cd has a big gouge in it. http://www.exactaudiocopy.de

  79. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess no more Frans Bauer for me then.. ;-)

  80. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ah. A member of the 'because I say so' school of grammatical thought. I can respect that.

  81. Cds? by panxerox · · Score: 0

    Oh, I forgot thats what you guys used to get your music on before downloading. Hehe the old days....

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  82. Holy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merry Christmas! Lemme know if you dump your boyfriend - I could use a Zaurus, and maybe some nicer speakers.

  83. Re:Making my life tougher Another Ripping Software by BesigedB · · Score: 1

    Good tutorial for EAC: http://moocow.arakion.com/stuff/gffstandards.htm

  84. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by slipgun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah. A member of the 'because I say so' school of grammatical thought. I can respect that.

    Presumably you said that to your english teacher when he told you to put a capital letter after a full stop.

    There are no two ways about it, "CD's" means "of the CD" or "belonging to the CD". "CDs" is the plural of "CD".

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  85. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by jez9999 · · Score: 2

    Yes, but I thought you were citing that as an example of how the 'missing letters' usage of the apostrophe was more common than the 'possesive' meaning. I don't think that's particularly true with its and it's.

  86. Making a difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all seriousness, will people make any difference in this? I ask because when looking at the protestations going on around the world when it comes to globalisation, Iraq or any other number of issues, it seems to succeed at nothing more than a mere mention on the news.

    For instance, in Italy, there were 500,000 people protesting against a war with Iraq. Another 2-400K people out in the streets in London. More in other parts of Europe. Has this made any difference? No.

    What I'd like to find out is what is the readership of Slashdot (and other similar sites?)
    Does anyone know?

    I suppose I get frustrated because we read story after story about how the music industry is doing this or that, but WHAT - or better yet, HOW CAN WE - do something about this in -realistic- terms?

    The typical advice of, "Well, don't buy or support them and they'll get the message" doesn't seem to work. As many others have noted, it won't even make a dent in their overall sales.

    So, again I ask, what -CAN- we do? Instead of the standard bitching on Slashdot, perhaps now -is- time to collectively organise and actually accomplish something before its too late?

    Ideas?

    1. Re:Making a difference by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      So, again I ask, what -CAN- we do? Instead of the standard bitching on Slashdot, perhaps now -is- time to collectively organise and actually accomplish something before its too late?

      It's called "Revolution", but this country's still not ready for it (IMHO). Just get ready to hanker down when the police state finally comes. It'll take popular support to ultimately win, and it's gonna take a whole lot of patience and determination to do so. It may not happen in our generation, it may not even be our kids that get to do it, but it will happen.

      Again, IMHO, the time when citizens could have made a difference came and went before I was born (ref: the protests to the Vietnam war, also did nothing). It's time to prepare (or join, although I don't know of any such groups) an organization that will act when the time is most suitable for taking back our country.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  87. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    Legally, you can still rip the cd into any format you want as long as you have the CD. If you return it you must destory the back up

  88. Re:my question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep. mike richards is a gay fairy for sure.

  89. ITS TIME FOR A LAWSUIT!!! by urbieta · · Score: 1

    go on, have fun suing the record company, artist, record store and anyone else included in the supply chain for selling crippled cds, because they ARE breaking the fair use laws, and betting on you not suing, so, what will it be? silence and nothing done? or lawyers and a cuouple million in compensation for you?

    Id like to see my favourite artist testifying on court about this! 8)

    1. Re:ITS TIME FOR A LAWSUIT!!! by newt · · Score: 2

      Why bother? Just download MP3's instead of buying copy-protected CD's, follow the path of least resistance.

      (do you think Columbia will lose more money by fighting lawsuits or by watching their customers irrevocably turn to P2P?)

      --

      -----
      I tried an internal modem, but it hurt when I walked.

  90. Re:Crappy English by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    The word is "gyped" not "jipped".

    Actually, it's gypped, pronounced `jipped'; without the second `p' the `i' would be a long sound, so it would say `jaiypped'. The dictionary doesn't mention the Gypsies, but they are actually a race, called Romnies. This didn't stop them from `adopting' a lot of non-Romny fellow-travellers, and with a relatively small population this would actually be necessary to prevent problems with inbreeding.

    While we're at it, `buy' == purchase, `by' == via, with or past, and (not in these posts, but it is common) `lose' == not win, `loose' == rattling around, not fastened down.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  91. Re:I wonder... (time bomb) by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    consider this. someone has an older analog style (not cdrom based) reader. their player works just fine on some protected cd - TODAY.

    then tomorrow their cd player breaks and they buy a new one. all of a sudden, that new player (and all other new players) refuse to play a disk that SEEMED ok before.

    I find this very unnerving. if you noticed it didn't play immediately (or in 30 days) you could return it. but suppose you had it for years and then the new player didn't play it? what do you do then?

    this whole thing sucks.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  92. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    You are correct.

    But then again, in a historical sense, the possessive "'s" does indicate missing letters. I do know that Chaucer didn't spell the possessive that way. I'd be interested in seeing the etymology.

  93. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

    draw the talent away from the RIAA music nazis and empower the independant labels

    I've seen this comment so often, and one thing strikes me. What were the 'big' record labels before they formed organisations such as the RIAA? They were independent. If we support independent labels and even if the talent DOES move to them, there's a very good chance that they will merely form the next RIAA, and the whole damn process starts again, with them using newer technology and us cracking it all over again...

  94. Use the preview, Luke! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    <-- it can be done -->

    Use &lt; and &gt;

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  95. Re:Fuck slashdot by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I beleive you are entitled to comedy gold post of the day!

    Damn good stuff :)

  96. What does this mean for us, the consumer? by Rambo,+John+J. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is not DRM, it is a form of multi-layered technology that will not only play audio CD but other forms of multi-media, it's a broken standard it seems (at first glance anyway) and some players don't know how to read it.

    It is breakthroughs like these that seem good at first and hurt us later.

    Please study the following example (sorry in advance for any minor flaws, this is all from memroy!):

    In June 1801, Zach, an astronomer whom Gauss had come to know two or three years previously, published the orbital positions of Ceres, a new small planet which was discovered by G Piazzi, an Italian astronomer on 1 January, 1801.

    Unfortunately, Piazzi had only been able to observe 9 degrees of its orbit before it disappeared behind the Sun. Zach published several predictions of its position, including one by Gauss which differed greatly from the others. When Ceres was rediscovered by Zach on 7 December 1801 it was almost exactly where Gauss had predicted. Although he did not disclose his methods at the time, Gauss had used his least squares approximation method.

    Gauss had been asked in 1818 to carry out a geodesic survey of the state of Hanover to link up with the existing Danish grid. Gauss was pleased to accept and took personal charge of the survey, making measurements during the day and reducing them at night, using his extraordinary mental capacity for calculations.

    From what I understand, Gauss original identity was:

    e^(ix)=cos x + sin x for any x that is a real number. When Pi is substituted in for x,
    then e^(Pi*i)+1=0 is obtained.

    But it doesn't end here. If one substitutes in Pi/2 for x in the trigonometric identity, then e^(iPi/2)=i is the result.

    If both sides are raised to the i power, then e^(-Pi/2)=i^i is staring us in the face. And if e^(-Pi/2) is punched out on a calculator, one finds the puzzling and troubling result that i^i = .0208045182. Go try figure that one out!

    Not necessarily wishing to get into a debate: is this a chance accident of evolution or does it point an Intelligent Designer? I believe the
    latter but, no doubt, the point can be argued. What I want to know is since i^i = .0208045182 is woven into the fabric of nature, what
    practical use does it have, if any?

    What does it mean? Or is it just simply a beautiful paradox for us to marvel at?

    Anyway, all apoligies, as I tend to ramble a bit myself, the point being is that we face these paradoxi in real life:

    Does "new improved" technology with multilayered CD's worth the chance of it not working in some players?

    Or the mere fact that e^(Pi*i) + 1 = 0 to some in the math.sci community feel that this proves God's existance?

    Some would say only God would allow a transcendental number raise to another transcendental number, raise to an imaginary number to come out so nice as just -1!

  97. Does this look infected? by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 1

    Got the new Sum 41 cd and it plays everywhere but my car cd player (blaupunkt). Got the cd yesterday and it works on my home machine (where I can and will rip it now), works in my son's car stereo and when I drove into work and tried to listen to it, the stereo says "cd error" and goes back to the radio. So, since it works on my machine at home, I'll go home tonight, burn a new one, save the image for future use and start listening to my burned cd tomorrow. Something I wouldn't have had to do if they had left well enough alone. Yeah, whatever they did to the cd sure showed me! Jack and the boys seem intent to force us into copying even at bayonet point! How many more of these victories can they take before they fold? ;)

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
  98. I got one .... by W2k · · Score: 2

    I got Robyn's latest album, "Don't Stop The Music". Great disc. BMG records have their own little copy protection mechanism it seems, the disc plays fine on ordinary CD players, but upon putting it into my CD-ROM, it autoruns and automatically installs a player which apparently uses Windows Media technology to play the (compressed) tracks from a data track on the CD. I was later able to uninstall this player, it left an uninstaller (UNWISE.EXE) and an install log in my C:\.

    Winamp and Windows Media Player both lock up trying to play the CD as an ordinary audio CD. When I opened exact Exact Audio Copy, it couldn't make out the tracks on the CD. When I put the disc into my CD burner (HP CD-Writer 9310i Plus) the tracks were properly recognized, though marked "Copy Protected", and I could play the CD as a normal audio CD from within EAC (WA and WMP still hung). This allowed me to rip the disc to MP3 by playing it in EAC, while simultaneously recording in SoundForge. So the ripping was a bit more troublesome than usual, but no sweat. The quality of the rip was excellent, despite the slightly weird ripping method.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
  99. Why my gifts are fine by autechre · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I bought "It Isn't The Fall" by The Lesser Birds of Paradise (Loose Thread Recordings) for my mother, and "High Society" by Enon (Touch and Go) for my brother.

    I know I sound like a broken record (ha ha ha), but these smaller labels actually want people to listen to their music. They have enough trouble promoting the stuff; they're certainly not going to put up any obstacles, or do things that would tick off the few customers/loyal radio stations they have.

    "But I don't know how to find that stuff / indie music sucks!"

    No, it doesn't suck. "High Society" certainly beats the hell out of Queens of the Stone Age. The new Apples In Stereo is great too.

    As for finding the music, the College Music Journal (cmj.com) is a great starting point. I'd point you to WMBC's own music database, which is (barely) searchable, but it's still a little shaky; I'm hoping to straighten out the code this winter and release it publically (it also does the tracking the RIAA requires for Internet broadcasting).

    [On a nice note, I also got "Big Swing Face" by Bruce Hornsby (RCA) for my father, and it wasn't crippled either.]

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:Why my gifts are fine by mr_burns · · Score: 2

      Right On! Enon Rules.

      Other ways to keep track of independent music:

      Some other independent streams:
      somafm.com (indie pop rocks is a favorite)
      spacelab.org (for all your pop and twee needs)

      I recommend keeping a list (textfile) of cd's you want to buy in your taskbar/dock. I listen to net radio and if I like a song, I add the info to the list and research the list ever week or so. The list is one click away in the top level of the GUI, so it's really efficient. I gave the list to my family before christmas this year and I was not disappointed.

      Another way is to join independent music email lists. There are plenty out there. I belong to several. People post reviews of stuff they discovered or ask for recommendations and get great answers. You can also find out about all kinds of underground shows. You can get 3 or 4 bands in a night for less than the cost of a matinee. And they often sell their CD's there for just over half what the majors sell stuff for in the stores.

      I stopped listening to radio after the telecommunications act screwed it all up. But after joining the right email lists and tuning in to independent net radio I've found that the quality and quantity of music in my life has increased tremendously.

      There is life outside the scope of the major labels and it is a good life.

      --
      "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  100. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Very good. I imagine that you didn't get C's in school, but rather As. The various Ph.D.'s--excuse me, Ph.D.s, I was reading the Chicago Manual of style for a moment there--at your college taught you rather well.

    Some things are a matter of style.

  101. If you import music watch out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It looks like other companies are worried and are staring to push out DRMed music as well. I noticed that while it use to be rare, now more cds from Japan are starting to use "copy-protection."

    The article submiter is right, I think a lot of these companies are getting really scared after having nothing happen in their favor for quite some time, and are thinking that they must do something about it now and fast. I would not be surprised if most companies feel that this their last year if they don't do something about it.

  102. Self-Fullfilling Prophecy by felonious · · Score: 1

    Like everyone has said all forms of DRM will always be bypassed and only affect those who know very little. The RIAA is punishing their true customers while having no affect on those who download said materials for free. I knew once they got rid of Napster that this would happen. You take a service like Napster that had centrally based servers, put them out of business, and replace them with non-centralized servers in a true P2P environment and what would you expect to happen? All the RIAA did is make their worst nightmare expand exponentially. Personally I think it's hilarious and they are their own worst enemy. The RIAA is so busy fucking true consumers and pissing them off as well that they fail to see that they are only polishing the brass on the titanic. Their business model from back in the day is all but sunk and they refuse to accept or evolve into what would truely save them. How can a business as a whole that is so money hungry refuse to do what it takes to get back on track instead of turning themselves into the music gestapo? They only have themselves to blame for becoming so demonized. The RIAA have become the equivalent of a computer illiterate user trying to rewrite a program in C+ all the while telling us they know what they are doing and how well it will work. They don't know shit period. I for one would *maybe* buy cds if they were priced right, (way under $10), or if I could use a service that didn't try to fuck me at every opportunity. Greed is a fact of life but I don't have to be a pawn in the game. If the RIAA was actually able to stop all forms of P2P trading, etc. then I'll just go back to ftp and usenet but we all know it's not going to stop so let the RIAA keep spending their profits and hopefully they'll put themselves out of business. Maybe then artists will get the bigger share from their work and we can all be a little happier. Either way fuck the RIAA:)

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
  103. DRM-enabled microwaves by NTmatter · · Score: 1

    No, you can't microwave DRM enabled CD's. It would destroy the part(s) of the disc responsible for preventing you from legitimately accessing your data. Thereby, microwaving a DRM enabled CD in order to destroy the copy protection is in clear violation of the DMCA. Furthermore, by making this idea public knowledge, you have also violated the terms of the DMCA by publishing a method of circumventing DRM. As such, you can expect a team of lawyers and moving men to confiscate your Microwave and CD collection. They will also steal your food, and reformat your hard drive with a sledgehammer. Please stop piracy before it starts. To rat out your friends and family, call our toll-free number at 1-888-666-DMCA

    Expect DRM-enabled microwaves to be appearing on countertops by mid-2004. They are, after all, just big imprecise CD burners in the end, aren't they?

  104. DRM maby? by fraxx · · Score: 1

    I dunno if this has any thing to do with the issue but im going to post it anyways. i got a few CD's this christmas, be they lame ones at that, but, on the front cover there was a sicker saying "This CD has copy protection software installed, please see back for details" it goes on to say that "This CD is intended Hi-Fi CD players only, and will not work on any other device, especialy PC-CDROM drives...". so just out of curiousity i put it in my computer and woh-and-behold the thing worked, and not only that, i used the winamp3 CD-ripper plug-in and ripped the hole damm thing to me hard drive.
    Now is it just me or does the DRM software on the CD seem a little pointless, I may not be able to play the disk as a CD but i can ripp-it and distrobute the content on the internet?

    1. Re:DRM maby? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woh dod, its lyke yoo should LEARN TO SPELL before posting on /.

    2. Re:DRM maby? by fraxx · · Score: 1

      you must be really bord, or really, really sad if you have got nothing better too do than waste time by pointing out the odd spelling or grammatic mistake!. Im sure there are many people like myself who at 00:30 in the morning cannot really be bothered to cross every 't' and dot every 'i' on a message board post. As long as people can understand it, who cares? And... (oh shit, i started a sentance with 'and' the rules of grammer say i cant do that, oh no!) for another thing what exactly has that got to do with the posted comment or the topic of the thread?

  105. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

    No. CD's is prefectly correct in some situations.

    "That CD's case is on top of the player."
    "This CD's TOC is all messed up."

    Bob will set you right.. :)

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  106. I don't believe this by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, I'm going to have to call shenanigans on this. I have never heard of pressed CD's with a lower track width causing a higher rate of errors. And that's all it would be if this happened, a higher error rate causing the CD player to interpolate more samples. These errors would show up on a good ripping program such as EAC, reading in secure mode. It doesn't seem likely that the pressing process could produce a lower quality CD given a bunch of bytes.. it's not like the pressing machine secretly switches bits on and off. So maybe a longer CD has a higher chance of unreadable frames, although I've never heard of this. But to say that the pressing process creates a CD where the bytes of data on the CD do not equal the bytes on the master, is ridiculous.

    Lucius, if it's true you're in recording you're in a unique position to prove/disprove this theory. Just take the master of a track, at 44/16/stereo. Then get a pristine, pressed CD containing that track. Rip it with a good program and a good CD drive, then do a comparison on the files. Except for the very beginning and end of the tracks, they should be identical. Audiophiles will tell you ridiculous things, it doesn't surprise me that someone out there thinks a CD is 'more than just bytes.' I mean, you'll meet people who say that the quality of your DIGITAL audio cable matters - as if a cheap 3 ft piece of fiber will somehow lose bytes, but an expensive 3 ft piece of fiber will get all those bytes there intact. These are the same jokers who buy the CDs that are pressed with gold.

    1. Re:I don't believe this by zhensel · · Score: 2

      Despite playing the first tracks much more than the later tracks on most of my CDs (I'm a habitual cd swapping junkie), the latter tracks on my CDs tend to fail before the earlier ones when the things starts to get beat up. I would assume that an 80 minute disc burnt to the rim of the platter would fare worse than a rip-off weezer album.

      I don't know why this is, exactly, but there is definitely a corrolation between length and failure, at least in my experience. Wow, that has some interesting sexual meaning as well!

    2. Re:I don't believe this by Alexei · · Score: 1

      Probably has to do with that physically, the outer part of the CD will tend to get scratched more than the inner part.

    3. Re:I don't believe this by atrus · · Score: 2

      I mean, you'll meet people who say that the quality of your DIGITAL audio cable matters - as if a cheap 3 ft piece of fiber will somehow lose bytes, but an expensive 3 ft piece of fiber will get all those bytes there intact.

      For that matter, why do we bother using Cat 5 cable, since we all know barb wire works just as well... I mean, it conducts electricity, right? Also realize that audio has no checksum system, it cannot retransmit audio frames like ethernet can. Jitter is a real problem on digital audio cables (and is usualy higher in optical systems, due to do added conversion process).

    4. Re:I don't believe this by netringer · · Score: 1
      I mean, you'll meet people who say that the quality of your DIGITAL audio cable matters - as if a cheap 3 ft piece of fiber will somehow lose bytes, but an expensive 3 ft piece of fiber will get all those bytes there intact.

      For that matter, why do we bother using Cat 5 cable, since we all know barb wire works just as well... I mean, it conducts electricity, right?
      FWWEEET! Bad analogy! The SIGNAL on Ethernet is ANALOG, not digital, thus the need for EIA cable specs like CAT 5 to control loss, crosstalk, &etc. It's as analog as what crosses the phone line on a conventional modem link.

      Fiber indeed carries a digital signal - 1s and 0s.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    5. Re:I don't believe this by atrus · · Score: 2

      And it carries signals using light (lets say amplitude). This can take time to change state from a 1 to a 0 and vice versa, making it analog as well. In fact, anything digital is simply strictly interpreted analog signals.

    6. Re:I don't believe this by topham · · Score: 2

      ding. wrong, it IS digital, but at the frwuqnecies used for Ethernet, and, at the LENGTHS used for ethernet there are issues. (Never mind that high frequency binary on a wire starts to act more analog than digital in some ways...)

      Typical cable for a stereo system (DVD to stereo, etc) is what, 6ft? You could probably point the 2 systems at each other and use the fiber port without a fiber cable and get a good response....

      6ft is nothing, and unless the singal is seriously distorted there will be no data loss or corruption. As for jitter... unless your amplifier has no internal processor doing anything to the sound the jitter is irrelevent as the signal is re-encoded before becoming analog anyway. (my system, admittedly low end has an internal DSP to add various effects. Nothing is immediatly turned to analog from digital, it all goes through a processor first. hence, jitter in isn't the same as the jitter out. (Assuming the internal clock -is- skewed and it results in jitter before the singal is converted to analog the only jitter introduced is from the internal clock, there is no cummulative effect caused by the incoming signal and the outgoing.

    7. Re:I don't believe this by topham · · Score: 2

      jitter != delay.

      Jitter is the shift in frequencies caused by the difference in timing between multiple samples not being consistant, or (this is a stretch, needs a diff. name) the frequency being accurate to itself, but different than intended. (44.5 instead of 44.1, etc.)

      While coax or fiber may make a difference on some systems as the the EXACT delay introduced into the signal before being converted to analog, and could, in a complex setup with multple systems handling the signal (in parallel, not sequential) cause unintended distortions. (2 independant amps introducing different delays driving front, and rear speakers in, say, a THEATER....)

      There is no real reason to believe jitter will be introduced differently by the two in even a half decent system. (Any system which would convert the sample as a whole, and not per bit would NOT be effected.)

    8. Re:I don't believe this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With jitter, you could argue that the jitter created between the transport and DA converter prevents the DAC from encoding a 'pure' stream, thereby modifying the sound not once, but twice. Also, all amps do something to the sound no matter what. They all amplify the signal for the speakers/headphones/recording deck (usually by boosting the electrical strenght of the resultant analog stream). But, yeah, if your DAC has 'effects', then you have more to wory about than jitter (namely, in older and cheaper models, converting to analog before processing effects or converting to a lower sampling rate before processing effects).

      With the cables, I will admit that such things as gold-plating optical cables around the optical eye is pure BS in a technical sense (but does match the gold plated audio cables). But the more expensive optical cables (and analog cables) are built to prevent EM radiation from distorting the signal. The shorter and more protected the cable, the less chance EM radiation will affect the data signals. It is analogous to running Cat 5 next to power lines, but with less interference. Ok, odne playing devils advocate. There is some interference, but the amount is certainly questionable. I think a short cable away from 20 other computer cables and the two attached computers works great.

    9. Re:I don't believe this by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      For that matter, why do we bother using Cat 5 cable, since we all know barb wire works just as well... I mean, it conducts electricity, right?

      Yes, but you would scrach your hands up something awful wiring your network :P.

      Actualy, Cisco or lucent or someone actualy did some research and was able to transmit ethernet over barbed wire, fences, and other not-so-pure conductors.

      In general, though the reason we need to use 'pure' wires like cat-5 is because you're transfering something at a very high rate. There is a huge diffrence between 1ghz and 44khz as far as distortion and stuff.

      Also, when you're talking about fiber, it's totaly diffrent. The cheap $3 toslink optical cables would probably have no trouble transfering even 10ghz ethernet signals.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  107. DRM Means Nothing. by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What the suits don't realize is that if a person can hear something, they can rip it. The only way they can turely stop piracy is to totally silence music, period. And that just won't happen. If someone wants to circumvent copy protection, they will. It doesn't take that much effort. DRM is a lost cause when it comes to music.

    There's nothing to stop someone from hearing a song on the radio and copying it onto a tape or in digital form short of shutting down radio. There's nothing they can do about someone plugging their TV into their computer and copying stuff from DMX or a similar service. Short of sending a "copyright babysitter" into each and every home to monitor every aspect of listening, they can't stop it.

    They can install all sorts of DRM equipment into new computers and such, but that still doesn't put a stopgap into older equipment. Technology has given us control of how we get our media intake. And that scares the piss out of the suits. And if they try to curb technology, we'll only go a step backward to fix that problem.

    To the RIAA/MPAA: Give it up. You're fighting a hopeless battle. Try lowering the price of a CD and maybe we'll stop pirating. We all know how much it takes to make a CD, there's no pulling the wool over our eyes anymore. Do yourselves a favor and treat your customers the way you should.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:DRM Means Nothing. by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      The only way they can turely stop piracy is to totally silence music

      Yeah, I can never get that John Cage stuff to convert to MP3. The compression numbers just don't make sense.

      I mean, what could Compression Percentage: NaN mean???

    2. Re:DRM Means Nothing. by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2

      I take it you fail to understand Cage's music. 4'33 is about anything other than silence.

    3. Re:DRM Means Nothing. by mzo23 · · Score: 1

      I take it you fail to understand, that bragging about understanding art doesn't make you look that smart. Especially since the parent of your reply didn't make any reference to anything other then the fact that the song was silent, regardless of its artistic components. I'm sure his silent song was some great magical artistic statement that's all so enlightening but it's still 4'33 of zero data. Hell i'm humming the song right now, I have the whole thing memorized! I apologize if your post was supposed to be satirical in nature.

      --
      I don't have a sig, can I borrow yours?
    4. Re:DRM Means Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! Next we'll see USB/firewire/digital DRM'ed speakers that have to digitally authenticate with the player, no analogue audio out functionality, and if you do crack it open then you're violating the DMCA.
      The suits have no choice. This is about survival and they're trying their damndest. Silencing music cuts their throats, not yours. They need to sell to keep in business, pay staff, rent, have money for coke, etc. The only thing keeping them alive is the fact that there are technically illiterate people out there. I also doubt for one second that if music cost as little as $2 for a CD that you'd rather buy it than get it for $0. Pandora's box has been opened and the RIAA aren't going to close it any time soon.

  108. Try older CDs that are lying around by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you really aren't sure if the problem is the CD or the player, try playing older CDs that you have lying around. Sony's players seem to be having the most trouble from the reading I've been doing.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  109. Re:To hell with OGG by ralphus · · Score: 1
    Right on foolip!

    Wish i had some mod points right now.

    All my CD's ripped to OGG quality 10.

    --
    Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
  110. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

    I'll tell you what; if it means that I never see "a bunch of box's" or "2 pizza's" again, then let's just say you can never use an apostrophe to pluralize and "CD's" is plain wrong.

  111. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I would complement you on killing a spelling troll, but unfortunatly you trolled a bit yourself.

    You should have written,

    It doesn't matter a whit what looks wrong to you.[I bet your reaching for the pills every day, just to cope with all the bad writing in the world, it must be agony].

    This is not a flame, just a pure simple fact
    'IT DOESN'T MATTER'

  112. sue by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --sue. Sue them, and here's how to do it. Take the LOCAL store manager to court, charge "fraud". Simple fraud is a crime. It's *illegal* to sell something that ain't that something. They offer to sell you a "cd" when it's not-it LOOKS like a cd but it isn't. It's fraud. Buncoism, it's against the law, just so widely done now it appears "lawful". You stick a crippled disk in front of 12 people on a jury and ask them what it is they'll say it's a cd, and cd's should play in cd players PERIOD. It's that simple a concept. Don't try changing the big guys all by yourself it ain't happening, don't try suing sony or walmart, take whomever took YOUR money and sold you something that wasn't as advertised to local small claims court or other appropriate venue for your situation and locality. Use this technique as a force multiplier. Don't even let them skate with a refund or a return, KEEP the crippled disk, that's your evidence of fraud, get some people who are "just following orders" to realise there ARE consequences for their actions. This is a basic problem our society has, "just following orders", it's never anyone's fault, nothing "bad" ever has any named human being attached to it just some vague "corporation" that's a bear to deal with, which is nuts, this goes for politics to economics, people just TAKE IT all the time when you don't have to. Don't let them plead ignorance or pass the buck or just rip off the next guy and the next guy and the next guy. If "anyone you" think this is an important enough issue, prove it! Once you get some judgements against these people, it will force THEM to bump it up, because THEY will in turn sue their bosses for being ordered to perpetuate and expand this scam congame. Work exactly at the level the crime occurred, you and your wallet and someone taking your money at a your local store.

    If you went into the store to buy shampoo and dumped it on your head and it was shoe polish, would you take it or sue the ^&^*(tards? If they kept selling shoe polish labeled as shampoo? Over and over and over again? If you went into the store and bought a can of corn and opened it up and it had rat parts in it instead of corn, would you sue, or just take YOUR time and go back and get a 'real' can of corn, knowing that half the cans on the shelf labeled corn that looked like cans of corn were in reality canned rat?

    The deal is these stores, and their corporate/cartel/monopolist bosses, want cowed sheepish brainwashed consumers, they want you to only grumble, maybe a few people exchange the defective products, they don't want to make the hard decisions that follow ethics, they want to skate the cheapest way they can. Suing some humongous corporation is HARD, suing a place local and a named individual for an exact specific crime is a lot easier and cheaper, and if thousands of people did it this crap would stop tomorrow.

    Sam with spammers, in the states where spam is now illegal-WHY aren't there thousands of lawsuits? I'll tell ya why, it's because 99% of people are sheep, easily cowed, don't want to "rock the boat", scared, think their single efforts won't matter, just content to bitch about things but nothing else-whatever, all excuses really for not taking personal indignation and getting shafted right back to the shafter and getting your day in court. If your cause is righteous, you at least have a chance, never even trying means you'll keep getting shafted, which just further emboldens the badguys to keep ripping people off and pulling more and more scams.

    If it was me with this particular issue, I'd tell that store manager (get their full name and job title) ONE TIME to stop selling crippled "counterfeit cd look-a-likes" that aren't "cds", that unless they are removed or labeled and displayed and stocked completely separately from REAL cd's PROMINENTLY six ways to sunday with BIG SIGNS that they AREN'T cd's and WON'T play in most normal cd players that you intend to sue HIM in local court personally,that you will file an official police report, then follow through if they keep ripping people off. Getting ripped off the first time is his fault, twice is "your" fault because "anyone you" puts up with it, generally and non specifically speaking.

    1. Re:sue by Foogle · · Score: 2

      You seem to feel pretty strongly about this issue. Why don't you sue someone?

    2. Re:sue by zogger · · Score: 2

      --I have, twice, both times against government people seriously abusing their positions, won both times. And you? What have you done?

      To me, drm and music cd's are a grade c low interest, I am way more concerned with what I feel are much more important issues, nothing big, just the growing power of this junta that's seized control of the US and is hell bent on inmposing a two class master/serf society based on fear, surveillance, command and control. I "work" on those issues more. I just like commenting "in general" and offerring advice that anyone by themselves *can* make a difference IF they actually follow through and try, IF they think they've been screwed and have some evidence. Anything from organizing a boycott, to a lawsuit to whatever, what DON'T work is just complaining about it. I've looked at this "cd that ain't a cd" issue in the stores, it's obvious as all get out, they are clearly mixed in with "normal" cds and are being sold "the same as".Miniscule fine print in jargon that is meaningless to most people, they are sold and displayed as 'cds" and they aren't. It's a pure scam. It certainly looks like consumer fraud and buncoism to me. So I wrote *IF* this was a concern of mine and I had become a victim, I would calmly go and sue them-whomever was in charge of receiving my money for the counterfeit- in local court. Not enough people do that, they fail to follow through on various things, they just take it where the sun don't shine over and over again. I don't know WHY but I can make some guesses at it, which I outlined above.

      This is a commentary forum, I commented,I've seen this same topic of bogus counterfeit non-cd look a likes come up here it seems a hundred times already, yet to hear of anyone actually using "the law" right back at them. Now sometimes-a lot of times-lawsuits are trivial and unwarranted, other times they are necessary and it's always a judgement call. Basic history and research shows that large concerns will continually try to skate the law or alter reality in their favor, BUT, there's differing ways to 'fight back", I encourage those actions and mindset, for people to stop being professiobnal "victims". So ya, it sounds strong, and I'm emotional about it, so what? Better than just hoping someone else does it. Myself, I don't buy cd's except for very occassional older used ones, sometimes entire years go by I purchase zero, I don't download mp3 music whatsoever,I own none of that, zero, and don't own any "illegal" software, but say if I DID purchase pre recorded new retail music and it was a major enjoyment and interest of mine I certainly might sue over these crippled disks. Just encouraging the others here who feel strongly about it-or any other *thing* they feel strongly about- to take the next logical step, and take the moral and legal high ground as well.

    3. Re:sue by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      The reason most people don't sue, is because it's often not worth their while. They've got enough crap to deal with, with their boyfriend/girlfriend, wife/husband, boss, kids, work, parents, etc. etc. etc. without taking some company to court so they can be the snowflake that eventually turns into the avalanche that takes out evil corporate greed/stupidity/inhumanity/corruption.

      That's why you can poke a cat, or a dog for a certain amount of time, before it tries to rip your finger off... it just wants peace, and for the hassle to go away. A certain amount is tolerated, in the hope that it'll stop. When it appears to be going to go on and on.... then action is taken.

      One or two "intentionally faulty" cd's [as I'd call them] is quite probably within someone's tolerance zone.
      But things may change, as time goes on.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:sue by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      and what? Chew chewlie's gum instead?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    5. Re:sue by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      --sue. Sue them, and here's how to do it. Take the LOCAL store manager to court, charge "fraud". Simple fraud is a crime. It's *illegal* to sell something that ain't that something.

      For all your moral statement here, there's something you're just not getting. It's not the LOCAL store that's responsible for the CD. Sure, maybe they should post a warning or something that says "Some CDs here are copy-protected, use at your own risk", but it's just not their fault.

      Your proposed suit would be frivolous because you're holding the wrong people responsible. It's just like holding tobacco companies responsible for lung cancer. Now, while I'll be the first to admit that their actions trying to prevent people from knowing about the dangers of smoking is certainly worth fighting over, it's not the tobacco company who's at fault because *I* smoke. *I* know the dangers, so hold me personally responsible for myself.

      To apply the reasoning to a local music store, *if* they know that some of their CDs are unplayable, they should either post a generic warning to that effect, or put specific warnings on the CDs, or at least say something when the CD is purchased.

      The only reasonable result of your lawsuit is to force the local music stores to inform their customers.

      Any other result will be nothing more than using the local store as a scapegoat, and will do NOTHING to prevent the bigger companies from continuing to do what they do. It's immoral to use someone as a scapegoat. Hold the appropriate people responsible for their actions.

      If that takes money, raise the money. There's plenty of people to support it. All it takes is someone to take action.

      There's people taking action. If you prefer NOT to take action personally, give money to those who are, because they *need* it, in order to pursue the morally (and legally) correct action.

      As a parting question, who is responsible for underage drinking? (Assuming for a moment that underage drinking is itself a problem) Is it the people that make the liquor, or the people that make it available to underagers?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    6. Re:sue by knodi · · Score: 2
      to sunday with BIG SIGNS that they AREN'T cd's and WON'T play in most normal cd players that you intend to sue HIM in local court personally,that you will file an official


      If they didn't play in most CD players, then nobody would sell them period. The whole point of the tech is they play in MOST cd players and not in MOST computers. If you went to court, you might win, but you might get a judge who said "This CD plays in 99% of players. You are obviously suing a merchant to make a point for your political agenda. Frivolous lawsuit, case dismissed."
      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    7. Re:sue by shepd · · Score: 1

      >you might get a judge who said "This CD plays in 99% of players. You are obviously suing a merchant to make a point for your political agenda. Frivolous lawsuit, case dismissed."

      At which point you sue again for the next disc. You might get another judge, but even if you don't, bring your MP3 CD player, your laptop, your home CD transport, and your car stereo into court. This time ask the court how, exactly, you were able to procure so many items which won't play this CD. Demonstrate that they are unable to play the CD. You might want to propose the question "Are all these items fraudulently advertising an ability to play CDs, or is this CD actually not a CD?".

      And this time, should you get an unfavourable judgement, you can now sue for your "defective" CD audio devices. Don't forget to summon the judge as a witness to your earlier demonstration for enhanced effect. :-)

      [ You might want to careful, I hear that if you piss off a judge too much you might get to spend a night with Bubba for contempt of court. Be careful not to drop the soap. Ask the guy who sued Coke for not coughing up the dough on their advertising campaign for more info on that topic. ]

      No, IANAL. But I play one on slashdot.

      This legal fiction brought to you by the letters E, S and Q.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  113. Santana's Shaman by rossz · · Score: 2

    Under Windoze, this CD launches a program that wants to connect to somewhere via the internet. No f*ing way. I just want to play the CD on my computer because the stereo is in the other room and is not convenient.

    I haven't tried under Linux because I broke the sound driver and haven't gotten around to fixing it, yet.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Santana's Shaman by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Under Windoze, this CD launches a program that wants to connect to somewhere via the internet.
      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, CDs LISTEN TO YOU.
  114. Probable explanation by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is probably because the later tracks are closer to the edge of the CD. Normal wear and tear from handling the CD may beat up the tracks closer to the outside. I don't take any original CDs in my car, it's too easy for them to get beaten up.

  115. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • Joe Studio Drummer could care less

    He could not care less, or he couldn't care less, not he could care less. It's not a difficult concept.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  116. Well, if you find that amusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just read everything marked -1 troll and -1 off-topic.

    Don't mod the crap up, a lot of us don't like reading shit that is unrelated to the topic.

    Seriously, if you want this crap use a search engine and find it yourslef.

  117. I can store data error-free on an 80-minute CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But not audio.

    I'm sorry, I can't buy this. I do understand the tracks are narrower. In fact, they are narrower than the spec says you should use. But still, if I can store data on an 80-minute CD-ROM and read it, I can store audio a 80-minute redbook audio CD and read it.

    1. Re:I can store data error-free on an 80-minute CD by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      Actually, you can't. The data has more error correction information, so you are able to store less. A 650MB data CD will actually store over 700MB of audio.

  118. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For words of less than 3 letters, that's not necessarily correct. Witness it's/its. Assface. Further, when words of length less than three are pluralized, particularly in the case of acronyms spelled lowercase, the apostrophe is allowed. The great thing about people is that we are a bit more powerful at lexical scanning and semantic parsing than Lex+Yacc.

  119. This was actually on national UK BBC TV by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, right up there. "Many CD's bought this Christmas will come with little stickers that say they contain copy protection technology designed to defeat music pirates". And so on. Evil music pirates, starving artists, copy protection rather than rights removal. No hint that it's snake oil, no suggestion that all it does it piss people off and actively drive them to P2P. A rather ambiguous assertion at the end that "But some people who have got used to getting music for free might not buy it at all." What the hell that's meant to signify, I don't know, other than that the BBC employs way too many inbred RADA rejects in their features department.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  120. Experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    What are other Slashdot readers experiencing today?
    I am experiencing a nauseating feeling when I see that you do not know how to write 'CDs'.
    Hey ./ editors, please use a spell checker at least on your titles...

    1. Re:Experience... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Hey ./ editors, please use a spell checker at least on your titles...

      To nitpick, it's "/." not "./".

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  121. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT DOESN'T MATTER,
    i don't care evil spelling troll

  122. I think DRM is a great present... by AtomicX · · Score: 1

    The thrill of copying the disc with EasyAudioCopy and giving it to a friend and therby screwing yet another $5 out of the tight-fisted RIAA is all the satisfaction I need.

  123. Re:To hell with OGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there just some discussion here a couple of days back about how ogg-vorbis is actually worse quality than mp3 for "archival" bitrates...
    128kbit vorbis may be better, but afaik for 192kbit+ or vbr at those bitrates mp3 wins....

  124. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeh, they'll never get to your door, the must think you a martian or somthing with that kind of illegable writing.

    Why do you give a fuck, please tell me, I wan't to be anal toooooooo. please oh please oh please mr troll please tell me.

  125. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    From the Gregg Reference Manual 7th Edition 623: "Capital letters and abbreviations ending with capital letters are pluralized by adding s alone."

    Examples given include CPUs, CEOs, and Ph.D.s. (NB: the use of the serial comma, as well).

  126. You got your formats wrong. by Fross · · Score: 4, Informative

    i dont know what crack they smoke where you work, but...

    Track widths do not vary with CDs so you can stuff more on. Hence there is no such "narrow track width" problem with CD. however, this *does* apply to vinyl, and is one of the main culprits of poor vinyl quality over the last 15 years.
    I've not heard of any "thin allyplate" problems with CDs, however using thin, low quality material has been a problem for sound quality for vinyl. some believe this was intentional on the labels' part to get people to switch formats.

    also, having worked in the music business myself, i'm happy to say that i've never encountered an instance where the producers don't get a test pressing.

    methinks your record exec may not be the only cokehead. ;)

    fross

    1. Re:You got your formats wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may not be the way DRM works, but CDR-99s definately DO have a narrower track width than a CDR-74. They're still both within "tolerance", but the 99 is narrower than the 74. Track widths can vary.

  127. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by slipgun · · Score: 2

    Very good. I imagine that you didn't get C's in school, but rather As

    Depends which subject you're talking about :-)

    Some things are a matter of style.

    Yes, some things are, and I really can't be bothered to argue about it - we'll (or well if you prefer) have to agree to disagree. What is the Chicago Manual of Style, by the way?

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  128. I got one by smartin · · Score: 2

    It has CD Extra on it and includes a video which would make it seem PC friendly. I put it in my PC under windoze and the machine locked up. Ejected it and put it in my cd burner and it was able to start CD Extra and i could play the video. Could not listen to the CD however even by trying to play it under the CD Extra program. Tried it on the Mac and it works fine. I can play it and rip it under iTunes. Tried it on the same PC under linux and was able to play it fine. Some thing is definitely going on with the disk but not working under windoze is the norm as far as i'm concerned.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  129. Christmas rage (software & DRM annoyances) by gdav · · Score: 1

    The DRM mess has collided with another well-known mess - horribly bad software.

    This Christmas, amongst other things, my daughter got an iPod and my son got one of the new, USB-driven, Sony NetMD minidisc players, and the Shakira album on "CD".

    Well, 'tis the Night After Christmas, and all through the house, not a creature is stirring except.... me. Now, after a few false starts, the Shakira album is going to .WAV files thanks to a well-placed sticker rather than a sharpie. For the iPod, I installed the recommended MusicMatch Jukebox, which is simply the worst piece of commercial software I have ever seen. So I deleted that and have since installed and happily used ephpod.

    Sadly, for the minidisc player I am stuck with another dire piece of software, Sony's OpenMG. Incredibly cluttered UI, bizarre colours, incomprehensible DRM-inspired nomenclature ("check in", "check out").

    I'm not cruel enough to leave my son to try to figure out how to transfer his brand new (Sony-sourced) Shakira album to his brand-new (Sony-sourced) minidisc player. Hence I'm staying up late to do it all myself.

    I'm a geek dad. I moved RAMTOP on my Sinclair as a kid. I remember the syntax to PIP. I have known the obscure pleasure of deeply nested emulation. My kids used to mock me by chanting "SCSI BIOS! SPOOLER! SCSI BIOS! SPOOLER!" at the tops of their voices. If I'm finding it tiresome and laborious, then quite a lot of unhappy customers out there are finding it impossible.

  130. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by eggnet · · Score: 1

    One can only hope you're trolling.

    Possessive pronouns don't have apostrophes: its, hers, theirs, yours, his, mine, ours, etc. Word length has no bearing on the matter.

  131. Wanna end DRM? by 1g$man · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way to end DRM is simple: find someone more powerful than the RIAA.

    And the only one more powerful than the RIAA in this country... is Wal-Mart.

    Get a few thousand geeks to buy copy protected CDs, and then demand a return at the same time because they are defective. If you get Wal-Mart annoyed enough, they'll throw their weight around and make changes.

    Ever wonder why many DVDs at Wal-Mart are fullscreen instead of widescreen? Because enough rednecks returned their DVDs and whined "'cos they didn't fill up mah dam screen!"

    1. Re:Wanna end DRM? by 1g$man · · Score: 1

      Funny?!? No, I'm serious!

  132. ASAIG by famazza · · Score: 2

    • As Simple As It Gets.

    Does these CDs have the CDDA logo on it? If it does Sony/Columbia must find a way to make it play in your ye old CD player.

    If it doesn't, you should have paid attention and bought only CDs compatible to your equipment.

    In both cases I think that you should sue them! Just fight within the same rules!

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  133. Apostrophe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD's means "something that belongs to CD". The plural of CD is CDs, just as the plural of Cat is Cats, not Cat's. If the people who submit the stories can't spell, and the editors can't spell, Slashdot could at least have a spellchecker.

    1. Re:Apostrophe by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      CD's means "something that belongs to CD". The plural of CD is CDs, just as the plural of Cat is Cats, not Cat's. If the people who submit the stories can't spell, and the editors can't spell, Slashdot could at least have a spellchecker.

      I'd rather see an idiot checker.

      First you demonstrate that "CD's" is a correctly spelled possessive. Then you show us the correct way of pluralizing CD. Then you think a spellchecker would fix the problem?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  134. -5, religious testimonial disguised as a reply. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Some would say only God would allow a transcendental number raise to another transcendental number, raise to an imaginary number to come out so nice as just -1!

    Would that be the same God who designed the relative sizes of penises and anuses?

    Your method of "reasoning" could lead to some very alarming conclusions if you applied it the same to every observation.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  135. Actually, yes, they did. Re:Let's review by mbourgon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'll briefly mention Windows NT SP 6, which broke Lotus Notes. I don't remember the specifics, but SP6 broke Notes' TCP/IP stack, while Outlook was unaffected. Microsoft replaced it a week or so later with SP6a, and IIRC never really mentioned why the 6a - they just pulled 6, and unless you were affected you'd never know. We got bit.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  136. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2
    Exactly. And the Chicago Manual of Style says that Ph.D.'s is correct. (It does agree with you, however, on abbreviations without punctuation.) Other manuals of style make an exception for abbreviations ending with the letter 's'. Still others agree with me.

    Everything2 has the best comments on the matter that I've come across:
    One thing that (excuse me) has been covered is the use of the apostrophe to indicate plural amounts of letters and numbers.

    "Bs" or "B's."
    "1980s" or "1980's"

    Unfortunatly, this matter in a flux, and is really a question of style based on appearance and personal preference. There are conflicting reports on proper usage in this matter from several reliable sources. There is one rule that seems to be constant, however. If the letter (or group of letters) is an S or ends in S, it is proper to use the apostrophe to pluralize it, such as: "There are five S's in that word" and not "There are five Ss in that word".

    It is also generally considered improper to use an apostrophe to pluralize abbreviations such as CD. This, however, also is conflicted.

    The bottom line? Do it however you want to (or whichever way your teacher wants for assignments).
  137. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    Amazon has some reviews.

    It's the same kind of book as the MLA handbook.

  138. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First, where the hell are you going to send a check? Their fanclub? Do you know Timberlake's address? How about Snoop Dogg's address? How about Creed's address? Tim MCGraw? Whoever it is you listen to, you probably don't have any idea how to actually get money to them, unless they are local to you. And that's an altogether different story.

    A fair question. Answer: http://www.fairtunes.com/

    Aside from the actual music, there are the studio people.
    Bands pay for their studio time to produce the album. And they pay a lot for it. The "studio people" got their money already.

    The cover art came from somewhere, and that person should be compensated.
    If I download the MP3 for a song, why exactly should I pay for cover art?

  139. Mod the parent up =) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod the parent up...fairtunes needs as much play as it can get ;)

  140. CD with DRM by HardYakka · · Score: 1

    I got the CD "Now that's what I call Christmas" and it won't play in any of my PC drives or my wife's iMac.
    However, Nero reported it was copy protected, so I checked the box to override it and the copy works fine.
    There is NO warning on the CD about DRM.

  141. CDs not on my list anymore by inkswamp · · Score: 2

    My wife and I used to buy each other lots of CDs for the holidays, but that has since changed. She bought me one this year (Audioslave) and thankfully it works fine. Given all the publicity these DRM-crippled pseudo-CDs have received, we've decided it's best to avoid that particular gift. We listen to a lot of music on our computer, and who wants to unwrap a gift to discover that it can't be ripped to your player of choice? "Merry Christmas, dear... and yes, I have the receipt so we can take this back." Lame. The RIAA's paranoia and lack of insight are rapidly putting itself out of business.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  142. freedb by Rambo,+John+J. · · Score: 0

    Freedb was having lots of problems yesterday, presumably due to a Christmas-induced DDoS attack.

    Word on the street is that it was intentional (crash the server before/while everyone pops in the new cd).

  143. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everything2 has the best comments on the matter that I've come across:

    Someone quoting Everything2 as authoritative is the best evidence of the apocalypse that I've come across.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  144. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if he actually meant he could care less? Perhaps he cared, even a very tiny bit, but it could be worse! It is, as you say, not a difficult concept.

  145. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    That's a possessive, not a plural (the latter is the subject at hand).

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  146. Get your facts straight. by gkuchta · · Score: 1

    Get your facts straight. That's Euler's identity, not Gauss'.

    -5 points for getting that wrong.
    -10 points for being an idiot.

    --
    when salmon are outlawed, only outlaws will have salmon
  147. I don't buy CDs anymore by orenzero · · Score: 1

    ... unless they're by an indy. Fuck the Big Five... fuck 'em where they breathe. I'll not buy anymore of their crap, ever. May they die out early, and often.

    -oZ

    1. Re:I don't buy CDs anymore by IVI4573R · · Score: 1

      I don't buy any cds that give profit to the RIAA. So that leaves me with buying from used cd stores, buying online, and buying special cd like the KISS Buzz Band collection where all the profit goes to a charity or some other organization. The buzz band cd is a colection of rock music and all of its profit goes to the Hispanic Scolorship Fund.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  148. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    Hehehe...True. But I didn't include the comments for any sort of authority value.

  149. Click here to sue by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    Click here to sue. Milberg Weiss, the well-known class-action law firm, is sueing the record companies over defective CDs. They sue big companies all the time and win, which makes them tons of money. Mostly they do shareholder lawsuits; they're the lead plaintiff in Enron litigation. But they do other class action work as well.

    Here's how they put it in their court filing.

    • Defendants conspired and agreed among themselves to sell defective audio discs which were rendered unreproducible or unstable for use in many personal computers, Macintosh computers, compact disc players, digital video disc players, car stereos and digital video game consoles. Defendants have affirmatively concealed the fact that their defective audio discs interfere with their customers' legal right to play or transfer music to other playback mediums. Additionally, Defendants have collectively misrepresented these defective audio discs as being standard Compact Discs (``CDs''), which they are not. Defendants undertook the acts alleged herein pursuant to, and in furtherance of, this conspiracy and agreement. Defendants manufactured, disseminated, advertised or sold these defective audio discs in such a way as to collectively conceal from plaintiffs, Class members and the general public the fact that these defective audio discs were of inferior quality and deprived customers of their legal right to backup and transfer their own music to other playback mediums. Such concealment resulted in plaintiffs, Class members and the general public paying more for these defective audio discs in expectation that, inter alia, the music would be playable on all playback devices and would be of equal quality to CDs, which they are not.

    That's clear enough.

    They ask that if you've found a defective CD, report it to them by clicking here.

    1. Re:Click here to sue by haggar · · Score: 2

      Wow, great news! In all sincerity, I was expecting some ambitious law firm to tackle the issue, thank you for finally showing me that it's actually happening. I hope these Milberg Weiss guys are as "bad" as their fame suggests.

      Incidently, does possessing one of those silver-colored discs (avoiding here to call them CDs) entitle you for a portion of the possible punitive charges?

      --
      Sigged!
  150. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by kirisu · · Score: 1

    It's a way of writing papers. Along with the MLA, APA, and a whole bunch of others. Here is a link to the FAQ for it.

  151. YOU ARE SO FIRED! by YOU+ARE+SO+FIRED! · · Score: 0

    I don't see no priss frost. You should be ashamed of yourself. Come on, pack your stuff up and get out.

  152. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by kirisu · · Score: 1

    Here's the link...

    http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/cmosf aq/

  153. I'm a FAG with a MACINTOSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and some CDs get stick in my MAC and I have to bring it to the Mac store to get it fixed.

    BOO HOO HOO!

    WHAA WHAA WHAA!

    It's not fair! Everything should work in my Mactintosh. I love to get fucked up the ass, like all Macintosh users do.

  154. Um by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, your example sucks. If you were running ethernet in 3 foot lengths it really wouldn't matter what you used for a cable. Barb wire would work fine actually, if you had 2 pairs.

    So back to what I'm saying, audiophiles love patting themselves on the back about this shit, and you've bought it hook line and sinker. It's a piece of plastic, a damn tube that blinks bits. Although I'm not convinced, I'll give you the jitter - who knows, maybe a golden ears listener can detect it. I can't, and you probably can't either. Fine, let's talk about coax then. You'll hear audiophiles whinging about true 75 ohm cables, how RCA connectors are bad - we're talking about a two wire digital connector. Have these people heard that a $5 USB cable has more bandwidth than their precious cables? And yes, they'll actually tell you that coax has jitter too. Am I supposed to believe that the sub-nanosecond time it takes for that signal to reach my decoder, actually degrades the audio? Come on. Most audiophile stuff is pure snake oil, bought into by gullible saps who want to pretend they can 'hear the difference.'

    1. Re:Um by atrus · · Score: 2
      It is a damn tube which carries light. You are right. When we are talking about a $5 USB cable, are we comparing digital bandwidth? Digital audio signals are usualy PCM encoded or encoded using something like DD (AC3), DTS, etc. This has a limited fixed bandwidth, and is not very demanding in its own right. As long as the decoder can find the clock and sync on it, it has a pretty good chance of finding the signal intact. Poor quality cable CAN make a difference, but its not the limiting factor in most audio installations. But once you have a pure Rotel/McIntosh setup going to your 6 B&W 801s (DTS EX), you're running out of things to replace (which confirms your views). It is not the first thing I would replace (BTW, a small piece of coax with RCA jacks, or even a suitably thick RCA cable will work just fine as a digital coax connection).

      The big cable quality issue comes when you go for analog audio. I'm not saying a pure silver $20/foot cable is going to sound better than a silver coated $7/foot cable for line level audio, but it WILL sound better than a 10 ft copper wire about the thickness of mechcanical pencil lead (your average RCA cable). There will be a difference between 22 gauge speaker wire (the thin stuff) and 12 gauge speaker wire (reasonably price at home depot). There is a difference between a low end Kenwood receiver (ick) and a high end Denon receiver (or anything priced higher). And lets not even try to compare low end speakers (Bose, Sony, etc) with high end speakers (B&W, Martin Logan, Paradigm, etc). You do get what you pay for... But there is a nice "value" level, where the next price level doesn't seem worth it.

    2. Re:Um by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Your post reminds me of a great quote I saw on /. a while ago: "You listen with your ears, not your ass, so quit being so anal."

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Um by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I'm not saying a pure silver $20/foot cable is going to sound better than a silver coated $7/foot cable for line level audio, but it WILL sound better than a 10 ft copper wire about the thickness of mechcanical pencil lead (your average RCA cable).

      Here's what's funny about most audiophiles, and why we laugh at them so much:

      They don't know jack shit about professional audio.

      I won't pretend that I do know it all (I started out at the bottom and got laughed at when I said I needed a 100 ft. RCA cable for a dance party, at the local sound shop), but I can tell you this: Pros don't use RCA cables. Period. Absolutely no exceptions, unless it's going through a transformer (and then it had better damn well be the only way to get the audio).

      Come back to me when you use balanced XLR, or at least balanced 1/4". Then we'll talk audio quality. And we'll also talk about how the only reason you want higher gauge cable is so that the sound engineer doesn't destroy your cables when he rolls the chair over them. And, best of all, when you start to use XLR cables, you won't care about shielding, actually, you will care -- you'll be reqesting that there is none.

      >There will be a difference between 22 gauge speaker wire (the thin stuff) and 12 gauge speaker wire (reasonably price at home depot).

      Sure. If you have a 200 watt RMS per channel stereo, the 22 gauge cable might warm up, thereby wasting some of the power. However, I've yet to come across one of these at a price I can afford. In the sub $10k range 22 gauge cable might provide some micro-ohms of resistance to your signal. I hardly think it's anything to write home about.

      Although I do use higher gauge cable, preferrably about 16 gauge. I normally use SPT-2 lamp cord, since it's available in this gauge, is CSA approved, and, most importantly, unlike most "speaker" cable, it's actually very flexible. Again, this is because I don't wan't my cable to split when I screw/clip it into the terminals at the speakers. At the small club I've been elected sound engineer for, though, we don't even do this. 1/4" jacks are just much more reliable for us.

      Now, when I get the opportunity to wire some 5000 Watt RMS subs to a 630V amp, then I think I'd be using some super low gauge wire, since I don't want to start a fire. Other than starting fires, durability, and power loss due to heat, there isn't much reason to use a low gauge cable.

      >There is a difference between a low end Kenwood receiver (ick) and a high end Denon receiver (or anything priced higher).

      I would have agreed 10 years ago. Today, I hardly think so, except in how they compare watts. The Denon doesn't lie, whereas getting a proper set of stats on the Kenwood would be difficult. A lower-power Denon receiver probably uses the same generic amp chips (maybe even the damned hard to find STK chips) as the Kenwood.

      Honestly, it isn't rocket science to amplify a sub 20 kHz signal. Get someone an LM12 + a good power supply and I bet someone who can wire their car stereo can build their own amp with BETTER quality, and with more power than the Denon (but cheaper ;-).

      >And lets not even try to compare low end speakers (Bose, Sony, etc) with high end speakers (B&W, Martin Logan, Paradigm, etc).

      Now here is where things have never been perfected. Being a tight-ass myself, I've elected for option 3: Build your own. If you follow the design rules correctly you can build a set of speakers as good as any other top-notch set out there. The only difference is yours come out rectangular, whereas theirs don't. Well, that and when you build it yourself you can control the sound of the speakers to your liking (A friend of mine suggested my speakers sounded a lot like Marshalls. Not owning any speakers of that brand myself, I really can't comment on the truth of this).

      >You do get what you pay for...

      This I can agree with, however not exactly as you would suggest.

      For example, you get what you pay for in a Sony amp with 500 Sony watts because the thing is much more likely to XPlod when you have it that high (the best are the cheap receivers that say 500 Watts, but have a 2A current rating), whereas the expensive receiver sounds good all the way up to its rating, and probably won't explode no matter how poorly you treat it.

      That's the difference. The fact is the Sony amp will sound as good as the Denon when 10 Watts are drawn out of each. It's just that when 500 Watts are being drawn from both the Denon will still sound good, whereas the Sony Xplods into a burst of flames and smoke.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Um by salesgeek · · Score: 2

      LOL! People can take the fun out of anything by simply going overboard on the technology. Doesn't matter if it's roller-coasters, movies, music or sex. I sold stereo gear when I was in college and used to get a huge kick out of audiophiles who would come in and while I was working with another customer and drop a nerd factoid and my customer and I. Usually it would be about RCA connectors or cables or my personal favorite, the "accuacy of a loudspeaker." I'd just wait for the nerd attack to end, thank Mr. Audiophile for enhancing my knowledge and say to my customer, "What's important is how it sounds to you. All the specs in the world can't replace your ears. If it doesn't sound good to you, just don't buy it." They bought more than they didn't.

      $G

      --
      -- $G
    5. Re:Um by Theaetetus · · Score: 2
      I won't pretend that I do know it all (I started out at the bottom and got laughed at when I said I needed a 100 ft. RCA cable for a dance party, at the local sound shop), but I can tell you this: Pros don't use RCA cables. Period. Absolutely no exceptions, unless it's going through a transformer (and then it had better damn well be the only way to get the audio).

      If you mean that pros avoid unbalanced analog like the plague, yes, we do. However, we do use RCA cables for S/PDIF (though, you're right, we prefer AES/EBU, which is carried over XLRs).

      Come back to me when you use balanced XLR, or at least balanced 1/4". Then we'll talk audio quality. And we'll also talk about how the only reason you want higher gauge cable is so that the sound engineer doesn't destroy your cables when he rolls the chair over them. And, best of all, when you start to use XLR cables, you won't care about shielding, actually, you will care -- you'll be reqesting that there is none.

      Not so... Shielding is still very important in balanced audio. Balancing your audio takes care of electromagnetic interference (RF getting into your cables). Shielding takes care of electrostatic interference (rubbing your feet on the carpet, then touching the cable, in addition to other types of surges and spikes).

      >And lets not even try to compare low end speakers (Bose, Sony, etc) with high end speakers (B&W, Martin Logan, Paradigm, etc).

      Incidentally, if we want to talk high-end, forget those... Try B&K, Sausalito Audio Works, Genelec, etc. Three-way powered studio monitors with active crossovers. Paradigm, B&W, Martin Logan are high-end... for consumers. Very different from the pro stuff.

      That's the difference. The fact is the Sony amp will sound as good as the Denon when 10 Watts are drawn out of each. It's just that when 500 Watts are being drawn from both the Denon will still sound good, whereas the Sony Xplods into a burst of flames and smoke.

      Well, one other side part - noise floor. The Denon will have a lower noise floor at 10 W than the $10 Sony will. Also, probably better filters internally, better caps, etc. But those are minor differences.

      And incidentally, I am a professional - more than half my life in the industry, currently in broadcast engineering/repair&maintenance, previously in recording/mastering, and before that in live sound.

      In spite of what "audiophiles" will say, there has not been an accurate-enough meter invented that can measure the difference between a 20 dollar speaker cable and a $10,000 speaker cable.

      -T

    6. Re:Um by shepd · · Score: 1

      >The Denon will have a lower noise floor at 10 W than the $10 Sony will.

      While this is true, to a degree, using a proper power supply would of course decrease noise effects, it's been my expereince that only the world's most pathetic audio equipment (Pyramid, Road Gear, Realistic, etc) suffers from perceptible noise problems at power levels this low. It might be there, but I doubt it's audible in all but the absolute worst equipment. Maybe I need to hook my oscilloscope up to my Kenwood amp and compare it to the (overpriced) H/K amp. I still think I'm going to feel like I've been cheated.

      As far as ESD goes, make your guys wear static wrist bands! ;-) It's like being on a telephone without actually using one! Besides, why is a home user putten der fingerpoken in the equipment when it's in use?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Um by Theaetetus · · Score: 2
      As far as ESD goes, make your guys wear static wrist bands! ;-) It's like being on a telephone without actually using one! Besides, why is a home user putten der fingerpoken in the equipment when it's in use?

      No, I'm talking about during regular use - touching the outside of an (insulated) audio cable that's unshielded will cause an audible pop if you're charged. Even touching the outside of some equipment - particularly if the case of the equipment is metal (and thus tied to the same ground inside), it can create a nice audible pop if things aren't properly grounded and shielded.

      -T

  155. Artists could make more $$$ WITHOUT DRM by jtoj · · Score: 1
    I have a CD from a Brazilian artist who produced his own CD and shipped it inside a music related magazine.
    You would find it on Mag stands and supermarket checkouts.
    The MP3's of his songs were everywhere - he made them and posted on Napster.
    He is not Elthon John, but considering how most musicians survive, he is doing all right.

    He made a lot more money than a record label would pay him. Does any artist get a clean U$1,00 from a CD?

    It costed a lot less than any CD on the nearest Bestbuy, and you got a magazine ( may be good or not )

    Your target audience goes to the supermarket, right? Some live on donuts and Burgers, i know...

    Record labels are not the only way to hit the market.

    sig sig sputnik.

    --
    Jose T Oliveira Jr.
  156. NetMD and OpenMG Jukebox by n9mtb · · Score: 1
    Thankfully, there are better ways to download to NetMD than the utter crapware OpenMG Jukebox. For directly copying CD->MD, the Simple Burner application is a lot more convenient and DRM-free -- no "checkout" limits, tracks are editable on the MD deck, etc. (If Simple Burner didn't come with your MD recorder, it can be downloaded .)

    For MP3 downloads, you can avoid OpenMG by using RealOne Player; a plugin for Sony devices (including NetMD) is available through its online update facility. Like Simple Burner, RealOne shows absolutely no trace of OpenMG's idiotic DRM, and unlike OpenMG it doesn't re-encode all your music when you import it into the media library. (It does have to convert to ATRAC3 as it downloads, of course, but it doesn't waste space keeping the converted tracks around unless you ask it to.) One minor disadvantage of RealOne's NetMD support is that it has no support for grouping tracks.

    There are also some independent utilities starting to appear; more information on some of them can be found in the minidisc.org NetMD FAQ.

    Another MP3->MD option is to use Simple Burner along with a CD imager such as Nero ImageDrive, Daemon Tools, CloneCD etc. RealOne is still more convenient, but this method allows the use of whatever audio-related features your burning software has (filters, inserting track marks using a .cue file, etc).

    Unfortunately there is still no way to upload directly from a MD. You can at least automate the process of analog uploading, and with a high quality sound card the result should at least sound good even though it will take a long time.

  157. Sony = Columbia by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

    Columbia belongs to Sony. So, in effect, only Sony is guilty in this particular instance, although Vivendi Universal and Bertelsmann are both deep in DRM.

  158. Here's an idea... by putigger · · Score: 1

    Remember the "Real California Cheese" campaign or the "Got Milk" campaign. An ad campaign telling consumers to "look for the CD Audio label" (i.e., Red book compliance) would properly hurt DRM title sales significantly. Of course,, who knows where the money for a national campaign would come from. However, regular ads in Rolling Stone, Wired, and some other carefully targetted publications could probably accomplish quite a bit.

  159. CD drives contain drm in firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    All optical drives by a certain manufacturer contain drm in firmware one tech web site reported a few months ago. They were caught quietly installing drm in the firmware, disabled, that could be turned on at a later date through software, or possibly through CDs. When confronted by the reporter, a manufacturer's spokesperson confirmed this information.

    The above is a true account of a one paragraph story I read sometime between three months ago and mid July. I have been archiving drm stories and news for a web site I'm developing. I read the above information quickly,and then went offline. I was going to go back the next day to download and archive the story, but I couldn't find it again when I remembered about it. I even tried googling it, but couldn't find it.

    Please, if you are good at finding information buried deeply in web sites or archived, and you are good with google, or have access to lexis/nexis (or is that nexis/lexis?) and are concerned with drm and trying to stop it, please try and find the above information with google. I tried using keywords "quietly, drm, installing, firmware, CD, drive, copy protection, caught" and variations of these keywords (the manufacturer is a well known consumer electronics manufacturer and also record label owner, 4 letters) Other manufacturers may have been mentioned. I couldn't find the article. Please, please, if anyone knows what I'm talking about, please let me know who was the tech reporter or tech webzine, where the story is located, url, anything. Please save this post by bookmarking it, then reply with your information or url if you find it. Thank you!

  160. The Donnas - Spend the Night by swb · · Score: 2

    I've heard a several people complain about this CD being uncopyable, but my copy ripped just fine. My copy has a bonus Quicktime video of a song that escapes me from "The Donnas Turn 21" which they were nice enough to include with a high quality stereo soundtrack that I ripped as well.

    Given what I've read about copy protection techniques generally resulting in a CD that's totally unusable on computers, it seems odd to me that they would release a "normal" CD with bonus material (there's also a screen saver and some other Flash BS) that *requires* a computer as well as a broken, DRM'd version. My version isn't any special edition or anything (that I can see).

    But then I also think there's probably a lot of discs getting labled as DRM'd that somebody was too clueless to RIP or was just a bad pressing as another poster mentioned.

    On my last trip through bestbuy I was suprised at the quantity and cheapness of DVD players and the paucity of plain CD players. I wonder how long it will be before some material is released as an audio-only DVD -- maybe some still material or something for video -- but only playable as a DVD on a DVD player.

    Yes, I know it's not *good* DRM, but better than what they have now. And that way they won't get dinged for releasing a "broken" CD, since its not a CD at all...

  161. My New Plan for Buying Music... by ottawanker · · Score: 1

    From now on, I'm just going to download all my music off of the Internet. If i listen to more than just the first 15 seconds of the song before deciding that it's crap, I'm going to mail $5 to the band. That's probably 10x more than what they would have gotten had I bought the CD. Screw the record label. The band can distribute the money as they see fit.

    Of course, I am aware that there are some problems with this plan.. It is still illegal, and there is no way to make sure that the record companies don't usurp the money from the band..

    1. Re:My New Plan for Buying Music... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Of course, I am aware that there are some problems with this plan.. It is still illegal, and there is no way to make sure that the record companies don't usurp the money from the band..

      Don't give in to FUD. If the music was ripped from a CD (not a DVD), it was NOT illegal for you to acquire it. It's called "Fair use", and as long as we allow them to make us think that P2P music sharing is illegal, it will be treated as such.

      Stand up and demand your rights! State them as such and people will know! When enough people know their rights, they will know that Napster was SHUT DOWN ILLEGALLY.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. The courts "interpret the law". Or somesuch, so that court decided it was illegal. There haven't been nearly enough cases taken to court over the matter, though.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:My New Plan for Buying Music... by mzo23 · · Score: 1

      One problem with this plan that is often neglected is the fact that usually record companies money IS spent on doing the recording that you download which is part(albeit a small part) of the reason when a new album is pressed the artist usually starts out in debt to the record company and has to make decent profits via live shows to try and get above water.

      Buying the album also helps to recoup those artists' costs. Now don't get me wrong, I think this scheme is horrible and maltreatment of artists and heavily exploits the artists especially since they also make the artists recoup all kinds of other bs costs like marketing and promotion(aka paying off radio stations to play their song).

      As much as I would like to say that stealing the song and then paying the artist is a good idea, the current system doesn't support it very well at all and in reality the only way for it to really work is for the artists themselves to distribute/sell their own music.

      Although I suppose the arguement could be made that as you said "The band can distribute the money as they see fit." they could pay back the record company with the money and keep whatever else they need it's still probably not enough without paying them the full normal song/cd/purchase price ratio.

      Artists really need to get together and form a good system of self-distrobution/self-promotion that doesn't rely on a "pseudo-guild" that exploits them to get their stuff out there and make a living. mp3.com is in some respects a decent system but Universal is definetly taking it in directions that aren't supportive of the independants and instead mutating it slowly into a record label of its own.

      --
      I don't have a sig, can I borrow yours?
    3. Re:My New Plan for Buying Music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, maybe if enough people support this plan, the bands would be able to afford to record and distribute their own music.. And the record companies wouldn't be able to afford the lawsuits against people who 'steal' the music. Most people don't realize that these lawsuits are funded by those bastards who actually do pay for the music; they're repressing the rest of us. :)

  162. Bad mastering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a guess, but... in the 1980s, CDs were being made off high-quality analog masters, or (relatively) uncompressed PCM recordings, right?

    Meanwhile, today, even if the guys in the booth are doing the right thing, the artists themselves might be using MP3 and other high-compression formats in their samples/so-forth. Plus, a recording that sounds like butt on one stereo might sound excellent on another, or vice-versa- I noticed this around '95, when Beck, Bjork (Homogenic) and The Chemical Bros. were putting out the big-noise mixes that worked great on cheap stereos... but on halfway decent equipment, better turn the bass allll the waaay dooown. ...and again, there are two halves to "mastering" - handling of the original master, which could be a DAT or somesuch, with all the mixing and balancing that occurs... and the actual pressing of the CD, where concerns like jitter and error-correction organization come into play. (Even if the original poster was bullshitting, I imagine there's been some slack on the logical-physical side of things- scratch a CD from 1990, and one from today, then see which is rendered totally useless.)

    1. Re:Bad mastering? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      well here's the thing... a friend of mine has a system that is completely phenom in every way.. he has a pair of home made folded horns that make anything out there you can buy sound like crap (no they don't have the typical folded horn resonance sound they each have about 350 pounds of dry sand in and around each of them. in the outer shell.... BTW he works as an acoustical engineer in a very high end speaker manufacturer R&D labs... he wont let me tell who... but they used to be based in Battle creek michigan)

      He has 4 discreet B&O amps 2 driving the high end (tweet and midrange) and 2 driving the low end (midbass/bass.. no subwoofer... he said that subwoofers are for pussies)

      I cant remember the japanese brand name on the tube preamp and CD player he has... it's not Nackamitchi..

      The Cd's I mentioned sound absolutely fantastic on his system... espically when you sit in the sweet spot. and when you put in a regular CD from today (we used the Crime of the century gold refrence CD I had and we purchased a current crime of the century CD from a local CD shop for this test.. The difference was unbelieveable.. the regular CD might as well be on AM radio... and when listening to other CD's from today (nickleback is HORRIBLE.. the cymbols and highs sound like they are a poorly compressed 96Kbps mp3!) The only album that sounded better than the rest was actually disc one of Smashing Pumpkins mellon Collie and the Infinate sadness box set. but returning to the gold refrence of Pink floyd's Dark side of the moon everything again sounded like complete and utter crap in comparasion.

      anything hip-hop'ish we had to crank the lows way way down as it is horribly obvious that they artifically in post production and mastering crank up all the low end to sound better on crappy stereos..

      My friend NEVER listens to anything but classical music.. and after out 2 hour listening session he said .... " Now do you understand why I don't listen to that crap? It's not the content but the horrible wrapper they put it in!"

      I have been finding that it is impossible to find any good CD's anymore... SACD is in the same state that CD's were in 1986... they need to impress everyone to get them to buy into it... but I am betting that SACD's will become as crappy as today's CD's within 5 years of it becoming popular.

      Note: he does have some "crappy" classical cd's.. he pointed out that every one that was crap came from the States and specifically a BMI studio.

      something to think about...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  163. Interestingly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...SPDIF has its problems, though they aren't particularly cable-related.

    Remember, CDDA was designed long, long before you could afford multi-megabyte buffers in consumer electronics... computers, at least those capable of running at a decent realtime priority, are immune to a lot of the timing issues. Still, in the case of home theater/similar, you can't just throw buffers at the problem or you'll have other synchronization issues...

  164. wouldnt be a bad idea by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    i, myself, i've only bought one cd from a *aa based system since napster. no let me rephrase this. since naspster *CAME DOWN*. i bought well over 10 CDs(not much for someone making less than minnimum wage, i might add), while i was on napster. the only CD i made an excuse for was still(possibly one of the best cds in my collection...i'd reccomend this to even the most antiriaa pf people)... but yea. kudos to you people who could start sometihng like this, but i'm hoping that the *more* significant portion are those who *don't buy CDs AT ALL* - the riaa can burn in it's own profitless spiral into the void. Burn anything you can burn off of Gnutella(or whatever your source is)...and then find local talent to fill the rest of your music needs. but i guess not everyone can do this - good luck to those who start this day event then!

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  165. You are a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CDs in question are from Sony and Columbia (a division of Sony).

    The Japanese are making these CDs, not Americans.

  166. Logical by m1a1 · · Score: 2

    This seems like the most logical idea I have seen so far. The one and only problem I see with it is that in some towns the only place to buy a cd is to hit the old wal-mart, hastings, or other chain. Now hastings, you may be able to make that happen. Wal-Mart, well, if the corporation gets involved you probably won't get anywhere. But, if you got really lucky. Maybe they'd offer you one of those nice settlements big corporations are so fond of using to make legal woes disappear.

  167. Interesting note about music 'pirates' by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    It's an interesting fact that music pirates don't really respect copyright, but they do respect registered trademarks. After all, what pirate would disrespect something marked with an ARRRR symbol?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Interesting note about music 'pirates' by haggar · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break it to you, but that joke "has a long beard" :o)

      --
      Sigged!
  168. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

    While im not going to argue with you, how about If I give you some alternatives for those of us who take a creative interpertation of english.

    CDen like ox->oxen

    or maybe CDi like octopus->octopi

    or lastly just plain CD, like sheep->sheep.

    --
    What signature defines me as a person?
  169. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not to flame, but you're all idiots. :) The purpose of language is to communicate effectively; whichever method is easier to understand (using apostrophes to pluralize acronyms/abbreviations, or not, e.g. CDs vs. CD's) should be the one that's used. As language is entirely arbitrary (but, for the sake of simplicity, often systematic), there is no absolute right or wrong -- but if everyone expects "CDs" and you type "CD's", that may make things harder to read, so you should probably use "CDs". And vice-versa, of course.

    Come on, guys. Anyone with enough education to argue about the finer points of disparate style manuals should understand this concept.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  170. Can't say that I have by Raul654 · · Score: 2

    Although I do have to figure out what to broadcast with my new webcam :)

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  171. I've been DRM'd by TheScogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damnit. Popped in my new John Cage album today. Low and behold...4 minutes and 33 seconds of pure silence.

    1. Re:I've been DRM'd by Fosberry · · Score: 1

      I'd mod this post up if I could. This is the funniest thing I've ever seen on Slashdot!

  172. Rio S50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a bad mp3 player, but i never liked the built-in memory option, forcing you to use their transfer software.

    I purchased a Nex II last year. Stores mp3s on a removeable CF card, so I can transfer using any CF reader. Cost less than $100, can't beat the price, then add your own CF card.

    Eventually mp3 players will appear as new drives in XP like CF card readers do now, and then I'll go back to mp3 players with built-in memory.

  173. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by buck_wild · · Score: 1

    I agree totally. I would agree with the anal people if this was a published work, or perhaps even if these comments were meant to be part of some reference work.

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  174. Re:What's all this talk about "playing it their wa by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
    1. Buy the disc, rip it (as ogg vorbis, not fscking mp3). I've yet to encounter a copy protected disc which can't be copied...
    2. Turn the disc back to the store, claiming it's useless. (it is, sort of)
    3. Send a check to the artists, and say that you like them, but hate their record label, and explain what you did.
    4. Send a letter to the record label, say that you hate them, and tell them what you did about it.

    I've got a better idea, because it's MUCH mroe convenient. If you really want to perform the first step as stated, do it. Otherwise, do these:

    1. Exercise your fair use rights and download songs from your favorite P2P network.
    2. If you like the music, go to the show. Artist's get fucked over by the labels and don't make any money from the CD, in fact they need the revenue from the live performances to PAY the labels.
    3. Send a letter to the record label, and show them how you paid for the music you listen to by going to the show, but you did not pay for their coke habit.

    There IS a better way to support artists than buying CDs. There is, however, the additional issues introduced of TicketMaster also being a Lord of Evil. Let's solve one problem at a time, ok?

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  175. While visions of DRM danced in their heads... by rworne · · Score: 2
    Since I have an XBR set, and usually am a total whore for Sony products, I was going over the manual for my new progressive scan DVD player: the Sony DVP-NS715P.

    I was browsing the troubleshooting section and came across this gem:
    "Copyright lock" appears and the screen turns blue when playing a DVD-RW disc.
    Images taken from digital broadcasts, etc., may contain copy protection signals, such as complete copy protection signals, single copy signals, and restriction-free signals. When images that contain copy protection signals are played, a blue screen may appear instead of the images. It may take a while when looking for playable images.

    I really don't know what mechanism they are employing here, I would suspect that it's looking for Macrovision signals and blocking playback of Macrovision-encoded video on consumer-recordable media.

    My Sony Digital-8 recorder also has a Macrovision detector in it.

    You'd think I'd learn by now...
    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  176. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD is an acronym. I don't know what you've been smoking, but back here on terra firma, acronyms do not use apostrophes to indicate missing letters.

    Contractions, on the other hand, do use an apostrophe to indicate omitted or combined sounds.

    "It's" is a contraction; "CD" is an acronym.
    It's as simple as that.

    If acronyms used apostrophes to indicate missing letters, we'd be writing things like "N'A'S'A'" and "S'C'U'B'A'" and "C'D's." Fortunately, that is not the case.

    Also, no possesive pronouns use apostrophes. This has nothing to do with "trumping" (English is not Bridge) and everything to do with the fact that pronouns are holdouts of old usage and so are inflected completely differently from nouns in Modern English. If you attempt to generalize the inflected forms of pronouns to those of nouns, you will fail. Note the complete lack of an accusative case for nouns in English.

    If you have a problem with the lack of inflection in Modern English, go learn Old English. Just keep it away from the rest of us.

  177. WASHINGTON POST DISCRIMINATES!!! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apparently if you are older than 102 years (i.e. were born before 1900) you can't register on Washington post!!

  178. whoa there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this out before you get too uppity. Understand now?

  179. from people with computers. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    what, you don't think the copy protection actualy works do you?

    A two second download will have you playing and burning the CD from your computer. But you can't download software to a high-end player, thus those copy-protected disks only stop people from playing the disks, not copying them.

    You can also just plug an audio cable into a computer and record them.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  180. Re:I wonder... (time bomb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh cds are digital buddy...there is no "analog" style cd player. cds are just 1s and 0s.

  181. Playing has nothing to do with it by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    It's not like a record where the needle physicaly touches the disk. A CD is only looked at, looking at the center wouldn't cause it to fail more then the outside.

    The problems are probably being caused by your fingers and other objects comming in contact with the disk, and more likely to touch the outside, especialy if you're a swap-junky

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  182. The Joy of SONY! by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

    I personally have not had this problem but I do know that (Ph)ony have released there own "CD" which has a hidden area of the CD which corrupts the data flow when used in a PC or Mac and since a lot of modern CD players use Computer components this track disrupts playing on them. The worst thing I have found out is that we have no real come back on this except to return the product to them. In the UK (where I am) this has caused much annoyance especially since people who buy CD's like myself and play them in their PC's can't without using legacy hardware, or using some nifty wee tricks with markers and the like. On a personal note I think these big companies should re-think their strategy on CD and protection, cheaper would obviously be better in my eyes or the ability to create "personal" CD's made from tracks on databases or something! Anyway, that's my experience not that says much ;-)

    --

    How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

  183. can you read? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The CDs that didn't work were Sony, moron. Last I checked, Sony was a Japanese company.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:can you read? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "The CDs that didn't work were Sony, moron. Last I checked, Sony was a Japanese company."

      It's the RIAA that thinks it needs to cripple CDs, numb nuts. Sony's one of the companies responding to it.

  184. Re:I wonder... (time bomb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh outputs on new cd players aren't all digital buddy. cd transports are 1s and 0s, cd "regulars" aren't.

    OH LOOK I JUST FOUND MY SHIFT KEY.

  185. Hacks for purple sticks? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Do you have any more info on this? I have a memeory stick walkman that I wouldn't mind using cheaper media on.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hacks for purple sticks? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2

      I remembered another discussion about Memory Stick products. The secret is to use another Memory Stick reader.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  186. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by shepd · · Score: 1

    In that case you're suggesting he could care less about anything other than his album sales. This suggests he makes his album sales his highest priority.

    For example, saying the above would suggest that he could care less about someone painting his drum set pink (in other words it is possible for him to not worry about it), but that he could not care less about someone causing decreased sales of an album. In other words, his album sales are so important it is impossible for him not to care any less than he does about them, or in other words he would be unable to worry any less about them, lest he violate some sort of personal principles he has about worrying.

    It is actually a difficult concept, since it depends on wether you assume that he could care less because he has no principles on the matter, or that he could not care less because he would feel poorer should he care less.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  187. well enough alone? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Well, if it plays in your PC but not your car, then there is a very good chance that your car sterio is just a peice of shit.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  188. CD or CD player by Nafta · · Score: 1


    Is it the CD that is faulty or the CD player. All the store needs to do is to take another CD player to court and play the CD. The CD works, but not in your "faulty" player.

  189. Maybe Universal are learning by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    I got the best of U2 1990-2000 for Xmas.

    I think they're starting to twig to what they have to do.

    It had no DRM, it came with 2 Audio CDs, an interactive VCD, a very thick insert with plenty of fan pictures and it was the same price as normal CDs here (about 19 Euros).

    I still think its expensive, but I don't think it was a complete and utter rip off as before, so it seems like better value to me.

    All the track ripped in MP3 format no problem, and the disks play on all devices, and the VCD worked in my VCD player aswell as my computer.

    It was on Island records (Universal).

  190. GTA Patch by BesigedB · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info. *heads off to download*

  191. At least most of those are godawful pop music. by SaraSmith · · Score: 1

    I don't buy cd's anymore anyway, more than I'm willing to pay, but I can probably count on one hand the number of those cds I'd ever want to even listen to.. the less players a lot of that plays in, the better in my opinion :P

  192. Re:Crappy English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy == how you get sex

    loose == your mother

  193. Business School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The law suits will suceed costing the Music Industry money. They will be forced to print a warning to consumers ON the cds. (More money) And then they will limite the consumption of those cds by about 50% initially to a total of about 80% by the time their done. Of those people offended about 25% will no longer purchase CDs again.

    They violated the trust of the american people and the trust of the artists their supposed be promoting. What is their innate talent? Well other then having lots of money they know how to make cds. We can find someone a little more honest to do their job. Buy BMG, Interscope, Bad Boy and everyone else who thought they could make money through dishonesty.

  194. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD is an acronym

    Close, but none of Willie Clinton's Finest Cubans for you. CD is an abbreviation, as you say the letters, rather pronouncing them as a word, like your examples, NASA and SCUBA, which are indeed acronyms.

  195. Macrovision is part of the DVD spec. by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1

    Macrovision is (I believe) part of the DVD spec. Unless your player is modified to disable this 'feature', there is a macrovision encoding chip that can be software enabled to 'protect' the video output. I'm not certain about the terms, but I think if a DVD publisher wants Macrovision on their title, they pay a licensing fee to the Macrovision folks and the 'Macrovision' bit is flipped on the disk. This is why one doesn't usually connect their DVD player to the VCR, thence to the TV, but instead connects directly to the TV.

  196. It is reasonable by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1
    to sue the local store, after they are made aware that the product is defective, if they continue selling it without sufficient, unambiguous disclosure that their products are not "Audio CDs".

    If they don't know what they're doing, they may be liable for replacing the defective product, but it would be hard to prove that they did anything intentionally.

    1. Re:It is reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to sue the local store, after they are made aware that the product is defective, if they continue selling it without sufficient, unambiguous disclosure that their products are not "Audio CDs".

      There is almost certainly plenty of case history to support this. After they are made aware the product is defective and they continue selling it without sufficient disclosure they will be required to make such disclosure. I'm sure there's not only case history, but FTC regulations requiring such disclosure.

      However, as I pointed out elsewhere, the only end result of the suit will be to get disclosure. While this is a Good Thing, this isn't what the original poster was after. He was saying that suing the stores would somehow stop the production of copy-protected CDs, and it won't. It will happen regardless of what we do to the stores.

      Now I will grudgingly concede that after this lawsuit (the one that hasn't happened yet for disclosure), when music stores start posting "adequate disclosure", people will stop buying CDs that are copy-protected, and this may result in stopping the production. But the second step is required, people have to look at the label and say "I'm not buying this because of that label".

  197. Do DVD players have RF out? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    This is why one doesn't usually connect their DVD player to the VCR, thence to the TV, but instead connects directly to the TV.

    Most of the time I've seen things connected through the VCR, the VCR was being used as an RF modulator for a video game console or camcorder with no RF output connected to a television set with no A/V input. How does the owner of a television set without A/V inputs connect a DVD player to his television set? Do DVD players have coax out on RF channel 3/4?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Do DVD players have RF out? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      NO, if you have a base model TV with no other inputs besides RF (Like I do), you have to get an RF modulator from radio shack ($30) or something similar. At least mine would not connect through the VCR because of the macrovision dark-lite-dark-lite behavior.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    2. Re:Do DVD players have RF out? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Oddly I dunno if it was macrovision but I ran into just this recently.

      At home its PS/2 -> TV direct. Its my game machine and DVD player...its sweet.

      I went over a friends house one night, and after she put her kid to bed we got out the playstation and threw in boondock saints.

      Her VCR is an old one...a top loader even! and boy did it ever not work. GTA: Vice city...played fine. Put in the movie, and it was all fucked up.

      SO next week I came over with my own VCR, worked fine. No problems at all.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Do DVD players have RF out? by Enzondio · · Score: 2

      Most of the time I've seen things connected through the VCR, the VCR was being used as an RF modulator for a video game console or camcorder with no RF output connected to a television set with no A/V input. How does the owner of a television set without A/V inputs connect a DVD player to his television set? Do DVD players have coax out on RF channel 3/4?

      This is my situation and with my old VCR (very old, 12 or more years) DVDs wouldn't play properly. I purchased a new VCR (which can handle Macrovision) and connected the DVD player through that. DVDs play fine, but don't record. New VCRs allow Macrovision content to be played, but not recorded. At least that is my understanding.

  198. The employee opens the package by yerricde · · Score: 2

    They WILL exchange an open title (audio, video or CD-ROM) for a sealed version of the SAME title.

    Several years, I asked a Toys "R" Us employee about the store's return policy. She replied that whenever a customer returns a copyrighted item (e.g. a VHS video or a PC or console video game), the store exchanges it and opens the package before giving it to the customer.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  199. Make one's own music? My sweet lord... by yerricde · · Score: 2

    and find a different store. When you have exhausted all of your stores, then maybe you should consider making your own music?

    If I do make and publish my own music, how can I be assured that the songs that I write will be completely original and not unconsciously misappropriated from some popular song? Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music established that even unconscious plagiarism is actionable as copyright infringement.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Make one's own music? My sweet lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I do make and publish my own music, how can I be assured that the songs that I write will be completely original and not unconsciously misappropriated from some popular song? Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music established that even unconscious plagiarism is actionable as copyright infringement.

      Tricky, that. :) Admittedly, very tricky. Based on following your link I can only say that it appears that the court didn't make the best decision it could have. It is true that much of what rock music is depends entirely on the performance. Also, when you listen to a lot of music and then write music, it's almost inevitable that you should reuse stuff you heard before. Some musicians (notably the guys in Slayer) prefer to lock themselves up away from outside music while they create their stuff. It's a tricky problem, indeed.

      It's inconceivable to try to cite influences when you publish. For one thing, if you publish as mp3 or ogg or something like that, you don't have any space to cite influences.

      Of course, for the Beatles there's no guarantee that they didn't steal that song in some form. Heh. It's possible that they did. Unfortunately, the description of the case that I read did a good job of laying down a scary aspect of the plagiarism issue. What do you do if you unconciously use someone else's song?

      Furthermore, can you even prove that you've never heard a song? There's only a certain amount of songs that can be written within a certain level of complexity (i.e. if you just use the 3 rock chords and string them around differently, you're bound to wind up with a song that closely resembles someone else's song).

      Tricky, that.

    2. Re:Make one's own music? My sweet lord... by yerricde · · Score: 1

      There's only a certain amount of songs that can be written within a certain level of complexity (i.e. if you just use the 3 rock chords

      There are six rock chords (I, IV, V, and their relative minors vi, ii, and iii). "My Sweet Lord" uses ii, V, I, vi.

      and string them around differently, you're bound to wind up with a song that closely resembles someone else's song)

      Actually, US copyright courts don't look at harmony (chords) as closely as they look at melody. This case involved a nine-note match (Gq Eq Dw Ge Ae Ce Ae Cq Cq) between "He's So Fine" and "My Sweet Lord".

      So how can I provide the guarantee of originality required by composing contracts?

      Furthermore, can you even prove that you've never heard a song?

      Yes. The easiest way to prove that is simply to have deeper pockets than the plaintiff. But when you're up against Warner Chappell Music (owner of, say, "Happy Birthday to You"), you're up against AOL Time Warner, a Fortune 50 company (heck, AOL(tw) owns Fortune), so your chances are quite slim.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  200. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no two ways about it, "CD's" means "of the CD" or "belonging to the CD". "CDs" is the plural of "CD".

    There are two ways about it. It could mean "CD is", as in "This CD's corrupt! The whole RIAA's corrupt!"

  201. (Meta) Nick can be a link as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless your using your full and proper name as your "nick", then your no less anonymous than an AC.

    Really? If you search for "yerricde" (my nick on Rose-Hulman, Slashdot, and Everything) on Google, you come up with my name: Damian Yerrick. Heck, if you click yerricde in any comment that I have posted under my account here at Slashdot (see below for why I posted this comment AC), you find my name and my school.

    Besides, the AC account itself has another purpose: to allow for the posting of comments about topics tangential to the main topic but which have arisen in comments, especially issues about Slashdot itself. I see it as a way of moderating yourself down once as -1, Offtopic, without affecting one's karma.

  202. It is a production fault by yerricde · · Score: 1

    do they bother to list between, say 'scratched', 'broken', 'production fault', etc. or just return the ones they got back as 'defective'?

    The designation "production fault" is appropriate here. If a CD as produced won't play in a stock Apple iMac computer, whose optical drive and audio data path adhere to the Red Book standard, then the CD as produced is faulty.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  203. Stand-alone RF modulator devices by yerricde · · Score: 2

    if you have a base model TV with no other inputs besides RF (Like I do), you have to get an RF modulator from radio shack ($30) or something similar.

    Do the RadioShack RF modulators distort the picture in response to Macrovision signals? Or are they illegal to manufacture under the DMCA? Or if neither, why not?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Stand-alone RF modulator devices by Andux · · Score: 1
      RF modulators don't seem to be covered by section 1201(k) of the DMCA* ("Thou not manufacture Macrovision-immune VHS, beta, or 8mm recorders."), and since Macrovision is akin to benefit denial rather than access control (i.e., the actual signal is unmodified until after the supposed crime has been committed), the other sections probably don't apply, either.

      *Please note, however, that I am not a lawyer.**

      **Not that there's anything wrong with that.

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
  204. That's a criminal complaint, not a civil suit by Reziac · · Score: 2

    When you charge someone with a crime, you DON'T "sue" them. You hie yourself to your local district attorney or police station or what have you in your state or local criminal justice system, and you swear out a complaint. After that, it's up to the cops as to whether the "fraud" is worth pursuing, tho you'll probably have to testify in court.

    I don't know which action would be best for exposing these not-quite-CDs, but if you're thinking about acting against it, at least get a clue what the differences are between criminal and civil cases.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:That's a criminal complaint, not a civil suit by zogger · · Score: 2

      --I agree, that's why I mentioned in the post notifying the police. It just depends on the circumstances how anyone might want to go about it. You can theoretically push the matter as a bunco crime-fraud- and as you suggest let the local prosecutor decide, or try for civil penalties in small claims court, perhaps you lost time from work to return the item, whether or not the money was easily and cheerfully refunded, etc. It could even start as a class action suit, even on a small local size. Variety of ways. Usually you can/should/be advised to always start from a default position that if you as joe little guy have a beef with an entrenched larger and richer org of any kind that any wheels of "justice" are slow and rusted up, but ya never know until you try, who knows you might get a hip local DA who's gotten burnt at home with a crippled CD and has a fume going on about it. If plan A don't work, goto plan B. My position is try plan A or B, because plan C-complaining about stuff as the only option, hardly ever "works" to solve a problem.

    2. Re:That's a criminal complaint, not a civil suit by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Right, and the advantage of the criminal complaint is that they can't really sue you in return unless it's a spurious complaint (there's some law against that, but I've had no reason to learn the details).

      And that would indeed be the best case -- a DA who already had a burr under his saddle and was itching for a chance to attack.

      And as you say, the **AA don't give a flip how much we complain so long as the bucks keep rolling in. And smalltime boycotts don't hurt anyone but the mom and pop shops.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  205. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Reziac · · Score: 2

    But most production personnel and studio musicians are paid for X-many hours of work just like any other contracted worker -- not by royalties from sales of the finished product. Barring unusual contract terms, the studio end has already been paid everything they had coming, long before the album ever hits the shelves.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  206. Re:uhhh, wait a minute... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Maybe, but that's why you reward them when they're small and operating in a fashion that agrees with your ethical code, and you stop rewarding them when they become large and greedy and join the RIAA. Maybe if people started a trend like this, some record labels might just resign from the RIAA and go back to being independent.

  207. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Andrewkov · · Score: 2

    Uh oh, the grammar Nazis are having a field day today! ;-)

  208. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rule. Burn, karma, burn.

  209. Ummm... copy protection is DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than that, I agree.

    1. Re:Ummm... copy protection is DRM by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      I suppose in the strictest sense you're correct. In practical terms, DRM is generally used with regard to schemes that allow you to access media if you have the right to. In the case of copy protected CDs, the intent is to keep you from accessing the media on computers, and there is generally no provision made to ever allow you to do so.

  210. Re:Also post them to the complete list of corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably your English teacher should've taught you to capitalise the first letter of a name, location, and nationality?

    There's no two ways about it*, if you're going to get all high and mighty and correct someone you better make sure you speak and scribe the Queen's English correctly, otherwise someone will respond with a sarcastic retort...

    * A horrible grammatical mess of a phrase in itself, I might add.

  211. Simple-MusicLink.com by thumbtack · · Score: 2

    It used to be called Fairtunes, It's now called MusicLink.Com

  212. Hey, I'm just relaying the Studio Sound article by Lucius+Sour · · Score: 1
    Studio Sound was the only pro-audio mag worth reading. So, naturally it's "suspended" I.E. gone. The website (www.prostudio.com) seems to be gone now as well, so there are no online reprints anymore.

    I've got a pile of them in the cupboard (the shelf went, I got so many) so I'm not sure I can find the article.

    I thought it was bullshit too. But when I heard things off album CDs that went onto long-play-time CDs they sounded "gritty" on the long-play pressings. I usually try to attend the cut, and it usually sounds fine at this time. It's only when the grim time of the boxes of pressed disks being delivered that you get a shock. When I read the SS article it seemed to provide an explanation.

    By the way the end product is at 96KHz at 24 bit depth, dithered/shaped down to consumer quality with an Apogee UV22, and as it's sometimes on Exabyte cart, I can't guarrantee I have a reader at home :-)

    Yes, I am in recording - since I was 16, a depressing 21 years in April. I was really venting my spleen at the parasites in the business (the RIAA).

    My formatting was wonky coz I typed it up in KWrite and didn't check the formatting. D'oh.

    Yes, audiophiles talk bollocks. All hifi is bollocks. When you've heard real analogue tape multitrack masters through real speakers in a room designed for neutral listening conditions, hifi is an abortion.

    Having said that, capacitance problems in long cable runs have been known to cause problems. They make XLR balanced boosters for some apps. Also, bout the only digital standards we can count on are MIDI and SPDIF!

    --

    Hands up everyone who refuses to obey orders.

  213. At least you understand how the words work... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...even if the rest of your life so obviously and anonymously sucks... (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  214. Re:DRM? More like bad pressing - mastering monkeys by Lucius+Sour · · Score: 1
    That is because they were mastered by pros, who have been working for decades and with pride in their work. I've had the privilege of working with George "Porky" Peckham on a mastering job. The guy knows more than I ever could, mind you he's at retiring age now, and he charges top-whack.

    Nowadays stuff sent to some training-scheme monkey with a "Finaliser" box (there are many makes -tc Electronic made the first, now Drawmer, DBX etc make similar boxes) which add multiband compression and "brickwall" limiting to make up for what was often a bad master tape. With the proliferation of home studios, VST and "producers" who have never worked in proper studios and don't know what to listen for. The Finaliser box does keep all the frequencies in line, but of course at a price. The sound.

    Nowadays I do all the mastering I can in the studio and present the plant with a press-ready CDR. If I play this CDR and then the pressed version, the pressed version sounds odd. Even the musicians can tell, and they have cloth ears.

    As for ABBA, don't be embarassed. They were great songwriters, and their studio (Polar) was equipped with a Neve desk, I believe. Lovely EQ (tone controls). Now people use SSLs, compression on each channel, subgroup busses and output bus. They sound NASTY - too much compression. Horrible EQ too. They are ergonomic, though.

    I'm amazed at how vitriolic people have been about this post. I may be a drunkard, but not a cokehead. My spleen was being vented at the record companies, who have no interest in the output.

    My point WAS that it _shouldn't_ be true that pressed CDs sound different, but I was reporting that they _do_ and reporting an article that purported to explain this. Those comparing ripped discs with the originals are missing the F____NG point. The pressing plants Do vary from the standard inter-pit-train widths. They shouldn't but they do. I wish they didn't.

    If anyone was any more questions, mail me at phasedistort(at)NOSPAMyahoo.co.uk

    If anyone just wants to shout, then Happy New Year to you.

    --

    Hands up everyone who refuses to obey orders.