Ocean water is hardly stationary and OTEC already shows you that the heat exchange is doable. Then again was there ever any doubt ? Insolation i 1.4 KW/Sq Meter so the discharge from a gigawatt plant easily covered by a square kilometer of ocean surface.
Even if that article is true (nice fring news source) the people hit by that car were in fact peaceful protesters. Just because some lunatic chased him with a gun does not mean that running over completely unrelated people is okay. Why I have to explain that to you in beyond me. The guy driving obviously was not defending himself from anyone when he hit that crowd
Why you have to explain ? Well I don't know maybe you need to explain how ANTIFA can be considered peaceful anything. Maybe you need to explain how a vehicular accident by someone in fear of their life.
Irrelevant. We have courts for that type of thing.
And we have the 2nd amendment for people like you. And yes it has been used to remove illegal governments in the U.S.
The actual issue is that nuclear ships generally dump heat into (relatively) flowing water. Also, the more heat they have to dump, the faster the water flows around them. Dumping a much larger amount of heat into almost stationary water is most likely going to be a bit more problematic.
You think ocean water is almost stationary ? And is unsuitable to being used for energy generation ?
In Europe some power plants take the heat left over from spinning the turbines and send it out into a neighbourhood hot water system that people and business use to heat their buildings and create hot water. In North America we just see it as a waste and dump it into the air or water. That makes the European systems much more efficient. Unfortunately the North American cities aren't built that way.
Rickover's work just doesn't scale. Remember it's based on pressurized water as the coolant medium. As the size goes up the surface area to volume goes down. The heat of the system goes up and in case of coolant system failure you wind up with pressures and temperatures that cause water to dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen.
A Lefty/SJW type, tried to violate the agreement software had been distributed by, and used in good faith. He did this to virtue signal in a way that would exacerbate the problem he was supposedly against, and would cause new problems for the country ?
You mean how London briefly has had a higher homicide rate than New York, a US city that has been experiencing record lows in that category https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/... [csmonitor.com] ? London, in a country that has had strict gun laws for over a half century.
Record lows despite a 50 year trend of liberalizing gun laws in the us from their most restrictive points in the 60s and 70s
Navarro rebuked federal prosecutors — using the words "flagrant" and "reckless" to describe how they withheld evidence from the defense — before saying "that the universal sense of justice has been violated" and dismissing the charges.
It wasn't the land use policies, it was the illegal railroading of a citizen.
I don't pretend my end of the political spectrum doesn't have assholes in it but clearly you do.
Look up the word "interfering" and get back to me.
Why ? Are you actually asserting you are responsive to input ? Or that you actually comprehend the concept ?
As for self-righteous, any mirror will serve you.
I'm not the guy who is trying to use his old neighbors fear of crime and their reasonable security measure to prove them insane.
Also my replies have a bit more depth than your "I know you are, but what am I", but I doubt you will be able see that no matter how many mirrors, or other optical devices you may be provided with.
It means the Democrats have already lost. He only needed to three percent better than Romney did with the white vote to win. Now he is farther ahead with the black vote than any Republican in 50 years.
That flushing sound you hear is the crazy left Democrats taking their party down the toilet.
Well nice to see you are insecure enough you used a rhetorical question to virtue signal. But lets look at your answers
Nope. I also do not support the Right's efforts to remove all non-governmental consequences from hate speech. (ie. people get to call you a racist moron when you are a racist moron. They don't have to listen politely and then not respond)
So you are ok with businesses discriminating based on creed. Tell me how did you feel about that baker in Colorado ? Oh you just told me
Private companies are not required to carry anyone's speech
So no Bob and Bob cakes need be made
No, if you're attempting to get into things like universal basic income, I support that because it's far more efficient than the status quo
So your answer is the world doesn't owe you a living but you demand it give one anyway ?
Considering I have specific situations where large corporations actually did harm me
That would be a yes then.
If you think that, you probably need to actually read the Constitution. Specifically, "promote the general welfare" appears more than once. Your version of the country's "social contract" did not appear until far later in the country's history.
Really ? Lets see what James Madison had to say
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”
So the initial point you are talking about is somewhere between 1776 and 1786 ?
Yes, and for good reason. Most people agree that you should be able to control who enters your house, establish behaviour rules, and to retract your welcome when someone breaks the rules.
Oh the house in this case is google ? So you are OK with bakers refusing service to gays and restaurants not seating black people ?
Oh I don't know it's easy and humorous. I mean what else are going to do but laugh at people who go chicken little over the "loss of 7.5 billion in coastal property values in the US investors get wise to global warming". Just a hint for you that isn't even a rounding error.
Slashdot Mirror
Ocean water is hardly stationary and OTEC already shows you that the heat exchange is doable. Then again was there ever any doubt ? Insolation i 1.4 KW/Sq Meter so the discharge from a gigawatt plant easily covered by a square kilometer of ocean surface.
Even if that article is true (nice fring news source) the people hit by that car were in fact peaceful protesters. Just because some lunatic chased him with a gun does not mean that running over completely unrelated people is okay. Why I have to explain that to you in beyond me. The guy driving obviously was not defending himself from anyone when he hit that crowd
Why you have to explain ? Well I don't know maybe you need to explain how ANTIFA can be considered peaceful anything. Maybe you need to explain how a vehicular accident by someone in fear of their life.
Irrelevant. We have courts for that type of thing.
And we have the 2nd amendment for people like you. And yes it has been used to remove illegal governments in the U.S.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Durrr, good one! Clearly you'd know my oppinions better than I would.
Well unlike you, I am not lying about them. I'm hardly the person who says there's a replication problem in science except for the parts I like.
The actual issue is that nuclear ships generally dump heat into (relatively) flowing water. Also, the more heat they have to dump, the faster the water flows around them. Dumping a much larger amount of heat into almost stationary water is most likely going to be a bit more problematic.
You think ocean water is almost stationary ? And is unsuitable to being used for energy generation ?
https://www.makai.com/ocean-th...
Always so loud and so wrong.
In Europe some power plants take the heat left over from spinning the turbines and send it out into a neighbourhood hot water system that people and business use to heat their buildings and create hot water. In North America we just see it as a waste and dump it into the air or water. That makes the European systems much more efficient. Unfortunately the North American cities aren't built that way.
Consolidated Edison disagrees with you
https://www.coned.com/en/our-e...
So do other U.S. Cities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
But please keep the virtue signalling going no sense letting facts get in the way.
It's an incredibly bad thing.
Rickover's work just doesn't scale. Remember it's based on pressurized water as the coolant medium. As the size goes up the surface area to volume goes down. The heat of the system goes up and in case of coolant system failure you wind up with pressures and temperatures that cause water to dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen.
Oops my bad going a little blind here.
Before. The U.S. civilian program is based off Rickover's work for the navy.
A Lefty/SJW type, tried to violate the agreement software had been distributed by, and used in good faith. He did this to virtue signal in a way that would exacerbate the problem he was supposedly against, and would cause new problems for the country ?
Well I am shocked.
I can't believe you're calling me an idiot with this stuff.
I can't believe you haven't come to expect just about everyone calling you an idiot.
Yes Bloomberg news is a right wing shit hole,
Get outside your echo chamber or at least your moms basement.
You mean how London briefly has had a higher homicide rate than New York, a US city that has been experiencing record lows in that category https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/... [csmonitor.com] ? London, in a country that has had strict gun laws for over a half century.
Record lows despite a 50 year trend of liberalizing gun laws in the us from their most restrictive points in the 60s and 70s
Keep going.
Drive a car into peaceful protester's and kill some one
Peaceful protestor yeah
https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...
Shoot up a place of worship because the people there were black.
Dylan Roof was certifiably insane
Hold up against the federal government in a violent manner because they object to federal land policies.
The BLM acted illegally http://www.latimes.com/nation/...
Navarro rebuked federal prosecutors — using the words "flagrant" and "reckless" to describe how they withheld evidence from the defense — before saying "that the universal sense of justice has been violated" and dismissing the charges.
It wasn't the land use policies, it was the illegal railroading of a citizen.
I don't pretend my end of the political spectrum doesn't have assholes in it but clearly you do.
Sure you don't
Insane government, out of control cost of living, street conditions that are driving conventions and tourists away https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.... https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/a...
Yeah, I think I'll look for someplace else with a pleasant climate and craft housing.
Look up the word "interfering" and get back to me.
Why ? Are you actually asserting you are responsive to input ? Or that you actually comprehend the concept ?
As for self-righteous, any mirror will serve you.
I'm not the guy who is trying to use his old neighbors fear of crime and their reasonable security measure to prove them insane.
Also my replies have a bit more depth than your "I know you are, but what am I", but I doubt you will be able see that no matter how many mirrors, or other optical devices you may be provided with.
I never told anyone else what to do. Why you feel the compulsion to perceive victimhood, I will leave to you to figure out.
Sorry calling you out as self righteous and interfering isn't me claiming victimhood.
Seems someone is happy with abusive monopolies as long as they think the abusive monopoly is on their side.
What's up with bawling, dude?
Swing and a miss
But please keep on deciding what's best for everyone else.
It means the Democrats have already lost. He only needed to three percent better than Romney did with the white vote to win. Now he is farther ahead with the black vote than any Republican in 50 years.
That flushing sound you hear is the crazy left Democrats taking their party down the toilet.
You notice how some of the worst people in the world are now using Trump's antics to excuse the most dishonest and despicable behavior?
Yes indeed. I mean really making Google and Facebook respect your privacy or at the very least spell out how your data is used. Imagine the cheek.
He has a 35% approval rate amongst black Americans.
https://www.usatoday.com/story...
Seems getting people jobs and not treating them like victims that can't tie their own shoes works well with people.
Well maybe not you.
Wow that was difficult to think of. Feel free to go back to flagellating yourselves with stories of imminent doom.
Well nice to see you are insecure enough you used a rhetorical question to virtue signal. But lets look at your answers
Nope. I also do not support the Right's efforts to remove all non-governmental consequences from hate speech. (ie. people get to call you a racist moron when you are a racist moron. They don't have to listen politely and then not respond)
So you are ok with businesses discriminating based on creed. Tell me how did you feel about that baker in Colorado ? Oh you just told me
Private companies are not required to carry anyone's speech
So no Bob and Bob cakes need be made
No, if you're attempting to get into things like universal basic income, I support that because it's far more efficient than the status quo
So your answer is the world doesn't owe you a living but you demand it give one anyway ?
Considering I have specific situations where large corporations actually did harm me
That would be a yes then.
If you think that, you probably need to actually read the Constitution. Specifically, "promote the general welfare" appears more than once. Your version of the country's "social contract" did not appear until far later in the country's history.
Really ? Lets see what James Madison had to say
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”
So the initial point you are talking about is somewhere between 1776 and 1786 ?
Yes, and for good reason. Most people agree that you should be able to control who enters your house, establish behaviour rules, and to retract your welcome when someone breaks the rules.
Oh the house in this case is google ? So you are OK with bakers refusing service to gays and restaurants not seating black people ?
Oh I don't know it's easy and humorous. I mean what else are going to do but laugh at people who go chicken little over the "loss of 7.5 billion in coastal property values in the US investors get wise to global warming". Just a hint for you that isn't even a rounding error.
Look again his point was based on inbound links and the list wasn't sorted by rate of linking.
Nice try though.