Slashdot Mirror


Startups Ditching Silicon Valley For New Cities (economist.com)

The rising cost of living in Silicon Valley is pushing startups out, the Economist reports, and re-focusing innovation in new cities around the country [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source]. From the story: More Americans are leaving the Valley than moving to it. In 2017 several counties in the area saw their largest combined domestic outward migrations in around a decade. In a recent survey by the Bay Area Council, a think-tank, 46% of Bay Area residents said they planned to leave in "the next few years," up from 34% in 2016. This is not just a case of people of more modest means being pushed out by carpet-bagging techies. At this year's "FOO camp," a freewheeling annual gathering of hackers and others, a session called "Should I/you leave the Bay Area?" saw a strong turnout. Participants shared their gripes about the high cost of living, bad traffic and a "toxic" culture obsessed with money.

123 comments

  1. Makes perfect sense by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The world is small, thanks to communications and travel systems. Why go to the Bay area with exceptionally high costs and congestion? If you want great central California weather, there are lots of places just down the coast around SLO that are great. The LA/Ventura/OC area is great. And then there's the rest of the country as well. The only reason to be in the Bay area is you want to be there because you perceive it has "extra value" in terms of how others perceive you. In essence - vanity.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Makes perfect sense by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a little bit more than pure vanity. The night life game there, where admittedly vanity is key, is seen as an end of it's own to a lot of locals. If you've never lived in a town with 24-hour commerce and more than 2 million people your own age you don't really know what you're missing out on.

    2. Re:Makes perfect sense by geggam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having just left the Bay area and starting to look for work hard I have this observation.

      The Bay moves exponentially faster in the hiring process. It is really hard to not go back simply due to the fact companies outside the bay want to take 3 - 4 weeks to hire you.

    3. Re:Makes perfect sense by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sounds like hell. Which I think is the point. If you have an environment filled with like minded people then how do you expect to innovate?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Makes perfect sense by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The night life game there, where admittedly vanity is key, is seen as an end of it's own to a lot of locals.

      Young locals, certainly - But once you're 35, the 'night life game' starts to become pretty unimportant (and for many 35-year-olds it's likely been unimportant for a half-decade already). You'd rather be at a pub with your friends, sharing stories and nachos.

    5. Re:Makes perfect sense by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actually, the night life in SV sucks. But San Francisco is only an hour away. SF is great: Plenty of chicks and a large percentage of the guys are gay, meaning less competition.

    6. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure Silicon Valley has had no problem innovating for the past 40 years, even though it's been filled with like minded people in that time.

    7. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I think I know perfectly what I am missing, and I am glad to live without that shit.

    8. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. There are no pubs in Silicon Valley.

    9. Re:Makes perfect sense by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plenty of "chicks".

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The Bay moves exponentially faster in the hiring process. It is really hard to not go back simply due to the fact companies outside the bay want to take 3 - 4 weeks to hire you.

      Having lived outside of SV for my whole life, I have to say "it depends". There are some companies that take this long. Smaller companies tend to just hire you on the spot. My last two jobs have worked this way.

      But yes, if you're addicted to working for mega-corp, 3-4 weeks can and does happen. Solution is, stop working for mega-corp.

    11. Re:Makes perfect sense by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I lived in Shanghai for 6 years - I know about big cities and non-stop nightlife! But you can get the same in LA, NYC, Chicago, Miami, Dallas, even Las Vegas. If that's what you want - 24 hour entertainment - there are a LOT cheaper places to live and get that benefit.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's a little bit more than pure vanity. The night life game there, where admittedly vanity is key, is seen as an end of it's own to a lot of locals. If you've never lived in a town with 24-hour commerce and more than 2 million people your own age you don't really know what you're missing out on.

      Sounds like when I visit Las Vegas. It's fun for a week at most, wouldn't want to spend all of my time in such an environment.

    13. Re:Makes perfect sense by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The Bay moves exponentially faster in the hiring process.

      Indeed. My company is in SV (San Jose) and if a candidate interviews well, we try to make a job offer before they leave the premises. If we wait, many of them, especially the best of them, will already be working somewhere else by the time we call them back.

      We rarely bother calling references, or doing background checks, because both are mostly a waste of time. Good references don't mean much, and having a criminal record is not correlated with job performance.

    14. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. There are no pubs in Silicon Valley.

      Another reason not to live there.

    15. Re: Makes perfect sense by DatbeDank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lolwut?

      Every club I've been in in the bay area is nothing more than a sausage party with techies who lack social skills who then gawk and talk tech with the few girls that do go out.

      I almost feel bad for single women in that city. Hoards of techies with unipolar interests. For goodness sake people, get hobbies that reside outside of tech and start ups.

    16. Re: Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always draws in a white knight or two

    17. Re:Makes perfect sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If you want great central California weather, there are lots of places just down the coast around SLO that are great.

      Hush your mouth, Rooster. We don't want them here. Let them move to goddamn Fresno.

      Anyway, it's horrible here on the Central Coast. It's congested and polluted and there's something called "valley fever" that will kill you dead, and there's red tide and earthquakes and the entire coast is on fire. The communists have created a living hell of high-quality affordable health care for everyone. Under no circumstances should anyone from Silicon Valley move to the Central Coast. You know where it's nice? Houston. Yeah, that's the ticket. Go to Houston. Housing is cheap and there are gun stores everyone and you never have to worry about your sinuses drying out. And from what I hear, the emissions from the oil refineries is known to raise T-levels in men.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Makes perfect sense by PPH · · Score: 1

      The world is small, thanks to communications and travel systems.

      Do you mean telecommute? That will only last as long as your CEO has the balls to stand up to the local business roundtable and answer why he (she) isn't dragging all the employees back to the headquarters. Where they will spend their money on members' overpriced businesses.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    19. Re:Makes perfect sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      But once you're 35, the 'night life game' starts to become pretty unimportant

      That's true. For me, wild nightlife means putting a few drops of cannabis oil in my CPAP machine.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you are in life. For some, having something to go to 24/7 is important. However, others are settled, spawned child processes, and are looking for a relatively safe, quiet place.

      I have lived in the above mentioned town... you get to a point where you really don't want a vibrant night life, because you don't want to be stepping over bums hopped up on K2 or PCP. You want a place where you can go to your job, come home, and do your own thing.

      It is always worth experiencing, but people change, and what is great during college grates on nerves 5-10 years afterwards.

    21. Re:Makes perfect sense by PPH · · Score: 1

      and more than 2 million people your own age

      All working 80 hour weeks. And spending the rest of their lives commuting.

      Hint: If you want an interesting social life, think college towns. Small enough where the students and faculty drive the social scene. SF/SV may have some decent universities. But the area is so large, the college atmosphere just dissolves into the general city life.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    22. Re:Makes perfect sense by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Go south to Santa Monica, and you get real British pubs.

    23. Re: Makes perfect sense by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Explains a lot of your posts... ;-) That said, I'd mod your comment Funny if I could.

    24. Re: Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like one woman in the engineering department once said to the only other woman: the odds are good but the goods are odd.

    25. Re:Makes perfect sense by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Like the Regal Beagle. (est 1977)

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    26. Re:Makes perfect sense by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Like the Regal Beagle. (est 1977)

      Come and knock on my door.

    27. Re:Makes perfect sense by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Dammit, now I want nachos...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    28. Re:Makes perfect sense by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Taxes are voluntary, (resp. to your sig). you can always move out of the country

    29. Re:Makes perfect sense by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    30. Re:Makes perfect sense by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0
      Who says I haven't, at least economically? You can locate your business in a low-tax/no-tax State or country around the world, and only pay taxes on the income you repatriate. As Justice Learned Hand famously wrote in Commissioner v. Newman:

      Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one's affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.

      You have no duty to pay more than the absolute minimum the law demands, and if you can legally lower it by locating your business elsewhere, then there is nothing wrong with doing so.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    31. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes it easier to wank off to the Cal Poly girls walking around Paso Robles at night, eh pope?

    32. Re:Makes perfect sense by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Hush your mouth, Rooster. We don't want them here. Let them move to goddamn Fresno.

      You are welcome on my lawn.

      Yeah. Let that sink in.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    33. Re:Makes perfect sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I don't go to Paso. Too warm up there.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Makes perfect sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Let that sink in.

      Oh, you're welcome on my lawn, Rooster, just not those Silicon Valley knuckleheads. I'll even bring you a nice cold drink and a slab of whatever I'm grilling.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf? Are you changing jobs 6 times a year? Who fucking cares if it takes 4 weeks to get hired vs. 2? I've been hiring in San Mateo for 10 years now and it might take me 6 weeks to get someone hired based on cash flow. Such a bizarre and irrelevant thing to worry about.

    36. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The central coast is hot as fuck, still expensive, AND near zero jobs. It's like an expensive version of Arizona. You'd be retarded to move from the Bay Area to there.

    37. Re:Makes perfect sense by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      So you admit your sig is just false?
      That, in fact, NO ONE is taxing you against your will?
      Good to know you acknowledge it.

    38. Re: Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think GP meant "chicks" in an "it's an offensive term" sense as much as a "they are trannies" sense.

    39. Re:Makes perfect sense by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      SFO actually shuts down dead as a graveyard every night around 8 o'clock except for a few scattered clubs. It's actually pretty boring that way, I rate SFO nightlife as below average for a major city. Mind you there are a lot of private parties if that floats your boat.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    40. Re:Makes perfect sense by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      No, it is taxed against will. Do you want to pay taxes? If so, why not pay more? Why take any deductions? They are not voluntary, they are enforced at the threat of jail.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    41. Re:Makes perfect sense by mikael · · Score: 1

      There are many hells. For me, the worst one is a company located in a remote industrial estate on the edge of a city with a two hourly morning and evening commuter bus service. Just to rub salt in the wound, a local railway line runs right past the offices while the nearest two train stations are three miles away in either direction. If the urban planners had any common sense, they could have insisted on building a train station there. But no, you have to wait two hours for the next bus.

      Another one is a city where all the shops close at 5pm or 6pm. Everything. The place becomes a ghost town. So when you have a reverse commute, it's like a Disney theme park after closing time.

      On the flip side, if you live in a 24-hour city, you will probably be living in a high-rise apartment block. In that case, you won't be able to sleep at night because there will always be someone having a party with the windows open. And there will be the constant sound of fire trucks and police cars.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    42. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With sticks.

    43. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are using a CPAP and putting more shit in your lungs? You are an idiot.

    44. Re: Makes perfect sense by PPH · · Score: 1

      Looked at /b/ a few times too many. Went away scared.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    45. Re:Makes perfect sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      You are using a CPAP and putting more shit in your lungs? You are an idiot.

      Don't be silly. I was just joking. I actually put the cannabis oil in my Preparation H.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf? Are you changing jobs 6 times a year? Who fucking cares if it takes 4 weeks to get hired vs. 2? I've been hiring in San Mateo for 10 years now and it might take me 6 weeks to get someone hired based on cash flow. Such a bizarre and irrelevant thing to worry about.

      Silicon Valley: "You've had only 3 jobs in the past 6 years? What, do you suck at finding better ones?"
      Everywhere Else: "You've had 3 jobs in the past 6 years? What, do you keep getting fired or something?"

    47. Re:Makes perfect sense by hypertex · · Score: 1

      Is the King's Head still around? Another fave was around the corner from the main library and opened onto the street.

    48. Re: Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol in Shanghai? Shanghai has way less happening at night than sf or NYC.

    49. Re: Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but youâ(TM)re a man in your 40s who browses slash dot. You donâ(TM)t know where to go and If you did it would be weird for an old man to be there.

    50. Re:Makes perfect sense by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Actually valley fever came from the Central Valley, thus its name.

      So Fresno won't fix that.

      But I agree with you about the rest. :o)

    51. Re:Makes perfect sense by antdude · · Score: 1

      I miss being young with my single and active friends. Now, we're all old farts with our own families, being too busy, having a hard time getting new jobs after being let go, more health issues (avoiding junk food like nachos), etc. Stupid life. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    52. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean tall women with tablets?

    53. Re:Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That excitement and density feels nice when you're 16-25, but it's no true advantage. Once the hormones wear off, you'll see the shallow narcissism spread everywhere, the toxicity of constant pandering and tribalism. Big cities and density are saccharine lies, and the sweetness leads to decay.

  2. ...since 1849 by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    The Bay Area (and California as a whole really) needs to wake up and take a cold, hard look at a number of things that will have a huge impact on their future. I'm in SoCal now, but many of the same issues are really going to come to a head here very shortly. I could live many other places with lower costs and avoid much of the stupid metropolitan planning debacle... and still have nice weather.

    But, people have been bitching ever since they first got here, so take it all with a grain of salt. Money talks...

    1. Re:...since 1849 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop talking about it and do it. If you can live comfortably working remotely, do it. Ease the congestion by moving away, the people who can't will thank you.

    2. Re:...since 1849 by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I live in Upstate NY. Back in its time, it was considered the Center of the Industrial Revolution, the Silicon Valley of its time. It rode the train for as long as it could, and did little to expand its economy so a hundred years later, they are rundown cities and towns, which show the reminiscence of its glory days, slowly decaying.

      When we moved away from industry as our primary economic driver the Cities were full with people unable to adapt to the changing economy, The workers were trained to be factory workers, not desk workers on the phone. The schools were setup to teach kids how to follow instructions not creative problem solving. Unions and social safety nets are based on factory type of conditions where disability claims are more socially understood, while other forms of social security are considered as just being lazy.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:...since 1849 by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That's why I am in Ventura. Close enough to LA that I can go there for meetings with bigger clients and/or fly from LAX, but still small town enough - and affordable enough - to offer a great quality of life.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:...since 1849 by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people with power, and the people harmed are DIFFERENT PEOPLE. The voters are the people that own property and want to see it climb in value even more as the housing market is squeezed. The people that want to live in SV, but can't afford to, don't get a vote.

      Disclaimer: I bought a house in San Jose 25 years ago, and have benefitted big time from all the NIMBY building restrictions and wildly skewed property taxes, but I still think it is stupid policy.

    5. Re:...since 1849 by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      What you have is a cartel of homeowners who, in order to protect the wealth tied up in their homes, oppose anything that will add housing supply to the market.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:...since 1849 by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's going to be popcorn time when the bubble bursts and the million dollar 2 bedroom broom closets start selling for under 100K.

    7. Re:...since 1849 by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That used to be my neck of the woods too. I'm really happy to have moved to a lovely, vibrant little midwest college town which is growing and has a lot of tech and biotech money flowing into it.

      I love to visit upstate NY, but I don't see myself ever going back to live. Watching the place you live in grow is exciting and interesting. Watching it rust and fall apart is horrifically depressing.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    8. Re:...since 1849 by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I practically work remotely already, although my commute is just a few miles on a bike.

  3. There is a lot of talent elsewhere as well. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can go to some of the remote areas of the US. And be able to find talent which is just as good if not better then what you can find in SV.
    It isn't like it was 40 years ago, where talent had to be localized to particular areas. People are interconnected and talent can be anywhere.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...when you can work in a low tax, low cost state for some 75-90% of the salary?

    "Gee, I can make the mortgage payment on a 3,000 square foot house in Austin for what it would cost me to rent a one bedroom apartment in Silicon Valley..."

    Anti-growth policies keep more housing from being built, and extreme regulation drives companies away.

    California is killing its own golden goose.

    1. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1, Informative

      Anti-growth policies keep more housing from being built, and extreme regulation drives companies away.

      Google plans to build a new downtown San Jose campus for 20K employees. Apple is buying up land for a new campus in North San Jose. Adobe bought a lot across the street from their current San Jose headquarters to build a new tower. So much for "extreme regulation" driving away companies.

    2. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Austin is becoming more and more like SV with 200 Californians coming to the city each day. In fact, a lot of apartments have gone to the Rentberry app so people wind up bidding on where they live. For example, a 1/1 shithole costs $1800 here, and that is if you get a two year lease. Then, there is parking, and some new apartment complexes actually have zero parking on site, because it saves them cash, and makes them look "environmental" by saying their tenants should have bicycles anyway.

      The OP mentioned the toxic attitude. It has grown here, where the ideal female is pointed out in this brochure. Dating? As someone who has been here for a long while, the people encountered will judge you immediately on what you drive, and where you live. You could be the Devil himself, but if you drive a BMW and are from Tarrytown, you have a date.

      Of course, this has pervaded the local city council as well, which has all but struck down all zoning laws, allowing four story "rabbit warrens" on two lane streets, without any thought that apartments might increase traffic. However, the city council has not done a single road improvement on any major highway, other than adding tolls or converting existing highways into toll lane, since 1995.

    3. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      The issue isn't buying land for new office buildings - the issue is the tight housing market with insane valuations. And crazy traffic as well. Or dealing with taxi drivers urinating and defecating in SFO parking lots.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when you can work in a low tax, low cost state for some 75-90% of the salary?

      "Gee, I can make the mortgage payment on a 3,000 square foot house in Austin for what it would cost me to rent a one bedroom apartment in Silicon Valley..."

      Anti-growth policies keep more housing from being built, and extreme regulation drives companies away.

      California is killing its own golden goose.

      Then they move to other states, complain its not like California, vote the same idiots in and ruin the state they relocated to.

    5. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley doesn't have any "new" land to build on. Everything was set aside for development or torn down to build higher. Residential towers are being built in downtown San Jose and mixed developments (ground floor retail and four stories of apartments or condos) are popping up along the light rail lines. I'm just waiting for the "luxury" real estate bubble to pop.

    6. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Which are more reasons that the startups are leaving. Their best employees will just get sucked up by the big boys. And the demand will just drive up prices for the talent.

      Pretty soon, it will be like Microsoft and the Seattle area. Where MS can afford to buy your business and/or hire your best employees. And then hide them in a basement, twiddling their thumbs. Just to keep the competition out of the market.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Why work in an expensive, high tax state... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those companies usually have exemptions. For example in Austin, a lot of companies are given land, with zero tax burden, just to move to the region. I'm sure SJ has done the same thing to ensure Apple, Adobe, and Google stay put, rather than go to NYC or other metropolitian areas.

  5. Why didn't this happen 10 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    15 years ago I had an ex-GF who's sister worked in the Bay Area. She worked as a project manager, and couldn't afford a house, and was still renting at 35 years old. It just boggled my mind why she stayed.

    Flash forward 15 years and it's gotten worse. Plus add in the nutty narrow beliefs over there (They freaking banned selling fur for gods sake!), and I just don't understand why anyone would want to live there. Haven't ya'll heard there's a whole other country out here? Everything I've heard about Silicone Valley is utter shit.

    1. Re:Why didn't this happen 10 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California keeps growing despite your expectations because your assumptions about what people value are incorrect in most cases.

  6. Excellent by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This will bring relief to their insane real estate market and reduce geographic income concentration. The only major reason to be in SV is for the venture capital anyway.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will bring relief to their insane real estate market and reduce geographic income concentration. The only major reason to be in SV is for the venture capital anyway.

      Don’t bet on it.

      The dirty secret about the supposed alternative destinations is that they are boring, ugly, the weather sucks most of the time and they are overrun by hicks. The cost of living is lower because the quality of life is lower (though locals are always pleased as pigs in mud).

      California is expensive many reasons beyond venture capital (which isn’t really bound by location anyway).

    2. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it won't. What happens is that the offshore Chinese companies who own land are so big, they can afford to keep properties vacant for years to decades. Here in Austin, there have been a ton of buildings tossed up. Most have 10-20% occupancy rates, just because the owners are holding out, have set the rents, and will not rent for lower, even if there is a recession. They really don't give a rat's ass if the real estate is empty. People either pay the rent, or they go elsewhere.

      Same with apartments here. The owners don't have anything to lose if everything is vacant.

    3. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The traffic and people are so bad in SV that 'quality of life' really could not get any lower. I've lived in many places including SV for the last 10 years and it's unequivovally the lowest quality of live I've ever seen. Blows my mind to see mature adults living in 1200 sq foot houses with 90 minute commutes and shitty schools pretend they are 'lucky' because they are in CA.

    4. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bay Area has access to road cycling that is far superior to most other places in the US. Not all, but most.

      Also, there are more cars on the road, but fewer Neanderthals behind the wheels.

  7. Re:Jealous AM Radio mind Lynnfag Cuckster is jealo by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    LOL - I live in Ventura, nice and peaceful, much better weather, better beaches - and only 1 hour away from Los Angeles (which is a MUCH bigger, better city than SF). Why would I want to "splurge" on a $1.2MM 2 bedroom condo in SF when I can get a real 3+ bedroom house just 200 feet from the beach, for less money?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  8. so what's new? by crgrace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is old news. I've been hearing this story (and it's true about out-migration) my whole life. I remember when I first saw a big article about the "Hollowing Out of Silicon Valley" or something similar in the early/mid 1980s. The article was about how semiconductor and electronics manufacturing was the main employment driver in the San Jose area and the offshoring of manufacturing to Asia, coupled with high housing prices, was going to turn San Jose into Detroit by 1990. Didn't happen.

    Interestingly, the article was mostly true. There aren't many (just a few) fabs left in Silicon Valley, and Silicon Valley has mostly turned into Software Valley (and swallowed up San Francisco). What the article didn't anticipate was the combined strength of an innovative culture and importing the best of the best in the world to contribute. I think the cliched term is "Creative Destruction".

    Every since the early 1990s I think more Americans leave California than move here. However, at least in the town I grew up in, it was mostly low-skilled Americans moving out and high-skilled moving in (which has led to SERIOUS gentrification). This effect, coupled with a lot of high-skilled foreign immigration, had made my area more dynamic than I've ever seen it.

    When I was a kid, we had no ethnic food beyond Mexican and Chinese in my town. Now we just opened a Burmese restaurant to go along with the 20 other cultural restaurants. I think that's a sign of progress.

    My whole life (and I'm in my 40s) California was a "Liberal Cesspool of Business-Hating Over-Regulation, one step away from a spectacular collapse". And yet, here we are, doing better than ever.

    1. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My whole life (and I'm in my 40s) California was a "Liberal Cesspool of Business-Hating Over-Regulation, one step away from a spectacular collapse". And yet, here we are, doing better than ever.

      Exactly.

      I grew up in the Bay Area. I left about 10 years ago for flyover country. I now live in a place that is constantly trying to woo tech companies with low taxes, cheap labor, cheap houses, etc.

      I went back to the Bay Area last year for the first time in about 10 and the place is freaking booming. I was actually a bit blown away.

      Every time they open s new office Park here on the so-called “silicon slopes”, local media and politicians gush about all he growth. These yocals have no idea.

    2. Re:so what's new? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      If you want to see low value poors leaving and high value young’s coming, look at Chicago.

    3. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I remember when I first saw a big article about the "Hollowing Out of Silicon Valley" or something similar in the early/mid 1980s.

      Nope. Please note, crgrace doesn't even try to argue why SV is moving, ensuring he's just regurgitating what he's believed since he was younger. Unsurprisingly, he's both created the idea that SV tech migration myths existed since before the Gopher protocol was finalized and then concludes with his own red herring about how well SV is doing (which he claims to live in).

      How this gets upvoted, is a telling indicator about the failure of the moderation system.

    4. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


      Interestingly, the article was mostly true. There aren't many (just a few) fabs left in Silicon Valley, and Silicon Valley has mostly turned into Software Valley

      Sure, and in the 1980s the money shifted from hardware to software. So so did SV. It's different now. There's no "new thing" to shift to.

      When I was a kid, we had no ethnic food beyond Mexican and Chinese in my town. Now we just opened a Burmese restaurant to go along with the 20 other cultural restaurants. I think that's a sign of progress.

      That has nothing to do with SV, it's a shift in the entire US. In Minneapolis in the 80s it was mostly the same, but throw in some Vienamese restaurants since we had a lot of people here from Vietnam in the 80s. These days it's huge. I now live within a half mile of a great Mexican supermarket, a middle eastern supermarket, a Korean supermarket, an Indian supermarket, and a massive littany of just about every ethnic food you can imagine.

      So no, it's not just SV that has this big explosion of diversity, it's much of the country.

      And yet, here we are, doing better than ever.

      You think? You're the center of the nutty revolution where you ban things like fur, fire people for having the wrong political opinion, and the housing prices are batshit insane.

      It _will_ collapse one day. Everything does. Detroit also seemed like it'd be Shangri-La for forever too. Then the rest of the world figured out how to build cars. You think the same thing hasn't already happened with Software? You're a one-industry town! How can you possibly sustain that? People keep predicting the demise of SV because it's just bound to happen given how non-diverse the economy is.

    5. Re:so what's new? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      My whole life (and I'm in my 40s) California was a "Liberal Cesspool of Business-Hating Over-Regulation, one step away from a spectacular collapse". And yet, here we are, doing better than ever.

      Before I moved to Silicon Valley, I'd constantly hear variations on this from my (often conservative) friends. That, and the usual comments about it being way too expensive. Well, after moving here, I simply don't see how these complaints have actually led to any sort of collapse.

      Tech jobs pay *way* more than anywhere else in the country, practically putting engineers on-par with what you'd need to be a doctor or lawyer to get elsewhere. There are also a lot more opportunities. Before I lived here, I felt like I was basically invisible to job opportunities. All the usual complaints about no one giving me the time of day, not meeting the 20 specific buzzwords in whatever job openings I could find, etc. After moving here, and to this day, recruiters have been trying to get my attention practically non-stop.

      Sure, housing costs are beyond ridiculous. I won't argue that point. But if you can make it work, there's a lot more opportunity.

    6. Re:so what's new? by Octorian · · Score: 2

      I grew up in the Bay Area. I left about 10 years ago for flyover country. I now live in a place that is constantly trying to woo tech companies with low taxes, cheap labor, cheap houses, etc.

      I hear about these places a lot. I wonder how many of them actually acknowledge what I consider to be the two most important factors in keeping SV attractive:

      - Critical mass of big *and* small employers ensuring that you have opportunity beyond the job that you originally moved there for.
      - Lack of non-compete agreements ensuring mobility amongst said jobs.

      (okay, there's also the bit about VC presence, which feeds into the first point)

    7. Re:so what's new? by crgrace · · Score: 1

      > Nope. Please note, crgrace doesn't even try to argue why SV is moving, ensuring he's just regurgitating what he's believed since he was younger. Unsurprisingly, he's both created the idea that SV tech migration myths existed since before the Gopher protocol was finalized and then concludes with his own red herring about how well SV is doing (which he claims to live in).

      I'm not sure I fully understand your comment. I'll ignore the rude aspects and respond to your substantive points.

      I have read multiple articles (in the newspaper and in magazines) growing up about how people were abandoning SV. Are you claiming I made them up? I'm confused. There are also books about this. For example, in "Zap! The Rise and Fall of Atari", there is about half a chapter about how Silicon Valley was collapsing. (this book is from the mid 80s).

      When I was graduating college in the mid 90s, the big news was AMD was moving their fabs from Sunnyvale to Austin, TX. True, Austin is now a tech hub but SV has grown even more. For years tech companies have been trying to move to cheaper areas, but SV keeps ticking. For example, in the mid 80s it was BIG news that Intel was building its new fab and moving so much of its engineering force to Portland from Santa Clara. There was a lot of doomsday feeling on the news here at the time (I was in middle school). I remember being afraid when some talking head on the news was prognosticating housing prices were about to crater since my parents had just bought a home. Their home is a craptastic 3bd ranch house on a busy street. My Dad bought this house in the mid-80s on one income and it is worth almost $800k now.

      The tech outmigration myth is only "kind of" a myth. It isn't an either-or; it's both. Lots of tech jobs are being moved to other states and countries. This is true and is the source of all the doom and gloom. HOWEVER, more jobs are being created due to company growth and, more importantly new companies, than are being lost. THAT is the myth.

      And I didn't claim to live in SV. I live in San Francisco (is which effectively in SV, but not really). I grew up in the East Bay, about 30 miles north of SV.

      If I misunderstood what you were expressing, sorry!

    8. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a one-industry town!

      And that industry is providing a stimulating and prosperous place for the brains of the world to drain to.

      The best that the butt-hurt left behind can hope for as a come-uppance for California is that it will have to compete harder with cities in Asia for talent as standards of living improve.

    9. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        now live in a place that is constantly trying to woo tech companies with low taxes, cheap labor, cheap houses, etc.

      I hear about these places a lot. I wonder how many of them actually acknowledge what I consider to be the two most important factors in keeping SV attractive:


      Places offering tax incentives aren't the ones you should be looking at. You should be looking at the ones that don't need to do this.


      - Critical mass of big *and* small employers ensuring that you have opportunity beyond the job that you originally moved there for.
      - Lack of non-compete agreements ensuring mobility amongst said jobs.

      #1 is relatively common in most large American cities.
      As far as non-compete goes, believe it or not in many states non-compete is not enforceable. As far as commonality, In 20 years of work I've barely even heard it even mentioned. I think the only time I've ever even heard it mentioned is when a competitor buys your company, and the CEO/Owner of said company has to sign a 2 year non-compete. The only reason this is enforceable is because mega-corp forked over X million dollars to the CEO to buy a share in the market. For people working in the trenches, it's totally unheard of, and you'd get strange looks if you tried to do it.

    10. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell they are banking primarily on low taxes, low wages and low cost of living.

      The takers tend to be large corporations looking for cheap places to park their tech support staff and other lower profile depts. I have every expectation that once the tax breaks dry up they will pull up stakes and move to the latest “up and coming area” willing to throw free money at employers.

      Start ups tend to be home grown. If they get traction they head for greener pastures where they can get the skills that they need to grow.

    11. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't live in SV, but I've been surprised at how well people can do in the tech sector in Austin. For example, a friend of mine's son graduated high school, but didn't want to go into heavy debt for college. He took a job at a MSP, got his RHCSA and some AWS experience, learned Kubernates and the other DevOps stuff, and now is making well above six digits.

    12. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to paraphrase the great Yogi Berra:
      nobody stays the bay area, it's too crowded.

    13. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than ever, sure, but compared to almost anywhere else, the bay area is an extremely unpleasant place to live. Public schools suck. Real estate sucks. Traffic sucks. People suck. Unless maybe you're trying to start a business and you WANT to work and commute all the time and be poor while you're at it. My house goes on the market next week, can't wait to get out of this shithole.

    14. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than ever, sure, but compared to almost anywhere else, the bay area is an extremely unpleasant place to live. Public schools suck. Real estate sucks. Traffic sucks. People suck. Unless maybe you're trying to start a business and you WANT to work and commute all the time and be poor while you're at it. My house goes on the market next week, can't wait to get out of this shithole.

      I say the same things about Salt Lake City every day. I hope you have better luck!

    15. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot tell whether this is sarcasm, or you really believe this.
      I get this a lot in the era of "Trump Hitler Russia Cis-Nazi" reasoning.

    16. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Section 8's like applicable everywhere now, every time a small slump happens in some locality landlords fall back to it, and people are leaving Chicago and Detroit in droves to find localities where they can all still live together but in housing that hasn't been extremely subsidized for very long. It's in a hell of a lot better shape. It's certainly changing *those* towns quickly, Chicago not quite so quickly.

    17. Re:so what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact that California has the highest poverty rate in the country, yes. Yes, you are doing better than ever. (If you're not in the massive poverty group).

  9. Western ny mansion 500k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In western ny you can have a freaking mansion for 500k.

    No wildfires, no earth quakes, plenty of water, beautiful area with depressed economy. Hidden little gem.

    1. Re: Western ny mansion 500k by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      You can do the same in Western PA but with better sports teams ;-)

    2. Re:Western ny mansion 500k by Questy · · Score: 1

      Atlanta suburbs here... 3 story home on an acre in an HOA neighborhood with 4 pools, courts, exercise facilities, etc. 300k out the door. Granted, Atlanta is taking on roughly 75k people every year, but the tech market is doing extremely well, and the salaries are on par with PHX/AUS/SJC/SFO for IC level roles. Yes, I'll eventually leave due to crowding, but for the time being, it's a great place to live and raise a family.

      --
      #!/Jerald
  10. I wonder why ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Insane government, out of control cost of living, street conditions that are driving conventions and tourists away https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.... https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/a...

    Yeah, I think I'll look for someplace else with a pleasant climate and craft housing.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. East Bay SF by Archfeld · · Score: 0

    I've a house in Concord, about 35 miles east of SF. I can scuba, surf, water ski, snow ski, hit a club in SF, San Jose, go to a farmers market or ranch. I work for company that has offices in Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Illinois, Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii, as well as internationally in numerous countries. One thing I will say is I can go outside for lunch and grab a random stranger who is more qualified than many of the 'specialists' we hire to work in our remote sites. I spend about 4 months of the year in Yuma, AZ with the snow birds working remotely and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. Northern California is just an awesome place, Granted California has many issues, like the parasitic South, LA and the Hollywood set are reprehensible, but the central valley is cool, and the extreme north has the Trinity, I love me some green skunk weed. Some day I'd like to have a place in mountains of Colorado, but until you can truly get great broadband and live off the grid it is unlikely.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:East Bay SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've a house in Concord, about 35 miles east of SF. I can scuba, surf, water ski, snow ski, hit a club in SF, San Jose, go to a farmers market or ranch. I work for company that has offices in Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Illinois, Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii, as well as internationally in numerous countries. One thing I will say is I can go outside for lunch and grab a random stranger who is more qualified than many of the 'specialists' we hire to work in our remote sites. I spend about 4 months of the year in Yuma, AZ with the snow birds working remotely and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. Northern California is just an awesome place, Granted California has many issues, like the parasitic South, LA and the Hollywood set are reprehensible, but the central valley is cool, and the extreme north has the Trinity, I love me some green skunk weed. Some day I'd like to have a place in mountains of Colorado, but until you can truly get great broadband and live off the grid it is unlikely.

      Too bad the commute from the South Bay to Concord is >2 hours right now (Friday afternoon). There are lots of places to live in Northern California if you want to spend 4 hrs/day in a car or bus, but if you want to work in Silicon Valley AND have a short commute then its EXPENSIVE.

  13. TFA was embarrassing for the economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This was a poorly researched fluff piece. Showing no reasons for folks leaving, and tossing in a few anecdotes, leaves the reader with more of a hypothesis than any facts. Sure, San Francisco is a sewer, sure land is insanely expensive, sure bay area isn't, IMO a great place to raise a family, but I don't see info other than a list of possible reasons, and then attempting to call correlation causality.

    Fake news, indeed.

  14. Duluth MN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clean water

  15. Move to Slab City by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    just east of Salton Sea
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  16. Forget the wall about Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    We need to build a wall around Silicon Valley for keeping those fuckers in. Every city those techies go they destroy the social fabric.
    Better to keep then walled in all in one place. Bonus if it's a desolated place with no running water.

  17. Yep Yep Yep by brickhouse98 · · Score: 1

    Dovetails with the recent CNBC article that listed places like Cincinnati and Chattanooga being the recipients of some such startups. Cali will be just fine but other cities stand to benefit.

  18. Toxic culture obsessed with money? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Hell, if the "toxic culture obsessed with money" bothers you, you might as well look at emigrating from the country, not the Bay Area. Actually, you should probably find someplace off-planet from our own little slice if Ferringinar.

    --
    That is all.
  19. How many really do move? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    46% of Bay Area residents said they planned to leave in "the next few years,"

    I'd like to see some followup to see how many actually did leave. Moving is hard, staying is easy.

    I've been "going to move out of the bay area in the next few years" for about 15 years. I finally did move out of the area earlier this year, but kept my house so I can move back if I want to.

  20. Discover the much better parts of the USA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The air is clean.
    The streets are clean. No trash. No drugs. No waste on the streets.
    Workers want to work.
    No crime. Police enforce laws.
    No tent cities.
    No extra new taxes.

    The company you work gets to pay less for power. The investors get more for their investment. Fast internet.
    The workers enjoy more pay and the lower housing prices.
    Governments allow that employee cafeterias..
    Win. Win. Win for workers and investors.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Re:Jealous AM Radio mind Lynnfag Cuckster is jealo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ventura is faggot town lol, you wanna-be-hollywood FAGGOT lol

  22. Hardly surprising by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    When $500K buys you nothing but a teeny-weeny apartment in dodgy areas; when a $100K/yr salary is barely enough to feed a family of three; when you spend hours a day stuck in traffic jams, you know that your quality of life sucks to high heaven.

  23. It's about time! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    The Bay Area has a reputation for being a great place for startups to find talented developers. Now that the frenzy of the dot-com boom is simmering down, companies are finding out that there are talented people everywhere. Often, in other parts of the country, those talented people can be hired for a lot less than in California because the cost of living is lower. For companies that want to create new software-based businesses deliberately instead of frantically, there are lots of great cities around the country!

  24. I live in one of the places they are going by mycroft16 · · Score: 1

    Utah has a swath of cities that has been dubbed The Silicon Slopes because pretty much every tech company is now here. Microsoft has set up offices. Adobe. Facebook is building a gigantic new datacenter. The NSA has their massive data facility here. Along with more startups than I can keep track of. The construction of office parks and buildings along a 30 mile stretch of freeway is insane. Housing prices here are great, power is cheap as well which is attracting large datacenters. Access to infrastructure is also easy, and Utah is taking advantage of it dumping hundreds of millions into freeway expansion and other projects to attract the business. Park City has also seen a lot of tech and start up growth as well using the "ski culture" the way California used the surf culture. Hit the slopes before work etc.