I'm going to ask you for a citation, if you think that is true.
To which A) that we are in an ice age ? B) That you didn't understand that fact ?
Seeing as you don't understand what you are talking about, I'll have to ask you to demonstrate you are tall enough for this ride before we go any further. Come back when you can post a definition of Ice Age and Inter Glacial Period.
Actually yes. The conflict between licensing on streaming services/satellite services/ conventional ppv has limited content that under the original television model would have been available and available as advertising support over the air television.
You can get more now, but it is via seperate purchases,
You're confusing yourself. The tiny positive you mentioned "more green plants".
The industrial revolution was in the past. We're talking about the future.
Please if you are going to be ignorant try not to demonstrate it quite so forcefully.
Greening the planet is hardly a tiny positive if you are starving. The industrial revolution is ongoing and still being powered overwhelmingly by fossil fuels, Where and how do you think the computer you type this one was made ?
we call him crashmarik. now go the fuck away shill.
Yeah DW you have always had that great way of marshaling facts and logic. If you try really hard some day you too will be able to science. Just keep screaming it's the key for you.
Try again I am talking about theories that predict the temperature of the earth in advance and fail to make accurate predictions. What do you call them ?
You're saying the Industrial revolution was a tiny positive ?
BTW Haansen and Mann(the teedle dee and dum of this) were predicting doom before congress going back to the 80s. Where is this huge catastrophe that's supposed to be here by now.
Then why should your claims be seen as anything other than tired old identity politics where your stance that AGW is a scam is purely based on you being told by "your clan" that it is so, irrespective of evidence and ignorant of it?
No I see his claims without evidence and trying to frame the argument as "We, you", not only as Tribal but as an appeal to the majority as well.
If someone tells your that we are running out of (insert fossil fuel here), what they are most likely talking about is economically viable (insert fossil fuel here) not absolute values.
Your post overall isn't bad. It's considerably better than the stuff that comes from people that mod anything that challenges their preconceptions down so let me ask
Just when have you heard anyone not frame fuel exhaustion in anything but apocalyptic terms ? It's overwhelmingly the case.
I don't even want to talk about just how many Greens are closet disciples of Malthus/Ehrlic, that just know better than to proclaim in public.
Oh, You weren't trying to dispute you were being tribal ?
You do seem to jump to whatever conclusions suit your preconceptions.
I don't know about that. So far I have been having fun watching you reveal yourself.
So tell me more about this we you are apart of that calls me a science denier. How is membership in the set determined ? Is it a reflexive self identification ? Does the group require a knowledge of the theories they claim I am a denier of ?
Yes I posted a correction just after I hit submit.. It's a personal quirk I have swtiching their names. Slashdot unfortunately still has no way to edit posts.
Slashdot Mirror
Now she is a data scientist ?
The laughs never stop with this woman. I'm with her 2020.
your ignorance is frightening
And yours is now irrelevant.
You actually have to have been born, summoned from the Netherhells doesn't count.
If you guys can't get your stories straight, that's not my problem.
You guys ? Good to see that tribalism again.
Is it Global warming this week , AGW, or climate change (something wherein any difference in the climate is proof of it happening)
Thanks for telling me what I already know. Want to also tell me the name of my cat?
No I actually try to bring facts, in this discussion your replies have veered towards the personal.
You claimed that I didn't understand we are in an ice age: provide a citation.
I asked you to prove you were worth talking to, seeing as you have declined that's more than enough.
If accurate prediction is the measure to use, why would anyone believe cultists such as yourself that don't have any
I'm done.
I'm going to ask you for a citation, if you think that is true.
To which
A) that we are in an ice age ?
B) That you didn't understand that fact ?
Seeing as you don't understand what you are talking about, I'll have to ask you to demonstrate you are tall enough for this ride before we go any further.
Come back when you can post a definition of Ice Age and Inter Glacial Period.
Actually yes. The conflict between licensing on streaming services/satellite services/ conventional ppv has limited content that under the original television model would have been available and available as advertising support over the air television.
You can get more now, but it is via seperate purchases,
You're confusing yourself. The tiny positive you mentioned "more green plants".
The industrial revolution was in the past. We're talking about the future.
Please if you are going to be ignorant try not to demonstrate it quite so forcefully.
Greening the planet is hardly a tiny positive if you are starving. The industrial revolution is ongoing and still being powered overwhelmingly by fossil fuels, Where and how do you think the computer you type this one was made ?
I am sorry, aren't you the guy who didn't understand we were in an ice age ?
Well what accurate prediction do you assert I am denying ? So far all you have is name calling and it makes you look like a cultist. Maybe you are.
The temperature isn't rising"
Oh hell why not give yourself a bigger target there and go for "The climate isn't changing"
"OK the temperature is rising, but it's because we are coming out of an ice age"
It's almost as good as this. We are in an ice age right now, this is an interglacial period of the current ice age.
Hint: When the poles are covered in ice it's an ice age.
If accurate prediction is the standard why do you believe a theory that only does so post hoc.
we call him crashmarik.
now go the fuck away shill.
Yeah DW you have always had that great way of marshaling facts and logic.
If you try really hard some day you too will be able to science. Just keep screaming it's the key for you.
Try again I am talking about theories that predict the temperature of the earth in advance and fail to make accurate predictions. What do you call them ?
You're saying the Industrial revolution was a tiny positive ?
BTW Haansen and Mann(the teedle dee and dum of this) were predicting doom before congress going back to the 80s. Where is this huge catastrophe that's supposed to be here by now.
Then why should your claims be seen as anything other than tired old identity politics where your stance that AGW is a scam is purely based on you being told by "your clan" that it is so, irrespective of evidence and ignorant of it?
No I see his claims without evidence and trying to frame the argument as "We, you", not only as Tribal but as an appeal to the majority as well.
That's right we aren't and you are trying to make this about them.
Hmmm
Yeah Dywolf, I recall you bragging you sodomized your mother in your post history. Too much trouble to find, I'll just point it out.
Good analogy
Oh wait Powering the civilization is in no way the same as terrorism. That's a lousy analogy.
Your post overall isn't bad. It's considerably better than the stuff that comes from people that mod anything that challenges their preconceptions down so let me ask
Just when have you heard anyone not frame fuel exhaustion in anything but apocalyptic terms ? It's overwhelmingly the case.
I don't even want to talk about just how many Greens are closet disciples of Malthus/Ehrlic, that just know better than to proclaim in public.
I never said the "we" was singular
Oh, You weren't trying to dispute you were being tribal ?
You do seem to jump to whatever conclusions suit your preconceptions.
I don't know about that. So far I have been having fun watching you reveal yourself.
So tell me more about this we you are apart of that calls me a science denier. How is membership in the set determined ? Is it a reflexive self identification ? Does the group require a knowledge of the theories they claim I am a denier of ?
Good for you, not everyone gets to be a personal We.
Yeah, I mean really who wants to live on a greener more fertile planet
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/g...
If highway traffic were anywhere near letting you go at a decent speed.
Yes I posted a correction just after I hit submit.. It's a personal quirk I have swtiching their names. Slashdot unfortunately still has no way to edit posts.
Dave who could possibly be offended by you ?