I agree- but easier than trying to find the screen real-estate to see the entire task list, click on the "CPU" column until "Sytstem Idle Process" is at the top- this will essentially sort the list by the most active programs of the second, and then the screen recording software will capture all the currently running processes.
I'll get mod-bombed right back down to Good Karma for this- but I have to say that I'm not at all sure it didn't happen in Ohio and Florida in 2004. The exit poll numbers, which had previously been extremely accurate in just about every election I'd ever heard of, were way off in those two states on the Presidential race- but the numbers were close enough that everybody focused on recounts instead (where possible).
It seems to me that write once media could be a partial solution here- a multisession CDR running packet write software, can be analyzed just like paper- but compresses the information.
Sorry, that's his gross profits. Time to develop the lecture, cost of equipment/media for the recording, and time for conversion to MP3/Upload would all come out of that 40%. I'm saying if the university wants a cut, they need to provide some of the services of that 40%.
and then he'd really be working for literally nothing. Look, maybe on Planet Hackwrench paying tuition fees gives you ownership of every idea a professor ever has and every minute of his time, 24/7, but in real life, a professor's employment by a university has some differences from slave labour.
Now that's interesting. Back when I was working Private Industry, every single job I had to sign a statement that specifically assigned the company copyright for any idea I had, because there was no way to prove that the idea didn't come on paid time. Why are professors different?
My point is that there are some very easy ways he could reduce the cost in both time and materials. I still think he deserves to charge for his work, but even using public systems he could reduce the cost to the end user to about $1 or so, by chosing the right software and equipment. OR the university could just take his idea and use it as a service.
My undergraduate school had several professors who just made their lecture notes directly public sharable, read/only- they'd pass out the URI at the begining of class and anybody who wanted to could see the notes.
No I don't- a republic insinuates freely elected representatives, not a choice on the ballot between two equally bought-and-paid-for puppets of the corporations and banking system.
How much of a cut? His profits are only 40% to begin with- I suppose we could give him 30$ and the University 10%, if they're willing to pay for the equipment....
I wouldn't pass a regulation against it- I'd just remove it from the professor's duties by hiring some underclassman at $5/hr on a work study program to wire a time-based recorder into the sound system of the lecture hall itself. The whole mess could be easily automated- it's not like the lectures happen at random times or anything. Heck, hack MythTV and send the MP4 files to a public file server on the university's network indexed by class ID.
My point is that he'd get 75 cents from Apple, but his students could buy the lecture for only $.99.
And exactly how hard is it to use a modern MP3 recorder anyway? Hit record at start of lecture, stop at end, upload file. Yes it takes time, yes he should be paid for his time, but how much time does it realistically take per lecture? 3 human minutes + 5 machine minutes?
Schrag explained that $1.50 of the money goes directly to ind-music.com, the host of the Web site offering the service. One dollar then goes to Schrag to offset the cost of recording and editing the lengthy lectures.
If he's only getting that percentage anyway, he could have saved his students money by making it a podcast.
The problem isn't with the type of weapon used, it's with the division of labor. FBI or Police are supposed to be used for this purpose, not the standing military whose mandate is defense of national security, not defense of your business because you were too stupid to make money in a business that people don't protest.
Look at the dates. John Titor hasn't been seen online since March 2001. But the non-leathal use by POLICE isn't the point. The use ofthe MILITARY internal to the United States is unconstitutional (that's why we have the FBI & Police to begin with, instead of just using the Army for everything). But you're right, nobody should be surprised by it.
Or we can now fight John Titor's Civil War confident in the fact that at least we won't be KILLED by government troops (as opposed to blinded, knocked out, made deaf, etc depending on the non-lethal weapon used).
Ask John Titor, he predicted this back in 2000 as a way for US Military to fight in a Civil War without killing citizens. Of course- if he really was a time traveler his timeline didn't seem to include 9-11-2001, but other than that the development of using non-lethal weapons on American Citizens is right on schedule.
Have you considered a good 3G cell phone? OS in ROM, more advanced browser, does everything the i-Opener used to do, and most are Bluetooth/EDGE/Wi-Fi compatible.
Here's one firm you won't have to worry about stealing your jobs.
Well, let's give them a fighting chance at least. Ok, here's what I do to estimate bandwidth needs: Minimum bandwidth x number of users @ peak time. In your case- I would say you need a 1.5 MBit T-1 line or better. If you can't afford to do that in your current contract, then you need to renegotiate your contract for more money.
Slashdot Mirror
And I'd believe that article exactly why? It's just sour grapes from the old media covering up for an old money bought and paid for election.
Falun Gong = Islam (the radical, extremist, shooting out missiles that have no guidance system variety)?
I agree- but easier than trying to find the screen real-estate to see the entire task list, click on the "CPU" column until "Sytstem Idle Process" is at the top- this will essentially sort the list by the most active programs of the second, and then the screen recording software will capture all the currently running processes.
I'll get mod-bombed right back down to Good Karma for this- but I have to say that I'm not at all sure it didn't happen in Ohio and Florida in 2004. The exit poll numbers, which had previously been extremely accurate in just about every election I'd ever heard of, were way off in those two states on the Presidential race- but the numbers were close enough that everybody focused on recounts instead (where possible).
It seems to me that write once media could be a partial solution here- a multisession CDR running packet write software, can be analyzed just like paper- but compresses the information.
Not without a jump/goto.
What do you think a procedure call is, if not a Gosub? What do you think an if statement is, if not a JNE or JEQ?
The Love of Money is the Root of All Evil. If Profit is your highest value, there is NO room for other values.
Sorry, that's his gross profits. Time to develop the lecture, cost of equipment/media for the recording, and time for conversion to MP3/Upload would all come out of that 40%. I'm saying if the university wants a cut, they need to provide some of the services of that 40%.
and then he'd really be working for literally nothing. Look, maybe on Planet Hackwrench paying tuition fees gives you ownership of every idea a professor ever has and every minute of his time, 24/7, but in real life, a professor's employment by a university has some differences from slave labour.
Now that's interesting. Back when I was working Private Industry, every single job I had to sign a statement that specifically assigned the company copyright for any idea I had, because there was no way to prove that the idea didn't come on paid time. Why are professors different?
My point is that there are some very easy ways he could reduce the cost in both time and materials. I still think he deserves to charge for his work, but even using public systems he could reduce the cost to the end user to about $1 or so, by chosing the right software and equipment. OR the university could just take his idea and use it as a service.
Actually, that's part of the problem. $1.50 of the cost is because he is explicitly NOT using university equipment to host this.
My undergraduate school had several professors who just made their lecture notes directly public sharable, read/only- they'd pass out the URI at the begining of class and anybody who wanted to could see the notes.
You live in a republic,
No I don't- a republic insinuates freely elected representatives, not a choice on the ballot between two equally bought-and-paid-for puppets of the corporations and banking system.
How much of a cut? His profits are only 40% to begin with- I suppose we could give him 30$ and the University 10%, if they're willing to pay for the equipment....
I wouldn't pass a regulation against it- I'd just remove it from the professor's duties by hiring some underclassman at $5/hr on a work study program to wire a time-based recorder into the sound system of the lecture hall itself. The whole mess could be easily automated- it's not like the lectures happen at random times or anything. Heck, hack MythTV and send the MP4 files to a public file server on the university's network indexed by class ID.
My point is that he'd get 75 cents from Apple, but his students could buy the lecture for only $.99.
And exactly how hard is it to use a modern MP3 recorder anyway? Hit record at start of lecture, stop at end, upload file. Yes it takes time, yes he should be paid for his time, but how much time does it realistically take per lecture? 3 human minutes + 5 machine minutes?
Schrag explained that $1.50 of the money goes directly to ind-music.com, the host of the Web site offering the service. One dollar then goes to Schrag to offset the cost of recording and editing the lengthy lectures.
If he's only getting that percentage anyway, he could have saved his students money by making it a podcast.
The problem isn't with the type of weapon used, it's with the division of labor. FBI or Police are supposed to be used for this purpose, not the standing military whose mandate is defense of national security, not defense of your business because you were too stupid to make money in a business that people don't protest.
Look at the dates. John Titor hasn't been seen online since March 2001. But the non-leathal use by POLICE isn't the point. The use ofthe MILITARY internal to the United States is unconstitutional (that's why we have the FBI & Police to begin with, instead of just using the Army for everything). But you're right, nobody should be surprised by it.
Does anyone get the feeling that sometimes America is a place where rich, powerful people do whatever they want?
Yes, it's been that way since a Supreme Court Clerk Decided that corporations were persons back in 1886. We lost our democracy then.
Yesterday, we learn that the HP executive who authorized the illegal surveillance has been slapped on the wrist.
Of course- she's not in your class.
Today, we learn that government officials will arbitrarily test military weapons on American citizens.
But only in keeping with what the Corporations want- in other words, they'll be used on protestors who are blocking streets and endangering profits.
Or we can now fight John Titor's Civil War confident in the fact that at least we won't be KILLED by government troops (as opposed to blinded, knocked out, made deaf, etc depending on the non-lethal weapon used).
Ask John Titor, he predicted this back in 2000 as a way for US Military to fight in a Civil War without killing citizens. Of course- if he really was a time traveler his timeline didn't seem to include 9-11-2001, but other than that the development of using non-lethal weapons on American Citizens is right on schedule.
I know an easy way to make sure it's the second- use the melting tundra to grow pine trees.
Have you considered a good 3G cell phone? OS in ROM, more advanced browser, does everything the i-Opener used to do, and most are Bluetooth/EDGE/Wi-Fi compatible.
Here's one firm you won't have to worry about stealing your jobs.
Well, let's give them a fighting chance at least. Ok, here's what I do to estimate bandwidth needs: Minimum bandwidth x number of users @ peak time. In your case- I would say you need a 1.5 MBit T-1 line or better. If you can't afford to do that in your current contract, then you need to renegotiate your contract for more money.