Slashdot Mirror


Helping Other Big Brothers Go High Tech

Dino writes "BusinessWeek has an interesting article about the export of high-tech equipment to China's security forces, and the dilemma that it creates. On the one hand, there is the desire to increase exports to a country with which there is a trade imbalance. On the other hand, we face a situation in which the technology can be used to track dissidents and unauthorized religions. Restrictions have been enacted since the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre to prevent exports intended to the Chinese security forces. However, the restrictions have been applied narrowly, and effectively prevent only low-tech exports such as handcuffs, helmets, fingerprint powder, and tear gas, while DB software, two-way radios, DNA analysis gear, and video probes, are allowed."

97 comments

  1. THEY NEED THAT DNA ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT by CmdrTaco+(troll) · · Score: 5, Funny

    They need to make sure blood on the bullet matches up so they don't bill the wrong family.

    --

    I hope high gas prices are depriving your children, you fucking dumbass.
    1. Re:THEY NEED THAT DNA ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT by markana · · Score: 2, Funny

      I though it was so they could match the transplant patients to the correct pris^h^h^h^h donor....

      For what those people are payng, they want the best match possible.

    2. Re:THEY NEED THAT DNA ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean the Wong familly?

  2. Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The actual headline in Business Week's article in the linked article is "Helping Big Brother Go High Tech ", yet the slashdot headline is slyly reworded to "Helping Other Big Brothers Go High Tech".

    I wonder this was just an innocent mistake or if the submitter intentionally reworded this to imply there are other big brothers we are helping. If so, let's see the evidence, otherwise this slight modification of text comes out of the pages of Animal Farm.

    Hmm..

    1. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is that the US itself is acting like a Big Brother lately with all this warrantless wiretapping, unlawful prisoner detention, warrantless phone records datamining, etc. And now Big Brother is helping another big brother so he can boom boom long time.

    2. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by ajenteks · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe the implication is that America itself is a big brother? The wire-tapping crap alone that's been going on lately sure makes it seem like that could be the case.

    3. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hopefully, we can help all Big brothers and Sisters everywhere!

    4. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Cinnimod · · Score: 1

      Ockham's Razor, people. Simplest explanation blah blah blah...the person who posted it typed the subject line by hand and put "brothers" instead of "brother", simple typo. Implications of greater conspiracy? I feel like I'm on one of those Area 51 websites. Take off your foil hats guys.

    5. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0

      I think the submitter might be refering to the US. Let's face it, there are a LOT of /.ers out there who are at least a little concerned about the state of privacy in the US. This might have been the submitter's subtle way of encouraging a flamewar.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    6. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      This is /.

      The hats are welded to our skulls with a lead-based agent.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    7. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put in an extra word too... Obviously, we know who Big Brother is. He's the one that keeps us sleeping easy every night, because we know he is out there fighting the terrorists... All Hail Big Brother.

    8. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Guuge · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I think it's quite obvious that the change is supposed to clarify that the "Big Brother" we're talking about is not our "Big Brother" but another "Big Brother".

    9. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder this was just an innocent mistake or if the submitter intentionally reworded this to imply there are other big brothers we are helping. If so, let's see the evidence, otherwise this slight modification of text comes out of the pages of Animal Farm.

      Of course there are others -- all the right-wing dictators we support.Whether it's the "counterinsurgency" techniques we teach at the renamed-in-name-only School of the Americas or any other repressive "allies" we keep.

      Remember the sales of IBM computers to the South African government that brought on the wave of dis-investment? Looks like it's time to dust off the old strategy again, except starting with China this time.

    10. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like it's time to dust off the old strategy again, except starting with China this time.

      The South African market wasn't worth the billions China's market is. Money talks: deal with it.

    11. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the slashdot editors are playing Big Brother by manipulating the article's headline and inserting a dig where it didn't belong.

      The editors love to complain about Big Brother but they play one themselves.

    12. Re:Very Interesting Rewording by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Maybe the implication is that America itself is a big brother?

      But instead of Emmanuel Goldstein you have Osama Bin Laden. Now stand for your two minutes of hate.

  3. Perception & reality by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is little evidence of companies caring much in the past (IBM & Nazis etc), and I doubt they will care in the future either. Very few will put ethics before a sale.

    However, they do care about how they are are perceived to be acting because negative press can get in the way of other sales, so they might not sell to Chine etc if they think that might hurt selling to a more lucrative market. Don't for a minute confuse that with genuine ethical feelings though.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Perception & reality by vancondo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, they do care about how they are are perceived to be acting because negative press can get in the way of other sales, so they might not sell to Chine etc if they think that might hurt selling to a more lucrative market.

      Yes, but even then they only care after there is an uproar about what they are selling and to whom. They don't seem so keen on detecting where they will get negative press, or else it's worth the risk hoping that no one will notice.

      --
      you give me beer, i give you condo.

      --
      -
    2. Re:Perception & reality by smilindog2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Worrying about exporting this stuff to China is dumb. We already export:

      - Cash. We invest more in China than the rest of the world combined.
      - Jobs. Our loss is their gain.
      - Internet filtering, courtesy Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft.
      - Chip manufacturing technology (indirectly through Taiwan)

      SMIC, China's largest semiconductor manufacturer (built on US technology) is listed on the Nasdaq. For some stupid reason, politicians in Washington don't think the Chinese are capable of building advanced computers, routers, or weapons. There's a perception of US superiority, due to good old Yankee Know-How. Give me a break.

      Why we allow US companies to censor web sites in China, I have no clue.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    3. Re:Perception & reality by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0
      Don't for a minute confuse that with genuine ethical feelings though.
      I must confess that I do confuse this with genuine ethical feelings. Then again, if you think about it, when we have "genuine" ethical feelings, don't we do it for selfish reasons? To feel good, to impress, etc? In fact, isn't that the reason that any life form does anything?
      Don't confuse your selfish motivations with "genuine" ethical feelings.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:Perception & reality by megaditto · · Score: 1

      What the Communist China lacks is creativity. I am not talking about the Chinese people here, I am talking about the dictatorship supressing Free Though.

      Hence Chinese grad students and scientists working abroad achieve wonders of creativity and invention, while those inside China, not so much...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  4. Re-evaluate. Pretty please. by TalkingWire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another carrot proffered naively by the US in hopes that China will "come around" and re-evaluate its currency?

    1. Re:Re-evaluate. Pretty please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No... it's further proof that the single party dictatorship in the United States is teaming up with the single party dictatorship in China to keep each other in power.

    2. Re:Re-evaluate. Pretty please. by thegnu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another carrot proffered naively by the US in hopes that China will "come around" and re-evaluate its currency?

      I think the US Government has been fostering this conception we have that they're stupid so we don't see blatant attempts to aid and abet their Big Bretheren as such, but as vast miscalculations. All Donald Rumsfeld will need to do in the future to dispel any thoughts that there may have been malice aforethought will be to spit out some more confusing nonsensical tirade about hot air balloons and how an ape could get sattelite imagery and sell it to the chinese.

      An excerpt from my novel, 2008 (not as catchy a title as 1984, but I'm trying):
      "Ah," we said, "Poor old man. He's going ferking batty."

      So, what confuses me is that if you say the current government we serve under doesn't care about us, people get their panties in a bunch. However say, "Feudalist govts were horrible, evil oppressors," people agree. If you say, "The Roman govt was a horrible and evil oppressor," people agree. If you say, "The Nazis were horrible, evil oppressors," people agree. If you say the Russian govt, the Serbians, the Japanese warlords, the Egyptians, pretty much everyone and his goat's grandmother in the middle east, India, Oprah, Kim Jung Il, or Saddam, people say, "Evil! Evil! Evil!"

      So. Our government is a massively organized, oppressive military force bent on clouding our judgement, keeping us complacent and stupid, and harvesting our resources and lives for their own desires. They have no regard for our lives. They only want our water--new rule, if you haven't read Dune, you don't get to read /. They have no regard for the children. They are poisoning us, injecting us with experimental drugs from the time we're born, eating food out of our children's mouths, stealing candy from every baby. They are destroying our land, they are poisoning our streams killing every natural means of sustenance on the face of the planet. And yes, with the expansion of the NSA spying program, the integration with online medical records, the ability to arrest people warrentless, without bail, and without explanation, I am scared. Let us please stop worrying about China, because there is so much work to do on our side of the table, and nothing we CAN do on theirs.

      (I'm not really writing a novel)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  5. Yuh-hunh, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China still cool! So exotic and foreign, possibly with alternative philosophies I can adopt to rebel against my western upbringing. I'd love to visit it!

  6. Heh, what? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

    Selling the Chines databases and two-way radios is bad? I don't get it. Also, where does in the article does it even mention two-way radios, video probes or DNA analysis?

    1. Re:Heh, what? by solevita · · Score: 0

      I bet if I went out and bought a two way radio it would say "made in China" on it somewhere. Am I the only one that thinks that China probably doesn't need to import these sorts of things?

    2. Re:Heh, what? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And it's not like PostGRESQL or MySQL cost a hell of a lot either, what with being free and all...

  7. Check "Related Items" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I submitted the story, I put that in parenthesis at the end, but the editors decided it was unnecessary.

  8. Unauthorized Religions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone answer why Slashdot is so biased to the point of promoting these "unauthorized religions"? Especially in places like China?

    Would these same people promote the same types of religions in the United States? How about the "David Koresh" religion, which was labeled as a cult. What about the Heaven's Gate cult in San Diego? Was that a valid religion too? Or were these two types of cults just another "unauthorized religion"?

    1. Re:Unauthorized Religions by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An "unathorized religion" would be the Catholic Church instead of the official Chinese Catholic Church or small Christian groups that meet in people's home. These are not fruitcake organizations that you find in the United States, although I'm sure the Chinese have plenty of fruitcakes in the Communist Party. Any social group that requires people to gather is considered an "unauthorized religion" in China since they might overthrow the Communists someday.

    2. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Falun Gong = Islam (the radical, extremist, shooting out missiles that have no guidance system variety)?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "These are not fruitcake organizations that you find in the United States"

      One can only hope that the wonderful American tolerence shines through to China.

    4. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      David Koresh's cult didn't get in any trouble until it was thought that they were breaking laws. The existence of the cult itself was not illegal. If you rape children, force people to commit "suicide", or don't pay your taxes, Uncle Sam will come after you. Other than that, they don't really care. Sure, you can say there may be some aspect of some religion that is illegal and that it shouldn't be -- multiple wives, use of mind-altering substances, whatever -- but it isn't the religion itself that is illegal. Raeliens, despite being considered a cooky cult, have not been arrested simply for being Raelien.

      That's the difference. In China, being a member of a certain religion, regardless of not having committed any other crime, is illegal.

      Now I'm not one to appologize for the U.S., and I think "better than China" is damning with faint praise, but this really is a fundamental difference between the two nations.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Heaven's Gate and the Branch Davidians (Koresh's cult) don't need authorization to exist as a religion. No religion needs authorization to exist. I can start a religion right now and the government can do jack shit about it. I am in fact an atheist and oppose all religion so it is not likely I will found a new one, but the point is those of us who "promote" (as you allege) the Falun Gong are actually promoting religious freedom. It is wrong for government to decided what people are allowed to believe. It is not wrong to prosecute individuals or organizations for legitmate crimes, i.e. fraud, sexual abse of children, posession of illegal/unlicened weaponry, etc. As soon as China decides all cults deserve legal equality we will stop "promoting" Falun Gong.

    6. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as China decides all cults deserve legal equality we will stop "promoting" Falun Gong.

      Very interesting...

      So I did a wiki search on the Falun Gong. And it looks to me like it is a total cult. The man who started it thinks that he's God. And he's cultivated over 70 million followers.

      Now by your reasoning, you are saying that China or any country should allow this to happen, just so that they can have "religious freedom".

      Wasn't that what got Koresh's cult into trouble? Because he thought that he was God, and could do anything he wanted, including having sex with his own daughters? And since his followers thought that he was God, then they were willing to allow it.

      So, your logic goes down a very dangerous road there.

      I found it ironic (fascinating actually) how the United States kept jabbing at China over the Falun Gong. It was like they were promoting their own David Koresh cult in China.

    7. Re:Unauthorized Religions by zacronos · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wasn't that what got Koresh's cult into trouble? Because he thought that he was God, and could do anything he wanted, including having sex with his own daughters?
      No. Don't be ridiculous. Did you even read what GP said? (Seriously, am I just feeding a troll here?) It wasn't thinking he was God that got Koresh's cult into trouble. They could have thought he was God all they wanted. And Koresh could have thought he was God all he wanted, too. But if you break an incest law, you get in trouble, regardless of why you decided to break it.

      The same would be true if I stood in the middle of a highway blocking traffic because I thought it would bring peace and happiness to the world:
      • Am I allowed to think that doing so will bring peace and happiness to the world? Yes.
      • Am I allowed to form a cult where my followers think that my standing in the middle of a highway blocking traffic will bring peace and happiness to the world? Yes.
      • Am I allowed to actually stand in the middle of a highway blocking traffic? No.
      • Is arresting me for doing it persecution of a religion? No.
      • Is arresting my followers for trying to prevent the police from arresting me persecution of a religion? No.
      What about this is hard to understand?
    8. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What about this is hard to understand?"

      It's simple. They don't want to understand because it will take away an anti-US, the US is just as bad, platform.

      I.e. they are intellectually dishonest

    9. Re:Unauthorized Religions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Is shooting missiles with guidance system any different?

      I thought what really matters is whether you deliberately aim at civilians or not. </offtopic>

    10. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      If your highway traffic-blocking religion grew from its humble roots to one day have a number of followers substantial enough to rewrite the rules of society such that standing in the middle of the highway blocking traffic was accepted, encouraged, and considered a Fundamental Right of Man, surely your far-future followers would condemn the actions of the present-day police as persecution.

      OK, sorry for this blatant troll post, I need some sleep.

    11. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Is shooting missiles with guidance system any different?
      I thought what really matters is whether you deliberately aim at civilians or not.


      Well, Hezebolah was doing both, so I guess that works (now whether or not they were hitting the civilians they were aiming at or not, is highly quesitonable- one would assume that their intent in attacking civilians in Israel was NOT to hit civilians in Palestine).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. Free market by gethoht · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The free market attitude is what dominates us policy(except for huge subsidies to oil companies, tax breaks to mega corps, etc...)

    Profit will always trump most other ideals in business today.

    --
    All things are subject to interpretation, whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and n
    1. Re:Free market by The+Clock · · Score: 1

      Selling to a government is hardly a "free market", since the money spent by the buyer is stolen from its citizens by force of law. The goods and services are obtained by coercion. This is true in the U.S. as well as China. The sellers enable it by taking the business.

  10. If you can make money out of it by gullevek · · Score: 0, Troll

    any human rights irrelevant.

    --
    "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  11. It was the Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am the submitter, and I copied the article's title from BusinessWeek as is, and put it in the subject field.
    I just noticed that since you mentioned it.

  12. Video Probe?! by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope I'm not randomly selected at the airport to be searched with a video probe!

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Video Probe?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I heard that segment of the Chinese porn market is rather hot.

  13. if you won't sell them .. by KaushalParekh · · Score: 1

    .. someone else will... or china can make them for themselves much cheaper (I am surprised why they don't do that in the first place)

    1. Re:if you won't sell them .. by DeeVeeAnt · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the same argument I use to justify my selling heroin to schoolchildren.

      --
      Home fucking is killing prostitution.
  14. If you think about it . . . by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    . . . nearly anything could potentially be used in the repression of free thought and free religion in China. Dealing with the Chinese at all, under any circumstance, could easily be construed as indirect support for China's totalitarian political infrastructure. Why split hairs over database software and DNA testing equipment? If you're going to be dealing with them at all, you've got to accept the risk that something you sold them might eventually be used to track down, restrain, or even torture a political dissident or practitioner of unsanctioned religion. It's China, what do you expect?

    Besides, if American firms don't sell them what they want, they'll either buy it elsewhere or rip off a foreign design and make it themselves.

  15. US Big Brother by mulhollandj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is interesting how much we blast China for not giving freedoms to its citizens. Do not US citizens realize the same thing is happening to them?

    1. Re:US Big Brother by uofitorn · · Score: 1

      It's because those who realize that our freedoms are being eroded over here are the same people who cry foul about Chinese citizen's rights. Regarding everyone else: My mother-in-law can't be bothered twice about such things. She knows what she hears on the evening news and can't be troubled to comprehend 'the facts' when I present them to her -- even when I meticulously back up such facts with duly cited resources and sources.

      It's like the Colbert Report Incarnate..

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    2. Re:US Big Brother by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some do, most don't.

      Keep the majority thinking that they're happy, and you could slaughter innocent civilians and get away with.

      For reference, see Iraq War 2.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:US Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please... you've seen all the protests lately. Now how many of those taking part have been shot or threatened by TANKS?

      It's not the fucking same and if you think so you're lying to yourself and everyone else.

      How many crazy religions are being prosecuted in the US? Besides waco.. but that's ok to you probably, they were a weird christian cult.

    4. Re:US Big Brother by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also China is nice to it's citizens in comparison to countries where they may on-sell this technology to like North Korea. Once you let the "top secret" tech out to the unscrupulous it ends up wherever it will end up - who would have thought that classified technology given to Israel would be put in tanks sold to China and then sold again to Iran within a couple of years of it's development?

      I'm curious as to why people think this thing is worse than arms sales - selling mustard gas to Iraq in 1990 and anthrax not long before (Rumsfeld was sure there were WMD because he could remember doing the deal). The moral high ground was lost long ago.

    5. Re:US Big Brother by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      The beauty of Western Democracy is that finally power brokers have a means to take rights from the masses, they simply ask for their consent. After all, democracy is the most important right, right? Oh no wait, democracy is a means to an end, not an end in itself. But in the West we have forgotten that. It is better to have your privacy protected, to be able to enjoy your cultural heritage, to feel safe at home, to be able to defend yourself, and to have the power to determine your own future in a benevolent dictatorship, than it is to be dictated to by the ignorant, religiously insane, dangerously xenophobic masses which any idiot with enough money can whip into a hysteria.

  16. As it is written... by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and in the end lose his very soul?

    If you need an argument against secularization of the culture (as opposed to the government), then look no further than capitalism completely unrestrained by any influence from the Protestant Christian tradition that gave birth to it.

    Or, as the Communists used to say, "the Capitalists will sell us the rope we will use to hang them."

    1. Re:As it is written... by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      Or, as the Communists used to say, "the Capitalists will sell us the rope we will use to hang them."

      And we all saw how that worked out for them...

    2. Re:As it is written... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they want you to think man! Open your Eyes!

    3. Re:As it is written... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Communists? In China? Where?

      Fascists, on the other hand...

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:As it is written... by hitchhacker · · Score: 1

      look no further than capitalism completely unrestrained by any influence from the Protestant Christian tradition that gave birth to it.

      This is a ridiculous statement. Capitalism isn't something created by government or religion, it is the absence of both. It has been around way before Protestant Christian "tradition"... any civilization that relied on bartering... there's your capitalism.

  17. Who is Scarier? by Skewray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really, is high tech scarier in the hands of China's gov't, or the USA's? I bet most people in the world think the American gov't
    is pretty scary right now.

    1. Re:Who is Scarier? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to say that anyone who finds the U.S. government scarier than that of China is either uninformed or stupid (or both). I like the Daily Show as much as anyone else, but the picture painted by it is not really fair - it's a comedy, and unlike in China it is legal and common to criticize the U.S. government on national T.V.. I'm not saying that the U.S.'s image hasn't taken a hit internationally, just that - jeez, perspective, people.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Who is Scarier? by Skewray · · Score: 1

      I am an American citizen. I've been to China ten times. I speak Chinese. My wife is Chinese. I guess that makes me informed but stupid. On what are you basing *your* experience?

    3. Re:Who is Scarier? by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      Well, despite your assumption, I have also traveled quite a bit in Asia, but that is irrelevant.

      I did not say that I disliked China or the Chinese. I did not say anything bad about the culture, people, or even tendency to throw anything that crawls, swims, or flies into the night's dinner.

      However, if you think that you are safer living under the authority of the Chinese government than you are under the American government, then you are not informed. Either that, or you are so consumed with all things Chinese that you are blind to the reality of the situation. Censorship is common, so much so that nearly every (urban) citizen encounters it every day. You cannot practice your choice of religion or join your choice of political party (unless your choice is one of those sanctioned by the government). Newspapers, television, and other news sources are heavily censored by the government, and not just for "offensive content" of entertainment (in fact they may do less of that than in the US), but routine news reporting. You can go to jail for violating these basic tenants of free speech. The government spends MORE of its GDP on the military than the U.S.. The government is unelected, and succession is largely based on the whims of the leadership at the time. I don't even need to bring up Tienanmen Square, do I? Or did that happen so long ago that it would never happen again? So I'll ask you, by what measure have you decided to fear the US government more than the Chinese government?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Who is Scarier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest an experiment: hold up a "Allahu akhbar" sign in the Ellipse in front of the White House. Then fly to Beijing and hold up a "Falun Gong" sign in Tiananmen Square. This will work best if you can make yourself look like an American of Middle Eastern extraction when protesting in front of the White House, and make yourself look like a Chinese citizen when protesting in Tiananmen Square. Make sure that you tell the Secret Service folks who show up to arrest you that you are an American Citizen, and tell the Chinese police who show up to arrest you that you are a Citizen of the People's Republic. Tell both sets of police the absolute truth: that you are simply carrying out an experiment suggested on Slashdot. Make sure that you perform the US half of the experiment first; it will be very hard for you to complete the experiment after spending several months in a Chinese "psychiatic facilty."

      Or, if you prefer to remain emotionally intact, research, compare, and contrast the treatment of Arlen Specter by the Republican Party since 2001 to the way in which Zhao Ziyang was treated by the CPC beginning in 1989. I'd suggest looking at "Zhang Liang's" compilation ???????? (or the English version, *The Tiananmen Papers*); I suspect that you won't be able to buy it in bookstores in Beijing.

      Unless Cheney and Bush are incredibly stupid (which is to say, stupid enough to try to abrogate the Constitution and hold power after Bush's term is up), this bunch will be gone in January 2009, and the next bunch will have to moderate all of their policies. How long until we see a change of government in Beijing?

      Look, if you really have been to China ten times, either you have focused entirely on the everyday lives of Chinese citizens with no political interests (the Chinese equivalent of a Kansas dentist who never bothers to vote except to lower his taxes) and comparing their experiences to those of politically active American dissidents, or you are simply deluding yourself. The current government in China is far more dangerous than the idiot cowboys in DC (do you know the old saying "if he had a brain he'd be dangerous?").

    5. Re:Who is Scarier? by Skewray · · Score: 1

      What does freedom of speech have to do with how safe I am? What does freedom of thought have to do with how safe I am? Your response is full of irrelevancies. As I travel about the world, I am much more likely to be kidnapped or murdered because I am an American. No one will bother my wife. Who is safer?

    6. Re:Who is Scarier? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I thought we were talking about which government was scarier? How did you get the impression that safety while traveling was linked to that? Or were you thinking that your wife is safe(r) because of her benevolent government? And in my mind, "rotting in jail" because I said something not on a government's safe list is not part of "safe". Tell you what, go into Beijing and start handing out bibles or human rights literature - see where that gets you. Then come to New York and start handing out government conspiracy 9/11 literature. Guess what? There'd be other people next to you doing the same thing. In the US you'd be surrounded by crazy folks, in China, other political prisoners.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  18. Real useful law by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, the restrictions have been applied narrowly, and effectively prevent only low-tech exports such as handcuffs, helmets, fingerprint powder, and tear gas

    I'm sure that really makes a big difference. You know, since China is such a small country with few resources, there's just no way they could manufacture stuff like that domestically. Yeah, I know, it's the principle of it all (or, in other words, a bill a politician could sponsor to make them appear moral).

    Unfortunately far too many laws are created so politicians can simply be seen doing something. Sort of like in our town, where a lady was killed in a car accident a few years ago (because her cat was loose in her car and she was messing around with it and pulled out in front of a truck), so the town quickly changed the intersection to a 4-way stop. Now hundreds of drivers are inconvenienced daily just because the local government wanted to do something the newspaper could write about.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Real useful law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, a cross-cut saw could probably solve that particular problem.

  19. Dual use technology by Introspective · · Score: 3, Insightful

    while DB software, two-way radios, DNA analysis gear, and video probes, are allowed

    And these items could also be very useful for disaster response and relief - in other words, humanitarian aid.

    The poster seems to be struggling to make a political point where there is simply not enoungh evidence which clearly defines what these things will be used for.

    1. Re:Dual use technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Australia we are also restricted by the crazy US laws. For example, in Energy Efficiency consultancy practices in the US, it is common to use Infra Red imaging technology to ascertain where heat is leaching out of a building. However, when our university goes to order the equipment, we're told it a National Security thing and cannot be exported. 'cause we're bound to invade the US/search for for Falungong/onsell the gear to China. Not.

  20. Less funny: few American businesses give a sh*t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Show me an honest businessman, and I will show you a figment of your imagination.

    Most American businesses do not give a damn about what happens in China. Look at Google. Its company motto was "Don't be evil". However, after going IPO and entering the Chinese market with a splash, the new motto is "What's a little evil among 'friends'?".

    Like Yahoo and MSN, Google actively censors its web site.

  21. Two comments in one! by Cinnimod · · Score: 1

    The unserious comment:

    Hey, why don't we sell them the FBI's security software? We can invade them while they're trying to click through all the error messages.

    The serious comment:

    This article is bait for all the foil hat wearers and doomsayers to come out of the woodworks whining about our governments and the governments of the world. Let's face it people. You get up in the morning, you brush your teeth, you go earn your paycheck, and presumably you have enough free time to post on this website! What "civil liberties" are you lacking here? You have the freedom to whine about our government on Slashdot, and do you think the CIA is watching you for doing it? And so what if you are? Might as well make up conspiracies about religions that say "God is watching you!" God, Big Brother, what's the big deal? Just live your lives for goodness sake, go vote, and if you have a problem with the way things are run write a letter to your Congressman, then you'll KNOW someone in the government will be paying attention to your opinions. And if China wants to watch their people and put them under totalitarian government, it's not our job to police them.

    In fact, let me try (with my limited vocabulary) to present you all with a little conundrum. Back in the Cold War, we were very set on "liberating Communist Russia", because we didn't like the way the people were being treated - in much the same way you are all complaining about China being treated. So our government began to take actions to stop Communism in all its forms, and men like Andrew McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover came into power, pioneering the "big brother" image of our government today, the same image that you're all complaining about.

    So in essence, aren't you in support of forcing our "Democratic principles" on the Chinese nation, while arguing against what happened the last time we tried to do that? Do the ends REALLY justify the means? Should we be minding our own business and letting well enough alone?

    1. Re:Two comments in one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And if China wants to watch their people and put them under totalitarian government, it's not our job to police them.

      It is, however, our moral duty not to cooperate with them by providing the tools to facilitate their spying. The old "not my brother's keeper' canard still doesn't hold water.

  22. Doubt it by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's as much offering China any carrots, as just bending over backwards to please the local big corporations. Wouldn't want to let ethical considerations get in the way of big campaign contributions, now would we? The US policy and politics of the new millenium have dropped any coherent planning or pretense of pursuing the interest of the country as a whole, and just focused on giving corporations anything they wish, even if it means shafting society as a whole to do that.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Doubt it by gettingbraver · · Score: 1

      China has MFN status re: trade.

  23. Think of the RFID chip Market, alone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.2 billion Chinese times maybe $0.24 per implantable RFID chip, and you're looking at $288 million is sales for the chips alone - just to chip the existing population. Add to this the cost of readers for the Police/Organ "Donation" Collection Squads, permanently installed gate-readers at transportation choke points, schools, and factories, and you are looking at some real money. Oh, and the technology needed to process this massive Ministry-of-Love style population control scheme will be expensive, too - database software, servers, fiber optic network hardware,etc.. Of course, living in China will pretty much suck even more than it does now - but, hey, corporations have to make a profit, right?

  24. definition of cult by zogger · · Score: 1

    A cult is two or more people who believe in something you don't.

    1. Re:definition of cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A cult is two or more people who believe in something you don't.

      Or, as has long been said -- a cult is a small, unpopular religion; a religion is a large, popular cult.

    2. Re:definition of cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a cute, catchy phrase. But like most cute, catchy phrases, it's a gross oversimplification. Cults are also characterized by their attempt to isolate you from your former friends and family members who might attempt to change your mind, and to control every aspect of your life - especially your finances.

    3. Re:definition of cult by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Trying to think of a religion which doesn't try to isolate it's members from non-believers... does Buhdism do this? I don't know many Buhdists. Likewise, is there a major world religion that doesn't encourage tithing? Almost all religions are cults by your definition. I'm not going to disagree with you if thats what you think because I have a hard time coming up with a better definition, but that kind of validates the original posters point.

  25. Sadly there is only one world religion... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    and it happens to be money.

    What I really fear is the torture that Tibetans are going to endure before the Olympic games. They're gonna be looking for a platform and China is probably just gonna round 'em up.

    Yet, the more you get China hooked on the milk from the capitalist tit the closer you are going to come to something resembling revolution and the ousting of Communism. It's moving pretty fast now.

    1. Re:Sadly there is only one world religion... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Yet, the more you get China hooked on the milk from the capitalist tit
      I've never been to China, but from talking to a several Chinese people it appears that China is already the most capitalist country on earth. People will buy and sell anything in China as distinct from the more regulated west.
    2. Re:Sadly there is only one world religion... by Denial93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >What I really fear is the torture that Tibetans are going to endure before the Olympic games. They're gonna be looking for a platform and China is probably just gonna round 'em up.

      You underestimate the Chinese. They're going to run a huge campaign where happy Tibetans in traditional-but-clean garments smile into cameras before magnificent Himalaya skylines and say how much better their country is after the Chinese helped them electrify it, and how the Dalai Lama and his guys are really just a bunch of old theocrats who want their dictatorship back. There'll be local representatives ready for interviewing, guided tours through Tibet (with really helpful translators so journalists can converse with the locals freely) and all sorts of helpful press maps/video clips/etc. After all, this is the perfect opportunity: the Chinese will, temporarily, have all the media in the World to press down the Party's version of the story in everyone's minds.

      Unruly Tibetans aren't going to be rounded up before the games (because the World could find out), but will be temporarily arrested "to prevent violence" during the games, to be seriously rounded up a bit later when the World has grown tired of China for a while, and looks somewhere else.

  26. Consumers? Hello? by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh please. You can talk about companies all day, but all of the corporations in the world don't begin to measure up to what consumer whores regular citizens are. You know those hundreds of millions of people shopping at Wal-Mart? You think any of them know or care where their money is going. I'd wager on "no". Hell, Wal-Mart didn't have even a bump in their upward trajectory when they quietly dropped their "Made in the USA" schtick. People just keep buying, and buying, and buying...

    And I'm not talking about Wal-Mart, I'm talking about every little thing that regular people buy every day. Hell, I've seen people beat the shit out of each other like animals so that they could save $100 on a laptop computer.

    Remember, the only reason these companies are here is because people keep buying stuff from them.

  27. tracking dissidents? by catalina · · Score: 1

    ...in which the technology can be used to track dissidents and unauthorized religions.

    We'd best be careful, here. Until recently ( 6 or so years?), we were falling behind in tracking our own dissidents and non-christians.

    But we're beginning to catch up, and this congress will soon put in place means so that we can get around those pesky laws/regulations which prevented us from doing this in the past.....

  28. Unauthorised religions by raahul_da_man · · Score: 1

    I really disagree that supression of religions is something that the Chinese government does wrong. You only need to look at at America with its far greater level of violence to see that religion can bring a society to its knees. Or Zimbabwe, with its great religious tolerance record. Religious tolerance is an inadequate measure of freedom in a society. Iran is also a society with great religious freedom, where Muslims can practice their faith without limit. Is that a society that should be emulated?

    Religious freedom is the worst idea that has ever existed.

  29. Re:Consumers? Hello? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Buy chinese goods, sell goods to chinese, make both economies interdependant. Make wealthy people in China, make the middle class grow. Leaving them poor and uneducated is surely not the way out of the dictatorship.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  30. What about the 'other big brother? by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the comapnies who help the US governement spy on their people? Are the bad, or are they patritic?

    I don't have a problem with anybody selling anything to China. I do have a problem with the Chineese policy and politics and I would love to see an embargo that forbids any country doing business with that country.

    Yet an emargo needs to come from the country, not from the company.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  31. I doubt it by Moraelin · · Score: 1
    These are not fruitcake organizations that you find in the United States, although I'm sure the Chinese have plenty of fruitcakes in the Communist Party.


    Actually, I somehow doubt that China or any other country is 100% composed of 100% sane and wise people, who'd _never_ be fooled by a cooky New Age cult. It's the kind of "in the Orient they're wise and do _everything_ better" idea that got us saddled with cooky pseudo-oriental cults in the west in the first place.

    People are people everywhere. Some people are disillusioned and at a "well, _is_ there a higher meaning to this shit?" point, and thus easy prey to anyone who wants to sell them some fruitcake meaning to it all. And there are plenty, ranging from ruthless sociopaths with no scruples to forward their own goals (be it wealth, glory, or seeing how many people can they convince to commit suicide) to genuine schizophrenic fruitcakes, who'll come up with such a "meaning to it all" to sell them.

    And if you study the history of religions in Asia, they have _millenia_ of ridiculous religions behind them. It's not all Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism and Hinduism in their past. They had murderous cults, sex-obsessed-to-the-extreme cults, etc, just like the rest of the world.

    And in some parts of Asia they still do. There are recent events like some Indian peasant family torturing and murdering a neighbour's child and IIRC drinking his blood, just because some tantric guru told them that that it's required for some magic spell that will make them finally have a child of their own. How's that for a cooky religion you wouldn't want in your back yard?

    (No, I'm not saying that India as a whole is like that, or anything racist. Just that, as I was saying, people are people everywhere. They have their gullible idiots too, just like Europe or America have theirs.)

    So, basically, yes, I fully convinced that China too must have a bunch of cooky cults too. They're not the ones that make the headlines (Falun Gong is more covered in western media than some new age cult with 12 members total). It probably isn't even the reason why China persecutes all "unauthorized religions" indiscriminately. Etc. But I do believe that they too must have their new age fruitcakes. They're just humans, that's all I'm saying.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  32. Maybe? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    Maybe? in what world you people live? As for the GP's other Big Brothers, excuse me, wasn't Saddam Hussein a former ally of yours?

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    1. Re:Maybe? by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless your name is Khomeni, he was probably a former ally of yours, too.

  33. Trade Imbalance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, end the import of all shirts from China which have at least one button falls off the first time you wash it. That alone will solve the trade imbalance.

  34. I don't see a problem by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Increased trade with China is a good thing for China, the chinese and the rest of the world. It creates a wealthy middle class who are no longer reliant on the government and who will want more political influence on how they are governed. This will have a far larger impact on the political reform than isolationism, which simply cements dictatorships in place.

    --
    Deleted
  35. I'd prefer the US by chowdy · · Score: 0

    I visited China wearing a t-shirt with a map of the region we were visiting (China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan), but Taiwan was colored as a separate country. I was quickly hunted down by Chinese guards/soldiers at the airport and told to take my shirt off, turn it inside out, and leave it in my bag for the remainder of my stay in China.

    Shoebomb jokes aside, that's ridiculous. Sure, the US gets pretty weird when there are big scares (red scare(s)), but don't compare it to China.