The new way is that you send up explosive drone clouds over the target, on every potential trajectory. INCLUDING the decoy warheads. Millions of them. It's more like very quickly building a brick wall for the bullets to hit.
Good luck using stealth to mask the heat of the launch.
A cloud of drones provides a shield. Computers and Satellites are fast enough to predict the target of any ballistic missile launch within nanoseconds.
Might be far better than what we're getting from the WTO and the UN. Especially now that ballistic missiles and nukes
are obsolete- welcome to the Drone Wars.
And in that lies the main problem with international trade as presently constituted: it is all about the specific individual good and never about the common good.
The World Trade Organization, and all of its trade treaties, are too corrupt to bother with. International terrorist organizations need to be utterly eliminated, whether they work in weapons or financials.
Though if we keep the same order- climate science=Relativity, string theory=quantum mechanics, and women's studies=Freudian psychology, so yes, right smack dab on.
I was trying for the Theft, Murder, and Jaywalking trope originally.
Those millions of illegal aliens voted legally, thanks to California being a sanctuary state. Do try to keep up with the insanity of how state law now overrides federal law.
Anybody stupid enough to move because of a legal vote- well, that's somebody who isn't likely going to be doing any original research anyway, just derived politically correct bullshit like climate science, string theory, and Women's Studies.
Stuff that the Trump Great America is not interested in funding because there is no profit in it.
If you protest against violent people, you should expect an increase in violence, yes. And that requires you to have more security, and yes, more guns.
I'm to the point where I'm against both freedom and liberty, of anything. It's been abused by people like you to the point that it isn't worth it anymore.
Thus, since their fake accounts have zero history, you have reason to ban them from coming in.
There is no way the 9-11 terrorists should have been allowed to get a visa, even a student visa, with those applications.
I'm one who thinks that on 9-12-2001 we should have deployed the patriots and kept shooting down anything approaching our borders until the end of the Islamic Civil War.
And how much help have YOU gotten with testing dark matter theory? Or for that matter, global warming? Or the existence of the Higgs Boson? There is plenty in science that we basically take on the same faith as believing any other eyewitness data, because it would be hard and or expensive to set up the experiment for it.
And that doesn't even count things like the existence of the Coelacanth or the Giant Panda. Or a Northwest Low Altitude Pika.
And even if you test it yourself, all that does is make YOU the eyewitness, it does not change the nature of the eyewitness report.
All human knowledge is eyewitness reports, in the end. Even the stuff that can be replicated, or that you claim can be replicated, the replication itself is just another eyewitness testimony.
Eliminate eyewitness testimony, and you have eliminated all human knowledge that has ever existed.
Slashdot Mirror
No, that's the old way.
The new way is that you send up explosive drone clouds over the target, on every potential trajectory. INCLUDING the decoy warheads. Millions of them. It's more like very quickly building a brick wall for the bullets to hit.
Good luck using stealth to mask the heat of the launch.
Much better to *decentralize* to the point that you can punch the commisar or the king in the nose.
And it can only be voluntary and at a local level with significant trade barriers protecting the local level.
Feudalism is the point- the desired end result.
A cloud of drones provides a shield. Computers and Satellites are fast enough to predict the target of any ballistic missile launch within nanoseconds.
They're an outdated and obsolete technology.
Might be far better than what we're getting from the WTO and the UN. Especially now that ballistic missiles and nukes
are obsolete- welcome to the Drone Wars.
Yep, it's a terrorist organization.
And in that lies the main problem with international trade as presently constituted: it is all about the specific individual good and never about the common good.
The World Trade Organization, and all of its trade treaties, are too corrupt to bother with. International terrorist organizations need to be utterly eliminated, whether they work in weapons or financials.
Though if we keep the same order- climate science=Relativity, string theory=quantum mechanics, and women's studies=Freudian psychology, so yes, right smack dab on.
I was trying for the Theft, Murder, and Jaywalking trope originally.
Those millions of illegal aliens voted legally, thanks to California being a sanctuary state. Do try to keep up with the insanity of how state law now overrides federal law.
Well, to give him credit, I did equate string theory with women's studies....so....
Anybody stupid enough to move because of a legal vote- well, that's somebody who isn't likely going to be doing any original research anyway, just derived politically correct bullshit like climate science, string theory, and Women's Studies.
Stuff that the Trump Great America is not interested in funding because there is no profit in it.
If you protest against violent people, you should expect an increase in violence, yes. And that requires you to have more security, and yes, more guns.
Uh, that mythical right winger is on the other end of the barrel, shooting you.
Protest against violence, die by violence is the lesson to be learned here.
Wouldn't the appropriate agile answer to that be to change the standard?
If the existence of open source is going to depend on historical revisionism, then perhaps it is better off dead.
Bruce, for once, you're acting like you are working for the patent pirates. Why is it OSI's claim so important to you?
For that matter, open source software has been around since at least the advent of source code in the mid 1960s.
I'm to the point where I'm against both freedom and liberty, of anything. It's been abused by people like you to the point that it isn't worth it anymore.
Thus, since their fake accounts have zero history, you have reason to ban them from coming in.
There is no way the 9-11 terrorists should have been allowed to get a visa, even a student visa, with those applications.
I'm one who thinks that on 9-12-2001 we should have deployed the patriots and kept shooting down anything approaching our borders until the end of the Islamic Civil War.
And how much help have YOU gotten with testing dark matter theory? Or for that matter, global warming? Or the existence of the Higgs Boson? There is plenty in science that we basically take on the same faith as believing any other eyewitness data, because it would be hard and or expensive to set up the experiment for it.
And that doesn't even count things like the existence of the Coelacanth or the Giant Panda. Or a Northwest Low Altitude Pika.
And even if you test it yourself, all that does is make YOU the eyewitness, it does not change the nature of the eyewitness report.
All human knowledge is eyewitness reports, in the end. Even the stuff that can be replicated, or that you claim can be replicated, the replication itself is just another eyewitness testimony.
Eliminate eyewitness testimony, and you have eliminated all human knowledge that has ever existed.
Funny how *we're* paranoid, but in Europe, you're ignoring the rape gangs.
Exactly what it is supposed to be.
Actually, it's to keep the damned nazi Islamics like you OUT.