If you have problems with the other script try this: #!/bin/sh # #/etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad - Start portfw for dialpad phone # access on Linux Servers with IP-Masquerading/Firewall. # # Add the following to/etc/rc.d/rc.local under # Slackware or/etc/rc.d/boot.local for SuSE. # ------------------------------------------------ # # Start dialpad portfw: # if [ -x/etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad ]; then # ./etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad # fi # # ------------------------------------------------ # Change x to your servers ip address. # Change y to the clients ip address. # # Dialpad
Use: #!/bin/sh # #/etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad - Start portfw for dialpad phone # access on Linux Servers with IP-Masquerading/Firewall. # # Add the following to/etc/rc.d/rc.local under # Slackware or/etc/rc.d/boot.local for SuSE. # ------------------------------------------------ # # Start dialpad portfw: # if [ -x/etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad ]; then # ./etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad # fi # # ------------------------------------------------ # Change x to your servers ip address. # Change y to the clients ip address. #
Dialpad is an excellent web-based solution that works as a browser plugin. It's totally free. You can dial any telephone in the US free or anyone in the rest of the world can call a US resident. Unfortunately they do not support Unix. They however in their FAQ they have included instructions on how to make it work on Unix based firewalls/masquerading. Several people I know now use it instead of a telephone. I did for a while but just can't stand having a Windows machine on my home network. It also works ip to ip anywhere.
Nice article. It appears Lars is pretty much computer illiterate. (Great musician though!)Maybe an interview with Todd Rundgren? He uses the Net to put it mildly. Maybe he can offer his opinions and insight into mp3's, the music industry and his feelings on what Metallica is doing.
McCrabb: It's clear that Linux will introduce changes into the pricing equation Translation: Were screwed
McCrabb: There is a great demand for companies that have no idea how to add the power of Linux to their complex computing environments. Translation: We know nothing about Linux and have no idea how to use it.
McCrabb We care about the success of the Linux market more than ever. Translation: Linux saved our ass and every other Unix.
McCrabb: Customers demand that Monterey have the ability to run Linux applications. Translation: Without Linux compatibility nobody will want it.
McCrabb: SCO *will have products that speak to all levels of the market at prices that compete on the terms of the particular market. Translation: *We are really screwed!
A: I think that the most important directions outside of general and continual i386 device driver enhancements, are for hardware IPSEC support, ultrasparc, and SMP. If these become a reality(especially SMP) I don't see any reasons to use any other OS, Linux included.
I have a couple Maxtor 5120 Ultra66 7200RPM/2MB cache drives that average 21MB/sec under Linux. I paid $129.00 each and they are whisper quiet. In fact my company uses IBM and Maxtors exclusively and in the past 2 years I can count on 2 hands the total amount of failures we had.(I know for fact many of those were dropped/abused) The modern EIDE is king in my book.
Aw come'on there's jerks everywhere it just so happens there are more in comp.os.linux.*. (See... it's easy to start a war). Seriously I heard many complaints from people about this. On the other hand many FreeBSD'ers are the archtypical Unix user with zero tolerance for newbies. Myself included on occasion. Most of this attitude stems from users who refuse to read the faqs, readmes, and docs. We learned it that way why can't you. Of course I'm not like any of them.(Ha!)
Damn straight! That penguin is stealing all our glory. (Just kiddin') Probably for the best. The slower(development) pace makes a far superior and stable platform. Everything about FreeBSD in my opinion is better from CVSup to sysinstall. The very concept of make buildworld/make installworld is lightyears ahead of the rest. Most importantly it demands knowledge of Unix. That alone may very well spell Linux's downfall. Linux is slowly changing but not necessarily for the better.
I get all my Linux apps over the Net free. Why would I want to go to CompUSA and buy StarOffice when I can download it for free in a minute or so. New users need to be educated on how to use Linux and OpenSource not make Linux more Windows like. Microsofts formula is a blueprint for disaster not success.
I think only the OS/2 community still actively uses BBS's, the largest being Peter Norlofs OS/2 Shareware BBS. He's been on the Internet for quite a few years too. Most users as seen when you log on are on the Internet however. You can still dial-up, telnet via tcpip, or browse his web pages. If your an OS/2 fan believe me this single site has pretty much everything ever made for OS/2 I too run a BBS, The Power-Users BBS. It also was a Maximus BBS but unfortunately I did away with the dial-up section. It is strictly http/ftp now. Unlike Norlofs my site has always supported Linux, FreeBSD, and Solaris too as well as OS/2. My site is the main XFree86 ports repository for the XFree86/OS2 community. We are now enjoying Gnome, Gimp, Qt and a host of other Linux ports thanks mostly to Holger Veit and his port of XFree86 and a very dedicated but small group of supporters. Mailists have also replaced the BBS in part becoming a place where small parties congregrate. The XFree86 and EMX mailists are an example. I think what comes around goes around so I would not be surprised if BBS's have a resurgance. I have had a lot of requests recently for good Linux BBS ports. There are some excellent BBS software packages for Linux that gives you all those nice DOS BBS features via the Internet. Who knows...
The part I am extremely angry about and most people don't recognize is how they manipulated Linux and the press for the DOJ's benefit. I hope everyone realizes Linux's new found fame is courtesy Microsoft. They had absolutely no defense as to competition to Windows so they fabricated this story about a new world-class operating system called Linux that is in a position to wipe out Windows. Starting with the carefully laid out Holloween paper(I hope ER realizes he was just a hapless pawn in all this). The unexpected results however where the major corporations embracing Linux. Their experience with major FUD campaigns including DRDOS and OS/2 gave them some particiular expertise at all this but the one dirty trick I still cannot forgive them for is using their wealth to do away with some excellent companies by drasticly and/or giving away their competing products for free. How can a smaller company fight against this. Something tells me that all there well-played plans are going to backfire this time.
Corel has to make it's distribution available free as per license agreement or they cannot distribute or sell it. Any changes and enhancements included. Only add-on programs like say Wordperfect, etc can be withheld from the distribution. I see another Caldera on the horizon. A Corel Lite and Corel Standard?
How can you say that. The library differences alone make or break it. Let's see we have libc5 5.3.12 vs 5.4.46 / glibc 2.07 vs 2.1.1 Bind v4 or bind v8 Where all the apps compiled for the current libraries, dynamic or static? Static libraries consume less memory hence are more effecient but are larger. (FreeBSD one of the proven performers is a-out.(2.2.8)) The amount of differences are staggering and their effect on performance absolutely critical but that's the beauty of Linux. Build it your way.
Why was RedHat chosen? A proven stable Linux server setup by a Linux professional would have been a fairer representation. In my experience the workhorse of Linux has always been the Slackware server. Even Caldera or SuSE would have been a better choice. The NT machine was tweaked by NT professionals so why not at our end. RedHat is not exactly known for it's installation ease and stability and usually requires a higher degree of expertise so the test was handicapped right from the start.
Everyone is saying cool. Did anyone try them? They suck(excuse my language)I just installed the libc5 versions on my STB Velocity 128 and it is the same buggy drivers they had before. Green console screen when quitting, screen placement way out of sync and the contrast set to double of normal. I put the excellent 3.3.2.3 SVGA server back. It works fine. What happened since then?
If he's a system admin how can he make comments like that. Typical Windows user in my opinion. Sounds like intentional fud to me, consider the publication and source.
Slashdot Mirror
If you have problems with the other script try this: /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad - Start portfw for dialpad phone /etc/rc.d/rc.local under /etc/rc.d/boot.local for SuSE. /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad ]; then /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad
#!/bin/sh
#
#
# access on Linux Servers with IP-Masquerading/Firewall.
#
# Add the following to
# Slackware or
# ------------------------------------------------
#
# Start dialpad portfw:
# if [ -x
# .
# fi
#
# ------------------------------------------------
# Change x to your servers ip address.
# Change y to the clients ip address.
#
# Dialpad
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm autofw -A -v -u -r udp 51200 51201 -c tcp 7175
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm autofw -A -v -u -r tcp 51210 51210 -c tcp 7175
# SpeakFreely
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2074 -R 192.168.0.x 2074
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2074 -R 192.168.0.x 2074
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2075 -R 192.168.0.x 2075
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2075 -R 192.168.0.x 2075
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -ln
#
Use: /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad - Start portfw for dialpad phone /etc/rc.d/rc.local under /etc/rc.d/boot.local for SuSE. /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad ]; then /etc/rc.d/rc.dialpad
#!/bin/sh
#
#
# access on Linux Servers with IP-Masquerading/Firewall.
#
# Add the following to
# Slackware or
# ------------------------------------------------
#
# Start dialpad portfw:
# if [ -x
# .
# fi
#
# ------------------------------------------------
# Change x to your servers ip address.
# Change y to the clients ip address.
#
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 51210 -R 192.168.0.x 51210
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 51201 -R 192.168.0.x 51201
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 51200 -R 192.168.0.x 51200
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -ln
# SpeakFreely
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -f
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2074 -R 192.168.0.x 2074
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2074 -R 192.168.0.x 2074
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2075 -R 192.168.0.x 2075
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 24.x.xxx.xxx 2075 -R 192.168.0.x 2075
/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -ln
#
Dialpad is an excellent web-based solution that works as a browser plugin. It's totally free. You can dial any telephone in the US free or anyone in the rest of the world can call a US resident. Unfortunately they do not support Unix. They however in their FAQ they have included instructions on how to make it work on Unix based firewalls/masquerading. Several people I know now use it instead of a telephone. I did for a while but just can't stand having a Windows machine on my home network. It also works ip to ip anywhere.
Nice article. It appears Lars is pretty much computer illiterate. (Great musician though!)Maybe an interview with Todd Rundgren? He uses the Net to put it mildly. Maybe he can offer his opinions and insight into mp3's, the music industry and his feelings on what Metallica is doing.
McCrabb:
It's clear that Linux will introduce changes into the pricing equation
Translation:
Were screwed
McCrabb:
There is a great demand for companies that have no idea how to add the power of Linux to their complex computing environments.
Translation:
We know nothing about Linux and have no idea how to use it.
McCrabb
We care about the success of the Linux market more than ever.
Translation:
Linux saved our ass and every other Unix.
McCrabb:
Customers demand that Monterey have the ability to run Linux applications.
Translation:
Without Linux compatibility nobody will want it.
McCrabb:
SCO *will have products that speak to all levels of the market at prices that compete on the terms of the particular market.
Translation:
*We are really screwed!
"Quick get my shotgun Maw there's one of those gosh darn Redmond fellah's at the front door again".
A: I think that the most important directions outside of general and continual i386 device driver enhancements, are for hardware IPSEC support, ultrasparc, and SMP. If these become a reality(especially SMP) I don't see any reasons to use any other OS, Linux included.
doh!
Here's a good place to start: http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/linuxsound/ My site The PowerUsers BBS has a growing collection also.
I have a couple Maxtor 5120 Ultra66 7200RPM/2MB cache drives that average 21MB/sec under Linux. I paid $129.00 each and they are whisper quiet. In fact my company uses IBM and Maxtors exclusively and in the past 2 years I can count on 2 hands the total amount of failures we had.(I know for fact many of those were dropped/abused) The modern EIDE is king in my book.
Aw come'on there's jerks everywhere it just so happens there are more in comp.os.linux.*.
(See... it's easy to start a war). Seriously I heard many complaints from people about this. On the other hand many FreeBSD'ers are the archtypical Unix user with zero tolerance for newbies. Myself included on occasion. Most of this attitude stems from users who refuse to read the faqs, readmes, and docs. We learned it that way why can't you. Of course I'm not like any of them.(Ha!)
Damn straight! That penguin is stealing all our glory. (Just kiddin') Probably for the best. The slower(development) pace makes a far superior and stable platform. Everything about FreeBSD in my opinion is better from CVSup to sysinstall. The very concept of make buildworld/make installworld is lightyears ahead of the rest. Most importantly it demands knowledge of Unix. That alone may very well spell Linux's downfall. Linux is slowly changing but not necessarily for the better.
I get all my Linux apps over the Net free. Why would I want to go to CompUSA and buy StarOffice when I can download it for free in a minute or so. New users need to be educated on how to use Linux and OpenSource not make Linux more Windows like. Microsofts formula is a blueprint for disaster not success.
I think only the OS/2 community still actively uses BBS's, the largest being Peter Norlofs OS/2 Shareware BBS. He's been on the Internet for quite a few years too. Most users as seen when you log on are on the Internet however. You can still dial-up, telnet via tcpip, or browse his web pages. If your an OS/2 fan believe me this single site has pretty much everything ever made for OS/2
I too run a BBS, The Power-Users BBS. It also was a Maximus BBS but unfortunately I did away with the dial-up section. It is strictly http/ftp now.
Unlike Norlofs my site has always supported Linux, FreeBSD, and Solaris too as well as OS/2. My site is the main XFree86 ports repository for the XFree86/OS2 community. We are now enjoying Gnome, Gimp, Qt and a host of other Linux ports thanks mostly to Holger Veit and his port of XFree86 and a very dedicated but small group of supporters. Mailists have also replaced the BBS in part becoming a place where small parties congregrate.
The XFree86 and EMX mailists are an example. I think what comes around goes around so I would not be surprised if BBS's have a resurgance. I have had a lot of requests recently for good Linux BBS ports. There are some excellent BBS software packages for Linux that gives you all those nice DOS BBS features via the Internet. Who knows...
The part I am extremely angry about and most people don't recognize is how they manipulated
Linux and the press for the DOJ's benefit. I hope everyone realizes Linux's new found fame is courtesy Microsoft. They had absolutely no defense as to competition to Windows so they fabricated this story about a new world-class operating system called Linux that is in a position to wipe out Windows. Starting with the carefully laid out Holloween paper(I hope ER realizes he was just a hapless pawn in all this). The unexpected results however where the major corporations embracing Linux. Their experience with major FUD campaigns including DRDOS and OS/2 gave them some particiular expertise at all this but the one dirty trick I still cannot forgive them for is using their wealth to do away with some excellent companies by drasticly and/or giving away their competing products for free. How can a smaller company fight against this. Something tells me that all there well-played plans are going to backfire this time.
Excellent. I was getting tired of adding all these Linux apps like StarOffice and WordPerfect.
Simplicity and extreme stability.
Corel has to make it's distribution available free
as per license agreement or they cannot distribute or sell it. Any changes and enhancements included. Only add-on programs like say Wordperfect, etc can be withheld from the distribution. I see another Caldera on the horizon. A Corel Lite and Corel Standard?
Surprised? Can anyone show me absolute proof and/or a documented case of true evolution? I thought so... another theory bites the dust.
If (Janus) is not free it's totally irrelevant. Why pay $1295+ support + required apps when the OS their trying to emulate FreeBSD/Linux is free?
How can you say that. The library differences alone make or break it. Let's see we have libc5 5.3.12 vs 5.4.46 / glibc 2.07 vs 2.1.1 Bind v4 or bind v8 Where all the apps compiled for the current libraries, dynamic or static? Static libraries consume less memory hence are more effecient but are larger. (FreeBSD one of the proven performers is a-out.(2.2.8)) The amount of differences are staggering and their effect on performance absolutely critical but that's the beauty of Linux. Build it your way.
Why was RedHat chosen? A proven stable Linux server setup by a Linux professional would have been a fairer representation. In my experience the workhorse of Linux has always been the Slackware server. Even Caldera or SuSE would have been a better choice. The NT machine was tweaked by NT professionals so why not at our end. RedHat is not exactly known for it's installation ease and stability and usually requires a higher degree of expertise so the test was handicapped right from the start.
It sure is It has 5 cd's! Switch to FreeBSD and spear that Penquin in the a**.
Everyone is saying cool. Did anyone try them? They suck(excuse my language)I just installed the libc5 versions on my STB Velocity 128 and it is the same buggy drivers they had before. Green console screen when quitting, screen placement way out of sync and the contrast set to double of normal. I put the excellent 3.3.2.3 SVGA server back. It works fine. What happened since then?
If he's a system admin how can he make comments like that. Typical Windows user in my opinion.
Sounds like intentional fud to me, consider the publication and source.