I don't mind that you pointed out my cicular arg. I find them annoying myself so I don't want to put them out. However, from my perspective it isn't circular as I have built the reasons for my assumption over the last few years. I failed to realize you may not have that. Silly me. I have more proving to me that the bible is true and God exsists than just the bible itself. Though I don't think going into it will convince you other wise so I won't. But you do have a point about the circularity of the argument though it was more of a statment of fact of my faith than an argument to prove it you. And your right you didn't shake me as expected.
at least we had a civilized discussion too many nonchristians and christians fall into petty quibbing.
As I tried to explain, I am not experienced in this and normally do not argue it as I don't know much about it. I just know there is more out there on creation than people give credit, and start spouting off it's religous propaganda. And I know that alot of inexperienced creationists come off sounding dumb when they say stuff like God put the fosils there to test us, which I don't ascribe to my self. I appologize for not fully understanding the 2nd law my self and now see why it doesn't fit as a good argument. I still feel that evoists put a wall to creation only because it came out of religious circles first. If an athiest scientist had said it first there would be no issue.
as for where else I might be wrong. Well I am human and I make mistakes everyday so there are lots of places. Just like you I imagine. Never claimed I am always right. And If you are implying that my faith is wrong simply because I didn't take enough physics and science in college. Imply all you want, no one aside from the God of the bible can ever change my faith and I know that as a fact (even if you think its not). No offese.
One thing I will say about this is Evolution is a Theory. Creation is also a theory. Both need to be taught and discussed.
I happen to be on the creationist side and feel that there are holes in evolution. The thing that convinced me the most is that evolutionist want me to believe that we evolved by chance. What you fail to remember are the Laws of Thermodynamics and that entropy, chaos, is increasing (the reason my aptartement never cleans itself and just gets worse). For a single cell thing to become more entropy would need to decrease. That can't happen without work being done. This is simple Physics 101. Also we look for Aliens using the Intelligent Design. An evolutionist looking for E.T. needs to ask himself 'How do we know that the organized pattern of radio waves we are looking for didn't just evolve by chance like we did'. If you take a critical look at evolution you will see it is as full of holes as they claim creation to be.
I am not a biologist and admit I probably could not convince any biologist/evolutionist of creation. However, I have known some trustworthy biologists who were creationists and they explained it well. A good web site for reading more on the creation theory is Answers In Genesis.
This looks cool, not that I would use it as I have a digital camera that I am happy with already, but the retailers can reuse the cameras making it a little cheaper for them, and the disposable camera market seems to do pretty well.
I think they can replace the disposable 35mm cameras with these fairly well. However as an end users more than maybe 7-8 uses of this becomes pointless as you can get your own one for that much.
Though if they are hacked and they turn into $20 digital cameras then I think the company will have to go back to the drawing board. It will be interesting to see if these become mainstream soon or not.
I would have to agree that it is a good first step. Let me say that we have a long way to go before we see change, our government isn't exactly fast moving when it comes to structual changes such as this. But if they start looking at it it would be good. In spite of the fact that they decided to recomend no change at least they didn't side with coporations which probably would make it harder for the small developer guy.
Only now is M$ saying that it is getting a bad publicity? And I thought windows 95 and on was bad publicity. (NOTE: I didn't use 3.1 so I can't speak for it)
If they are worried about a bad image one would think that they would start trying to better their image verses destroy the competition in effort to leave them as the only choice.
I would think all the reality show entities would jump on this to make it their next show.
They could title it "NYPD Jail Cell 24/7" and it could run right after Cops on Fox!
Slashdot Mirror
You also never see Imitation veggies made out of beef!
I don't mind that you pointed out my cicular arg. I find them annoying myself so I don't want to put them out. However, from my perspective it isn't circular as I have built the reasons for my assumption over the last few years. I failed to realize you may not have that. Silly me. I have more proving to me that the bible is true and God exsists than just the bible itself. Though I don't think going into it will convince you other wise so I won't. But you do have a point about the circularity of the argument though it was more of a statment of fact of my faith than an argument to prove it you. And your right you didn't shake me as expected.
at least we had a civilized discussion too many nonchristians and christians fall into petty quibbing.
As I tried to explain, I am not experienced in this and normally do not argue it as I don't know much about it. I just know there is more out there on creation than people give credit, and start spouting off it's religous propaganda. And I know that alot of inexperienced creationists come off sounding dumb when they say stuff like God put the fosils there to test us, which I don't ascribe to my self. I appologize for not fully understanding the 2nd law my self and now see why it doesn't fit as a good argument. I still feel that evoists put a wall to creation only because it came out of religious circles first. If an athiest scientist had said it first there would be no issue.
as for where else I might be wrong. Well I am human and I make mistakes everyday so there are lots of places. Just like you I imagine. Never claimed I am always right. And If you are implying that my faith is wrong simply because I didn't take enough physics and science in college. Imply all you want, no one aside from the God of the bible can ever change my faith and I know that as a fact (even if you think its not). No offese.
One thing I will say about this is Evolution is a Theory. Creation is also a theory. Both need to be taught and discussed.
I happen to be on the creationist side and feel that there are holes in evolution. The thing that convinced me the most is that evolutionist want me to believe that we evolved by chance. What you fail to remember are the Laws of Thermodynamics and that entropy, chaos, is increasing (the reason my aptartement never cleans itself and just gets worse). For a single cell thing to become more entropy would need to decrease. That can't happen without work being done. This is simple Physics 101. Also we look for Aliens using the Intelligent Design. An evolutionist looking for E.T. needs to ask himself 'How do we know that the organized pattern of radio waves we are looking for didn't just evolve by chance like we did'. If you take a critical look at evolution you will see it is as full of holes as they claim creation to be.
I am not a biologist and admit I probably could not convince any biologist/evolutionist of creation. However, I have known some trustworthy biologists who were creationists and they explained it well. A good web site for reading more on the creation theory is Answers In Genesis.
I think you have an extra 'anti' in 'MS antispyware program'.
On a more serious note I wonder what they mean by 'free'
sudo allows you to run things as root and other users. root is not an administrator root is above that :)
This looks cool, not that I would use it as I have a digital camera that I am happy with already, but the retailers can reuse the cameras making it a little cheaper for them, and the disposable camera market seems to do pretty well. I think they can replace the disposable 35mm cameras with these fairly well. However as an end users more than maybe 7-8 uses of this becomes pointless as you can get your own one for that much. Though if they are hacked and they turn into $20 digital cameras then I think the company will have to go back to the drawing board. It will be interesting to see if these become mainstream soon or not.
I would have to agree that it is a good first step. Let me say that we have a long way to go before we see change, our government isn't exactly fast moving when it comes to structual changes such as this. But if they start looking at it it would be good. In spite of the fact that they decided to recomend no change at least they didn't side with coporations which probably would make it harder for the small developer guy.
Only now is M$ saying that it is getting a bad publicity? And I thought windows 95 and on was bad publicity. (NOTE: I didn't use 3.1 so I can't speak for it)
If they are worried about a bad image one would think that they would start trying to better their image verses destroy the competition in effort to leave them as the only choice.
--
Who needs windows when you have linux.
I would think all the reality show entities would jump on this to make it their next show.
They could title it "NYPD Jail Cell 24/7" and it could run right after Cops on Fox!