I'm able to change the protocol to https for any page, successfully. But all the links on that page point back to http. So... That's pretty limited https support.
Look, I'm all about loyalty. In fact, I feel like part of what I'm being paid for here is my loyalty. But if there were somewhere else that valued loyalty more highly, I'm going wherever they value loyalty the most.
I keep seeing people saying that temperatures have not risen since 1998, but nobody ever cites any real data to back up that assertion. Care to step up?
"Money" is just a medium here; it's a matter of where it makes sense to focus our efforts and resources. You're endorsing misallocation on an unprecedented scale.
In Roman Catholic theology, the Immaculate Conception was the conception of Mary, whom they hold to have been conceived without original sin, that is, immaculate.
This has nothing to do with the Virgin Birth, which appears to be what the summary is aiming for.
2.20462262 pounds per kilogram. It's defined in terms of the kilogram. If it weren't, there wouldn't be global agreement on weight of things (which there is). This is why the US cares what the mass of the kilogram is.
But this situation means there's no reason to NOT hold out. Everybody agrees on the definitions, they just use different ways to express the same measurements. Agreement on the fundamental definitions is what's important, and we have that.
Did you even read that page? It describes how the top 5% of income earners are shouldering 59% of the federal tax burden. That fact doesn't directly have anything to do with rates.
Slashdot Mirror
The first paragraph of your link describes how water is compressible, and not only that, how the compressibility changes with pressure.
You can't standardize pressure because to even define pressure you first have to define a kilogram. Circular.
But you can't define 1 atmosphere without defining the kilogram first.
Such a definition is ultimately circular. The volume of water depends on pressure, which itself has a mass component.
I'm able to change the protocol to https for any page, successfully. But all the links on that page point back to http. So... That's pretty limited https support.
Somebody dropping two hundred and fifty big ones on a video card is mid-range?
Because people with no IPv6 support are entirely unaffected. This only affects people with broken, not absent, IPv6 support.
Look, I'm all about loyalty. In fact, I feel like part of what I'm being paid for here is my loyalty. But if there were somewhere else that valued loyalty more highly, I'm going wherever they value loyalty the most.
I keep seeing people saying that temperatures have not risen since 1998, but nobody ever cites any real data to back up that assertion. Care to step up?
http://reason.com/blog/2011/01/06/global-temperature-trend-upate
"Money" is just a medium here; it's a matter of where it makes sense to focus our efforts and resources. You're endorsing misallocation on an unprecedented scale.
So that's the most recent 1.3% of the time that's passed since the end of the last ice age.
The article author is also behind The Practice of System and Network Administration, truly an excellent text into the practicalities of work in IT.
Can you tell us more about this? What library, what app, what service? Thanks.
You're absolutely right about buying from GM. But Ford in fact has had Bluetooth connectivity for a few years now via their "Sync" system.
In Roman Catholic theology, the Immaculate Conception was the conception of Mary, whom they hold to have been conceived without original sin, that is, immaculate.
This has nothing to do with the Virgin Birth, which appears to be what the summary is aiming for.
Because the volume of water depends on pressure, which has a mass component.
2.20462262 pounds per kilogram. It's defined in terms of the kilogram. If it weren't, there wouldn't be global agreement on weight of things (which there is). This is why the US cares what the mass of the kilogram is.
But this situation means there's no reason to NOT hold out. Everybody agrees on the definitions, they just use different ways to express the same measurements. Agreement on the fundamental definitions is what's important, and we have that.
No, because the volume depends on pressure. Which has a mass component. Circular.
Because this prototypical kilogram is what the definition of the pound is currently based on.
Last I heard, nobody had come up with a way to define mass without referring to an artifact. It seems easy but they all turn out to be circular.
They DO use kilobytes, just a lot more of them. :-)
I think we have an order of magnitude problem here... K != M
Citation needed.
Did you even read that page? It describes how the top 5% of income earners are shouldering 59% of the federal tax burden. That fact doesn't directly have anything to do with rates.
Had to be for what? In order to display at all? In order to get the error message?
I believe the rule is just what I said.