I think that when a particular standard or implementation isn't specified, SQL would be a database using SQL as the it's query language. Is there anything else that everyone can even remotely agree on?
So, as expected, just about anything can be a spoiler and whether something gives, or doesn't give, away the outcome is judgment call. This definition doesn't challenge the assumption that every article concerning fictional works is likely to contain spoilers and, therefore, a non-spoiler/spoiler split is arbitrary and, arguably, counterproductive.
Also worth noting: just because it has ACID doesn't mean that it's SQL, and just because it's SQL, doesn't mean that it is ACID.
In other words, the only thing that is SQL vs NoSQL here is that the former tend to be ACID while the latter are all over the board because there is quite a bit that isn't SQL out there.
The closest it comes to that is by listing "acquaintance" and it is well understood that they aren't synonyms. The non-hostile group inclusive definition is hardly applicable to "making friends", since one doesn't the coworker group is assumed and non-hostility is the default: "not make enemies" would be the appropriate form there.
call it the ability to be tolerably liked at work, rather than the ability to make friends if you prefer.
So, you included the same thing twice? Because "making friends" was followed by "work together without coming to blows". Yes it is pretty clear what you meant, you meant them as separate things, not as an example of the same thing, as you try to present it now.
I don't see how it's anything but a mistake stemming from extrovert bias. No, it's clear that you didn't mean to basically present a sizable part of the population in a bad light. However you still did it.
So, when it was "a lot of people want to keep it", it was "lack of democracy". When just it's "a few people want to keep it", it is "tyranny of the majority". Either way, if the powers to be disagree with your opinion, they are being oppressive, no matter how the decision was made.
Plot summaries can be very short, and if it's not clear what you're reading you can find yourself getting all the big plot twists in less than a couple of sentences.
Spoiler:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Plot summaries have a big "Plot" heading, it can only be read by accident if you don't pay any attention in the first place. If that is too hard, don't visit any wikipedia pages on fiction to begin with, that is another way to surely avoid the spoilers within.
As to whether every HR department would benefit from having an introvert... I don't understand what benefit you are claiming they would derive, so I don't really have an opinion to offer you on that.
They would not turn away perfectly capable people who don't make everyone they know a friend and wouldn't twist "making friends" (what you originally posted, and I objected to) into "only creeps can't get people to like-in".
Not everyone is an extrovert. Introverts tend to have few friends, as he said: buddies, associates, etc. Just because we socialize at the workplace don't mean we are friends with the people, that would involve quite a bit more.
Stage 1.5 five, is necessary in some cases. Why do you think you know the problems involved in making a universal boot loader then the people who made a rather good one?
all communications performed before that exploit was found remains secure (unlike classical protocols where you only need the recorded data to apply any exploit)
That isn't necessarily the case for side channel attacks, as the side channel to capture isn't known in advance of exploits. Similarly man in the middle attacks need to be live.
One time pad with a truly random key. Getting good entropy is a problem, but not a deal breaker. Key exchange is the weak point (quantum crypto is supposed to fix that, but who can afford dedicated, well guarded fiber from each location to each location? or have a working system for that matter...), but with with multi-gigabyte MicroSD it is a realistic alternative to symmetric encryption for reasonably sized messages.
Soft skills like the ability to make friends, work together without coming to blows, etc, are frequently valued more highly by employers than pure technical skills.
One can only hope that, unlike you, most employers know that the ability to make friends and the ability to work together are separate things, and one doesn't mean that the other is there.
Thanks, I'll look into it. Now that I think, the Witcher series by Andrzej Sapkowski seemed to have some of it as well, but I've only read the first book.
What I mean is that the rules, previously unknown to us, fall into place in the exact way to save the protagonists. And then there's the plain old inconsistencies, such as Voldemort's manipulations of Harry's mind stopping after one, highly successful, intrigue without proper explanation. Not to mention *several* one-in-a-million chances over and over again.
If it was all planed out before hand like that, there is certainly no way to tell as a mere reader, that there are larger forces behind the scenes that govern it all. A sufficiently convoluted plot is indistinguishable from a series of deus ex machina solutions tacked together.
Most fantasy (at least what I've encountered) has haphazard and quasi-mystical exploration of the underlaying rules of the world. Admittedly most science fiction has the same problem, so I guess I'm looking for "hard" fantasy, not fantasy that is as "detailed" and "thorough" as common sci-fi.
Actually, on a really close look, it does say that you can advance from PADAWAN(TM) to JEDI MASTER(TM). Jedi Mind on the other hand claims that you can play Warcraft... Totally meant to deceive you that you can become a JEDI MASTER(TM) in Warcraft.
I, as a reasonable person, would not be too surprised to find an actual Jedi-branded "mind control" system. Actually, I think I saw one is ToysRUs once.
If you are thinking of this, then you should look closer next time. Not a mention of Jedi there.
Slashdot Mirror
I think that when a particular standard or implementation isn't specified, SQL would be a database using SQL as the it's query language. Is there anything else that everyone can even remotely agree on?
So, as expected, just about anything can be a spoiler and whether something gives, or doesn't give, away the outcome is judgment call. This definition doesn't challenge the assumption that every article concerning fictional works is likely to contain spoilers and, therefore, a non-spoiler/spoiler split is arbitrary and, arguably, counterproductive.
Also worth noting: just because it has ACID doesn't mean that it's SQL, and just because it's SQL, doesn't mean that it is ACID.
In other words, the only thing that is SQL vs NoSQL here is that the former tend to be ACID while the latter are all over the board because there is quite a bit that isn't SQL out there.
The closest it comes to that is by listing "acquaintance" and it is well understood that they aren't synonyms. The non-hostile group inclusive definition is hardly applicable to "making friends", since one doesn't the coworker group is assumed and non-hostility is the default: "not make enemies" would be the appropriate form there.
So, you included the same thing twice? Because "making friends" was followed by "work together without coming to blows". Yes it is pretty clear what you meant, you meant them as separate things, not as an example of the same thing, as you try to present it now.
I don't see how it's anything but a mistake stemming from extrovert bias. No, it's clear that you didn't mean to basically present a sizable part of the population in a bad light. However you still did it.
Do you have a clear definition of a spoiler?
So, when it was "a lot of people want to keep it", it was "lack of democracy". When just it's "a few people want to keep it", it is "tyranny of the majority". Either way, if the powers to be disagree with your opinion, they are being oppressive, no matter how the decision was made.
Wikipedia isn't your friend. It's a source of information, not a source of movie/book recommendations.
Spoiler:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Plot summaries have a big "Plot" heading, it can only be read by accident if you don't pay any attention in the first place. If that is too hard, don't visit any wikipedia pages on fiction to begin with, that is another way to surely avoid the spoilers within.
Exactly, anything is a "spoiler" of some sort.
Link-in, not like-in.
They would not turn away perfectly capable people who don't make everyone they know a friend and wouldn't twist "making friends" (what you originally posted, and I objected to) into "only creeps can't get people to like-in".
That is not about friends anymore, now is it? Every HR department would benefit from having an introvert...
Not everyone is an extrovert. Introverts tend to have few friends, as he said: buddies, associates, etc. Just because we socialize at the workplace don't mean we are friends with the people, that would involve quite a bit more.
Stage 1.5 five, is necessary in some cases. Why do you think you know the problems involved in making a universal boot loader then the people who made a rather good one?
That isn't necessarily the case for side channel attacks, as the side channel to capture isn't known in advance of exploits. Similarly man in the middle attacks need to be live.
One time pad with a truly random key. Getting good entropy is a problem, but not a deal breaker. Key exchange is the weak point (quantum crypto is supposed to fix that, but who can afford dedicated, well guarded fiber from each location to each location? or have a working system for that matter...), but with with multi-gigabyte MicroSD it is a realistic alternative to symmetric encryption for reasonably sized messages.
Yes, it does. GRUB deals with the boot process, it's one of the things that do have any business of being there.
One can only hope that, unlike you, most employers know that the ability to make friends and the ability to work together are separate things, and one doesn't mean that the other is there.
Thanks, I'll look into it. Now that I think, the Witcher series by Andrzej Sapkowski seemed to have some of it as well, but I've only read the first book.
What I mean is that the rules, previously unknown to us, fall into place in the exact way to save the protagonists. And then there's the plain old inconsistencies, such as Voldemort's manipulations of Harry's mind stopping after one, highly successful, intrigue without proper explanation. Not to mention *several* one-in-a-million chances over and over again.
If it was all planed out before hand like that, there is certainly no way to tell as a mere reader, that there are larger forces behind the scenes that govern it all. A sufficiently convoluted plot is indistinguishable from a series of deus ex machina solutions tacked together.
Harry Potter, as fun as it is, is prone to making rules up on the spot.
Most fantasy (at least what I've encountered) has haphazard and quasi-mystical exploration of the underlaying rules of the world. Admittedly most science fiction has the same problem, so I guess I'm looking for "hard" fantasy, not fantasy that is as "detailed" and "thorough" as common sci-fi.
Now that's a book I'll read. Not that I've encountered one...
Actually, on a really close look, it does say that you can advance from PADAWAN(TM) to JEDI MASTER(TM). Jedi Mind on the other hand claims that you can play Warcraft... Totally meant to deceive you that you can become a JEDI MASTER(TM) in Warcraft.
If you are thinking of this, then you should look closer next time. Not a mention of Jedi there.