"The controversy about ALH 84001 was not that it is from Mars (that is pretty much agreed upon): the controversy was about nanofossils purportedly discovered in this meteorite."
Many, including myself don't agree with that it was from Mars. I am am afraid that such an "agreement" by others may have been reached because a president was made a fool in combination with wishful thinking. Look at the analyses, via the Wikipedia link above. They are not persuasive.
Kuhn would have loved to analyze that "agreement".
There have been too many sloppy science news the last decades.
Please, recall when president Clinton was fooled into saying they had found a rock from Mars, on Earth!!! A few days ago, there was another rock from Mars, also found on Earth. The arguments why these terrestrial rocks were from Mars is sadly weak.
Another Clintonian Mars or even a Piltdown Man (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man) is what we all should dread.
Pushing the barrier between bad towards dishonest science is NOT good at all.
If we can once again ascertain that NO extraterrestrial life has been found, the better.
Huh?! Well, that doesn't preclude that you can improve what you can measure.
Yes, I believe that valuable insights can be gained from what you can measure. For example, if your data couldn't determine a success factor that is a valuable result in itself! The insight then is "there must be an unknown factor we have not included in our model".
What is the big deal? I also think that the unexpected can be found within a mainstream setting, it all but takes a glimpse of genius to discover it. Finding that genius recipe in the dark, without any previous experience is silly, ignorant and ill-informed. Think of the angry birds authors who had made about a hundred games before they hit gold. That was no luck. They had the experience. Systematizing that 'hovering feeling' experience into a mathematical model? Why not? It still takes genuine talent to make it fun and implement it well.
Microsoft most likely won't provide "healthy competition". History has shown that they are on the same low level as Apple when it comes to competetion.
The Reuters article referred to 2.1 trillion rubles:
"Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev approved a plan to spend 2.1 trillion roubles ($68.71 billion) on developing Russia's space industry from 2013 to 2020, state-run RIA news agency reported."
We need oxygen-producing bacteria, like cyanobacteria.
We don't need meat-eating microbes on Mars. Good to see they found out this before-hand. Hmmm... Or did they? How do we know the little rover bugger wasn't filled with them?! Maybe it is already too late!
When the US surpassed Europe - How dare they? When the China surpasses US - How dare they?
Of course they dare. It is their 'obligation' to try. And if they win out big we won't hear about those embarrassing inbreds from Alabama and Kentucky discussing evolution any more. From what I have understood, Chinese are more pragmatic than any Bible reader, or?
"The ASEA IRB is an industrial robot series for material handling, packing, transportation, polishing, welding, and grading. Built in 1975, the robot allowed movement in 5 axes with a lift capacity of 6 kg. It was the world's first fully electrically driven and microprocessor-controlled robot, using Intel's first chipset."
What is reported now was also reported then, for fear of losing jobs. Robots fears are nothing new.
Isn't Metropolis from 1927 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis_(film)) and Frankenstein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankenstein) from 1818 about this too in a way.
That is not even close to being true. R surpasses but not outclasses Matlab in many instances and vice versa. It all depends on what you're doing.
R has an unknown userbase (http://bigcomputing.blogspot.se/2011/07/figuring-out-number-of-r-users-in.html) but an impressive, free codebase (www.r-project.org)
whereas Matlab has some 300,000 users (http://www.cs.cornell.edu/info/people/lnt/multimatlab.html) and an equally impressive codebase ( http://www.google.com/search?q=matlab+code).
R is an excellent piece of software, but so is Matlab.
As for simplicity, I find them equally easy to learn.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps you need someone trained to alternative explanations?
After all, several of the available color schemes were adapted using people trained in adapting color schemes. Maybe someone trained may help you.
Meddle with muddled motives? Or, just money? Just like that? Justice this, justice that? Pray, they just summon Mammon.
"The controversy about ALH 84001 was not that it is from Mars (that is pretty much agreed upon): the controversy was about nanofossils purportedly discovered in this meteorite."
Many, including myself don't agree with that it was from Mars. I am am afraid that such an "agreement" by others may have been reached because a president was made a fool in combination with wishful thinking. Look at the analyses, via the Wikipedia link above. They are not persuasive.
Kuhn would have loved to analyze that "agreement".
Many games have these, 'bonus' and 'penalty', and Scrabble appears to be one of them.
It is part of the game and Mattel has no reason to change their rules.
There have been too many sloppy science news the last decades.
Please, recall when president Clinton was fooled into saying they had found a rock from Mars, on Earth!!! A few days ago, there was another rock from Mars, also found on Earth. The arguments why these terrestrial rocks were from Mars is sadly weak.
Another Clintonian Mars or even a Piltdown Man (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man) is what we all should dread.
Pushing the barrier between bad towards dishonest science is NOT good at all.
If we can once again ascertain that NO extraterrestrial life has been found, the better.
That's what I read, at first.
No, it doen't make sense. :)
"It seems to be the reason (or excuse) for why all sorts interesting things don't get done."
When it comes to drinking there ARE all sorts of excuses!
"you can’t improve what you can’t measure"?
Huh?! Well, that doesn't preclude that you can improve what you can measure.
Yes, I believe that valuable insights can be gained from what you can measure. For example, if your data couldn't determine a success factor that is a valuable result in itself! The insight then is "there must be an unknown factor we have not included in our model".
What is the big deal? I also think that the unexpected can be found within a mainstream setting, it all but takes a glimpse of genius to discover it. Finding that genius recipe in the dark, without any previous experience is silly, ignorant and ill-informed. Think of the angry birds authors who had made about a hundred games before they hit gold. That was no luck. They had the experience. Systematizing that 'hovering feeling' experience into a mathematical model? Why not? It still takes genuine talent to make it fun and implement it well.
Microsoft most likely won't provide "healthy competition". History has shown that they are on the same low level as Apple when it comes to competetion.
Don't fool yourselves.
Why do people use decimals on a non-metric system? sigh...
"the average price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. was higher in 2012 than in any year before it"
Huh? The average price for just about anything in the U.S. was higher in 2012 than in any year before it...
The Reuters article referred to 2.1 trillion rubles:
"Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev approved a plan to spend 2.1 trillion roubles ($68.71 billion) on developing Russia's space industry from 2013 to 2020, state-run RIA news agency reported."
A lot of money in any case.
Steve Ballmer. You have some work to do. Get Windows 7 back on track. Happy New Year.
WT?
We need oxygen-producing bacteria, like cyanobacteria.
We don't need meat-eating microbes on Mars. Good to see they found out this before-hand. Hmmm... Or did they? How do we know the little rover bugger wasn't filled with them?! Maybe it is already too late!
When the US surpassed Europe - How dare they?
When the China surpasses US - How dare they?
Of course they dare. It is their 'obligation' to try. And if they win out big we won't hear about those embarrassing inbreds from Alabama and Kentucky discussing evolution any more. From what I have understood, Chinese are more pragmatic than any Bible reader, or?
Metro ruined my face
was it running windows 8 ?
"was it running windows 8 ?"
Bad question. You are not allowed to defile people with disabilities, in most countries.
For me, running Wndows 8 equates you have some retardation. This is my understanding of it.
I may be wrong, but no-one has ever contested that with any medical proof.
"Well, it isn't ready for desktops either! :D"
Well, Windows 8 sucks even more on desktops. The ENTIRE WORLD KNOWS that...
KDE is cool with touch-based devices, not perfect, yet better than Win 8! :)
KDE is probably the best option for anyone using mouse and keyboard.
If not, forget it as a temporary workaround.
"By dying of starvation and brutality."
But not in the countries where the robots are common.
"With More Disabilities Than Ever"?
That is not necessarily so. There may just be more diagnosed and reported than ever, at least in releative terms.
In absolute numbers, yes. But that is due to Earth's population growth...
This debate emerged many decades ago. Here is one example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASEA_IRB
"The ASEA IRB is an industrial robot series for material handling, packing, transportation, polishing, welding, and grading. Built in 1975, the robot allowed movement in 5 axes with a lift capacity of 6 kg. It was the world's first fully electrically driven and microprocessor-controlled robot, using Intel's first chipset."
What is reported now was also reported then, for fear of losing jobs. Robots fears are nothing new.
Isn't Metropolis from 1927 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis_(film)) and Frankenstein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankenstein) from 1818 about this too in a way.
Technophobia.
Humans tend to work around these issues.
"Presumably, you are allowed to take your calculator to exams, but not your Linux box."
Nokia N900...
That http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Elop should get another job.
"Matlab is more mature"
That is not even close to being true. R surpasses but not outclasses Matlab in many instances and vice versa. It all depends on what you're doing.
R has an unknown userbase (http://bigcomputing.blogspot.se/2011/07/figuring-out-number-of-r-users-in.html) but an impressive, free codebase (www.r-project.org)
whereas Matlab has some 300,000 users (http://www.cs.cornell.edu/info/people/lnt/multimatlab.html) and an equally impressive codebase ( http://www.google.com/search?q=matlab+code).
R is an excellent piece of software, but so is Matlab.
As for simplicity, I find them equally easy to learn.
That said I dumped Matlab years ago for R.