Because it interferes with holding different people to different standards?
Whether or not it was her intention to humiliate her ex is beside the point.
It's the entire point.
Negating the wishes of her partners in the video (which brings up other issues), what wrong did she commit against the ex? He doesn't own the rights to her sexuality.
And if the Clinton's had buddied up to the 1950's edition of Byrd, you might have had a point with your "joke". As it was, you echoed a dumbfuck talking point of equating the post 70's Byrd with current racist Republicans, and thus was taken to be a dumbfucker. Kinda like going on about Obama and "birth certificates". Protip: don't use tired troglodyte GOP talking points, and you wont be taken for a troglodyte GOPer. Instead, talk about how more minorities have been thrown into prison because of the Clintons, or how Obama has deported far more immigrants than Bush. Honesty plus a good talking point, it can be done.
Hell, it was a matter of weeks before SCOTUS legalized marriage equality before Hillary fully supported gay marriage. Not just Obama's "state's rights" position that simultaneously endorsed state bans on marriage while applauding marriage in states that had legalized it.
Did NPR pointedly refused to call torture, torture, or did they not? Yes, they did. So WYP? That you are even more unreliable than you're accuse HuffPo and Gawker of being?
Submitter is a corporatist apologist. And WTF is this nonsense about letting consumers "choose" to have their bandwidth throttled. BeauHD must also think that banks are doing depositors a huge favor by paying a $1.25 overdraft in return for a $35 fee, plus $7 a day until the depositor gives them their blood money.
Clinton is still being questioned about her emails, despite a (hostile) congressional investigation and the FBI both clearing her of any serious impropriety,
No. They didn't. If she were anyone else, she'd already be in jail, and looking at a century of prison time. Just ask the sailor being prosecuted by the DOJ for taking pictures of a submarine on his phone - they agree that he didn't intend to distribute them, but is still prosecuting him for mishandling classified evidence.
And that's for for a few pictures, not tens of thousands of emails on an unsecured, unauthorized, public-facing email server.
It's surprising how this was modded up to 3 or 4, then down to flamebait. Particularly surprising for a post that is entirely factual.
Entirely a series of bullshit racist tautologies, you mean, and thus the definition of flamebait. Or did you think no one would notice your rattling off a list of names without bothering to cite a single thing any of them said? Lazy winger....is lazy.
Really? Just going to say it, people who are against voter ID are insane, in the worst case I'd call you anti-democratic.
Hosreshit. Stem to stern. Voting is a right. Do you have to show ID to engage in free speech? Do you have to show ID to enter a church? Do you have to show ID to have a public attorney present at a trial? No, no, no and no. If you want to bring up the 2nd Amendment, make sure and read the first sentence of it first.
You're basically pro-voter fraud as long as you keep pushing this BS. There are multiple cases of it happening.
Try 31 cases out of a billiion cast, moron.
Yes, moron. 70,000 eligible voters were stripped from Florida voter rolls in 2000, and that was just one state in one election - not to mention more than two thousand times higher than the number of in-person voter fraud cases total over a much longer period of time, across a much wider area.
You're basically pro-voter fraud as long as you keep pushing this BS. There are multiple cases of it happening.
Or you have no idea WTF you're talking about. All the cases mentioned by voter ID proponents, virtually none of them would have been prevented by showing ID. It's all examples of felons trying to vote, people voting absentee and then in person, or people not meeting residency requirements. Not Micky Mouse showing up at the pools and trying to cast a vote.
Umm, err... every state offers a non-driving photo ID.
Which costs time to get. And money, if you need to get a birth certificate or other papers from the state. Which mostly affects poor people who don't vote R.
This is not a campaign against certain persons, some persons just do not want to participate & prefer to paint themselves in a corner. Easily said.
Of course it is. Invariably, all the examples the voter ID proponents point to would not have been prevented by an ID. Felon? Nope. Hadn't yet established residency? Nope. Voted absentee and then in person? Nope, nope and nope. The number of actual cases of in-person vote fraud - John Smith trying to vote as Micky Mouse - are insignificant next to the number of legitimate voters tripped up by voter ID laws.
Sorry, that's not what I see. For example, she's apologized for her "super predator" and "half are deplorable" comments, or at least re-stated them to narrow the scope.
Mendacity and ass-covering do not an apology make. HRC has never said she's sorry, only used the same doublespeak she uses to defend her Iraq War vote.
It is as if they are four year olds getting in trouble, and saying "but Billy's Mom lets him drink beer/smoke dope".
Did your self-awareness at least tickle a little bit when you wrote that?
You mean, like when Bill Clinton said "Make America Great" is racist, even though he used that same exact phrase a number of times during his own presidential campaign?
Was he being a raving racist moran towards latinos and muslims when he was saying it? No? Then your lazy false equivalency is duly noted.
Actually, there are plenty of benefits that Illegals get, that Citizens don't get. The lack of proper "documentation' gets them a lot of linenacy in criminal situations that I do not get.
Is that what Santa told you? Cuz believing in that jolly old elf is just as rational as this alternate universe you've constructed for yourself. Both cops and the DHS have quotas, and busting anyone they can for deportation helps boost those numbers, even if they have to deport American citizens to do it.
While not "free stuff" there are a lot of Tax Payer resources that are available, expressly for Undocumented people, that I do not qualify for, such as legal support and help.
That was you in Missouri in 2003, wasn't it? Immigrants without documents subsidize your ignorant ass by paying into benefits they will never try to collect on, least they get deported.
And quite frankly illegal immigration is affecting the suppression of wages
Responsibility for which you are laying at the feet of businesses and capitalists eager to exploit these workers, yes?
When Hillary Clinton talks about how Robert Byrd was her "friend and mentor" this also proves that Trump is a racist. See how easy that is?
What's easy to see is the idiocy of wingnuts who want to chicken-fuck Byrd without mentioning the fact that he flip-flopped on race issues - in the early 80's. If you wanted to lambast Democrats for being racists, you'd blast the Clinton's for their 90's crime bills, and their "super-predator" dog whistles, which they defend to this day.
But, that would require you to be honest for five seconds, and most of the chicken-fuckers heartily approve of those aspects of the Clinton legacy, anyway.
That's quite the left brain/right brain thing you have going on. First, you want us to remember the half a million kids that died under Clinton sanctions, then you want to deny another Clinton's responsibility for the rise of ISIS.
Which is like denying that water is wet.
Of course the U.S. is responsible for ISIS, with Hillary playing a starring role. Destabilizing the entire region with regime change after regime change, and arming "militants" everyone to fight people the U.S. doesn't like, whether it's in Iraq, Syria or Iran.
The only distinction between an ISIS radical in need of a good droning and a heroic freedom fighter taking it to Assad is a line on a map.
The same reason why the IRS ran a campaign against tea party groups and people resigned over it, but no charges were laid?
Because that's wingnut dumbfuckery:
1) There are only two political appointments at the IRS, and the chief was a Bush appointee 2) The only group to be denied tax-exempt status was a liberal one
Now, this is where the chicken-fuckers whine that more conservative groups were investigated than liberal ones - but no shit, Sherlock, that's because the explosion in groups after Citizen United was entirely conservative. Unions didn't have billions to suddenly throw at front groups, that's the Koch's and the Sheldon Adelson's. And unions are of course invested in the other right wing party - the Democrats.
It's not like there aren't legit issues for right-wingers to complain about - Obama signing the NDAA, letting the banks commit the greatest theft in the history of the human race, persecuting more whistleblowers than all previous presidents combined times two - but that would require you to be honest for five seconds.
A sailor going and photographing classified sections of a submarine over a period of months. Basically looking like he was engaged in active espionage.
Basic horseshit. Even the DOJ that's prosecuting him agrees he had no intent to distribute the images from his cell phone. You know, the same DOJ that was threatening Aaron Schwartz with 35 years in prison for unauthorized network access.
So no, not a comparable incident.
Damn straight it's not a comparable incident - Hillary had thousands and thousands of emails with classified information on them, in an unauthorized, insecure private email server. You're comparing an anthill (sailor) to Mt. McKinley parked on top Mt. Everest (HRC). And also destroyed evidence without authorization, something that Sandy Berger went to prison for. This goes beyond cognitive dissonance to willful dumbfuckery.
You have to either have a powerful level of narcotics in your system, or a powerful level of stupid, to say a sailor should face prosecution for deciding to take pictures on his personal phone, which is not accessible to the entire internet, and hand waive away a private email server, with exponentially more secretive information yet public-facing, with a straight face. Would it make any difference if that sailor said "but but but I also used that phone to dictate mission reports!" - of course not. So how the hell can anyone rationalize another state worker putting far more amounts of far more secretive information at far greater risk?
Petraeus deliberately shared highly classified materials with his mistress and biographer. Not a remotely comparable incident.
It's all comparable, because the prosecution is all comparable: mishandling classified information. Just ask Sandy Berger, and any whisteblower persecuted by the Obama administration. Intent does not matter, only the action matters.
Nope, he was deliberately removed classified documents and they proved he lied about it.
Berger wasn't authorized to carry those materials out of the National Archives nor destroy them - and Hillary wasn't authorized to use a private email server for far far FAR more information than Berger was ever accused of removing, nor destroying the evidence (deleting emails).
Willful.
Dumb.
Fuck.
Er.
Eee.
Lab Tech Steals Data from Nuclear Facility. Jessica Lynn Quintana, a former worker at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, pleaded guilty in federal court to âoeknowingly removing classified information from the national security research laboratory, after she took home sensitive documents and data from the lab last year.â
Talk about misrepresenting the facts. She was charged because she was running a meth lab!!
Was she or was she not charged with mishandling classified information? No amount of hand waiving is going to change the fact that Hillary's dumb ass would be in prison if she were anyone other than Hillary.
Randians and other elistists, I'm talking to you. You, with the ad-hoc tautologies that public sector workers shouldn't be allowed to organize, because reasons (as if anti-tax organizations didn't exist to force rates down). Expecting workers to train their foreign replacements is depraved, no matter their country's origen.
Half a million deaths in the Human population is not a lot
I doubt you'd be as blase if you lived in parts of the world most afflicted by malaria. And even if it doesn't kill you, it can leave you disabled if not treated in time.
Slashdot Mirror
He's a bigot. You're defending bigotry.
Aside from the complete lack of death?? Were you going for the gold medal of dumbfuckery with this comparison?
You're mostly leaving out 95% of the story. Why?
Because it interferes with holding different people to different standards?
It's the entire point.
Obtuse non sequitur.
Being willfully obtuse does not a response make, AC.
And if the Clinton's had buddied up to the 1950's edition of Byrd, you might have had a point with your "joke". As it was, you echoed a dumbfuck talking point of equating the post 70's Byrd with current racist Republicans, and thus was taken to be a dumbfucker. Kinda like going on about Obama and "birth certificates". Protip: don't use tired troglodyte GOP talking points, and you wont be taken for a troglodyte GOPer. Instead, talk about how more minorities have been thrown into prison because of the Clintons, or how Obama has deported far more immigrants than Bush. Honesty plus a good talking point, it can be done.
Hell, it was a matter of weeks before SCOTUS legalized marriage equality before Hillary fully supported gay marriage. Not just Obama's "state's rights" position that simultaneously endorsed state bans on marriage while applauding marriage in states that had legalized it.
Did NPR pointedly refused to call torture, torture, or did they not? Yes, they did. So WYP? That you are even more unreliable than you're accuse HuffPo and Gawker of being?
Small communities who roll out their own faster internet access for a fraction of Comcast's costs make a bad liar out you.
Submitter is a corporatist apologist. And WTF is this nonsense about letting consumers "choose" to have their bandwidth throttled. BeauHD must also think that banks are doing depositors a huge favor by paying a $1.25 overdraft in return for a $35 fee, plus $7 a day until the depositor gives them their blood money.
No. They didn't. If she were anyone else, she'd already be in jail, and looking at a century of prison time. Just ask the sailor being prosecuted by the DOJ for taking pictures of a submarine on his phone - they agree that he didn't intend to distribute them, but is still prosecuting him for mishandling classified evidence.
And that's for for a few pictures, not tens of thousands of emails on an unsecured, unauthorized, public-facing email server.
Entirely a series of bullshit racist tautologies, you mean, and thus the definition of flamebait. Or did you think no one would notice your rattling off a list of names without bothering to cite a single thing any of them said? Lazy winger....is lazy.
Hosreshit. Stem to stern. Voting is a right. Do you have to show ID to engage in free speech? Do you have to show ID to enter a church? Do you have to show ID to have a public attorney present at a trial? No, no, no and no. If you want to bring up the 2nd Amendment, make sure and read the first sentence of it first.
Try 31 cases out of a billiion cast, moron.
Yes, moron. 70,000 eligible voters were stripped from Florida voter rolls in 2000, and that was just one state in one election - not to mention more than two thousand times higher than the number of in-person voter fraud cases total over a much longer period of time, across a much wider area.
Or you have no idea WTF you're talking about. All the cases mentioned by voter ID proponents, virtually none of them would have been prevented by showing ID. It's all examples of felons trying to vote, people voting absentee and then in person, or people not meeting residency requirements. Not Micky Mouse showing up at the pools and trying to cast a vote.
Which costs time to get. And money, if you need to get a birth certificate or other papers from the state. Which mostly affects poor people who don't vote R.
Of course it is. Invariably, all the examples the voter ID proponents point to would not have been prevented by an ID. Felon? Nope. Hadn't yet established residency? Nope. Voted absentee and then in person? Nope, nope and nope. The number of actual cases of in-person vote fraud - John Smith trying to vote as Micky Mouse - are insignificant next to the number of legitimate voters tripped up by voter ID laws.
By design.
Yes, they are a biased, right-wing rag. Which is why the endorsed the right-wing candidate most likely to support the status quo.
Mendacity and ass-covering do not an apology make. HRC has never said she's sorry, only used the same doublespeak she uses to defend her Iraq War vote.
Hmmm, I think I saw that episode.
You're using that word, "liberals", but who you're really referring to is right wingers who lie to themselves a lot.
Did your self-awareness at least tickle a little bit when you wrote that?
Was he being a raving racist moran towards latinos and muslims when he was saying it? No? Then your lazy false equivalency is duly noted.
Is that what Santa told you? Cuz believing in that jolly old elf is just as rational as this alternate universe you've constructed for yourself. Both cops and the DHS have quotas, and busting anyone they can for deportation helps boost those numbers, even if they have to deport American citizens to do it.
That was you in Missouri in 2003, wasn't it? Immigrants without documents subsidize your ignorant ass by paying into benefits they will never try to collect on, least they get deported.
Responsibility for which you are laying at the feet of businesses and capitalists eager to exploit these workers, yes?
What's easy to see is the idiocy of wingnuts who want to chicken-fuck Byrd without mentioning the fact that he flip-flopped on race issues - in the early 80's. If you wanted to lambast Democrats for being racists, you'd blast the Clinton's for their 90's crime bills, and their "super-predator" dog whistles, which they defend to this day.
But, that would require you to be honest for five seconds, and most of the chicken-fuckers heartily approve of those aspects of the Clinton legacy, anyway.
That's quite the left brain/right brain thing you have going on. First, you want us to remember the half a million kids that died under Clinton sanctions, then you want to deny another Clinton's responsibility for the rise of ISIS.
Which is like denying that water is wet.
Of course the U.S. is responsible for ISIS, with Hillary playing a starring role. Destabilizing the entire region with regime change after regime change, and arming "militants" everyone to fight people the U.S. doesn't like, whether it's in Iraq, Syria or Iran.
The only distinction between an ISIS radical in need of a good droning and a heroic freedom fighter taking it to Assad is a line on a map.
Because that's wingnut dumbfuckery:
1) There are only two political appointments at the IRS, and the chief was a Bush appointee
2) The only group to be denied tax-exempt status was a liberal one
Now, this is where the chicken-fuckers whine that more conservative groups were investigated than liberal ones - but no shit, Sherlock, that's because the explosion in groups after Citizen United was entirely conservative. Unions didn't have billions to suddenly throw at front groups, that's the Koch's and the Sheldon Adelson's. And unions are of course invested in the other right wing party - the Democrats.
It's not like there aren't legit issues for right-wingers to complain about - Obama signing the NDAA, letting the banks commit the greatest theft in the history of the human race, persecuting more whistleblowers than all previous presidents combined times two - but that would require you to be honest for five seconds.
And we can't have that, can we?
Basic horseshit. Even the DOJ that's prosecuting him agrees he had no intent to distribute the images from his cell phone. You know, the same DOJ that was threatening Aaron Schwartz with 35 years in prison for unauthorized network access.
Damn straight it's not a comparable incident - Hillary had thousands and thousands of emails with classified information on them, in an unauthorized, insecure private email server. You're comparing an anthill (sailor) to Mt. McKinley parked on top Mt. Everest (HRC). And also destroyed evidence without authorization, something that Sandy Berger went to prison for. This goes beyond cognitive dissonance to willful dumbfuckery.
You have to either have a powerful level of narcotics in your system, or a powerful level of stupid, to say a sailor should face prosecution for deciding to take pictures on his personal phone, which is not accessible to the entire internet, and hand waive away a private email server, with exponentially more secretive information yet public-facing, with a straight face. Would it make any difference if that sailor said "but but but I also used that phone to dictate mission reports!" - of course not. So how the hell can anyone rationalize another state worker putting far more amounts of far more secretive information at far greater risk?
It's all comparable, because the prosecution is all comparable: mishandling classified information. Just ask Sandy Berger, and any whisteblower persecuted by the Obama administration. Intent does not matter, only the action matters.
Berger wasn't authorized to carry those materials out of the National Archives nor destroy them - and Hillary wasn't authorized to use a private email server for far far FAR more information than Berger was ever accused of removing, nor destroying the evidence (deleting emails).
Willful.
Dumb.
Fuck.
Er.
Eee.
Was she or was she not charged with mishandling classified information? No amount of hand waiving is going to change the fact that Hillary's dumb ass would be in prison if she were anyone other than Hillary.
And what's the carrier for malaria?
/rollseyes
Randians and other elistists, I'm talking to you. You, with the ad-hoc tautologies that public sector workers shouldn't be allowed to organize, because reasons (as if anti-tax organizations didn't exist to force rates down). Expecting workers to train their foreign replacements is depraved, no matter their country's origen.
Says the western elitist who uses 30 times the amount of resources of the poor third worlder he wants to target for eugenics.
I doubt you'd be as blase if you lived in parts of the world most afflicted by malaria. And even if it doesn't kill you, it can leave you disabled if not treated in time.