Slashdot Mirror


University of California Hires India-Based IT Outsourcer, Lays Off Tech Workers (computerworld.com)

dcblogs writes from a report via Computerworld: The University of California is laying off a group of IT workers at its San Francisco campus as part of a plan to move work offshore. Laying off IT workers as part of a shift to offshore is somewhere between rare and unheard-of in the public sector. The layoffs will happen at the end of February, but before the final day arrives the IT employees expect to train foreign replacements from India-based IT services firm HCL. The firm is working under a university contract valued at $50 million over five years. This layoff affects 17% of UCSF's total IT staff, broken down this way: 49 IT permanent employees will lose their jobs, along with 12 contract employees and 18 vendor contractors. This number also includes 18 vacant IT positions that won't be filled, according to the university. Governments and publicly supported institutions, such as UC, have contracted with offshore outsourcers, but usually it's for new IT work or to supplement an existing project. The HCL contract with UCSF can be used by other UC campuses, which means the layoffs may expand across its 10 campuses. HCL is a top user of H-1B visa workers.

618 comments

  1. Completely wrong.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

    Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators.

    Terrible.

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Completely wrong.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, because they are supposed to be committed to the welfare of students that pay good money to be there. Instead they choose to become part of the problem.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Completely wrong.... by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nationalism is never a particularly rational argument.

      However there is a much more reasonable argument. Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class (which in turn feeds businesses). But if that work goes offshore, then that tax is going offshore and stops being useful to the taxpayer from an economic perspective.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're getting tax dollars as subsidy. Corp america doing it is bullshit unethical enough. This is even worse.

    4. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

    5. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say there are many rational arguments for nationalism, but you saved me the effort by providing one yourself.

    6. Re:Completely wrong.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Because they're getting tax dollars as subsidy. Corp america doing it is bullshit unethical enough. This is even worse.

      Exactly. Corporations try to control costs because it is their own money. But public universities are spending tax dollars, so there is no reason to be frugal.

    7. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Currently a UCSF student. Many people don't realize this but UCSF is exclusively a medical professional school with no undergraduate degrees. Students here are a minority compared to the system of hospitals run by professionals. https://www.ucsf.edu/about/economic-impact-report/employment-economic-stimulus

    8. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well maybe not completely wrong. Perhaps they're just "teaching" the students the facts of life.

      Today's Lesson:
      If you decide to go into IT for a living, don't expect to find a stable job that earns a decent income.

    9. Re:Completely wrong.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information, but how is this relevant? You're saying a federally subsidized organization shouldn't care about anyone but its own students?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    10. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it breaks the law you should not take away it's funding. Are you saying the state does not have the right to govern itself and make it's own decisions which are not unconstitutional?

      Or are you saying this is somehow unconstitutional? Beside just being angry and wanting revenge, what is you're actual argument?

    11. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators.

      Terrible.

      This, this, this. A thousand times, this.

    12. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The federal/state subsidies have been severely cut over the years resulting in tuition/fees/CoL per school year nearing $100K! Federal/state subsidies are constantly being cut and its becoming increasingly difficult for the school to keep the budget balanced without drastic changes. Likewise, UCSF has no undergraduate tech students to hire to help offset costs of hiring tech professionals living in San Francisco. Maybe I am just becoming desensitized to these constant cutbacks and compromises.

    13. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn it's from its.

    14. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trolling but I want to understand why you think this instance of globalization is not acceptable. There are a ton us US companies that pushed into markets across the world with brands that are ubiquitous now. Let's talk Coke and Nike as among the more visible ones. These companies ran local businesses into oblivion but that was ok because it was somewhere far from home.

      I'm sorry but this just looks to me like the chickens coming home to roost. And it's probably affecting less that 1% (citation needed) of actual US jobs so you should find something else to rage on.

    15. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately they're in the business of... well, business! Making money is the top priority, education is secondary.

    16. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll attempt there, but you miss the point of course. The ends don't justify the means.

    17. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UC is a system of campuses.

      What is stopping them from "outsourcing" their IT to another UC school which teaches system administration as part of it's curriculum. It seems like it would be a good opportunity to teach remote administration.

      What am I missing?

    18. Re: Completely wrong.... by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tuition for public universities are no where near 100k in California.
      For undergraduate non resident students is somewhere between 35k-40k. It's actually cheaper for non-resident grad students at ucsb.

      http://www.finaid.ucsb.edu/cos...

      UCSF is also significantly cheager than you're suggesting.

      https://finaid.ucsf.edu/newly-...

    19. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      h1b is supposed to bring in workers that employers "can't find" in the country already. but fuck, man, you should not be able to replace your *current workers* (who you already found and hired) with h1b. this system is just totally fucked up. and a school doing it.. a school that is supposed to be educating their future workers? a total insult to the entire u.c. system.. their own institutions can't produce a worker for them.

    20. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is legally very different. The public sector is obliged to act in the best interests of the state and are accountable to the people. Companies are not. Anyone who feels strongly about this can launch a citizen's initiated referendum or lobby the state government to penalize UCSF by reducing funding.

    21. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The argument I shall use is simple, if they can do something considered underhanded but legal, then so can I.

    22. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And luckily blacks abandone their kids so they turn to crime, thus leaving the mediocre white families and the HB-1 workers stealing their jobs.
      I guess the Asians will be alright.

    23. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? The university's function is to provide research and education, not IT jobs at rates far higher than their current market value.

    24. Re: Completely wrong.... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      You become so narcissistic that you begin to think you are the centre of the universe and that any obstacle you face is a moral outrage. Naturally you are outraged by taxes then.

      The trouble is that normal people actually associate with other individuals and have compassion and empathy for them. Normal, sound human beings actually want to help others who are suffering.

      Well then, it follows logically that if taxes == compassion & empathy, then the the only compassionate and empathetic thing to do is to tax 100% and distribute it where needed (we won't discuss who makes those decisions nor what standards/definitions they use).

      Government is a necessary evil and so the taxes that are necessary to support it are likewise a necessary evil, the less of both we can comfortably and as a practical matter do without, the more free and wealthy everyone is. Government is by its' very nature a restriction of freedoms and liberties. That's all government is; an organization set up for the creation and enforcement of rules forbidding, restricting, or compelling under threat of organized lethal force. It consumes the wealth generated by peoples' labor, produces nothing, and pays no interest while redistributing the rest to political cronies, towards expanding their personal power, and furthering their ideological agendas.

      In order to have a free & open society where individual rights and freedom are paramount and Rule of Law is the norm for rich and poor alike, government must be as local and decentralized as possible, putting the decisions affecting the peoples' lives and those who make them as close and accountable as possible to those they govern. Central governments must be kept only as powerful as necessary to maintain the functions of a nation, with only very narrow and compartmentalized domestic powers.

      If there is great power there that someone could benefit from, it will be bought/sold (or blackmailed etc) somehow by someone somewhere along the way. It's human nature. The only practical way to mitigate the risks are to break up the power and decentralize it, just as a network of standalone boxes are more resilient to intrusions than a server/dumb-client network, all things being equal.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    25. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumption doesn't mean anything, production is what matters. Your public sector spending logic is equivalent to you giving someone 100 dollars so that they can then buy a product from you for 50 dollars (the other 50 is consumed by the bureaucracy redistributing other people's money). Net result is that you just lost a product and 50 dollars. It would usually be far more efficient to invest the 100 dollars into your business, i.e. increase production.

    26. Re:Completely wrong.... by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      UC is a system of campuses.

      What is stopping them from "outsourcing" their IT to another UC school which teaches system administration as part of it's curriculum. It seems like it would be a good opportunity to teach remote administration.

      What am I missing?

      See, you're looking at the problem with common sense, they're looking at with dollar signs.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    27. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No by that logic taxes don't == compassion. You're thinking how you input information into a machine, not a human. Taxes are merely an instrument by which you can enact policies that give compassion. You can also do evil things with them like blow up children.

      If you disconnect for a while an actually think about the real world and real people for a while you might actually learn what problems people face, how they get in those situations. What their dreams, hopes and aspirations are and why paying more taxes would keep more jobs in America.

    28. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very salient point. Outsourcing will eventually turn full circle to slap everyone in the face when they realise service levels aren't what they used to be.

    29. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need more people like you within their board than the existing delusional bunch.

    30. Re: Completely wrong.... by saloomy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how much it costs. So long as the savings are passed on to new graduates, and the service levels don't degrade, please make education cheaper. If you have to go to foreign suppliers because domestic suppliers are too expensive, go foreign. Domestic suppliers will quickly realize they are uncompetitive and either change their pricing or change their product to deliver a competitive value proposition.

      Seriously, since when does being an American mean we are uncompetitive and in favor of protectionism?

    31. Re:Completely wrong.... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      This happens every day in corporate america. Why is it different in public universities? Because the educated proletariat in universities are somehow better than the rest of us?

      This is obviously a hard concept for you or the University to grasp, but if this University also has an IT/BIS/Computer Science program, they are marketing that to the American students. It's quite literally a sales pitch for an expensive investment into someone's future career.

      Needless to say, outsourcing the IT department doesn't exactly help that marketing strategy, as students would (accurately) see a career in IT as a rather wasted effort.

      Bottom line is I hope the University loses revenue and any Federal funding over this shit.

    32. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd say there are rational arguments for nation states? Arbitrary lines drawn over the globe by tribal apes? Rational? Yeah, right.

    33. Re:Completely wrong.... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators.

      Terrible.

      That "argument" boils down to "USA! USA! USA!" - might fit a Trump rally, but really is not argument at all.

      What is an argument is that service from abroad is likely to be unsatisfactory - at least because of distance, time zones, and the cultural differences, even if the provider is competent in general. And that last point is not a given.

      Of course, the UC also thinks its ok to let torture lawyer John Yoo teach constitutional law to impressive young students. On the other hand, they gave us UCSD Pascal and BSD UNIX. Overall, it looks like some talents, no judgement to me.

      --

      Stephan

    34. Re:Completely wrong.... by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class

      Yes, thats why I break a random window in the city every day. It keeps the money flowing and therefore increases employment and consumption.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    35. Re: Completely wrong.... by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do understand WHY foreign labour is cheaper, right?

      Despite common believe, IT employees are not able to live on half a can of mountain dew a day.
      The entire economy has to basically collapse in order for local labour to become "competitive" with countries where everything in the economy is cheaper.

      As an example; technical education in India is about US$1000 per year (http://qz.com/445500/the-cost-of-getting-a-decent-education-in-india-is-now-staggering/).
      According to GP, that would be roughly 35 times cheaper at the very least.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    36. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be under the impression that educating students is a goal for schools.
      Where's the profit in that?

    37. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously, since when does being an American mean we are uncompetitive and in favor of protectionism?

      Why don't we just turn that around then and hire outsourced offshore medical care for one of the big IT schools? Cheaper is better right? Protectionism is bad, right?

      Now these health-care workers with their cheaper education will find it hard to pay off those expensive student loans because no one will hire expensive old them.

      Protectionism is a word with many bad connotations. It is used to designate being discriminatory. It is used to prop up non-competitive business. It can also be used literally: meaning to be protect one's own. To assure, as much as is possible, the well-being of ourselves and our peers.

      If we don't protect ourselves, who will? Charity begins at home, and much of the anger these days is that what we've been "protecting" hasn't been our own legitimate competitive practices, but the predatory practices that make foreign labor more "competitive" simply because those workers don't enjoy the benefits and privileges that we consider important to keep our own workers and residents safe and healthy.

    38. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nation states are groups of people working with a more or less common interest.

      So are corporations.

      It just happens that one is defined primarily by geography and the other less so.

    39. Re:Completely wrong.... by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Why? Do they buy their pens from a company with a "Made in the USA" label on them?
      Do they only run their vehicles on oil from Texas?
      Do they buy only vehicles made in the USA - and if they do, do they ensure that EVERY component in the car is also made in the USA? If the bulbs for the indicators are made in China, should they lose funding?

      Your argument is grade-A batshit crazy. Outsourcing part of their IT operations is the same as outsizing where the car indicator bulbs are bought from. It's a measure which will make them more cost effective and efficient.

    40. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Despite common believe, IT employees are not able to live on half a can of mountain dew a day."

      That's "belief", and I don't think Mountain Dew comes in cans... WTF.

    41. Re: Completely wrong.... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      We've been saying this about HP for 20 years now. "Sooner or later, service levels, product quality and employee quality/morale will degenerate to the point that nobody will buy their stuff." A large institution can circle the drain for a long time.

    42. Re:Completely wrong.... by rworne · · Score: 5, Informative

      It isn't exactly working that way.

      No US workers are being laid off to hire H1B's. UCSF just cut their IT costs by going to an outside contractor and laying off a portion of their workforce - this is perfectly legal. And just so happens to be the way the system is rigged to get around laws protecting US workers. The contractor is able to supply IT workers at a lower cost per head than the existing employees because they use H1Bs that work for considerably less salary. UCSF benefits from less employee overhead, and the contracting firm gets paid the H1B's salary plus a bit more for profit.

      By inserting the contractor between the company and the H1B workers, companies are immune from H1B restrictions.

      Just about every H1B story that hits the news (SCE, Disney, etc.) use this method.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    43. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup...more "progressives" costing Americans their jobs.

    44. Re: Completely wrong.... by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Informative

      As an example; technical education in India is about US$1000 per year (http://qz.com/445500/the-cost-of-getting-a-decent-education-in-india-is-now-staggering/).
      According to GP, that would be roughly 35 times cheaper at the very least.

      Technical "education", in India, is also hardly worth the ink written to spell those words.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    45. Re: Completely wrong.... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      How is Chipotle doing these days?

    46. Re: Completely wrong.... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Technical "education", in India, is also hardly worth the ink written to spell those words.

      It's apparently sufficient to outsource jobs to.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    47. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, arbitrary lines by tribal apes. You are rationalizing, not being rational.

    48. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than that, it's basically sending US Money out of the country, instead of keeping it in the country and boosting your own local economy.

      Bad times for you guys.

    49. Re:Completely wrong.... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      How about because they are funded by American taxpayers they have a higher duty to employ employ Americans - if nothing else so those Americans can earn money and keep paying taxes so they can keep their funding.
      Only an idiot bites the hand that feeds it. It's bad enough when corporations can't figure out that they rely on Americans having good paying jobs to BUY their products so replacing all the American workers with cheap Asian ones is a bad idea - the Asian ones can't buy your products, if they wanted to - they wouldn't be cheap anymore, but now the market that used to buy it can't either. But sadly - that is always the next CEO's problem, the current CEO only cares about this quarter's earnings because that determines his bonus and the impact of gradually reducing the average income of the entire country won't be felt for several years by the people selling shit.

      But when public services - which are directly tax-funded, can't figure out that all their money comes out the pockets of people who earn wages, that's a whole other LEVEL of stupid. Especially since, as tax-funded public services - they are not beholden to shareholders and bonus incentives - they don't have any reason to care mostly about this quarter's earnings, and what they ARE beholden to is the public good - since the public pays them for that and should STOP paying them if they no longer serve it (i.e. take their taxfunding and give it to another university).

      Universities aren't supposed to be profit making anyway. They are supposed to be KNOWLEDGE-making. University fees SHOULD be far below what is needed to pay for what it does and the taxpayer filling in the gap - because universities aren't supposed to make money, they are supposed to make something far more valuable: useful, freely-available, public knowledge.
      By the way: first step to get that back: make it illegal to patent university research again, if a university produces useful research it should be public domain for anybody else to develop into products. Encouraging researchers to do it themselves (the supposed justification for the law) is stupid. Firstly because good researchers are rarely good businessmen and you won't get the best companies selling the product this way, secondly because it denies the public as a whole the full fruits of their investment (which should be multiple competing products based on that research) and thirdly because it encourages the researchers with the best discoveries to actually leave academia and go and sell one of those discoveries instead of staying where they are and making many more discoveries.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    50. Re: Completely wrong.... by silentcoder · · Score: 0

      Then how come somebody with a Technical Education in India is about to take your job ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    51. Re:Completely wrong.... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      The problem with bean counters is that they are usually not even very good at counting beans efficiently.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    52. Re: Completely wrong.... by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Well then, it follows logically that if taxes == compassion & empathy, then the the only compassionate and empathetic thing to do is to tax 100% and distribute it where needed (we won't discuss who makes those decisions nor what standards/definitions they use).

      Why is it that so many people seem to think in such extremes? Like the only two legitimate options are 0% tax for everyone and 100% tax for everyone? The only two ways to drive are 100 mph and stopped.

      Is this supposed to be a rhetorical device? "If a little is good, then too much can not exist." Everything that follows a patently ridiculous claim is going to be viewed with suspicion and doubt: it makes the writer look incapable of reasonable argument.

      In order to have a free & open society where individual rights and freedom are paramount and Rule of Law is the norm for rich and poor alike

      Access to the Law has a cost and is inherently more available to the rich. If access to the Law is paid by the communal wealth of your small neighborhood, then it is more accessible by rich neighborhoods. Rich people and residents of rich neighborhoods have a vested interest in direct control. If equal access to the Law is your norm, then rich people have to pay for the poor people, and rich neighborhoods have to pay for the poor neighborhoods.

    53. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's completely different -- consumer dollars are paying for the lightbulb. Taxpayer dollars are paying for UCSF IT. I really don't give a sh*t what UCSF does, however I do expect the $ they pull from my paycheck to stay in the Uni, not drift out to a subcontractor nor H1B. I don't smell business decision, I smell nepotism and kick back. These are Drs we're talking about, historically the worst businessmen in the world.

      Btw overseas IT is completely shitty, I wonder why UCSF even bothers...just have the balls to cancel it all together.

         

    54. Re:Completely wrong.... by sg_oneill · · Score: 0

      Consumption doesn't mean anything, production is what matters. Your public sector spending logic is equivalent to you giving someone 100 dollars so that they can then buy a product from you for 50 dollars (the other 50 is consumed by the bureaucracy redistributing other people's money). Net result is that you just lost a product and 50 dollars. It would usually be far more efficient to invest the 100 dollars into your business, i.e. increase production.

      Weird little economy your fantasizing about there where people make things then, uh, put them in a hole or something (because consumption means nothing). Meanwhile that bureacracy is spending $50 at someone elses store while you lay off staff.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    55. Re:Completely wrong.... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      No kidding, THIS is the big reason America is falling apart. Greed that steals American jobs and gives them to non-Americans.

    56. Re: Completely wrong.... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      Because someone in the accounting/management bureaucracy has looked at the dollar amounts and no further. Heaven forfend that they cut fat where the fat really is - in said bureaucracy.

    57. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you and at what point this is going to stop? The plan is left the states without a single job or what?? This is just ridiculous!!

    58. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you do the math ,

      total money * convert in INR / Number of employees / number of years :
      50 * 65000000 / 100 / 5 = 6500000 = approx 100,000 USD

      For that kind of money, you can get Engineers from IIT/NIT who would be so many times better than the folks presently .

      Now I know they would not hire engineers from IIT/NIT , but still, it enough money to hire absolutely great talent and still save like 30% of the money .

    59. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's 49 new Trump voters.

    60. Re:Completely wrong.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators.

      Terrible.

      The football team needs that money - they had to hire in-house parole officers, and they don't come cheap you know.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    61. Re:Completely wrong.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Currently a UCSF student. Many people don't realize this but UCSF is exclusively a medical professional school with no undergraduate degrees. Students here are a minority compared to the system of hospitals run by professionals. https://www.ucsf.edu/about/eco...

      I wouldn't be too smug, because looking around, most medical professionals aren't from the US.these days, and perhaps non-citizens should replace US citizen doctors.

      Maybe its time for UCSF to go under. That'll save a lot of money

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they work for about 1/5 the cost of a US worker.
      It doesn't matter whether or not they're competent. The bottom line is what the University (and previously, places such as Disney) sees.

    63. Re: Completely wrong.... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      The two are far from equivalent. You can get a degree in India in one year, and if your parents are well connected you don't have to attend classes - just the threat of losing your job is enough to make teachers give us pass. And cheating is just part of the system. Like in the US, there are good schools and diploma mills. Your outsourcer is heavy on the latter - it's the only way that they can complete with the other diploma mill loaded outsourcing firms. Once everything is outsourced, why go to school anyway? To get more debt for a jobless future? Excessive outsourcing should be seen as a national security issue. You outsource too much, not only do you gut your economy, but you become dependent on other countries that may not have your views. Look at China and the China Sea spat, their position on Taiwan and their theft of technology to dump high quality specialized steel in the market. Blame Nixon for opening the door.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    64. Re:Completely wrong.... by ti1ion · · Score: 1

      You are setting up an argument that was not made by the original commenter. If you pay attention to the Slashdot debate, the prevailing attitude is that this is wrong no matter where it occurs. Perhaps you could elaborate on why you feel it is *not* wrong when it happens in "corporate america" [sic]. What we are talking about here is H-1B visas and the abuse of the system by business. As you must be well aware, businesses claim that there are not enough qualified Americans to fill all the tech jobs that need to be filled and this means the US needs to bring in more qualified tech workers from abroad. Politicians who get their money from such businesses have elevated the debate to the national level and increased the number of foreign workers allowed in the country, using the same business argument they are being fed by their backers. Schools have been blamed for not teaching enough tech and a wide ranging debate on how to increase the numbers of home grown tech workers has ensued. There are whole segments of the education industry, sometimes funded by governments at all levels, that are promoting tech work as a secure and life-long career path. And all of this is a lie, from beginning to end. There is no shortage of US tech workers. They are everywhere. Instead, the real travesty here is that a visa program promoted and executed for the expressed purpose of filling a shortage is a complete sham! This program needs to be shut down immediately, or at least severely curtailed.

      Look, if a business of any kind decides that it will outsource its IT infrastructure and workers to to a foreign country, that is one thing. All the buildings and computers and networking gear and workers would then be located and employed in that foreign country. Not something an American might want, but business may dictate it. But to use a lie to bring in foreign workers onto US soil and fire US workers for the purpose of having a non-citizen workforce that can be rotated/replaced at will and paid less than prevailing wages and benefits? That's a different matter. And this lie is propagated at the highest levels of American government completely unchecked. American citizens need to do something about that. Just use your own head and think about this for a few minutes. How far could such lies go and how much of the American economy and workforce could they affect? THINK!

      There is a certain percentage of the American population (sadly, usually white and Republican) that thinks their fellow Americans have it too easy, or that they are too lazy, or some such. These Americans have swallowed the notion that if "you" want to compete, then "you" must work for the same amount an Indian worker would accept, or a Mexican migrant might accept (because these foreigners know they have no rights and can be fired for any reason at any time and thrown out of the country). But Americans don't live in India, or Mexico. Americans have to live and survive in a country with a higher cost of living, not to mention the daily differences in the way life is lived in the US (like requiring a car). These Americans also usually think that they are somehow the exception, that they will succeed through hard work and unpaid overtime. That they deserve to be paid more because they accept no benefit, temporary, contract work. They will soon learn that this is now a dream and that they too will be replaced by younger, more desperate, workers (or foreigners living among them while having few rights).

      As much as we don't like outsourcing to other countries, the long term effect of such outsourcing is that the cost of labor in that foreign country rises and there is a more level playing field. This is even happening in China and that country is struggling with the consequences, just like the US. But bringing the foreign labor into the US and displacing American workers is a much more evil way of keeping labor poor. It does not bring the same benefits to the rest of the world, while destroying American labor at all levels. The US, and

    65. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the rich ends up paying for it, that may actually be a good things. Our "trickle down" system where the rich makes all the money relies heavily on the rich also spending much of their money for the economy to still be healthy.

    66. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxpayers shouldn't have to foot any of the bill for the extended childhoods and cruise liner accommodations found at large state universities, especially when they don't even use that money to provide jobs for Americans like in this case.

    67. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate welfare disguised as education.

    68. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Are you really that stupid? Have you been to these things called grocery stores?

    69. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they have more certification's than you or I do.

      They are easy to get when you know the questions and answers walking into the test centre. Braindumping is very common there.

      SOURCE: Personal experience. A very large city trading type company we provided specialist Oracle IT for went to India to save some money. We worked with them for a year doing the handover, all onsite. When we finally left the customer site they managed to make such a balls up of it we were back sub-contracted by the Indian company to fix their mess. And now in the present day the Indians are out and we are back as the sole supplier and we charged them extra for our services.

    70. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China, India, the EU, Japan and everyone else in the world protects their own workers and industries from foreign competition, while our laws and corporations do everything possible to screw our workers out of salary or a job using cheap offshore labor. This isn't about nationalism, but economic survival, and our declining median wages show we are not doing a good job of that.

    71. Re:Completely wrong.... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Don't worry the Democrats will protect us from those evil Republicans. /sarcasm

      While the above paints the Ds in a a bad light the Rs are just as bad on the H-!B issue it is just they lack the standout champion of expansion that is Senator Klobuchar. The last time I wrote Senator Amy Klobuchar on the H-1B issue I got a very patronizing response back, which is par for the course from here on the rare occasion I get a response, where she stated that it was the Republican's fault because they failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform that had her amendment to increase the number of H-1B visas.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    72. Re:Completely wrong.... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      America was founded on greed. American independence was fought over corporate taxes. What's kept America great was the steady importation of smart well educated people from elsewhere.

    73. Re: Completely wrong.... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      For undergraduate non resident students is somewhere between 35k-40k. It's actually cheaper for non-resident grad students at ucsb.

      Hmm... I'm not sure that you are correct. If you are talking about "Graduate Academic" for UCSF and "Graduate program" fro UCSB, then it is not a good comparison. The UCSF program is for only 9 months and cost $17,310 for tuition (+$15,102 for non-resident); whereas, UCSB program is for 12 months and cost $12,294 (+$15,102 for non-resident).

    74. Re: Completely wrong.... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I misread. NVM. :P

    75. Re: Completely wrong.... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      It's made by Pepsi Co. and it comes in cans, bottles, draught, etc and is a staple drink among many American hackers. What did you think he was talking about anyway?

    76. Re: Completely wrong.... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      "Despite common believe, IT employees are not able to live on half a can of mountain dew a day."

      That's "belief", and I don't think Mountain Dew comes in cans... WTF.

      You can buy it in every grocery store around here in cans.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    77. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the bull taught in MBA schools getting endowments from companies who want that kind of bad business taught. When you outsource everything to the lowest bidder, you may make some near term profits, but eventually you lose your intellectual property and expertise to your foreign competition. Eventually the "cheap labor" figures out they can do what you're doing, and don't need you anymore. Ask the many US companies who lost their business segment to Asian competitors they used to outsource to.

    78. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that wrong? I live in the USA. I am an American citizen. It is wrong for the government to have policies that benefit its own citizens instead of those of other countries?

    79. Re:Completely wrong.... by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Consumption without production means you're printing money somewhere. That can only lead to inflation and eventual collapse.

    80. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason you can get away with not vaccinating your kids. Everyone else is taking up the slack. How long can that last?

    81. Re:Completely wrong.... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      well if the H1B min wage has set at a high point then the contractors will be able to make an super low bid.

    82. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The consumption comes as a consequence of production. Some portion of the money you invest in production will go to wages, enabling employees to buy stuff. If your products are good, you might even export some, increasing the amount of wealth in your local economy. This is far better than handing over your money to the government in hopes that they will do something useful with it.

    83. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nationalism is never a particularly rational argument.

      Nationalism is a very rational argument. My ancestors fought and died to establish a government of, by, and for the people. The purpose of the government is to serve the citizens of the country. The purpose of the economy is to serve the citizens, not the other way around. When the government is modifying the rules such that the economy serves the interests of the government and foreigners over the interests of citizens, it's not doing its job.

      What's irrational about expecting the government to serve the interests of the citizens who established, fund, and defend the nation?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    84. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That "argument" boils down to "USA! USA! USA!" - might fit a Trump rally, but really is not argument at all.

      How is that not an argument? I expect the government of Mexico to serve the interests of the citizens of Mexico. I expect the government of China to serve the interests of the citizens of China. I expect the government of the USA to serve the interests of the citizens of the USA.

      What is an argument is that service from abroad is likely to be unsatisfactory - at least because of distance, time zones, and the cultural differences, even if the provider is competent in general. And that last point is not a given.

      When somebody else wants to fuck your wife do you quibble about whether or not his service will be satisfactory to her?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    85. Re:Completely wrong.... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Not pretending to know the exact merits in this particular case, but my guess would be it has more to do with San Francisco, 18 vacant positions relative to 49 employees. If you can't find the people you are kind of stuck.

      To typical /. Point #2: these employees are union, no? What does their collective bargaining agreement say about this?

      The better approach rather than outsourcing to India (or another state) would be for the IT labor pool to be shared across the Board of Regents schools, although I doubt they can really work that way given how they are structured. I would think Berkley and UCLA (maybe Irvine and San Diego as well) would be in a better position to lead / handle common services, and limit dedicated staff to dedicated needs. They need to try to leverage economies of scale and synergies and all that crap.

    86. Re:Completely wrong.... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      then university's should be hiring students for in house jobs and not outsiders

    87. Re:Completely wrong.... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      As a tax payer I do not want to pay for an entitled American who thinks he is worth 6 figures when someone else can do it cheaper and still get the job done

    88. Re: Completely wrong.... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Hmm...That doesn't seem far off from what mine cost at about $1400 per year. I went to a local community college for my technical skills. I only did an IT Management degree at university, and that was basically just a resume filler and not exactly something I needed.

    89. Re: Completely wrong.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how much it costs. So long as the savings are passed on to new graduates, and the service levels don't degrade, please make education cheaper. If you have to go to foreign suppliers because domestic suppliers are too expensive, go foreign. Domestic suppliers will quickly realize they are uncompetitive and either change their pricing or change their product to deliver a competitive value proposition. Seriously, since when does being an American mean we are uncompetitive and in favor of protectionism?

      The thing is, unless there is some egregious waste, there isn't a way to significantly reduce cost without affecting quality. As Mwvdlee said below, the reason outsourcing companies can charge less is that their employees are living in a third-world country. In order for American companies to compete, the US would have to become a third-world country.

      You wonder when Americans became less competitive. I wonder when they forgot that you get what you pay for.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    90. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just described nationalism in economic terms. So, it is rational after all.

    91. Re:Completely wrong.... by scamper_22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sometimes irony is too much.

      I imagine the university will also have the cognitive dissonance to talk about STEM and the information economy and the future of highly skilled work. We need to educate our kids in technology so they can have jobs in the future!

      By that they mean the kids can take courses at the university to bring business to the university.

      All the while doing this to actual tech workers.

    92. Re:Completely wrong.... by RenderSeven · · Score: 3, Informative

      Think of how much money they could save if they outsourced their bean counters. Not to mention being awash in poetic justice.

    93. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nationalism is never a particularly rational argument."

      No, but 'racism' is. Care to discuss?

      Why do you believe that white people, and only white people, should not be allowed to simply live around their own kind?

      You obviously believe that white people are somehow superior to other races, and that by denying other races the ability to live around white people, we are denying them something. Care to explain what that is?

    94. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not nationalism; it's protectionism. If you're going to resort to ad hominems rather than actually debating the point, at least get it right.

    95. Re:Completely wrong.... by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I expect the government of Mexico to serve the interests of the citizens of Mexico. I expect the government of China to serve the interests of the citizens of China. I expect the government of the USA to serve the interests of the citizens of the USA.

      I don't. The USA was established as a more enlightened nation, one that understood the notion of inalienable rights, including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The proper role of such an enlightened government is to guarantee those rights and freedoms to all people within its jurisdiction, not just to those who through an accident of birth acquired the label of "citizen". Further, such a government should take the view that all humans everywhere deserve the same guarantees, and that there is no reason to favor one group over another, though the government's ability to provide guarantees is limited to its own territory.

      I expect other nations to be short-sighted and parochial. I expect mine to be exceptional. Yes, taking the high road often means some short-term disadvantages and pain, but moral leadership will win in the long term.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    96. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they couldn't find Americans with the skills necessary for the job. Perfectly valid use of outsourcing. Okey-dokey.

    97. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxes are NOT good for the economy, by definitions it's a misallocation of resources.

    98. Re:Completely wrong.... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators.

      Terrible.

      Oh, shut up, you whiny liberal bitches. This is the free market at work and it is a glorious thing. If you work in IT and your job is sent off shore, it simply must mean that your work is not worth what you were being paid for it. No other explanation makes sense. Right? After all, who would send your job offshore, to a someone of dubious skills, suffer the additional security risks, management overhead, language barriers, etc. just to save a buck. No, that can't be it. The free market would never let that happen. /s

    99. Re: Completely wrong.... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      Why is that wrong? I live in the USA. I am an American citizen. It is wrong for the government to have policies that benefit its own citizens instead of those of other countries?

      If you go by Adam Smith, in a voluntary exchange, both sides win. The university could argue that it has a fiduciary duty to spend taxpayer money as efficient as possible, and if they can buy the same service abroad cheaper, that's the way to maximise the amount of education it can provide for a given budget. So they can either give a better education to their students or increase the revenue of US companies. And the universities job is education, not subsidising the economy.

      And on a national level, if the university needs fewer local IT people for comparatively low-paying jobs like IT infrastructure maintenance and help desks, that leaves more well-trained US people to go to Silicon Valley and invent the next high-value product. iPhones are made in China, but only 1.8% of the price stays with Chinese labourers, while nearly 60% are profits realised by Apple in the US. If Apple made the iPhones in the US, they would probably go broke, and neither side had any of the revenue (or phones).

      --

      Stephan

    100. Re:Completely wrong.... by silentcoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Like the Futurama episode where Hermes realizes the number one factor harming the company's performance is the ridiculous performance assessments he keeps doing and fires himself.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    101. Re:Completely wrong.... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      They're corporations. They're all corporations. You missed this?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    102. Re: Completely wrong.... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Corporations rely on innovation and customer service to get 'established'.

      Then they rely on the government(s) to sustain that establishment.

      You think Apple will pay the EU that tax bill? Not unless the US fails to smack the EU down. And you think you can just make a Lightning cable without involving Apple Inc? Not unless you're in China. And well, China has its own rules.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    103. Re:Completely wrong.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Consumption without production means you're printing money somewhere. That can only lead to inflation and eventual collapse.

      Consumption without production leads to prices rising which leads to companies increasing their production capabilities which leads them to hiring more people. You can't run a market economy if you're afraid of prices fluctuating, since it's that fluctuation which guides production.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    104. Re:Completely wrong.... by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      "Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class"

      The ONLY legitimate reason to pay taxes is to fund government services necessary to serve the people. In every way paying taxes to stimulate the economy is a failed experiment, and has led us to this state of unsustainable debt and crippled government.

      You have come pretty close to claiming the broken window fallacy works for government. No, it does not. Money will flow if you get the heck out of the way.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    105. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, since when does being an American mean we are uncompetitive and in favor of protectionism?

      When we realized that we can't compete with third world economies without adopting a third world standard of living. You'd think this would be simple.

    106. Re: Completely wrong.... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      and the service levels don't degrade

      But it's clear that's exactly what's going to happen. HCL got the contract. They are professional service level degraders. Boeing paid them millions for the control software for the AirBus, and it was so bad they had to fire HCL and spend 2 years re-writing the software.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    107. Re:Completely wrong.... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 0

      You'd say there are rational arguments for nation states? Arbitrary lines drawn over the globe by tribal apes? Rational? Yeah, right.

      They are not arbitrary. They are drawn that way to create a defensible position to defend resources from marauding bands of killers and pillagers. The marauders are still there, but some of them have learned better techniques than violence and killing.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    108. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter how much it costs. So long as the savings are passed on to new graduates

      Sorry but the savings will be used to hire more administrative & diversity bureaucrats. More safe-spaces will benefit the construction industry though.
      Maybe this won't come to pass as the education bubble is about to burst.

    109. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another example of this - after an agreement for outsourcing is signed, largest HMO lays off majority of IT workers. Some workers become employees of the US-based IT company that won the contract. Slowly, the US based IT workers are replaced by Indian-based counterparts. Major funding for the HMO comes from US tax dollars (Medicare, Medical, etc.). Some of those dollars are now funneled, indirectly to off-shore jobs....not helping the US economy.

    110. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking serious? Of course Mountain Dew comes in cans you pillock, most soft drinks do.

    111. Re: Completely wrong.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Because they take my tax dollars under threat of imprisonment or death. A corporation does not.

      You stupid motherfucker.

      Oh, really? They don't?

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2016/08/21/why-did-mylan-hike-epipen-prices-400-because-they-could

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    112. Re: Completely wrong.... by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having worked several times with these outsourcing companies, I can say fairly definitively that it isn't. These people are so breathtakingly inept that it boggles the imagination.

      The decision to oursource is *always* made by pointy-haired MBAs who are unable to make the connection between cost of labour and quality of labour.

    113. Re: Completely wrong.... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      ...and why paying more taxes would keep more jobs in America.

      There is no practical scenario where that is actually true.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    114. Re: Completely wrong.... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      "SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. ... Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer."

      - Thomas Paine, 1776

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    115. Re: Completely wrong.... by wardk · · Score: 1

      Boeing software for Airbus?

    116. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I would at least hope this puts an end to any registration for it's Comp. Sci. program. If you're not going to be hiring any, why pay them to make new ones?

    117. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class (which in turn feeds businesses).

      Sure. That's what we need. We need to create plenty of government jobs.

      Take a look at third world nations. You'll either find that most of the jobs are government jobs or the most highly-desirable jobs are government jobs.

      Taxation and government have their place and are necessary. However, the levying and paying of taxes is not what grows an economy. Properly, the tax money should be used to infrastructure (transportation, telecommunications, education, etc.) to increase efficiency and decrease the cost of doing private sector business.

    118. Re:Completely wrong.... by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      This just goes to show you they don't even value their own CS degree and would rather hire someone from India...

      This move should decimate their CS deoartment

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    119. Re:Completely wrong.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      The USA was established as a more enlightened nation, one that understood the notion of inalienable rights, including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

      For US CITIZENS not the whole fucking world.....

      These ideals are for the benefits of OUR citizens, not the expense of our citizens....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    120. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While true, the biggest issue is that they "know the price of everything but the value of nothing."

      Never is it more true with the accounting profession. Of course, they never question why their salaries are so high relative to "comparable" talent from India. After all, it's just numbers. An outsourced accountancy firm doesn't really even need to speak English.

    121. Re:Completely wrong.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      You'd say there are rational arguments for nation states? Arbitrary lines drawn over the globe by tribal apes? Rational? Yeah, right.

      So, your position is that it is irrational for tribal apes to demarcate the boundaries of their tribe? Who's really being irrational here?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    122. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so I'm going to wave the "Bullshit!" flag on that one.

      India, like many countries (including the USA) has schools that cover the whole range of standards, from poor to excellent. One of the legacies of British rule is a deep respect for education amongst the vast majority of Indians. Unfortunately, inequality is still rife in India and somewhat rooted in the caste system that still governs much of Indian life. The desperate do what they do the World over in such circumstances - whatever they see as necessary to escape poverty, including cheating exams, but there are schools in India that rival the best that the UK and USA can offer. Yes, technical education, that is obviously worth much more than whatever global social studies "education" that you received.

      Want to talk objectively about educational standards in some football schools? Or is it easier just to throw Hail Mary's down-field and hope that you don't get incepted.

    123. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one messed up view of the world. If not for taxes you'd have no police or roads to keep your economy moving. You need a stable platform to conduct business or you will not have a real economy.

    124. Re:Completely wrong.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on one thing: there shouldn't be *any* State or federal funding for any university. The same should be true of any funding, none should be coming at the expense of people, whose money is stolen via the violence of the State to provide anybody with any benefit.

      It's not your money. It belongs to the Federal Reserve; says so right on the bill. You're just borrowing it. So enough about how the government is stealing your money. You are already paying a bank just for the privilege of having money at all.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    125. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the other trick to this thingie called a "nation" is that you can't just move from one to the other willy-nilly.

      I read a while back, maybe 2005-ish or so, was around the time I was making minimum wage in a call center in the USA, that call center workers in Bangalore iirc were pulling down upper middle class wages and were actually living not too differently from upper middle class in the USA.

      If we want to say "booo on nationalism!" well then boo on nationalism! I should be able to move somewhere that the cost of living is within the means that a global corporation is willing to pay me. I currently live in flyover country, which means I enjoy a low cost of living. But there is nowhere else for me to go if there is no job available for me to work that will allow me to support myself.

      Also to speak to your point, I like living in a country where people understand that it's not sanitary to routinely shit in fields. I suppose the cost of living will always be somewhat higher somewhere there's universal basic sanitation, but I don't believe the disparity in cost of living can be explained that simply. How else were those call center workers I read about leading upper middle class lives on a dollar or two per hour?

      Until we have universal migration of labor everywhere on the globe, just like we have universal migration of capital, nationalism is a necessary evil.

      It doesn't need to be about keeping the gay vegan moooooooslims out at all.

    126. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a presumption based on zero fact and then make another presumption again with no facts. You clearly lack any historical context if you're making a statement like this. If the CCC had not built the Hoover dam then Vegas would likely not be one of the fastest growing cities in the country right now. Who funded the CCC to put people back to work? That's right, the Government, it absolutely had a tremendously beneficial effect on the our economy.

      Look back at our most prosperous and fastest periods of growth. What were the tax rates during that time? Notice how the economy collapsed after the Bush tax cuts? This asinine idea that trickle down economics is even a thing needs to die in a fire. Ayn Rand sure sounds smart but those are some pretty terrible ideas espoused. The Libertarian dream is based on the strongest surviving which is more of a reversion of our economic situation. In modern times there is simply no reason people have to suffer anymore. Greed is the biggest obstacle left for us as a species to overcome.

    127. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting money in the pockets of people in this country, my neighbors and family and those who share our values, is better than paying someone from another country, all other things being equal.

      And in the case of contract IT work, the financial savings are not that great. They're looking to get out of treating workers well.

    128. Re: Completely wrong.... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Oops - I meant the DreamLiner.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    129. Re:Completely wrong.... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And YOUR employer feels exactly the same way about you.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    130. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just goes to show you they don't even value their own CS degree and would rather hire someone from India...

      This move should decimate their CS deoartment

      I have often thought colleges and universities which refuse to hire their own graduates are selling snake oil. A local community college demands job applicants provide an official transcript. not a copy of their diploma, in addition to a number of years work experience during the hiring process.

    131. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "smart well educated people from elsewhere"

      What's that have to do with Indian H1Bs? I mean, you _have_ worked with some of them, right?

    132. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Nationalism is never a particularly rational argument.

      Depends. If your entire aim is to run things as a business and make a profit then nationalism has no place in the equation. However it could be argued that government entities and entities that are at least partly government funded have a responsibility to the citizens of that government and that ensuring jobs and other benefits go to those citizens is an intangible goal of such organizations.

      Does the University of California meet this criteria? Hard to say. But one thing is for certain, the money paid to that outsourcing firm is going to benefit the community of its workers in India, not in the US.

    133. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be about keeping the gay vegan moooooooslims out at all.

      Can we keep them out anyway? Because of the gayness and the explosions?

      Or, more importantly because a "nation" is collection of people with common blood and/or ideas. If you let in too many people who don't share your ideas and give them decision making power, eventually your nation ceases to be. If you rather liked the ideas of your nation this becomes very bad for you. Like say what happened in Lebanon.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    134. Re:Completely wrong.... by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Funding government services and stimulating the economy are not mutually exclusive options. Infrastructure and education can be government services, but they also bolster the economy.

    135. Re:Completely wrong.... by drnb · · Score: 1

      Nationalism is never a particularly rational argument.

      However there is a much more reasonable argument. Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class (which in turn feeds businesses). But if that work goes offshore, then that tax is going offshore and stops being useful to the taxpayer from an economic perspective.

      Your alternative argument is absolutely nationalistic. Nationalism, like Libertarianism, is not defined by its extreme fringe. Nationalism at its core is giving your country's interests a high priority. This can manifest in rational economics as you discussed.

    136. Re: Completely wrong.... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      So your saying that I can get a visa to India, and get a PhD in IT for about U$25K and probably live like a King while I'm doing it?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    137. Re: Completely wrong.... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Unless you're the poster, I would ask them what they think which. government expenditures would serve the purpose they believe justifies taxation to stimulate the economy. Public works, you and I actually agree. Subsidizing alternative energy systems, I'm not sure looks government is doing it quite right most of the time.

      Specifics.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    138. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is still worth enough to be used on a check box to get that worker into the US replacing an American worker who is actually trained and educated on how to do it.

      The quality of the education doesn't have to be worth anything so long as the worth of the degree is enough to get brought into the US and trained by the ones they are supposed to replace.

    139. Re: Completely wrong.... by bayankaran · · Score: 1
      Wow...classic FUD.

      I am an Indian. I have no idea what you are talking about.

      You can get a degree in India in one year, and if your parents are well connected you don't have to attend classes - just the threat of losing your job is enough to make teachers give us pass.

      Do you think the above is a common occurrence in India (or anywhere else in the world) or some one off event?

      The rest of your assertions is also utter nonsense. Are you Donald Trump by any chance?

      What the university did is stupid! But your hypothesis is worse than stupid, its bordering on xenophobic fear mongering.

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
    140. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should lose government funding. ..or is not having any working computers going to be punishment enough?

    141. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've fallen into the trap of universalism, that there exists some universal culture beneath our surface cultures and that deep down we're all the same. But we're not. So, no, those "rights" and "freedoms" are not for all people, because not all people agree they exist or even want them to, and unreciprocated altruism is a very bad idea because you will be very nice to people thinking they will then learn to be nice to you but they won't. They will still hate you and want to exploit or kill you. This is why we can't go invade Iraq and then say "you're free now! Be a free western democracy!" No, they say "oh, we can be whatever we want to be now? We want to be an Islamic government" and we kept having to try to swat down the Iraqis writing Sharia law into their constitution and then it all collapsed into tribal/muslim bullshit as soon as we left.

      The purpose of the government is not to be your conscience and humor your universalist fantasies. It is to protect the way of life of our unique, and exceptional people. And it is absolutely not to impose burdens on our people in order to serve foreigners. That's some weird slave morality, and I do not share it with you.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    142. Re:Completely wrong.... by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

      No, because as a taxpayer, I would like my money to go to supporting my fellow US citizens.

    143. Re: Completely wrong.... by saloomy · · Score: 1

      Time will tell. If the company falls apart at the seams then this short stint of outsourcing will be over soon as the companies who participated fall apart. If not, then they will be more competitive for doing so, and it will have been a good choice.

    144. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's irrational about expecting the government to serve the interests of the citizens who established, fund, and defend the nation?

      Well, duh, it's 2016.

    145. Re: Completely wrong.... by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      As an example; technical education in India is about US$1000 per year (http://qz.com/445500/the-cost-of-getting-a-decent-education-in-india-is-now-staggering/). According to GP, that would be roughly 35 times cheaper at the very least.

      Technical "education", in India, is also hardly worth the ink written to spell those words.

      If that were true, American companies (and universities) wouldn't be outsourcing their IT to India, because the Indian workers would be incompetent due to their poor education. Clearly that's not the case.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    146. Re:Completely wrong.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Although if the people you are hiring are not US nationals, then the money is not being fully reinvested into the community that UC serves and relies on for at least part of their operating income.

      Of course, H1-Bs do pay US taxes, but much of their discretionary income is sent back home, which is then used overseas, making H1-Bs a much less efficient consumption source for the US in terms of circulation of money locally. Since they are not complete black holes in terms of taxes, an H1-B is justified when they fill roles that no US person could. However, when they displace US persons in jobs, they decrease the amount of money in the US domestic market per capita.

    147. Re:Completely wrong.... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the government is not to be your conscience and humor your universalist fantasies. It is to protect the way of life of our unique, and exceptional people. And it is absolutely not to impose burdens on our people in order to serve foreigners.

      "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". -- Thomas Jefferson, with some help from Franklin and Adams, 1776, before there even was a United States you or anyone could be a citizen of.

      "Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. [....] Liberty consists of doing anything which does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of each man has only those borders which assure other members of the society the enjoyment of these same rights." -- Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 1789

      "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood." -- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948

      Those are exceptional thoughts by exceptional people. What you exhibit is small, petty and shortsighted egoism. Life is not a zero sum game.

      --

      Stephan

    148. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd think they would teach STEM so they can get students that can train their Indian replacements much more efficiently. Perhaps that should be a class they give: Training Indian Replacements 201.

    149. Re: Completely wrong.... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, and what he said was clearly overstating the case. But with that said, fraud/deceptive tactics are more accepted in India than in the US. You can find lots of counter-examples, because there's a lot of overlap in the curves, but the means and the medians are as stated (though I wouldn't want to say by how much, as it's quite difficult to measure accurately).

      OTOH, it's also clearly (and unfortunately) the case that the acceptance of fraud has been increasing recently in the US.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    150. Re: Completely wrong.... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how hospitals operate at all. The time delay is likely to be measured in decades and lives.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    151. Re:Completely wrong.... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1

      When somebody else wants to fuck your wife do you quibble about whether or not his service will be satisfactory to her?

      No, I assert that even given that the activities of screwing the milkman and getting supper are mutually exclusive, now that the screwing is over, surely then, supper may now, logically, be got.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    152. Re: Completely wrong.... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There have been many cases where the people outsourced to were incompetent. Many of those companies survived to reverse their decision...of course they needed to hire a new IT department. And sometimes that appeared to be the intent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    153. Re:Completely wrong.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The thing is... I know that the contracting company is how they get around it, but how do the contracting companies justify the H1-Bs? Shouldn't they need to hire US citizens as well. This is where I think it is more than fishy. Yes, UC is doing something legal, although honestly they should (and do) know the real deal and shouldn't be doing that.

      We need to find and close these contracting company loopholes.

    154. Re:Completely wrong.... by psmoot · · Score: 1

      This university should lose it's state and federal funding for doing something like this.

      Really? A graduate school focused on medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry decided to cut their IT overhead by outsourcing? As a California taxpayer and parent of two UC students, that sounds like a really great idea. I'd much rather they spent their budget on professors, TAs, teaching equipment, and the like. They're a university, not an IT jobs program.

    155. Re:Completely wrong.... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I could accept that the boundaries were seen as arbitrary (but others question that). What I can't accept is that this implies that nationalism is irrational. I will grant that extreme nationalism is irrational, but moderate nationalism is quite defensible. E.g., the value of the currency you buy things with is what you can buy with it. And the currency is "guaranteed" by the government. (I.e., "Pay your tax bill in our officially recognized currency, or we'll steal your property, and possibly your life.".) This gives the currency value to those living in the country, regardless of how arbitrary its borders. Now if actions are taken that depress the "things you can buy without a given amount of currency" it disadvantages everyone living in that country.

      Now as to whether such groups should exist, one would need to come up with an alternative (organization?) to replace them. One thing that every government does is claim the exclusive right (which it may delegate) to certain uses of force within it's boundaries. This function tends to decrease the level of violence within the society, and is thus desirable. Whether it comes at too high a cost is a legitimate question, but needs to be answered directly rather than just have an answer assumed. Governments may also do other things, but I am not aware of any other function that is claimed by all governments. Not even taxation. I am aware that this makes some "criminal gangs" count as governments, and I believe that this is correct. In history such gangs have frequently morphed into governments during periods of the decay of wider governments. See China and Warlords for one example.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    156. Re: Completely wrong.... by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I take it you have never worked with HCL.

      We finally got rid of them at my company after the contract expired. Holy hell our IT went into the toilet when they were here.

    157. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nation isn't an abstract notion. In case you haven't noticed, you live in a sovereign state and the rule of law you live under is predicated on its existence.

      To ignore it is irrational.

    158. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sg_oneill wants cronies to be enriched instead of having ordinary people benefit.

    159. Re:Completely wrong.... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      There is nothing nationalistic about this at all. If I pay taxes, I'd like those taxes to be spent in the country (school) and not for that entity to then send the money directly offshore at the expense of my neighbors, or myself, for that matter.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    160. Re:Completely wrong.... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Or, more importantly because a "nation" is collection of people with common blood and/or ideas. If you let in too many people who don't share your ideas and give them decision making power, eventually your nation ceases to be. If you rather liked the ideas of your nation this becomes very bad for you.

      Well, the US is certainly not a nation of common blood (melting pot) nor ideas (have you seen our politics, and not just now either, but throughout history) I'd hazard most of the population would still rather live here than elsewhere.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    161. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason folks will argue against Nationalism, Big Gub'ment, and other Pro-Home ideals is that US has an inherited fear of government... they're still afraid of King George coming across the big lake to conquer them. And if not some king, then the suspicions fall on its own establishment. Any establishment is historically evil, and apparently, only homesteading in the wilds of nature is true-living whilst only the occasional trip to town for goods & services.

    162. Re:Completely wrong.... by psmoot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nationalism is a very rational argument.

      I respectfully disagree. The older I get, the fewer reasons I see to make a distinction between "us" and "them" other than selfishness.

      My ancestors fought and died to establish a government of, by, and for the people.

      Your ancestors and mine fought and died to protect our inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that to protect these rights, we institute governments. Government is a means, not an end. But I split hairs...

      The purpose of the government is to serve the citizens of the country. The purpose of the economy is to serve the citizens, not the other way around.

      Yes, and in this case, the state government is serving the people by running a public university dedicated to teaching medical skills. Running an IT jobs program and spending more than necessary on IT staff does not serve the students or taxpayers of California. You may want more IT training and jobs in the US but that's not UCSF's mission or expertise. They quite reasonably decided to let someone else handle that and focus on their core job.

    163. Re:Completely wrong.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, they seemed to be very top heavy with IT staff. UCSF has 1686 academic staff (plus other staff). They've got 565 people in their IT department. That's 1 IT person for every 3 profs? Granted, outsourcing is not a good idea at all but they definitely could have used with a good paring down.

    164. Re:Completely wrong.... by judoguy · · Score: 2

      Part of the reason we pay taxes is because they are good for the economy, as they keep money flowing in the economy and increases employment in the public sector thus increasing consumption by the working class

      Yes, thats why I break a random window in the city every day. It keeps the money flowing and therefore increases employment and consumption.

      Ah, the Zorg strategy!

      That's why Detroit is the ultimate national model for the Democrat party.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    165. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The older I get, the fewer reasons I see to make a distinction between "us" and "them" other than selfishness.

      The older I get the more I realize "us" and "them" are not the same, and "them" don't reciprocate your altruism.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    166. Re: Completely wrong.... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Actually it's worth about 80% of the pay an american would get for doing whatever job their H1-B brings them into.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    167. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      And those people were wrong, because they were not as experienced with foreign cultures as are we today. What you exhibit is braindead wishful thinking.

      That our cultures and religions and races are merely window dressing and deep down we all have the same values and goals and ideals is a very pleasant fantasy. You get the moral high ground, but your naivety is easily exploited.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    168. Re: Completely wrong.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Technical education in India is very spotty and in many cases is just awful. Yes, you see a lot of really good Indian workers in the US but these are generally the best of the best and not the average phone tech support people. It's also one reason India focuses incredibly heavy on IT because these are the sorts of rote jobs that can be done over the internet or phone with moderate educations.

      UCSF, not surprisingly, is in an extremely expensive area that has difficulty finding affordable housing for essential services (police, fire, teachers, etc). So no wonder the bean counters are worrying about paying for local workers in cases where being local is not necessary or the skills required are fungible. I don't think quality here is an issue, given the large number of IT workers that campus has.

    169. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's worth about the same as USA techical "education", I work almost exclusively for outsourcing, I've worked for many companies in USA, I worked with people from East Europe, from India, from USA, Canada. there was no difference in technical skillset. In most programming job education bought for 10k$ or gotten for free in Polish university is worth exactly the same amount of money in the global marketplace as degree you've paid 100k $ at USA University.

    170. Re:Completely wrong.... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I think that is the point they are going for...it isnt so much the taxes that go away as the money itself being shipped over seas or whatever. The impact of losing the local economy is much more of an impact than losing tax revenue. I would argue that all of this is OK in the light of effieciency but offshore is not more efficient. If they dont really have much need for strong, agile IT resources then offshore is fine. If IT is your differentiator you have have to keep offshore to a minimum.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    171. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you French ?

    172. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. The US is based on the ruthless exploitation of the plebs. It started with out and out slavery of blacks, allied with the wholesale extermination of the natives, and moved on to taking advantage of hordes of poor immigrants in every way possible, and now exists in the wage slavery of US corporate culture.

      They still seem to think it's "exceptional" to be a slave though. Stalin would be proud.

    173. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a spectrum of colleges and the quality of education and graduates vary.
      The IITs are great... they attract the top talent many of whom eventually end up as professors in top tier US universities.

      The same could be said of the top graduates from many of the regional engineering colleges. These have
      greatly improved and are sufficient for a decent technical undergraduate degree. A degree from many of
      these schools would prepare you adequately for grad school education in the US. In that sense they are
      comparable to US undergraduate degrees.

      The problem is that these consulting companies often attract the bottom of the barrel... often the most
      junior candidates from the lower tier universities. There is a reason they are cheap.

      I realize it might be frustrating to lose jobs to cheaper overseas labor that is less competent.
      To blindly dismiss all technical education in India is being unworthy might be convenient, but its ignorant
      and dishonest (coming from a naturalized US citizen with a US undergraduate and graduate degree)
       

    174. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and the state is the only corporation that can legally do what they want.

      Corporation = people co-operating

    175. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, the reason I pay taxes is that I'd be locked up otherwise

    176. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So business is always rational. How cute!

    177. Re:Completely wrong.... by zlives · · Score: 1

      tell me again about the taxation policy of the founding fathers and how that relates to outsourcing jobs paid for by the said taxpayers, accidental citizenry or not.

      as far as taking the High Road, i am pretty sure it does not go through the coffers of HCL or others corps (fits) benefiting by increasing profits.

    178. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought kings had working toilets... just saying

    179. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many administrators per student are at the school? What is their average salary? How much do they spend on upkeep for buildings?

    180. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I'd have to disagree on that. I graduated from UCSD and went on to work there for nearly twenty years. An undergraduate education in 2011, over four years, was costing roughly 160,000 US.

    181. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UC is a research university. System administration is largely seen as a technical skill. Training for that kind of work is nonexistent beyond intro to UNIX. Quite rightly, when they need skills they reach into the same talent pools as industry. Moreover, different campuses do provide services for the system, and outside universities as a whole.

    182. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful troll is beautiful. Actually lol'd at this.

    183. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparent only to people who won't quantify quality.

    184. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then hire 18 offshore employees. That didn't seem hard.

    185. Re:Completely wrong.... by bane2571 · · Score: 1

      A better argument for why this is a terrible idea is that UC likely (I have no idea) provides IT related degrees. They're almost literally saying those degree are worthless because any IT work should not be given to locally trained people.

      I wonder if anyone has pointed this out to their marketing/admissions people?

    186. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Progressives hate the working class.

    187. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money flows up hill if you get completely out of the way though.

    188. Re: Completely wrong.... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Ah. Nice circular argument here. Indians are technically proficient, because American institutions outsource to India. These institutions do so, because Indians are technically proficient.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    189. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This university should lose it's state and federal funding for
      > doing something like this.

      So should your English teacher, nigger.

    190. Re:Completely wrong.... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Yes, and in this case, the state government is serving the people by running a public university dedicated to teaching medical skills. Running an IT jobs program and spending more than necessary on IT staff does not serve the students or taxpayers of California.

      The state should do BOTH.It should look after ALL. If this means that the school becomes more expensive, so be it.Because with the people out of a job, you will lose more than you gained by keeping them.

      This is like not doing grocery shopping anymore. Sure you save a lot on groceries, but the budget of eating out will go up more than you save. Just because dad1 had the budget for groceries and dad2 for shopping does not mean it is a good idea moneywise.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    191. Re:Completely wrong.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, they gave us UCSD Pascal and BSD UNIX

      They did that stuff decades ago. What have they given us recently? Probably nothing.

      I say this school should have all its government funding cut off. See how long they survive as a private school.

    192. Re:Completely wrong.... by kattisch · · Score: 1

      It is Obama's agenda and the US Trade Partnership Agreements that mandate this outsourcing. The government is probably giving them bonus monies (from taxpayers) for doing this. Where was everyone who should have objected to the Trade Partnership agreements instead of promoting them? JBS warned that in every trade partnership agreement throughout history, the US has lost jobs big time, so should that last signing of partnership agreements do anything different? Definition of Crazy is when you do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

    193. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, everyone knows you're voting Trump. You've made it clear.

      If everyone from India were that incompetent, in the manner you are suggesting, I doubt this would have happened for the past 20 years without businesses shutting shop because of IT department failures. Stop blaming others for your failure to hold on to your job. If you're that skilled, you'd have a job. Period.

      FYI, I'm an Indian who didn't complete high school. Got an overseas GED from Maine, went on to study at a crappy university in the UK and today my colleagues are the creme delay creame of Oxbridge. Tell my colleagues that Indians are incompetent.

    194. Re: Completely wrong.... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      "creme delay (sic) creame (sic)" ... Please, don't make me laugh. With spelling like that, it shows you got a GED ("good enough degree", which pretty much any high school dropout can get) and while you (in your own words) went on to study at a crappy university in the UK, they booted your sorry ass out.

      Cheating is pretty visible.. Indian students who feel they have a right to cheat.

      "It is our democratic right!" a thin, addled-looking man named Pratap Singh once said to me as he stood, chai in hand, outside his university in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh. "Cheating is our birthright."

      Corruption in the university exam system is common in this part of India. The rich can bribe their way to examination success. There's even a whole subset of the youth population who are brokers between desperate students and avaricious administrators.

      Then there's another class of student altogether, who are so well known locally - so renowned for their political links - invigilators dare not touch them. I've heard that these local thugs sometimes leave daggers on their desk in the exam hall. It's a sign to invigilators: "Leave me alone... or else."

      Everything I wrote is borne out by a quick search. You can get a degree in India without attending class or knowing shit.

      The question is, what's the solution? When pro-cheating rallies were held in Uttar Pradesh in the early 1990s, the state's chief minister gave in to demands and repealed an anti-copying act - he actually allowed students to cheat.

      Institutionalized cheating ... and look what happens when they try to stop it

      More than 3000 students of 20 law colleges in the eastern Indian state of Orissa have boycotted their final university examination and demonstrated in protest against a ban on copying.

      The students turned against teachers when they were stopped from copying inside examination halls this week.

      Authorities called in police for help.

      "On frisking in the presence of the police, we found almost all students carrying books and photocopied notes hidden on their body," education official Radhanath Mishra, said from the state capital of Bhubaneswar.

      "We asked them to hand over all the illegally smuggled study materials. But they did not listen to us."

      When authorities seized the smuggled notes and books with the help of police, the students turned violent and left the examination halls in protest.

      According to reports, students of almost all law colleges ready to take the same examination around the state protested in a similar way demanding they be allowed to "resort to cheating" during the examination.

      Students of the University Law College of Bhubaneswar and Madhusudan Law College of Cuttack blocked the Calcutta-Madras national highway for more than three hours and burnt tyres protesting against the authority's decision to be "strict" during law exams this year.

      Blocking traffic by burning tires for the "right to cheat" - only students who can't pass the exams (which is the vast majority of them) have to resort to cheating. And the "best" students are the ones most likely to have cheated or used intimidation, because it's easier to get a perfect score that way.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    195. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. They'll reverse their position once the students and staff begin to complain about the quality of the IT services. Several area public school districts where I live outsourced all their IT departments in an attempt to cut costs (albeit to an American based company). Once the staff, then students, then eventually parents complained about the lousy IT services they were getting, those same schools dropped the outsourced contracts and hired new internal IT departments.

    196. Re:Completely wrong.... by allquixotic · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I actually agree with both of you (meta-monkey and Stephan Schulz).

      From my perspective, if you look at all the currently living humans, meta-monkey is correct that some of them (many of them) will never, and can never be, brought to believe and uphold modern Western values of freedom, brotherhood, and universalism.

      However, the way that a Western civilization seeking to change the behavior and values of another culture can accomplish this, is through two things: (1) selective breeding; and (2) waiting for those who will never share our values to die (preferred over violence in almost all cases); or, if they are dangerous, actively kill them.

      Selective breeding refers to the idea that a human being born and raised into a culture that is at least not actively hostile to the Western values and way of life, is far less likely to become radically (militarily and/or ideologically) opposed to the West. So, being able to control the education of the young for the masses of a population of non-Western people is a very important point of leverage if our goal is to instill in them our values.

      It also refers to the idea that those who *do* become ideologically opposed will tend to act on their opposition in some way during their life, and that their activity can be labeled in such a way that our government can justify striking them before they have a chance to harm us. The problem is that certain forms of retaliation or preemptive violence against these people will tend to radicalize a lot more people than are being killed by us; this is the effect that has made our problems in the Middle East worse over time, instead of better. Even if you are raised to value Western ideals, seeing someone you love or know intimately get killed by a drone missile strike is going to dramatically increase your chances of wanting to become militant or ideologically supportive of anti-West organizations.

      We needed (past tense) to handle the Middle East problem more like we handled the Japan and Germany problem in the 20th century. Now the problem is so large that I'm not sure we can actually contain the ideologies that have cropped up against us, no matter how we choose to act. If we kill people, we just piss even more people off. If we don't kill people, they will sit there and fester; spread their ideals; gain power, influence, and resources; and strike back at us when they're prepared and able. Either way, we lose. Even if you kill every last one of them in that whole geographical area, that act alone will serve to radicalize people who sympathize with them from within the Western civilization's citizenry, leading to riots, uprisings, and heightened levels of terrorism that will itself be far worse than what we're enduring presently. Clearly, that isn't a viable option, even if you were able to morally justify it in your conscience.

      While in a utopic world, universalism would be "by design" (due to all cultures on Earth agreeing to some basic principles on the value of human life, like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; I'm not saying you have to be an overt capitalist), the reality is that it will now take many generations of careful efforts by Western civilization to properly control the cultures we've radicalized against us, and breed out the ideologies that are incompatible with ours and portray our civilization as the root of all evil.

      Unfortunately, I'm not sure if we have enough time to effect any plan at all, before these groups become powerful enough to actually have the capability to destroy us. They are already turning our own governments against us by enabling politicians with authoritarian tendencies to enact laws that trend toward authoritarian goals and move away from traditional Western values of democracy and human rights. These politicians are perfectly content to rule by fear; when we weren't afraid of anyone, they had no platform to stand on. Now they do, thanks to our ideological enemies making everyone live their daily lives in fear of being nuked or hit by a h

    197. Re:Completely wrong.... by psmoot · · Score: 1

      You're saying a federally subsidized organization shouldn't care about anyone but its own students?

      Well, they should probably be respectful of the US taxpayers and try to reduce the amount of subsidy they need.

    198. Re:Completely wrong.... by psmoot · · Score: 1

      The state should do BOTH.It should look after ALL.

      If you want an IT jobs program, or general jobs program, go ahead and lobby for it. I don't see any reason to bring UC into the discussion, just like I don't buy the argument we shouldn't cut defense spending because it will cost jobs.

      Because with the people out of a job, you will lose more than you gained by keeping them.

      I don't see how you figure this. Would you care to explain?

    199. Re:Completely wrong.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree with you. But I don't think a universal culture is ever possible, because evolutionary psychology is a thing. While our cultures may not be genetically determined, our genes carry an awful lot of cultural baggage. Different environments result in different cultures optimal for survival which select against genes that don't manage to reproduce in that culture. "Control the education of the children" or whatever but you're still fighting against tens or hundreds of thousands of years of divergent evolution. Humans are not blank slates into which any culture can be poured. If we were you could condition any people to accept any conditions, but you can't.

      We can find ways to coexist. But we cannot make us all the same, or pretend we are all the same.

      I don't think that will happen though. Westerners will die by their unrequited altruism. Islam will conquer Europe, America will balkanize and dissolve. The Chinese are not as stupid as we, as they forbid Islam and do not allow themselves to be invaded and subverted by foreigners. The Han people will ultimately win the game of civilization.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    200. Re:Completely wrong.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok so they will be outsourcing the professors and doctors then? Because I can tell you, they make way more than the IT staff made.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    201. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is not completely true. US products and services have swamped India in all walks of life, ranging from Dell computers to Pizza Hut and have caused closure of local brands. It is is sad and sadness extends across continents...

    202. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And exactly why Obama started out repairing and boosting our fallen economy by buying all our older cars and destroying them, and helping the public sector by forcing all the immigrant laborers to ride the city buses out to the fields for harvests, instead of having those old (tho affordable) "clunkers" to get to work and home.

    203. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1b's file income tax in the USA.

    204. Re:Completely wrong.... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Probably the reason they can't find those 18 people is because tech wages in the Bay Area have been stagnant for a decade, while during the same time the real cost of living has more than doubled.

    205. Re:Completely wrong.... by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who knows anything about India would be sceptical about using Indian tech workers. There are good Indian engineers and programmers but there are also a heck of a lot of bad ones. India also has a massive fraud and quality problem in its universities on a scale that is truly breath-taking. Degrees for sale, outright fake degrees, exam systems that are rigged on an industrial scale.. If you think the US has a crime problem... By choosing Indian workers they are pretty much guaranteeing low quality second rate work.
      Pay chickenfeed and get chickens to run your organization critical IT program - great plan..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    206. Re: Completely wrong.... by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Most Apple profits don't stay in or even touch the US. Their money goes to tax havens and then get laundered so they never have to pay tax. Apple would sell your children to dog pounds for dag food if it made a profit and they could get away with it.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    207. Re: Completely wrong.... by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft. Sorry that name immediately came to mind when you mentioned 'circling the drain'.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    208. Re:Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the case of contract IT work, the financial savings are not that great. They're looking to get out of treating workers well.

      Now there's the truth of it.

    209. Re:Completely wrong.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If they didn't, they get bashed for not cutting costs. When they cut costs, people complain. What would you have them do? Close from lack of funding? Outsource to the lowest bidder to keep the doors open?

    210. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 years ago I was paying $3k/year for world class education in the States, but some of your State University's patents have run out and tuition is now up to $6k/year. Local tuition is about 90% discounted over out-of-state. Being world class, we attract many out of country applications from China, India, Japan, and South Korea. You can identify them by their $40k cars and they're paying about $20k/sem for schooling and live in $10k/month apartments. They bring in a lot of money.

    211. Re: Completely wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently someone doesn't own an iPhone with auto correct turned on?

  2. Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You've let the worst human beings rule this world since... a long time now. You expect *good* news to just appear without doing anything about it? This nightmare will continue until a good person (if such a thing exists) decides to put a stop to it.

    1. Re:Well, what do you expect? by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are plenty of good people, but the problem is good people get too many enemies as they rise to the top.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAGA

    3. Re: Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean someone good like Jimmy Carter, winner of a Nobel Peace Prize, but no one ranks him the great presidents.

    4. Re: Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carter was too good for the people he served. History will eventually cast him in the light he deserves.

    5. Re:Well, what do you expect? by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      MAWA

    6. Re: Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carter was a fucking idiot with the Carter Doctrine, the root cause of the fucking mess in the Middle East you guys are responsible for today.
      Contrary to Murican belief, shit doesnt just happen out of the blue and then goes away after 30 mins, like on tv.

    7. Re: Well, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obomber won a Nobel Piss Prize too...

  3. Globalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What better way to get value deserved for the tax payers? This is what democrats are all about.

    1. Re:Globalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better way to get value deserved for the tax payers? This is what democrats are all about.

      That's what *anyone who ever appears on a ballot in any federal election, most state elections, and some local elections* is all about. Because if they're not all about the big trans-national agendas, then they don't get the funding and the support it takes to run for office and win an election in the first place. Nor would they have the ability to actually accomplish anything once they get there. If you win a seat on the House of Reps, for example, well you aren't going to have any say without getting on the right committees and being on decent terms with your party leadership, and you do that by playing ball.

      Right now that means you support globalism or you don't get much of a political career, because globalism stands to make a lot more profit and concentrate power for a lot of wealthy and powerful people.

    2. Re:Globalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, right. I forgot that Dubya fixed all that in the years from 2000-2008, and Obama fucked it all up again.

    3. Re:Globalisation by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Oh, right. I forgot that Dubya fixed all that in the years from 2000-2008, and Obama fucked it all up again.

      Nope, W. and Obama are both globalists, as was Bush Sr. It's been getting fucked up for at least that long.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Globalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to bring your sarcasm detector.

  4. So this college can't produce skilled tech folks?

    And that's why they need H1B's?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this college can't produce skilled tech folks?

      Probably not anymore after they see how they would have been treated in the workforce.

    2. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, because they cannot get skilled H1B workers, they have to off-shore.

    3. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UCSF is a graduate only medical school.

    4. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They *HAVE* skilled workers. They are getting rid of them.

    5. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh "offshore" usually means "in another country". As in, not related to visas H1B or otherwise.

    6. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't get the joke, this is one of the institutes that's supposed to be producing skilled tech workers

    7. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a med school, you dumb fuck.

    8. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They cannot afford to pay them because of the increasing cost of the standard of living locally, so they are offshoring the jobs to an area with a lower cost of living which means they're able to settle for lower salaries (and probably be better off on those at the same time). The alternatives would be to either reduce the IT staff which'd cause knock-on effects elsewhere in the university, go bankrupt or raise their fees. None of the options are good for the students or research staff, keeping a full IT staff without changing fees is probably the least worst option.

      I'm sure they'd be thrilled to employ the skilled workers they produce... if they move to India and accept the going rate there.

    9. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... for more efficient ones. Why do you hate competition so much?

    10. Re:H1B by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate domestic labor so much? Also it's not more efficient, it's just cheaper labor.

    11. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because they are too expensive, inefficient or otherwise ineffective.

    12. Re: H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true! Our IT workers are being fired in order to hire cheap labor, mostly from India. Then told to keep mum on this, then they have to train the Indian, or the company threatens to with hold a bonus package.

      This is the USA, these citizens are told to keep their mouths shut! What is happening to our Country? And why isn't DC stopping this?

      Yes, it is all about more people here, more campaign dollars and more voters...please do not say non-citizens do not vote, because they do and have!

    13. Re:H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do we know they have skilled workers ? For all we know they have a troop of Wally's from Dilbert. In fact I see many more wally's and point haired boss es in American company IT than Dilbert Alice or even the (H1B!) Asoke !

      And if you follow Dilbert you will know that wally's strategy to keep his job is to lie about maintaining systems whose arcane knowledge only he knows :)

  5. I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Trump!

    (Perhaps being crazy is underrated.)

    1. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh you do know that of the two presidential candidates Trump is the more likely one to offshore things? Hint: businesses do it all the time and he is a businessman.

    2. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Informative

      But hillary is paid by the people who keep the H1B machine running.

      They both suck, let's not pretend.

    3. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's a real estate developer.. how much can you really offshore with that?

    4. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Trump is very much against this. Hillary Clinton is an endorser of the H1B program. I'm a Canadian and seems I know more about this than you do. Follow some of Trump's speeches more closely and listen for yourself.

    5. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trump is...

      Here is Trump's actual policy regarding H-1B, which you may read on his campaign site:

      Increase prevailing wage for H-1Bs. We graduate two times more Americans with STEM degrees each year than find STEM jobs, yet as much as two-thirds of entry-level hiring for IT jobs is accomplished through the H-1B program. More than half of H-1B visas are issued for the program's lowest allowable wage level, and more than eighty percent for its bottom two. Raising the prevailing wage paid to H-1Bs will force companies to give these coveted entry-level jobs to the existing domestic pool of unemployed native and immigrant workers in the U.S., instead of flying in cheaper workers from overseas. This will improve the number of black, Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valley who have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program. Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities.

      The last time anyone heard anything definitive about H-1B from Clinton was early in 2016 at which point she wanted a higher cap (more H-1B workers.) Not surprising given how much loot Silicon Valley has dumped into the Clinton coffers.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    6. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary has so much money she doesn't need to get paid any more.

      If you want H1B reform it is going to have to come from the bottom up - starting in congress. And it seems to be catching on with both Ds and Rs with a reform bill recently co-sponsored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) with support by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) All 3 of which previously held various pro-H1B positions.

    7. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump!

      (Perhaps being crazy is underrated.)

      Well, you can look at the situation now and see what "smooth, polished, and so very carefully presented by the equivalent of a PR firm for public consumption" has gotten you.

      A guy who says things people don't always like might seem crazy. I don't know. But I think a clean, sterile, clinical downward spiral towards a fall that will take much less time than Rome did would be worse. Really though I don't think the president actually has much power. It's hard for a president to make meaningful changes without support from Congress. If Trump ever really gets there, he'll experience tremendous pressure to play ball just like everybody before him. What I like about the guy is that he stirs shit up, and right now some of that is needed. I seriously doubt he'll be much more than another Ross Perot but at least he's serving a purpose. And it amuses me to see how upset and venomous people become over him - apparently they can't just disagree with something, they must also demonize it in some way.

    8. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      His resorts staff up the same way.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump's immigration policies are written by Jeff Sessions - the same person that Ted Cruz touted as backing his 'poison pill'. Except that Sessions chose to endorse and be a major adviser to Trump

    10. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by unixisc · · Score: 1

      He already said - he hires foreign workers for seasonal jobs, which locals usually don't want b'cos they're looking for something full time and longer term

    11. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty slick answer.. but then why doesn't he just hire one person and teach them to flip between a couple seasonal jobs? There are too many other solutions.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trumps says this but he will never be able to do it. Zuckerburg, Rubio are not going away.

    13. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trumps already outlined an aggressive cutback on H-1Bs. From mandates on minimum salary and really looking domestically for hiring.

    14. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would I listen to Hitler; everything I need to know about Trump I learned from CNN. So as long as he's still a fascist baby-eating, muslim-gassing, Europe-nuking, orange-faced, tiny-handed, Putin-fellating, literal antichrist, #ImWithHer.

    15. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      Trump played the game as rigged.

      Clinton helped rig the game.

    16. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr burns once said something about how he'd trade his entire fortune for a little more.

      Also money is good, but money and powerful friends to back you is better, money can also buy friends.

    17. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      but then why doesn't he just hire one person and teach them to flip between a couple seasonal jobs?

      Maybe because the number of people needed in one season is different from the number of people needed in another...

      ...I know, crazy right? Thats why I propose a better education system... so that there wont be as many idiots like you spewing idiotic questions with obvious answers.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    18. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would I listen to Hitler; everything I need to know about Trump I learned from CNN. So as long as he's still a fascist baby-eating, muslim-gassing, Europe-nuking, orange-faced, tiny-handed, Putin-fellating, literal antichrist, #ImWithHer.

      Would you support him if he finally returned the kidnapped Lindbergh baby and promised to stop dropping nukes on Japan?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    19. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's wrong about the effect it'll have. It'll lead to most of those jobs being given to the same people but working offshore. That'll mean they don't pay taxes on it within the US and have little effect otherwise.

    20. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by rworne · · Score: 1

      Hillary has so much money she doesn't need to get paid any more.

      You are telling me rich people don't want to get richer? Seriously?

      I can understand that when a rich person gets rich enough, making money gets boring and they have other people manage it for them. Once that happens, they usually look to start amassing power and the ability to control others.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    21. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed

      http://m.slashdot.org/story/315953

      Stories like this one are an example of what I believe is wrong with our countries foreign worker policies. Allowing companies to replace employees with overseas non citizen workers hurts everyone who resides in the US because of the trickle down effect. Companies who do this should be penalized to the point of needing to prove that it is a result of a skill gap and not the result of trying to save a few pennies.

    22. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      There should be a way to draft good politicians into office. All the ones on the ticket suck.

    23. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how the rich will continue raking in obscene profits will be able to continue when the individual consumer (ultimately the bottom-line of ALL economic activity on the planet) is working for 40%-60% less, if they are employed at all? But, the rich have not been known for their ability to think critically...or, for the past six decades, even long term.

    24. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Viewsonic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How about we do one better, we see what the ACTIONS of what someone like Trump, who makes products actually does versus what he SAYS.

      Oh, you're all quiet all of a sudden? What happened? Yeah, you drank it all, didn't you? Quit smiling at me with those blue mouths!

    25. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's wife was an H1B fashion model for many years. She says she didn't become a US citizen until after they married.

      Trump will have that as a reminder every night if he's the one deciding on the future of the program.

    26. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've actually listened to Drumpf's speeches then you know he contradicts himself with every breath (often within the same sentence). While I won't claim that the cunt is any more trustworthy, given the options I'd rather vote for a bag of sand.

    27. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the answer with out hoop jumping is Trump is a pile of shit.

    28. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Because most of those people like living where they are, and don;t like moving form resort to resort for a job.

      Having lived in a few resort towns I get this. I loved living there, because I had a full time job and could literally winter over. But when the beach opened up for the season workers came because jobs. From somewhere else. And when the beach closed, they went elsewhere. Many to another country.

      I've also lived near farms where workers came to harvest. And went on other crops in other places. Migrant workers have been part of America's agriculture industry for decades, with at least one great novel documenting the system.

      Resorts do this all over the world.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    29. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of entry-level STEM graduate jobs are really things like maintenance, verification, bug-fixing on old hardware. The really good jobs let you do software development work, research, design, development, working with the latest hardware. Taking the wrong job can pigeon-hole you for a decade or more. So students will avoid certain jobs and industries like the plague.

    30. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      Uh you do know that of the two presidential candidates Trump is the more likely one to offshore things? Hint: businesses do it all the time and he is a businessman.

      No, his plan is to make it more expensive and difficult to offshore anything. Sure, he offshores stuff all the time, the system is set up to encourage it. He wants to change that system. The only candidate who has talked about doing anything about the bleeding of jobs and wage suppression since Ross Perot (the other candidate everybody called insane).

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    31. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has very dirty hands with regard to importing 'talent'. You won't see it in the $$media$$, but Barbara Boxer has asked for investigation into Trump Models for labor and immigration violations, based on a Mother Jones investigation:

      http://www.motherjones.com/files/Bb-Letter-USCIS.jpg

    32. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'FACTS!!! Stop that, Trump sucks, he's a jerk, I don't like him WAHHHHHHH! Free education, free healthcare, free living wage, free...you pick up the tab though, ok ' - clinton supporter.

    33. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Clinton received lots of money from HCL while Hillary was at the State Department.

      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/12/report-top-h-1b-outsourcing-firm-paid-bill-clinton-260k-for-speech-during-hillarys-tenure-at-state-dept/

    34. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      People like making money. Sure you have to pay people more to take a temporary position, that's part of business expense. You either pay them to get them into the position or you make it less of a temporary position. As it turns out, Trump chose to be unoriginal and do what everyone else is doing. That was his choice, now he needs to live by it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    35. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Rubio has learnt his lesson and probably won't side w/ amnesty again. Zuckerburg and even more Musk are another story

    36. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what Trump's web site says? Trump doesn't even keep his word when it's on a signed contract, so why would you assume he'll pay any attention to what somebody put on his web site?

      dom

    37. Re: I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Trump is for or against is not known to you, because it's random, and will change wildly once he gets in office and practicality sets in. Campaign promises are universally known to be hot air, from every candidate, yet people are treating the promises of the hottest airiest blowhard of them all like they're something to be taken seriously. Ridiculous.

    38. Re:I'm so mad, I almost want to vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking?

  6. doesnt seem good value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So thats 79 people out of jobs for $50mil over 5 years.

    or 126.5k per person per year.

    1. Re:doesnt seem good value by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      That's with fringe benefits which are at least 33% of that cost.

      So multiple $127k * 0.66 to get their salary... or about $83K per year.

      That's not a lot for tech workers in one of the most expensive cities in the US

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    2. Re:doesnt seem good value by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      That's about right. Figure 50% of salary for benefits, costs, and regulatory expenses.

      Sort of $84k salary/yr. Pretty good work. But that's the average. Your CCIT/blah network architect and senior admins get more, the net admins less.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  7. H1Bs should be canceled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Laying off current qualified workers should cause all of their H1B visas to be automatically canceled.
    Obviously there is not a shortage of available workers.

    1. Re: H1Bs should be canceled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's not going to happen. Afraid for your job, nerd? You should be. You'll be thrown out in the cold, replaced, made irrelevant. Your skills were not as hot as you thought, nerd, hunh? Weren't you nerds supposed to be "our bosses", hunh? So why are we in management making more money than ever while you geeks are being thrown in the gutter, hunh? Har har.

    2. Re:H1Bs should be canceled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current system already would get around this method. The company in question lays off the local employees, and uses a third party staffing company that uses predominantly H1B workers as a contractor.

      Whether the company performing the layoffs has rights to H1B visas or not would be immaterial as all they are doing is hiring an american based company to provide the services, and that company is the one with the H1B workers.

    3. Re: H1Bs should be canceled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out, silverspoon. With the nerds and geeks no longer feeling so "hot" they might just decide to unionize. Oh, and remember all those manual workers you laid off a while back? Know what happens when disenfranchised educated folks (the brains) get in the same boat with disenfranchised laborers (the muscle)? Check out Columbia circa 1980s for one scenario; or China 1940s / Russia 1910s for another scenario.

      Just think, little richboy, that could be the future of your country. Maybe we'll just nationalize that fat little company your daddy gave you. I think your mansion would be a pretty good home for a couple working families, don't you?

      When it comes down to it - nepotism is all you've got going for you. Better hope and pray your faction stays in power. ;-)

  8. Very Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    UC is very wrong to do this. They should lose all of their funding. My message to Students and Staff get ready for subpar work. Yes Sir Yes Sir but no progress and they will even break what infrastructure you already have.

  9. HAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving the contract to Indians to handle. Let me guess how much they're going to regret doing THAT in 12 months. For starters, I can guarantee that nobody they're training now will still be working there. IT jobs are a stopgap for any form of management position for Indians.

  10. they should be teching real skills not outsourcing by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they should be teching real skills not outsourcing work. Also PASS the savings on

  11. WHO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not "The University of California" which is laying off the workers. It is some asshole administrator who made the decision and is hiding behind the university's skirt to avoid criticism. SO WHO THE FUCK DECIDED THIS? Names please.

    1. Re:WHO? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Janet Napolitano

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  12. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also PASS the savings on

    Passing savings on? What kind of commie talk is this. Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    --
    The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
  13. They couldn't use student labor or interns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the kind of foreign labor abuse President Trump is going to crack down on. I hope it bites them in the ass.

    1. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yet he staffs his resorts using similar tricks.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh it's fluffy the lefty. Not surprised you've already got 2 mod points for such a tiny post with zero facts or proof to back it up other than it was anti-Trump. That's how the registered slashdot community rolls.

    3. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the kind of foreign labor abuse President ..whoever.. is going to crack down on. I hope it bites them in the ass.

      It doesn't matter who you were talking about so I removed the name. The story is that this possible future president will prevent $THING_YOU_DONT_LIKE but thinking back when has that ever happened? Politicians serve themselves and they are unaccountable to anyone once voted in. They all promise things they know they won't have the ability to deliver.

      The whole my side/your side system blocks any actual progress and polarises all issues to a binary choice between two parties who are in effect cooperating to keep their two party block in permanent control.

    4. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Oh it's fluffy the lefty. Not surprised you've already got 2 mod points for such a tiny post with zero facts or proof to back it up other than it was anti-Trump. That's how the registered slashdot community rolls.

      Dickhead he has a score 2 because he's logged in and probably has decent karma and 2 is the default score for that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    5. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Not really. These are temporary workers, hired under an entirely different program. Resort hotels, frankly really do have a hard time hiring the extra help they need for 3-4 months during peak season, at minimum wage or just above, so pretty much all the resorts use the H-2B program to staff up for the peak season.

      The H-2B visa nonimmigrant program permits employers to hire foreign workers to come temporarily to the United States and perform temporary nonagricultural services or labor on a one-time, seasonal, peakload or intermittent basis.

      Employer must also specify the period(s) of time during each year it does not need the services or labor to be performed. peakload need - An employer claiming a peakload need must show that it: Regularly employs permanent workers to perform the services or labor at the place of employment; Needs to temporarily supplement its permanent staff at the place of employment due to a seasonal or short-term demand; and The temporary additions to staff will not become part of the employer's regular operation.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    6. Re:They couldn't use student labor or interns? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Good thing employers have the choice to pay people high enough wages that they will come from wherever you want them to. This is just another snow job.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  14. Welcome to Hapoo Tech Support! I am Bob of Texas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope the students enjoy trying to pick actual, discernable english out of the mush-mouthed, can't do shit without a script tech support wannabes.

    They're paying all that money. And the school's endowment keeps growing.
    BUT THEY GOTSTA CUT CORNERS!

    The H1B visa system needs to be shitcanned with a quickness.

  15. This will come back to bite them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is $0 (aka being fired) considered a living wage?

    This will come back to bite them when they have issues with support quality, timezone differences and other well known non-US outsourcing problems (though maybe less with accents).

    They probably could have swung this quite a bit to their benefit by outsourcing to Detroit, Baltimore, pick your own troubled city... Underprivileged American worker sounds better when they're trying to explain it, (double points explaining that they're also not limiting to under 30 years old) yet they still get something in a reasonable timezone, and get a lot of the benefit of moving out of San Fran wage zone.

  16. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by diesalesmandie · · Score: 1

    Also PASS the savings on

    Passing savings on? What kind of commie talk is this. Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    Real capitalism? Define real capitalism please, because its not capitalism with plenty of government intervention like it is in the USA (or a lot of countries for that matter).

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  17. Training is immoral by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Expecting an employee who is being fired to train his replacement is immoral. This is even more so when the employee is being fired without cause.

    The employees have every right, both legal and moral, to stonewall the education of their replacements. It would be immoral to sabotage systems or update documentation to be incorrect, but passive resistance is fair game, and far better than the University deserves.

    1. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how all unions within universities work. Get used to it. I've had it happen to me before. You can always be replaced when you are just another number/priority in a system who views workers as interchangeable. This would not typically happen to facility or administration. What do you have against the university trying to get the most bang for the taxpayers buck?

    2. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup..
      1. Cease updating documentation
      2. Don't do anything, at all, that would be classified as an enhancement or preventative maintenance. Reduce role to working immediate outages only. EXCEPTION: if an enhancement poses the opportunity to make large swaths of documentation worthless.
      3. Do not answer any after hours calls
      4. Try and quit on your terms ASAP

    3. Re:Training is immoral by unixisc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Immoral maybe when having a citizen train another citizen. Probably illegal when having citizen train H1B worker. After all, when are H1B workers allowed? When an organization can demonstrate that they can't find Americans to do the same job (says nothing about the cost of doing it). But here, you have Americans who can do the job having to train foreign workers who can't as yet do the job. If they were training an offshore team in Bangalore or Gurgaon to do it, it would still be legal, if sadistic, but if they have to train H1B's to do it, then no!

    4. Re:Training is immoral by skids · · Score: 1

      5. Set up an external monitor of your ex-services so you can laugh when the replacements drive the car into the ditch.
      6. Get friendly with the most likely tech services agency that will inevitably be called in to clean up the mess, so they can call you with offers for consulting, but tell them they have to charge 2x-3x what you were making per hour.

    5. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morality is irrelevant in the pursuit of profits.

    6. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait til they outsource professors to H1B...

    7. Re:Training is immoral by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly!

      I have no problem with off-shoring. Sure, I don't like it, but the same technology that lets me work from home means that my job can be done from pretty much anywhere on the planet. And if that area has a lower cost of living so that someone can charge less? Again, I don't like it, but there's not much I can do. Competition is a good thing.

      If the work is being off-shored, though, then it shouldn't be done here. There should be no reason for anyone to have to come here for training. If they want in-person training, they'd better be sending me over there. Otherwise, we can do video-conferences and document our work and they can take it over.

    8. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how all unions within universities work. Get used to it. I've had it happen to me before. You can always be replaced when you are just another number/priority in a system who views workers as interchangeable. This would not typically happen to facility or administration. What do you have against the university trying to get the most bang for the taxpayers buck?

      Uh, what??? It's not the unions who are laying off their own members and replacing them with outsourcers. The unions would be very much against such an infringement on the status of the workers they represent.

    9. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens all over the tech industry in the UK also. It's sold as cost reduction but you end up hiring 10 times the number of people who are woefully short of skill, ability or professionalism. The end cost of such a policy? Immeasurable.

    10. Re:Training is immoral by Calydor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The businesses probably argue that the H-1B workers have the TECHNICAL skills they need, and the training is more of a list of "This is what we've already done, this is why we did it" etc. since you can never hire a new worker, domestic or foreign, that instantly knows everything that's already been done on a project.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    11. Re:Training is immoral by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Expecting an employee who is being fired to train his replacement is immoral. This is even more so when the employee is being fired without cause.

      The employees have every right, both legal and moral, to stonewall the education of their replacements. It would be immoral to sabotage systems or update documentation to be incorrect, but passive resistance is fair game, and far better than the University deserves.

      Most likely they're holding a severance package over the heads of current employees to be paid out upon completion of training their replacements.

      Sure, it's yet another sign of their immoral behavior, but they've already opened that can of worms, so par for the course.

      Stonewalling would require 100% participation. Doubtful you're going to get it when there are those who likely need the severance package.

    12. Re:Training is immoral by tlambert · · Score: 1

      just wait til they outsource professors to H1B...

      I look forward to people using Turbo C in a 32 bit VM under FreeDOS to learn their "mad software engineering skillz". This seems to be a pretty common approach to teaching programming in many universities in India.

      But seriously: it's unlikely to happen at UCSF, which only sells graduate medical related degrees.

    13. Re: Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Wake up to reality, realize there's nothing you can do about it and simply do as you're told because you have no choice.

    14. Re:Training is immoral by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      just wait til they outsource professors to H1B...

      H1b is a fairly common visa status for postdocs and non-tenure track faculty.

      H-1Bs working at universities "include 21,754 professors, lecturers and instructors, 20,566 doctors, clinicians and therapists, 25,175 researchers, post-docs and biologists,

      So, already there.

    15. Re:Training is immoral by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Any American should be able to take an H1B job, if they can prove they are able to perform it. Having previously done that exact job would count as proof.

    16. Re:Training is immoral by swillden · · Score: 2

      The employees have every right, both legal and moral, to stonewall the education of their replacements.

      Sure they do. They have the right to quit. They don't have the right to continue getting paid while refusing to do the work being asked of them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:Training is immoral by Chas · · Score: 1

      What do you think places like ITT, Devry and ASU are?

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    18. Re: Training is immoral by skids · · Score: 1

      (Step 7 only necessary if you have been living above your means and not saving)

      I've quit a job over less. Not being a slave to your monthly paycheck is quite liberating in this respect.

    19. Re:Training is immoral by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Problem is they still need to demonstrate why the current worker does not have those skills and cannot meet their needs. If you have someone already in a position and you aren't getting rid of them for cause, then presumably they meet the needs of that position. Thus if you bring in someone to replace them saying "This new person has technical skills we need" isn't really a valid argument.

    20. Re:Training is immoral by Calydor · · Score: 1

      "We are just trying to fill our quota of non-white workers."

      Oh god I can see a company actually using that justification.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    21. Re:Training is immoral by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      Isn't this "briefing," not "training?"

    22. Re:Training is immoral by Calydor · · Score: 1

      There is nothing brief about it.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    23. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true if they were being replaced with H1B labor. The offshore worker does not need a visa because they are off shore. I don't believe there is any prohibitions against off shoring service or manufacturing work unless its related to national security or something.

    24. Re: Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering what kind of wheelchair you recommend? Seeing as you have no spine...

    25. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then my time spent at DeVry in the early 90's was not wasted. I'm already highly qualified.

    26. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is they still need to demonstrate why the current worker does not have those skills and cannot meet their needs.

      That's easy. The current workers are clearly stupid since they are willing to train their own replacements rather than quitting immediately as a group whilst they still have a strong negotiating position. Your skills and experience are your value. You are employed to do your job, not to teach someone else to take it over. That information is for sale for no less than five year's salary. If you, from a position of a normal employee, do train your replacements then you get what you deserve.

      And yes, anyone earning over about 20k dollars (+ 10 k per kid) should always have six months money (whatever that means to you - I can live in a tent int he woods if I have to) in the bank so they can just quit tomorrow. That's what make the difference between a free man and a slave.

    27. Re:Training is immoral by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In fact, it would be funny to see a faceoff b/w immigration advocates and SJW activists

    28. Re:Training is immoral by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the severance pay that's normally used to entice/blackmail the departing employees to train their replacements. The threat of withholding it if it's not done. Which is what's even more grating

    29. Re:Training is immoral by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Precisely what I said - illegal if replaced by an H1B, controversial if replaced by someone offshore

    30. Re:Training is immoral by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      It would be immoral to sabotage systems or update documentation to be incorrect

      Why?

    31. Re:Training is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure hope your job doesn't get outsourced, I'm sure there will be someone just as callous as you to point out how worthless you are in regards to "competition". Also the worst trained workforce in the world isn't competition, it's cheap garbage.

  18. University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    University of California Cites 'Courage' As Reason To Lay Off Tech Workers

    1. Re:University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha nice one.

    2. Re:University of California had a good reason by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      University of California Cites 'Courage' As Reason To Lay Off Tech Workers

      Well, I sure know where to insert the new plug.

    3. Re:University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go... http://appleplugs.com/

    4. Re:University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      University of California Cites 'Courage' As Reason To Lay Off Tech Workers

      Well, I sure know where to insert the new plug.

      Step 1: Bend over
      Step 2: Grab Ankles
      Step 3: Insert Plug

    5. Re:University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the dumbest line ever at an Apple rollout. A horrible design decision wrapped in a thick layer of "we're smarter than you"

    6. Re:University of California had a good reason by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Good luck telling your wife "no need to thank me, darling, I fucked your sister because it was the courageous thing to do."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re:University of California had a good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!!

  19. Right, university labor is expensive. by somenickname · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you telling me you can't find a handful of smart kids in your Computer Science department that would rather do remedial computer work than work at the mall? You've literally got an entire department of unemployed cheap labor and you are looking to India? That doesn't speak too highly about your graduates...

    1. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by skids · · Score: 1

      Actually, this only works out if you have a lot of semi-technical people that enjoy re-training staff and keeping them busy. Heavy techs are too zoned in on their current projects to deal with this. For a college with this many IT staff, they really should have plenty of those, though, or they hired wrong.

    2. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a medical school - they don't have a Computer Science department.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by somenickname · · Score: 1

      It's a medical school - they don't have a Computer Science department.

      That certainly defaults my argument. Dang.

    4. Re: Right, university labor is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aaand... UC Berkeley across the bay has one of the better Maths & CSE depts in the country, yet pinhead administrators can't figure out how to access that pool of potential interns etc?

    5. Re: Right, university labor is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what does it say to those CS students across the bay. No worries, you're wasting your time? Might as well be majoring in Sanskrit Contemporary Culinary Grammar for Expressions of Furniture Design.

    6. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Heavy techs are too zoned in on their current projects to deal with this.

      OK, so, American IT workers have a weight problem. So what?

    7. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That campus is a medical school. They have other campuses, which includes UC Berkeley (The B in BSD...) just across the bay bridge.

    8. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by jittles · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me you can't find a handful of smart kids in your Computer Science department that would rather do remedial computer work than work at the mall? You've literally got an entire department of unemployed cheap labor and you are looking to India? That doesn't speak too highly about your graduates...

      UCSF does not have a computer science department. Every single student at UCSF already has a bachelors degree in some field or another and is currently pursuing a graduate degree in some medically related field - whether that be a medical doctor, nurse practitioner, dentistry, or some other healthcare related field.

    9. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the UC campuses do.

    10. Re:Right, university labor is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Medical schools in US don`t teach medical informatics. Well at least this one doesn't.

  20. Irony of ironies by unixisc · · Score: 1

    So one of the most Liberal institutions in one of the most Liberal cities in the country (being outdone only by its neighbors Berzerkley and Santa Cruz) decides to do exactly what Liberals accuse Big Business of? So many things - they can't produce students who'll do the same work at the same rates while being in the same time zone & place?

    1. Re:Irony of ironies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the coastal regions (Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento) are liberal and the rest of California is quite conservative?

    2. Re:Irony of ironies by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      That's kinda beside the point at the UC in question here is UCSF.

      Also, with the possible exceptions of Irvine and Davis, all UC campuses are coastal.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:Irony of ironies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's kinda beside the point at the UC in question here is UCSF.

      All those rich people moving into San Francisco is changing the character of the city. It's no longer the liberal bastion it used to be.

      Also, with the possible exceptions of Irvine and Davis, all UC campuses are coastal.

      Locating campuses in major population centers was probably a good idea.

    4. Re:Irony of ironies by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the coastal regions (Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento) are liberal and the rest of California is quite conservative?

      Yeah, if you noticed, I said nothing about CA. In fact, last time I looked, Sacramento was sorta moderate, as was San Diego and Orange County - has that changed? But I don't know of any part of CA that is conservative - and if there are, they have next to nobody living there.

    5. Re:Irony of ironies by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The rich people moving in are as Liberal as the traditional Libs that have always graced that city. And being surrounded by the likes of Oakland, Berkeley & Santa Cruz, that's not likely to change

    6. Re:Irony of ironies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      In fact, last time I looked, Sacramento was sorta moderate, as was San Diego and Orange County - has that changed?

      Except for Los Angeles, Southern California and the Central Valley is the conservative promise land.

      But I don't know of any part of CA that is conservative - and if there are, they have next to nobody living there.

      That could explain why the CA GOP has more in common with the endangered spotted owl than 1/10th of the U.S. population.

    7. Re:Irony of ironies by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I thought that both OC and San Diego County have shifted Left since the Governator's reign.

    8. Re:Irony of ironies by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      liberal = conservative = centrist = progressive = capitalist

    9. Re:Irony of ironies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The rich people moving in are as Liberal as the traditional Libs that have always graced that city. And being surrounded by the likes of Oakland, Berkeley & Santa Cruz, that's not likely to change

      The new rich people moving into San Francisco are more conservative than the old liberals, pushing the poor and middle class out of the city. The not too rich people are moving into Oakland and Berkeley, making those places less liberal than before. If the SF Bay Area was still a true liberal bastion, out of state Republicans wouldn't be fundraising here.

  21. It's not likely to save them money either by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least not unless there is a reduction in services. I don't know why people think outsourcing always saves money. It often doesn't. Basically outsourcing is a good idea if you are too small to be able to do something yourself efficiently. You either don't do enough of it, or do it often enough to make it worth having an internal team.

    For example construction is something basically everyone outsources. You just don't build new buildings often enough to make it a worthwhile proposition to have a dedicated staff for it, they'd be sitting around most of the time.

    However when you get large, often you can do shit in house for cheaper, or at least the same price and have more control. It isn't like those contract workers are free, and it isn't like the company who contracts them takes no cut.

    With a large university, practically everything should be in house. They are so large they usually have their own police forces, they are literally small cities. So you have enough needs that hiring your own staff usually makes sense. In general when I've seen a university outsource something they used to do it ends up costing them more, and the service is generally worse, sometimes a bit, sometimes a lot.

    Thus my bet is in the end this contract costs them more than they were paying.

    Worst example I've seen is a friend who consults for a public school system (primary, not university). They outsource most everything, as is evident from him contracting to them to do development. So a project he was doing needed a dedicated Linux virtual server. They balked at that, and he pushed back, confused. It was a low spec server, could be a VM, it just needed to be dedicated for security. The reason they balked? The outsourcing firm that ran their servers charged them well over $1000/year per VM. AT a rate like that, you don't need many VMs before it would be cheaper to buy a server and hire a guy who does nothing but mind after it.

    1. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      because you current have X senior, Y mid level, and Z junior IT staff.
      H1B outsourcers promise X+Y+Z senior staff at junior prices. universities are extra susceptible because the entire H1B staff has masters degrees.

    2. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's see $50M/over 5 years, divided by the 79 employees they're firing is what, $126K/yr/employee, including contractors for whom you don't have to pay any benefits, and they're allegedly saving money this way? Good luck with that. Wake me up in 3 years after it all goes to crap and they have to re-hire in house to attempt to clean up the mess, then several years later, the same cycle will start again. I've seen the entire cycle more than once at more than one large private sector company already, and now it sounds like the public sector thinks it's a good idea to follow their (bad) example?

    3. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      But if things go wrong, "those damn furriners" can be blamed by incompetent management!

    4. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      The problem is that most companies don't (can't) measure the impact of outsourcing. They don't have statistics on errors/kloc or time spent developing a functional point. Very often they don't even have good statistics for their help desk tickets - the operators quickly learn how to game them.

      All this means that there is usually no good basis to measure the success or the failure of outsourcing. Well, other than business success - which is why I think it's fair for private companies to outsource - they'll suffer the consequences privately if outsourcing is bad. With state run institutions it will be the public to pay the bill.

    5. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AFAICT, the outsourcing savings are usually spreadsheet savings up front measured with optimistic labor costs of lower paid workers.

      Lost in these models are the inevitable cost increases that happen over time. Increased consulting management fees required from the inevitable management maze that gets created, adding in additional outsourcing bodies, often higher rate bodies with more skills when the cheap bodies aren't good enough, longer implementation cycles caused by the transient nature of outsourced workers who lack institutional knowledge and organizational buy-in.

      Then you get the service reductions, either because the outsourced staff aren't as good, deliberate service reductions as organization management attempts to contain spiraling costs, or service underdelivery by outsourcers working under fixed price contracts who face pressure from the outsourcing company who want to retain their own profit margins.

      I would argue that the basic economics of outsourcing don't make sense. The macro economy of an organization has a kind of invisible hand effect that sets the cost of IT services at a given service level. The idea that it's possible to deliver the same services at a lower cost while extracting a profit for the outsourcing provider without a loss in service delivery is like believing in free energy.

      Organizations that decide to fix their IT environments with outsourcing are basically admitting a failure of management, either the inability to manage their IT department or their entire organization. Sure, some IT departments are broken, but who's fault is it they got that way? Almost never the line level IT worker or even first tier of management.

    6. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing your server farm is attractive. Who wants to build and maintain a server room? Cooling, standby power, physical security, connectivity. Hardware refreshes, storage maintenance and repairs, expansion. Patch management, OS and network security. Disaster recovery, hot- and cold-site provisioning, failovers.

      Your staff grows from a 'server guy' to add a 'security guy', then you virtualize and need a 'VM guy', then you cross train, and none of them sleep at night waiting for the intrusion alarms to tell you that your system was compromised six months ago and the last miscreant in triggered an alarm. Your backups are all full of malware. Your users data is time bombs driving you crazy. No one can find a clean VM image. Your app images are all out of date, and you need to pay the contractor to deliver a last good image that they actually promised in writing they would not retain, in violation of their contract... And to patch that up to production.

      After the third or fourth server instance, you quickly do the math, and start looking at EC2 or any provider that has any sort of positive record.

      God, I'm glad I'm not doing SMB work any more.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just want to say this is an outstanding post, especially this line: "The idea that it's possible to deliver the same services at a lower cost while extracting a profit for the outsourcing provider without a loss in service delivery is like believing in free energy."

    8. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thus my bet is in the end this contract costs them more than they were paying.

      Yeah, but how else is some pin-headed bureaucrat going to get his or her promotion?

    9. Re:It's not likely to save them money either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work in the IT division at Pfizer and we hired HCL under a fixed price managed services agreement (this was back in 2012). The H1Bs only come here temporarily to learn the job from the on shore folks and then they go back to India. After about a year or two into the agreement HCL was unable to meet their targets (Pfizer's procurement division is *really* good at shifting all the risks of problems to the supplier and then not paying when it goes downhill). Once HCL figured out they were losing money on the contact it all fell apart and HCL was shown the door. A lot of the work that HCL was doing was moved over to another offshoring provider (probably Infosys). Anyway, the PHBs who put this contract together save in direct costs (which they can account for) but expenses go up elsewhere (which they do not account for, that's someone else's budget). For example, if you have your own server sitting in a closet (which a lot of the R&D folks have) you can do software deployments pretty much anytime you want. To go thru the offshorer for a deployment it takes several weeks, a lot of $ (everything is charged back), and you have to document everything since the offshore guys are pretty much brain dead and cannot think for themselves. R&D has pretty much given up on using the IT division for anything since the offshoring makes it too expensive and too hard to do. They now do their own IT projects for themselves. You'll see UC go down the same route. All the academics will buy their own hardware (they'll call it "lab equipment"), do their own projects, and have the grad students do all their IT. Maybe campus wide systems like email and payroll will work under this offshoring agreement, but nothing else will.

  22. Re:Welcome to Hapoo Tech Support! I am Bob of Texa by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Maybe give the students a crash course in Hindi/Kannada/Tamil/Marathi, so that they'll know how to run the conversation

  23. He's already flipped on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wouldn't hold out much hope. He two-faced and both of them are fake orange. He's already flipped to supporting H1b visas already:

    http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-h1b-visas-gop-debate-immigration-2016-3

    Kelly: "Mr. Trump, your campaign website to this day argues that more visas for highly skilled workers would, quote, "decimate American workers." However, at the CNBC debate, you spoke enthusiastically in favor of these visas. So which is it? "

    Trump: "I'm changing. I'm changing. We need highly skilled people in this country," Trump said. "And if we can't do it, we'll get them in....And one of the biggest problems we have is people go to the best colleges ... as soon as they're finished, they get shoved out. They want to stay in this country. They want to stay here desperately. They're not able to stay here. For that purpose, we absolutely have to be able to keep the brainpower in this country. "

  24. So many tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the need for so many tech and tech support workers is the real problem. Either their system is broken or the staff isn't effective. It shouldn't take that many people to manage a university that size.

  25. The usual by no-body · · Score: 1

    We the people, for the people by the people

    (suckers)

  26. Here's a little humor in this story by footNipple · · Score: 1

    https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sci...

    Well, it's kinda funny...

    1. Re:Here's a little humor in this story by DoctorBit · · Score: 1

      Actually that's a different university. USF != UCSF

  27. San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was likely a factor in the decision: the minimum wage is $13/hour and will be $15/hour by 2018.

    http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Minimum-Wage-Jumps-to-13-Per-Hour-in-San-Francisco-385257511.html

    When something is more expensive, less of it gets bought. When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California has such good weather. It's still worth it living here. When it has fully gone to shit, there is probably another great place where to relocate that doesn't promote poverty.

    2. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was likely a factor in the decision: the minimum wage is $13/hour and will be $15/hour by 2018.

      http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Minimum-Wage-Jumps-to-13-Per-Hour-in-San-Francisco-385257511.html

      When something is more expensive, less of it gets bought. When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away.

      This contract breaks down to 103,000 per year per employee. Why would an extra 4k a year per worker matter? The contractor's overhead profit is certainly more than 4%.

    3. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting the IT professionals were being paid minimum wage? How did somebody possible mod this as "informative," the idea is insane.

      Maybe if you were talking about McDonald's workers or retail jobs, sure. But IT? Would you take an IT job that paid less than $13/hour?

    4. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was likely a factor in the decision: the minimum wage is $13/hour and will be $15/hour by 2018.

      http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Minimum-Wage-Jumps-to-13-Per-Hour-in-San-Francisco-385257511.html

      When something is more expensive, less of it gets bought. When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away.

      Are you seriously trying to say that your believe that UCSF has IT workers that it is currently paying Please go back to peddling your #fail ec "theory" in the basement. These kinds of choices are made because they seem appealing to administrators and bean counters (who also have ideological BS running through their heads), regardless of whether it makes sense; that is all. (And why do they have those beliefs? Could it be because Econ 101, and probably most MBAs, teach them to look at the world in the manner exemplified by the parent? Could "education" -- used loosely -- be the enemy?)

    5. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely, why study IT at UC only to make minimum wage?

    6. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      It's ILLEGAL to pay H1Bs less than the prevailing wage.

    7. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about H1Bs? The summary says the work is moving offshore, not that foreigners are being brought in.

    8. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away."'

      Interesting, care to explain how CEO jobs never go away despite increasing in cost?

    9. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Illegal" and "Impossible" are two different things.

    10. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by houghi · · Score: 1

      Do you really thing that the extra $2 is it? Or are you saying that people should start working for the same amount of money people in India make to be competitive?

      Or are you just moaning without an actual solution?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the contractor. THEIR "prevailing wage" is rather lower than the US "prevailing wage".

    12. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      This was likely a factor in the decision: the minimum wage is $13/hour and will be $15/hour by 2018.

      http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Minimum-Wage-Jumps-to-13-Per-Hour-in-San-Francisco-385257511.html

      When something is more expensive, less of it gets bought. When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away.

      So you're arguing all of the following?
      1) That University of California IT workers actually are making only $13 an hour.
      2) That these workers can actually live in San Freakin' Francisco on $13 an hour .
      3) That the Indian workers are somehow magically going to be paid LESS than $15 an hour (since the rates are going up and that's your justification, we have use $15 as the rate now).

      Good luck with that one.

    13. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well. There's the book that the tax man sees so the "yes, massa" box can be checked off by the corporation so as to not ensure any penalties, and then there's the real book...

    14. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      How can this be a factor at all? The replacements are still entitled to these laws, and paying minimum wage would disqualify H1Bs from being used anyways.

    15. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      This was likely a factor in the decision: the minimum wage is $13/hour and will be $15/hour by 2018.

      Never mind that those kind of IT jobs are typically $25+ per hour.

      When something is more expensive, less of it gets bought. When it costs more to hire people, jobs start to go away.

      That's funny. So many hipsters want to live and work in San Francisco, recruiters are offering higher pay rates ($35+ per hour) to get people to work in southern half of Silicon Valley (San Jose, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale).

    16. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Texas. Just check your liberal policies at the door.

    17. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that applies here....

      If UCSF is paying its IT staff minimum wage, I honestly don't know what to say except that.... they will or likely do, fail state mandated Computer Security standards by leaps and bounds. That the State of California is allowing this is abhorrent.

      To note, the same thing did, or has happened in varying degrees in the State of Texas for higher Ed. public institutions. They didn't outsource IT, namely due to likely WAY too much backlash, but they sure as hell tried. Every other 'service' to the Universities however, facilities management, etc... was outsourced. Again, absolutely disgusting, since at the office level, quality of service and environment is absolute crap. Lingering trash, dirty environments/bathrooms..... All to save a buck. The 'good ole boys' network is really getting their moneys worth.

    18. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the "Prevailing Wage" (especially when the company is allowed to weight benefits, experience, etc, its own way) is always less than the cost of the people being replaced? Even the inexperienced new hires, like minimum wage hourly IT workers, that are somehow above the "Prevailing Wage".

    19. Re: San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't mean it isn't done. What do you bet the grunt worker wages for the outsourcing firm are $5/hr or less?

    20. Re:San Francisco minimum wage heading to $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That University of California IT workers actually are making only $13 an hour.

      Maybe the junior people who pull wires and hook up monitors and such. Not the sysadmins and other senior people.

      That the Indian workers are somehow magically going to be paid LESS than $15 an hour (since the rates are going up and that's your justification, we have use $15 as the rate now).

      The outsourcing will probably move the servers to India, and whoever works on the servers will make whatever the going rate is in India. That may well be less than $15 per hour; a Quora answer says that engineering graduates can expect to be paid $15 to $25 per day. I don't see IT specifically, but another answer on that same URL says that software engineers make 500K Rupees per year, which would seem to work out to less than $5/hour.

      (But the outsourcing company will almost certainly have more servers per sysadmin than a University IT department, and that calculation has nothing to do with minimum wage.)

      The junior people will simply lose their jobs, and instead of having IT employees, contractors will be called in from time to time. The contractors will make more per hour, but won't be paid 40 hours a week.

      If UCSF had a lot of junior IT people, the minimum wage change likely affected the decision; if not, then not.

  28. Well there you have it, you dig your OWN graves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been hearing Americans complain about their economy being in the shitter for the better part of four decades. When was it good then? Seriously, where does it end with you Americans? It is not a question about Nationalism, competence, immigration or whatever else you may blame this on. It is all about MONEY. American engineers cost more than Indian engineers. But you want to save $$Millions because you don't want to pay American engineers. You want cheaper. You want $200 flat screen TV's and a tablet and a smartphone for every fucking kid in your household. You want a $100 million project to cost $50 million. How do you think those prices are possible? Sending the hard work overseas and bringing cheap H1B people in. But you don't want that! You only want the cheap prices! Of course you yourself want to earn $150k year and have your luxury iPhone renewed every year. That's the contradiction your Orange Prince is selling you. Jesus, it is nothing short of a miracle how cheap your gasoline is. What the hell do you want your economy to do? 100+k jobs for everyone and 100% American made iPad that costs 300 bucks? Give me a fucking break.

  29. Student loans need to have chapter 7 and 11 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Student loans need to have chapter 7 and 11 so that schools can't get a free pass.

    1. Re:Student loans need to have chapter 7 and 11 by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      They used to be. But then the federal government took over the entire industry and got rid of bk'ing student loans. After all, if the government can borrow money from itself @ 3% and loan it to someone for 6% and keep the profits, why should it let the private sector do it.

  30. is there a severance package? by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    Other wise I'd tell them to fuck off if I was told to train the person who is going to take my job by me being laid off.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:is there a severance package? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is a severance package, it is almost surely contingent upon the worker agreeing to remain at the job for at least X months to train the foreign replacement.

    2. Re:is there a severance package? by snadrus · · Score: 2

      It's quite easy to get an OPS position in SF. They should just get out of there early.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
  31. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but we are talking about socialism. ( public education )

  32. Re:Well there you have it, you dig your OWN graves by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    There is a large portion called "profits" that you seem to be omitting. People really get screwed at both ends because companies are taking everything and funneling more and more to shareholders year over year, or simply keeping it offshore. At one time there was balance but now there is not.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  33. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Capitalism is NOT a system of governance nor is it a form or measure of patriotism, regardless of how one may have been socially engineered to believe otherwise.

  34. CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at state by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at state schools. Also mit and harvard are more on the theory side and had some outsourcing WTF in the past.

  35. nested VM's just request an 32 core 128 GB VM by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    nested VM's just request an 32 core 128 GB VM and then nest all own VM that you need under that.

  36. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smells like capitalism to me

  37. masters degrees that are not accredited with schoo by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    masters degrees that are not accredited with schools own accredited ones.

  38. H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K

    1. Re:H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K

      I like that idea, actually. The theory is that H-1B workers are hired instead of US citizens because the H-1B workers bring crucially needed skills otherwise unavailable, and not because they can be paid less and/or treated like slave labor. If they are that crucial, pay them accordingly.

      And if raising the prices on something means you get less of it... in this case, that means less of H-1B workers, leaving more room for US citizen workers.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    2. Re: H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Along the lines of Trump's H1B reforms.

    3. Re:H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      I disagree a little. The H1B by definition is for the incredibly exceptional, for there can be no equivalent US workers available. The minimum should be more like 200,000-250,000.

    4. Re:H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That is likely not even close to what these people should be getting paid. Yes I am serious when I say that and I will attempt to prove it even using the reasoning given by big business.

      First off business likes to claim that they can't find Americans to do these jobs. This would indicate that in a country of 300+ million people that the skill set they are looking for is truly exceptional and rare.
      Second business like to claim that they can't afford the time to train someone to do these jobs. This would indicate that not only are these people super critical and that the company cannot function without them.
      Third the H-1B program was to bring in temporary workers with highly specialized skill sets, not bring in people with general skills to work in entry level jobs.

      So here we have a case where H-1B visa holders supposedly have a skill set that is exceptionally rare and is so critical to a company that they would be unable to continue to operate without them. To me this would indicate that an H-1B holder should be the person that has the highest total compensation (this includes base pay, bonuses, medical, dental, travel, housing allowance, relocation fees, stock options, etc) of anyone at the company they are performing work for or are employed by (highest of the 2) over the period they are doing the work. To help keep things a bit predictable take the average of the previous 5 years of highest compensation at the company and calculate it out as a weekly salary and then double it as this will help to prevent any funny business. It isn't like companies fail when a CEO leaves and they spend the next 6 moths looking for one so the work H-1Bs do must be even more critical to the ongoing operation of the business and thus should be compensated as much. Make this change first and I say we can have as many H-1B visa holders as businesses want. If business start bitching about a help desk technical all of a sudden getting paid $8 million a year well maybe that job isn't as special as they claimed it was. Same thing with entry level programmers, entry level DBAs, junior network admins, etc. who are brought in mass by body shops for projects. Some of those people are competent others are as effective as a corpse in a corner but a lot of them are just incompetent. I do however believe that there are some truly exceptional people out there who would benefit greatly from this who do actually have a highly specialized skill that only a few people in the world have and is needed now for a critical project. Those people deserve every cent they get.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:H1B minwage needs to be like 100k-150K by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Ain't that what Congress had proposed - in fact, link in the related stories at the top of this page

  39. higher ed bubble ready to pop by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The higher ed bubble is ready to pop.

    ITT was good in the 90's / 2000's but in 2016 it went under.

    Le Cordon Bleu schools owned by Career Education Corporation 2015

  40. My tax dollars by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Being used to undercut my field of employment.

    1. Re:My tax dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure to put the blame where it belongs. FTA: ""It is a particularly egregious abuse of the H-1B program since the chancellor of the UC system is Janet Napolitano who served as President Obama's Secretary of Homeland Security, which oversees the flawed H-1B program," said Hira. "She well knows how the program destroys American jobs and subsidizes offshoring. For her to OK this abusive use of the program is embarrassing. She cannot plead ignorance," he said."

  41. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those skillsets are high school level skilled trades these days. Because of the insistence that IT was only something you could get into with a full college degree by people like those on Slashdot we never trained those workers in the skillsets.

    IT is the equivalent of welding these days. Until the US vocational schools start cranking out IT and programmer techs companies are going to fill the positions with Indians.

  42. Nothing wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of US multinational were able to set up shops in developing countries like India etc due to WTO and other trade agreements, they destroyed a lot of local companies because they mass produced good at a cheaper price, now why is this wrong.. Let the private company decide how they want work to get done...

  43. this, shit-fuckers, is why we need public unions by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    Randians and other elistists, I'm talking to you. You, with the ad-hoc tautologies that public sector workers shouldn't be allowed to organize, because reasons (as if anti-tax organizations didn't exist to force rates down). Expecting workers to train their foreign replacements is depraved, no matter their country's origen.

  44. BURN BABY, BURN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has tried to outsource an entire department worth of people can tell you: this shit is going to go up in flames like the Hindenburg. Hydrogen. Gas. Explosion. Their network is going to become a smoking ruin. Sit back and roast marshmallows over the flames people.

  45. A Way To Use Trump In A Sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    %&@@Trump%&!!#, the situation in University of California is annoying!

  46. There goes the last "safe" employer by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    UCSF is a medical campus, and they operate a hospital, so this is probably where the cuts are being made. Healthcare IT is badly funded and there's never enough money to do anything interesting...they're focused solely on keeping doctors happy so IT's needs never come before that. But, having a public university system signing outsourcing contracts with vendors, foreign or domestic, is a new twist I didn't see coming.

    It didn't say in the article what they offshored, but in my experience HCL is a mainframe programming shop, so of course this means that anyone being replaced is probably "old" and will have a very rough time finding employment even close to previous levels again. That sucks double for them, because they're going to be marched through the "train your replacement" humiliation to get severance/early retirement.

    I'm all for stuff like cloud computing, colocation, etc. where it makes sense, but I really don't understand why companies continue to believe they're going to get some great deal doing an outsourcing engagement. Do they not realize these companies have to get paid enough to profit from the deal? Where do they think that money comes from? I hate the trend of running companies on a huge tower of outsourced services. Every company of reasonable size should do almost everything in house -- it's cheaper in the long run and the employees doing the work are more engaged. There is absolutely no task that is better done by an outsourcer than your own employees.

    1. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder who the next medical hack/ransomware attack will occur to.

    2. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by dcblogs · · Score: 2

      This is what is going offshore: > HCL will provide data center monitoring and operations, server, storage, database, middleware and Citrix, as well as network operations, routers, switches, firewalls, load balancers, WLAN controllers. Other services will include unified communications -- telephony, email, chat, SharePoint, audio and video conferencing -- and application maintenance for PeopleSoft, C#, .Net and Java apps. It will also provide application development augmentation services, according to the university.

    3. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Healthcare IT is badly funded and there's never enough money to do anything interesting.

      I did a PC refresh project at a local hospital in Silicon Valley a few years ago. All the old Dell workstations with Windows XP got replaced with new Dell workstations with Windows XP. The new hardware was needed to deploy Windows 7 virtual machines in the near future (should be available now). Whenever someone logs into a workstation, their Win7 VM is downloaded from the network and run locally.

      There is absolutely no task that is better done by an outsourcer than your own employees.

      The contracting agency I worked for has everything outsourced, as there is an app for everything. Headquarters in New York City has six full-time employees who manages 120+ contractors across the country.

    4. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That is an important factor here... most universities pay IT modest wages with free or reduced tuition for family members or the employee. I am not so sure that incentive works so well with such a specialized school.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The large state university I live right next to is known for this. As I'm getting older, I'm valuing stability and the ability to do good work without looking over my shoulder all the time over raw salary. What I've found, knowing many people who work there, is that there is a definite trade-off. Pay is the low end of average, budgets are tight, and you have to deal with some state bureaucratic nonsense. On the flip side, the job is rock-stable, your retirement is pretty much guaranteed so you have to save less, you have free or reduced tuition for you and your family, you get a lot more freedom, and you actually get to work with a smarter bunch of people. Because of this, very few people leave; you basically have to wait for a retirement to open up a position, hope that position's budget item isn't removed -- and be in a position to take a reduced salary. Last time the opportunity came around I couldn't justify the salary cut -- I'm probably going to be thinking hard about this the next time something opens up.

      Something like this throws that whole trade-off/balance into question though. Maybe it's because it's San Francisco and UCSF has to pay people more than they would traditional state employees...I don't know. When you think state university IT, you don't think of extravagant salaries and flashy Google-esque office spaces. One IT guy I know at the university is in a windowless cinderblock office in a basement, and he could definitely be making more money elsewhere. These aren't the typical people you target for offshoring. I've seen banks, airlines, insurance companies, etc. do this because they hate having to pay people "normal" salaries for something they see as a non-core service like cafeteria or janitorial service.

    6. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who does IT in a VERY large hospital environment, I simply can't imagine the IT environment here outsourced. This place was be compromised so fast, the fines slapped down from the FDA/US Gov would outweigh the cost savings by orders of magnitudes.

      The one thing my environment has going for it, is that they are putting large amounts of money into IT now... Rewind 5 years ago, and that wasn't the case... Now? It's considerable, and they can't fill enough positions to keep up the internal IT project demands.

    7. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at UCSF and in IT. I can tell you what's being outsourced: All internal infrastructure - but not the customer facing people (help desk) or IT execs. The DNS admins, AD admins, storage and other server admins in central IT are being let go. Besides the central help desk and IT leadership there are still some specialized departmental IT groups around - these are funded directly by the department/group/investigators they support. All of this comes on the heels of shutting down the central colocation datacenter they set up a few years ago and pushed every department to make use of.

    8. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by zlives · · Score: 1

      and what is not outsourced? other than upper mgmt ofcourse.

    9. Re:There goes the last "safe" employer by lurker412 · · Score: 1

      Good to hear from someone who knows what's actually going on. One question: the Medical Center (hospitals and clinics) used to have a totally separate department from the teaching and research side. Are both sides outsourcing or only one? I used to work for Med Center IT and we were under very different funding rules, as the Med Center was (in theory) self-supporting.

  47. Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by drnb · · Score: 1

    Horrible insult to the USA, our students, and our educators. Terrible.

    Yes, but this is in character with CA politicians. Recently when the Bay Bridge was constructed they used Chinese steel.

    Do you think the jobs of white collar IT workers are any more valuable than blue collar steel workers to CA politicians? That being a UC employee makes any difference to them? And don't kid yourself about the administrators of the UC system being politicians. Funds must be cut to fund their political payback projects and their vanity projects.

    FWIW, I have seen behind the scenes of UC politics a little, spent some time on two campuses.

    1. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to believe this is happening in Socialist California. Don't practice what they preach do they. Typical of the ruling class.

    2. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is in character with CA politicians. Recently when the Bay Bridge was constructed they used Chinese steel.

      If the CA politicians put in a "Made in USA" provision into the contract and it cost the project more money, you would be complaining about crony capitalism.

    3. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is in character with CA politicians. Recently when the Bay Bridge was constructed they used Chinese steel.

      If the CA politicians put in a "Made in USA" provision into the contract and it cost the project more money, you would be complaining about crony capitalism.

      Cronyism is contracting to "friends" who have not fairly won the contract. "Made in USA" is not cronyism. When money is spent it has a second life contributing to the economy where it is spent, that benefit can occur in the USA or China. Which is better to the interests of the CA? Those financial contributions can exceed your hypothetical extra costs. More importantly, the project is costing more money because of defective materials and workmanship, cables rusting already, etc. The cost saving by going with a Chinese supplier are already evaporated.

    4. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      "Made in USA" is not cronyism.

      Depends on where you fall on the political spectrum. Some people would regard "Made in USA" as cronyism because the work would benefit unionized workers who typically vote for the Democrats and not Republicans.

    5. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did they use Chinese Steel, they ended up being essentially being extorted by the Chinese when it turned out that the steel could not be delivered on budget.

      Lastly, they ended up paying for a state of the art mill to be built in China, because originally the Chinese did not have the technology to manufacture a high enough grade of steel for the project.

      But remember, Trump is a Racist Homophobe so don't vote for him!

    6. Re: Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Chinks got a plum over priced contract PLUS the capability to rape US steel makers in the future usingbtheir own technology against them, for free ??

      Lol...you guys are fucked.

    7. Re:Wrong but consistent with CA politicians ... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      Hardly a CA only issue.
      In New Zealand one of our major cities -Christchurch- got whacked by a major earthquake a few years ago.

      The current (National/ right-wing) government specifically gave exemptions to allow Chinese reinforcing steel etc. for the rebuild. It has now been found that the Chinese steel is shit and not as 'ductile' or flexible enough to withstand any future shocks. The test certificates that come with the Chinese steel are not worth the paper they aren't printed on.

      The Chinese have threatened NZ with a trade war (our largest export market) if we get into quality/ dumping issues which is what the pricks have been doing.
      NZ makes it owns reinforcing mesh with trustworthy certificates which has been seriously undercut.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  48. reasonable voter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quick, vote in lying nazi as president who outsources production to china!

  49. Re: this, shit-fuckers, is why we need public unio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go on, unionize. Then watch as nobody joins and those who do suddenly find themselves unemployable. In a globalized economy workers have no leverage at all. The class struggle is over and Big Money won.

  50. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Alumoi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And who controls the government in the US? That's right, the corporations. Case closed.

  51. It's called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GRAFT.
    Bribes, corruption, back handers, nepotism call it what you will it's the ONLY way to get things done in India.

  52. Re:Welcome to Hapoo Tech Support! I am Bob of Texa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to learn Hindi - they just need to learn the Hinglish accent.

  53. In the immortal words of Leonard McCoy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In a battle of Good versus Evil, Evil usually wins unless Good is very, very careful.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:In the immortal words of Leonard McCoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... evil usually wins unless good is very, very careful.

      Dr L McCoy, 'The Omega glory', Star Trek: TOS, 1968.

      "... evil will always triumph, because good is dumb." — Dark Helmet, Spaceballs, 1987.

    2. Re:In the immortal words of Leonard McCoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you see that Evil will always triumph because Good is dumb.

    3. Re:In the immortal words of Leonard McCoy by psmoot · · Score: 1

      In a battle of Good versus Evil, Evil usually wins unless Good is very, very careful.

      I'm going off topic here but I don't believe that. Good loses battles but Evil is losing the war. On a whole, the world today is more prosperous, free, educated, safe, healthy, knowledgeable, connected, and tolerant that it's ever been in all of history. That's a massive victory for Good, especially in the last 200 years. It's not perfect but it's never been better.

  54. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The educational landscape has changed dramatically in the last decade or two. At any credible university with a good technical program, they will have a fully fledged technology college filled with diverse degrees only one of which will be "algorithmic computational math" the rest will vary from network engineering to databases to enterprise admin and management.

    In modern colleges computer science has returned to it's roots as being more about math and programming than about the ins and outs of running IT departments.

  55. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, it is just the guiding force for all our decisions based on a partially free market. In that sense, it is a governing force, since it also controls the government on a global level.

  56. This the direct result of "No New Taxes" by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Taxes pay for public education. The UC budget has not kept up with the combination of more students and rising costs.

    So they are trying to keep a sinking boat afloat. That's why they recruit out of state/out of country students: they pay full tuition, as opposed to residents who pay less.

    Also, don't underestimate the influence of the corporate takeover of the educational system. The regents and the leadership at all the campuses are integrated with corporate interests. Public funded research results in patents and the profits are used to support research. Sounds OK, but in fact the ultimate benefit goes to corporations who have deals with the schools. It's a lot like the NFL using state supported schools as their farm team system. Get someone else to develop the talent and harvest the results at a huge discount.

    I'm not defending any of this. It's just one more example of the corrupt state of the country. All the costs are go one way, all the payout goes the other.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:This the direct result of "No New Taxes" by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. "More money" has been thrown at all levels of public education with increasingly dismal results.

      Where are these rising "costs" for education? I see rising "prices" but that's a different matter. The colleges and universities are inflating prices in direct proportion with the students' ability to pay(by taking on huge amounts of debt).

      What do you need for education?
      1. A subject matter expert
      2. Classroom and office space
      3. Desks and chairs
      4. Textbooks, notebooks, pens, pencils
      5. IT infrastructure.
      6. Lab space and equipment for some subjects.
      ???

      Are the professors' salaries skyrocketing? Has it become that much more expensive to build and furnish classrooms, offices and labs? Textbooks, pens and pencils aren't included with tuition, so that's not a cost driver. IT hardware has been getting cheaper and U.S.-based IT staff aren't seeing major salary increases.

      The sharp spike in "prices" is not being driven by increases in "costs" which are being passed on to the students. Colleges and Universities, just like any business, will charge the highest possible prices they can without losing customers. As long as they can keep a full contingent of students, they will keep pushing up prices.

      We need government, especially federal government OUT of higher education! Roughly 70% of college students have student loans. If we get the government out of the lending business, will we see a 70% decrease in the # of college students and massive layoffs of faculty and staff? Hell no. Colleges would need to cut prices dramatically to attract students, something that the schools could very easily afford to do. They certainly don't need more grants and subsidies.

  57. Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be good news for the University as after all Indians with English sounding names are always ringing us up to tell us they work for Microsoft and that our PC's is faulty as it's either full of Malware, Viruses or just just plain slow and for a small fee they can fix it all for us. The university should be proud at getting these wonderful people to replace homegrown tallent as not once has any IT staff rung us to say our PC's are faulty etc.

  58. Qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HCL is a top user of H-1B visa workers.

    Are they qualified to implement HIPAA rules?

  59. Where's your tough guy attitude now, Murricans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bunch of tough-talking pussies, Murricans are. Use your second amendment rights, yeesh. In a country full of guns where normal people are shot every day for stupid shit, can't someone just shoot the CTO/CIO's at these places? It would make a good news story, plus scum that needs to die... dies.

  60. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shooting capitalists dead -- a great way to relax. Shoot one today!

  61. Higher Indoctrination is a rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people still pay for college? lolololol

  62. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Also PASS the savings on

    Passing savings on? What kind of commie talk is this. Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    Real capitalism? Define real capitalism please, because its not capitalism with plenty of government intervention like it is in the USA (or a lot of countries for that matter).

    Oh yeah, I can really tell that "government intervention" is hurting Apple these days.

    I cite Apple, because if you were to pick one company who will gladly ask the "highest price the market will bear", they are THE example.

  63. Cult-like psychopathic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's all universities are anymore.

  64. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they still teach that it's means it is, or is that outsourced too these days?

  65. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And who controls the government in the US?

    Elected politicians do.

    The fact that these elected politicians sell legislation to the highest bidder has nothing to do with Capitalism and everything to do with Statism.

    If you want to reduce the influence of money on the State, then the correct course of action is to reduce the influence of the State. I bet however, that you are one of those "don't throw your vote away" douches that is going to vote for Donald Clinton.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  66. It was likely on the table. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is stopping them from "outsourcing" their IT to another UC school which teaches system administration as part of it's curriculum. It seems like it would be a good opportunity to teach remote administration.

    It was probably on the table that they have another UC's IT department handle it; it was likely *never* on the table that IT students handle it.

    Personally, I wouldn't be an IT student, if it's obvious that IT is going to be outsourced everywhere; about the only thing you could train to be would be a trainer. It's like being an English major: the only jobs are in creating more English majors.

    What am I missing?

    Most likely the fact that UCSF is a graduate medical university, and that means that pretty much every IT system on campus has "live data", which means, in turn, that you have to be able to trust the people running it with HIPAA sensitive information.

    You can trust HCL (which is actually located in Sunnyvale, not India) with that, because they have deep pockets to sue, if they ever screw up. You can't really trust students to the same degree.

    1. Re:It was likely on the table. by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can trust HCL (which is actually located in Sunnyvale, not India) with that, because they have deep pockets to sue

      If they ever lose a major judgement we will find out that the US entity is a penniless shell and the money is all in India.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:It was likely on the table. by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      You can trust HCL (which is actually located in Sunnyvale, not India) with that, because they have deep pockets to sue, if they ever screw up. You can't really trust students to the same degree.

      Isn't it the exact opposite? The outsourcing company sells its services entirely on low cost and not on quality or trustworthiness, so a hit on reputation is insignificant. In contrast, the student is working for a degree, so the university has extreme leverage in being able to add negative annotations to the student's transcript or even expel the student. Also, the outsourcing company has multiple contracts, so it probably factors a nonzero probability of a soured contract into its cost of operations, while for the student, the impact of a single incident with the university is huge.

    3. Re:It was likely on the table. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      You can trust HCL (which is actually located in Sunnyvale, not India) with that, because they have deep pockets to sue

      If they ever lose a major judgement we will find out that the US entity is a penniless shell and the money is all in India.

      Obviously, I look forward to the test of that theory, but I wouldn't hold my breath, since I think that there are a lot of people who are capable of meeting the HIPAA threshold, I just think they are professionals, and not UC students.

    4. Re:It was likely on the table. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      You can trust HCL (which is actually located in Sunnyvale, not India) with that, because they have deep pockets to sue, if they ever screw up. You can't really trust students to the same degree.

      Isn't it the exact opposite? The outsourcing company sells its services entirely on low cost and not on quality or trustworthiness, so a hit on reputation is insignificant.

      Not really. The point of outsourcing is to prove that you are able to do the job, in order to obtain the contract. Part of that is your new customer talking to past customers, as references, to decide whether or not to hire you.

      If it were that easy, all the laid off IT workers in the U.S. would be doing two things:

      1. Starting their own outsourcing companies to compete with HCL

      2. Doing their damnedest to "death by a thousand cuts" HCL and similar companies over issues that apply only to companies with relatively large numbers of H1-B workers.

      It's be pretty easy to be competent, take advantage of the same economies of scale, and at the same time ethically sabotage HCL.

       

      In contrast, the student is working for a degree, so the university has extreme leverage in being able to add negative annotations to the student's transcript or even expel the student.

      The consequences to the student are that they don't get to work in a dying field if they are expelled. I've never, ever seen a transcript with a job application in over 30 years, and I don't expect to be seeing them, so not getting a blue star that day for attendance isn't really going to hurt their job prospects.

      Also, the outsourcing company has multiple contracts, so it probably factors a nonzero probability of a soured contract into its cost of operations, while for the student, the impact of a single incident with the university is huge.

      I disagree. You blow one HIPAA audit, and all your HIPAA contracts get pulled/audited, if you are a single company doing a lot of them. The idea is that if you screwed the pooch on one of them, then you probably made the same mistake on all of them. That's the downside of being a clearinghouse.

    5. Re:It was likely on the table. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      IT is the modern equivalent of the assembly line worker 75 years ago. Education requirements are relatively low and there are millions of other people with the same skills you have.

    6. Re:It was likely on the table. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      IT is a unique field in that it is particularly dependant on language skills. Most Indians can barely speak or understand English let alone read or write it, and that puts them at a massive disadvantage from the start. They also come from a culture where crime and corruption are totally endemic and where the poor and weak are allowed to die on the side of the street. Not great for ethical background. The Indian education system is also awash with corruption and some get degrees while barely attending a single course - or even their own exams.

      In short there are very good reasons why Indian IT workers are cheap.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  67. yeah, and sky high interest rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want a bank to give a person around age 20, with minimal work experience, and an unproven aptitude, a loan for 5 digits? Some student loans can be had with interest rates about 5 percent. Mortgages can be had for 3 percent. If the person defaults, you can seize a sellable house. If the student defaults, what can you seize? I guess if slavery were legal, this would not be a problem.

  68. There's theory, and there's fact. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They used to be. But then the federal government took over the entire industry and got rid of bk'ing student loans.

    There's theory, and there's fact.

    The theory was that no one in their right mind would loan someone in poverty, and who did not qualify academically or athletically for a scholarship, the money for them to get an underwater basket weaving degree, unless the government agreed to do it.

    In exchange, the government, as guarantor, put the condition on the loans that they could not be discharged in bankruptcy -- just like any debt owed the government (i.e. we still have debtor's prisons, only they are for taxes). That way the guarantor could throw your butt in jail if you decided not to pay the student loan back.

    The fact is that underwater basket weaving isn't really a marketable enough skill to allow you to make your student loan payments.

    1. Re:There's theory, and there's fact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's theory, and there's fact.

      The theory was that no one in their right mind would loan someone in poverty, and who did not qualify academically or athletically for a scholarship, the money for them to get an underwater basket weaving degree, unless the government agreed to do it.

      In exchange, the government, as guarantor, put the condition on the loans that they could not be discharged in bankruptcy -- just like any debt owed the government (i.e. we still have debtor's prisons, only they are for taxes). That way the guarantor could throw your butt in jail if you decided not to pay the student loan back.

      The fact is that underwater basket weaving isn't really a marketable enough skill to allow you to make your student loan payments.

      Oh please, the government doesn't throw you in jail for that, they make you work, and take a slice off your paycheck. Much better for them.

      Though honestly, where does this Underwater Basketweaving nonsense come from? Is there even a degree in it?

      Now I suppose you COULD say that the government should only foster those degrees it considers valuable, but then you'd just have the free market types bitching about government thinking it knew better and spending decades ignoring say, the Computer science field because it wasn't in their projections or whatever.

    2. Re:There's theory, and there's fact. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Underwater basket weaving does seem, however, to be better than IT.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:There's theory, and there's fact. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Oh please, the government doesn't throw you in jail for that, they make you work, and take a slice off your paycheck. Much better for them.

      It's called "tax evasion", dude. Look it up. It's how Al Capone ended in jail, when they couldn't arrest him for killing people.

      Though honestly, where does this Underwater Basketweaving nonsense come from?

      It's a proxy for any non-marketable degree. This includes many non-STEM degrees, and, with the ability to outsource, it also includes IT degrees (as opposed to CS degrees, which are currently still marketable, but with an unknown future).

      Now I suppose you COULD say that the government should only foster those degrees it considers valuable, but then you'd just have the free market types bitching about government thinking it knew better and spending decades ignoring say, the Computer science field because it wasn't in their projections or whatever.

      You appear to not know the difference between CS and IT. IT emphasizes business and communications. IT is what used to be called an "MIS" degree, and it used to be taught by the College of Business or the College of Technical Education, rather than the College of Engineering.

  69. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lot's = lot is, lot was, or something belongs to the lot. The lot's number was indicated lots of different ways.

  70. Like when Microsoft laid off Nokia workers? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Laying off current qualified workers should cause all of their H1B visas to be automatically canceled.

    Like when Microsoft laid off Nokia workers?

    Obviously there is not a shortage of available workers.

    I'm sure that Microsoft could have employed all those "Can't make a cell phone product anyone wants to buy" workers in another segment of their business, like the X-Box division. That would have enabled them to make an X-Box no one wants to buy too, since that's the core competency of those workers.

    In other words: that's a dumb idea with frosting on top.

    1. Re:Like when Microsoft laid off Nokia workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does a loon like you come up with such "ideas"?

      IF MS did it then, yes, the same should happen to them. Who do you think is defending this based on company? A pointless jab at MS so you can just hear yourself talk about a non issue. Where do morons like you come from?

  71. Yes, they are telling you that. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Are you telling me you can't find a handful of smart kids in your Computer Science department that would rather do remedial computer work than work at the mall?

    Yes, they are telling you that.

    UCSF doesn't have a CS department, and they aren't talking about CS anyway, they are talking about IT. Different degrees.

    1. Re:Yes, they are telling you that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you telling me you can't find a handful of smart kids in your Computer Science department that would rather do remedial computer work than work at the mall?

      Yes, they are telling you that.

      UCSF doesn't have a CS department, and they aren't talking about CS anyway, they are talking about IT. Different degrees.

      One is a professional degree that might get you a job that will eventually be outsourced to the lowest bidder. The other gets you an embossed piece of paper with "Computer Science" written on it that is nearly useless unless it has an "M.S." appended to it, and less then useless if it has a "Ph.D." appended to it.

  72. I once was trained by someone I was replacing by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Which they weren't happy about and didn't train me correctly. And honestly, I don't blame them. It was a shitty position to be in.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  73. What it says to UCB CS students... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    And what does it say to those CS students across the bay. No worries, you're wasting your time?

    What it says to UCB CS students... is "Aren't you glad you're getting a CS degree (computer science emphasis), rather than an IT degree (business and communications emphasis)?" ...which is probably exactly what it should be saying.

    1. Re:What it says to UCB CS students... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Makes me glad I studied history and philosophy. Way more intellectually interesting that computer science. Sure, I've worked in software for 15 years, because programming is easy if you can think logically, and the pay used to be good. But now that the US tech industry is circling the drain, I guess it's time to get out before there's nothing left at all.

  74. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Afty0r · · Score: 3, Informative

    Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    That's not capitalism, it's free market economics.

  75. Well, the best solution for everyone would be by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    Simply to mandate that if you replace a position with an H1-B, you have to pay them the same salary. It's only fair. And also allow them to find work, whenever they want, on the open market and leave the company at any time. No company can effectively master their H1-Bs.

  76. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Alumoi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Way off, buddy. I'm one of those eurotrash types who lives in a (still) democratic country. Unfortunately you USians are doing your damnest to destroy what's left of democracy all over the world.
    But I digress. It's a long standing tradition in your mighty country to buy your way into politics. Show me a politician not backed up by some lobby group (BTW nice euphemism for bribery) founded by some corporation. I'm not talking here about some obscure name from some obscure state but the ones from the federal level.
    Can you?

  77. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by jrumney · · Score: 2

    Passing savings on? What kind of commie talk is this. Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    Especially when the product involves basic human needs like Education or Health. Quite why the food industry hasn't realised this and continues to compete to drive prices downward is a mystery to me.

  78. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're obviously pushing their institutions' business schools with these shenanigans. what better way to teach future business leaders how the world works than by firing the very person who helped you with a intranet login issue last term and replaced them with a dark skinned guy named 'bob' with a funny accent and short dark hair.

  79. Yo, pedantic asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mountain Dew does come in cans: https://www.amazon.com/Mountai...

    WTF, indeed.

    1. Re:Yo, pedantic asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mountain Dew does come in cans: https://www.amazon.com/Mountai...

      WTF, indeed.

      OK idiot, I can't believe I have to spell this shit out for you.

      Mountain Dew (the product) does come in cans.

      "mountain dew" (a natural phenomenon) does not.

    2. Re: Yo, pedantic asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to admit - that was a solid pedantic troll.

  80. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by tburkhol · · Score: 3

    Universities have been outsourcing their IT for years. At my school, we use Microsoft for email, Elucian for student records, Plesk for web services, and I can't recall which company does personnel. Company comes in and claims that, because of their existing infrastructure, they can offer better services at lower per-student cost, and budget pressure takes over. Contracting out the actual staffing of help desk is just the next logical step.

    It's a funny thing to watch a university that was part of the development of open, distributed electronic mail abdicate its management to Microsoft. It feels like selling out, although it's probably just the natural progression of technological maturity. My only compensation is to imagine that the university is using some of those people to develop the next cool technology, and I just don't know about it yet.

  81. I say fight fire with fire by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Those laid off should claim that layoffs trigger them and they need a safe space at work. Claim that outsourcing is a microaggression! They should be able to get the process reversed quickly.

    1. Re:I say fight fire with fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome idea. You should do a little searching to find contact info for these people and give them your suggestion.

      If having someone give a speech on campus is enough to "trigger" the special snowflakes and send them scurrying to a safe space, what does the trauma of job loss do to a person?

  82. Do the needful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time a student hears that iconic phrase, ***triggered!***

  83. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >The fact that these elected politicians sell legislation to the highest bidder has nothing to do with Capitalism and everything to do with Statism.

    Sorry pal, but now you're moving the goalpost. You declared that capitalism is selling at the highest cost the market will bear. These politicians are being capitalists by selling their product, legislation to the highest bidder. Their supposed to sell it to the voters (who appointed them at the ballot box and pay their salaries with taxes) but the voters offer less than the market will bear.

    That's capitalism - like it or not.

    The thing is - this is not supposed to be a capitalist institution. A public university is part of the civil service. What you're seeing is the outcome of the long republican drive telling us "universities should be more like businesses" - which is what they are now doing, and this is exactly why that was always a terrible idea. The two types of organisation have nothing in common. Universities are not SUPPOSED to be profitable or efficient or even cost-effective. They are suppose to produce knowledge and to give that freely to the world. That's the exact opposite of what a business is supposed to do.
    If all you care about is the cheapest school the market will bear - private universities exist for that purpose, but public universities first and primary goal is supposed to be research and even their entire education section's sole real purpose is to pass the results of the research into the population and, coincidentally, train another generation of researchers to take over when the current batch dies.

    Making money, even training people for a job, is nowhere on the list of things a university is supposed to do. The latter is, at most, a tangential benefit from sharing knowledge with students.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  84. This is hillarious..... by SadButResolved · · Score: 1

    Your trying to sell a product for MONEY, do not kid yourself, this is about MO MONEY for the top of that college. Those top 20 folks that are multimillionaires on the back of student debt. They just gave the big F-OFF kid, your not smart enough to realize your stupid. Perhaps it was that Fluoride, Mercury fillings, and lead in the water that put your kids here?

    New World ORDER and TPP for the FAIL folks, repeal Nafta, pull down this bullshit outsourcing/insourcing scheme, GO VOTE ignore any polls and vote. You won't stop this level of stupid with some letters to the dean, expect all colleges to attempt this soon if they are not already doing it behind the scenes. Your paychecks will not go up, and your employment will not get stable until you fix the 1% bleeding you dry. Its called Tarrifs, its called taxes, its called real trade agreements that help Americas people not to the benefit of 65 people that own half the planet.

  85. here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of complaining about things on slashdot, lets all get off our collective IT asses institute change by organizing and protesting until we get the things we want or change the things we dont like. other countries do it all the time, why doesn't america?

  86. Mr. Bengfort needs to replace himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe R. Bengfort is the Chief Information Officer for UCSF Medical Center and Campus and joined the organization in June 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Bengfort worked for 22 years at Dell Services / Perot Systems

    Oh wow conflict of interest much?

  87. Vote Trump For Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why vote for Trump. He is an idiot but at least he is in favor of jobs in america.

  88. San Francisco Earned this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIO notes that Obamacare (ACA) basically has put the financial screws to he hospital and that they've chosen to cut in the IT area rather than patient care, which is completely rational.

    Nancy Pelosi promised lots of news jobs from ACA. And you idiots believed her. So don't whine now. You earned this.

  89. HCL is the worst company by cgiannelli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh man, I don't often comment, but wow, they chose HCL... HCL is shit. I work for a financial company that is canceling HCL contracts and kicking their asses out, several of their staff has recieved permanent bans from EVER working at my company again. From people not showing up ans billing for time, costing over $100,000 in fraudulent payroll. To people just deciding to not work because the Project Manager was not in that day. despite them having set tasks and work scheduled for that day. We've gone through a slew of "frontmen" the business representatives, even their White American representatives suck and fill our ears with lies. Going to India based solutions is NOT good for American companies. For one there is a massive language barrier. Indians are inefficient and poorly organized. I'm a casual scripter and out programmed a team of 10 "professionals" As stated above, it takes 10 or more to achieve the same level of work as a single well trained US based IT worker. Then there's the constant brain drain. Indians cycle on a 3-5 years at their job, burn out and work somewhere else. Or some other company is hiring for better pay and they pack up and move across the country to their new venture. Over the long term this ends up costing business far more than their bargain basement prices at the start. Indian politics are also horrendous. Woman get worse treatment no matter their skill level. They'll fire a skilled worker to hire someone from their local district. America needs to stop trying to skim the bottom line and work towards highly trained and more efficient working practices. Not this "out of site out of mind" principal.

    1. Re:HCL is the worst company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not good huh ? You do realize that this is not the second year things are getting outsourced right. And if outsourcing was bad, by now CIOs would be rolling back - not expanding.

      Screw IT jobs - even other jobs are going to India. Check out Mu Sigma.

    2. Re:HCL is the worst company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not agree more. Even though my former company did "did not pay Americans to write code", we sure re-wrote a lot of code when HCL made a delivery.

      Also - these are not H1-B workers. H1-Bs actually do possess proven skills. HCL has L-1 workers. There is no limit to how many can be used because they're HCL employees. If you expect anything more than declaring a variable, if statement, or for loop, you're screwed.

  90. Why not African IT support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it always Indians, not Africans?

    Anybody?

  91. It sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other wise I'd tell them to fuck off if I was told to train the person who is going to take my job by me being laid off.

    I wouldn't advise it. I'd train them to the best of my ability with a smile on my face.

    Now when you start looking for another job and an employer is interested and does a background check, you'll want a nice reference. Because they'll ask why you were dismissed and you'll tell them that they outsourced/off-shored/hired H1-bs.

    Hopefully, you won't hear what I heard, "If you were any good, you wouldn't be unemployed."

  92. Time for a class action suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This practice is illegal and those getting the shaft need to sue. I'm sure there are plenty of attorneys that'll take this on spec.

  93. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    Way off, buddy. I'm one of those eurotrash types who lives in a (still) democratic country. Unfortunately you USians are doing your damnest to destroy what's left of democracy all over the world.
    But I digress. It's a long standing tradition in your mighty country to buy your way into politics. Show me a politician not backed up by some lobby group (BTW nice euphemism for bribery) founded by some corporation. I'm not talking here about some obscure name from some obscure state but the ones from the federal level.
    Can you?

    You hit it right on the head...

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  94. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2

    Damn it, where are my mod points this morning? Excellent post!

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  95. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at state schools

    Apparently CS also means skipping that class where they talked about using apostrophes (unless it's used to remark out a line in a script).

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  96. Clinton 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton is a square shooter. Clinton 2016!

  97. start??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Until the US vocational schools start cranking out IT and programmer techs"

    Seriously? We graduate 2-3 times the number of STEM students and programmers than job openings. Your statement is out of touch with reality.

    1. Re:start??? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      We graduate college STEM graduates. We need voch tech STEM graduates.

  98. law not enforced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This law is not enforced. Good luck trying to stand on that point.

  99. This is actually good news by CharlieG · · Score: 1

    Now that it is happening to the public sector, the real power in this country other than big business (public sector unions) will sit up and notice, and maybe we'll finally get some rules against this

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  100. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by rhazz · · Score: 1

    +1. I went to university for 5 years for a CS degree and it cost me $25k for tuition alone (it's closer to $40k today). As far as being a prerequisite for my current job goes, I'd say maybe 5% of the overall content was useful, another 5% provides a nice background, but otherwise 90% was wasted time on unnecessary specialization (AI, search engine algorithms, heuristic search, advanced maths). But 100% was required to get the piece of paper which is a requirement for my position.

  101. asia is about teach the test. Japan is hard to get by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    In Japan is hard to get accepted by a college but after that you’re on a easy street party!

    Also the entrance exams can be passed easy if good at test cramming.

  102. Savings will be eaten by custom programming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that by the end of next year, UCSF will have spent $10 million of that $30 million savings on custom programming from HCL just on writing interfaces for a new version of Blackboard.

    2018 will spend another $10 million on new interfaces for Ellucian.

    2019 will spend another $10 million on new new interfaces for Blackboard.

    Repeat ad naseum...

  103. If you ask me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trustees and management of the university that made this decision should be lined up and shot! Period. It will happen soon enough. Keep it up fuckers! See what comes to you!

  104. doctors have a union / AMA to stop that by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    doctors have a union / AMA to stop that!

    1. Re:doctors have a union / AMA to stop that by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      That sounds unfair to foreign competitors. We in the UK have exactly the same problem but have taken it a step further - by allowing our education and training systems to fall apart we now actually need foreign workers for a lot of jobs.. The UK has something like ten times the population density of the US and they still want more immigrants in..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  105. A Free Market with H1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Eastern Bloc PHD whose education was financed by a communist country is competing unencumbered for a job against an American student who amassed an enormous debt load . The capitalist companies are using labor that was educated by foreign states. If that is the case it would make sense to heavily tax these companies in order to provide state funded education and have an equal "market" for labor. Maybe Bernie was on to something....

    The ironic thing about this story is it is a University and India. What do they tell their Comp Sci students at the career center?

  106. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    IT is the equivalent of welding these days. Until the US vocational schools start cranking out IT and programmer techs companies are going to fill the positions with Indians.

    I think they are similar in that there are two aspects to welding - one i step skills trade and the other is the engineering and science aspect that requires advanced education. You can get a BS, MS and PhD in Welding Engineering for example, where the focus is on the science of welding and goes far beyond sticking two pieces of metal together; and the welding engineers I met have great respect for good welders. Similarly, you can teach a bunch of kids coding basics but don't expect them to understand computer science; do real CS types respect coders?. Also, welding and programming are similar in that anyone can strike an arc or write code, to do it at a master level takes experience, practice and talent. Fortunately for welders, having that type of skill means you are in demand, for coders it simply means you are too expensive and can be replaced by a couple keyboard bangers just out of school.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  107. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bernie Sanders.

  108. Outsource Congress to HCL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having the pleasure of hand holding HCL for every little task, they should be completely qualified for Congress.

  109. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Capitalism doesn't differentiate the external causes of profit. It just rewards profit.

    If the federal government stopped subsidizing student loans the education industry would adapt and, perhaps, lower tuition. Or reduce the time needed for specific training (degrees intended to prepare one for a vocation might better be called 'training'). Or change the course offering to reduce institutional costs. They would adapt.

    And if the Federal government stopped granting H1-B visas on the flimsiest of claims of no available talent, businesses would find employees to do the work needed, or move where the employees are. Unless, of course, moving was not practical.

    Capitalism is distorted by government manipulation, and that's a good reason to limit government. But capitalism isn't nearly so concerned with that. It's not that capitalism is right or wrong, it that capitalism is efficient, even when interfered with. And efficient economics is better than inefficient economics.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  110. Ultimate irony:Outsourcing unemployment offices by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    I always find the most amusing outsource is when states/government outsources unemployment office jobs. Really, you could not find someone unemployed to fill the position in the unemployment office? I know Indiana played with it, along with California and even England.

  111. Do not train anyone what so ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even where the coffee is. Fuck them you are toast anyway.
    Walk now.

  112. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    True this.

    Not long ago your typical college graduate in India could find work as a call center worker. That changed, and many college students in India were working their last year of school in those call centers. Fast forward to today, and it's not even high school graduates in India that are the hot call center employees - it's high school graduates in the Philippines.

    College graduates from India are now sent out as programming leads, project managers, business analysts. High school graduates in India are head-down coders. A full year of experience qualifies you as a lead. Two years later, you've rotated back to India, team lead. Two years later, rotate back to the US, an architect. Your predecessor rotated back to India to lead your team... And you, as architect, have a team of BAs and leads telling them what to code overnight.

    Departmental outsources let companies fix costs in a way that they cannot with the incumbent department. VPN the NOC over to Gurgaon, everyone is watching the screens, responding, taking MAC orders and funneling them through the chain leaving your actual workers waiting 72 hours for their login to the ERP to be reset. Or not.

    It's a real time Dilbert strip.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  113. Freshers! by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 1

    I learned a new term last week sitting in a grad class -- "Fresher".

    When an Indian identifies themselves as a "Fresher", it means they don't know squat about that field even if they hold an advanced degree.

    My guess is that lots of Freshers from HCL will be running around UCSF very soon.

  114. Technical support or a scammer? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Damn, man. Now people won't be able to tell if the "Hello, dees ees weendows tiknical support," phone calls are real or a phishing scam. Maybe the UC system people who made this boneheaded move fell for it.

  115. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    And who controls the government in the US?

    Elected politicians do. The fact that these elected politicians sell legislation to the highest bidder has nothing to do with Capitalism and everything to do with Statism. If you want to reduce the influence of money on the State, then the correct course of action is to reduce the influence of the State. I bet however, that you are one of those "don't throw your vote away" douches that is going to vote for Donald Clinton.

    Can you hear my eyes rolling from wherever you are? Because you should be able to.

    I'm constantly amazed at the ability of Libertarians to ignore the power of concentrated wealth. If you reduce the influence of the State, who steps into the vacuum? Nobody? You think that's reasonable to expect? Or maybe the most wealthy and powerful private interests? What do you do about them? How do you reduce their influence when they start running roughshod over people and their rights and interests? Do you sue them? With what money? And who enforces contracts and the outcome of lawsuits? The government? The same government that should be so weak it isn't worth taking over?

    This is what drives me nuts about this simplistic Libertarian bullshit. The government has to be the biggest kid on the block! Reasonable people can disagree about the size and scope of government. But the government has to be supreme in order to enforce laws. At the end of the day it has to have coercive power. The idea behind a government by and for the people is that this big bully will work for the benefit of society and protect the weak against the strong. You keep money out of it by enacting laws against it and enforcing them; not by reducing government to the point of impotence.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  116. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Shompol · · Score: 1

    You can also offshore mathematicians, physicists, doctors... should they all be replaced with vocational school graduates? What happens when our vocational school graduates are replaced with offshore vocational school graduates, because those will be always cheaper?

  117. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    You declared that capitalism is selling at the highest cost the market will bear.

    Nope. Wasn't me. Do you have a problem with reading comprehension and attribution? It appears so, since it was someone else who said what you are now claiming that I said.

    Do you make this mistake often? Perhaps also when you blame republicans for what the democrats did?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  118. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    Show me a politician not backed up by some lobby group (BTW nice euphemism for bribery) founded by some corporation.

    Just one? How about Dave Brat.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  119. And why tag this H-1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As these jobs are moving offshore, as in literally to workers in another country, what does the H-1B have to do with this? Yes, the California higher ed system has lots of people in the US working on H-1Bs, but since the new offshore IT people aren't in the US they won't be on H-1Bs so the visa has nothing to do with it. Quit spreading visa FUD.

  120. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    You're not familiar with the 'plural you' ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  121. Re:Well there you have it, you dig your OWN graves by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Thinking that through, I never, NEVER got any single thing that cost more than $75 from my parents. Never. Not even my good fly rod. My first phone bill as an adult was $11.76 for a month. I scored free installation because the Phone Company got caught claiming private lines were not available in the city despite being required by tariff to provide them when requested.

    And now I'm coming to grips with giving my 14 year old daughter a smartphone worth $400-$800. For two years tops. And $50/month for service. In two years that's more money than my first PC cost. And the phone line for the modem. And the modem.

    Some of our pain is self-inflicted.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  122. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is by far and away the stupidest comment I have ever read on Slashdot. And I've been coming here for 20 years.

  123. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump.

  124. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative

    should they all be replaced with vocational school graduates?

    They are. My wife is a doctor and what a doctor does in 2016 has changed a lot from what they did in 1996, 1976, 1956, etc. You have nurse practitioners, registered nurses, all the way down to orderlies. You can get into the medical field with... voch tech level training. It's not because the work doesn't need to be done it's because the doctors need to work on other things and it's too expensive to pay them to do something someone with a tech degree can do.

    A doctor should know how to put in an IV but there's a good chance they'll suck at it. They don't do it anymore that job falls to other positions.

    We need fewer CS code architects and more Programmers that can actually build it.

  125. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    Those skillsets are high school level skilled trades these days. Because of the insistence that IT was only something you could get into with a full college degree by people like those on Slashdot we never trained those workers in the skillsets.

    IT is the equivalent of welding these days. Until the US vocational schools start cranking out IT and programmer techs companies are going to fill the positions with Indians.

    Didn't ITT Tech just go under? And how is designing, building, upgrading, maintaining and troubleshooting complex systems anything like welding?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  126. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    > And how is designing, building, upgrading, maintaining and troubleshooting complex systems anything like welding?

    Spoken like someone that doesn't weld in an industrial setting.

    A CS major should have as much to do with what the programmer does as a college welding major does with skilled trade welding.

    Didn't ITT Tech just go under

    Good, maybe we can push people to community colleges and high school voctech programs instead of for profit colleges.

  127. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

    And then bribing the government to give you some sort of competitive advantage, and raising the price more.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
  128. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by ranton · · Score: 1

    Sorry pal, but now you're moving the goalpost. You declared that capitalism is selling at the highest cost the market will bear.

    No, Kabukiwookie said that. Rockoon, the man you are replying to, said nothing of the sort. Rockoon pointed out not all market economies (where supply/demand helps set pricing) are capitalistic in nature. Governments can be involved in a market economy without their economy being primarily controlled by private ownership of property and the means of production (capitalism). China is a prime example of communism which relies heavily on manipulating market forces through state run corporations. On a global scale it behaves very similarly to capitalism, but the lack of private ownership of the economy precludes it from being considered capitalism.

    the thing is - this is not supposed to be a capitalist institution. A public university is part of the civil service.

    Every institution within a market economy, whether the economy is capitalism or communism, will be affected by market forces. Every institution without exception. Unless the government can both control the institution and force people to work there for a rate determined by the government, market forces will affect even non-profit institutions.

    Making money, training people for a job, or increasing demand for IT professionals in the local economy are nowhere on the list of things a university is supposed to do.

    There I fixed that for you to make it more relevant to the topic at hand. Like you implied above, the university should stick to its public charter and not take on so many tangential roles. Public universities were not created to increase the number of IT jobs by employing them in the university. If lowering the costs of operations helps them provide a better learning experience for a more affordable cost to society, they are doing their job. The choice to outsource IT operations may still be a bad one, but it doesn't conflict with the role of public universities in our society.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  129. H1-B workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This university should no longer get money from the federal government if they outsource from foreign countries and require the current workers to train their replacements.

  130. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by geek · · Score: 2

    CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at state schools. Also mit and harvard are more on the theory side and had some outsourcing WTF in the past.

    There is the problem. IT != CS. Getting a CS degree to do IT work is like getting your MD and becoming a nurse. Requiring CS degrees for simple IT work has fucking destroyed the industry.

  131. Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HCL is widely known for paying large kick-backs to obtain it's contracts, then for "maximizing billable hours" at outrageous rates.
    Their turnover rate is so high that "training their replacements" is ludicrous. The people being trained will be gone from HCL within 6 weeks (their "training" allows them to jump ship to another outsourcing contractor at a higher pay) and you will be right back where you started. Then HCL will charge you more for "more experienced contractors" who will still need training. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
    I would also investigate the private bank accounts of the IT Executives at UCSF for unusual "large deposits" from offshore accounts.
    It is common for HCL (and Cap Gemini, WiPro, etc.) to pay a fixed % of the total contract back under the table to the IT executive who signed the contract (so do AT&T, Verizon, etc.)
    I can't tell you how many times our R&D has hired HCL only to fire them for shoddy work, just to see them hired AGAIN by another part of the company (only to be fired again.) Wash. Rinse. Repeat. Once they are in the system as a validated contractor, you can NEVER get rid of them.

  132. Offshore UCSF leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With decisions like that, they do not have to be local. Even better, get rid of it. Decisions like this can be made by a computer

  133. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Sorry pal, but now you're moving the goalpost. You declared that capitalism is selling at the highest cost the market will bear. These politicians are being capitalists by selling their product, legislation to the highest bidder. Their supposed to sell it to the voters (who appointed them at the ballot box and pay their salaries with taxes) but the voters offer less than the market will bear.

    That's capitalism - like it or not.

    That's poor oversight by the voters. Because most of them are re-electing the douchebags who made promises to the voters before the elections and then sold out to corporate interests. I'd expect a lot more people voting for third parties, concerns about "lost votes" be damned.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  134. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody cares. web forum posts are not pulitzer candidates.

  135. When will we outsource the C level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the true savings, I'll bet you could get a good CIO, CEO, CTO, etc. really cheap offshore.
    Maybe even automate it. Just say no all the time and act pissed off.
    Or do nothing like Tim Cook, just collect your cash and stock options.

  136. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eric Allman developed what became sendmail while a student at UC Berkeley. According to my technical instructors at Sun Microsystems (back when there was no such thing as web based training, and classes included lots of side discussions), Eric was told that this was never going to be released in any way, it would always be just part of his degree training. Or something along those lines. Sort of ironic that 1.) they were wrong and 2.) since sendmail was released as part of BSD, it became the defacto mail server of the 90's. For whatever reason, this discussion dug this little nugget out of my memory.

  137. Outsource the C-Suite = more savings, less clutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsource Napolitano's office and UC would save 570k+ per year alone. Outsource the head coaches of the basketball and football teams and they'd save more than UCSF's entire IT budget annually. Priorities folks...

  138. Really? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    So underpaid foreign dregs is America's future in your book?

    I think I found the corporate scumbag shill!

  139. HCL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for HCL. They caused more than enough issues for me as far as pay goes.

    As for the company they contracted, complaints have gone up for customer service. They whine on the phone with customers and have short tempers.

  140. What is the world coming to? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Not American but this affects every country that is currently racing to the bottom. Ffs, passive resistance is needed, probably futile, but someone needs to take a stand before we're all writing documentation for our Indian colleagues.

  141. Is SW a dead end career? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    I've been told that as long as SW devs stay with a company past 45 or so, they can make it work until retirement.

    That plan wouldn't work for any SW folks in this case.

    About to turn 35 and jittery ...

  142. Nose despite face by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    One supposes the UofCA has a poor CS curriculum since they do not think so much of CS workers.

  143. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, you want to remove the influence of money on the political process, you make efforts to remove outside money from the process by things such as public funding of elections, banning of donations to the politicians from people, companies, and the political parties themselves and making the appointments to ruling the nation ban them from working outside of it again.

    Running a nation should be seen as an endgame goal, not a stepping stone to a consulting job and banning them from taking money to get in and getting rewarded for selling out after they get out is a great way to deal with that.

    Sorry but reducing the influence of the state is throwing the baby out with the bath water as the influence of the state SHOULD be the influence of the people except it has been co-opted by the rich because money was allowed into the process.

    You make the mistake that many have made before, you think by removing THE government from an area that you removed government from it. Many times that is untrue. Many times when you remove THE government from an area all you did was open up a vacuum where the strong companies within it fill and become the government within that area with even less accountability to the people. Doubly so in many areas where competition can not function or the demand is static and will be there regardless of cost or quality.

  144. Re:CS = lot's of theory and little hands on at sta by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I can see how a guy who can't understand the shift key would want that to be true. But actively inserting an apostrophe where one doesn't even belong isn't a sign of laziness - laziness would involve leaving OUT an apostrophe where one ought to have been. Dropping them in where they don't belong is signs of a cognitive issue, and brings into question the meaningfulness of the entire post.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  145. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show me a politician not backed up by some lobby group (BTW nice euphemism for bribery) founded by some corporation. I'm not talking here about some obscure name from some obscure state but the ones from the federal level.

    This is a classic problem of correlation and causation. Please tell me what evidence I should look for from an outside perspective to tell the difference between the following two situations?
    1) Corrupt Senator looking for a big payout. Big Oil (or Environmentalism, Wall Street, or whatever group you want) goes to him and says, "vote this way, we'll fund your next campaign $10M." Corrupt Senator does so.
    2) Principled Senator thinks that new technologies for energy are too risky and expensive, so votes against subsidies to solar due to his earnest belief and principles. Big Oil sees Principled Senator, likes having him in congress, so donates $10M to his campaign.

    Putting that aside, some politicians on the national level which fit your criteria (putting aside if you agree with their positions, just that they have principles) are Ron Wyden (Oregon) and Bernie Sanders (Vermont).

    Note I am referencing them by reputation, so it's possible that if you do some digging some of them may have skeletons. I just don't know of any for those two.

  146. Check their major donors list by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    There's your reason.

    Kickbacks.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  147. HCl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ftfy

  148. Re: they should be teching real skills not outsour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should check your sarcasm detector, it seems to be broken...

  149. HCL = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the needful

  150. offshore the dean and admin first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to have a locsl Dean. Admin is done just as good (or bad) anywhere else. actually the only people truly needed locally are the janitors. That is until robots can do it. Hell we could even ship students offshore.

  151. Re:Well there you have it, you dig your OWN graves by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

    And now I'm coming to grips with giving my 14 year old daughter a smartphone worth $400-$800. For two years tops. And $50/month for service. In two years that's more money than my first PC cost. And the phone line for the modem. And the modem.

    Some of our pain is self-inflicted.

    Just get her a flip phone with cricket or whatever pre-paid equivalent you have in your area. Smartphones are great, but I feel like young teenagers don't have the capacity for responsible cell phone use.

  152. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by psmoot · · Score: 1

    Passing savings on? What kind of commie talk is this. Real capitalism is asking the highest price the market will bear.

    And real free markets is refusing to pay a dime more than you absolutely must.

  153. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we respond from our government computers - all made in China.

  154. red stapler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who took my red stapler?

  155. End the H1-B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been proven it's a corrupt mechanism that is harming the local economy and contributing to the downfall of the U.S. Get rid of it, and jail anyone that tries to circumvent it. Sure, some companies will threaten to leave, and exactly zero of them will, because they know they won't get a better deal elsewhere.

    That's the first thing that needs to get fixed right now, before it is too late.

  156. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately you USians are doing your damnest to destroy what's left of democracy all over the world.

    Oh look at the little euro-cuck flapping his mouth about something of which he knows nothing. You're not free in the EU so don't even pretend to lecture anyone else.

    Does your king/queen allow you to use words like "democracy"? Nice freedom of speech over there where you can literally be arrested for saying the wrong thing on twitter.
    Does your wife's muzzie boyfriend allow you out of the house or do you have to sit and listen while he "rapes" her? You're not even allowed to fight him off if he was or you'd be arrested for assault!
    Now stop posting on /. and get back to paying taxes so that those muzzie immigrants get more free shit.

  157. Three decades in tech... by buss_error · · Score: 1

    ... and not once have I ever seen a transition to contract labor, especially off shore contract labor, do a satisfactory job.

    Not once.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  158. Here's what they could do. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    As a group categorically refuse to train their replacements. If one person says they're going to do it, the administration can single that person out and make an example out of them. When the entire staff locks arms and says "no". What can they do then?

    1. Proceed with firing them... That's great except for the problem where all the knowledge goes out the doors.
    2. Lock them out... Except they only manage the physical access, so they're not sysadmins, nor know how to close accounts, etc.
    3. Lawyer up and sue them for breach of contract or terms of employment?

    I suspect the last option would likely be what they'd do, but if that happened what then? If my companies suing me for refusing to train my replacement, I don't see any incentive to train my replacement.

    The whole thing seems like a fluster cluck from top to bottom.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  159. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by suutar · · Score: 1

    they haven't managed to patent foodstuffs to the point of having a monopoly yet.

  160. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    The food industry does ask the highest price the market will bear. They can't gouge like education or health because there are lots of suppliers of food, unlike suppliers of education or health, who each undercut each other slightly to gain a slightly larger marketshare (and thus more profit overall than the alternative), which in aggregate drives the price that the market will bear down toward the cost of producing the food.

    To make education or health care more like food, we'd need to increase the number of education and health care suppliers, or rather somehow make it easier for someone to go into business supplying education or health care and let the search for profit do the rest.

    Of course, with education at least, a significant chunk of demand is not for the education per se -- it's easier than ever to actually learn things from many different sources. It's the status conferred by the organization that declares you to be educated. Increasing the supply of such status requires more than just increasing the supply of educators, but somehow increasing the pool of institutes that employers et al consider sufficiently status-conferring. That is a harder problem.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  161. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    Glad to see someone else properly distinguishing between the two.

    Of course, they're not mutually exclusive either, and it's possible that this situation in question is actually capitalism in action, not just the free market.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  162. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Rockoon · · Score: 0

    You're not familiar with the 'plural you' ?

    Not in the way you used it, "pal."

    Are you familiar with just owning up to being wrong, fucker?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  163. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a college welding major

    Yeah, because such a thing totally exists. Right next to the the Mplumbers and the PhCarpenters.

  164. Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck these guys, seriously. No matter what spin BS they try to put on it, it's only to save money. Will that money saved mean lower fees? Like hell it will.

    Right up there with corporations that want to:
    - drive efficiency
    - encourage innovation
    - downsize for success
    - become a leaner, more agile.
    -

    All they mean is "we want to shed heads so we can make our share-price look good" and push workloads onto people already overloaded.

  165. Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We do have laws concerning hiring foreigners before citizens.

    Seems those laws are not followed either. Businesses and this college are hiring lawyers to find out how to hire foreigners over citizens. Video on YouTube.

    Politicians allow it without changing our laws. Politicians are ANTI-AMERICAN WORKER.

  166. That's the way it happened at SCAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of South Carolina did a big 10 year contract with IBM Global services. All H1B. Same outcome. This is IBM's business model aside from the pump'n'dump known as Watson.

    The next step is other gov't departments. This is what passes for innovation.

  167. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Uh, Welding Engineer. Look it up.

    And the MPlumbers go by "Mechanical Engineers with specialization in fluid dynamics"

    and the PhCarpenters are Civils.

  168. No, they don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First: The AMA is not a labor union. Also, as the years have gone by it has been gradually morphing into a political group. Most doctors are smart enough not to form/join a labor union and are smart enough to know that political goals can be achieved better by political organizations.

    Second: Contrary to popular opinion, most doctors do not belong to the AMA.

    1. Re:No, they don't by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      First: The AMA is not a labor union. Also, as the years have gone by it has been gradually morphing into a political group. Most doctors are smart enough not to form/join a labor union and are smart enough to know that political goals can be achieved better by political organizations.

      Second: Contrary to popular opinion, most doctors do not belong to the AMA.

      Particularly if you create the organizations yourselves to give yourself meaningless credentials! Right Dr. Paul?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  169. Lower the salary by myid · · Score: 1

    If I were a UCSF IT employee, and if I thought I'd have a hard time getting another job, I'd be willing to keep my job at a lower salary.

    Can UCSF offer their current employees a lower salary? Doing this would help UCSF, because the employees who stayed would be experienced.

    If UCSF's HR/contracts department was able to fire current employees and bring in new HCL employees under a new contract, then they should be able to figure out a way to lower the salaries. If all else fails, maybe they can eliminate the current jobs, and then re-create the same jobs at a lower salary, and offer the jobs first to the current employees.

  170. because the man is abominable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jimmy Carter spent his presidency appeasing evil men all over the world, and completely trashing the US economy - these things had bad side-effects.

    Domestically, millions of Americans suffered severe economic distress and never recovered from the economic damage (earnings lost in your early career cannot generally be made-up since you lose the compounding effects on investments etc). Families broke up over the financial stresses, people committed suicide (yeah the horror show leadsto the "dogs and cats were living together..." nod to Bill Murray). Rather than admit his failures, the man blamed the American people claiming they were suffering from"malaise" and THAT was why the economy was bad. He told them to ignore the gas rationing and ride bicycles, ignore the cold and home heating oil shortages and just wear sweaters. His buddies in the press churned-out stories about how it was not Jimmy's fault - EXPERTS were saying the world had become too complexfor any one man to manage.

    Internationally, Jimmy decided that the exiled Ayatoylla was a "ghandi-like" peaceful guy in robes who should be allowed to leave France and return to Iran where his Islamic revolution woud make the people of Iran peaceful and happy.... this kicked-off almost 40 years of international Muslim terrorism.

    Jimmy started "Habitat for Humanity" to try to raise his reputation above that of Benedict Arnold in his post-presidency and THAT has worked out well for some needy folk but also helpedin its primary task of political rehabilitation. His Carter Center, on the other hand, is quite evil and embraces every international dirtbag that is convenient and every globalist Anti-American wet dream. The true rehabilitator of Carter is going to be the combination of the Calendar (most now are too young to remember how close this man came to trashing America during the Cold War when such failure would have been VERY BAD) and Obama who has actually delivered LESS economic growth than Carter and worse worker participation rates. To be fair: Obama has not produced gas rationing, double-digit inflation, and double-digit interest rates. He probably has matched the double-digit unemployment, but the press is cooperating in reporting phoney numbers - they report percent of workforce getting unempoyment benefits as the unemployment rate, rather than reporting percent who are unemployed. (Hint: you cannot have a nation of approx 320 million, which census data says about 198 million are "working age" [18 to 65], and have 95million of those workers out of the work force, and then honestly claim unemployment is below 20%)

  171. That time has passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orange county is now a liberal hell hole. The congressional district there that used to be represented by "B-1 Bob" Dornan (a Republican veteran military pilot who served on the armed services comittee and got his nickname insisting on actually flying and evaluating the B1 himself instead of just buying the marketing hype from the defense contractor) is now represented by one of the extremely left-wing pro-open-borders Sanchez sisters.

    San Diego county which used to be dominated by a combination of defense workers and active and retired Navy and Marine personnel used to be politically and socially conservative, and majority WASP is now an increasingly secular, Hispanic, gay-friendly place peppered with pot shops. If you drive by a San Diego county school that in the 1970s or 1980s was 80% white, you notice that the kids there now are 95% Hispanic. You're free to see these things as positive developments if you choose, I'm not arguing about whether this is good or bad, but my point is that the demographics, industries, and politics have shifted dramatically.

    California was the recipient of most of the illegal aliens who got amnesty and then citizenship in the 1986 amnesty deal - which promised amnesty for about 4 million in exchange for a permanent securing of the border so no amnesty would ever happen again. The post cold war defense cuts eliminated many military bases, downsized/re-aligned others, and eliminated all the big defense contractors like Convair which had built the Atlas rockets and the payload bays of the space shuttles in Kearny Mesa (northern part of San Diego). For the movie fans: NAS Miramar, the home of Top Gun, is no longer a Naval Air Station - it is now MCAS Miramar (a Marine air base) and home to mostly helicopters and Ospreys (the Top Gun school is now out at Fallon). The Navy boot camp in San Diego is now a combination of civilian apartments and shooping centers.

  172. Garbage, Democrats bragged about record revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democrat Governor Jerry "moonbeam" Brown and the Democrat legislators who have 2-to-1 super majorities in the State Assembly and State Senate have been bragging in 2016 about the record-breaking revenue gathered by the Franchiose Tax Board. There is More money available to the state government than at any time in California History, by a large margin.

    The problem is that liberals can never limit their appetite for spending. Jerry Wants his 60+ Billion dollar non-high-speed (it's NOT a French TVG or even an Acela, it won't out-race a car) train-to-nowhere (it won't link San Diego, LA, Santa Barbara, Sacramaneto and SF. It's just going from a rural spot NorthEast of LA to a point further North, possibly Fresno). The state wants huge K-12 and College education spending (Teachers' union is single biggest source of political cash in California, followed by other state worklers unions and indian tribes). The state spends huge sums on handouts to the poor, which it keeps making more of with anti-industry rules and importing more of with open borders supporters. California cares for EVERYBODY, except the hard-working middle-class tax payers and small business operators. The only businesses the stae loves are Google, Apple, Facebook etc which make huge piles of cash and make NOTHING in California.

  173. Ahem... you seem to forget that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UC system is currently run by Hillary's friend and former Anita Hill lawyer Janet_Napolitano, hardly a right winger. Also, Hillary called TPP (which she helped negotiate and which will remove all limits on outsourcing, offshoring, and importing of cheap labor) "the gold standard in trade agreements" before switching during the campaign and opposing it while her buddy Democrat governor Terry McAuliffe was telling people she will flip back into support of it after she gets elected.

    Yes, in the post-Bill-Clinton-world of free trade with commie China, Trump makes things like ties and shirts in China like nearly all the vendors he competes with, however he builds all his big American products (golf courses, resorts, skyscrapers) in the USA (though obviously he builds his foreign buildings in the countries where they arelocated). Yes,sadly he makes his small [relatively] cheap products in China under current rules, but he has said he will return that work to the US after the rules are changed for everybody including his competitors.

    Hillary has no experience making ANYTHING and there's zero evidence she is in any way concerned with making things in America.

    Want more of the economy of the past 7 years? Vote Hillary.

    Want change? The you have to do something different to get different results: vote for the guy the establishments of BOTH parties despise: Trump.

    Want all the big money out of politics? Hillary has spent over a hundred million dollars on ads trashing Trump, and most of that money comes from super-wealthy supporters and Wall St bankers (she has never made any product to earn that money). Trump has spent next to nothing. This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to put somebody in office who owes nothing to Wall St bankers. If Hillary wins, you will likely NEVER see a reduction in campaign cash in your lifetime, but if Trump wins, every politician, ad meister, pollster, campaign consultant, lobbyist, pundit and columnist will have to seriously re-consider the role of money in elections.

  174. Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiots who get your "news" from late night comics cannot resist outing yourselves with that childish "Drumpf" nonesense.

    Trump was born with the last name "Trump" - he was NEVER named "Drumpf". You think you're being clever by insisting that he ought to go by some name a low-quality stand-up quasi-comic claims an ancestor of his had.

    How about we use some REALITY and TRUTH on your hero politicians?

    1. Is Barack Obama's name "Barry Soetoro"? He actually used that name for himself as a younger man. No imagination by comics is needed. (note: the college ID card image circulating on the net with that name on it is a photoshop job, but he DID use that name)

    2. Was Barack Obama born in Kenya? I happen to believe he was born in Hawaii, but his own literary agent (not some right-wing enemy) listed him as born in Kenya all the way up until 2007 just as he began his run for President. You don't have to get that from some late-night comic or from some enemy of his.

    3. Was Hillary Clinton named after Sir Edmund Hillary? She claimed it and even her fans at Politifact confirm both that she claimed it and that it was not reasonably true given that Sir Edmund Hillary was not yet famous at the time she was born.

    Need I go on to further illustrate how dumb, childish, and hypocritical you "Drumpfers" are?

  175. SQUIRREL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this shouting about the few people Trump imports to work seasonal jobs at several properties, while most of his thousands of employees are US Citizens, is nothing but a distraction from a fact we are intended not to notice: Hillary has never employed ANY US citizens to do productive private sector jobs. She has landed her supporters some jobs in government or at the Clinton Foundation, none of which make ANYTHING of substance. Hillary has no experience employing people in the private sector doing actual productive work.

  176. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    If a third party wants votes - let them earn it the right way. You don't run for president every four years... you need to be at the grassroots running for every office. Where's the libertarian candidate for postmaster, the green candidate for dogcatcher ? Run for those offices, prove your ideas at the ward level by running for seats at the low level and slowly wiinning. Then run for the councils of small towns and when you have a bunch of councilors then you run somebody for mayor of them. Prove your ideas in the towns that bite.

    When you got a mayor in a 30% or more of the towns, then start running for cities and metros in the same way. When you got a bunch of those - THEN you can run for state government and eventually get some governors.

    And then - 20 years from now,THEN you'll be a viable third party who can run for congress and the white house.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  177. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, buthurt much, Donald?

  178. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    I live in Brat's district. He's a Tea Party douche-nozzle who sides with the plutocrats every time he votes on a bill. He's just as bought as the rest of them. Plus, he doesn't govern -- he grandstands.

    'Brat' is a wholly appropriate name.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  179. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 0

    I live in Brat's district. He's a Tea Party douche-nozzle who sides with the plutocrats every time he votes on a bill. He's just as bought as the rest of them.

    So you don't like his politics, so you consider him "bought", even though it's bullshit. In fact, the "Tea Party" association is bullshit, too. He was tagged with it even though he never did anything to associate himself with any tea party groups and pointed it out. Nice confirmation bias you have going on, there.

    Brat is representing his constituents, and doing a great job of it. That's not something that can be said of the rep he ousted, Eric Cantor. Cantor represented himself and the big banks, and that's about it.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  180. Will California vote to fix the H-1B problem? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    One of the two candidates in our upcoming presidential election has promised to fix the H-1B problem and the other has not.

    I suspect IT workers in California will still vote "D" come November believing that Democrats actually care about the working class.

  181. Is this a joke?! by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    If not they need any public funding withdrawn, and get the ITT Treatment with regards to student loans.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  182. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    The first step towards socialism - a justice system and police force paid for through taxation. Laws banning slavery, forcing universal suffrage, universal justice, universal taxation, sexual equality, racial equality, banning the buying and selling of children and use of children as sex slaves, etc.

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  183. Re:they should be teching real skills not outsourc by LienRag · · Score: 2

    Bernie Sanders?

  184. Is it really cheaper - for now? by martinfb · · Score: 1

    How much cheaper is it for an entity to outsource an IT department than to manage it's in-house staff, or a US based shared IT services company?

    Isn't the competition in the states good enough that US companies can compete with global providers?!
    If not, then should the US implement an 'equalizing' policy such that supplanting US jobs to foreign sources costs as much to do as it costs to keep jobs in the US?!

    Could the US inflate foreign economies so that their workforce costs are at parity with our own?!

    IF money (i.e. 'bottom line') were no objective, wouldn't jobs and education both benefit?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.