Does President Trump, calling out publicly for Russians to hack his political opponent, in front of an audience of thousands and broadcast around the world and saved for your viewing pleasure on Youtube constitute collusion?
No. Because unlike Russigaters, Russians aren't complete fucking idiots and know that both Democrats and Republicans have been virulently anti-Russian for over a century. Your baseless conspiracy theory makes as much sense as accusing a gay person of interfering in an election between an extremely homophobic Catholic and an extremely homophobic Mormon. Any more stupid questions?
No evidence that you've seen, but who the hell are you? You're not the special counsel, right? You're not on his team? You have no idea what evidence they do or do not have or who their targets might be?
Russiagate cultists keep repeating this as if it's supposed to mean something. It doesn't mean anything when the investigation has gone on for two fucking years and Mueller hasn't even come up with probable suspicion that a crime was committed, much less probable cause, much less that Trump was in on it.
You wankers are the village idiots screaming that the emperor is wearing the finest livery, when it's blindingly obvious he's got nothin on but his boxers.
People keep saying that as if it's supposed to mean something. Mueller hasn't found anything so much as probable suspicion that a crime was committed, much less that it was done by Russia, much less that Trump was involved. If he hasn't found something in 2 years....he's not going to find anything. Don't like it....go sit over there next to the Bushbot True Believers, who are holding out hope that any day now, proof will emerge that Saddam had WMD's and planned 911. You know, more than ten years after even the Bush Administration itself gave up any such claims.
This probe isn't to look for any wrongdoing, it's for the deep state to keep a leash on our game show host president. That fact is so blindingly fucking obvious that Ray Charles could see it with his naked eyes. And Ray Charles is blind.
They have the evidence. They don't want to go to trial yet because exposing that evidence will make it easier for future targets of the investigation to evade justice.
Then he would have kept all the indictment sealed until he was ready to go trial, cultist. And though the current indictments are for DNC hacking - Mueller still hasn't bothered to have the FBI examine their servers. Don't bother brining up the CrowdStrike report as it isn't fit to be toilet paper, and would be tossed out of court as inadmissible.
So either 1) Mueller is too incompetent to be trusted to run the office Keurig machine by himself, least he burn the place down, or 2) this shitshow has been a farce from day one, and Russiagaters are the most gullible people in the history of the human race.
....so this is still a farce. Doubly so given the fact he hasn't even raised an eyebrow at Cambridge Analytics, when that foreign company has outright bragged of swinging American elections. Triply so given he DGAF that Hillary actually did what Trump is (without any basis whatsoever) accused of doing: colluding with foreign intelligence agents to get dirt on an opponent for a general election: when she paid for the Steele Dossier. And to the Dembots reading this, don't even bother with the blather that Trump's republican rivals were sniffing around first. That does fuck-all to change the fact that Hillary paid. for. the. Steele. Dossier.
Facts getting in the way of your wingnut religion? The memos were verified for accuracy of their content and that's just a fact you'll have to deal with. Now, piss off unless you want to hold that standard to the rest of the media, in which case every editor, reporter and anchor across the country is going to be out of a job tomorrow.
You CAN read his writing for yourself rather than making up shit to hate whoever Bill Maher tells you to hate.
And you CAN try not being willfully obtuse, as I already addressed that canard the first time: last mile and market consolidation naturally leads to less than a handful of providers in any market. The entire point is a red herring anyway; if I own a small company should I be free to ignore the Clean Water Act, dumping lead in the town's water supply, just because I don't employ 50,000 people like Dow Chemical? The entire line of "reasoning" is asinine on its face.
Just curious: why should posting Nazi ideology on your private blog get you fired, if said posts have nothing to do with your employer and in no way reflect badly on that employer other than simply having you on their payroll?
No you think it isnn't the point but it actually is. Things don't exist in a vacuum and humans are not simple, mindless rules inference machines. Further the world is not a simple binary state either, it exists on a continuum.
Since you need a picture drawn with crayons, the point isn't to equate Nazism with Jessica Price. The point is that it's absurd to claim it's not the company's concern when you publicly talk about company business on a public Twitter account, to which you've attached your employer's name - and then be a flaming asshole to one of the comapny's partners. Now here's another analogy you'll love: you reason like a Klansman justifying his dislike of Jews "because Jews killed Jesus". More on that in a minute.
Yes true.
Not true. Plot limitations is an old subject not just in MMORPG's but RPG's in general, and as a partner to the company, something Deroir actually knows WTF he's talking about from a user perspective. Bioware had this shit worked out with Mass Effect 3, though they were criminally cut short on time by EA to apply it to the main story. Rather than worry about every branching conversation option or plot choice, just assign points to various options the player has taken to see how the story is resolved a la Rannoch.
But even if it was true, and Deroir asked a dumbass question like "have you considered adding graphics acceleration to the game", nothing justifies Jessica going full sexist nuclear hatorade on his ass. If she was capable of either reason or professionalism, she could have answered something like "that takes much more work - which campaigns in the game would you have traded for more meaningful plot decisions?"
Common, even you know this is BS. Just flip the genders
Oh yes. I should just pretend like the world isn't the way it currently is. I know a few women in various tech jobs. They have had to put up with a *lot* of shit that I haven't along these lines.
Except Jessica was the one throwing out a *lot* of shit here, not Deroir. You only get to the play the cards on the table here, not bring in some irrelevant baggage & bullshit. Deroir wasn't some high school guidance counselor telling a student she should really consider a liberal arts degree instead of computer science. He wasn't some GamerGate nutjob doxxing a person he didn't like. He wasn't some fuckwad calling everyone a See You Next Tuesday on a livestream.
Pretending to the contrary, and justifying Jessica's abuse of Deroir by other wrongs done by other people to other women, is straight up "Jews killed Jesus" reasoning. Fuck that. But trying to claim moral superiority while literally becoming what you hate - good luck with that too.
Really there wasn't that big a difference between Stalin or Hitler, except for the fact that Stalin was a much more effective killer of civilians.
Riiiight. That's why Stalin halted the Holocaust, and why there were 50 million more civilians in Russia after his reign than before it, and that's with Russia losing 20-30 million people in WWII.
The way you guys carry on you think it was Russia that boasted about inteferring in the 1996 election and then doubled the size of the Warsaw Pact, all the way to America's borders, after promising not one inch of expansion in the 80's. All the whining about Ukraine and Crimea is just Swiftboating, as it was the U.S. that overthrew the elected government of Ukraine and is busy arming literal neo-nazies, along with Israel.
You mean besides all the indictments and guilty pleas that have nothing whatsoever to do with Russia interfering with the election or colluding with Trump to do so
FTFY. Even in Mueller's embarrassing indictment of a Twitter troll farm, he admits it had no effect on the election. You Russiagaters are as sad as the Bushbots who still insist that Saddam had WMD's more than a decade after the Bush Administration itself gave up on any such claims.
We are still at zero evidence so far for Russiagate, which is the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time. It posits that Putin was so clever and crafty that he knew years in advance that a racist professional wrestling game show host could be president, yet was so unbelievably incompetent that he couldn't anticipate any blowback, or collude with someone as dumb as Trump. Because if Trump knew, that means that the CIA/NSA/FBI would know. Which means that President Elect Hillary would also know, as the race was hers to lose right up until November, and she had already campaigned on shooting down Russian jets over Syria.
All your "evidence" is as solid as a Birther seizing on a picture of Obama eating humus and insisting that was proof that he really was a muslim born in Kenya. Yes, Russiagate is that bad.
As I told my family members who moved away - I'm not important enough to live near, so you're not important enough to visit. If I show up, I do, but I'm under no obligation.
Wow, you are SUCH a badass. But lets say your kid goes to a university on the other side of the country and is in a nasty accident, and your employer will only let you take three days off next to a weekend. You really gonna tell Junior to go fuck himself & he's on his own, or are you going to put down the big man act for a couple of days and fly Southwest?
Because you as the user have chosen to give away that data to the carrier...
Because you have to live as a hermit or an Amish commune to enjoy privacy in modern times? You can't be a normal citizens WITHOUT third parties having information on you. Even SCOTUS, which has spent decades trying to render the 4th Amendment meaningless, now agrees that cops need a warrant to get cell phone data.
Those two factors ensure that Americans generally have only one crappy choice for cable or one crappy choice for DSL. Thus, net neutrality rules that applied to all.
As written, the rules applied to ALL ISPs, no matter what market power they had, so it was illegal to operate a kid friendly service.
Illegal for parents to opt-in to a kids portal? [citation needed]
Fixing that would have saved the Net Neutrality rules from a 1st amendment challenge, he thought.
He's a corporatist looking for any excuse to work his ideology into his rulings - he'll be at home setting next to the other hacks on the court.
...but who would be interested in such tripe? Aside from present company.
So a conservative-leaning judge supports free markets
The free market where ISP's suddenly start paying rent on what used to be right-of-ways? And returning hundreds of billions in government subsidies and research?
broad application of the First Amendment
Double-charging and denying speech is a first amendment issue on what planet?
Why the wingnut misdirection? It was the Killian's secretary who verified the commander had written memos critical of Bush. And back to the subject of delusional wingnut standards that apply to only one person and for only one situation - how many people were fired for repeating lies told about Iraq. How many news organizations keep archivists and typography experts on staff to inspect every document before it goes to air.
Most commonly used by Sam Harris and his fanboys when anyone points out his psychopathic rationalizations, imperialist hypocrisy and racist islamophobia. "Using words that have come out of my mouth is quote mining and that's sooooo unfair!" (stomps feet).
The problem with Media Matters isn't quoting, it's that they've turned into a purely tribalist organization for the DNC that will go to great lengths to ignore right wing bullshit if its coming from Democrats, or to rationalize it.
Dan Rather, anchor long time CBS anchor, forced to resign in disgrace for manufacturing anti-conservative news
Wrong wrong wrong. CBS did verify the memos for the accuracy of their content. If they were forged - which has never been proven - someone forged the truth.
And bitch, please, it's not as if every reporter, anchor and editor who repeated the outright lies on Iraq was castigated, much less suspended, much less fired for taking part in the very worst propaganda in modern times. Wingnuts have created this standard that applies to just one person, because it fits your biases.
NPR admitting press is biased
Yes, National Pentagon Radio is quite biased. Just 180 degrees from where you think it is.
Title fixed. This is all about suppressing news that goes against the establishment narrative - if Youtube had been big in 2003 it would have been tagging videos questioning Saddam's WMD's and ties to Al Queda as conspiracy theories.
Speaking of CT, Youtube doesn't give a shit about batshit crazy theories as long as they're coming from CNN or MSDNC. Like how Putin was such a master chess player that he knew years in advance that a professional wrestling character could be president, but at the same time was completely unable to anticipate any blowback in messing with an election. Or how Assad never uses chemical weapons when it would be to his tactical advantage, but loves to drop gas the very day weapon inspectors arrive in the country, or the United States announces a withdrawal from its regime change operations.
If Youtube was honest here, every other clip from Fox, CNN or Rachael Madcow would be the ones coming with disclaimers and debunking information.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course it is, moran. The trope that a prosecutor could "indict a ham sandwich" exists for a reason.
No. Because unlike Russigaters, Russians aren't complete fucking idiots and know that both Democrats and Republicans have been virulently anti-Russian for over a century. Your baseless conspiracy theory makes as much sense as accusing a gay person of interfering in an election between an extremely homophobic Catholic and an extremely homophobic Mormon. Any more stupid questions?
Russiagate cultists keep repeating this as if it's supposed to mean something. It doesn't mean anything when the investigation has gone on for two fucking years and Mueller hasn't even come up with probable suspicion that a crime was committed, much less probable cause, much less that Trump was in on it.
You wankers are the village idiots screaming that the emperor is wearing the finest livery, when it's blindingly obvious he's got nothin on but his boxers.
People keep saying that as if it's supposed to mean something. Mueller hasn't found anything so much as probable suspicion that a crime was committed, much less that it was done by Russia, much less that Trump was involved. If he hasn't found something in 2 years....he's not going to find anything. Don't like it....go sit over there next to the Bushbot True Believers, who are holding out hope that any day now, proof will emerge that Saddam had WMD's and planned 911. You know, more than ten years after even the Bush Administration itself gave up any such claims.
This probe isn't to look for any wrongdoing, it's for the deep state to keep a leash on our game show host president. That fact is so blindingly fucking obvious that Ray Charles could see it with his naked eyes. And Ray Charles is blind.
And dead.
That's your problem, he did.
Then he would have kept all the indictment sealed until he was ready to go trial, cultist. And though the current indictments are for DNC hacking - Mueller still hasn't bothered to have the FBI examine their servers. Don't bother brining up the CrowdStrike report as it isn't fit to be toilet paper, and would be tossed out of court as inadmissible.
So either 1) Mueller is too incompetent to be trusted to run the office Keurig machine by himself, least he burn the place down, or 2) this shitshow has been a farce from day one, and Russiagaters are the most gullible people in the history of the human race.
Pick one.
....so this is still a farce. Doubly so given the fact he hasn't even raised an eyebrow at Cambridge Analytics, when that foreign company has outright bragged of swinging American elections. Triply so given he DGAF that Hillary actually did what Trump is (without any basis whatsoever) accused of doing: colluding with foreign intelligence agents to get dirt on an opponent for a general election: when she paid for the Steele Dossier. And to the Dembots reading this, don't even bother with the blather that Trump's republican rivals were sniffing around first. That does fuck-all to change the fact that Hillary paid. for. the. Steele. Dossier.
Facts getting in the way of your wingnut religion? The memos were verified for accuracy of their content and that's just a fact you'll have to deal with. Now, piss off unless you want to hold that standard to the rest of the media, in which case every editor, reporter and anchor across the country is going to be out of a job tomorrow.
And you CAN try not being willfully obtuse, as I already addressed that canard the first time: last mile and market consolidation naturally leads to less than a handful of providers in any market. The entire point is a red herring anyway; if I own a small company should I be free to ignore the Clean Water Act, dumping lead in the town's water supply, just because I don't employ 50,000 people like Dow Chemical? The entire line of "reasoning" is asinine on its face.
Since you need a picture drawn with crayons, the point isn't to equate Nazism with Jessica Price. The point is that it's absurd to claim it's not the company's concern when you publicly talk about company business on a public Twitter account, to which you've attached your employer's name - and then be a flaming asshole to one of the comapny's partners. Now here's another analogy you'll love: you reason like a Klansman justifying his dislike of Jews "because Jews killed Jesus". More on that in a minute.
Not true. Plot limitations is an old subject not just in MMORPG's but RPG's in general, and as a partner to the company, something Deroir actually knows WTF he's talking about from a user perspective. Bioware had this shit worked out with Mass Effect 3, though they were criminally cut short on time by EA to apply it to the main story. Rather than worry about every branching conversation option or plot choice, just assign points to various options the player has taken to see how the story is resolved a la Rannoch.
But even if it was true, and Deroir asked a dumbass question like "have you considered adding graphics acceleration to the game", nothing justifies Jessica going full sexist nuclear hatorade on his ass. If she was capable of either reason or professionalism, she could have answered something like "that takes much more work - which campaigns in the game would you have traded for more meaningful plot decisions?"
Except Jessica was the one throwing out a *lot* of shit here, not Deroir. You only get to the play the cards on the table here, not bring in some irrelevant baggage & bullshit. Deroir wasn't some high school guidance counselor telling a student she should really consider a liberal arts degree instead of computer science. He wasn't some GamerGate nutjob doxxing a person he didn't like. He wasn't some fuckwad calling everyone a See You Next Tuesday on a livestream.
Pretending to the contrary, and justifying Jessica's abuse of Deroir by other wrongs done by other people to other women, is straight up "Jews killed Jesus" reasoning. Fuck that. But trying to claim moral superiority while literally becoming what you hate - good luck with that too.
Riiiight. That's why Stalin halted the Holocaust, and why there were 50 million more civilians in Russia after his reign than before it, and that's with Russia losing 20-30 million people in WWII.
Was that sincere Hatorade or performance art? It's hard to tell for sure these days...
That story would be so much more credible if it was delivered by Glenn Beck with a chalkboard.
The way you guys carry on you think it was Russia that boasted about inteferring in the 1996 election and then doubled the size of the Warsaw Pact, all the way to America's borders, after promising not one inch of expansion in the 80's. All the whining about Ukraine and Crimea is just Swiftboating, as it was the U.S. that overthrew the elected government of Ukraine and is busy arming literal neo-nazies, along with Israel.
FTFY. Even in Mueller's embarrassing indictment of a Twitter troll farm, he admits it had no effect on the election. You Russiagaters are as sad as the Bushbots who still insist that Saddam had WMD's more than a decade after the Bush Administration itself gave up on any such claims.
We are still at zero evidence so far for Russiagate, which is the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time. It posits that Putin was so clever and crafty that he knew years in advance that a racist professional wrestling game show host could be president, yet was so unbelievably incompetent that he couldn't anticipate any blowback, or collude with someone as dumb as Trump. Because if Trump knew, that means that the CIA/NSA/FBI would know. Which means that President Elect Hillary would also know, as the race was hers to lose right up until November, and she had already campaigned on shooting down Russian jets over Syria.
All your "evidence" is as solid as a Birther seizing on a picture of Obama eating humus and insisting that was proof that he really was a muslim born in Kenya. Yes, Russiagate is that bad.
Dumbest.
Conspiracy.
Theory.
Of.
All.
Time.
Wow, you are SUCH a badass. But lets say your kid goes to a university on the other side of the country and is in a nasty accident, and your employer will only let you take three days off next to a weekend. You really gonna tell Junior to go fuck himself & he's on his own, or are you going to put down the big man act for a couple of days and fly Southwest?
Because you have to live as a hermit or an Amish commune to enjoy privacy in modern times? You can't be a normal citizens WITHOUT third parties having information on you. Even SCOTUS, which has spent decades trying to render the 4th Amendment meaningless, now agrees that cops need a warrant to get cell phone data.
Uniformly white skin has nothing to do with having nice things, Klansman.
Those two factors ensure that Americans generally have only one crappy choice for cable or one crappy choice for DSL. Thus, net neutrality rules that applied to all.
Illegal for parents to opt-in to a kids portal? [citation needed]
He's a corporatist looking for any excuse to work his ideology into his rulings - he'll be at home setting next to the other hacks on the court.
...but who would be interested in such tripe? Aside from present company.
The free market where ISP's suddenly start paying rent on what used to be right-of-ways? And returning hundreds of billions in government subsidies and research?
Double-charging and denying speech is a first amendment issue on what planet?
Why the wingnut misdirection? It was the Killian's secretary who verified the commander had written memos critical of Bush. And back to the subject of delusional wingnut standards that apply to only one person and for only one situation - how many people were fired for repeating lies told about Iraq. How many news organizations keep archivists and typography experts on staff to inspect every document before it goes to air.
Most commonly used by Sam Harris and his fanboys when anyone points out his psychopathic rationalizations, imperialist hypocrisy and racist islamophobia. "Using words that have come out of my mouth is quote mining and that's sooooo unfair!" (stomps feet).
The problem with Media Matters isn't quoting, it's that they've turned into a purely tribalist organization for the DNC that will go to great lengths to ignore right wing bullshit if its coming from Democrats, or to rationalize it.
Wrong wrong wrong. CBS did verify the memos for the accuracy of their content. If they were forged - which has never been proven - someone forged the truth.
And bitch, please, it's not as if every reporter, anchor and editor who repeated the outright lies on Iraq was castigated, much less suspended, much less fired for taking part in the very worst propaganda in modern times. Wingnuts have created this standard that applies to just one person, because it fits your biases.
Yes, National Pentagon Radio is quite biased. Just 180 degrees from where you think it is.
Title fixed. This is all about suppressing news that goes against the establishment narrative - if Youtube had been big in 2003 it would have been tagging videos questioning Saddam's WMD's and ties to Al Queda as conspiracy theories.
Speaking of CT, Youtube doesn't give a shit about batshit crazy theories as long as they're coming from CNN or MSDNC. Like how Putin was such a master chess player that he knew years in advance that a professional wrestling character could be president, but at the same time was completely unable to anticipate any blowback in messing with an election. Or how Assad never uses chemical weapons when it would be to his tactical advantage, but loves to drop gas the very day weapon inspectors arrive in the country, or the United States announces a withdrawal from its regime change operations.
If Youtube was honest here, every other clip from Fox, CNN or Rachael Madcow would be the ones coming with disclaimers and debunking information.
Her twitter feed is objectively a nasty train wreck. But however you want to project your own biases....