What I really meant is why use the current telephone system at all? As flat rate high speed internet connections become more and more common it becomes that much easier to stick to pure VOIP. All you have to do is make it as easy as dialing a phone and people will use it. I haven't paid for a phone call to my family for a long time now.
PS: I highly recommend TeamSpeak (www.teamspeak.org) which is what I use at the moment.
I don't really understand how any regulation on VOIP would work. Living in England, I speak to my family in Spain on a daily basis using VOIP. At the moment I sit down if front of a computer and use microphone/speakers. How long will it be until someone comes up with a telephone type device which you plug into your DSL modem?
It really depends on the density of cell phone towers. I think it varies from around 2 km if you are out in the middle of nowhere, to a few meters in the city.
In the UK people have been convicted based upon evidence provided by mobile phone companies, which pinpointed their location. In one case a man was convicted of murdering his niece when it was shown that he had been using both his and her mobile phone to send messages back and forth in order to create an alibi for himself. Both phones had been using the same base station, which wasn't anywhere near where the man had claimed to be at the time.
I also know that in Germany some companies will allow you to use your mobile phone as a house phone and will charge you land line rates if you are within a certain distance of your house (I think 500m).
So if you delete your cookies, or use a browser such as Opera which automatically gets rid of them after each session it can't really keep track of you.
Unless they actually *do* log you IP every time you search...
The reason the Smart has such disappointing sales is mainly due to the price. For the same price as a two-seater 600 cc engine (even though you can buy them turbocharged) you could buy yourself a 4-seater with a 1200cc engine.
What this translates into is a car which you would only buy as a second or third car and isn't really all that practical. It will still get stuck in traffic jams and a lot of cities in Europe have ALL parking bays painted out on the road anyway, including the parallel parking bays, making the main reason to buy it void.
Is it me or do practically all the reviews posted come to the conclusion that the reviewed book was good/interesting/worth buying?
I guess it could be accounted for if the reviewers are paying for the book themselves - even if you do buy a book with the intention of reviewing it, you aren't likely to buy it if you think it isn't worthwhile. Unfortunately, while this might not always result in a biased review, it does make it harder to be negative, as well as cutting out on books that the reviewer doesn't like the look of to start with.
Satellite TV in Spain (cable didn't catch on) relied on a smart card that contains all the information about what the subscriber has paid for. This meant that if you reprogrammed the card to contain the most recent user codes, you could access all the PPV channels for free. If you have a legit card, it recieves the new codes from the satellite signal itself.
There was a huge underground industry around - it got to the point were people where actually selling cards with PICs on them which would reprogram themselves automatically, getting the info from the satellite signal.
Obviously the satellite company knew about it, as did everybody else. I cannot think of anyone that didn't have one of these cards (if they had satellite obviously). The TV company didn't do anything about it for a couple of years. Why? Market share. The more people that signed up for their service and got a box, at a higher price than it would be with the compentition, the better in the long run for the company. People were signing up left right and center with the expectation of being able to unlock all the channels.
And then all of a sudden - clamp down! The company started verifying the user info in a different way an bingo - millions of subscribers that are addicted to 24/7 PPV.
I quite like it when they change the actor in series of movies - it adds a bit of variety. It doesn't detract from the movie itself (if the actors chosen are up to the challenge of course).
Take James Bond - does it really matter that Sean Connery doesn't play the lead in all of them? Some of the 'James Bonds' have been better than others, but still fun nonetheless.
Having said that though, I wouldn't want to lose £11 million either...
The bit I like best from this site (fumento.com) is this:
MCS has been rejected as an organic disease by the American Medical Association, the American Medical Council on Scientific Affairs, the American College of Physicians, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and (my favourite) the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.
It really just sounds like a nice new way of blaming someone (or something in this case) else for agoraphobia.
Slashdot Mirror
The article does not say that British officials want to use them - it says that corporation that manufactures the chips thinks it would be good idea!
What I really meant is why use the current telephone system at all? As flat rate high speed internet connections become more and more common it becomes that much easier to stick to pure VOIP. All you have to do is make it as easy as dialing a phone and people will use it. I haven't paid for a phone call to my family for a long time now.
PS: I highly recommend TeamSpeak (www.teamspeak.org) which is what I use at the moment.
I don't really understand how any regulation on VOIP would work. Living in England, I speak to my family in Spain on a daily basis using VOIP. At the moment I sit down if front of a computer and use microphone/speakers. How long will it be until someone comes up with a telephone type device which you plug into your DSL modem?
It really depends on the density of cell phone towers. I think it varies from around 2 km if you are out in the middle of nowhere, to a few meters in the city.
In the UK people have been convicted based upon evidence provided by mobile phone companies, which pinpointed their location. In one case a man was convicted of murdering his niece when it was shown that he had been using both his and her mobile phone to send messages back and forth in order to create an alibi for himself. Both phones had been using the same base station, which wasn't anywhere near where the man had claimed to be at the time.
I also know that in Germany some companies will allow you to use your mobile phone as a house phone and will charge you land line rates if you are within a certain distance of your house (I think 500m).
So if you delete your cookies, or use a browser such as Opera which automatically gets rid of them after each session it can't really keep track of you.
Unless they actually *do* log you IP every time you search...
The reason the Smart has such disappointing sales is mainly due to the price. For the same price as a two-seater 600 cc engine (even though you can buy them turbocharged) you could buy yourself a 4-seater with a 1200cc engine.
What this translates into is a car which you would only buy as a second or third car and isn't really all that practical. It will still get stuck in traffic jams and a lot of cities in Europe have ALL parking bays painted out on the road anyway, including the parallel parking bays, making the main reason to buy it void.
Am I the only one that couldn't make any sense of those specs?? Man technology moves fast! ;)
Is it me or do practically all the reviews posted come to the conclusion that the reviewed book was good/interesting/worth buying?
I guess it could be accounted for if the reviewers are paying for the book themselves - even if you do buy a book with the intention of reviewing it, you aren't likely to buy it if you think it isn't worthwhile. Unfortunately, while this might not always result in a biased review, it does make it harder to be negative, as well as cutting out on books that the reviewer doesn't like the look of to start with.
Satellite TV in Spain (cable didn't catch on) relied on a smart card that contains all the information about what the subscriber has paid for. This meant that if you reprogrammed the card to contain the most recent user codes, you could access all the PPV channels for free. If you have a legit card, it recieves the new codes from the satellite signal itself.
There was a huge underground industry around - it got to the point were people where actually selling cards with PICs on them which would reprogram themselves automatically, getting the info from the satellite signal.
Obviously the satellite company knew about it, as did everybody else. I cannot think of anyone that didn't have one of these cards (if they had satellite obviously). The TV company didn't do anything about it for a couple of years. Why? Market share. The more people that signed up for their service and got a box, at a higher price than it would be with the compentition, the better in the long run for the company. People were signing up left right and center with the expectation of being able to unlock all the channels.
And then all of a sudden - clamp down! The company started verifying the user info in a different way an bingo - millions of subscribers that are addicted to 24/7 PPV.
I quite like it when they change the actor in series of movies - it adds a bit of variety. It doesn't detract from the movie itself (if the actors chosen are up to the challenge of course).
Take James Bond - does it really matter that Sean Connery doesn't play the lead in all of them? Some of the 'James Bonds' have been better than others, but still fun nonetheless.
Having said that though, I wouldn't want to lose £11 million either...
The bit I like best from this site (fumento.com) is this:
MCS has been rejected as an organic disease by the American Medical Association, the American Medical Council on Scientific Affairs, the American College of Physicians, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and (my favourite) the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.
It really just sounds like a nice new way of blaming someone (or something in this case) else for agoraphobia.