Slashdot Mirror


Shelter: A Quest for Non-Toxic Housing

Crocuta writes "Many of the geeks on /. voluntarily confine themselves to their homes for vast stretches of time, but what happens when your home becomes your prison? Eric Hunting suffers from Environmental Illness which perpetually confines him to his home, which even as carefully furnished as it is, is still slowly killing him. His website, Shelter, is both a plea for help and a guide documenting one man's quest for non-toxic housing."

448 comments

  1. yummy by Botchka · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hell to think that I was happy my crayons and paste were non toxic........oh crap! is playdoh?

    --
    Money not found! A)bort, R)etry, D)eclare Bankruptcy
    1. Re:yummy by maurert · · Score: 1

      I heard Crayola used to add asbetos to crayons to make them stronger. All locked inside wax so not likely to cause the breathing problems, but it's there. Makes you think about those candles one used to make that were colored with crayons though...

  2. Arconsanti is the answer by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arcosanti is housing project designed and developed by Paolo Soleric

    1. Re:Arconsanti is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though Arcosanti is indeed a very cool place, I don't believe it is the answer this man is looking for, as Arcosanti is constructed largely of normal materials and they use many of the chemicals that this man claims to be allergic to.

  3. Erm... by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Erm, wood anyone? Bricks and mortar? Glass?

    Having looked at the site, I can't help thinking that there might be a psychological element to "Environmental illness".

    1. Re:Erm... by Maeryk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Erm, wood anyone? Bricks and mortar? Glass?

      What wood? Plywood (flooring substrate) and press board are all made with really nasty glues.. that give off formaldehyde, among other things, for years and years. Bricks are made of god knows what in some cases, bonding and strengthening agents are used in the formula, and these too can give off gasses or dusts that are toxic to people with allergies. Mortar has really nasty things in it.. which again people can be allergic too, and to seal it you need to use paint.. which also can cause reactions in people who cant deal with certain fumes.

      The fact that the guy is leaning towards adobe makes me think he is allergic to something that is pretty commonly used as a "safe" bonding or strenghtening agent.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:Erm... by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny

      What wood? Plywood (flooring substrate) and press board are all made with really nasty glues.

      Well don't use fricking plywood or press board then!

      Bricks are made of god knows what in some cases

      Bricks are made of clay, baked at very high temperatues. There really isn't much more to it than that.

      Mortar has really nasty things in it

      Really, like, erm, lime, silica and sand?

      Where do you buy your building supplies, for flips sake, Dr. Evil?

    3. Re:Erm... by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Modern wood isn't very chemically "safe" -- various treatments involve chemicals you wouldn't otherwise like to be exposed to. One of the primary agents used in pressure treated wood is aresenic -- and there's some evidence that it does leak out into the surroundings (although still at a non-harmful level). Engineered wood (plywood, pressed wood, OSB, etc) often contains formaldehyde, along with other chemicals used in the bonding process (again - low levels - less than 1% of the mass is the bonding agent).

      Modern wood floors are coated with polyurethane and aluminum oxide. I've done more furniture finishing than I care to think about and poly isn't the nicest thing on earth.

      There are various chemicals used in the tinting of bricks and mortar, which I can imagine would be problematic. Modern concrete is also nasty - there's a reason they warn you not to handle with bare hands, since you can get chemical burns in short order.

      Glass would seem to be relatively inert, but who knows.

      Paints and wallpaper all have fun and interesting chemical compounds.

      There probably are some psychosomatic symptoms in this illness, as there are in many, but I doubt that covers all of it. There's a high likelyhood that he actually does have severe negative reactions to a vast amount of chemicals -- although why this is is an interesting question. Genetic defect? Too many antibiotic sprays and cleaners as a kid (yes -- overuse of these is bad and reduces the overall effectiveness of your immune system)? Exposure to some high doses of chemicals that caused a trigger effect?

      And while he claims the need for EI-friendly housing is "extreme", it's extreme only in a very, very, very small community. I won't question his need for it, but I do question the number of people in need. And the fact is, it's going to be expensive. Hideously so. Removal of modern building methods and resources means a lot of human intensive labor along with some very specialized resource requirements. An adobe home for $125/sq ft may be one of the cheaper alternatives.

    4. Re:Erm... by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Mortar has really nasty things in it

      Really, like, erm, lime, silica and sand?

      Where do you buy your building supplies, for flips sake, Dr. Evil?

      I don't know where you get your building supplies, but the stuff my contractor showed up with had a long list of US patent numbers for additives that improved the strength, reduced the set time, and cut down on the dust. Anything else those chemicals might do is beyond me, but I can tell you there is more in there than lime, silica, and sand.

    5. Re:Erm... by NitroPye · · Score: 1

      I dont know about the bricks and mortar but like previously stated wood is commonly treated and in the case of plywood it has glues and such. Glass ususally is not just the things your told in chemistry class anymore. They add other chemicals to make it stronger or lighter ...

    6. Re:Erm... by notfancy · · Score: 1

      Go see Safe , by Todd Haynes. Forget about interpretations and allegories, and just try to empathize with Julianne Moore (a terrific performance, BTW).

    7. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you buy your building supplies, for flips sake, Dr. Evil?

      That's why his house costs two ... MILLION ... dollars!

    8. Re:Erm... by pubjames · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And the fact is, it's going to be expensive. Hideously so.

      Wood comes from trees, timber yards make trees into planks of wood, in case you didn't know that. Go to a timber yard. Ask them to sell you some untreated wood.

      Stone comes out of the ground. In places called "quarries" they take it out of the ground and cut it into pieces suitable for building houses. Go there, buy some stone.

      There you have the basic ingredients for your house. If you search very carefully, you might just be able to find a builder that is used to making constructions from wood and stone. I've heard they exist.

    9. Re:Erm... by The_K4 · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's it....i'm gunna go live in a log cabin in montana, grow a beard and mail packages to important people. :) he he he

    10. Re:Erm... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are correct in that there are a number of things in there other than lime, silica, and sand but that would make me ask the question "But does there have to be?"

      Wood, bricks, and mortar. If he simply used real natural wood, basic clay bricks, and a standard simple mortar he would get the desired effects I think. I don't know if those are even available today without an additive here or a treatment there but that would be an answer I think.

      having said that it seems like the hardest part of all of this would be making sure the contractor was in fact only using the materials you specified. I mean, who's going to check it? You? In this scenario you're the guy who gets sick around the stuff so that's not going to be any fun. On top of that would you know what you were looking at and if you did could you be there during the entire construction to make sure?

      Tough nut to crack here.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    11. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, especially with Non-Toxic housing requirements such as:
      14 Light, lighting and color shall be in accord with natural conditions.
      22 Harmonic measures, proportions and shapes need to be taken into consideration.
      1 A building site shall be geologically undisturbed.

      While I sympathize with the dude's suffering, these are a little to touchy-feely for me - what the fuck is a harmonic measure!?!? is this house resonating? How does the shape of a house affect his condition? Must be my engineering background, I'm gonna go drink some PCB's.

    12. Re:Erm... by alastairm · · Score: 1

      How about this? £25000, sustainable and pretty much all natural? OK you need (quite) a few mates to do it for that price, but you can always pay someone.

      Grand Designs

    13. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concrete has been nasty since roman times, and not because of newfangled additives. It is chock full of lime, after all.

    14. Re:Erm... by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And as to his quest for an *adobe* house... Adobe is made from natural clay mixes, which particularly in the Southwestern U.S., can contain (and leak) measurable quantities of lead, arsenic, uranium, and in some basin areas, enough selenium to make anyone sick. Not to mention that adobe is not chemically-inert (it tends to dissolve over time, if not kept roofed and whitewashed) and is fairly dusty.

      Then he was looking at ceramic-coated steel buildings. Some older ceramics contain lead pigments, sufficient to be toxic. Has he checked that? evidently not.

      If discarded UFOs were available as housing, THAT is what he'd be trying to finance.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Erm... by Fyndo · · Score: 1
      Modern wood isn't very chemically "safe" -- various treatments involve chemicals you wouldn't otherwise like to be exposed to.
      Yeah, like pitch and tar, and turpentine. What, you think the smell of fresh-cut wood is made purely of stuff that's good for you? Why is it that these people mysteriously are allergic to only "synthetic" chemicals, but are completely immune to millions and billions of "natural" ones? That's what confuses me.

      Why is Adobe safe? Do you screen the dirt used based on what trace elements are in it? Arsenic is often found where iron oxides are found, probably don't want to use red-colored clay then. Sure, modern concrete can give you chemical burns, but so will non-modern concrete. Calcium Oxide has been used as a building material for centuries (in mortar), and just plain isn't good for you.

      Glass would seem to be relatively inert, but who knows.
      If you have a problem with glass, it's all over. If you have a problem with glass, you're going to have a problem with quartz. And sand. And any other silicate.
    16. Re:Erm... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that house is going to be wonderfully energy efficient and cheap, right?

      Uh huh.

      There's a reason we've moved on from such basic building methods. They're labor and resource intensive - both upfront and in continuing costs.

    17. Re:Erm... by iocat · · Score: 1

      Why not move into an old house, built pre-plywood? Although I suspect my house has formaldahyde insulation, it was built in 1915, so any smells have had a long while to leech out. Located ~2 miles from the Hayward fault, there are also no true lines in the house, ensuring a constant breeze through the inefficient windows to keep fresh air in the place, and keep radon or other fumes from building up. I have not yet suffered any ill-effects of the house, other than needing a lot of blankets to sleep...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    18. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fuck's sake. Be a man, get some tools and do it yourself.

      Pick up a used sawmill and get a freaking chainsaw, cut down a couple of tree's...build a cabin, make some furniture. It's not freaking hard...seriously. You can get a top of the line contractor-style tablesaw for 700-800 hundred bucks, throw a router table on the side of it...get a drill press, thickness planer, maybe a jointer, and a couple of sanders and you've got the new-motherfucking-yankee workshop. Build your own stuff out of whatever you want.

      Ok...now...all trolling about aside (yes...I was being inflammatory), I think the guy has some psychological component to this problem, almost as bad as the editor who posts this crap.

    19. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these too can give off gasses or dusts that are toxic to people with allergies.

      This is simply not a correct use of the technical term "toxic".

      For example, if Bob is allergic to peanuts, this does not mean that peanuts are toxic, even though exposure to peanuts may kill Bob!

      Now, many parts of buildings (such as pressure treated lumber) can release toxic materials if improperly used. But under normal use this does not happen. For that matter, human beings emit a significant amount of toxic material every day, but with basic hygenie this does not cause a health problem in the home.

      And, to repeat what I said before, toxicity is entirely separate from allergic reactions (to dust, dander, flour, hair, etc.). Allegric reactions are indeed a serious problem for many people, but are not due to anything's being inherently poisonous.

    20. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so simple.

      1. Good luck finding lumber that hasn't been treated with even mild anti-insect, anti-fungus, anti-something chemicals. Those agents soak into the wood a lot easier than they'll wash off.

      2. Bricks contain primarily clay, it's true. But 'clay' isn't exactly pure/simple/elemental. It's full of impurities (minerals, typically, but this guy seems to be allergic to everything). It's actually the minerals that help give bricks their color when fired (iron oxides provide reds, yellows, even blacks, I think, unless additional coloring agents are added). While iron oxides and other minerals would be considered non-toxic and inert for most of us, this guy is clearly hypersensistive to things we're not.

      3. Even 'plain' colored mortars will usually contain pigmenting agents. Hopefully they're non-reactive minerals like in the bricks, but I don't think this guy is taking anyone's word for it. It's also very common for mortars to include "easy-trowelling" agents. These are plasticizers of various types. They're always labelled "non-toxic", but who knows...

    21. Re:Erm... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      One of the primary agents used in pressure treated wood is aresenic -- and there's some evidence that it does leak out into the surroundings (although still at a non-harmful level).

      This was true 20 years ago, but even then only wood which would be exposed to the elements for long periods of time was treated with arsenic. It IS relatively safe, as long as you do not burn the wood and inhale the fumes.

      Arsenic treated would is going to become illegal in less than two years. Menard's has already stopped selling it.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    22. Re:Erm... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. My house was build in 1949. The flooring is oak on top of pine planks. The furnace is gravity, not forced air. The foundation is poured concrete.

      While I purchased this house because of location and affordability, a lot of the new construction techniques concern me. My brother build a brand-new house and within a year there was mold growing inside of the walls (mositure trapped due to the plastic wrap put on them).

    23. Re:Erm... by rark · · Score: 1

      I can't get at the site, it's apparently slashdotted.

      That said, I know a fair amount about MCS. A lot of people (none of whom actually have MCS, that I've been able to tell) seem to think it's psychological. Thus far, no one's been able to prove it and many attempts at "shrinking" the problem away have failed.

      Speaking as someone with far milder chemical sensitivities (asthma attacks in response to certain perfumes and fragrances, mostly), I seriously doubt that it's psychological -- at least not primarily.

      The problem with wood (and why not buying plywood and pressboard isn't the answer it might seem) is that in the U.S. it's exceedingly difficult and expensive to buy untreated wood appropriate for building a house. Treated wood has formeldehyde and arsenic and plenty of other chemicals that can set people off. Also, in many areas, building codes prohibit building parts of the house (generally external and/or parts that touch the ground) with untreated wood. Even using treated wood for those parts and untreated wood for the rest won't be sufficient for some very sensitive people.

      In terms of psychological weirdness, I haven't gotten to read the site yet, but I'd point out that in most humans, isolation tends to make them a little whack. Humans are social animals that are meant to move about, not solitary cage animals (hmm..is any animal naturally a cage animal?) Also, people with MCS often have difficulty with friends, family, doctors, etc not believing them. If you had an illness that nobody believed you had -- if you were stuck in a house because every time you left you got sick because of things that everyone else seems to handle okay -- the chances of you slipping from psychological norms would be pretty good.

      The thing that somewhat scares me is that I find myself wondering if people with MCS (and to a lesser extent, people like me, with my many food allergies and milder chemical sensitivities) are the canary in the coal mine. None of these chemicals are particularly good for humans, it's just that most people don't react noticiably to them in doses as small as the ones that are outgassed. I find myself wondering if the combination of our lifestyle (everything from the food we eat to air pollution to applying chemicals to ourselves [check out some of the ingredients in cosmetics, esspecially]) is slowly destroying us. Add in the increase in children with diagnosed learning disabilities, autism, asthma and other conditions (even with improvements in access to health care and diagnosis, I'm having a hard time believing that 3/4ths [more or less, the numbers vary, but by anyone's numbers, a majority] of kids with autism in the last generation were completely missed) and an apparent increase in food allergies and sensitivities, and, well, you get the idea.

      But near as I can tell, no one will profit from studies on this, and much industry in the U.S. would lose profits if this turned up to be true, so research on it is and will probably remain quite minimal.

    24. Re:Erm... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      He was quoting someone else's requirements for fully EI housing. It sounds like he has banded in with a larger movement because their moral/social needs coincide with his percieved health requirements.

    25. Re:Erm... by meatspray · · Score: 1

      Modded Flaimbait? maybe just a little crass, but he makes a damn good point.

      You may not be able to go to your local lumberyard and find the right stuff, but you should be able to get it in sufficient ammounts from a lumber mill. I would reccomend you find a nice out of the way place to live, near where these types of resources exist. buying a couple of tons of unprocessed raw lumber from a local mill may just be cheaper than buying pressure-treated from a lumberyard.

      The same for bricks from a brickyard, bricks don't come from 10000 miles away (most of the time), chances are there is a brick manufacturer a couple hundred iles from where you end up. The places that make the bricks are the ones that put the additives in and probably have the ability to make them without, if it's really a dire issue, ask you local building supplier how to contact their suppliers, it shouldn't be all that difficult to track down a facility that can make you friendly materials.

      As far as it goes for contractors, learn the trade, educate yourself in working with the raw materials, hire a contractor to instruct you on the basics on how to do it, certainly not fast, but you have to take a stake in your life.

      So you're disabled, Learn to deal with your condition, pick up the necessary skills to make your life work for you, and work hard toward that goal. In the ammount of time he spent on the website he could have learned about carpentry, found distributers and started planning/collecting materials.

      Only have pity for those who pity themselves. Pity them not for their woes, but for their inability to face them.

    26. Re:Erm... by DThorne · · Score: 1

      I spent 8 years of my life living with a woman with "EI". Obviously that biases somewhat, but as someone that has(had) no such troubles, and yet was extremely close to one that was, it gives me at least a modicum of useful experience, I think.
      To keep it short(although that's one word I'd never associate with living with EI), I found that EI is a generic expression that encompasses such a massive range of potential reactions to the environment, it really defies being clumped together as one thing. As to your suggestion - it's *very* true - it's almost impossible to separate a psychological and physiological approach. There seems to be a certain sort of person that has these troubles, and it is *all*-consuming. Every day is a search to find yet another problem - mercury fillings, wheat flour, certain bacteria in the gut, house insulation, furnace filters - it never stops. Each one is the "saviour" - once it's addressed then all will be well...until...the next bout of symptoms and you move on to the next round. These people are desparate, they're suffering with real physical symptoms, and their lives have become medical textbooks.
      I'm not sure what to do about it - I know for a fact that certain people really do have a negative physical response to certain things that many of us can live with daily, and without trouble. There are some grains of truth in there, no question.
      What are we supposed to do about it? Alter the way all houses are built for everyone, even the vast majority who are fine with these things? Make a law that every baker must carry a spelt line of products? I personally see it like diabetes - there are a very few concessions made for the diabetic in modern culture, but restaurants certainly don't feel the need to provide a diabetic menu. There are some specialty products for them, there is a market for it, but it really doesn't affect the vast majority. I think this is no different.
      And in case you're wondering - yes, it was hell living with someone you love that suffers from this - whatever it is.

      DT

    27. Re:Erm... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      If someone would be allergic to IRON componds he would be long dead, or if it started later, he soon will be, with or without any house at all.

      Hint: his blood is full of it, ever heard of red blood cells and hemoglobin?

      He could buy wood and mortar straight from manufacturers before they put in those things big customers (=resellers) need, but that might be expensive, dunno about his financial situation.

    28. Re:Erm... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      No it is not that hard. Any one this nuerotic is going to be making the house himself. But he is still a fool for trying to make it out of Adobe.

      If you are insane enough to think that the definite chemicals in commonly used housing materials are "posionous" then you can still easily do the following:

      Build a Log cabin. Use fresh wood that you cut down yourself. Make sure to wear thick cotton gloves that you made yourself from cotton that you grew yourself to protect you from the poisons that those nasty Axe makers used on your Axe.

      There are so many chemicals in the air and the food we eat (even if you grow it yourself - there is NO such thing as "pure dirt") that his entire philosphy is bad. He is the kind of guy that will get upset if I tell him I dumped a gallon of the most powerfull solvent (Monoxide-Di-Hydrogen) in it's purest form on his face. When he realizs that I dumped water on him he will try to convince me that I lied to him.

      Chemicals != bad. Salt is a chemical. Sugar is a checmical. Proteins are Chemicals. Vitamins are Chemicals.

      Any substance if you get too much of it, will kill you. At lesser levels they are bad for you. But Even the deadliest posion around has a safe level, and quite a few of them have minor beneficial effects when adminstered at safe doses (Arsenic is used in certain medical treatements.)

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    29. Re:Erm... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      While I purchased this house because of location and affordability, a lot of the new construction techniques concern me. My brother build a brand-new house and within a year there was mold growing inside of the walls (mositure trapped due to the plastic wrap put on them).

      As someone pointed out, the really good housewraps prevent this, as they tend to allow moisture through one-way. but unfortunately, a lot of people dont ask what type is specced when they build a house.. and even worse, in these "plunk in 200 identical house" developments, it is almost guaranteed the builder is cutting corners everywhere he can. (Even on the place my mom built, which was close to a 250K construction job, even though we did all the wallboarding, insulation, wiring, and plumbing), the alleged "builder" totally ignored contractual requests for things, and waved them away as "no-one really does that.. you dont need it." (yeah.. he's a crappy buildier.. but came highly highly reccomended by others who had used him, which kinda makes me think the "others" looked at the blueprints, hemmed, hawwed, pulled their chins like they knew what they were talking about, and were then "happy" with the result.)

      What I do know is that the floors squeak (he didnt glue and screw like we asked, he just air-nailed) none of the wall frames are square to ANYTHING, not even CLOSE. (We found this out installing the interior doors.. the amount of shimming we had to do to get to plumb was upwards of half an inch over a six foot run on some of them.) The windows dont open and close right because the framing isnt square.. etc.

      But on the mold thing.. I dont know how dangerous mold really is, to people who dont have a mold allergy (fungus allergy). THeres mold _everywhere_, really.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    30. Re:Erm... by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

      "I can't help thinking that there might be a psychological element to "Environmental illness"."

      You are VERY mistaken...

      --
      If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
    31. Re:Erm... by Caltheos · · Score: 1

      Uhm, why not make your own bricks and mortar, it really isn't that difficult provided you have a kiln for the bricks. And well lumber, ahem, pioneers were more than capable of building a log house that was quite secure in a matter of days with help or weeks without.

      --
      We've secretely replaced the Enterprise's dilithium crystals with Folgers crystals. Lets see if they notice.
    32. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Nicotine is used in cigarettes..
      just a drop will drop you!

      --
      Please dont argue with me.. as I dont care.

    33. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am your father AND...
      I had sex with your mom..

    34. Re:Erm... by coke_dite · · Score: 1
      "I can't help thinking that there might be a psychological element to "Environmental illness"." >You are VERY mistaken... Personally, I would have to agree with you. The only psychological element I would be willing to believe in this case would be the effect the illness has had on the sufferers. Yes, the author of the site seems very bitter and paranoid, but he's been persecuted his entire life for an illness he can't explain. That might make me bitter, I'm thinking. If he thinks everyone's out to get him, or no one's willing to help him, then maybe he's just never encountered anyone who WAS willing to help him - that would make me paranoid.

      My sister-in-law began having weird symptoms about three years ago. She was hospitalized, all kinds of tests were done on her, and so far, the only diagnosis she has is a tentative one of "High Anxiety Disorder" - a diagnosis we are not willing to accept without further investigation. Her symptoms came on her like a flash of lightning, and before her first "episode", she was a competent, contributing member of society who dealt with high- and low-stress situations very well.

      Now, she can't work (because she never knows when she might have another episode), she shouldn't drive (but living in a rural area, she really has no choice). It's just baffling. She was transformed overnight from a strong, independent person to someone who experiences dissociative episodes, migraines, and who can never be left alone for more than a few hours.

      Scary? You bet - but what can you do? I don't have a medical degree, and if I did, I still wouldn't know where to start - she's been tested for everything under the sun, and only when they ran out of things to test her for did they stick a psychological label on the mystery illness.

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
    35. Re:Erm... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1
      You're right about those identical house developments. That where my brother's new house is.

      On the mold issue, I'm not at concerned about the health issue (although there must be some) as much as the damage issue. There was an expose in the local newpaper (Minneapolis) a while back about $500k houses that needed to be bulldozed because it wasn't worth repairing them.

      Moisture built up in the walls, trapped by the housewrap. Usually there had been a small error in application around a window or some other opening. The wood was literally rotting away behind the siding (a lot of wafer board disintigrates in water).

      Link to similar article

      That's the kind of thing that worries me about a newer house. I'm not a construction expert by any means, and it seems that this should never occur when all materials are applied correctly. As you noted, there are problems with even "good" builders, and there's often no way to tell what has been done wrong because it's all covered with Sheetrock and siding.

    36. Re:Erm... by hungsolo · · Score: 0
      I used to perform environmental inspections for timber companies when I was in college. Most lumber would be pressure treated using materials that are extremely hazardous - arsenic (as the above poster pointed out), toluene, mercury, and various other heavy metals.

      The fumes of these chemicals is enough to cause damage, let alone what physical contact can do.

    37. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt some Asian women are kinda cute, but not luscious. Most of them look like boys with girlish faces. The only Asian women that are luscious are born in North America and eat a western diet. However, once that's done, they are the same as white women.
      So if you can get it up for women with bodies like boys and little pubic hair, go for it, but don't you dare repress someone else for being a pedophile, though.
      PS: How about those gray/yellow teeth and female pattern balding?
      Where's the genetic superiority now?

    38. Re:Erm... by autophile · · Score: 1
      but the stuff my contractor showed up with had a long list of US patent numbers for additives that improved the strength, reduced the set time, and cut down on the dust.

      Kind of like the vegetables and fruit that we buy are just "vegetables and fruit", but the stuff with no pesticides and which haven't been bred for decades for better shelf life and shippability (but poorer taste) are "organically grown" and "heritage origin".

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    39. Re:Erm... by x01mOiRe10x · · Score: 1

      What about rammed earth construction? If he's alergic to dirt, what's left?? with dirt walls, and heavy timber roof framing (read home-grown, untreated wood) he can have a great all-natural, allbeit high-maintenence home.

      --
      "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Benjamin Franklin
    40. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? You bought that stuff. Your fault. Doesn't mean there aren't alternatives.

      And, gasp, the alternatives are the OLD way and style some buildings were built.

      In fact, there is a whole slew of materials used in housing and renovation of older homes that are documented online. For example, a lot of older homes use hand mixed materials that require NONE of those additives, esp. when repointing, because the current stuff does nasty things to the old brick made the traditional way. If you have such a home, you don't have to do it this way, but there are plenty of people that have hand-mixed their own mortar one small bucket at a time and repointed their homes on their own time, to keep the look as well as preserve the exterior. They could have saved time and money just using modern materials, but some like it old school.

      This is not hidden stuff either. The TV channel HGTV covered a home repointed this way. I know this becauase we have what we think is a 100+ yo farm house that we are thinking about repointing. And, not knowing the age, you spend a fair amount of time getting the mortar analyzed, in part so when you drill out portions to repoint, you aren't making yourself and neighbors sick, as well, as repairing adequately certain things in the wall that you may well come across.

      Put another way, your post is like the one previous saying wood has glue in it. No, it doesn't. You can build furniture with NO GLUE. You can use dovetails and dowels and grooves instead of biscuits and glue. Just depends on how much time and money you want to put into something and what your condition is.

      I'm not sure why this fella does truck in tons of nice dirt, and pack it down into walls, adding glass and copper for windows and a roof. If this doesn't solve the issue, it's more the environment itself than the lack of inert and nonreactive building materials he's dying from.

    41. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * You can get untreated wood from many suppliers across the country. They are both plainly unfinished and untreated. Now, maybe the wood itself sucked up something from the acid rain and ground materials itself, but I find the extent and impact of that unlikely. Getting such untreated and unfinished wood in bulk is not hard. I seem to recall timberframe dealers knowing a lot about this, both in terms of materials and some tools that may be used in the craftsmanship and use of the wood.

      The only problem here may be -- is he also allergic to the steel that is used to cut and shave down the stuff too?

      * Brick and mortar -- You can find various recipes for mortar mixes online so you can control what's in them. The mortar is definitely softer than current materials (by a lot) but has been used in the past on 80+ yo home that still stand today, mainly 3 layer brick homes. Similarly, there are places that will do custom brick mixes for you, with no additives. Again, more expensive than typical but absolutely not prohibitively so.

      * Glass - I know less here since I've never heard of anyone being allergic to glass. I can't remember this for sure, but I thought there was a process that insured sealed glass and edge paning, so even if there was other materials in there that may pose a problem, they'd be sealed.

      * Paint and wallpaper - Umm, don't use them then. Ever see a room using unsealed wood panelling? Actually is pretty nice looking.

    42. Re:Erm... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Insulation, paint, glue, plastic, and foam.

      I'm a carpender, trust me, you won't like a floor that we just nail down, it will squeak. Often we glue the walls down too for the same reason. The glue has the potential to outgas.

      Insulation. Firberglass is extreemly common, but most modern fiberglass is mostly something other than glass (glass itches too much when installing it. I wouldn't be surprized if installing it is as bad for the lungs as smoking) There are other things, but even the safest ones can contain plenty of other things.

      Paint. I don't think I need to comment.

      Plastic, there are several different types, because really nothing stops airflow like a solid layer of plastic. This of course is the two edged sword, without that plastic your house would breath enough to let that nasty stuff out, and mold would not be near the problem it is because water can get through the walls. On the flip side though, plastic is a major contributer to insulation value, it stops air penitration, which is a major source of heat loss.

      You would be surprized how much foam is used in a house. Around every window we spray it in. Around the rim (floor joists) we use foam. (joists have to sit on a wall, so we can't put normal insulation there, foam is better than normal insutlation though more expensive)

    43. Re:Erm... by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      You, and all those who replied, seem to forget that wood is generally covered with something. Paint is one, but even "wood" furnature that looks like wood is not just wood. [Assuming it is made out of solid wood, not vaneer or engineered wood with toxic glues] It is stained, and then varished. Almost all varnishes have formaldehyde in them, you have to specifically search for ones that don't.

      Not realy up on the contents of brick and mortar, but what do you want to make out of glass, and what kind of glass? Leaded glass? Stained glass in lead frames? Stained glass in copper soldered with lead solder (though most solder is lead free now).

      It is just about impossible to avoid harsh chemicals unless you make your own house/furniture.

      And even if you do, you better be sure your home is well ventilated and there are no leaks or you can get invisible mold that releases toxic gas that causes brain damage.

      Personally, I believe central AC with no air exchange is the cause of most problems -- open a damn window. There is also the psychological aspect, and people generally just being to steryl and their immune system freaking out.

      That's why I live in a mess - it's healthy. My wife just doesn't understand.

    44. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not have him wake up in a happy dream where the walls are white (white symbolizing cleanliness) and people around him telling him that hes in a completely safe enviro when hes actually in a normal building built from all american poison products aka bricks mortar and glass. if he continues to exhibit malaise, then he probably has some crazy ass disease. if not, then we all know the guy is a loony

    45. Re:Erm... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      Don't buy an axe, just make adzes out of rocks.

    46. Re:Erm... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Having looked at the site, I can't help thinking that there might be a psychological element to "Environmental illness".

      To play the devils advocate, and then agree with you, it is but it also isn't. I'm extremely allergic to formaldehyde, and you would be amazed at what type of shit has formaldehyde in it. Carpets, plywood, even put-it-together desks. When I buy one I have to leave it in a room or outside by itself, with the door closed and the windows open for about 2 weeks or I get sick.

      Some people are allergic to certain things, and some things are all over the place. It sucks, but oh well.

      Now, people who say they are allergic to an entire environment, I would say are mostly hypochondriacs. I perused through his site, and it is a very recent thing, one in which often times has no scientific backing. People say all the time, "I'm allergic to cigarette smoke" but that's like saying you are allergic to car exhaust. There is an amazing amount of similarity between car exhaust and cigarettes. The mind is extremely powerful. If I wasn't so young when I first discovered my formaldehyde reaction, I would question if it was in my head or not. If you look at a lot of these cases of people having "EI" they started when they were older in life.

      Generally speaking, you don't suddenly become deathly allergic to things. It usually goes the other way around. Sensitive as a kid, and get stronger as an adult. You don't wake up one morning in your 17th year and become allergic to Carbon Dioxide.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    47. Re:Erm... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      The fact that the guy is leaning towards adobe makes me think he is allergic to something that is pretty commonly used as a "safe" bonding or strenghtening agent.


      A lot of people are allergic to formaldehyde and have no idea. I am severely allergic to it, and if I plan my environment it doesn't bother me one bit for the most part. Formaldehyde is also in a lot of things, but it's easy to live a normal life without it.

      The thing about formaldehyde is that the product that contains it (lets say glue, in a desk) airs out for 2 weeks, you can't tell there is formaldehyde there. Most of the EI cases are psychological, not physical.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    48. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're simply incorrect. Many people have varying levels of chemical sensitivites, which can be caused by many different things. These sensitivites can be life threatning, especially when continually exposed to it (like in your house).

      Please check your bias at the door.

    49. Re:Erm... by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Build a Log cabin. Use fresh wood that you cut down yourself. Make sure to wear thick cotton gloves that you made yourself from cotton that you grew yourself to protect you from the poisons that those nasty Axe makers used on your Axe.

      Um. I wouldn't do that if I were you. The sawdust is carcinogenic. Really. Instead, I would build my house entirely out of um, um.

      On a serious note, this guy seems very neurotic and fairly full of himself. He talks in his biography about how he was reading at college level by age 7. And building materials aren't "toxic", well, most of them anyway. The vast majority of the population isn't going to have problems with construction materials that we use. He's just allergic to it, (Or he imagines that he's allergic. Sounds a bit like a hypochondriac to me)

      To give you an example: Is peanut butter toxic? Of course not. But a small percentage of the population will die if they eat it. Housing material isn't toxic. It's just this guy's over active immune system. He was overweight, too, as a child. This most likely contributed greatly to his asthmatic problems and allergies.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    50. Re:Erm... by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Don't buy an axe, just make adzes out of rocks.

      No way dude. Many kinds of rocks are carcinogenic. Plus they have (jarring chord) CHEMICALS!!!!

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    51. Re:Erm... by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Or to be more specific:

      1) find some sand, grass, mud, etc., and redeem for Stone Blade Construction
      1) comb the beach for pieces of slate
      2) break two pieces of slate and make slate blade
      3) collect wood, and create a board cutter
      4) make brick slats
      5) make bricks
      6) make oven
      7) make more bricks
      ...

      900) make distaff
      901) collect, rot, and process distaff into flax, create canvas and linen from flax on loom
      902) create construction site
      903) build mine, collect ore
      904) make forge
      905) make axe

      ...now you know why I quit A Tale in The Desert...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    52. Re:Erm... by zenyu · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, you don't suddenly become deathly allergic to things. It usually goes the other way around. Sensitive as a kid, and get stronger as an adult. You don't wake up one morning in your 17th year and become allergic to Carbon Dioxide.

      I tend to lean toward the assumption that many people like this are hypochondriacs. BUT, I got an entirely new alergy as an adult. Some nuts, most notably hazelnut, just make my mouth numb. I know they didn't do that before because I loved the stuff. The whole numbness thing has made them drop a few rungs on the desireability index. I no longer drink a hazelnut coffee unless I have a big craving. I still eat Nutella, I just make sure it's in the dessert... Still the reaction didn't show up until I was in my early 20's, which helps me believe people that claim to aquire allergies.

      (I've lost the childhood asthma, so the 'we tend to get stronger' arguement seems to apply to me.)

    53. Re:Erm... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I tend to lean toward the assumption that many people like this are hypochondriacs. BUT, I got an entirely new alergy as an adult. Some nuts, most notably hazelnut, just make my mouth numb. I know they didn't do that before because I loved the stuff. The whole numbness thing has made them drop a few rungs on the desireability index. I no longer drink a hazelnut coffee unless I have a big craving. I still eat Nutella, I just make sure it's in the dessert... Still the reaction didn't show up until I was in my early 20's, which helps me believe people that claim to aquire allergies.

      I hear that a lot with nuts, it's weird. I know quite a few people who suddenly develop allergies to nuts. My formaldehyde allergy has gotten better, but it still will give me a migraine and I start throwing up in about 30 minutes (Before it was about 2 minutes, along with fever, and all sorts of other badness.)

      Abundance chemicals in the air should effect any person long before they're old for their mind to start fucking with them...

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    54. Re:Erm... by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      Follow the chain of discussion.

      Post A: Purchased mortar has nasty stuff in it.

      Post B: Where do you buy this nasty mortar? Mortar is safe.

      Post C: Modern mortar has many chemical additives.

      Post D: (Your post) You can make your own mortar!

      Hmmm.... how does your post follow the chain of discussion? Perhaps it is just a wild rant?

    55. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On a serious note, this guy seems very neurotic and fairly full of himself. He talks in his biography about how he was reading at college level by age 7."
      When I'll see your degree in psychology, I'll accept your at-a-distance diagnosis of a person you don't know.
      And about the 'full of himself' part. People make so much noise about how smart their children are, I just saw an episode of Oprah were it was all about the "smartest" kids in America. Of course, they were all Hitler's wet dream, no ugly or fat kids here, no sir.
      So how come you can get away with being praised by Oprah, and that's OK, but point out that you were reading at a college level (not that that means much in America, they are illiterate compared to normal people elsewhere) at age 7, and you're "full of yourself"?
      Some people just aren't lucky in life. Parents are 100% responsible for situations like that. I was reading encyclopeadias in grade school, real ones, not children's ones, but received NO encouragement WHATSOEVER from my parents. Now I'm an unemployed wreck of a human being, but I'll still bet I'm 'smarter' than you, just not able to 'suck that cock' to get a job.

    56. Re:Erm... by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      To give you an example: Is peanut butter toxic? Of course not. But a small percentage of the population will die if they eat it.

      I'm with you on that one. Two of my cousins are like this. They're so allergic to peanuts that the smell of them makes them ill, and if you do something like use a knife in a jar of peanut butter, then use it in a jar of jelly.. they can't ever touch that jelly.

      Reading this guy's story, it does sound a lot like there's at least a bit of hypochondriac in there. The basic thing seems to be that these are people who's bodies are defective in some way.. and they get mad when everyone else doesn't understand. Of course they don't, they don't have those problems. Also, sometimes there's just too much required of the normal system to accomodate some people. Is it right to effect everyone because of a tiny minority.

      The thing that bothers me is that it basically sounds like it's a defect in his system that was caused by his father in the first place.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  4. Non-Toxic Apartments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing a story several years ago
    about an entire apartment complex that was
    built specifically for people that suffered
    from this "illness". Much desing and research
    went into making the complex non-toxic. Only
    problem was that when these people moved in
    the complained that they felt worse than when
    they lived in their previous (toxic?)
    environments.

    1. Re:Non-Toxic Apartments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people need therapy rather than a toxic-free environment. I'm not surprised they had adverse reactions in the non-toxic environment since in 99% of the cases (from what I've read) this "illness" is in their head.

  5. house arrest by greenalbatros · · Score: 0

    when your home becomes your prison you have done a very bad thing. however, the thing you did was so bad and high profile (ie genocidal chilean dictator, high ranking mafia boss etc), that you dont have to prison like a normal criminal. you get stay at home and watch kilroy all day. a punishment worse than death

    --
    this sig steers like a cow. and i can prove it
  6. Bullshit by sam_handelman · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    The article poses the question: What Is Environmental Illness? It then goes off about Northern Exposure, which was a very funny television show, but is not a well established authority on immunological disorders.

    It's a psychosomatic condition. Get a subscription for paxil and go the fuck outside.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Bullshit by srboneidle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The bit I like best from this site (fumento.com) is this:

      MCS has been rejected as an organic disease by the American Medical Association, the American Medical Council on Scientific Affairs, the American College of Physicians, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and (my favourite) the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

      It really just sounds like a nice new way of blaming someone (or something in this case) else for agoraphobia.

    2. Re:Bullshit by irving47 · · Score: 0

      Geez. All allergies are *not* "in one's head."
      I'm allergic to milk and am forced to avoid anything with whey, sodium caseinate, etc... Eating at a picnic one day got me realllly sick. I couldn't understand what it is, so I looked at the ingredients on everything I'd eaten... The hot dogs had SKIM MILK as a doggone FILLER! That was it. Ok, so it served me right for eating a hot dog at all, but you get the idea. So how exactly is that psychosomatic?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    3. Re:Bullshit by pthisis · · Score: 3, Informative

      All allergies are *not* "in one's head."

      Of course not. But Environmental Illness is.

      In your case, you had a placebo control: you didn't know there was milk in the hot dogs and you still got sick. That's a good indication of a legitimate illness.

      If, on the other hand, you claim to be allergic to a certain chemical but don't develop symptoms when you're exposed to it unless you are told that it's there, that's psychosomatic. And general EI has been shown to fit that category in numerous studies (there are some other allergies that sometimes get grouped in with EI that _are_ legitimate, but that's another story).

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll agree with the subject line. but in reference to the 'it's a psychosomatic condition' article.
      it read like the 'we never landed on the moon' conspiracy liturature. and frankly i couldn't finish it.

      with logic like that you could argue. 'you were not beat up, it's all in your head. sure the bruises are real but perceived causes are not' to paraphrase a line from the article.

      i'll stop now before i go off on an uncontrolled rant. besides it's all in my head. -sheesh

    5. Re:Bullshit by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Frankly I don't see how something like this gets modded as "Flaimbait". Some good points in the link provided and it made sense to me.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:Bullshit by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of my aunt, who always swore up and down she was allergic to onions and claimed she had all sorts of horrible symptoms as a result of eating onions.

      With wicked glee, we sneaked onions into every meal they could be hidden in (soups, casaroles, etc). Funny thing -- so long as she didn't *know* there were any onions in the food, she had ZERO symptoms. :)

      Now, I do know someone who is genuinely allergic to onions -- they come back on him rather explosively. As an onion lover who used to eat 'em like apples, he still tries to eat them occasionally. But the difference is grudging acceptance (and occasional challenge) of his body's quirks, rather than rabidly embracing the most loony explanation available.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Bullshit by iocat · · Score: 1
      This is what I don't get -- you can't live in anything but an adobe hut, or a canvas tent, but until you save up the dough to do that, you need to stay in your *car*, which is somehow not toxic?

      New Car Smell is certainly more pungent and chemically than New House Smell...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    8. Re:Bullshit by joshamania · · Score: 1

      Two words: Mental Illness

      Bullshit is right. This is extreme hypochondria and /. should not be treating it like it is a valid news item. These folks need a pshrink.

      To the poster above who mentioned Safe, the film with Julianne Moore...ugh...empathize? I was disgusted by that weak, helpless character that could not act upon her own will. That character attempted to drag the rest of the world around her into her own distorted vision.

      In other words, she was nutz. Prozac, Paxil, whatever, that's what she needed, not some porcelain egg in which to shut out the world. She needed help, not isolation.

      Oh, and Chomsky is a self-righteous, utopian minded idiot.

    9. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAD, but I think the physiological distinction is:

      Milk products make you sick because of an immune reaction to something which is in them. This means you are allergic, and it is what you have described.

      If instead you were not able to digest lactose efficiently, but otherwise had no problem, you would be lactose intolerant. (Not an allergy).

      And if the perception of being exposed to milk products (independent of actual exposure) caused you to get sick, you would have a psychosomatic disorder. (Not an allergy).

      When a person gets sick, it is a medical problem, whether it is an allergy or otherwise. This particular guy says he has Environmental Illness, not because he wants us to realize he is getting sick (which no one doubts), but because he does not want to have a psychiatrist treat his illness.

    10. Re:Bullshit by binkless · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Bullshit by DanDwig · · Score: 1

      Minor addition, but if you cannot positively identify what you are alergic to, that is also a probable sign of a psychosomatic response. As in "I am allergic to pizza, without a definition if its the dairy, grain, tomotae, or other toppings."

    12. Re:Bullshit by rark · · Score: 1

      > And although the symptoms they experience are so
      > inconsistent they defy proper assessment

      Beep, wrong. Granted, there's no blood test or similar test for MCS, but the symptoms are at least as consistant as those of many other, recognized, diseases.

      > protocols, Washington University medical
      > professor H. James Wedner has detected one
      > dominant feature: most are middle-class white
      > women, financially able to exit the environment
      > that's making them sick.

      Beep, wrong. If his study shows this, then his is the only one I know of to do so (women do seem to be slightly more affected, but class has nothing to do with it, and if anything poor people seem more affected as well) and probably has issues with the way he procured his sample. For instance, in recruiting subjects.

      > Evidently, poor folks can't afford to suffer
      > from this illness.

      Beep, wrong. Though poor folks generally can't afford treatment, so may be underrepresented if you pull your samples only from people being treated at specialty clinics.

      > If we really cared about MCS sufferers, we'd
      > stop feeding their delusions, and tell them the
      > truth. Kindness isn't doing them, or us, any
      > favours.

      You know, given that most MCS sufferers are ill for *years* before they find out what's wrong, and given that most MCS sufferers are told, by friends , family and medical professionals, both before and after they are diagnosed, that they are malingering, hypochondriacal, or suffering from psychosomatic symptoms, and that they still feel ill, this statement completely flies in the face of logic.

      On the surface of it, it looks like this guy is just pissed that he can't wear his fragrances. I do wonder who is funding him, however.

    13. Re:Bullshit by KnowledgeFreak · · Score: 1

      From the Article:

      "These cases proved immediately politically controversial because of the implication that they could be related to ubiquitous consumer products. These 'human canaries', as some physicians had dubbed them, were a potential threat to corporate interests and the government agencies charged with establishing safety and health standards. Thus there was a tendency by the medical establishment to at first dismiss the growing number of reports and then to promote a psychosomatic explanation that effectively blamed the patient -or the influence of their physicians suggestions- for his illness -a neat solution to the issue of potential liability. This was supported by the preponderance of women among MCS patients, which suited the misogynist attitudes of a medical establishment that still tended to regard women as prone to 'hysteria.' However, the steadily accumulating body of facts eventually belied this notion, as far as the vast majority of cases were concerned, but despite being generally discredited this psychosomatic 'excuse' has persisted, particularly among government bureaucrats and the contract medical mouthpieces of major corporations. But then, it's not all that hard to find physicians in the US today who still insist that even conventional allergies are all psychosomatic."

      Just because you don't have allergies doesn't mean that allergies don't exist.
      Why don't you go all the way and just be a god damn solipsist?

      -Pete

    14. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of things are psychosomatic in origin. Psychosomatic does not mean purely in one's head (people generally don't know the real definition, go look in a dictionary), it means that there is a mind-body relationship. To put it in easy to understand terms: your brain has been programmed so that it causes your body to react to certain chemicals. This why there is techniques such as NAET which can remove allergies (I can't vouch for NAET's effectiveness or methods). The mind and body have a very tight relationship with each other, and modern science has only touched the surface of this.

      Do a little research, you may not have to live with your allergies. I personally had some minor allergies (typical cold symptom stuff), and suffered for many years. It was not until later, when I dealt with a lot of other problems of psychosomatic origin, that I realized that the allergies were psychosomatic as well. I'm not saying this is the same for your case, but you never know.

      And remember, almost everyone has psychosomatic problems, it is nothing out of the ordinary. It's not easy figuring out all this stuff, but once you do, you can live a better life.

    15. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the perception of being exposed to milk products (independent of actual exposure) caused you to get sick, you would have a psychosomatic disorder. (Not an allergy).

      Nonono.. Psychosomatic has nothing to do with perception. People think it does that is why everyone gets offended. It simply means there is some kind of mind-body relationship. It does not imply that the person has someone created the illness with his mind. I wish people would actually learn what it means before getting offended or putting down someone who actually has a psychosomatic problem (which is just about everyone).

    16. Re:Bullshit by zootread · · Score: 1

      Get a subscription for paxil and go the fuck outside.

      I initially read that as "go fuck outside" which I thought was also a good idea.

      --
      Zoot!
    17. Re:Bullshit by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but this made me laugh quite loudly. Especially reading the post about how "strengthening agents for bricks will kill us all" up above this post.

      I definantelly must completely agree with you though, this is complete bullshit, and if you look at the "website" provided the guy "investigates" everything as a living enviroment. I will admit that I was dupped until I got to the middle and saw one of the suggestions being marine transport containers.

      The sad part is, I'm sure that this phobia/paranoia/obsessive based disease is completely real in his mind, and I'm sure he's convinced that if he leaves his home he'll die.

      I dunno if you can just single diagnose someone like this. Granted I've only taken like 6 psych courses my whole life, I did actually remember a few things.

      My guess is the following:

      1.) The guy is an agoraphobic (fears anything outside a defined comfort zone or familiar people)
      2.) The guy has Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (check his site and look at all the "homes" he's found and "researched")
      3.) Possible mild scziophrenia(sp?)/paranoia (obviously there is something outside that is going to "kill" him, while this may fall into agoraphobia it resembles quite a bit of basic paranoia)
      4.) Finally, manic depressive (all the guy can do is think about his doom)

      HOWEVER, you are right, with a therapy and a drug treatment combination, he'll have his problem fixed in no time flat. Perhaps his "answer from slashdot" should be to contact a psychatrist.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    18. Re:Bullshit by serotone9 · · Score: 1

      i was chemically injured while in graduate school in 1998, suffering similar MCS consequences.

      paxil? guess what? paxil comes in liquid form, and 1 drop per day (about 1/50th regular dose) for about a week in me caused massive liver damage (i have the lab tests with elevated ALT and other liver enzymes to prove it is not "bullshit"). same for zoloft in similar amounts, effexor caused heart damage (eleveted c-reactive protein and b-natriuretic protein), celexa caused increased immune deficiency (WBC 3.9 to 2.5), prozac caused microvascular angina: 4 mg./day. people such as you (who know nothing) say "it can't happen," and "bullshit," but the lab tests prove it.

      why does MCS happen? because modern industrial synthetics and toxins need to be processed and eliminated from the body, and that happens in the liver with sulfur enzymes called "cytochrome" enzymes. because of genetic polymorphism everyone has different expression and amount of those enzymes, and furthermore, mercury (from coal burning powerplants, medical waste incineration, seafood consumption, etc. and also vapor leakage from dental fillings) BINDS to those enzymes and disables them (because mercury has a high molecular affinity for sulfur -- ask any doctor: when someone is acutely [as opposed to subacutely, which they do not know anything about thanks in part to the propaganda of the ADA] mercury poisoned, the doctors give sulfur-based chelators such as DMSA (dimercaptosuccinic acid: mercaptan = sulfur) to get the mercury out.

      doctors from Baylor college of medicine a few weeks ago testified at US House subcommittee hearing on the astronical rises in the rates of autism that they are now starting to attribute to Thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines, describing exactly what i have told you here regarding the damage to the cytochrome P-450 enzyme system. probably mercury from the mother eating contaminated fish and from mercury fillings (scientifically proven to offgas mercury vapors for the life of the filling and required to be disposed of as hazardous waste by US Federal law when removed from the mouth) gets many of those kids in utero, making them even more susceptible later (as recent news shows that californians have mercury levels 85percent higher than "safe" (though none is safe) after eating fish).

      people who are genetically susceptible cannot process the body burden of mercury and other modern synthetic chemicals, and at an acute point the detoxification system (Phase I cytochrome enzyme system and Phase II glutathione conjugation in the liver) breaks down, flooding the body with the toxic partial metabolites and free radicals. the free radicals damage many organ systems and much fat (called lipid peroxidation), and of course the brain is mostly made up of fats called phospholipids, meaning it gets a healthy dose of damage.

      furthermore, the olfactory nerve has a direct connection in the brain to the limbic system (called the olfactory-limbic-neural pathway) and every time from then on that the person is exposed to chemicals, fragrances, etc. not only are they massively impaired as far as removing them from the body, but the olfactory limbic neural pathway is stimulated, causing cascading seizures (called excitatory neurotoxicity and "neurologic kindling" -- look it up on medline) along with a host of assorted symptoms, both emotional and otherwise (as the limbic system is one of the seats of emotions, fight/flight, hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis neurohormonal regulation, and so on). then the victims are blamed for having "psychological problems," "psychosomatic" disorder, etc. (by people who are not even using the term "psychosomatic" correctly and do not even know what it actually means). yeah, sure. my mind is so powerful it is going to raise my liver enzymes when i take 1 drop of paxil, raise my CRP, BNP, cause protein to show up in urine indicating kidney damage, and wipe out my white blood count from 9 to 3.1 overnight. yeah, okay.

      yes, immune system is involved, too, and it's not an "allergy." my WBC

    19. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychosomatic has nothing to do with perception. People think it does that is why everyone gets offended. It simply means there is some kind of mind-body relationship. It does not imply that the person has someone created the illness with his mind.

      Perception simply means your mind reacts to something. I'm not saying a person has conscious control over a psychosomatic reaction.

      For that matter, I think in a lot of cases it is not possible to have 'unconscious' control over these reactions -- i.e., psychoanalysis will not be effective. Many responses, whether learned or unlearned, depend on brain chemistry.

      And when I refer to a learned response, I don't mean learned in a conscious or deliberate way.

      For example, if someone has a horrible, traumatic experience in a room smelling of onions, he or she may in the future become sick when the brain recognizes the smell of onions. That is a real illness and a serious matter, but it is nevertheless psychosomatic and not an allergy.

      The point is that we should call a spade, a spade. There should not be a stigma associated with psychosomatic illnesses.

      In real life there is such a stigma, but what we should do in response is to educate people and reduce prejudice. If instead we lie about the cause of a particular illness, it will only make things worse.

  7. For those of you.... by pfankus · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...too lazy to dig deep enough, here's a description of the illness from the site:

    What Is Environmental Illness?

    In 1990 the CBS television series Northern Exposure introduced America to a little known community of disabled people through the character of Mike Monroe, a lawyer afflicted by an illness known as MCS (Multiple Chemical Sensitivity) who sought refuge in a peculiar geodesic dome home on the outskirts of the eclectic Alaskan community featured in the series. Mike was 'allergic to the 20th Century' and suffered a variety of symptoms in response to the most minor exposures to chemicals. Though writers of this series took much liberty with the facts of this ailment, the essential social condition of people with this illness was well portrayed, in particular the alienation and social anxiety associated with having an illness that no one really comprehended, least of all those in the medical community who would normally be relied on for understanding and compassion.

    It is unclear precisely when MCS first emerged because misdiagnosis and politically motivated denial have consistently accompanied it to the present day. But over the 1980s physicians throughout the industrialized nations of the world began reporting a steadily growing number of cases of people developing a host of chronic symptoms, sometimes vague, sometimes plain, and sometimes dramatically life-threatening, which seemed to have no obvious pathology other than an association with the presence of common household industrial products or pollution. Symptoms ranged from things one might normally associate with conventional flu or allergy -such as asthmatic, skin, and gastrointestinal reactions- to neurological effects both subtle and dramatic -such as cognitive difficulty, numbness, trembling, twitching and spasms, and partial to total paralysis. Some patients claimed sensitivity to things well beyond the conventional clinical sphere, such as electromagnetic fields produced by appliances and electrical wiring. And there were few symptoms any patients had consistently in common other than a general progressive malaise dubbed 'chronic fatigue' and a vague chronic muscle or joint pain labeled Fibromyalgia. Many could trace the onset of their illness to a trigger exposure to some specific chemical product which resulted in a sudden flu-like illness and rapid break-down, though therafter their reactions would come in response to exposures to a vast assortment of things, including foods and sometimes natural contaminants like pollen, fungal spores, dusts, and natural fragrances.

    Most MCS suffers tended to succumb to the condition in mid adult-hood and are often female with middle-class backgrounds. In the US there is a preponderance of them from northern and eastern urban/suburban regions, suggesting an association with general environmental pollution levels. Male cases were rarer and more often associated with specific industrial chemical contamination or industy-related pre-cursor illnesses such as the Systemic Candidiasis which is common among brewery workers. (GWS suffers, as noted below, are veterans and mostly male, their trigger exposure related to whatever they were subjected to in the Gulf War) Children were the rarest group but also a rapidly growing one, due perhaps to an increasingly sedentary and sequestered lifestyle that keeps children exposed to more indoor air pollution coupled to a steadily decreasing quality of diet for children in industrialized countries.

    These cases proved immediately politically controversial because of the implication that they could be related to ubiquitous consumer products. These 'human canaries', as some physicians had dubbed them, were a potential threat to corporate interests and the government agencies charged with establishing safety and health standards. Thus there was a tendency by the medical establishment to at first dismiss the growing number of reports and then to promote a psychosomatic explanation that effectively blamed the patient -or the

    1. Re:For those of you.... by MightyTribble · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. It's quack science.

      Anything from a peer-reviewed medical journal? Or is "the Man" keeping them down?

    2. Re:For those of you.... by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Lord, how did our ancestors cross the plains with all these syndromes and diseases?

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    3. Re:For those of you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Most MCS suffers tended to succumb to the condition in mid adult-hood and are often female with middle-class backgrounds

      *cough* oprah made it up *cough*

    4. Re:For those of you.... by lostboy2 · · Score: 1

      For those who are interested, the book Muddling Through : Pursuing Science and Truths in the Twenty-First Century by Herbert J. Bernstein and Mike Fortun has a really good, objective description of MCS (which also goes by other names). They don't try to prove or disprove it, they're just using it as an example of how hard it is to divorce science from other things (politics, social enviroment, etc.), which is the purpose of their book. But, in doing so, they give a lot of good case studies of MCS, information about related legal battles, etc.

      [OT: it's a pretty good book, as well.]

    5. Re:For those of you.... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's been reported much further back than the 1980's. Only a thousand years ago, it wasn't attributed to electromagnetic fields or trace chemicals, but evil spirits inhabiting a home, or maybe a spell cast by the local witch. Though I think an exorcism or spiritual cleansing (or witch burning) was probably cheaper than moving to a geodesic dome in Alaska. Probably had the same effect, though.

    6. Re:For those of you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, a thousand years ago, those wacky Chinese came up with an "elixir of life" that would make you immortal. It consisted of Mercury, Arsenic, and some filler material.

      Maybe that's just what this guy needs. It'll cure all his ills...

    7. Re:For those of you.... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It is unclear precisely when MCS first emerged because misdiagnosis and politically motivated denial have consistently accompanied it to the present day.

      It is unclear precisely when MCS-based hypochrondia first emerged because misdiagnosis, quack medicine, and politically motivated advocacy have consistently accompanied it to the present day.

    8. Re:For those of you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've learned enough about the accidemic establishment to know that the only difference between a fanatical quack and a fanatical docter is a piece of paper.

      People with MCS sensitivities don't need anyone telling them they're psychologically unbalanced. It's very simple: expose them to the chemicals they have problems with, and they become sick in some way. They don't need to conciously know they're there, it just happens.

      As someone who was sprayed by insecticide when I was 13, and has subsequently developed symptoms such as greatly decreased skin sensation, I think I know what I'm talking about. Of course they plainly tell me I'm a hyperchondriac, as do they to everyone else.

      If you still don't believe me, there are examples such as children who are so hyper-sensitive to chemicals that they live in sealed rooms with machine-filtered air.

  8. Um.. MOVE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steps to finding a non-toxic home:

    1. MOVE OUT OF NEW JERSEY

    The rest will be much easier once step 1 is complete.

    1. Re:Um.. MOVE! by gid-goo · · Score: 0

      New Jersey sucks balls anyway so I can't see why he wouldn't do this right away anyway. Hell, New York, Pensylvania or Maryland is better than the cesspool of NJ.

    2. Re:Um.. MOVE! by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1


      Exactly ... this guy isn't motivated to "fix" anything. It seems like he likes his situation, be it for the social security handouts or the pity aspect.

      If I was that sick, I'd be out in the middle of the desert building my own shelter out of wood and rock.

    3. Re:Um.. MOVE! by wizarddc · · Score: 1

      I feeel obligated to defend my state. Most people, when they think of New Jersey, think of Newark, the location of the airport, which, when most people come to my home state, come here. Newark is an inudutrail hell nightmare, and the surrounding "suburbs" of Newark are even scarier. The second most common entry point in Camden, the city that people coming to NJ from I 95 come through. Camden is a nice place to be, if you're a bullet. But other than those two extremes, NJ is a fucking great place to live. Pretty much everything outside of those two uber densely populated areas is greener than green. We have supertatsic beaches, despite the bad publicity of the 80's. Hell if NJ was so bad, my highways in Central Jersey wouldn't be crammed fully of NY jerkoffs coming down to ruin my summer. So next time to smash Jersey for being a cesspool, please, visit Monmouth County. We're that little nub in the middle of state, eastside. Sandy Hook, anyone?

      --
      Th
    4. Re:Um.. MOVE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry man, NJ aint that bad, we just like to make fun of it 'cause we're jealous that we don't live in the Garden State.

      NJ Pride dude, NJ Pride.

    5. Re:Um.. MOVE! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      But other than those two extremes, NJ is a fucking great place to live. Pretty much everything outside of those two uber densely populated areas is greener than green.

      Some of it even glows green.

      New Jersey, the 5th smallest state, has more superfund sites than any other. That's why people make fun of it, not just because of Camden.

    6. Re:Um.. MOVE! by SablKnight · · Score: 1

      I feel obligated to defend my city. Most people, when they think of Newark, think of the riots in the 60s. The city has moved on since then. Sure, there are still some bad areas, but the local colleges (NJIT, Rutgers-Newark, UMDNJ, ECCC) are working hard to improve conditions in their surrounding areas, downtown is booming with the (relatively) new NJ Performing Arts Center, sports arenas are planned, the subway has been recently improved, and the "suburbs" are fine, filled with friendly people. All this, plus the ability to visit NYC at any time, makes it a really nice place to live. So netxt time you smash Newark for being an industrial hell nightmare, please, visit Branchbrook Park, Forest Hills, or NJPAC.

      -SablKnight

    7. Re:Um.. MOVE! by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      I can't tell you how annoying it is to hear the crap dished out about NJ, yet to have the parkways filled up each weekend in the summer with people from NY/CT coming down to use the beaches here.

    8. Re:Um.. MOVE! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I lived in Monmouth County for 4 years - 1987-1991. I moved there to work for Concurrent Computer Corp. I loved the job, hated the state. The 'bennies' (derogatory term for NY'ers that clog the beaches in the summer) were intolerable, the beach was nasty (washed up while I was there: used hypodermic needles, parts of Mafia-whacked jockeys from the nearby racetrack, and a uterus, for Christ's sake!) I met some truly nice folk, but I met an awful lot of arrogant, self-centered jerks, too. The state sport seemed to see how much you could "get over" on the next guy. I beat cheeks back to Virginia, only to find that Jerseyites had started to invade while I was gone. Ugh.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    9. Re:Um.. MOVE! by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      Actually I-95 comes in from PA between Ewing and Pennington. Or, if you want some fun, cut through Trenton on Rt 1. Where they meet in Lawrenceville, I95 stops. (This is quite far from Camden, considering it is less than 10 miles from the border.) Then you have the choice of going up Rt. 1 (if you weren't in any hurry) or go south on I-295 and jump onto I-195 which you can take to the great NJ Turnpike (I-95).

      Trenton isn't bad either though, if you don't mind a school with a 97% failure rate. Of course the safety of the city may decrease with the new police chief.

      But I do love NJ. Since I live here, I can make fun of it all I want. It's a love punch.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    10. Re:Um.. MOVE! by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      If a cheap house costs you $250,000 then somebody must like it.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    11. Re:Um.. MOVE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His bio blames his illnesses on the poor environment of NJ, so the original post still stands - maybe he doesn't need to move entirely out of NJ, but he sure seems to be in the bad part of it.

    12. Re:Um.. MOVE! by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      No kidding. You go to Arkansas or something and you can get a 10 bedroom mansion with a guest house and free horses for the price of a shack behind the airport up here.

  9. impossible quest by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, without building a treehouse and moving there.

    Anything chemically processed is a potential source of 'toxins', not to mention possible natural toxins that may get trapped in your house instead of floating around in nature.

    This quest, like the quest for a bacteria free home (lead by those lysol nuts), are not realistic.

    What you can do is get outside and exercise/experience the real world more often, and this exposure to a wide variety of things should help one's body recover from being sheltered inside a closed system that contains toxins.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:impossible quest by BFaucet · · Score: 1

      Yeah right! Next you'll be telling me to get a girlfriend...

      --
      -Derick
    2. Re:impossible quest by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Well, without building a treehouse and moving there.

      Are you saying there are no chemicals in trees? How about pollen?

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:impossible quest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your sig:
      Americans, tired of Bush? Let congress know!
      www.votetoimpeach.org


      You're aware that Ramsey Clark, the guy who "drafted" those articles of impeachment, is a die-hard supporter of Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, and other dictators, right? Read about it here... and Salon is not exactly a right-wing source.

  10. Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by defile · · Score: 1

    What is "Environmental Illness"? I've never heard it before in my life.

    What does "toxic home" mean in this context? I've never thought of lampshades as dangerous. I'm left guessing here.

    Obviously I can look these all up (and I will). But any other reporting source would've explained these concepts in some detail.

    1. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is "Environmental Illness"? I've never heard it before in my life.

      Basically, from what I have read, it is one step below bubble-boy on the allergen list. Instead of being suceptible to germs, these people are susceptible to gasses and chomicals that most of us tolerate fine.

      What does "toxic home" mean in this context? I've never thought of lampshades as dangerous. I'm left guessing here.

      It means that every piece of anything chemically processed that you have in your home slowly breaks down over time, and gives off noxious chemicals. Everything from formaldehyde to radon.
      Most of us dont notice, but it apparently makes some people _very_ sick. Couple this with todays "need" to make homes virtually air tight, and you have a place that makes reactive people really, really sick.

      Obviously I can look these all up (and I will). But any other reporting source would've explained these concepts in some detail.

      He kinda does on a another page.. but you have to dig a bit to find it. It apparently involves moose, alaska, and nOrthern Exposure.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      " I've never thought of lampshades as dangerous. I'm left guessing here."

      Obviously someone missed When Lampshades Attack on fox.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Basically, from what I have read, it is one step below bubble-boy on the allergen list. Instead of being suceptible to germs, these people are susceptible to gasses and chomicals that most of us tolerate fine.

      Nitpicking note--germs are not allergens, and bubble-boy syndrome (severe combined immune deficiency--SCID, IIRC) is a result of a person's inability to produce and maintain a healthy population of immune cells. Allergic reactions typically look and feel like a severe overreaction by the immune system--something that you would never see from a bubble-boy sufferer.

      It means that every piece of anything chemically processed that you have in your home slowly breaks down over time, and gives off noxious chemicals. Everything from formaldehyde to radon.

      Nit number two. Radon exposure in the home is never the result of chemically processed materials breaking down in the home. Radon gas is formed by the nuclear decay of natural radioisotopes in soil. (Since natural clays are used to make bricks, there may be slightly higher radiation levels in brick buildings, as well.)

      Most of us dont notice, but it apparently makes some people _very_ sick. Couple this with todays "need" to make homes virtually air tight, and you have a place that makes reactive people really, really sick.

      The airtight buildings of today do concentrate allergens while often simultaneously drying out mucous membranes that would normally keep these nasties out of our lungs, "Sick Building Syndrome" (SBS) may result. Often, the cause of SBS can be traced to one or two contaminants in the environment--moulds in the air system, formaldehyde releases from fresh carpet adhesives, and so forth.

      "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity" (MCS) is a disorder characterized by extreme sensitivity to multiple environmental toxins. MCS is still far from being recognized by the medical establishment at large. Here is a good, balanced summary from the American Academy of Family Physicians. Of particular note is the fact that the AMA, the American College of Physicians, the International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, and American Academy of Allergy and Immunology have rejected MCS as an organic illness--but then, they could be wrong.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      every piece of anything chemically processed

      You mean like every object you can buy? Last time I checked, everything was a chemical. Better not wash those Oranges off, after all, water is a chemical!!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Creepy · · Score: 1

      It's even worse than that - no chemical cleaners of any kind can be used. Shampoo and soap? nope (for the most part). No varnishes or treated woods or treated carpets (and most non-natural carpet fibers, for that matter).

      I know a guy with this in Wisconsin - he grew up near a chemical plant that spilled toxic chems into the water table. That company basically pays for everything he (and his less probematic brother) need, as well as everyone else who grew up in that neighborhood before the cleanup (they still ship in bottled water to every house).

      It's really funny in a sick sort of way whenever I go to his house - I'm toxically allergic to his pets and dust/dustmites, and he's allergic to the chems on our clothes (or our deoderant, shampoo, etc). For some reason matter/antimatter comes to mind...

    6. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read on the news (believe google news) that children exposed to dogs when they're young have less allergies.

      I guess someone didn't have a pet when they were younger.

    7. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but it is a natural chemical, and therefore is obviously safe. Just like hemlock, rattlesnack venom, radon, and cyanide.

    8. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Taldo · · Score: 1
      Yea, but it is a natural chemical, and therefore is obviously safe. Just like hemlock, rattlesnack venom, radon, and cyanide.
      Allow me to cut through the general ignorance on this subject.

      Yes, people who talk about 'natrual substances' sometimes go a bit overboard... (particularly marijuana apologists...) However, there IS a point here. Hemlock, rattlesnack (sic) venom, radon and cyanide are all quite toxic. Nobody's claiming they aren't. However.... Look at how much venom is in your average rattlesnake bite?

      Yeah.... try injecting yourself with that much Sarin... or VX. You'd be dead in a few seconds... compared to the rattlesnake bite where you have a reasonably good chance of not dying at all.

      The thing about 'natrual' toxic substances is that our bodies have developed around their presence for about 3.5 million years. Our systems have at least SOME idea of how to get rid of them... and in cases where we can't get rid of them our bodies can frequently cope.

      The other thing to remember is that in the case of housing you're talking about something medical science really isn't set up to look for... low level exposure over (frequently) decades of time. The classic 'double blind study' attempts to simulate this (badly) by exposing test subjects to massive amounts of the material being studied. (Look at the EPA's 'second hand smoke' study... which ended up being roundly debunked after the PR damage was already done.)

    9. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      For some reason matter/antimatter comes to mind...

      You're a hug away from free energy!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    10. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by t · · Score: 1

      It is not nitpicking, it is a grossly wrong comparison. For a normal person, bubble-boy syndrome is like smallpox everywhere. For allergic reactions it is more like cayenne pepper in the face (less an overreaction by the body). Maybe a severe allergy to bee stings or oysters is easier to grasp.

    11. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      every piece of anything chemically processed

      You mean like every object you can buy? Last time I checked, everything was a chemical. Better not wash those Oranges off, after all, water is a chemical!!

      Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.... try injecting yourself with that much Sarin... or VX. You'd be dead in a few seconds... compared to the rattlesnake bite where you have a reasonably good chance of not dying at all.

      Sarin and VX are bad examples because people deliberately tried to make them as deadly to humans as possible.

      Whereas when people make pesticides and preservatives (or even insect and rat poison!) they try to use the least harmful chemical (to humans) available.

      The point is
      not that the artificial substances are harmless, but that they are less harmful than many natural substances.

      And more importantly, as our scientific knowledge increases, we tend to come up with less harmful and more effective chemical agents. This is the clear trend of over 150 years of history. (Asbestos and lead paint, anyone?)

    13. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by johndiii · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that, while it can make you sick from radiation, Radon is an inert gas under anything like normal conditions. So it is very unlikely to trigger an allergic reaction.

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
    14. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Taldo · · Score: 1
      Um... you're aware that VX was originally intended to be a pesticide?

      It was never USED as one because people realized how lethal it was....

      The trend over the past 150 years has been to come up with less costly and more attractive chemical agents. As long as something isn't immediately and obviously lethal, harm to the consumer has been largely secondary. It's nice if a product doesn't kill you.... but as long as your sickness/death can't be conclusively traced back to a given product, 'how much' is by far the more important concern from the standpoint of the producer.

    15. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Rattlesnake venom and Hemlock evolvede to be as poisonous as possible. So if one wants to use venom and hemlock as "examples" of natural chemicals (read: among the most poisonous nature can produce) then VX and sarin are fair examples.

    16. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by forii · · Score: 1
      Yeah.... try injecting yourself with that much Sarin... or VX. You'd be dead in a few seconds... compared to the rattlesnake bite where you have a reasonably good chance of not dying at all.


      Rattlesnake poison is one thing... Aflatoxins are another. Aflatoxins are produced naturally by certain species of the Fungus Aspergillus, and have LD50s on the scale (around 100 mcg/kg) of Sarin, VX, and other related organophosphates.


      Then there is also Ricin, commonly available in Castor beans, which grow wild in many places. When injected, Ricin has an LD50 at around 3 micrograms/kg. Plus you get the bonus of going through several days of high fever, organ necrosis, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, before you die. Fun!


      Then there's nicotine, easily available by doing an extraction on tobacco. When injected, Nicotine has an LD50 of around 1-5 mg/kg. So I guess that's a lot safer...

    17. Re:Uhm, I think some things need explaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the guy is also allergic to a HEPA filter? What about charcoal ones?

      Fact is, the need to make homes airtight also led to the need for radon and exchange systems, both of which work very well, as well as increase air quality in the home above that of older, less airtight residences.

      There are so many materials that are not processed or minimally so. I mean, hell, wood--there is nothing keeping him from going out with an ax and a saw and building his home out of freshly cut lumber and adding a thatched roof. Labor intensive, time consuming all, but doable.

      But there is little to keep him from chemical expsosure from the industry plant down the road, or glue from the sneaker's his friend had on when he came in, or whatever.

  11. Re:Just transfer your brain into a computer by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

    ike I did, and don't worry about. Living virtually is more than virtually living.

    better to have lived virtually, than to not have lived at all....

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  12. toxic housing: by Maeryk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My mom just built a house. She has spent upwards of 20 years designing it to be mostly passive solar, and was very careful about what went into it. (She is, honestly, just this side of whacko when it comes to believing "industry safety" and pays much attention to the very non-publicized reports in things like science news, etc).

    Helping with the house, I learned a _heck_ of a lot about what I dont want in my house. The stuff that you put in and never give a thought about is incredibly dangerous! From the formaldehyde released by everything from your insulation, plywood, and flooring to your couch and carpets, added to the fact that todays houses are usually wrapped in Tyvek or some other non-permeable barrier means you are breathing deadly gasses the entire time you are home.

    This is scary stuff! I have to personally wonder how much of the "cancer rise rates" are directly related to things like this.. especially the huge jump in Lung Cancer in the last 20 years. It certainly is not only due to smoking, as smoking levels have been decreasing steadily.

    It's kind of scary what "they" can get away with selling you as "safe". There are huge warnings on certain exotic hardwoods that the dust created by them is toxic, and some people can have allergic reactions to them, but CCM and CCA pressure treated wood is regularly used by people to build raised bed gardens. (Nothing like having chromium, arsenic, cadmium, and other fun things leaching into the soil around your tomatoes!) I honestly think if most people knew exactly how they make PT lumber, they would _never_ use it for their kids to play on or in their homes. But lots of people do. This stuff is going to be the Love Canal of the future.

    *sigh*

    People like me, however, when I bring it up, are just labeled "paranoid". The thing that REALLY annoys me is that things like Cedar and Redwood are naturally just as resistant to decay, and a fully renewable resource.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    1. Re:toxic housing: by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your mother is a crackpot. and she is bringing you over to that side.

      Yes, MANY things can release som nasty gasses. but your wild ass remark about tyvek sealing it in is proof of a crackpot logic. Does your house have doors and windows? how about a properly installed heating system with the correct fresh air intake and heat exchanger? if the house was correctly designed you change over the air in the home at least 2-3 times and hour.

      The new home can have trace amounts of nasties in it's atmosphere, but by the time you move into it, a gas chromatagraph cannot even detect it. and it is alot more sensitive than anything you can gain access to "measure" how dangerous a home is.

      My father was a contractor, In college chemistry classes I wrote a thesis on such crackpot theories, and using standard science proved that it's all a bunch of hooey in a properly built home.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:toxic housing: by pthisis · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is scary stuff! I have to personally wonder how much of the "cancer rise rates" are directly related to things like this.. especially the huge jump in Lung Cancer in the last 20 years. It certainly is not only due to smoking, as smoking levels have been decreasing steadily.

      Your assumption that there is a "huge jump in lung cancer in the last 20 years" is wrong, or at best misleading.

      Age-adjusted lung cancer rates have declined significantly from 1990-1999--age-adjusted rates are the only ones that are really worth looking at, they're what for instance the CDC and other bodies use since they account for increases in lifespan. Preliminary data for 2000-2002 seems to indicate this trend is continuing. If there is an increase over the last 20 years it's because an earlier increase (1983-1989) hasn't been wiped out yet.

      Remember that cancer rates lag smoking rates, too, so if smoking was halved today that would show up more and more over the next decade(s) rather than showing up immediately.

      http://seer.cancer.gov is one good resource for this data.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    3. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nothing like having chromium, arsenic, cadmium, and other fun things leaching into the soil around your tomatoes!) "
      Yeah, it's not like chromium, arsenic, cadmium, COME FROM THE FUCKING SOIL IN THE FIRST PLACE, IDIOT.
      Geez, where do you think this stuff comes from in the first place?
      Take your Paxil, get a girlfriend, GO OUTSIDE. But be careful, there's nitrogen, carbon dioxide, ozone and krypton out there!

    4. Re:toxic housing: by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      That house she built sounds interesting. Any web site with details?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:toxic housing: by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Having an uncle who is a contractor, I agree with you. A properly buils home has already been exposed to release much of the toxic fumes. As the subcontractors go in and out throughout the building, the entire home is exposed to fresh air flow until the last few days. They leave windows, doors, skylights, and anything else they can open throughout the process.

      There is, however, one key phrase in that: 'properly built.' Based on the lowest bidder model, properly built is often traded off for lower cost and less effective techniques, cheaper materials, etc.

      The best advice is simple. Talk to the contractor. Ask questions. Reputable, reliable contractors who are willing to 'properly build' have no problems telling you wether they are using pressure treated lumber, or are instead using environmentally friendly CDX plywood. Detailing who the manufacturer of each product is. Do not be afraid to tell your contractor what you want. After all, it is your home, and your life.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    6. Re:toxic housing: by gid-goo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow, in college. That must have been some serious research you did. You and Doogie Howser must have been up doing your titrations in to the wee hours to get the data for your journal article.

      And your dad a contractor? Jesus, you're all over that shit. How could anyone possibly refute contractor Dad and an undergrad paper.

    7. Re:toxic housing: by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      formaldehyde released by everything from your insulation, plywood, and flooring to your couch and carpets

      Yup. You're right. And at what levels? Measurable? Didn't think so.

      Tyvek or some other non-permeable barrier means you are breathing deadly gasses the entire time you are home

      Hell, I breathe carbon dioxide all the time and it's a deadly gas too. So is oxygen. So is nitrogen. I'm freaking amazed I'm not dead yet!

      Of course it might all have something to do with concentrations, but lets not let science enter into this. It'd just confuse things.

      Unless you keep your house hermetically sealed with the HVAC off then it's a non-issue. Even with Tyvek or similar housewraps (which are used to dramatically increase the energy efficiency) houses are designed to leak - primarily through the attic (another energy efficiency thing).

      CCM and CCA pressure treated wood is regularly used by people to build raised bed gardens

      Yes, and the arsenic does leach out. And it's up to 10x the concentration in the surrounding soil. And still far, far, far below toxic levels. Plants can be concentrators, but they're unlikely to do so at any appreciable level even then.

      if most people knew exactly how they make PT lumber, they would _never_ use it for their kids to play on or in their homes

      I know how they make it, as well as other engineered wood products. And I still use them. Because, frankly, they are safe. The leeching levels are very, very low over a very, very long time.

      I wouldn't chew the stuff, but I wouldn't chew untreated lumber either.

      The thing that REALLY annoys me is that things like Cedar and Redwood are naturally just as resistant to decay, and a fully renewable resource.

      Sure. And you're willing to wait how many decades for that cedar grove to become big enough to supply the wood for even one house? Or maybe you'd rather wait a couple centuries for the redwood.

      Of course, I have this lovely southern pine which will be ready for use in under a decade.

      Oh and what was that you were saying about toxic fumes? Because, of course, cedar doesn't give off any fumes at all, right? Uh huh.

      She is, honestly, just this side of whacko

      Fortunately, the side you are both on is the opposite side from the majority of humanity.

    8. Re:toxic housing: by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Using mixtures of arsenic and zinc to waterproof wood has been a common practice since the 1600's. Dutch Settlers in upstate NY used these methods... which is why 350-450 year old barns and houses aren't that uncommon.

      The fact is the notion that everything "leeches" into the soil is pure bunk. Tyvek doesn't eliminate ventilation -- it eliminates leaks. If you want to vent the air -- try opening a window!

      Cedar and redwood are great woods, but they are not exactly in great supply. The traits that give these woods their excellent properties are largely becauase they are slow-growth trees that take decades or centuries to replace.

      You really need to disavow the conspiracy theories regarding building materials and construction techniques. I'm sure your mom is a great lady with good intentions, but her theories and interpetations of things are just off base.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    9. Re:toxic housing: by pubjames · · Score: 1

      The stuff that you put in and never give a thought about is incredibly dangerous! [..] People like me, however, when I bring it up, are just labeled "paranoid".

      Tell me about it! Here is a list of stuff that people actually eat, every day, without realising it!:

      Carbohydrate derivatives -pectic compounds - galacturonic acid, pectin methyl esterase. Gums, mucilage - complex branched chains - gum arabic, gum tragacanth. Sugar alcohols - sorbital-hexahydric glucose mannitol, inositol. glucosides - anthocyanines, anthoxanthins, tannins - sugar and phenolic compound, cyanogenic compounds, fats, oils, waxes, esters of acid (fatty). polyhydric alcohols, aldehyde or ketone group. monosaccharides - Disaccharide, sucrose, maltose, lactose glucose and galactose, cellobiose - cellulose. Trisaccharides -raffinose - galactose-glucose-fructose, Polysaccharides, monoterpenes and deterpenes. menthol, camphor, triterpenoids - sterals sitosterol, stigmasterol, cholesterol, brassins, tetraterpenoids - carotenoids - B carotene, lycopene, poly-terpenoids...

      Oh, wait a minute, those are all naturally occuring in fruit and vegetables... They don't sound very nice, though, do they? And I'm sure some of them are toxic! Better stop eating fruit and veg!

    10. Re:toxic housing: by jpellino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, wish any of them luck in building a house without a well-engineered wall system - vapor barrier and permable wrap - Tyvek is not airtight - it is a liquid barrier bus allows moisture to migrate back out of the insualted wall, while a sealed barrier makes sure the moisture stays out of the house interior. Leave these two out and good luck fighting off the mold that will be inside the walls in short time. Short of straw-bale adobe, it's pretty necessary. Also - don't seal the ground with a well-engineered basement or barrier or vent system, and you're blind to radon infiltration, which is not a syndrome - it is a proven and measurable health risk.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    11. Re:toxic housing: by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The rise in cancer is due to increased longevity. Cancer is a "first-world" phenomenon because people in poor countries die from infection first. Developing countries see sharp rises in cancer as their life expectancy improves. Chemicals or no, there is always genetic mutation and even if you could otherwise live indefinitely, cancer would get you eventually.

    12. Re:toxic housing: by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      This is scary stuff! I have to personally wonder how much of the "cancer rise rates" are directly related to things like this.. especially the huge jump in Lung Cancer in the last 20 years. It certainly is not only due to smoking, as smoking levels have been decreasing steadily.

      Actually, lung cancer rates have been declining in Canada and the United States for the last twenty years or so, and the result is largely attributed to declines in cigarette smoking. The reason why lung cancers increased through the middle decades of this century (despite a relatively stable smoking rate at the time) is a significant lag between increases in smoking rates and increases in lung cancer incidence (and mortality).

      Smoking rates increased from World War I, peaking in about 1965. Trends in lung cancer incidence lagged by fifteen to twenty years, peaking around 1985, and declining since. (Source: Canadian Cancer Society.)

      Increases in other cancers may have environmental causes, though there are lifestyle factors to consider as well (e.g. the rise in colon cancer is associated with our unhealthy eating habits.) Also, medical science has gotten better at treating some diseases--we're dying more often due to cancer just because we're not getting killed by other ailments.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:toxic housing: by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Cedar and redwood also contain chemcials that aren't so good for you if exposed day in and day out. Redwood can produce microsplinters that are a real bitch if you get 'em in your skin (I'd hate to think what they'd do if inhaled as dust). And cedar isn't just flammable, it's *explosive* due to the oil content. (Remember the 900+ houses that went up in the big Oakland fire of some years back? The fire spread *primarily* via cedar-shake roofs, even tho most had been treated with fire-retardant.)

      "Cancer clusters" also occur in dogs, but even cursory inspection of pedigrees shows that the problem is genetic (essentially a form of inherited autoimmune disease) -- it quite definitely follows familial lines, which tend to become regionally entrenched. I suspect if pedigree analysis were performed on "cancer cluster" humans, similar data would emerge.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:toxic housing: by luzrek · · Score: 1

      How are you using a computer. Do you have any idea how much toxic material is in a computer? Let's see, a typical monitor probably has 4 lbs of lead, the solder on the circuit boards is made mainly of lead (and possibly cadmium). Your keyboard and mouse are probably made of plastic, which is probably slowly breaking down releasing your dangerous chemicals.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    15. Re:toxic housing: by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Tho in my experience, an improperly built home is more likely to leak air at every possible juncture, than to be too sealed. (In a windstorm, I can't tell which side of my bedroom window I'm standing on!!) Excessively-sealed homes exist, but it's not the side that sloppy contracters are likely to err on.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:toxic housing: by Chelloveck · · Score: 2, Funny
      Tell me about it! Here is a list of stuff that people actually eat, every day, without realising it!

      Don't forget about Dihydrogen Monoxide! This is one of the most dangerous chemicals in existence, yet it's used in just about every processed food there is. Stop the madness!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    17. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Better stop eating fruit and veg! "

      yeah,ok asshole,you(and a bunch of other twats) just proved his point about being called paranoid for having a clue about your environment.

      Go back to fuck'n sleep, sheep.

      "a list of stuff that people actually eat, every day, without realising it!:"

      yeah, why don't you add the BAD stuff,dumbass... artificial sweeteners, artificial colors, monosodium glutamate 'fillers',etc...

      Oh,but i guess i'm 'paranoid' because i've opened my eyes on what's going on around me..

      Better to eat olestra chips and diet coke in front of the boob-tube all day, right?

      frigg'n sheep...

    18. Re:toxic housing: by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Aren't those the ingredients in a Twinkie?

    19. Re:toxic housing: by kcelery · · Score: 1

      granite in the southern part of China is relatively rich in Radon, which is mixed in the concrete of local buildings. Good vantilation is recommended to prevent radon build up. Some people suggested impermeable paint like those epoxy paint to seal in the gas. But I am not sure if it works or not. Radon is known to cause cancer.

    20. Re:toxic housing: by solarcardork · · Score: 1

      I worked stucco for a few years and I've used more Tyvek than I care to speak about. Tyvek is used as a moisture barrier to keep liquid water out, not gasses in. It is actually covered in tiny holes, small enough that the surface tension of water keeps it outside and large enough that gasses can pass, letting the house "breath." The poly vapor barrier on the other hand is what seals new houses up tight and causes all the problems (ever try to light a fire in a new house's fireplace? Sometimes you have to open a door to get some airflow).

    21. Re:toxic housing: by t · · Score: 1
      A sealed house is easy to identify. Just look for moisture accumulation and mold.

      And if you really wanted an indestructable house you would make it out of iron wood and teak. Good luck on those.

      PS: The bogeyman is even scarier.

    22. Re:toxic housing: by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      True... it tends to be a tradeoff... you get lower quality materials, more likely to contain toxins and release dangerous fumes, yet the house is leaky letting more out. But I think I would rather have the high quality materials, and just remember to open windows once a week to air the house out...

      At least with a good contractor, you have more options and someone more willing to work toward your goals and wants.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    23. Re:toxic housing: by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Um, actually fresh air intake for the circulating air is not considered a "properly installed heating system". A heating/cooling system that involves taking air from the house and replacing it with air from outside is something quite exotic to tell you the truth (in a normal house anyhow, I think fresh air intakes might be more common on mobile home furnaces). The typical furnace installation simply involves a duct system to collect air from the various rooms of the house, a furnace (and cooling coil) to heat (and cool) the air, and a duct system to redistribute the air to the rooms of the house. That's it, nothing more. The fresh air intake that you may be thinking about is common on higher efficiency furnaces where fresh air is brought in from the outside to be used in the combustion process (thermodynamically, cooler air is better to burn). But fresh air intakes for the air actually circulated around the house are quite rare, at least in the north east, things may be different in other parts of the country.

    24. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Is your father a contractor that's worked recently? If so, you would probably have heard of something called Internal Air Quality.

      The problem with most houses now is that they *aren't* properly built. "Sick house" syndrome and mold issues are becoming a HUGE issue in the contractor's world today, and are proven to be dangerous. Dangerous levels of mold require removal procedures that rival CDC or USAMRIID biohazard procedures.

      A lot of this stems from improper installation of ventilation systems or air filters, sometimes it has to do with the flooring or insulation of the house. The fact is that these materials can be dangerous in certain situations, and thinking that these are all "crackpot" theories is the wrong way of going about it.

    25. Re:toxic housing: by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      As other posters have already stated, your mom is trying too hard to find things to worry about.

      I'm not calling you "paranoid". Obviously, you're just an intelligent person who became concerned by all the "facts" your mom spouted off in her quest to build a safer home.

      These types of things are always worth looking into. It's just that like the recent scare about people's cellphones causing brain tumors, it's pseudo-science that sounds just believable enough to get people worrying about it needlessly.

      It's pretty much all about *quantities* when you try to define what's hazardous vs. safe to be exposed to. The fact that PT lumber gives off barely measurable levels of a poison like arsenic means nothing. The sun gives off harmful UV radiation all the time, too - yet as a soceity, we're not deathly afraid of walking outside. Why is that? Obviously, we've used common sense and realized that in resonable amounts, exposure to sunlight does us more good than harm.

    26. Re:toxic housing: by halfread · · Score: 1

      If I have to choose between his mom and your dad to build my house, I'll take the crackpot. Why is it that contractors and their children always believe that the way they do things is the best way or only way? There is a lot of data out there about problems with indoor air quality. A brand new and properly built house may have very low outgassing problems and may have proper air circulation. But ask around about how many people you know have a fresh air intake on their heating system. But much of the problem comes as you live in the house. Carpeting traps toxic dusts, pesticide residues, etc. etc. that the American Lung Association has begun to link with increased incidences of asthma in young children. Improperly cleaned air handlers trap these dusts and residues as well. Fact: there is a lot of chemistry floating around out there. A lot of it is known to be carcinogenic. Most researchers agree that potential interactions between chemicals can impact health, but no one knows how and there isn't enough money out there to research it. IMHO, a little of the precautionary principle doesn't hurt, even for contractors.

    27. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "that involves taking air from the house and replacing it with air from outside is something quite exotic to tell you the truth"

      Are you an idiot or what? 4 way heat exchangers are sold at home depot, what the biggie?

      Takes the air from outside, passes it through one side of the exchanger: hot air from inside exchanges heat with the cold air from outside. There's no gas exchange here. So the stale hot air is cooled and forced outside. The fresh cool air is forced IN and heated up.
      It's just a cardboard box full of straws.... Very simple, not exotic at all.

    28. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4-way heat exchangers are not standard on most OEM furnace and heating systems. You have to buy them from places like Home Depot and then find a contractor to install it. As a result, most places will not actually have a 4-way heat exchanger.

    29. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before I dropped-out of high school, I completed my thesis in howto kick your fellow man's fuckin ass.

      I HATE YOU. I HATE YOU!

    30. Re:toxic housing: by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the better-built house doesn't start cracking apart with the first minor quake... Suing contractors who built shoddy condos has become a SoCal cottage industry!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    31. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the AC, but I can't remember my pass.

      You are very correct in you air recirculation assesment of homes. I know of no home that draws in outside air for conditioning. Maybe for combustion (my furnace is in my attic, so it gets outside air all the time). But the conditioned air is always recirculated. Just like turning on recirculate on your car's A/C for better cooling. Same thing here. It would cost you an arm and a leg to use outside air and condition (heat and hudimiy or cool and dehumidify) it.

      Commercial buidlings are another story, and they do use some outside air. "Sick buildings" came about in the 70's, so the EPA (I think) mandated a certain percentage of outside air must be drawn into the building.

    32. Re:toxic housing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are thinking about are heat exchangers - stale air goes out, fresh air comes in, but most of the heat from the outgoing air is transfered to the incoming air. Some models will even extract the moister from the outgoing air to give to the incoming air (a condensate wheel I belive it is called)

      Expect to pay between $2k and $3k extra for one to be installed in your house.

  13. Alaska by l33t+j03 · · Score: 1

    He needs to watch more Northern Exposure. They had a good couple of episodes with a character who suffered from the same thing. As usual, TV provides all the answers.

    1. Re:Alaska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the website before you post.

    2. Re:Alaska by l33t+j03 · · Score: 0

      The problem with that is that I can't read.

  14. Psychological by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From what i've read/seen on the topic of people with multiple personalities, many of the personalities have sicknesses that other personalities don't. Some wear glasses others don't. Could this mean that like multiple personality disorder this person has created his sickness?

  15. Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gypsum, plaster, brick, wood, steel are inert. If you can't handle these natural substances then too bad. Fate is not always kind. Life is not fair. Perhaps you have a psychological problem. Maybe a psychiatrist would be your best bet.

    1. Re:Wrong problem by Maeryk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gypsum, plaster, brick, wood, steel are inert. If you can't handle these natural substances then too bad. Fate is not always kind. Life is not fair. Perhaps you have a psychological problem. Maybe a psychiatrist would be your best bet.

      BZZT:! Wrong answer. Gypsum is bad for anyone who has respiratory issues, because it is such a fine dust, and anyone with any kind of silica allergy has serioius problems with it.

      There are several woods that are downright toxic.
      Line a room with Cedar and make the house airtight and see how long you survive. The gas given off by it is not only toxic to Moths, it is toxic to people also. But the little blocks you keep in your closet dont release enough to sicken you, unless you are highly reactive to it.

      Bricks are also not inert all the time. The JIRR
      had an article on a brick in Boston that was carrying syphillus. (yes, that was meant to be humorous, but its true).

      Yeah.. I know i'm feeding a troll.. but your misinformation is staggering.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are wrong. Baking flour is a fine dust which can be bad for your lungs. Toxins in the puffer fish are among the most deadly known. Cobra venom is so powerful that a few milliliters can kill dozens of men. Don't eat bread. Don't eat fish. Kill all snakes.

      Sorry bub, buy gypsum board is a solid, not a "dust". Cedar is so expensive that no one would use it in home construction. You can pick and choose instances of exceptional cases that have no bearing on daily reality. You are playing games and not living in the real world. Wait ... I've already said that, in other words see a psychiatrist.

    3. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Line a room with Cedar and make the house airtight and see how long you survive."

      Yeah. And build an adobe house, line it with Britney Spears posters and make it airtight, and see how long you survive.

    4. Re:Wrong problem by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Sorry bub, buy gypsum board is a solid, not a "dust".

      What crack are you smoking? Gypsum board is dust compressed into a board. rub your finger on some exposed gypsum and see. Or better yet, get it wet enough and watch it crumble back to dust.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    5. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZT! Wrong answer. We are not talking about exposing someone to raw gypsum, we are talking about gypsum PLASTER which provided it is not drilled or cut will not make any dust. Your misinformatin is staggering. And please get a dictionary.

    6. Re:Wrong problem by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      No not really. Actually his misinformation is merely average.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Wrong problem by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      You are suffering from hysteria.

      Gypsum dust is produced when you are cutting plasterboard or mixing plaster. When it's up on your wall, it isn't releasing dust.

      Nobody lines an interior wall with cedar - it's too hard to cut properly to use inside. Some people choose to use cedar for their outside siding.

      Bricks are inert baked clay. Other than background radiation from the clay, it releases nothing.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    8. Re:Wrong problem by TheMiller · · Score: 1

      Also, wallboard contains a lot of binders. It is a major and long-term source of formaldehyde outgassing.

    9. Re:Wrong problem by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Gypsum is intert. However, just like Coal, if you breath in a lot of dust it will rip up your lungs. While it is dangerous to work with it is perfectly safe to have around.

      I also seriously question how one could have a silica alergy since that is intert to. It is also a major component of dirt.

      Bricks are Inert. They are made of clay and straw baked at a very high temperature (no life could survive the firing process, just like with other ceramics). If a brick was subsequently contaminated with something, then the brick is still intert, it is just conaminated. That's like saying penguins are toxic because some were contaminated by the Exxon Valdize oil slick.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    10. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so cool to use "BZZT".

    11. Re:Wrong problem by t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should review the definition of the word "inert". The word inert has nothing to do with bacteria or other types of life, it is a chemistry term.

    12. Re:Wrong problem by JLester · · Score: 1

      Yep, the US Gypsum plant is near my house. The guys that work there say it is so fine that you can touch the surface of a large mass of it and it will ripple like water .. pretty cool!

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
    13. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, gypsum miners have a far lower incidence of lung problems than coal miners.

    14. Re:Wrong problem by isorox · · Score: 1

      make the house airtight and see how long you survive.

      Not too long I'd imagine. I've got a wierd disability that required me to breath oxygen. If I put my head in an airtight bag, I tend to die very quickly.

    15. Re:Wrong problem by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying penguins are toxic because some were contaminated by the Exxon Valdize oil slick.

      Wrong hemisphere, unless the Exxon Valdeeze oil slick was much, much bigger than was reported in the news.

    16. Re:Wrong problem by Big+Ryan · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone with a Silica allergy have serious problems with Gypsum? Gypsum (CaSO4-2H20) is a sulfate, not a silicate.

      Isn't mineralogy great?

    17. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ceder will kill your pet gerbil or hamster in no time too. A lot of cedar shavings for animal waste bins advise against using the cedar in glass cages for this very reason.

  16. Non Toxic Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At present my work time is being occupied by the pursuit of three housing strategies; rent supported multi-unit housing, home-brew modular construction, and the most recent addition of relocating and adapting a Lustron home. Unfortunately, none of these seem to be coming together.

    The first of these is the result of a colleague in the mortgage brokerage industry discovering that I had a very good credit rating despite a lack of income and suggesting the idea of mortgaging the construction of several small rental homes or a multi-unit home so that the rent from most of them would cover the mortgage on the whole. This is a simple strategy that has been exploited by many but my situation complicates it due to the regressive restrictions of the Social Security Administration on what SSI recipients can do with their property. SSI recipients are prohibited from owning any kind of 'investment property' and thus in order for this idea to work I would have to have all my rental units on the one single piece of home property I am allowed. Because the needs of my disability require a relatively remote location free of pollution, the only likely tenants are people with my same health problem. This means that all the housing units have to be built to the same non-toxic construction standard and as a result are much more costly than they might otherwise be. This, in turn, creates the dilemma of needing immediate 100% occupancy because the higher construction cost means less principle can be reserved to make mortgage payments while waiting for tenants. My colleague in the mortgage business tells me that it would be impossible to make this work unless I can have tenants signed up before the mortgage application is even made.

    Demand for non-toxic housing is extreme in the US. HUD receives hundreds of calls a month by desperate EIs looking for this kind of housing. So as long as the rent rate is reasonable, it is guaranteed that tenants will be found no matter how remote my location may be. The problem is that there is too much variability among the mix of sensitivities EIs have. It's relatively straightforward to make a home that is suitable in composition for some 90% of all EIs. But no one location in America can likewise match that because of the subtle ubiquity of pollution here, particularly from domestic sources. As a result, most EIs will not sign a lease for a home unbuilt because they cannot be sure they can tolerate it until they have tried it for at least a week. This problem has proved unsolvable so far.

    A colleague in the EI community in Arizona recently referred me to key individuals in HUD with the intent that they might be able to offer a solution to this problem through a HUD guaranteed loan that might offer more flexibility in repayment terms. But it turned out that HUD does not offer such things to anyone but large corporations and non-profit organizations. They showed great interest in my project and have asked to be kept updated on its progress but they offer no help. HUD seems to have a sincere desire to find a solution to the non-toxic housing crisis in this country. They can't ignore the huge number of calls they receive about this problem. But they want a solution on their own terms -which basically means a single turnkey solution that works for 100% of all EI patients. They have tried to build non-toxic public housing in the past but it had poor results because they relied on a project team of EI patients with no construction experience and insisted on an urban location no serious EI sufferer could ever tolerate. They did try to offer me some useful information on what they mistakenly believed was non-toxic housing which was displayed in an exhibit on the National Mall in 2001. Called the Solar Decathlon, it was in fact an exhibition of solar pwoered prefab housing designed by university students. On examination, it turned out that not a single one of these could even come close to being suitable as non-toxic housing due to a common reliance on a large assortment of chemical laden materia

    1. Re:Non Toxic Housing by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are collecting SSI, you are supposed to be disabled and unable to work.

      If you are capable of managing a construction project and being a landlord, you are not disabled an unable to work.

      Why don't you post your name so someone can turn you in for defrauding the social welfare system.

      Fucking cheat.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  17. Environmental Illness by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

    When I was a poor student, I lived in a basement suite that had a problem during heavy rains... Namely that the floor became a bit squishy in areas...

    Fortunately I moved out, however I did at one point find something resembling a truffle growing in a dark closet corner... Needless to say, I'm sure _that_ environment wasn't doing me any good.

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    1. Re:Environmental Illness by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

      "...I did at one point find something resembling a truffle growing in a dark closet corner..."

      That was no truffle, but a Fungi from Yuggoth! H.P. Lovecraft was right! ;)

    2. Re:Environmental Illness by thunderbee · · Score: 0

      Come on, we all know that fungi sprout on Yuggoth, not in dark closets.

      --
      In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
    3. Re:Environmental Illness by luzrek · · Score: 1
      This actually is problem housing. Many people actually do have real alergies to molds and mildews. Insurance companies will typically help out clean up the mildew and fixing the problems.

      Please don't confuse this with the people who claim to be alergic to compressed air and dirt.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  18. it's psychosomatic... by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Does the guy wear a tinfoil hat as well?

    Studies of such "syndromes" as sensitivity to EMF have revealed that the people in question are utterly able to distinguish the presense of radio waves or whatnot. It's bogus -- they're scaring themselves to death.

    I quote from The American Academy of Family Physicians website:
    "[MCS] has been rejected as an established organic disease by the American Academy of Allergy and Immunology, the American Medical Association, the California Medical Association, the American College of Physicians, and the International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. It may be the only ailment in existence in which the patient defines both the cause and the manifestations of his own condition. Despite this, it has achieved credibility in workmen's [sic] compensation claims, tort liability, and regulatory actions."

    "No evidence based on well-controlled clinical trials is available that supports a cause-and-effect relationship between exposure to very low levels of substances and the myriad symptoms reported by clinical ecologists to result from such exposure . . . . Until such accurate, reproducible, and well-controlled studies are available, the American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs believes that multiple chemical sensitivity should not be considered a recognized clinical syndrome."

    "Review of the clinical ecology literature provides inadequate support for the beliefs and practices of clinical ecology. The existence of an environmental illness as presented in clinical ecology theory must be questioned because of the lack of a clinical definition. Diagnoses and treatments involve procedures of no proven efficacy."
    Sorry to be insensitive, but until I see some better evidence for this being a real disorder, I'm going to assume that he's just another crackpot hypochondriac.
    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    1. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sorry to be insensitive, but until I see some better evidence for this being a real disorder, I'm going to assume that he's just another crackpot hypochondriac

      Bear in mind, exactly the same things were said about ADD, ADHD, Fibro-Myalgia, and a myriad of other things until they actually proved them. These are the same people who tell you Nutrasweet is "safe".

      Sorry.. anything that bonds into my bloodstream, goes straight to my brain, and there releases Formaldehyde and Methanol is _not safe_, and I dont care how much the AMA and the NEJM say "its okay! We tested it for three years before we gave it to you!".

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drooling-dog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe you're right about these illnesses being more psychiatric than physical. However, that doesn't mean that they're not real in terms of the suffering that these people go through. The "crackpot" label is a little harsh. This guy probably has a mental illness, but it's an illness all the same...

    3. Re:it's psychosomatic... by z4ce · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nutrasweet aka Aspartame IS safe. My dad works for the Merisant corporation which makes Equal, the largest consumer of Nutrasweet. If Nutrasweet is not safe, then certainly the solution to the problem will be darwinism. My dad and all of the other executives drink the stuff with every beverage. If they're at a restaurant that doesn't have Nutrasweet, they request it, and so on. All of the studies have shown there is no link to aspartame and any problems, and it has been one of the most studied substances on the planet. Something like 7000 studies I believe. And Merisant is NOT paying anybody off.

      As far as "Formaldehyde and Methanol" being such a problem, let me remind you that an eating an apple releases much more methanol into your system than the equal in your tea.

      And actually for the most part I think ADD and ADHD are just names for normal kids who want to sedate for our instutitional learning facilities (I do believe there are some true cases, but the vast majority).

    4. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maeryk, which is more dangerous to your health, some building materials or a
      homo's dick up your ass? Maybe you better get your priorities straight, ne c'est pas?

    5. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Shalda · · Score: 0

      But they do make a pill for it! It's manufactured by Placebo Industries. While some sufferers find themselves cured after a month or two on Placebo, others must take this pill for the remainder of their lives.

    6. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Draoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      All of the studies have shown there is no link to aspartame and any problems, and it has been one of the most studied substances on the planet.

      Nope, I'm afraid. Any foodstuff containing aspartame has to be labelled "Contains a source of phenylalanine", which it does. This is because sufferers of phenylketonuria are likely to die if they continually ingest it. More info here

      Co-incidentally, my wife gets severe migraine if she takes anything containing aspartame. This works regardless of whether she's aware of the contents or not ....

      (Controversially, the then commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Arthur Hayes, approved the general use of aspartame for the Searle corporation. Three months later, he was working for Burson-Marsteller, Searle's advertising agency. Co-incidence??)

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    7. Re:it's psychosomatic... by mdxi · · Score: 1

      Safe or not safe, it still tastes like crap. It's the wrong sweet (for lack of a better term), and it has a gnarly aftertaste. Sodium saccharine is also the wrong sweet but at least it doesn't linger. Give me regular old granulated sugar anyday, thanks.

      Note: I'm perfectly aware that taste is subjective, but I still hate Nutrasweet.

      --
      Posted with Mozilla
    8. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as "Formaldehyde and Methanol" being such a problem, let me remind you that an eating an apple releases much more methanol into your system than the equal in your tea.

      Major difference being they release it into your stomach.. the bond in nutrasweet is specifically designed to go to the brain before it does that.

      I work with a chemist, who is pretty high up here in chemistry. That was his take on it. I'll believe him over a PR study by a company that is trying to make money from me. Saccharin was "safe" too. So is TYlenol.. as long as you dont mind the odd coma and liver damage.

      And actually for the most part I think ADD and ADHD are just names for normal kids who want to sedate for our instutitional learning facilities (I do believe there are some true cases, but the vast majority).

      I can tell you for a fact that diet reactive ADD/ADHD exists. Hell.. I can prove it if you want me to hang out in your living room for about a week and you have a supply of pixie sticks around. I dont doubt that a hell of a lot of the current diagnoses are just kids that the system does not have time to deal with, but then again, I dont "believe" in the use of ritalin and other drugs to deal with a neruological disorder that can be effectively combated through proper diet and learning to deal with it.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    9. Re:it's psychosomatic... by pthisis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bear in mind, exactly the same things were said about ADD, ADHD, Fibro-Myalgia, and a myriad of other things until they actually proved them. These are the same people who tell you Nutrasweet is "safe".

      Can you really not understand the difference between caution and dismissal? The AMA said at one point "we don't know that ADD exists. We have no evidence for it." That's very different from saying "we don't believe Environmental Illness exists--we have evidence that it doesn't".

      The former calls for more information to find out whether there is a problem. The latter calls for a shift to psychiatric treatments of something that is a psychological problem and not a physiological one.

      And, BTW, there's still no credible evidence of any problems from aspartame (though it does taste rather nasty). Notice I didn't say that it's safe, but the studies cited widely in certain communities (e.g. the 1960s "FDA is keeping us in the dark!" studies) are certainly worthless.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    10. Re:it's psychosomatic... by kurokaze · · Score: 0

      I agree.. its Saccharin (sp?) that was a carcinogen.

    11. Re:it's psychosomatic... by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My friends from the fringe are constantly chiding my use of Nutrasweet, but honestly I like it better than sugar and it doesn't make me feel all weird like lots of sugar does. The only other sweeteners I use besides nutrasweet are honey and molases, but these are flavorizers as much as sweeteners.

      I just wish nutrasweet was more shelf-stable and high temperature stable so I could substitute it for sugar in recipes and not have the diet coke in the back of the fridge go south.

    12. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Alpha+Prime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And doctors know everything...

      In 1967 I was advised by an MD to start smoking because it would help my asthma. Studies since then have shown the hazards of smoke and secondhand smoke. I smoked for 17 years after that, have been quit for more than 20, but still have asthma.

      Asthma is quite often triggered by the very chemical pollution your AAFP article would seem to deny. No, I don't have clinical trials, just my own experience. When the pollution is low, my asthma is tolerable, when the pollution is high, my asthma is painful. When I get near fresh paint or other forms of pollution my lungs start hurting. This is not psychosomatic at all, its a real pain and goes away when the source is removed amd my lungs have had a chance to clear.

      BTW, several allergists have said that you can't be allergic to chemicals. Go figure.

      I'm glad you're healthy and can dismiss the rest of us that have health problems. May you never lose your health, but I hope a little compassion comes your way.

    13. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      You are obviously a corporate tool! Everyone knows that if you forcefeed a rat 100 tons of aspartane it kills it rather nastily! Hence Aspartane must be a deadly, cancer causing poison!

      >;)

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    14. Re:it's psychosomatic... by defile · · Score: 1

      To use my wife as an example...

      She would come down with these incapacitating migraines almost biweekly. They were awful, she'd be bedridden for almost the entire day, except for hourly trips to the bathroom to dryheave.

      She adjusted a few factors in her life and now they're practically gone.

      Firstly, she switched birth control pills. Supposedly this is a common side effect of Ortho-Tri-Cyclen. This cut them down to about once a month, with a little less intensity.

      (Yes, she did have these ailments before she started birth control, they were just more erratic, as were her periods. Birth control made them both regular.)

      Second, she started drinking organic milk. This didn't affect her periodic migraines, but it did stop the headaches she'd come down with a few hours after drinking milk.

      Thirdly, she started drinking more water, and cut out coffee, soda, etc. This seemed to eliminate them altogether. Now during her cycle she has a light headache at best (which is supposed to be normal). Now if only we could get rid of the bitchiness.

      Another point is Apples. She'd almost always go straight into a migraine/dryheave-a-thon after eating an Apple. But she's not allergic to Apples themselves. It turns out that a lot of fruit is sprayed with a preservative. *shrug*

      There are two conclusions that you can make.

      One is that there are dangerous chemicals in everything we eat and touch that makes us sick. The other is that people are crazy and can make their bodies do some amazing shit for attention. either way, problem solved I guess.

      And I'm one of those people who thinks ADD and ADHD are bullshit, or at the very least way too overprescribed. That is, I guess I'm a skeptic. But I can't argue with results (I'm pretty sure my wife's not crazy).

      I myself cut out regular coffee, soda, juice intake and replaced it with (filtered) tap water. After the caffeine withdrawal (which was about a week of agony), I've felt better than ever (I even wake up early with energy, imagine that). Oddly enough, my blood pressure has also dropped from high to normal (not "fantastic", but no longer at "we're going to prescribe procardia").

      Maybe I could even do a bit of exercise and lose some weight. But back on topic...

      Humans are such interesting little machines.

    15. Re:it's psychosomatic... by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://www.google.fi/search?q=aspartame&ie=UTF-8&o e=UTF-8&hl=fi&btnG=Google-haku&lr=

      yeah you shouldn't make assumptions on what comes off from google straight away.

      however, there are studies that DO show aspartame as harmful, it tastes like crap, and has no real reason to be used instead of sugar(yeah sugar has energy but drink water then it's not like your going to get rid of fatty ass by drinking alternatives, eh, and they're just as bad to teeth as well, dissolving them).

      the biggest gist is that it got through the check system by weaseling a bit.

      hmm... i wonder why the more caring types of my family stopped drinking sweetened stuff(educated in medical, reading studies occasionally).

      7000 as a number is just absurd too.

      "Of the 90 non-industry-sponsored studies, 83 (92%) identified one or more problems with aspartame. Of the 7 studies which did not find a problems, 6 of those studies were conducted by the FDA. Given that a number of FDA officials went to work for the aspartame industry immediately following approval (including the former FDA Commissioner), many consider these studies to be equivalent to industry-sponsored research."

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:it's psychosomatic... by rkischuk · · Score: 1
      Bear in mind, exactly the same things were said about ADD, ADHD...

      ADD and ADHD - gotta love them. Pure garbage labels given to children on the disciplinary fringe as an excuse to drug them. My wife is a teacher - I hear her describe the behavior of her "ADD" children, and it sounds an awful lot like the way I acted as a child. Was I tough to control? You bet. Does it mean I should have been drugged into behaving - absolutely no way.

      Don't forget about the latest lme excuse coming down the pipe, ODD - "Oppositional Defiant Disorder". Sounds like puberty to me, but what do I know...

      A pattern of negativistic, hostile, and defiant behavior lasting at least six months during which four or more of the following are present:
      1. Often loses temper
      2. often argues with adults
      3. often actively defies or refuses to comply with adults' requests or rules
      4. often deliberately annoys people
      5. often blames others for his or her mistakes or misbehavior
      6. is often touchy or easily annoyed by others
      7. is often angry and resentful
      8. is often spiteful and vindictive
      --
      Seen any BadMarketing lately?
    17. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing irks me more than "female problems". No doubt about it -- women are fucked up.

    18. Re:it's psychosomatic... by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Just because something is psychosomatic, doesn't mean that they are just making it up.

      Psychosomatic illnesses have psycological roots, but it is far more than being a hypochondriac. For example, someone is nervous or upset. This gives them heartburn or an upset stomach. The stomach trouble is caused by the psycological stress, but it does not mean that the person doesn't really have an upset stomach.

    19. Re:it's psychosomatic... by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Sig Comment, I love Dylan Thomas.

      That poem was one of my favorites along with Thanatopsis.

      Jeremy

    20. Re:it's psychosomatic... by hetta · · Score: 1

      > Sorry.. anything that bonds into my bloodstream, goes straight to my brain, and there releases Formaldehyde and Methanol is _not safe_,

      Now ask yourself, why do some people get symptoms from chemicals while others do not? It's all down to how good their liver is. Help that and you'll feel enormously better. Also, check exercise and diet.

      It always pays to look at the whole person. I should know, I'm a practising herbalist.

    21. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      it's not like your going to get rid of fatty ass by drinking alternatives, eh

      A little offtopic, but are you on drugs? By switching from regular soda to diet soda, you're effectively cutting out about 150-180 calories per serving/can. If you drink 2 or 3 cans a day, that's a significant decrease in net calorie intake.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    22. Re:it's psychosomatic... by vidnet · · Score: 1
      My dad and all of the other executives drink the stuff with every beverage. If they're at a restaurant that doesn't have Nutrasweet, they request it, and so on.

      It does sound addictive though.

    23. Re:it's psychosomatic... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you should not be drinking soda in the first place, you know, you DON'T HAVE TO DRINK SODA with food.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    24. Re:it's psychosomatic... by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Cool, I also like Altarwise by Owl-light a lot.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    25. Re:it's psychosomatic... by 3am · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Any foodstuff containing aspartame has to be labelled "Contains a source of phenylalanine", which it does. This is because sufferers of phenylketonuria are likely to die if they continually ingest it."

      Phenylalanine is an essential amino acid.

      People who cannot metabolize it are rare, born with the condition, and must adhere to a very strict diet because it's present in just about everything. Phenylketonurics are "likely to die" if they continually ingest meat, nuts, or beans - let along aspartame (and the major danger of consuming aspartame in quantity is in neural development problems in infants and young children).

      Aspartame is half Phenylalanine, half aspartic acid (another amino acid). There is nothing insidious about this, these amino acids are present in nearly all food.

      --

      A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
    26. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Draoi · · Score: 1
      Sure, but my point still stands. Aspartame is a source of phenylalanine & thus, the previous poster's assertion that "there is no link to aspartame and any problems" is not true.

      Furthermore, now that the stuff is now so pervasive, those kids who do suffer from PKU have less and less choice of foodstuffs, considering they're severely restricted *already* ...

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    27. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Saccharin probably is safe. The study that showed it to be carcinogenic centered around one batch of rats, all of which developed the cancers.

      On the other hand you're probably right about nutrasweet being nasty stuff. I consume a fair amount of it (unfair?) because I know that sugar is bad, too, though for completely different reasons. I'd rather be in shape and die early than be a big fatass all my life and nutrasweet is one price I pay to control my diet and still eat what I like.

      Do you have any opinion as to what happens to splenda in the body?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sugar is basically the worst thing you can eat in terms of health. Consuming refined sugar causes immense insulin surges, over time you may become resistant to insulin. (The jury is still out on whether or not this effect is real but it is strongly indicated.) What we do know for certain is that if you work your pancreas too hard it will stop working, and you will become a diabetic.

      When you take in sugar (or any "ready" carbohydrate, basically anything refined) the body wants to convert it to glucose so you can use it. Insulin is the signal. Glucose controls hunger, as well as being fuel for your body. You may (see parentheses 2 up) become resistant to both glucose and insulin, so it takes more insulin before your body stops producing it, and it takes more glucose before you feel full.

      What else can I debunk in your message? Soda does not dissolve teeth in most cases, you can leave a tooth in most colas (let alone less caustic beverages) more or less indefinitely. The sugar is the real problem because it feeds bacteria which cause tooth decay. A diet soda doesn't do that.

      Now, aspartame probably is harmful, but this is just FUD for the most part. It's bad for you, but so is sugar the way we use it in America. I just hope that Splenda (sucralose) turns out to be harmless :/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    30. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the bond in nutrasweet is specifically designed to go to the brain" ... Huh? Why would they "design" it to go to the brain? Why don't they design it to go out your ass instead?

    31. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I had a friend who was supposedly allergic to everything, but she could ride in a car, so I take that whole MCS thing with a grain of salt. On the other hand, I had a housemate who was violently allergic to any and all petrochemicals, so the vinyl that's all through a car didn't affect him, but when he pumped gas he wore the little glove and leaned way back, he couldn't use lysol (because of its propellant)... And I *know* there are people who are allergic to vinyls.

      SO; If you were allergic to petrochemicals in general, AND vinyl, you would be allergic to 99% of complex manmade devices. Furthermore it is a fact that allergies can suppress the immune system and open you up to other additional infections and illnesses. So I think it's safe to say that this is a real disorder; whether or not this guy suffers from it is another issue. Certainly some of those people are hypochondriacs, but I'm sure some of them are legit. Most of those who are allergic to everything probably die in infancy "for no discernable reason".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Studies of such "syndromes" as sensitivity to EMF have revealed that the people in question are utterly able to distinguish the presense of radio waves or whatnot.

      I am one of many people who can tell very easily when any part of my body is exposed to certain radio waves. I can even gauge the approximate strength of the RF. I can detect RF with wavelengths around 1 um with just about any part of my body. I have a couple of parts, though, that are very sensitive to RF with wavelengths between 400 and 800 nm - I can detect very small amounts of radio wave exposure using these parts.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    33. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      Even in 1967 only a quack fake MD would actually recommend (tobacco) cigarette smoke as a treatment for asthma! Even then, they knew it constricts your airways.

      BTW, cannabis used to be a common treatment for asthma, because unlike tobacco, it does tend to open up your airways (and also increase phglem production.) It was sold as an asthma treatment in most pharmacies over the counter until the late 1930's, when it was made illegal in the USA (for unrelated reasons.)

    34. Re:it's psychosomatic... by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      And doctors know everything...

      In 1967 I was advised by an MD to start smoking because it would help my asthma. Studies since then have shown the hazards of smoke and secondhand smoke. I smoked for 17 years after that, have been quit for more than 20, but still have asthma.


      Okay, so you have successfully proved that one doctor didn't know what he was talking about in one specific instance. What does that prove? I know lots of computer programmers that couldn't program a simple sort routine to save their lives, but that doesn't mean that everything that comes out of the field of computer science is inherently suspect.

      I listed several peer-reviewed medical journals that dismiss this guy's claims. Maybe they're right, maybe not. Either way, I'll take the opinion of medical professionals doing peer-reviewed double-blind clinical studies over random anecdotes on the Web any day. Even if they ultimately turn out to be wrong, guess what -- they'll be proven wrong by other doctors doing other double-blind studies, not by random anecdotes on the Web.

      I program computers; I don't study medicine. As such, my best bet is to trust the current prevailing wisdom among doctors. Sure, they may turn out to have been wrong about certain things, but I'll still take that chance over ignoring everything that the scientific method has taught us in the last few hundred years.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    35. Re:it's psychosomatic... by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Sure, but my point still stands. Aspartame is a source of phenylalanine & thus, the previous poster's assertion that "there is no link to aspartame and any problems" is not true.

      Dear God, could we be a little bit less pedantic here?

      Water can kill you. Air can kill you. Sugar can kill you. Heat can kill you. Cold can kill you. Phenylalanine can kill a very small percentage of people. Blaming that on aspartame is absolutely absurd.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    36. Re:it's psychosomatic... by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      That would be "infrared" and "visible light", not "RF" or "radio waves". Ha ha, very funny.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    37. Re:it's psychosomatic... by PD · · Score: 1

      The original claim was that aspartame was a problem for normal people, which is completely false. It's been shown to be safe, unless you have that specific problem you're talking about.

    38. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously defective. Aspartame tastes far far better than sugar or saccharine. Perhaps you should have a doctor or a psychologist take a look at your obviously flawed sense of taste. The notion that taste is subjective is a liberal myth, and it is also supported by terrorists. You don't want to be one of those, do you?

    39. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Do you have any opinion as to what happens to splenda in the body?

      Funny you should mention that. My wife is pregnant, but she _loves_ this "fruit2O" crap.
      That is made with splenda. We have been researching the crap out of it, and strangely enough, the pages that claim SPlenda is safe look surprisingly like the pages that say Nutrasweet is safe.. if you substitute "splenda" for "aspartame". Same "one of the most researched things ever" same old "the NEw ENgland Journal of Medicine says its safe!" (course, they have said EVERYTHING is safe.. so no surprise there.)

      So far, I havent been able to find anything _bad_ about it, but it is relatively new.. I will ask the aforementioned chemist if he knows anything.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    40. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Sugar does not cause hyperactivity

      Right! It cause hyperkinetic activity, but that is just the fidgets. Wanna show me where I said ANYTHING about sugar and hyperactivity? In my case, its certain colors, most preservatives and flavors that cause it. Anything with FD&C red, or any store-brand bread is sure to set it off. And yes, I am 33 years old, and still suffer. The difference between me now and me in 7th grade, is I now recognize the symptoms (inability to concentrate, increased irritability, less impulse control, specificially in gross motor and verbal outbursts), and can A) control them to a much greater extent and B) watch what I eat if Im worried about it.

      There are times when eating a red pixie stick really helps.. like right before I go play Laser Tag.. cause then being aware of EVERY SINGLE DAMN THING GOING ON AROUND ME helps. However, when I am sitting at work, the lack of difference between input priority scheduling (IE: the work I am doing on the PC in front of me is coming in at EXACTLY the same priority as everything else.. including the feeling of the hair on my leg against my pants, the sound of the rain outside, and the guy at the other end of the room who burps out loud.). It is really hard to explain to someone who doesnt have it, but that is the best explanation I can give.

      But no, Sugar has nothign to do with it. Now.. one of my ex g/f's had it so bad that the "natural" red in apples would set her off.. she had to eat yellow and green apples, or peel them first in order to eat red ones.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    41. Re:it's psychosomatic... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      My mom worked at Searle in the late 70's. She got to inject rabbits with that shit (aspartame), and dissect them after they died from it. I highly doubt that it is safe.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    42. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      The original claim was that aspartame was a problem for normal people, which is completely false. It's been shown to be safe, unless you have that specific problem you're talking about.


      As the poster of the original claim, I have a nit to pick with that. SO FAR it has been shown to be false. THe clinical trials they did didnt pick anything up. Then again, for the first 100 years of smoking there was "nothing wrong with it". Same with alcohol. You just dont KNOW what it does over the long long term (20-30 years of continued ingestion.) You also dont know what it does in the huge doses some people use it in. You arent supposed to (or werent.. dont know if it has changed) use it in hot things.. said so right on the box, yet everyone I know who uses the stuff puts it in tea, coffee, etc.

      Now, just about everyone in my family is allergic to the crap.. instant, splitting migraines from even the tiniest amount. This is not usually an issue, because it tastes HORRIBLE anyway. And no, this isnt "psychosomatic" because two of the people who noticed the problem had no idea whatsoever A) what they were drinking and B) the link. THey figured it out when they stopped drinking nutrasweet.

      Granted.. it may _not_ be harmful. But the number of people who have had symptoms that mysteriously went away when they stopped drinking that crap makes me believe that even if its not toxic, there are certainly a large number of people with allergys to it, and that and that alone is enough to keep me and anyone I can sway away from it.

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    43. Re:it's psychosomatic... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      I hate nutrasweet, but are you sure that it wasn't caffiene that was causing the headaches? The same thing happens to me (headaches, stomach aches, etc) when I drink caffinated drinks.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    44. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      I hate nutrasweet, but are you sure that it wasn't caffiene that was causing the headaches? The same thing happens to me (headaches, stomach aches, etc) when I drink caffinated drinks.

      Certain. I drink Dew by the gallon, coffee, tea, pepsi and coke.. (the regualar sugar/corn sweetener kind) and have no problems whatsoever..

      One bit of nutrasweet.. WHAM!

      Also have that problem with really cheap domestic beers.. bud, coors, etc.. instant headache.. I can only suspect it has something to do with the sugars created by really fast really cheap fermentation. (Which is basically the byproduct of nutrasweet anyway.. alcohol and formaldehyde).

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    45. Re:it's psychosomatic... by DanDwig · · Score: 1

      The original objections to aspartame were based on it causing cancer in lab rats. If they were dosed with some ridiculous amount each day. It is virtually impossible to consume that much. Also, personally, I just think that placebos prevent cancer in lab rats. :)

    46. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Okay... you say:

      there are certainly a large number of people with allergys to it, and that and that alone is enough to keep me and anyone I can sway away from it.

      Now answer me this. Do you keep everyone you can sway away from peanuts? There is a fair number of people out there who are deathly allergic to peanuts. So, I guess that means no one should eat them, right?

      I hope you see my point... allergies are one thing, general toxicity is definitely another. If aspartame turns out to be toxic, fine, sway people away from it. But if it really is an allergy, then there's really nothing inherently evil about it... it's just something some people can eat, and some people can't.

    47. Re:it's psychosomatic... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      > I highly doubt that it is safe.

      Not safe to be a rabbit in your mom's lab, that's for sure!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    48. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's hard to imagine it being dangerous because it's so simple. As I understand, one atom in a sugar molecule is replaced, carbon -> chlorine or something else odd that didn't sound right to me. Aspartame (As you know) is a dramatically more complex thing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:it's psychosomatic... by fendel · · Score: 1

      I just wish nutrasweet was more shelf-stable and high temperature stable so I could substitute it for sugar in recipes and not have the diet coke in the back of the fridge go south.

      Dunno about shelf-stable, but Splenda (sucralose) is heat-stable. Makes great cheesecakes. Diet Rite cola is sweetened with sucralose and acesulfame potassium, and has neither aspartame nor caffeine.

    50. Re:it's psychosomatic... by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1


      Only in USA.

      The 'jury' will decide on sugar causing diabetes?

      Haven't you heard, using sugar doesn't cause diabetes. Diabetes is mostly inherited genetically, and all the same reasons apply than in all the modern era's modern diseases like allergies for example. Too healthy lifestyle can cause illnesses too you know. We live in an artificial, clinical and polluted world. Sugar isn't the cause.

      - Voice of Ambience -

      --
      - Voice of Ambience -
    51. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Nutrasweet aka Aspartame IS safe

      http://www.oralchelation.com/technical/MSDS/p7.h tm

      Go read that MSDS sheet then come back and tell me it is safe. (Yeah.. I know.. the MSDS for Oxygen says it is dangerous too.. and it is. I defy anyone to sit around and breathe pure oxygen).

      Now.. I read a few of the "aspartame facts" on the official aspartame page.. I love one quote in particular "In fact, due to the way it is metabolized, it never reaches the organs".

      Now, funny that a completely independent study has found that use of aspartame leads to a buildup of formaldehyde in the brain and other organs. Hmmm.

      Wonder if maybe Monsanto shoved it through FDA testing?

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    52. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Alpha+Prime · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was more than one doctor, but as you say, not a consensus of multiple doctors in a double-blind test.

      I do know, for a fact, that the environment has physical affects on me and others, and its not just the biological environment, molds, pollen, etc.. Its the hydrocarbon pollution from industry, transportation, paints, solvents and other fumes. It seems no one wants to admit that humans are affected by this pollution, but they are, and it can be very painful.

    53. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Alpha+Prime · · Score: 1

      Actually, tobacco did control the "attacks", but made it so I was constantly short of breath.

      Never tried cannabis.

    54. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, speaking as a person who fought the diagnosis of ADD for 14 years. Who for that period strongly denied it, and was angered at ANY implication of it, I can tell you that since I've accepted it (within the last year), and started taking medication AND also mentally trying to adjust myself, I find I am alot better off. I don't lost focus as much, and I find it easier to do tasks that I once had alot of problems with.

      Now on the other hand, I think they give out ritalin far too easily and ADD/ADHD is misdiagnosed ALOT, helping add to the stigmatism behind it that you by your words add to.

      Ritalin actually was a partial factor in my fighting the diagnosis, since when they first told me I suffered from this affliction, they prescribed it to me. This stuff is horrible, sure I could focus, but in a zombie like state, who would want to?

      What I take now is low doses of dexadrine (dextrorotary-amphetamine), and this keeps my thought patterns intact, yet leaves me still feeling like... well me.

      Coincidently I also have asthma-like problems with certain chemicals (perfume sets me off like nothing else), so maybe I am a crackpot :)

    55. Re:it's psychosomatic... by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Agreed. All I'm saying is that the good old double-blind test is the only way to get to the bottom of it.

      If we're not doing the experiments, we should be. If the people doing the experiments are crooked, we should be getting other people to double-check them. But I'll base my judgements upon such studies, which (potentially flawed though they may be) represent the best way we have of figuring out the truth behind a claim. If a claim (especially a human health claim!) isn't backed by double-blind trials, it isn't ready to be taken seriously.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    56. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, now that the stuff is now so pervasive, those kids who do suffer from PKU have less and less choice of foodstuffs, considering they're severely restricted *already* ...

      I used to have a friend with PKU. Suffice it to say it isn't the aspartame which is causing them diet headaches. I'm guessing just about anything which contains it would proabably have been off-limits without it as well - they can't even have a slice of bread unless that is all the protein in their diet for a day. (Ok, they can have "bread" instead, but the "bread" they can eat can only be considered bread on the basis of general appearance and the fact that it is baked.)

      Just think the slimfast diet - a shake for breakfast, a shake for lunch, and a sensible dinner. Then just leave out the sensible dinner part...

    57. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As I understand, one atom in a sugar molecule is replaced, carbon -> chlorine or something else odd that didn't sound right to me. Aspartame (As you know) is a dramatically more complex thing.

      If anything I'd think the reverse would be the case. Substituting a single atom could make the moleule unmetabolizable, meaning that it could build up in the body and have strange effects. On the other hand, aspartame is a simple methyl ester of a dipeptide - and peptides are molecules designed to be broken down by the body - the methyl ester part would probably break down spontaneously. Molecules the body is used to seeing should be the safest.

      Then again, there is always room for testing - many snake venoms are simple peptides as well. I believe aspartame has been tested pretty thoroughly, and I don't think any scientific studies have ever linked it to problems.

    58. Re:it's psychosomatic... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      dissect them after they died from it. I highly doubt that it is safe.

      If you inject enough of just about anything into a rat it will die. In order to determine the safety of a compound you typically keep injecting more and more into rats until you consistantly are able to kill half of them - that dose is the LD50 for the compound. Table salt has a relatively low LD50 compared to many compounds - if you try eating a pound of it you'll see why. That hardly means that table salt is toxic - just that your body can only handle so much of it.

      For Aspartame the LD50 is 10+g/kg. For table salt the LD50 is 3-4g/kg. I hardly think we should start banning salt.

    59. Re:it's psychosomatic... by sigwinch · · Score: 1
      Sugar is basically the worst thing you can eat in terms of health. Consuming refined sugar causes immense insulin surges,...
      No. Simple starches are the worst--things like instant white rice and baked potatos. "Diet" rice cakes are glycemic hell. When you eat a lot of sugar your stomach is smart enough to release it into the intestine slowly. Simple starches reach the intestine quickly, and are rapidly converted into sugars by digestive enzymes.

      Have a look at some glycemic index tables. The simple starches generally make your blood sugar and insulin rise faster and farther than pure glucose syrup! When the FDA Food Guide Pyramid says to eat all those servings of bread and grain products, they don't mean white bread made from finely-milled flour.

      I just hope that Splenda (sucralose) turns out to be harmless :/
      Sucralose is chlorinated. If I'm going to abuse my liver, it had better be more fun than a mere sweetener. And the first person who points out the glycemic index of alcohol gets slapped. ;-)
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    60. Re:it's psychosomatic... by z4ce · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're actually working on some formulations to solve exactly those issues. I'm not actually fimilar with the "diet coke in the back of the fridge" issue.

      But with regards to baking, I haven't actually heard any time frame but I would imagine within a year they will have a product you can bake with. The main issue with baking is actually finding a filling agent that has a caking property similar to sugar, not the heat.

    61. Re:it's psychosomatic... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Diabetes used to be a thing adults got. It wasn't until the FDA recommended that we make starches the basis of our diet that we had a problem with childhood diabetes. What if it's all been a big fat lie? is a really excellent article which was in the NY times on this very subject.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Judge Dredd, anyone? by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    This "illness" reminds me a bit too much of the condition footsie as described in the Judge Dredd comic books. It's labled as "future shock," wherein the sufferer can't deal with living in the necessarily confined spaces with large groups of individuals for long periods of time without it taking a physical and mental toll on the body--result being eventual madness and death. Of course the best idea is for this guy to (a) see a shrink, and (b) get out of NJ.

  20. A suggestion by ptomblin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everything I've read about "Environmental Illness" suggests that it's psychosomatic. The amount of money this guy is spending on a special house and medical quackery could buy an awful lot of psychotherapy.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:A suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount of money this guy is spending on a special house and medical quackery could buy an awful lot of psychotherapy.

      Yeah but would it get him on slashdot?

  21. Why would anyone voluntarily stay indoors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's so lame that some /.ers are slaves to their computers. Go outside once in a while.

    1. Re:Why would anyone voluntarily stay indoors? by non-plus · · Score: 0

      I do. I've got my ThinkPad running Mandrake 9 and a 802.11b card routing to my xDSL. I use this to compute outside, sitting on my deck on the nice days. It's a great way to kill a day and if a much nicer computing enviroment.

  22. There will only be more of this to come by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the near future, environmental problems will come home to roost - a direct result of the short-sighted environmental policies persued by both governments and corporations.

    You may dismiss this as "tree-hugging BS", that's your perogative, but illnesses such as childhood asthma, leukemia, allergies, etc are all on the rise. And, as much as they try to hide it, pollution does maim and kill thousands, if not millions, every year.

    Arguably, modern medicine is to blame as well. By curing the sick and the weak, modern medicine has prolonged the lives of people who would have otherwise died (including me). Don't get me wrong, I'm not against treating sick people but it's an inescapable fact that by allowing the weak to live you're weakening the gene pool.

    Harsh facts but the facts all the same.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:There will only be more of this to come by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

      "Arguably, modern medicine is to blame as well. By curing the sick and the weak, modern medicine has prolonged the lives of people who would have otherwise died (including me). Don't get me wrong, I'm not against treating sick people but it's an inescapable fact that by allowing the weak to live you're weakening the gene pool."

      Does that mean you don't have the right to live? If so, perhaps you can deal with the situation directly.


      the above statement is sarcasm...don't freak, yo.

    2. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sickly whiny losers like you dont get laid. Nor do the ugly or retarded.

      It's a troll, sure, but it's true. Your doomsday Darwinism is drivel.

    3. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Shenkerian · · Score: 1

      It's not an inescapable fact at all. We don't yet know enough about the human genome to understand all of the effects any single one has.

      The obvious example is the (I believe recessive) gene for sickle cell anemia. You might argue that by treating the proportionally large population in Africa with sickle cell anemia, we're allowing the gene to propogate to continue and thereby "weakening the gene pool." You'd be overlooking the fact, however, that this very same gene increases resistance to malaria.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    4. Re:There will only be more of this to come by strider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is correct to suggest we should be worried about the potential lethality of the substances we manufacture. That is precisely why people who claim they are alergic to "chemicals" are so dangerous. They do damage to an important issue through their irrational claims. Look people, EVERYTHING is a fucking chemical. That includes things like AIR and water. Just because it came out of a factory does not *necesarily* mean it is toxic. Plenty of "natural" things are far far more toxic than anything in your kitchen. "Fragrances" are not a category of chemical with a specific bilogical effect.

      As to medicine ruining the genetic crop, I don't really think it's that big of a deal. First off, if the gene pool is "weekened" because more people are surviving it seems indicative to me of their being a different standard for survival in the modern age. This doesn't mean were all going to get weak and die. Second, evolution occurs gradually. Finally, I think brains are a more important adaption than brawn. The human race also appears to be getting smarter over time.

      --
      The preceding passage has been checked for spelling, you will find no sentence without at least one mis spelled word
    5. Re:There will only be more of this to come by nolife · · Score: 1

      So which is better? Vinyl siding on your home or natural wood shingles? Sythentic carpet or a wood floor? Vinyl siding and nylon carpet are made from toxic chemicals that have wasteful byproducts and does not break down for hundreds of years if at all. Or should you cut down more trees for a wood floor and wood shingles? Maybe we should all live in caves.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:There will only be more of this to come by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Look, I know that appealing to Darwin as if he were some sort of demigod leading humanity to perfection is fashionable here on Slashdot, but from what I learned in my physical anthropology classes, "survival of the fittest" just isn't the reality. Closer would be, "survival of that which is most likely to procreate."

      Follow me here. In Africa, they have a disease called malaria, which has lead to the sickle cell trait being passed down and becoming common among populations in Africa. Sickle-cell blood is unhealthy blood which causes all kinds of health problems, and can lead to death, but which is unpalatable to the malaria disease. So while a person with sickle cells is more likely to survive to produce children, a person with sickle cells is not really healthy.

      At some point, people discoved that the bark of a Cinchona tree could cure malaria. If the population that eventually developed the sickle cell trait as a common trait had had access to quinine, most of those people would now have healthy blood, instead of suffering the ravages of sickle cell anemia.

      So, the idea that letting people die natually of disease is somehow "culling the herd" is a false one. If you believe that a trait leads to fitness, nature might not decide to back you up. The people who had access to medicine were less likely in the above example to transmit unpleasant traits to their offspring.

      Evolution is a kludge.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    7. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you really need to do, is correct your defination of Fit. Fit does not mean "one who is most healthy", it means "one who is most adapted to their environment", "fit for survival." By having sicle cell, these people are more fit for living in their environment. Certainly not as fit as they could be.

    8. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know... I was diagnosed with asthma but I've never had an attack or anything... there was just a period of a about a week when I was younger and displayed symptoms. Obviously not an accurate diagnosis.

    9. Re:There will only be more of this to come by MsGeek · · Score: 1
      The human race also appears to be getting smarter over time.

      Oh man, have you ever opened a can of worms! :)

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    10. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You've got it a bit wrong about sickle cell anemia. That, as a disease process, only occurs when the gene for it is homozygous.

      When it's heterozygous, the person is resistant to malaria *and* does not suffer health problems as such.

      So -- yeah, there's an occasional death from sickle cell anemia (by the genetic chance of a homozygous-affected individual), but from a species survival standpoint, that's better than mass death from malaria.

      And quinine may be all well and good now, but what about all the millennia of human existence before it was discovered??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Why can't you have a stone floor? Stone is abundant: the whole planet is made of it. Cover it with tatami mats. Tatami is made from renewable reeds, and it regulates indoor humidity and temperature.

      Hardwood finished and carpet are both the result of complicated chemical processes. I wouldn't recommend them for the interior of a "natural" home.

    12. Re:There will only be more of this to come by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      "The human race also appears to be getting smarter over time."

      surely you jest ;-)

      cheers.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    13. Re:There will only be more of this to come by nolife · · Score: 1

      By wood for floors, I was talking about plain old wood. Get some planks and nail 'em down.. The parent poster was claiming that world is coming to an end and I offered a temporary solution. After all, the thousands of years before last centry, everyone had "natural" walls, floors, and roofs.

      As for the stone floors.. Very good idea and would would probably look nice but I believe the extra stuctural support required by the weight of the stone would offset any environmental advantages.

      Maybe an underground house would provide the most benefit, Less external structure to cover and maintain, constant 55-57F temperature so yearly heating and cooling peaks would be reduced, and probably less prone to natural disaster damage (except flooding of course). You could get light in through tubes or even with mirrors to simulate windows?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    14. Re:There will only be more of this to come by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      This doesn't mean were all going to get weak and die.

      Actually, we will. We all will. It's just a matter of how and when, not if.

    15. Re:There will only be more of this to come by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Lots of people think rise of illnesses such as asthma and allergies are more due to efforts to try protect from them than anything else. Of course it's bad to live on a dump, but living in overclean, sterile location may wery well be worse.

      If you insulate yourself from universe and never have contact with anything, it's no big surprise your body eventually doesn't know how to manage with it any more.

    16. Re:There will only be more of this to come by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yup, As far as I can tell the death rate has been a constant throughout history. 1:1.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  23. Your mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My mom just built a house ... She is, honestly, just this side of whacko...
    Honestly, why am I not surprised?
  24. in the olden days by greenalbatros · · Score: 1

    we would go out into tut forest and hack our huts out of the very trees themselves. and be thankful for it at the end of the day. aye, people today dont know how lucky they are

    --
    this sig steers like a cow. and i can prove it
  25. MOD PARENT UP by MightyTribble · · Score: 1

    If *all* the major peer-reviewed medical associations call it quackery, then it's Quackery with a capital "Q".

    MCS/EI folks need good shrinks, not safe houses.

  26. (-1, Erqhaqnag) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lrnu, gunaxf, V nyernql ernq gur gbc bs gur cntr. Erqhaqnag nff.

    1. Re:(-1, Erqhaqnag) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you aren't a "rot-13 only reader", so please shut up and keep your ass closed!!

  27. a very narrow view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i love how people can take a look at an incredibly complex system, and say "x" is causing "y". is more pollution the only thing that's changed while these illnesses have been on the rise? yeah, i didn't think so.

    instead of saying that pollution is causing all this, how about going with a much more likely cause? that the average fitness of people has fallen through the floor. people are more sedentiary today than ever, and eat worse as well. guess what? medical science has proven that a fit individual who eats well is significently more resistent to disease and illness. i donna know, but that seems like a much better answer.

  28. Annoyed by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1, Informative

    Is anyone else annoyed by this whiner? I'm sorry he has issues, but many people do.

    However, this guy mooches off the state and does nothing but bitch and moan about how he doesn't get enough money out of my pocket.

    He seems very annoyed that he can't live well off of our money, and is shocked that he'd have to try and find a job.

    Maybe I'm callous, but he sure seems ingrateful.

    Admittedly, I scanned through the article pretty quickly, but - why can't he find an outdoor job??

    If every environment makes him sick, he might as well be sick and working rather than sick and sitting on his butt at home living off of me.

    1. Re:Annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is a leech of the worst kind. Generally only bored housewives come down with EI, but this guy had to find a way to live out his dream of living of the Man.

      He lives in fucking staten island when he claims the environment is killing him... It's really cheap to live in North Dakota or Alaska.

    2. Re:Annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't he move to Utah or something and become a farm hand?

      Sitting on your ass on welfare in NJ isn't the answer - if you're allergic to the indoors go live the great outdoor life that is still around in this country!

    3. Re:Annoyed by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      I totally agree....

      I'm allergic to different types of molds and pollens. But, ya know what? Claritin takes care of that.

      I know he claims no medication can help him, but... I dunno... somehow I think some dayquil and afrin would take care of him pretty well.

      Maybe he just LIKES living off my tax dollars.

    4. Re:Annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's really cheap to live in North Dakota or
      >Alaska.

      I don't disagree with that... But, I find it easier to make a modest living in relatively expensive areas, than to find a subsistence living in a less expensive area.

      I would like nothing more than to live in a Northwestern forest, for example. But even though it might not be very expensive to live ther compared to a typical US city, the career options are approximately zero. Even in the worst economic downturn, you should be able to at least avoid true starvation in a city. Outside the city, it might start to be a bit more complicated.

    5. Re:Annoyed by pumpkinescobarsof2 · · Score: 1

      RTFA... (in this case 'A' stands for autobioraphy)

      he is not shocked that he has to try and find a job, his autobiography relates his incredibly frustrating attempts to find a job with extraordinary clarity.

      a quick scanning does not do this topic justice.

      and yes, you are callous...

    6. Re:Annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure about that. I lived in Fargo, ND for five years, and now I live in Sillicon Valley.

      In Fargo, you can work as a cashier, flip burgers, or do some other menial task and get paid well enough to have a decent apartment, a modest food budget, and a decent car. There are no beggars, homeless, or starving people in Fargo. Access to low-cost housing is everywhere, and government assistance is right there too. Now I've got an engineering job in the valley and my standard of living hasn't gone up much at all.
      There are homeless people everywhere, people can't afford even modest accomodations. If those very people would move to Fargo, they'd have "the good life" while doing even the most menial work. That's why I have little sympathy for people who can't afford to live in expensive places. If I couldn't afford to live in the valley, I wouldn't bitch and moan about it, I'd just move.

    7. Re:Annoyed by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

      Read paragraphs 12-15 again. All he does is bitch about SSI and how much of a pain it is, and how it doesn't provide enough money for him.

      You failed to respond to my suggestion that he find an outdoor vocation, so I can we can conclude you're a typical american socialist.

    8. Re:Annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's such an amazing software genius, why doesn't he write his own software?

      I read his bio - either he's paranoid, or everyone from high school on was out to get him. "high schools treat their students based on the social status of their parents"? Get real. HSs don't have parent-teacher night, teachers don't know or care who your parents are.

    9. Re:Annoyed by pumpkinescobarsof2 · · Score: 1

      he's right though, SSI does not provide enough money for anyone to live reasonably. arguably enough to get by perhaps...

      and again you're missing the point, he says that it is relatively easy to manage your environment indoors, but is almost impossible outdoors. so your 'suggestion' that he find an outdoor job is nonsense.

      for the record, i am a canadian socialist and certainly not typical.

      however, from your assumption that everyone who reads /. is an american and that anyone who expresses a tolerant view is a socialist, i can safely assume that you are in fact a very typical citizen of our reckless neighbour to the south.

  29. Healthy housing is simple really. by rolfpal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have built a few "Healthy Houses" for clients that were both environmentally sensitive and for non sensitive people.

    The simple fact of the matter is that buildings are made of stuff, and some of this stuff gets on our skin and into our lungs. If the stuff is bad for you, why use it. This problem is worse in energy efficient houses.

    Just the same as we know now that smoking is bad for you so:

    It makes sense to avoid building materials that produce toxic dust (silicone, asbestos, fiberglass)

    It makes sense to avoid materials that offgas formadehyde gas or other noxious organic compounds. Materials such as particle board, cheap carpet, urea formaldehyde foam insulation offgas significant amounts of formaldehyde, formaldehyde is good for some things, but not increasing your lifespan.

    It makes sense to minimize the potential growth of toxic or allergic natural pests such as mold, dust mites, spiders, ants and wasps.

    --
    nothing is real
    1. Re:Healthy housing is simple really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Fiberglass is toxic. Right. Because, you know, it's made of glass.

      And... oooh... better watch out for that silicone. Women only heave it around in their chests for 20 years at a stretch. That's a real killer.

    2. Re:Healthy housing is simple really. by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1


      But here in Finland, that sort of housing is expensive as hell. Things here are badly awry.

      All your points are valid, only if someone would hear them. There are people who'd be in almost critical need for housing like that and what they almost certainly lack is the money to invest on such houses.

      Atopia and allergy are a bad company... Not to say there wouldn't be more worse diseases. These are just the ones I have been blessed with...

      - Voice of Ambience -

      --
      - Voice of Ambience -
    3. Re:Healthy housing is simple really. by rolfpal · · Score: 1

      in the dust form silicone causes silicosis. Any product that contains it usually has a warning label.

      Fiberglass is a carcingen in dust form, and has been banned from housing is some countries for that reason.

      --
      nothing is real
    4. Re:Healthy housing is simple really. by weaselgrrl · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget that a lot of modern building techniques create air-tight homes lined with primo mold-growing materials. I don't know about the rest of this (beyond Formaldehyde outgassing - cheap new carpet causes all sorts of health problems and IS NOT recommended in a house with children/babies or young pets) but the MOLD problem is very real and a very bad health hazard. If you are lucky, you'll just feel like you have a cold, are spaced-out and slighty drunk while in a moldy building. If you are unlucky, you will get life long asthma, increased allergies, various pulminary and neurological diseases plus potential loss of all your belongings.

      Moldy homes are a real problem and the cause of many environmental illnesses.

      Note -- a lot of insurance companies are no longer covering mold damage in policies (because it has become such an epidemic) so you need to be very vigilant. Keep your basements dry, fix leaks and replace wall board completely if it becomes infected.

      --
      I spent all of those years as Anonymous Coward and all I got was this lousy number (204976).
    5. Re:Healthy housing is simple really. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      The simple fact of the matter is that buildings are made of stuff, and some of this stuff gets on our skin and into our lungs. If the stuff is bad for you, why use it. This problem is worse in energy efficient houses.

      Huh? How do you figure that facing your windows north (in oz), double glazing your windows, building on a concrete slab, and putting wool insulation into your wall cavities, is somehow making the problem worse?

      It makes sense to avoid building materials that produce toxic dust (silicone, asbestos, fiberglass)

      Asbestos hasn't been used in housing for decades.

      Don't demonise energy efficient housing. You Americans are wasteful enough as it is. There's no need for you to run around scaring people into thinking there's some benefit to wasting energy.

  30. Chemical Allergies by forii · · Score: 1

    My medical opinion is that this guy has a bad allergy to Pyrimidines and Purines. He probably should watch out for those Phosphorous compounds as well. I suggest he move to a place far away from these dangerous chemicals.

    1. Re:Chemical Allergies by Reziac · · Score: 1

      He's probably allergic to dihydrogen monoxide as well.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. The air itself is carcinogenic. Try to relax. by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a fact that the air we breathe, even in the cleanest environments is composed of a large percentage of free radicals. That's a basic fact of life on Earth.
    The people who created the original microbial test for cancer later became its loudest critics when it was found that almost anything in excess can cause cancer. The air itself is toxic without any form of man made pollution.
    I'm all for prolonging life through stem cell reasarch, cloning, genetic repairs, whatever. But trying to avoid, rather than repair, cellular damage is ridiculous. You can't do it.
    Playing the blame game just keeps money in lawyers pockets. Don't participate in that crap.

  32. MCS are real diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are three large cohorts, the Vietnam Vets,the Gulf War Syndrome, and the Japan nerve gas subway survivors. All three have Chemical Sensitivity symptoms. Essentially, pesticide is a toned down nerve gas. It is oil soluble. It is designed to kill stuff. Nerve gas and pesticide is the same chemical family. Since it is oil soluble it is difficult for the body to excrete. And yes it acts as an immune system adjuvant spurring the immune system into hyper alertness.

    When we bombed Saddam in the last war we bombed his chemical agent factories. Our troops were down wind. Thousands of nerve gas sensors went off. BUT the US claims that these nerve gas sensors were defective. Why is the same nerve gas sensor still in our arsenal??? Why hasn't the manufacturer been sued??

    Even the expensive gas spec and mass spec loaded on pick up trucks detected nerve gas.

    During the 1950's the breast cancer rate was 1 in 20. When I was in Med School a decade ago it was 1 in 11. Today, the breast cancer rate is 1 in 8. There is a Long Island Breast cancer cluster. WHY?

    Isn't there some curiosity, that the animals that live in polluted waters have all kinds of tumors???

    Part of the cover up occurs when you follow the money. The liability runs very high. Lawyers are called in. Has anyone watched "A Civil Action"??

  33. What about earthships? by ServoX · · Score: 1

    Would the rammed-earth tire design of earthships cause this guy problems?

  34. I can speak to this personally... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up with this sort of mindset presented as the normal way of life. My mother self-diagnosed herself with EI, MCS, Lupus, and other assorted disorders which never seemed to be confirmed by traditional medicine. This was always presented by her as proof of the shortcomings of the allopathic community.

    We lived out in the middle of the country, in a house made with a purposeful absence of traditional building materials. Non-treated wood, cedar shakes, etc. In spite of this, my mother seemed to grow constantly more sensitive to her environment, and put more and more safeguards in place to attempt to purify it. Ionic air filters were everywhere, including one in the car to attempt to reduce the effects of hydrocarbon emissions. She pursued a macrobiotic diet in order to attempt to balance her body and eliminate toxins taken in through food. Nothing seemed to improve the situation. Strangely(?) enough, as the years went by, both my sister and I both started exhibiting similar sets of symptoms.

    12 years later, I have a very strong feeling about what actually happened during that time of our lives. After I moved out, I started presenting a plethora of external insults to my body in the form of poor environmental conditions, a [comparably speaking] junk food diet, and ingestion of various chemical substances. I called it "college." :-) Strangely enough, the longer this went on, the less and less sensitive I became to my environment, to the food I ate, to the air I breathed. Now, as I sit here at my glue-ridden wooden desk in my carpeted office, breathing the air of one of the worst polluted cities in the country, the transformation is complete. I understand perfectly that people in my mother's mindset will say that I have "deadened my senses" to the surrounding toxins. My opinion is that, like any exercise in biodiversity, increased exposure to a variety of envioronmental substances makes one's system more able to cope with foreign invasions. The attempt to sterilize our living environment while growing up simply made us react more strongly to any small variation in that environment.

    As an addendum, my mother is still attempting to isolate herself from the known universe. In spite of this, she is still having the same difficulties. Given my experience over the past decade, I really have to wonder if the cure is a substantial portion of the disease.

    1. Re:I can speak to this personally... by RembrandtX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I too know folks like this.

      Its a self-reinforcing downward spiral. At some point person-A becomes convinced that their recient sickness/ailment is due to something in their environment/diet/etc. So they alter that environment. Use more anti-bacterial soaps, and strangely enough .. continue to get sick even more frequently.

      I had a pal who ate only alge cultures and tofu, hardly ever went outside, wore sunblock constantly, never used deodorents, and took showers at least 4 times a day.

      After 5 years of this he was admitted to the ER with a severe case of pnuemoneia (in August) and when he tried to tell the Dr. that was treating him that he had severe allergic reactions to any 'toxins' the doctor took a culture.

      The doctor then brought in the test results (along with some kind of a picture of the cuture from his mouth) and showed them to him. He carefully explained that he had accute pnuemoneia which he believed was caused by his body loosing its tollerance to the .. ready for it .. COMMON COLD.

      Apparantly my friend Paul isolated himself so well from germs, that his immune system no longer felt it needed/could produce antibodys to the germs that are part of our everyday life.

      Paul resumed normal life, and started eating acutal food again etc. And what do you know - he gets sick a lot less.

      of course .. he still can't eat meat, apparantly after an extended time without processing meats, the body doesnt start producing the enzymes needed to break it down quickly.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    2. Re:I can speak to this personally... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Or maybe it's all psychosomatic? And maybe she has a mental illness? And maybe you and your sister began experiencing symptoms because you were being "taught" to experience this from an early age? I'm not trying to dismiss your mother's problem, it sounds very real, but I am not sure there's any evidence that it really is anything more than a psychological disorder. Certainly your description of the fact that exposure to broader society and developing normal social relationships with people who don't expect or tolerate such wierdnesses made your symptoms "go away" imply induced psychosomatic sympathy for your mother's illness.


      I do know what I'm talking about too. I have family members who have suffered from anxiety disorder and panic disorder. The symptoms (a panic attack can feel like you are having a heart attack) are very real, even when the causes are psychological in origin. Luckily, the people in my family were self-aware enough to realize these were psychological problems, and they sought help of the appropriate kind, and didn't go hole themselves up in "safe" homes in the woods.

    3. Re:I can speak to this personally... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      this tells me that it was in your mind.

      You do not adapt to toxins that readily. You rpobably started tjhinking about it less and less.
      Your conclusion seems to indicate your body will adapt to toxins the way your immune system adapts to new colds.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I can speak to this personally... by praksys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oddly enough, just after reading your post I ran across this at the Reason website:

      http://www.reason.com/rb/rb031203.shtml

      Looks like the body may well adapt to toxins in a way that is comparable to other desease causing agents.

  35. phenylalanine by swb · · Score: 1

    IIRC they test newborns to see if they are "PK babies" right away, since they'll die before they ever get their first diet coke due to phenylalanine exposure in regular foods.

    1. Re:phenylalanine by Draoi · · Score: 1

      That's true. It's an intolerance to a particular protein.

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  36. Chemical Sensitivity is in the Medical Journals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are three large cohorts, the Vietnam Vets,the Gulf War Syndrome, and the Japan nerve gas subway survivors. All three have Chemical Sensitivity symptoms. Essentially, pesticide is a toned down nerve gas. It is oil soluble. It is designed to kill stuff. Nerve gas and pesticide is the same chemical family. Since it is oil soluble it is difficult for the body to excrete. And yes it acts as an immune system adjuvant spurring the immune system into hyper alertness.

    When we bombed Saddam in the last war we bombed his chemical agent factories. Our troops were down wind. Thousands of nerve gas sensors went off. BUT the US claims that these nerve gas sensors were defective. Why is the same nerve gas sensor still in our arsenal??? Why hasn't the manufacturer been sued??

    Even the expensive gas spec and mass spec loaded on pick up trucks detected nerve gas.

    During the 1950's the breast cancer rate was 1 in 20. When I was in Med School a decade ago it was 1 in 11. Today, the breast cancer rate is 1 in 8. There is a Long Island Breast cancer cluster. WHY?

    Isn't there some curiosity, that the animals that live in polluted waters have all kinds of tumors???

    Part of the cover up occurs when you follow the money. The liability runs very high. Lawyers are called in. Has anyone watched "A Civil Action"??

    1. Re:Chemical Sensitivity is in the Medical Journals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, you realize that almost anything can set off a sensor designed to deetect almost anything?
      You stupid shit. All the people groups you describe have "I was scared shitless but I lived through it" syndrome. Post Traumatic Stress syndrome is real, and caused by ... holy shit ... it's caused by stress.

  37. Bad house air by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    In my teenage years I often worked with my father during the summer. He was a private contractor, did everything from building houses to putting on siding.

    A lot of what I have seen of "bad house syndrome" was caused by either human error or nature.

    One woman had asthma problems every year around the same time (early spring). She said it was the heat baking some chemical out of her roof (or something). A look into her heating and air system showed a lot of built up dust. So, it could have been a mold or mildew that went crazy around that time of year. Cleaned the air system and the danker sections of the house - her problem disappeared.

    Another house had problems with a child being sick, especially after he had been in the basement. It turned out that the supports down there were full of termites. Apparently the kid was allergic to something produced by the termites.

    Then there is human error. One new house (not Dad's work, he was called in) had a distinct chemical smell. During the construction somebody had spilled something and it had soaked into the subfloor.

    Honestly, a house with the correct setup does circulate the air pretty well. Plus, while building material may give off fumes for years, how much exactly are we talking about? Even in nature we are constantly subjected to small amounts of all sorts of things. The key is amount. Here is some information about formaldehyde from the EPA: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/formalde.html. In fact, check out their whole section about indoor air quality.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  38. How sorry? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sorry to be insensitive

    Okay. I agree. The author, in all likelihood, has a kind of psychosomatic disorder.

    So, how does this translate to 'crackpot hypochondriac'?

    Let me be more specific. I believe that there are a great many common illnesses that are psychosomatic in nature. However, the pain is real. This guy is in pain, its clear to see. He's pursued this untenable solution to his pain for most of his adult life, according to the site. He's endured a fair amount of ridicule for thinking he's 'allergic to the 20th century'.

    Just think about what that must be like. He believes firmly that the world is ignoring his pleas. Which is true, because his pleas are bogus. He doesn't know that. He just gets labelled 'crackpot'. He has no way out, really.

    I guess, maybe just a little more sensitivity, guys? He may be nuts, but he's also sick, and I don't see the difference between this and any other mental disorder. If a paranoid schizophrenic thinks the world is after them, we don't (hopefully) decry them as purposefully nuts. We try and help them. If helping this guy find an adobe hut will make him think he's better I say give him an adobe hut.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:How sorry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the pain is real. This guy is in pain, its clear to see. He's pursued this untenable solution to his pain for most of his adult life, according to the site.

      "I read it on a website, it MUST be true!"

      Note that he's able to visit a "boutique" full of manufactured electronics(with all sorts of nasty plastic chemical smells etc) yet he "nearly collapses" in a courtroom?

      Note he doesn't give the name of the guy who appears on CNN, nor the title of the book he wrote. Uh huh. Riiight.

      Then there's this little gem, where he whines about how terribly hard it is to get a mortgage:

      "especially when dealing with people who seem incapable of communicating except by face-to-face contact and with constant pestering to hold their attention."

      Fancy that, you want a boatload of cash, they want to meet you.

    2. Re:How sorry? by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      What would you say if his symptoms were caused by a firm, deep-seated belief that the CIA, in cooperation with aliens from the Andromeda galaxy, were shocking his testicles with cattle prods while he slept? His testicular pain would be, of course, absolutely real -- the presence of stress chemicals, FMRI scans, and whatever other tests you care to do all show that he's experiencing real testicular pain.

      Does the fact that his pain is real make him any less of a crackpot?

      I'm not dismissing this guy's suffering. He is experiencing a real problem, and needs competent psychiatric help to get through it. I truly hope that he seeks help and receives it. However, I honestly don't see a significant difference between him and the hypothetical cattle-prod-to-the-nuts guy, as their complaints are equally bizarre and imaginary. He needs help, I agree, but I stand firmly by the "crackpot" comment.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  39. Chemical Sensitivity is in the Medical Journals by vleep1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are three large cohorts, the Vietnam Vets, the Gulf War Syndrome, and the Japan nerve gas subway survivors. All three have Chemical Sensitivity symptoms. Essentially, pesticide is a toned down nerve gas. It is oil soluble. It is designed to kill stuff. Nerve gas and pesticide is the same chemical family. Since it is oil soluble it is difficult for the body to excrete. And yes it acts as an immune system adjuvant spurring the immune system into hyper alertness. When we bombed Saddam in the last war we bombed his chemical agent factories. Our troops were down wind. Thousands of nerve gas sensors went off. BUT the US claims that these nerve gas sensors were defective. Why is the same nerve gas sensor still in our arsenal??? Why hasn't the manufacturer been sued?? Even the expensive gas spec and mass spec loaded on pick up trucks detected nerve gas. During the 1950's the breast cancer rate was 1 in 20. When I was in Med School a decade ago it was 1 in 11. Today, the breast cancer rate is 1 in 8. There is a Long Island Breast cancer cluster. WHY? Isn't there some curiosity, that the animals that live in polluted waters have all kinds of tumors??? Part of the cover up occurs when you follow the money. The liability runs very high. Lawyers are called in. Has anyone watched "A Civil Action"??

  40. I had a similar illness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Though I didn't believe it was related to chemicals in the air. I would vomit constantly, especially while at school, and would be sick almost 24 hours a day. I would get nauseated in the mornings and afternoons, and would have severe cramps in the evening.

    I went to school in a variety of buildings. My illness was debilitating. I couldn't go out with friends or anything. My girlfriend started to get frustrated because I could rarely go out with her. I was sick so often that a lot of the time I would go to her apartment (which had a strange, musty smell, which must have made me sick) and vomit several times while I was there.

    I gradually started to cope with it, though only a little bit. I was still sick, but it was relatively predictable, and I could run to the bathroom when I knew I was going to vomit. I started getting ulcer-like symtoms because of my stomach trouble. I constantly felt like I had the flu, and doctors had no idea what was going on.

    So I went on medication: Paxil. Turns out I have a social phobia that causes me to become severely ill whenever I am in social situations. It is PURELY PSYCHOLOGICAL, but manifests itself physically by causing me to have flu-like symptoms (fatigue, headaches, nausea->vomiting).

    I've been taking Paxil for 4 years with an outrageously enormous amount of success. I go out with my friends often, and haven't felt extremely ill because of my phobia for 4 years. It hasn't completely gone away, I still suffer in some form or another when I have other, unrelated stresses in my life, but it's mostly manageable right now.

    I'm not about to rule out his "environmental illness" as psychological. I think it's a definite possibility. The same illness that plagued him for years did the same to me for years -- for as long as I can remember. It was debilitating, I couldn't go out, couldn't do anything.

    I fail to see any substantial evidence that lends creedence to his claim that this is physical.

    Note: Posted A/C because there are still those who don't understand what, and how common, mental illness truly is, and would persecute those who have it. It's all in your mind folks, and we all have mental problems to some degree. You have to look at is as an obstacle to overcome, not as a condition over which to scorn a person.

  41. Straw Bale Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.harvesthomes.ca/

  42. Are all of you retarded? by gittela · · Score: 1

    Looking at the various comments, it seems to be a genereal groove going "It's in your head, get th fuck outside. Houses are made of bricks and wood. Can't be nothin' wrong with that?".

    I must admit that being from Norway, Europe, I often lean to the statistics saying that quite a large portion of the US have very low education. Now, I have family over there, and I know there are smart people there, but come on?

    Concrete gives out huge amounts of fumes, wood is soaked in chemicals to withstand water etc, insulation is a whole book in itself on chemical hell. Are you aware of how much NASTY stuff is in everything we surround ourselves with?
    NJ sounds like a really shitty place to live, and the way this guy's been treated doesn't surprise me one bit. If the easiest way to handle a problem is to resign, then people will very often do that! As seems to be the case with the whole of NJ.

    I hope you guys don't consider general pollution a figment of imagination too? Go suck on the tailpipe of your car for an hour or so after a good run in the park!

    I think we will see an increase in these illnesses in the coming years, as things start to backfire. Here in Europe at least more and more people are reacting to electromagnetic radiation. A cellphone nearby can be enough to cause illness! Schools has actually been shut down for a period of time here in Norway because of chemical fumes in the building.

    It's just plain scary when you start to realise what steps people are willing to take just to make money. Killing a few people is low on the list. Mass Pollution is a picnic in the park. We're currently strugling with The Sellafield Nuclear plant in England, as they dump their waste directly out in the sea, killing our coastline.

    I'm not really sure where I'm going with all this, but please, sit down and think!!
    Just because you can't see it doesn't indicate that it's not real...

    phew... ../~howard

    1. Re:Are all of you retarded? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Man, you think wood and concrete are bad?

      Look at this stuff! DHMO is so dangerous, hell, it can kill a man in mere minutes!

      Did you know the majority of people want DHMO banned? The conspiracy of the companies selling this stuff is so obvious it's not even funny!

      This substance is so deadly it kills without warning. Strangely enough, there are wacko groups who would support the continued use of DHMO!

      Here's some more quality information on DHMO, please read it before you kill yourself with this horrible substance. Just look at the list of people addicted to this substance: The KKK, Hitler, Pedophiles, and Charles Manson. The substance clearly changes one's mood for the worse -- just look at the groups it is linked to.

      Please sign the petition to ban this horrible substance now before we all die from it.

      Thank you.

      >I must admit that being from Norway, Europe
      >We're currently strugling with The Sellafield Nuclear plant in England, as they dump their waste directly out in the sea, killing our coastline.

      Uhhhh... you do realise that England isn't part of Norway, right? That they aren't even connected in the most remote manner? And that the majority of the radiation leakage ocurred when the plant was called Windscale, eh?

      And you would suggest Americans are stupid...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Are all of you retarded? by QuackQuack · · Score: 1

      wood is soaked in chemicals to withstand water etc, insulation is a whole book in itself on chemical hell.

      You're referring to Pressure-treated lumber. At least where I live, that seems to be only used for outdoor structures, like decks, retaining walls, fence posts etc. The lumber inside is untreated.

      Mass Pollution is a picnic in the park. We're currently strugling with The Sellafield Nuclear plant in England, as they dump their waste directly out in the sea, killing our coastline.

      And they allow this? Sheesh, and they say US environmental laws are lax...

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    3. Re:Are all of you retarded? by gittela · · Score: 1

      Moron, I know England is not part of Norway. I even know where it is. Do you? Obviously not. Look it up, then see if you find sellafield. Or even better, have a look here, so you don't have to have two thoughts going at once: http://www.bellona.no/en/energy/nuclear/sellafield /

      So I'll suggest once more that some americans are quite stupid, based on recent discoveries.

    4. Re:Are all of you retarded? by gittela · · Score: 1

      Allow is stretching it a bit, but what can one do? Money talks.
      We have stupidity among politicians here in Europe too. Even in Norway the degree of stupidity can be impressive.
      But that's beside the point. I was merely suggesting that some openness towards problems that may not yet have been classified as "valid" by science and medicine, as it could very well prove to be a genuine disease. And some reflection on how we live.

    5. Re:Are all of you retarded? by gittela · · Score: 1

      Oh, and by the way, they DO filter their waste water, just not good enough. Some compounds are let through, as taking them out is more expensive. Sorry about the "directly", just pushing the point.

    6. Re:Are all of you retarded? by homemademissiles · · Score: 1

      Seems like a troll but I'll bite anyway....

      I live in europe, electromagnetic radiation caused by cellphones does not shut schools. Here in the UK, cell towers are reguarly installed on schools. We dont seem to have a population of adolescents convulsing every time someone decides to ring their mum.
      As for norway being 'irradiated' by sellafield. I would worry more about the nuclear plants closer to home. Theres a reactor north of varberg in sweden thats a hellava lot closer to norway than sellafield.

      Just because you heard it from some soap dodging hippy, does not indicate that its real either...

    7. Re:Are all of you retarded? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Unlike yourself, I've actually been to Sellafield. So stuff that up your jumper. The tour there actually features a history of the power plant, including the fact that it partially melted down a few decades ago (when it was called Windscale).

      And I thought Americans were arrogant. You, sir, take the cake. How can you be struggling with problems from Sellafield when you are in Norway? Please don't give me some bullshit about the water somehow carrying contaminants a thousand miles across the ocean to you -- it's just too stupid an idea to comprehend.

      >NJ sounds like a really shitty place to live, and the way this guy's been treated doesn't surprise me one bit. If the easiest way to handle a problem is to resign, then people will very often do that! As seems to be the case with the whole of NJ.

      Yeah, I was right. You are the most arrogant person I've met in a long time. Making assumptions on how "shitty" a place is before being there. I can assure you that after having visited both places, I'd rather live in Shithole, NJ than anywhere in Europe.

      >Here in Europe at least more and more people are reacting to electromagnetic radiation.

      WHAT? Dear lord, that has to be the stupidest pile of crap I've ever read. Do you even know what EM is? Assuming you can actually see, you're enjoying the benefits of EM right now. Hooo boy you have a lot of high school physics to complete.

      >A cellphone nearby can be enough to cause illness!

      Show me a non-biased, non-bullshit study about this. Have you ever heard of the law of squares for radio distribution? The only way you're going to get "irradiated" in any meaningful manner by a cellphone is if you jam it up your ass.

      I bet you're just mad because you clicked all my DHMO links and only figured it out on the last one...

      >insulation is a whole book in itself on chemical hell

      Insulation is glass fibre! That's it! It's that simple! Ever burnt any? It turns into... GLASS! What a surprise! What's the chemical hell? The fact that it comes baled in plastic wrap?

      >I hope you guys don't consider general pollution a figment of imagination too? Go suck on the tailpipe of your car for an hour or so after a good run in the park!

      Asphyxiation and pseudo-science are two totally unrelated matters.

      >It's just plain scary when you start to realise what steps people are willing to take just to make money. Killing a few people is low on the list.

      That is nothing new. The Crusades, Jesus, Roman Empire, Egyptians. People have been killing people for as long as I can think of in an attempt to "better" themselves. This isn't anything new, and it certainly isn't related to modern, "chemical", living.

      >I'm not really sure where I'm going with all this, but please, sit down and think!!

      I did, and I did it a long time ago, and that's why I know most everything you're talking about is a steaming pile of junk science.

      You have something on the pollution angle, though. But you're being too vague on it, so I'm really not sure what, exactly. Pollution covers so much, from annoying sounds, to second hand smoke, to antrhax sprays, it's hard to tell what the discussion is on when people bandy the term about so loosely.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  43. I have Environmental Illness ... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that everytime I code for 6 weeks straight without going outside, that when I finally do go outside something seems to cause me great discomfort and pain. I am not sure what it is, its so bright out there. Hard to figure out what it could be with that damnable "day-star" burning the hell out of me.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  44. His other interests by blahlemon · · Score: 1

    I agree with the others who say this guy needs to see a shrink. The idea that he condition has become so severe because of all the time it went "untreated" is laughable. It really is a sign of the culture we live in that *no one* seems to want to face reality or accept responsability for their own problems. As for his other interests they all seem to be involved with getting off the Earth or land for the most part. Lots of Pie in the Sky type stuff that in reality we will never see in our lifetimes. Maybe he should get a hobby, like knitting, to take his mind off his self created delusion. Ever wonder why the net is so slow? Worms, Viruses and people like this guy who waste perfectly good webspace with self indulgent tripe. He's more flaky then a Head and Shoulders convention.

    --
    It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
  45. Re:for YOU, rot-13 readers!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Yvfgra, lbh tbq qnzarq pbpxfhpxvat shpxvat juber, vs lbh qba\'g fgbc ebg13\'vat Fynfuqbg cbfgvatf V\'z tbvat gb pbzr bire gurer naq xvpx lbh va gur phag naq hfr lbh nf n jngrefxv!

  46. First rule of toxicology by JCMay · · Score: 1
    1. Re:First rule of toxicology by serotone9 · · Score: 1

      the dose no longer solely makes the poison, that's outdated misinformation. "Low Doses May Be More Potent than High Doses "Another key shift [in scientific thinking] is the acknowledgement that the assumption that the dose makes the poison can be misleadingly simplistic, if it is used to imply that only high dose exposures induce effects. In fact, low exposure levels sometimes cause effects not seen at higher levels [for example, see 12,13,14]. Researchers are now intensely pursuing these non-monotonic dose response curves and the uncertainty about their underlying mechanisms, which likely vary from case to case. [A "non-monotonic dose response curve" means that as the dose of a chemical is raised or lowered, the effect does not necessarily rise or fall in lock step with the dose. In some cases, low doses may cause greater effects than high doses.] One plausible hypothesis [to explain why dose and response do not always move together in lock step] is that at low, physiological levels, the contaminant interferes with developmental signaling but does not activate biochemical defenses against impacts that would be caused by higher exposures. At somewhat higher levels, these defenses are activated and the contaminant is successfully detoxified. At even higher levels, the defense mechanisms are overwhelmed by the toxicant and more traditional toxicological effects are induced." http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/bulletin.cfm?Issue_ ID=2284

    2. Re:First rule of toxicology by serotone9 · · Score: 1

      more about why the dose no longer solely makes the poison:

      INTRO:

      "The science of toxicology has been fundamentally altered by the discovery, 20 years ago, that industrial chemicals released into the environment can disrupt the hormone systems of plants and animals, including humans.

      For more than 450 years, toxicologists have relied on an idea expressed by Paracelsus in the fifteenth century: "The dose makes the poison."[1] By this, Paracelsus meant that everything is poisonous in a high enough dose and, "Even strong poisons are harmless if the dose is low enough." Implicit in these two ideas is a third, "The higher the dose, the stronger the poison." Together, these ideas have been used to justify dumping billions of tons of biologically-active chemicals into the environment each year: even the most active were considered OK to dump because they would be diluted by air and water down to doses that were considered safe."

      ~snip~

      "Because we are all exposed to mixtures of chemicals every day, the toxicity of mixtures is an important public health matter. If insignificant doses of several chemicals add up to a significant dose then "the dose makes the poison" misrepresents reality and may put us in harm's way. Two studies published recently in ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES examined this question.

      "The first study tested a mixture of four organochlorine chemicals (the pesticide Lindane, plus two forms of the pesticide DDT and a breakdown product of DDT called DDE). Each of these chemicals by itself is known to behave like the female sex hormone, estrogen, when tested on human breast cells. The researchers conducting this study wondered whether low concentrations of these four chemicals (too low to cause estrogenic effects by themselves) mixed together would cause an estrogenic effect on human breast cells -- in other words, could low doses of four separate chemicals add up to an effective dose?

      "This study showed unmistakably that these four estrogenic chemicals at low levels DO add up to an effective dose. This is a very important finding because it means that chemicals present in food and water at "harmless" levels may combine with other "harmless" chemicals in the environment and, together, cause harm. [EHP Vol. 109, No. 4 (April, 2001), pgs. 391-397.]"

      ~snip~

      "But the newly-discovered difficulties for the old "dose makes the poison" school of toxicology don't stop there. Many hormones are only active during a brief period in the life of an organism. To test whether a chemical disrupts a hormone, it must be tested during the particular time when that hormone is active. This was illustrated by a study of Bisphenol A published recently in ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES.

      "Bisphenol A is a chemical used extensively in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics, including soft drink containers. Bisphenol A can also be found in some modern plastics used as "dental sealants" and in the lacquer lining of tin cans. From these sources, hundreds of millions of people are being exposed to low levels of Bisphenol A, without their knowledge or consent. Bisphenol A is known to be "weakly estrogenic" -- meaning that it behaves like the female sex hormone, estrogen, but with a potency about 10,000 times less than pure estrogen. Because it is only "weakly estrogenic" many toxicologists have assumed that it is safe to expose hundreds of millions of humans to Bisphenol A and ethically acceptable to expose people without their informed consent.

      "The new study in ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES reveals that Bisphenol A is particularly potent in mice exposed near the time of birth. Pregnant female mice exposed to low levels of Bisphenol A near the time of birth produce offspring that gain excessive weight early in life and maintain excessive weight thereafter. This effect does not occur in mice fed Bisphenol A as adults. (The study also found that low doses of Bisphenol A produced a greater effect than higher doses, standing Paracelsus on his head.

    3. Re:First rule of toxicology by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read This link. Common sense and a little scientific method make the world a much less scary place!

  47. We're not doing this guy any favors.... by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...By indulging his hypochondriac fantasies. I glanced over his autobiography, and here's what I think (I am not a mental health professional, but I know plenty of mildly crazy people)

    1. He's had trouble getting a job because he keeps on bringing up his fantasy 'handicap' (though he surely believes it's real), and he finds no employer wants to deal with a handicapped IT person.... I think it would be more accurate to say no company wants to deal with a crazy employee in any proffession.

    2. His entire autobiography, he paints himself a victim of this 'syndrome.' (and peer abuse, and being overweight) Never anything more than that. True, his weblog is about 'non-toxic' housing, so he may want to keep it on topic, but it really seems to be more of an entire 'pity me' diatribe than a tale of his life thus far. Certainly he takes no responsibility for the over-eating and inactivity that made him fat, and is responsible for his low stamina. (News flash: Fat people can't move fast, or far. Remember, KE=M*V^2!)

    3. I bet his doting, single mom raised him to think he was always sick- ever heard of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy ? Tell a kid something long enough, and he's likely to believe it. Drag him around to all sorts of doctors starting in infancy, and you might start to think you can never be healthy.

    MCS, as many other posters have pointed out, is a fantasy illness. Michael Fumento, a respected health writer, has written a number of articles on the subject that can be found here. Incidentally, I reccomend browsing through his articles for any other topics that might be of interest to you.

    So here's my (albeit non-proffessional) advice to this gentleman:

    A. Stop eating.

    B. Start Exercising. Cardio-Vascular and weight training. Do it till you drop. Guess what? You'll find that every week you keep it up, you'll last just a little bit longer. I'm not slim (6'1", 255lbs so not grossly obese either) but I've started exercising regularly- trust me, it won't be long before you start noticing the improvements. Maybe weeks. The fatter you are, the more you need to start right now.

    C. STFU. really. No one cares about your problems, except fellow hypochondriacs who are looking for reciprical support on their bullshit illnesses. Any given ailment can be exploited for a very limited amount of sympathy. Coming up with new ailments all the time will just piss off the people around you, and turn sympathy into mild disgust.

    Buddy, it seems to me your mom screwed you up from the start, before you even had a chance to know better. Blame the doctors for prescribing too many anti-biotics? Blame your mom for bringing you to so many doctors and insisting on medication. Up until the mid 90's, anti-biotics, especially weak ones, were the classic 'go-away' prescription, since doctors can't exactly prescribe sugar pills to crazy patients, or patients with crazy moms.
    Oh yeah, the bad thing about over prescribing anti-biotics is that it makes the pathogens more resistant- they don't do much to you except a little diarehhia, because they kill helpful intestinal bacteria. But you must of missed that news report.

    Your mom screwed you up. It's high time you got over it.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:We're not doing this guy any favors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, fat people can move fast!
      I'm 6' 300lb and I can pull a faster 100meters than most of the skinny little peeps I know ;-)

      You do have some major points though - a fat guy with MCS doesn't seem like it makes sense. I do believe EI exists, but only for people that have been in severe chemical accidents, not John Q. Public.

      Unless this guy took baths in concrete strengthener fluid every day I don't think he's super allergic, I just think he's a fat whiney welfare addict.

  48. Re:Um.. MOVE! HMMM This isn't quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. MOVE OUT OF NEW JERSEY 2. ????? 3. Profit!

    Actually at all the bridges here you have to PAY to get out of New Jersey. It is free to get in, however.

  49. Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Maybe this is just mother nature's way of getting rid of this guy?

  50. Buy some plants and stop whining. by Scyber · · Score: 1

    Common houseplants can filter a number of chemicals in the air. See the Nasa study:

  51. They're Creeping Up on You by gughunter · · Score: 1

    Even the very rich have a hard time affording a completely toxin-free environment. See the epochal Romero/King documentary Creepshow for a prime example. Wealthy industrialist Upson Pratt was killed by his living environment, and not very slowly either.

  52. Everquest is your Salvation by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

    If this guy is really as bad off as he makes out, playing Everquest 24/7 may well be within his means. At this rate assuming he has any gaming skill, he should be able to start selling some l33t equipment on Ebay shortly. I'm not an expert on this financial model, but certainly someone who is restricted to his home and has a high-end PC should see a fantasy world (where he can aquire wealth that may transfer to the real world) as a posibility. I wish him the best of luck even if his bio is a bit "poor me".

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  53. that place looks familiar by LifesABeach · · Score: 0



    its chilling, but the outside of the place looks like a standard cell at the yuma state prison.

  54. Some more (perhaps unnecessary ) perspective by SolemnDragon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oke. Here on quackwatch there's a whole lot about what to look for in an illness description that might not be, well, as deductively logical as we'd like. But while MCS may not be generally acknowledged by the standard med community, that doesn't mean that there aren't conditions which can cause extreme sensitivity. For example, there are autoimmune illnesses with measurable, detectable effects, such as Celiac sprue, in which the body can't quite identify what it's fighting- and a whole host of new allergies and sensitivities can crop up. Including verifiable ones- sensitivities to latex, nickel, even hay fever allergies where there were none before. Get rid of the immune-triggering agent, and some of those go away. (YAY!) So... My MedAlert tag doesn't read MCS. But it has each other allergy listed carefully.
    does this mean that all MCS patients are just autoimmune patients waiting for a Dx??? No. Nor does it mean that MCS does or doesn't exist as a separate medical entity... but it does mean that there are certainly cases where allergies and sensitivities can be induced by other causes.

    Incidentally, there are also illnesses that are actually being proven to exist, like fibromyalgia, where the complex list of ailments is also real... again, NOT to be taken as evidence that every ailment with such a laundry list of symptoms is genuine yet unproven, in fact this is the exception, rather than the rule. This list of ailments comes up with almost any new toxin. It came up with"Electricity Allergy," where the patient claims to have an allery to Electromagnetic fields which can even break the devices that bear the fields. Again, cases where the patient does the describing and the diagnosis. *shaking head* Doesn't anybody believe in double blind studies any more??

    i hope this fellow gets better. I hope that people stop referring to empirical- science based medicine as 'allopathic,' which is a label that only self-stylised 'holistic' pseudomedics seem to use. I just wanted to point out the exception or two where the symptoms are diagnosable, distinct, testable, and can be demonstrated not to be psychosomatic. I didn't read anything that leads me to believe that he's had all the tests to rule such things out. Medicine is NO PLACE for shoddy science!!!!

    1. Re:Some more (perhaps unnecessary ) perspective by rark · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'd love some double blind studies.

      Incidently, I spent years being told I was a hypochondriac, my 'allergy' to wheat was psychosomatic, etc, before getting diagnosed with celiac. And I wouldn't have been diagnosed if a friend of mine (with celiac) hadn't noticed that I had all the right symptoms.

      Also, I've been flat out told, within the last five years, that celiac was a made up disease and anyone who treated it was a quack. By an MD. I finally started making that one of my test questions -- anyone who tells me that my food sensitivities (I have a bunch, all IGG and food challenge proven, but IGG testing is quackery in the U.S. [not in england, which is where the test was done, I mailed off the sample to them airmail and they mailed the results to me] and food challenge doesn't prove that it's not psychosomatic) is automatically not my doctor. Avoiding these things is too important to my health to let them have their way.

      The problem with MCS, fibro, CFS, etc is that instead of saying "This person has real symptoms that I can't figure out, maybe they've got something I don't know about. Maybe I should go do some research or refer them to a specialist, or even just admit I don't know" doctors seem a lot more likely to say "I can't figure it out, thus it must not exist and this person must be crazy and anyone who can help them must be a quack"

      The money for studies only exists for things that will make people money. This is not 100% true, but is largely true. Because the treatment of MCS will probably not make anyone enough money to justify it, the money for studies is not out there. Drug companies manage to invent illnesses, or more often, exaggerate the incidence and ramifications of a condition, and minimize what the symptoms are, if they can make money off of them (and this is not considered quackery). But unless you can figure out how to make someone a lot of money with a disease, forget about having the money for double blind studies.

      This is not 100% true, but for the relatively small amount of funding available for things that aren't going to make someone bunches of cash, there are a lot of people researching a lot of different conditions competing for funding.

      In the case of MCS and a few other things (of which celiac is occasionally one, though not to the same degree), there are entities who would really be economically hit, in a bad way, if it turned out that what MCS appears to be is what it is, and esspecially if it the cases we are seeing now are the tip of the iceberg -- if the canary in the coal mine theory is correct. These folks do have money to fund studies and most of the studies I've seen on MCS that say it doesn't exist are funded by them. I find that quite suspicious.

      But then, I also can't understand why we don't call quackery when drug companies fund the studies that prove their drugs are safe and effective -- even when later studies (funded from other sources) prove that the drug in question is not as safe or as effective (or both) as originally thought.

  55. I dunno... ther may be merit to some of this by andymac · · Score: 1
    All I know is that over the years, I hae developed sensitivities to things that *never* bothered me before. I get outside more than most people (running, cycling, open water swimming, soccer, golf, hiking, you get the idea), and over the last four years, I have become:
    • allergic to cats - this one is wierd, growing up I always had cats and never had a problem
    • allergic to plant pollens - also wierd, I've always spent tons of time outdoors and never had "hayfever" symptoms, used to work for a florist is college
    • allergic to grasses (esp cuttings) - for someone who played soccer for 10+ years, it's pretty odd that I'd develop this sensitivity only in the last three-ish years
    • allergic to strong scents and colourings in beauty/skin care products - how the hell did this happen? after 5-10 years of use?

    All of these "allergies" or sensitivities started showing up after I had a bad bought of bronchitis is '98 and was given heaps of drugs, including brochodilators. I am in the peak of health - 500+ annual hours of aerobic and anaerobic activity, VO2 max in the top 5% of the population, resting HR below 50 bpm, below 20% body fat, etc. Yet everytime I go for a bike ride through agricultural regions near where I live, my legs are covered with welts for days afterwards (likely due to the chemicals used in farming).

    While there's lots of people out there who want you to believe you're sick, sick enough to give them money for some wonder product, I also believe that there is too much of... everything.. in our daily environment. Our bodies are reacting more and more to compounds found in nature, let alone those crazy man made chemical products. So you tell me what the hell's going on. Why has everyone I know developed some sort of sensitivity in the last 5ish years?

    --
    "Content's a bitch."
    1. Re:I dunno... ther may be merit to some of this by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
      Yet everytime I go for a bike ride through agricultural regions near where I live, my legs are covered with welts for days afterwards (likely due to the chemicals used in farming).

      Are you sure these aren't bug bites?

      Anyway, my mother developed a sensitivity (in her eyes) to the cheap ink used in most newspapers when she was in her late 30's. (A doctor told her this, she didn't just make it up.)

      They have no idea where it came from; it just came on within a period of a few months. A newspaper in the vicinity caused her eyes to basically dry up and itch. She has special prescription eye drops to help soothe her eyes.

      I believe the symptoms have reduced somewhat over the last few years, but it's something she still has to deal with. No one seems to know why this would happen.

      It's probably the local newspaper companies switching to a newer, cheaper ink, which for some reason she is sensitive to.

    2. Re:I dunno... ther may be merit to some of this by andymac · · Score: 1

      Yeah they're not bug bites... I had that checked out. That's interesting about the paper ink. It's too bad that the majority of medication to relieve these symptoms is cortisone based though... long term use can;t be good for us.

      --
      "Content's a bitch."
  56. Big Move to Renewable / Safe Housing by GangstaLean · · Score: 1
    This Book, Materials Matter was recently published, convering not only the ideas of building with non-toxic, environmentally friendly materials, but also incorporating that ethos in a financially viable manner into all aspects of manufacturing.

    Many of the current building materials may seem relatively inert to individuals without compromised immune systems, however many can be transformed into deadly materials quite simply.

    For example, when vinyl siding burns, it releases a chemical so deadly that it is frequently responsible for the smoke inhalation deaths in building fires.

    Many building materials cannot be disposed of safely and ecologically, like PVC pipe, and the long term effects of exposure to complex chemicals are just being studied.

    We know how to produce safe materials, and we know how to produce environmentally sound materials. Why not start now?

    --
    -- Bird in the Bush: The Renewable Energy Blog http://www.birdinthebush.org
  57. Radon by luzrek · · Score: 1
    Ummm...Radon is naturally occuring from the radioactive decay of the Uranium in the soil. It is of course radioactive, so people freak out about it. However, it is chemically intert (nobel gas), so it is absurd to say it is a noxious chemical. Also, Radon levels go way up after it rains.

    Environmental Illness is a psycological disorder. If it really existed as a physical condition it would be very well studied and there would be a very expensive treatment because it nearly always afflicts middle-upper-class white women. It would also be much worse in homes built in the 50's than newer homes since in the 50's many more chemicals and much more toxic chemicals were used. Most people that suffer from it claim to react to newer buildings.

    For a non-toxic house why not make something completely out of steel and concrete? That has to be pretty cheap. Or why not just live in a cave?

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  58. huff by mike1086 · · Score: 1

    and i'll puff

    and i'll blow your house down

  59. House pollution by forkboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for an environmental laboratory that does testing for this very thing. This guy's whining aside, many folks' houses are more polluted than the outdoors.

    There are quite a few factors that can cause illness to those living in such a place. Many older paints contain lead, older carpeting and padding can give off fumes of organic solvents, a lot of older linoleum and drywall contains asbestos, mold can grow in moist areas and squirt bits of mold particles all over, basements contain radon in many areas, oh and it clings to smoke/dust particles which lets it lodge in your lungs and sit there emitting harmful ionizing radiation directly into lung tissue. Granted, much of this stuff is just allergens, but constant allergies can lower your immune capability. And some of this stuff is downright toxic or carcinogenic.

    Get your house tested. It really doesn't cost that much. Do it sooner rather than later, especially if you have children...this isn't a plug to drum up business for my lab, you really will be amazed at what kind of crap is in your home.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  60. Nice bunch of tolerant individuals you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I tend to agree that there may well be a psychological *component* to the symptoms being described, it's a rather neat solution to go from 'this person may have some psychological issues *in addition to* some real medical ones' to 'this guy's a nutcase'.

    Consider:

    1. The 'normal' curve -- we have peanut allergies, dairy allergies, bee sting allergies... is it so far-fetched that someone might actually be allergic one or more of the chemical compounds used in modern buildings? It might be rare, but the odds are almost certainly much better than 1 in 5 billion. And how much more likely would you be to discover your allergy if you were living in one of the most heavily-polluted/polluting countries on earth?

    2. A good friend of mine has been diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Are there psychological factors involved? Probably, they had a really messed-up childhood. Are they crazy? No. Are they normal? Yes. Do they experience concrete, physical symptoms that are completely debilitating? Absolutely.

    Maybe MCS is simply a confluence of psychological and physical circumstances that tip someone over an invisible sensitivity ledge. It doesn't necessarily make someone crazy, it makes them in need of a great deal of help.

    1. Re:Nice bunch of tolerant individuals you all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think folks around here are pretty tolerant but this fellow in question does nothing but whine on his site about the inequities of "the system" and he uses his so-called illness as an excuse for his present situation (unemployed welfare queen). He feels he somehow deserves different due to his extraneous situations when in truth a person is dealt a hand in life and you need to play that hand as best you can (sorry for the poker analogy).

      I personally feel this fellow has too much time on his hands and he needs a kick in the pants. He is an *overweight* person on welfare!!! I was very poor growing up and we would occassionally go without food and heat and there are other families in the same situation...why should we finanace this crackpot's living expenses?

      Also, I get pissed at folks using the term "illness" so casually (in regards to his state of mind). My mother was a paranoid-schizophrenic and is still institutionalized...that is mental illness. She does not carry on a "woe-is-me" web blog which is simply a person with too much time on their hands.

  61. MCS by karb · · Score: 2
    Umm, I hate to downplay the value of geekily pursuing it, but I don't believe there's reliable clinical evidence that verifies the existence of MCS.

    MCS is kind of aligned with the same people who feel that radio waves harm them.

    Now, allergies to about everything, individually, _are_ considered medically viable and clinically verifiable. But MCS, which proposes that one disease makes you allergic to almost all chemicals, doesn't seem to pass muster.

    Here is a compilation of views of medical associations towards MCS. Nobody says it is complete bunk, but everybody agrees that there aren't any good studies that proves it does exist.

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

    1. Re:MCS by rark · · Score: 1

      Actually, allergies are pretty damn contraversial in the mainstream medical community, too.

      Amoung other things, I was told for years that my reactions to dairy, eggs and wheat were in my head by doctors. Because instead of triggering my asthma and eczema (I had eczema all the time, but not obviously in relation to what I was eating), or breaking out in hives, they gave me massive gastric disturbances and weird mental symptoms. And standard allergy testing didn't confirm them.

      As it turned out, *years* after I started having symptoms, a friend of mine, who happened to have celiac disease, told me that the symptoms looked about right, and I got tested and sure enough, that's what I had. A dozen doctors couldn't figure out what my friend did. That explains the wheat (and other gluten bearing grains). For milk, eggs, tree nuts, soy, etc I still have no clinical proof of allergy that is considered legitimate in this country. Even so, they'll make me sick, even if I wasn't aware they were in the food I was eating.

      Oddly enough, people with celiac disease are more likely to have an autistic spectrum disorder than people from the general population. And the 'mental symptoms' I spoke of are exactly that -- going gluten free hasn't made me 'normal' (and I don't think I'd want it if it did) but has made it easier for me to function. A fair number of other people have noticed the gluten-autism link. There's a great deal of information about gluten free/caesin free diets and autistic kids. I would love to see a good study to see if the kids who are helped by GF/CF diets (only a fraction are) also have celiac disease.

      But, because GF/CF diets are considered 'quackery', I doubt I'll see such a study soon.

      I do have IGG reaction results (from England) that clearly show that these foods (the specific list I compiled from trial and error) do cause a reaction . But IGG testing is considered "quack" medicine in this country.

      Scarily, some doctors in the states consider celiac disease to be quackery. The incidence of it in the U.S. is still underreported.

      The thing that pisses me off about this whole issue is that while multiple politically and financially motivated groups argue over whether MCS exists, a whole lot of people (and thankfully, I'm not one, but my research into my own problems brought me into contact with this one) are severely disabled, and suffering real symptoms that have been proven not to improve with psychological counsoling. The usual medical response to this is along the lines of "take two prozac and don't call me in the morning". A whole sub industry of quacks *has* sprung up, because the medical establishment won't deal with this (and a number of related issues -- chronic fatigue, IBS [medical establishment is better with this, but misdiags a number of other things as this too often], etc) and people want answers and more, want to feel better so they can live their lives. The AMA can lay the blame for all the quacks in this field squarely on their own doorstep. If they'd stop pandering to political interests and started actually treating patients, people would be less likely to support quacks.

      On MCS causing allergies to almost all chemicals -- two thoughts:
      1. In practice, it seems that each individual has their own set of chemicals that set them off, and they can and do differ widely from person to person. It's also very difficult for an individual to test which chemicals are setting them off -- it's not as if you can go down to the corner store and buy little vials of every chemical used in manufacturing (or even the most common ones, or the ones that would likely outgas) and then go do a sniff test on each. So in absence of knowing exactly which chemicals are problematic, given the severity of the symptoms, the decision to avoid all possible triggers seems intelligent.

      2. I have been of the opinion for awhile that what is referred to as 'autism' (and the whole autistic spectrum) is actually a number of conditions, but we lack the knowledg

  62. Simple Solution by hndrcks · · Score: 1

    "...that give off formaldehyde, among other things, for years and years."

    Not to be flippant, but I live in a house built in 1905. There isn't a speck of pressboard or plywood in the place. In fact, the only environmental hazard I can find (building-products related) is lead paint.

    Solution? Buy an old house. Kinda helps on the whole overdevelopment / landfill / pollution stuff too...

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Multistory buildings made in 1905 usually contained shitloads of asbestos. As long as you don't disturb it, isn't generally a problem.

      But if you have kids and there is lead paint, I would get that replaced by a competent professional, even if it isn't flaking.

    2. Re:Simple Solution by Sgt+York · · Score: 3, Interesting
      To quote you.... "not to be flippant, but"... try and find an old house in a non-settled area. That breeze you use for ventillation has diesel fumes, etc in it if you live anywhere near a city. The guy can't live in areas with any level of pollution, ruling out all cities, US or otherwise.

      Also, BTW, "toxic" here is a relative term. Toxicity is the level at which a certain potentially harmful thing begins to have negative effects. Every person has a different tolerance to a given substance based on a host of factors (genetics, prior exposure to that and related substances, current/prior disease states, current/prior injuries, etc); what is toxic to you may have no effect on me.

      This guy (and people like him) have a decreased tolerance to a large number of substances for some unknown reason. So, although you may have lived in your house for decades with no ill effects, the case will likely be different for him.

      This condition really intrigues me...it makes me wonder what could happen to make someone sensitive like this. There has to be a phsyiological/biochemical reason for it.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    3. Re:Simple Solution by chillichic · · Score: 1

      Maybe the simple solution is for this guy to go see a psychologist for his psychosomatic disorder.

  63. Not to be a troll, but... by Xthlc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy's site is not doing much to help those who are environmentally sensitive. He's got all the warning signs of an chronic hypochondriac (read his autobiography; he goes out of his way to portray himself as a martyr and a victim of pretty much everyone and everything he's ever encountered). I think he's got some serious attention issues, and will prejudice the casual viewer against against ES sufferers.

    Another poster in this thread recommended the movie safe, and I couldn't agree more. ES syndrome is a complex, daunting problem that is often equal parts biology and psychology; you can't treat the psychological factors without giving some relief for the physical symptoms, but the problems will never truly go away until you address the mental component of the disorder. A patient often has some kind of severe sociopathology (extremely needy and demanding of attention, or fearful of social interaction), and attendant phobias or OC fixations. It's pretty amazing to see somebody break out in hives when you just *tell* them that there are painters in the other half of the building; this is a disorder of mind and body that Western medicine's reductionist approach is more or less powerless to address.

  64. Packed dirt? by Arpie · · Score: 1

    I was just yesterday talking to some friends about Earthships.

    Packed dirt not only offers thermal mass to help with heating and cooling costs, but also might be "hypo-allergenic".

    --
    /* TAANSTAFL */
  65. Environmental Illness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwahahahahaa.

    Yeah, ok. If I contrive my own disease not recognized by science or medicine, can I have my own Slasdhot story, also ?

  66. but can he lose gracefully at TP? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    the card says moops

  67. Troll or not by Ted_Green · · Score: 1

    Why I am not surprised that Slashdot readers sympathize with a paranoid loser who walls himself up within his own house?

    That was a pretty funny comment.

  68. some people darwin never intended! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At risk of sounding overly harsh, you know, there are some medical defects that really should not survie long enough to introduce into the gene pool, its a bummer and all, and i suppose the good natured part of me says ahh live and let live, but really, its a modern industrial world...

  69. OK Mr poison vendor by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1


    Besides the fact that it tastes like shit, nutrasweet gives me a headache even in modest quantities.

    So yeah, the solution is darwinism: the idiots who ingest the stuff will die off.

  70. ADD, ADHD, Fibro-Myalgia, ... by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    they're all bullshit too!

    (For the second time, since the last one got moderated into dust. I guess some people can't handle the truth afterall!)

  71. Natural Chemicals? by obiquity · · Score: 1

    I am a Chemical Biologist (PhD) and specialize in the chemistry of natural products. Natural products are compounds made by living organisms. Examples include penicillin (made by a mold and a bacteria), erythromycin (made by a soil bacteria), and taxol (anticancer compound made by a Yew tree). The thing I question about MCS syndrome is the fact that we are surrounded by varying environmental toxins continually.

    For example, soil contains tens of thousands known carcinogens. Furthermore, these bacteria are very mutable and are constantly evolving chemical structural variants and the like. The very "smell" of soil is caused by a compound called geosmin, a terpenoid compound. Complex bioactive chemicals are everywhere and produced at fairly high levels. It is difficult for me to understand why man-made chemicals would be any more dangerous or insulting to a human immune system than natural product molecules. Nature makes more nasty molecules with greater constantly varying structural variety than any chemical factory or synthetic chemist could ever hope to make.

    If MCS is real, there should be no solace for people afflicted with it, short of moving into a granite cube filled with synthetically synthesized, purified air.

  72. Moops by t0ny · · Score: 1

    Does this guy live in a bubble?

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  73. Doctors poo pooed Chronic Fatigue Syndrom too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But just cause no body knows why the symptoms are present doesn't mean they don't exist. See the link for a theory on MCS...

    http://molecular.biosciences.wsu.edu/Faculty/pal l/ pall_mcs.htm

  74. Re:Bullshit - modern chemicals? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    If, on the other hand, you claim to be allergic to a certain chemical but don't develop symptoms when you're exposed to it unless you are told that it's there, that's psychosomatic.

    Yeah I think this is all in this guy's head too.

    The problem I have with this is that everything is made of chemicals. The air, the sea, the ground. His head. All chemicals.

    And since plain wood and brick and stone are okay, it seems that it's only modern chemicals he has a problem with. Interesting how his disorder can check patent dates on-the-fly.

    Get this guy some counseling. The toxins will go away.

    Weaselmancer

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  75. offtopic - your link by zackbar · · Score: 1

    Your link to impeach bush makes me wonder how credible your arguments really are.

    I opened the link, and it seems that these geniuses want to impeach bush because of the probability of war with Iraq. If one took that seriously, then a serious argument could be made that we would have to impeach Bush if he DIDN'T consider war with Iraq.

  76. The best part is the donations page by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    He seems reasonable...all he wants is a completely self-contained home with "satellite broadband service". Oh, don't forget the "Buckminster Fuller Dymaxion Bathroom Unit"

    And a boy's gotta ride: "converted conventional vehicle, new or used, with factory installed interior replaced with non-toxic materials and air purifier unit added."

    Since he's got all this time on his hands and the job assembing radios fell through, perhaps he can become an EQ god and sell items on e-bay, or maybe just pimp his skills on a site like elance.

    I guess that would be too easy and would require him to take personal responsibility. After all, everything is not his fault...

  77. Oh like that guy in Northern Exposure. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Before Edwards was on ER, he was on the best show ever, North Exposure, who played a character who had MCS.

  78. Is Darwin rolling in his grave? by Arpie · · Score: 1

    Modern society allows people with disfunctions or disabilites (like this guy) to (sometimes) not only function but also thrive.

    No offense to anyone, I'm just trying to be analytical, but I guess many people who would've probably died -- or at least have been at a big disadvantage -- from their disabilities now are able to live a happy, productive life, mate, breed and (in some cases) pass their disabilities on. I myself have asthma and often depend on medicine to breathe, and both my siblings have other problems, so maybe all of us would have been dead, or maybe have a very hard time mating and breeding (now hold on... is this why geeks have a hard time getting laid? ;-)

    So I ask, what is this causing to the human race and its genetic pool? Are we becoming physically and maybe even mentally weaker?

    OTOH, who knows the parameters for what is actually best? Maybe it would be good if we all were shorter, fatter and dumber. Or taller, thinner, weaker, smarter, geekier, wear glasses, who knows?

    --
    /* TAANSTAFL */
  79. Stop trying to diagnose yourself... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone nowadays is on a real kick. They think that they can diagnose every single illness and problem with themselves. Without any knowledge other than what the internet says or a book says. Well I have one thing to say to them. Stop trying to diagnose yourself!

    One important thing was said to me during my psychopathology class and it has stuck with me ever since. (Roughly):

    "You are going to learn about many different psychological diseases, their symptoms and causes. Just because you learn about it though, doesn't mean you are qualified to diagnose yourself. Your problems always seem amplified to yourself, so you never really get to see the actual picture of what you are doing and what's happening to you. So, right now I am going to tell you all, you very likely aren't bipolar, don't have any personality disorders, aren't schizophrenic, and don't have any of the diseases the book talks about. If you feel you do have any of them, go and see a professional and don't diagnose/treat yourself. It's that simple. You will avoid a lot of hardship that way."

    Well, I think that applies to all of these people who think their bodies are hosts for bug larvae, or people who are determined that every big evil corporation is actively trying to kill them, or that their small problems in their life are so huge that the world must be collapsing and the sky must be falling...

    You likely aren't sick, but if you honestly feel you are, go see a qualified professional and get it checked out properly. At least that way you can try to find the root of the real problem, and not live your life in fear and horror of these imaginary deamons that are haunting you. Stop attacking these windmills blindly.

    Also, I would like to point out that there isn't a giant conspiracy orchestrated by the doctors and psychologists to steal your money and keep you sick/kill you.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  80. Re:Bullshit - modern chemicals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ----------snip-----------
    And since plain wood and brick and stone are okay
    ----------unsnip--------- ...and are historically made only of naturally occurring chemicals then painted. In the last 20 years man has created all sorts of wicked additives to make these materials more water resistant, last longer, fire resistant, termite resistant, etc....

    ----------snip-----------
    it seems that it's only modern chemicals he has a problem with
    ----------unsnip---------
    modern chemicals implies recently discovered or man concocted chemicals. A large percentage of these chemicals (naturally occuring chemicals as well, cobra venom comes to mind) are very toxic.

    Hydrocarbons (foam, manmade fiber carpet, plastic, vinyl, basically everything plastic, rubber, polyester etc) are very recent developments and can be considered "modern chemicals". These chemicals permeate our lives and homes.

    No one knows the long term effects of these man made hydrocarbon chemicals(or leached fumes) on the body because they have not been tracked or studied. In the 60's people used to breathe asbestos dust, and back then, the doctors sounded a lot like you do now when people started having problems.

    I would not dismiss this stuff so easily. This guy might just be hyper sensitive to this stuff and could possibly be an early indicator of the types of long term problems all of us, who have existed and been inundated with these chemicals for our entire life, will have one day.

    This guy may be legit, but there is just as much of a chance of him simply being a sissy boy phony who wants attention. With out the data and actual research, we can make no assumptions.

  81. Your TV Knows all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its funny that Northern Exposure not only introduced this "illness" to a wide audience but it also showed that in the end the entire thing was in the characters head.

    If you remember he was "miraculously cured" and went off to join Greenpeace. The very fact that his "illness" spontaniously disappeared was indicative that his character was never sick. He suffered from the same psychosis all the copy cat illnesses do.

    1. Re:Your TV Knows all by K-Man · · Score: 1

      That show came to mind when I read this story, and I remember noting that the character could sense an oil drum 1000 miles away, but he had no problem getting into an airplane filled with "toxic" foam, plastic, gas, oil, and paints, and flying all over trying to "escape" the toxicity.

      The funny thing was that later I was at a public meeting where some "chemically sensitive" person got to speak first (because she was disabled, of course), and her main topic was how she should be able to park her car anywhere she chooses. I guess those little pine tree air fresheners that people hang from their rear-view mirrors really work, because she got right back into her toxin-mobile after the meeting, with no ill effects. Irony is apparently not toxic.

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
  82. Mmmm ... Cthulicious .... by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

    (n/m)

  83. Perhaps a concrete home... by Roland+of+Gilead · · Score: 1

    ...poured into stay-in-place styrofoam forms (insulation), would be the answer. With an airtight vapor barrier and careful selection of interior finishing components this fella would be in business. Needless to say that an air exchanger would be required in said airtight house. Air exchangers are excellent for any home for that matter, stagnant air is not healthy. The only other alternative that I can think of is a steel building. (that is if you discount having the poor chap live in a big plastic (non-allergic) bubble. /. rules!!

  84. Re:Eric Hunting is a pussy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, actually. This Environmental Illness sounds like another illness of psychological origin. I know a bunch of you are going to react to me saying this, but you need to dig deeper to see that there are so many things that are caused by the relationship between mind and body. Allergies are just one small example.

    In any case, this guy really shouldn't reproduce.

  85. Re:ADD and ADHD (was it's psychosomatic...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just sedate them, but sedate them with a dangerous narcotic.

    Of course, ritalin is perfectly safe when doled out by public skool administrators.

  86. Why pound on this guy? by dlakelan · · Score: 1

    The average reaction is either "yeah this guy is right, we're all being poisoned" or "this guy is a nut, it's all in his head". Extremism is common in the world.

    I think from reading through his web site, it's clear that:

    1) This guy has spent a significant amount of time looking at interesting architectural experiments, and has done a lot to write these up in an accessible way to those who believe that there is something better possible than 2x4 stick built houses with gypsum board and vinyl flooring. Just look at his "simplicity and pavilion architecture" site.

    2) Stress kills. No joke. Even if his primary problem is psychological, he suffers real physical problems from the stress caused by the psychological problems. Try living under continual stress conditions for a while (ie. barely able to pay your creditors, or on the run from the law, or being held as a POW or something), you'll see what I mean.

    3) There really are toxic environmental issues that we should be aware of. For example, for the longest time Atrazine was a popular approved weedkiller. People thought DDT was a good idea at one point. People even though smoking was harmless at one point.

    Pressure treated lumber IS dangerous, primarily for those who cut it, but leaching levels in the soil are measureable. That's why it's being phased out. Formaldehyde offgassing levels CAN be measured. No it's simply NOT true that standard forced air heaters exchange the air several times an hour, that would be WAY too expensive.

    Take a look at the contents of a water resistant drywall spackling compound container some day. We had our bathroom done recently and I still can't be in that room for very long. I just hope when the swanstone goes up over it, it seals in the damn chemicals.

    Often people claim that things are completely safe, but these claims are based on expected usage. All you have to do is put a piece of software in the hands of one of your users to know how easily people can do the unexpected...

    Toxicology is about studying the levels of toxins that produce statistically unmeasureable effects. But LOTS of things confound statistics to make measuring effects difficult.

    Oh and by the way there are major differences between the toxicity of volatile organic compounds and the toxicity of minerals like arsenic embedded in adobe. For one, you can't avoid VOC's by simply not licking your walls.

    Does this guy have a real problem? Sure. What is it, biochemical or psychological? Are you all philosophical dualists or can we agree that psychological problems can have biochemical origins?

    Anyway, I just want to thank this guy for putting together an interesting web site...to hell with the rest of you who feel they have to debunk his illness.

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    1. Re:Why pound on this guy? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Strange that human life expectancy has been going UP for the past century with all these poisons in our habitats. There are toxins, poisons, killer bacteria, killer viruses, radiation in nature also.....this guy's problems are 99% mental, and if he lived 300 years ago in Europe or America, he'd likely be dead already.

    2. Re:Why pound on this guy? by dlakelan · · Score: 1

      So you should pound on him? So he'd be better off dead? what?

      Anyway, I like his site, and he reminds me of Ignatius J. Reilly from John Kennedy Toole's Confederacy of Dunces...

      He's a sort of tragicomical architecture buff, so what?

      Why should we scorn him? I've never been religious, but I'm beginning to think a few "turn the other cheek"s and "love thy neighbor"s would help out around this place...

      Argue all you want about the economics and politics of welfare, but don't pound this poor guy.

      As for life expectancy vs toxins in the environment. Sure, we're not dying of malaria, or malnutrition, or dysentary, or what would be today's "minor" bacterial infections. Does that mean we shouldn't be looking for quality housing that produces less VOC and doesn't contain lead or cadmium or arsenic or asbestos? Come on.

      Of course this guy is not normal. of course he has mental problems (if even only from relative isolation). So what? I hate to think that slashdot is full of basically mean people who want to pound on relatively helpless guys.

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    3. Re:Why pound on this guy? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      300 years ago in europe or america or anywhere, people weren't getting pumped full of antibiotics at an early age.

      Do you have any idea what that can do to an immune system?

      try staying indoors for 20 years or so, then go sunbathing.

    4. Re:Why pound on this guy? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      300 years ago in europe or america or anywhere, people weren't getting pumped full of antibiotics at an early age. Do you have any idea what this can do to an immune system?

      er, make someone live to be 70 or 80 on average?

      try staying indoors for 20 years or so, then go sunbathing. I mostly have done that...I spend most of my life indoors with all these nasty chemicals, and I drink diet soft drinks by the gallon....no cancer or diseases so far, but stay tuned....

    5. Re:Why pound on this guy? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      He's only helpless because he thinks he is. He'd be better off changing his perspective and truly living. And these "mean" things I pointed out are part of that.

    6. Re:Why pound on this guy? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      wrong. it decreases the effectiveness of your immune system, while increasing your dependance on anti-biotics to keep you healthy. Anti-biotics are helpful, but proscribing cipro every time you get the sniffles leads to some pretty nasty stuff.

      People who have to use hand sanitizers in their every day work see this first hand. They have a little biology lab going on on their hands, where the weaker bacteria are killed off, and stronger and stronger ones evolve until nasty hand infections become more prevalent.

      >>I mostly have done that...I spend most of my life indoors with all these nasty chemicals, and I drink diet soft drinks by the gallon....no cancer or diseases so far, but stay tuned....

      you missed the point, which was, you'd be burned by the sun much easier if you haven't been exposed to it for the first 20 years of your life. Maybe i should have chosen a more simplistic example. ...hmm...that was the simplest one i can think of.

    7. Re:Why pound on this guy? by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My wife is from Cambodia. I've seen first hand what NOT using antibiotics and NOT using chemicals to preserve their food and NOT using hand sanitizers can do (beggars with limbs rotting from their bodies in markets, children with parasites visible under their skin, etc.).....I say *our* way of doing things is in EVERY way superior to the alternative of people who live "naturally". Take a trip to a third world shithole sometime and have a look. I agree there are bad effects from using antibiotics, preservatives, "chemicals", and overmedication....but perversly to not use them is even worse.

    8. Re:Why pound on this guy? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      ok..ill try to make my point one last time...

      no antibiotics = suck

      too much antibiotics = suck

      use of antibiotics, just like use of anything that our so-called civilisation, used in moderation, is beneficial.

      use of these technological advances blindly, and without thought of the concequences, leads to ruin on the personal level.

  87. Re:ADD, ADHD, Fibro-Myalgia, ... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

    they're all bullshit too!

    Fibro-Myalgia most certainly is not bullshit.

    As for ADD/ADHD.. I really hope you are blessed with a kid who has this "bullshit" affliction. And I really hope you try to beat it out of him like my teachers did.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  88. Atopia is also 'kind of' environmental illness... by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1

    It might be so that there is a psychological element as well. Though I can only speak for myself since my experiences differ only in the way that I am an atopic and suffer from different sorts of rash and skin diseases cronically. And in my perspective it is *all* due "environmental" reasons. Every time the humidity lowers or rises, temperature fuxuates or then just the air pressure changes radically my skin starts to react.

    The only solution in my case would be to move to the mediterranean or the tropic...

    The "Shelter" got all my sympathies, I wonder, are there others who feel the same way? Any fellow atopics among the geeks here? :)

    - Voice of Ambience -

    --
    - Voice of Ambience -
  89. Sick? by Paddyish · · Score: 1
    ...Quite possibly.

    Read the life story. His immune system was crippled by overuse of prescribed antibiotics during childhood, a key development time for any human. This still happens to people today, sadly.

    Without a good immune system, you're susceptible to all sorts of strange problems, especially at point-of-contact with the world: sinus, ears, throat, lungs. Chemicals in the air can weaken a struggling system further, making it easy to be overrun with even the most primitive bacteria, which most of us resist easily.

    Those quick to say 'Its in his head' likely take their fully-functional immune systems for granted.

  90. I'm not saying that CFS doesn't exist. by SolemnDragon · · Score: 1
    In fact, it's being separated into some interesting subcategories even now, and there's an interesting opinion essay on it here. with more interesting stuff here and HERE is some dept of Health (US) stuff on it.

  91. Vote with your dollars for less chem in bldg mats by halfread · · Score: 1

    There is a small market for environmentally safer building materials out there, but for most of us they are really hard to find and very expensive (due to transport costs, if nothing else) when we do find them.

    Suggestion: Work to make this market bigger. Maybe you can't afford it either, but at least tell joe at the lumberyard that you are interested in that kind of thing.

    One source for info: http://www.oikos.com

  92. Aspartame by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1

    Actually... care to check whether your dad's hands are shaking while trying to hold 'em still?

    I've noticed those who quaff the stuff by abt. liter per day have the most shaky hands I've ever seen..

    And no, none of them smoke tobacco.
    And yes, I know it isn't known to be harmful nor harmless, whether it is or not is not the issue, it has no nutritional value and has very poor taste, doesn't taste sweet but bitter. If I don't know what it is then I am not going to risk my health using it, you shouldn't either. It just isn't proven to be anything yet.

    There is actually something I heard about it though that should be considered though. Usually when eating food rich with sugar your body starts to develope insulin to burn the glucoses from your blood and transform them in to more useful forms of energy for your body to use up. Now if you fool your system by giving it aspartame instead it again starts to develope insulin to break up the sugar. But what happens when there is no sugar to burn? As we know aspartame doesn't contain glucose.. what silly things might happen in our bodies then? This is one of the reasons I prefer to use real sugar and not something I am not sure of.

    - Voice of Ambience -

    --
    - Voice of Ambience -
  93. Marble and Granite by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    Expensive (in the US), but it doesn't get any more non-toxic than that....

  94. Re:ADD, ADHD, Fibro-Myalgia, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up you fucking faggot hypochondriac.

  95. it must be psychosomatic... by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1

    I wonder why someone has to drink that much soft drinks per day... heard of milk? ..water?

    - Voice of Ambience -

    --
    - Voice of Ambience -
    1. Re:it must be psychosomatic... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, part of it has to do with the natural "taste" of the local water. So I drink diet sodas, and use an aspartame flavored drink mix to disguise the "taste" of the water.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    2. Re:it must be psychosomatic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because I LIKE IT, maybe?

  96. Interesting movie - Safe by snotlet · · Score: 1

    Dunno if anybody else posted a link to this, but it's a pretty darn good flick that might improve your understanding of the situation: Safe

  97. this is just a bunch of tree-hugging BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    this is just a bunch of tree-hugging BS

  98. Mud Hut, err adobe by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Just move out into Bumfuck Nowhere (tm) in the desert, grow your own grass (it doesn't take too much water to grow straw), and use the grass and mud to make an adobe house. For roofing, fell a few trees thyself (perhaps out of area and import them), make planks, and use a thach/plank roof.

    So what if it leaks in the rain? It's nice, 100% natural building material. If your psychosomatic illness demands it, it's possible to do.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  99. Re:Bullshit to your bullshit by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Hate to tell you this but your immune system can be destroyed by continual exposure to varying types of chemicals. You then become violently ill based on exposure to significantly less chemicals. It's quite bad if you know someone that has had a problem with this type of illness.

    I guess people who think everything is "bullshit" are lacking the empathy until it happens to them or someone they care about.

    Sounds like a Republican to me.
    Here's how:
    1)republican == christian right
    2)christian religion preaches help everyone, turn the other cheek, ... == reality is they bomb (preemptive strikes) anyone they please, they are trying to become the next empire (guess they dont read history books) and they sure as shit help no one (medical, social programs, etc ...)
    3)republican party == hypocrites

    Keep lying to yourselves, maybe someday you'll believe the "bullshit" you put out.

  100. Oh for crying out loud by joejgarcia · · Score: 1

    Seriously...I grew up in NJ...I was sick all the f'ing time...I was picked on all the f'ing time...I was WAY smaller than everybody my age and WAY smarter. Here is the deal, I had mono-nucleosus twice and that is supposed to be impossible...I was sick all the freaking time going in and out of hospitals and at one point they thought I had a wierd form of AIDS that they couldn't detect yet. I wound up being one of the first diagnosed cases of Epstien Barr syndrome and well there is not one damn thing you can do about it. So what did I do...I stopped feeling sorry for myself got off my ass and started making things happen for myself...I started to demand that people pay attention to me instead of being a passive doormat and I started to just force myself to do things no matter how bad or sick I felt...and you know what....I am a normal human being now with a normal life...I am 6'2 and I am very athletic...and I am not athletically gifted at all but I keep trying at something till I get it no matter how stupid I look in the process...Get a freaking spine...Seriously...Get off your ass and start f'ing doing something no matter how bad you feel. or how small it is. Self-loathing and self-pity are disease unto themselves...don't tell me I don't know because I haven't been in your shoes, I was you and probably much worse. I was out of school with mono for 6 months once when I was in 5th grade and then again when I was in 8th. This guy is just running a scam and needs a kick in his ass!

  101. Where is his resume? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    You'd think a guy who wrote, "With little disposable income and a Damaclese Sword of imminent homelessness perched perpetually over my head..." would be trying to get a job. Instead of a long page of things he wants people to donate he should have a long page of why someone should hire him to work from home.

    Maybe it would be good for him to end up homeless. When he realizes his "illness" doesn't kill him, he could make some money appearing in "Bumfights".

  102. Re:Erm...mold by x01mOiRe10x · · Score: 1

    actually, mold has become a pretty big deal. Mold doesn't hurt you, but the spores can cause illness in humans, even a few documented deaths. The lawyers are already sharpening their pencils over this...

    "However, all molds produce spores when they reproduce, and some of those spores produce mycotoxins, or poison."

    --
    "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Benjamin Franklin
  103. Re:Bullshit to your bullshit by iceperson · · Score: 1

    "reality is they bomb (preemptive strikes) anyone they please"

    I didn't know that Clinton was a Republican. That brings me back to the all important question... does CAT really spell DOG?

  104. Re:Erm...Glass by x01mOiRe10x · · Score: 1

    "Glass would seem to be relatively inert, but who knows."

    There you go! how about an all glass house. I know i've seen one in an architecture magazine. it was pretty cool, and not necessarily transparent, either. The walls were made like a foot thick, with 1" thick panes of glass stacked against each other. Hypoalergenic, and kindof cool looking. I can't find a link right now but there's some cool pictures out there somewhere, i think it was Architectural Record. (no i don't mean the Farnsworth house, or that one from the movie. Of course the furnishings would have to be all glass too. I'm sure they could be cast into nice non-sharp, form fitting shapes...

    the only unplesentness would be the view of the glass pipes from the upstairs bathroom running through the glass interior wall, especially when in use... :-)

    --
    "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Benjamin Franklin
  105. Re:FUD by Urox · · Score: 1

    I used to be one of those people who would drink diet sodas in great amounts (I drink a lot. I drink at least 3 ltrs of fluids per day.. now imagine if 3/4 was diet soda). Then I started to get migraines which pretty much left me immobile while under the effects (I breathe: it hurts). Through trial and error, I realized I'd developed a sensitivity to aspartame and now can't even chew a stick of gum without getting a migraine.

    It's always fun to find out what foods contain aspartame by whether I get a migraine after eating them .

    Before, my dad would tell me about the holes in rat brains that were fed aspartame. I even read studies done by the University of Washington about spacial awareness before and after aspartame intake (which showed that rats could not find a platform and drowned in a water tank after injesting the aspartame). I figured that I was lucky in that I didn't have any symptoms...

    I am aware of at least two other people who are aspartame sensitive (even more so than I am). It is doing things to people and there *were* very shady things going on to get it past the FDA.

    --
    "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  106. A council in England by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    was caught out making house bricks out of toxic waste recently. When old industrial estates get bulldozed, where do you think the rubble ends up?

    1. Re:A council in England by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the plan to put radioactive material into the scrap metal supply chain! Brilliant idea!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  107. What about botulism? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    Botulinus toxin is one of the most potent ones known, producing paralysis then death - (checks notes) 1 mg can kill 150 people. Most natural sources of poison (such as a snake bite) are just dilute, because not all that much is needed. A snake just needs to be able to kill a rat quickly, it doesn't need to be able to wipe out a town.

    Many natural toxins are just as nasty as artificial ones - however, if they were a major source of death/evolutionary failure, we'd have greater resistance to them (like the mongoose). Of course, this "environmental illness" thing is quite different from a very real acute reaction like that, say, produced by an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor ("nerve gas"), which will either kill you, leave you hospitalized for a few months until your body can produce new AChE to replace that irreversibly bound to the toxin, or not reach sufficient levels in your blood to produce an effect.

    1. Re:What about botulism? by Taldo · · Score: 1
      Yes, botox is extremely toxic.....

      How many people have built up a resistance to VX?

      As I said.... in many cases your body can learn to cope with them.

  108. Re:Bullshit to your bullshit by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

    Did you glance at my sig before calling me a right wing christian?

    I regard myself as intensely compassionate; I am a secular humanist and a libertarian socialist. If someone is delusional, they need help. Encouraging their delusion, especially if you profit from it, is not a compassionate act. Those doctors who maintain that MCS exists, and I can see this clearly because I have seen the primary data involved, are profiteering off of the mental illness of unfortunate individuals like the man who posted the original article.

    When I see someone, even an unfortunate delusional person, promulgating their delusions on a public forum such as this, I think of the damage this can cause, on two fronts, and I become upset, which is entirely fitting.

    The human cost is clear. This man's insanity is ruining his life for no good reason. This sort of posting encourages other sufferers to barricade themselves inside their houses instead of seeking psychiatric help.

    The cost to the legitimate causes of environmental activism is indirect. Your immune system can be damaged by exposure to a number of environmental chemicals - most of these are chlorinated organics (PCBs being a prime example.) There is actual, indeed, extensive scientific evidence for this. However, unlike PCB poisoning, MCS is not scientifically validated. The more "mindshare" is given over to delusional diseases like MCS, the more ammunition is given over to those who are trying to subvert science to ignore actually existant threats like PCBs.

    I realise that I may come across as a sophist, since many arguments similar in overall structure are proferred to justify horrendous acts of inhuman behavior, in an effort to conceal selfish motives. I point to the fact that I am a computational biologist who studies evolution and protein topology; I have no material interest in believing as I do. In fact, I could probably make good money developing "treatments" for MCS, as do those doctors who believe it is a disease with a physical basis.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  109. Interesting search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it is an interesting problem to search for MCS housing, and I wish him the best. However, did anyone take a moment to read through the lengthy autobiogrpahy section? He may be a really great guy, but excerpts from his diatribe make him sound like a psychopath.

  110. Amish Houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Amish do not use building codes; they use common sense and that is the most healthy living condition.

    Wood, nails, non-electric hand-tolls, and ol' fassion'd sweat and toil: environmentally safe living.

    We Amish people do not accept the English world's building codes. We are sovereign, in these respects, and consider all accomplishments achieved in less time always to have a negative effect in some way. Nothing, not chemical additives or other dangerious ingredients, will improve life like a Amish-style house.

    Meat, Potatoes, Milk, Pie, Eggs, Bacon, Oats, and Water; every day is the Amish way.

    But who am I to know...I can't be Amish, on slashdot, ...or wait... :)

  111. Re:untreated seriousness by Urox · · Score: 1

    There are diseases out there that become more severe the longer they are left untreated. Hyperthyroidism is one (where your thyroid puts out metabolism hormones despite the feedback system that is telling your system to stop). My doctor explained what it does to your metabolism to be like cruise control on a gas pedal that once it's turned on, it slowly increases the speed until you're at risk of heart attack due to your metabolism. It takes longer time and more drugs to bring it back down to normal levels the longer it is left untreated.

    Malignant cancer is another.

    --
    "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  112. Nutrasweet kills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was reading a magazine about pest control, and the magazine's author (unknown) provided information that astounded me: mix a small ammount of nutrasweet with sugar, spread on window sills or entrance ways which ants invade a building, and the ants die from consuming nutrasweet-contaminated sugar.

    To the geeky slashdotter, it is found that the process which kills that ants is the nutrasweet residue is spread onto the sugar, the ants eat the sugar granules that have the nutrasweet residue, and durring ingestion the nutrasweet releases a foul, incidious, and most evil gas that causes the ant's stomach an intestines to *BURST* and thus the ant's thorax and abdomen simply rip appart to release the expanding gasses caused by Nutrasweet(TM).

    The big question is:

    WHAT IS NUTRASWEET(TM) DOING TO YOUR HEALTH WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS NUTRASWEET(TM) DISAGREES WITH OTHER VARIOUS *LIVING* ORGANIZMS?

  113. Disability - Give me a break by Culture · · Score: 1

    Pretty normal based on my observation of relatives. They are too disabled to do anything except what they want to do. Then, they have no trouble at all doing it.

    --
    ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  114. But adobe is made out of DEAD PEOPLE! by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1
    So his clean, natural adobe house is made from clay right. And what's clay but dead decaying organisms. Dead people, squirrels, pets, insects, and millions more carbon life forms. Just after 9-11 people were coming down with all kinds of symptoms coinciding with the massive loss of life in a concentrated area. You can't claim it's not toxic to humans.

    Green shelter is made out of people, PEOPLE!

  115. Conpiracy! by BFaucet · · Score: 1

    Though it may have been drafted by a nut case (I admittedly don't really know much about Ramsey) this does not mean Bush isn't guilty of the acts listed. I am an American and love my country. From what I can see, Bush and his administration are destroying everything this country stands for.

    Zak: No, it's mostly about what went on (and is still going on) with Afghanistan. My largest concern is over my rights which I feel are under attack.

    Honestly, I don't think Bush will be impeached, however I do feel this would be a fairly strong message to congress that many people are not happy with Bush. The reason I put this in my sig is because of the many people who sit in these forums and bitch about "Bush this and Bush that," but they don't write their reps or try to communicate to anyone with any political power.

    --
    -Derick
  116. Write-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, KE=1/2*M*V^2.

    1. Re:Write-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my bad.
      -dfenstrate

  117. Why is there no discussion of diet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I eat a lot of refined sugar I notice that I feel worse in the morning.
    When I drink a lot of alcohol I notice that I feel worse in the morning.
    When I drink caffeine I notice that I get a headache if I don't drink it the next day.
    When I don't drink enough water I get a headache.
    If I eat a vitamin on an empty stomach I get nauseous.
    When I eat too much salt I feel swollen and uncomfortable.

    And so on...

    This guy could be sitting around drinking coca-cola every other day wondering why he feels like crap. Perhaps he should start just by eating better and see what that gets him first.

    The solution to a TON of health problems are really fucking simple, but people continue to abuse their bodies and wonder why they feel like crap, pumping more crap into their body to compensate for the crap they ate an hour ago and blaming everything other than their own behaviour.

  118. Darwinism at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weak people like this just suck the resources out of society. He lives off of our taxes and plays victim.

    If all of these "sensitive to everything" people just die off without reproducing, the world will be stronger. This is just plain Darwinism at work. Coddling him weakens the human race.

  119. one word... by _EternaL_ · · Score: 1

    "darwanism" - without all the political or ethical bullshit.

    "let he who is without sin cast the first stone." but since I usually shit bricks at people, Darwinism is what allows me to survive being hit in the head when people throw shit back at me.

    Adapt or Fail. That is all.

    --
    -=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-
    following my instincts not a trend...
  120. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    One of the things that hamper Linux's climb to world domination is the
    shortage of bad Computer Role Playing Games, or CRaPGs. No operating system
    can be considered respectable without one.
    -- Brian O'Donnell, odonnllb@tcd.ie

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...