I'm not fully versed on how this works, but I believe in most cases with Apple and Android the app itself does not use your credit card or collect the info, but rather you give it permission to bill the credit card you have attached to the store (iTunes or Google Play). Sometimes it's permission for a one time charge, sometimes for a recurring one. So if you gave an app permission to charge, depending on what permissions you gave it, it could easily charge your card for another app, or possibly even pass those permissions on to another app (not sure about that one though).
In general I do not have a credit card attached to either my iTunes store or my Google Play Store and just don't get apps that cost money. If on the rare times I do want a paid app, I will attach a specific low limit card I have for online purchases, make my purchase, then remove the card from the system after the expected charge has gone through. In the past I had left my card attached to the Google Play store, but on at least a couple occasions, had fraudulent charges come through the attached card.
Thank you, you are correct. I read through too quickly and my entire comment is actually wrong. So everyone, please ignore the random noise I have generated.
I think that the FCC is arguing that the court does not have any authority to impose net neutrality rules, not that the FCC doesn't have it. The FCC basically removed the net neutrality rules and California returned them. The case before the court is whether California can or can't do that. The FCC has said that the court doesn't have the authority to make that decision.
Yeah, I tried a few, but even then some of them had a hard time. Slowing a modern i7 processor to the speed of an 8MHz 286 is in the tiniest fraction of 1 percent of the host processors speed.
There is an old game I loved called Ancient Art of War at Sea. Played it on an old 286 with a CGA graphics card. I found it once on an abandoned-ware site. Thought awesome, I can play it again. Yeah, about that, it loaded and ran, but as soon as I clicked start it was over and I lost. The game used the CPU cycle timer and not the actual clock timer for turns. Computers are a bit faster now. So I can't play that game anymore (yes I know there is slowing software). Computers improve and change quite fast compared to other industries. I KNOW that what I buy now may not work in a year, or may not work well, on new systems. If I buy something with an online DRM system I also know that if that system stops, so does my software. It's why I avoid buying that type of software if possible (it's becoming harder though with things moving to software as a service). While I think it would be great if Steam could have a way of releasing those games to continue playing without upgrading the OS, or even provide some time of emulator sand box, anyone who wasn't aware that there lifespan was limited when they bought them, especially with the verification systems being used, was living in a fantasy world. If you wanted to keep that old computer and run that game forever you better have made sure when you bought it that it could stand alone.
Just my two cents.
Being caught or not does not effect the definition of legality, however, it certainly does have a strong correlation to the legal consequences that may arise.
There is an argument that the Supremacy Clause only applies to specific Constitutionally mandated powers, and that anything else, is left to the states. The Supremacy Clause says - "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof...." One could interupt that to say the clause only applies to laws in pursuance of the Constitution and therefore leaves the 10th Ammendment ("The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.") in play for anything else, even in the case of a conflict. However, I wouldn't be suprised if the Supreme Court has at one time or another already weighed in on such a reading of the law and the effects of the 10th Ammendment on it. I didn't research it that far.
Our government is ran by the people, yet we seem to be getting lost somewhere. I personally believe some forms of copyright are necessary, but if the majority of the people believe we should have none, then we should have none. At worst we should find a compromise that fits the will of most of the people. But it seems that the more the people feel copyrights are too restrictive, the more the laws become more draconian. I don't want to start an discussion of what is or isn't the best level of copyright protection, but I would like to say that if you disagree with a law, it's your job to let your representatives know it's bad and to try to get as many people that agree with you to tell them also. If you aren't proactive with your government you really aren't doing everything you can to let your side of the argument be heard and considered. If you aren't happy with a law, don't fall into the rut of thinking there is nothing you can do, but begin letting everyone know why it needs to be changed. You should be able to decide, rather then just be stuck to follow, on what course you want your legislature to steer the nation.
As a telecommuter that lives in Oregon and works for a company in California full time I telecommute from my home office. Taking aside the needed disciplines of staying focused, you need some office protocol disciplines too. For one, we do weekly department head meetings and weekly staff meetings with a video conference set up or at minimum audio conference, and we all talk about what we are working on and what our goals are. This helps everyone know what everyone else is doing. I also send at least one week each email to all the people I've been doing projects that effect them, or need to stay on top and just ask if I've been able to make things work as they expect and if there are any other items they need or would like. This keeps them in contact with me. I also do a weekly meeting with my director and we discuss projects and goals. And finally I try to take at least 6 trips a year to the actual office staying through a week on each of those trips. I usually do more like 9 to 10 trips and sometimes stay a week and a half. I actually hate that part, living out of a hotel room sucks, but it's a small price to pay for having no commute time and being able to work in my pajamas. And you have to sometimes keep pushing for all those meetings and trips as the office will tend to let them slip otherwise.:)
While we should strive to make our batteries safe, the reality is that it is impossible to stop all defects or problems. As we develop more and more powerful batteries, more energy packed into a smaller space, the damage done from a sudden release of all that energy will become worse. The best thing we can do, and to my knowledge I'm not sure we have the material knowledge to do this yet, is to create a material that even in it's natural default state will only release it's stored energy at a slow rate. As long as the materials that store the energy in a battery have the ability of a catastropic fast release of that energy this problem will become a more and more a dangerous situation as we increase the available energy in batteries.
OK, ban the CFC propelled inhalers, fine. But why do the alternatives only have to be prescription? What is in them that makes it that you still can't create cheaper over the counter versions? If it's a patent issue then I'd think the government would have the intelligence to release such a patent for the good of the people. But that's not going to happen since getting a seat in the government means taking money from corporations, one wouldn't want to upset your path into office. But then us sheeple just vote for the candidate that spends the most on advertising. How many people actually research candidates (not the rheteroic they produce, but the history of votes and actions they have done). Sorry, I'm getting off topic, my on topic comment really is just that the real issue isn't the ban itself, but the lack of inexpensive over the counter alternatives. Are there really just no other options then a CFC propellent for an over the counter inhaled propellent? Use nitrous oxide, let them enjoy the asthma medicine at the same time.....
"scrap and start over" should be a last resort, but I know from experience there are times it benefits. In the best world all development would be forward thinking and designed and written modular enough to handle future changes and growth without causing muddled and or patched code. However, in practice this is not always the case and forward thinking can't handle all the possibilities that might come along. Sometimes things become so tangled that a rewrite is the best option out. Not so much because you think you can do it better then the previous developers, but because you have a better definition of the evolved project that is now in use and can design the pieces to interact better now. If an application is static, it probably would never need a start over, but if it's dynamic and evolved over years a scrap and start over approach can sometimes save great amounts of time in the future. I will say though that I have found that most times the culprit of muddled and patched code is rushed development in trying to just get a result to the public as quickly as possible. This however has been an unfortunate side effect of doing business long before the computer age, if your competition beats you to the opening you'd better have something far better to even be noticed.
I think it's interesting the arguments about whether being too clean makes one unhealthy or not. I realize the article really didn't answer that, but I think in general history tells us the answer pretty clearly. For most of human history we lived in our own filth, didn't bath and had many other unclean things about us. And we've learned that being cleaner has doubled or tripled our lifespans. And cleanliness especially plays a role when someone is not healthy for some reason or another. While I am not certain of this fact at the moment, and would love to research it if given the time, but I believe that during the medival period in Europe people in the cities had a shorter lifespan then people in the country. It wasn't that country folk bathed more often or did much difference in living, but the real difference was that they weren't constantly being contaiminanted by other peoples "dirt". So I think a kid digging in the dirt doesn't really need to rush in and clean off the bacteria. But I think a kid in the mall run his hand along all the places other kids run thier hands, playing in the playgrounds where other kids have played, and don't get me started on those plastic ball pits and what's in them... there, perhaps a dose of cleanliness afterwards is useful. I think overuse of antibiotic cleaners would indeed have several potential problems, but if used in context and looking at where true risk really is, I think they are useful.
Hasn't been to the Supreme Court yet - but - "According to the latest ruling out of the Ninth Circuit Court, it’s perfectly legal for federal agents to secretly plant a GPS locator on your car in the middle of the night, even if it’s parked in your driveway, and then use said locator to track your movements as they see fit. Even without a warrant."
I'm 45, well 46 in a month, and I've been programming since I was 17. I've worked in easily a couple dozen different languages from the lowly assembly code to the higher end object code. Sometimes I actually miss the control you had of the computer when everything was assembly, but on the other hand, the new languages really take a lot of the tedium out of the process and allow you to get to the important parts of your code. In any event, as I am moving on to iPhone development now and continue to learn new platforms, I certainly have not burned out and don't see myself doing so anytime soon. And I can say for a fact, all the mistakes I've made in the past have certainly made me a far better programmer even when working with a newer language. In the end, a computer is still a computer is still a computer and they basically do the same things now that they did then. Just far faster and with many more options. In my opinion the solution to not burning out,is to never let an employer use you as a commodity that they just use up and burn out. I've held my ground on never working constant overtime and making sure my employers know I have a life outside of work and I'm not their slave to be called in at their whim. And no, I've never been let go for holding my ground in this manner, while being flexible enough to come through for the company on a tight deadline. Just don't allow one tight deadline to follow another to follow another, etc, etc.
I've hired a couple programmers in the past and there is always one question I ask that I have found sorts out some of the better candidates. The question - "I've just requested you to do some task and you find you really haven't worked out that type of task in the past and aren't fully sure the best approach. What do you do?" The answer I'm looking for is basically they'll let me know that's a new area for them, but that they'll go out and find examples of that type of task and research it and find out how to make it happen. If they say anything along the lines of having me help them, or ask to go to a class, or anything along that line it will automatically set up red flags. And of course, just answering the question "correctly" doesn't automatically mean they are good at doing that, but you can dig deeper into how they'd research it, etc.
I've been a programmer for over 25 years now and while there are certain core things that a computer can do and some it can't, the actual processing of it is what matters and it's nearly impossible for you to remember every little detail of every language and system, the real power is in knowing where to look to quickly get your answer. And as a final important talent, a person needs to be good at understanding and conversing specifications from someone that is not technical.
Just my thoughts on what I've looked for....
It's 56 degrees at 8:40 this morning and this is the 4th story I've read after I got up around 7am and have had 2 cups of coffee. Damned numbers are everywhere....
I have to wonder, if England of the 1770s had the type of security we do now, would the Revolution have succeeded or would we still be under English rule? It's just something to ponder I think, where is the best balance of being secure, yet not having to fear the ones providing the security. I don't personally think we are there yet, but where is that line?
I for one prefer my Kindle (ver 1 for that matter) over an LCD screen any day, but not for the eyestrain reason. I can read my kindle by the firelight of my fireplace, or a candle, and not have any issues with eye strain at all. While I can read my LCD in a completely dark room, or by any indoor light, it does eventually give me eyestrain, but it's really not very much. For me the big difference is in power. I can read my kindle for two weeks and not have to plug it in. Even my best LCD laptop only goes about 5 hours. On a 10 hour plane flight I'd either have to bring extra batteries, or only read for half the flight. And on camping trips, forget it, but with the Kindle I can be on a week long camping trip and still know I'll have something to read.
In the end, I think each has it's place, just as people debate which is better, a PC or Mac, each has strengths and each has weaknesses. The Kindle, Nook. iPad issues will be the same, and in the end, it comes down to what do you want out of it, and what are the most important features to you. That will be all the difference in making one better then the other.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not fully versed on how this works, but I believe in most cases with Apple and Android the app itself does not use your credit card or collect the info, but rather you give it permission to bill the credit card you have attached to the store (iTunes or Google Play). Sometimes it's permission for a one time charge, sometimes for a recurring one. So if you gave an app permission to charge, depending on what permissions you gave it, it could easily charge your card for another app, or possibly even pass those permissions on to another app (not sure about that one though). In general I do not have a credit card attached to either my iTunes store or my Google Play Store and just don't get apps that cost money. If on the rare times I do want a paid app, I will attach a specific low limit card I have for online purchases, make my purchase, then remove the card from the system after the expected charge has gone through. In the past I had left my card attached to the Google Play store, but on at least a couple occasions, had fraudulent charges come through the attached card.
Thank you, you are correct. I read through too quickly and my entire comment is actually wrong. So everyone, please ignore the random noise I have generated.
I think that the FCC is arguing that the court does not have any authority to impose net neutrality rules, not that the FCC doesn't have it. The FCC basically removed the net neutrality rules and California returned them. The case before the court is whether California can or can't do that. The FCC has said that the court doesn't have the authority to make that decision.
Yeah, I tried a few, but even then some of them had a hard time. Slowing a modern i7 processor to the speed of an 8MHz 286 is in the tiniest fraction of 1 percent of the host processors speed.
There is an old game I loved called Ancient Art of War at Sea. Played it on an old 286 with a CGA graphics card. I found it once on an abandoned-ware site. Thought awesome, I can play it again. Yeah, about that, it loaded and ran, but as soon as I clicked start it was over and I lost. The game used the CPU cycle timer and not the actual clock timer for turns. Computers are a bit faster now. So I can't play that game anymore (yes I know there is slowing software). Computers improve and change quite fast compared to other industries. I KNOW that what I buy now may not work in a year, or may not work well, on new systems. If I buy something with an online DRM system I also know that if that system stops, so does my software. It's why I avoid buying that type of software if possible (it's becoming harder though with things moving to software as a service). While I think it would be great if Steam could have a way of releasing those games to continue playing without upgrading the OS, or even provide some time of emulator sand box, anyone who wasn't aware that there lifespan was limited when they bought them, especially with the verification systems being used, was living in a fantasy world. If you wanted to keep that old computer and run that game forever you better have made sure when you bought it that it could stand alone. Just my two cents.
I believe the quote you are looking for is this one: "Old age and treachery will always beat youth and exuberance." -- David Mamet
Being caught or not does not effect the definition of legality, however, it certainly does have a strong correlation to the legal consequences that may arise.
I also need to learn how to spell interprete.
There is an argument that the Supremacy Clause only applies to specific Constitutionally mandated powers, and that anything else, is left to the states. The Supremacy Clause says - "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof. ..." One could interupt that to say the clause only applies to laws in pursuance of the Constitution and therefore leaves the 10th Ammendment ("The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.") in play for anything else, even in the case of a conflict. However, I wouldn't be suprised if the Supreme Court has at one time or another already weighed in on such a reading of the law and the effects of the 10th Ammendment on it. I didn't research it that far.
Our government is ran by the people, yet we seem to be getting lost somewhere. I personally believe some forms of copyright are necessary, but if the majority of the people believe we should have none, then we should have none. At worst we should find a compromise that fits the will of most of the people. But it seems that the more the people feel copyrights are too restrictive, the more the laws become more draconian. I don't want to start an discussion of what is or isn't the best level of copyright protection, but I would like to say that if you disagree with a law, it's your job to let your representatives know it's bad and to try to get as many people that agree with you to tell them also. If you aren't proactive with your government you really aren't doing everything you can to let your side of the argument be heard and considered. If you aren't happy with a law, don't fall into the rut of thinking there is nothing you can do, but begin letting everyone know why it needs to be changed. You should be able to decide, rather then just be stuck to follow, on what course you want your legislature to steer the nation.
I'd rather have this bottle in front of me then a frontal lobotomy...
As a telecommuter that lives in Oregon and works for a company in California full time I telecommute from my home office. Taking aside the needed disciplines of staying focused, you need some office protocol disciplines too. For one, we do weekly department head meetings and weekly staff meetings with a video conference set up or at minimum audio conference, and we all talk about what we are working on and what our goals are. This helps everyone know what everyone else is doing. I also send at least one week each email to all the people I've been doing projects that effect them, or need to stay on top and just ask if I've been able to make things work as they expect and if there are any other items they need or would like. This keeps them in contact with me. I also do a weekly meeting with my director and we discuss projects and goals. And finally I try to take at least 6 trips a year to the actual office staying through a week on each of those trips. I usually do more like 9 to 10 trips and sometimes stay a week and a half. I actually hate that part, living out of a hotel room sucks, but it's a small price to pay for having no commute time and being able to work in my pajamas. And you have to sometimes keep pushing for all those meetings and trips as the office will tend to let them slip otherwise. :)
You can't. Not without breaking it....
While we should strive to make our batteries safe, the reality is that it is impossible to stop all defects or problems. As we develop more and more powerful batteries, more energy packed into a smaller space, the damage done from a sudden release of all that energy will become worse. The best thing we can do, and to my knowledge I'm not sure we have the material knowledge to do this yet, is to create a material that even in it's natural default state will only release it's stored energy at a slow rate. As long as the materials that store the energy in a battery have the ability of a catastropic fast release of that energy this problem will become a more and more a dangerous situation as we increase the available energy in batteries.
OK, ban the CFC propelled inhalers, fine. But why do the alternatives only have to be prescription? What is in them that makes it that you still can't create cheaper over the counter versions? If it's a patent issue then I'd think the government would have the intelligence to release such a patent for the good of the people. But that's not going to happen since getting a seat in the government means taking money from corporations, one wouldn't want to upset your path into office. But then us sheeple just vote for the candidate that spends the most on advertising. How many people actually research candidates (not the rheteroic they produce, but the history of votes and actions they have done). Sorry, I'm getting off topic, my on topic comment really is just that the real issue isn't the ban itself, but the lack of inexpensive over the counter alternatives. Are there really just no other options then a CFC propellent for an over the counter inhaled propellent? Use nitrous oxide, let them enjoy the asthma medicine at the same time.....
"scrap and start over" should be a last resort, but I know from experience there are times it benefits. In the best world all development would be forward thinking and designed and written modular enough to handle future changes and growth without causing muddled and or patched code. However, in practice this is not always the case and forward thinking can't handle all the possibilities that might come along. Sometimes things become so tangled that a rewrite is the best option out. Not so much because you think you can do it better then the previous developers, but because you have a better definition of the evolved project that is now in use and can design the pieces to interact better now. If an application is static, it probably would never need a start over, but if it's dynamic and evolved over years a scrap and start over approach can sometimes save great amounts of time in the future. I will say though that I have found that most times the culprit of muddled and patched code is rushed development in trying to just get a result to the public as quickly as possible. This however has been an unfortunate side effect of doing business long before the computer age, if your competition beats you to the opening you'd better have something far better to even be noticed.
Is a food salary working for peanuts?
I think it's interesting the arguments about whether being too clean makes one unhealthy or not. I realize the article really didn't answer that, but I think in general history tells us the answer pretty clearly. For most of human history we lived in our own filth, didn't bath and had many other unclean things about us. And we've learned that being cleaner has doubled or tripled our lifespans. And cleanliness especially plays a role when someone is not healthy for some reason or another. While I am not certain of this fact at the moment, and would love to research it if given the time, but I believe that during the medival period in Europe people in the cities had a shorter lifespan then people in the country. It wasn't that country folk bathed more often or did much difference in living, but the real difference was that they weren't constantly being contaiminanted by other peoples "dirt". So I think a kid digging in the dirt doesn't really need to rush in and clean off the bacteria. But I think a kid in the mall run his hand along all the places other kids run thier hands, playing in the playgrounds where other kids have played, and don't get me started on those plastic ball pits and what's in them... there, perhaps a dose of cleanliness afterwards is useful. I think overuse of antibiotic cleaners would indeed have several potential problems, but if used in context and looking at where true risk really is, I think they are useful.
Hasn't been to the Supreme Court yet - but - "According to the latest ruling out of the Ninth Circuit Court, it’s perfectly legal for federal agents to secretly plant a GPS locator on your car in the middle of the night, even if it’s parked in your driveway, and then use said locator to track your movements as they see fit. Even without a warrant."
I'm 45, well 46 in a month, and I've been programming since I was 17. I've worked in easily a couple dozen different languages from the lowly assembly code to the higher end object code. Sometimes I actually miss the control you had of the computer when everything was assembly, but on the other hand, the new languages really take a lot of the tedium out of the process and allow you to get to the important parts of your code. In any event, as I am moving on to iPhone development now and continue to learn new platforms, I certainly have not burned out and don't see myself doing so anytime soon. And I can say for a fact, all the mistakes I've made in the past have certainly made me a far better programmer even when working with a newer language. In the end, a computer is still a computer is still a computer and they basically do the same things now that they did then. Just far faster and with many more options. In my opinion the solution to not burning out,is to never let an employer use you as a commodity that they just use up and burn out. I've held my ground on never working constant overtime and making sure my employers know I have a life outside of work and I'm not their slave to be called in at their whim. And no, I've never been let go for holding my ground in this manner, while being flexible enough to come through for the company on a tight deadline. Just don't allow one tight deadline to follow another to follow another, etc, etc.
I've hired a couple programmers in the past and there is always one question I ask that I have found sorts out some of the better candidates. The question - "I've just requested you to do some task and you find you really haven't worked out that type of task in the past and aren't fully sure the best approach. What do you do?" The answer I'm looking for is basically they'll let me know that's a new area for them, but that they'll go out and find examples of that type of task and research it and find out how to make it happen. If they say anything along the lines of having me help them, or ask to go to a class, or anything along that line it will automatically set up red flags. And of course, just answering the question "correctly" doesn't automatically mean they are good at doing that, but you can dig deeper into how they'd research it, etc. I've been a programmer for over 25 years now and while there are certain core things that a computer can do and some it can't, the actual processing of it is what matters and it's nearly impossible for you to remember every little detail of every language and system, the real power is in knowing where to look to quickly get your answer. And as a final important talent, a person needs to be good at understanding and conversing specifications from someone that is not technical. Just my thoughts on what I've looked for....
It's 56 degrees at 8:40 this morning and this is the 4th story I've read after I got up around 7am and have had 2 cups of coffee. Damned numbers are everywhere....
Clothes you have to buy anyways, computers you do not.
I have to wonder, if England of the 1770s had the type of security we do now, would the Revolution have succeeded or would we still be under English rule? It's just something to ponder I think, where is the best balance of being secure, yet not having to fear the ones providing the security. I don't personally think we are there yet, but where is that line?
In the end, I think each has it's place, just as people debate which is better, a PC or Mac, each has strengths and each has weaknesses. The Kindle, Nook. iPad issues will be the same, and in the end, it comes down to what do you want out of it, and what are the most important features to you. That will be all the difference in making one better then the other.