Slashdot Mirror


iPhone Auto-Combusts On Australian Airplane

First time accepted submitter thegreymonkey writes "Last Friday, an iPhone caught fire on flight ZL319 operating from Lismore to Sydney. This incident is under investigation from Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This accident might be related to the iPhone battery again." Whether it "caught fire" may be a matter of semantics; as reported in the above linked story and by Network World (hat tip to reader alphadogg), though, the iPhone "started glowing red and emitting dense smoke."

277 comments

  1. First post by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You know, my iPhone has been getting a little warm since I dropped it earlier tod^W^W^ NO CARRIER

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In the past four days you've posted more than 50 times, and have been modded up fewer than 10. Perhaps it's time you realize you're not as funny or interesting as you think you are and you don't need to share with us every goddamn thought that comes into your head.

    2. Re:First post by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      This is nothing ! iPhones have been caught FLYING AWAY from their masters !

    3. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the chodes (this guy doesn't qualify for troll status).

    4. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had 4G, he may have been able to clue us in on what happened. :(

    5. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haw, Masters! The iPhone is a thing of magic, the darkest blackest magic, forged from the blood and flesh of suicides. Now that the sorcerer responsible for binding the nameless terrors is gone, the bindings are becoming weak. Ever wonder why they claimed jail-breaking was dangerous and the whole thing was bound with Pentacle-screws?

  2. Glowing red and emitting smoke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds more like a job for an exorcist. I banish thee, Steve!

    1. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      The power of Woz compels you!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Please forgive my ignorance, but I was curious about this: Would a battery problem like that really cause something to glow red? I mean, by the time it reaches glowing red, isn't it already at a point where it can ignite anything touching it?

      I'm just curious if this is an obvious embellishment of the story.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by laejoh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I put on my robe and wozards ha... hold on...

    4. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      By the time it's glowing red, dropping it on the floor can result in it melting its way through the hull of the airplane. "Glowing red" is actually hard to do, and hotter than most people think. I've heated a poker red hot, and it would melt through an aluminum can without a problem (essentially what an airplane is).

    5. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      Nah, it's very easy to get individual electronic components to glow red hot due to excessive electrical current.

      The actual chunk of silicon inside an IC is tiny, so if it shorts out you have a lot of energy in a small space = high temperature. The outgassing explodes the heat resistant plastic/resin encapsulation, and the silicon sits there glowing red hot.

      In this case, it's not the whole phone that would be glowing red hot, just some of the exposed internals.

    6. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      By the time it's glowing red, dropping it on the floor can result in it melting its way through the hull of the airplane. "Glowing red" is actually hard to do, and hotter than most people think. I've heated a poker red hot, and it would melt through an aluminum can without a problem (essentially what an airplane is).

      Great, now all electronic devices will be banned from planes to prevent terrorists magically making them glow red hot and melting a hole in the fuselage.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Glowing red and emitting smoke? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They should ban "magic" from all flights. The problem is that to the TSA, who still haven't mastered things like shoe laces, everything since velcro is magic (what, do they pull these guys from the Amish towns, oh wait, the Amish are at least polite people).

  3. From XKCD to life?? by sohmc · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://xkcd.com/651/

    Seems like Randall has predicted the future again!

    I don't want to start a "TSA is a bunch of idiots" thread but I'm honestly surprised that this hasn't happened more often.

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
    1. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seems like Randall has predicted the future again!

      If spending 30 seconds illustrating something which has been well-known for years to anyone with half a clue is "predicting the future", then yes, once again xkcd is at the forefront. Are you also impressed by the number of innovations in Apple products which have never been seen before?

      The fact is that batteries in portable electronic devices have the potential to start fires if they fail in various unlikely ways. I don't know of any failure mode in a smartphone battery will explode with enough force to blow a hole in an aeroplane - any regulatory tests done by a window mock-up? Directly against the metal fuselage? But they're all sufficiently dangerous that there certainly needs to be the means to extinguish an electrical fire.

      The lack of extra shielding on Apple unreplaceable batteries is going to make things a bit more interesting, but you knew that when you bought the product.

    2. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't want to start a "TSA is a bunch of idiots" thread but I'm honestly surprised that this hasn't happened more often.

      I somehow doubt the TSA was involved in any way, shape, or form for a domestic Australian flight. At all... call it a hunch.

    3. Re:From XKCD to life?? by sohmc · · Score: 2

      What I meant to say is that despite all of the headaches with airport security (no matter where you are), the biggest risks are the ones that no one expects.

      I'm surprised no one has done this intentionally yet.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    4. Re:From XKCD to life?? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      A phone / laptop battery catching fire is not a significant risk to the plane. The cabin might fill with noxious smoke, but then again there's those handy masks in the overhead panels which pump out nice, clean oxygen in the event of depressurisation.

      I'd recommend putting out the fire with one of the extinguishers in the clearly marked overhead lockers before pumping out pure oxygen into the cabin, though. Drench that sucker. Bonus points if, in your zealous efforts to put out the fire, you accidentally fill the lungs of the guy who tried to blow up the plane with fire retardant foam.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:From XKCD to life?? by catmistake · · Score: 2

      there certainly needs to be the means to extinguish an electrical fire.

      Might I humbly suggest each passenger be issued standard a bottle of water?

    6. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Bingo. And -1 redundant to every other comment in this thread that doesn't mention the smoking elephant in the airplane toilet.

      A hand grenade has about 690,000 Joules of chemical energy (~150g of TNT at 4.6 MJ per kg). A high capacity external battery pack (a reasonable carry-on, right?) packs around 550,800 Joules (I can find 153 Watt-hours packs). That's in the same ballpark. Extracting it is left as a (thought) exercise for the reader.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:From XKCD to life?? by mr1911 · · Score: 1, Funny

      there certainly needs to be the means to extinguish an electrical fire.

      Might I humbly suggest each passenger be issued standard a bottle of water?

      If you are smart enough to throw water on an electrical fire, might I suggest you do the gene pool a favor and lick the fire?

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    8. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Try throwing water on an exposed lithium battery and see how well that works out.

    9. Re:From XKCD to life?? by catmistake · · Score: 2

      Try throwing water on an exposed lithium battery and see how well that works out.

      like this? Thanks for the tip... better issue every passenger some pliers, gloves and a bucket of water.

    10. Re:From XKCD to life?? by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One hand gernade is less than a 20oz soda, high explosives aren't calorically dense, they are good at release.

      You may as well say a gram of anything has huge amounts of energy (E=mc^2), extracting it is left as a thought excersize.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:From XKCD to life?? by omglolbah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the standard "Do not use water with electrical fires" is based on the danger of electrocution.
      'Throwing' water on something would work fine as there is no stream connecting you to the electrified component.

      In battery-powered systems this is usually not a concern and water is a fine medium to put it out with ;)

      Hell, in any modern house the GFCI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device) should trip long before you're in any danger of serious damage. More likely than not the power has already tripped if there is an electrical fire, or it will trip the instant the stream of water causes leakage current from the burning piece of hardware.

      High voltage is of course a completely different scenario, luckily one most wont have to deal with... Like a water cooling system next to a 132kV transformer... ugh...

    12. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "In battery-powered systems this is usually not a concern and water is a fine medium to put it out with ;)"

      Not by any means are you correct. Battery fires are classified as metal fires, and require a class-d extinguisher.

      You try putting out a lithium fire by throwing water on it - I dare you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "A phone / laptop battery catching fire is not a significant risk to the plane"

      My 10 hours solo flight time remaining 'till private pilot's license issuing says you're dead wrong.

      That's one of the pre-flight check items - flammable objects.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:From XKCD to life?? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Is it true the iphone4(s) use lithium polymer batteries? Those seem to be the more volatile and less tolerant to abuse than lithium ion. Lithium polymer batteries can start unfavorable chemical reactions going slightly outside their voltage range, seems a poor choice for consumer electronics.

    15. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Not by any means are you correct."
        You sir are incorrect, if it is the electronics burning, and not the battery, he is 100% correct in hist statement. If the fire is a result of the battery overloading then it is an chemical/metal fire. In which case water is a bad idea; chemical splash/just wont work on metal.

    16. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Water is the correct response to a lithium ion powered consumer device fire, as shown in this FAA-video:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS6KA_Si-m8

      The purpose of the water is to cool down the batteries to prevent thermal run-away.

    17. Re:From XKCD to life?? by mr1911 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the standard "Do not use water with electrical fires" is based on the danger of electrocution. 'Throwing' water on something would work fine as there is no stream connecting you to the electrified component.

      Absolutely amazing this statement has been modded insightful. Apparently mods have no further understanding of electrical fires than the poster.

      Not putting water on an electrical fire has little to do with electrocution, although that is a valid concern for the responders dealing with the situation. Water is fine to put out the subsequent fire - say if the circuit board, plastic housing, or something else is on fire. However, if the electrical components that created the fire are still energized, dumping a conductive liquid on it is a stupid act. You will have a much larger problem before you have dumped enough water to create a viable electrocution hazard.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    18. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, I worked at a battery company for a while. Yes, at first, the water reacts with the anode, and will cause more heat and reactions to happen. However, they found that a sufficient quantity of water (if you have a way to direct a large amount of water at it, don't just toss a single bucket at it) is actually a good way to put out a battery fire, the water does suck the heat out from it, and eventually you've reacted away all the stuff in the battery.

    19. Re:From XKCD to life?? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You may as well say a gram of anything has huge amounts of energy

      No not really, and the GP is correct. Explosives generally aren't particularly energy dense. The reason is that unlike fuels, they have to contain their own oxygen supply, which limits the energy density.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    20. Re:From XKCD to life?? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The O2 masks last barely long enough for the pilot to descent to below 8000 feet in event of depressurization.

    21. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are not correct by any means" or "You are not by any means correct".

    22. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pizFsY0yjss

      Yes, watch it through, there are dramatic jets of flame and explosions.
      The flame jets seem to have quite a bit of heat.

      And of course, you can carry multiple laptop batteries. 1 per laptop + 1 spare. I've routinely carried two portables in the past, so that would presumably have entitled me to 4 of these.

      But of course they still want to confiscate my smaller shampoo or lotion.

      Not to mention the fact that if they are letting these through, presumably they could be packed with even stronger explosives.

      If you point out that they do chemically test laptops for explosive residue, I'd like to note that's hardly foolproof if someone was thorough in cleaning and sealing it, that they hardly ever do it, and, that surely this could apply to my SO's $30 bottle of shampoo that they are about to throw out.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    23. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Not by any means are you correct."

        You sir are incorrect, if it is the electronics burning, and not the battery, he is 100% correct in hist statement. If the fire is a result of the battery overloading then it is an chemical/metal fire. In which case water is a bad idea; chemical splash/just wont work on metal.

      You're missing the point entirely.

      The iphone 4 uses a "Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery. (http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html)
      Putting water with Lithium is bad. (http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/water/lithium/lithium-and-water.htm)

      Since the battery is damn near on fire, it's probably not wise to assume it remains intact and is not, in fact, leaking. Because if you're wrong, you get a pretty interesting reaction. Try YouTube if you'd like some examples, I trust you can locate the 'search' bar.

    24. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      A phone / laptop battery catching fire is not a significant risk to the plane. The cabin might fill with noxious smoke, but then again there's those handy masks in the overhead panels which pump out nice, clean oxygen in the event of depressurisation.

      Yes, because in the event of a fire, additional oxygen always helps.... Any time you in a ship, be it on the water, in the air, or in space, the greatest fear is fire because you can't escape the confines of the environment. And during fires, more people die of smoke inhalation than the fire itself, so yes, smoke is also a problem, since you can't just roll down the window.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    25. Re:From XKCD to life?? by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      A phone / laptop battery catching fire is not a significant risk to the plane.

      Neither is exploding underwear.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    26. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      do the gene pool a favor and lick the fire?

      Tastes like burning!

    27. Re:From XKCD to life?? by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Try throwing water on an exposed lithium battery and see how well that works out.

      I know a chunk of pure(ish) Lithium metal and water make a fun reaction, but is the Lithium in a battery in that kind of form?

      I'm curious.

    28. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Khyber · · Score: 0

      The device was 'red hot'

      Thermal run-away is already happening and out of control.

      The proper response is a Graphite-based extinguisher, which was made for fighting magnesium fires (magnesium burns way hotter than lithium.)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_extinguisher#Class_D

      The FAA doesn't know shit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    29. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Khyber, as someone who is not yet a pilot might want to realize, there is a world of difference between the Cessna or whatever LSA you're learning to fly in and a commercial jet airliner when it comes to what kinds of things might be dangerous and what might be a hazard that can be managed.

      For example, if your iPhone you've stored in your flight bag in the back seat spontaneously combusts while you are flying solo:

      • YOU are the only person available to deal with it.
      • Distracting YOU, the pilot, while flying, is a huge detriment to the safety of flight.
      • The back seat was probably manufactured with flame retardant, but through multiple cleanings has lost much of that capability, and will probably burst into flames, too.
      • The noxious vapors from the back seat burning will quickly incapacitate the only person on the plane who is able to fly it.
      • That burning back seat is about three feet away from the gas tanks.
      • The only fire extenquisher on the plane is strapped to the floor between the front seats, and you've got to get it unstrapped, unpinned, and pointed at the fire while using one hand to fly and one hand to do all the rest.
      • Unless you are learning to fly in a corporate jet or turbocharged multi, you probably don't have an oxygen supply, and certainly wouldn't have much training in how to don and use it quickly.

      Now, think about an iPhone starting to combust in some passenger's pocket on a 737.

      • As it starts to get warm, the pax will feel it, pull it from his pocket, and start yelling, long before flames start.
      • One of the several trained, non-flying crew members will react to the cries and will be able to focus her efforts on locating the fire extinguishers and using them to put the flames out. Something they are trained to do before they are allowed to be crew members, and which they get recurrent training in.
      • The flying pilot, after being notified of a potential problem with onboard fire, will quickly don an oxygen mask and continue to fly the aircraft.
      • The PNF (non flying pilot) will also don a mask and begin concentrating on the full "in flight fire" checklist, which you might have seen a few times in your POH but have probably never had to go through in real life, much less in a fully featured simulator with an evaluator grading you on how well you do.

      So, yes, it is interesting for you to keep saying that "it's a checklist item". but not really relevant. I've also never seen it in any small aircraft checklist I've been through. Are you referring to checking the engine compartment for bird's nests and the like? And what does your checklist say to do about "flammable objects"? I know that I personally carry a lot of flammable objects every time I fly. Those sectional charts are printed on paper, you know. That book of approach plates? The batteries in MY cellphone, and the ones in my aviation handheld radios. Until they changed the certificates, those pilot certs you are required to carry used to be printed on some pretty easily ignited paper. Now they are flammable plastic, but the medical cert is still on paper.

      Do you remove all flammable clothing when you fly and fly only in Nomex?

    30. Re:From XKCD to life?? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Dumping water onto an energized circuit in an attempt to put out a fire should de-energize the circuit from the short. If it does not, it will decrese the risk of the secondary fires without a great risk of creating more.

    31. Re:From XKCD to life?? by nothajan · · Score: 1

      High voltage is of course a completely different scenario, luckily one most wont have to deal with... Like a water cooling system next to a 132kV transformer... ugh...

      Actually, HV transformers CAN be water cooled: http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200410/s1221697.htm (In this case, it was a 33kV/11kV transformer)

    32. Re:From XKCD to life?? by mr1911 · · Score: 1
      Famous quotes from future Darwin Award recipients:

      Dumping water onto an energized circuit in an attempt to put out a fire should de-energize the circuit from the short.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    33. Re:From XKCD to life?? by pgpalmer · · Score: 2
      From http://www.apple.com/iphone/iphone-4/specs.html :

      Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery

    34. Re:From XKCD to life?? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How would that put the douser at risk? It doesn't, unless you set it up like a scene from Final Destination. Less movies, more life, and you'll see that water on an electrical fire is much better than nothing on an electrical fire.

    35. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess Energizer doesn't know as much shit as you either? Lithium Ion Batteries PRODUCT SAFETY DATA SHEET

    36. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone / laptop battery catching fire is not a significant risk to the plane. The cabin might fill with noxious smoke, but then again there's those handy masks in the overhead panels which pump out nice, clean oxygen in the event of depressurisation.
      I'd recommend putting out the fire with one of the extinguishers in the clearly marked overhead lockers before pumping out pure oxygen into the cabin, though.

      Yes, because in the event of a fire, additional oxygen always helps....

      It sounds like you are making that statement sarcastically, in reply to parent saying the exact same thing sincerely . That being the case, no, you are very wrong. Please educate yourself before you accidentally burn or kill someone.

      Adding pure oxygen will NOT help (Unless your goal is to blow up the plane of course)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_triangle

      Pure oxygen will just enable the fire to burn longer and possibly hotter.
      That is a BAD thing. Bad!

      Also since you purposely mis-quoted parent, you can't complain that I just did the same thing to you :P

    37. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I've also never seen it in any small aircraft checklist I've been through"

      Fuel, fuel lines, etc. Hello, there are more flammable objects than just the cloth and such one might be wearing.

      Please expand your viewpoint.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    38. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Sheesh, of course I've seen things on the preflight list for checking fuel and fuel leaks. I would never lump that kind of thing under some generic "flammable objects" checklist item.

      Point remains, small aircraft checklists are a poor reference when trying to determine level of hazards on commercial airliners. What can be a critical hazard for a single pilot in a tiny plane might be trivially handled on a 747 by a professional flight crew. A "bee in the cockpit" can cause a small aircraft crash; hardly worth reporting in a 747. An "oil leak in the engine" ditto. When you've got half a dozen trained pros ready to handle things, and multiple engines, what you call a critical hazard might not be the same. I think perhaps it is you that needs a viewpoint expansion.

    39. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet again some american thinks their government agencies have jurisdiction over another country...

    40. Re:From XKCD to life?? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      there certainly needs to be the means to extinguish an electrical fire.

      Might I humbly suggest each passenger be issued standard a bottle of water?

      On a full service airline (I'm not sure if these even exist any more) each passenger may be issued with as many bottles of water as they wish.

      But anyway. if this Iphone toting idiot had of listed to the pre-flight announcement and turned his phone off this wouldn't have happened.

      Kudos to the hostie's quick thinking though. This should put to rest the popular delusion they are only there to serve you drinks.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      The iphone 4 uses a "Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery. (http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html)

      Which highlights the main point of this whole sorry episode. What stupid idiot designs a hand held carry in your pocket type device with a lithium ion battery that can't be removed in a hurry?

      People keep saying Apple are good at design, but it seems to be only aesthetically. In terms of functionality, Apple design has got to be the most brain dead stupid crap around.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    42. Re:From XKCD to life?? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy to extinguish an iphone battery using water.

      It hisses like all hell, but not all that bad compared to letting it light everything else in the room on fire.

      If you -have- a suitable alternative water isnt the first choice... But in a case where you have a burning iphone on your livingroom table, a bucket of water is a hell of a lot better than fleeing the house and calling the fire department.

    43. Re:From XKCD to life?? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      The local fire department held a workshop for a group of us a while back (year or two).

      To sum it up in a short way:

      If it is electrical and on fire, the fuse should already have tripped in any household situation. If it is an industrial system move away. It is not your job to put it out. Let professionals do it.

      If you have an alternative like CO2 or powder, use it. If you do not, water is fine as a fallback. In the unlikely event that the power does NOT go out, tripping the fuses manually is recommended but you have to consider if there really is time.
      Focus on the area around the electrical fire instead of the electrical itself.

      But the thing they stressed was that avoiding water altogether was a fairly silly thing in any modern house. Fuses and GFIs should handle the power and the water can handle the fire.

      They demonstrated this by hosing down a lamp on fire :p

    44. Re:From XKCD to life?? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they use a water/glycol/oil at Kollsnes Gas processing plant in Norway.

      Working on 132kV systems is nice though. You know that if you fuck up you wont have to get up in the morning... ever again :p

    45. Re:From XKCD to life?? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That's true!

    46. Re:From XKCD to life?? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I hate non-removable batteries as much as the next guy (typing this on a Thinkpad with a 94Wh 9-cell... Mmmmm...), but are you REALLY saying that if your phone starts smoking because the battery's overheating (which you probably wouldn't know, because it's hard to tell from the outside), you're going to take off the back cover and take out the battery instead of just chucking the whole thing?

      I wonder what burning Lithium Ion battery gunk does to human skin...

    47. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      I have had my phone start getting noticeably hot after software updates and removed the battery. So far thankfully it has been from poor quality third party apps but it does happen and it's nice to have the option to stop it before it starts smoking.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    48. Re:From XKCD to life?? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      All phones get hot in certain situations, so where do you draw the line between normal use and taking out the battery? Do you remove the battery every time the phone gets warm from use as a navigation device? Because most of them get plenty hot that way...

    49. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Generally not. I did take it out recently after I updated a cpu monitor type thing and the battery started dropping rapidly and the phone got hot. It gets very warm doing gps, skype/fring etc, but that's to be expected.

      Another reason a non removable battery is brain dead stupid is that there is no hard power switch, so you never really know when it is turned off and you can't force it. A colleague recently had a problem where the work supplied iPhone froze and couldn't be restarted for half a day. Thankfully I haven't had that problem with my iPhone (no apps on it because I don't do iTunes) but it has on my Samsung and again, I can very quickly yank the battery and restart. Anyone in technology who is arrogant enough to assume that the technology they produce is infallible should not be in technology.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    50. Re:From XKCD to life?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if commercial aircraft should carry a fireproof container for this situation. Drop the burning phone in a box and squirt in dry powder from an extinguisher.

    51. Re:From XKCD to life?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      IIRC Mythbusters tested hair dryers in a bath to see how fatal they could be. The answer was not much. At one point they had a mains powered dryer motoring around in a bath, entirely immersed without triggering a breaker or an RCD.

    52. Re:From XKCD to life?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't want to start a "TSA is a bunch of idiots" thread but I'm honestly surprised that this hasn't happened more often.

      I somehow doubt the TSA was involved in any way, shape, or form for a domestic Australian flight. At all... call it a hunch.

      We have our own version.

    53. Re:From XKCD to life?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend putting out the fire with one of the extinguishers in the clearly marked overhead lockers before pumping out pure oxygen into the cabin, though

      Yes, I am sure Gus Grissom would agree with that.

    54. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The O2 masks last barely long enough for the pilot to descent to below 8000 feet in event of depressurization.

      Yeah, and "Hey, there's a fire on the plane - let's add in some extra oxygen sources" sounds counter-intuitive

    55. Re:From XKCD to life?? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if commercial aircraft should carry a fireproof container for this situation. Drop the burning phone in a box and squirt in dry powder from an extinguisher.

      Wouldn't it be easier just to throw it out the nearest window?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    56. Re:From XKCD to life?? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't get far if you tried. People would see what you were doing and stop you. Since we got metal detectors that work right down to your shoes there has been no way to sneak a practical bomb onto an aircraft. People have tried, for example the pants bomber, but the difficulty of detonating the type of explosives that security would miss makes them impractical.

      That and locks on cockpit doors are about the only two things which have made us any safer.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    57. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      When it is fully charged, it is. Remember, it's storing a lot of energy, and it's storing it chemically. This means it needs some pretty reactive materials.

      If you puncture a lithium battery, it'll catch fire just from reacting with the oxygen in the air. That is what these laptop and smartphone fires are all about.

    58. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      The only thing that ever catches fire in a phone is the battery. Your pedantry is misdirected, and kind of dangerous.

    59. Re:From XKCD to life?? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Actually, that relies on several assumptions, the most important one being a multiple-cell battery. With multiple cells, the cells will rupture due to overpressure from heating at different times, and when they do so, the contained lithium will rapidly burn. Pouring water on this is fairly safe, as the lithium in the ruptured cells has already burned out, and the remaining lithium in the non-ruptured cells is protected from the water by the cell casing. Your goal there is to prevent any further cells from erupting by cooling them down.

      A cell phone generally has a single cell, however, and once it ruptures there's no point in trying to cool it down. At this point, the only way to stop the fire is to let all the lithium burn out. If the fire is slow, perhaps because the cell has a very small puncture, then pouring water on it will speed it up. If the single cell has not yet ruptured water may help cool it down, or it may not, and once it ruptures the water may make the fire worse.

    60. Re:From XKCD to life?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if commercial aircraft should carry a fireproof container for this situation. Drop the burning phone in a box and squirt in dry powder from an extinguisher.

      Wouldn't it be easier just to throw it out the nearest window?

      Not if pressurized.

  4. Wait till the TSA hears about this by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mobile phones will be prohibited on flights.

    (But there are drawbacks as well; think laptops with lithium-ion batteries.)

    1. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by Pi1grim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then we will just have to wait for one of those mysterious self-combustions on the plane. Then people will be prohibited by TSA on planes as well.

    2. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by Tharsman · · Score: 0

      It wont go that far, BUT, had this happened in the US the phone owner would still be in jail, being interrogated and forced to confess about this failed terrorist bomming.

    3. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      Mobile phones would be far worse to ban from flights in my mind. Navigating a strange city without the ability to make a call at any given time (plus gps, etc) would be a pain. Or rather, it was... especially having to pick preordained meeting points and wait at meeting locations to gather back together. Mobile phones make trips much, much easier than they used to be. Of course, the sale of disposable phones just outside the airport would boom.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Either that or there will be a law requiring you to TURN OFF YOUR PHONE DURING THE FLIGHT! The plain is perfectly safe... Your phone isn't.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by enemorales · · Score: 1

      High concentrations of Aussies will be banned in flights.

    6. Re:Wait till the TSA hears about this by laejoh · · Score: 1

      First they came for the Spinal Tap drummers, but I said nothing, for...

  5. Need to get on the no-fly list? by Rockstar+Rich+G · · Score: 1

    There's an app for that.

  6. Australia, Black Friday, and fires... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm astonished. Really.

  7. NSFA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not safe for australia ? ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NSFA )

  8. A feature? by pjabardo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is an iPhone therefore it is a feature.

    1. Re:A feature? by jo_ham · · Score: 5, Funny

      Samsung are apparently hosing down crates of Galaxy II S 's with gasoline trying to copy the feature as we speak.

    2. Re:A feature? by pjabardo · · Score: 1

      Another lawsuit on the horizon...

    3. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      He was holding it wrong.

    4. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the idiot activated the space heater app

    5. Re:A feature? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the passengers were wearing their Apple compliant turtlenecks, they could have easily filtered out the smoke.

    6. Re:A feature? by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

      Hah! Nice. (I'm replying because I have no mod points. Sue me.)

    7. Re:A feature? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Oh relax, cupcake it's a JOKE.

      Jesus. No one has a sense of humour anymore.

    8. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you really that stupid?

    9. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always claimed that the moment iPhones started exploding the fanbois would start explaining it away as a combination of "your'e holding it wrong!" and praising the "pure cleansing fire" smiting the undeserving.

      Personally I believe that it's the resurgence of the one who forged the phones of power. this time as a "literally" flaming eye. This has been denied by Tim "Witch King of Auburn" Cook.

    10. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. No one has a sense of humour anymore.

      The ironic thing is Jesus is somewhat indirectly responsible for the lack of sense of humor thing. If only his followers acted more like he did.

    11. Re:A feature? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Ah, trying to backtrack (or a different AC).

      Starting off with "Ah, the Apple bitch" is really not in the spirit of the joke.

      So, no, not "that stupid", but just calling someone on no sense of humour. What's your excuse?

    12. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh

    13. Re:A feature? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Nope, no "whooosh", that really wasn't a jokey, lighthearted reply.

    14. Re:A feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starting off with "Ah, the Apple bitch" is really not in the spirit of the joke in my limited and myopic scope of humour.

      FTFY

    15. Re:A feature? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      You forgot to log in.

  9. relax... by grub · · Score: 2


    The guy was just running the iHotplate app to warm up his coffee.
    Nothing here to see, move along.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  10. Now we know why phones must be off on planes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Finally, an answer to the question "why must I keep my phone off while flying"!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Now we know why phones must be off on planes by Pi1grim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who said it was? To prevent things like this you have to take the battery out. Oh, wait

  11. Re:Nano battery? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Yes, my sister got hers a couple of days ago. They are getting round to it, it's just taking time. This is in the UK, fwiw.

  12. Amazing! by spinkham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Energetic chemistry is energetic.

    Go find some RC enthusiasts and ask them if they've seen LiPos burn. There's a good chance they have.

    That's why we charge our batteries in a lipo bag or other fireproof container.

    Of course, RC batteries are abused much more than those in phones, but it's highly non-surprising that occasionally one lights on fire.

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    1. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go find some RC enthusiasts

      No thanks.

    2. Re:Amazing! by synapse7 · · Score: 0

      I just posted above about the volatile nature of lithium polymer batteries, a poor choice for consumer electronics.

    3. Re:Amazing! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I just posted above about the volatile nature of lithium polymer batteries, a poor choice for consumer electronics.

      Perhaps that's why the iPhone battery is Lithium Ion

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Amazing! by spinkham · · Score: 2

      Specifically, they use a lithium-ion polymer battery, also called LiPo

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone#Model_comparison

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_polymer_battery

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    5. Re:Amazing! by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Is removing the battery called LiPosuction?

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    6. Re:Amazing! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I saw one of these firsthand - my father was telling me some of the stories he heard, and then he had trouble inserting the battery in his charger. Then all the sudden he drops the battery as it had apparently gotten quite hot - then its packaging starts distending into a more round shape. I clearly was not thinking quickly enough because I should have turned my eyes away. Fortunately it did not explode - we placed a big pot or something else that was handy over it and let it cool down.

      Turns out that during the manipulations trying to connect it to the charger the connectors had gotten stuck on the charger and ripped off, exposing the leads leading into the battery. Then when pushing the battery back into the charger the leads had shorted.

      We have a new appreciation for the power of batteries.

      The problem with things like RC helicopters is that they push the power-to-weight ratio quite a bit so the batteries tend to be engineered a little aggressively. They need to generate considerable amounts of current, but they have to be really light so the case has to be pretty thin/etc.

      Now, just imagine what will happen if supercapacitors take off!

    7. Re:Amazing! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Is removing the battery called LiPosuction?

      I think on an iPhone it's called "voiding the warranty".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. And liquids are still banned by surmak · · Score: 1

    So they go through all the trouble of banning liquids on flights, and other security theater, while allowing provably dangerous electronics onto the planes without any question. What happens when some terrorist is able to reprogram a phone or computer to overheat on command? Perhaps they could even "forget" the phone on a plane, and arrange for it to cause some mischief after the bad guy deplanes.

    I would love to see them ban computers and cellphones because that would effect frequent business travelers, and perhaps cause some pushback against the insanity of airline security.

    1. Re:And liquids are still banned by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would love to see them ban computers and cellphones because that would effect frequent business travelers, and perhaps cause some pushback against the insanity of airline security.

      Modern government could be summarised with the tagline: "The infrastructure exists for the corporation."

      So that won't happen.

    2. Re:And liquids are still banned by DJRumpy · · Score: 2

      You would probably see a little smoke, possibly get a pop with some plastic shrapnel that travels 6-10 inches from the device, and a rather embarrassed terrorist who has no clue that a phone battery isn't any danger to a plane.

      Seriously...wtf?

    3. Re:And liquids are still banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they go through all the trouble of banning liquids on flights, and other security theater, while allowing provably dangerous electronics onto the planes without any question. What happens when some terrorist is able to reprogram a phone or computer to overheat on command?

      Apple stopped making that model a long time ago.

    4. Re:And liquids are still banned by Khyber · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Wrong.

      There's a reason why flammable objects are part of a pre-flight checklist.

      That includes power storage.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:And liquids are still banned by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      What happens when some terrorist is able to reprogram a phone or computer to overheat on command?

      How about if they just load laptop batteries with firmware to do the same. No computer needed. (Remember this story about battery firmware?). Sell them on eBay for cheap.

    6. Re:And liquids are still banned by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Flammable objects are not part of a pre-flight checklist. If that were the case, you wouldn't be allowed to carry on your hair, your clothes, your luggage, or any other non-metal items. Even ammunition is allowed for checked baggage on some flights.

      Explosives are not allowed for obvious reasons, but a batteries energy potential isn't that great, and is easily put out.

    7. Re:And liquids are still banned by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      No, the strategy would be this:

      1) Bring permitted iPhone through checkpoint.

      2) Before deplaning, slip it behind the magazines in the pouch behind one of the seats, so it doesn't get noticed when they sweep the plane between flights.

      3) Have the phone set on airplane mode and programmed to overload the battery in ~3 hours.

      4) Assuming someone hasn't found the phone on the next flight, it catches on fire and spreads to the stack of magazines.

      5) Cabin fire.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    8. Re:And liquids are still banned by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Is the checklist on paper? Good thing that paper doesn't burn. Has anyone told Ray Bradbury?

    9. Re:And liquids are still banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... we've replaced all of our inflight pubs (aeronautical charts, airport directories, checklists) with iPads... oh... I see what you did there.

    10. Re:And liquids are still banned by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Flammable objects are not part of a pre-flight checklist."

      Fuel? Fuel Lines? Ensuring no leaks on any fuel-holding/pumping equipment?

      Have you ever flown a plane? I have, multiple times. Direct from Huntsville, AL (direct from NASA's airport, where I was getting my flight training started thanks to NASA's 'You Can Fly'/Aviation Challenge program) to Macon, NC.

      Please. You're lacking the prerequisite knowledge for this conversation.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:And liquids are still banned by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      It was obvious the intent of the parents post was a check of passengers, not airplane equipment since the general gist of the discussion is what a passenger could do with a damaged battery to an airplane.

      In general, passengers do not have access to fuel lines, or fuel pumps/tanks.

    12. Re:And liquids are still banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liquids are not banned on Australian Domestic flights.

    13. Re:And liquids are still banned by Khyber · · Score: 1

      In general, no. But once a fire starts, you're not very likely controlling where IT goes.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  14. Phone sex by Pandur77 · · Score: 0

    This is why you shouldn't have phone sex on an airplane.

  15. Suicide by vawwyakr · · Score: 3, Funny

    The phone realized via it's GPS and flight tracker where it was headed and offed itself.

    1. Re:Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tits

  16. Bad purchase by schlesinm · · Score: 1

    I told him not to buy that app.

  17. For one battery that goes, billions are just fine by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Between this, the Volt battery going up in flames and on a smaller scale the Belgian Post e-bikes catching fire, I am very worried about the fast deployment of Li-ion batteries in many fields.
    I am a researcher in Li-ion batteries, and I know how dangerous those little buggers can be, but also how many efforts are done to make them safer. However, you can't take bad manufacturing out of the equation, and you should always ask yourself why a no-name chinese battery costs 1/3 of the original battery.

    It would be nice to know if the phone was ever dropped, or its battery replaced at any point, or if a non-standard charger was used.

  18. ouchie by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

    ...glowing and smoking=combustion (not necessarily fire), but yeah. I've had a few such devices (one phone, two mp3 players, one bluetooth headset) crack off while plugged in to a third party charger (they were all chargeable through USB but all I had available at the time was an unregulated 6V adapter and a 4-port USB brick). Lesson learned; use manufacturer-approved chargers with Li-Ion! The battery technology uses pulse modulated charging current; DC (via a Powermonkey or suchlike) or unregulated DC (cheap adapter where the output voltage can vary wildly) can cause serious damage to the battery. I also read somewhere (it might have been on an iPhone 3G battery) that deforming the battery in any way (like, sitting on the phone?) might cause a short.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:ouchie by WastedMeat · · Score: 0

      Glowing is indicative only of temperature; no combustion is necessary. Look up Planck's Law. Red-hot steel is not undergoing combustion as it is being worked.

    2. Re:ouchie by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Add smoke (it always amazes me that people read only what they want to read), and something is most certainly combusting.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:ouchie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add smoke (it always amazes me that people read only what they want to read), and something is most certainly combusting.

      The question is, is the combustion and smoke due to something getting really hot, or is the heat because something caught on fire? In this case it's far more likely that the former is the answer, since that's the usual sequence with a battery failure -- first a fault causes a high self-discharge rate, which causes runaway heating, which causes fire.

    4. Re:ouchie by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I had a chat with a pyrotechnician friend of mine, and he pointed out that solids and liquids aren't the things that are burning.

      Simple proof: drop a lit match into a cup of petrol (do this in a well ventilated area). The match will not ignite the petrol, as one might expect; it will go out. Why? Because there is not enough oxygen within the liquid to allow hot combustion to take place. Where is there enough oxygen? In the air. To get something to burn you have to first aerosolise it to allow enough oxygen to contact it. Same with every other slow combustible from paper to candle wax to hair to jet fuel.

      There is an exception: chemical explosives. But it's nothing to do with the nature of the reactant.

      Dynamite and high explosives such as TNT, nitroglycerin, C4, Torpex and Semtex have an added extra ingredient: an unstable oxide, which during the course of the explosive reaction releases oxygen into the mix while in the solid phase and allows the dense reactant to, well, react explosively. Without this unstable oxide ingredient, there would be no Earth-shattering KABOOM! and we wouldn't have the Nobel Peace Prize.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  19. Obviously... by techishly · · Score: 5, Funny

    they were holding it wrong.

  20. Re:Nano battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Step 1 - Request - November 23, 2011: Product received
    Step 2 - Service - November 23, 2011: Issue identified
    Step 3 - Return - November 23, 2011: Product replacement pending

    This is in Canada.

  21. Of course by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    It's probably a battery manufactured by Sony which isn't designed to be used upside-down.

    1. Re:Of course by asylumx · · Score: 1

      So... they were holding it wrong?

  22. That's what you get by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    the iPhone "started glowing red and emitting dense smoke.

    That's what you get for installing the antichrist app. Idiot.

  23. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly what is the difference between a no-name Chinese battery, and a named Chinese battery, besides cost?

  24. Car DVD PLayer by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Coincidentally yesterday I was driving while the kids watched movies on DVD players. Then Bang a huge explosions and plastic and metal go flying. The cigarette lighter power adapters conditioning electronics had exploded. I didn't drive off the road but could have. It looks like the culprit was a kink in the cord, perhaps from getting caught in a door at some point, causing a short. The violence of the explosion was surprising both literally and figuratively. You just don't realize how explosive your consumer electronics can be when they go bad.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Car DVD PLayer by omglolbah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sounds like hardware with inadequate fusing.
      Any power adapter should be able to survive a complete short on the output if it is designed properly.

    2. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Kotoku · · Score: 1

      Did you get it off eBay? I've had some really bad parts from no name brands.

    3. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Xest · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You just don't realize how explosive your consumer electronics can be when they go bad."

      This isn't about consumer electronics going bad, this is about your testimony against the boss.

      We'll get you next time!

    4. Re:Car DVD PLayer by scharkalvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would probably have been an exploded electrolytic capacitor. The small ones inside low power devices usually just blow their tops which are scored to act as a safety valve. The larger type capacitors can literally blow up like an M80 firecracker. I've seen photos of TV sets that had a hole blown in the side of the cabinet by a capacitor going "bomb".

    5. Re:Car DVD PLayer by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Yup. A firecracker is the best way to describe it. In some cases, it looks just like a blown Back Cat or Lady Finger. From the sound, intensity, to the unrolled bits of paper and all.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      made in China

    7. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like hardware with inadequate fusing.
      Any power adapter should be able to survive a complete short on the output if it is designed properly.

      Maybe the device WAS properly fused and the fuse blew. Instead properly replacing the fuse, he just shoved a hunk of tinfoil where the fuse used to be.

      Not necessarily saying the GP did this, but I've seen it done.

    8. Re:Car DVD PLayer by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just checked the fuses on the car socket and suprisingly they are intact. The conditioner itself (inductor and caps) did not have a fuse. I can't actually figure out which element exploded: the whole case is town apart and the PC board shattered but all the caps look fine. it's the wires and springs that look cooked. Also it did not sound like a firecracker, it was more of a concussive sound. Our first thought was we had sideswiped an elk or someone had shot the window.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    9. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like hardware with inadequate fusing.

      No, it sounds like an electrolytic capacitor gave up the ghost.

    10. Re:Car DVD PLayer by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      What is a figurative surprise?

    11. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuses are slow.
      Breakers are fast.

    12. Re:Car DVD PLayer by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      The fuses for lighter outlets are usually fairly large. MUCH larger than the hardware in the attachments can handle.

      The fuse in the circuit doesnt matter if the hardware attached cant survive the rated current :(

      And as another posted pointed out, fuses can be quite slow comparatively to a short. Car fuses especially...

    13. Re:Car DVD PLayer by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sounds like hardware with inadequate fusing. Any power adapter should be able to survive a complete short on the output if it is designed properly.

      Maybe the device WAS properly fused and the fuse blew. Instead properly replacing the fuse, he just shoved a hunk of tinfoil where the fuse used to be.

      Not necessarily saying the GP did this, but I've seen it done.

      Well yes, and maybe OP had also used some semtex to keep the broken plastic battery cover shut and the device inadvertently became a perfect bomb, not SOP but I've seen it done. Oh, no, wait, of course I haven't because that would be fucking insane

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Car DVD PLayer by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Our first thought was we had sideswiped an elk

      How could you hit an elk and not notice?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Car DVD PLayer by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Our first thought was we had sideswiped an elk or someone had shot the window.

      It's scary that you think that a large beast like an elk could sneak up on you while you're driving without you noticing. Was it you watching the DVDs, or the kids?
      It's also a bit scary that having a window shot out is one of the first things you'd think of. It must be an interesting war zone you live in ; I've considered job offers in Somalia, but I've never considered taking my kids (not that I have any, of course) to live there while I'm at work.

      It's also a bit worrying that you'd installed what sounds like a rats-nest of cabling yourself and had left it possible to get caught in the door, hadn't checked for appropriate fusing (not that that seems to be the problem here) etc. Are you sure that you're sufficiently electrically competent to have carried out this installation? Cable routing can be as important a part of an installation as connecting the right conductors together (and not connecting the wrong ones). That's why there are regulations about it, at least in industry.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    16. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our first thought was we had sideswiped an elk or someone had shot the window.

      Well, of course. That would have been my first thought too.

    17. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean "and not see it coming".

      For such large animals, they can move remarkably quickly. They probably think the same about your vehicle. Needless to say, no driver intends to hit an elk, nor do the elk intend to hit your car, but like the cop car that you just completely didn't see over there, occasionally you'll have an unexpected rendezvous with one.

    18. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's scary that you think that a large beast like an elk could sneak up on you while you're driving without you noticing.

      Elk don't "sneak". They can actually move rather quickly when they're so inclined. Your homework assignment is to find "Elk" in this list and see if you can't then come up with a short explanation of how one might be involved in a vehicular accident.

      It's also a bit scary that having a window shot out is one of the first things you'd think of. It must be an interesting war zone you live in ; I've considered job offers in Somalia, but I've never considered taking my kids (not that I have any, of course) to live there while I'm at work.

      I'm pretty sure one of the first things I thought of wouldn't be "something in my car's electronics blew up". But hey, what do I know. One time I was riding in a car with an ex-Green Beret and absent-mindedly tapped a plastic side panel with my finger. The guy jumped and asked if I'd heard the gunshot. When I told him what it was, he said it sounded exactly like a pistol shot some distance away.

    19. Re:Car DVD PLayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our first thought was we had sideswiped an elk or someone had shot the window.

      It's scary that you think that a large beast like an elk could sneak up on you while you're driving without you noticing. Was it you watching the DVDs, or the kids?
      It's also a bit scary that having a window shot out is one of the first things you'd think of. It must be an interesting war zone you live in ; I've considered job offers in Somalia, but I've never considered taking my kids (not that I have any, of course) to live there while I'm at work.

      It's also a bit worrying that you'd installed what sounds like a rats-nest of cabling yourself and had left it possible to get caught in the door, hadn't checked for appropriate fusing (not that that seems to be the problem here) etc. Are you sure that you're sufficiently electrically competent to have carried out this installation? Cable routing can be as important a part of an installation as connecting the right conductors together (and not connecting the wrong ones). That's why there are regulations about it, at least in industry.

      Wow you certainly are inexperienced. Why a gunshot or an Elk. Well it's fucking hunting season, you moron. Elk are leaving the mountains and grazing on roads sides at night. Hunters are legal ones and spotlighters are shooting at Elk near roads. As some one who has hit Deer, they literally can slam into your car. they freeze in headlights (hence "spotlighting" for hunters) and then bolt counter intuitively towards a threat when the spotlight goes away. The result is slamming into the side of your car.

      Cable routing a portable car DVD player? Haven't you ever seen one of these. They are designed to be strapped onto headrests. There is indeed a rats nest of cables to inter connect the power, video and audio between a pair of units. But your not going to be doing any "cable" routing. You tear this down when you get back from the long car ride vacation.

      You need to get out more and open your mouth less.

  25. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by mr1911 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Exactly what is the difference between a no-name Chinese battery, and a named Chinese battery, besides cost?

    The name, obviously.

    --
    This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
    Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  26. When Electrical Devices Catch Fire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... take out the battery!!!

    Oh... Wait... iPhone? Nevermind.

  27. not funny by berashith · · Score: 1

    who wrote the "drummer from spinal tap app" ?

  28. How hot... by tesdalld · · Score: 2

    How hot does it have to be "Glowing Red". Wow.

    1. Re:How hot... by treeves · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.processassociates.com/process/heat/metcolor.htm, it needs to be at least 500 degrees C.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  29. Thought Experiment? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell with that! I want to see it on Mythbusters!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Thought Experiment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      Do you think it's been suggested on the forums on Discovery yet? If not, I'm totally submitting it. Electronics make some of the most awesome explosions...

      You, sir, are a genius!

  30. The airlines were right... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    You all mocked the airlines- but turns out they were right.

    Using electronic devices on planes IS dangerous.

    On a more serious note- wonder if any airlines will take this too far and completely ban cell-phones/smart phones etc from being carried on to the plane.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:The airlines were right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, let's put them all in luggage in the back of the plane where if one catches fire it will probably set most of the cargo on fire and take down the plane. If it starts to go up in someone's pocket they'll notice it a hell of a lot faster and it can be isolated and dealt with in a safe and timely manner.

    2. Re:The airlines were right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it would be much better to put it down in the luggage, where it could burn unattended...

  31. Blame game by Murdoch5 · · Score: 0

    I love how apple tried to blame everyone else for what is actually there problem. If the phone explodes or caught on fire then it's apples fault, there in charge of the end product. It doesn't matter if a customer makes the phone explode or the battery or anything,apple needs to be the ones saying "oh we F'd this up". If the phone can explode and if the phone can catch fire then it's apples fault.

    1. Re:Blame game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, douchebag? If the battery manufacturer screwed the pooch, its Apple's fault? If the customer fucked the phone well after Apple shipped a healthy device, that's Apple's fault?

      Right.. and when drunk drivers kill people, its Jonny Walker's fault. Cause goddamn once you make something, you are solely responsible for anything involving your product, even when third parties do something obviously inappropriate. Although how your mind can skip over the fact that the battery manufacturer isn't at fault, I don't know..

    2. Re:Blame game by itsdapead · · Score: 0

      I love how apple tried to blame everyone else for what is actually there problem.

      Yeah, because other manufacturer's batteries never go wrong.

      ...or maybe they do, but when an Acme MP-5147/Z (T) goes phut on a plane it doesn't make the tech blogs. Apple's high media profile is a two-edged sword.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:Blame game by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

      If apple sources from a manufacturer then it's there job to assure that company's product works exactly as expected. So it would still be there fault if a phone had issues.

    4. Re:Blame game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look, if we use your logic, then it is also the battery manufacturer's fault for not ensuring that their battery went out entirely up to spec AND, this is going to shock you, its the user's fault for not ensuring that the product he purchased was not entirely within spec.

      Because product manufacturers are responsible for their shit. And users are responsible for the shit they buy.

      So sorry Apple raped your invisible friend, but much as you'd like to pin this one on Apple, you aren't anywhere near being able to do so in any sensible way.

    5. Re:Blame game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaaah. It's "their" job, and "their" fault. Including your original post ("there problem"), that's three strikes - you're a bozo.

    6. Re:Blame game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Their x 2, brah.

    7. Re:Blame game by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the battery manufacturer screwed the pooch, its Apple's fault?

      They would be accountable, yes.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Blame game by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It would be Apples fault if it used a faulty battery in its product.
      If you took the battery out and put your own in then it would be yours or the battery manufacture, depending if it was marketed as such.

      The Jonny Walker Analogy isn't really apt. It is more the case like you got some Orange Juice and the shipment of filtered water to make the juice was replaced with Alcohol and then you got drunk and killed a person while driving.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Blame game by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Your right, the battery manufacture carries the same responsibility. Everyone who makes a product of any kind carries this carry's this responsibility. However the company who produces the "final" product must assure that everyone under them has the same quality control. It doesn't matter if it's apple, HTC, Rim or anyone even a tire manufacture for cars.

    10. Re:Blame game by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Their, There and They're. In either case I use THERE, only an English student will care.

  32. More energy = bigger possible breakdown by tirk · · Score: 1

    While we should strive to make our batteries safe, the reality is that it is impossible to stop all defects or problems. As we develop more and more powerful batteries, more energy packed into a smaller space, the damage done from a sudden release of all that energy will become worse. The best thing we can do, and to my knowledge I'm not sure we have the material knowledge to do this yet, is to create a material that even in it's natural default state will only release it's stored energy at a slow rate. As long as the materials that store the energy in a battery have the ability of a catastropic fast release of that energy this problem will become a more and more a dangerous situation as we increase the available energy in batteries.

    1. Re:More energy = bigger possible breakdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing we can do, and to my knowledge I'm not sure we have the material knowledge to do this yet, is to create a material that even in it's natural default state will only release it's stored energy at a slow rate. As long as the materials that store the energy in a battery have the ability of a catastropic fast release of that energy this problem will become a more and more a dangerous situation as we increase the available energy in batteries.

      There are battery chemistries which aren't capable of discharging quickly, but this property is usually linked to high internal resistance, which can be modeled as a resistor in series with the voltage source representing the battery. The power dissipated through a resistor is I^2 * R, so if R is anything above ~0, the battery will lose a lot of energy to internal heating at anything above a very slow discharge rate. (For the same reason, you can't charge such batteries quickly either, or you'll damage them due to internal heating.)

      I suspect one problem using such batteries in smartphones is that even if the average current demand is low, if you plot it against time the instantaneous demand can be very high (it's quite spiky). During such current spikes, a low discharge rate battery might suffer from voltage droop, which can cause other problems. This can be solved by using bypass capacitors to average out the spikes, but beefy caps take lots of space, an extremely precious commodity in mobile phones.

      So far, the method used to deal with Lithium Ion is to put an intelligent charge/discharge controller between the battery and the rest of the system, one which can monitor capacity, current charge level, cell temperature, cell voltage, and so forth, and make good decisions about how fast to allow the battery to charge or discharge. However, the best intelligent battery monitor circuit in the world can't compensate for an internal fault which causes the battery to start discharging through itself.

  33. Novelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When that the new iPhone was "hotly anticipated", this is not what I imagined!

  34. New Website by LMacG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quick, somebody register "damnyouautocombust.com"!

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
  35. There's an App for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a bricked iPhone, there's an app for that you can't refuse. If you want your location revealed to everyone, there's an app for that. If you want an exploding battery on an iPhone, there's an app for that. Here at Crapple, we strive to give you a crappy overpriced product for you fudgepacking, twinkie sucking faggots out there.

  36. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    you should always ask yourself why a no-name chinese battery costs 1/3 of the original battery.

    I think we're safe there, I hear that the Apple-branded replacement batteries from the Chinese no-name manufacturers cost as much as the new iPhones themselves.

  37. Possible to DIY-test a battery? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

    (..) and you should always ask yourself why a no-name chinese battery costs 1/3 of the original battery.

    A lot of that will be branding, some of that may be shortcuts taken in production. But much more interesting question:

    Would it be possible to determine this, non-destructively, for a battery you already have? I mean, if construction of a battery is different to the point of being unsafe, wouldn't that also affect that batteries' electrical (and perhaps thermal) behavior? Could some test procedure be devised to determine whether you have a battery in hand whose construction isn't safe?

  38. iBOMB!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple more incidents like these, and TSA will stop letting folks carry personal electronics.

  39. Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by Animats · · Score: 1

    A ban on phones with non-removable batteries may be necessary. You can carry the phone on board, but the battery has to go in a plastic bag in luggage.

    1. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      A ban on phones with non-removable batteries may be necessary. You can carry the phone on board, but the battery has to go in a plastic bag in luggage.

      Obvious troll is obvious. This was one incident and we do not know what the circumstances were. It is possible that the passenger had sat on the phone by having it in their back pocket and then battery could have ignited after the glass punctured the battery and sweat reacted with the lithium.

      I'd rather have twice (or more) the battery life per charge than a removable battery which is one reason I have an iPhone 4S instead of an android handset.

      Where are you going to keep those extra batteries that you have to swap throughout the day when you are not on a plane? What happens when you have then in your pocket with some keys and one of the keys short the terminals on a battery in your pocket?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      A ban on phones with non-removable batteries may be necessary. You can carry the phone on board, but the battery has to go in a plastic bag in luggage.

      ....but then passengers will start spontaneously combusting because they can't call people up to say "I've just landed" the millisecond the seatbelt sign goes off. When you tried to pick up your luggage you wouldn't be able to get near the carousel because of a crowd of numpties rummaging in their suitcases to find batteries and then standing around making calls (with the total disconnection from the surrounding environment that entails).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

      This was one incident and we do not know what the circumstances were.

      Lets be honest though, that's all the assholes down at TSA need.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    4. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by Skapare · · Score: 1

      It is possible that the passenger had sat on the phone by having it in their back pocket and then battery could have ignited after the glass punctured the battery and sweat reacted with the lithium.

      Please don't tell the terrorists how to turn them into an iBomb.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    5. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Batteries removed from devices are not automatically safer batteries.

      However, if and when they do go off, it would be much better, on average, to have them do so where people can see the problem and take action. Such would not likely be the case if the batteries are stowed in a luggage compartment in the belly of a plane or ship or bus, etc..

    6. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have twice (or more) the battery life per charge than a removable battery which is one reason I have an iPhone 4S instead of an android handset.

      Where are you going to keep those extra batteries that you have to swap throughout the day when you are not on a plane? What happens when you have then in your pocket with some keys and one of the keys short the terminals on a battery in your pocket?

      Who said anything about carrying extra batteries? Let me count the number of times I have carried an extra battery for my phone (android or other) since phones changed from analog to digital carrier: never.

      Having a removable battery allows for several things, such as removing the battery when something goes wrong (or to prevent it from going wrong), or replacing entirely when the original battery has worn out.

    7. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Having just bought an iphone 4S I can at least say the battery life is pathetic, I am lucky if it lasts a day. Like the phone but wish I could change the battery.

    8. Re:Ban phones with nonremovable batteries by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Having just bought an iphone 4S I can at least say the battery life is pathetic, I am lucky if it lasts a day. Like the phone but wish I could change the battery.

      Go into Settings-> Location Services and System Services and toggle off Setting Time Zone as well as any other service that you see a purple arrow by or is something with a grey arrow that you don't need or want.

      Your iPhone 4S should be lasting you at least a day. Mine lasts about two days on a single charge with Wifi turned on all of the time. Also, turn off blutooth unless if you really need it.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  40. Let me guess... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    ...it's because Gerard Depardieu pissed on it, right?

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  41. Re:Nano battery? by wygit · · Score: 1

    I received the box in ( I think ) two days. I sent it in the same day. Since then:
    Step 1 Request - November 15, 2011: Product received
    Step 2 Service - November 16, 2011: Issue identified
    Step 3 Return - November 16, 2011: Product replacement pending

    sigh...

  42. Custom back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice a custom back had been installed on the phone? Notice that the Apple logo has Steve's silhouette in it.

    That seems like the more likely cause...

    1. Re:Custom back. by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      No, I don't think that's Steve's silhouette on the logo.

      But that does lead to the question, when are we going to start seeing Jobs showing up on tortillas on teh intarwebz?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  43. Re:Nano battery? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Got the box in three days, sent the old beastie back.

    I wonder what they'll think about the install of Rockbox on it...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  44. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Beorytis · · Score: 1

    I am a researcher in Li-ion batteries

    A question for you: Does atmospheric pressure (especially the reduced pressure in aircraft) have any impact on Li battery chemistry?

  45. battery by cre_slash · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe the passengers should be required to remove the battery from their iphones and ipads in the future...

    1. Re:battery by tirk · · Score: 2

      You can't. Not without breaking it....

    2. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's your *whoosh* award. Enjoy!

    3. Re:battery by cre_slash · · Score: 1

      i know :)

    4. Re:battery by aristotle-dude · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe the passengers should be required to remove the battery from their iphones and ipads in the future...

      Maybe passengers with phones with removable batteries should be limited to one battery in total including checked luggage forcing them to buy another battery at their destination. On their way back, they would have to ship one of their batteries back home. That way people with android phones with removable batteries but shitty battery life would get why removable batteries are not an advantage if you need them to compensate for poor battery performance.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    5. Re:battery by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It'd be more whoosh-worthy if this was several years ago before non-removable batteries became ubiquitous.

      Posted from my Galaxy Tab

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:battery by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Whoo we have an Apple Fanboi here!

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    7. Re:battery by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Umm... I tried to do a comparison of manufacturer rated battery life, but no Apple product ranks in the top twenty phones currently available. Fourteen of the twenty are android phones. The iPhones range from 5-8 hours of talk time, which is pretty mediocre. (I'm assuming you're contrasting Android phones and the iPhone, but RIM's and Nokia's smartphones aren't in that list either.)

      Of course, "shitty battery life" aside, no smartphone can bear active use all day (or for the entirety of a long flight). For example, the last 30 hour (on-site) call I did I simply charged my extra battery and swapped once, whereas my fellow sufferers with iPhones had to leave them plugged into USB ports over half the night. One minute of downtime for a reboot is better than several hours of the phone being left unattended, IMHO. Plus, at $5 each with free shipping from the phone manufacturer, why wouldn't you want a spare or two?

    8. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4500mAh battery, 4 days of battery life on my Android phone. I'd like to see your dinky iPhone do better.

      Also my battery won't explode like yours might.

    9. Re:battery by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      4500mAh battery, 4 days of battery life on my Android phone. I'd like to see your dinky iPhone do better.

      Also my battery won't explode like yours might.

      Yes, at 4500mAh it will explode about 3 times as powerful - and weigh more than twice what a complete iPhone weighs.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    10. Re:battery by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      A number of points: a) manufacturer rated battery life, b) manufacturer rated battery life, but ignoring any footnotes (that may not even appear on the spec pages themselves), c) taking the worst number from Apple's spec page (while just accepting the "up to" number from the others), just because they don't hide the actual numbers behind footnotes.. Do you want a rating for your efforts?

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    11. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4500mAh battery, 4 days of battery life on my Android phone. I'd like to see your dinky iPhone do better.

      Congrats on your boat anchor.

      Also my battery won't explode like yours might.

      You know this how?

      All LiIon batteries have some level of risk of going bang or overheating badly. You are a fool if you believe otherwise. Lithium ion energy density is high, and the battery chemistry is inherently capable of discharging that energy at a very high rate. Put the two together and you get something which can generate an awful lot of heat when a fault develops. No manufacturing process known to man produces zero defects, so there are going to be batteries which do this.

      If anything, your battery is a worse risk. It has something like 3x or more the energy capacity of the iPhone's battery. If it fails, your phone is going to get a lot hotter than an iPhone will, and there might be a lot more flammable material on the outside (the iPhone 4 glass and steel enclosure is nice that way, those materials aren't going to combust).

    12. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats on your Ferrari with a teaspoon of gas.

    13. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, no incidents of explosions caused by either the phone I have, the battery I have or any phone or batteries of the same brands vs tons of incidents throughout the years of almost every Apple product line exploding. Yeah you must be right, Apple products are surely safer.

    14. Re:battery by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the CNET reviews on the various phones for battery life. The Apple numbers are conservative and seem to be either consistent or lower than those achieved by third party reviewers whereas the opposite is true for android handsets.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    15. Re:battery by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      4500mAh battery, 4 days of battery life on my Android phone. I'd like to see your dinky iPhone do better.

      Also my battery won't explode like yours might.

      My iPhone 4S lasts two and a half days and is considerably lighter than your boat anchor.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    16. Re:battery by izomiac · · Score: 1

      They reported 4.95 to 9.2 hours with the various models of iPhones, more if they disabled a radio (a favor not performed for any other phone aside from the Nexus One, at least in the first 8 pages). That's within 15% of the stated amount, and still lackluster for their list. Of course, cell phones are notoriously difficult to compare battery life with, as one of the biggest determinants is signal strength, which varies by spot to spot within the same building.

      In the real world, most of the newer Android phones are 4G, so I'm not surprised that users report less than advertised battery life using 4G, as those networks are still under construction. I wasn't aware the iPhone lacked 4G so I hadn't realized that the talk times weren't directly comparable. In other words, the iPhone 4 S should be head and shoulders above the older 3G android smartphones since it has newer technology and generally gets better signal strength (sadly, it isn't). The newer Androids should improve as more towers go up, and one could always disable 4G to level the playing field.

    17. Re:battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, two and a half days of idle. I've heard numerous complaints about iPhone 4/S eating up battery if you do anything with it from friends. Mine, on the other hand, lasts 3-4 days with heavy CPU and GPU use. I'll take an additional 7mm of thickness to have a phone that works when I need to, for as long as I need it, to do what I need.

      But I forget, you're an Apple shill. You only care about what your phone looks like externally and not about functionality.

    18. Re:battery by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 0

      Let's see, no incidents of explosions caused by either the phone I have, the battery I have or any phone or batteries of the same brands vs tons of incidents throughout the years of almost every Apple product line exploding. Yeah you must be right, Apple products are surely safer.

      Come again when your phone has been sold even remotely as much as the iPhone, then tell u how many have exploded, then compare the numbers. Oh, and what magic phone would that be you have? Is there a reason why you don't tell us? Is that reason called Google?

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
  46. Re:Nano battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, I did the request 2 weeks ago and haven't gotten the box.

  47. then apple better say wow we need batts that come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then apple better say wow we need batts that come out or we will be on the no fly list.

  48. Li + H20 = LiOH + H by mangu · · Score: 3, Funny

    You try putting out a lithium fire by throwing water on it - I dare you.

    Your fire will be extinguished by the hydrogen + air explosion. Even if it doesn't, the original fire will be the least of your concerns.

  49. Can't say I'm surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say the iPhone is HOT, HOT, HOT! Now we know why.

  50. wow by demonbug · · Score: 1

    It smokes and it glows red? And here I thought Apple products couldn't get any cooler!

    1. Re:wow by Hentes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well the problem was exactly that they couldn't get it any cooler. They tried to blow on it and turn it off, but it was still red-hot.

  51. Quite understandable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhone gains self-awareness; learns of Jobs demise

  52. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The TSA has announced that cell phones found on your person at airport check points will now be confiscated."
     
    We hope you fly us again soon...

    CAPTCHA: arrester, Irony? I think not.

  53. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by jpapon · · Score: 1
    I'm no expert, but if there was a significant effect then I'd imagine the residents of cities like Denver would be screwed.

    Also, afaik, Li-Ion batteries are completely sealed, so I don't see how changes in atmospheric pressure could have much effect.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  54. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by grqb · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to know if the phone was ever dropped, or its battery replaced at any point, or if a non-standard charger was used.

    In this case, the backplate of the iphone had been replaced (you can tell from the apple logo in the picture). Obviously I don't know if this was the cause though, but perhaps the backplate was replaced because the original broke during a fall which may have jolted some internal circuitry close to the battery causing a local hotspot near the battery and then thermal runaway. Somehow I doubt that the battery would have been punctured just by dropping/replacing the backplate though.

  55. Hold the fort.... by DJ+Particle · · Score: 0

    We all know that China make very good (cosmetic) fakes. We see them demo'd on YouTube all the time. This point was brought up in the comments in El Reg too with this story. How do we know it's a REAL iPhone? Some of the fakes are indistinguishable unless they're turned on.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9p7WvXF4Kw

  56. Chances are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the owner was probably playing Angry Birds.

  57. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by NetNed · · Score: 1

    The Volt's issue arose from the NHTSA doing a side impact pole test, then flipping the car over to see if fluids leaked from the battery. The only thing that leaked was coolant. They then proceeded to park the car with a full charge in it, which it ignited after 3 weeks of sitting with a full charge and no coolant in the system. That is something I wouldn't do with any Lithium battery. The NHTSA even said at the time that the condition was highly unlikely to happen, yet they tested further by taking the battery out of the car and recreating the test with it out of the car. It started on fire this time 1 week after the test. Since I don't think to many people will be taking the battery out of their volts and smashing them in a crash test, I think any worry is a little bit more then dramatic for no good reason. It's close to being worried about being hit by lighting.

  58. Mission:Impossible by otuz · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one this reminded of the self-destructing media devices in Mission:Impossible?

    1. Re:Mission:Impossible by balajeerc · · Score: 1

      "This message will self destruct in 5 seconds..."

  59. problem of the iphone keyboard or usb adapter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it the problem of the iphone keyboard or usb adapter? Sounds like hardware with inadequate fusing.

  60. Hale's Own iPhone by DC2088 · · Score: 1

    Welp, looks like this is what happens when Apple goes up against Mann Co.

  61. no smoke command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that what this is for: http://www.groovie-baby.co.uk/showthread.php?510-The-NOSMOKE-command

  62. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

    Exactly what is the difference between a no-name Chinese battery, and a named Chinese battery, besides cost?

    I'd guess it would be brand recognition and QC/QA. BAK puts out decent cells.

    --
    That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
  63. Same thing by Karljohan · · Score: 1

    I think that TSA &co are fully aware that it's pretty much the same thing or else it would already have been forbidden to bring the phone and/or computer.

  64. Still waiting... by LastGunslinger · · Score: 1

    for an article about a Kindle Fire on fire.

  65. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Xarin · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for Apple to sue Chevy for violating its patent on combustible devices.

  66. Ob South Park Reference by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    It is highly likely that the spontaneous combustion of that iPhone is due to the phone holding in a fart, causing a build up of methane which then ignited.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  67. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    Coincidence or not, recently I received a notice from Apple informing me that they are going to replace my 1st gen iPod nano due to the battery potentially catching fire as it ages.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  68. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....and the NHTSA admitted to not following the specific instructions that Chevy had provided them with for battery care after an accident. Don't follow the instructions, something bad happens, whose fault is it?

  69. Simple enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They spilled their in-flight beverage on it.

  70. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    Coincidence or not, recently I received a notice from Apple informing me that they are going to replace my 1st gen iPod nano due to the battery potentially catching fire as it ages.

    How did they know to get in touch with you? Is the device registered with Apple?

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  71. Inconceivable! by DragonHawk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any power adapter should be able to survive a complete short on the output if it is designed properly.

    And as we all know, the consumer electronics market is known for its high quality and attention to detail in their designs and build quality. ;-)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Inconceivable! by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised (or probably not...) if you saw the quality of some of the industrial control systems around the world....

      Scary as all hell how badly designed some of it is...

      I work fixing that kind of crap... I wish I could travel back in time and kill bad engineers...

  72. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by phorm · · Score: 1

    In some cases, the testing, and who you can sue when a battery goes bad an burns down your house/car/etc. Batches that come in from local corporations have to undergo standards-agency approval. Batteries that come in via ebay, not so much.

  73. funny dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to say that the sheild-your-iballs dept is funny, thank you for that.

  74. Nobody wants to, probably. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's well known that you can take down a plane with a cellphone battery and a bottle of duty free brandy. But some security theatre is economically politically unacceptable, and anyway, almost no freedom fighters actually want to take down a plane, especially not while they are on it.

  75. Must be the iPhone 3D (or iPhone 5) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Must be one of the iPhone 3D versions - the iPad version ran really hot in alpha and had major battery drain.

    Either that or someone said something to Siri about camel toe and she got all red.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  76. Its only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for Apple to patent this feature and sue the next corporation which release a device with similar flaws.

  77. tare your wrists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iQaeda terror cell?

  78. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 1

    Exactly what is the difference between a no-name Chinese battery, and a named Chinese battery, besides cost?

    In Japan and South Korea battery production is almost fully automatic and conducted in well controlled conditions. This is a continuous process in which a long sheet of electrode material is assembled in a roll.
    In China, on the other hand, many batteries are produced by hand by stacking discrete smaller sheets of electrode, then putting the stack in a container (be it an aluminum can or a soft pouch). You can imagine that this stacking can be less than perfect and a shortcircuit due do misalignment or some foreign body is always possible.
    Of course not all batteries are produced this way, but some are.

  79. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 1

    Good question. Short answer, I don't know for sure.
    Long answer, see below.

    For batteries packaged in an aluminum can, I can't see a big impact. For batteries packaged in a soft pouch (such as the iPhone's, I believe) it might be more of an issue.
    The point of the problem is the liquid electrolyte, which is generally formed by two main solvents, Ethylene Carbonate and Dimethyl Carbonate. EC is a solid at room temperature (mp around 36C), while DMC is a liquid with a reasonably high boiling point (90C IIRC).
    I don't think that the reduced pressure in the aircraft is enough to make so much DMC evaporate as to create excessive pressure in the packaging. Which is however designed to fail if too much pressure is built up, and Li-ion batteries are assembled in the discharged state.

  80. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    I think one of this AC's points was that brand stuff is made in China too, while the country's name is many times attached when talking about cheap garbage. Cheap CHINESE this, cheap CHINESE that.

  81. FireAngel smoke alarms, and now Iphones!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand FireAngel using crap batteries in their smoke alarms that caught fire this month, but not Apple Iphone. Mmmm!

  82. Miracle! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

    It's a sign from Saint Steve.

  83. Re:For one battery that goes, billions are just fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the point was that China is well-known for unauthorized assembly line runs while the regular employees are sleeping (or supposed to be sleeping). While you could hardly call these sort of products "counterfeit", they're produced with little concern for quality control and often high-quality, expensive items required for their manufacture are replaced with cheaper, low-quality replacements which cause unacceptable failure rates in the finished product. But hey, since the quality control guy is off the clock, that's not a problem.

    Sure, the "official" name-brand product got tested and certified and assembled from quality materials. But what you don't know is that the "unofficial" one, which looks freaking identical (made on the same machines with the same dies, undoubtedly), got a cheap dielectric which can break down and short out, and was assembled as fast as possible with no concern for its finished quality, because there's no name on the outside to tell you who to come sue if it blows up.