The question is not whether you are him or not. It is whether you represent yourself to be him or not. Plagiarism is copying without proper attribution.
the whole reason for doing it natively is to gain the speedup from decompression of all fft-based formats (jpeg,mpeg,mp3,etc.) in hardware instead of in software. If you lose that, then flash has no point.
For many years it was rent control. That's largely gone now. The other obvious problem is air rights. Both were an impediment to building when building was needed. Now there is actually a glut of real estate in Manhattan that goes unnoticed. Most bank building have 1/2 occupancy. They have large sections of empty floors. And many small businesses are ran out of adopted residential apartments. If the banks didn't continue to receive the free handout in the form of artificial minimum spread on lt vs st interest, they would be forced to be more conservative with their real estate holdings -- they'd rent it out to business and small firms would leave down town and village residential buildings.
Either get out of the way of the private business and let people come and charge a lot of money for solving problems when they occur OR think of ways to make government more agile and adoptive to situations as they occur. That doesn't mean over-preparing for everything the way NASA has to. It means finding ways to make government works thinking in adoptive ways. The only alternative is what will probably actually happen -- theatrical preparation which will fall flat on its face whenever the actual disasters occur. A lot of people will make money on the resulting corrupt institutions. Graft is widespread, well-known, and well accepted in NYC. People simply take corruption in NYC as part of the culture at this point. Maybe they are just hoping that disaster recover will be the next wave of businesses to fleece.
Because of the artificial scarcity of housing, "beach front" doesn't carry much value in NYC. In fact, most beach front communities are poor or middle class. There are notable exceptions, but they don't rise to the rich levels. The rich neighborhoods all have short commutes to high paying jobs. The idea wasn't bad in itself, but NYC simply doesn't have a long enough beach season to justify high cost for beach front properties.
The AG knows full well he is morally wrong to charge people who provided solutions which the state could not provide. Otherwise, he would have subpoenaed these records before the election.
You are an idiot. The only way to take advantage of the problem is to provide a solution. The only way to make a lot of money on providing a solution is to provide a solution where no other solution exists. These people provided gas which wasn't available from any other source. They deserved whatever money they charged.
Everybody who solves a problem takes advantage of the fact that the problem exists. If the private merchants solved the problem that NY state could not, the state owes them a thank you -- not a subpoena. Oh, and what an ass hole.
Cmon... admit it... you are really just aright winger posting ad a dumb left winger... nobody could be advocating for the left while portraying such a caricature of a left winger.
No, they actually want it.. not believe that they want it. This is what GOOD companies do -- give their customers what they want rather what some misanthropes think these customers need.
While I am a fairly convinced atheist, I have to admit that while Dawkins himself walks the fine line between insulting and disagreeing, the same cannot be said for many of his devotees. I am not saying he is guilty by association, but I am saying that someone who stirs emotions the way he does is at the very least responsible for them. In other words, he is not guilty, but he is responsible. The same, by the way, is true of the religions which purport to espouse peace while creating civil unrest. The main theme of this is, of course, explored in Dune. Paul's main angst was not losing but creating a cult in the name of which millions would go on to be slaughtered. The same concern must be shared by anyone attempting to challenge social norms. Not paying regard to such concern is exactly how secular revolutions against dictatorships turn into the rule of Shah.
Anyway, why would a "normal citizen" like "a politician" would open a bank account outside of the reach of the European union? There is no need.
As the other post points out, political instability (which has marked the European Union for the past year or two) would be a very classic reason to keep money in Switzerland. And by the way, this is Slashdot. Obvious mistaken syllogisms have no place here. Just because most corruption scandals involve Swiss accounts, does not (at all whatsoever) imply that most Swiss accounts involves a corruption scandal. Unless, of course, you also believe that just because most terrorists today are Muslims, this must necessarily mean that most Muslims are terrorists? It's the same logical fallacy. By the way, I didn't just accuse of racism. Only of bad logic.... just in case you were going for rightful indignation as your next topic of debate.
Nothing will happen.
Nothing should happen other than the jail time for someone publishing private bank accounts of individuals in a public forum. That's a pretty nasty thing to do. And god help us all if we reach a day when it's not illegal.
"The summary is definitely a troll" - Love that strategy of repeating non-sense till people believe it. Keep repeating.
It wasn't proof through repetition. It was a conclusion drawn based on the argument presented.
He was boarding a flight to NY. Canadians gets to go through security in Canada so they don't have to go through security in the US. This arrangement, in general, works out better for both sides.
No, not really. Air control is abysmal. Highways are in a state of constant disrepair despite spending more money on it than is earned by the entire electronics industry. And military costs more than all of the world militaries combined despite the fact that our standing army is less than half a million people.
Either they have better evidence than justifies a "maybe" or the suggestion is completely absurd. Just another two things happened in the same place so once of them must have caused the other. This is garbage. It's not even correlation v causation. They haven't even shown correlation. It's just garbage.
terrorism is just that which kills human bodies. killing feelings is not terrorism. otherwise, protests against freedom of speech would be terrorism too.
XP 64 has bigger issues. There is a reason it had such a shortage of drivers. Visual Studio doesn't support 64 bit operations for XP (only starting with Vista). Worse, it doesn't support memory barriers for XP. So rolling your own 64 bit operations on XP essentially means a good deal of getting dirty with assembler. Since in the presence of pipelining the execution path is fairly unpredictable, writing your own concurrency code in assembler is a black art.
It reflects properly on all experts who voice opinions in subjects which are not matters of their expertise. If you think this was out line, you should have read Terrance Tao's G+ post on why math is different from other fields of study. He trashed essentially anything else that humans do even though he only has cursory familiarity with it. Experts are human. Humans are fallible.
Essentially any society gravitates towards the lowest common denominator unless there is leadership taking it in the opposite direction. In the real world there are institutions which provide such leadership (places of worship, employers who demand respect among employees and towards customers, etc.) On the Internet no such leadership exists. When such leadership is introduced, the level of rudeness actually drops quite a bit -- just look at what happened in WoW guilds lead by polite people vs the ones lead by playerz. The level of discourse is raised when someone is able to introduce penalties on those lowering the level of discourse.
Slashdot Mirror
The question is not whether you are him or not. It is whether you represent yourself to be him or not. Plagiarism is copying without proper attribution.
the whole reason for doing it natively is to gain the speedup from decompression of all fft-based formats (jpeg,mpeg,mp3,etc.) in hardware instead of in software. If you lose that, then flash has no point.
For many years it was rent control. That's largely gone now. The other obvious problem is air rights. Both were an impediment to building when building was needed. Now there is actually a glut of real estate in Manhattan that goes unnoticed. Most bank building have 1/2 occupancy. They have large sections of empty floors. And many small businesses are ran out of adopted residential apartments. If the banks didn't continue to receive the free handout in the form of artificial minimum spread on lt vs st interest, they would be forced to be more conservative with their real estate holdings -- they'd rent it out to business and small firms would leave down town and village residential buildings.
Either get out of the way of the private business and let people come and charge a lot of money for solving problems when they occur OR think of ways to make government more agile and adoptive to situations as they occur. That doesn't mean over-preparing for everything the way NASA has to. It means finding ways to make government works thinking in adoptive ways. The only alternative is what will probably actually happen -- theatrical preparation which will fall flat on its face whenever the actual disasters occur. A lot of people will make money on the resulting corrupt institutions. Graft is widespread, well-known, and well accepted in NYC. People simply take corruption in NYC as part of the culture at this point. Maybe they are just hoping that disaster recover will be the next wave of businesses to fleece.
Because of the artificial scarcity of housing, "beach front" doesn't carry much value in NYC. In fact, most beach front communities are poor or middle class. There are notable exceptions, but they don't rise to the rich levels. The rich neighborhoods all have short commutes to high paying jobs. The idea wasn't bad in itself, but NYC simply doesn't have a long enough beach season to justify high cost for beach front properties.
The AG knows full well he is morally wrong to charge people who provided solutions which the state could not provide. Otherwise, he would have subpoenaed these records before the election.
You are an idiot. The only way to take advantage of the problem is to provide a solution. The only way to make a lot of money on providing a solution is to provide a solution where no other solution exists. These people provided gas which wasn't available from any other source. They deserved whatever money they charged.
Everybody who solves a problem takes advantage of the fact that the problem exists. If the private merchants solved the problem that NY state could not, the state owes them a thank you -- not a subpoena. Oh, and what an ass hole.
Cmon... admit it... you are really just aright winger posting ad a dumb left winger... nobody could be advocating for the left while portraying such a caricature of a left winger.
No, they actually want it.. not believe that they want it. This is what GOOD companies do -- give their customers what they want rather what some misanthropes think these customers need.
I suppose the virtuous ignore their suffering and become morally deformed
This implies that immorality is the necessary outcome of perseverance. Which isn't true.
While I am a fairly convinced atheist, I have to admit that while Dawkins himself walks the fine line between insulting and disagreeing, the same cannot be said for many of his devotees. I am not saying he is guilty by association, but I am saying that someone who stirs emotions the way he does is at the very least responsible for them. In other words, he is not guilty, but he is responsible. The same, by the way, is true of the religions which purport to espouse peace while creating civil unrest. The main theme of this is, of course, explored in Dune. Paul's main angst was not losing but creating a cult in the name of which millions would go on to be slaughtered. The same concern must be shared by anyone attempting to challenge social norms. Not paying regard to such concern is exactly how secular revolutions against dictatorships turn into the rule of Shah.
Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
That's the credo of the entitlement complex.
You can also get along with cooperation and with compromise.
Fancy words for saying unennumerated exchange. Of course, there is also enumerated exchange -- trade.
Anyway, why would a "normal citizen" like "a politician" would open a bank account outside of the reach of the European union? There is no need.
As the other post points out, political instability (which has marked the European Union for the past year or two) would be a very classic reason to keep money in Switzerland. And by the way, this is Slashdot. Obvious mistaken syllogisms have no place here. Just because most corruption scandals involve Swiss accounts, does not (at all whatsoever) imply that most Swiss accounts involves a corruption scandal. Unless, of course, you also believe that just because most terrorists today are Muslims, this must necessarily mean that most Muslims are terrorists? It's the same logical fallacy. By the way, I didn't just accuse of racism. Only of bad logic.... just in case you were going for rightful indignation as your next topic of debate.
Nothing will happen.
Nothing should happen other than the jail time for someone publishing private bank accounts of individuals in a public forum. That's a pretty nasty thing to do. And god help us all if we reach a day when it's not illegal.
"The summary is definitely a troll" - Love that strategy of repeating non-sense till people believe it. Keep repeating.
It wasn't proof through repetition. It was a conclusion drawn based on the argument presented.
For a moment I thought you meant that the politician's name was too obscure... Only for a moment though... Khaaaaan!
He was boarding a flight to NY. Canadians gets to go through security in Canada so they don't have to go through security in the US. This arrangement, in general, works out better for both sides.
No, not really. Air control is abysmal. Highways are in a state of constant disrepair despite spending more money on it than is earned by the entire electronics industry. And military costs more than all of the world militaries combined despite the fact that our standing army is less than half a million people.
Holding a bank account in Switzerland is hardly evidence of tax evasion. The summary is definitely a troll.
Either they have better evidence than justifies a "maybe" or the suggestion is completely absurd. Just another two things happened in the same place so once of them must have caused the other. This is garbage. It's not even correlation v causation. They haven't even shown correlation. It's just garbage.
terrorism is just that which kills human bodies. killing feelings is not terrorism. otherwise, protests against freedom of speech would be terrorism too.
XP 64 has bigger issues. There is a reason it had such a shortage of drivers. Visual Studio doesn't support 64 bit operations for XP (only starting with Vista). Worse, it doesn't support memory barriers for XP. So rolling your own 64 bit operations on XP essentially means a good deal of getting dirty with assembler. Since in the presence of pipelining the execution path is fairly unpredictable, writing your own concurrency code in assembler is a black art.
use context managers and it won't
It reflects properly on all experts who voice opinions in subjects which are not matters of their expertise. If you think this was out line, you should have read Terrance Tao's G+ post on why math is different from other fields of study. He trashed essentially anything else that humans do even though he only has cursory familiarity with it. Experts are human. Humans are fallible.
Essentially any society gravitates towards the lowest common denominator unless there is leadership taking it in the opposite direction. In the real world there are institutions which provide such leadership (places of worship, employers who demand respect among employees and towards customers, etc.) On the Internet no such leadership exists. When such leadership is introduced, the level of rudeness actually drops quite a bit -- just look at what happened in WoW guilds lead by polite people vs the ones lead by playerz. The level of discourse is raised when someone is able to introduce penalties on those lowering the level of discourse.