I am referring to previously built internal libraries and not the module that failed. Some home grown build systems that are basically just makefiles strung together with shell scripts have trouble with incremental builds. I use GNU autotools in case you are wondering.
Because as far as I know, BSD ports is about just package management and not managing the compilation (and configuration of that compilation) of thousands of packages with many of those packages using different build systems themselves like ebuild does.
The article doesn't mention what build system was used for the C++ code. GNU Autotools? CMake? Plain old makefiles? A build system can help you modularize your build so that a complete recompile does not occur after a syntax or linker error.
When I see the error avalanche the first place I check are the first few error messages and that is usually enough to spot the problem. Typos still make c++ compilers barf way too much crap.
which enron "peep" are you referring to? Last I heard was kenny boy selling his 3rd and 4th summer houses, but not one day of jail. If the "peep" is Marcus von Bock und Polach, a nobody lawyer/patsy that is not good enough to be considered justice.
I wish I had mod points for this.
Everyone loves Jello!
I am referring to previously built internal libraries and not the module that failed. Some home grown build systems that are basically just makefiles strung together with shell scripts have trouble with incremental builds. I use GNU autotools in case you are wondering.
Because as far as I know, BSD ports is about just package management and not managing the compilation (and configuration of that compilation) of thousands of packages with many of those packages using different build systems themselves like ebuild does.
I really admire how Gentoo manages the build of so many packages from ebuild. I think the authors of this paper should study this project.
The article doesn't mention what build system was used for the C++ code. GNU Autotools? CMake? Plain old makefiles? A build system can help you modularize your build so that a complete recompile does not occur after a syntax or linker error.
When I see the error avalanche the first place I check are the first few error messages and that is usually enough to spot the problem. Typos still make c++ compilers barf way too much crap.
I wish I had mod points. I keep hearing "Aaaaa" in my head.
Not completely private sector. Because they are a defense contractor, they must use U.S. citizens and can't outsource outside of the Unites States.
"There was an interesting idea posted on slashdotregarding using make to handle the boot process (Parallelize, and dependency handling) The original slashdot post is here."
No correction necessary.
Those are just state charges. They will probably drop them because they interfere with the federal case.
which enron "peep" are you referring to? Last I heard was kenny boy selling his 3rd and 4th summer houses, but not one day of jail. If the "peep" is Marcus von Bock und Polach, a nobody lawyer/patsy that is not good enough to be considered justice.
From Your CIO
What! I read in CIO magazine that MS operating systems were "ROBUST" and "simple to manage".
Wait until I tell Alice!!