Slashdot Mirror


No Americans Need Apply

Victor G. Sommers writes "Daniel Soong, who lost his programming job to Indian offshore companies, is willing to relocate to India. 'It would be really interesting to work in Bangalore,' he says. 'But I was told, "Daniel, it is against the law for you to work here. You can come here on vacation, but you can't work here."' Indian officials have told him they don't hire Americans." An article in ComputerWorld talks about the possibility of getting more than you bargained for in outsourced code.

1,374 comments

  1. Duh... by tliet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, duh... As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

    1. Re:Duh... by (startx) · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are two types of people I hate in this world. Those who are intolerent of other people's culture, and the Dutch!

    2. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. It is trivial to get a job in the US as a non-citizen, and I'm not just talking yardwork.

      GMAMFB. Anyone from Western Europe is not in a position to bitch about American immigration or labor laws.

    3. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep you are exactly right. I am a US citizen and my company had to get a work Permit to send me to England. I don't get why this should be on Slashdot. Sound like more fear-mongoring. I do think there needs to be some sort of limitation to countries that do not have similar worker rights as the western world. However, that probably wont happen in Dick Cheney's new America.

    4. Re:Duh... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's easy. All your prospective employer has to do is put a bunch of wierd job requirements that just coincidentally happen to match those on your resume, take a couple dozen other resumes, and strike them out because they don't have ten years experience in Java.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:Duh... by JoeBuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But as a Dutch citizen you can follow your job to Germany or the UK or Italy, because within the EU there is free trade for both labor and for capital. "Free trade" advocates these days want free movement of capital and goods, but not workers.

      In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but workers cannot follow. This one-sidedness pushes salaries down everywhere, as companies seek the cheapest available labor.

    6. Re:Duh... by boomgopher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the point being made is that everyone bitches about how jobs are moving overseas because of American's extravagant lifestyles, etc. But when someone is willing to move to a place where you can live dirt-cheap, the government over there won't allow it.

      And actually you can move right on in to California now, since the retarded state gov is basically trying abolish all immigration law. Come on over!

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    7. Re:Duh... by Brahmastra · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The only purpose to this article is so that a bunch of Whiners can rant, rave and get cardiac arrests over Indians. The law in most places is that you have to give preference to citizens over foreign nationals with equivalent skills. If the US has a bunch of lawyers who can convince the government that certain foreign nationals have unique skills, it's not the fault of some other country.

    8. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's not true. All you have to do is get a job with an American company.

      My company has "imported" more than a dozen Australians in the past three months; we closed down our Sydney operation and offered key staff the opportunity to move to the States. Those who took the chance got visas with no hassle whatsoever, after the most minimal of background checks.

    9. Re:Duh... by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

      Is your middle initial an "O"?

    10. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly. Free-trade advocates want free trade in workers too--conveniently ignoring the fact that while Peoria and San Francisco aren't too wildly different (and God knows, there's enough culture shock there to act as a barrier to moving), an Italian physiotherapist is going to have some pretty big problems treating a Welsh miner, starting with not being able to understand a word they say...

    11. Re:Duh... by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yep you are exactly right. I am a US citizen and my company had to get a work Permit to send me to England. I don't get why this should be on Slashdot.

      Read the article more carefully. The guy tried to get a job with Tata Consulting, an Indian-owned firm operating in the USA that places staff at USA-based clients. They apparently refused to hire him for this work in the USA because they do not hire Americans. Only then did he try to work in India, which is the less interesting aspect.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    12. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you explain the ubiquitous practice of Americans having to train their H1B replacements?

    13. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're out of luck then. There are plenty of people in the US who can put their finger in a dike.

    14. Re:Duh... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      What!? You mean they've closed the immigration offices?

      Oh, you want to visit here just to work. You want to exploit all the benefits (pay) of working for another nation, yet escape most of the negative side effects (taxes, selective service, social security), possibly upsetting the delicate balance of the national vs world economy?

      Hmm, why won't we let you do that again?

    15. Re:Duh... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, duh... As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

      What are you talking about? Europeans are everwhere in America, and I don't mean white-bread European-descended Americans (European Americans) either. They are in the universities and in the job market. The U.S. is not the problematic party in terms of open job opportunities. It is the European Union's cradle-to-the-grave mentality for their job market that prohibits better agreements. In truth, there should be free trade and free job opportunities between the U.S., our subsidiary named Canada, and the European Union. While Britain would most likely sign on in a heartbeat (the Scottish National Party would complain though), the other backward viewing countries, ahem "member (nation) states" like Germany and France (especially) wouldn't.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    16. Re:Duh... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trivial, but it's not legal. I went the legal route, moved here, married, waited 6 months for my work visa, and another two years for my green card.

      Of course, California is just going to hand out drivers licenses and soc. security cards to anyone no matter how they got there, with no proof of background or even who they are.

      I did it the hard way.. Spending thousands on lawyers, when I just could have showed up with my hand out.

      But then I'm a white Canadian, so I guess I had no choice.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    17. Re:Duh... by GMontag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this from the "superior society" that the Liberal Arts students/faculty were constantly droaning about?

      Let me get this straight: I can not expect Indians to hire anybody from the USA because I need to be tolerant of their society, but I must hire anybody other than an American to be inclusive?

      Yea, still makes no sense.

      BTW, obviously not a direct response to your post, just staying on topic and adding a new point with historical context.

    18. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has a serious shortage of counter help in the area of "coffee house" reefer sales. Any experience?

    19. Re:Duh... by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States

      This is the root of the problem. The US government is allowing companies to work around this law in so many ways that it may as well not exist.

      These laws were put into place to prevent what amounts to H1-b slavery. A lot of Indians/Russians/whatever move to the US to take an H1-b job, and if they aren't willing to work like dogs for significantly less than their American counterpart, they get their visa pulled, and the company simply takes the next H1-b in the queue. This is very bad for everybody. Bad for immigrant workers, bad for american workers, bad for the economy. The only person it is good for is the shareholder of the company that employs these underhanded tactics. As for offshore, it just happens. Happened to textiles, happened to auto manufacturing, will happen to IT. The people I really feel sorry for are all these fresh grads with a shiny new CS or MIS degree, 50K in student loans, and NO job prospects.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    20. Re:Duh... by abolith · · Score: 1, Insightful
      and THAT is why I am already packing my stuff and leaving Calilf. next week. got a job and a nerw house all lined up, too bad it is at 70% of my current salary thanks to the H1-B's.

      --
      if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    21. Re:Duh... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but workers cannot follow. This one-sidedness pushes salaries down everywhere, as companies seek the cheapest available labor."

      What'll be the end of this, though? Eventually there'll be enough stabilization over the globe that it won't matter as much. I don't think that it'll happen in my lifetime, so it won't help me any, but as the world grows closer, I could envision this happening. Some countries with less free market play than here will have an advantage, for a while, but ultimately I think that it'll even out.

      The other trouble is that we're seeing paradigm shifts that people aren't ready for. Remember what happened to the Swiss watch and clock makers once Japanese engineers perfected the use of quartz for accurate timekeeping? Their entire industry disappeared in a matter of months. In this case, if programmers as a whole are overpaid or are charging too much for their work as others perceive it, then the others are going to find a solution that doesn't involve the programmers. It's happened in other industries before, it'll happen again, I'm sure.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    22. Re:Duh... by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      **What!? You mean they've closed the immigration offices?**

      yeah they pretty much did that..

      i guess.. why else would there be so much 'green card lottery' spam circling(or the usual get in through marriage fraud and illegal emigrants that work in sweatshops, i bet those mexicans are not planning on just coming aboard for few benefits and then going back).

      and you mean that he wouldn't be paying american taxes and generating the american company money while working there, and then "escaping" all the benefits like pensionary to another country? a working age worker is just the kind of a guy you would want to come into the country for few years(and then haul his ass back home when he starts to cost more than what he generates).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    23. Re:Duh... by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 0, Insightful
      I do think there needs to be some sort of limitation to countries that do not have similar worker rights as the western world.
      As someone that actually had to outsource a substantiall part of our operations to a low cost country in Asia i find this opinion to be naive.
      If you had known how strict some of the countries are on worker rights i think you woyld have beeen surprised. There is a lot of industry certification and regualtions that monitors these factories. Getting all the paperwork done was very expensive and we repeatedly had to include governmental officials in our business in order to get the paperwork done.

      And why should US companies _not_ move some parts of their operations to Asia if that can secure the work of others in the USA?
      The truth is that many skilled asians really wants to work in these jobs while many lazy american workers don't wants to get their hands dirty.
      Most of the asians workers work harder and are willing to work with a bonus scheme while american workers demand a fixed pay and many benefits like expensive health insurance and free lunch time.
      On top of that our asian empoyees are more willing to work long hours in order on demand in order to produce more when we get a big contract. American workers on the other side demands a lot in extra pay in the way that i wonder if they really supports our business.
      I have realizzed that most of them only think about themselfes and not about the good relationship between the business and our workers.

      So why would we want workers to have "similar worker right as in the western world" when these benfits hurts american businesses and makes it impossible to compete with other countries?

      --
      Proud patriot and republican voter.
    24. Re:Duh... by El · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you tried marrying an American? It worked for my wife...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    25. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I always get slapped when I do that sort of thing.

    26. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      You're smoking crack too. Just get an H-1B or L-1 - you can come in right away - even without any skills. Oh, and American workers will be happy to train you for your new job here just before they get replaced by you.

    27. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

      What are you talking about? Europeans are everwhere in America,
      Theres no contradiction here. It's true that Europeans can't emigrate unless they can show they're more intelligent, productive, hard-working, open minded, better educated and just more damn sexy than Americans.

      No one ever suggested this was difficult.
    28. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read this and then come back and we'll talk. http://www.zazona.com/ShameH1B/Horror.htm

    29. Re:Duh... by jovlinger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      erm.

      you do realise that everyone who works in the US (regardless of where they LIVE) pays taxes in the US.

      A more accurate statement is that aliens give up their ability to vote or get government support for inelegibility for the draft, which is pretty much dismantled anyway. Many aliens are leaving significantly better social security nets behind when they come "visit".

      So I think the US comes out WAY ahead on all aliens working inside its borders. Especially as the aliens are less likely to have children and more likely to be highly skilled, so they are pretty much always a net gain for the economy, both locally and nationally.

      I would suggest you revisit some of those conceptions and think about how free markets tend to perform compared to protectionist markets, but I'm sure you were just being smarmy to make a point. Which I missed.

    30. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      The point is: globalism is a lie. What we have today is no globalism, it's ONE-SIDED globalism. The world can send millions of workers to the U.S. but no other country on earth will tolerate this kind of flood of "non-immigrant labor" - 4 million and counting just since 2000 alone.

    31. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That may be the law in most places, but it sure isn't in the U.S. In the U.S. it's perfectly legal to lay off a U.S. citizen and replace him with an imported "guest worker". Only in America. No other country on earth would tolerate this. Where is the WTO? All the other countries of the world scream that the U.S. is protectionist, but where is the WTO telling India to open its labor markets to AMerican programmers? Oh, and by the way, it wasn't a bunch of U.S lawyers that convinced congress to do this to the U.S. it was NASCOM - the Indian IT lobby.

    32. Re:Duh... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      it would seem, if they aoperate in the US, and don't hire someone because of there nationality they should be in violation of saome laws. Certianly not an EOE.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well it IS in violation of the law. U.S. law forbids discrimination in hiring on the basis of national origin. But guess what? The EEOC will NOT investigate ANY complaints filled by AMERICANS. Imagine being locked out of your own job market in your OWN country because 4 million non-immigrant guest workers have been imported to fill you jobs. Only in the U.S. will this be tolerated.

    34. Re:Duh... by dipipanone · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'm a British tourist
      And I'm very very rude.
      I hate the foreigners
      I hate their stinking food.

      I don't like French or Germans
      Or care for Belgians much
      But most of all, most of all
      I hate the Dutch!

      The Dutch, the Dutch
      With fingers in their dikes
      They use the wrong side of the road
      And ride around on bikes.

      They don't have any manners
      They don't say "thanks" or "please"
      And all they eat is tulips
      And stinking gouda cheese."

      British Tourist,
      John Dowie

    35. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tata Consulting? What some other similar companies named, Yaya Consulting, Melons, Headlights, Jugs, etc.?

    36. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you order her from a web site?

    37. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're smoking crack too. Tata, Wipro, and InfoSys sure as hell can move their workers across borders - 4 million from Indian alone into the U.S. since 2000. It's *other* countries who won't allow it. Now in theory WTO is supposed to make everyone play by the same rules. But as the article showed, it is *illegal* to hire Americans in India. As Orwell would say "some animals are more equal than others" under the WTO. "Globalism" is a scam designed to siphon off the wealth of the U.S. We're globalizing, the rest of the world isn't.

    38. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      It's not state law - it's FEDERAL law. It's called "Non-immigrant work visas" and it's a total scam being used to REPLACE American workers. The U.S. can import 4 million workers from India since 2000 to take IT jobs HERE, but in India it's ILLEGAL to hire Americans. Where is the great and fair WTO on THAT. Globalism is a scam designed to siphon the wealth of American off into other nations.

    39. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And why should US companies _not_ move some parts of their operations to Asia if that can secure the work of others in the USA?
      The truth is that many skilled asians really wants to work in these jobs while many lazy american workers don't wants to get their hands dirty.

      Your comment rings quite hollow. The laziest Americans are not the workers but, in fact, are the very CEO's and the Managers (who never get their hands dirty, BTW)... the same ones that are concerned enough about their golden parachutes that they are willing to lead the charge to outsource jobs to the cheapest place possible without regard to the long term consequences.

      I dunno... it must be the patriotic thing to do in this day and age.

    40. Re:Duh... by satyap · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a TCS policy, not an Indian Government policy. So I should be pissed because Boeing won't hire me?

    41. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      The end of this will be that 180 million workers from India, China, wherever will come into the U.S. and REPLACE the 180 million U.S. workers. In the no to distant future, Americans will not be able to find jobs AT ALL. Can the U.S. really take the entire population of India? Are we going to import 1 billion people? Do you really think corps will want to pay American wages once that has happened? We are, in effect, turning the U.S. into a 3rd world country like India because we are importing its population here. The American worker has no future if this continues.

    42. Re:Duh... by krysith · · Score: 1

      That's funny, one of my best friends, a programmer, moved from the US to Mexico to get a job. She was having trouble finding one here.

      I think Cali has too many programmers. Try Alabama or Mississippi instead - lowest percentage of immigrants in the nation, and not a lot of programmers either. And in some parts you can live dirt poor too. Obviously having no immigrants is helpful to a state's economy, right?

    43. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree with you. Hence the VISA system. I have worked with plenty of Indian and Chinese programmers who had fairly typical development skills, while buddies of mine, who happen to be American, were sitting at home hoping for a call from their head-hunter.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    44. Re:Duh... by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      I believe that Grey Area in Amsterdam is running a training programme for US proprietors.

    45. Re:Duh... by satyap · · Score: 1
      But as the article showed, it is *illegal* to hire Americans in India.
      The article showed no such thing. I doubt that it's illegal.
    46. Re:Duh... by iceperson · · Score: 1

      I think your attitude towards 'workers' gives Republicans a bad name. Would you have the rights of workers in this country moved back 100 years? We've seen what a lack of any government protection brings. Turn the clock back to the early 20th century and tell me that the laws we have now to prevent the exploitation of the 'worker' haven't helped. I guess your conscience (or lack thereof) allows you to believe that giving an 8-year who works 12 and 13 hour days, 7 days a week, a cardboard box to sleep in and $2 a week is fair compensation for your new pair of nikes.

    47. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      Now YOU got it right. It's NOT about jobs going overseas. The problem is the VAST invasion of the U.S. by "temporary guest workers" who are not so temporary after all. If you follow this Tandoori invasion to its logicial conclusion, U.S. corps will want to take all they can get. If they can, they will replace ALL 180 million U.S. workers with imported, cheaper workers. Last time, I checked, the U.S. still belonged to the PEOPLE of the U.S. We CAN stop this - simply demand your Congressperson repeal all the guest worker laws. If they refuse, stop paying your taxes. You are incorrect about one thing tho: there is no requirement in the guest worker visa laws that says an imported worker can ONLY be hired if a 'qualified' American cannot be found. Even if there were, there is no way to enforce that provision. Any company can simply submit the LCA and lie on it.

    48. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would suggest you revisit some of those conceptions and think about how free markets tend to perform compared to protectionist markets, but I'm sure you were just being smarmy to make a point. Which I missed.

      If we only had a truly free market, then you would have actually made a point too. However, since I, as an American, cannot currently get an IT job in India (or many other countries), it's not a truly free market, is it?
    49. Re:Duh... by notbob · · Score: 0

      So why would we want workers to have "similar worker right as in the western world" when these benfits hurts american businesses and makes it impossible to compete with other countries?


      Maybe you would like your workers to have LIVES? Or be allowed to live as human beings and not slaves?

      I'm sorry but 40 hrs / week is too much time as is, then they want you working at least another 5 / wk for free when you're on salary for the priveledge of this job when the company has no responsibility to keep you in a job.

      It's everyone for themselves, I get no severance if I lose my job, hell getting unemployment is difficult. At my last job we wrongly fired a guy and it took over a year for him to get a dime of money from unemployment.

      The day a corporation treats me like a member of the family and a community is the day I'll bust my ass without question, but when they're going to try to ass rape me I gotta watch my own.

    50. Re:Duh... by satyap · · Score: 1

      This is not true. To get an H1B, you need to have a job. To have a job, you need... guess what? Skills!

    51. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey IDIOT that is called a 'JOKE' look it up you computer nerd loser. War!
      (I love the way the most insulting shit usually comes from idiots signing off with 'peace'... Idiots)

    52. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flaw in your argument is that H1B's are just like average Americans. Congress passed a law in 2000 (called AC21) so H1B's can move between jobs now - it just takes 10 days for the INS to do the paperwork.

      H1B's will leave low paying employers for better paying jobs, so the employer ends up paying for legal fees, the INS fee's and relocation costs and then loses the H1B if they are really underpaying them as much as is usually claimed by those opposes to H1B.

    53. Re:Duh... by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The question I have - since H1Bs are supposed to be for skills that couldn't be found in the US - if I can prove that I have the skills an H1B has,c an I file a lawsuit to claim that position.

    54. Re:Duh... by gid-goo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not to mention that it's too expensive and full of Californians. Why the hell would anyone want to move there. When a shitty house costs $300k but the wages don't match the increased cost of living it just doesn't make sense. I worked for a company in Milpitas (but I got to live in Oregon). The programmers I interacted with were the biggest bunch of no-nothing losers I've ever met. It seemed like CA companies would hire any retard off the street to punch keys and ask stupid questions.

    55. Re:Duh... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      It's all a scam. Don't forget FTAs which allow UNLIMITED numbers of workers to come into the U.S. while it si still illegal to hire Americans in India. The American worker is being replaced en masse. Why do you think we hear about all these layoffs all over the place? IBM was caught yesterday laying of 15,000 due to what it said was "slowdown in global corproate IT spending". Well, guess what? IBM then filled an SEC report saying that its demand for worldwide services was "very strong". The message is clear: lay off all the Americans REPLACE them with imported guess workers. Oh yeah, next we are importing nurses and teachers. The American worker is DOOMED.

    56. Re:Duh... by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      Read the article more carefully. The guy tried to get a job with Tata Consulting, an Indian-owned firm operating in the USA that places staff at USA-based clients. They apparently refused to hire him for this work in the USA because they do not hire Americans. Only then did he try to work in India, which is the less interesting aspect.

      The interesting bit about the guy trying to work in India, is that they don't allow foreigners in to work, i.e. it is fine for all the Indian's to go to other countries and leach work, but it is not ok for people to go to India to get work. Capeche? :)

      See:

      "It would be really interesting to work in Bangalore," he says. "But I was told, 'Daniel, it is against the law for you to work here. You can come here on vacation, but you can't work here.'"

      While it is of concern that Tata Consulting have a racist policy against the country that they are employing people in, I think India's policy is pretty shit too!

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    57. Re:Duh... by captainktainer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't buy it, and I'm glad you haven't been modded up. What you're failing to realize is that the immigrants from India (and loads of other countries) end up becoming Americans when they live and work here, and end up contributing productively to the economy.

      I get the feeling that when you say "Americans" you mean "Americans I'm comfortable with," which means "people who don't speak with accents and who have a similar skin color-" because if not I fail entirely to see the reason behind your statement. Our country is composed of immigrants and descendents of immigrants- hell, even the Native Americans are immigrants, if you trace it back far enough. You, yourself are the descendent of immigrants. So why spread FUD about people with roots analogous to your own?

      I just noticed the time/date stamp (I'm usually oblivious to dates), and it occurred to me that this is a very topical discussion to have today. Many of the people who died in the World Trade Center two years ago today were immigrants to the United States or here under work visas. Many of the firefighters and policemen who died were immigrants or the sons and daughters of immigrants. The immigrants "took American jobs"- and yet many became citizens or were in the process of becoming citizens, thus becoming Americans themselves. The point I'm making is that immigration- even in massive waves- has always been and will always be an important facet of the economic and cultural life of the United States, as has anti-immigrant bigotry, intolerance, and xenophobia. I invite you to reflect on this.

    58. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and as an American, it's not possible for me to work in the Netherlands unless I can prove my skills cannot be found there.

    59. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was a funny enough quote in the movie, and certainly not offensive to the point where it should be included. What the movie-makers don't factor in is monkeys like you who hear the quote and then think it's funny to say any time you hear the word dutch.

      There's only one type of person I hate in the world, and you're a perfect example.

    60. Re:Duh... by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I've been wanting to go back to school. I might just have to join this training program.

    61. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From Motorola's President, Mike Zafirovski:

      "There are at least two big opportunities for us. First, we must significantly increase our revenues in India. Our revenues in India more than doubled in 2002, but they are still less than $300 million. The Global Telecom Solutions Sector has done a terrific job - we have deep relationships with all six major carriers and are well positioned to extend our 40 percent market share. Thanks to the Global Relations and Resources Organization, we also have strong ties with government and business leaders. The Global Software Group (GSG) has a well-established presence there (since 1987), with two software centers in country. The Personal Communications Sector has revved up its activities in India but needs to do more. All in all, a good foundation for Motorola, but we really haven't begun to tap into the rocketing India market.

      Second, we must take better advantage of the technical and administrative resources in India. Other than GSG and some Semiconductor Products Sector resources, we have not leveraged the Indian workforce at levels equal to many of our competitors and other global companies. Yet this nation offers one of the best educated, technically trained workforces in the world. Indian engineers and information technologists can readily compete not only on cost, but on process, quality and speed."

      Translation: Americans, your days are numbered.

    62. Re:Duh... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      That's not true. If you are employed by a consulting organization *outside* the US, you can work in the US but get paid in your country of employment. I did an almost year long stint in Sweden working for a US consulting firm and certainly did not pay Swedish income taxes. I also did a 6 month project in Canada and did not pay Canadian income tax. If an Indian consultant works in the US but is employed in India, they also would not pay US income tax.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    63. Re:Duh... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Because of housing costs in CA, you may see an actual *RISE* in disposable income, depeding on where you are moving to.

    64. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the article more carefully. It was only heresay that they hire only Indians:

      "His friends told him that Tata only interviewed Americans to be in compliance with the equal opportunity employment commission, and that no Americans were ever hired."

      Either way they wasn't the point of the article:

      "Daniel Soong, who lost his programming job to Indian offshore companies, is willing to relocate to India. But Indian officials have told him they don't hire Americans."

    65. Re:Duh... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Theres no contradiction here. It's true that Europeans can't emigrate unless they can show they're more intelligent, productive, hard-working, open minded, better educated and just more damn sexy than Americans."

      I assume you are speaking of Monica Bellucci, and if so, I agree with you 100%. Monica my dear, if you are reading this, please come to the U.S. Someone in the Administration will invalidate your marriage to Vincent Cassell on the grounds of a humanitarian hardship and then we can live in bliss... That's my version of The Matrix... :)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    66. Re:Duh... by javiercero · · Score: 1

      Please spare me the speech, those laws were passed with the blessing of American business. It makes sense for them, lower wages -> bigger profits. They give a shit about the American public in general. The enemy is sometimes sleeping with you, deal with it. Oh, I know it is easier to blame it on the towelheads, go on then...

    67. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are wrong, foreign trade is currently increasing the wealth of Americans. America is running a trade deficit of about $500 billion a year with the rest of the world. That means that American is receiving $500 billion more in goods and investments than it is giving back to the rest of the world. It seems to me that globalization is making Americans more wealthy to the tune of $500 billion a year.

      Globalism, like all other types of trade, increases wealth. Companies that charge less for goods gain business, companies that are less efficient lose business (and eventually go on to do something they are relatively better at). Everyone gains when they get more for their money when competition drives prices down.

      Oddly, everyone focuses on the loss of jobs in uncompetitive industries and ignores the benefits of cheaper, better-quality goods. It is interesting that everyone focuses on the half of the trade equation that hurts rich company owners (loss of business), and ignores the benefits that increased competition brings to everyone else; I wonder why?

      If buying goods manufactured outside of my country is bad, when is it good to trade? Should I only purchase goods manufactured in my home Province? Within my home city? Within my family? I guess I can conclude that the best thing for me to do is to grow my own food and manufacture everything I use, then all the benefits of job creation will go to me alone. I don't think you would agree that everyone would be richer if they never traded with anyone, so where do you stop? We accept that competition and specialization within a country is a good thing; why stop at the border?

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    68. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost 300,000,000 since 1492 alone!!! Of course a few of those descended from immigrants but it still the same.

    69. Re:Duh... by glenrm · · Score: 1

      You should try this, if you are out of work you have the time to work with a lawyer on the case and it would be interesting to see how much publicity this generates.

    70. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't blame your salary decrease on foreign workers diluting the market. It's your own damn fault for not being better than the competition and thus, obviously worth the higher salary.

      Loser.

      As if the world owes you a living.

    71. Re:Duh... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1, Troll

      And actually you can move right on in to California now, since the retarded state gov is basically trying abolish all immigration law. Come on over!


      What is happening in CA is the definition of critical mass.

      California is now being overrun by Mexicans, who want to live well but instead turn it into "new new" Mexico. Then when the property values plummet, there is no money and infrastructure to allow such a lifestyle, they will be moving to the Midwest in droves to unintentionally destroy its infrastructure and educational system, and taking all of the jobs away for crap wages and sucking up government services at a rate that we cannot even possibly pay for.

      The Mexicans have proved that NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE IN MEXICO. And I'll be damned if they aren't turning California into Mexico right now. Who's next?

      This is what happens when you let a group in that doesn't want to integrate into the society, but instead have a goal that has nothing to do with the other half. When the population gets high enough, the society takes an off ramp. Just like California is right now.

      "La Raza!"

      You'd be well informed to learn what that means. It is an exclusionary statement. I saw it everywhere in California.

      So all of you that may get mad at what I said, I ain't no gringo. I may be white, but I speak Spanish almost fluently. SO IF YOU THINK THAT I AM SOME REACTIONARY REDNECK, think again.

      I just see it for what it is.

    72. Re:Duh... by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      there is no requirement in the guest worker visa laws that says an imported worker can ONLY be hired if a 'qualified' American cannot be found

      Hmm, I always thought that was part of the H1-b system. Well, regardless of whether it is or isn't, the law is very unfair. I can see how it would be useful in the presence of a labor shortage (like the 90's tech boom), but now that unemployment of American workers is so high, it is time to reduce/eliminate the H1-b programs. The continued acceptance of this situation by the government is very short-sighted. Like many foreign workers, a large amount of the money they earn is sent back to their families. This is money that isn't being spent here. Once again, big companies with political ties get a sweet deal while the rest of the population gets FUCKED.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    73. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey dipshit, the only americans profiting are CEO's and that top 5% in this country who happen to be billionares.

      Oddly, everyone focuses on the loss of jobs in uncompetitive industries and ignores the benefits of cheaper, better-quality goods. It is interesting that everyone focuses on the half of the trade equation that hurts rich company owners (loss of business), and ignores the benefits that increased competition brings to everyone else; I wonder why?

      I'll tell you why, they can't buy those cheap goods without jobs!

    74. Re:Duh... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      You're perfectly welcome to pick grapes for less than minimum wage, or change my godson's diapers for six bucks an hour, if you're really that concerned about the furriners coming over and "taking" "our" jobs.

      --
      hang brain.
    75. Re:Duh... by drpentode · · Score: 1

      I think I'll marry an Indian. Then I'll get that job in Bangalore.

    76. Re:Duh... by rifter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, duh... As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

      Informative, my ass. Funny, maybe. Yes, you can come here and work. The requirements of the work visas indeed are that no Americans can do the job and that the applicant gets paid the same as Americans. But that is not what is happening here. The whole point is that these laws have no effect because they are not enforced. RTFA, Americans are being replaced by foreign workers wo are being paid half or less what the Americans are. That is why we are complaining.

      Whereas you can come here, buy land, get a job, and become a citizen it is impossible for Americans to do that in pretty much any country. In fact these kinds of things are unheard of in many countries.

      I am not against the opportunities the USA provides, I am in fact proud of it. But I think we need to start enforcing the law w/r/t immigration instead of winking and nodding when it translates into runaway profits for major corporations.

    77. Re:Duh... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      I think your attitude towards 'workers' gives Republicans a bad name. Would you have the rights of workers in this country moved back 100 years? We've seen what a lack of any government protection brings. Turn the clock back to the early 20th century and tell me that the laws we have now to prevent the exploitation of the 'worker' haven't helped. I guess your conscience (or lack thereof) allows you to believe that giving an 8-year who works 12 and 13 hour days, 7 days a week, a cardboard box to sleep in and $2 a week is fair compensation for your new pair of nikes.

      Straw man logical fallacy. Thus, your point is useless.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    78. Re:Duh... by pdbogen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I was in History 106 today, and my professor says to us, "One of the primary characterizations of the industrial revolution was a period of rapid change." Rapid change, sort of like how you buy a video card, and a month later it's obsolete, and two months later it's a paperweight.

      Reading this article has got me thinking, though.
      One of the other characterizations of the industrial revolution was cheap labor- the massive influx of immigrants into the U.S., who proceeded to work for dirt and drive "Americans" out of jobs. If you recall, it only made everybody's - except the wealthy, of course - living conditions worse. This is not a good thing. Being only a mere computer scientist, I hesitate to speculate on what far-reaching sociological effects this will have, but at the very least, in the near future, this is not a good thing.
      Last time this happened, we unionized, but I don't think that will work this time. I wish I had a solution (since in three years when I graduate I probably won't have a job), but I can't see one.

      And, for the record, I wasted three mod points to post this.

    79. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait some more time. Till your bigotry flushes you down into the toilet.

    80. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...your conscience (or lack thereof) allows you to believe that giving an 8-year who works 12 and 13 hour days, 7 days a week, a cardboard box to sleep in and $2 a week is ...

      Love to pull numbers out of your butt, don't you?

    81. Re:Duh... by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Informative
      since H1Bs are supposed to be for skills that couldn't be found in the US - if I can prove that I have the skills an H1B has, can I file a lawsuit to claim that position.

      No, an H1-B is granted to a foreign national who fits the requirements of a job, if no qualified American or permanent resident can be found after a reasonable recruiting effort. There are 280 million Americans, and it'll be prohibitively expensive to ensure that there are absolutely no matches anywhere in the country.

      That may sound like a bad deal to you, but consider that the foreign national in question may have to have moved an entire family overseas to take the job. It is equally unfair to fire him or her the very moment a qualified and willing American shows up at the door.

    82. Re:Duh... by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. So in essence, our govenment has made it easier to fuck citizens out of their jobs for a cheaper imported worker. Nice.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    83. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree a bit. I've noticed rates for contractors plummeting, although I'm sure part of that is due to the economy being the way that it is. I think, though, that getting $90k a year for coding might have been a bit much. We all say "this company wouldn't run without programmers" but then again, it wouldn't run without accountants, and marketing specialists, and a call center..

      Maybe we have too much pride. Look at the number of immigrants willing to do landscaping, and work on the back of garbage trucks. Most American's are "above" that kind of work, and demand too much money to do it. Maybe call centers and software development are similar to that. Maybe I'm just rattling on now...

      With current trends, I don't see US citizens fairing well in the future. We're already the first generation in history to be worse off than our parents were. Hell, I still make more than $80k/yr (after several pay cuts recently) but my family wouldn't get by the way we do if my wife didn't work too.

      I think I need some more caffeine....

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    84. Re:Duh... by jalilv · · Score: 1

      The Guy doesn't make it clear what exactly was told to him about the law in India. There is certainly no law that restricts foreign workers in India. The point is, India has lot of programmers and other labor force that is locally generated. Why would they think of hiring someone from abroad when they have plenty in supply ? Plus the hassle of Visa drives them away too .

      Oh and TCS, its a blood sucking bodyshop. They pay lowest possible wages to its employees (unless you are higher up) and thats how they are able to bid low on contracts and get many of them.

      - Jalil Vaidya

    85. Re:Duh... by rifter · · Score: 1

      While it is of concern that Tata Consulting have a racist policy against the country that they are employing people in, I think India's policy is pretty shit too!

      It is especially stupid when you consider that Indian politicians have been crying about a "brain drain" in India for decades (e.g. anyone with brains gets the hell out in a hurry). To me immigration would be something one would encourage, especially when it is educated people from developed countries with proven skills.

    86. Re:Duh... by pmz · · Score: 1

      "Free trade" advocates these days want free movement of capital and goods, but not workers.

      Actually, they should advocate that the recieving countries can choose one, the other, both, or neither. The sending countries either play along or take their business elsewhere. Eventually, countries will figure out what works will do well, and the countries that don't will suffer (and eventually come around).

    87. Re:Duh... by McMuffin+Man · · Score: 1

      Tata Consulting Services doesn't hire Americans? I need to call an American friend of mine who works at TCS and tell her she should stop showing up.

    88. Re:Duh... by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      siphon of the wealth of the US? What are you talking about, this whole thing is because it's cheaper for the American corporations this way.

    89. Re:Duh... by tricorn · · Score: 1

      So find out which companies are (ab)using H1-B a lot, and send them your resume, including the skills they're claiming they need. Then sue over the next H1-B they hire that matches the skills you told them you had.

    90. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull! Do a Google search for "H1B". If you're willing to be the low bidder, there's plenty of would-be sponsors looking for cheaper slave^H^H^H^H^Hemployees.

    91. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you had read the article, you would understand that the issue isn't whether this guy could go to another country and get work with an american country as a foriegner, but that American companies and interviewers are paying lip service (at best) to the US requirements.

      You say "the law in most places is that you have to give preference to citizens over foreign nationals with equivalent skills". Yet in this same article (which I guess maybe you did not read) they state that the guy in question has been interviewed for positions where they hung up on him after only fifteen seconds for what was later explained to him "just to get you on the phone so they can claim to meet equal oppertunity requirements; they enver actually hire Americans".

      So yes, in most places, you have to give preference to citizens. But not in America.

    92. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So, property values in California are lower today than they were 10, 20, 30 years back, because there are more Mexicans now? And by golly, you'll be damned before you let them do the same to Iowa?

      You are a reactionary redneck. Wait, no, lemme think again ... Make that spanish-speaking reactionary readneck.

    93. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      think the point being made is that everyone bitches about how jobs are moving overseas because of American's extravagant lifestyles, etc. But when someone is willing to move to a place where you can live dirt-cheap, the government over there won't allow it.
      Don't be an idiot - I am not aware of any country on the planet that will let foreigners work without a work visa - why should India be any different?
      And actually you can move right on in to California now, since the retarded state gov is basically trying abolish all immigration law. Come on over!
      I agree, lets kick all non-native Americans out of the US - GO BACK TO EUROPE YOU FOREIGN SCUM!
    94. Re:Duh... by efflux · · Score: 1
      including the skills they're claiming they need

      Only the skill requirements are often never met, and in some cases cannot be met (e.g. must have more years experience than the technology/language/etc has existed for).

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    95. Re:Duh... by Slordak · · Score: 1

      Wrong. No skills are needed; just a faked up resume and an employer looking for cheap labor. They don't really care if you aren't qualified and can't do the job properly, they figure that at 1/6th the cost of a US employee, they're getting a steal regardless.

    96. Re:Duh... by micromoog · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...too bad it is at 70% of my current salary thanks to the H1-B's.

      Are you sure it's not because you're an incompetent hack?

    97. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is they will tailor the skill set for that job to something that perhaps is not essential, but one that you might not have.

      Its a game played by the lawyers. If you really want to bust this sort of thing, the INS should hire senior IT people to evaluate the skill sets that companies file for each position.

    98. Re:Duh... by rmohr02 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Semi-related quote: "There are two things I hate in this world: racial profiling, and Arabs on my plane."

    99. Re:Duh... by mAineAc · · Score: 1

      You know this is totally untrue. We have thousands of illegal aliens take jobs from Americans. It seems like many companies actually look for this feature in their employees.

    100. Re:Duh... by pinka · · Score: 1


      But as the article showed, it is *illegal* to hire Americans in India.


      The article quoted an official saying this. It gave the impression that it was an Indian *government* official that said this. However, this is not the case. Indian laws are pretty similar to US. If a company wanted to hire foreigners it would have to go through an awful amount of red tape. When companies really want to hire someone badly, they will do it.

      However, it is more likely that it just a TCS official that made this statement just to get out of an uncomfortable situation: an euphemism for "we don't want to hire you". They might have millions of reasons.

      1. Plenty of well-trained graduates inside India

      2. A perception that an American won't really want to work in India. (After all, where do you want to retire to? Do you really think that any retirement savings you make in India will contribute anything if you retire to the US? The exchange rate is about 1 dollar to 45 rupees; improving, true, but won't get above 30 rupees in the foreseeable future. and so on.)

      3. There might be local (i.e. statewise) labour laws that forbid this; but somehow I doubt that.

      4. There might be a perception that Americans would ask for American style labour laws etc. and if anything goes wrong would be more liable to sue, or drag the US government into the picture or generally create more hassles; and thus represent significantly more risk in terms of intangibles.

      That said, it is a pity that we don't have free movement of labour. Once this was something that only people from the third world wanted. First worlders talked of "our culture". But freedom of domicile, like free trade and freedom of speech tends to improve matters for everyone concerned (except maybe fundamentalists).

      I know that Indian companies hire non-Indians; at least in the higher ranks. Most of them, though tend to be of Indian origin and so are expected to understand the culture better...

    101. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason TCS does not hire Americans or actually anyone already in US is because it is much cheaper for them to get someone from India to relocate. They pay much lower salary as compared to what someone here might except.

      Besides, they have so many people in US on the bench right now why would they hire anyone else. As for working in India, just get a work visa.

    102. Re:Duh... by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny
      The programmers I interacted with were the biggest bunch of no-nothing losers I've ever met.

      Did they "no" how to spell "know"?

    103. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO IF YOU THINK THAT I AM SOME REACTIONARY REDNECK

      Dude, when you have "El Camino SS" as your nickname, you're already a redneck. Whether or not you're reactionary is another matter. ;-D

    104. Re:Duh... by thud2000 · · Score: 1

      True, MS may not have the number of immigrants of CA or other states. And, it's true you can live dirt poor in places. DIRT poor. Here's the catch - the places where you can live dirt poor, don't usually have businesses that hire a lot of programmers. The areas that do have businesses that hire programmers, are nowhere near cheap to live in. (Try looking at real estate prices in the Jackson area. Now compare this with what programmers in the Jackson area usually make).

      There aren't a lot of tech jobs here anyway, not since the whole WorldCom fiasco basically torpedoed the state's nascent tech economy. So, to sum up: Don't come here, Californians! It's too hot anyway.

    105. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that India's policy is pretty shitty. They should open borders and allow anyone to come and work there. And so should the U.S. and Europe. Keeping jobs by protecting borders is pretty much a lose-lose proposition.

    106. Re:Duh... by satyap · · Score: 1

      So you're assuming that all H1Bs are unskilled. Gee, thanks.

    107. Re:Duh... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like, duh, you've never heard of the internet? Prohibitively expensive? Let's see: set up a website with jobs about to be given to foreigners; wait 30 days for applications; no aplications?; you can bring someone in; otherwise, forget it Mr. CEO Bossman.

      This argument would fall under the rubrick of tissue of lies if were even that substantial.

      My great grandfather moved halfway around the world to sell fruit off of a wagon in Sioux City, Iowa. Don't give me this sob story about moving your entire family.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    108. Re:Duh... by ScooterBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been well proven that a closed society with strict immigration and trade policies is far less efficient than an open one. The US has always been fairly open in terms of immigration and trade and we seem to be the largest world economy by far.

      Take a look at software. Copy protected, closed source, limited distribution, special requirements to become a developer. These things all will ultimately hinder progress.

      What we have here is a bunch of L33t "US citizens" who can't compete with a poor third world country and who want their government to protect their financial interests. Boo Hoo.

      The government has one function. That is to make sure that the people aren't being screwed by those with money and power (read large corporations). The government is the buffer between runaway corporate greed and an incentive based capitalism.

      In this case, our government should require a reciprocal agreement with India so that everyone has a fair shot.

      Protectionism is not the answer. Adaptation is the answer. I think Soong sounds like a smart guy and could easily join the rank of other entreprenuers that this country is famous for. Then he could exploit the workers in 3rd world nations too!

      M

    109. Re:Duh... by Zebbers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm
      the job is temporary
      he shouldnt have moved his family
      if he did
      thats his mistake
      hes not here to become a citizen
      just here to make some cash

    110. Re:Duh... by rifter · · Score: 2, Informative


      " But as the article showed, it is *illegal* to hire Americans in India."

      The article showed no such thing. I doubt that it's illegal.

      RTFA.

      He still gets occasional interviews, but he feels that they are just for show and that the companies will send the job overseas. Soong recently decided to send his rZsumZ to India, to see if he could get work there.

      "It would be really interesting to work in Bangalore," he says. "But I was told, 'Daniel, it is against the law for you to work here. You can come here on vacation, but you can't work here.'"

      Now, it may not be true. Just to be sure, I looked into the official websites. Unfortunately India's visa website is far less informative than many others. It is not clear whether an American can get an employment visa for hire in an Indian firm, or if s/he must be working for a company that happens to base its operations in India and is transferring him/her there. However, if they follow what most countries do, the Business Visa would be for transfers and the employment visa would be for employment.

      Of course, even if that is true there is the chicken-and-egg problem of getting the job before getting the visa. Notice the only statement of requirements:

      # EMPLOYMENT VISA
      Are issued to skilled and qualified professionals or persons who are engaged or appointed by companies, organisations, economic undertakings as technicians, technical experts, senior executives etc. Applicants are required to submit proof of contract/employment/engagement of of foreign nationals by the company or organisation.

      I would be surprised if this were all there is to it. To be fair, the US requirements are similar, but in the case of the H1Bs people are worried about they are being sponsored by US companies who pay the visa fees and do all the paperwork for them. I would doubt there are a lot of Indian firms doing this for US workers as there is not much in it fo rthem, but there might be.

      Anyway, you might find the following article interesting; it is prophetic, don't you think? Check the date.

    111. Re:Duh... by Computer! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you need to stop buying so much shit.

      That was a little simplistic, but it's the source of the problem. How many cars does your family have? How much are you paying on them each month? Is your house bigger than you really need? How many TVs do you own? How many activities are your children enrolled in? How many times a week does your family eat out instead of just cooking at home?

      Note that all of these questions are rhetorical, and the answers are none of my business. Just something to think about. Foreign workers can get by on less because they spend less.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    112. Re:Duh... by bronxist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apparently, the Republican party is outsourcing fund raising to Indian call centers as well...

      http://www.business-standard.com/archives/2003/j an /50310103.016.asp

      Wonder how they do the Texas drawl?

    113. Re:Duh... by bbrockit · · Score: 2, Informative

      "There are 280 million Americans, and it'll be prohibitively expensive to ensure that there are absolutely no matches anywhere in the country." First off, there are 150 mil Americans in the workforce or available to work if you don't include retired people and children. There are over 2 million unemployed Americans and over 500,000 unemployed American IT workers. Companies don't have to expend a lot of effort to find qualified American workers because those people are beating their doors down. Visa workers and offshore workers are being used for service desk and software development. 99% of the time, it's not cancer research. There is no reason for the US to be importing over 250,000 H-1B Visa holders a year in this employment market. The only thing most of these foreign workers have to offer is that they'll work for less. That's it. More of the truth can be found here. Thankfully, the H-1B Visa quota will be cut to 65,000 this month and there is increasing pressure to eliminate L-1 Visa's altogether.

    114. Re:Duh... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm swimming in an ocean filled, not with water, but with irony.

      The US has enjoyed the benefits of globalization for decades now. Look at all the goods at your disposal, right now. Look at the computer, the mouse, the car, the food. Realize how much of it is affordable to you because they exported the labor, to a place that could make your underwear with labor that cost $1 a day.

      Now, imagine all the prices of all those goods increasing as every individual on the production and supply chain, all the way back to the origin, gets paid in US-standard wages that allows each and every worker to buy a US-sized house on a US-sized tract of land for a small nuclear family, with 2 recent-make cars for the family, health care, home entertainment systems, etc. Are you willing to pay $20 for a pair of socks to make that happen? $50,000 for an entry-level car?

      I'm all for wage convergance, labor and environmental riders on trade agreements - although that will also end up making your goods more expensive. But to think that the US has suffered under globalism is completley misguided.

      Also, the H1B visas were granted because of something that most IT professionals, particularly the libertarianish ones, just don't understand: class conflict. IT was very expensive blue-collar labor. The US economy is managerial capitalism, and it is in their class interests to push down the cost of that labor.

      Most IT types mistook their good wages for a sign of inclusion in the "wealth-generating," upper-classes. In fact, it was an artifact of a labor scarcity that has been engineered away. Now, the IT rabble has to take its place in front of the punch-clock like all the other line-workers.

    115. Re:Duh... by hcduvall · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a former Liberal Arts student ... which one of us claimed they were a superior society? And which "they" am I defending right now, the liberals, the indians, the martians?

      Let me straighten it out: You cannot expect Indians to hire anybody from the USA (or any foreign country) w/o a work visa in India. If they're doing that in the US, and the job doesn't requrie speaking Hindi and Gujarat et al, or any other special qualification that after time searching results in no American applicants, when they can hire whoever the hell fills the qualification, then its damn illegal and we fine them or whatever until they change.

      You don't need to hire anybody for anything. But those pesky non-American companies/clients/customers like talking to people they relate to, its salesmanship. And people like working with other people they relate to. But hiring for diversity in backgrounds with US citizens doesn't have the same crux issues as to hiring foreign nationals.

      Gee, that makes sense.

    116. Re:Duh... by chmilar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The term "free trade" is often used to describe trade agreements which do not fit the definition.

      True free trade allows:

      • Free movement of goods.
      • Free movement of capital.
      • Free movement of labor.

      The European Union has all three. It is a true "free trade" system.

      Most others, including NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), do not allow free movement of labor. NAFTA permits "brain drain" labor movement to occur fairly easily ("temporary" work visas are easy to obtain for skilled/educated workers), but unskilled labor cannot cross borders.

      NAFTA and its ilk are not free trade agreements. They are better described as trans-national outsourcing agreements.

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    117. Re:Duh... by dcocos · · Score: 1


      Especially as the aliens are less likely to have children and more likely to be highly skilled, so they are pretty much always a net gain for the economy, both locally and nationally.


      I don't know where you get the idea the aliens are less likely to have children.
      If you are H1B and you get laid off if you don't find a job that will sponsor you with in two weeks you get sent back to your country of origin. ....
      but if you get married (citizenship of your bride doesn't matter) and pop out some kids since your kids are citizens you can't get kicked out. To me that sounds like good incentive to multiply.

    118. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the white race is further diminished. 15% of the world's people are white today. In 50 years, it will be less than 5%.

      in 100 years, less than 1% if we are around still at all..

    119. Re:Duh... by axxackall · · Score: 1

      75% of H1Bers I know personally (about 300 of them) successfully apply and get their Green Cards.

      --

      Less is more !
    120. Re:Duh... by zwaffle · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm from Europe too an I've moved to the USA 6 years ago. Of course I didn't get a job right away (that's really hard unless you already work abroad for an american company), I came here on a student visa. Once you get a Master degree (in one year min), you get a one year working permit for practical training. So I got a job, then switched to H1 status, then won a green card at the diversity lottery (note the software company I work for now gets GC for all its employees). So I guess you didn't try hard enough. You see the selection process is not "Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.", it's "Unless I'm really willing to make the commitment and effort to come to the USA". And of course, it doesn't hurt to be really good at what you do.

    121. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a prince!

    122. Re:Duh... by axxackall · · Score: 1
      The only thing most of these foreign workers have to offer is that they'll work for less.

      Sounds a reasonable argument to me to let them in.

      Oh, by the way, what was the reason American Indians let your grandfather in the country a century or two ago? No, seriously, anything special besides the different skills in using weapons?

      --

      Less is more !
    123. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Vote the morons out who allow this to happen. There is an election approaching, at least, try to vote them out.

    124. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Discrimination on the basis of national origin applies to American citizens. So you can't hire Italian Americans and not Mexican Americans on a whim.

      I dont think you violate any laws if you put CITIZENS ONLY on any job posting, as long as it does not have the "purpose or effect" of discriminating on the basis of national origin.

      See http://www.eeoc.gov/docs/national-origin.html

    125. Re:Duh... by Jeremy+Allison+-+Sam · · Score: 1

      Very true. Capital is free to move anywhere, people are not.
      This is the main problem with globalism.

      Jeremy.

    126. Re:Duh... by axxackall · · Score: 1

      What the difference between your grandfather and people from India? That time your grand-father was no more uniq than American Indian living on that land for centures. They let him in. Why you don't want let India-Indian in your country now?

      --

      Less is more !
    127. Re:Duh... by rifter · · Score: 1

      That may be the law in most places, but it sure isn't in the U.S. In the U.S. it's perfectly legal to lay off a U.S. citizen and replace him with an imported "guest worker". Only in America. No other country on earth would tolerate this. Where is the WTO? All the other countries of the world scream that the U.S. is protectionist, but where is the WTO telling India to open its labor markets to AMerican programmers? Oh, and by the way, it wasn't a bunch of U.S lawyers that convinced congress to do this to the U.S. it was NASCOM - the Indian IT lobby.

      Actually, it is against Federal law to hire foreign workers to displace US workers or to pay them less than the prevailing wage. Outsourcing is legal, but the recent shenanighans with the H1B et al are not. Unfortunately Mr. Ashcroft is too busy rousting American citizens from mosques and putting doctors in jail for prescribing medicine which is legal in CA but illegal in Ashcroft's asshole where his head is to enforce the law in this country.

    128. Re:Duh... by schtum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First of all, you don't seem to know what globalism is. Globalism means i can buy a Coke and catch the latest Hollywood movies almost anywhere on the planet. You're right that it's one sided, it's hard to find foreign films and products, even if they're popular overseas, in the U.S.

      Second of all, you're wrong that only the U.S. has a large migrant worker population. France, Germany, England, even Ireland since their economy picked up, all have them.

      The key here isn't "U.S. vs. the World", it's Wealthy vs. Non-wealthy nations. In which case it only makes sense for things to be one sided. India wouldn't tolerate a flood of "non-immigrant labor" because their economy couldn't support it. On top of that, most Americans wouldn't be interested in doing more work for lower pay 10,000 miles away from their loved ones.

      Not that it never happens. A friend of mine recently quit a comfortable job at Deutsche Bank to work for a non-profit micro-finance company in Nigeria. She didn't do it for the money, she did it because she wants to help people.

      Like others have pointed out, foreigners are typically only hired for skilled labor if the employer is unable to find someone with the necessary skillset in the local population. If India isn't hiring non-Indians for computer programming work, it's because they have more programmers than they have jobs. If you really want to work in India (which i doubt), find out what they need.

    129. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Puts on bedsheet over head*
      [KKK]
      You bloody foreigner, stealing our women and our jobs![/KKK]

    130. Re:Duh... by Milican · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding.. and the sad thing is there are job requirements like that. Duh.. its impossible!

      JOhn

    131. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's exactly the point I was trying to make. We have three vehicles (two are paid off), a 4 bedroom house, and our three kids are extremely active. I would prefer to provide my kids with their own bedrooms, and would hate to deny them access to their activities. Each plays at least one sport, and each plays at least one instrument. None of that is terribly important information, but in my neighborhood, and the crowd that I hang out with, that's extremely typical as well. If our household income had always been much lower, you can bet our spending would follow suit.

      But to go from this lifestyle to one of lesser means would be a difficult transition, physchologically. That's what I'm getting at. We're all used to owning vehicles (in most cities, anyway... NY and Chicago are obvious exceptions), having air conditioning, carpeted rooms, being able to eat out, or at least cooking what we want for dinner. People from contries where the per capita GDP is $2500 would take half of what I'm getting for the same job.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    132. Re:Duh... by Wanderer1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Native Americans had a choice in the matter. For better or worse, people came who saw things they wanted and had the connections to take those things.

      The comparison doesn't work here. Whether you believe the conquest of the Americas was just or not, the issue is whether a free market society can exist without some sort of handicap process to keep the citizenry employed despite severely unbalanced costs.

      Bill

    133. Re:Duh... by demonbug · · Score: 1
      And actually you can move right on in to California now, since the retarded state gov is basically trying abolish all immigration law. Come on over!


      I can only assume you are referring to the governor signing a bill whcih allows illegal immigrants to obtain a driver's license. I'd guess it will have very little, if any, real effect. You do realize that this is merely a return to how things were before 1994 (legislation enacted in 1993 first prohibited illegal immigrants from obtaining a license in California)?

    134. Re:Duh... by pbox · · Score: 1

      This is illegal. All firms (beyond a certain size, about 10 ot more, depends on your state) need to observe federal non-discriminatory laws. Tata Consulting broke the law, and therefore prime suspects for a large legal case...

      Equal Opportunity employment law applies to all firms operating in the USA.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    135. Re:Duh... by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Fully agreed!! Let's send back the 300 million people living in the US and give the land back to the native americans!!!

    136. Re:Duh... by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1
      Find the job first, then apply. I've never seen a US company who wasn't willing to write their job definition in such a way as to make sure that the candidate they wanted wasn't the only possible acceptable candidate.

      If you have any skill, and you found a job, you would have no trouble slipping by the H-1B restrictions. I'm sad about this, but quite resigned to it at this point.

    137. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again if most of the staff is from India, or first generation, they could make "speaking Hindi"(sp?) a required skill.

      You would have a harder time in court battling that.

    138. Re:Duh... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      If you are paid in a different country, then that money is hard for the US to get their hands on.

      However, if you file taxes in the US, you are required to estimate the fraction of time spent in the state and are taxed on that fraction of the income. At least that's how I read the tax forms.

    139. Re:Duh... by StevenMaurer · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, an H1-B is granted to a foreign national who fits the requirements of a job, if no qualified American or permanent resident can be found after a reasonable recruiting effort.

      Unfortunately, who determines whether the individual is qualified is the employer. This means that the only real requirement is that the employer advertise for a job for which they have absolutely no intention of hiring anyone.

      Sometimes - to keep down the number of responses, they'll also stick in all sorts of obscure unrelated skills their visa applicant has. You see this a lot on job boards -- "HW Design Engineer working in Boise - must be fluent in Mandarin".

      This comes straight from the mouth of a senior HR recruiter I knew at a previous company.

    140. Re:Duh... by gmezero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So after we ship all of our jobs overseas, who the hell is going to be left to buy the things these companies make?!?!

      As it stands, the only people I know who have a consistent job tommorow are CEOs/VPs, service workers (want fries with that), and Smut peddlers... and as it stands, if we don't have any money, those service jobs are going to dry up as well.

      ARGHHHH! Guess it's time to pitch my morals and get into porn :(

    141. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a lot of companies outsource *to* Ireland, including American companies.

    142. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, your sig should read

      "Open Source is good" -- Steve Jobs
      "Open Source is evil" -- Bill Gates


      Get it? In your sig one quote is by a company one is by an individual. So, why don't you try making the second quote either by Steve Ballmer or Bill Gates.

    143. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking as someone on the other side of this particular issue at the moment, I know full well I'm almost certainly the only person who can reasonably be said to be qualified to do my job. That's not to suggest that I couldn't spend a few years working with someone to get them into the same position as I am, but we don't have a "few years".

      Why? Because I wrote the product I have to maintain, it's several hundred thousand lines in size, and - critically - while it's been properly documented, logically designed, and written in an easily maintainable way, we have yet to be able to palm the work off onto someone else, despite my genuine best efforts.

      My lawyer, who is trying to get me a green card, has indicated that despite this it will be impossible to word an advert that genuinely reflects this situation without the INS rejecting it. In all honesty, the INS doesn't care what the job requirements are; "labor certification", the means by which a person should get a Green Card if they're genuinely required by a US employer, is relatively hard unless you fit a particular profile unrelated to the job you're doing. Most companies try to get their most necessary employees to stay by portraying them as managers (for some reason the INS believes that US companies are in desperate need of mindless managers. I have NO idea why), and the INS are now clamping down on that too.

    144. Re:Duh... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      If you are offered a fun job in a far-away country, you are more likely to take it if you are single, than if you need to bring along spouse and shorts.

      Likewise, taking the risk to go to a country with the intent of finding a job while there, or going to school and staying of afterwards, are both activities I'd judge more likely for the single person.

    145. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And actually you can move right on in to California now, since the retarded state gov is basically trying abolish all immigration law. Come on over!

      Do you mean the retahded state governer?

    146. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigration is under the jurisdiction of the Federal Govt. If you are refereing the drivers license issue...you need an illegal immigrant still needs TAXPAYER ID to get a license. You need a license to get insurance!! Who exactly do you think benifits from illegal workers?

      On another note...I work at in same location that kevin flannigan did, he shot himself they same day he got laid off, and yes it was sad, but there were othere issues involved besides losing his job. And the folks he helped train went back to india to resume their work for the company that contracts with the bank. So the contract fees went 100% offshore. So the the H1 visa thing in this case didnt really apply.

    147. Re:Duh... by gr0nd · · Score: 1
      His friends told him that Tata only interviewed Americans to be in compliance with the equal opportunity employment commission, and that no Americans were ever hired.

      If this is true, its discrimination. You can't discriminate in hiring because of age, race, sex, etc. There was a story similar to this recently (that I can't find), and the person that brought the suit didn't even apply for a job. The rumor was the restaurant didn't hire women. Not legal my friends.

    148. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I'd hate to be a CEO.

    149. Re:Duh... by Compinche · · Score: 1

      It might sound that these non-immigrant guest workers are taking the US for a ride, but when all the expense and time are tallied to educate and raise these workers, for which, by the way, the US economy paid little or no money or make no investment and are often the best and brightest from their home countries, you'd have to ask if it really is such a bad deal.

      Have you heard of developing countries "brain drain"?

    150. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      75% of H1Bers I know personally (about 300 of them) successfully apply
      and get their Green Cards.
      ... and continue to pay taxes, and purchase real estate, goods and services.

      Contrast this to sending the H1B back to India where he sets up an outsourcing shop, hires 10 Indians, and then deletes 10 jobs in the US (not only that, but he is no longer paying taxes and buying goods and services in the US).

      It would be better if more like 95% of H1Bs remained in the US; these are people with skills that will simply take their job (and many other jobs) overseas with them if they are forced to leave (most would willingly stay in the US if granted green cards).

    151. Re:Duh... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded up?

      It's been well proven that a closed society with strict immigration and trade policies is far less efficient than an open one.

      Huh? What's an "efficient" society? What is considered strict immigration? You mean, like Suadi Arabia or China? Neither of them are backwater also-rans.

      The US has always been fairly open in terms of immigration and trade and we seem to be the largest world economy by far.

      The US economy is large, but teetering on the verge of collapse. What worked in the past to make our economy great (slavery, child labor) might not always work. The "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach only works if it ain't broke.

      What we have here is a bunch of L33t "US citizens" who can't compete with a poor third world country and who want their government to protect their financial interests. Boo Hoo.

      That's what the government's for, among other things. To protect the life and livelyhood of its citizens. Who should we be crying to? Companies who are completely within the law, while sacrificing their workers to make a quick buck?

      The government has one function. That is to make sure that the people aren't being screwed by those with money and power (read large corporations).

      The government has a bunch of functions. Read the preamble to the Constitution sometime. It doesn't mention greedy corporations. Maybe it should, though.

      In this case, our government should require a reciprocal agreement with India so that everyone has a fair shot.

      What happened to "boo hoo"?

      Protectionism is not the answer. Adaptation is the answer.

      OK, you get to live in a shack with a concrete floor and no indoor plumbing, with your grandparents, aunts, uncles, and all of their children. Be satisfied with a fifth-grade education, and an astonishing illiteracy rate. You may/may not die from diseases for which the rest of the world has had a cure for centries. Let me know how it goes. Should be awesome.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    152. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      The jobs don't go away, they just change. Or more correctly, the jobs never went away in the past, so why would they go away now?

      Millions of farming jobs have disappeared; millions of programming jobs have been created. Which are the better jobs? Do we even care that so many fewer people are milking cows?

      I'll also point out that globalization creates jobs. Microsoft couldn't employ as many people if they could only sell to the U.S. market. In fact, the entire tech industry has been collecting money from the rest of the world and using it to pay American workers. Maybe those other countries resent the fact that their workers, who are just as good as American workers but are willing to work for less, can't find work because of protectionism in America. Free market principles say the cheapest and best is supposed to win. Just a few short years ago, the U.S. unemployment rate was hitting decade lows, and under pretty much the same system of globalization we have now. Maybe the job losses are not due to globalization, but due to a crummy economy.

      Preserving the jobs we have now means shielding companies from competition, which means rewarding the owners of those inefficient businesses. Everyone (but the company owner) is worse off when inefficient businesses are protected; everyone pays more than they should and employees are wasting their time when they could be doing something more valuable.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    153. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but
      workers cannot follow.


      This is just plain wrong. WTO rules specifically declare that free trade includes trade in professional services (i.e. labor).

    154. Re:Duh... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The flip side of Hollywood as cultural hegemon is that it is far easier for the rest of the world to adapt to an American culture that's been blasting at them for the past 40 years, than it is for Americans to adapt to other cultures that they only understand through, well, Hollywood.

    155. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site, http://www.insourceamerica.org/ uses
      PHP-Nuke. That's free software that probably has cost some US portal software suppliers many thousands of dollars in software license fees. The PHP-Nuke author according to their FAQ, was born in Quebec, Canada on June 10 1969 and currently lives in Venezuela. And obviously PHP-Nuke wouldn't be what it is without contributors from all over the world.

      Don't forget 280 Million verses remaining 5.8 Billion: its inevitable that there will always be more smarter people out there given US represents just 5% of the worlds population.

      Reducing visas to just 65,000 means that we're only interested in just allocating visas to just 0.001% of the worlds population. F*cking noise if you ask me. Who's scared of 1/1000th of a percent of the world's workers ?. If you can't compete then get the hell out of here.

    156. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Service workers do not have a consistent job tommorow. Mcdonalds is using automated ordering screens in a trial in several locations now. Grocery check out is hoped to be eliminated by automated check out as well. Even management jobs are rather scarce right now. There are a number of new stories relating the trials and tribulations of recent Harvard/Stanford/Yale/etc. MBAs who can't find work.

    157. Re:Duh... by dcocos · · Score: 1

      If you are offered a fun job in a far-away country, you are more likely to take it if you are single, than if you need to bring along spouse and shorts.

      Two responses to this, the first is that many people actually want to come to the U.S., and I don't think I'm going out on a limb here, it is agruably a better place to raise your children than a lot of other countries.
      Secondly you are correct the people are probably more likely to take a job in a far away country when they are single but it doesn't mean that they will stay that way once they arrive.

      Likewise, taking the risk to go to a country with the intent of finding a job while there, or going to school and staying of afterwards, are both activities I'd judge more likely for the single person.


      Going to school in the U.S. doesn't qualify you for H1B Visa status, but if you are about close to graduation and get married and hava kid, you no longer have to leave when your school visa expires

      I'm not arguing that it is right or wrong I just wanted to assert that the assumption that only single people will be working is wrong.

    158. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow! So 20-25% (dependig on how you read the post)of the unemployed people in america are IT workers? WOW!

      Ahem........BULLSHIT! I SMELL BULLSHIT!!!!!

    159. Re:Duh... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that only 2% of the US population pays most of the US bills. Since the US economy is a huge portion of the world economy, that means that only 0.1% of the world population is making a serious contribution. Now that 0.001% starts to appear more significant - that's 1% of everybody that really matters when it comes to actually producing things that are valuable (ie computers - not subsistence farming).

    160. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Dutch overlords!!!1

    161. Re:Duh... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA.

      I thought you guys could fly?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    162. Re:Duh... by satyap · · Score: 3, Informative
      The article showed no such thing. I doubt that it's illegal.
      RTFA. [snip]
      But I was told, 'Daniel, it is against the law for you to work here. You can come here on vacation, but you can't work here.'
      Yes, and it doesn't say it's illegal. It says "I was told...". By whom? Conveniently, it doens't say. the website is uninformative? I'm not surprised. I'm sure it's not illegal, though. Nor does the article show that it's illegal. This whole thing is based on hearsay and propagates FUD. The original article as well as the /. article should be prosecuted for slander or libel, and fall in the same class of those stories written by that juornalist (NYT? Washington Post?) who made his stories up.
    163. Re:Duh... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I am a US citizen and my company had to get a work Permit to send me to England.

      The English Premiereship football club Tottenham Hotspur offered a contract to an American player on the order of $1.2 million/year, compared to the ~$100,000 he was making in the MSL. The UK gov't refused him a work permit on the grounds that he was not an international-calibre player.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    164. Re:Duh... by mantera · · Score: 1

      That's because german, british and italian are all europeans. But try to work in europe if you're non-european.

      europe has better protection for its workers.

    165. Re:Duh... by dewke · · Score: 1

      That may sound like a bad deal to you, but consider that the foreign national in question may have to have moved an entire family overseas to take the job. It is equally unfair to fire him or her the very moment a qualified and willing American shows up at the door.

      I'm sure that's a whole lot fairer than telling the citizen that his job has been replaced by a h1-b, or moved offshore, and his family now has to move to wherever to find a job.

      --
      Oderint dum metuant
    166. Re:Duh... by mlong · · Score: 1
      As it stands, the only people I know who have a consistent job tommorow are CEOs/VPs

      Well if its a publically traded company and it starts going downhill, usually the CEO is one of the first to get blamed and canned.

      --
      //m
    167. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. The point is that this person lost his job to a off shore development company. He just wants his old job back. The reason you cannot come to the US is that we dont hire idiots.

    168. Re:Duh... by ugly_kid_joy · · Score: 1


      "His friends told him..." Now thats a reliable source of information

    169. Re:Duh... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Wonder how they do the Texas drawl?

      The voice training at the call centers seems to be going downhill. Time was I could barely pick out the Indians. Now I'm getting obvious hints of Indian accents almost half the time I call a bank, airline, etc. It's fun to greet them with "namaste" and listen as they get flustered and then recover.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    170. Re:Duh... by dup_account · · Score: 2

      This whole argument shouldn't be about outsourcing of jobs, but what the great american society is doing about it. If we continue to try to up-source american workers, while letting lessor skilled positions go off-shore, great. But if we always have to find ways to push up. Right now, there is great apothey in trying to push up for outplaced computer workers. Maybe when Silican Valley becomes a ghost town like Detroit and the steel towns will we see it as a problem.

    171. Re:Duh... by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      In additon, the myth of the Lazy american is just that, a myth. A mericans on average have the highest productivity, work longer hours and take less vacations then their world counterparts.

    172. Re:Duh... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      The interesting bit about the guy trying to work in India, is that they don't allow foreigners in to work, i.e. it is fine for all the Indian's to go to other countries and leach work, but it is not ok for people to go to India to get work. Capeche?

      That part is not interesting to me, because having worked as a foreigner in India, I know it not to be true.

      Also, "leech work" is a fairly one-sided description. They are also providing low-cost high-skill labor that increases the efficiency of our economy. Proper social policy will derive from a dispassionate weighing of these competing interests.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    173. Re:Duh... by mickwd · · Score: 1

      But why would he do that ?

      Presumably because the person he wants to employ is cheaper to employ than a native American citizen.

      I'm sure if an American in India could undercut the salaries there, and agree to work for less than it would cost to employ a native Indian, then "a way would be found" to employ them too.

      But I suspect there are few Americans who would be prepared to work in India for a salary which undercuts the native population.

      Welcome to globalisation.

      On an unrelated topic........Several years ago I used to work with an Indian hardware guy. He once told me "You know the trouble with this industry ? Too many cowboys, not enough Indians".

    174. Re:Duh... by sniggly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google search for india callcenter accent - they train people to do the texan drawl. Most usually you can pick either common american or common british accents. But money can buy you any accent.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    175. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That is not entirely accurate... at least it doesn't display all facets of the situation. Foreign workers can get by on less because, among other things, companies are willing to pay them less than an American. Many companies would much rather pay a foreigner $30,000 a year rather than an American. If a foreign born worker used to live in a house with no running water and a dirt floor, then the perception is that they will be grateful for the few scraps that the company is willing to throw to them in exchange for their work. An American worker who made $120,000 at their last job would never even be considered for the job paying $30,000 a year, because the perception is that the first time the company tries to treat them like shit they can just leave.

    176. Re:Duh... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Because only the U.S. is so damned afraid of being seen as Politically Incorrect by the rest of the world, that the U.S. looks out for everyone else's interests first, and its own citizens' welfare last.

      And people wonder why I've become a proponent of gun turrets at the border... :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    177. Re:Duh... by mycal · · Score: 1


      Thats because as a dutchman you won't work for 20K a year. Also to make it work for you you and your fellow dutchmen would all want to work for 20K a year, then you could work in the USA no problem and there would be infrastructure to make it happen. You would also have to program a little, but not much, mostly just follow directions and work on the weekends for no extra pay.

    178. Re:Duh... by gmezero · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, so basically, the only future here then is to be a CEO who can run a U.S. company with foreign workers paying them pennies a day, selling their work for dollars (or Euros!)... or pay some "18" year old $50 to prostitute herself on film since she can't find a job flipping burgers... and I make my money charging what $19 bucks a month for people all over the world who do have money to look at those pictures. ...Now I'm wondering... what happenes when all of everyone in the U.S. is running their own porn site?

    179. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only disgruntled people take the pain to vent their frustration on websites. Others who are happy with the work don't. You can guess which group gets more publicity and which group are much more in number

    180. Re:Duh... by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      By "citizen" you mean "a citizen of the united states", right?

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    181. Re:Duh... by Hellbuny · · Score: 1

      Dutch Hater!

      --

      meep!
    182. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's
      You and what army?
    183. Re:Duh... by member57 · · Score: 1

      No it's not, I was fired without concern for my family...

      --
      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
      The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    184. Re:Duh... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      a better place to raise your children

      True. But there is a large difference between all countries and many countries. While I would choose the US over, say, most of the third world, Canada/US clearly goes the other way, as does Europe/US.

      only single people will be working

      That wasn't the assertion (and if you read it that way my writing skills are going down-hill). Rather, the assertion was that aliens have a more positive net effect on the economy than the population average.

      Their lower likelyhood of having/bringing children (thus contributing to the school system without using it) was cited as one cause, but a very minor point, and one in retrospect appears to have detracted from my point. Even if they have children, they still remain net positives as long as they are paying enough taxes to cover their costs.

      doesn't qualify you for H1B

      Are you deliberately trying to misinterpret me? I never implied that it did. However, many schools help their graduates, both domestic and foreign, find jobs. The employer requests a visa for you.

      In general, you seem fixated on foreigners flocking to these shores to spawn like rabbits. I assure you: few people consider neither marriage nor children to be acceptable ways to achieve permanent residency. At least among the people I meet.

    185. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

      That and you're fucking Dutch....

    186. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The code pertaining to the hiring of nonimmigrant workers on H-1B visas is publically available. The bill states that H-1B dependent employers must certify that no domestic American workers were available or diplaced at the time when the H-1B worker was hired. The catch is that practically no companies are "H-1B dependent employers,"--see the bill for the formal definition--So none of them actually have to show this. However, they are likely still in violation since they must attest to paying the H-1B workers a prevailing wage, which many do not. If you personally know of a company which is in violation then you can file a complaint with the DOL by using this form. If you don't like the H-1B visa program you can help to get it repealed. There is a bill in congress now which does just that. If you are in favor of this bill, then tell your representatives about it.

    187. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one, welcome our new Indian overlords....

    188. Re:Duh... by X · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that most free-trade zones that have been created also have fairly nice rules for moving employees across borders. This is true both with the EU and with NAFTA.

      The WTO doesn't pursue this because just getting the trade barriers down is hard enough. If you start trying to push a world immigration policy things get even dicier.

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
    189. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah..I was rejected from many jobs because I'm not a US citizen. Iprefer to be a EU citizen anyways.

    190. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And yet, I don't see any picket lines in front of their corporate office. Or read about this in the headlines of local newspapers. Why is that? Are we so busy with the RIAA and SCO that we can't be bothered to get out and take care of stuff that really matters in the physical world?

      I tell you, 5 guys with "FOO WON'T HIRE AMERICANS!" pickets, proveable claims, and a list of their customers would have such a place closed in about 2 days in my city.

    191. Re:Duh... by floydigus · · Score: 1

      At least you get to smoke as much dope as you like and your nation is one of the more sexually liberated on the planet with a high quantity of beautiful blonde ladies willing to do nasty things for free.

      *duck*

      Seriously though, as a UK citizen I am actually excluded from entering the US green card lottery (not that I would anyway). Anyone know why?

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    192. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Someone ought to mod that comment as insightful.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    193. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The industrial revolution was about replacing people with machines. I can assure you that the wages for a machine are much lower than for people. So where did all those jobs go when machines replaced people? Clerks used to copy out documents by hand, now we have photocopiers. In every trade or technological revolution we have had so far, the standard of living increased and everyone still had jobs at the end (and much more interesting ones than before machines). Are you saying that people today have a lower standard of living than before the industrial revolution? Or at any other time in history?

      Immigration is no different than having babies; actually immigrants are cheaper because taxpayers in a different country financed their education. An extra person is an extra mouth to feed, so he decreases the standard of living; but he is also an extra worker, so he is an extra set of hands. So far, we've always found a good use for those extra hands.

      People who emphasize the loss of jobs just want to keep the system the way it is. We should be suspicious when wealthy company owners (or overpaid workers) try to scare us into shielding them from competition. If we keep things the way they are, our standard of living will stay the same as well. Those benefiting from the system now may be happy, but every other time the economy has changed the overall standard of living has gone up. I'd hate to trade in a chance for things to get better in order to prop up a bunch of people that got rich from exploiting an earlier revolution.

      I've even made all my arguments using the current fad of only looking at one side of the business equation. Everyone concentrates on the supply side (or jobs) and ignores the consumption side (or prices). When wages go down, so can prices. Preserving jobs means preserving higher prices, and that sacrifices the likely increase in the standard of living that results from lower prices. Protectionism costs money, either directly through subsidies or indirectly through artificially high prices; we need to look at how much worse we would be from higher prices before we decide to preserve higher wages (and profits) for a few. I doubt protectionism is ever a net benefit to society.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    194. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read it. Now what? The propaganda you linked to has nothing to do with jobs moving abroad, but talks about (non-)immigrants in the US. They are NOT the cause of your problems. Your bad economy is. Sending all current H1-B holders home will not magically give you a job, but will only cause more problems for the US economy.

    195. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right.

    196. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell me: are all of the clothes you wear manufactured in the United States, or were they assembled in a sweatshop in Asia? Where was your TV made, your car, your cellphone? Jobs have been moving abroad for many years now. It is only now that some of the more "prestigious" jobs are moving abroad that people are really starting to take notice (or at least being vocal about it on the Internet).
      The only way this will stop is if people make a conscious effort to pay more for "made in USA" products (ain't gonna happen in the current economy), or by regulation (ain't gonna happen since Bush is a puppet for big corporations).

    197. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

      Too bad there is no "mod -1; if you spell like that, it's no wonder you're unemloyed"...

    198. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are not correct that jobs always go to the lower wage country. Wages in Canada are generally lower than in the U.S., but during the tech bubble, many Canadian businesses were bought and the jobs were transferred to the U.S. At the time there was a management fad that thought that all your employees had to be together in the same place.

      Now we have a fad for outsourcing, and Canada is again bypassed to go to places even cheaper. It is never good to be in the middle :-)

      Before Americans get too riled up about the Indians, they should perhaps examine their own history of buying companies and moving them to the U.S. American immigration laws prevented employees of those companies from following "their" jobs too. They might also reflect on where the revenue that pays their wages comes from, maybe foreigners think they are entitled to share some of the wages that their purchases make possible.

      As far as I am concerned, Americans are just getting a taste of what other countries have gone through the last few years. Americans disproportionally benefited from the tech bubble and may have a false idea of how much they are really worth.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    199. Re:Duh... by Syrrh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why you don't want let India-Indian in your country now?

      Excuse me sir, your words seem to have accidentally fallen into my mouth. Nobody said they don't want Indians around. Ever. In the entire thread so far, not even an AC. We're sick of having unqualified and/or unneeded immigrants coming under the pretense that we need more middle-class labor. Read the article.

    200. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      just here to make some cash

      Cash that will flow OUT of your economy if that person leaves after his 6 years are up, or if he sends it to his family overseas... Not only should you want that person to bring over his entire family, that person should also *stay* after the H1-B expires. That way, the money stays in *your* economy.

    201. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are already employed by a US company or company with business units here you get a special type of visa for working here for just that company...makes sense, because you could be an engineer here to train US workers/conduct meetings etc. How do you think they get the Indians here to learn our jobs in the first place!

    202. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      Companies don't have to expend a lot of effort to find qualified American workers because those people are beating their doors down

      I was recently involved in several interviews for multiple positions within my company, and let me tell you: it is *very* hard to find qualified American workers. Not only were they not beating our doors down, but the ones we tracked down ourselves turned out to only look good on paper.

      Thankfully, the H-1B Visa quota will be cut to 65,000 this month and there is increasing pressure to eliminate L-1 Visa's altogether.

      If anything, that's only going to move *more* jobs overseas.

    203. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Umm, you said we are the first generation with a lower standard of living, not that we WILL be the first generation with a lower standard of living. I'll bet your current lifestyle is better than what your parents had at the equivalent point in their life.

      Old foggy rant: kids these days expect to match what their parents have as soon as they start working. They forget that their parents had to work and save for decades to get what they have now.

      At any rate, you shouldn't listen to the fear-mongers. Why do you expect that our generation will have a lower standard of living? Yes, individuals are harmed by changes in the economy, and maybe you'll be harmed by the latest changes; but every other change in history has resulted in a higher average standard of living. I'd hate to give up my chance for a share of a higher standard of living in order to preserve your current standard of living.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    204. Re:Duh... by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      The main point of my article was the short-term effects of a revolution, and I pointed out the analogies between the Industrial Revolution and the current revolution(?) we're going through: Over-cheap, over-plentiful labor, and a period of rapid progression in whatever field is in question.

      The short term effects, plainly put, are a drop in the standard of living for most of the population; Even if lower wages meaning lower costs, most companies will just see that as an opportunity to increase their profit margin, at the very least keeping their prices equal to what they were before; Total change in buying power? Negative.

      I'll be the first to admit that this is a somewhat selfish point of view. I want to be able to live well when I get a job in my field of computer science. I want to be able to provide for my children when, and if, I ever have any. If the only way I can get a job without getting a new degree is by moving to India and making (don't blast me, I don't know the actual numbers) $10,000 a year, I don't think I'll be able to do either of what I want.

      As to claims that the costs of living in India are simply lower, whether or not they are true, my concern is not food and housing... My concern, as a tried and true geek, are gadgets; And correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think my 30" LCD is any cheaper in India than it is in the States, and, as a potential parent one day, being able to send my children to good schools. Possibly my school. When it costs me $5K/semester to go where I go - a public University as a citizen of this state - How can I afford to help provide for my childrens' education, 20 years from now, making no money in whatever country IT has been outsourced to?

      (BTW: "Yeah, we moved around a lot when I was a kid." "Army brat?" "No, IT.")

    205. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      Sometimes - to keep down the number of responses, they'll also stick in all sorts of obscure unrelated skills their visa applicant has. You see this a lot on job boards -- "HW Design Engineer working in Boise - must be fluent in Mandarin".

      Contrary to popular belief, visa applications have to meet a stringent set of requirements. One of them is that the job description cannot be tailored like you describe above. A visa-application for a job description like this will be denied by the INS and/or the department of labor, unless the company can show that being fluent in mandarin is really a requirement for this position.

    206. Re:Duh... by davebo · · Score: 1

      It's been said many a time already - but the "help wanted" ads for H1B visa holders are written very specifically so that only 1 person qualifies.

      My experience: company wanted to hire H1B guy. HR person spent day with guy carefully crafting "help wanted" ad to match him specifically. Ad placed - applications arrived - one was found to be a reasonable fit. And "poof!" the funding for that opening "disappeared" - so no interviews were held and no one was hired. A week or so later, a "new" job posting was made, with even more requirements (coincidentally, requirements not met by any previously received applicant), no one was found & H1B guy got his visa.

    207. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

      Dear soundcore,

      It is clear from your comments so far that you have nothing better to do than to sit at home and blame the loss of your job on those damn foreigners. Why don't you brush up your skills and go find yourself a job instead? Do you really want to stay home and collect unemployment (partially payed for by those same foreigners, no less!) until somebody rings your doorbell and hands you the job that is so rightfully yours?

    208. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what ae you going to do? Elect honest politicians who will not let companies get away with stuff in exchange for some contributions? I thought not. You bitch and moan, but you probably don;t even know the name of an honest politician.

    209. Re:Duh... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      all depends on what your definition of 'standard of living' is... In the 50's/60's in the US, a family could survive/prosper with the man working, and the woman at home with the child. (yes, very stereotypical, I'm just using it as the average...) Now, dual income families are barely surviving. The average cost of living has far outreached the median income...

    210. Re:Duh... by zog+karndon · · Score: 1

      You are aware, of course, that the Federal Motor Voter law requires that anyone with a drivers license can vote, right?

      It went into effect in 1993, unsurprisingly enough.

      Hence, only citizens can drive, because all drivers are voters, and only citizens can vote.

      Thanks, Democrats!

    211. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but workers cannot follow. This one-sidedness pushes salaries down everywhere, as companies seek the cheapest available labor.


      No, no no no no!


      It lowers salaries in rich countries, raises salaries in poor countries.

    212. Re:Duh... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Like, duh, you've never heard of the internet? Prohibitively expensive? Let's see: set up a website with jobs about to be given to foreigners; wait 30 days for applications; no aplications?; you can bring someone in; otherwise, forget it Mr. CEO Bossman.

      You misunderstand my post.

      First, assume that we're talking about an honest company that is making a real effort to find a qualified American. My point is that this company cannot be expected to find every last qualified American, and offer them the job, before hiring a foreigner. Putting the job on a website and sifting through the resumes you get is exactly part of a "reasonable recruiting effort" that I was talking about. Knocking on every door in case there's an American engineer behind it, on the other hand, is not a reasonable requirement because it is "prohibitively expensive".

      Now, if we're talking about lazy or greedy companies that intend to subvert the process by not honestly examining American candidates, then they're breaking the law right there. All you should need to do is to alert the INS, not sue them for the job.

      As for the "sob story", I am referring to a foreigner who made a major life decision (moving an entire family to a foreign land) based on a legitimate job offer. This offer should not be rescinded any moment an equally qualified American worker (who did not know of the honest recruiting effort, for example) shows up at their door. This is merely good faith.

    213. Re:Duh... by TopherC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who only speaks one language (called "an American") I find it an easy mistake to judge someone's intelligence by how well they speak English. It sounds like the author(s) of the stuff on this webpage are making the same mistake too. But as a physicist, I work with a lot of other people with Ph.D's for whom English is a second (or 3rd, 4th, or 5th) language, so my mistaken prejudices are gradually wearing off.

      For one example, I think that most foreign physicists I work with have better written grammar than the average US physicist, as more often than not these folks write the best papers. And on the other hand, I knew another fellow student who had great trouble speaking and writing English (and programming languages for that matter) in spite of several years of learning and speaking in the US, but who was an absolutely brilliant mathematician and theoretical physicist.

      So, a person's English-speaking skills are not a good measure of how well they communicate. And communication is just one dimension of intelligence, which itself is a massively multidimensional thing. IMHO intelligence is impossible to quantify in any meaningful way.

    214. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did. In 2000. Thanks, Bill.

    215. Re:Duh... by jpetts · · Score: 1

      the job is temporary

      No, not necessarily. The H-1B is actually classified as a dual-intent visa by the BCIS (what used to be the INS). Anybody on an H-1B can come with the intent to gain permanent resident status. The visa itself is temporary, and a given application can be renewed up to a total of six years, but that does not mean that somebody can not travel to the US on an H-1B, intending to use it as a means of attaining permanent resident status.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    216. Re:Duh... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that's a whole lot fairer than telling the citizen that his job has been replaced by a h1-b [...]

      I'm referring to a foreign national who accepted a legal job offer from a company that performed an honest and reasonable search for American workers to fill the job. If you think that this company should fire the foreign worker the minute an equally qualified American worker (who did not take advantage of the honest recruiting efforts) shows up at the door, you have a different definition for "fairness" than I do.

      If the company didn't follow the law, then it's not just unfair, it's illegal. Report them to your local authorities.

    217. Re:Duh... by axxackall · · Score: 0, Troll
      Unqualified? All H1B programmers I worked with were more qualified than "made in USA" ones. And it's a myth that H1B programmer costs less. H1B was a fresh brain stream to reanimate the dying IT undustry in US.

      I doubt that you grand-father was same useful for then American land when he originally migrated from Europe.

      I understand your frustration though: you have lost your job to better ones. Sad. Have you ever tried to improve your skills? Specifically after you've lost your job to H1B?

      --

      Less is more !
    218. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      European Union hiring rules are just as stringent - to apply for a job in the Netherlands the company has to prove that the skills cannot be found within the E.U.

    219. Re:Duh... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Globalism is a scam designed to siphon the wealth of American off into other nations.

      You're a little off the mark here. Globalism exists to siphon the wealth of the entire globe into the coffers of the extremely wealthy elites in many different countries. Middle and lower class Americans stand to lose as much as any foreign class.

      When Sun hired all those Indian workers, the idea was to make Sun's major investors more wealthy - they couldn't have cared less about the well being of the workers they hired.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    220. Re:Duh... by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Me and my twenty inch dong.

      (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!)

    221. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you will not. Your salary will go down as well. No developer, in say, Wyoming, makes enough to buy a $300,000 house.

    222. Re:Duh... by Digizen64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When wages go down, so can prices. But debt doesn't go down. Right now in America, we have the most debt-laden society we have ever had and the cost of college tuition is making higher education unattainable for many and the cost of providing health care to employees is killing companies. So if you get out of college in debt and suddenly wages go down and prices go down, you're still stuck with debt which is now inproportionate to what you make in wages. People you called overpaid are also more likely o have higher debt due to the cost and related cost of education. Also, as a country we provide regulations that protect workers while the countries we are "competing" with don't and in India's case they subsidize the hell out of certain educational tracks. Sorry, but stating that eventually it will work out doesn't necessarlity make the deterministic prediction true.

    223. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the recrtuiter will advertise a position that is already tailored toward the individual that the company wants to hire. Especially for senior/management positions, this how it always works. Why?

      Because the company got interested in an individual, the company got to know him (and not through his resume), and he fits in perfectly. If you hire by resume, there's a big risk that you'll get somebody, who's not going to be part of the team.

      So this is not an exclusive H1B thing. If you own a company or are putting together a team, you hire people that you'll work well with. And in many cases you don't look for people by advertising a position, instead you search your network. So suppose you used your network, got an individual that you need, created a position for him, would you look around for resumes? No!

      You only do it because the company has a requirement to advertise positions. And for H1B you always have to advertise. But I assure you, not only H1B adds are "phony", the majority of job ads out there are "phony". You send a resume and never hear back because the person for the position is already de-facto hired.

    224. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since when has blue collar labor required at least a four year education? Answer. Never.

      IT workers may be as numerous as Blue Collar labors but they are in different classes. Some blue collar labors required a couple years of apprenticeship at most. A meager comparision to the education of most IT workers. Education will will always be the catayst that moves people between classes. Rich people that are dumb, don't remain rich for long.

    225. Re:Duh... by leshert · · Score: 1

      I hate to feed the troll, but every green-card holder I've every known has had a driver's license. Not a one could vote.

    226. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats NOT totaly true. They usually come here on scholorship. They get their student visa. Stay for a few years and get their education here. Then 'go home' for a year or so. To fullfull the terms of the scholorship. Then they are hired by a company here as a h1b visa. They then get on the marygoround of the get a green card sponsored by your company. They are basicly SLAVES to the company that hires them. Pay raise? Here is a .0001% raise. I have see this happen many times to many people.

      H1b visas are a way retaining employees and paying them less than the going rate. Its a sneaky underhanded tech of HR. Do not doubt for a second they are doing this to them. In some cases they do not dare leave for it is better here then where they were. I know a couple of people that quit over it and imigrated to canada, and got a pay raise to boot!

    227. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are crazy! Being an H1B I have ran into thousands of ads saying: American Citizen Only. I have seem *zero* ads with "Indian" or "Russian" only. I say its all sour grapes.

      Maybe something to worry about is the fact that software industry is moving abroad? What about the fact that most CS graduate schools are full of foreigners? Or that most engineers in start-ups were from abroad? And btw getting into grad school from abroad is incredibly hard, with all the F1 visa restrictions.

      There is another mechanism at work here. I don't think Americans like engineering that much, they are content to be in the sales/marketing professions, while engineering is picked up by foreigners. The CS department at the school that I used to be at shank like crazy. At my current job (public research institution) most developers are from India, China, Europe. I see an industry already abandoned to the outsiders. At the same time I hear all the rant.

      More generally - US is become a sales/marketing country, all engineering disciplines are moving out. Manufacturing is going fast. Technical management gets abandoned to foreigners. Do you think a country that only sells and does marketing is needed by other countries? I see a serious crisis ahead, forget about the .com crash...

    228. Re:Duh... by (startx) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rich people that are dumb, don't remain rich for long.

      hello?

    229. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemmy Caution:

      You are soooo spot on! You completely called this correct - the only ongoing problem is that with the exponentially exploding offshoring of jobs - leading to cascading unemployment (the three tiers of employment depending on primary jobs disappearing also begin disappearing...) eventually lead to either economic collapse or the next Great Depression! Unfortunately, we entered the CASCADING UNEMPLOYMENT PHASE around 2001, and the indicators look REALLY BAD for around 2005 or 2006! GOOD LUCK, dude!

    230. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While debt can be a bad thing (not always). It is usually a side effect of bad planning. I have many friends that ask how come I buy all the cool stuff. I tell them simply that i have no debt. They look at me like I just produced the holy grail and am drinking beer from it. Half shock and half disbelief. I tell them that I have a huge stockpile of money for the 'rainy' days.

      Then they ask why I drive a crummy car. I then show them a picture of my house (which is quite nice). They think I am a loonny. I ask them well that sure is a swell car you are driving. How much of your income per month are you putting into that depreciating thing? It will not be so swell in 5 years will it?

      But it all comes down to a sign I once saw on a buffet. 'Do not let your eyes be bigger than your stomach'. Or in terms that seems to be hard for some to understand, 'Dont buy what you dont have the money for.' Its realllllly that simple. If you can not afford it do not buy it. Most people are never taught this. My parents, thank God, did teach me this.

      My debt for my house will be gone in 8 years. At that time my salary in effect will double. What could you do if your salary doubled? I know I have some pretty good ideas about what to do. Hell I could work at sears part time for min wage and still live ok.

      Another thing I have found is do not let other people spend your money. Do not let them talk you into buying a new car. Do not let them talk you into buying a new whatever. Its your money. I have a friend who let his parents spend all his money and their own. He now has more debt that I could concieve of and crummy credit because he can not make the payments. He LET his parents spend his money. Now he is in a cycle where he NEVER has enough money and he makes more than I do. Breaking the cycle of debt can be very hard to do. The best way is to never let it form in the first place.

    231. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dutch drive on the right side of the road? They can't be all that bad! It'd be worth visiting if you weren't afraid of getting run over by a stoned prostitute on a bicycle.

    232. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really simple:
      India Per Capita Income (Per year): ~$2,500US
      America Per Capita Income (Per year): ~$37,600US
      Jobs in India: Scarce
      Jobs in America: Plentiful.

      Lets get a grip on one thing; IT'S INDIA!
      If an American looses their job, it sucks, but they can find another job, go back to school, or get some of that good ole' EI.
      If an Indian looses his job (assuming he can find one in the first place), he looses everything, moves to a shanty town, and dies.

      As for the company in America, I bet they wanted to help Indians (You know, those New Immigrant folks) get jobs.

      Essentially what I am trying to say here is: Grow up, look around, and stop bitching.

    233. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? They didn't have anyone to sell fruit in Iowa?

    234. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you can't even speak English. Not even remotely. And that is a real qualification. You can't speak your native language any better, I'm sure, but I can't tell because I don't speak it either.

    235. Re:Duh... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      IF you look it up, you'll find stats that will tell you that if everyone had the standard of living of uk family, the world could only sustain 2 billion maximum.

      The usa uses/waste MORE, (wasn't it 3 times the uk in pollution?) and there are 6+ billion people in the world today.

      The usa is going down. the world slightly up. the rich are going to gain on all of this. Its so predictable. Then when the world is all serfs of Gates, he will be over thrown, and the cycle continues...Each time it just seems to effect MORE people than previous times in history.

      Cheap IT is now like those off-brand chinese products you buy to save on costs. Now you're the SONY being dumped for the APEX...

    236. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every brain that leaves a developing country, there are at least 50 bodies that go with it.

    237. Re:Duh... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      The guy tried to get a job with Tata Consulting, an Indian-owned firm operating in the USA that places staff at USA-based clients. They apparently refused to hire him for this work in the USA because they do not hire Americans. Only then did he try to work in India, which is the less interesting aspect.

      Then he should contact the INS and they will revoke Tata's ability to apply for visas with immediate effect.

      On the other hand what Tata might have said (particularly since they certainly know what they must never say even if it were true) is something like 'you don't have the skills we need'.

      Part of getting an H1B visa is a process where the job position has to be advertised so that US citizens can apply for it. You also need to perform a survey of salaries and show that the candidate is being paid 15% above the going rate.

      There are some ludicrous parts to the process. For example there are plenty of US citizens who would like to work in the UK for a short time and vice versa. Yet both countries throw masses of beuracracy in peoples faces.

      It is also quite amusing the way that died in the wool Ayn Rand acolytes can put down their copies of Atlas Shrugged and rant for hours on how the govt. is allowing foreign workers to take their jobs.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    238. Re:Duh... by S.Lemmon · · Score: 1

      Of course they can justify it! The Mandarin is necessary to talk to with your fellow employees. :-)

    239. Re:Duh... by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      California is now being overrun by Mexicans, who want to live well but instead turn it into "new new" Mexico...

      The Mexicans have proved that NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE IN MEXICO. And I'll be damned if they aren't turning California into Mexico right now...
      What a load of crap! There were Mexicans in California even before California existed. Of course it is easier for White Americans to pick on immigrant Mexicans than to come right out and say what is on their mind, that there are too many Chicanos in Califas. Your average White American would rather come across as xenophobic than racist...
      "La Raza!"

      You'd be well informed to learn what that means. It is an exclusionary statement. I saw it everywhere in California.
      Even more bullshit. La Raza means "the people" and the Chicano people are composed of a complex intermix of white, yellow, red and black people. To me that is about as inclusive as you can get.

      And FYI, you too can become part of La Raza if you could get a Chicana to marry you, but with your attitude I doubt if you can get a Chicana to even look at you, much less go out with you.
      SO IF YOU THINK THAT I AM SOME REACTIONARY REDNECK, think again.
      If you don't want people to think you are a reactionary redneck, then quit saying ignorant things that lead them to believe that you are one in the first place!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    240. Re:Duh... by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      The thing is, US workers don't make all that much anymore. See the number of 2-income families that were once of the single-income variety 50 years ago, same standard of living. Two cars, tract housing, health care, etc., is not feasible with one income for too many people anymore.

    241. Re:Duh... by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      I'm actually fine with that if the guy they're bringing in is a superstar. But if he's just another shmoe and they're looking to cut costs by getting a Chinese shmoe, F- them. We have plenty of shmoes standing around here already.

    242. Re:Duh... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      The Indians on H1B visas can buy the stuff I guess. And, anyway, the low end service jobs are still around for us. We can serve them McSamosas and McDosas. There's nothing wrong with porn, or prostitution for that matter.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    243. Re:Duh... by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      Maybe when Silican Valley becomes a ghost town like Detroit and the steel towns will we see it as a problem.

      I doubt it. As someone who lives in Buffalo, one of the old steel towns, nobody seems to give a damn about us one way or the other. And our jobs were all shipped out years ago.

      (On the other hand, Buffalo has developed into a much different city than it ever would have if the mills were still running. But that's another issue. At this point, it's more convenient to just go along with what everyone thinks my adopted hometown is like. Millions of Polack steelworkers can't be wrong!)

      --saint

    244. Re:Duh... by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      Now, imagine all the prices of all those goods increasing as every individual on the production and supply chain, all the way back to the origin, gets paid in US-standard wages that allows each and every worker to buy a US-sized house on a US-sized tract of land for a small nuclear family, with 2 recent-make cars for the family, health care, home entertainment systems, etc. Are you willing to pay $20 for a pair of socks to make that happen? $50,000 for an entry-level car?

      You are assuming that all of the savings is passed on to consumers. It isn't. The price of an item isn't set by how much that item cost to produce--it is set by what the market will bear. That is why you can pay $100 for a pair of designer jeans that cost $3 to make in a sweatshop in Pakistan. The savings from making the jeans in a sweatshop didn't go to you, the purchaser of the jeans. It went directly into the pockets of the huge, wealthy, multinational corporation who owns the sweatshop. To say that we can't produce a $100 pair of jeans or even a $30 pair of jeans without resorting to sweatshop labor is absurd. The markup on these things is huge. All we have to do is force the corporations to carve out a piece of that markup and give it to their workers. Sounds easy, right? But the greed of some people is astounding.

    245. Re:Duh... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what makes you think that everyone's standard of living is better than their parents.

      Anyway, I think you're missing the point. Wages are determined by supply and demend. When you increase the supply by allowing foreign workers, the price of labor goes down.

      The American standard of living is artificially inflated by our immigration barriers (and to some extent by the cost of traveling here). That's what barriers to entry always do. Just like professional licensing and unions. It reduces wage competition.

      I have a Cuban friend who thinks $1.00 a day is an excellent salary. For that he would work very hard, and probably 10 hours a day, seven days a week. And he's smart, very smart. How many of those guys are you willing to compete against? Are you willing to live on $1 a day?

      Having said that, does it seem fair that we should earn so much and they should earn so little based merely on an accident of birth? I don't know. I know that I don't want to live like I have seen people living in 3rd world countries. I would quite literally rather be dead.

      We can raise their standard of living while reducing our own. You may argue that it is not a zero sum game, but in this context (for the employees), that's exactly what it is. Obviously the companies and stockholders are better off.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    246. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the H1B's I have ever come across have ever had any more talent or skill then "made in the USA" workers. In fact many of them will just accept such a lower wage that companies will accept them for thier lower/poor skills as mangement tries just to fill the ranks to make thier bosses happy. For the most part, generally the H1B's skills are much poorer then thier counterparts and therefore work for the "made in the USA" boss....

      BTW all the references to the "grandfather" are stupid, just goes to show how low your intelligence and intellect really are. Its people like you that make all other H1B's sound like terrorists....

      **AND LEARN ENGLISH BEFORE TRYING TO INSULT OTHERS, ESP WHEN POSTING ON AN ENGLISH BOARD**

      my 2 cents..

    247. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not correct about it being easy to get a visa in California (or other parts of the US, as this is under federal jurisdiction). My employer has spent several thousand dollars, as well as over 9 months trying to get me an H1B visa.

      Mind you that I have contributed out of state tuition for four years to get my education here, in addition to living expenses, have been granted conditional work permit (artistic) a few years before and have a family history of people coming to this country for a few years, (although they have mostly been involved in shipping, and not IT like I am).

      The BCIS (the new name for INS, and now under homeland security) took 5 months to request additional information, and I can not yet be employed by my company. I do not come from a third world country, I am not going to get paid sub par wages (most of you would probably consider my pending salary as very nice), and have a skill set that is relatively rare.

      I was the only one with the needed qualifications to apply for the job. Since I only have four years of experience in IT, and since my major was in a different field the BCIS is likely to reject the application as they require a four year degree in the field, or six years of experience.

      However, the worst thing is that I have a SS# and could easily work here illegaly, paying tax and the government would likely never find out. I just happen to be somewhat ethical. Nice guys finish last, I guess.

    248. Re:Duh... by broody · · Score: 1

      There is nothing better for childen and the elderly than a hard day's work for a fair wage. It will teach self-respect and independance which is severly lacking in our hollywood driven, liberal society. After all we each of us should be contributing members of a free society and it about time that we all started carrying our own weight. Damn those non-natives and welfare cheats. We're forgetting what made America great: xenophobia, protectionism, and sweatshops.

      *wink*

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
    249. Re:Duh... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      It's really simple:
      India Per Capita Income (Per year): ~$2,500US
      America Per Capita Income (Per year): ~$37,600US
      Jobs in India: Scarce
      Jobs in America: Plentiful.


      Fast forward 10 years to a world economy. Average American income: $10,000. Average Indian Income: $7500. Is that what you want? Without a truly equalized world economy there will always be inequalities between countries.

      I suppose you can argue that fair is fair. Fine, then let's let the corporate profits share in just as much of this "fairness". Why should the employees be the only ones to subsidize the bettering of the world population.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    250. Re:Duh... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Back in the early 50s a new black and white TV was $500 in dollars that were generally 10x more valuable than today. (Think 20 cent loaves of bread, gold at $32 an ounce.)

      Today, many people refuse to do without unnecessary expenses. (Cable TV, internet connection, single family home)

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    251. Re:Duh... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Think about this: the difference between the 3 dollars to make the jeans and the 100 dollars to buy them is as much - or in fact, more - the 60K per year IT salaries of the people at the jeans company as it is the 400K per year of executive management.

    252. Re:Duh... by not_from_here · · Score: 1

      how about as a way to keep costs down we cap execs salaries? if the board of a sockmaking company doesn't make 20 mil a year plus bonuses and perks then the company could afford to hire 500 workers at $50k a year. thats a lot of socks.

      its fucking greed by the rich pigs at the top. it always has been and it will remain that way unless things get so bad people are rioting in the streets and kicking down the doors of their mansions.

    253. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How utterly retarded. Always upset about SOMEONE ELSE - it's always SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT. I wonder if you even KNOW any mexican-americans, hell, any mexicans at all?

      Why don't you stop throwing stones before someone finds reason to throw stones at you?

      You say "ain't" and it's not even a word - you say you're no redneck - but jeez, you SOUND LIKE ONE.

      You're not even FROM California - so just shut up and go away. Your point of view is meaningless.

    254. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my current job (public research institution) most developers are from India, China, Europe.

      So you work in a place that doesn't hire Americans, and you think that no American wants to work there. Perhaps your employer discriminates, or didn't that idea ever occur to you?

      My place of work on Sunday published a 'job available' ad for ONE position. We have about 500 resumes so far. Abandon the industry? The industry is abandoning us.

    255. Re:Duh... by Digizen64 · · Score: 1

      My life taught me that but my fiancee went to law school and graduated in to the worst econmy in ten years and makes as much as I do and her debt is KILLING us. Once we get it stabilized, that's it! But a lot of people are in debt for reasons other than 'big eyes'.

    256. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not be surprised. I got a call from a telemarker who was Indian. As I am on a state and federal DO NOT CALL list, I asked the telemarketer's name and his company name. I couldn't understand him. So, I asked to be referred to his manager. I infomed the manager that by his call, he is opening his company up to a $5000 fine - just by my state. That doesn't count the federal fine that he opened himself up to. They said "sorry" repeatedy. I reported them. I get 10% of the fine the state collects. now THAT is democracy in action.

    257. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      lazy or greedy companies... If they are publicly held they better be both. It they are not lazy then they are doing more work than they have to and are burning shareholder $$$. If they aren't greedy then they are not maximizing shareholder $$$.

      This is how companies work. They do anything that is legal to make more money (never mind that they sometimes do more than is legal). If you think that the allowable behaviours of corps. are affecting your society then you may want to have a word with someone who represents you in the gov't.

    258. Re:Duh... by fijimf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The short term effects, plainly put, are a drop in the standard of living for most of the population;

      This is simply not true.

      http://www.eh.net/hmit/gdp/

    259. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And FYI, you too can become part of La Raza if you could get a Chicana to marry you, but with your attitude I doubt if you can get a Chicana to even look at you, much less go out with you.

      Er... so, "La Raza" isn't inclusive, then, or is it? You're contradicting yourself here, pal.

    260. Re:Duh... by citog · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to where these statistics are published?

    261. Re:Duh... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      It's funnier this way:

      There are two things I hate in this world: insensitivity to other cultures, and the Dutch.

    262. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Letter to you.

      Hi Ben,
      I do sympathize with Soong and thousands of others like him who have lost jobs. I have been through it and know how it feels. But you fail to report the other side of the story which is that for decades the US has been using its economic might and diplomatic strength to create chaos in the markets of developing and underdeveloped countries as a direct result of which, there has been widespread poverty and unemployment in other countries. The US has been during the 70s and 80s pushing for removing restrictions so that they can push American goods to new markets. They used their deep pockets to do advertising blitz and kill the local players and have the people in other countries buy American products. Much of the recent strength of the American economy is a direct result of this. Today if there is a huge disparity between the salaries of an American and say an Indian or a Chinese, it is due to this factor.
      Consider Denim. Jeans became fashion in India around two decades ago. There were a number of local players and no MNCs. Once American companies like Lee and Levi's realized that there was a market in India, they launched their products with big advertisements, the likes of which Indian companies could not compete against. Indian firms who used to produce Jeans had to close down and there were job losses with sob
      stories worse than that of Soong. The Levis used to tout quality and style as their USPs.
      And the funny thing is that the denim used for the Jeans they produced was actually made in India. And, the different new fits that Levis brought out were very ill-suited for the Indian physique. And yet people used to keep buying these Jeans costing twice or thrice the Indian variety. Or for example take the case of softdrinks. During the 80s the govt. of India allowed no foreign players in that market. There were a number of local players who competed with each other. Enter the 90s and Pepsi entered the market (followed by Coke a few years later). The Pepsi launch in India was a mega-event with articles written on from how big the company was to charts with comparison between
      Pepsi, Thums Up (The No: 1 Indian Cola drink) and Coke. When they launched the product, they ran an ad that ran for whole 60 seconds on the National Channel.
      Something equivalent to the Super Bowl ads. These two between them wiped out the entire Indian Soft drink Manufacturers by either forcing them out or buying them. Equally sad story considering that thousands would have lost jobs in the process. And all this was so that they make more money, increase market share and make the 'American stockholders' happy (read richer). Did you guys at that time realize the damage you were causing to the rest of the world to finance your fat salaries? Is it not obvious that Jobs will follow to markets where American goods have gone? How long can American companies
      sustain in a market where one has to pay $40,000/- for a secretary? How long can the company continue to pay $60,000/- for a build manager or for a software engineer. One must consider that 90% of these software engineers do not need to work on rocket science. What they are doing is something which is doable by quite a big % of the world population. Then what sense does it make to pay 10 times the salary for the same?
      Is it sustainable? It was till now because there were new markets like the Middle east, India and China. But with lack of new markets, growth and profits have shrunk and it is no longer possible to pay such huge salaries for such simple work. The Americans worked a lot during the early decades of the 20th century, and that is why this is a great nation. Today it seems like most Americans have become lax and are interested in maximum enjoyment from minimum work. They refuse to stay a minute more than office time. They jump companies for higher pay (including Soong) and then complain if the startup (which obviously cannot sustain the model for long) lays them off. They do not realize that they bring the situation on themselves

    263. Re:Duh... by screenrc · · Score: 1
      It is not a benefit to gain a competitor in
      return for his money to stay in this country.
      It is a benefit only if he is not
      a competitor. I don't mind
      allowing everyone on earth to relocate here,
      as long as they don't work in IT.


      In short, competitors should be shot and
      rot on hell. Non-competitors (who might
      need my IT services) are welcomed with open
      arms.

    264. Re:Duh... by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Internet is NOT an unnecessary expense :-)

      But yeah, you're right...it costs a lot more to live today, but we also have a lot more STUFF. Everyone has to have a couple of cars, a big-screen TV, movie channels..

    265. Re:Duh... by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      RE: The US has enjoyed the benefits of globalization for decades now. Look at all the goods at your disposal, right now.

      When textiles were mass produced by the lowest bidder, the quality went to hell. Check out vintage cotton from the Victorian era (made in England and the USA) with the cheap, practiacally disposable stuff kicking around now, even in "high end" clothing.

      I'm sorry, but our standard of living has NOT gone up in the 50 years since we sent all the manufacturing and now IT jobs overseas - it's been getting steadily worse, and worse, and worse.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    266. Re:Duh... by sudohnim · · Score: 1

      In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but workers cannot follow. This one-sidedness pushes salaries down everywhere, as companies seek the cheapest available labor.

      What they don't realize is that I won't buy their product if I don't have a job. Thus "cheapest available labor" becomes useless without cunsumers.

      --
      Its pretty sad when a commercial OS ships a debugger with their system but no compiler.
    267. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides have you noticed? The young American girls are getting too fat, mostly. So we can't even do good porn anymore.

    268. Re:Duh... by raga · · Score: 1

      but I must hire anybody other than an American to be inclusive?

      Being "inclusive" has nothing to do with it; Money does. When you show reductions in operating costs, it makes Wall St. happy. Which makes the shareholders and the BODs happy. The resulting fat bonus makes the CEO/CFO/CGO... happy. Seems like one big happy family to me!

      Every one is bitching about H1-Bs, but no one cares to question the folks who implement these "cost-cutting measures" in the first place. Or the folks who reward them for doing so.

      cheers- raga

    269. Re:Duh... by turgid · · Score: 1

      ...and just think of all that yummy Indian food! :-)

    270. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how are the two of them doing?

    271. Re:Duh... by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      Er... so, "La Raza" isn't inclusive, then, or is it? You're contradicting yourself here, pal.
      Well it depends on the individual Chicana or Chicano as to how inclusive we are but we tend to be pretty open to the idea of intermarriage. I myself like White girls named Debbie! ;-)

      (I wonder if your average slashdotter will get that cultural reference, or is it too obscure?)
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    272. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO intelligence is impossible to quantify in any meaningful way.

      Gee...I haven't heard that kind of thinking since the 80's. In my highschool, administrators got that stupid kind of thinking. For political reasons and for fear of parents' complaints, instead of failing students who didn't meet high standards of education, they decided to lower the standards so that even the stupidest of students could pass. Even that didn't seem to work, so they began entertaining the idea of having classes without grades or tests -- everyone passes. Fortunately for me, I was able to graduate before all these moronic ideas affected my education. The only thing that sucked was that an advanced placement english class I was registered for got canceled because there were only two people qualified to take it -- me and some other student.

      Of course, all aspects of intelligence are not quantifiable, but that is not the point. The point is that there are standards that need to be met and there are certain levels of competence that can and need to be measured. Anyone can "declare" themselves to be a programmer and obtain a doctorate degree in computer science via mail order for $29.95, but would you want that person programming pace makers, or the braking system on your car?

    273. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does that have anything at all to do with that post?

      He was commenting on a social effect, not legalities.

      Go back where you came from.

    274. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since when has blue collar labor required at least a four year education? Answer. Never.
      No, most blue-collar jobs require a much longer apprenticeship than that.
    275. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, as others has said, learn some bloody English before posting to a discussion board in which English is used.

      Second, as someone with years in the IT trade, I have seen your type in this industry. For the record, your skills are non-existent. I have been forced to train a number of Indians on H1B visas. Their technical skills and literacy levels are a joke (one of them did not even know that the asterick in a case statement in a ksh script was the wildcard option; my secreetary even knew that, chump) yet their level of arrogance, especially toward our (American) women(for the record, I am a man), is a disgrace. Your country is full of arrogant, effete, effeminate assholes whose only strong quality is attracting corporations that need coolie, unskilled labor like yourself. That is the reality, asshole, deal with it.

    276. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One trick that I've seen is for an employer to recruit for the position in locations far from the intended office. Relocation isn't offered and the salary is low. The purpose -- prove that no American would take the job so that an H1B could be hired.

    277. Re:Duh... by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      I think you meant that IT workers require a degree level education right? Or is your workplace hiring 10 year olds for their entry level coding positions?

      Actually IT as a mandatory degree level occupation (in the UK at least) is a relatively recent phenomenon. I went to school in the 80s and had classmates who were looking at getting into Systems Analysis with just A-levels (the UK equivalent of a HS diploma near enough) and during the 90s I have worked in IT with a number of people who didn't have a degree. Generally these are older colleagues who came into the business when it was (much more realistically) regarded as more 'skilled-trade/technical' than 'managerial/professional'. Clearly there is nothing magical about a university education when it comes to the skillsets, attitudes and mentalities required to do IT work at a reasonable level of competence.

      I agree with the earlier poster that IT workers have largely duped themselves into believing they are 'owning class' as a virtue of their occupation (rather than as a side benefit of being able to salt away some of their wage surplus into capital should they so choose) and are in for a series of rude shocks as this mis-categorisation corrects itself. Look at what happened to frame-loom weavers in the UK during the industrial revolution to get an idea of the sort of structural adjustments to the IT labour market that are likely in store over the next couple of decades.

      Outsourcing is by no means a universal panacea but the days of codemonkeys being able to command professional/managerial style salaries without bringing at least some of the interpersonal, cultural or domain expertise skillsets that professional/managerial types are selling are fading fast. The message for the future is to upskill or crosstrain - I'd suggest something like plumbing as a fallback trade. I don't know what its like stateside but good plumbers are like gold-dust in London; they pull down 60-80k pa if they work for themselves and can't be outsourced to SE Asia.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    278. Re:Duh... by prash_n_rao · · Score: 1

      Students plagiarizing? Bah! That's nothing! Lecturers plagiarize here in India! A few of the text books we were prescribed for our Electronics courses were messy copies of infinitely better books by Millman, Taub and Halkias.
      Our mathematics exam papers were 'remixes' of previous exam papers which, in turn, were mostly clean reproductions of practice excercises in our text books.

      --
      This is not my sig.
    279. Re:Duh... by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      I know how you feel. It will be about a year yet before my wife gets her immigrant visa. In the meantime, I'm here, back in the US and working. She's in her country of citizenship and is not allowed to enter the United States *at all* until her visa is approved (astonishingly, she could do it if she did not have a US citizen husband and a US citizen child, but somehow those two things make her untrustworthy to enter the United States).

      I used to live in Japan and some foreigners there complain about the Japanese immigration department and sometimes about the immigration laws and regulations. Heh. They have no idea. It's about 100 times worse here. If I'd known how bad it was going to be, I would have just stayed in my wife's country, even though it's a poor, third-world nation with little decent medical care, and it's really hard to make a living there if you're a foreigner. It's not a democracy, either, so freedoms are rather constrained. However, being forced to spend over a year living away from my wife because of our ridiculous immigration laws is kind of giving me better perspective on how much my freedoms are curtailed now that I'm home. At least I'm free to bitch about the law here. That could get you put in jail in my wife's country.

    280. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Avoiding debt gives you a higher standard of living and really isn't that hard to do. To a first approximation, people spend all the money they make in their life. If you are impatient, and buy everything on credit, then you add an additional 20% (or more) cost to everything because of the interest payments.

      On the other hand, if you have a little patience and save before buying things, you'll save all that interest. You don't get very far ahead with credit, since you can only buy stuff until your credit limit is reached. That means that after you are in debt to the hilt, you are in the same boat as the debt-avoiders; you must save before you can buy anything else.

      So compare the two cases. The smart alternative is that you suffer a little in the beginning until you save enough to buy stuff the first time; after that, you replace or fix out of money you save. The more common alternative is to buy until your credit is maxed out, then save until you can replace or fix things, all the while wasting money on interest. I think it is clear that if you can avoid debt at the beginning, and suffer a bit for the first few years of your working life, you'll end up with more stuff in the end by avoiding interest payments. After the first few years of sacrifice, you'll be able to buy more stuff and buy it sooner than if you'd resorted to credit.

      Unfortunately, the credit trap occurs right at the beginning of your working life, when you have student loan payments, and you are tempted to leave your impoverished student lifestyle now that you're working. If you're lucky, your parents warn you about this trap; but isn't this important enough to teach everyone in high school? I am convinced that "home economics" ought to be the most important subject they can teach you in school. Avoiding debt will probably increase your standard of living more than any other subject they teach.

      I had the same sorts of experiences with my friends when I was in University. They'd ask me why I had so much nice stereo equipment, and I'd tell them I didn't have a car. It is amazing how much cars cost to run; and that's for people like me that keep a car until it dies. I pity the fools that lease, thus combining two very expensive habits: buying on credit and constantly buying new cars.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    281. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was till now because there were new markets like the Middle east, India and China

      I wouldn't want to have to sell any kind of product to a country where the average citizen makes $200/month. For any product that is not a basic necessity, it seems that there would be no market at all. Obviously, Indians and maybe Chinese can afford a 75 cent can of soda, but higher priced items are somewhat impractical to sell in such countries. Can Indians afford a $40 pair of Levi jeans if they are only making $200-$300 a month?

    282. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously not an American. We can spot you foreigners a mile away. Your women are every bit as fat as ours and (unless you're French or Czech) probably twice as ugly.

    283. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Umm, you said we are the first generation with a lower standard of living, not that we WILL be the first generation with a lower standard of living. I'll bet your current lifestyle is better than what your parents had at the equivalent point in their life.

      I didn't say standard of living, I said worse off... that meant economically. My parents are from a time where both parents didn't have to work to make ends meet. They also come from a time where the disparity between the have's and have not's wasn't so wide. The middle class is shrinking and another article. Unless you squeak into the wealthiest 5% of U.S. citizens, then you're either considered impoverished or a dying breed.

      I agree with your old fogie rant. My first salary out of college was $18k, when most of my friends expected to hit the work force running at $30k'ish. THey all thought they should have nice new cars (while I drove an old beat up pickup truck to work), wear expensive suits to work (I shopped at the discount stores), and live uptown. They were all living check to check and barely getting by, because they thought they deserved nice things like their parents had. Fast forward 12 years later, and I have a nice savings account, a nice 401(k), have maxed out on social security (not that I'll ever see any of it), and have extra investments to boot. Mainly because I lived within my means. Which, by the way, were lower means (if you compare using CPI) to how my parents lived when they started out.

      I'd hate to give up my chance for a share of a higher standard of living in order to preserve your current standard of living. Sadly, this comment is the case for many people... at least those who work for mid to large companies. I now write HR software, and am privy to the extra monies the senior execs rape from companies, including this one which hasn't seen a profitable year in the last three. There have been paycuts, cuts in the bonuses, and cuts in benefits. Meanwhile, the senior execs have seen increases in their bonuses. So the effect of this is exactly what you said... my standard of living is suffering because theirs is increasing... drastically. This is not the only company I've seen this happen at. Hell, just watch the news... we saw this with Enron, Dynegy, El Paso Oil, WorldCom......
      You, however, shouldn't have to worry about my standard of living affecting yours... and only I should worry about my standard of living. But I would love to see examples of "every other change in history has resulted in a higher average standard of living." How about the new bill that expands the definition of exempt employees? Millions of Americans will not be able to bill overtime (such as police officers). Their standard if living will decrease... all in the name of corporate greed.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    284. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is NOTHING that can't be done cheaper somewhere else in the world. Thirteen years ago, I never thought that real software development could take place in the third world. We could use their coders, perhaps, to implement some lower-level functions, but that's about it. Guess what? They're actually pretty good.

      Now, people think "upper management" is safe. Sorry. You can find people with better CEO skills willing to work for less money also.

      Smut? Why can't a guy in Coimbatore peddle smut just as easily?

      Women to pose (or fornicate)? I understand that there are women in other parts of the world also. Why pay $50 if you can pay $5?

      The work that requires physical presence (the "service" jobs you were talking about) are about all that I see as being safe. Burger-flippers, truck-drivers, politicians, gardeners, government jobs, airline pilots, hotel clerks, etc. will likely remain domestic occupations.

      As for me, I guess I'll just keep mooching off of my relatives and day-dreaming about the good old days when we all aspired to top-siders, Izod shirts, Khaki pants, an Ivy League education and imitation-WASP gentility. Noblesse Oblige.

      Ah ...

    285. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      I don't mind allowing everyone on earth to relocate here, as long as they don't work in IT.
      In short, competitors should be shot and rot on hell. Non-competitors (who might need my IT services) are welcomed with open arms.

      If your IT skills are so limited that you fear competition from foreign labor to the point that your desire physically killing your competitors, then perhaps you should consider a change of career. Burger-flipping comes to mind.

    286. Re:Duh... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      They won't need one once they have a kid in America - then they can't be kicked out

      Another lie. Please educate yourself before spouting such nonsense.

    287. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with the rest of your post, I get so tired of the "Americans speak only one language" crap. The reason people in most of the world speak multiple languages is because in those places it makes sense to. Where I live if I drive for 5 hours, I'm still in my own state, in Europe, I might be in my 5th country, all of which speak their own language. So if I know another language over there, I can actually use it. They are not learning multiple languages out of some scholarly pursuit of multiculturalism. I dare say that in the USA today, there are alot more people who can speak Spanish now in addition to English, because now with so many Spanish speaking people living here, it's actually useful. I speak a little of a regional Indian dialect, but if I were not married to someone from India, why would I bother? I don't learn new programming languages just for the hell of it, I learn them to apply to a task...

    288. Re:Duh... by raga · · Score: 1

      Where does that have anything at all to do with that post?

      Continuation of a comment to a different thought, my dear.

      He was commenting on a social effect, not legalities.

      I too am not talking about legalities.

      Yes, I am cynical enough to suggest that most social "effects" are driven by money.

      When times are good for all, it is fashionable to be "inclusive".

      Along comes a downturn and it is "us" vs. "them".

      However, because of their lower rates. "them" continue to be in demand (by those who are making the *real* money.)

      Go back where you came from.

      I see that you, by trying to be rude as an AC, are already where you came from. Was it the view or the fragrance that enticed you back?

      cheers- raga

    289. Re:Duh... by shaay · · Score: 1

      Regarding the porn employment option: don't quit your day job just yet. I was employed as an, er, entertainment phone operator. Yep, phone sex. And it was easier to get paying calls a year ago. The market seems to be slowly drying up :-/ as the level of disposable income goes down. Even smut isn't immune to recessionary economics!

      --
      Remember: anything not compulsory is forbidden.
    290. Re:Duh... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Tell you what, you live in a house the size they had in the 50's/60's, have one car for your family, no cable, no A/C, just one phone, and have wifey cook your meals every night instead of going out, you'll do A-OK with one income. Well, unless you live in a big "popular" city with obscenely inflated real estate prices, where you'll be competing with all the other imbeciles trying to live beyond their means.

    291. Re:Duh... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      How many houses in Wyoming cost $300,000? FWIU, that's a cheap house in CA.

      Housing is usually your biggest expense. All other things being equal, cheaper housing more than offsets a reduction in salary.

    292. Re:Duh... by shaay · · Score: 1

      Sure, they may be the first to go, but CEO's seem to have the nasty little habit of cashing their stock options in before the company goes downhill too far, and then they get all those nice layoff benefits the rest of us don't get. And then they "leverage" their contacts and get hired at another company to do it all over again. How many times have we seen this? Golden parachute, anyone?

      --
      Remember: anything not compulsory is forbidden.
    293. Re:Duh... by shaay · · Score: 1

      Perfectly happily self employed, thanks for your concern. But extremely frustrated on behalf my community, my country and our collective future.

      --
      Remember: anything not compulsory is forbidden.
    294. Re:Duh... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      I still disagree with you about how well off people are now compared to our parent's generation; but you are correct to point out that distribution issues matter too. It doesn't really matter if GDP increases, if the increase is restricted to the rich.

      I live in Canada, but like everyone else in the world, I am well exposed to what is happening in America. I think you are all screwed until you get rid of Bush. All he ever talks about is averages; so he talks about an average tax cut of $2000 and lets people misunderstand average to mean typical. If people knew what the median tax cut was (and therefore had some idea of how it was distributed), they'd see that the benefits all go to a few rich people, and maybe complain. I am amazed that under his leadership, rich investors get tax breaks on their dividends and capital gains, who can then invest that money; while poor and middle-class people refinance their mortgages to keep on spending. This system guarantees that inequality will increase over time.

      I think a "jackpot" mentality has entered society. All our supposed role models are people who have struck it rich. A few musicians and athletes become rich, and everyone is supposed to think it is fair that the majority of the reward goes to a few at the top of the pyramid and there is next to nothing for those below. A 1% chance for $5,000,000 a year is not the same as a 100% chance for $50,000 a year, even if gamblers would say it is. I can only think that the majority of people don't care if the rich get all the breaks because they figure they'll be able to cash in too, when they strike it rich.

      Canada seems to be a little more European in outlook. Canada still has a (shrinking) middle class and most people aspire to be middle class rather than rich. Pro-American commentators usually complain about this as a lack of drive and a sign of mediocrity (a friend's favourite saying is "Good enough for Canada"), compared to a U.S. characterized by ambition and successful risk-taking. I'm not sure which system will work out better in the end; but we are not going to determine that by looking at the average standard of living, which is significantly higher in the U.S.; but by looking at the median standard of living, which is much more equal (but still in America's favour).

      I aimed for the middle class, and I even hit the top end of that range by being a programmer. But I am seeing the same things as you. My company was bought, the new management said they recognized that we grunts that knew the business were important and our jobs would be saved. Yet, as you'd expect, only managers were given retention bonuses and fewer than 6 months passed before we were all laid off. At least Canadian law ensured that I was paid a generous severance for my 12+ years with the company (which the new company complained about!). This wouldn't be so aggravating if management ever had to pay for their mistakes; as I am sure the current outsourcing fad will turn out to be. But managers get rewarded for every change they implement; they'll get fat bonuses for outsourcing, then they'll get fat bonuses when they recognized their mistake and hire people again. This is what happens when there is no check on the power of rich people.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    295. Re:Duh... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I am amazed that under his leadership, rich investors get tax breaks on their dividends and capital gains

      Actually that's been going on for decades, although I'm no longer a fan of Bush (having been at one time... I did like him as governor of my home state).

      HP is as guilty as anyone, regarding your comment about managers getting rewarded for the changes they make... I'll post (www.jeffreyhamby.com) the article I just got today from a buddy of mine that works for HP. It's all about current shareholder value these days -- regardless of the future of the company.

      You're right on about the typical US citizen and the jackpot mentality. I probably make $30k/yr more than most of my friends, and they all like to talk about what they'll do when they win the lottery. I doubt a single one of them really knows what their retirement outlook is. Pretty sad really.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    296. Re:Duh... by iceperson · · Score: 1

      you're right, i should have said 7 year olds spending 16 hours a day going through garbage and separating something "valuable" from used condoms and other garbage for 50 cents a day. http://www.globalmarch.org/clns/clns-aug-2003-deta ils.html#26-1

    297. Re:Duh... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There aren't that many rich figureheads like W. Occasionally there is a need for them, though.

    298. Re:Duh... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      lazy or greedy companies... [...] It they are not lazy then they are doing more work than they have to and are burning shareholder $$$. If they aren't greedy then they are not maximizing shareholder $$$.

      If you actually finished reading that sentence, then you'll realize that I wrote "lazy or greedy companies that intend to subvert the process by not honestly examining American candidates, then they're breaking the law". I'm talking about a degree of laziness or greed that is illegal.

    299. Re:Duh... by tricorn · · Score: 1

      For anything which you don't meet the requirements, if you can show that the H1B that got the job also doesn't meet them (and you are the same or closer to meeting them), I think you'd still have a case.

    300. Re:Duh... by screenrc · · Score: 1
      I don't know anyone who likes competition.
      And I don't know anyone who does not
      desire that their competitors be shot
      on sight and rot in hell.

      Perhaps, you have
      different desires towards your competitors, I don't.

    301. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By American it is meant BORN IN AMERICA. Not some poor camel jockey that wants to jump on the bandwagon because our nation is better than theirs.

      Immigrant American != American

      I for one am sick of dealing with id10t foriegners and trying desperately to figure out what they are trying to communicate. "...But English may be their Xth language". English is the language of business. If you cannot speak it GTFO.

    302. Re:Duh... by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have laughed, but I did.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
    303. Re:Duh... by wraith0x29a · · Score: 1

      I hate intolerant people.

      --
      ~ Better a freak than a sheep. ~
    304. Re:Duh... by abolith · · Score: 0
      Don't comment when you don'tknow the whole story. I was told that I would be training my replacement (my boss doesn't shine me on) and then I would be fired because it was ceaper. THAT was why I left before training my "replacement".

      --
      if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    305. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are, obviously, an american. Dream on.

  2. Just usual by Karamchand · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's common in many countries all around the world. As long as you aren't a citizien it is rather hard to get a job - not just because of possible prejudices but also simply because you are not allowed to!

    1. Re:Just usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't get a job in the States unless I marry someone there. No green cards for people from the UK unless a company sends you over there and bullshits that they've looked around and can't find people with the relevant skills, and no green card lottery for UK citizens because more than 50,000 Brits enter the US each year already (presumably via the 2 mechanisms I just mentioned).

    2. Re:Just usual by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Exactly .. I'm Canadian, and I can't get a job in the US without getting a green card and/or work visa (or whatever the requirements are, I've never done it). Why would Americans be surprised that they can't get a job in another country without going through a similar process?

      I haven't read the article due to a severe Slashdotting, but it sounds like a troll, I don't imagine anyone would seriously emmigrate to India from the US unless that happens to be their family's background. You could quit programming and become a part time janitor and still have a better standard of living in North America. (no offence to Indians intended)

    3. Re:Just usual by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      suprise! other coutries also require almost-impossible-to-get visas to work there. Even for americans.

      As someone currently trying to decide on which of my feet to put this particular shoe, this fills me with a certain schadenfreude (amazing that this word seems not to exist in english)

    4. Re:Just usual by mantera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're totally missing the point. While Americans can't work in india, scores of indians are taking over American jobs in the US.
      So americans aren't allowed to compete with indians in india, but indians can compete with americans in america.
      No other country i know of would allow such a thing to happen. You should consider why such a thing simply does not happen in Europe, where they are more protective of their citizens livelihood.
      Check out the republican party's politics, they even resourced their fundraising to india!
      Those damn capitalists. Let's just hope democrats will win in 2004.

    5. Re:Just usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many places, like south korea, won't even let you become a citizen unless you can prove that you are south korean (ie, race, heratige).

      Btw, this whole issue is just the capitalist redistrubition of wealth, people in the US just need to retrain and start doing other, more profitable jobs. Its kinda like the textile industry, how many textile labourers do you see around? It all went over seas, and surprise, both we, and the rest of the world is better because of it.

    6. Re:Just usual by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      Try being foreign (yes - even Indian) and getting a job in the US. I'd guess it would be much easier to go from the US to India than vice versa.

    7. Re:Just usual by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not just a troll. Most other countries make it significantly harder for foreigners to get jobs than the US does (I'm not saying that we make it easy). It's also true that they tend to invest a larger percentage of the national income in social services, like health care. (Not too surprising that there's this correlation.)

      When I investigated emmigrating, it turned out that I should have left before I was 30. When you think about it, it makes a bit of economic sense. Before then you are largely an asset (after you are employed). As you get older, you become more of a consumer of assets. Larger medical bills, etc. Even in the 1980's Canada only allowed "landed emmigrant status" to people with skills in certain desired professions. (Presumably you could also buy your way in via real estate purchases...same justification. But I didn't check.)

      So. We have India, China, etc. Large populations, trying hard to find jobs for all of them that will bring in the shekels. (Dollars, Pounds, Euros, what all.) They aren't going to be eager to accept emigrants. They've already got enough trouble keeping people employed. But I bet they'd let you, say, volunteer at an orphanage. But you'ld have to pay your own way. Same justification.

      This always irritates me when some large company uses cheap foreign labor as an excuse for exporting jobs. The costs of living here are what they are, and they aren't getting less. And we *can't* relocate to where they are moving the jobs. So they should be charged extra taxes for the damage that they are doing to the local economy. But of course, the laws that they have caused to be passed don't penalize their behavior.

      P.S.: I've known a few people who were long term emmigrants to India from the US. The ones that I knew, of course, are ones who returned. None of them regretted the experience. (Of course, several of them spent their time in India at Ashrams...)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:Just usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to my dictionaries (Langenscheidt's englisch-german and Webster's New World D.) it does exist. (Though of course it is "imported".)

    9. Re:Just usual by gfody · · Score: 1

      Try being foreign (yes - even Indian) and getting a job in the US

      Its pretty damn easy aparently you don't even have to leave your country.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    10. Re:Just usual by soundcore · · Score: 1

      Unless it's the USA. Then it's hard to get a job if you ARE a citizen. No other country would tolerate this. "Separately, the State Council of the People's Republic of China in August directed all government ministries to buy only Chinese software in the next upgrade cycle in an effort to encourage the development of local software companies but also to protect sensitive government data."

    11. Re:Just usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess all you want because you are wrong. That's the great thing about guessing. If you are wrong you can just say - it was just a guess.

      Jobs are tight in the US in some areas, no doubt, but we still have 1/3rd of the Population spread out over 3 times the land area.

    12. Re:Just usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're totally missing the point. While your parent posting was modded up, the user's only point might have been to get new fresh karma

    13. Re:Just usual by FroMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Geesh, up until your crack at the Republicans, I was in full agreement with your post.

      I think that we allow folks to immigrate to the states and work here. Live here. Bring their families here. Become citizens. Pay taxes. Get an education. Enjoy life here. All those things and many more is what makes America great.

      Immigrants are immigrants usually for a single generation, often shorter than that since they can become citizens. Then they are part of us. Then they have to worry about the next batch of immigrants taking their jobs! Crazy huh?

      Maybe you ought to ask yourself why there are so many immigrants in the US. There just might be a reason. We are not an exclusive club like many EU contries. We are the people, born here and immigrated here.

      When the USS Reagan launched a short while ago I was reading some of the commentary and stories in the news. One was from one of his aides (I forget who exactly). He told the story of how when Reagan was at one of the Olymic games events and how he watched all the athletes enter. His comment to paraphrase was this:

      The Chineese entered will all the Chinese looking folks, the Mexicans entered with all their Mexican looking folks, the african nations all entered with their african looking folks. But you know what brought the most joy, was that the Americans came in looking like all the world, white, black, short and tall, but all of them were Americans.

      How so many people in our country claim that the republicans are the racist bunch is beyond me. If there was ever a group of people that truly would ignore skin color, gender, or such, the republicans are truly the political party who does not care who you are, but are all inclusive.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    14. Re:Just usual by gears5665 · · Score: 1, Informative

      while my karma is bad enough, I venture to worsen it by replying.

      How so many people in our country claim that the republicans are the racist bunch is beyond me.
      There is a historical precedence to this. (Civil Rights, Segregation, Anti-Immigrant)

      Conservative by its definition means keeping the status quo. Keeping the Rich White Christian Men in power. As a white man of many generations in America I've almost been tempted to vote Republican many times to maintain my status when I felt threatened. But the arguements of the Republican party against common sense in the fields of Gay and Lesbian Rights, Religious Freedoms, Civl Liberties, Women's Right to Work, National Health Care for Everyone, anti-Union, anti-Choice of Abortion, and many more keep me voting democrat time and time again. And while the current administration in America has too many faults for me to accurately characterize, I don't think I could do the arguement justice. I'll leave that up to the people that will replace them.

      Suffice it to say, the stated views of the Republican party have always been against the common good.

    15. Re:Just usual by rastos1 · · Score: 1
      >I think that we allow folks to immigrate to the states and work here. ...

      Reading that made me to do a little research. The reason is that my company had serious troubles to get me to US ~5 years ago for 2 weeks of on-site debugging. We had to ask US-based subsidiary of a businnes partner to send an invitation letter for me.
      I did not found anything to confirm my doubts, but I've found Diversity Immigrant Visa Program instructions, which among other things says that:

      • by submitting you are entering lottery. (the link is broken, the program did not start yet)
      • the submissions are electronic only
      • you have to include your photon in jpeg format , 240x320pixels and defined color depth.
      Interesting, isn't it? Getting ready for face recognition?
    16. Re:Just usual by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Interesting, isn't it? Getting ready for face recognition?

      Immigration is still a privilidge. As far as submitting your photo, this is not a big deal. It would be foolish to let just anyone in and screening is an important part.

      I see no problem making sure folks coming in come in legally and such.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  3. Stamp-over advertising? by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Am I the only one who had to copy and paste the text from the second linked page into a word processor to view the story?

    In Mozilla, I got a Sprint ad in a huge box which overlaid the story text, making it impossible to read. I tried hovering over and such to see if it had a 'click to hide' option, but nothing. I'm not clicking the ad itself.

    Is this some new advertising tactic to force people to visit ad sites to view the article, or is this just a page design problem?

    1. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Privoxy.

    2. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by Tirel · · Score: 1

      it works fine in epiphany 1.0 which is based on the mozilla-1.4-gtk2 engine. either upgrade or select block images and reload.

    3. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by yerfatma · · Score: 1

      Err, I guess you would want to try Opera if you were worried about a Moz bug. Viewing it in IE isn't going to tell you much about whether the page has design issues or not.

    4. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by slaker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Moz is the browser that is most compliant with actual web standards.
      Probably some dumbass webmonkey didn't bother to check his page in anything but IE6 for Windows, and therefore didn't realize the problem.

      OTOH, it looked fine to me, and I'm using Moz 1.4 with most of the image and javascipt-blocking options turned on.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    5. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by fenix+down · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If it doesn't take Mozilla into account, that's a design issue.

    6. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by forrestt · · Score: 1

      The second link is /.ed, so I can't tell for sure, but...

      Yesterday I had a similar experience on a site (using Moz 1.4 on RedHat 9) and found that if I narrowed the browser the stamp-over would move to the right and allow me to see the text. My guess is that the problem is with viewing the page with a high res desktop rather than browser specific, but what do I know?)

    7. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i'd say it's a requirements issue. if the requirements allow for a site to be IE6.0 only, and the dev team uses windows with IE, you're going to get an IE only site.

    8. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Actually, it sounds like a problem with Shockwave Flash: namely, that you have the flash player installed. Between uninstalling that and using Mozilla, you'll rarely have to put up with any advertisements, ever.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    9. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this some new advertising tactic to force people to visit ad sites to view the article, or is this just a page design problem?

      No junkbuster, no happiness.

    10. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I'm using a firebird extension called "remove this object", its handy for removing ads on an ad hoc basis, I found it in the mozillazine.org forums.
      Just thought i'd point it out for anyone who would like to add it to their browsing toolbox.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    11. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

      Nah I didn't see any ads at all on that page. If you don't know about the Adblock mozilla extension get it, its awesome. Make sure you get the dev build cos that doesn't download the ads either. Here's the filter list I currently use:

      [Adblock]
      *.ads.*
      *.adtech.*
      *.advertising.*
      *.atdmt.com/*
      *.valueclick.com/*
      */ad?*
      */adcontent.*
      */adfarm.*
      */ads/*
      */adserver.*
      */banners/*
      */eur.yimg.com/a/*
      */fastclick/*
      *doubleclick.*
      http://ads.dennisnet.co.uk/*
      http://ads.ign.com/*
      http://ads.osdn.com/*
      http://ar.atwola.com/*
      http://media.fastclick.net/*
      http://s0b.bluestreak.com/*
      http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/phpAdsNew/*
      http://www.businessweek.com/sponsors/*
      http://www.canada.com/barterads/*
      http://www.zone-h.org/banner/*

    12. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      There's also a great extension for Mozilla Firebird where all Flash is displayed as a grey box, and if you want to see it just click on the box. This means you can avoid seizure-inducing crazy blinking ads, but be able to view great sites like Homestar Runner.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    13. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who had to copy and paste the text from the second linked page into a word processor to view the story?

      In Mozilla, I got a Sprint ad in a huge box which overlaid the story text, making it impossible to read. I tried hovering over and such to see if it had a 'click to hide' option, but nothing. I'm not clicking the ad itself.

      No problems here with Mozilla 1.4...but this might have something to do with it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Stamp-over advertising? by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      Blocking web advertisements is theft, pure and simple. You aren't viewing the material on the terms under which it was offered to you.

      This is yet another illustration of the problems resulting from renegade programmers abusing innocent users' PCs. There is no accountability behind open source software.

  4. But we live in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean theres even some native Indians that live down the street from me. We came here back in 1492 remember?

  5. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a bunch of hyped nonsense. There are plenty of Americans and other nationals working in Bangalore. Maybe they don't hire people who suck

    1. Re:Nonsense by redfenix · · Score: 1

      One would think that the person being hired would do the sucking.

      --
      "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  6. Of course he can't work there... by ksheka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The laws are probably similar to the US:
    You can't immigrate to work unless you can prove that you can do a job that no one else in the country can do.
    If it wasn't for this law, the US would be flooded (more so than now) with techs and doctors from all over asia.

    --
    alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    1. Re:Of course he can't work there... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and did you read the article?

      A MAN SHOT HIMSELF BECAUSE HE ENDED UP TRAINING HIS INDIAN REPLACEMENT.

      So, if this man could come to the US and BE TRAINED by a CITIZEN what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

    2. Re:Of course he can't work there... by skitz0 · · Score: 0

      How is this a troll? Its 100 accurate.

    3. Re:Of course he can't work there... by TheGreek · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Work for half as much money.

    4. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      Work for $.25 / hour.

      --


      Knightfall
    5. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is a solution! So, then I can eat half as much food and only pay half my mortgage.

      When my phone bill comes, I'll only pay half, I'm sure they'll understand.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Of course he can't work there... by zoid.com · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you ever heard of the H-1B Visa program? H-1B workers continue to flood a terrible job market. During 2001 and 2002, 799,100 H-1B visas were issued and renewed despite a 6 percent national unemployment. Read some speech excerpt by U.S. Representative Tom Tancredo.

      It's time to terminate the the H-1B visa program.

    7. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not shoot himself?

    8. Re:Of course he can't work there... by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      I was answering his question, retard.

    9. Re:Of course he can't work there... by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      So, if this man could come to the US and BE TRAINED by a CITIZEN what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

      You're kidding right? I'm guessing he could speak at least two languages, could claim to have unique contacts in India, and who knows, maybe he can dance a tango. The point is that the requirements for any job can be (and sometimes are) tailored so that only one possible condidate will meet all of the "requirements" of the position.

      Take a look at some of the free job location services and think about the requirements you see in some of the listings. I bet you will find such a "tailored" list of requirements on your first try.

    10. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if this man could come to the US and BE TRAINED by a CITIZEN what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?


      Live in a rat-infested efficiency apartment, eat 3 meals a week, bike to work, wear second-hand clothing, have no TV/cable, etc, thus requiring less pay?

    11. Re:Of course he can't work there... by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He could get an H-1B visa, evidently.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    12. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am uninterested.

      People in this country are quite capable to do their jobs. We don't need to train people from India to be our replacements.

      If they want a job so bad, move here, become a citizen, and get a job. Don't take someone else's away.

      People who speak two languages (in the IT area) are a dime a dozen, who cares?

    13. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to work in India, it is really not impossible. I work in bangalore and I have 2 collegues who are US citizens (went to US on H1B , became citizens, got laid off), nobody checks if you are non-indian. There is a Nepali and a Srilankan too.
      I also have a lot of american, as in caucasians working here (not in my division though ), since this is an Offshore development centre of a US company.

    14. Re:Of course he can't work there... by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      "You're kidding right? I'm guessing he could speak at least two languages"

      Have you talked to any flavor of outsourced tech support lately?

    15. Re:Of course he can't work there... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      What have you been smoking? The U.S. IS flooded with IT personell from all over Asia. *4 million* have come to the U.S. alone since 2000. For those of you who have read Orwell, "Some animals are more equal than others" under the WTO. The U.S. is globalizing, the rest of the world isn't. We have to take the entire world's surplus workers, but no one will hire Americans. In China the law says all foreign businesses must hire 50% local Chinese workers. Where is the WTO?

    16. Re:Of course he can't work there... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The guy who killed himself was mentally unstable. Lets not make too much of an issue out of this as most people don't committ suicide just because they lost their job.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    17. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Gorphrim · · Score: 1

      So, if this man could come to the US and BE TRAINED by a CITIZEN what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

      uh, maybe he can do the same job for lower pay?

      --

      Queens of the Stone Age - they rule
    18. Re:Of course he can't work there... by skitz0 · · Score: 0

      Finally! Someone who knows how to use their mod points.

    19. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > Lets not make too much of an issue out of this

      The psychological impact of training someone as a part of your job, only to get fired and have said person take your job, should not be understated.

      Granted I wouldn't go suicidal over it.. but I haven't ruled out homocide. ;)

    20. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you can prove that you can do a job that no one else in the country can do.

      uhhh....and you think companies are honest? I work for a company that has replaced all american workers with H1B Indian replacements. They know it's wrong, but they know they won't get caught. Corporate crime is an all time high my friend!

    21. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your sarcasm proves the point: You apparently can't do what the Indian replacement can do, namely working for less and still get by.

    22. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "Have you talked to any flavor of outsourced tech support lately?"

      Who said that either of the two languages had to be English? ;)

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    23. Re:Of course he can't work there... by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Nobody said either of those two languages were english.

      It's so wonderful to call a call centre and get someone who I can't understand.

    24. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know the dead guy, so I don't know the whole story, but...

      Maybe it's possible the guy was getting fired because he was mentally unstable? I mean, I've lost a few jobs too, and I haven't shot myself.

    25. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

      Be a Citizen of India.

      Harsh reality, when you outsource jobs, skillsets go with them. I'm sure the reverse is true, that the replacement he trained couldn't become a Citizen of the US.

      It does work both ways...

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    26. Re:Of course he can't work there... by satyap · · Score: 1
      If they want a job so bad, move here, become a citizen, and get a job. Don't take someone else's away.
      Er, that's what some of us are trying to do?
    27. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one explain all the singers and actors
      moving to the USA from other countries? The US
      doesn't have enough singers and actors of its
      own?

    28. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in the USA it is the custom to humiliate ill people and fire them? And you call yourselves civilised and free? If he's lost his job, how can he afford to get better, since you don't have free health care? Would he not then be unemployable, on the scrapheap of humanity with no hope? Hell, if I lived in your extreme right-wing hell, I'd probably have shot myself long ago - but I'd have taken some of you suckers with me....

    29. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 2, Funny

      The laws are probably similar to the US:
      You can't immigrate to work unless you can prove that you can do a job that no one else in the country can do.


      I dunno, I see a lot of Indians here in the US doing jobs that I could be doing. Must not be too hard for them to immigrate here.

      Basically here's the phone conversation between the US Dept. of Immigration and the HR person for the company trying to hire an Indian worker:

      Immigration Officer (IO): "So there's nobody else in the US who can do C++ programming and who can fill your position?"
      HR Person: "Yeah, that's right."
      IO: "OK, you can hire Asok."

      It seems that in India they don't let people from the US (or other countries) come in to work at all - that's much different from how it works in the US.

    30. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a terribly ignorant statment. Are you implying that every foreign person working in the US with a work visa is the ONLY person who can do what they do? Did you read this law on some joke website?

    31. Re:Of course he can't work there... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Damn right. I know a guy that happened to a few months back. Had to train his replacement just before he got laid off. That's bad enough, but then he was constantly being called at home by the replacement for help even after he was gone...

    32. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      So, if this man could come to the US and BE TRAINED by a CITIZEN what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

      Apparently the Indian guy wasn't a suicidal maniac.

    33. Re:Of course he can't work there... by randyest · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, oh +5 Insightful but painfully incorrect one. There is no such law in the US that requires H1B visa applications to be denied even if there are many Americans capable of doing the job.

      You certainly wouldn't have to prove it anyway, under any conceivable sensible legislation, since it's hard to prove a negative, and an exhaustive analysis of all 230 million + Americans would be rather cost-prohibitive.

      What keeps the US from being "flooded (more so than now) with techs and doctors from all over asia" are the limits placed on the number of H1B visas granted, not any sort of rules for being eligible for an H1B visa.

      --
      everything in moderation
    34. Re:Of course he can't work there... by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      That's bad enough, but then he was constantly being called at home by the replacement for help even after he was gone...

      I would have said, "Tell you what, if you want help, go to your boss and have them bring me in as an outside consultant on contract. Until then, piss off."

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    35. Re:Of course he can't work there... by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
      what could this man do that the CITIZEN could not?

      Work for $5.75 an hour with no benefits ;-)

      --

    36. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      An honest, actual question: has this actually happened to you? Have you ever called a call center and gotten someone who didn't speak your language?

    37. Re:Of course he can't work there... by prakashk · · Score: 1
      During 2001 and 2002, 799,100 H-1B visas were issued
      The actual numbers are much smaller.

      From the H1B FAQ on the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services site:

      Is there an annual limit on the number of H-1B aliens?

      Yes. The current law limits to 195,000 the number of aliens who may be issued a visa or otherwise provided H-1B status in FY2001. In 2002 and 2003, the number of aliens who can be issued a visa will also be 195,000. In 2004, the number of aliens who can be issued an H-1B visa or be provided H-1B status otherwise will revert to 65,000.

      /prakash

    38. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He should've shot his replacement instead... :)

    39. Re:Of course he can't work there... by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      Did youy read the speech?

      "In the year 2000, the cap was 115,000. We took in 294,000. In 2001, the cap was 107,000. We took in 384,000. In 2002, when the cap went to 195,000, we took in 294,100. In 2000, Congress added an exemption for universities and nonprofits. As I say, in the 2 years of 2001 and 2002, 342,000 H-1B visas were issued in this category. If we add to this number the number of visas already issued not yet up for renewal, it is clear that there are well over 600,000 H-1B visa holders employed in 2002."

    40. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Or answer the questions and send monthly invoices. My rule of thumb for this sort of thing is to take what you'd make in an ideal world (with your choice of sky colors), add a heft percentage and just send it to Accounts Payable. Net 30 terms are fine, after 90 days take 'em to court.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    41. Re:Of course he can't work there... by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Spoke it, yes. Comprehensibly? No. It has happened once or twice.

    42. Re:Of course he can't work there... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      A MAN SHOT HIMSELF BECAUSE HE ENDED UP TRAINING HIS INDIAN REPLACEMENT

      No, a man shot himself because he was mentally unstable and in dire need of help.

    43. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Persoanly I would have answered his questions with replies like

      "yeah, you need to use the format command to get the report formatted in that way"

    44. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      That's easy, silly. He can work for less money ;)

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    45. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "boss."

    46. Re:Of course he can't work there... by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Tom Tancredo is one of the most anti-immigrant Congressmen around. He is hardly a source of accurate H-1B statistics. 799 thousand H-1Bs in two years is garbage.

      For more accurate statistics, check the government's web site.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    47. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      It's time to terminate the the H-1B visa program.

      You almost got this right, it should have been:

      It's way past time to terminate the the H-1B visa program.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    48. Re:Of course he can't work there... by LINM · · Score: 1

      He probably also couldn't live on 10 dollars per day. In the US everything is much more expensive. All goods and profits are taxed at every level of the value chain and we have plenty of regulation to drive the price up artificially further.

      20% of the GDP coming from the government means that the remaining 80% has a quarter of its budget going out the window. That may work (inneficiently) as long as most major industrialized countries are similarly held back, but when you compete against countries with less government overhead, you lose.

      That's it.

      --

      Hunger is the best sauce.

    49. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how it works. The companies are not just negotiating wages. If it were that simple they would offer a pay cut before firing the Americans. I would be willing to work for less than the Indians for those jobs, but they are not hiring.

    50. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why? Isn't America supposed to be evil?

    51. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not for a programming job. He can probably get a job at Walmart though.

    52. Re:Of course he can't work there... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Maybe that "training" just involved showing what's aready done to someone who COULD ACTUALLY DO A FAR BETTER JOB? It did _not_ mean teaching them how to program.

      Sorry to do the non-neighbourly thing, but lemme point at a simple fact: the dot-bomb meant a lot of incompetents and liars got hired as "programmers" for ludicrious sums. And _retard_ with _zero_ programming knowledge could put on a nice suit and get hired by a clueless PHB.

      It was sorta like this: you're a drooling baker with an allergy to flour? No problem. Buy a bogus certifficate from some "learn QBasic without even coming to a course" fraudster, and suddenly you were a high paid IT consultant. Or don't even buy the fake certifficate, just go get hired anyway.

      Even in the rare situations where those people eventually learned the language syntax, they had _no_ knowledge of the core libraries, _no_ knowledge of algorithms, _no_ idea of security, _no_ nothing. In some cases, _no_ intention to actually learn anything, either.

      The code they produced was of piss-poor quality at best, and riddled with problems. In a lot of cases it was just a piss-poor job of copy and pasting (the wrong) sections from other people's programs.

      A lot of them knew that they're cheats and frauds, and were content with that too. They only engaged in office politics games, and their only "professional" activity was backstabbing the ones who actually did the work.

      Don't believe me? I've actually read a study that said only about 1 in 4 "programmers" could actually program _at_ _all_. The rest either lived as parasites off a real programmer, or made a living as the PHB's personal brown-noser.

      Basically 3 in 4 were nothing more than ticks or leeches on a company. (Which often was a leech itself, like so many of the dot-coms.) They never gave anything useful, and only lived in luxury off other people's work.

      Exorbitant funds, which could have better been used elsewhere, were effectively drained from the economy to keep these parasites living in cluster homes and driving sports cars.

      Think this money just came out of thin air? No, they were paid by the actual companies which produced something. Every single company who silently footed the bill for yet another a failed project, was effectively a victim of these leeches.

      How is _that_ situation better for the economy, than giving the job to someone actually competent? Oh yeah, let's keep over-paying a bunch of incompetent cheats and liars, just because they're proper American Citizens (TM).

      Never mind that that kind of a financial black hole was causing more jobs to be lost in other sectors. Yeah, jobs also occupied by proper American Citizens (TM).

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    53. Re:Of course he can't work there... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      So how does one do that, then?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  7. Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    India is a sovereign country. They can do that with impunitity. I have no problem with that.

    USA is also a sovereign country. Let's do the same. It's about time we stop issuing visas to people who steal native born Americans' jobs.

    Before some slashbot calls me a racist, let me tell you that I don't care if you are a black, white, hindu, christian, jew or a muslim. If you're American, I've got nothing against you. But if you think you should be able to just waltz in and have a job or study at one of our universities, think again.

    1. Re:Sovereign country by Tirel · · Score: 1

      american universities cost about 10,000 times more than european ones. HTH.

    2. Re:Sovereign country by yerfatma · · Score: 1

      I think "troll" would come up before racist. Unless your ancestors were Apache coders. Like, uhm, literally or something.

    3. Re:Sovereign country by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Most companies of any significant size these days are multinational. There are several legal entities that are owned by one or more parent companies.

      If the US chooses to make it difficult for the US-based subsidiary to outsource, it's a simple shell game for aa multinatioal to run it's outsourgins through one of your non-US subsidiaries.

      Welcome to the global economy.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, a 4 year education at a European University costs somewhere between $2-$16?

    5. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is already happening in USA, I tried to get a work visa some time ago but It was imposible. Even the Marines that custody the Consulate were insulting us.
      There is a problem when your are in the weakest side of the situation.

    6. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you should see their taxes.

    7. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Was that in France, by any chance? Are foreign consulates guarded by Marines, too?

      Anyway, insulting people who visit a US consulate is unbecoming behaviour for a US Marine. You should have made a formal complaint.

    8. Re:Sovereign country by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      > But if you think you should be able to just waltz in and have a job or study at one of our universities, think again.

      But then where would you get all your doctoral students and postdocs from?

    9. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, as all in Europe, it depends on the country you are .
      In Portugal and spain costs around 500 euros a year, but in countries like sweden and finland the universities are for free, for all levels. And not only that, but the state gives you around 250 euros (more or less the same in dolars) just for studing, plus 400 in a loan, interest rate free, that you can pay for the rest of your live (during 50 year +-)
      Now, that's nice, and that's how student life should be !!!
      Watch and learn something !

    10. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      finland the universities are for free, for all levels.

      And just where in Finland is that?

      I have to pay the fee of the student union in order to parttake in the exams, get credit points and diploma...

    11. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd probably be considered a 'racist' as most propogated liberals would name-call, but regardless of that fact, American jobs should not be moving overseas, I don't care who was doing the job..black, white, whatever...if they're a US citizen their job should not be moving off shore.
      Sanctions should be applied to corporations pulling this B.S. as well as, while we're at it, massive sanctions against those companies who hire illegal aliens.

    12. Re:Sovereign country by nandu_prahlad · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You forget that, It's you'r universities that are begging us to come and study there. We are their cash cows. Your university scholarships and aid which your school gives you, all comes from our pockets. You may think that we steal your jobs, but you forget that we also pay taxes in your country, even if we don't get to enjoy the benefits because we are not citizens of your country. You may whine about all the jobs going out to India. How ironic that you who preach the benefits of free market competition to us, can't take even a little competition from your former "students".

    13. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it again; He says Native Born American (anybody who was born here) as opposed to Native American (American Indians).

    14. Re:Sovereign country by Jhan · · Score: 1

      In Sweden and Finland the universities are for free, for all levels.
      And just where in Finland is that? I have to pay the fee of the student union in order to parttake in the exams, get credit points and diploma...

      Same deal in Sweden. And the union fee is a crippling $45 a year! Not to mention you don't even get free lunches, pen/paper and litterature, like you do in lower education! Shocking!

      A masters degree could cost me $225! A doctorate, $400+!

      Of course, I would get $15,000 in goverment grants during that period but that's BESIDE THE POINT!

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    15. Re:Sovereign country by pyros · · Score: 1

      I think troll would be more appropriate for your response. I think the parent poster made it pretty clear that being a citizen of the U.S., not ancestral lineage, is what makes one American. My ancestral roots are Frech (several hundred years back), Norwegian (not sure how far back) and Italian (3 generations back). I sent the bulk of my childhood living abroad. But I was born in the U.S., I'm a U.S. citizen, and my permanent residence is in the U.S. I am American. If someone permanently moves to the U.S., then they are making a long term investment in the U.S. economy. Many people dislike immigrant workers, like H1-B sponsored workers and illegal aliens, because they have a habit of working here for a few years, pumping their earnings into the economy of their home country, and leaving. It provides little benefit to the U.S. economy. It takes money out of the U.S. economy and leaves U.S. workers unemployed, further hurting the economy, because the slack must be taken up by social programs like government unemployment benefits, public housing, and government health care.

    16. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Same deal in Sweden. And the union fee is a crippling $45 a year!

      I wasn't saying that it's crippling - I objected to the term "free". Yeah, it's nice to have a welfare society but if you choose to advertise it internationally, please stick to the truth.

    17. Re:Sovereign country by krysith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I won't call you a racist.

      I'll just call you ill-informed.

      Let's take a look at the economic performance of places where immigration happens, and where it doesn't. percent by state
      Now, which state do you think has a better economy, New York or West Virginia? California or Mississipi? Obviously, the immigrants are going to where the economy is good, so if Mississippi's economy picks up, then they are likely to see more immigrants. However, if having a large number of immigrants hurts our economy, then I'd say that NY and California should have gone downhill and Mississippi, Alabama and West Virginia should have become the economic powerhouses of the nation long ago. I also think it's interesting that the poorest states in the union are also the ones which have some of the strongest anti-immigrant sentiment, despite having hardly any immigrants there anyways. As if an Indian moving to San Jose is stealing a job from a guy in Mobile.

      It is natural for jobs to go to the person who can do the job who asks the least pay for it. People bitch about it when they are trying to get a job, but no one bitches about it when they hire someone to wash their car. We have four choices: A) let people come to America and work, B) let the jobs go to places where people work cheaper, C) work for cheaper than the other people, or D) wait for our economy to go so far into the crapper that no one would ever come here to work.

      Ok, you pick.

      Personally, I'd pick A. Of course, it would be better if we'd let them become citizens, because then they'd be Americans. But as long as we have people like you, who insist that only Native Born Americans = Americans, we insist that only a few are allowed to become citizens, not matter how many want to.

    18. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist!

    19. Re:Sovereign country by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Many people dislike immigrant workers, like H1-B sponsored workers and illegal aliens, because they have a habit of working here for a few years, pumping their earnings into the economy of their home country, and leaving.

      You are utterly ill-informed on the issue.

      The reason H1-B workers don't make long term investments in the US is because US law requires them to leave the country after 6 years as their visas expire. What would you be doing if you were in their shoes?

      Also, don't lump illegal workers together with legal ones when discussing their contributions to the US economy. H1-B workers pay taxes, including social security taxes that they have no hope of collecting (because if they lose their jobs they must leave the country).

    20. Re:Sovereign country by Paradigma11 · · Score: 1

      hmm, i do agree that those mexican, argentinian, brasilian...... americans would also need the jobs but where is your point?

    21. Re:Sovereign country by rsidd · · Score: 1
      But if you think you should be able to just waltz in and have a job or study at one of our universities, think again.

      Actually, I personally believe that it is the universities -- and only the universities, with their commitment to high standards regardless of colour, religion, national origin -- that made America a great country. They maintain their standards by attracting the best in the world, both students and faculty. A huge fraction of students and faculty at the top places is immigrant (and their output in turn feeds American industry and high technology). If that stops, the USA will lose its competitive advantage and become, at best, comparable to lots of other countries and, at worst, a redneck backwater.

    22. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > American jobs should not be moving overseas,

      Do you think American products should be sold overseas?

    23. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >But if you think you should be able to just waltz in and have a job or study at one of our universities, think again.

      Yes, I do think that. I study at a state-sponsored university and almost all my tuition is covered by (federal) financial aid.
      And you know what? That is how your government intends it to be and there is nothing you can do about it.

    24. Re:Sovereign country by trickycamel · · Score: 1

      You are clearly a moron. This is exactly why the rest of the world hates Americans.

      Nobody steals a job from 'native born Americans'. Remember, you live in a capitalist economy of which you are so proud. If somebody can do a job better than you, and they are willing to be paid less, guess who's going to get hired?

      You have no clue how difficult it is to get a student or a work visa. I know this because I went to a major East Coast Ivy League college on an F-1 visa. Let me tell you that all those H1B and F-1 people have more motivation and drive than you ever will. They are hungry to work, to study, and to get what they came to the US for. That's why they are consistently in top 5-10% of their class, and that's why they get hired.

      You may now return to your sad chavinistic world in which the inscription on one's passport determines one's career and rights.

      --
      Sig? What sig?
    25. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's about time we stop issuing visas to people who steal native born Americans' jobs.

      Foreignters are not "stealing" American jobs, they are offering labour to American companies at more competitive prices.

    26. Re:Sovereign country by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What should I call you? "In-need of a logic or statistics class?"

      Correlation does not imply causality.

      Causality under certain conditions does not necessarily lead to the same results in all conditions.

      Your logic is sorely flawed.

      --
      everything in moderation
    27. Re:Sovereign country by fault0 · · Score: 1

      > because they have a habit of working here for a few years, pumping their earnings into the economy of their home country

      Do you even know what a H1-B is? It's a freaking temp. VISA. Many H1-B's get greencards however, and that's a commitment to staying in the US. Other are refused and the only choice they have is to go back to their native countries even though they'd have liked to stay in the US.

    28. Re:Sovereign country by fault0 · · Score: 1

      > Sanctions should be applied to corporations pulling this B.S.

      Great! Let's do this and see half of all tech companies go out of buisness and ruin the economy further for those of us Americans with jobs! It urge you to barge into Congress and stick it to them!

      > American jobs should not be moving overseas

      Yup, while we're at it, let's stop exporting shit to other countries too. The last time I was in India, there was coca-cola stands in every street corner and American products had flooded grocery stores. Buying kool-aid and nabisco ritz crackers is always fun to do in other countries. This is a stark difference for as little as ten years back, when there were products made by Indian companies were in grocery stores. All those companies got gobbled up by the richer American comapnies as soon as India stopped with it's protectionist policies.

      Globalization has a much adverse effect on poorer countries than richer countries. It just fills the coffers of big American companies.

    29. Re:Sovereign country by endus · · Score: 1

      And I won't call you an idiot, I'll just call you shortsighted. Who gives a crap about any of this. The fact is that we are headed for disaster in terms of the employment situation in this country. We cannot ship jobs overseas while allowing even more people to come into the country and take jobs which there are CLEARLY people already here to fill. It has nothing to do with the race of people involved, it has nothing to do with the country of origin of the immigrants, it just has to do with the number of people who live here and would like to continue livng here. Our economy is in the crapper and that taints our discussions because a lot of us are unemployed or doing contract work that will soon end and leave us jobless again. The fact is though that a.) we need jobs for the people who are already here in order for an economic recovery to happen and b.) even if the economy struggles back to life, significantly more people than jobs is not a viable situation unless you want crime and suicide and crazed dope fiends pounding on the windows of your Mercedes as you drive back to the million dollar home that sending your development tasks to India bought you. "D" is the only way that people are going to ahve jobs again if we don't do something about this situation. Personally I'm not really so into the idea of rampant unemployment turning the US into a 3rd world country again, but that's just me.

    30. Re:Sovereign country by mantera · · Score: 1

      " I won't call you a racist. I'll just call you ill-informed. Let's take a look at the economic performance of places where immigration happens, and where it doesn't. percent by state"

      your argument is false. The reason is simple, it's more logical to suggest that states with better economies attract, and may even need, more immigrants, than to say that more immigrants create better economies.

      You totally reversed the cause and effect.

    31. Re:Sovereign country by 2na · · Score: 1

      Shut up coward. Yelling racist is the easy way out.

    32. Re:Sovereign country by comp.sci · · Score: 1

      This is ridiculous, seeing this comment getting modded up +5 Insightful is a shame for Slashdot.

      The one sentence "If you're American, I've got nothing against you." shows incredible ignorance by the author. I can only hope this was a case of bad writing...

      I do understand it is Sept. 11th but this does not excuse this awful comment getting modded up at all.

    33. Re:Sovereign country by pyros · · Score: 1

      This particular statement was meant to be a summary of one particular view held by a section of the population, not necessarily a statement of my own opinion, perhaps a disclaimer should have been made. I did not know that about H1-B, but I really don't think it matters. When millions are unemployed and possess the skills to perform the job functions, then they are going to be upset with companies bringing in millions of foreign workers to fill positions. If I were in their shoes I would have started off pursuing a more permanent means of entrance. Six years is also plenty of time to pursue them while working on an H1-B visa, unless H1-B prevents you from doing so. I've lived abroad and been subjected to foreign labor restrictions (well, my parents were, but it still impacted me as it was from age 4 to 16, because if they couldn't work I couldn't eat). Also, my mother-in-law was a naturalized citizen. So I'm not just some elitist 'get the hell out of my country' hick (not that I think you stated/implied that I am).

      I do understand that skilled workers coming in thru legal avenues is in a different class as illegal aliens. I was merely stated a common complaint about income going to foreigners when it could be going to citizens. In a poor economy with millions of skilled workers unemployed, citizens stop caring about how a foreign worker came into the country, and focus on the fact that the worker is not a citizen.

      I also know that H1-B sponsored workers pay tax, but they still send a considerable portions of their income back home to family.

      Personally, I think people coming in on an H1-B visa is fine. Let me say that again, I have no problem with bringing in foreign labor to bring supply up to meet demand. However, there are millions of skilled U.S. workers who could be performing these jobs but are unemployed. I think that is wrong. The long term effect on the U.S. economy is not good.

      I think every government of every country has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure that domestic businesses are doing what is good for the domestic economy. If millions of skilled workers are unemployed, then there should be no new work visas issued to bring in foreign workers.

      Anyway. The world is what it is and we all try to make the best of it. Everybody on the planet has an equal right to a good life.

    34. Re:Sovereign country by pyros · · Score: 1

      As I stated to the other reply, I did not know that about H1-B visas. The ones who are granted greencards and stay permanently would fall under the group I said people approve of. Hopefully, the ones who are denied a greencard are denied because there are unemployed U.S. workers who are capable of performing the job in question. The ones who choose to leave, because they never intended to stay, are the ones who I stated, or at least tried to state, skilled U.S. workers who are unemployed are upset at. Not even at the workers themselves, but at the companies for hiring them and at the government for allowing it. It's not a perfect system, and it never will be. The skilled U.S. workers who need a job and the foreign workers who should be allowed to stay but aren't are the victims in this system. I have nothing against foreign workers in general, only against a system that allows citizens to remain unemployed as foreign workers with no intent to stay are employed instead.

    35. Re:Sovereign country by member57 · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning is not logical. Their economy is governed by LOCATION ie seaports, financial districts, movies star's homes, etc...

      --
      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
      The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    36. Re:Sovereign country by sdawara · · Score: 1


      If you're American, I've got nothing against you. But if you think you should be able to just waltz in and have a job or study at one of our universities, think again.


      I am surprised at the statement above! I strongly disagree with your view on studying at one of 'your' Universities. Before you start tearing away at the system, I think you should be aware that:

      1. US Universities allowing students from abroad (or India) into their fold, actually works and is justified! Think Dr. Kalpana Chawla who was on the shuttle Columbia on its last mission. She has a distinguished service record with NASA. She happens to be a graduate of the Punjab Engg. College, India. She was later awarded her Master's and Doctorate by US Universities.

      2. Without foreign students, classes in some of America's largest universities would be quite empty. These students pay their tuition and if they do have their tuition waived, they put in an equivalent amount of effort into the development of labs and research projects. No one 'waltzes' into anyplace!

      I thought value for hard work and innovation was part of the foundation the American society. I might agree that the job market is twisted, but I definitely cannot agree with paranoia and generalizations.

      - Santosh

      --
      Santosh Dawara
    37. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, it would be better if we'd let them become citizens, because then they'd be Americans.

      sarcasim
      Then they could help me bitch when workers with a visa takes jobs from both of us.
      /sarcasim

    38. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that there is a lot of anger among tech workers that have lost their jobs. It is easy to say "too bad, someone else can do it cheaper", but you will feel different when the time comes to replace you. Right now I dont understand why we need so many H1Bs. The labor market is very loose. I think that the number of H1B's should be cut until the market tightens up again.

    39. Re:Sovereign country by krysith · · Score: 1

      You are correct: correlation does not imply causality.

      However, many of the people posting on slashdot have implied that by allowing more labor to enter the US, that we would end up with an economy populated entirely by low-wage workers. You know, the whole "If we let all the Mexicans in, we'll be poor like the Mexicans" arguement.

      If this arguement holds water, then the states with the most immigration should be the poorest. And yet they are the richest. Perhaps other factors might explain the difference - location, natural resources, luck, etc. Our sample size is only 50 states after all. Maybe California is ~so~ rich that they can afford to have all those poor immigrants come and still be better off than Alabama.

      However, because there is a correlation between the locus of immigration and the locus of economic growth, I do not need to show that immigration is the cause of the growth. Frankly I don't care whether it is a cause or a symptom. All I need to do is show that immigrants are not "stealing American's jobs". In order to rebut my arguement, you would need to show that the jobs which immigrants have taken would have been taken by Americans. I don't think you can do so in an America where 11.1% of our population is imported, and we have 6.1% unemployment. If the immigrants had not come, would we have -5% unemployment? (yes I do know about the statistical games they play with the unemployment figures, it is still valid by proportion of population, if we assume that unemployment in the immigrant population is less than or equal to that in the population as a whole, which is true).

      So obviously, not all of the immigrants have stolen American jobs. But those jobs came from somewhere... Once you admit that "some" of the jobs were not stolen from Americans, how can you say that the majority of the jobs weren't? If you kicked out all the immigrants and gave the job to an American (regardless of how unfair that might be) until all Americans who wanted a job had one, you'd still have immigrants left over. And I guarrantee you that kicking a few million people out of the economy would result in the loss of many, many jobs. So therefore the presence of immigrants has resulted in job creation.

      There is far more to job creation than capital density with respect to population. That is an important factor, but other factors are also important.

    40. Re:Sovereign country by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I did not know that about H1-B, but I really don't think it matters.

      Well, it does matter. If you're not sure whether you'll be living in a town for a long time, you generally hold off on purchases like real estate and various durable goods. It's not fair to hold that against H1-B workers, whose main reason for hesitation is US law!

      If I were in their shoes I would have started off pursuing a more permanent means of entrance.

      Like what? The only other ways to enter the US to work basically involve having blood or marital relatives in the US.

      Six years is also plenty of time to pursue them while working on an H1-B visa, unless H1-B prevents you from doing so.

      Actually, it's not plenty of time. The INS and various state labor departments can be horribly inefficient. Also, companies don't exactly have a great deal of incentive to help their employees get green cards. In any case, without a green card in hand, foreigners are simply not likely to make big purchases here.

      The point is, you can't restrict a person to a 6-year deadline to live in the country, and still expect them not to send money home and expect them to purchase a lot of US goods.

      As for the unemployed US workers, they should in fact get preferential treatment, even under existing US laws. H1-Bs must be hired at prevailing wages, and have additional expenses as far as companies are concerned. IOW, the problem doesn't need some magical solution, merely proper enforcement of laws already on the books.

    41. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an America citizen and I don't feel hate towards foriegners who "take" our jobs. What upsets me is that bigshot capatalist corporate companies here will exploit cheap labor so that their stocks go up $0.05, that's who is to blame. Of course the indian citizen does not realize that he is being exploited nor does he care since before this he did not even have a job. The problem is not them the problem are the companies that use cheap labor so their CEOs can pocket millions. Another achievement by capitalism!

    42. Re:Sovereign country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right...
      YOU NAZI!!!

    43. Re:Sovereign country by satyap · · Score: 1
      Before some slashbot calls me a racist, let me tell you that I don't care if you are a black, white, hindu, christian, jew or a muslim. If you're American, I've got nothing against you.
      Sure, but what scares me is that some ignorant fuck is going to read these articles, jump to the wrong conclusions because of the stupid and ignorant comments posted here (it's not illegal for Americans to work in India with the right visa, H1Bs do have to pay income tax in the US), and beat *me* up. I mean come on, I obey the laws better than some people I see. And yet I'm treated like a terrorist?
  8. What's this? by Royster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Americans can't move overseas and take jobs away from locals? What is this world coming to?

    I mean we let people from all over come here and work. Ummmmm, except we don't.

    You can get a tourist visa to visit most any place in the world. I went to China earlier this year. But those visas don't allow you to work.

    Why is this even a story? It's the way things are.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:What's this? by treat · · Score: 0
      I mean we let people from all over come here and work. Ummmmm, except we don't.

      Right. I'm just imagining all the H1Bs taking jobs away from Americans because they can be paid less.

    2. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I mean we let people from all over come here and work. Ummmmm, except we don't."

      Thats what the article talks about, jobs being lost over seas. So yes they do come from all over to work here, just that the don't have to be here to have the same effect on taking our jobs. We can't go over there to work, but its cool for them to take all of our jobs.

    3. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You can get a tourist visa to visit most any place in the world.

      Yeah, sure. Except that if the plans by the US Office of Homeland Security come through, I won't be able to fly over to the USA with my brand new EU passport without submitting my fingerprints and/or retinal scan with the visa. The new passports will, at the request of the beforementioned office, have to feature digital biometric information that will be fed to a federal database.

      I will not submit to this.

    4. Re:What's this? by Future+Man+3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a story because the work is being done for American companies. Americans, in this case, would be reclaiming their jobs at much lower pay and standards, rather than claiming jobs from somebody else's job pool.

      I think it merits discussion.

      --

      I never vote for anyone. I always vote against.
      -- W.C. Fields

    5. Re:What's this? by bricriu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      H1-B visa? Anyone? Bueller?

      --

      AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
      - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

    6. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is this even a story? It's the way things are."

      He's American so hasn't been brought up to have any understanding of how things work in his own country, let alone abroad. What is it - 4% of Americans have a passport? Even George "The Idiot" Bush didn't know the name of the general running Pakistan, until 9/11.

    7. Re:What's this? by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      More than that - when my wife moved here she was offered an opportunity for a fastrack work permit while she waited for her green card. Yes, up and up, through the INS.

      That means she could have been working within a matter of months instead of the years it took to become a permanent resident, with no special specifications about the job needing to be met.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Right. I'm just imagining all the H1Bs taking jobs away from Americans because they can be paid less."

      H1-Bs cannot be paid less. They are paid the prevailing wage.

    9. Re:What's this? by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      We don't let people come here and work?

      That's absurd.

    10. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yeah. I mean, "retinal scan?" Turn off the fuckin sci-fi channel, man. But fingerprints, yes.

      In other words, before we let you into our country, you have to prove that you are who you say you are. It's that simple.

      I will not submit to this.

      Please don't. Stay home.

    11. Re:What's this? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      H1-B visa? Anyone?

      India working visa, anyone? Contact your local Indian embassy for details.

      This story is bunk.

    12. Re:What's this? by treat · · Score: 1
      H1-Bs cannot be paid less. They are paid the prevailing wage.

      Luckily business have all sorts of ways to get around laws like this. IANAL so I don't know how they do it. But I imagine it's similar to the trickery that allows them to get around paying overtime, even in countries that don't allow forced unpaid overtime.

    13. Re:What's this? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      It's actually H-1B, not H1-B.

      --
      ...
    14. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The parent makes it look like easy to get a job over here. Oh, just get an H1b. I have a lot of international friends who tried to get work here and it's just not that easy. Even for those with great GPAs they're told if they don't have a masters degree there's little hope of them making it past audits because you can not work under an h1b unless you're more qualified than any citizens who want the job. Paperwork has gotten much nastier since 9-11 and hasn't gotten better in the years since (unless it did and I didn't hear of it). to top it off the number of h1b visas allocated is getting slashes this fall so it'll be even harder to get them. So yeah, it's possible but it's not like people are coming here in droves at their slightest whim.

    15. Re:What's this? by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually from a little googling it looks like the rules says that "etry visas" or visas for a general long term entry is decided on a case by case basis. Also no work permits are required. Look at this link and scroll down to the "work permits" part.
      Seems like they have reasonable migration policies.Moreover no restriction on Natural/Naturalised citizens in politics either. An former Italian is the opposition leader

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    16. Re:What's this? by Daytona955i · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course we don't let them work here. We let them come here to go to school, then we send them back and they take our jobs there because why pay a lot of money for software when you can get it dirt cheap from India?

      Now is a real bad time to be a programmer... especially a newly graduated one. Of course pointy-haired bosses don't see the value of in-house development. If they can save money now, they look good. It doesn't matter that the software they get doesn't work right and they have to spend more money to fix it, they saved the company money.

      There are also security concerns... but I won't go there.

    17. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Turn off the fuckin sci-fi channel

      It's real. Read it here (note that this is an ultra conservative mag).

    18. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and yet rated +5 informative

      slashdot -- go figure

    19. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron, I heard some people on the radio talking about this, and they definately said H1-B. Check your facts, RETARD!

    20. Re:What's this? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      They are not taking the jobs. American, people like you, yes you are putting the jobs over sea. This is done for two reasons. To increase profit wich ofcourse is good for you, yes you, since you as any american who matters own shares in those companies. What you don't own shares? Then you are an american who doesn't matter.

      The other reason is even simpler. Stop people from complaining to much. High unemployment is good for business, it means the workers can't make demands for fear of being replaced.

      So don't blame india, blame you own people. The people who said unions are commie ideas. Those who said that business can best be thrusted to look after the economy.

      Oh and of course this is not typical america, it is just that good or bad america leads the world so this will be happening in the rest of the world in the not so distant future.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    21. Re:What's this? by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      the real question is: can you GET one?

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    22. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone read this article?

      There are two things here that US Tech workers should worry about:

      1. A US based technical consulting firm owned by Indians operating in the US that interviews Americans but won't hire them, even for work in America.
      2. That nice H1B guy you're training might just be your replacement, because they can pay him 1/2 what they pay you, and he can't quit or his visa expires.

    23. Re:What's this? by Nept · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get a tourist visa to visit most any place in the world. I went to China earlier this year. But those visas don't allow you to work.

      Yea, you'll need a worker's visa for that. I actually was confronted by someone over there because of that, and who seemed rather upset. I was working on a project in Shenzhen; he wanted to know what I was doing that a Chinese citizen couldn't. Well, in the big picture nothing, but my company did have reasons for sending me there. Still, I could see where he was coming from. Jobs are scarce in China, and a lot of the Jr Programmers making $400/yr had PhDs.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    24. Re:What's this? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      No, YOU check YOUR facts. I'll actually do it for you: U.S Department of Labor good enough for you?

      --
      ...
    25. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually, my american visa says L1 Blanket. The H1 (or L1) is under the Type/Class heading and the B (Blanket) is under the 'Annotation' field.

      Mine ran out after sept 11th when the US dept of immigration decided not to renew anyones visas whilst they were re-processing all the recently issued visas looking for the rest of the terrorists that had been let into the USA.

      It cost about $30,000 I seem to remember - so I imagine that the US immigration folks are making a nice wee profit in there somewhere.

      We have the same problem in the UK right now. The way companies are bending the rules is that they are putting adverts in the press for: 5 yrs Java, J2EE, .NET 2 years, C, C++, C#, VB, SQL, Oracle, DB2 - $10,000 pa

      oddly enough, no UK programmers apply for the job and an indian on a fresh green card gets it.

      rd

    26. Re:What's this? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      There is also no such word as "definately."

      --
      ...
    27. Re:What's this? by Royster · · Score: 1
      News flash: There will be fewer H-1B visas issued in 2004.


      Though the number of H-1B visas is limited by law to 195,000 per year -- a number that will drop to 65,000 in 2004 -- amounting to just 0.13 percent of the total U.S. labor force, the programs have their greatest impact on high-tech jobs, which are among the best-paying in the economy.


      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    28. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You definately need to get a sense of humor.

    29. Re:What's this? by lspd · · Score: 1

      Thats what the article talks about, jobs being lost over seas. So yes they do come from all over to work here, just that the don't have to be here to have the same effect on taking our jobs.

      Can you honestly say with a straight face that US companies have never destroyed any foreign labor markets? I mean, if Nike could make all their shoes cheaper with just 10 american workers and a room full of machines, would anyone here give two shits about putting 10,000 day-laborers in Malaysia out of work? This aspect of the problem (foreign countries doing things cheaper) is unsolvable. If we start building trade barriers everyone else will do the same. Problems with out own immigration laws are a different subject. They should be fixed to make US citizens more competitive in the US labor market.

    30. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      is one example of the misuse of the H1-B visa.

      The point of the artical is about how the H1-B program is abused by hiring non technical people for non technical work that there isn't a shortage of american workers for.... like welding.

      And as far as them being mistreated, yes, they were underpaid, but their room and board was paid for and they didn't have any bills to pay. They weren't kept prisioner, they just did't have any cars and they were in an old industrial part of town with no place to go. I know they were taken out on more than one occasion. One time a group of friends of mine rented out a skating rink for the night and one of those friends was the IT guy(technical american, not H1-B) for the John Pickle Co and brought a bus load of them with him. They all seemed pretty cool and not at all acted like they were just released from prison.

    31. Re:What's this? by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

      Americans can't move overseas and take jobs away from locals? What is this world coming to?
      I mean we let people from all over come here and work. Ummmmm, except we don't.


      Ummmmm, except we do. In the last place I worked (last summer) almost a third of the people were from either India or China here on H1B visas.

      Where have you been working, McD's?

    32. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to visit the US from China and you are female and under 30, its not going to happen. All people travelling to the US from China must submit to an interview. Unless you are immigrating, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you will return (via bills, letters from employers, family information, etc).

      Those people with visa apps that were to be reviewed right as the DHL re-orged the INS fell into a "black-hole" and have been waiting years to even get their petition reviewed.

    33. Re:What's this? by Mythicman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I mean we let people from all over come here and work. Ummmmm, except we don't.

      Um, YES we do!

      The H-1 and L-1 Visa programs were invented specifically for this reason. In the US, we have no standard like those I've read about in Australia and elsewhere. Well, we have some regulations, but recently they've gone completely unenforced. If a company in this country can hire someone from overseas to do a job for which they're currently paying an American worker, and pay that worker half or less what the American makes, the company is under no pressure not to hire the foreign worker. It's happening for real. In the REAL world.

      http://www.rescueamericanjobs.org/
      http://www.local6.com/money/2381343/detail.html
      http://www.thenetworkadministrator.com/LosingYou rJ ob.htm
      http://www.house.gov/delauro/press/2003/L1_bill_7- 10-03.htm

      Further, US jobs now are being sent TO other countries. By some estimates, 2 million plus jobs in the next few years. Than't a HUGE chunk of the IT sector.

      http://www.cio.com/archive/090103/backlash.html (accoring to this article, the number is like 10% of IT jobs)
      http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.j html?articleID=14700325
      http://www.msnbc.com/news/947478.asp?cp1=1
      http://www.techsunite.org/news/techind/030722_ibm. cfm
      http://comment.cio.com/comments/13404.html

      The reason this is a story here, is because a good number of us work in the IT sector. This has HUGE implications for us.

      Consider the fact that many colleges around the nation are scaling back IT programs (my stepmother teaches various IT classes at a local college) and thike about what that means for those of us who spent money on educations or who have been relying on our IT experience as means to acquire jobs.

      The economy and job prospects have been bad enough just dealing with the economic slowdown without having to deal with the jobs that are still there going away from the US (I know, I was unemployed for the greater portion of 2002, and I'm only employed now because I new the guy who ran the IT department for the company I work for now).

      In many countries in the EU and also in Australia, they cannot hire a non-citizen unless they CANNOT find a qualified candidate who IS a citizen. The US government needs to step up and implement some similar legislation. Even if you think about this from a lawmakers perspective, an American who makes $50,000 a year pays a whole lot more than an unemployed American and the foreigner who takes his job for $30,000. They'll see a WHOLE LOT less than that from the unemployed American and the job that's no longer in the US! Even the companies that do use outsourcing are killing their own market. How many computers or programs or Coke ayr you going to buy when you're unemployed, and can the foreigner who's making half of what you were making pick up the slack? I don't think so...

      Anyway, I'm done...

    34. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. There are Americans working in Bangalore and Bombay... some of the multinational US companies prefer expatriate managers to local ones..

    35. Re:What's this? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Stop the FUD please. You don't know how they do it, nor do you know that they do it at all. You're just making that up. My company hires H1B's, ad every time they do, they have to post a big notice all over work showing the position sought, the salary range to be paid, and the terms of employment. We've even had a few unannounced visitors come to make sure all was in order, and in a few cases they requested salary records from HR, and even interviewed other employees (in same positions, but not H1B) with questions obviously aimed to see if we thought the salary was "fair."

      Nor do they "get around paying overtime," at least not for long, and not without serious consequences when (not if) caught. Unless you mean making you an "exempt" employee, which seems hardly trickery to me, since in most cases exempt employees are makign big bucks and are payed a salary to produce, not hourly to mind the fry machine.

      If your goal is to draw attention to the many problems with American corporations, please note that exaggeration and FUD-spewing will hurt your cause, as most thinking folks can see through your weak, empy allegations.

      --
      everything in moderation
    36. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. This story is bunk. India has a work visa (not an H1-B of course, but an equivalent, and yes they are obtainable).

    37. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you are not in one of those EU countries requiring fingerpring of their own citizens...

      Then unlike in the US, you would need fingerprinting just to be in your own country

    38. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I'm a US citizen who spent a year in India in 1984/85 under an education visa. I met many Americans there who were employed locally with legal work visas. My last trip back was in November of 2001 to pick up my newly adopted daughter. Again, I met several Americans in both Bangalore and New Dehli with legal work visas. The previous company I worked for used Indian programmers and were all set to send me over to do some training and management for a period. That would have paid for the adoption flight, but alas, the company went belly up just as we were preparing to go.

    39. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am agree.
      It sounds to me like a good one reasson for not travel to USA.

      I can pass my holidays in other places. Here at home I have a lot for visiting.

    40. Re:What's this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      software they get doesn't work right

      Just plain bullshit.
      Foreigners are well prepared workers.

    41. Re:What's this? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Hope you are not in one of those EU countries requiring fingerpring of their own citizens...

      That's bullshit and I'm calling it. No EU country requires fingerprinting of all citizens. Never has, probably never will until the US Dept of Homeland Security forces us.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  9. Wow. More than we bargained for? by metrazol · · Score: 1

    As in, the link will be Slashdotted in under 5 minutes? Typical second rate contractors...promising more for less.

    Anybody get a mirror?

    --
    "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
  10. Not such a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    India sounds like a rather nice place. I mean, there's the constant omnipresent poverty and the not-quite-up-to-american-standards utility and government services, but there are worse things than that.

    Anyone want to disagree?

    Of course, lots of people moving INTO one of the most populated countries in the world may not work all that well..

    1. Re:Not such a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention the FOOD. Holy Christ, I ate at an Indian place one time, and about 15 minutes after I left, HUGE AMOUNTS OF SQUIRTY DIARRHEA. I can't understand how they eat that shit daily and their insides don't rot out. I'd rather eat a whole bucket full of wet feces than touch another plate of Meekrab.

    2. Re:Not such a bad idea. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Meekrab is a curse word. Please watch your mouth, lest you raise the ire of the Royal Knights of Standards and Practices.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Not such a bad idea. by satyap · · Score: 1

      Troll. I've never heard of this 'meekrab'. Besides, Arby's goes right through me sometimes.

  11. Re:No sandniggers need apply either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Afraid that they'll blow out a couple more candles on that cake you call New York?

  12. The bigger story by cindik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    of the two is the malware threat. Most countries have labor restrictions (when i went to an improv festival in Toronto, Canadian officials wanted to be certain I wasn't there to make $25 or so performing somewhere some night). But the risk of getting a little extra code in your outsourced project is something about which execs ought to be aware.

    1. Re:The bigger story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Canadian officials wanted to be certain I wasn't there to make $25 or so performing somewhere some night...

      That's because Canadian officials, like officials everywhere, are a bunch of ignorant assholes whose primary interest lies in enforcing ignorant rules written by ignorant politicians.

      Fuck them all, that's what I say. What we need is less rules, less officials, and above all, less politicians. It would be a better world.

    2. Re:The bigger story by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      But those extra lines can be put in by employees, or an outsourced firm in the USA. In any case, it's a contract dispute between vendor and client.

      Outsourcing's a bitch, but all these "Indians will put big worms and nasty stuff in your programs!" is really just racism.

      It's like saying "Don't hire a black guy, he'll rob you blind!" or "Don't hire a Mexican, they just sleep all day!".

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:The bigger story by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well...there *is* this difference. If a guy in India puts the bug in your code, you need to invoke international extradition treaties, or prosecute him in an Indian court. That might be seen as a significant difference. Of course, it would apply to any international contract. That's why credit cards aren't refundable on international transactions. Because it *is* a significant factor. (And, of course, because they can get away with it.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:The bigger story by pirhana · · Score: 1

      What guaranty you have that american firms like Microsoft is not placing back doors in their software ? Why do you assume that indian firms are more likely to put back doors in the software ? All the proprietery softwares are inherently vulnerable to this issue. Whether its american or indian doenst matter. The funniest part is that most of the third world and euorpean countries are thinking about open source at varying degree which effectively make it impossible to have back door and US is the only major country without any open source initiative.

    5. Re:The bigger story by Reziac · · Score: 1

      One of the horror stories on http://www.zazona.com/ShameH1B/Horror.htm pointed out that not only are jobs and code going overseas, but also data warehousing, INCLUDING your personal information, such as credit card accounts (which of course are associated with your social security number). The potential for massive identity theft** and credit card fraud is absolutely staggering, especially if the "security" is of the same quality as everything else seems to wind up.

      ** Another pointed out how this simplifies a terrorist's job ... not that a false ID is even necessary to enter the country, but at least it's something one could use to frighten, er, I mean motivate congresscritters against work visas, given the post-9/11 security climate.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  13. Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously: typical wage for Indian IT graduate: $200/month. Equivalent for US graduate: 10--20 times more.

    It is almost redundant to say that Indian firms won't be hiring many Americans.

    Curiously, my little firm is now subcontracting for Indian firms, so perhaps the rules can be bent a little for genius Belgians. C'est genial!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant or Moot maybe but no Redundant.

    2. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Ok but what is the cost of living in India compared to the cost of living in say San Francisco or LA?

      I bet you its about the same ratio lower to live in India.

    3. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Kenja · · Score: 1
      Current rate for US IT graduate: 0$

      "Will geek for food"

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by tetsuji · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having been in the Bangalore area in the past year, I think I can safely say I could live comfortably there on less than $1000 US per year. $200 a month is a great salary in India; I was there building houses with Habitat for Humanity and the average day laborer's pay was less than $1.

    5. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, you can live comfortably in India for about $5-$10 USD / day. And that's not knowing all the inside-out's of cheap places to eat/sleep/shop that the locals know.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    6. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Ok but what is the cost of living in India compared to the cost of living in say San Francisco or LA?

      I bet you its about the same ratio lower to live in India.

      While true, this doesn't make any difference to the people paying for the work.

      --
      -Dave
    7. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by renoX · · Score: 1

      >I can safely say I could live comfortably there on less than $1000 US per year.

      Yes, but only if you plan to stay forever in India!
      How will you retire in the US if you cannot put aside enough money?

    8. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I can safely say I could live comfortably there on less than $1000 US per year.

      > Yes, but only if you plan to stay forever in India!
      > How will you retire in the US if you cannot put aside enough money?

      If he can live comfortably in India, why can't he retire comfortably in India?

    9. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      It is almost redundant to say that Indian firms won't be hiring many Americans.

      But you'd think they would allow the best 1% of American workers to immigrate for a year or two to each his Indian co-workers everything he knows.

    10. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I've read that a fair number of Americans who had emigrated from Poland return there when they retire.

      Not only is it their original home, but their social security and retirement checks allow them a much better standard of living than they would have here on the same money.

      My oldest brother and I were talking about that at noon while eating. He asked me where I'd retire if I were to move somewhere less expensive and the only places I could think of were places like Argentina, Chile, or Bolivia.

      Some place like Tristan da Cunha (sp?) would be interesting, but I don't think they'd let you stay there. How about Pitcairn Island?

    11. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >in India; I was there building houses with Habitat for Humanity and the average day laborer's pay was less than $1.

      After all this... screw India. I hate you. I hope you get outsourced yourself. Come build affordable housing in Massachusettes, USA, and leave the Indians to themselves.

      For all the "talk" about spoiled Americans complaining about loosing their luxuries... it's not that at all.

      Housing and rental flats are so expensive in Massachusetts you need $20/hour to get above the poverty line. The AVERAGE house now sells for $460,000 here and the AVERAGE RENT is $1200... for a low-end apartment.

      I suspect that in India housing prices have not doubled in the last 3 years. Oh, the wisdom of slashing interest rates so quickly during mass unemployment means the investment community is gobbling up property and my $40,000 a year job (from $70,000 1 year ago) cannot "bid" high enough to get out of high-rent properties.

      In short, income is NEVER the issue anywhere... it's cost-of-living relative to income.

      I'd suggest outsourcing The President and Congress to India... but for all intents and purposes, they're already owned by foreign nations like India and Saudi Arabia. Red-white-and-blue, my ass!

    12. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, this is a one-sided argument. Yes, rent may be cheaper and milk may be cheaper too but if I want to buy a new Honda - how much do I pay in India - $20,000 right? How much do I pay in the US - $20,000. So what's your point here, huh?
      Also, if I live in India and decide to go on vacation in the US how is that working out, huh? What about a US student going to India for spring break, huh?
      Do you see what I am hitting here. Don't ever quote "cost of living" because this is a superficial argument and makes you look superficial too.
      My 5 cents on your point.

    13. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for that matter, with a savings account of half a mil - financed by the sale of my home, could I not live like a king in India - straight off the savings, in theory, for 500 years, without working?

      That sounds like a better opportunity than living in America, and working two jobs to keep up my $2000/mo house payments. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:Especially Americans who whorked for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the equivalent for a new US graduate is 0 because they can not find a job!

  14. Re:Outsource or Insource? by multiplexo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could this be slightly more buzzword compliant?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  15. Not exactly unfair or unusual. by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 5, Informative

    With the exception of places like the EU, it is not unusual for foreigners to just pack up and grab a job someplace else. I doubt people will be surprised by this, considering that what happened three years ago today reminded people to tighten Visa restrictions. Who knows, it may have been much easier five years ago, but today that's just the way it is. Here in Ireland there are immigrants who are qualified doctors, but because they aren't allowed to work here as anything other than a fast food counter-person, their skills are totally wasted. It's not discrimination, it's just the way the world works.

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:Not exactly unfair or unusual. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, what happened three years ago today?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Not exactly unfair or unusual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happened three years ago, today. I can see how that would require tightening of visa restrictions.

    3. Re:Not exactly unfair or unusual. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      doubt people will be surprised by this, considering that what happened three years ago today reminded people to tighten Visa restrictions

      Ok, I'll bite: what happened on September 11, 2000? Really, you didn't even get the year right.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Not exactly unfair or unusual. by 1jpablo1 · · Score: 1
      Well, just because it's the way the world works doesn't mean it isn't discrimination.

      Call it as you wish, but this state of affairs just reflects the great disparity between capital and work force, and for me that's an injustice.

      It also "distorts" free market (laboral market), for those of you free market whoreshippers.

    5. Re:Not exactly unfair or unusual. by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      And as your current system in the EU spirals on downward in its destruction, I am sure that the one thing that will be continue to be said, "Look at our great system ... and how much better it is than what those silly Americans have." As almost every country in the EU is on a serious downward trend in population, I think that over time you will be rethinking those immigration laws. Didn't you guys learn from your history, create a large enough underclass with no prospect of advancement and you set the fuse for a revolution. My odds are on the French having trouble first, as they are developing a significant amount of Islamic people in their imported labor. There's a group of people known to react rationally.

  16. Answer: Telecommute for India From the US. by abstrakts · · Score: 0, Funny

    hey :)

  17. What about convenience stores? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should let Americans work at Indian conveinence stores!

    That way, no matter where it is in the world, it'll be fucking impossible to get a big gulp and a chilli dog.

    1. Re:What about convenience stores? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They should make Americans work at American convenience stores.

      That way they'd learn why they can't survive without immigrants. (Hint: $4/hr)

    2. Re:What about convenience stores? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you! Come again! Huh!


      USA! USA!

    3. Re:What about convenience stores? by micron · · Score: 1

      What do you think that the Peace Corps is for?
      A friend of mine in the Peace Corps (American), ran a "General Store" in Rwanda. Explains why folks come to the US to run their own "General Store" here....

  18. Should read no forgieners .... by jj_johny · · Score: 1, Insightful

    India is like every other third world country... its looking out for itself. It really doesn't need a bunch of people to come. They already have more than enough. So really what is this guy offering that the locals can't supply? Not much in their minds.

    1. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      And what are Indians in this country offering that the locals can't supply?

    2. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      India is like every other third world country... its looking out for itself.

      Take out "third" and you would be more accurate.

    3. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great work ethic?

    4. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by Algan · · Score: 1

      Cheap, inteligent labor...

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    5. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hot women!

      God, the Middle Eastern and Indian women are sexy. Iranians in particular.

    6. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Cheap, inteligent labor...

      That's intelligent.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    7. Re:Should read no forgieners .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll do that as soon as the caste system is really obsolete.

  19. hidden malware story by herrvinny · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hidden malware in offshore products raises concerns

    Story by Mark Willoughby

    SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ( COMPUTERWORLD ) - "You've go to be a little paranoid to survive in this business." -- Andrew S. Grove, chairman and founder, Intel Corp., ca. 1980
    The extreme difficulty in discovering a back door hidden deep within a complex application, buried among numerous modules developed offshore in a global software marketplace, is forcing those assigned to protect sensitive national security information to take defensive actions.

    The threat of hidden Trojan horses and back doors surfaced this summer when the governments of the U.S. and China announced plans to strengthen national security policies covering information processed by applications written in the global software marketplace. The private sector joined the fray with the August announcement of the File Signature Database, which will use hash values to protect software integrity from malicious additions (see story).

    The National Security Agency's information assurance director, Daniel Wolf, in testimony before the House Select Committee on Homeland Security's cybersecurity subcommittee in July, called for a federal lab that would "find malicious software routines that are designed to morph and burrow into critical applications." Separately, the State Council of the People's Republic of China in August directed all government ministries to buy only Chinese software in the next upgrade cycle in an effort to encourage the development of local software companies but also to protect sensitive government data.

    Mark Willoughby, CISSP, is a 20-year IT industry veteran and journalist with degrees in computer science and journalism. For the past seven years, he has tracked security and risk management start-ups and is a managing consultant at MessagingGroup, a Denver-based content development specialist.

    Steps taken so far

    The simmering global paranoia is rooted in the realization that no simple solution exists today, experts say. It is virtually impossible to find unauthorized malware hidden deep within a sophisticated multitiered application with data normalization, messaging middleware and other modules originating from labs in a half-dozen countries.

    Robert Lentz, the U.S. Defense Department's director of information assurance, said in a written statement, "The DoD currently is studying several aspects of software assurance. The DoD has a current software acquisition policy. The group studying software assurance is looking to supplement that policy with strengthened mechanisms to increase our confidence in the security of both foreign and domestic software products."

    Input, a Chantilly, Va.- based technology research firm, says federal government spending on IT products and services will grow 8.5% yearly from 2003 to 2008, from $45.4 billion to $68.2 billion. Approximately half of that spending will be in areas in which the government would like to see stronger information assurance.

    Incidents of back doors compromising sensitive national security information may never be known. That's not so in the private sector.

    "There have been a number of cases where software was found with intentionally planted back doors," said Shawn Hernan, team leader for vulnerability handling at the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University. "Most of these were for providing support, although no such support option was given to commercial customers. It's happened in both proprietary and open-sourced software."

    Hernan said discovering hidden malware is one of the most difficult tasks facing an assurance investigator. CERT doesn't track vulnerabilities by country of origin, he added.

    Software engineering processes are only now beginning to focus on providing traceability in security code. Traceability, which would allow a given line of code or a software module to be tracked back to the developer, is viewed as the Holy Grail in combating hidden malware. Traceability is also an effectiv

    1. Re:hidden malware story by hajibaba · · Score: 1

      "...the SEI is introducing Team Process Software (TPS)..."

      So when will we see the almighty TPS reports?

    2. Re:hidden malware story by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      More reasons for Open Source...

    3. Re:hidden malware story by BobGregg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I went through graduate school in Carnegie Mellon's Software Engineering program, and took lectures at the SEI, where Watts Humphrey was and still is. But I didn't realize that they were doing presentations to Microsoft. Back in the day (6-7 years back), Microsoft seemed quite uninterested.

      To see this tied in to the Trustworthy Computing initiative, though, is pretty jarring. Seems like the "trustworthy" then applies more to the developers than to the software. Not exactly where I'd expect their primary focus to belong!

    4. Re:hidden malware story by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      This is an important article. I've written about similar topics at:
      http://www.outlander.com/policy/h1b.htm

      RJB

    5. Re:hidden malware story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be modded up.

    6. Re:hidden malware story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      However, the SEI is introducing Team Process Software (TPS), which brings traceability of specific code modules to individual programmers, said Humphrey, a former IBM software engineering executive. Indian software companies and a few U.S. developers, notably Microsoft Corp., are aggressively implementing TPS.

      "Did you get the memo about the new cover sheets on the TPS reports?"

    7. Re:hidden malware story by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Ummmm..

      It's happened in both proprietary and open-sourced software."

      Though I see your point in that the code in OSS is viewable.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    8. Re:hidden malware story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm having real trouble understanding how replying directly to the text of the linked article can be construed as "Off-topic". Unless, of course, the moderator in question didn't RTFA, or even the post being replied to. Sheesh.

  20. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I need to go to the US to finish a contract I have with a US company. I only need to be there 3 days. Guess what, just for that, we need to fill in tons of paperwork to get a visa and the whole thing is likely going to cost more than anything else in the contract... What a good way to help the US companies/economy!

    1. Re:My experience by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      you could come to the US to finish a contract with a foreign company. then you're basically on vacation as far as the US is concerned.

      as an american i've looked into living temp. out side the borders. one could live in mexico and work for an american company. the mexican taxes would be very low if any b/c the money earned is from a foreign company. america allows you to earn up to maybe 70k per year working abroad w/o paying taxes. now if i could only find a company to pay me to telecommute, i'd be living in the yuccatan.

    2. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What a good way to help the US companies/economy!

      Actually, yes. It's a GREAT way to help the US economy. See, the economy is strong when we EXPORT goods and services and IMPORT money. When we IMPORT goods and services and EXPORT money, the economy is harmed.

      So it's wise to make it difficult to import goods (via tariffs) and services (via immigration restrictions).

    3. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For things like this I am just attending "meetings" as far as Immigration is concerned.

    4. Re:My experience by leandrod · · Score: 1

      > When we IMPORT goods and services and EXPORT money, the economy is harmed.

      This is ridiculous.

      Actually when you export money, that is called foreign investment... as foreign return rates are usually way higher in underdeveloped countries, the US investor is bound to make loads of money, which in big part will eventually return to the US.

      And when you import goods and services, usually you are getting things for either a lower price or a higher quality than available from the US, and this benefits the US client...

      Not to mention all this is good to make the whole world richer, thus easing the North-South tensions.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  21. Do they hire Canadians? by apoch2001 · · Score: 1

    Not that I want a job there but just wanted to know if other countries were exempt.

    1. Re:Do they hire Canadians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, they're both part of the Commomwealth.

      Although I don't think Indians can immigrate any easier than citizens of any other country into Canada.

    2. Re:Do they hire Canadians? by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      Come on over ! Bangalore is a great place to live in.

      Check out the indian government website for Employment Visa if interested.
      http://indiagov.org/consular/visa_gui de.htm

      from that website :
      These are the requirements for an Employment Visa

      EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

      This article is essentially a troll - its about someone whose job was outsourced, who joined Anti-H1B in the US, who had asked "someone" for a job in india and got turned down. I can understand the difficulty someone can go through while hunting for jobs, but it cant be an excuse for posting false info.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  22. What the case really is by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    During the economic boom, and even before that, the US has always needed employees. The high job to population ratio meant less qualified people to fill up job vacancies. That's how the H1 visa program came into being, and was greatly appreciated during the 1990's boom.

    Unlike the US, India, being a developing nation, with a very large economy has always had a dirth of jobs. There are a few hundred people to fill up a single job vacancy. Thus, India has *never* felt the need for foreign employees.

    However, I know for a fact that a large number of Americans/Europeans (and even Russians in defense companies) regularly work on contract basis. I had a Russian neighbor long back, working in India on a 2 year contract with a defense company.

    So people, before you start flaming, ponder over the fact that a law for hiring outside employees doesn't exist because there hasn't ever been a need for it. Now with the outsourcing, it may not be too long before the government comes up with an H-1 like plan.

    /end rant.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:What the case really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a few hundred people to fill up a single "job vacancy.."

      some of the biggest government recruitments in India sometimes see close to 60,000 applications for a job!..

    2. Re:What the case really is by geekmetal · · Score: 1

      Very true. People flaming here forget the essence of this country! This country was built by immigrants remember? Ask the native american if you can find one (and fuck no he is not an *Indian*).

      There lies a very fundamental difference between India and USA. Regardless of that and the cries of people having lost jobs in the current market what make the US of A great is the fact that she welcomes immigrants.

      --
      There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us
    3. Re:What the case really is by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ".. and was greatly appreciated during the 1990's boom."
      only by managment.

      But your post really has nothing to do with the article.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:What the case really is by gillbates · · Score: 1

      The high job to population ratio meant less qualified people to fill up job vacancies. That's how the H1 visa program came into being, and was greatly appreciated during the 1990's boom.

      Actually, this was never true - there were always enough qualified people to fill the high-tech job vacancies. The problem was that Corporate America wasn't willing to pay the salaries commeasurate with the skills they were demanding. The idea was that if you introduced more workers into the job pool than there were jobs, you would reduce the cost of labor, and salaries would go down.

      Instead, they found another route to depress the wages of their workers - hiring overseas.

      Now remember, this is about Corporate America's liberal anti-americanism. The truth is, as you and I both know, that telecommuting has always been a viable option for IS workers. In the 90's, the corporate mantra against telecommuting was that in order for a project to succeed, you had to have a physical presence at your workplace. But as we all knew, this was just a lie to deny us the benefit of working from home - now that outsourcing to India has become popular, it seems that the physical presence issue has become moot. In short, Corporate America bought into the left-wing anti-american sentiment which says that the natives overseas are somehow more dignified than the "greedy, lazy, beer-drinking, unsophisticated American worker". They never wanted to hire Americans, and it has been one excuse after another.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    5. Re:What the case really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Corporate America's liberal anti-americanism"

      Now there's a phrase I never thought I'd ever see.

    6. Re:What the case really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now there's a phrase I never thought I'd ever see

      Yeah, I know, it goes against the stereotype of a greedy, capitalist, war-pig, republican-loving, big business. But when it comes down to it, look at the way corporations behave - they are often very liberally minded (same-sex partner benefits, funding planned parenthood, abortion, etc...). They want the "evil corporation in bed with the republicans" stereotype to flourish because typically, Democrats have interfered much less with business than the Republicans (NAFTA, anyone? - passed by Democrats, jobs go to Mexico, good for big business).

      Anyway, I hope I've at least inspired someone to open their eyes to what's really going on around them - it's not necessarily a conspiracy, per se, but rather, that the American media wants to frame the way people look at problems. By framing the way someone looks at a problem (i.e. big business vs American worker), they can keep people from solving the real problems (such as why are corporations bad? Is it the corporate structure, or could it be - GASP! - that the people running them have no morals? Could it be that even if we did away with "big business", we'd still have the moral dilemnas that plague "big business"? Maybe the problem is not big business vs American labor, but rather, the lack of morality the corporate structure enforces?)

  23. Re:Outsource or Insource? by mojoNYC · · Score: 1
    this is the problem...the turd who spewed this crap is probably making six figures, meanwhile, real work is being devalued by these marketroids...

  24. Re:Outsource or Insource? by jakarta · · Score: 1

    Sheez, put down your book that you got all those buzzwords from and write an interesting comment. Maybe it was just the thrill of a first post. resistance is futile...

  25. Can't work there? Why are they here? by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, I had accepted the fact that H1B's killed the IT job market for Americans. Competition and all that. That's just fine. Shit happens. But if Americans can't work in India, then let's kick the damn H1B's out of this country. I had NO IDEA that Americans couldn't get an Indian job. If that really is true (although no real good source was cited), I say fuck 'em and give 'em the boot until India wants to open up it's doors to American workers.

  26. Re:I'm going into medical field. by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

    Well, being an ex-doctor myself and now being active in the biotech area: If you just plan to be a humble practitioner treating patients you might get around all that IP stuff, but life sciences and medicine are that plastered with patents that IT looks like paradise in comparison. So it might be worth reconsidering.

  27. Tech companies are looking to score! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    I guess with the big tech bust and investors very edgy on Tech stocks, Some companies are looking to make a major comeback by outsourcing for cheaper labor. 10% return on your investment isn't good enough anymore, that's if they are making that.

    Look at Nike and Rebook. They make millions by paying children 50 cents a day and adulterer basketball players millions to endorse thier products!

    1. Re:Tech companies are looking to score! by skitz0 · · Score: 1

      aledged adulterer basketball players

    2. Re:Tech companies are looking to score! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Actually, he's admitted the adulterer part, he's only alleged to have raped her...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  28. This can't be true by etymxris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our company is getting ready to send someone over to India to head up some outsourcing. He's British, but that should not be any significant difference. I haven't heard of any barrier for foreigners working in India. Anyone care to cite some relevant Indian law, rather than a few words at the tail end of an article?

    1. Re:This can't be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's British, he would have an advantage over non-Commonwealth nationals.

    2. Re:This can't be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general, a company can send its own employees abroad for specific purposes. That's between the company and the employee. Most countries (except the USA, of course) are cool with that, because they understand that sometimes you need to have your own person on the ground.

      Going to work in a foreign country for a foreign company, however, is a completely different issue. People talk about "those damn Asians taking our jobs!"

      Contrary to what some slashbots seem to think, a foreigner can't just walk into a tech job in the USA. There are some real serious hoops to jump through, for both the employee and the employer, and the employer has to be pretty thoroughly convinced that it's worth their while.

    3. Re:This can't be true by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I haven't heard of any barrier for foreigners working in India. Anyone care to cite some relevant Indian law, rather than a few words at the tail end of an article?

      I have legally worked in India. I think someone was being overly glib.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:This can't be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what some slashbots seem to think, a foreigner can't just walk into a tech job in the USA. There are some real serious hoops to jump through, for both the employee and the employer, and the employer has to be pretty thoroughly convinced that it's worth their while.

      The H1-B is tougher to get than the L-1 visa, but either one can still get a company a cheap laborer. As an added bonus, they can't quit that company for one that would pay better either, unless they want to start the visa process all over again. I haven't heard one way or the other on this, but I'm wondering if the companies can have them sign contracts that require them to stay with the company for a period of time or be forced to pay for the visa expenses. Much like companies due with training and tuition reimbursement programs.

    5. Re:This can't be true by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Same with the place I work in. But I think they're much, much more receptive and welcoming if you're sending people there to train their workers. Big difference from the guy mentioned in the article who just wanted a paycheck.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    6. Re:This can't be true by scarolan · · Score: 1

      The fact that your coworker is British will work to his advantage. As you know, India lived under British rule for a couple hundred years and there are many remnants of the British rule still current.

      Many of the Indians sort of look up to the Brits, and their school system definitely has a 'British' flavor to it. I visited a school there and the minute I walked in the door all the kids stood up, saluted with their right hand, and in unison "Good Morning, Sir!"

  29. Nothing new there... by lord_paladine · · Score: 1
    A quick search through Jobstreet India shows that many of the jobs listed state:
    "Applicants should be Indian citizens or hold relevant residence status."

    I really don't see why this should have surprised him.

  30. In small business there is hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Small businesses tend to want to hire locals. It all comes down to the fact that small biz can't and won't put up with the beaurocratic overhead needed to outsource offshore.

    They also tend to be more resistant to the hiring freezes and layoffs of large corporations durring recessions.

    1. Re:In small business there is hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but if a field is plastered by patents then a small business cannot survive.

  31. Humble practitioner, that's the idea. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Sure I will be dealing with patented tools and medicines, but I won't be the one patenting the stuff.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Humble practitioner, that's the idea. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      If you work in biotech but never patent anything, you'll be soon fired.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Humble practitioner, that's the idea. by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      As i said before, as long as you are "just" treating patients you won't have too much IP issues on your hand. But frankly, the really interesting things in modern medicine are happening at the academic institutions and in industrial research. And especially academia has changed drastically over the last couple of years: Some years ago the main goal was "publish or perish". Today everybody is first trying to find out if the findings might be patentable before publishing; by doing so, lots and lots of companies are spun off from academic institutions everywhere, building their business mostly on IP to sell or licence.

  32. And if it were the other way around... by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I absolutely love reading this.

    When it's Americans being forbidden to work in a foreign country, it's that country's right to do so.

    But if it were the other way around, and Indian people coming to this country were suddenly forbidden to work here, imagine the uproar that would cause among Slashdotters!

    Even if you are going to be wrong, at least be consistent!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:And if it were the other way around... by windi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it's Americans being forbidden to work in a foreign country, it's that country's right to do so. But if it were the other way around, and Indian people coming to this country were suddenly forbidden to work here, imagine the uproar that would cause among Slashdotters! Actually, it's pretty much the same in the US, except that getting a US work permit is easier than getting one for India, since the US is a country based on immigration, while India isn't.

    2. Re:And if it were the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an idiot

      Indain people *are* forbidden to come and apply for jobs in the U.S. => and there *is* *no* uproar

      as are citizens of all countries

      the U.S. only allows in people in numbers it is believed will help grow the economy

      this story is no story

    3. Re:And if it were the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. The U.S. Congress does what multinational corporations pay it to do. They already hand out H1-B and L-1 visas like there's no tomorrow. I don't see how it could get much worse.

    4. Re:And if it were the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well now. that comment just dropped you off my 'foes' list. And, I love your sig! is that supposed to be the goatse from a nasa photo? great!

    5. Re:And if it were the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are indeed correct, sir! Goatse in the sky! Most observant of you! And welcome back to my good side too! :) You are entitled to disagree with me whenever you want, but I wouldn't recommend it, because then you would be wrong.

  33. text of /.ed computerworld article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SEPTEMBER 11, 2003 ( COMPUTERWORLD ) - "You've go to be a little paranoid to survive in this business." -- Andrew S. Grove, chairman and founder, Intel Corp., ca. 1980

    The extreme difficulty in discovering a back door hidden deep within a complex application, buried among numerous modules developed offshore in a global software marketplace, is forcing those assigned to protect sensitive national security information to take defensive actions.

    The threat of hidden Trojan horses and back doors surfaced this summer when the governments of the U.S. and China announced plans to strengthen national security policies covering information processed by applications written in the global software marketplace. The private sector joined the fray with the August announcement of the File Signature Database, which will use hash values to protect software integrity from malicious additions (see story).

    The National Security Agency's information assurance director, Daniel Wolf, in testimony before the House Select Committee on Homeland Security's cybersecurity subcommittee in July, called for a federal lab that would "find malicious software routines that are designed to morph and burrow into critical applications." Separately, the State Council of the People's Republic of China in August directed all government ministries to buy only Chinese software in the next upgrade cycle in an effort to encourage the development of local software companies but also to protect sensitive government data.

    Mark Willoughby, CISSP, is a 20-year IT industry veteran and journalist with degrees in computer science and journalism. For the past seven years, he has tracked security and risk management start-ups and is a managing consultant at MessagingGroup, a Denver-based content development specialist.
    Steps taken so far

    The simmering global paranoia is rooted in the realization that no simple solution exists today, experts say. It is virtually impossible to find unauthorized malware hidden deep within a sophisticated multitiered application with data normalization, messaging middleware and other modules originating from labs in a half-dozen countries.

    Robert Lentz, the U.S. Defense Department's director of information assurance, said in a written statement, "The DoD currently is studying several aspects of software assurance. The DoD has a current software acquisition policy. The group studying software assurance is looking to supplement that policy with strengthened mechanisms to increase our confidence in the security of both foreign and domestic software products."

    Input, a Chantilly, Va.- based technology research firm, says federal government spending on IT products and services will grow 8.5% yearly from 2003 to 2008, from $45.4 billion to $68.2 billion. Approximately half of that spending will be in areas in which the government would like to see stronger information assurance.

    Incidents of back doors compromising sensitive national security information may never be known. That's not so in the private sector.

    "There have been a number of cases where software was found with intentionally planted back doors," said Shawn Hernan, team leader for vulnerability handling at the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University. "Most of these were for providing support, although no such support option was given to commercial customers. It's happened in both proprietary and open-sourced software."

    Hernan said discovering hidden malware is one of the most difficult tasks facing an assurance investigator. CERT doesn't track vulnerabilities by country of origin, he added.

    Software engineering processes are only now beginning to focus on providing traceability in security code. Traceability, which would allow a given line of code or a software module to be tracked back to the developer, is viewed as the Holy Grail in combating hidden malware. Traceability is also an effective tool for discovering software defects that expose an application to a myriad of exploit

  34. Yep - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My division, in one of the big (probably the biggest other than microsoft) tech companies has been shutting down our site and moving the jobs to India.

    Of course, we are all offered positions within the company before we are kicked out of the door, and we are supposed to be able to apply anywhere in the company.

    One individual here, who really wanted to move to India, (and accept the reduced pay, etc) is an exceptional candidate. The managers in Bangalore (same comapny here) WILL NOT CALL HIM BACK. It flies in the face of all of the companies published policies, but of course, nothing happens.

    1. Re:Yep - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you work for HP too?

    2. Re:Yep - by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      he oughta slip the managers some cash.

      in some places in india, that's the only way to get things done.

  35. Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by kahei · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I have to inject dull ol' reality into another 'The Indians Are Coming!' flap, but why exactly is it surprising that he can go to India on holiday and can't work there? Does he have a work visa for India? Are Indians allowed to work in the US with no visa?

    I always figured the general pattern was that to work in country A, you need to be a citizen of country A or have a work permit issued by country A. Did this suddenly stop applying in the case of Americans wanting to work in India?

    Other than that, well, it's a competitive marketplace. If other people are selling the same skills -- or what are percieved as the same skills -- cheaper, then he's got to change something.

    Incidentally, I've known some terrible experiences with outsourcing to cheap countries and I think it's generally a false economy. But on the other hand, I think I'd rather have a disoriented and inexperienced Indian working for me than listen to this guy's whining.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by Black+Perl · · Score: 2, Informative

      The implication of the article was that it is not possible for him to get a work visa. A work visa requires a corporate sponsor, and no Indian firm was even willing to talk to him.

      --
      bp
    2. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you probably havent seen some of the best outsourcers in India, they cut code as well better than the local recruits. The next time you try outsourcing, try this:
      1. set time frames,
      2. set quality parameters that don't change,
      3. specs and features that are well thought out
      4. get the proper contract papers and payment terms on time.
      5. send some of your best people out into India maybe.

    3. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I always figured the general pattern was that to work in country A, you need to be a citizen of country A or have a work permit issued by country A. Did this suddenly stop applying in the case of Americans wanting to work in India?

      Better call up George Bush and have him bomb the hell out of India. How dare those Indians deny Americans their god-given right to work anywhere they damn well please?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by sapped · · Score: 1

      The implication of the article was that it is not possible for him to get a work visa. A work visa requires a corporate sponsor, and no Indian firm was even willing to talk to him.

      Boo-hoo! Shame! Life is so hard! Do you have ANY idea how many American companies turned me down before I managed to pick up a job in the US?

      That's the way the cookie crumbles my friends whether you are American or not. If you want to live and work in another country prepare yourself for a lot of hardship.

      This is what gets me the most about these anti-H1B types on /. here. They have no idea - no idea whatsoever - what it takes to get a job here in the first place, go through the visa process and the relocate your entire family to another country. Then guess what? I still have to compete with Americans in the same shitty economy - paying the same rent and the same taxes! Interestingly enough I still have a job here. Guess what- I am really good at my job and my attitude doesn't suck. I wonder if that has anything to do with it. No, obviously not.

      Do you catch me complaining about it though? No of course not! I knew about the hassles up front and not being American I didn't expect to have everything handed to me on a plate the very first time I asked for it.

      Honestly, the average American these days seems to have grown too soft and that is the root cause of a lot of the problems in the USA today.

      OK, All the Anti-H1B zealots please line up on the left. All the Anti-"Any Foreigners" please line up on the right. You may flame at your leisure.

    5. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      Boo-hoo! Shame! Life is so hard! Do you have ANY idea how many American companies turned me down before I managed to pick up a job in the US?

      That's the way the cookie crumbles my friends whether you are American or not. If you want to live and work in another country prepare yourself for a lot of hardship.


      Sigh... another person who either misunderstood the article, didn't read it, or just decided to get on a personal soapbox.

      The article makes it obvious that Daniel Soong couldn't even get a job in THIS country when things got tight. It's hard for everyone, no matter where you were from. He wasn't complaining about that.

      The point is in the quote "...Tata only interviewed Americans to be in compliance with the equal opportunity employment commission, and that no Americans were ever hired." That smacks of illegality, and it may well be true.

      Also, ChevronTexaco breaking his contract for no good reason, while possibly legal, is pretty darn shady.

      This is what gets me the most about these anti-H1B types on /. here. They have no idea - no idea whatsoever - what it takes to get a job here in the first place, go through the visa process and the relocate your entire family to another country. Then guess what? I still have to compete with Americans in the same shitty economy - paying the same rent and the same taxes! Interestingly enough I still have a job here. Guess what- I am really good at my job and my attitude doesn't suck. I wonder if that has anything to do with it. No, obviously not.

      Do you catch me complaining about it though? No of course not!


      I caught you--I read the preceding paragraph. Or do you think Slashdot doesn't count?

      Honestly, the average American these days seems to have grown too soft and that is the root cause of a lot of the problems in the USA today.

      I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I have noticed that Americans tend to have quite a bit more "padding" than those from other countries :-)

      Seriously though, I have noticed something. I think it's a lack of education. All the just-out-of-college people seem to be simply idiots. Just 10 minutes ago I was helping a recent (year ago) CS grad who didn't know what fork() is, or even conceptually what it does. What are they teaching CS people these days? FrontPage? Geez.

      --
      bp
    6. Re:Why yes, it *is* illegal to work with no visa by satyap · · Score: 1
      The point is in the quote "...Tata only interviewed Americans to be in compliance with the equal opportunity employment commission, and that no Americans were ever hired." That smacks of illegality, and it may well be true.
      Then hit the company with a lawsuit. Don't kill me.
  36. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't want to work in India. If you want to get back at those H1 people by going to India to work, you're a fool. You can "steal" the jobs back from them in the US just as easily, all you have to do is work for a wage that you will find ridiculously low.

  37. citizenship by perlchild · · Score: 1

    hmm and becoming a citizen might be harder in India than in the USA because they are highly overpopulated and the USA isn't...

    It might explain why he can't get a work Visa OR become a citizen. Depleted scarce resource: citizenship in the fastest-growing population in the world. The fact that they need to import money to feed all those people is probably explained somewhere in macroeconomics.

    Since the USA's richess comes from a lot of things, but mostly not from natural resources, they tend to export money(IANAMEBIWMAOIAJ: I am not a macroeconomist, but I would moonlight as one in a jiffy).

    1. Re:citizenship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The fact that they need to import money ...

      Man, I would love to import money into my home... unfortunately that usually involves exporting goods or services. Damn.

  38. Won't hire Americans? by schussat · · Score: 1
    They won't hire Americans? I guess some of those ex-SCO employees can cross one more address off their list of places to send applications.

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
  39. Re:No sandniggers need apply either by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Such is the world comming to :(

  40. This kind of bullshit belongs on Fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headline and entire viewpoint of this posting come from just 2 sentences at the very end of the article (which is just an aside)

  41. OK, no programming job in India. by Tool+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what about the taxis?

    1. Re:OK, no programming job in India. by deadmongrel · · Score: 1

      The way the traffic system in India is there is no way an american can handle it unless he is a stunt driver. No offense meant but that's the truth.

    2. Re:OK, no programming job in India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you EVER seen the traffic and road state in Inida, man?

  42. TPS Report? by mkldev · · Score: 5, Funny
    Something I found amusing from the article:

    However, the SEI is introducing Team Process Software (TPS), which brings traceability of specific code modules to individual programmers, said Humphrey, a former IBM software engineering executive. Indian software companies and a few U.S. developers, notably Microsoft Corp., are aggressively implementing TPS.

    To which my immediate reply was, "Did you remember to include the right cover on your TPS report?" :-)

    --
    120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    1. Re:TPS Report? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does SourceSafe or cvs not do that already? Can someone elaborate, is this actually a new technology?

      I mean, you want to find out who put the comment /* Gates is a big dork!! */ into windows.h, you look at the changelog.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:TPS Report? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you can most likely do something like that in safesource or cvs but how do you have cvs and safesource tell you which group of programmers was responsible for the blaster worm? plus if you find out they were responsible was it intentional or accidental? the blaster hole (from what i remember) was in since winNT now say it was intentional and that worker worked at MS for 5 years after he put the bug in. how many other bugs did he put in? how many millions is it going to take for you to find them all? can you sue this unsatified worker for causing this bug since it was intentional?

    3. Re:TPS Report? by slyborg · · Score: 1

      It's amazing the stuff that gets by editors. I also laughed when I saw this, but what Watts and the SEI are pushing is a methodology called "Team Software Process" or TSP, not TPS.

  43. Re:I'm going into medical field. by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Yep. Dealing with malpractice issues and byzantine procedure reimbursement rules sure sounds a lot more relaxing.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  44. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Grow up. Sanjay won't let me play with his toy train so I am not going to play with him ever again. India has 1 Billion people to employ. The last thing they need is Americans coming in and taking quality jobs.

  45. Unions made the IT jobs leave! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Oh...wait a minute, there was no IT union. This computer outsourcing reminds me of the blame that's placed on unions for the factory jobs leaving the country.

    No computer union, and the companies outsourced anyway.

    1. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Americans, living in an open market republic, are the most business and trade ignorant people I have ever met.

      This isn't the opinion of an outsider criticizing America. I'm and American. I've always been an American. My father was always an American and so was his, and his and his going back to 1630 something.

      But I've traveled, and off the beaten western path at that.

      The average Arab door to door rug trader knows more about business and trade than the average American CEO. The proof is as near as the local car dealership. Watching Americans confront trying to buy a car, about the one and only time in their life that they will directly encounter true market dynamics face to face, is pitiful. Masters of industry go all to pieces or have their eye teeth stolen from them.

      Buy low, sell high. What's so hard to understand about that? What's low? That which is in oversupply. What's high? That which is short.

      You trade what you have in oversupply for what you are short of. What would be the point of paying a high price for that which you already possess an excess of?

      India has lots of people and little money.

      America has fewer people ( who are necessarily more expensive) and lots of money.

      Sounds like trade opportunity to me.

      Not happy about that?

      Well, let me ask you, when was the last time you payed someone $1000 to mow your lawn or shovel your walk?

      Ahhhhhhhhh, you're not quite that much of a moron after all, are you? You get some kid to do it for you for $10.

      Because you can.

      KFG

    2. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      Well, let me ask you, when was the last time you payed someone $1000 to mow your lawn or shovel your walk?

      Ahhhhhhhhh, you're not quite that much of a moron after all, are you? You get some kid to do it for you for $10.

      Ok. That does it. This is about the worst analogy I've ever read.

      Everyone here is now dumber for having read it.

      I award you no points.

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    3. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      A random lawn mowing service

      What kid in the US will mow lawns for $10? Are you nuts? Unless you have a tiny tiny yard you can expect to pay double that - minimum. Even to some kid.

      Outsourcing your lawn to someone in India might actually cost that $1000 though

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    4. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by krysith · · Score: 1

      I guess it's just us old-family Americans who get it. All these 3rd and 4th generation Americans whose great-grandparents came over and became Americans want to lock out the rest of the world, as if they founded this country. We let them in, and we want to let other people in too. Why? Because we've seen how it benefits America.

      C'mon slashdotters, read some history.

      krysith
      (four ancestors on the Mayflower)

    5. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      What kid in the US will mow lawns for $10?

      I used to do that for $5. That was back in 1984, but given that you're talking about a job that takes maybe 60-90 minutes, I'd have a hard time imagining that people would pay much more than $10 for one of the neighborhood kids to cut grass.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      I'd have a hard time imagining that people would pay much more than $10 for one of the neighborhood kids to cut grass.

      Which is why you see people mowing their own lawns. All I know is the neighborhood kids where I'm from wouldn't mow a modest lawn for less than $20.

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    7. Re:Unions made the IT jobs leave! by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      All I know is the neighborhood kids where I'm from wouldn't mow a modest lawn for less than $20.

      Only because their psuedo-wealthy parents keep them in the money. If you don't get pocket money, you try and earn what you can. I remember washing cars for $3 when I was a kid. All that probably went on candy, but hey.

  46. Unemployment Rate is higher in INDIA by deadmongrel · · Score: 1

    look at it this way. India produces more engineers than any country in the world. The problem is there is no work for these people in India. The unemployment rate is higher and a population nearing more than a billion there is not enough space to live in cities. At least you have the *option* to work in stores here in the US. now i am not saying every one should do that but its still an option viable or not its upto the individual to decide.

    1. Re:Unemployment Rate is higher in INDIA by skitz0 · · Score: 1

      Then maybe its time to outsource some rubbers to India.

    2. Re:Unemployment Rate is higher in INDIA by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time for people in India to re-evaluate their career choices, then, instead of shoving all the unemployed and students over here?

      It strikes me that maybe the reason they produce so many engineers these days, when their job market is already flooded, is to shuffle themselves off to the US as fast as possible. That's not good for the US, and it's not good for India.

      After being hired for a technician spot earlier in the summer, my employer remarked that I had beaten out almost 30 other students, almost all of them Indian/Chinese. Yet none of them got hired because, when it came down to an interview, they were clueless regarding the skills needed to perform the work.

      Whether they're qualified or not, Indians and Asians have a strong tendency to swarm over any vaguely technical job they can get here. This breeds major rensentment from those they beat out, and annoyance in those who see they can't even preform the job they're applying for (and in some cases, barely speak intelligble English).

    3. Re:Unemployment Rate is higher in INDIA by bot · · Score: 1

      Erasers? You want to send pencil erasers to India?

      hehe.

      That's what a 'rubber' means in Indian (British ?)English.

  47. I think you underestimate.. by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the level of difficulty one has immigrating to the USA, even on the H1 visa program.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:I think you underestimate.. by MagPulse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It might be really hard. Getting a PhD is really hard, starting a successful business is really hard, but people do those every day. Right now someone on a foriegn visa is impacting my ability to get a job, because while it is very hard, they are I dare say even more motivated than I am. They're fighting to live, I'm fighting for a middle class life instead of a lower class one.

    2. Re:I think you underestimate.. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yeah, it is hard for a specific individual, but, all it takes to get people over here is for a large company, going over, recruiting the folks, and then filling out the paperwork. 6 months latter, all the new H1Bs are arriving.

      then you get companies saying "hey, we can get these fools for half the price of American workers, even with the cost in recruiting them, lets lie and over estimate the needed number for workers so we can get cheaper labor to displace American labor"

      this is why programmers needed a Union in the 90's.

      then they could hold to balls of companies to the fire over jobs and out-sourcing.

      does anyone listen when times are good and they have the leverage? NOOOOOOOO.

      now look who is out of work with no recourse and 5 years left on their student loans.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop expecting a 6 figure salary and maybe you'll have better luck. All of the job whiners I've seen/spoken with are either upset that they rode the bubble all the way to the top and now can't afford that lifestyle (stupid) or they were in the wrong positions to begin with.

      Most people - IE those that haven't bought big fat SUVs or mansions - can live on relatively little money. If you can't, maybe you need to stop blaming H1B's and figure out wtf is costing you so much money.

    4. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "impacting"?

      I want to hire you just so I can fire you.

    5. Re:I think you underestimate.. by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      i'm looking for 5-figure salaries, and i can't find any. i'm damned lucky to have the job i've got. and it's just BARELY 5-figure. because of the area i live in, that doesn't mean i'm blaming immigration - but i'm also looking in higher population areas where tech jobs should be aplenty. they are truly very rare. even the $10k tech jobs are rare.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    6. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of it is based on the cost of living of your area, especially if you live in the US.

    7. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What must really piss you off is well off foreigners with degrees from top western universities who make more than the Average american and are not fighting to live - but are just more motivated than you - period.

    8. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      They're fighting to live, I'm fighting for a middle class life instead of a lower class one.

      so did you learn from that wise statement?

      If you are fighting for mearly "more stuff and a SUV" you will lose. no if's and's or but's.

      And people still wonder why a family of 12 from China will within 5 years end up being a business owner (resturant, service or Technology usually) ...

      If you want to be sucessful, you have to have real motivation not just some lame excuse.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:I think you underestimate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. It's very easy to get around getting into the US. I know like ten people from other countries who come over on ESL "student visas". Once here they stop going to school and get jobs with companies who pay them under the table. They pay less than it would cost to pay a US citizen...so it saves the company money. They can hire about 6 workers for the cost of 1 US worker.

      If the school reports them for not showing up to class, they transfer to another ESL school that they can pay off to say that they are in class when they are supposed to be. A bunch of these ESL schools are setup specifically to cater to these people here illegally. It like the frikkin underground railroad. Supposing that student can't afford to pay off a new school they just go "Robin Hood". It's ridiculous. The next time you go to a Thai or Indian restaurant 9 out of 10 people you see working there will be illegal. No lie.

      You might ask how they can live on that small pay? Easy. The rent out a studio or 1 bedroom and line beds up on the floor so that 6 or more people can live there. And don't forget they are living tax free. Once they have saved up enough money after a few years they then take that money back to their home country where there it will make them able to live like kings. I know one person who went through the process of becoming a US citizen and after 5 years she was able to. But looking back on it she doesn't know why she went through the effort as she has also witnessed these people coming over here reaping the benefits and not being penalized for it.

    10. Re:I think you underestimate.. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      the level of difficulty one has immigrating to the USA, even on the H1 visa program.


      What makes it hard is that there are a 2 billion indians and chinese competing for a (relatively) small number of visas. Unfortunately, the number of visas is significant when compared to the number of IT jobs and out of work workers. I don't care how hard it is to get an H1 visa. The fact is that far too many have them.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    11. Re:I think you underestimate.. by satyap · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have a problem with illegals. Please stop shouting "terrorist" or beating me up when you see me in the street, because I'm here legally. And I pay my taxes, too.

  48. It's not called stealing by sonali · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I don't get from all theses articles/posts about India-stealing-jobs-from-US, is why they use the word stealing. All India is doing is improving its economy. India is not stealing any jobs, and the reason why US is outsourcing to India is simply because its cheaper. That's India's "strength" :people and lots of it. So what are Indian companies supposed to say when US companies ask them for outsourcing: Hey we can't take your jobs. We are really worreid about your economy but not ours.

    1. Re:It's not called stealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree; there's no "stealing" happening on the part of India. They're just trying to better their lives, and you can't blame someone for doing that.

      The anger isn't directed at the Indians (despite all the cries of racism that go up any time someone dares criticise visa programs). It's directed at the executives in America who are making these decisions at the expense of their countrymen, and at the government officials in America who accept the bribes from corporations to never make any law or policy that might help protect workers in America. You know, laws like enlightened places like India have.

      It's our own "elites" we despise, not the Indian workers.

    2. Re:It's not called stealing by satyap · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The anger isn't directed at the Indians
      Remember that the next time an Indian gets beaten up for having dark skin or a beard, okay?
  49. TPS Reports are Here! RUN AWAY! by computersareevil · · Score: 2, Funny

    "However, the SEI is introducing Team Process Software (TPS), which brings traceability of specific code modules to individual programmers, said Humphrey, a former IBM software engineering executive. Indian software companies and a few U.S. developers, notably Microsoft Corp., are aggressively implementing TPS."

    Does life imitate are or what?! I never thought I'd actually see TPS reports, but now I expect my next boss will be named Lumberg...

    wurst sig evr.

  50. TPS Reports by ImACucumber · · Score: 2, Funny

    However, the SEI is introducing Team Process Software (TPS), which brings traceability of specific code modules to individual programmers, said Humphrey, a former IBM software engineering executive. Indian software companies and a few U.S. developers, notably Microsoft Corp., are aggressively implementing TPS.

    The guys at Microsoft better make sure they put a cover on those TPS reports!

  51. Meeeeeh by dosius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    IE is the buggy browser, not Moz. If something works in IE and not in Moz that's because people are writing faulty code.

    My web designer uses IE exclusively. Well, one of my pages that he laid out for me broke in Moz Firebird, because the column widths were even so slightly different... There's standards, folks, use them! I would have preferred to use <NOBR myself.

    -uso.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    1. Re:Meeeeeh by jpu8086 · · Score: 1

      You talk about complying with standards and then break them yourself. You're one ignorant evangelist. NOBR is not part of any HTML standard. Never was.

      Yes, I do use Mozilla FB. And, I do know standard HTML.

      --
      now supporting:
      cmdrTaco for president '04
      michael for oval office intern summer '05
    2. Re:Meeeeeh by dosius · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it HTML 2.0? Or was it a Netscape extension?

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    3. Re:Meeeeeh by jpu8086 · · Score: 1

      A definite no-no for standards. Here is proof.
      Netscape put that shit in, just like too much other crap like frames.

      Here are people requesting alternatives at w3.org

      --
      now supporting:
      cmdrTaco for president '04
      michael for oval office intern summer '05
  52. India has no H1B, that is the point of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of the article is that while the US allowed qualified Indians to come into the US to work, India has no such reciprocation. Indians have all the advantages while Americans have no advantages, ie. H1B takes jobs from Americans but then when Americans want to go to India to work, the Indian government won't let them.

    All it is highlighting is that the H1B was a way for American corporations to screw over American citizens to help shore up their bottom line. Now, when they want to squeeze out even more profits, they will offshore everything, not caring about the American citizens at all, and screwing up the entire IT industry... and the government is letting them do it!

    This is why you can never trust corporations to "Do The Right Thing" for their country. They have no loyalty to their citizens or employees, they only have loyalty to the senior executives and the shareholders and will do anything and screw over anybody to make money... Once public policy gets dictated by corporations, which it already does, then the entire country is going to go tits up, because a country should be governed with the welfare of the people in mind, not with money in mind.

  53. Free Trade Double Standard by gothrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here is a prime example of one of the main problems of free trade. Corporations are free to trade jobs off to some developing nation where wages are minimal but people are not allowed to move to where the jobs are. Perhaps someday we will negotiate trade agreements which guarantee a fair living standard for workers reguardless of where they live.

    1. Re:Free Trade Double Standard by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      yep; globalization has a long way to go yet.

      but by then, they'll just be importing technology from Ix.

  54. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get used to it. US workers cannot get jobs in Canada, Europe, Australia, etc. without first applying, and getting necessary work visas. To get a work visa, you must have an employer who has applied to get you in, and has demonstrated that there isn't local talent who could do the job you're being hired for.

    Funny enough, that's pretty much the situation here (except for the illegal immigrants that is.) If you really want to work overseas, start applying for foreign citizenship/work permits.

  55. WHERE ARE THE PROTESTS??? by superangrybrit · · Score: 0

    Come on you crazy libbies. Where are those protests taking place?

  56. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Sanga · · Score: 1

    Factual errors in your post:

    -- US companies invited people to work in the US with the H1B program
    -- It is argued that H1B visa program actually created more jobs and allowed citizens to climb up the value chain. It did not reduce the jobs in a holistic sense.
    -- A visitor's visa does not allow you to work. This is true for any country.

    If there is enough pressure put by companies moving offices to India to allow alien workers, such legislation will get enacted. Ask your nearest Indian to write to her/his MP.

  57. Noonien? by captainstupid · · Score: 1

    Okay, so Daniel Soong can't get a job in India? The Indian gov't must not be very smart considering that Daniel's great-great-great-great-great-grandson, Dr. Noonien Soong, will invent the first sentient artificial lifeform. But now that I've posted this comment I've polluted the time-space continuum and Data may not be created. And without Data, how will Picard convince Q and various other omnipotent alien entities that the human race is worth preserving!

    Oh No! I've ruined EVERYTHINGGG!!!!

    --
    "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
  58. Immigration by krez · · Score: 1

    How is this different from American requirements? As a Canadian, I needed to get proper approval/documents to work in the USA: if the US government decided that engineering jobs were limited or scarce, I'm sure they'd have taken those papers away from me. Every country has the right to decide who they will/won't let into their country, and on what terms.

    Now if the US would only apply this to hispanics...

    --
    =U= "Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you"
    1. Re:Immigration by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's more lets shine a light on the crux of the matter. Economic downturns always bring heightened nationalism, immigrant bashing, and typically self-destructive policies on trade and immigration. Given the current political climate and the significance of today's date only heightens that sense of national pride. This, in my opinion, is a dangerous position to be in. This is the kind of climate that breeds "Brown Shirts".

      I think the important distinction that must be drawn is the fundamental difference between H1B type workers and immigrants. In my opinion, an immigrant is someone actively pursuing citizenship and should be considered an "American". As the descendant of Scots, Irish, and French Canadians I've heard the stories of persecution and discrimination my great grandparents underwent during the Great Depression because they were "stealing" jobs from "real" Americans.

      In my opinion, the hiring policy, this man ran in to is just plain wrong regardless of legality. Does this mean that the US should adopt a similar policy? I don't think so, I believe the outcome would not impart a favorable change on the state of the economy. If my company lost all its H1B's we would be in serious trouble. I'm pretty confident we could not fill the vacant jobs with "real" americans, even in today's job market. Of course, I could be wrong.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    2. Re:Immigration by TWX · · Score: 1

      I guess that I wonder what the ultimate point of the H1B visa actually is. Do we use the visa to encourage people to come try us out, and then give them the hard sell to come to the U.S. as permanent residents? Do we just use them because we need people now, and we can't find any locally? Do we use it because we want to pay people less?

      If we don't have enough jobs to go around, I could understand paring down the H1B program if it's being used by companies to employ labor that is cheaper than that which people already present provide. This doesn't mean that I advocate revoking existing visas, or automatically not consider renewing visas coming up at their expiration, and the like. I think that we need to work to sell our H1B people on becoming permanent residents here, or else restructure the program, but not cancel it outright or try to call someone unamerican for supporting it.

      In my opinion, the government's role in economics should be fairly small and indirect. Playing hardball doesn't ever seem to do much good, since it causes direct impact without considering existing conditions, which screws with things. If policy is going to be adjusted, changed, tweaked, whatnot, do it slowly. Don't go "*grunt*H1B BAD. Hurt workers!".

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Immigration by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Even in our economic downturn, we still have a rather small unemployment rate.

      Don't forget how unemployment is defined - the number is lower than it could be because many people have simply given up looking. Should the market start to recover, it's been theorized that unemployment will actually increase for a time, as the people who have given up will begin looking again.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    4. Re:Immigration by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I think the important distinction that must be drawn is the fundamental difference between H1B type workers and immigrants. In my opinion, an immigrant is someone actively pursuing citizenship and should be considered an "American".

      I am currently in Canada on what would be an H1B in the US. I would love to apply for landed immigrant status, but guess what: I don't have enough points. Tadaaa.

      I am pretty qualified for what I am doing and would definetly "contribute" to the Canadian society but I am not allowed to, unless of course I get married, then all of the sudden it wouldn't matter anymore.

      So, people on H1B might not have the option to apply, though many do, because after 6 years it's either have a Green Card or be out of the country.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    5. Re:Immigration by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was aware of that. We have a few H1B's that have been working on getting citizenship for what seems like an eternity to them.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    6. Re:Immigration by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the answer is a little bit of all of the above. In general, I am a proponent of the H1B program, but I do have some serious reservations. Most of the H1B's I work with are very intelligent people that would be difficult to replace even in the current job market. I believe the root of this problem is our educational system in the states, but thats a whole other debate.

      I've been looking for a good Oracle DBA job for a while now and its been difficult. I'm not very happy where I am. In this situation, the H1B program definitely hinders my search, but I really don't think by all that much. Most people who oppose the H1B program talk about just this kind of scenario and their argument has merit. However, the biggest problem I have with the H1B program is the way some employers abuse the hell out of the process. My division has been undergoing constant layoffs for over two years and during this process our managment has really been treating us very poorly, but it pales in comparison to the way the H1B's are treated. More than a few have received veiled threats that they will do what they are asked or they could be laid off and promptly kicked out of the country. They've forced people in to very long hours, constantly cut benefits, in general become hostile. The consensus among most of the H1B's is to keep their mouth shut and do what is asked. It is in this regard that I think the system needs an overhaul. I do not, however, know the solution.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    7. Re:Immigration by vg425 · · Score: 1

      Actually its a very clear issue. You must make a distinction between immigrants, who move here permanently and are allowed to apply for residency and eventually citizenship and guest workers. Guestworkers come on H1-B and L-1 visas which are NOT immigrant visas. Their legal ability to stay in the US is at the mercy of their sponsor (generally the employer). This is why employers can pay these workers far less than the prevailing wage, thus placing American workers at a competitive disadvantage. While there are laws which require employers to pay the prevailing wage this is often not the case.

      The point is that there are very important legal differences between guest workers and immigrants and the issue here is not that American jobs are taken but that Americans are at a competitive disadvantage.

    8. Re:Immigration by bronxist · · Score: 1


      I respect most of what you say, and believe it to be closer to the truth than nativist arguments you are responding to.

      But you should consider the possibility that things are not going to be alright again once the economic cycle turns. The standard of living of the affluent American is unsustainable as long as there are millions of hungrier, but equally capable people elsewhere in the world.

      Manufacturing and IT are most obviously hit right now, but agriculture and services can't be far behind.

    9. Re:Immigration by HardCase · · Score: 1
      Don't forget how unemployment is defined - the number is lower than it could be because many people have simply given up looking. Should the market start to recover, it's been theorized that unemployment will actually increase for a time, as the people who have given up will begin looking again.


      This is an argument that I've had with a number of people (and I'm sure I'm not alone). Even with the number of people who are no longer seeking work, I believe that the unemployment rate is still quite low. If you turn the numbers around, consider that even with a 10% unemployment rate, that means that 90% of the people are working. It's pure speculation, but I wonder just how many people who have given up have done so because they just won't work in a low-paying job? I'm lucky - I avoided my company's layoff sweep, but if I hadn't, you can bet that I would have taken just about any job if it meant the difference between paying the bills or going bankrupt.


      Now I'll grant that perhaps a number of people may be underemployed, but the point is that they are working - they are making money and at least able to pay the bills. Yes, times are tough right now, but not nearly as tough as they were in the past. I remember the horrible recession of the Nixon era. Inflation was rampant, unemployment was rampant and the government stepped in with draconian wage and price controls. What's happening now is not even close to that bad. I remember the early '80s when interest rates were shockingly high...if you had money, you could make money, but if you needed money, you were screwed!


      I think that part of the problem with negativism about the economy is that an awful lot of people are comparing today with the economy of five years ago. That was an unsustainable, irresponsible period of growth that had no foundation to stand on. It simply had to collapse. The whole "new economy" was a sham. I don't mean Enron...companies that simply made stuff up (although they certainly carry their fair share of blame). I mean the whole dot-com gang and their ilk. A lot of money moved around, a lot of people had great, high paying jobs, but in the end, it all had to fall apart because there was no profitable production to keep the money flowing.


      So right now, as the economy corrects itself, a lot of people are working to just get by and pay the bills. That's too bad...it really is, but many of them are the same people who went on the crazy ride of the 90's without stopping to think about just how that particular economic boom was supported. I don't say that anybody deserves what they got...I'm just saying that everyone is paying for the unsupportable growth of the economy during the 90's.


      -h-

    10. Re:Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so out-of-the-loop. Read the numbers - do the math - study the data. This is an unprecedented economic situation in US history! There is only a finite number of jobs - once critical mass is reached - which happened several years ago - we then enter the CASCADING UNEMPLOYMENT PHASE - all the jobs dependent in offshored jobs also disappear - eventually, as in two or three more years - leading to economic collapse. To anyone whose had linear algebra and multivariable calculus - this should be obvious!

    11. Re:Immigration by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      This is an argument that I've had with a number of people (and I'm sure I'm not alone).

      I agree with your perception. I would also add that 2% (or more) of the population is willing to work just long enough to start receiving more unemployment benefits. This distorts the unemployment %'s significantly.

      This may also be part of the reason that 4% unemployment is considered full employment in the US....2% is normal turnover, 2% don't really want to work any harder than is necessary to get unemployment anyway.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Immigration by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      >>The United States is a nation of immigrants.
      >>The number of 'native' people here is confined >>to mostly people who have property right to an >>'indian' reservation. The rest of us are either >>from somewhere else or of people decended from >>somewhere else within the last 200 years. There >>are very few people who can claim their only >>lineage from the original east coast Pre-US >>colonies.

      Well, if you believe the theory that the American Indians migrated to the Americas over a land bridge that once crossed the bering ( excuse spelling ) straits, then even they are not "natives".

      Yes, I am splitting hairs, but I figured some people may find it interesting.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    13. Re:Immigration by cybercreek · · Score: 1


      You present a fake argument.

      H1B and L1 visa workers are NOT immigrants. They are prohibited from immigrating by the nature of the visas.

    14. Re:Immigration by dan14807 · · Score: 1

      If my company lost all its H1B's we would be in serious trouble. I'm pretty confident we could not fill the vacant jobs with "real" americans, even in today's job market.

      What the hell are you smoking? Are you aware of how many very well qualified unemployed or under-employed programmers and I.T. people there are out there?

      Obviously not.

    15. Re:Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um...I'm a native American...I was born here.

    16. Re:Immigration by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should have added "in a timely manner" to that statement, but regardless

      30+ IT positions, in my department alone, is ALWAYS difficult to fill on short notice. 5,000+ company-wide is even harder. I'm not saying that there aren't people out there who could possibly step in, but the initial pain would be excruciating.

      Its not easy for a programmer to just step in and take over for another programmer without a significant ramp up and sdjustment period. Its not easy to replace a DBA who is both extremely talented and knows anything and everything about the environment; with or without documentation. The same goes for network and system admins. Could we find a body to fill all vacancies, possibly, but the fact is the interim would be very painful to our customers.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    17. Re:Immigration by Olathe · · Score: 1

      When have there EVER been a set number of jobs ? If I go out and mow people's lawns, that's one more job that wasn't there before. Yet, I somehow doubt that that job was included in your magically determined set number.

      Considering that ANYONE can work freelance in a job that has a demand and get paid for it, I don't see why there'd be a limit.

      This is a lot like the predictions they made in the early 20th century about science ending because nearly everything had been discovered.

    18. Re:Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a database (not database applications) company, or a systems company, good luck finding good (much less exceptional) people. H1Bs increase your hiring pool greatly, letting you hire more qualified people.

      There is a massive glut of programmers in some subsections of the industry: Java *, multimedia, everything that was 'cool' during the boom.

      Outside those areas, good people are as hard to find as ever.

  59. Another 'HP' printer? by redfenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real question is if you cast your dollar vote for HP again or someone else this time. And even more importantly, if you researched the printer company's support locations before you bought that one.

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  60. If you haven't woken up before... by analog_line · · Score: 1

    ...you might want to smell the coffee now.

    American coders and IT workers of all stripes, you are a commodity and you always have been. You used to be a valuable one, now you are expendable and replaceable. If you want to keep coding or doing IT work, you need to take responsibility for yourself and work to find a job. If you can't find a job in IT that pays enough, no matter how hard and long you work, you have a hard choice. Either stick with it because that's what you love and deal with the hard times, or take the hard choice and find a different career where people are hiring.

    No one outside your country is going to want you to come and take jobs away from their citizens, even if your country is more than willing to take jobs away from it's own citizens. No amount of complaining is going to get you a good IT job. We all laughed at those who were having trouble when we were riding sky high. Now it's our turn to eat some humble pie.

    1. Re:If you haven't woken up before... by hrieke · · Score: 1

      No, actually all jobs are commodities, just that the companies haven't figured out / don't want to figure out a way ship the middle / upper management out either.

      My only thought on this is this: With so many jobs being outsourced, who the hell is going to be left with the disposable income to buy these goods and services?

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  61. errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unlike the US, India, being a developing nation, with a very large economy

    :%s/economy/population
    sorry 'bout the typo

  62. I know how you feel, but... by KGBear · · Score: 1

    Having relocated to the US 2 monthes ago to be with my wife while she pursues her PhD at Colorado State and still waiting for a reply on my application for a work permit, I can't really sympathize with Mr. Soong. I certainly understand that any country should protect their own work force but it's only fair it should work both ways...

  63. Another Horror Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This from August: http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=38 760&site=lightreading Seems "Greed" is a universal known throughout the world, anybody will try to screw anybody given the chance.

  64. Indian embassy by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    May i recommed that you contact the nearest indian embassy and find out about the Employment Visa as found on the indian government webpage.

    I am sure there is a provision. While living in india i have seen many foreigners, mostly russian working in the nuclear facilities at BARC. It shouldnt be more difficult than it is to receive work permit in the US.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  65. Re:Duh...(a job for you) by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny
    Well, duh... As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

    If you know how to spell, use proper English, and can recognize that two stories are duplicates, you could probably be the editor of some tech news blog.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  66. Attorney Fees? by redfenix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, and I'm sure that the unemployed masses have the funds to sue corporations for giving preference to H1s.

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    1. Re:Attorney Fees? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yep, since Bush took office the economy has lost 2.8 million jobs, if you count in population growth we are at an ~5 million job deficit vs where we should be with normal growth. Add in the number of people who are underemployed and the job situation in the US is pretty grim. On top of all this NONE of the things Bush has done or proposed are the things you do to get a country out of a slump.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Attorney Fees? by soundcore · · Score: 1

      It's not Bush's fault - except that he's stupid and ignorant of what is going on. He's probably totally unaware of the worker visa thing. It was CLINTON who signed the America Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act which opened the floodgates to allow 195,000 H-1Bs in every year. Oh, and those aren't the real numbers. It has really been close to 300,000 every single year since 2000. Oh yeah, and the U.S. consulate in Chennai says it will be 750,000 per year coming in from India alone by 2005. If you think the job market is bad now........ Oh yeah oh yeah - forget visas, the gov't has learned a new trick: Free Trade Agreemnents. Under the Chile/Singapore Free Trade Agreement, UNLIMITED numbers of "guest workers" can come in without any restrictions. The more FTAs we sign, the more workers will come in. The ensuing flood will make the visa limits look like an eyedropper's worth. Oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah - also, the President now has sole authority to sign FTAs as he pleases - no Congressional approval needed. The American worker is DOOMED.

    3. Re:Attorney Fees? by msgmonkey · · Score: 1

      Well the unemployeed can still vote last time I checked.. Vote-in a government that will do something about it and if you can't get in a government to do what the majority wants (if that is the case) then it's time to start questioning your democracy.

    4. Re:Attorney Fees? by phallstrom · · Score: 1

      Why bother with H1s at all? Just lay off your development team and outsource it to a 3rd-party company in India... as far as I know the US gov wouldn't care at all about that, but the net result is the same.

    5. Re:Attorney Fees? by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      NONE of the things Bush has done or proposed are the things you do to get a country out of a slump.

      Translation: NONE of the things Bush has done are what a bunch of Academic political scientists who are big-government advocates feel should be done.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    6. Re:Attorney Fees? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      In fairness to Clinton, at the time, H1B Visas made sense - there was a massive demand for workers and not enough Americans to fill them. We all remember the boom, right? The problem is that after that fell apart, the H1B program wasn't scaled down or cancelled.

    7. Re:Attorney Fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can vote can't they? If people really cared about this, they would vote accordingly.

    8. Re:Attorney Fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they can vote either for the party that encourges massive immigration, both legal and illegal, that holds wages down -- or they can vote for the party that encourages massive outsourcing to other countries, that holds wages down.

      Yep, voting sure is the way to go.

  67. Let me explain something. by azav · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) I used to work writing gambling software (ethically, I knew it was going to fold). There is a rather attractive woman who lives in Marin and is rather wealthy who owns/runs a set of gambling web sites. Her dev team is in India. She's young, beautiful and rich.

    2) I use Macromedia Director extensively on a mac. I have since 1987. I even worked on Director for about 4 years at Macromedia. Director MX for the mac was ported by a company in India. IT SUCKS ASS. A vast majority of "details" that make software great are gone. It is now just "usable" and annoying. I will saddly admit that the windoes version of Director MX is much more usable than the mac version. Whomever ported it, just doesn't get it. What really sucks is that this crappy ass port is what I have to use every day. Yeah. Woo. shoot me.

    3) I used to contract for McGraw Hill in Carlsbad. We took a major project that was about to fail, developed and released the 4 CD set on time and budget for McGraw-Hill. After I left, under financial pressure, one of my co workers told me that things were about to change. This biz guy from a software firm in India come in to talk to the biz guys at McGraw-Hill and states "my programmers can write 1000 lines of code in a hour and they are pennies on the dollar." WHAT MORON measures productivity in "lines of code per hour?" Obviously, the business guys who don't understand programming. Last I hard, a lot of Glencoe/McGraw-Hill's development moved offshore to India.

    Leaves alot to think about.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Let me explain something. by Zimm · · Score: 1

      As I type this i'm surrounded by Indians. Other then the project manager, and a Russian, i'm the only non-Indian. Half the indians are here, the other half are in India. So far the way the project is going, i'm scared as hell, the indians i'm working with here as H1-B's are top notch, and they get about market value. The indians that we have in India are also top notch, and are being paid about $15hr. The project is cheaper and of higher quality then using US labor according to the project manager. I'm not about to move to India for $15hr, and as much as I hate to say it, it's only going to get worse. I was talking to a former co-worker who just got his green card after coming here from India a few years ago, and he says there are thousands upon thousands of Indian's in school, and just getting out of school who are *extremely* well trained in comp sci and engineering. Things are only going to get worse, time to move up to management...

    2. Re:Let me explain something. by Ralman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I fully agree with the *MORON* comment.

      Oh yay... 1000 lines of code an hour for pennies on the dollar. Big friggin deal.

      I have seen this type of practice implemented at other companies before. The task get shipped over to Inda, Isreal, or wherever. Simple tasks mind you. Such as implement the error handling on the submission from this HTML form using Java. We send full specs as to what is allowed for the submission.

      The code we get back is 10 times longer than needed, won't compile, and when fixed to compile is not even logically correct against the spec. Now it has to be fixed to accept the correct submission parameters. Mind you someone just spent more time debugging and fixing the code to get it to work than it would have taken to write the thing from scratch. On average, we threw out 90% of the code that we sent back to us and wound up writing it ourselves.

      Just where are the savings? The business execs didn't see a problem with it, all they saw was they has twice the workforce for half the money. Too bad that section of the workforce created more work for everyone else.

      Note: I am not trying to bust on any programmers from India orIsreal (I have known a few that were amazing code jockeys).

    3. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I gotta say, I used Director back when it was MacroMind Director (and before then when it was VideoWorks, I think) and I gotta say, the best versions of Director were 3.0 up to 5.0. I think it was version 4.0 were MacroMind (changed to MacroMedia as of version 4.0, I think) went cross-platform and you could tell that it hurt the application. Director 3.0 had this awesome Mac feel that just allowed you to flow with productivity. If you ever used the score in Director 3, 4 or 5 you'll know what I'm taking about!

      Drag and drop to the letter was everywhere in Director. The paint tools didn't feel flaky, sure, debugging sucked back then, and Lingo wasn't as powerful as it was now, but I constantly find myself going into Director 4.0.4 to do my work till I max out on the file size (32MB) and then have to convert to Director 6.0 format and then to Director MX to finish... And I HATE it! To edit a particular frame now, you have to "split" it, edit, etc. There is no "small icon" view that tells you whether it's a bmp, line, field, has a script attached to it, etc. The score is the heart and soul of Director, and if you've seen it in Director 4 or 5.... Sigh...

      IMHO, Macromedia has butchered it pretty good, and since Director 5, the look and feel has gone down hill.

    4. Re:Let me explain something. by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

      This situation is VERY simple
      Economy is not in great shape. India has cheep labor, and that now includes a big base of computer labor. So companies just go there and get the job done for cheep, and get rich off the savings. But in this world, I have been a FIR believer you get what you pay for and you pay for cheep code, 9 chances out of 10 you get cheep code, such as the badly ported software example.

      Now as willing to move to another place, well that's another fun topic. I live in Canada, and have a computer science technology diploma. But because its a diploma and not a degree, I am not allowed to work in the states tell I have several years experience or upgrade to a degree. Even If a friend in the states wishes to hire me for his firm, legally, he can't, which is actually my case. Many countries have things like this, and some well not even recognize the diploma/degree from you country. So this can be a VERY tricky subject

    5. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me say that I install and have to support a lot of "bookware" (McGraw-Hill and others) and have for many years and a pretty good-sized university. Let me only say that it can't get much worse (maybe the stuff you wrote was good, but most of it sucks a55).

      The big problem with it is that it is written by "programmers" that only work with Director (nothing against you). Director is great, but don't write apps that have to be reliable and do heavy lifting with it. I can't think of a "bookware" (for college course texts) that isn't written Director.

      I can't imagine what it will be like if it doesn't get better... shudder...

    6. Re:Let me explain something. by azav · · Score: 1

      RIGHT! Material has to be written not just to work but also For the target audience, to be USED by the target audience.

      People think differently than you do when you are coding it.

      As an example, many people here LOVE the command line. Imagine a CAR with a command line interface.

      When creating a product it is imperative to create it with knowledge of how easily people will learn to use it.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    7. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1) I used to work writing gambling software (ethically, I knew it was going to fold). There is a rather attractive woman who lives in Marin and is rather wealthy who owns/runs a set of gambling web sites. Her dev team is in India. She's young, beautiful and rich.


      What, exactly, does the fact that the woman is young, beautiful, and/or rich have to do with anything? What, do you want to marry her or something?
    8. Re:Let me explain something. by sharkey · · Score: 1
      I used to work writing gambling software (ethically, I knew it was going to fold).

      No kidding. You should have written in the ability to raise and call, too. You can't win if all you do is fold right after getting your cards.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An easy to use program has absolutely nothing to do with the language that it is written in. I have worked with very great user-friendly (graphical) programs that were written in LISP for crying out loud. There was a 2-D scroller game written in the stuff that was completely mouse driven. There are great, easy to use programs written in almost every language out there... and they are a testament to the coders, not the language they choose.

      So don't give me your "better programs != command line" crap.

      Face it, any programmer that can't write a good (easy to use) program without having it all handed to you through Director is not a programmer. They are a crappy coder that thinks they are a programmer. They are like the people that think knowing how to add HTML tags without a GUI is programming.

      You seem to like Macs. Mac OS X is not written with Director and probably has some icky real world programming stuff thrown in for sure.

      By crappy bookware, I meant unstable, hard to install, use and impossible to support. The stuff crashes all the time or won't install correctly, if (god forbid) you want to install it to some place other than the C: drive. Its people that don't know squat about real programming that make those stupid mistakes and "bookware" is full of it...

      And most of it is written with Director.

      That's not to say that good programs can't be written with Director, but I think that you would need a REAL LIVE TRAINED PROGRAMMER for that instead of someone who is proud that they are a Director developer because that is all they know.

      My basic premise stands. Bookware written with Director generally sucks. Why?

      (1) It isn't stable and crashes often

      (2) The programmers make assumptions (ie. will only install the C: drive, for example)that are never challenged. A good (educated/trained) programmer not so tied to one development platform looks at handling inputs and outputs gracefully... for the most part, bookware developers do not.

      (3) They generally have poor interfaces and non-existent support files, because of the "It was written in Director, it should just work" of its developers.

      (4) No interface testing. The programmers' "just work" attitude means that interfaces that are counter intuitive or counter productive get passed along with basic assumptions of use. The end user is left with the headache of trying to intuit what the developer was trying to do.

      (5) When you get someone on the phone about the problems of 1, 2, 3, or 4; they have no clue what to do because "it should just work."

      ARGH!

    10. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RIGHT! Material has to be written not just to work but also For the target audience, to be USED by the target audience.

      So you're saying it is OK to write software that doesn't work (with Director) as long as it fits with the target audience.

      As far as its use, I guess coasters are in short supply among professors.

      Interesting ZEN design specs.

    11. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I live in Marin, get I get that lady's name and number? :-)

    12. Re:Let me explain something. by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Would you care to enlighten us to the kind of project and segment of the industry? The dev teams I work with are all fairly small, and the overhead of coordinating a project with an overseas subcontractor would add a lot of cost. I'm guessing your project must be damn huge for them to need so many coders? How big is your QA section?

    13. Re:Let me explain something. by Zimm · · Score: 1

      Would you care to enlighten us to the kind of project and segment of the industry? The dev teams I work with are all fairly small, and the overhead of coordinating a project with an overseas subcontractor would add a lot of cost. I'm guessing your project must be damn huge for them to need so many coders? How big is your QA section?

      The project is a shrink wrapped psychiatric analysis tool it can be run on a single desktop or as client server. We have lots of mathematical graphs and plotting and we are supporting a propreitary scripting langauage which needs a compiler along with GUI's. There are 10 of us working on it here and 8 in India. To be honest I don't know how big the QA dept is, there on a different area of the building then I am. Coordinating isn't to bad, just look at all the open source projects spread around the world that do it quite well.

    14. Re:Let me explain something. by azav · · Score: 1

      No, not at all, I am saying that you need to pay attention to the audience to make it GOOD. It is expected that it should work.

      I'm picky like that.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    15. Re:Let me explain something. by azav · · Score: 1

      I think you're taking my argument the wrong way.

      I'm not going to get into your first point about "any programmer that can't write a good(easy to use program)" there's just too much there.

      re: MAc OS X - Ya. It feels like a layer of molassas between the GUI and the tasks underneath. I'm not exactly loving it for MANY reasons that you wil be glad I am not going in to. Basically look & feel + more.

      RE: The crappy bookware. I DEFINATELY agree with you there. Pressure on the newbie programmers/scripters to pump out projects? I dunno.

      Re: A REAL LIVE TRAINED PROGRMMER. - I tried that but loathed it. All the goofy syntax for no reason tha tI could fathom - it didn't make sense. Others have similar aversions to "formal" programming. those more creative than analytical. Now don't get me wrong. I just created a callback enabled async network lingo system with pseudo threading and 4 levels of ancestry so IF oy uknow what you are doing, you can create some meaty stuff - in a language that is closet to english.

      sooo 1) It isn't stable and crashes often? What platforms? Stability is the PRIMARY requirement when releasing a new vers of Director. I dunno here since I can't see your examples.

      2) Not Director's fault. You raised the point about a "REAL LIVE PROGRAMMER". If a hack is working in C++ then you just might expect crap to oright?

      3) WOW. A hot chick just walked into the coffee shop. Mmmm. OH - Poor interfaces and non existant support files - Again, isn't this a prob with the developer using Director to create stuff?

      4) No interface testing. AGAIN the developer - BUT IF Director came with modern and robust user interface classes, this would be less of an issue. Crappy coder AND lack of support files, foundation classes.

      5) Then you have encountered an idiot. Sorry man, I feel your pain.

      in summary, most of your points are related to a lame developer, not a lame tool. But I agree on the supportin code part.
      Software should suck less. Knowing how to do this is the tough part.

      Ahhh, she's got a belly. Ack.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    16. Re:Let me explain something. by Giant+Robot · · Score: 1

      I heard a lot of these stories about offshore monkey's lack of skill. I actually worked with many (they were shipped in to do a consulting project.. very hardworking, very sloppy code). Mind you, the good ones are _really_ good, but the bad ones just suck.

      Just curious.. so you guys sent them the specs they were required to meet, but they failed to meet them. Did they actually get paid afterwards? How was their compensation structure like?

      I bet if the banana was only at the top of the tree the monkey will be forced to learn to make better code ;) win win situation!

    17. Re:Let me explain something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell did you include item number 1? Did you just want to taunt lowly slashdot nerds with the concept of a young, beautiful woman :-(

    18. Re:Let me explain something. by Ralman · · Score: 1

      The kicker is that they were full time employees of the company. There were a few good coders in the group overseas, but it seems like the ones that were put on the "least sensitive" project couldn't code a Hello World! example.

      I have no idea what the pay rate was. But, when they send three guys over to be trained to replace the work of one person (me) you know they could not have been making too much overall.

      The problem as I see it seems to be a difference in how people think. Most of the people that I find are good coders are very logical thinkers. They spend the time to research the problem, and can think outside the box. The people that can't seem to code very well, have trouble thinking about logical patterns and 'consequences'.

      By 'consequences' I am refering to the concept that if action A is done it will interact with action Z. However if action B is done it will affect action Y. I am sure some of you understand this even though I am being very loose in my description.

      So in the end, it seems like the cultural differences and life experiences between coders has a major impact on how they code. Yes the programers in India might have degrees up the wazoo, but do the understand what they are doing. Being book smart is one thing, being able to understand and use the techonology is another.

    19. Re:Let me explain something. by Giant+Robot · · Score: 1
      I have no idea what the pay rate was. But, when they send three guys over to be trained to replace the work of one person (me) you know they could not have been making too much overall.

      The problem as I see it seems to be a difference in how people think. Most of the people that I find are good coders are very logical thinkers. They spend the time to research the problem, and can think outside the box. The people that can't seem to code very well, have trouble thinking about logical patterns and 'consequences'.

      By 'consequences' I am refering to the concept that if action A is done it will interact with action Z. However if action B is done it will affect action Y. I am sure some of you understand this even though I am being very loose in my description.

      I understand exactly what you mean. I noticed the same pattern in good programmers myself.

      I feel for you man. Being replaced by new overseas monkeys really suck. On thing they really do can't do is communicate with management effectively.

      One thing I learned is we gotta find something we can do that they can't do that well. Maybe consulting, or business software design is something is an example of that. I mean, someone has to write the specs (this is where logical thinking is really important). For myself, I went back to school to study financial engineering and try to stay away from monkey-type coding jobs.

      good luck to us all!

  68. extra precaution by Ruis · · Score: 1

    They just want to make sure they don't hire any SCO employees. Not hiring americans is just their way of making sure none of them get through.

  69. Iam a Red Indian, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...i want you out of my country, and I want my bison back.

    Stop crying, or acting racist, there are plenty of good reasons why you shouldnt be cribbing...If you like working for us $150 a month, I've got a job for you in India... as a linux sys administrator/DBA/Perl programmer/C++ (all skills required)...

    whats with these India stories? India is just doing what others have been doing till date, ireland is an example...Capitalism goes around the world, seeking low price points to use as advantages in manufacturing, and the surplus comes back to the US, as profits, maybe the last time you worked you should have had a greater say in the company, or a greater stake in its profits... get the law makers to pass a bill that prohibits companies from making use of these advantages, and lets see how many comapnies close shop and move out...

  70. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you know what you feel when you couldnt get a work visa in the states.

    1. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. How are you enjoying your janitorial job at the local library?

  71. A bit of perspective... by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This writeup is a distortion of the article. For the most part it's about how this guy lost his job because of outsourcing, and how he's joined an anti-H1-B group. At the end there's a throwaway comment about how he tried to get a job in India and "someone" told him not to bother. It's not like there's extensive, or any, suport for the claim that it is impossible to work overseas in India.

    It's not like I'm shocked that there's now a heated debate about Indian labor law among the various IANAIndianLaborLs here -- that's why we're here, right? -- but you may want to wait for someone in possession of even a single real fact to come along before drawing a conclusion.

    1. Re:A bit of perspective... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Your missing the point. Indian and other 3rd world programers come to /. and post about how they are able to do what they do for cheap because they live in the 3rd world. Wonderfull!

      The people who aren't jumping ship on IT in the states aren't the jerkoffs who got a ComSci degree because there was money in it. They've been doing it since they were kids, it's what they love. And they would gladly live anyplace if it let them keep doing what they love.

      Well guess what, they can't do it! They can't program again even if they were to move across the globe to do it!

      This is bad enough, but one would expect the market to eventualy re-equalize, as more tech service or other IT jobs requireing local workers opened up from the "growth" in the economy. But this won't happen, because H1-B's are being given out like candy to anyone who's willing to be treated like a slave by an American company, gutting what's left of the domestic market.

      This isn't about American's not being payed "enough" it's about people who are good at what they do, and passionate about it, being put out to pasture for no GOOD reason.

      By GOOD reason I mean from a national perspective. Outsourcing is bad enough, but the market will eventually change and adapt, and people will find jobs in kinda-related fields again. But flooding with H1Bs extends the problem hugely! A company can abuse the hell out of an H1-B, by threatening him to go home to mother russia (or what ever). These people are basicaly slaves, and in addition to their poor treatment, they are taking the jobs that would normally be comming available in a normal economy.

      So since the only way for an American programmer to keep doing what he was BORN to do is to move to a country where there is a lower cost of living, and therefor jobs. And that option is taken away from him, by un-equal labor laws in these countries.

      THAT IS WHY WERE PISSED!

    2. Re:A bit of perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want more reasons to hate H1-B?

    3. Re:A bit of perspective... by Otter · · Score: 1
      Yes, of course that's the point!!!

      What is /not/ the point is an entirely baseless argument about whether it's possible for foreigners to work in India. It's Michael and the submitter who completely missed the real issue.

    4. Re:A bit of perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The people who aren't jumping ship on IT in the states aren't the jerkoffs who got a ComSci degree because there was money in it. They've been doing it since they were kids, it's what they love. And they would gladly live anyplace if it let them keep doing what they love.

      The entire time that I was reading this article and when I read your hot little two pennies worth, I kept thinking to myself "What utter Bullcrap!"

      Move to the midwest and get a 40-80K job coding for some insurance agency or university. There are tons of jobs that just go begging at Universities right now. The midwest is hurting for labor, but everyone is heading for the "big money" on the coast. Seriously. Go look!

      Get a list of colleges (tons available online) by state and start working through the list while sticking to the midwest (and, NO, I don't mean Chicago, St. Louis or any other "big city.). Look for pages with the headings "Employment," "Job Opportunities" or "Human Resources." Look in their IT sections.

      I guarantee that you will find TONS of open positions that are stable and won't be shipped overseas (or to Outer Space Aliens). There are plenty to go around. Seriously... tons of these go begging... for lack of applicants.

      Sure, you won't make a lot of money, there are no stock options, AND the code you write won't win any industry awards (you might even have to code on a Mainframe...), but it is work in a field that you "love" and the price of living in the midwest (look at the schools in small towns) is about 1/3 to 1/4 of living on either coast.

      I have a friend who got offered two jobs recently. One with a small midwest firm in a small town pulling down $60000 a year and with guarantees that he could work there until he retired if he wanted. The other was based out of San Francisco earning $100000 after bonuses.

      He went with the SF gig and is never home in his TINY apartment and is looking at getting a job as a bookseller in Utah or Nebraska just to cut down on the stress (problems with job worries and ulcers).

      I guarantee he could have lived like a king on that $60K job. But it was boring.

      So... simple solution. Follow it... enjoy life.

      Even if you want to start a startup or move your company. Move to the midwest (Tell em Taco)! It's F'ing cheap to live here. And better yet, most midwest states are offering major deals to move tech to the heartland and stop the braindrain of its people (moving West and East). Ohio, Illinois and Indiana have a number of "incumbation programs" in the works and there are definite tax and labor incentives.

      Go (mid)West, young man! Your problems would be over.

  72. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by RussHart · · Score: 1

    The case isn't that NO Americans (or British/European/Whatever) can't get jobs in India, it is just that they have EXACTLY the same basis for their employement/immigration laws, in that people will only be granted visas for jobs that no other people in the country can do. This is what happened in the US in the 90's - people filling the lower level tech jobs for which there was not enough native US workers to fill.

    I know a few people happily working in India and have had no problems re: visas, but all of these people are working in management positions of tech firms.

    It is simply likly that this person was refused a visa as he was applying for a low-ish coding jobl, for which Indians can easily fill natively.

  73. Meanwhile in other H1B news by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    A Study (instead of innuendo) finds that: "in 2001, the latest data available, H-1B workers with bachelor's degrees were paid more, on average, than U.S. citizens with bachelor's degrees. It would seem, then, that H-1B competition was actually putting upward pressure on wages."

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Meanwhile in other H1B news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crap study. Yes, an H1B visa holder who was brought in for a relatively specialized technical position, tends to make more than your average U.S. worker with a bachelor degree. Because that "average" contains all the ones with Bachelor of Art degrees who couldn't find any job related to their English degree, or Art Studies, or the like, and they're flipping burgers and inquring as to your preferences in the fries area.

      Compare like to like, and the results will be a hell of a lot more revealing.

    2. Re:Meanwhile in other H1B news by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      If you knew anything about economics, you would know that that is impossible for an increase in supply to increase prices. It's like a study discovering the existence of a square circle. All it proves is that the study is either flawed, or designed to discover exactly what it did. The laws of economics are not "innuendo" as you put it.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  74. Re:would like to add by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    from that website :
    These are the requirements for an Employment Visa

    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  75. Mismodded humour by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But if it were the other way around, and Indian people coming to this country were suddenly forbidden to work here, imagine the uproar that would cause among Slashdotters!

    I'm imagining it ....

    business as usual ...

    utter silence ensues .....


    Heck, I'm on an EU passport, and *I* don't have the right to work in the USA. This is perfectly normal practice worldwide - I'm not saying it's right, just commonplace.


    So why does this bit of humour get a + insightfull moderation?

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  76. that is the problem of free trade by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you can move jobs here or there, but the work force cannot follow.

    perhaps we need a redefinition of free trade as a condition in which you can put lots of people out of work in one location and then not allow those people to move to where the jobs are so that we can destroy the middle class.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  77. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by SpacePunk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    the last thing we need in America are for Indians coming in and taking quality jobs also.

  78. And this is intresting how? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Most countries don't just let people move there to work without lengthy immigration procedures. Certainly not the good 'ole USA. Perhaps if Americans didn't work so hard to keep foreigners out this would be noteworthy, but then we probably wouldn't have an outsourcing 'problem' anyway.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  79. WTF, you guys dont get it... by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    About 40 posts so far, and not one person has understood the problem.

    Being denied a work visa and being denied work because of being an American are 2 different things.

    Last time I checked, America is still employing H1B visa workers... Maybe America should cancel all those H1B/A work visas. Seems only fair.

  80. Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have no sense of humor, or just don't get it.

  81. No true by pubjames · · Score: 1


    A simple web search will show that you can get a working visa for India:

    Employment Visa are initially issued for one year stay subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. This can be extended by Foreigners Regional Registration Office in India, if the job contract continues. Spouses and children will get coterminus Visa.

    Looks like just about anywhere else in the world.

  82. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So you want to take away the existing Workers visa's? That sounds like a raw deal to me. The US is an Empire. If we want people to follow our lead we need to have foreigners learning and working in the US. This helps spread our influence throught the globe. Every succesful Empire has done this.

  83. Why work in Banaglore? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Look how bad the working conditions are there!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Why work in Banaglore? by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      I followed your "work conditions" link, then wandered over to the job postings. There are 12 open positions in India, 2 in Japan, and none in Europe, the US, or Canada.

      Interesting.

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    2. Re:Why work in Banaglore? by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

      It is not unusual for Indian companies not to advertise on their websites. Bulk of thier recruitment is done from college campuses where they hire students fresh out of college. For example, a company like Infosys will approximately hire around 2000 people per year from campuses.

    3. Re:Why work in Banaglore? by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      I think you misread my comment. Infosys India *is* the only regional office doing any recruiting. :)

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

  84. Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by SilentSage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This situation did not come about until the institution of the H1-B and L-1 visa program. This program should be scrapped for the following reasons. 1.) Labor Shortage: The stated purpose of these programs was to fill a temporary shortage of american tech talent obviously this is no longer a shortage of American geeks to fill these jobs. 2.) Anti-Competitive: The way the H-1/L-1 visas are written the sponsored geek is can only be employed by the sponsoring corporation. If he/she is forbidden by law seek other employment employers do not have to compete for talented labor or worry about retention once these guys have been trained. This creates a type of indentured servitude and an artificially depreciated labor market. 3.) Lack Of Parity: There are no similar programs in the countries who are the major sources of imported labor. We should not open American labor markets while foriegn labor markets are protected. 4.) Tax Drain: The maximum time an H1/L1 visa holder can work in the US is 6 years. They have been assured by the Bush administration that they will still recieve Social Security benefits even though the current law says you must contribute for 10 years to be eligible.

    1. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by inteller · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      i totally agree, even though my wife is where she is because of H1B. We needed it THEN, we dont need it NOW. Get rid of it! ESPECIALLY L1s. The L stands for LEECH cause all fucking L1s do is glean knowledge and go running back to their country WITH OUR JOBS!

    2. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      1. Labor Shortage. There still is a labor shortage. Among all those weenies who pour out of schools with certificates in HTML and Java it's still hard to find people who are actually intelligent or have talent.
      2. If he/she is forbidden by law seek other employment.... They are a highly mobile. There really isn't any difficulty switching jobs if you can convince the new employer to pay the $6000 for a new visa application. This is peanuts compared to salary.
      3. Tax Drain. Eh? Where do you get this bullshit? There is a net flow of tax from H1-B workers.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by SilentSage · · Score: 1

      1.) A lot of very qualified geeks have been displaced by much lesser qualified H1/L1 replacements. Hence the term "knowledge transfer" used by companies as a euphemism for the 3 week extensions laid off geeks are getting to TRAIN cheap foriegn replacements. Also you obviosly have not had to deal with the very shitty offshore scripted tech support from companies like Dell just to get a replacement for a fualty part. 2.) Read the Law They are not mobile at all. They BY LAW can only work for the company sponsoring their visa. 3.) There is negative flow of tax from H1/L1 workers because they are paid so much less than their replaced counterparts. Usually less than half a salary translates to less than half of the tax revenue on top of the fact that we will pay them social security benefits. An as for the supporting article for my Social Security article it may be found at: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/xml/un comp/articleshow?msid=23736

    4. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) Labor Shortage: The stated purpose of these programs was to fill a temporary shortage of american tech talent obviously this is no longer a shortage of American geeks to fill these jobs.

      The program has been there for years. they simply increased the number because corporations asked for it. Who makes decisions? the congress. Who asks the congress? Americans.

      3.) Lack Of Parity: There are no similar programs in the countries who are the major sources of imported labor

      You obviously are ignorant and never worked outside the US. There are MANY programs in many countries. On the top of my head, I can think of the NAFTA agreement between US, Canada and Mexico (soon to be expanded to some south america countries). You can work in Japan, most countries in Europe, etc.

      4.) They have been assured by the Bush administration that they will still recieve Social Security

      I am on H1B and I can assure you that I will NEVER receive a single penny of unemployment NOR social security as you can't even stay in the US after your visa period. Explain me how I will receive money because I'm very interested to received what I contribued to....

    5. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      They BY LAW can only work for the company sponsoring their visa

      And BY LAW they can get themselves sponsored by a new company when they want a new job. And they do.

      H1B workers do not get paid half. This is utter bullshit. BY LAW they must be paid a fair market rate. I hire H1B workers myself and have man H1B coleagues. Some of the highest paid people in my own company used to be H1B workers until they got Green Cards. It is illegal to underpay H1B workers. The salaries are part of the H1B application and the salaries paid to every single H1B worker are made available publicly and online for anyone to check.

      You sound like some loser who couldn't get a job making stuff up to justify your moaning.

      Oh, and offshore shitty scripted tech support is no worse than US shitty scripted tech support but costs me less as a customer and the people you deal with aren't such arrogant and ignorant assholes (These jobs are often taken by well educated people in India.). Sounds great to me.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    6. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by who+what+why · · Score: 1

      Whatever. The only difference betweeen L1 and H1 is that L1 is for people who already work for the company overseas and want a visa to work for the same company in the US. H1 is for people who are not currently employed by the company.

      All these comments about it being "only fair" to totally drop H1Bs are racist and stupid. The people on H1B visas are generally getting a pretty shitty dea; themselves. What's needed is real visa reform, with labor protections built in. If you want to blame somebody for outsourcing your job, blame the fat-cat who actually did it, not the $1/hour schmuck in India.

    7. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. Why do you think IT geeks are the only people getting H1Bs? You have to be highly bloody qualified to get a H1B visa and not just be yet another computer weenie with an MSCE...

    8. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by SilentSage · · Score: 1

      I find it unfortunate that you seem so angry and defensive on this issue. Your first point has a certain amount of merit to it, although I do not know how hard it is to get responsored. From here you denigrate into some illogical emotional diatribe. You can tell yourself that it is illegal to underpay H1/L1 workers if you would like and you might actually be in the tiny minority who actually does not underpay these workers. But they are for the most part grossly underpaid when comapred to the American workers they replace. This can easily be established from a variety of sources. Not to mention the "workers" actually working in offshore shops. They are making around $200/month (again the folks at Dell are an example here) to fill the call center jobs which were going for 25K/35K in this country. This is sweatshop labor brought to you by voice over IP. I can source any point above upon request. By the way just because they are sweatshop level employees does not mean they cant be ignorant assholes as well. By the angry reaction to what seem to me to be very rational objections to a program (you have yet to provide anything but angry anectdotal ranting and childish name calling as evidence to support your position). My facts of my argument are still thus the H1/L1 program replaces highly paid very qualified geeks with cheaper and usually less qualified labor. This economy has lost 3 million jobs and most of their accompanying tax revenue. There are to date 1 million H1/L1 visas issued with over 200,000 more issued each year. While SOME H1/L1 workers may be very talented it does not change this fact. My well paying IT job is secure probably beacuse it is government but many, many American jobs are being lost to this program.

    9. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by SilentSage · · Score: 1

      No you dont you just have to have someone sponsor you who says you fill a critical need. Burger King could hire H1/L1 workers if they wanted to. By the way IT people are not the only ones using this program many other fields are taking adavntage of this program as well to get educated labor at sweatshop prices.

    10. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by SilentSage · · Score: 1

      1.) You are entirely right this is the fault of the American Government but 90% of the public working outside of IT does not know what H1B is let alone the negative impact is has had on the american economy. 2.) NAFTA is another example of the exporting of american jobs to pennies on the dollar competition hurting our economy. Neither India or China have such a program and yet profit immensely by it in the way of cash and expertise sent back home. 3.) The US Trade representative says you will indeed see that money. When the time comes to collect I am sure you will find out how to collect.

    11. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by Sanction · · Score: 1

      Just like all those people that BY LAW will get paid overtime. Wait, they don't. If you own enough politicians, the law is irrelevant, especially one so poorly defined and badly enforced.

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    12. Re:Terminate the H1/L1 visa program by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      Here is an example sweatshop. This is not sweatshop labor. Even the Dell technical support jobs are highly prized jobs with employees well treated, quite different from actual sweatshop jobs that exist in other industries in India. Additionally, the Dell technical support workers are in many cases much more highly qualified than TS workers in the US who are frequently minimum wage workers and from my own personal experience are ignorant morons. The only think that is lacking with Indian TS workers is that they are less familiar with American culture so need a crash course in it (!) to be able to communicate fluently with Americans.

      I hire with H1B workers and hang out with H1B workers from India in the large Indian community in Fremont, CA. This is not a community of underpaid workers. This is a highly affluent part of our society. Oh, and my personal experience is that every Indian worker is way more intelligent than the average American worker.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  85. I wonder why everybody... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

    Is bitching the Indian Government...

    They should focus more towards those that are handing out these jobs to India...

    The only thing those employers are interested in is maximalization of profit, even their families are less important...

  86. Maybe not India, but other countries... by afreniere · · Score: 1
    I've often thought of moving to someplace cheap, like central europe, to start working for an American company there, or even start my own. My costs would be much lower (cost of living in, say, Hungary is 5-10% what it is where I live now, Boston), but I would be an american-born programmer so that could give me an edge over foreign programmers, at least in the language-barrier department. Plus it would be a blast to live somewhere abroad for a while. But first I have to eliminate my US-super-sized fixed costs... that's the challenge. There are many countries in central and eastern europe that don't really enforce their work visa laws, because they are glad to have foreigners there spending foreign cash. This has several advantages, because it helps the local economy and tends to equalize the differences between these countries and the more developed West. Ultimately this could make those countries less appealing for outsourcing - once their economy starts to equalize a little bit, cost of living (and standard of living due to cheaper imports) will go up. But also it could help a recovery in the US tech sector, because what it needs is cheap labor to jump-start it right now.

    Mass exodus to Hungary!

    -Ansel.

    --
    G=C800:5
  87. Re:No sandniggers need apply either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't know a single American who wouldn't gladly give his life to rid the world of raghead terrorists. Bring 'em on.

    There's plenty of us "ragheads" in the EU. Why don't you pick on someone your own size for once? In other words, bring it on...

  88. I want to know why... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...he isn't allowed to work in India. The article leaves that as the last line with no explanation. Sounds a little too convenient for me. I would guess this is a weird pairing of anti-equal opportunity employment folks and people who would NOW turn to the government for assistance in getting the system to work for them. Chances are that a lot of people in this boat would have been completely opposed to government intervention before.

    1. Re:I want to know why... by satyap · · Score: 1

      http://www.imahal.com/education/india/visa/list.ht m He can get a visa. That last line should be covered under "incitement to riot" laws. It's pure FUD.

  89. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Choobius+Gothicus · · Score: 1
  90. Was on a Business trip to Chicago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Coming from Toronto (before post 9/11 stupidity became all the rage) with my uncle. At the boarder he was asked what we were going to Chicago for, "to teach a course" he politly replied.

    The boarder guard looking insulted and spat back, "What do YOU have to teach Americans???"

    Even though he had all his documentation, (it was an American company that requested his visit/expertise), we were promptly turned back to our country. I have never even considered going to the States again.

    Too bad too, I've met plenty of nice Yanks when they vacation up here...

    1. Re:Was on a Business trip to Chicago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the Canadians are the same. Canadian immigration, at least for Quebec have very Gestapo like attitudes and tend to be anti-American. As an American you would indeed encounter exactly the same scenario.

      Unlike all the Canadians who seem to want to live in America due to (I assume) warmer temperatures and a greater variety of jobs, I would actually like to live for a while in Quebec. I found it to be more or less impossible. The only way would be to marry a Canadian girl.

  91. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by deadmongrel · · Score: 1

    we should have stopped globalization in the first place. Its globalization is not bad but it worth is not much when compared to the problem it makes.

  92. Hmm.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Every day Soong makes the rounds of employment agencies. When he is lucky he gets a temporary job answering phones or testing video games, nothing that ever pays more than $10 an hour. Most days he doesn't work. "I've been able to pay my bills at the end of the month," he said in early June, "although this month may be a little tough." Two weeks later, Soong canceled his cell phone and e-mail accounts.

    I haven't found it to be nearly so bad out there. Especially considering this guy is willing to hop about the country to work. There are jobs there, the IT unemployment rate is 4%, while the national rate is 5%. Actually better off than the rest.

    I guess he's looking for a salary noone wants to pay.

    Even if he couldn't find an IT job, then go find another job - do something else.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Hmm.. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what I though. From what he says, this guy is highly skilled, and has 8 years of experience with software development. He's most likely good with numbers, so even if he can't get a software job, he could always look to changing career to accountancy. Not the most exciting career for everyone, but it pays the bills (and then some).

      What is he doing wrong? Does he just have bad interview technique? Sure, the tech industry is in decline, but proper skilled professionals who are willing to relocate shouldn't have a problem.

  93. Re:Outsource or Insource? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That post is from a book review:
    http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:vtBJ vVkKaMQJ: bookworms.org/aws.cgi/mode_books/search_Outsource% 2520Services+%22Internet+infrastructure+and+its+ab ility+to+perform+flawlessly%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie =UTF-8

  94. Some at SEI has a sense of humor... by anactofgod · · Score: 1
    and has seen "Office Space".

    Team Process Software? TPS"?

    It's too contrived of a name for it to be a mere coincidence.

    ...anactofgod...

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
  95. live by the sword by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    I suppose that the story is not really surprising, so much as sad. Americans seem to cry foul only when things finally happen to them, like getting laid off. We were content to benefit from tapping the world's intellectual resources and leaving others behind -- now it's a taste of our own medicine, at the hands of those who can do it cheaper/faster, with no dental plan required.

    It's time to realize that the market has no qualms about putting YOU out of work -- a capitalistic/competitive system (which is very successful at what it does) can cause very great instability in people's lives.

    Some people mock the social employment systems in Europe, where you can't fire government/private workers without huge amounts of effort. They don't advance as fast (economically), which is why they lagged behind the IT boom. But also, people there don't have to change jobs every 6 months.

    In 2 years, take a look at India again, and let's see where their jobs have gone. China? Estonia? Every one gets their turn in this game.

    1. Re:live by the sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans seem to cry foul only when things finally happen to them, like getting laid off. We were content to benefit from tapping the world's intellectual resources and leaving others behind -- now it's a taste of our own medicine, at the hands of those who can do it cheaper/faster, with no dental plan required.

      Plenty of us have been crying foul for a long, long time. You just weren't listening.

  96. Hrm... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Read the article more carefully. The guy tried to get a job with Tata Consulting, an Indian-owned firm operating in the USA that places staff at USA-based clients. They apparently refused to hire him for this work in the USA because they do not hire Americans.

    I very much doubt this is legal.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hrm... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Would make a great case for racial discrimination.

    2. Re:Hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians are Caucasian too

    3. Re:Hrm... by xmutex · · Score: 1

      err, maybe, if American was a race, but it's not, so no, it wouldn't.

      --

      jack's bicycle is music to my ears
    4. Re:Hrm... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhh...US EOE laws forbid discrimination on the basis of national origin. So it would be illegal discrimination here.

    5. Re:Hrm... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      You all miss the point, prove it! It is nearly impossible for a caucasian male in this country to sue anyone under EOE. The federal courts have ruled that it is perfectly acceptable to count race as a factor when hiring if it's to increase minority hiring. You would have to have a US company on camera or in writing stating that the sole reason you weren't hired is because your a US citizen. And nobody's that stupid.

    6. Re:Hrm... by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      but then couldn't it be shown that the hiring is not being done to increase the minority hiring, but to increase the hiring of foreign workers?

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    7. Re:Hrm... by satyap · · Score: 1

      So then why do people make such a big deal about H1B? That's national-origin-based, too.

    8. Re:Hrm... by stew-a-cide · · Score: 1

      IIRC in Canada at least it is ILLEGAL for a company operatng in Canada to follow any but Canadian laws (i.e. the foreign parent can't make the Canadian subsidiary do something because the parent's government passed some law or issued some directive).

      I beleive this came about because of some dispute with the US, where the US told its companies to do something or other and Canada saw this as a threat to its sovregnity.

      Anyone remember the exact circumstance?

    9. Re:Hrm... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      I think this applies more to racial origin and not current citizenship status.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    10. Re:Hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ol' Cuba insanity

  97. It isn't true. by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative


    You can get a working visa for India. I have a friend that works there. It's just like anywhere else in the world in that respect.

    I expect this guy just got a tourist visa and turned up in India expecting to get employed, and the person told him he couldn't legally employ him, which would be true because he had the wrong type of visa.

    Is there anywhere in the world where you can just turn up without a working visa and legally work? Not that I know.

    I wish the Slashdot editors would just spend five minutes googling to check the validity of this type of thing before posting.

    1. Re:It isn't true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you, this is India. Wave a few Rupees at the local law and all your problems dissapear. Think I jest? I think not. I spent some time in India and had to obtain a residency permit. They kept pushing me further and further back in the line. This wasn't because they where being racist, though there are many who are at least at a mild level, it was because I was a white guy and white guys have the money to pay bigger bribes right? Corruption is part of the system there, if you can get a job with Tata on a contract basis- you can work there and not bother with the law.

  98. Unionize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't software developers unionize? It worked to secure blue collar workers their jobs, why not for white collar workers?

    1. Re:Unionize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because ultimatly, companies could move ALL jobs to other countries. Stike? Ok. you're fired.

  99. Why would anyone want to move to India??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 Billion people, and at some point in their lives 1/2 of them will use the street as a bathroom.

  100. Let us get the facts straight. by jpu8086 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disclaimers: I was born in India. However, my family moved to USA since I was 14. I consider myself American.

    Fact #1: Americans (and others) can work in India
    Fact #2: Lots of Americans (and others) do work in India
    Fact #3: A Visitors visa is different from a Work visa (just like USA)
    Fact #4: If you travel on visitors visa, you cannot change it to work visa unless you leave the country first. Basically you cannot transfer visas without changing your port of entry (guess what? just like the good ol' USA)
    Fact #5: This guy traveled to India on a work visa and applied for a job
    Fact #6: Following fact #4, he got denied a visa.

    BTW, all these facts are responses to USA's visa policies. India has a repuation for treating citizen of outher countries the same way other countries treats it's citizens. For example, USA charges a fee for each applicant of a visa (may it be student, work or travel) to people from India. Guess what India does? They charge a fee to Americans who want a visa to India too. Nepal doesn't charge a fee for Indian citizens. So, India doesn't charge a fee to Nepalese citizens. So, that is it guys: tit-for-tat.

    However, moving tech jobs offshore is bad, and so are H1B visas in todays economy. They were good during the boom days when we couldn't hire enough people.

    --
    now supporting:
    cmdrTaco for president '04
    michael for oval office intern summer '05
    1. Re:Let us get the facts straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try to change the subject using facts and logic. We see right through that! These fucking Indians are out to destroy us hard working Americans. They want to rape our women, pillage our PowerMacs and marry our daughters without giving us the usual stipend. How onerous!

    2. Re:Let us get the facts straight. by Groovus · · Score: 1

      "Fact #3: A Visitors visa is different from a Work visa (just like USA)
      Fact #4: If you travel on visitors visa, you cannot change it to work visa unless you leave the country first. Basically you cannot transfer visas without changing your port of entry (guess what? just like the good ol' USA)
      Fact #5: This guy traveled to India on a work visa and applied for a job
      Fact #6: Following fact #4, he got denied a visa."

      Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how "Fact #6" follows from "Fact #4"

      If what you say in "Fact #5" is true, that he traveled to India on a work visa, then it seems as far as visas go he had the right one according to "Fact 3" - the one that would allow him to work in India. Care to get your "Facts" straight?

      What in the above serves as justification for him being denied work in India?

    3. Re:Let us get the facts straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he meant to write

      Fact #5: This guy traveled to India on a VISITOR'S visa and applied for a job

    4. Re:Let us get the facts straight. by jpu8086 · · Score: 1

      Big OOOOPS.

      You are correct.

      --
      now supporting:
      cmdrTaco for president '04
      michael for oval office intern summer '05
  101. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by The+Baron+Dev · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The last thing we need in America is an increase in whining from the unmotivated. Follow the laws of supply and demand and the cream will rise to the top.

  102. This is such BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because a company wants to pay less, they send their work overseas. Great! Just what the economy needs!

    Companies like this make me fucking sick.

  103. awww... by EpokhusMinimalist · · Score: 1

    Poor guy, he will just have to take another job in the US and settle for clean drinking water and a high standard of living...

  104. What? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Then how do you describe discrimination?

    You're the reason the world sucks. "Accept it, that's just the way it is." No wonder Ireland is like a 3rd world country. Pathetic alcoholics, have a guiness for breakfast when you're 9, it won't cause any problems.

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello little racist. Irish incomes match those in the US. 18 is the legal age for purchasing alcohol.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irish incomes don't match those in the US.

  105. Sensationalist by RudeyKewl · · Score: 1

    My cousin, a British citizen, is currently working in India. So I know for a fact that the Indian government has proper laws in place to have employees of foreign origin. Contract or otherwise.
    Having said that, I think the article is sensationalist to say "Indian Officials". What is probably true is that the Indian consulting co.s are refusing to hire Americans, and are interview Americans just to comply to EOE.

  106. Re:No sandniggers need apply either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's plenty of us "ragheads" in the EU. Why don't you pick on someone your own size for once?

    Like who? Germany? Japan? Russia?

    Been there. Done that. Hell, there's practically no one our own size LEFT, 'cept China and India, and they're way too smart for that shit.

    I'm just waiting for Indonesia to get too big for its britches. Old Glory flying over Jakarta. Mmm. What a beautiful day that will be.

    In other words, bring it on...

    Huh. Typical idiot. You're confused about the proper use of the "bring it on" phrase. When faced with a threat, the proper response is "bring it on," meaning that you are ready and eager to respond to action against you.

    It's utterly meaningless for an EUian to say "bring it on," because nobody's threatened you with anything. Why? Because you guys just don't matter any more. The world has moved on. EU doesn't stand for anything. Everything from Lisbon to Athens is just one bland smear of failed socialism and ineffectual liberalism. No industry, no culture, no innovation, no might.

    EU: Yawn.

  107. You cannot work here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds about what I sign away every time I
    enter the US (mostly to partake in ANSI J3
    meetings - the Fortran Standardization
    Committee) - my right to go look for
    *paid* work (as opposed to voluntary labor
    in an ANSI committee).

    Toon Moene (GNU Fortran maintainer).

  108. Jobs will move around by leeet · · Score: 1

    That's the way the economy works. In 10 years india will be a super power and jobs will move to another country. What will happen of USA, India and Europe is yet to be seen.

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  109. Today India, tomorrow somewhere else... by KJACK98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the real issue is the greed of corporations, and a global marketplace that is getting more and more competitive. If you've been to India, you'll realize, that they are now struggling with increasing salaries; eventually the cost savings won't be there, so these corporations will be moving on. Tomorrow you will be bashing Chinese or Romanians. The best we in North American can hope for is to create new markets, and technology. The world our parents grew up in is no more, now is a world of eternal vigilance to stay one step ahead of other countries. If workers in China, because of low salaries can outperform us in the cost of developing products, then we should be saying is it possible to develop machinery or automation technology to keep it as competitive, thus the skills and money get transferred instead to developing the machinery.

  110. The story is wrong by pubjames · · Score: 1

    But if Americans can't work in India, then let's kick the damn H1B's out of this country.

    You can get a working visa for India. The guy in the story must have asked the wrong person or something.

  111. Free Trade/Comparative Advantage - LEARN IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you lost your job to an Indian... don't blame them for it. They work cheaper and are as qualified as you. Now it is time for you to take up some more education while you have some free time and then try to land a job that will pay 100x what your Indian friend is making. Standard of living in India is under $100 a month I believe (take into consideration that India is also much bigger than America). I would recommend reading "The Choice" by Robert Russel.

  112. Why would you want to get work from India? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    This doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

    The reason why companies are going elsewhere is cost of development. They think, "Why pay a programmer $45,000 a year when we can pay someone from India $12 an hour?" (or whatever the going rate is)

    If people in India can't even find decent jobs and need to find work from American companies where they will get paid peanuts, what makes Americans think they'll get lucky and find a good paying job there?

    You'll get paid as much, if not LESS, than what the Indian residents could get. At that rate you might as well take a paycut and go work IN-HOUSE for the company who's willing to pay less for someone from India.

    Employment increases, companies won't have to shell out as much (greedy asses), and everyone's happy! Right?

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Why would you want to get work from India? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      At that rate you might as well take a paycut and go work IN-HOUSE for the company who's willing to pay less for someone from India.

      problem is that most companies aren't willing to do that anymore. once they've decided to go the outsourcing route, your job has already been cut in their minds. once you and your team get the word, there's no re-negotiating about the deal. contracts have already been signed.

  113. It's so fucking tiresome by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    listening to Americans bitch and moan about how unfairly they are treated.

    Have you any idea what your foreign policies are like? Have you any idea why and how indians are allowed to 'take your jobs'?

    Your governments mantra is: Free trade and free exchange of labour! And with a whisper they add (As long as it benefits US corporations)

    Here's a newsflash for you. What benefits American corporations benefits the American government, but not necessarily the general US populace.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      No offense, you kind of contradicted yourself there.

      Here's a newsflash for you. What benefits American corporations benefits the American government, but not necessarily the general US populace.

      Right after saying:

      Have you any idea what your foreign policies are like? Have you any idea why and how indians are allowed to 'take your jobs'? Your governments mantra is: Free trade and free exchange of labour! And with a whisper they add (As long as it benefits US corporations)

      The American people do not pick and choose their foreign policies. As much as we'd like to think we do, we don't control what the govt. does.

      Most of the people complaining in here are average joes like you and I who have absolutely no say whatsoever in the way things are.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    2. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by CausticWindow · · Score: 1
      The American people do not pick and choose their foreign policies. As much as we'd like to think we do, we don't control what the govt. does. Most of the people complaining in here are average joes like you and I who have absolutely no say whatsoever in the way things are.

      Wether you have any power, real or illusionary is irrelevant. Most of you still support your government what ever they do. Then again most of you doesn't even vote, so your point isn't entirely invalid.

      Oh no, that's right. You don't support your government. You support your country. And your country is some warm fuzzy feeling in your hearts that make you cry on 11/9 or something like that. Fuck off.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    3. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      hahahaha, well you're an ansty young fellow, aren't you?

      Not one thing you said was even remotely relevant to "bitching americans" aka people being concerned about losing their IT jobs.

      If you're talking about americans who are concerned about 9/11, it's pretty much off topic.

      Do you even know what you're angry at? Pick one. Is it american people who care for their jobs or the way our govt. deals with foreign policy?

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    4. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Who says I'm angry.

      I'm just trying to treat you with the disrespect you deserve.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    5. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now now now,

      let's not assume that people here really care for the reality. As far as they are concerned they are getting the short end of the stick, even though they have no idea how hard it is to get an H-1B Visa in the US (I know, I was once young and dumb enough to try).

      Forget about it, as long as it is THEM they will whine whine whine.

    6. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, cunt.

      - George Fucking Washington

    7. Re:It's so fucking tiresome by 0111+1110 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have you ever been here? You don't know what you're talking about. It's amazing how often non-Americans think they know everything about us because they watch some of our TV or movies. I hate to break it to you folks, but that stuff bears no resemblance to reality. You are displaying the same kind of gullibility and ignorance that is so often attributed to Americans.

      Most of us don't cry about 9/11. But it does give a lot of us a warm fuzzy feeling when we take revenge on an Arab country. It's a nice deterrent. If everytime we get nailed by some cowardly terrorist hiding in shadows and sneaking around, we take possesion of one additional Arab country, it might make them think twice. After all, they could never beat us in any kind of traditional battle.

      The fact is that Americans are no different from people in many other parts of the world, certainly including most of Europe and Asia. People are basically people. What usually causes our wars is idiots like you and people from many other countries who think that some imaginary line on a map makes human beings fundamentally different.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  114. As an Indian ... by bronxist · · Score: 2

    I sympathize with the Americans that lost their jobs and wish that India would freely open its borders to people who want to work there. That's more likely to benefit people from Bangladesh and Nepal, than the U.S., but you should all be welcome to live and work where you choose.

    Unfortunately, for the forseeable future, three trends will continue in the U.S. (and Europe)
    a) Emigration of jobs
    b) Competition with immigrants for remaining jobs.
    c) Lower pay scales and standards of living

    Banning or allowing immigration will only change the emphasis between trends.

    1. Re:As an Indian ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true curry munching H1-B job theif.

    2. Re:As an Indian ... by bronxist · · Score: 1

      You mean "thief", pilgrim?

    3. Re:As an Indian ... by fault0 · · Score: 1

      LOL. I'd have to say that parent poster "0WN3D" grandparent poster.

      -- A prowd produkt of da Amerikun Skewl Syztem

  115. I say by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I say we should kick you out, you xenophobic fuck. Wanting to punish all Indians because of their government policies (when most of the h1b's want to become US citizens anyway) isn't any diffrent then Al-Quada wanting to punsh all Americans for the actions of our government.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:I say by geekoid · · Score: 0

      he is not xenophobic, he just wants the field level.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not being xenophobic. I would welcome more and
      more indians. They are on our side against the camel
      humpers (Those dreaming of 72 virgins for killing indians or americans).
      The problem is that we can't compete with people
      getting wages close to half of a decent wage.

      Make the same rules for everybody and make it impossible for employers to have the visa cancelled
      because the employee doesn't work like a slave.

    3. Re:I say by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      He isn't xenophobic.

      I bet high on 50% of india would choose to move to the US if we let them. Should we do that?

      She would let every mexican illegal in? Nope.

      Bring in the people we need for jobs, for cultural infusion, for lots of reasons, but limit it so that all americans (of any race) can get the services and support they need.

      America was ofunded by immigrant, yes. But at the time the thing the country's economy needed was more immigrants. Now we need less, and so policies appropriately change.

      If you dont agree with this, it would be okay to run up to Canada whenever I needed some medical attention, get it for free, and then come back. Is that okay?

  116. Just what India needs: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India doesn't really need to import workers, they've got 1 BILLION FREAKING PEOPLE already.

  117. why work in India? by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 1, Informative

    why would you want to work in India? You should *retire* in India. A few years of working in the U.S. should be enough for you to save up enough money to live a good 20 years in India easilly. You'll even be able to afford servants. Don't worry about language, in the big cities, most people speak English.

    If you plan to live in one of the populated areas of India, be prepared for incredibly bad polution. Also, one of the advantages is that you can piss in the streets or anywhere in fact. No more having to find a bathroom or worrying about cops arrested you just for taking a leak. Hell, you can take a dump on the side of the road, and no one will even look at you funny. On a related note, be prepared for some serious diarrhea. Diarrhea is common there, that its typical to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea."

    If you're rich enough (a small U.S. fortune will do), you can build a huge castle on a huge plot of land, and have servants cook you food using vegetables grown on your own land. They will clean the entire place every day. I've seen this myself with someone who moved here for a few years, made some money, and then moved back to India.

    This applies to people in other rich countries besides the U.S that have a high currency value.

    --
    --Drunk as in Beer
    1. Re:why work in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded to troll? I live in India and everything he said was absolutely true.

    2. Re:why work in India? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      > Diarrhea is common there, that its typical to respond to "how are you doing?" with "I have diarrhea."

      That's why it's recommended for foreign nationals to drink boiled water for at least a year once moving to India. After that, you'll get used to the bacteria, protozoa, and other deadlies swimming in Indian water.

      I'm not joking too.. The situation is a *little* better in South India in places like Bangalore, but absolutely stinks in north and east India (Delhi and Calcutta's water sucks ass)

  118. Please don't make me mad... by rcs1000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    OK.

    The weavers who were put out of jobs by the development of the Spinning Jenny weren't too happy either.

    The typists in the typing pool who were put out of work when their boss got a word processor were hardly chuffed.

    The textile workers who found that Americans were more than happy to buy stuff from India or China probably didn't feel great.

    Work will always move to the place where it can be done most cheaply. That is called free market "global" capitalism. That is what got you the Lexus or the Toyota in your garage. That is why the memory in your PC is probably made by Winbond or Samsung. That is why your Hi-Fi is probably made by Sony or MEI.

    I want code written, I can ask anyone in the world to write it. Really. That is my right.

    How dare anyone say I cannot ask an Indian in Bangalore to write it? How dare you say I must pay for an American?

    If you want to live in a country where foreign goods and services are banned try Bhutan.

    You violate my rights (while almost certainly demonstrating a revealed preference for Japanese consumer electronics) when you deny me the ability to hire who I want in whatever country I want to do my work.

    Sorry this is turning into a rant. But...

    Would you ban books by Indian authors because they put American authors out of work?

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:Please don't make me mad... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      Would you ban books by Indian authors because they put American authors out of work?

      They probably would. I guess you're too young to remember 'Freedom Fries', and the slump in champagne, brie sales?

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    2. Re:Please don't make me mad... by mobiGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you want to live in a country where foreign goods and services are banned try Bhutan.

      Why go so far? Y'all live in a country that simply imposes crushing tariffs whenever the right lobby group gets involved...

      "Free markets" my fanny...

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    3. Re:Please don't make me mad... by danila · · Score: 1

      And the obvious difference between IT and steel/auto/agriculture/whatever industry is that Indian programmers are not imports, like hi-fi stereos. They are cheap resources for IT companies. I am sure American government will do nothing if Pakistanis decide to move to Michigan or Pennsylvania and replace millions of American steel workers.

      No one really gets shafted with IT. I mean, no company does, and we all know how much the government cares about people.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:Please don't make me mad... by soundcore · · Score: 1

      I would ban anything from any nation that does not allow free trade. Indian companies can export 4 million programmers to the U.S. yet it is illegal to hire Americans in India. The result of this (in any nation) can only be the *transfer of wealth* from the importing nation to the exporting nation. Globalism is a lie being sold to us under the guise of 'free trade'. It is in fact, siphoning off America's wealth. $4 billion in USD was *transferred* from the U.S. to India in 2002 alone. Why do you think we have these huge trade deficits? Trade deficits == transfer of wealth. And the U.S. is $500 billion in the red.

    5. Re:Please don't make me mad... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      Let's see those (illegal) steel import tariffs lifted then...

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    6. Re:Please don't make me mad... by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > You violate my rights when you deny me the ability to
      > hire who I want in whatever country I want to do my
      > work.

      That's right! If I'm manager of a company, and I only want to hire white, dumpy, balding men who are great golfers then that's my business. Everyone knows that Negroes will shirk, Mexicans will steal, and girls, well, although they're good at getting coffee, they're better off in the homes.

      Just because the government provides loans, lucrative contracts, and has the duty to make sure all citizens have equal opportunities certainly doesn't mean they have the right to suggest I can't discriminate according to race, color, gender, creed, etc. Right?

      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have other work to do. These martinis aren't going to finish drinking themselves! The only thing keeping me awake during my afternoon nap is -- first it was manufacturing, now it's software development -- what if managerial jobs start moving overseas too?

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    7. Re:Please don't make me mad... by halo8 · · Score: 1

      IANAE (economisists, i dont even think i spelt it right)

      1
      If american jobs go to foreign places to lower the costs.where foreign workers get paid less.

      who is left to buy the product?

      american workers are all out of work
      and foreign workers dont make enough to buy it.

      2
      i like the artical slashdot had from wired with the indian manager complaining how all HIS jobs where going to russia and the ukraine, cause they worked for less. in 20 years time that guy on the corner that will "work for food" ya.. he'll be doing tech support or customer service and getting his "pay" on a plate.

      3
      thank you fat cat *EO's selling out your country.

      ever wonder why when you watch a sci-fi show, its always an american selling out the planet to the aliens? you dont see other ppl from other nations doing that?

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    8. Re:Please don't make me mad... by 2na · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. In pure theory protectionism is a bad thing but unrestrained globalism thrashes the world's workforce. Right now the driving force is cheapness of goods or services abroad. Unlike the trends of the manufacturing past the impact today is across the board. We're exporting much more than programming jobs. We're sending accounting work, financial analysis and any other knowledge related tasks that can be remoted vialthe net. India and China are growing at everyone elses expense. When will they begin creating a demand for these services within thier own economies? During the Y2K days I worked with teams of Indoans. I would joke about how the millenium would bring disaster for thier countries because they were all over here fixing our systems. They would turn and laugh at me because "over there everything is done on paper!". Funny indeed. I can't help but feel that thier strategy is to continue to be a global parasite that takes from the worlds markets instead of contributing. How can a U.S developer paid $60K compete with an Indian at $6K or a Chinese developer at half that? Why will our universities bother to teach skills that are no longer needed in our domestic marketplace? What kind of picture does that paint for our immediate future and that of generations to come. If the goal is to raise all boats let's not loose site of our domestic fleet.

    9. Re:Please don't make me mad... by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Well well, isn't this funny... USA is the most "liberal" and "liberator" country in the world when talking about why all other countries in the world should open their markets for US-produced goods and services, but when it comes down to lift their own commercial barriers, it's time to whine and complain, right? Give me a break.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    10. Re:Please don't make me mad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see managerial positions being relocated to Turkey in the not too distant future.

    11. Re:Please don't make me mad... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      We call it irony. Oh, wait they're not trying to be funny...

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    12. Re:Please don't make me mad... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      I would ban anything from any nation that does not allow free trade.

      How the hell is trade "free" under such conditions?

    13. Re:Please don't make me mad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The united states has been the worlds #1 supported of free trade. Its called capitalism. If you don't like it, write to Ashcroft, I'm sure he can arrange to have you deported without trial.

    14. Re:Please don't make me mad... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Hell, the neo-conservative religious nut-jobs here in Texas are trying to prevent any mention of enlightened scientific theory from appearing in our state's public school textbooks. I have no doubt that these people would hold weekly book burnings if they thought they could get away with it.

      And before anyone replies with "I'm glad I don't live in a back-water like Texas", you should realize that many states pay close attention to what goes on the Texas curriculum, and textbook publishers pay close attention to that. That means that your state is probably taking it's educational lead from mine. Ponder that for a minute.

      You might also consider GW's track record regarding schools during his tenure as governor.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    15. Re:Please don't make me mad... by satyap · · Score: 1
      yet it is illegal to hire Americans in India.
      This statement is absolutely false.
  119. Corporate Ignorance by AngryCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    These executives won't be happy until they finally get rid of the American middle class and the only thing left are the extremely rich and extremely poor. Then they will finally know why offshoring is a bad idea.

  120. Student life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now, that's nice, and that's how student life should be !!!

    No, you fucking leech.

    I'm a Finn. I graduated with an MSc (HUT, Physics) in 4 years and got my PhD in 5 years. I've got a wife, a job and a child on the way and I didn't even break a sweat (scratch that on the child thing ;-).

    And now you expect me to pay for your drinking and debauchery so that you can waste 7-8 years on your graduate degree? Because "that's how student life should be"? What are you? A fucking moron?

    I'm sure you'll be of the same opinion when you graduate and by a miracle manage to get a job and - thanks to our Ministry of Education - practically anyone can walk in and start studying with the same benefits you enjoyed.

    Ever taken a look at the status of our health care system? State's mental health care for children ran out of funds last summer? Huh? Does that make you think? No? Well, keep on drinking and partying then. Fucking asshole.

  121. *** Who Rules America? *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who Rules America?
    The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken

    By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Books
    P.O. Box 330 Hillsboro West Virginia 24946 USA

    There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment.

    Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.

    The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know -- or think we know -- about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television.

    It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas" that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.

    For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations -- all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.

    On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct way.

    Molding American Minds

    For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the other hand, a White racist -- that is, any racially conscious White person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial situation in America -- is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.

    The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

    And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we rea

  122. Re:Of course he can't http://www.h1b.info by nxs212 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No, the laws are not the same. Here, in US, we have 35 year old "college students" with student visas who "supplement" their income by working 9 to 5. (they attend classes at night)
    And don't get me started with H-1B and L-1 loopholes. L-1 is far worse because companies don't even have to pay $1,000 to train American workers when companies "transfer" their workers from India, China, etc.
    http://www.h1b.info/
    I had two teachers in the last 6 months at my college who had the credentials and were supposed to be "experts in their field" Well, these two fucks didn't know anything and just read from the book to us. They had NO teaching skills and had horrible accents. An English teacher could have done better teaching these tech classes.
    I did well in class but not because of the lectures.
    As far as the guy who blew his brains out is concerned...he should have done us a favor and taken his replacement and managment who approved it with him. His replacement is probably still working, laughing his ass off because some poor schmuck didn't have the balls to stand up for his rights.

  123. fall thru the cracks by iksrazal_br · · Score: 1
    If moving to a new country was easy, alot more people would do it, especially in hard times.

    For me, that hard time was 2001 - I lost my programming job like a lot of people. I travelled. I liked Brazil, knew a girl there I met in europe. I had a toursim visa. I found a job - heard no a lot, but eventually I heard yes. Falling thru the cracks is indeed possible in the third world, especially if the talent matches. Eventually I got married, but it wasn't to work - I proved I could anyways.

    My point? Be creative, have perserverence, and make some friends. Doesn't that cover just about anything?

    iksrazal

  124. Get used to it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called global trade. Go back to school and learn whatever the other guy knows (that you don't know)

    It cost a LOT of money for a company to get an H1B. Do you really think they spend all that money for fun? Yet, it's only a 3 years visa.

    1. Re:Get used to it... by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      If they pay the guy $20,000 per year instead of the $40,000 that the citizen would make, they save $60,000 over the three years. I doubt that it costs more than that to get an H1B.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    2. Re:Get used to it... by satyap · · Score: 1

      Except they're not allowed to do that. Has anyone looked at the procedures for H1 before whining here?

    3. Re:Get used to it... by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world buddy.

      Just because the H1 procedures state that the H1B must be paid the fair-market rate, doesn't mean that there aren't ways around this. It happens.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  125. What I got from This by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 0
    1. Companies are outsourcing work to India and elsewhere. India is obviously not refusing this.

    2. For jobs that require somebody on-site in the States, companies are going big for H1-B's, at the same time as laying off people. As I understand it, this is supposed to be illegal, but INS is not being real aggressive about enforcement.

    3. India is being more aggressive about enforcing their work visa laws than we are.

    I get the feeling that as long as a company is laying off people, it should be disallowed from hiring H1-B's, since companies are finding ways to scoot around the laws already in place and/or the laws are not being vigorously enforced.

    I think this is going to be a hot issue for the upcoming election year.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:What I got from This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it will be, at least for Democrats. They *love* illegal immigrants (hello CA and free drivers licences!) and H1Bs and anything else that have any remote chance of them becoming voting citizens to elect them back to power.

    2. Re:What I got from This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then we're screwed. Because the Republicans (and I consider myself to be more Republican than Democrat... growl...) seem to have a permissive attitude toward businesses, especially big ones. Anything which floats their bottom line, they're A-OK with! H1-B? Is it cheaper for you? It is? Then, sure!

  126. Where do the candidates stand? by stinkenstein · · Score: 1

    Is there a place where we can get an informative matrix as to where each presidential candidate stands on issues such as H1B visa's and the like that are of interest to the /. community? So far, I have liked Dean, but AFAICT, his site is a leetle vague on H1B's specifically.

    --
    Where do you get *your* entropy?
  127. the usual muddled mess of an argument by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1
    The article makes the usual muddled mess of an argument. Let's be clear:
    • Stopping the H-1b program doesn't slow down outsourcing to overseas, it actually accelerates it: after all, all those qualified workers who can't move to the US are going to work for even less overseas. If they come to the US, at least they are considerably more costly to employers, thereby raising wages in the field, and they pay taxes to the US government.
    • Steel workers, textile workers, and farmers have had to deal with cheap competition from overseas, why should programmers be any different?
    • Why should the software jobs for companies like MacDonalds, CocaCola, IBM, etc. go to US workers in the first place? Those companies sell all over the world, it makes sense that they should do their software development all over the world.

    The US had it really easy after WWII: Europe was in ruins and much of the rest of the world was saddled with inefficient economic systems. Investments in many places other than the US were viewed as very risky. That's all changing now. As countries like China and India are becoming more efficient and more competitive, US workers may well have to work harder to maintain their standard of living, or accept making do with less. And US unemployment, still low compared with many other nations, will probably equilibrate with other nations. Whining about it won't help, and protectionism and closing borders would probably just make things worse for the US.
  128. how are you supposed to address an invisible prob? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    The most difficult thing about this issue is that most of the "solutions" are not concrete -- I mean they don't involve the regulation of physical goods or people crossing the border, as it used to be in the pre-internet economy.

    How do you regulate a company using a phone line to outsource accounting work to India, for example? Do you say that they're not allowed to make calls over there? Or mandate that they hire a certain number of American accountants? It used to be more straightforward when the people were coming from overseas to do work here. You could see who was employing whom and what was being done where. Now we just send the work over the internet. Regulations address things that companies do, not things they don't do, such as not hire workers from the US>

    This is going to take a new approach in the regulation of global trade if the issue is really to be addressed properly. Governments cannot keep on operating as if the internet age is an extension of global business. It has fundamentally changed the routes of labor and materials (even the definitions of those things).

    Maybe this has been said before, but it seems worth thinking about. Enjoy.

  129. I usually add such "back doors" by jc42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Most of these were for providing support, ..."

    Yeah; I usually do this. Any program more than a few dozen lines, and I start adding debugging hooks.

    They're never "hidden", though. I always document them. Of course, I can't force users to read the documentation.

    And I don't remove the debug hooks for a "release" version. When it's out at some customer's site and they call you asking what's wrong is when you REALLY need those hooks.

    It's really handy to be able to be able to tell a user "Just add the following line to the config file, wait a bit, and tell me what it says."

    I've worked on several projects where we added an HTTP interface, with the app listening on some port. All configurable, of course, but usually turned on by default. Then when a user called with a problem, if they are on the Net, we can ftp to that port, start typing GET commands, and learn about its state. This is a real back door, very easy to implement, and incredibly helpful when there are problems.

    Of course, you do want to document them, so that the user can't accuse you of sneaking something in on them. And make sure there's a simple way to turn them on and off. If the app has a config file, a line like "HTTP-Port: N" does the job, with N=0 to disable the back door.

    Then you can say "Well, I can't see what's wrong, because the HTTP port is turned off. Yes, I understand your security concerns. But I can't help you if your security won't let me talk to the program."

    Usually this isn't much of a problem, since new users rarely notice that stuff, and leave the back door enabled. When their security folks discover it, it's really handy to be able to point to the fact that it's all documented in the manual and the sample config file. Then they say "Oh, yeah." turn it off, and don't bug you.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  130. india was a british colony - easier? by leeet · · Score: 1

    Just a guess....? Like Canadians getting a visa for UK. Unless I'm wrong, I though/read that it's easier.

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  131. This is not correct by Vedanti · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was working in India, our company always used to have some Americans working in the company. Just as in the US, you need a work permit ( see this advice ). We also had quite a few non-citizens of Indian origin working in our company, who also needed work permits. Unlike H1B, your company doesn't need to prove that a person with your skills can't be hired locally.

    The problem really is one of money. Why would anyone want to work in India for fraction of the money you can get anywhere else ?

    Considering how easy movement of professions helps Indian S/W industries, I'm sure the govt. will be willing to introduce temporary work permits too if need be. Infact, they had mooted GATS guidelines on visas, work permits. I don't know the status now.

    For those who don't know, India has a huge illigal immigrants problem. The immigrants are mostly from Bangladesh. In the 80's and 90's there was a very militant movement against illegal immigrants in the state of Assam. See this article.

    Opposition to H1B in the US now is understandable. Infact, if INS is even now giving out H1B visas in this economy, it is absurd.
    .

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
  132. "The New Tolerance" by Josh McDowell by colnago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a great book called The New Tolerance by Josh McDowell about this very subject. It's heavily religious but the principles apply here very well.

    1. Re:"The New Tolerance" by Josh McDowell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definitely a book I would recommend to any HR person faced with an inclusive company policy.

  133. an ironic twist by Savatte · · Score: 1

    The beef hot dogs over in India are actually made of beef!

    1. Re:an ironic twist by sys$manager · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmmmm, sacred...

  134. Issue is Temporary Work Visas that are not G-Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Issue is that of Temporary Work Visas that where not designed to lock the person into your local economy. Those are the ones used to train the foriener to do your work.

    Second is this was enevitable, issue is not that the work went there it is did the Research go there? When the Research and Development goes over seas guess what you do not have local and no potential of building. Also remember it was bound to happen with those Countries investment in their human capital.

    Look here, North America and particular United States puts the burdon on the individual to educate and train them selves. This is done with support from business but the problem is, what happens when the total cost of the worker is more then the investment? Will Companies invest any more? Can we blame them? If you want Hi-Tech Work you must invest in it. What is the point of self education when I do not get a return on the investent?

    Summary is you must invest in the total economy. Do not do cost shifting, this does not help at all. Key is to have an economy that will maximize everyones ability to survive, from the Individual to the Corporation.

    Answer to those out there. Go get an Education Degree and go over seas to another cheeper country to China/India and take the jobs from them. Can't work in India, try working in Ethiopia.

  135. Don't dis the Sinclair by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    ...first computer in the fifth grade, a Timex Sinclair ... wasn't good for much more than writing a few snippets of code in Basic

    No more than a few snippets of code! That whirring noise is my 128K +2 spinning in its grave. You could do a darn site more than that with a Sinclair.

  136. India does have employment visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please visit the following link to see an employment visa is being offered by the Indian government.

    http://www.indianembassy.org/consular/visa_guide .h tm

    Getting a visa might be a different matter altogether.

    Posts like "if India doesnt allow then we shouldnt allow" are precisely the reasons why Indians have been successful in getting jobs in USA.
    Spending 5 minutes googling will get you that link.

    This lack of application & industriuosness is what is causing the downfall.

  137. We are just CorpGovMedia's livestock by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    THey always make sure the fences are good and strong.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  138. What is that?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that white dot right below the banner ad at the top of the main /. page?? What is it??? Is it a secret message from an alien race?

    1. Re:What is that?!? by DirkDaring · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's a peep hole. Get real REAL close to your monitor and stare inside it!

  139. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grammar good that.

  140. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by satyap · · Score: 1

    Would you be willing to move there, go through a convoluted visa process, and if you're lucky, get a 10-hour-a-day job for $700/month?

  141. There are more H1B visas than you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong about this. There are a lot more
    H1B visas issued than you might think.
    Very often what happens is that an offer is made
    that is much lower than what engineers in the USA
    would accept. Americans who do apply usually are
    turned down on bogus reasons. An unemployed person
    can't afford to sue anyone, specially not a
    possible employer as no one would ever consider
    your resume after that.

    We have several people on H1B visa where I work
    and they earn a lot less than what I earn. There
    is a fear among many of us that we will eventually
    be replaced by H1B visa holders.

    It is time to put someone like Howard Dean or
    Gephart in the white house to clean this stupid mess.

  142. Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by reporter · · Score: 1, Interesting
    David Soong is learning what many Americans already know. Countries like India do not have the same sense of fairness that the United States of America (USA) has. The American government allows hundreds of thousands of H-1B workers to work in the USA, but the Indian government does not allow American workers to work in India.

    What can we in the West do about this injustice?

    Here are the facts.

    1. Unethical American companies like Intel demand that the American government allow them to hire H-1B workers. They claim that they cannot meet their labor needs without H-1B employees even during a period of 8% unemployment in Silicon Valley. ( clincher :IBM does not hire H-1B workers unless they are applying for a job that requires a Ph.D. The Power4 family of chips were all built without H-1B labor.)
    2. Huge immigrant communites like the Indian community and Chinese community (which includes Taiwanese and Hong Kongers) have arisen simply because H-1B laws allow them to stay here. They then pressure the American government to allow even more Indian and Chinese immigrants into the USA via H-1B laws or other immigration loopholes. ( clincher : In these particular communities, most parents teach their kids (1) that Western culture is only for "White" people and (2) that they should not assimilate into American culture. Please read "Immigrants: Traitors Among Us". These communities produce people like David Yang and Eugene Hsu who attempt to destroy the security of the USA via giving American military technology to Beijing, etc. By contrast, communities, like the Vietnamese community, that did not grow from H-1B laws tend to assimilate much better into American society.)

    What we, along with David Soong, should do is the following.

    1. Petition the American government to shutdown the H-1B program.
    2. Tell unethical companies like Intel that they can handle their supposed labor shortage by outsourcing (i. e. hiring only folks living in foreign countries).

    In the short term, both "outsourcing" and "H-1B" employment will deprive Americans of jobs to the same degree. However, in the long term, "outsourcing" has many benefits. It will stop the growth of ethnic communities that do not wish to assimilate. Further, "outsourcing" will actually increase the number of jobs in the long term. How? The American nation is a huge market, and there are many economic advantages to building a company within the market in which you wish to target. First, the company employees and the customers of the company speak the same language: English. Second, the design time of the product is reduced because the time for the path of consumer_needs->marketing_department->engineering_ department is reduced. This reason is the prime reason that many Japanese companies like Toyota have set up shop in the USA. When the market share of a company exceeds a critical threshold, the company will be compelled to setup operations in the country where the market is located.

    When we shut off the H-1B faucet, American companies established in the USA will hire exclusively Americans during economic upturns. Now, in the era of the H-1B faucet gushing with H-1B applicants, unethical American companies like Intel hire hordes of H-1B folks, so the total jobs available to Americans during the economic upturn is less.

    Let us in the Slashdot community start a campaign to terminate the H-1B program immediately. Simultaneously, we support outsourcing. It sounds counter-intuitive, but in the long run, outsourcing will help to maintain the quality of life in the USA and t

    1. Re:Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by Da+VinMan · · Score: 1

      Nice post! I don't know that I agree with all of your logic, but you present a good case. Interesting.... I hope I see some debate around your message.

      Well done!

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    2. Re:Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      so why the hell are we all still sitting here talking about it? what do i need to say to my congressman so i don't look like a complete ass? (he's next door, btw.)

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    3. Re:Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by RudeyKewl · · Score: 1

      "but the Indian government does not allow American workers to work in India"
      Are you sure you have your facts straight?
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=780 91&cid=6932 659

    4. Re:Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true. The US imports people it needs because it says there is a shortage of these skills. That itself may not be true but that is why the US imports people.

      You can't come to the US to work as a pizza delivery driver for example. The US would say there is not shortage of pizza del. folks.

      India on the other hand might say there is not shortage of software or hardware programmers in India. Thus they won't issue a work permit for that particular field.

      Its not that India is unfair. The US subsidizes US farmers but tells developing nations to open their agricultural markets, is that fair.

      Get the facts first.

      I am sure if you can weld underwater or have some strange skill that India needs, they will issue a work visa to you.

    5. Re:Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing by bbrockit · · Score: 1

      That's ludicrous. H-1B and L-1 Visa immigrants at least contribute to our economy. They buy cars, houses, etc. In this economic climate their numbers should be limited of course, but not eliminated entirely. America has imported a great many talented people that have created new products, new markets, and founded new companies, and many new jobs. The greatest threat is outsourcing. The workers do not contribute to our economy and because they live in poor countries with very low costs of living, they cost far less to American companies. Millions of US jobs are potential outsourcing targets and the problem is spiralling out of control. And contrary to academic theory, the people laid off in the process of moving jobs overseas aren't moving onto "the next big thing" or being freed up to do more "strategic" jobs. The only thing they're being liberated from is a job, an income, and a way of life. Check out www.insourceamerica.org to learn more.

  143. Re:India has no H1B, that is the point of the arti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indians have all the advantages while Americans have no advantages

    Yeah, all those damn Indians get all the breaks - like getting to live in squalor - 85% of the population makes less than $100 a month.. What more do they want?!?!

  144. Re:Are there any mods older than about 14 here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    God! I wish most of the mods around here were properly socialized and understood the nuances of humor and human social interaction in general.

    So true. That's why you see so many quotes from the Simpsons, Futurama, Monty Python, etc. Most moderators don't recognize humor unless it comes from a source "officially" known to be funny. Making up an original joke will just get you modded down.

    Letting twelve year old semi-literate shut-ins moderate posts of people three times their age is just not such a hot idea.

  145. Re:Student life?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry to disapoint you, I'm not finish ! and no I don't get money from state, since I'm from a south country !!!! life is not goot to all ppl. So don't worry with me !
    As for the "that's life" I mean you could get your independence, and start, easily, living with no help from parents. But of course, I guess you only looked at the partys and get drunk part. I guess that's a trauma you have, maybe alchool to expensive, and sold in strange ways. I don't know.

    And if you're interested I always finised my studies on the minimum possible time, and was working as investigator to do my master. Of course I did had a lot of parties, and so on. You know, it's possible to do all... if you don't close yousefl at home.

    PS: if you look I didn't need to insult you in a basic way, like calling names ...

  146. Re:India has no H1B, that is the point of the arti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America is already dead. It died of corruption, bribery, and the executive class. Only the rotting shell of it is still moving around, waiting for the final collapse.

    Things won't change until at long last a revolution, bloody or not, happens. There are starting to be more and more unemployed people with no hope and a lot of time on their hands...

  147. RTFA! by Chromodromic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Anyone can browse these posts and discover for themselves what seems to be a frequent trend on Slashdot; most people go ahead and comment without reading the freaking articles that the posts refer to. They read the headline, they read the (frequently misinformed or mis-stated) summary of the submission and then they fire off myriad comments.

    These postings are riddled with "Why is this even on here?" and "Is this even a story?" These people didn't read the article. Or, they're idiots. Possibly both.

    --
    Chr0m0Dr0m!C
  148. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this troll modded up? the dot com crash and the terrible economy killed the IT job market. H1B visas aren't killing it and even if they were this issue is being addressed: H1B visa cut to hit infotech industry
    it's almost impossbile to get a job over here without at least a masters degree and honestly if companies can get a masters student for half the price your average american BS grad will accept who can blame them. Do we have the right to be employed at a high salary just because we were born here?

  149. What the case really is - fairness by amightywind · · Score: 1
    So people, before you start flaming, ponder over the fact that a law for hiring outside employees doesn't exist because there hasn't ever been a need for it. Now with the outsourcing, it may not be too long before the government comes up with an H-1 like plan.

    Another apologist for our poorer trading partners who grow by taking advantage of the U.S. The fact remains that America has an asymetric economic and trade relationship with the rest of the world and it and the American worker suffers. You don't care about the worker? You think he retrain and find a new job? Maybe so. But these people are citizens and have a vote. Over the long term large numbers of these people will force government policies to shift radically, to everyone's disadvantage. To prevent such upheaval it would be polically expedient for our government to get rid of H-1B's during the economic downturn.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  150. Re:WTF, you guys dont get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah and while you're at it, get back to your cavern and don't forget your fur outfit.

  151. Outsourcing software development by jgacad · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I worked for a company which wanted to outsource sofware development work to a group of Pakistani programmers in Indonesia. I was assigned the responsibility of getting them accustomed to our development environment. Due to the language differences, it was quite difficult. In the end, my company scaled down the expectations for the consultants. This illustrated a couple of points: 1) Outsourcing development adds the obstacles of distance and possibly language differences to the task of training developers. 2) Not only are you now dealing with getting requirements right with the client who wants the software, you have to clearly communicate requirements with your second 'client' - the outsourced developers. The above difficulties, I believe, reduce a project's chances to succeed. Add to this the possibility of bad code, back doors, etc deliberately placed into the code and you have some convincing reasons why outsourcing software development to groups outside the US is not a good idea.

    --
    ...the right of the people to keep and arm bears shall not be infringed.
  152. This gets tiring by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I wish that the coders would realize that working for somebody else enables them to call the shots. If you do not like it, then build your own company. For technical americans, let me suggest that you consider using the knowledge that you have. Consider the case of our network patch cables. Most are made overseas. Why not design and build an automated machine that will build these using Cat 6? Or if that is difficult, then consider how the wire could be easily manufactued so that end conenctors could easily be added. America (and Europe) lost much of their manufactuering jobs over the last 60 years. So now is the time to automate it. It is much easier to do than it appears.
    Another example is Claw/Nut Crackers.
    How about automating manufactuering flatware/silverware?
    How about creation of led-based xmas lights?
    One thing I am working on is doing Linux into niche markets that have few programs that control that industry (multi-billion). By making several of the programs work on wine, and then doing the others on Linux (they are actually trivial programs being sold at outlandish prices).
    Likewise, I am working on hardware that I think will be where the future is. It is easy to see if you open your eyes and see.
    Look around. Now that we are deregulating power generation and how a few companies can merge and monopolize, you can bet that electricity is going to get very expensive (think of the cable or defense industries). How many ppl can afford to pay 200-300 /month on electricity? So lower the energy needs of the highest energy consumption.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  153. This is the most insiteful robIE post yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is this guy anyway ?

  154. Duh Right Back at You. by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    You get double-taxed when you work outside the country. You pay the taxes of the nation your work in, AND if you opt to retain your US citizenship, you STILL pay US federal taxes, too.

    The US government would love to have citizens working outside the country...because then they aren't providing you with roads, with infrastructure, and army protection, and yet you're still funneling them a hefty cut of your paycheck...which is entirely in funds from another country. You have just brought in income without costing the US a dime. They would love to ship out US workers to Bangalore more than anything.

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  155. Most of you guys are completely missing the point by waxdaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who cares about the last part of the clip, everyone knows that it's a pain in the ass to get a job in another country, unless your an executive or you live in the EU. (My personal experience alone with this is endless.)

    The point is the first part. And I don't want to collectively diss the /. population, but if you guys would read BusinessWeek, The Economist, etc., in addition to all your damn computer magazines, then you'd be enlightened already about how the H1 visa problem is growing so fast in the States.

    There are countless stories at countless firms about people who've been forced to train their outsourced replacements. It is a really big problem in this country.

    I really don't give a f*ck if you want to outsource a job to India. But all that bullsh*t with Tata is a gross exploitation of a labor-law loophole. Generally, the law states that you can't lay someone off and replace that exact position within "X" amount of time (it varies by State, I believe, here in Illinois it's 1 year). So companies get around it by creating whole new departments and positions for companies like Tata to come in and rape your office space, replacing you with an H1-er.

    Start reading other magazines, and you guys might actually be motivated to care about this instead of giving supposedly righteous comments about how obvious it is that it's difficult to obtain work visas in other countries.

    Focus on the important stuff. Like the BEGINNING of the clip.

    "All techies should be forced to take at least 12 credits of business in college."

    -SD

  156. Re:Are there any mods older than about 14 here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Making up an original joke will just get you modded down.

    Even worse, the joke's not original at all! It's from "Austin Powers in Goldmember", a movie even mom's-basement-geeks, I would expect, have seen.

  157. CNN Story: H1-B Visa program may not be that bad by gupg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    See this news story:
    http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/11/news/economy/visa_ impact/index.htm?cnn=yes

    First few lines are:
    Visas vs. jobs
    While many U.S. tech workers hate the H-1B program, studies suggest its impact is limited.
    September 11, 2003: 12:14 PM EDT
    By Mark Gongloff, CNN/Money Staff Writer

    NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - A U.S. visa program that allows aliens to temporarily work in technology and other high-paying industries is often blamed for taking American jobs and pushing wages lower. But two recent studies suggest this program might not be as awful as some critics think.


    ......
  158. mod parent up by Artifex · · Score: 1

    Let me also point out that Toyota does build some cars in North America, so not all the money leaves for Asia.

    Face it - until everyone expects the same standard of living, jobs will continue to migrate to the cheapest labor market.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  159. what goes around comes around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might not be so bad

  160. We need Tom Clancy's Trade Reform Act by pvera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the second half of Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan series, a new law is enacted, the Trade Reform Act. The law is really simple, it allows the president to pick a country with unfair trade laws and mirror them. They want to inspect every car that arrives at the dock? Sure, we'll do the same. They won't hire americans to work at their code shops? Ok, we'll do the same. This of couse triggers two wars in the series, but the core concept of the law was pretty solid.

    I am well aware of the economics of outsourcing to India, my previous employer spent at least 6 months being courted by a half dozen code shops in India. They were complete professionals and very flexible. The skillset was in place, the language skills were better than what we want to believe and the price advantage was good. *That* I can live with.

    What it is bothering me is this statement that it is illegal for an american to work in India. I mean, the only thing they had to do was say suuuure, come work for us, but you will get an indian salary commesurate with your skills and experience, we cannot pay you a US salary just because you are an american. That would be fair for everyone involved.

    Or somebody in the government should wake up and see all these american going out of work because their jobs are going overseas. This of course sounds horribly naive on my part, but what is going to happen with defense sensitive software development? Are we going to outsource it too?

    Some kind of trade reform act would be a great way to wake up India, China and Japan about the real meaning of trade. They can't expect to continue flooding us with cheap products and labor and then taking their profits and spending them elsewhere.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:We need Tom Clancy's Trade Reform Act by lifeone · · Score: 1

      "What it is bothering me is this statement that it is illegal for an american to work in India. " It is complete BS. Many American citizens work in India and has always done so. See my post and others posts regarding this.

      --
      In a perfect world, there should be no Bushes
    2. Re:We need Tom Clancy's Trade Reform Act by pvera · · Score: 1

      Heh, I told you it bothered me!

      It is probably a BS explanation, or maybe the recruiter was sick of people calling expecting to nail a job in India with an american salary plus relocation. That is just for starters. I bet he did not even bother checking out with the Indian embassy or a local consulate to check on work permit/visa requirements.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    3. Re:We need Tom Clancy's Trade Reform Act by ricochet_ca · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that this is a good idea. Take the Japanese, for example (which is, I believe, the country targeted in Tom Clancy's book) -- they have lots of barriers to U.S. and other foreign products...as a result, Japanese consumers pay more for rice, cars, etc. than they would in a truly free, competitive environment. The main reason for their protectionism is to foster exports -- Toyota can sell me a Camry here in the U.S. for cheaper than it could if it had to realistically compete against Ford at home in Japan. Thus, in effect, the Japanese consumer is subsidizing the American consumer. If they want to do this, why should we stop them?

      I didn't come up with this argument, Milton Friedman did. But the real solution to this is the the Japanese consumer waking up and deciding that he/she isn't going to take this anymore. If Japanese carbuyers knew what the real cost of a Toyota car was to an American carbuyer, things would probably change...

      As for India and China, it's just a matter of time before they get "India-d" themselves. $1/day probably looks pretty sweet to somebody living in war-torn Ivory Coast.

    4. Re:We need Tom Clancy's Trade Reform Act by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I think the difference between the real world and Tom Clancy books is that in Tom Clancy books political motives affect economic motives. Essentially it's the whole patriotic struggle of "you want to screw with me? now i'll screw with you.".

      I suppose that's still relevant in real life but as Wutang says: C.R.E.A.M (Cash Rules Everything Around Me). More specifically, let's look at the US / China relationship. China, the largest stronghold of Communism, should probably be the last country we should be have trade with. They are one of our biggest partners when it comes to trade..in fact we run a huge deficit. Why? Because, in this case, the economic motives outweigh the political ones.

      Who cares that they suppress free speech and political leaders are appointed and not elected? We can get cheap leader that is more skilled than other parts of the world.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  161. Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by 1337_h4x0r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay - so the point of H1B's is to provide workers for a growing economy when we can't train our own people fast enough, right? (No local talent).

    So when there IS an abundance of local talent (evidenced by the posting volume of /. posts) why aren't H1B's sent home? I have no problem with international workers being here, if they are filling a need that can't be filled locally.

    To give an example of the way I think the H1B system is getting worked, the last job I worked at was an Informix 4GL shop. If you don't know what this is, it's the most insanely brain-dead programming language ever made. No features, no objects, hell you can't even pass arrays to functions. So what does this company do? Hires chinese H1B's who don't really know anything, for pennies. These guys were working REALLY cheap (like $8/hr) and the company had no intention of hiring any Americans because they wouldn't work for $8/hr. They had some scam running where a few of the american employees did work that cheap "officially" but got kickbacks for supporting the H1B program. I came into this company from a merger, and left shortly thereafter.

    My current company is outsourcing to an Indian development firm who supposedly has 30 employees assigned to us. Our entire dev team here in the US is like 5 people, and we're doing the lion's share of the work!

    So my opinion of outsourced and H1B employees is rather low, although I'll be the first to admit that there are probably lots of great foreign computer folks out there too. I just haven't seen any :)

    1. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, I've been an H1-B employee (and before that, L-1 which is intra-company transferee). I was paid _more_ than my peers. I worked for a certain company which is ROT-1 away from HAL.

      Of course, no anti-H1-B person would ever come up to my face and say what many Slashdot posters keep blurting out. Especially since I'm white, good looking, and speak perfect English (because, well, apart from some Manx Gaelic and very rusty French, it's all I speak), just with a funny accent.

      I've since moved back home. I really enjoyed my time in the USA and I think it's a great country. I'm glad the H1-B opportunity exists. I also found it refreshing to see my own country from the view of being 4000 miles away gives you.

      If you think about it, if you have a choice of H1-B workers or outsourcing, H1-B is far better for the United States. H1-B workers will be paying tax in the US, buying goods and services in the US, and the education and skills they bring to the US will have been paid for probably by a foreign government. In many cases, the H1-B is a win. The United States is built on immigration. Judging by the majority of the US population, your family was an immigrant family too, probably less than 10 generations ago.

    2. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd never come upto your face and tell you what I think about H1Bs - I'd spit in your face.

    3. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't have the guts. Besides, if you did that I'd beat nine shades of shit out of you and enjoy it :-)

    4. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by DrEasy · · Score: 1
      So when there IS an abundance of local talent (evidenced by the posting volume of /. posts) why aren't H1B's sent home?


      Maybe because you can't treat people like you'd treat old CPUs? So you bring people in when you need them, and then dispose of them when you don't? "H1Bs", like most human beings, have a family, kids who go to school, a home, friends...

      Now having said that, I agree that any immigration policy has to be crafted carefully, with considerations of the impact on the long term economy, as well as cultural and social integation, so that it contributes positively to the melting-pot.

      Most European countries went through the same crisis 30 years ago, when they brought in loads of blue-collar workers, who solved a punctual economic need, but who also took ages to fit in. All it did was generate racism on one side and fundamentalism on the other.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    5. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys were working REALLY cheap (like $8/hr) and the company had no intention of hiring any Americans because they wouldn't work for $8/hr. They had some scam running where a few of the american employees did work that cheap "officially" but got kickbacks for supporting the H1B program. I came into this company from a merger, and left shortly thereafter.

      This seems unlikely to me: to get labor certification for an H-1B applicant an employer has to submit a form ETA 9035E, and section D of this form requires the employer to submit information about prevailing wages in the city of employent, including the source, and the year the source was published. I'm sorry, but I just don't believe any $8/hr ($16,000/year) would be acceptable to the INS as an H1-B salary. This post is a silly troll.

    6. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repopulating people is not my complaint. My complaint is to stop issuing so many HB-1 visas when a field such as the computer field is over saturated. When the level of unemployment is high in a specialty, why would you bring in more workers in that specialty? Yea, some people are laid off because they suck but come on? There should be some sense used when issuing visas.

    7. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      American workers pay taxes too, and buy things, neither of which they can do when they are unemployed. I don't see how you can argue that Americans were better off due to your labor. People need to face the fact that, unless a foreign citizen is coming here (or to your country) to open a new business, he is taking away a job that could have gone to a local.

      Taking a job does not create more jobs. If a company earns more money, they can just use that additional money to hire more workers. The fact is that wages in any first world country are inflated far beyond what they would be if all of the inhabitants of 3rd world countries were free to move to or work in the 1st world countries.

      Really the whole point of this is that equalizing the wage discrepancies in the world will make every country a 3rd world country. All first worlders are basically enjoying a kind of cartel. Labor prices are kept artificially high by reducing the competition. In a truly free worldwide marketplace for labor, even skilled labor, it would be exceedingly difficult for anyone to earn more than a few dollars an hour. In some countries even doctors earn less then $50/month.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    8. Re:Why are H1B's not sent home in a bad economy? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point. My point was, that given this choice:

      (a) hire one H1-B worker
      (b) outsource the job

      that (a) was a great deal more beneficial for the United States. Indeed, much of the economic success of the United States can be attributed to immigration.

      If you hire an H1-B, the H1-B buys goods, services and pays taxes. It isn't a zero-sum game either. In some cases, an unscrupulous firm may be hiring an H1-B to replace a local worker, but in many more cases, the H1-B is not "taking a job". In the case of the firm I was working for at the time, all of us "filthy stinking rotten foreigners" were earning exactly the same as the locals with the same working conditions. (Since I was an intra-company transferee, not only did I keep my better home country vacation entitlement - we start off with 25 days of vacation rather than 10, but I was also being paid an international service allowance, so my conditions were actually better and it was one of the reasons I was so happy to stay for 6 years).

      One thing that is undeniable is that immigration is far better for a country than outsourcing. In outsourcing, not only does your job get replaced, but the money is flowing out of your country instead of into it. Just look around you - probably 99% of the people you know are descendents of immigrants or immigrant families. I could safely wager that your last name is of European roots, too...

  162. How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Indians, my friends, aren't the ones we have to blame. We need to look closer to home.

    The philosophy of market fundamentalism--the mantra of Fox, Wired, Rush, Gilder, Friedman and every zealous conservative and libertarian pundit--is doing an excellent job of encouraging business to turn its back on US employees. We'll see much, much more job flight in the short term until the brakes are applied to this savage anti-social approach.

    Plainly this is what happens when you shatter the social contract and replace it with an ideology of dog-eat-dog. When times are good, it's nice to be able to bark, "Hands off my bone!" Not so nice, is it, when times are bad... Then, living under dog ideology isn't all it's cracked up to be, and you may come to see that millions and millions of your fellow Americans have been given the same raw deal.

    For America, reeling under the destructiveness of this philosophy, a reordering of priorities is necessary. Increasing shareholder wealth may be the highest goal of a company; but it should never be the highest goal of a nation.

    Above all, as you see jobs go to India, or elsewhere, and worry that it might be yours next, remember whose advice and guidance led you to this low hour. Remember also who made historically high profits from your labor in the 1990s, but now pleads the inability to continue your employment. And ask yourself if you can afford to subscribe to the politics of plutocrats who don't care if you and your family sink or swim.

    1. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by zero+time+ghost · · Score: 2, Funny

      I look forward to the day when economists are offshored. We'll see how the free market ideologues hold up, then.

    2. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by sylware · · Score: 1

      Some companies started to offshore finance, accounting and... medical diagnosis. IT is only the first one, because it is the one needed to make possible offshore plenty of other domains.

    3. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by halo8 · · Score: 1

      I think voltaire said it best

      "The most ideal form of goverment is Democracy tempered with assasination"

      i say its time to thin the "fat cat" heard

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    4. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by firstkillallthelawye · · Score: 0

      Yep, Just some more liberal pablum for the masses! I just love the idea of working hard to pay more taxes so my government can spread the wealth I earned to people who lacked the sack to get out of their stoned comas long enough to become gainfully employed. Liberals are destroying America with this unadulterated BS!. This is the Weapon of Mass Destruction we REALLY should be rooting out and killing!

      --
      "The first thing we must do is kill all the lawyers" - Henry VI, Wm. Shakespeare
    5. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economists?

      I'm waiting for the LAWYERS to get offshored. THEN something will happen to reverse the trend.

    6. Re:How do you afford your right wing lifestyle? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I realize that was a joke, but there are lots of economists from foreign countries these days. The econ dept. at Oregon State had a lot of eastern Europeans(Ukranians, Russians, etc.), apparently because those countries have good math education. Funny how people don't complain about light-skinned immigrants....

  163. Did you f*ck her? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She's young, beautiful and rich."

    I hope you did. But I suspect she is spoiled because she has it so good, so don't hang around for breakfast.

  164. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1
    To get a work visa, you must have an employer who has applied to get you in, and has demonstrated that there isn't local talent who could do the job you're being hired for.

    Tell me about the "demonstrated that there isn't local talent who could do the job" part, again?

    Because that certainly doesn't seem to be how the H-1B program is working here in the U.S.!

    Companies are laying off long-time skilled workers, because they can save some money by bringing people from overseas. Of course, none of these companies seem to realize that if they all lay off workers, they're not just losing workers, they're losing customers, because a large portion of those wages leaves the local economy.

    Here's a tip for all those executives: You cannot lay off enough people to dig your way out of a recession. You get out of a recession by HIRING people, so they have money to spend.

    !Sig

  165. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by akmad · · Score: 1

    Why do we just accept the fact that the H1B is hurting american workers? H1B was a great policy when companies could not find employees. American workers had jobs, Indian workers had job, companies filled the positions they needed filled; everyone was happy. Now the economy is much different; companies aren't hiring, Americans are out of work, Indians still have many of the positions in the US and they have many opportunities in for work in India (work that used to be in the US). While I don't think that the current H1B workers should be kicked out it is beyond me why we are still accepting more. There were 150,000+ H1B visas granted this year! So this leaves American workers out of work, costing us the taxpayers in Unemployement and hurts the economy because unemployed people can't buy as much.

    I don't hold anything against H1B workers; they've just taken advantage of a situation that is great for them. I blame this on goverment policy and the companies that choose to screw US employees to make a couple more bucks.

  166. Why the hell should the Indians care? by Pac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I know, American companies, led by American managers, controlled by American dhareholders, are relocatting your jobs to places where they can have the same service for less money. Go complain with them. Or with your Congress. The Indian workers do not need nor care to become a citizen of your country. The jobs are being offered in India...

    1. Re:Why the hell should the Indians care? by sbuckhopper · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, American companies, led by American managers, controlled by American dhareholders, are relocatting your jobs to places where they can have the same service for less money. Go complain with them. Or with your Congress. The Indian workers do not need nor care to become a citizen of your country. The jobs are being offered in India...

      Good point, lets look at this another way though -- these are two articles written in a language commonly spoken in the United States published by a magazine in the United States talking about the state of how the job market is in the United States.

      That would imply that the target audience is the United States. One of them in peticular, CIO, which seems to be the focus of this discussion, is an acronym for Cheif Information Officer, a term coined to describe the person in charge of the IT area of a company. I believe that this is one of the groups that you explicitly mention as the correct group to be complaining to.

      So by basis of the exact same anaylsis that you did, it seems quite obvious that the target audience for the articles is the parties in the United States who you were referring to -- not the Indians.

      If anything it could be seen as a way to disgust the US companies that are outsourcing into not outsourcing because they will see that it helps them in no way beyond their bottom line (yeah like that may happen), or perhaps the target was to scare the legislators into action.

      You may also be enlightened by the about CIO.com statement on their site. Incase you don't feel like following the link, here is what it says:

      Our primary audience is made up of CIOs in the United States, although we have readers from around the world. Different versions of CIO are now published in nine other countries/geographic areas (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Korea, New Zealand, Singapore, and Japan) with more planned in the coming months.

      --
      "Everybody knows the moon's made of cheese," Wallace.
    2. Re:Why the hell should the Indians care? by dslgross · · Score: 1

      They may not wish to have American values and attitudes present in their companies. The people they have don't have the whole American work ethic. That ethic involves things like work rules, unions, overtime etc. Having an American would infect the local workers with ideas they don't want over there.

      Sorry no cute tag line.

  167. Death Penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say we give the death penalty to all the CIOs/CEOs who import these dirty, smelly, ass-backwards towelheads who come over here and pollute our country.

    While we're at it, let's nuke the shit out of the middle east and put an end to the H1B/L1 visa problem by taking out the populace.

    DEATH to ALL the FUCKING towelheads! Death TO all THE fucking TOWELHEADS!

  168. Abuse of H-1B Laws by reporter · · Score: 1
    Well, duh... As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

    However, abusing the H-1B laws is easy. Silicon Valley has 8% engineering unemployment, yet unethical American companies like Intel insist that they cannot find American workers to hire. In fact, they have asked Congress to maintain or increase the H-1B quota.

    Join with us in the Slashdot community. Support outsourcing but stop the H-1B program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  169. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The part the gets me is all the people saying that they will "only" get $700/month in India. What I would like to know is what is the cost of living in India, I bet that $700/month would easily pay your bills and give you a nice hefty chunk left to go out to eat.

    This is like people getting upset over "sweatshops" people getting payed $10/day to work 12 hours, when their rent/mortgage and such comes out to be $10/month, leaving them a hefty amount of money for the 5 cent loafs of bread and the chicken at $2 per recently butchered whole chicken? Where is the injustice in this?

    The cost of living is high here in the US, and we pay the price. When gas prices hit $1.70 per gallon, we bitch and moan, AS we are filling up our SUVs.

  170. Globalisation: not free travel of workers by zebul0n · · Score: 1

    Welcome to globalization!

    Globalisation means free travel of products not free travel of workers.
    Free travel of people doesn't apply if the people are under-developed...

    Z.

  171. You can get an H1B without a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. Now they can come over here on speculation without even having a job offer, and then apply for jobs that are advertised domestically.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/ co mp/articleshow?msid=133722

  172. Maybe depends on the treaties in place? by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1

    I can't speak to the not hiring Americans in America situation, but as for getting jobs overseas sometimes it really depends on the trade treaties in place between the two countries. In North America for example you have the NAFTA visa-Americans are eligible for work in Canada and Mexico and vice versa.

  173. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    So, um, tell me sir, where are all these low-paying IT jobs? I haven't seen any advertised. Since some folks are making $0, they might be interested.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  174. Sure its possible to work in India by TheFairElf · · Score: 1

    You need to get an employment visa sponsored by your employer. Source

  175. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by phliar · · Score: 1
    Ex-squeeze me?

    A non-citizen can't just come waltzing in to the US to take a job, they need to go through the H1B process. It costs money, it takes time, and there's a limit on how many. How do you know India doesn't have a similar law? This guy is steamed because he thought paperwork shouldn't apply to him?

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  176. You don't know what you are talking about by Pac · · Score: 1

    Do have the faintest idea of the difficult it is for any foreigner to get a green card? Nothing prevents the USA from imposing any barriers they want for foreign workers, and they do. If your Congress bought the "IT shortage" speech from the industry leaders, it is your problem, not the rest of the world's.

    And by the way, Americans are not flooding elsewhere looking for work, so "no one will hire Americans" is something at least unclear...

    1. Re:You don't know what you are talking about by sbuckhopper · · Score: 1
      Do have the faintest idea of the difficult it is for any foreigner to get a green card? Yes. I have 8 very close friends who have all gotten their green card since I've known them. The summary of how they did it was this:

      1 of the following:
      • a sponsor
      • a spouse who is a citizen
      and the following mandatory requirment:
      • a good lawyer.
      There were some points of the process where the US could process their papers at their own will and there was a chance that the papers wouldn't be processed before the visa ran out, but on the average case, a green card was recieved within 3 years (H1-B's run out in 5). In one case the green card was recieved in under a year (spouse). By the way, the percentage of people that I knew with visa vs. the amount of them that got green cards is 100% (8 out of 8).

      Nothing prevents the USA from imposing any barriers they want for foreign workers, and they do. If your Congress bought the "IT shortage" speech from the industry leaders, it is your problem, not the rest of the world's.

      Read the part about a good lawyer and get back to me. Although you are fundamentally correct, the US law is all beside itself with political correctness. If you have a good lawyer there are usually loop holes that can be found in it. True, you still can be kicked out of the country, but things like that can happen. Sorry if it happened to you.

      And by the way, Americans are not flooding elsewhere looking for work, so "no one will hire Americans" is something at least unclear...

      Ironic that you say this. I included a bunch of European countries in my last job search. The job descriptions all matched the job description of the job that I have now (which I was hired on during that last job search). I did not get one response to 15+ applications. I may not be in the majority, but I have found it very difficult to find a job over seas, or for that matter, even in Canada. I'm not complaining about it, I just think that you may want think about what you write and make sure that it is not perspective biased.
      --
      "Everybody knows the moon's made of cheese," Wallace.
    2. Re:You don't know what you are talking about by randyest · · Score: 1

      IANAL, and did not need one when helping my wife get a green card. I couldn't even begin to imagine why one would need a lawyer for the relatively simple and inexpensive process of obtaining a green card. The process is pretty trivial (if the immigrant has a spouse or relative who is a US citizen, i.e., me in this case -- I assume it's much harder if not).

      All of the documents and procedures we needed to know ere available on .gov websites, and if you're slow or really paranoid there are loads of (free) FAQs and forums available to help you avoid the few potential pitfalls that do exist.

      I suppose having a lawyer is always a not-too-bad idea (and I hate that fact), but I'm not sure I agree with your characterization of "a good lawyer" as a "mandatory requirement" for getting a green card.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:You don't know what you are talking about by sbuckhopper · · Score: 1

      IANAL, and did not need one when helping my wife get a green card. I couldn't even begin to imagine why one would need a lawyer for the relatively simple and inexpensive process of obtaining a green card. The process is pretty trivial (if the immigrant has a spouse or relative who is a US citizen, i.e., me in this case -- I assume it's much harder if not).

      Good point, now that I think about it, the reason why that person needed a lawyer was due to a situation where they were here on a research visa and would stand the chance of getting deported if they got married while on the visa. This is why they got a lawyer, but another group of my friends initially went to a lawyer and the lawyer told them it would be a waste of their money to hire him (or any lawyer) because of how simple the process was for what they had to do.

      All of the H1-B's I knew had lawyers though. For some reason it seemed trickier.

      --
      "Everybody knows the moon's made of cheese," Wallace.
    4. Re:You don't know what you are talking about by satyap · · Score: 1
      (H1-B's run out in 5)
      3 years, renewable for additional 3.
      I included a bunch of European countries in my last job search. The job descriptions all matched the job description of the job that I have now (which I was hired on during that last job search). I did not get one response to 15+ applications. I may not be in the majority, but I have found it very difficult to find a job over seas, or for that matter, even in Canada.
      Umm, I think everyone's had that experience.
  177. Also not accurate. by Speare · · Score: 4, Informative
    I am an American citizen, who works for an Indian contracting firm, though not the mentioned Tata Consultancy Services.

    I also work with people from Tata, and they do employ American citizens, to fill much the same sort of job responsibilities that my firm does.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Also not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an American citizen of Far Eastern descent?

    2. Re:Also not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But these guys here are not interested in or discussing what actually happens. They are just scare-mongering. They are scared shitless!

    3. Re:Also not accurate. by Speare · · Score: 1

      No, I'm mostly Irish by descent. The Tata worker I deal with regularly is Dutch. Others in my group are typical American mutt.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    4. Re:Also not accurate. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Do they have any other openings for Americans of mostly Irish decent? I can do the accent pretty well. Heck, when I try to do an Irish accent it ends up coming out Indian.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Also not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I also work with people from Tata..."

      And when they walk into the room, do you say "Nice Tatas"?

    6. Re:Also not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if you get laid off on Wednesday, does that mean you have "Tatas till Tuesday"

  178. Re: nature of the U.S. - then and now by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, I almost feel like we should send the Statue of Liberty back to France, and say "Thanks - but we're pretty much done with it now. Why don't you use it now?"

    Of course, the country was "built by immigrants". It's pretty tough to develop a formerly undeveloped nation without bringing some people in from other places.

    After everything is in place and sufficient people are citizens to get everything done that needs doing - I think it's time to re-examine the immigration policies and start tightening things up.

    Despite being very much a Libertarian, this is probably the one area where I'm not sure I can quite agree with their philosophy. Libertarians seem to be very big on "open borders" and allowing unlimited immigration. The idea could work, but only on a level playing field, which much of the rest of the world is nowhere near ready to do.

    In the current world economy, it's economic suicide for the U.S. to allow all of these H1B Visas. Yes, people in many other countries would love to come over here and improve their lives. But no, we can't just let them do so at our own citizen's expense.

    The USA may have become great from welcoming immigrants, but there's also such a thing as having "too much of a good thing". Companies complaining that there aren't enough Americans with the skills and training they require should be funding education and training in the U.S. - instead of outsourcing the jobs.

  179. Re:Duh...(a job for you) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know how to spell, use proper English, and can recognize that two stories are duplicates, you could probably be the editor of some tech news blog.

    Holy shit! When did spelling become a prerequisite?

  180. you are Right : Its called Employment Visa by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    from Indian government Visa Guidelines:
    These are the requirements for an Employment Visa

    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  181. A symptom of other immigration problems by Londovir · · Score: 1
    I'm not surprised in the least by the unfortunate circumstances that the subject of the article is involved in. His problems are symptomatic of a wider issue involving immigration, foreign labor, and other similar concerns that have been growing in the US for a number of years.

    Growing up in South Florida, I've spent 30 years watching the influx of immigrants, both legal and illegal, spread and increase. The ratio of those of foreign origin to native origin in the southern portion of the state has boomed, with areas such as Miami now being nearly evenly split, if not more foreign. I watched news stories begin in a small trickle, then a river, and nowadays a flood where people lose their jobs to those willing to work for a cheaper labor rate. Often (not always, but often) they lose their jobs to foreigners who don't expect fair wages (perhaps out of gratitude for living in the US, or out of fear of being reported for being illegal). It's nothing new in South Florida.

    How often have we seen the same problem in areas of the Southwest, where the large exodus of illegal aliens from Mexico has led to a changeover of jobs from native born workers to those of foreign origin? Most of the time, these foreigners are being exploited by the employers because of their status, which is a problem in and of itself.

    Now we're seeing the 21st century version of this same problem, where employers are outsourcing vital job opportunities to foreign businesses or individuals. This is a decade where businesses fail at any moment because of the ripple effect felt by lack of consumer confidence, unsteady stock prices, and often unethical & illegal corporate business practices. In order to survive, these businesses will try to cut to the bone wherever they can, and rather than pay the average rate to an American employee, they will go where they can to save what they can.

    Will laws help solve the problem? Probably not. They may stop the flow for awhile, but it won't succeed in the long run. We already have corporations move their corporate headquarters offshore in order to escape tax brackets and regulations. We have auto companies move major manufacturing plants to Mexico so that they can hire lower cost labor and make a higher margin on their vehicle sales. If states such as California pass some law that restricts the hiring of foreign employees, the only result I can foresee for the future is an exodus of companies from California to states that allow it, or to countries other than the US.

    It almost makes me glad that I abandoned Computer Science in college in favor of Education. I don't have to compete with foreign labor for cheaper wage rates - as a teacher cheap wage rates are already built into the system!

    Londovir

    --
    Londovir
  182. Dumbass by Merk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd call you a troll but with so many people saying the same thing it must be an actual viewpoint a lot of dumbasses have.

    Do you think a secretary or a security guard has the same mortgage payments you do? They have accepted their jobs pay X a month and have learned to live within their means.

    Your job no longer commands the salary it once did. Deal with it. Don't whine about not being able to make mortgage payments, move to a smaller place! If your phone bill is too expensive, use the damn phone less!

    1. Re:Dumbass by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
      Well, it's obvious YOU are trolling. Try selling a house in an area with the economy bottomed out: you have two choices: either sell for less than you paid. . .or sit on the house, hoping values will go up. Of course, you COULD just walk away.

      Likewise, the phone bill. At a certain level of use or less, there's a minimum payment whether you use it or not.

      I made it through the dot-com bust, but it sucked. I have friends STILL looking for jobs, a year later, who now work as managers at fast food places, or at Sears, or wherever.

      Get a little compassion for your fellow geeks, pal. . .

    2. Re:Dumbass by M-2 · · Score: 1

      Get a little compassion for your fellow geeks, pal. . .

      Compassion isn't a 'Family Value'.

  183. Re:The bigger story - liability by gillbates · · Score: 1

    But what about the liability issue - you contract with an Indian firm, and when the project goes into production, it doesn't work.

    So what do you do? The programmers, consultants, and your money are all overseas, out of reach of US law. You can sue, maybe, but good luck collecting a judgement.

    Quite frankly, I've heard horror stories about outsourcing. You know, the projects that didn't integrate correctly, didn't work, and the worst of it was that the company had to bring in local consultants to fix it. Of course the consultants charged much more than the project would have cost in the first place had it been done in house.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  184. counter example: Permanent Residents in the USA by reporter · · Score: 1
    That's common in many countries all around the world. As long as you aren't a citizien it is rather hard to get a job - not just because of possible prejudices but also simply because you are not allowed to!

    However, there are varying degrees of "not allowed to". Permanent residents in the United States of America (USA) have almost the same privileges as citizens. Even IBM treats permanent residents (i.e. folks with just a "green card") identically to citizens. Permanent residents can get a job just as easily as citizens in the USA.

    Of course, a person who has neither permanent residence nor American citizenship has a relative easy time looking for work in the USA. A person of the same status would have a mucher harder time in Japan, for example. This ease is the source of abuse in the H-1B laws. Folks, we in the Slashdot community must wake up! Silicon Valley now has 8% engineering unemployment, yet unethical American companies like Intel insist that they cannot find American workers to hire. In fact, they have asked Congress to maintain or increase the H-1B quota.

    Join with us in the Slashdot community. Support outsourcing but stop the H-1B program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  185. Lets return the favor by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are plenty of unemployed Americans in the computer industry right now. Lets give the jobs to them first. It's only fair.

    1. Re:Lets return the favor by zero+time+ghost · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. $5,000/year salary, it is! Do you like your dogfood crunchy or the kind the makes its own gravy?

    2. Re:Lets return the favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have the crunchy kind please? Actually dog food is too expensive these days. But food isn't the problem. It's the high rents.

      The funny thing about poverty is that the dogs are often the first ones to take the hit. In many countries dogs are skinny scavengers. There isn't much more depressing than seeing the street dogs in 3rd world countries.

  186. I know of several foreigners working in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hi all,
    I haven't read all the responses and some of them may have covered what I am writing.

    I know of several people of non-Indian citizenship working in India.

    One company for which we developed MIS located in the heart of Delhi had a British (white man, not an Indian of British nationality) head.

    The last company I worked for in India had an American head.

    Also, do you remember the Bhopal Gas Disaster of 1984? There were some technicians of American nationality working in Union Carbide plant in Bhopal even in those days.

    Long ago (I think 1993, 94)Microsoft India had an American national of Indian origin handling their affairs in Delhi.

    An acquaintance works in Cathay Pacific and their bosses working in Delhi are British or nationals of some country from East Asia.

    Last year at the height of India-Pak military standoff, it was reported that there were 60,000 individuals of American nationality working in India.

    The guys who are creating the city of New Auroville in India are totally American.

    Hence it is not true that non-Indians cannot work in India. They can do so, can do so legally and also remit dollars to America or Canada. This according to a FERA - Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - consultant who I know and who deals with such matters routinely.

    (Also, there are hundreds of thousands of illegal Bangladeshis living in Delhi and other parts of India, earning money and sending some back to their relatives in BD).

  187. And its' spreading.... by L8knightz · · Score: 1
    I know this story is nothing new, matter-of-fact its an old one unfortunately. I used to work in another industry (Film) which was trashed by the creation of NAFTA, now all the work goes to Canada. So I went back to what I know, computers and after 3 years as an engineer my company lost their contract because the client we supported shipped the jobs to India and Mexico.
    Fortunately, one of the business groups at the company didn't like this idea and were able to negotiate a local engineer for their needs - thus putting my job on life support. How long this will last is anyone's guess.
    I now consider the IT field dead and once I lose my job for good I am moving back to Europe (my wife and kids are German passport holders) where I can find some meaningless job, non-computer related. Then I can go back to computers being my hobby, maybe at that time I can actually enjoy them as I once did because now they are only a source of heartache.

    By the way, I know this isn't only a problem here in the U.S. I have many tech-worker friends back in Germany and they are reporting the same trend going on there as well. I don't know how companies can feel good about their technology and infrastructure being in the hands of a near 3rd world nation halfway around the globe nieghboring countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan. Got a feeling it will bite them in the ass later (one could only hope).

  188. That's business-friendly vs. citizen-friendly by DaveJay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any government that is more concerned about their citizen's well-being than about corporation's well-being will block non-citizens from working.

    Any government that is more concerned about corporation's well-being than about their citizen's well-being will allow companies to hire non-citizens to their heart's content.

    I think that's pretty cut and dried. I am certain someone will correct me shortly. ;)

    1. Re:That's business-friendly vs. citizen-friendly by aliensexfiend · · Score: 1

      No correction necessary.

  189. The other side of the H1B coin? by grn_lantern · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was working on a project a couple years ago where it was decided necessary to hire outside help. I provided the skillset requirements and let others handle the hiring. As a result we hired (temporarily) a fellow from Bangladesh, through a consultant organization.

    I can't remember the particulars of his situation, but the place he worked for really had some strick rules. In order for him to work in the US, he needed someone to sponsor his visa (as others have suggested). He wanted a job here, permanently, but in order to do so had to have someone sponsor him through the process.

    His family (a wife and a newborn) came over later on. I think it was a condition of his contract that he work several months away from them. I might have that wrong. But there was definitely something time related to the job, either he'd have to work for them for X number years or something simliar.

    As I recall the contract fee was cheap, $25k or so over several months. So I can only imagine what he was actually paid. At any moment as well, I belive they could fire/let-him-go and without a visa he'd have to return to Bangladesh. What's more, a lot of the expenses related to the job he had to cover himself (apartment, transportation, travel, etc.).

    Eventually I think he was considering moving to Canada because the immigration process would be faster (6 or 7 years!). But this was before the attacks on the World Trade Center so one can only imagine that it's even longer now.

    I'm not saying I agree with the whole "ship everything out of the country cuz its cheaper" idea. But opposing H1Bs doesn't solve anything either. Ultimately we're all people who are trying to do the best for either ourselves or our families. Folks in other countries have just as much right to find work as we do. As others have suggested, I don't find it too surprising that they'd indicated no Americans could apply. When the consultant I worked with tried to find work elsewhere, as I recall, some places couldn't hire him because they weren't able to sponsor his visa (or didn't want to), one was a state (wisconsin) funded agency.

  190. Re:The bigger story - liability by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    I've already worked on two contracts where the company outsourced development, and it was horrible code. So they brought it back in house to "fix" (translation, rewrite).

    Not to say that foreign developers aren't quality coders, there are plenty that are outstanding. It just seemed to me that you get what you pay for. There were probably unreasonable deadlines to be met and bad code was stuffed in to hit them. On the back end, these two companies were unable to collect from the foreign companies. So they simply stopped outsourcing.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  191. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Dav3K · · Score: 1

    I can't believe the parent to this was modded +5 Insightful. Insightful my ass - more like +5 Isolationist. First off, the H1B is hardly about India - it is used by people from all countries, including Canada, Britain and Australia, to name a few.

    But the real question is this: As an american, would you really WANT to live and work in India?

  192. You probably wouldn't want to live in Bangalore by scarolan · · Score: 1

    I just returned from vacation in India, and I stayed in Bangalore for a week.

    Americans are mostly used to a much higher standard of living that what you'll experience in Bangalore. As mentioned above, the average IT guy will make less than 18000 rupees a month, which roughly equates to about $400USD. It's true the cost of living is less, but you'll have to get used to: frequent power outages, lack of clean, potable water, extremely crowded city with often unsanitary conditions, etc. Bangalore has awful air quality. Although it is the "garden city", they have no emissions controls, and practically anything with wheels and a motor is allowed on the roads. I think just being on the street there must be equivalent of smoking a pack of cigarettes everyday!

    There are ZILLIONS of Indian computer programmers who are vying for that job. Why would they give it to an American citizen? These guys are goofy to think they can try to relocate to India.

    Instead of whining about it they should get some new skills and make themselves more valuable in the marketplace. You have to be flexible and change with the times, not just complain when your job skills become outdated.

  193. I think I see the problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Director has ALWAYS sucked ass. The idea that a port of it could actually make it a more annoying and buggy product than it already was is unfathomable.

    1. Re:I think I see the problem here by azav · · Score: 1

      And please be so bold to tell us why you think Director sucks?

      For people who hate abstract languages with abbreviations and syntax that doesn't make sense, Director is well adopted.

      Sooo, your reasons are... what?

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    2. Re:I think I see the problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he said the mac version was worse than the windows version. Obviously, if he worked ON it then he likes it, he just thought the indians did a bad job porting it.

  194. Outsrc to corps that discriminate agnst Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The idea of this disgusts me. If our corporations are to be allowed to outsource highpaying, high technology jobs, they should be required to do so only to corporations that are willing to balance that favor with ethics that are not hypocritical.

    I am not prejudiced, but I have seen this happen with Indians in the Silicon Valley as well. Once they become hiring managers, they hire only other Indians. And the quality of work is really second rate. Americans tend to hire on merit. Indians, as I have witnessed, on blood (and caste). IMHO, of course.

  195. Free trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is precisely why I stopped believing in free trade. It's easy for corporations to relocate operations, but difficult for individuals to relocate themselves. This creates an imbalance of negotiating power that ultimately results in downward pressure on wages everywhere.

    India got a nice boost in wages, but already I've seen articles that they're losing jobs to other countries that are even cheaper. Expect this process to continue.

  196. Didn't anyone check out the 2nd article? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 0, Troll


    (Who cares about that wetback gringo...)

    There's hidden backdoors put into non-outsourced code. Is it really so much more prevalent a case with outsource code that outsourcing should be avoided?

    Can the perp really get away with it with a source revision control system in place, and the proper contract (And a properly designed network/system infrastructure)?

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  197. let me make a few points by CowBovNeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to know. The US is losing its manufacturing jobs. Have you heard of any factory workers say they want to go work in china?
    The living standards will probably make you flee in a week or a month. Workers do not have health insurance, the language is a big problem etc.

    A while back, I read that a few well known Indian companies were looking for very experienced(8-10+ years) business managers who take charge of the software development units.
    Many Indian companies are getting contracts but they are usually below 50 million $. The big contracts still go to Accenture, IBM etc.
    These Indian companies were willing to pay 60,000 $(all inclusive) for these kinds of managers.
    And still there is a shortage. This is because the software business there has taken off only in the last few years. Prior to that nobody did big business there so that meant that there were not many experienced people to manage large and complex projects.
    People with that kind of experience earn atleast 150k in the US. So if you have the above skills, Indian companies would probably be interested in you. They have no need for pure coders. There are tons of them there. If you don't have any special skills to differentiate yourself, you're probably going to be run over.

    Also, companies outsource because they can!
    If there was a law against outsourcing, would companies do it.
    In the same vein, if US companies could avoid paying tax, many would do so.

    Don't expect companies to listen to you.
    Outsourcing is done because its possible.
    Business is tight. Wall Street is a wolf.
    Everybody wants a piece of the pie.
    Ask your representative in congress for answers.

    --
    Bush is on fire and its not good for my lungs.
  198. Us Immigration worse by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

    Immigration policies generally are worked out between governments, and follow a kind of we'll treat you like like you treat us approach.If a US makes difficult to get a visa for citizens from a country, that country (often more symbolically than anything) does the same to american citizens.

    I'm absolutely sure that if he had a company willing to sponsor his visa application into india he would have had no problems.

    Some times two nations are able to negotiate special terms for their citizens allowing a greater degree of freedom of movement between them. Good examples being the US and canada, australia and new zealand, and the european union.But usually there has to be a good reason to enter a country to work, you have special skills, a company is sponsoring you or your filthy rich.

    If anything america has some of the strictest policies, and by far the rudest and most arrogant immigration staff around, (from talks with many international students, and post doctoral workers in the US and my own personal experience).

    I have a feeling the guy didn't do anything more than call the indian embassy and ask to enter india to find work, and of course he got rebuked. An indian would have to lucky even to get through to the US emabassy on the phone in India, let alone hope to be allowed to enter the US on the vague hope of finding work.

    1. Re:Us Immigration worse by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 1
      True story-heard from a Chinese friend working in Canada-he was supposed to go for a job interview with GE in the U.S. but it was derailed at the border.

      Why? Because he was a mechanical engineer, and as the immigration officer noted, "Why would General Electric need a mechanical engineer?"

      (My emphasis-the immigration officer figured GE should only need EE's)
    2. Re:Us Immigration worse by firstkillallthelawye · · Score: 0

      WHoa There fella!~ "If anything america has some of the strictest policies, and by far the rudest and most arrogant immigration staff around" We'll duh Captain Obvious! There job, a job I personally WANT to them to be obnoxious in doing is to keep people OUT of the county when they try to be here illegally. One of the things we Americans MUST do is stop this insanity of illegal immigration and SECURE OUR BORDERS. I am an immigrant! My family came to this country LEGALLY! We spent the money, cried the tears and shed the blood. What American needs is at every immigration post, a US Marine Recon company, locked and loaded, an anyone trying to get into the country illegally, goes straight back! Or to jail. Their choice. Not some middle aged gray haired ex-school teacher! Nice and Courteous? Please...spare me!

      --
      "The first thing we must do is kill all the lawyers" - Henry VI, Wm. Shakespeare
  199. There are several missionaries working in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Missionaries in India have been working there since 1st century (or zeroth?) since the times of St. Thomas who is considered the patron Saint of India.

    They regularly come to India in droves and work there to harvest lost souls.

  200. To quote a popular song... by twoslice · · Score: 1

    It's no fun being an illegal alien
    Snuck into India to ply my trade
    found a cool job, thought I had it made
    didn't wear a turban and had pasty-faced skin
    got caught real fast before my first paycheque came in.
    It's no fun being an illegal alien...

    -- Fill "subroutine" Callin's

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  201. Project stability - go to India by zpok · · Score: 1

    A friend I worked with has gone the other way and moved from India to Belgium. A very very well trained and capable man, btw.

    He told me that a very good reason to outsource to India is project stability. Your programmers will stick to you from start to finish.

    With the extra overhead, communications issues and exchange of people in both teams ("here" and "there") - that is, if you care about implementing a setup that gets you good code and usable programs - outsourcing isn't really that cheap. But if done well, you have a stable project from start to end.

    This is four years ago, when programmers jumped from one well paid job to another. Things have changed a bit but I think you can follow his reasoning.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  202. Free Trade my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is simple xenophobia. What happened to the libertarian slashdot posts during the boom? It's a bear market so kick out the foreigners? Figure out how the US was made great my friends. Also, consider how a free market works.

  203. Get over it. Improvise, adapt, overcome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been an engineer for about 25 years now. I've been hearing the same refrain, in one form or another, for all of that time.

    I've been an employee, a contractor and a consultant; sometimes all at the same time. I've done electronics design, sales, tech support, project management, tech writing, supervision, embedded controller programming and now IT programming.

    My Motorola IT job is being outsourced to India. Some say this isn't patriotic. I say if programming for Motorola in India isn't patriotic then buying our cell phones in India wouldn't be patriotic either.

    I don't mind being laid off. I've got three side programming jobs going on at the moment anyway. I'll just ramp up the consulting and contracting. But if I did want another full time job, there are plenty. Without even looking I found a company here locally that is adding fifty more Java programmers by the end of this year (and they don't need to know J2EE:)

    Get over it. Improvise, adapt, overcome. Learn something new. Stop reading SlashDot. Start a business. Write a book. Make a movie; it's cheap now. Have some backbone. It's your life. you can whine about how unfair it is or you can get off your butt, use your head and make an opportunity for yourself.

    Life is what you make of it (and other cliches).

    Rob:-]

    "Be the change you want to see in the world." - Gandhi

  204. Immigration by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think that you've read "Camp of the Saints" by Jean Raspail too recently, but I understand where you're coming from. I have some specific points to disagree with, though.
    • The United States is a nation of immigrants.
      The number of 'native' people here is confined to mostly people who have property right to an 'indian' reservation. The rest of us are either from somewhere else or of people decended from somewhere else within the last 200 years. There are very few people who can claim their only lineage from the original east coast Pre-US colonies. Immigrants have brought business ideas, culture, and intelligence. A vast array of our scientists that have developed military materiel are immigrants. We tolerate them, right?

    • Immigrants won't 'take' jobs from existing population for very long.
      Even in our economic downturn, we still have a rather small unemployment rate. Our economy has always been cyclical, and now is no different than any other time, other than the industries most strongly affected. On an upswing companies hire as many people as they can, if they have a need for them, and they trim back when they have spent in excess of what their workforce can deliver, based on economic times. This is normal. It sucks, but as long as we allow the severe swings that we see, it'll remain this way.

    • Immigrants generally contribute to the U.S. Economy over that of their homeland.
      When someone lives here, (s)he buys goods and services locally. This is money that isn't leaked out to foreign companies. Even the immigrant that sends money home for family ends up spending a lot here, since the cost of living is so high. I'd want to see raw figures collected by someone without a bias one way or the other before I would revise that thought.

    • Immigrants frequently assimilate into the U.S.
      Not all immigrants remain, but many do. Many find a much better life here than they have in other parts of the world. They see the salaries of their peers, and ultimately want that salary, or more of that lifestyle. They get addicted to pay-per-view and pizza delivery and cheap transportation. They become part of 'us'. I won't say that they all do, for many who come from countries as economically comparable per capita as the U.S. don't assimilate, but they have no reason to, either. Those from poorer countries become Americans. Their original culture doesn't disappear, but it all gets thrown in.

    It's not nearly as clear of an issue as people make it out to be.
    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  205. Not slashdot! by jbottero · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you know how to spell, use proper English, and can recognize that two stories are duplicates, you could probably be the editor of some tech news blog.

    Which blog would that be? Not Slashdot, we know that!

    1. Re:Not slashdot! by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      I think those all fall under the "there's no way my skills can be found in the States" requirement.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  206. Then in the interest of fairness... by Zathras11 · · Score: 1

    we here in the USA should adopt the same policy.
    Indians (people from India), should be welcome
    to come here for vacation, but not to work. And
    US companies should stop outsourcing their work
    to India.

    Before you moderate me down, know this: my
    mother in a LEGAL immigrant from Eastern Europe.
    I have NO problem with people coming here LEGALLY!
    She had to wait, YEARS, then she came here (not
    speaking ANY English) and she learned the language.
    She became a VERY succesful businesswoman.
    These people are NOT better than my mother, and
    they should not be treated in a special manner!

    I do however have a big problem with ILLEGALS
    (and I ain't talking about sick birds), and I
    also have a big problem with India's policy, if
    it is true.

    If we here in the USA did adopt their policy,
    we would be labeled as racist. Pot, Kettle, Black.
    India, you are racist (but I like your food)!

    1. Re:Then in the interest of fairness... by Zathras11 · · Score: 1

      I should mention that while in college, I had the
      pleasant opportunity to meet an Indian fellow who
      was in my Russian class. Very nice guy, we studied
      together a few times. Tough class! His family
      had come to the USA only a few years prior. He
      introduced me to some Indian snack foods that I
      still enjoy.

    2. Re:Then in the interest of fairness... by lifeone · · Score: 1

      It is absolutely untrue that americans can not work in India. Hell when I was working there in 1992 my CTO was an american. Every MNC that goes to India has a number of American citizens as it's staff. Even my company (here in the US) has 3 vps and countless managers shiped from here on deputation to work there. atleast few of them I know, decided to stay back. Also getting a work permit to work in India is a piece of cake compared to the H1B for USA

      --
      In a perfect world, there should be no Bushes
  207. Re:WTF, you guys dont get it... by satyap · · Score: 1
    Being denied a work visa and being denied work because of being an American are 2 different things.
    This is FUD. Read the article. "Someone" told him. last I checked, only the Indian government speaks for the Indian government. Get a fucking clue.
  208. I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you offshore your IT, how do you police who is doing the work at any time? What is to stop the company you offshore to employing any number of terrorists who can plant time-bombs in the code?

    In fact, how do you know that the offshore companies themselves are not simply cover organistaions for terrorist infiltration cells?

    I'm not trying to spook anyone, I was just wondering what procedures are in place. Anyone here in a position to give any answers?

  209. Economy Draining by g_goblin · · Score: 0

    All I know is the salary once payed to a US citiizen is now going to a foreigner. Who then saves his money, takes it back home with him, and then spends it in his country's economy. This causes our economy to weaken and the foreign country's to strengthen.

    Now the company in the U.S. has a short term gain, but three or four quarters down the line they show a net loss because they have too much inventory sitting in their warehouses. All because the American consumer lost his job and can't buy didly squat.

    I'm thankful for the job I have and hope those who don't have one, find one soon.

    Alan Greenspan

    1. Re:Economy Draining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the American economy. The entire of the west is going through this sort of turmoil because short sighted executives think it's a great and easy way to get your share price up. Then they sell off their shares, p*ss off and leave everyone else in deep sh*t.

      It's happened numerous times in the past and each time countries have gone through huge depressions until the next big thing comes around. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a next big thing this time.

  210. What about Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of these companies that are outsourcing stuff to India have considered what will happen when Pakistan finally decides to take a shot at India? All of those tech jobs (and techs) go up in a nice nuclear mushroom cloud.

    1. Re:What about Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh, and then the Pakis, will perish, expire, cease to be. And a problem will be solved and India will grow faster than now and take over the world.

  211. You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Scot+Seese · · Score: 5, Informative

    My fiance' is presently working in the U.S. on an H1-B Visa. A quick refresher:

    H1-B visas are only granted to persons with the equivalent of a 4-year Bachellor's degree. Part of the application process involves going through a degree equivalency comparison by an accredited lawyer. My fiance' has a Masters' in Computer Science.

    H1-B visa holders have a minimum salary stipulation. I believe the last time I checked it was $35,000 US. My fiance is being paid the same salary as the person that held her position before her, which is substantially higher than minimum.

    The position she was hired for was unfilled for some time as the company could not find someone with her required database/programming/java skills locally (we reside in a small midwestern community of ~150,000 population including neighboring villages and suburbs.)

    The real culprit here is twofold:
    1. The L-1 Visa. The L-1 has *substantially* lower pay requirements. These are the job-stealing visas.

    2. Corporate greed and government inaction. CEO's just see their programming expense as a budget line item to be reduced, like finding a cheaper widget supplier. Government inaction is self-explanitory. They are closing the door too slowly.

    H1-B's are typically attracting highly educated Western Europeans to the U.S. for a number of reasons. Salaries that are 1.5 to 2x higher than back home (not 5-8x as compared to India), A significant other in the states (grin) or a sense of adventure and desire to try the U.S. for a while. I find it baffling that in the wake of the articles regarding Teller's passing that we're questioning the H1-B situation. Post WWII, alot of our brainpower came from Western Europe. Highly skilled, highly educated persons who desire to become U.S. citizens and melt into the pot are what strengthens the U.S.

    It.is.the.L-1.visa.that.is.killing.the.programmi ng .jobs.market.in.the.US.

    PERIOD.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    1. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by zebul0n · · Score: 1

      As long as the door is open for the Western Europeans, it's ok.
      But when Indians (I mean well-educated Indians) start to benefit from the H1B visa, then it's not good anymore...
      I sense some form of racism in here...

      Z

    2. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. The L-1 Visa. The L-1 has *substantially* lower pay requirements. These are the job-stealing visas.

      I am not sure how you can say that.

      I worked in the US for three years on an L1 visa. I had to go through extensive chats with lawyers, check ups on my qualifications, interviews and tests for the field I worked in.

      Plus the job was advertised in the US prior before relocating me to the office in the US.

      I also had to work for the company for a certain number of years (it's been so long I think it was 4), and I could not change jobs when I felt like it.

      It was hardly slave labour. I was getting paid slightly less then someone with the same qualifications (they would of gotten a lot more due to the lack of the people in the US). However because I am not actually employed over there, I still got my home country wages and a per diem was added to bring my money up so I could afford to live in the US.

      Plus the visa runs out and your forced to extend for a short time, but then have to go back to your home country.

      So it is far from a job stealing visa. It is not something someone can just wander into the US with easily. I know more people who have gotten the H1 easier.

    3. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally - some informed opinions on this subject! In my experience (non-American, male caucasian with a PhD and a H1B), the bottom line is that every other H1B holder I know is a highly qualified individual who got sick of the crap salaries and career oppotunities in their own countries. In my field (science), the entire world knows that the US values basic R & D and pays better + the career options are MUCH greater here. It's a no-brainer to come to the US if you want to do well-funded, hard-core research. The H1B visa program covers a large percentage of the US scientific landscape - an awful large fraction of the very best basic science done in the US is directy attributable to this kind of forward thinking visa program - killing it off just because some computer weenies don't have the skills or brains to improve their employability when their job market gets tough is just plain stupid.

    4. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      ost WWII, alot of our brainpower came from Western Europe.

      hell we swiped EVERY german rocket scientist we could find.

      NASA is completely based on German Rocket Engineering Science. We would have not been to the moon yet if it wasn't for those silly German Scientists.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 35k for a 4 year degree...that isn't underpaid. Riiiiight. Oh, and they couldn't fill that job in the midwest? I bet they advertised it for 1 day in a local newspaper. The way the tech market is, plenty of ppl would move to the midwest for a job. The H1B is being misused. You can spin it all you want for hubby, it doesn't change the facts.

    6. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by holzp · · Score: 1

      The position she was hired for was unfilled for some time as the company could not find someone with her required database/programming/java skills locally (we reside in a small midwestern community of ~150,000 population including neighboring villages and suburbs.)

      Dude! I have the car running. Where is this magical place!?

    7. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't exist. When I got my BSCS from a college in a small midwest city, there were no high-tech positions open. I could've taken an RPG or Cobol job, but that was about it.

      I guaran-fucking-tee that I would've worked naked for $30,000 a year to stay in my home town working at a "database/programming/java" position. Couldn't fill the job? My ass. Try "didn't advertise".

    8. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The position she was hired for was unfilled for some time as the company could not find someone with her required database/programming/java skills locally (we reside in a small midwestern community of ~150,000 population including neighboring villages and suburbs.)

      Oh, PLEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAASE!!!!!!!!! I live in a "really" small town in the Midwest (20,000) and RIGHT HERE I know of AT LEAST half a dozen people with those skills, including my own husband who has been unemployed for two years. Requiring a master's degree to write Java sounds like a classic example of tailoring the job requirements to their already-picked-out H1B worker's resume in order to get out of hiring Americans. Or did she have ten years' Java experience too? Maybe they couldn't find an American with a master's degree because over here we have REAL hackers who are capable of LEARNING NEW LANGUAGES ON THEIR OWN! Oh, wait, you said a LAWYER said it was OK? Well that makes everything better, doesn't it?

      Forgive my bitterness. Or don't - hell, I don't care. I certainly don't forgive you for making cute remarks about significant other....(grin) while citizens with years of experience (but no master's degree!)put ads in the PennySaver for home computer repair at an effective rate of less than minimum wage in order to feed their children. I and many people I know are sick sick sick of hearing the lie that the Midwest is devoid of knowledgeable IT workers so they have to import people. If your girlfriend can relocate from the other side of the globe, why can they not find Americans to move within their own country? I have seen Americans go cross-country for less than the number you quote, when they have the chance. Obviously, the company in question chose not to advertise adequately. They chose to lie and say they need someone with an advanced degree to write Java.(Or the PHBs actually believe that. I don't know which is worse.)

      And for the record my husband is not white and neither are many of the people I have seen suffering in this situation. The way you talk about "Western Europeans" as though the fact that they are white makes it OK for them to steal our jobs really makes me sick. This is nothing to do with race, nor religion. It is everything to do with what's going to become of people of all ethnicities in our country in 20 or 30 years if we keep exporting the bulk of our productive activity and bringing in cheap foreigners to do the little that's left.

    9. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what's stupid is arguing that we should displace the entire native workforce of a major industry in order to facilitate the research careers of a few science weenies.

    10. Re:You are all misinformed about the H1-B Visa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And apart from the German launcher people, don't forget the English and Canadians who formed the core of the Apollo spacecraft program. (Came down from Canada after the Arrow was scrapped !sob!)

  212. What Crap ! by kettlehead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please listen to an Honest Indians defence I cannot believe that C I O could publish such a stupid article !!!! IT IS NOT ILLEGAL FOR EXPATS TO WORK IN INDIA ! How do I know this , Well we set up a company makin watches in collaboration with a jap company. The jap company being the majority shareholder sends two japanese managers. All the japanese company had to do was get a WORK PERMIT, Which believe me is a piece of cake compared to the shit we go through to get a h1b or even a student visa. All major US companies and mnc's who set up base in India have a number of managers who are actually expats. In fact the CEO odf Coke India etc. etc are US citizens. In fact articles in indian business magazines have pointed out that there is a recent trend even among Indian companies to hire expat managers. And if u think that they hire only coats, That also is not true. Many Indian software comanies also hire techies although they have to be *highly specialized* However if some of u nice unemployed people want to shift to India, Think of what you are going 2 put urself through. A TechWorker in India with all the qualifications of Daniel Soong may have to work for as low as 200-300$. Believe me thats what my friends here earn! All of u who think that bannin the h1b is the answer may be sadly mistaken. Outsourcing may be a more serious problem than H1B and also realize that artificially creating hurdles rarely solves problems. The companies who are outsorcin 2 India are the ones that are doing this out of desperation alias economic recession. Note that america could not really prevent a lot of manfacturing activities 2 be shifted to bases like China, Malaysia. Banning the h1b also will not prevent the long term ousourcing phenomena.

    1. Re:What Crap ! by mantera · · Score: 1

      "The jap company being the majority shareholder sends two japanese managers."

      you're not comparing like with like. I'm sure if an american company made a major investment in india some american specialists managers would do som supervision.

    2. Re:What Crap ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least if we keep all those h1bs from coming here, there's less of a chance that they will stay here in the USA. All the world, including the Dutch, Indians, Mexicans, etc. all want to come to the US because they *just love* America. They would be "honored" be in the great country. Funny thing is that as soon as they get here they suddenly feel they have all these new RIGHTS. They suddenly have the RIGHT to work in the USA. They also complain about "injustices" in the USA and try to tell us what the USA should do. However, in their own god forsaken hell hole of a country they couldn't say a bad thing about their government out of fear of being thrown in jail. As for the Dutch, like may Europeans, they just hate Americans REGARDLESS of what we do. The US is damned if we do and damned if we dont. So, we just dont listen to the Europeans anymore because of their arrogance and jealosy.

    3. Re:What Crap ! by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I didn't read your whole post nor do I know if you're an American, but in America calling Japan or Japanese people "japs" is rude, racist and ignorant. It's a throwback to the racist slur used during the WW2 days. I just thought you'd like to know before making that kind of blunder in front of other americans.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  213. Waiting for the TPS reports ... by Doofus · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else notice the TPS acronym bandied about in the Computerworld article? I can hardly wait!

    M'kay?

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  214. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

    The last thing we need is for America to become an intolerant, isolationist country again. I don't know about you but my I am not Native-American and I have descended from immigrants. I am very glad that they had the opportunity to come here and work.

    I work with several individuals who were not born in this country and I can tell you that they every bit as talented (if not more so) as the people who were born here.

    Take your hate rhetoric elsewhere.

  215. It's entirely possible to work in India by lifeone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any American can work in India provided they a) have a job there b) their employer is willing to sponsor their work visa. You can talk to any Indian consulate for this. The whole process takes a week or two with all the documentations available. Last time I went to B'lore (2001) I found many Ukranians and Russians there working for the software companies. If they can do it so can you. This sort of articles with a half assed research to find a scapegoat dont bode well in terms of your own philosophies. Remember, not a single Indian arrived in the USA unless an American company sponsored them to come and work here. I liked what the CEO of Infosys said once about all these jobs moving there .. "They came to save money and stayed for quality" Frankly I think this is an unstoppable trend and in a global economy and in the "so called" free market, this is entirely expected. Also some mentalities matter as well. No one gave a damn when the 3rd world countries were starving in the 60s and America and Canada were dumping wheat filled ships in the atlantic. So why should anyone care what happens to their workforce now ?

    --
    In a perfect world, there should be no Bushes
  216. Your grammer and punctuation sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me correct (I don't know where you learned your English):

    They are not taking the jobs. American people like you are putting the jobs over sea. This is done for two reasons:

    1. To increase profits, which of course is good for you, yes you, since you own shares in those companies. What you don't own shares? Then you are an american who doesn't matter.

    2. The other reason is even simpler: To stop people from complaining too much. High unemployment is good for business; it means the workers can't make demands for fear of being replaced.

    So don't blame India, blame your own people. Blame the people who said unions are commie ideas. Blame those who said that business can best be trusted to look after the economy.

    Oh and of course this is not typical America. It is just that good or bad America leads the world. So this will soon be happening in the rest of the world in the not so distant future.

  217. False by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States
    That's one of the paths you can take to getting a Green Card. But to get an H1B you need to (1) convince an employer to sponsor you and (2) be qualified (eg. a degree in a relevant field). There is no requirement to prove that your skills cannot be found in the US for an H1B.
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  218. You can work in India, with a work permit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreigners can work in India, they just need a work permit. I am from Bangalore and I see a lot of foreigners who live and work in India. They tend to be senior managers or executives but they do get a work permit and thus they can work.

    Get a work permit and then apply for a job in India. Tell the company you have a work permit.

  219. devil's advocate: Its a free market baby! by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this age's global economy, the reality is that the US economic model is growing beyond the US's borders. Multi-national corportations are shopping around for the best deal. Particularly when the US economy is struggling, many of these companies will define 'best' deal as the cheapest. Other posters have pointed out that you get what you pay for. Maybe eventually the companies that outsource will realize that their savings on paper are costing them more than they realize.

    In the meantime, technical folks that lived large during the boom times have to realize that people offshore have also realized there's money to be made in technology. Their price is lower, so the jobs go offshore. Those of us here in the US have to either lower our prices or convince employers that we provide more value than the cheaper offshore workers.

    In other news, blue-collar workers have been arguing for years that we need to close our borders to foreign products, or tarrif the hell out of them. Now, suddenly, white collar jobs are being lost as well & people are shouting "Close the borders!" "Get rid of the H1-B's!" "Save MY job!"

    Sorry, dude. Thats the way it works. Change careers. Develop new skills. Start your own business that hires only 3+ generation Americans. But if you choose to drive a foreign car, or watch an off-shore made television, or insert example here of products built outside the US that were/are more expensive when built here, you're living a double-standard. It can't work both ways. Pick your economic system: protectionism or a free market.

  220. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of low paying jobs both IT and not but it is sometimes hard for people with a lot of experience to get them. If you were a VP making $120,000 at your last job and you are applying for a Help Desk job at $40,000 I can tell you that no one is going to hire you because they know you will be gone in a heartbeat when the market improves. They would much rather hire somebody with little to no experience and train them because they know that they will have some loyalty.

    This isn't hypothetical by the way. It is exactly the scenario my friend is going through for the last two years. Go out to Monster and do a search on Help Desk.

  221. Sounds like a good economic policy by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    The US should look into it.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  222. What a troll! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The US is one of the most nepotic countries. Just look at the President. Americans hire on merit. You're funny!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  223. Not quite... by StandardCell · · Score: 1
    US workers cannot get jobs in Canada, Europe, Australia, etc. without first applying, and getting necessary work visas. To get a work visa, you must have an employer who has applied to get you in, and has demonstrated that there isn't local talent who could do the job you're being hired for.

    For an American applying for a NAFTA visa in Canada, an employer does not need to demonstrate a lack of local talent. All you need is a job offer, a letter describing why you are qualified (degrees, experience, and how they relate to the open position), and to be part of the list of qualified professions. In fact, it is possible to qualify for the equivalent of a green card in Canada (called Landed Immigrant status) right off the bat.

    Sadly, you are likely not to find very many jobs. Go to monster.ca or workopolis.ca and see how many tech jobs there are (e.g. type in "computer science" or "electrical engineering"), then go to monster.com and see the difference. If you think US immigration and naturalization policies are "loose" you obviously haven't been to Canada. Salaries are so low here and jobs so scarce so as to be ridiculous. In fact, many Indians and Chinese immigrate to Canada first, then apply for TN visas in the US and then for H-1Bs.
    1. Re:Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of tech jobs in canada...remember we are ~1/10 size of the US population.

      But I will agree with the wages are lower (of course cost-of-living is also lower). Its much better now that the dollar has improved...but prices haven't dropped at all, even on consumer goods.

      I agree its also common that a lot of ppl come here and get landed immigrant status or citenship only to take off to US ASAP.

    2. Re:Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Yes! Canada is, in fact a third world nation that harbours terrorists. We all sit here in our igloos and collect welfare money. We pay for our free health care by stealing from American tourists, and we get rid of our old people by leaving them to die on floating ice cubes. Moron.

    3. Re:Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about that? I don't have time now to double check, but I am an American and I wanted to work in Montreal. IIRC, the requirements to live there were nearly identical to ours. They wanted to make sure that I wasn't "stealing" a job from a Canadian, that my talents were absolutely necessary. In my experience getting a Canadian work (or tourist) visa is every bit as hard as getting an American one.

  224. How about quickie mart store clerk? by ShizzleWizzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cab driver?

  225. H-1B Program: Don't get Angry; Get Justice by reporter · · Score: 2, Informative
    But if Americans can't work in India, then let's kick the damn H1B's out of this country. I had NO IDEA that Americans couldn't get an Indian job. If that really is true (although no real good source was cited), I say fuck 'em and give 'em the boot until India wants to open up it's doors to American workers.

    Don't get angry. Get justice. Join with us in the Slashdot community. Support outsourcing but stop the H-1B program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    We in the West often make the innocent but stupid mistake of extrapolating our experiences in the West to other societies. The morals of people in non-Western societies like India are radically different from the morals of people in the West. To us, allowing an H-1B worker to be employed in the United States of America (USA) but preventing an American worker from working in India is wrong and unfair. To the Indians, such a situation is fair. Radically different sense of right and wrong.

    Don't get angry. Get justice. Join with us in the Slashdot community. Support outsourcing but stop the H-1B program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing". Petition the American government immediately to stop the H-1B program. Do not sit on your ass. Move it.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  226. Not as hard as you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.americanfreepress.net/Free_Trade/H1-B_V isas_Shaft_U_S__Workers/h1-b_visas_shaft_u_s__work ers.html

  227. or even as a Transit passenger on a layover by Blademan007 · · Score: 1

    Now, even if you are just flying through the USA airport system, you will need a visa.

    Man, if the rest of the world did this, my passport would be full of visas and stamps.

    "We recently suspended the Transit Without Visa program, for example, when we received information that indicated terrorists might exploit that system to cause Americans harm. The important point is that when we got intelligence that we could act upon, we acted upon it..." - Tom Ridge

  228. Offshore Outsourcing is rampant by bbrockit · · Score: 1

    It's not just tech support and software development anymore. Enough technology and service industry jobs are moving offshore to seriously threaten the middle-class of America. Check out www.insourceamerica.org.

  229. Stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    USA is also a sovereign country. Let's do the same. It's about time we stop issuing visas to people who steal native born Americans' jobs.
    Nobody "owns" a job - except the person most qualified to do it at a reasonable salary. If you aren't good enough to compete with someone else, irrespective of where they are from, you don't deserve the job. Stop whining.
  230. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by lspd · · Score: 1

    Get used to it. US workers cannot get jobs in Canada, Europe, Australia, etc. without first applying, and getting necessary work visas. To get a work visa, you must have an employer who has applied to get you in, and has demonstrated that there isn't local talent who could do the job you're being hired for.

    It seems that these standards are near impossible to apply, and it goes both ways. When I was stationed in Germany my wife (a US citizen) got a job working for a German photographer. It was basicly light office work...hardly anything that native workers couldn't do. She had to get a SOFA stamp on her passport (Status of Forces Agreement), and her employer had to file some paperwork claiming that no German citizen would/could do the job. For the money he was paying, it's not suprising that no German would take the job.

    I think you could solve the problem both here and in Germany by simply requiring employers that hire foreign citizens to pay them MORE than citizens working in the same job recieve. If their skills are so important, pay shouldn't be an issue right?

  231. You have a foul grasp of economics... by default+luser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that globalization is making Americans more wealthy to the tune of $500 billion a year.

    A Trade Deficit means we continue to import more than we export, that is, spend more than we produce.

    This is a cycle most of you are more familiar referring to as DEBT, in this case, foreign debt. The cycle is hard to stop once it gets rolling, and once foreign debtors no longer believe us credit-worthy, they can refuse us credit and cripple our economy.

    Read this for a better understanding of the situation. Economists have been warning about this for years, and now that our core software industries are packing up for India, things look even more bleak. Considering how every government official in America has chosen to ignore this problem, including every president since Reagan, I can't see us addressing it in time to really help.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:You have a foul grasp of economics... by jimsum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you lend money, you exchange pieces of paper (or more likely, numbers in a database) for real goods that you can use. Debt is a promise to repay; you have the goods, the seller has promises.

      Yes, eventually you will have to repay those loans, but in the meantime you can improve your economy by spending the loaned money wisely, or you can use it to pay for bread and circuses until the repayments start. Smart businesses, consumers and governments will not borrow money except to smooth temporary cash flow difficulties or to invest in money-making capital goods. It doesn't matter what you do with the wealth that other countries are lending to you via the trade deficit; the goods you import, and the net investments that you get increase the current wealth of the country. If you invest that wealth wisely, you'll be able to repay those loans and be better off.

      And don't be so sure that the debt won't turn into a permanent wealth increase. If the debt is repaid when the exchange rate is lower than when it was invested, there will be a permanent transfer of wealth.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    2. Re:You have a foul grasp of economics... by Zimm · · Score: 1

      This is a cycle most of you are more familiar referring to as DEBT, in this case, foreign debt. The cycle is hard to stop once it gets rolling, and once foreign debtors no longer believe us credit-worthy, they can refuse us credit and cripple our economy.

      No, the trade deficit means that we buy more products from a given country then they do from us. That doesn't mean there is any debt, that just means that a country's companies are getting a lot of Dollars that they need to convert to their currency, or they can spend the Dollars here in the US. They get more Dollars from US then we do of their currency. There are implications for currency value in this situation. It looks like what your thinking of is the US budget deficit, which is debt. When the government spends more then it has, it issues bonds, you and I can by these bonds, or so can other countries. This can and does have serious implications on interest rates as the supply of debt in the marketplace goes up.

      Read your linked to article again. The point is that the US has been buying on credit to support our spending on imports. The article goes on to say that there is a good long term out look for exports since our currency is going to be valued less, and foreigners are going to want to spend those dollars, rather then collect them.

    3. Re:You have a foul grasp of economics... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Wow, did you read your own link? All it states is that foreign creditors may want to cash in and get tangible assets if the value of the dollar drops... And American exports are more attractive when their prices fall. Plus it shows the debt at 5% of the GDP. It hasn't jumped appreciably, (it wasn't 0.05% five years ago, for example.) We have a long way to go before your economic holocaust occurs. We are still an attractive buyer to sellers abroad. What other country buys so much worthless shit every year? It wouldn't be incredibly bright of a creditor to suddenly cash in his chips and lose the buying power of the most deep-pocketed nation in the world, (or more likely find additional tariffs on his goods.) It's not as if we're defaulting on debts, we're just paying them late.

      There are other angles to this too. Taxing the living shit out of your citizens isn't the best way to help business either. And some of that tax money goes in the form of aid (indirectly) to those countries, so that futher complicates the situation.

      But, one thing that I find alarming is that we can't get over the hump of early-20th century manufacturing processes, and we wonder why foreign competitors walk all over us. It's not just that American-made products are expensive. I could deal with that. They're also mostly poorly made. Like many areas of the country, we've got a lot of small to medium-sized manufacturing business churning out parts on 30+ year-old equipment, using 70+ year-old methods. About the only improvement in cost-savings has been the hiring of gullible immigrants to do minimum-wage labor. The factories that are modernized mainly use foreign-built automation equipment that has to be maintained by foreign technicians.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
  232. He applied at the wrong company ... by cyrus007 · · Score: 1

    He should have done some more checks before applying at that company. Yes, TATA's are biggest company but they are known for not being ethical, even handed in the business. You should have tried at better companies who do hire foreigners with special skills on contract. He will need to show other specialised skills on top of what he has to get one. There are lot of people with C, C++, Java, Oracle and ABAP skills in India. #

  233. If this is reality, what are our options? by westendgirl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    While completing my (Canadian) MBA program last year, my professor pointed out that more and more jobs were going to Bangalore. He pointed out that most of these jobs were lower-skilled in the grand scheme of skilled jobs. My classmates seemed to take some comfort in the fact that these disappearing jobs were in tech support, QA, and other skilled jobs at the "bottom" of the food chain. (At least, the food chain that they were willing to consider. Anything that would ensure their middle class existence.)

    However, I noted that Indian companies are building on these small projects, much the way that any start-up takes small steps before landing the "big" clients. In time, Indian workers will have significant knowledge of North American & European standards, procedures, and business cultures, as well as a proven track record. Then, Indian companies will be able to take on essentially any work that "developed" countries do.

    My professor agreed, but said we could take comfort in that we would all be retired in 20 years. But I'll only be 49, and what about future generations? He said the answer was to climb to the top of the "skills" food chain. Bioinformatics and biotech were 2 of his examples.

    So, that being said, what are our options, here in the so-called developed world? What are the next big skilled areas? Instead of fighting to keep jobs in our countries, what can we do to stake out competitive advantages? What can we learn to do before anyone else can jump in? How do we stay ahead of the curve?

    And, perhaps more importantly, what options do people who just aren't university material have?

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

    1. Re:If this is reality, what are our options? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Stay away from commodities... anything that can be easily taught and requires only book knowledge can be sent overseas or peddled to the lowest bidder. Programming and System Admin have traditionally been technical positions because they were esoteric and specialized, however with the introduction of commodity hardware and software (think Intel and Microsoft) these skills have become just as much a commodity as the tools they use.

      I don't see a lot of graphic designers complaining about outsourced labor as of yet, although the printing and garment industry already went through that phase about ten years ago.

      So as for Computer Science, you'll need to learn about software architecture and design more than simply development. no longer can you just be a 'code monkey' while expecting to be paid big bucks. You must become the code engineer instead... think about the difference between a hardware engineer and a factory worker at a hardware plant.

      Hopefully though our children will be able to freely move around to different countries and work at whatever job they choose. Making less money doesn't matter if the cost of living some place is really low.

      The funny thing is that you could probably start a new business in India easier than you can get a job there. Why not just move there and become an independent consultant?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:If this is reality, what are our options? by krysith · · Score: 1

      Well, everyone has different competitive advantages (that's what makes economics, and the world, so interesting). You are going to be much better at identifying what yours are than any stranger on the internet. You already have an MBA, that's a big plus, but takes you nowhere on its own. Ask your business school friends what they think you are good at, that is sellable.

      Are you locked into IT? Because my first advice would be to find an industry which ~doesn't~ have half the world jumping into it due to the formerly high return on skills investment (remember when every joe and his brother learned HTML over the weekend and got a job?). There will, of course, be niches in IT which do quite well, but in order to succeed in those, you have to be better than many, many people. Remember that all those programmers who want to stay programmers will be trying to remain ahead of the pack, increasing their skills and leaving the lesser skilled jobs to the newcomers.

      What really matters is what you are good at. Which is usually highly correlated with what you enjoy. So whatever it is, I'd find a way to do ~that~ better than anyone else. But if what you are good at doesn't determine your industry path (maybe you are good at managing people, or making friends, or posting to slashdot), then you can choose to follow the money:

      1) Starting a company in India - more difficult than foniksonik thinks, I believe. It used to be illegal for foreigners, but that may have changed. Besides, there are always ways to get in on the action - just ask Draper International. I don't know if too many people have jumped on this boat yet, but I doubt it. You have an MBA, you should understand where I am going with this.

      2) Start a company here. Doing what? You tell me. You know what you are good at. If you are looking for business opportunities, they are always out there. Post a resume link, I'm looking for partners, maybe I've got something up your alley. I'm not going to post any real opportunities to slashdot.

      3) Develop skills with a high barrier to entry, in a field which is ~not~ going to disappear. This is tough, but rewarding. Brain surgeons do this - as long as brain surgery is around, they'll tend to do well. On the other hand, if the field disappears (think blacksmiths), that investment was wasted. For best results, combine with 1 or 2 (run a company full of brain surgeons), then...

      4) Profit!!! ;)
      Sorry, its /. tradition.

      krysith

    3. Re:If this is reality, what are our options? by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      Hey, thanks. Those are great points -- and ones I'll keep in mind. But I was thinking more in terms of "we" the developed nations -- more in terms of our need to re-think our competencies and move into uncharted territory. For example, in Canada, our government has undertaken a long-term strategy to build national competencies in 10 areas of innovation. While I think this shows good foresight, I think the country needs people on board -- doers and dreamers. Canada is just one country -- and perhaps those 10 areas aren't even the right ones. If we look at the so-called developed nations that are (allegedly) losing ground to lesser and least developed nations, what can we do to stake out new competencies?

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    4. Re:If this is reality, what are our options? by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      I suppose the key is to commoditize knowledge without making it freely available. Knowledge poses a tremendous barrier to entry (expensive, high effort to create), but it is easy to replicate (books, music, code, etc). How do you build a competency in a knowledge area (as a nation) without opening yourself to commoditization of that knowledge (e.g. people reading your books & patents)? And how does this work if further innovation is spurred by sharing?

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    5. Re:If this is reality, what are our options? by krysith · · Score: 1

      National competencies are just the sum of individual competencies, times a conglomeration factor which occurs when you get lots of good people in one spot (ie Silicon Valley). I don't know that government officials are the best people to be directing the direction of innovation - heck, I innovate and I don't know where things are going. I think the best things that the developed nations can do to promote both having their people working in innovative fields and innovation itself, is to 1) create an environment that fosters innovation (many developed countries already do a good job of this) 2) encourage innovative people to move to your country and 3) encourage the people in your country to become innovators. Then let the innovators decide what they want to develop. If its something really worthwhile, it will be something you or I didn't think of.

  234. Assuming there is a direct correlation by Blademan007 · · Score: 1

    between a good economy and a need for immigrants.

  235. TATA and Amerian workers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will post this AC just because ..... you don't need to know who I am and where I work. But I am an American ... Indeed My family has been here from before this was the USA. I type this on a TATA owned laptop. So as you can see ... American can and DO work for TATA.

  236. WHAT ABOUT FEAKING "FREE TRADE"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > They can do that with impunitity. I have no problem with that.

    Why is it they can do this "with impunitity"? Are not my services a product? Does not "Free Trade" demand unfettered access to markets?

    Oh, I SEE. "Free Trade" was really a hidden, pro-Asian, agenda all along.

  237. Why the hell is this post moderated overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why the hell is this parent article MODDed as overrated? Apparently, there are moderators who do not like the content of an article and who do not have effective counter arguments to the valid points in an article, so they then use MODDing to hide the article.

    This is really disgusting.

  238. Facts of India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am posting this from the Indian state of Bihar and
    would like to bring a few facts to your notice.

    Big IT is limited to a few cities like Banglore,
    Hyderabad,Delhi,Pune,Bombay etc.Very miniscule portion
    of the Indian population of 1 billion is involved in IT.

    Perspective Indian IT exports 10 billion USD Microsoft sales 50 Billion USD

    99% of IT wok done in India is outsourced work from
    US,Europe,Japan etc.No original product development
    or ground breaking software science here.
    There is no major contribution from India to any
    Open Source Software project.On the hardware front
    India does not have a decent semiconductor manufacturing
    facility.

    The great "Call Center" story is turning sour.There is
    40% rate of attrition.According to a recent article people
    working at these centers develop physical/physiogical
    problems.Nothing is great about being Sam with a "American accent"
    at night and being Swaminathan during the day.Identity Crises

    Education is pathetic.Original thinking is not promoted.
    Learn by text books and vomit in exams.
    Regarding the IITs in a population of 1 billion you can
    statistically always find 10k people who are exceptionally
    brilliant.The untainted/rigirous selection process ensures
    that these people get selected into the IITs.India has not produced a
    single Noble prize winner since Independence.Those Indians who have
    won the Noble prize are settled and working out of India.If the Noble
    is an benchmark for original thinking you can see where India stands .

    No development in basic sciences as all bright students go to IT.

    Corruption in India extremely high and prevelant in all walks of life.
    Bush and his colleagues would look like saints when compared to Indian politicians.

    Pollution is high in cities and you can see squalor in most areas.BTW Bombay has the largest
    slums in asia.

    Because of its lowest "code monkey" cost India is today on everyone's
    radar screen.When some other country takes that title India will
    be forgotten just like a couple of years before.

    All in all not a great place to be in.....

    1. Re:Facts of India by westendgirl · · Score: 1
      I wish I had some mod points to give you.

      Good points. However, the US, Canada, Australia and other countries started as sources of raw materials and widget factories. Most studies show that clusters of universities and even basic technology firms eventually lead to spin-off companies. Do you think this will be different for India? Surely the potential is there for India to move into other areas in time?

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

  239. What the case really is-The damning of America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worse than that. Don't forget the age discrimmination that occured as well.

    A couple of things for people to research:

    1-Who started us onto the path of Globalization (follow the money)?

    2-Who does Globalization actually benefit (follow the money)?

    BTW A true test would be if we move all the corporate HQs overseas. See if they can survive in the environments they created.

    A good book to read on the subject.

  240. Sexing up the story? by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
    I cannot believe /. editors can be so naive, and/or biased. Most sincerely, the heading of the /. story not only misrepresents, but blows out of proportion a hearsay from another site! Even if we assume that the person in the story is speaking the truth, it is one SINGLE non-official response from the country. I have to ask /. editors, would you report if such an incident occured in the US to a single Indian person?

    Here is a CREDITABLE story of a french citizen to made it big in India. The holy frenchman

    Another viewpoint of H1 visas. Visas vs. jobs

  241. The article is just plain WRONG by Aryawhat · · Score: 1

    The article has got the 'working in India' part completely wrong, or maybe thought it sounds more interesting this way. I'm a manager at an Indian software company. I'd rather not enter the moral debate here, but here are some facts: - We have American and British citizens working at my company. - The last company I worked in had American citizens working. - I know of several others working at other companies I know. - Several of these people are not transferred by American companies to work in India, but applied for (and got) positions in India companies.

    1. Re:The article is just plain WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have American and British citizens working at my company"

      Yeah, but they are being of having their origins from India, are they not being of? That shouldn't technically count.

    2. Re:The article is just plain WRONG by Aryawhat · · Score: 1

      Ethnicity wasn't mentioned in the article or the Slashdot thread. The point being made was that American citizens cannot work in India. However, the ethnic side of it was, perhaps, what they were really trying to say, and by that logic, I agree, the people of Indian origin shouldn't count. While most people I mentioned are, indeed, of Indian origin, I know of two cases which would fall into the "people of European origin" class, if that is the correct description. Their reasons for being here are surprisingly similar. One if married to an Indian, and the other is working on a relationship with one. The point I'm making is that I'm happy to have them. My company does work which needs a solid grounding in computer science, deep algotithm and system programming skills. These skills are relatively hard to find in India, and both these developers are outstanding computer scientists. As their manager, I'm scared they'll leave, rather than the other way around. Software jobs in Indian pay way more than most other industries. Most software people here are trying to make as much as they can while the going's good. Keeping out Americans is very far from being on anyone's agenda.

  242. Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by Tor · · Score: 5, Informative
    The title "No Americans Need Apply" is both incorrect w.r.t. working in India (or other countries) in general, and only serve to rile up the more, ahem, chauvinist elements among the (American) Slashdot readership.

    In order to work in India, you need a work permit. Not knowing exactly the procedure for obtaining a work permit in India, I can only speculate that one will normally be issued only for jobs/diciplines for which there is no qualified native applicants.

    That's the same way it works in the USA. In order for foreigners to get a work permit (a H1-B visa), the prospective employer must:
    • Advertise the position publicly for 60 days
    • Demonstrate that the candidate has unique skills pertaining to the job
    • Be unable to find qualified candidates that are either citizens or permanent residents.


    The H1-B visa is temporary (expires after 3 years, can be renewed for a grand total of 6 years). This is kind of unique - not many other countries have this restriction.

    Finally, a H1-B visa is tied to a particular employer (which some other countries do, but not all), so the holder cannot change jobs without going through this process again.

    Given these restrictions, only a small percentage of American companies (usually mid-size companies that otherwise have troubles finding qualified personel) are willing to sponsor H1-B visas for foreign workers.

    In a country of ~250 million people, an influx of 150-200 thousand legal (H1-B) immigrant workers per year is nothing - indeed, a much lower percentage than other western countries (including my native Norway).

    Of course, illegal immigration is much larger, and a different problem alltogether. Too bad some of the less intelligent elements of this society is unable to distinguish the (modest) number of legal immigrants from the (huge) number of illegal immigrants.

    The process of getting a permanent residency ("green card") -- remember, the H1-B is only temporary -- is even harder, and many more steps are involved (including INS, the department of labor, and a handful of other agencies -- all of which are understaffed and overwhelmed).
    I was personally on a H1-B visa for nearly the allowed 6 years -- it took me that long to apply for (and receive) a green card. I am in a field where there is still a lot of demand for labor, and I am from a country for which parts of the application/qualification process goes quicker than for most. (Yes, the processing time of one of the agencies involved in the serialized green card application process depends on where you are from).

    Re: Outsourcing to India in general, I can only say: Tough. The USA is getting what it asked for - a more globalized economy. If the US gets easier access to foreign markets, then foreign countries get easier access to the US market as well. Indian-produced goods and services (whether managed by US companies or not) can enter the US market more freely, just like US goods and services have already entered other markets more freely.

    The bad news for industrialized countries is that this will level the global playing field w.r.t. salaries, standards of living, etc. The good news for the developing word is the same. All the same, it means further concentration of power an money in the hands of large, multinational corporations, whether they be incorporated in the USA or elsewhere.
  243. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, you should read before you open your mouth. The US sponsors only 65,000 H1B visas a year, which is a tiny percent of the overall market. I agree it may make the market more competitive, but as the only superpower you should concern about having the BEST people, regardless of background. If you want a job, get more education or something. Now, the salary makes easier to hire immigrants, since we usually take a lot less than Americans. Do not blame us; blame the American society which is always trying to maximize profits. Besides, at current US birth rate you will require immigrates to work here to support your retirement benefits. So please do not speak so loosely. This is not an easy issue and I if were American I would probably think as most of you do. It is well known that you need cheaper workers for agriculture and such and American hire them to maximize profit. What make that good and this bad?

  244. Tarbosh the Indian Magician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh what we ought to do is outsource all of the cokehead, WAY overpaid executives in this country. Especially record company executives, and attorneys...oh please let's outsource the attorneys. That should go over well and very quickly our corporations will be hiring Americans again. But then again, given the insanity of California, there won't be any Americans left.

  245. dog-eat-dog by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    (Not aimed at the parent article)

    Funny how people support the "dog-eat-dog" philosophy until it hurts them, then it is unfair. Be careful what you wish for, you may just get it.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:dog-eat-dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone is claiming that it is "unfair". That would be a tough argument to make. It's just self preservation. Trying to maintain our first world living conditions while competing with others who don't have them.

      If everyone were to just "share the wealth" the world would be a much "fairer" place but first worlders would have to adapt to third world conditions. It may not be "fair" that we live better without working any harder, but who can blame us for wanting to live comfortably. The third worlders want the same thing, and I don't think they would be any fairer about it than we are were our positions reversed.

  246. Tenacious Tatas by xigxag · · Score: 1

    For those who may have forgotten...this Tata Consultancy Services is a subsidiary of the very same Tata that took over the website www.bodacious-tatas.com in the landmark cybersquatting case.

    That is one big bad Tata!

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  247. Re:Are there any mods older than about 14 here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only mom's-basement geeks without taste or a sense of humor would pick that movie for their semi-monthly foray in to the Overworld.

  248. RTFA by dkermit007 · · Score: 1

    Read the damn article you imbreads. It says he sent his RESUME overseas not himself.

    1. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Read the damn article you imbreads. It says he sent his RESUME overseas not himself.

      Ok, let me get this straight. He send his resume overseas. Noone offered him an interview (who's paying the travel costs?) He concludes that he can't work overseas? What did he expect, that foreign companies should be mandated to consider his application?

  249. An example of a foreigner who worked in India by rsidd · · Score: 1
    If he could succeed, you can, too.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3094780.stm

  250. The Homeland Security Act should outlaw foriegn IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn.. Patriot Act, Homeland Security, you figure that some foriegn national would be barred from working on any governement IT work. And since Oracle .
    Since Oracle Employs many of these monkeys we should not use Oracle.

  251. You can work in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all countries, but at least 3 years ago the only requirement for working in Spain was you couldn't live there for more than 3 months at a time. Practicly that ment anyone wanting to work in Spain needs travel somewhere to get their pasport stamped every 3 months. With the EU that isn't as easy as you might think, France rarely even as someone at the border who could stamp your passport if you are comming in from Spain.

    Laws change all the time, the above was current 3 years ago, but might or might not be now.

  252. Moderators are inconsitent idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Original post being replied to]
    "India has 1 Billion people to employ. The last thing they need is Americans coming in and taking quality jobs."
    [Reply to Post]
    "the last thing we need in America are for Indians coming in and taking quality jobs also."

    To the moron moderator who doesn't get it. It's the original statement with "Indians" substituted for "Americans". If the reply is flamebait, then the original is too.

    If you STILL don't get it then:

    "India [America] has 1 Billion people [Whatever the US population is] to employ. The last thing they need is Americans [Indians] coming in and taking quality jobs."

    1. Re:Moderators are inconsitent idiots. by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Just shows how biased the crowd here at Slashdot is. It's ok for the world to shit on the Americans, but turn those words around to them and they accuse flamebait. Well, as far as I'm concerned, fuck the world. Fuck everyone who shits on America, and fuck every one of those lousy fuckers that talk shit about America then whine when America doesn't help them out. Fuck those here in America that crap all over it, and are going to school on government grants. I've had enough of em all. Fuck Bono and the countries he want's debt relief for. Fuck countries that 'borrow' money from America and craps all over America every chance they get. If anyone doesn't like what I've said then fuck them too.

  253. Re:counter example: Permanent Residents in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You realize that almost all countries have a concept similiar to "permanent residency"?
    And you know that H-1B != Permanent residency?

    Then please tell me what exactly your post was supposed to mean.....

  254. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    applying for a Help Desk job at $40,000

    A help desk job at $40,000? WHERE! I want that.

    I'm doing real programming and have a CS degree. All I can seem to get is about $30,000.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  255. Words from Naughty by Nature... by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    India I believe is still majority an agricultural country. Granted, Bangalore is consider the fastest technology growing city in Asia. However, if you google for Bangalore and select a few links, you will see that Bangalore is also becoming the urban city of the west where it is dealing with a massive population explosion, every form of polution problem known to man, i.e. ranging from air to water. And you also have the urban ghettos and slumbs in the country side where the malnutrition is also a big problem. This article describes some of these urban ghetto problems. So before you make a permanent change of address, you may want to take a second look and perhaps listen to the final words from an old rap song from Naughty by Nature...

    If you ain't ever been to the ghetto
    Don't ever come to the ghetto
    'Cause you ain't understand the ghetto
    And stay the f*ck out of the ghetto

  256. H-1B and L-1 Visas: 2 Wrongs do not make a Right: by reporter · · Score: 1
    It.is.the.L-1.visa.that.is.killing.the.programming .jobs.market.in.the.US.

    Two wrongs do not make a right. Don't get angry. Get justice. Join with us in the Slashdot community. Support outsourcing but stop both the H-1B program and the L-1 program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    If an unethical American company wants to hire H-1B workers at a time of 8% unemployment, they should go overseas and setup shop there.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  257. Get rid of the green card lottery first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as an immigrant I must say that perhaps you should consider the elimination of the green card lottery first (50,000 each year, 64000 H1B). In the H1B market at least there is some competition. Whith the lottery who knows who is coming to America. Unfortunately the trend of moving jobs overseas will continue while such a big difference in salaries exists.

  258. Americans, inform yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is globalization in practise. Lovely when it benefits you, not so nice when it doesn't. US trade and competition policies are destroying many things, but only when they affect you do you whine. Uninformed whiney little bitches.

  259. Income Tax by pinka · · Score: 1


    That's not true. If you are employed by a consulting organization *outside* the US, you can work in the US but get paid in your country of employment. I did an almost year long stint in Sweden working for a US consulting firm and certainly did not pay Swedish income taxes. I also did a 6 month project in Canada and did not pay Canadian income tax. If an Indian consultant works in the US but is employed in India, they also would not pay US income tax.


    This depends on the specific tax treaty between US and the country you are going to work for. But why am I arguing here? The American Worker has risen and the target is India. The message, "open your country to our goods, but don't compete with us". Farm subsidies, enough to drown the world in a sea of maize; steel subsidies propping up inefficient mills in Pittsburg, (which incidentally hurt downstream industry in America, but I guess Detroit needs to exercise its first amendment rights more vigorously) and now more protection for java (substitute your favorite language) coders.

    1. Re:Income Tax by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Slashdot only mentions the export of tech jobs but it's happening in many other service fields too. I've heard of legal research, accouting, and medical transciption work being exported out of the US too.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  260. Facts about India by pinkmamba · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I am posting this from the Indian state of Bihar and would like to bring a few facts to your notice. Big IT is limited to a few cities like Banglore, Hyderabad,Delhi,Pune,Bombay etc.Very miniscule portion of the Indian population of 1 billion is involved in IT. Perspective Indian IT exports 10 billion USD Microsoft sales 50 Billion USD 99% of IT wok done in India is outsourced work from US,Europe,Japan etc.No original product development or ground breaking software science here. There is no major contribution from India to any Open Source Software project.On the hardware front India does not have a decent semiconductor manufacturing facility. The great "Call Center" story is turning sour.There is 40% rate of attrition.According to a recent article people working at these centers develop physical/physiogical problems.Nothing is great about being Sam with a "American accent" at night and being Swaminathan during the day.Identity Crises Education is pathetic.Original thinking is not promoted. Learn by text books and vomit in exams. Regarding the IITs in a population of 1 billion you can statistically always find 10k people who are exceptionally brilliant.The untainted/rigirous selection process ensures that these people get selected into the IITs.India has not produced a single Noble prize winner since Independence.Those Indians who have won the Noble prize are settled and working out of India.If the Noble is an benchmark for original thinking you can see where India stands . No development in basic sciences as all bright students go to IT. Corruption in India extremely high and prevelant in all walks of life. Bush and his colleagues would look like saints when compared to Indian politicians. Pollution is high in cities and you can see squalor in most areas.BTW Bombay has the largest slums in asia. Because of its lowest "code monkey" cost India is today on everyone's radar screen.When some other country takes that title India will be forgotten just like a couple of years before. All in all not a great place to be in.....

  261. Anti-Outsourcing Campaign & Petitions by SilverThorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found through Google about Congress and Outsourcing revealed this interesting article on IndianExpress.com

    Here is also a Petition site attempting to Abolish the H-1B program entirely: Zazona.com

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
    1. Re:Anti-Outsourcing Campaign & Petitions by bbrockit · · Score: 1

      More information on what you can do to put an end to the H-1B Visa program visit www.insourceamerica.org.

  262. Corporate Espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also bad is the potential for confidential company information to be stolen. E.g., Ernst and Young has moved their basic accounting operations to India. The other big 4 firms may do the same in the future. I don't know if their clients are aware that non-American citizens have all of their accounting details in a foreign country...

    1. Re:Corporate Espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify my comment that no one has read anyway, E&Y has moved much of their tax accounting jobs to India, and so it is not wise to apply for tax accounting positions with E&Y anymore (as they are few and far between)

  263. Re:TPS Reports are Here! RUN AWAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhhhh, yeah. I'm going to have to ask you to come in on Saturday. And the next day too.

  264. Fact India by pinkmamba · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I am posting this from the Indian state of Bihar and
    would like to bring a few facts to your notice.

    Big IT is limited to a few cities like Banglore,
    Hyderabad,Delhi,Pune,Bombay etc.Very miniscule portion
    of the Indian population of 1 billion is involved in IT.

    Perspective Indian IT exports 10 billion USD Microsoft sales 50 Billion USD

    99% of IT wok done in India is outsourced work from
    US,Europe,Japan etc.No original product development
    or ground breaking software science here.
    There is no major contribution from India to any
    Open Source Software project.On the hardware front
    India does not have a decent semiconductor manufacturing
    facility.

    The great "Call Center" story is turning sour.There is
    40% rate of attrition.According to a recent article people
    working at these centers develop physical/physiogical
    problems.Nothing is great about being Sam with a "American accent"
    at night and being Swaminathan during the day.Identity Crises

    Education is pathetic.Original thinking is not promoted.
    Learn by text books and vomit in exams.
    Regarding the IITs in a population of 1 billion you can
    statistically always find 10k people who are exceptionally
    brilliant.The untainted/rigirous selection process ensures
    that these people get selected into the IITs.India has not produced a
    single Noble prize winner since Independence.Those Indians who have
    won the Noble prize are settled and working out of India.If the Noble
    is an benchmark for original thinking you can see where India stands .

    No development in basic sciences as all bright students go to IT.

    Corruption in India extremely high and prevelant in all walks of life.
    Bush and his colleagues would look like saints when compared to Indian politicians.

    Pollution is high in cities and you can see squalor in most areas.BTW Bombay has the largest
    slums in asia.

    Because of its lowest "code monkey" cost India is today on everyone's
    radar screen.When some other country takes that title India will
    be forgotten just like a couple of years before.

    All in all not a great place to be in.....

  265. Re: nature of the U.S. - then and now by micromoog · · Score: 1
    The idea could work, but only on a level playing field...

    You just summed up the problem with ALL Libertarian tenets. There are no level playing fields.

  266. Economic forces restrained by Paolomania · · Score: 1

    IANAEconomist, but this is my intuition about the situation (if anyone here actually knows what they are talking about, please feel free to correct me - I am very curious about the validity of this theory): This is a situation that benefits the parties that are in control of the situation, thus it will be perpetuated as long as possible. Both US corporations (and therefor the present administration) and foreign governments would like to perpetuate. US Corporations get cheaper labor and increased profitability in the short term (short term being just fine for a CEO who plans on making enough cash in the short term to last himself a lifetime). The foreign participants in the H1B program gain for their citizens wages that are excellent by local standards. This situation exists because there is an economic "potential difference" between the US and countries like India, an economic gap that is protected from the "invisible hand" and not allowed to close. US workers are not allowed to compete for jobs in places like India; nor are US consumers are not allowed to buy products at Indian prices (DVD region encoding, etc.) However, US corporations ARE allowed to compete for cheaper workers and production costs on the global market. This sets up some kind of "economic pump" that, for the time being, enriches US Corporate executives and foreign workers at the expense of the US economy. Yet it sells both the foreign workers and US workers short in the end, as the foreign workers cannot compete for jobs that have the benefit of operating under labor-laws, and US workers cannot extend their buying power on the global market the same way that the corporation can.

    This make any sense?

  267. Are you being wanting some code with your slurpee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a terrible turn of events...and this travesty through the use of outsourcing, H1B and L1 is considered "legal". Let's not even get into all of the unskilled illegal immigration going on...

  268. Scare Mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The latest in the scare mongerer series!! This time with an "You cannot work in India even if you wanted to" type of slant. I am not surprised that Daniel Soong is out of a job as he does not appear very smart. Mere googling would have put to rest this lie:
    "It would be really interesting to work in Bangalore," he says. "But I was told, 'Daniel, it is against the law for you to work here. You can come here on vacation, but you can't work here.'"
    Not very smart, relying on hearsay. On the other hand, the one who posted this article might be merely trying to stoke the fire.

    Check this out, from the Indian government website:

    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

    Well, Soong we are waiting to hear you take up employment in Bangalore, India.

    If you want to take up some business, get the right type of visa

    BUSINESS VISA: Valid for six month or one/more years with multiple entries. However, the period of stay in India (for each visit) under this category is limited to six months only. A letter from the sponsoring organization indicating nature of applicant's business, probable duration of stay, validity of visa, places and organizations to be visited and also a guarantee to meet maintenance expenses etc. should accompany the application. Business visa valid for ten years with multiple entries is available to foreign businessmen who have set up or intend to set up joint ventures in India.

    Want to study there? Then get this:

    STUDENT VISA: (Valid for the period of study in India). Multiple-entry visas are given to bona fide students to pursue regular studies at recognized institutions in India. A letter confirming admission from such an institution along with evidence of financial arrangements for stay in India should accompany the application. In case of admission in medical or paramedical courses in India, a letter of Approval or No objection certificate from the Ministry of Health, Government of India, is also required. Similarly, for admission to graduate or post-graduate courses in engineering/ technical institutions in India, a letter of approval or a No objection certificate from the Ministry of Human Resources Development (Department of Education) is required.
    1. Re:Scare Mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what Nimrod, no Indian company is going to hire a foreigner, so of course Daniel can't work in India. It's not illegal for him to work there, it's just that no company will hire him.

    2. Re:Scare Mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude.. I personally KNOW someone who works at the company in question. This is a bunch of heresay without proof in this article. The editors should have probably asked for some proof at least. Instead, he just repeated what his friends said.

  269. Backdoors by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    From the article:"Skilled programmers are very good at hiding malware of "moderate" and "high" attack potential, which even the most skilled code auditor may need some luck to discover, the NSA spokesperson said."

    This from the guys that brought you NSA_KEY and the secret printer. OK, that last one I'm not sure about, I had an extra printer that only appeared in dev studio, and wouldn't give any feedback when I sent it something. I just assumed it was a backdoor that somehow got exposed to that app by my particular combination of tools and OS version, so I printed a quick nastygram to it :-) Sounds like those guys have experience in that area from the article.

  270. News Item! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    In India non-citizens can be easily shafted!

    While, here in the good ole USA -- guess what? -- non-citizens can be easily shafted!

    I don't think citizens of the U.S. have much of leg to stand on until we get our own house in order.

    That would include all the nudging and winking about hiring illegal immigrants and not cracking down harder on those U.S. employers abusing their non-citizen employees.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  271. Outsourcing supports unacceptable labor practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have ever reviewed the classified adds of local newspapers in various outsourcing countries you see a number of labor practices reflected that would be unacceptable in this country. For example it is not uncommon to see adds which specify both a sex and age (i.e. "female age 25-30 to fill programming job").

  272. Indian programmers - why there are no more jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This really sucks.... BIG TIME. Indian programmers come over here and work for half our wages for big Phat cat companies under an H1A visa. Usually, they don't last long, so seek work for other companies, taking away OUR jobs.

    I guess few people know that the Bush administration increased the H1A visa quota 5 times what it was before.

    Indian's are buch better trained programmers then we could ever hope to be.

    I lived in Mumbai and Goa for a period of time, and everywhere I go, I see huge ass billboards touting "Learn C++ Enroll today".

    Indian's get subsidized scholerships to these special trade schools and "diploma mills". Americans have to pay FULL PRICE, usually involving about $5k.

    How many Indian programmers are working at YOUR company?

    While in India, I learned how this works. In Bangalore (Indian's answer to Silicon valley), American programmer houses started to spring up. Indian's just out of school would work there, getting "real world" experience. Only problem was keeping them. Most Indians would prefer to work and live in US, and they have a large network of American firms eager to snap them up. In most cases, American recruiters are in cahoots with these Indian programmer havens.

    Jobs that open up in American companies are never even put on the USA job market. Indian recruiters get them first. Often these spaces are filled long before they would even be known over here.

    So, if you're a programmer out of work, you have little chance of landing that ideal job.

    This is MY experience with India, programmers, and the insane Bush administration claiming to do something about getting us jobs.

    And now this? Americans can't even go to India looking for work? This really sucks.

  273. I would blame Daniel Soong by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    I am a high school graduate with no certs or college to speak of, and I have to turn down job offers.

    I am something of a jack of all trades, capable of programming, web development and networking ( to name a few ). Further, my experience only spans a few years ( 4 ).

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      I am something of a jack of all trades, capable of programming, web development and networking ( to name a few ). Further, my experience only spans a few years ( 4 ).

      Oh Yea? Well my /. id is lower than yours.

      So There!

      -D

    2. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by finse · · Score: 1

      This simply amazes me. Seriously, I know computer scientists, who are excellent in many aspects of computing, yet some have been forced into grossly underpaying jobs. (10$ an hour)

      Perhaps you can do the rest of us a favor and let us know where these mythical jobs you speak of are located?

      Remember, job offers as a burger slinger don't count. Neither does any mall job.

      --
      Paranoid tinfoil hat crowd say Y here, everyone else say N.
    3. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps you can do the rest of us a favor and let us know where these mythical jobs you speak of are located?

      Central Valley, California.

      I am currently a network admin in a win32/unix enviroment in the medical field ( techically, I am a systems analyst, but that's a bullshit title ). I know there are several non-profits in the area who need tech help and have reasonable budget ( in comparison to the work you'd be doing ). Further, I know of at least two dentists offices that have an immediate need for compentent computer people ( don't bother messaging me, I already recommened a few people ).

      It's all about your presence. I have never been turned down for a job after I have interviewed. I treat people with respect and keep them informed as to what I am doing. My current boss is great, he always wants to know what I am doing and how. :)

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    4. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by dist_morph · · Score: 1, Interesting
      So you've been working for four years now and everything has worked out beautifully. I wonder how you'll feel in 20 years when you have kids, worry about college tuition, retirement, health expenses/conditions, and the mortgage.

      Do you think you can put yourself in these people's shoes and see why they might not all be able to take on part-time positions without benefits? How many of the opportunities you list offer benefits? How many of these opportunities offer a salary on which a family of four can survive when it has fixed epxenses?

      We're not all straight out of college and if you have any imagination, you will see that even you who never had a problem getting a job might have to worry a little bit when you look into the future.

    5. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Who said I was part time?

      I am full time, with great benifits, and I support 3 kids of my own, thank you very much.

      The fact is, there are jobs out there, period. If you can't find them, or are not willing to adapt to the changing market, then I am sorry, but that's not my fault, is it?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    6. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by Roberto · · Score: 1

      Newbieeeeeeee!

      And mine is not only way way way lower, it also has three sevens. ;-)

    7. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by dist_morph · · Score: 1
      I wasn't talking about your job, I was talking about the jobs you mentioned: providing IT support and programming services to dentists, other professionals, or non-profits. These jobs are of course out there and will always be out there. You can't tell me that those opportunities (at least not the vast majority of them) have any benefits associated with them.

      I fully agree with you that you have to be adaptable and that some people will have trouble no matter what, but I think you are improperly generalizing based on your experience.

      I have visited areas that have been devastated by the combination of structural crisis and outsourcing. Consider Richardson, TX, the former nirvana of the telecommunications industry. Many employers shut down, others outsourced and the consequence is an economic bust of epic proportions.

      You might say: "Why don't you just move someplace else?"

      The reply is easy: with so many jobless and foreclosures, many people can't sell their houses without losing too much.

      It's not always the person and even if it were: not all of us are cut out to be self-selling, self-advertising, self-promoting, customer-facing. How many good engineers do you know who have none of these qualities?

    8. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      The dentist's offices, to my knowledge, have decent benefits, but you are right, the non profits don't offer any.

      Beggers, however, can not be choosers.

      I am not a self-selling, self-advertising, self-promoting, that's the kicker. I do my job well, I am moderately sociable ( I can thow a joke as well as the next guy, but I usually don't go to lunch/dinner with people, preferring to read my books ), but I don't hype myself. My clients do that for me, that's where I get all my phone calls.

      On top of that, while you can move to find the jobs, I wouldn't suggest that to anybody unless it's the absolute last alternative. With enough experience in one field, you can translate that to many other fields. Given my experience in a professional enviroment, I could just as easiely take any office position. It doesn't HAVE to be in the computer field, I would just prefer it.

      At the end of the day, as long as I can support those I love and myself, that's the important thing. I am just lucky enough to be able to do it doing something I love to do.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    9. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      What I wanna know is when do I cease to be a N3wB, and become a 1337 m0f0. I just wanna hax0r some b0xen.

    10. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong by dist_morph · · Score: 1
      Beggers, however, can not be choosers.

      You're right, but weren't we talking about finding jobs in the same field? And let me just throw out one more totally unresearched assertion:

      With the highly paid software jobs going away, a large amount of discretionary spending is going away too. This inevitably has a trickle-down effect on the rest of the local economy and causes many suppliers, vendors, and service providers to scale back or shut down too. If you had been in Richardson, TX, you wouldn't assume that you can necessarily get a job as an office clerk or even a burger flipper because the offices and burger joints closed too.

  274. Fact checking? You mean page hits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Facts don't make money, page hits do.

  275. It's no longer possible to gain national security by Baldrson · · Score: 0
    Any attempt to gain national security now will result in random power outtages and other assorted SNAFUs.

    The time to have been concerned was before importing the world to acquire the technology of the West.

  276. H1-B Visa program is very bad by reporter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The CNN story describes a report about H-1B workers. Over the past 5 years, more than 500,000 H-1B workers have been employeed in the United States of America (USA). Those 500,000 H-1B workers may not have impacted the salaries of their employed American peers. However, the 500,000 American workers displaced by the 500,000 H-1B workers felt a serious impact.

    Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  277. Columbus... by hackrobat · · Score: 1
    If only Christopher Columbus hadn't lost his way to India, we wouldn't have had these problems.

    Duh!

  278. How does it feel? by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always found it curious that it is considered morally wrong to discriminate against someone based on their race, gender, or sexual preference, but perfectly fine based on their place of origin. In fact, there are entire government agencies in place whose sole purpose is to discriminate against non-citizens.

    People don't exactly get to choose where they get born or grow up, you know.

    (Yes, I am a foreigner in the US, and yes, I'm just a tad bitter.)

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    1. Re:How does it feel? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      (Yes, I am a foreigner in the US, and yes, I'm just a tad bitter.)

      Hear ya..... The longer I am in North America the more I come to think of it as the biggest Oxymoron in the world.....

      Not really bitter, but not happy either.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  279. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although the cost of living in India is insanely low - I was living on $3/Day in Goa, and had a very comfortable place.

    But I doubt of Americans would want to live there. Especially during the monsoon season. Best times are after November until April.

    Besides, you'll just LOVE the traditional Indian toilets (if you can even call it that).

    Watch what you eat, watch what you drink... you might get luckey and not get horribly sick. And then there is that very hot tropical climate you have to deal with.

    All in all, it was quite an experience....

  280. Re:Oppose H-1Bs and L-1s but Support Outsourcing by reporter · · Score: 1
    That's ludicrous. H-1B and L-1 Visa immigrants at least contribute to our economy. They buy cars, houses, etc
    You overlook the obvious. If unethical American companies outsource to India, the new jobs in India give Indians more money. They can then buy more cars, computers, ethernet cars, and other products imported from the USA.

    Anyhow, we in the Slashdot community need to stop this nonsense called the "H-1B program" and the "L-1" program immediately. Let us petition the American government, today, to terminate both programs.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  281. Business 2.0 Magazine - The Coming Job Boom by $exyNerdie · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I read this in the September 2003 Issue of Business 2.0 Magazine :

    Forget those grim unemployment numbers. Demographic forces are about to put a squeeze on the labor supply that will make it feel like 1999 all over again. - The Coming Job Boom

  282. Re:Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bad news for industrialized countries is that this will level the global playing field w.r.t. salaries, standards of living, etc.

    I welcome you all to the future where 99.5% of us live errily similar lives while the wealthy run them.

    You are the Robot, welcome to death.

  283. Will the REAL Americans please stand up??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's ask the Mexicans who 'owns' California? Is what is happening now any different from what happened to them when the Americans up and waged war on them to take their land away? C'mon.

    It's payback time. That's all. Get scared now because in 20 years (in your lifetime), YOU will be part of the minority.

  284. Transient money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "H1-B's are typically attracting highly educated Western Europeans to the U.S. for a number of reasons. Salaries that are 1.5 to 2x higher than back home (not 5-8x as compared to India), A significant other in the states (grin) or a sense of adventure and desire to try the U.S. for a while. I find it baffling that in the wake of the articles regarding Teller's passing that we're questioning the H1-B situation. Post WWII, alot of our brainpower came from Western Europe. Highly skilled, highly educated persons who desire to become U.S. citizens and melt into the pot are what strengthens the U.S."

    You answered your own question. The word is "citizens". Not visitors, or any such, but "citizens". When H1-B's contribute like "citizens", then a lot of problems disappear. But they don't, and to add to it, most send there money back(1). There was a story awhile back that pointed out that Mexico gets more money from it's transient citizens, than it gets from tourism. Were are the transient Americans sending money back to the US?

    (1) Nothing immoral, unethical or anything like that, but that's money not spent in our economy.

    1. Re:Transient money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Were are the transient Americans sending money back to the US?

      Just because you don't know any doesn't mean there aren't any. There are many Americans working overseas, and they are required to pay federal taxes in additional to local taxes (in contrast to almost every other non-America citizen).

    2. Re:Transient money. by tyen · · Score: 1

      There are many Americans working overseas, and they are required to pay federal taxes in additional to local taxes (in contrast to almost every other non-America citizen).

      Very simplistically, first $70,000 under the foreign earned income exclusion is exempt from U.S. federal income tax for expatriates. Unlike all other nations except for Libya however, all income beyond that is subject to federal income tax.

  285. Globalization Anyone? by Enthrash · · Score: 1

    Anyone else still believe that Globalization is good for anyone but large corporation multi-national corporations? Or is the (1st) world populous still unconvinced?

    As for IT workers & outsourcing, I think the solution here is two fold:

    1. Domestic IT workers have to keep on the leading edge. The logic here is that there is a significant lag in the time it takes for new knowledge and skills to propagate to the 2nd/3rd world countries. This means specialize in new software development areas such as wireless, do research oriented work etc. The days of getting paid 60-70k/yr for lemming C++/C, SAP coding are fast coming to a close I'm afraid.

    2. Perhaps it's time for some larger groups of programmers and developers (read: Microsoft, IBM, Oracle etc) to organize into trade unions to help protect jobs and hold governments accountable for the decisions they make, and provide some counter lobbying to the corporate lobbyists.

    In anycase, you unemployed American techies out there don't get too depressed. I'm sure the wall feel like they are falling in right now, but once that monster of an economy you guys have gets rolling again I bet you'll be in alot better shape.

    Rich...

  286. Source code inspection not as good as it seems by CormacJ · · Score: 1

    You can inspect the code all you want if it's been cleaned first.

    As a proof for my thesis I wrote a patch for a compiler that added a backdoor to code at compile time. The source was always clean, but the code was compromised.

    If I were the Chinese I'd ask for the rights to compile the code, not just review the source.

    This is why I trust open source more that object code. I can inspect the code then compile it and be fairly sure that as long as I trust my compiler I can have a good system

  287. And I'll call you an idiot. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Sooooo...because the immigrants go to states where the economy is strongest, they are the cause of the strong economy?

    Are you fucking kidding me?

    Obviously there are a few people equally or more foolish than you, as I see you have been modded up.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:And I'll call you an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the arguement was that if immigrants cause harm to the economy, then the states with the highest immigration should have had their economies harmed by the influx of immigrants. But, it hasn't been so (and rather the opposite has been) and so maybe they're not related.

    2. Re:And I'll call you an idiot. by FatSean · · Score: 1

      Still a crap argument, because who knows if the locations which had a strong economy AND much immigration would have a stronger or weaker economy without thosr immigrants!

      --
      Blar.
  288. Re: nature of the U.S. - then and now by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Umm, can you back that statement up with some facts?

    I can't say I agree with this at all.
    The Libertarian party is basically formed along the lines of what the founding fathers (especially Thomas Jefferson) believed, when they were helping put together the Constitution.

    What about Jefferson's beliefs and values do you feel is only valid in a world where there's a "level playing field"?

    As I said, about the only concept the LP seems to endorse which I have trouble with is the idea on keeping borders completely open. During the founding of the U.S. - this policy had much more validity than it has in today's world. So perhaps this just stems from Libertarians lifting the ideas straight from the writings of these political leaders - without considering how much has changed in the last 200 years?

  289. READ THE ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez. About 90% of the posts show no one read the actual article.

    His beef is all US tech workers are being replaced by H1-B workers or the jobs are going overseas, and those of us Americans with lenghty education and employment/job skills are unable to find jobs in our own country, let alone other countries.

  290. Many are sure ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

    ..too bad it is at 70% of my current salary thanks to the H1-B's.

    Are you sure it's not because you're an incompetent hack?


    Many people are sure - because their company hires a bunch of H1Bs, uses their higher-paid US workers to TRAIN them to do jobs equivalent to the US workers', then fires the US workers.

    Happens all the time in Silicon Valley - both in big and small companies. Occasionally a large company (Sun was one) gets so blatant about it - dumping whole departments - that they get sued.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Many are sure ... by rtv · · Score: 0

      I thought it was a great American tradition to Let the Market Decide. That 'bunch' of 'H1-Bs' (skilled workers) were obviously a better deal for the company. I guess your family sprouted from the ground in North America, rather than coming here looking for work?

      but hey! you manage to be racist and war mongering in the same post! way to go for double fascist points, asshole!

    2. Re:Many are sure ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I guess your family sprouted from the ground in North America, rather than coming here looking for work?

      I've traced a couple branches back to the revolution. Before that they tended to end up here either because they were thrown out of there or fled from there to avoid persecution.

      That's why they HAD a revolution - and why certain "dead white males" laid the foundation that eventually freed the slaves - both here and from under a stack of tyrannies back in Europe and elsewhere.

      As to my wife (who tends to agree with me on thses subjects), one branch of her family came over on the Mayflower while another met the boat.

      I take it, from your lack of understanding that some of us may be descended from people who came here for reasons other than moving to money (like for instance avoiding glaciers while working on exterminating the terror birds and mammoths, and grooming the rest of the continent into a low maintainence farm) that your predecessors are part of the "Ellis Island Crowd"?

      Not that it matters.

      What DOES matter is whether you personally have the integrity to let others live their lives, or insist on molding them into your own politically correct image and flaming them when they fail to conform.

      But immigrants (who go through channels) are still welcome. The issue with the H1s is not the immigrants themselves, but the managers who break the law in order to obtain H1s for some other country's huddled masses, in order to make them into their company's serfs while laying off, or refusing to hire, perfectly qualified native-born or naturalized US citizens.

      Why do you think there are so few US-born blacks, hispanics, or women employed in hi-tek - as other than janitors, secretaries, and food-service workers? It's not that there aren't any who are qualified, you know.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Many are sure ... by rtv · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm sorry for the flame, and particularly the name calling. I'd mail you personally to apologize if I could. I saw red after reading this thread and lost my cool.

      This topic interests me though. I'm an H-1B myself. I work at a research lab that stopped hiring non-citizens after 9/11 and we have a staffing problem. I'm leaving what has become an awkwardly restrictive environment, and am having a really hard time finding someone to hire into my post.

      If you look around the top CS departments in the US, you'll find a real scarcity of talented homegrown graduate students. I'm hoping this is a temporary phenomenon; perhaps most citizens went for great jobs in the 'net boom and we're in a slump before those bright start-up people get out of the grad schools they re-entered when the bubble burst. However, right now the institutions that can not use the H1 program such as NASA, nuclear labs, etc. have a hard time finding qualified people. Simultaneously, a large proportion of the DARPA/ONR/Air Force funded University research is being executed by great quality Indian, Chinese, German, South African, Brazilian, etc.grad students. Professors would love to get hold of smart American science grad students, as there are dollars there for the taking. They are absolutely NOT being crowded out by foreigners in this area. Rather, there just aren't enough local people available.

      Meanwhile there is clearly a situation out there where people feel that foreigners without exceptional skills are taking their jobs. The main claim on this thread seems to be that employers exploit the H1 program to get staff that will accept lower wages. This is a little wierd because those H1s live in the same city, go to the same movies, maybe even send some cash home. How can they afford to so this if the citizens can not? Perhaps the expectations of the locals have been raised a little high? Perhaps one episode of Friends too many? The labor certification process requires that H1 salaries are reasonable. None of the many H1s I know does badly.

      Isn't honest-to-goodness competition a good thing? Most Americans perceive themselves to have many advantages over other people. So, compete. America is a hard-working culture. If the education system is letting you down, use your votes and tax dollars to fix it. If the corporations are behaving immorally, use your personal spending to tell 'em what you think.

    4. Re:Many are sure ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm sorry for the flame, and particularly the name calling. I'd mail you personally to apologize if I could. I saw red after reading this thread and lost my cool.

      Consider it delivered and accepted. B-)

      This topic interests me though. I'm an H-1B myself. I work at a research lab that stopped hiring non-citizens after 9/11 and we have a staffing problem. I'm leaving what has become an awkwardly restrictive environment,

      Sorry to hear that.

      (Being "collateral damage" is no fun, even if you do get to live through it.)

      [...] and am having a really hard time finding someone to hire into my post.

      If you look around the top CS departments in the US, you'll find a real scarcity of talented homegrown graduate students.


      And there you, or your site's administrators, are making a classic mistake.

      Why are you seeking talend ONLY among:
      - Recent Graduates or Grad Students of
      - CS departments of top universities?

      You're limiting yourself to an artificially constrained market. Consider:

      For starters the couple universities with the "top CS departments" limit their enrollment - largely to the children of the idle rich. (I could show you how this is done while still looking "open" and "diversified" on paper.) Rich people have no monopoly on smarts. So try looking at the top people from the better state universities, or from a variety of schools with competent (if not top-in-the-nation) programs. You should easily find somebody with more ability and savvy than even the best of the preppie crowd. The competition for him or her will be less. Such graduates will often display more open-mindedness and/or common sense than a top-tier grad. ("It wasn't taught at my school so it can't be important!") And if your co-workers can handle working as peers with a smart woman or minority member, you're more likely to find one at a lower-tier school.

      I can't tell if you're talking about a university research setting or a corporate R&D operation. Universities have a vested interest in dealing only with other academics - maintaining the actual and perceived value of degrees and using funds to support their students rather than random people. So while they can get some opportunity improvement by looking at students of other than the top couple schools, they're still limited to current students and recent grads - which is a drastic squeeze. But if it's corporate, the potenital for hires is FAR greater.

      Why a recent grad? Why not a somebody with some experience, that you don't have to break in? Desipte their reputation for "creativity", new grads are constantly be making newbie mistakes, while an old-hand will have workable solutions at his fingertips - along with a host of knowlege about things that LOOK like they should work but DON'T - so you can avoid spending months or years down a plausible dead-end that he's seen kill several companies in the past. Old hands don't fossilize once they get out of school. (Research shows intelligence actually INCREASES somewhat with age.) Instead they accumulate experience, canned solutions to common problems (rather than reinventing the wheel new-grad style), and a collection of new ideas that they'd love to try out - if they just had the right environment. Meanwhile they keep up with the academic advances in their field AND with the stuff that's only in the trade journals now, that the academics will finally teach maybe 10 years later - if ever.

      While you're at it, don't limit yourself to graduates. Some of the top people in the industry are old hands who came up through the ranks or dropped out of school short of even a bachelor's degree for any of a number of reasons that may be POSITIVELY correlated with talent. For instance: Focus on their specialty to the exclusion of distribution-requirement sidetracks. "Working their way through college" and stopping when their outside job became a lucrative carreer. Heck: Even some of Minsky's original MIT h

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  291. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

    Obviously things are different depending on where you live. In NY $40,000 is reasonable for someone with experience but of course the cost of living is much higher. To give a comparison - I made more than $30K fresh out of college and that was over 8 years ago.

  292. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article more carefully. The guy tried to get a job with Tata Consulting, an Indian-owned firm operating in the USA that places staff at USA-based clients. They apparently refused to hire him for this work in the USA because they do not hire Americans
    This is the absolute wrong conclusion one can get from the article. I especially like the part "they do not hire americans". The conclusion from the article you can make is "Tata didnt hire him" and not "they do not hire americans". As far as working in India goes, this dolt obviously did not follow the proper procedures and is complaining about it. Do any of you guys know about foreigners working in India? I dont think so. So please dont make general sweeping statements.
    The article is like one that comes out of a Aryan Nation propaganda machine, except that only its blindly directed against H1b workers (though they pay taxes inclusive of social security and medicare + unemployment without any possible way of getting benifits from any of those programs).
    Not being able to secure work is a mysery and can be empathized with. But making sweeping false accusitions against a class or category is deplorable.

    1. Re:Mod parent down by dup_account · · Score: 1

      Do any of you guys know about foreigners working in India? I dont think so.

      That was the point of the article. He wanted to move to india, but they don't hire foreigners.

  293. You really didn't understand the article by plsuh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You really didn't understand the article from the SBA website, did you? IAAE (I Am An Economist), and it boils down to this -- what can a foreigner do with a US dollar? The only thing that he or she can do is buy US-produced goods and services. When he or she does that, it increases demand for US production which stimulates the US economy and causes the GDP to rise.

    Foreigners putting their dollars into dollar-denominated investments only puts off the problem. At some point, the foreigner must use the dollars to buy US-produced goods and services. Doing anything else means that US consumers have gotten a whole lot of real goods and services for the price of printing a bunch of green paper or transferring a few electrons.

    A trade imbalance is not like your PERSONAL debt. It doesn't mean the same thing, so don't try to apply your intuition about personal debts to a trade deficit.

    --Paul

    1. Re:You really didn't understand the article by MKalus · · Score: 1

      True,

      which poses an interresting question for the US though: What if all of the sudden many goods would need to be paid for in Euros instead of USD?

      Right now the US pretty much has a license to print money, this makes it very very cheap to run the deficit, no? (IANAE), so if I am wrong, please enlighten me :)

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:You really didn't understand the article by jimsum · · Score: 1

      I'll quibble a little about personal debt being different than the trade deficit; it isn't.

      Define imports = what you buy from others; exports = what you create while doing your job; and debt is debt. International trade just adds a new distinction based on whether you are selling, buying, or borrowing from a foreigner or a local.

      If you wanted, you could tally up your own trade balance by tracking which foreigners you do business with. I know my personal exports amount to about 95% of my personal GDP and my imports are much less than that. My debt payments are all domestic, so I'd guess I am running a fairly big trade surplus :-)

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    3. Re:You really didn't understand the article by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      Foreigners putting their dollars into dollar-denominated investments only puts off the problem. At some point, the foreigner must use the dollars to buy US-produced goods and services. Doing anything else means that US consumers have gotten a whole lot of real goods and services for the price of printing a bunch of green paper or transferring a few electrons.

      One point that needs to bemade is the difference between a trad edeficit and a current accoutns deficit. The trade balance is the measure of goods and services between two countries. The current accounts balance is the trade balance plus investment. What we shoudl really be seeing is the dollar decreasing in value relatie to the foreign currency making US goods cheaper in the other country and foreign goods more expensive here.

      In order to buy the foreign goods, dollars must be trade for the other currency. This should cause the dollar to fall relative to the other currency because their is greater demand for that currency than the dollar. But, what is happening is that many of those receiving dollars turn around and invest them in the US rather than changing them into their home currency. This tends to keep the dollar high a relatively stable. Basically, what is happening is the money we pay for foreign made goods gets used by the foreigner's to fund our government deficit.

      Some congressman are starting to complain about China keeping their currenyc artificially low by not allowing it to float on the open market. At which point demand for Chinese goods should push the value of yuan higher.

      Dastardly

    4. Re:You really didn't understand the article by PiNSiR · · Score: 1

      I think that Default Luster is gettinng the Trade Defecit and the National Debt confused.

      The Trade Defecit is not necessarily a bad thing, as the SBA website stated it will eventually encourage more US products to be exported.

      On the other hand; The National Debt is something that I myself have always paid very close attention to. Every year the average American taxpayer pays two thousand dollars in taxes to cover merely the intrest that our nation debt accumulates. That figure is ridiculous and I strongly believe that we need to have a Zero Balance Budget for our nation. For thouse of you that aren't familiar with the term, a Zero Balance Budget means that our president accounts for our nations debt in planning the countrys budget and by the end of the term the budget is balanced. It may seem like an impossible task with the debt at an ominous 6,823,880,316,308.28; but its only getting worse. Take note, thats nearly 7 TRILLION dollars.

      I don't know slashdots age demographic, but if many of you are young, as I am (18 years old), then take note because we are the ones that will be paying for all the fun spending that all our parents did. Ever hear of national defense program "Star Wars"? we get to pick up the check, and with with 20 years intrest to boot!

    5. Re:You really didn't understand the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > IAAE (I Am An Economist), and it boils down to this -- what can a foreigner do with a US dollar? The only thing that he or she can do is buy US-produced goods and services. When he or she does that, it increases demand for US production which stimulates the US economy and causes the GDP to rise.

      Then you know that is a simplistic answer. Mostly, they can buy raw materials vs. higher order goods (ultimately "the problem"). They can avoid the intermediate problem by leaving it to others by tradeing away dollars, for other currencies. When finally stuck with too many excess dollars they buy control-issue items things like real-assets, political leaders, etc.

      > Foreigners putting their dollars into dollar-denominated investments only puts off the problem.

      Eventually, one ends up holding the wealth of (and effective lordship over) the Nation, much as the Saudi's enjoy today. Tick them off, the sale of a small portion of their total stock holdings would TANK the markets.

      You view of "dollar denominated investments" is incomplete. At some level (surely at 51%), mere investment establishes control. Thus, having asserted a controlling interests over much of the economy they now get to set the price they pay for good, and the price that will be paid by consumers.

      Now, as an Economist, I'm sure you know the typical end-game for nations behold'n to monied foreign interests. Borrowing, continuing poverty, defaults on debits, nationalization of industry, and rampant inflation.

    6. Re:You really didn't understand the article by Morosoph · · Score: 1
      If you wanted, you could tally up your own trade balance by tracking which foreigners you do business with. I know my personal exports amount to about 95% of my personal GDP and my imports are much less than that. My debt payments are all domestic, so I'd guess I am running a fairly big trade surplus :-)
      Expect for one thing: your currency doesn't get revalued relative to others'!
    7. Re:You really didn't understand the article by ralphclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was thinking along similar lines.

      Like, for example, if several major members of OPEC were to begin pricing their oil for export in Euros rather than dollars. Most of the substantial national USD reserves around the world (procured mainly for the purpose of buying oil) would then find themselves being sold off to buy Euros.

      One analysis I saw said the US treasury has continued to print dollars in order to buy imports as if there were no tomorrow, with the result that these foreign reserves now account for half the US dollars in existence. But this is just storing up big trouble for tomorrow.

      Figure it out for yourselves. If half the world's dollars, previously locked up, were to start leaking out onto the money markets following an OPEC move towards the Euro, the value of the dollar would quickly go to nothing.

      Actually it's a matter of record that this process has already begun. North Korea has already switched exports of its oil over to the Euro. By last spring, Saddaam Hussein had almost completed a three-year long process of switching Iraq's oil exports over to the Euro (presumably this was mainly intended to take a swipe at the US). Venezuela has been considering such a move for some time, to reduce dependence on the dollar. Who's next?

      Many people think that this was the real reason President Bush's government sought to remove Hussein, to deter other OPEC leaders from attempting to follow suit. Just as, in fact, it had supported Venezuala's failed military coup in 2002.

    8. Re:You really didn't understand the article by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      The Swiss used a similar ploy to stay out of two world wars: nobody dared attack them because all their (the rich and powerful's) money was sitting in Swiss banks.

      Now it's the Americans who have got everybody's money - locked up in unpaid debt - so the world literally can't afford for the US to fail economically.

      The only people who don't care about that are the people who don't have any cash invested in the US: i.e. the world's poor and disaffected. So you shouldn't have to look too far to see exactly where the greatest threat to national security is coming from.

    9. Re:You really didn't understand the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To: The USA
      From: The rest of the world
      Subject: That loan

      Hi

      We're a bit strapped for cash at the moment. Do you think we could have our seven trillion dollars back by next Friday?

      TIA,

      The Other Countries

    10. Re:You really didn't understand the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. trade deficit (or more correctly the Current Account Deficit) has been the major engine for world-wide growth for the last ten years. If it were to magically "balance", a global recession would quickly ensue.

      It is actually financed mostly by foreign governments buying U.S. dollars and keeping them as assets, not by buying hard-assets like American real estate or stock. (% of foreign ownership in America has in fact gone down in the past few years, mostly because of the collapse of the Japanese economy and the sell-off of their assets.)

      So here's the cycle: America prints BILLIONS of new dollars every year, which foreign governments happily snap up, which allow Americans to turn around and import more goods from these same countries.

      This leads to countries like China, which the U.S. has a major trade deficit with, but whom owns 12% of the U.S. Dollars in foreign circulation! Which is why it hard for the U.S. government to get mad at China about cheap imports - they're financing America's consumption!

      The only risk to America is that governments will decide another currency (like the euro) is a safer currency, which would cause a drop in the demand for the dollar, a drop in U.S. imports (unless they increase the national debt to keep consumption up) and a drop in exports for all the countries the U.S. trades with.

      If Europe picks up the slack and consumes more (i.e. imports more), no big deal, but if they don't and just save more, the global economy would have trouble.

      So America's Current Account Deficit is really not a bad thing for anyone involved, so be careful what you wish for!

    11. Re:You really didn't understand the article by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 0

      OPEC isn't a problem; we have a contingency plan for this. We invade a major oil-producing country, and liberate their oil.

    12. Re:You really didn't understand the article by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think we noticed. In fact I described this strategy at the end of my comment. What, did you fall asleep before getting to the end?

    13. Re:You really didn't understand the article by trud · · Score: 0

      There are three types of idiots.

      Idiots, Damn Idiots and Economists

    14. Re:You really didn't understand the article by fijimf · · Score: 1

      Amusing, but no one is forcing the world to invest in the US.

      Supply equals demand, so rather than smirking at America's inability to live within its means, the world should be marvelling at the ability of the US economy to profitably and efficiently absorb capital.

    15. Re:You really didn't understand the article by hughk · · Score: 1
      IRTE (I read The Economist and I disagree with you. A dollar like any other currency only has the worth that someone puts on it. This is why, in the Former-Soviet-Union, the dollar could be preferred to the rouble, even for locally produced goods. There is no intention to repatriate the dollars so they just slosh around, never coming near to the Fed.

      The issue is that when a country moves away from the dollar, the cash comes back into circulation causing a downward pressure on exchange rates (As has been seen recently). The Fed can't really control this because it has only relatively crude tools and they don't have much control away from the domestic markets.

      Actually, I worked on some capital markets reform projects, so you could say that I'm a kind of barefoot economist.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    16. Re:You really didn't understand the article by MKalus · · Score: 1

      If other statements are true then there is the little fact that apparantly Iran right now is preparing to trade in Euros as well.

      Actually it might even get worse, most of the delivery contracts are made for 2 or 3 years, let's say exporters like China give the USD a little bit of doubt for the next 2 years, once those contracts are up though they might decide to ask for Euros instead.

      One of the biggest advantages the US had in the past was that it was one huge, homogeneus(sp?) market, but with the Eurozone coming on now (and not running such a huge defecit) it looks more and more enticing for a lot of other countries like China for example.

      What I found funny in the linked article was that they were talking about "US Exports becoming cheaper", that's a great thing to say, but what exactly does the US still produce? Most of it's manufacturing capabilities moved off-shore in the last 20 to 30 years, the only thing I could think off right now would be cars / trucks, but electronics, major household goods etc. are all made someplace else.

      Dell Computers? The parts are not made in the US, and I doubt that the final assembly is in the US either (Mexico anyone?).

      Which begs an interresting question: Where is the US headed? If everybody would switch to Euros right now and would turn the US bankrupt then we all would suffer, but if they move slowly, building new markets as they go, the US in itself might be left behind before they know it, and no military in the world can change this (unless they decide to nuke the countries who "desert" them, but if that happens I doubt we have to worry about anything anymore.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    17. Re:You really didn't understand the article by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate how shitty things can get.
      Never underestimate the ignorance, incompetence and bloodyminded selfishness of our leaders.

    18. Re:You really didn't understand the article by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      The President can't "account for our nations debt in planning the countrys budget" since the President can only approve or disapprove of the budgets Congress creates. And if he disapproves, he can still be overridden by Congress, so aim for the correct target here.

      I agree that a balanced budget (or one as closed to balanced as possible) is correct, but the people to complain to are your elected representatives.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  294. No social security card from CA by JCMay · · Score: 1

    Since the Social Security Administration is a Federal agency, I doubt that the State of California has the ability to hand out Social Security cards.

  295. H1B rules are a different problem by phriedom · · Score: 1

    There are two separate issues here which both affect US jobs. One is H1B visa holders taking jobs from citizens. That is a legitimate complaint, but even if the rules were enforced, that isn't going to stop the problem this article is about, which is jobs leaving for another country.

    I have heard anecdotal evidence that the largest private employer in my State is doing the development for their next chip in Bangalore. For evey job they eliminate here, they create one there for half the price. In that particular case, I heard a manager who was relocating had 50 job openings for Americans who wanted to relocate to Bangalore, more or less permanently, and earn Bangalore wages.

    Daniel Song doesn't even have that choice. His job is leaving and he can't follow it.

    A different article I read this week said a study had concluded that most of the millions of manufacturing jobs that have been lost in the last 2 years are not going to come back when the economy recovers. Those jobs didn't just temporarily subside because of reduced demand, they moved to another country. After NAFTA was passed, many manufacturing jobs moved to Mexico. Now those jobs have left Mexico and gone to China where they are done even cheaper.

    My point is that we are facing a much larger employment problem that H1B visa rules are not going to effect.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:H1B rules are a different problem by rifter · · Score: 1


      A different article I read this week said a study had concluded that most of the millions of manufacturing jobs that have been lost in the last 2 years are not going to come back when the economy recovers. Those jobs didn't just temporarily subside because of reduced demand, they moved to another country. After NAFTA was passed, many manufacturing jobs moved to Mexico. Now those jobs have left Mexico and gone to China where they are done even cheaper.

      Actually, its not just manufacturing. And more IT jobs will be going offshore. worse than that, CNN has been getting us used to the idea lately. That usually means this is what we can expect te corporates and the government to endorse, the view that these jobs are gone forever and more to be lost even as the profits source in corporations and the economy is already recovered.

      The worst part was the assertion that since US workers are the most productive in the world, and our productivity is more than ever before, this will be the rationale for not hiring more workers. It is like the scene in Animal Farm where the pigs boast of having their workers work twice as much for half the food, except that they are actually fucking broadcasting this crowing on TV.

      I don't understand, personally why this has to be. I understand if you can make product A with 50 workers instead of 100 you make more profit. That is grade school math. BUt I thought these assholes (the CEOs, etc) went to college. If you have 50 workers that can produce X amount of product A, 100 workers who are just as productive can produce twice as much or more. Or they can make it possible to make product B.

      I also don't think any of these people are doing the right math anyway. They are looking at straight savings in salaries and not the big picture, which is performance per dollar. Again, the US worker gives more performance per dollar. But these shortsighted fools refuse to pay for quality.

    2. Re:H1B rules are a different problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, the US worker gives more performance per dollar

      Ahahahaha, you are funny.

    3. Re:H1B rules are a different problem by rifter · · Score: 1

      Again, the US worker gives more performance per dollar

      Ahahahaha, you are funny.

      Well how about providing a rebuttal, chief. These were the economic figures reported on cnn. Perhaps you have a better source?

  296. So how is that news? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    What do you think, you are American, therefore any compay in the world can just hire you, no questions asked? That you are somehow exempt from the immigration laws that affect the other few billion people on the planet?

    Of COURSE you can't just "go work" for a company in India.. and if India has enough programmers to fill the jobs, they should not be accepting foreigners.

    Just as, say, a Canadian like me can't just go get hired at any American company... there are things like Work Visas and whatnot you have to apply for.

    If the company in question doesn't have a problem filling it's positions locally, why would it want to go to all the extra expense and paperwork of hiring foreign nationals?

  297. You forgot E by garrulous · · Score: 1

    Wait for India and Pakistan to let the nukes fly.

  298. Re:Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bad news for industrialized countries is that this will level the global playing field w.r.t. salaries, standards of living, etc. The good news for the developing word is the same.

    And for countries like India which fall in the middle, they just grab their ankles. See an earlier /. story on outsourcing jobs leaving India for even cheaper places.

  299. NAFTA Countries by FrankDrebin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) a citizen of a NAFTA country may work in a professional occupation in another NAFTA country if the applicant meet certain requirements.

    American professionals may easily work in Canada, for example, and vice versa.
    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:NAFTA Countries by grvsmth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but RTFP, it says right there that you need to already be on the payroll. You can't just go and join the labor market. So all this means is that your company doesn't need to get you a work permit. Big deal.

  300. dude needs to look harder for a job... by goofballs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    San Francisco...When he is lucky he gets a temporary job answering phones or testing video games, nothing that ever pays more than $10 an hour

    c'mon, if this is the case, he's just slacking. i'm up in silicon valley every month or so, and i constantly see signs at fast food joints looking to hire at more than $10/hr.

  301. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me about it. I tried to get a job with this "Taliban" company in afghanistan, working as a pilot with this new airline they wanted to start, and they wouldn't hire me at all. Just as well, I didn't want to go to New York anyways.

  302. Are you stupid? The article is false. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you read the comments?
    It is POSSIBLE FOR FOREIGNERS to work in India.
    You need a WORK PERMIT.
    You can REMIT DOLLARS back to America.

    You can check with appropriate departments with the Government of India.

    You can check with the thousands of Americans working in India.

    You can call American Embassy in Delhi and talk to them.

  303. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by etcpasswd · · Score: 1

    H-1 Work Visa is a business deal. Just because I sold a car to you doesn't mean I'm obligated to buy a car from you. Moreover, the reason why I sold you a car in the first place is because you wanted one.

  304. Continental poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the 1700's and 1800's England forced India to import English railway equipment (engines, etc.) to boost the English "hi-tech" sector even though India was producing better machines locally. Whoa! How'd they do that? Well, ahem, anyhow, if Indians weren't inferior, they wouldn't have let Europeans invade in the first place! Yeah. Similarly it was Manifest Destiny that the palefaces eradicate the native Americans and get all the goodies. And of course there's the astronomically gargantuan evil of slavery, which England and it's I'm-independent-I'm-not-like-you-Daddy colony promoted, defended, participated in, and profited from to the max. Is this attitude barbaric and backward, or what? Sure -- but it's the colonial mindset. And the imperial mindset. And of course the Indians weren't allowed to import their railroad equipment into England.

    So now we have protectionism working the other way, and the world's supposed to be outraged.

    Small wonder that American principles of freedom, justice, and democracy have great credence in the world, but the USA doesn't, simply because it caves in on those principles whenever it's expedient to do so.

    Every culture has it's "we're better than everyone else, somehow" mythology -- Americans, Indians, Japanese, Swedes; big cultures, little cultures, liberals, conservatives, pagans, Christians, Jews, Moslems; we all think we're more divine than the next person -- and it's a yawning bore every time it comes up. Life's better when you stop trying to be right, and stop being a victim, and just appreciate it. (And if you agree with this post, then you're extra-special too! :)

  305. No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Only in the U.S. will this be tolerated

    You haven't seen bizarre immigration rules/enforcement until you've lived in Canada.

    In Canada you can show up at the border without any documents and claim refugee status. Not only will you gain entry after filing out forms for about 45 minutes, but you will be legally allowed to work until your hearing.

    Of course nobody bothers to even show up for the hearing since there is no deportation enforcement. At most you will receive a letter in the mail telling you that you must leave the country. Nobody will contact you to find out if you actually do leave the country.

    Then there are the cases where the "refugee" decides to make a living via B&E, armed robbery, etc., despite being able to work legally. Even if they are caught, their lack of compliance to basic laws of society cannot be used against them in the hearing that they will not attend that produces results that nobody pays attention to.

    1. Re:No Way by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll be there in three days. Can you send me your address? I need a place to crash for a while.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:No Way by epiphani · · Score: 2, Informative
      Then there are the cases where the "refugee" decides to make a living via B&E, armed robbery, etc., despite being able to work legally. Even if they are caught, their lack of compliance to basic laws of society cannot be used against them in the hearing that they will not attend that produces results that nobody pays attention to.

      This is exactly the type of prejudice that I as a Canadian am vehemently opposed to. I'm insulted to think these comments came from a Canadian, and it sickens me to see this type of racism being moderated as "Interesting".

      From the Canadian Government website on refugee elegibility:

      The Convention Refugee Abroad class includes people who are outside their country of citizenship or habitual residence. Refugees in this class have a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of:

      * race;
      * religion;
      * political opinion;
      * nationality; or
      * membership in a particular social group.

      There are other reasons listed on that page. Believe me, if you have ever delt with a customs agent beyond the standard 5 questions, you will have one hell of a time claiming refugee status without any documents.

      As a side note, are you aware that more than 100 American Citizens claimed refugee status in canada for some of the reasons listed above?
      --
      .
  306. Reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not have reciprocity? If Americans can't work in India(for example) then Indians can't work in America.

    1. Re:Reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and Americans can work in Mexico... So that means... Wait, Mexicans live in america too. I get so confused.

  307. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, boy! Calm down. Did you know that H1B-s are not only Indians but other nationals too? So just because India doesn't allow US workers, according to you we need to "boot" all the rest that we don't even know their nations' laws, huh? Have you ever applied for an H-1B in the US? Do you know what it takes to get one? Waiting, patience and strong nerves is involved in this business, something that the average american has never experienced. I am sure if you are put under the same bureaucracy you'll be the first one to give up. Therefore, don't ever assume that all H-1Bs are just sittiing here and having fun - I will tell you from my own experience - they are the slaves in the american employment system because if your boss doesn't like you and fires you you have nothing left but to pack your bags and go back home. Read more about what H1B's are then we can talk.

  308. Outsourced by jrgeek · · Score: 1

    Ok, so you don't have to like the Dutch, but understanding the outsourcing orgs themselves is important. I worked for an Indian outsourcing company that implemented Oracle and other ERP systems. You would be surprised at the loopholes they used to get cheap labor over here. They would improperly fill out the reason the person was coming over for and using B1 visas rather than H1's. They needed a few people form the local market to bring to client sites mostly for show it seemed and also to make sure that culturally they were able to fit in. It was a lot cheaper to use the B1 since they were only supposed to be here for training and not working at client sites. This is something many of these offshore company's do to manage their costs. Even further, they would shack all of these B1 engineers in one house sometime 15 people in one 3 bedroom house. They were treated more like slave labor than anything else. I have since moved on from that company to better industry. After that experience, I would probably never consider working for another Indian company again.

  309. I call Bullsh*t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "We're already the first generation in history to be worse off than our parents were."

    Usually the studies that say this are done by people with an agenda.

    You are most certainly better off than your parents; you just are comparing your financial status at 21 to their financial status at 50, and there's frankly no comparison.

    So lets stop this nonsensical talk based on nonsense.

    1. Re:I call Bullsh*t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I am not 21. I am 33. And, at my age, my father was making a great deal more money than I am, especially when you adjust for inflation. Of course, he worked a lot "harder" than I do. But I do believe there was a higher job/person ratio back then. Employees are increasing at a faster rate than employers. Why is it that you glass is half full people are always thinking that things are just constantly getting better, that the future is always better than the past? I'll believe that when I see it.

  310. Some issues with this story by bot · · Score: 4, Informative


    1. Before you start beating up on Indians, remember that it's American managers that do the outsourcing, and the ones that benefit the most.
    2. If the Tata company didn't hire him in US because he was American, he could (and should) take legal recourse.
    3. You can work in India as an American. Thousands of other Americans do, even in high tech jobs. You need to :
    a. Get a job in an Indian company. Like Intel :-)
    b. Apply for a 'business visa for employment at your local Indian embassy/consulate
    And go.

    The economy sucks, but that doesn't mean you put the blame on other people who like you are trying to work for a living.

  311. My company has outsourced some positions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...namely, our front-line help desk. So, when the users call 800-HELPME or whatever, it's picked up by some guy in India. This, of course, was done as a cost-saving measure.

    I don't think it's going to last terribly long. Basically, the English-language skills of the phone workers there aren't quite as good as the company made them out to be. As a result, the end-users spend far more time on the phone with them trying to get their problem explained. Multiply that by 50k, and that's a hell of a lot of lost time, and I'm sure it's one hell of a phone bill.

    The smarter end-users have taken to calling 2nd & 3rd level support folks like me directly, even though they're not supposed to. I let the nice ones get away with it...the nasty ones...back to the India call-queue for them.

    It seems like our company is starting to chalk this India oursourcing thing up as a failed experiment. As the economy slowly recovers, more and more positions are coming back to the US.

  312. Generation of Reduced Expectations by Greyfox · · Score: 1, Funny
    We expect too much here in the IT Industry and here in the USA, I think. A lot of people have to work jobs that they hate for a lot less money than is common in the IT Industry. We seem to feel we're entitled to the huge salaries and benefits just because we can bend computers to our will. Turns out people living in abject poverty halfway around the world can do that too. Hell, even the people here in the USA who work jobs that suck and make less than half the average IT Worker's salary have high expectations -- that they can eat meat on a regular basis (The US has 1/15th the world's population and consumes 1/3rd the world's meat) and that everyone should own a car. Stuff like that. Turns out people living in abject poverty halfway around the world might be willing to do without the car and may or may not go for the meat on a regular basis as long as they can at least eat on a regular basis.

    We need to live with a reduced set of expectations if we're going to open up our trade to the world. Corporations will naturally migrate to the lowest cost areas, all else being equal. The suffering is spread across the board -- imagine how the poor CEO who has to pay upkeep on his "expensive wife" must feel having to make do with only $25 Million or so in severance bonusses. Or who has to make do with only one house larger than most city blocks. Imagine the poor politician who has to make do with only $25,000 in campaign contributions from any given company! Who are we, then, to complain if we can't find a job and end up having to move back in with our parents? You don't see them complaining about having to have 27 people living in a one room apartemnt in other countries, so why should we be any different? It's pure arrogance, I tell you!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  313. Rolling eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already explained this to you in an earlier post. He was trying to f*ck her, and that's why he put up with bullsh*t like that.

    I mean, guys put up with anything to get laid. Take Brittany Spears. Annoying as all get-out. But because she has a great ass (and she does), and some nice t*ts, then guys put up with music that sucks, and a brain the size of a walnut in that head-thing of hers.

    The beauty of getting to your 40's is as a guy, the hormones tone down a little, and while I still enjoy sex, I'm no longer willing to put up with mindless nonsense from a chick just to get a blow job or some p*ssy. Frankly, ugly chicks usually f*ck better than good looking ones anyway, because they really *try* to give you a good time. Good lookers mostly think they're doing a favor just putting your d*ck in one of their holes (and always just the one).

    You may find this little diatribe hard to take, but I'm telling you the dead-honest truth. That is a gift to treasure, my friend.

  314. Freedom of Capital vs Freedom of Labour by meehawl · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read constantly about stories like this, and the older thread about about how a secret memo shows that IBM are planning to move huge quantities of their best jobs out of the US and into India over the next few years.

    The central issue for me that links these stories is not so much the relocation of manufacturing and productive jobs from the core of an empire to peripheral client states. This has happened before (Roman Empire, United Kingdom, and so on) and will happen again.

    No, for me the real issue is one of freedom of movement for labour versus freedom of movement for capital. Because of their many advantages, corporations are "gaming" the international political system to produce labour arbitrage. They have lobbied hard for their right to move capital between countries at will. What we have now is globalization that serves corporations, not globalization that serves people.

    This is the fundamental ideological underpinning of this discourse. Corporations and politicians have structured a political system that implicitly and irrevocably favours the movement of capital over labour. Why should this be so? Could it be different? These are questions that need to be addressed. Different political movements are examining them in different ways.

    Meanwhile, for ordinary people who, for the most part, have no greater or more fundamental asset to offer than their labour, their options are a lot more restricted. US companies send jobs south into Mexico with minimal regulation because of NAFTA, but Mexican people are not equally free to move their bodies north into the US. This unequal treatment creates the exploitative arbitrage that the corporations milk for profits.

    This also explains a fundamental difference between the USA, NAFTA, and the European Union project. I've noticed most Americans really don't "get" the EU because their expectations are constrained by NAFTA and the halting of the US expansion within North America.

    At its core the EU project is very simple, but very powerful. It holds out the promise of regional improvement by granting freedom of access to a unified market for both capital and labour. As it expands, relentlessly it seems, it allows poorer countries to join, once they restructure their political, legal, and social systems to bring them into some degree of harmony with the EU consensus. In return for this social transformation, all the citizens of member countries can enjoy free and unfettered movement throughout all other EU countries (admittedly and annoyingly, several EU countries impose different temporary restrictions on some new member country citizens). In essence it's very similar to the freedom of movement that US citizens enjoy throughout all 50 States.

    This is a powerful lure. For all the talk of "old Europe" and "new Europe", the former Soviet Bloc countries are not clamouring to create bilateral trade agreements with the US... they are fighting tooth and nail to join the EU, and so submit their trade relations with non-EU countries to the fiat of Brussels. This yearning for EU membership has produced and is producing massive social and political change across eastern Europe.

    However, it seems that the US project has stalled at its current borders. I don't see the US engaged in a determined effort to expand south, to create a distributed American citizenship that would be a beacon for social progress and political aspirations throughout the Americas and the world. Immigration isn't any sort of answer: it's tedious, socially disruptive, and over-regulated. Try opening the floodgates, as the EU has done for its member countries, and within a few decades the improvements in both old and new member States will be enormous and unprecedented.

    But that's a fantasy. People today in the poorer countries of Central America, so close to the US, nonetheless know explicitly that their relation to the US and the member States within can never be based on equality and access, but will instead be permanently structured as clientist an

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Freedom of Capital vs Freedom of Labour by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The temporary movement of labor is known better as Temporary Movement of Natural Persons. It turns out that the price differential for labor between developed and undeveloped countries tends to be much larger than the price differential for goods, thus is more important for a global marketplace than free trade of goods. TMNP allows for flexible labor movement without worrying about sovereignty issues (as permanent movement would).

      Studies show that by increasing developed economies' quotas on inward movements of both skilled and unskilled labour by just 3% of their labour forces, world welfare would rise by $156 billion - about 0.6% of world income.

      Further liberalization of labor movement could double world income and imply proportionately even larger gains for the developing countries.

    2. Re:Freedom of Capital vs Freedom of Labour by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Brilliant points, just to add this these three:-

      a) Here's a very interesting book on this 'ancient' globalisation bit:- the travels of a 12th century Baghdadi Jew and his Indian slave

      b) Despite what everyone thinks, India has actually one of the largest ex-pat worker populations in the world, mostly thanks to a huge, unfenced border on our East with Bangladesh. In a sense then, we have the reverse situation in South Asia; movement of goods is vastly restricted, but the movement of people is, well, badly regulated.

      c) There's no end in sight to this; post-911, restrictions on this freedom of movement of labour have increased. Tremendously.

    3. Re:Freedom of Capital vs Freedom of Labour by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      The EU is an interesting example. If any one country in the EU has lower prevailing wages, becoming an EU member should increase it's wages while at the same time lowering the wages of all the other countries by just enough to make up for it.

      Basically labor scarcity is something of an illusion. In a truly fluid world economy, world unemployment (and poverty) should be reduced by about the same amount that the wages of the employed are reduced. It's just supply and demand. Again, the comparitively high wages in 1st world countries only exist because of the poverty in the 3rd world countries.

      Protectionist labor policies do exactly that, they protect the employees of that country by artificially holding the price of labor above it's natural worldwide market price. It's no different from what the oil cartels do when they want to keep the price of oil higher than what the market price would be. To keep prices up, reduce the supply.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    4. Re:Freedom of Capital vs Freedom of Labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should all go to Europe and work for SuSE?

      I'm so there!

  315. Regardless by Pac · · Score: 1

    I was answering the AC statement above, specially "If they want a job so bad, move here, become a citizen, and get a job. Don't take someone else's away.".

    My main point is that it is not India's or Tailand's or Hong Kong's problem if your companies choose to send your jobs there. The Indian guy may or may not want to become an American citizen, but his wishes are completely irrelevant in this context, as the jobs are being offered in India. He has the same need to become an American citizen to take a job in India as an American has to become an Indian citizen to take a job in the United States. None.

    And if you look at it from his point of view, he is not taking anyone's job. He probably thinks his American counterparts are all being given fancier jobs like the next version of Windows, the next Mars missions or the next smart bomb software and wish he could do that instead of VB COM components to print pretty payroll reports.

    So, CIO may well be talking to American CIOs, but it is pretty useless talk while American companies need to compete among themselves for Wall Street praise in a quarter by quarter basis. And as the whole world knows, Wall Street couldn't care less about who has which job or even if anyone has any job, as long as those quarter results keep going up.

    1. Re:Regardless by sbuckhopper · · Score: 1

      My main point is that it is not India's or Tailand's or Hong Kong's problem if your companies choose to send your jobs there. The Indian guy may or may not want to become an American citizen, but his wishes are completely irrelevant in this context, as the jobs are being offered in India. He has the same need to become an American citizen to take a job in India as an American has to become an Indian citizen to take a job in the United States. None.

      You have a good point in this reguard.

      And if you look at it from his point of view, he is not taking anyone's job. He probably thinks his American counterparts are all being given fancier jobs like the next version of Windows, the next Mars missions or the next smart bomb software and wish he could do that instead of VB COM components to print pretty payroll reports.

      I do disagree with you here though. In the few dealings I've had with these outsourcing companies, they know exactly what they are doing. (disclaimer: this could obviously be the exception) I would be suspicous that any one of them that says the things you are saying is just trying to give a policially correct answer to the problem. In other words if they look like total jerks they figure they will not get the job.

      In some cases they have been far from tactful here as well. I have seen a case where a company thought about outsourcing certain areas of their business, they dropped back on a few of them becaues they did not want to cut so many employees and the outsourcing company got irate about it -- even before the contract was signed. So in my experience (which I'm definitely not saying is every case) some of the outsourcing companies not only know exactly what they are doing, but are vocally unhappy towards the potential customer when the companies that are giving them business do not cut their tech employees.

      --
      "Everybody knows the moon's made of cheese," Wallace.
  316. Subsidies by geophile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard a discussion of agricultrual subsidies in the industrialized
    countries, by Robert Reich last night on NPR. Stay with me, I'll get
    to the point.

    It is far cheaper to grow grain in developing countries than in the
    industrialized countries. It is the best way for those countries to
    make money. Yet they cannot afford to compete with the US, Europe and
    Japan because of subsidies. Why are there subisidies? Because
    agribusiness is politically powerful.

    In all the discussion of offshoring that I've seen on slashdot, I've
    never seen this point discussed. In fact, I haven't seen the point
    raised anywhere. I'm definitely not in favor of ag subsidies, and I'm
    probably against any subsidies. I just find it curious that the
    subject of subsidized software development has not come up at all.

  317. H1-B jobs: qualified U.S. citizens need not apply by xeo_at_thermopylae · · Score: 1
    You claim that
    In order for foreigners to get a work permit
    (a H1-B visa), the prospective employer must:

    • Advertise the position publicly for 60 days
    • Demonstrate that the candidate has unique skills pertaining to the job
    • Be unable to find qualified candidates that are either citizens or permanent residents.

    But in fact no check is performed in many, if not most, cases. A local state university is an example: the university's H1-B specialist told me that no check for U.S. citizens is performed in academic positions. Whomever (the specific named person) is requested is the only person accepted for such positions.

  318. Same here by jjga · · Score: 1
    The lousy consulting company I have worked for in the US for the last 2.5 years has a site in Bangalore. After they ran out of projects here in the US, and I had being on the bench for 2 months, they were willing to send me over to Bangalore with a 1000$/month salary (which I know is extremely good over there).

    So I do not really agree with the original post about being that difficult being sent over to India to work.

  319. Re:counter example: Permanent Residents in the USA by krysith · · Score: 1

    Unemployment in Bangalore is 10% source
    A more recent source (thehindu.com) gives 10.5% for "urban youth" for Mar 2003, so I figure its still about the same. I can't find the engineering unemployment rate.

    So what do they blame? Globalization

    Funny how lack of barriers and "protections" are always perceived as the cause for unemployment, no matter which side of the barrier you are on. It's always the other guy's fault. If you want to stop H-1B's, please replace it with an increase in the quotas for citizens. I'd rather have those programmers and doctors as Americans, thank you.

  320. Moron? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seriously have no clue. He said nothing about what you are blabbering.

  321. Re:Dick by jswalter9 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad someone else sees Dick for what he is.

    --
    Retired from software... maybe. Sort of.
  322. My experience by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company who started doing technical support for Microsoft around the time Win98 came out. They hired 300+ workers at the same time to support Win98, and as time went on we got more contracts from Microsoft. I was eventually put into the Multimedia and Games support. We got the contract to do email support, that was going good, until a company in India somehow got the contract and we lost it. The next big move was the 2nd lvl support (which I was doing at the time). About 20 of us in 2nd lvl support were laid off last year, all those jobs went to India. This year was the worst. That building that held 300+ (probably around 450 employees at its peak) is now empty. Every single one of the contracts we had with Microsoft now is being handled by companies in India. Since then I haven't been able to find any sort of tech job, closest I can find is working in a call center taking orders from people for clothes. I currently work as a cook, making less then half what I used to make.. Why hire an american work force, when you can get one in India for a tenth the price?

  323. developing world directors by LordBeaver · · Score: 1

    its great to see the effects of free markets on the world - open up IT and we get a drift of jobs to areas that will provide the resource for cheaper - brilliantly simple economics! now as i see it IT is just a start - soon we can have other areas of business transfered overseas where costs are lower - so lets hope the directors/board members of these companies see sense in their logic and resign in favour of cheaper developing world labour. surely their share holders deserve it ;-)

  324. Re:CNN Story: H1-B Visa program may not be that ba by gupg · · Score: 1

    There was no/little displacement of american workers. The H1-B program (ostensibly) is to get people whose skills cannot be found in the US.

    So, the H1-B program helped the American economy and was one of the factors for the Internet boom.

  325. Why we use H1-Bs and hire foreigners by ScooterBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've processed several software engineers through the H1-B program. Simply put, when you hire a really good software engineer and he tells you he has a collegue that is really good and is willing to relocate his family but needs an H1-B visa, it's all too tempting to go that route. The other option is to advertise and hope you get someone good.

    There is a requirement to advertise the position in the US before you can get an H1-B but it doesn't really make a difference.

    Now personally, I can't tell the difference between the people we've hired locally and those who've immigrated. They're all good people.

    I'd rather have companies help immigrate good, hard working foreigners than have our government tell me I have to hire some slob just because he lives here.

    I do agree than any company that exploits a 3rd world cheap labor force without following labor practices like we have here is guilty of a crime.

    M

    1. Re:Why we use H1-Bs and hire foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously having trouble finding non-slobs in this economy? There are so many amazing and even popular (networked) programmers looking for work right now...

  326. Blame your own government. by l-ascorbic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is simply because the US doesn't have reciprocal work visa arrangements with anyone. As a British citizen, I can get work visas in many countries pretty easily, and others like me from those countries can do the same in the UK. This is in addition to the complete free movement of labour within the EU. So, while I can get an Australian work visa from the travel agents, I don't have a hope of getting a US one according to their rules.

    Personally, I like The Economist's idea: free movement of labour between all countries of comparable wealth.

  327. Terrorist Connection by klaxor · · Score: 1
    Yeah, well how do you explain that some of the money used to outsource IS goes into the hands of Muslim terrorists? Oh yeah, that's right - when a guy does drugs, he's supporting terrorism (because terrorists sell drugs, right?) but when a corporation sends millions of dollars to India (hotbed of radical Islam), nobody says a word. Why is that?

    Is it really patriotic for a corporation to put Americans out of work so they can get cheaper labor, inadvertently funding terrorism in the process?

    1. Re:Terrorist Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      dood, india's been fighting terrorism for the past 15 years, if not more. And a majority of the terrorists trying to harm India happen to be sponsored muslims from across the border.

      atleast get your facts fskin' straight before posting.

    2. Re:Terrorist Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I thought most Indians were Hindus, not muslims.

    3. Re:Terrorist Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      thought most Indians were Hindus, not muslims.

      Which is exactly the "problem" that radical Muslims are trying to solve.

  328. Mod parent up by Fred+IV · · Score: 1

    I'm just sorry I don't have mod points to save your comment from troll status. I used to live in a town that was devastated by the loss of textile jobs, same deal...different scope.

  329. Stop patronizing by Pac · · Score: 1

    You should really lose the idea that poorer means dumber.

    Some countries and some kinds of workers are willing to cope with less regulation in order to attract the jobs being outsourced. For the time being, at least. Other countries, like Brazil, are not deregulating and lifting worker protection, considering the damage would be greater than the economic benefit (but the debate continues).

    But rest assured the whole world has smart union leaders, economists, planners and politicians, all well aware of the benefits and liabilities of this trend.

  330. Re:Oppose H-1Bs and L-1s but Support Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    errr... American doesn't make computers, ethernet cars or manufacture much of anything anymore. Been to a WalMart lately?

  331. Voice of Nature by Greenisloved · · Score: 1

    Hi friends , I can empathize the feeling of jobless americans..Can you guys empathize millions of homeless people whose next target is to find food for the day ?Have you americans know such people exist in poor and developing countries like india? I have seen so many people toiling in hot sun just to eat and save their children. Why should such vast economic disparity exist ? Guys , u sure can survive in america .Ofcourse you might really be frustrated that your high salary life till recent is going down. Change is inevitable.Eventually the money will reach the poor if not in entirety.Being humanitarian is one step ahead of being patriotic. STOP WASTING MONEY: I have seen americans wasting money like anything .I can really tell you indians save money a lot better.Very few indians have debts on their cards. INCREASE WORK HOURS AND QUALITY No doubt american work quality is great.However it can improve to the very best imaginable.America is in recession , so one should not complain of long work hours.This pain is temporary but a real solution in future BE CONTENT AND INFORMED America is not the world.Most of the americans are very less knowledgeable abt the way things work in other country.If they learn that, they will thank god so much .This will help in being content , controlled and self satisfied. America to me is a great country.Their work ethic ,mannerisms , quality is unparallelled. Dont blame outsourcing.Its the way nature decides.

    --
    Hello , this is my way.
    Which way is yours ?
    btw there is no right way
  332. Visas vs. jobs - Repeal H1-B by Bratch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone seen this yet?

    In response to the pressure, and in light of a lack of job growth in the broader economy, House Democrats and Republicans have proposed a bill to repeal the H-1B program.

    http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/11/news/economy/visa_ impact/index.htm

    --bratch

    --
    Beware of the Redittor who loans you a Sharpie.
    1. Re:Visas vs. jobs - Repeal H1-B by mattsucks · · Score: 1

      Lies, damn lies, and statistics. From the article:

      "In fact, Zavodny said that in 2001, the latest data available, H-1B workers with bachelor's degrees were paid more, on average, than U.S. citizens with bachelor's degrees. In that sense, then, it would seem that H-1B competition could actually put upward pressure on wages."

      Now this is a very nicely worded statement that, on the surface, seems to indicate that H-1Bs are actually helping wages.

      Hooey.

      H-1B visa holders are concentrated in the hi-tech industry (57.8% of H-1B holders worked in computer-related fields in 2001, also according to the article). OF COURSE their average salary was more than that of the average degreed US worker. If they compared the H-1B salaries to the salaries of US workes IN THE SAME FIELD, would the averages work out the same way?

  333. Re:Immigration - NOT the issue by StingRayGun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your little pro-Immigration rant was nice, but it should have been modded off topic. The topic here is that the US does nothing to protect it's workers, while India does. This is unfair.

    The US needs to do something about this. I don't mind jobs moving to other countries, I also don't mind people from other countries coming here. I do mind countries taking advantage of our near-open borders, while not extending the same openess to us.

  334. we have a word for legal immigrants in California by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    and that name is CHUMPS!

    one of my best friends is a Canadian immigrant. it took him two years and about $10k to get legal immigration status here in California.

    And he is a dumbass chump.

    He should have just worked here illegally and then in Janary gotten himself a drivers license, which is basically all you need for a job, to register to vote, or get on an airplane.

    California has much more sensible immigration policy than the right wing anti-immigration folks in the EU... who are doing everything, including shooting, at folks trying to make it into Spain from North Africa.

    http://bailiwick.lib.uiowa.edu/bordercrossings/a fr icanmigrants/

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  335. The above is not true: no check is performed by xeo_at_thermopylae · · Score: 1
    I spoke to the person in charge of H1-B at a nearby state university. They said that for all H1-B's hired by the university:
    • no search for U.S. citizens with the same skills is performed,
    • the H1-B job listing is posted only on the billboard at the university's human resources office,
    • The person specified to the H1-B handler is the one hired: they are specified by name, not by skill.
  336. Don't blame the foreigners.... by lotus87 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Concept A: H1-B people take jobs from Americans
    While this is true, it is neither the fault of the H1-B foreigners who take the jobs nor the Americans who lose them. Most of the H1-B foreigners were educated an universities here in the US. Back at the beginning of the CS/IT boom, there weren't enough qualified people, so employers petitioned the government to expand visa programs so that they could hire the foreign students that were available in universities here. Once employees started leaving for start-ups employers realized that because of their visa restrictions, most H1-B employees would not or could not leave. So they petitioned Congress again to expand the program. They got what they wanted, and American workers are now paying the price.

    Concept B: Outsourcing is taking jobs from Americans
    While this is also true, did you expect something different? Corporations are there to make profits for their shareholders. If I tell a corporation that my company in India/China/Eastern Europe can complete the same work their in-house American IT department does for half the cost, no MBA-carrying CEO would ever turn me down. Even if I lied and it's only 2/3, that's reduced operating costs by millions or dollars, thus increasing the return for shareholders.

    All of this happened decades ago in agriculture, 20-25 years ago in the textiles industry (remember the by clothes made in the USA campaigns??), 20 years to present in the manufacturing industries (auto, steel, toys, etc.), 5-10 years in semi-conductor and IC manufacturing, and 3-5 years in the call-center industry. Were you naive enough to think it wouldn't happen to us?

    Concept C: Foreign workers are less-apt than Americans
    This is pure ego run amuck! Since the 80's, every foreign country has been improving their educational systems (most of which are now better than ours), and churning out qualified computer scientists, electrical engineers, and computer engineers. It was only a matter of time before corporations sought to tap into that resource. Why hire a bunch of Americans from average underfunded party schools when you can hire better educated and cheaper foreigners from the best schools in India, China, Czech Republic, etc.? That's capitalism at its best.



    I'm all for altruism and idealism, but the reality is that these decisions are driven by $$$, and nothing else. If we want to keep CS/IT jobs here in the USA, we need to create more value for less money. Otherwise, we WILL follow the same path as the industries I mentioned above.

  337. Re:Duh... of course you can - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone from every country in the world is over here taking American jobs. Just ask the guy from India sitting next to me who is here solely on an H1-B work visa. Of course there is not another US citizen here in the country that knows how to write java. If it wasn't for the Foriegn workers we could not have enjoyed the DOT.COM bubble. :-)

    Hillary Clinton is a strong advocate for foreign workers coming to America, write her a letter.

  338. More! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am so sloppy. For my 3rd post on my own lame little personal thread, I would like to post a reference:


    "Accounting Firms Outsource Tax Returns to India" [seattletimes.nwsource.com]

    thank you.

  339. who is going to have money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is going to be left in the US to buy all this merchandise that is being made in India when all the US jobs have gone overseas?

    its cyclical..the jobs will have to come back once companies realize they have noone who can afford to spend money on their products.

    Unfortunately, it might take a good chunk of time before that happens.

    besides, the skill level in India (at least for IT jobs) is HORRENDOUS. if those people had half a brain, they'd have already been in the USA to begin with on a H1B.

  340. Miners by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So after we ship all of our jobs overseas, who the hell is going to be left to buy the things these companies make?!?!

    Well, there's always miners. Mining jobs are among the highest-paying jobs in the country (U.S.). Support mining and miners in your community, for not only do miners provide the raw materials (avg. is 45,000lbs/year of newly mined minerals for each American) for everything from basic infrastructure, agriculture, communications, power generation, etc. to luxury goods, but the money we spend in the community, from equipment to services to goods, helps everyone. I know it isn't perfect, but you have to admit that countries with abundant natural resources are the richer nations.

    I'm relatively secure in my job discovering mineral deposits, knowing that for at least the next hundred years or more, we'll still need everything from gravel to gold, and that we'll need someone to find those deposits, and mine them.

    -cp-

    1. Re:Miners by TwistedSquare · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting... In the UK mining was killed off, essentially completely, in the 1980s and is now rapidly becoming part of the industrial past.

    2. Re:Miners by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Oh right, like Japan... which has to import nearly all its raw materials. I wouldn't feel so secure in your job since environmental regulations here are relatively restrictive and places like Central Asia are ripe for rape by U.S. companies looking for cheap raw materials, as close to slave labor as possible and regulatory regimes as close to non-existent as possible. Start saving your pennies.

    3. Re:Miners by EvilArchitect · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huh...
      Just spoke with my dad today (a mine foreman who retired 2 years ago).

      Is $16-20/hr considered one of the highest paying fields? As my father put it: "I retired making over $20 an hour more than the people who worked for me. I never checked into it, I only put down their time. If I'd known how little they made, I'd have put down more. " (That's my dad, fraud never scared him... :) )

      --
      I'm just a caveman programmer. I don't understand your strange, "modern" ways of thinking.
    4. Re:Miners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dad ox

      stick it to the man

    5. Re:Miners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah great! Just think of the dollars in your pocket ripping the guts out of the Earth rather than what you will need to do AFTER the next hundred years...

    6. Re:Miners by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      I guess that depends on where you're at, and what your job is. I know lots of miners, and they started out above $35/hr. Most make $65/hr. and up plus lots of benefits.

      -cp-

    7. Re:Miners by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      There are dollars in my pocket ripping the guts out the earth?

      Bad Dollars! Bad, Bad Dollars!

      Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

      -cp-

    8. Re:Miners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. What a little retarded creature you are.

    9. Re:Miners by IrkenInvader · · Score: 1
      There aren't any mining jobs near me but there are auto technician jobs.

      I'm still in college, originally for computer science but ditched that after the bubble burst. It still looks like I made a good choice. I had decided to work on an applied physics degree but due to economic reasons I'm going to have to drop out soon. There aren't any nearby engineering colleges otherwise I would have taken that track.

      I know how to work on cars so I'm going to get a auto tech certificate at the local community college. It's only two semesters so it's not much time lost. I can then continue, albeit slowly, on my physics degree. Hopefully, the economy will change sometime in the near future.

      At least as an auto technician, I'm pretty much assured that my job won't be outsourced.

    10. Re:Miners by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I know how to work on cars so I'm going to get a auto tech certificate at the local community college. It's only two semesters so it's not much time lost. I can then continue, albeit slowly, on my physics degree. Hopefully, the economy will change sometime in the near future.

      Good luck, dude. But I should warn you. I was a mechanic for 3 years, and found it to be one of the more expensive shit jobs to get into. You have to buy all your tools (no big deal, except if you want them to last you have to pay big bucks for each one), but you don't make much more than a whopper-flopper in pay. It's a tough life, the life of a mechanic.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:Miners by davesag · · Score: 1
      I know it isn't perfect, but you have to admit that countries with abundant natural resources are the richer nations.

      rotflmao - like the Congo you mean? Or Iraq? or Venezuela? oh you are too funny.

      The money we spend in the community, from equipment to services to goods, helps everyone.

      heard of Trickle Down Economics? It's a sham.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    12. Re:Miners by mfrank · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but after the next hundred years, I expect to be dead.

    13. Re:Miners by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      He's completely right here. You'll spend about $8,000 on tools in the first couple years and you'll probably end up with about $15,000 in tools. You won't make much money when you start. It's a pretty competative market where you work against other mechanics in your shop. When you start, you get stuck changing oil and they do the work where you can beat the books by a lot.

      I don't know if you've looked into working with cars, but book rate is how much they assume it'll take you to fix something. You can usually work faster. Say book rate is 1.5 hours for changing an alternator and you do it in 30 minutes. You still get paid for 1.5 hours and you have time to work on other stuff.

      But hey, it's just 2 semesters of classes. Try to get a job at a dealership and shoot for something like BMW or Jaguar. Good luck if you try it. I did just because I wanted to be able to work on my own cars.

    14. Re:Miners by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      But hey, it's just 2 semesters of classes. Try to get a job at a dealership and shoot for something like BMW or Jaguar. Good luck if you try it. I did just because I wanted to be able to work on my own cars.

      Heh, I considered that a side benefit. :) But one thing is certain, mechanic work is a lot of fun. If there was enough money in it to give my family a good living, I'd still be doing it. I loved it, and it hurt me to stop doing it. But bills are bills, and the kids are hungry....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:Miners by IrkenInvader · · Score: 1
      I know all of what you speak. I was a auto tech for 8 years and attained ASE Master Tech level. I primarily worked on foreign cars, VW and Subaru mostly. Later, I joined the US Coast Guard for 7 years and did electronics & radio communications. Now I can't find work as an electronics tech and the future for comp sci and engineering isn't looking good.

      I just need to get the auto certificate so I have something recent. A few things in auto tech have changed since I did it but the basic stuff hasn't. Luckily, I kept all my tools. Any way, it's just to hold me over until I can get my degree done and the economy changes. (hopefully)

  341. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There *is* an employment visa. You need a letter of employment, however, most employers would be reluctant to hire someone without first seeing them. Any American would be an asset to an Indian company especially as a technical liaison. Oh yeah and whichever official he talked to is full of @*%^.

    Here are the instructions for visas to India

    http://chicago.indianconsulate.com/VISAINSN.html

    Try the 'good' employers like Infosys or Wipro. Just fyi, the job market is a lot more competitive over there with a rather strong emphasis on education.

    1. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong.
      you can get a visa to india, yes. i've been there training the idiots on systems they have no business administering. However, you can't be based out of india and work there full time if you are not a US citizen. this is a fact.
      although who would want to? the smell hits you as soon as you step out of the plane.

  342. H1B wages must be 90% of prevailing wage by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    It's not like H1Bs can just come in and take jobs at pennies on the dollar.

    They must legally be paid 90% (or is it 95%?) of the prevailing wage for their profession as defined by the Department of Labor.

    Whether this is enforced or not is another thing entirely.

  343. Re:CNN Story: H1-B Visa program may not be that ba by holzp · · Score: 1

    sigh. i wish i had a job writing studies. i wish i had any job. :(

  344. Re:Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by randolfe · · Score: 1

    I cannnot allow this to pass unchallenged.

    1) India's rules regarding temproary work visas are *significantly* different than in the US or EU.

    2) India is largely of a protectionist bias. India has the dubious distinction of receiving a very large number of WTO rules violtation charges.

    3) US "H1-B" visas, and related visas, within the US afford much longer than 6 years residency. Our average "H1-B" visa employee has resided in the US for over 14 years. It is very common for "H1-B" visa holders to "reset" their qualification process for "Green Card" application numerous times as they change jobs.

    4) Your understanding of how globalized markets work operate is so simplistic that it does not even deserve a USA-Today level of readership. Try applying a little more economic extrapolation to the subject than you learned in freshman economics.

    Since the US is a net-importer, and India enjoys numerous protectionist barriers, there is a net flow of wealth from the US into India whereas global trade and commerce are concerned.

    Nothing burns the biscuit more than psuedo-insightful statements which, upon closer examination, are really just political reactionims.

  345. Italian could end up being India's Prime Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo Bros, Sonia Gandhi, born Italian could end up being the PM of INDIA (the TOP job). She is now the leader of the oppposition Congress Party owing to have been married into the Nehru-Gandhi family which ruled India for a few decades. Agreed she is a naturalised Indian citizen now, but people opposed to the possibility of her taking the top job, have found nothing in Indian law which can prevent her from becoming the PM. Can you do that in the US? Even kids born to American parents outside the US cannot run for the top job.

    How can you beat that? If that is possible, techies can surely go work in Bangalore. That article is clearly a voice in the ranting against H1-Bs and outsourcing.

    And to all those who are beating their chests and shouting about protecting American jobs and keeping immigrants away, remember that your ancestors probably came here from somewhere else. They not only took the jobs but worse still, killed off all those Native Americans.

  346. 3 month gain for long term slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see the ceo and board of a company laying off 25% of the company's people in the USA and replacing them with an equivalanet number of India people.

    Guess what, projects across the board are slowed down for years to come. Quality drops, customers leave. The last few US based, 'critically important to the company' people leave when they figure out that the company does not have a future for them.

    How can that be good for the company in the long run?

    Endless cost cutting will only demorialize your employees and hurt the company in the long run.

  347. Indian Embassy website information for Visas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taken from the official webpage for the Indian Embassy in Washington:
    http://www.indianembassy.org/consular/visa_guide.h tm

    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

    This is some of the documentation you need, to apply for an employment Visa for India.

    Also from the same page:

    Note: Change of purpose is not permitted once you have reached India. Depending on the nature of your journey, apply for the correct visa category.

  348. no check is madefor Americans with same skills by xeo_at_thermopylae · · Score: 1
    You are incorrect. The H1-B specialist at a nearby state university went through the process with me:
    • the job is open only to the person named; no others are considered,
    • no search for U.S. citizens with the same skills is made,
    • the job listing is posted in one place: a human resources bulletin board in a hallway.
  349. Parent is a troll, pls mod down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This person seems to be a rabid India hater(seems a pakistani), doesn't seem to hail from Bihar and has just created his nick so that he could post his same trollish comment 3 times on the same page. Pls take his comment with a pinch of salt.

    1. Re:Parent is a troll, pls mod down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We thinks he is Chinese. He talks about "Wok"s.

      "99% of IT wok done in India is outsourced...."

  350. MOD down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This person seems to be a rabid India hater(seems a pakistani), doesn't seem to hail from Bihar and has just created this nick(see post history) so that he could post his same trollish comment 3 times(last time i counted) on the same page. Pls take his comments with a pinch of salt.

  351. Releave economic pressure--don't just block leaks by V_drive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We'll see much, much more job flight in the short term until the brakes are applied to this savage anti-social approach.

    what brakes? the reason all this is happening is that the american economy is overinflated. inside the united states are high wages and high cost, with much of the rest of the world as a relative vacuum.

    don't give me the corporate greed hatespeak--you can view the income statements and balance sheets yourself for the largest corportations. things are expensive in the united states because production costs are high. production costs are high because workers demand more money. workers demand more money because cost of living is high (notice i'm not using "greedy worker" hatespeak). cost of living is high because things are expensive. the cycle goes on and pressure grows.

    this cycle is protected such policies as taxing imports, fixing high prices on agriculture, and creating barriers to accessing foreign labor. these policies don't help ameri

    by putting the "brakes" on, all you're doing is keeping the pressure in. i'm not saying we need to rip open the floodgates (in fact, i think that would be very dangerous), but the solution is not to just keep plugging holes. what happens when the average american is making 100 times as much as the average indian without an improved standard of living from where americans are now? what about 200 times?

    you can't let the pressure grow forever. we will size up eventually, either now in a controlled manner by choice, or later in a dangerous and chaotic manner by force (when nobody else in the world will pay so much for our labor or goods, but we still want imports from them).

    pardon me for ending this post with bitching, but i'm getting really tired of politicians who propose lots of great things for america when they are really just passing the cost to the next generation. it sounds great at first to protect the american workers in these ways, but america must pay in the end.

    --
    char *mySig;
  352. Those are good economies? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    New York and California may have enormous economies, but I'd be hard pressed to call them good. In fact, I hear that the big state to the far left may be voting to fire its upper management because of this exact problem.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  353. omg--i can't spell!! ...yes, it's "relieve" by V_drive · · Score: 1

    i caught that the moment i hit submit...so much for being taken seriously :(

    oops...slashdot requires me to wait 2 minutes between posts...waiting...waiting...go

    --
    char *mySig;
  354. What is this, FOX News?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is an insightful, accurate comment. I don't agree with its sentiment, and I rather resent its tone...but that doesn't make it wrong. Who are the JACKASSES who modded it down? Are we more interested in promoting "patriotism," on Slashdot, than in elevated, educated debate?

  355. I'm moving!! by raygundan · · Score: 1

    No kidding. I *like* small midwestern communities. Ones with computer engineering jobs are pretty stinking rare, though. Do tell us where this magical place is located!

    Pretty please?

  356. Is CowboyNeal Dutch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Grew up in Holland, Michigan.
    2. Was gradutated from Hope College (Home of the Flying Dutchmen).
    3. Of all the places he could live in the world, he still chooses Holland, Michigan.
    4. Blond.

  357. Want an IT job? 6 lakh others want it too by coli2 · · Score: 0

    MS Janani, 22, a computer science graduate, is sitting next to her telephone waiting for that special call. No, it is not from her boyfriend but from a US-based multinational IT firm for a telephonic interview. Ms Janani's fate is not rare. She is one of the thousands of computer science and engineering graduates who are unemployed. A lot of them are from tier two and three engineering colleges with specialisation in computer science or electrical and electronics engineering - EEE in short. Recently, Ms Janani applied for a job in Infosys Technologies. To her shock, she found was competing with over six lakh applicants. She tried her luck with Polaris Software. It was no better. Her application number was 78,000 plus. Frustrated, Janani started dropping her resume with all the recruitment firms. From hopes of working with firms like Infosys or Wipro four years ago, when she entered college, Janani today is willing to take any IT job coming her way. Today, getting an IT job has become tough even as a large number of engineering and computer science graduates pass out every year across the country. Infosys Technologies received 6.30 lakh resumes during 2002-03 for various posts. The number is almost equal to that of the entire software professionals employed in India. The company made about 6,200 offers. For an entry-level post, Polaris received 1.60 lakh applications for 500 positions. For a recent half-page advertisement calling for generic skills, Cognizant Technology received over 18,000 applications. Small and medium-size IT firms are also receiving a large number of resumes. Says Infosys spokesperson, the challenge for companies lie in distilling the best application. Today candidates have more choices, and recruitment is on an upswing. Organisations are willing to look at differential compensation package even as specialised technical skills are in higher demand. According to Mr R. Chandrasekaran, Senior Vice-President, Cognizant, for any generic technical skill such as Java or Mainframe, the company gets over 450 resumes, and for any senior-level position or niche skills over 100 resumes for a single post. This number excludes unsolicited resumes dropped through Cognizant's Web site and boxes. Of the total applications the "must hire" category is about 5 per cent, followed by "can be hired" 8 per cent. Cognizant recruits 60 per cent of its employees from engineering and management campuses and the remaining 40 per cent from open market. Of the 40 per cent, 65 per cent are from global consulting and technology companies and leading Indian software companies, and the remaining 35 per cent are from niche software companies. Cognizant recruited about 2,400 professionals last year, of which about 1,200 were from the open market, he said. The recruitment firms too are flooded with resumes for IT jobs. Says Ms Saundarya Rajesh, CEO of the Chennai-based Avtar Career Creators, a human resources consulting and recruitment firm, a recent advertisement attracted over 5,000 resumes from software testing engineers for 25 posts. Even for unknown IT companies, the response is in a few thousands, she says. Separating wheat from chaff To cope with the large number of applications, IT companies follow different screening and evaluation process. At Cognizant, for every 100 resumes received, at the first pre-screening level - to call candidates for interview is short-listed - 77 applications are rejected. In the next level of interviews to offer, 45 per cent of the short-listed applications are rejected, making it a net rejection rate of 87 per cent. That is, for every 100 applications received, there are only 13 candidates recruited into Cognizant. While Infosys recruited one in every 100 applicants, Cognizant's was 1.5 persons for 100 resumes received, Mr Chandrasekaran said. Says Mr R. Shekar, Senior Vice-President - Head HR, Corporate Strategy and Business Excellence, Polaris Software Lab, at the entry level, the company follows a two-step process. A written test is done to validate the analytical ability, numeric an

  358. How about equal pay around the world by sckeener · · Score: 1

    Instead of the US giving out money to other countries, why don't we just pass a law saying that to do bussiness in the US you have to pay workers the same amount as you would a US employee.

    It would stop jobs from going overseas and/or improve conditions in other countries.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  359. Outsourcing won't last by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    I have experience managing outsourced projects (in our case it was China). You definitely get more skill for the buck, but only up to a certain level. In the end I think most of the money spent on the offshore programmers was wasted (it wasn't a lot of money though).

    First, there is the time difference. You send an e-mail and get no reply until tomorrow. Then there is the language barrier - sometimes I think the offshore programmers used it their favor (i thought you ment this, not that, sorry). The lack of responsibility - loyalty is a two-way street, and they know that we only like them cause they're cheap; after a while you start getting the vibe that they only care about the project as much as you care about them. Worst of all, they didn't really know what "responsibility" is, as we know it (in America, or western Europe), i.e. little things dropping here or there are OK. They don't understand that the paycheck depends on their performance - for them it arrives from somewhere in the wild west where everyone is rich.

    After a while we tried to improve things by sending an employee to china for several months. While he was there, we thought things were improving, but in the end not much has changed.

    All this leads me to believe that the offshoring thing is going to prove a bitter disappointment for many companies, and it will also damage reputation, especially for those in the consulting business, e.g. Accenture or PWC, etc. Imagine how happy an exec at a large company will be when he finds out that the consulting firm that charged him $120/hr has a bunch of guys somewhere working for $.50, especially after it becomes apparent that what they've been writing for the past 6 months is all unusable crap?

    To the unemployed out there I'd say don't worry, and keep your skills current. If you have no project - go help some big open source project, like Apache, it will look good on your resume when companies will learn their lesson and start hiring based on skill and character, not on salary.

  360. Visas from india by harlemjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I happen to be an American citizen born in America (and a Republican voter to boot), who studies in America and lives in India. So I have both angles covered here.

    Let me begin by saying that I have a 10 year work permit for India and it took me all of two days and 5 bucks in postage stamps to get it.

    My friends have had hell trying to get student visas, forget H1Bs. They are submitted to such embarrasment as showing bank balances to prove they can afford the entire college course (not, say 20gs for one year, but 100gs for all four!). If they don't shave or come for their interviews wearing shorts, they are often rejected for their I-20s despite having all the necessary credentials.

    A friend of mine got rejected for renewal of his I-20 -- after having been in American college for two years, he was rejected when reapplying for his third. The interviewer asked him if he was planning on living in America after college, and he said no, I don't like America all that much, and so was rejected!

    Another friend was rejected on the basis that his father is self-employed. The interviewer said that since you are going to take over your father's business anyway, why go to college?

    Yet another of my friends decided to go to England over America because the visa officer indirectly hinted that she was going to America to look for a husband with an American passport.

    I like America, and am proud to be, but the INS really is the worst, most incompetent and most impolite immigration service I have encountered yet. As an American, I throw a fit when a foreign visa office treats me badly --but look at the humiliation my own doles out. It's disgusting.

    The saddest story is of a friend of mine who goes to a large state school. He got trashed one night in college and some friend of his tore out his visa from his passport. He reported it to the INS who required that he leave the country before they issued him a new one. He ended up losing a year of college and a year of fees to the INS.

    Makes me sick as an American. All I can say is, power to those who endure the punishing visa process -- they desrve the bloody jobs after all that!

    --
    shooting is not too good for my enemies
    1. Re:Visas from india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Thank you very much for this post. Finally one post that makes sense.

      Please mod parent up.

  361. Keep it in the US by blate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to work at a major network hardware company. They had outsorced a large chunk of QA work to some contractors in India -- some script-writing, some regression tests, and other sundry tasks. Without necessarily making any broad generalizations about Indian contractors or foreign contracting in general, let me share my experiences and impressions with you, in the hopes that you won't make the same mistake that my company made.

    1. Time zone: I was on the East Coast (EST/EDT). I beleive that India was about 12 hours away from us, give or take. This meant that basically anything you asked them to do took at least 1 full working day, since by the time I got into work, they were in bed. You can just imagine the problems this caused when deadlines or other time-critical matters were involved.

    2. Language: Again, without making any broad generalizations... Their English sucked. It was nearly impossible to communicate with them on the phone and their written English was less than acceptible. Also, based on serveral very frustrating experiences with the whole group, I concluded that their comprehention of written English was equally poor. We finally found a guy there who could understand English well enough to explain things to the rest of the group, but even then, my confidence level was quite low.

    3. Work Ethic/Product: Both the group in question and several other Indians I've worked with since then have had some similar issues w/r/t how they worked and what they produced. Again, not to generalize... If you give them very clear, step-by-step instructions to perform a discrete task, they generally will perform the task quite thoroughly. However, if the procedure requires any deviation from the norm or any creativity or synthesis, you're better off doing it yourself, because they'll never figure it out.

    We also had problems getting them to listen to anyone other than management -- they basically ignored team lead's, including myself.

    In their defense, I understand that the education system in India teaches them to work this way; it has a large focus on rote memorization and obeyance of authority. That's great, and it seems to work for them. However, that's not how we work in the US, and folks who have gone to US (or European or Chinese) schools and worked with others of the similar ilk will get very frustrated trying to mesh with thinking processes that are polar opposites of their own. Furthermore, I find this thinking process thoroughly unproductive and pretty much useless in an Engineer.

    Now, I'm just waiting for someone to write back flaming me for being some kind of racist, so let me state once more that I am relating my personal experiences with certain Indians. I went to grad school with several amazingly talented Indians whom I would choose to work with in a heartbeat. I'm not trying to reinforce any sterotypes or discriminatory policies.

    What I am trying to say is caveat emptor. If a thing seems too good to be true, it probably is. Sure, you can get engineering labor abroad for 10 cents on the dollar. But in many cases, you get what you pay for.

    And finally, there are countless qualified engineers in AMERICA who need jobs. If a foreign individual or group has skills you can't find here, then fine, bring them here. But in the long run, you hurting yourself, your company, and your fellow Americans by trying to save a buck abroad. It ain't worth it.

    1. Re:Keep it in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Most of the good(in skills,english,great GRE scores) Indians have already left their shores for US/UK etc. and most of those who remain lack in certain skills. But if America stops the H1,L1 etc. companies would simply outsource. So choose between having a person spending their money in fueling US economy or Indian economy.
      PSsst: managers do like ppl who don't question authority and who work like zombies churning out code.

    2. Re:Keep it in the US by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      As you say your points are specific to your experience and shouldn't be taken as a sweeping generalisation. I work for an SI consultancy and have had experience working with staff from our Bangalore/Chennai off-shoring subsidiary and I certainly recognise some of the issues you touch upon; however in my experience these factors weren't as acute as the situation you describe but that may well be down to my company being able to cherry-pick better quality staff in India. There's also the possibility that the cultural/linguistic fit between British and Indian staff makes your second point less of a problem for us (certainly we are better placed to manage the timezone problem in Britain).

      Nevertheless you put your finger on some of the key risks when you opt for outsourcing as a solution to project costs. Certainly you can resource a project at a fraction of the price (my company's staff from Bangalore, Chennai or Kuala Lumpur are about a quarter the price of their European or NAmerican colleagues) - but you immediately add in various 'frictions' to the project which have to be managed around or ammeliorated and, unless running complex IT projects is part of your core business, there's a serious question about whether you should be doing this stuff yourself rather than employing specialists (like my company...) to do it for you.

      To a certain extent this sort of thing will sort itself out over the next few years. Outsourcing to India is a child of the Y2k fracas and the dotcom bubble - a lot of the problems you allude to will only become apparent to the less clueful PHBs once they've had their fingers burned, at which point the garderene rush to Bangalore and points east will ease off somewhat. Having said that the phenomenon isn't going to disappear. The Indian software business is maturing fast, with the international SI consultancies already hip-deep in the sector and the sort of knowledge, skillsets and culture required to pull this sort of thing off effectively starting to spread to second and third tier players. Expect to see a lot of the cultural and professional problems you allude to becoming less significant, along with an ongoing erosion of Bangalore's price advantage wrt other regions of India (this is already happening) and the Far East.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  362. That's innacurrate. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Quite.

    There are two factors you didn't include.

    1 - tax treaties. If there are tax treaties between the US Govt and the country you are paying taxes to, often the taxes you paid, or a portion of them, are deductable from what you pay in the us. Almost ALL countries on earth work this way.

    2 - exemption for non residents. If you are a US citizen but are not considered a resident of the US (in this context, resident has nothing to do wiht your right to live there, only whether or not you do live there), then you have your first $75,000 foreign income as tax exempt. So.. if you move to some little island and you only make $75,000, and you don't keep a house/car/wife/kids in the US, and don't spend too much time in the US a year, you pay no taxes to the us. When you DO pay taxes, you pay federal ones only, not state.

    US Taxation is still based on citizenship. Every other country on earth taxes based on residency. A Canadian citizen living abroad does not pay tax to Canada on income not earned in Canada. Same for the UK, Sweden, Japan, and so on.

  363. Re:Italian could end up being India's Prime Minist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    heh, you don't how right you are, not even 1 woman or a non-white american male president in 250 yrs whereas the 'non-tolerant', 'racist' India had a woman as a prime minister, had muslims, christians and dalits(supposedly the lowest caste ppl) as presidents. btw the current president of India is a muslim. All of this within 55 years(240) of Independence from the british who brought the once supposedly richest nation in the world to almost complete ruin.
    This is only intended to the trolls calling India racist/backward/non-tolerant etc without doing the homework.

    Instead lets all vie for stopping the greed among CEOs and demand proper compensation/benefits for WHOEVER does the work, WHEREVER.

    While we rant about these, those ppl are in millions by making Americans jobless and exploiting the poor foreigners.

  364. Related Register Article by DocDJ · · Score: 1

    This Register article discusses one reason why outsourcing may be so much cheaper (although paying peanuts is probably a much bigger influence.) Seems to me that one way to address this problem may be to charge more for software to companies that outsource to countries where stealing software is endemic.

    1. Re:Related Register Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riight!

      Buying a possibly stolen jacket is acceptable (hey! the girl was desperate!). But obviously, the slimy Indians are stealing software, even if its circumstantial evidence.

  365. Outsourcing creates more jobs in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this article which says that outsourcing is more beneficial to US workers than Indian workers. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/xml/un comp/articleshow?msid=178120

  366. Do something about the problem now! by reporter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do not channel your energy into being angry. Do something about the problem. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    Silicon Valley has 8% unemployment, but Intel says that it cannot find engineers to fill its ranks. Intel insists that the American government allow it to hire H-1B workers from India and China (which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong).

    Fax a letter to your local Congressional representative and tell her that you want the immediate termination of the L-1 and H-1B programs. Do not wait for someone else to carry out your civic responsibility. Move your ass. Do the job.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  367. Terminate both the H-1B program and the L-1 progra by reporter · · Score: 1

    We must do more than just terminate the H-1B program. We must also terminate the L-1 program as well. With secure video-conferencing, there is no need to rotate a foreigner into the United States of America to work for an extended period of time.

    Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    Fax a letter to your local Congressional representative and tell her that you want the immediate termination of the L-1 and H-1B programs. Do not wait for someone else to carry out your civic responsibility. Move your ass. Do the job.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  368. Don't you think... by ^BR · · Score: 1

    ...that your employability would increase if you actually learned how to spell (and format your posts, they're a PITA to read).

    You read like a high school dropout who landed a high paying job in a stupid startup in the crazy years because you where PHP litterate and is angry because the tougher job market actually requires real skills now...

  369. Apparent Labor "Shortages" do not Require H-1Bs by reporter · · Score: 1
    During the economic boom, and even before that, the US has always needed employees. The high job to population ratio meant less qualified people to fill up job vacancies. That's how the H1 visa program came into being, and was greatly appreciated during the 1990's boom.

    Well, no, most American workers did not "greatly appreciate" the H-1B visa program. It provided the perfect excuse for unethical companies like Intel to avoid training American workers.

    Economies normally grow and shrink. There will always be periods of temporary shortage. However, over time, the shortage will disappear. All shortages are self-fixing; read any book on economics. In the particular case of labor shortage, wages will rise; higher wages will attract more labor. The shortage will disappear.

    During periods of apparent shortage, there is no need to "fix" the problem by importing foreign H-1B workers like Indians or Chinese. Anyhow, we should immediately terminate both the H-1B program and the L-1 program.

    Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    Fax a letter to your local Congressional representative and tell her that you want the immediate termination of the L-1 and H-1B programs. Do not wait for someone else to carry out your civic responsibility. Move your ass. Do the job.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  370. Give me your.... by lotus87 · · Score: 1

    "Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" ***
    But keep your damn programmers!

    ***engraved into the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty after the opening of Ellis Island

  371. Re:Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by Tor · · Score: 1

    3) US "H1-B" visas, and related visas, within the US afford much longer than 6 years residency. Our average "H1-B" visa employee has resided in the US for over 14 years. It is very common for "H1-B" visa holders to "reset" their qualification process for "Green Card" application numerous times as they change jobs.


    No, the H1-B visa allows for a grand total of 6 years only. (Believe me, I have first-hand experience in almost running into that limit, with no possibility of extension, before the "timely" issue of a green card).

    The average person who initially gets employed on a H1-B may well reside in the US for 14 years (your assertion, not mine) - a significant percentage of H1-B visa holders eventually obtain a green card (and/or citizenship).

    Personally, I came on a F-1 visa as a student + 1 year on a practial trainee program; 6 years on a H1-B VISA, and now as a permanent resident.


    4) Your understanding of how globalized markets work operate is so simplistic that it does not even deserve a USA-Today level of readership. Try applying a little more economic extrapolation to the subject than you learned in freshman economics.


    Sure it is simplistic - This is not exactly the type of forum where you go into the lower level details. But the bottom line is exactly as I said - the US has been pushing for free trade (even trade "subsidies" in the form of tax breaks for exporters); it follows that products and services get imported more as well as exported more.

    Companies like IBM try (perhaps misguidedly) to maximize their profitablity by outsourcing functions to India, so as not to lose ground against other companies that already operate in, say, India (based there or not).


    Since the US is a net-importer, and India enjoys numerous protectionist barriers, there is a net flow of wealth from the US into India whereas global trade and commerce are concerned.


    According to the CIA World Fact Book, India (just like the USA) is a net importer.

  372. Outsourcing is better than H-1B/L-1 programs. by reporter · · Score: 1
    It is natural for jobs to go to the person who can do the job who asks the least pay for it. People bitch about it when they are trying to get a job, but no one bitches about it when they hire someone to wash their car. We have four choices: A) let people come to America and work, B) let the jobs go to places where people work cheaper, C) work for cheaper than the other people, or D) wait for our economy to go so far into the crapper that no one would ever come here to work.

    Choice B is the best choice. Outsourcing is superior to both the H-1B program and the L-1 program. Please read "Oppose H-1Bs but Support Outsourcing".

    Anyhow, we must do more than just terminate both the H-1B program and the L-1 program.

    Fax a letter to your local Congressional representative and tell her that you want the immediate termination of the L-1 and H-1B programs. Do not wait for someone else to carry out your civic responsibility. Move your ass. Do the job.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  373. Re:Double Duh... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ...Yes and I can follow my job from the Republic of California to the Commonwealth of Virginia, further than from Nice to Moscow. I just executed such a 2500 mile move, so I fail to see a functional difference between the US and EU as once exiting either, WTO has more or less the same effect.

  374. Sobering statistic ... by blueforce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a software developer for the world's largest network of independent executive recruiters. We provide software and services which allow recruiters to share jobs, candidates, and generally network together. We are to staffing what the MLS is to real-estate.

    Currently, there are 40,604 jobs in our database. Approximately 4809 are actively being recruited right now.

    Of those 4809, 17 indicate the client is willing to sponsor or hire a non-us citizen.

    That's about 1/3 of 1 percent.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  375. EMPLOYMENT VISA to work in INDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.india-visa.com/wahington-info.htm

    BUSINESS VISA: Valid for six month or one/more years with multiple entries. However, the period of stay in India (for each visit) under this category is limited to six months only. A letter from the sponsoring organization indicating nature of applicant's business, probable duration of stay, validity of visa, places and organizations to be visited and also a guarantee to meet maintenance expenses etc. should accompany the application. Business visa valid for ten years with multiple entries is available to foreign businessmen who have set up or intend to set up joint ventures in India.

    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

    STUDENT VISA: (Valid for the period of study in India). Multiple-entry Visa are given to bona fide students to pursue regular studies at recognized institutions in India. A letter confirming admission from such an institution along with evidence of financial arrangements for stay in India should accompany the application. In case of admission in medical or paramedical courses in India, a letter of Approval or No objection certificate from the Ministry of Health, Government of India, is also required. Similarly, for admission to graduate or post-graduate courses in engineering/ technical institutions in India, a letter of approval or a No objection certificate from the Ministry of Human Resources Development (Department of Education) is required.

  376. Help us Pakistanis in your spare time! by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Did you lose your job to India?

    We're Pakistanis and we have something in common! You think your upset about India taking our job! They took part of our country!

    Help us improve our weapon's systems, and, when reduce India to ashes for stealing Kashmir from us, you'll benefit with better wages! :-)

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Help us Pakistanis in your spare time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the UK took your country, then chopped it up, and spat out the remains.

  377. H1-B visas are not always renewed... by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 1

    ...I worked with an immigrant from the Phillipines. She is a fantastic Oracle DBA, very easy to work with and knowledgeable. She was hired as a contractor in the middle of the dotcom boom when tech people were scarce and then was moved to an H1-B visa to hire her fulltime. When it expired, after about 3 years, it could not be renewed because I work for a government agency and the change in the job market indicated that we could no longer justify her in lieu of a US citizen. She is still in the country as her husband has an H1-B visa and she is working on getting her own work authorization approved by the INS. I hope her position will still be unfilled by the time her work authorization comes through so that we can hire her back.

    To replace her with a contractor we cannot hire someone directly, due to liability issues (read lawsuit happy culture), and HAVE to use an "approved" agency/pimp. We told them what we needed and they sent over someone completely incompetent - we dismissed them after a week during which time they completely messed up 2 of my applications with their sloppiness, setting me back 4-6 weeks in development. We now have a contractor who is atleast competent but he insists on complaining to me about how much more he is used to getting paid (to which I replied that he should negotiate with his agency since we are paying an absurd amount for him given the current market).

    With the current budget crisis (I'm in CA) we are not able to fill the DBA position so we will keep the contractor for a while. Meanwhile, I miss my old DBA - she was worth every penny and I still would prefer her over anybody, US citizen or Non-US citizen, just because of what a joy she was to work with. She made my life easy.

    Just my 2 cents.

  378. Re:CNN Story: H1-B Visa program may not be that ba by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's why approximately 8,000 people in the US were fired and their jobs given to people outside the US.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  379. Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: You don't want to live in India anyway. They don't have toilets, they squat and shit into holes in the ground. There are no traffic laws other than 'he who wins at chicken has right of way.' They say they got rid of their caste system, but it still is very much in existence (ever wonder why that Indian you work with is such an arrogant prick? He comes from the upper castes, and is used to acting that way back home. Also, he is taught that he is superior to you stupid Americans). Add the probability of being toasted by a Paki nuke in the near future, and you should probaby rethink your travel plans.

    B: Check this bullshit out. A recruiting company in New Jersey advertising on Usenet, flatly stating that their client would PREFER a foreigner. Of course, the recruiters name is also Indian, shockingly enough!

    Read this.

    Me? I say: Send them ALL home.

  380. Wife doesn't want me to read... by cpopin · · Score: 1

    ...this stuff, but I couldn't resist.

    Okay, so I dissed Sinclair computers and supported Atari 800, but I still understand what he's going through.

    But for India not to hire Americans? Blatant double standard. And they don't know what they're missing. It takes so much in the way of resources to gain the info, knowledge, language, and culture of an American in India that it's near priceless. They don't even realize what they're missing in an American programmer whiling to relocate to India.

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  381. Re:Inflammatory subject. Here is a reality check. by randolfe · · Score: 1

    >>>No, the H1-B visa allows for a grand total of 6 years only. (Believe me, I have first-hand experience...

    Your anecdotal experiences aside, there is no rule/law that prevents indefinite extensions to H1-B visas. We employ one individual for whom our immigration attorney has just procured another H1-B extension. This gentleman has been in the US, on H1-B since 1988. He, like so many here, also started on a student visa in the mid 1980s. In fact, our immigration attorney often is able to entirely reset the "grand total" counter for visa holders through any one of numerous loopholes that exist in immigration law. One example loophole, which was recently closed, allowed for a H1-B visa holder to reset their residency by applying for the equivalent visa in Canada, then applying for a transfer of the Canadian visa back to the US, which is provided for by immigration law.

    The behavior of our [actually our parent] corporation, like so many others, is the point of contention here. They are exploiting the H1-B visa holders, depressing salaries for residents--citizens and green card residents alike--and profiting from an intentional misuse of immigration law.

    (By the way, there is in INS as a separate congressionally funded agency anymore. It was enveloped by the new DHS. This is actually quite a subtle, but important event, as direct administrative manipulation of immigration law is now much more complicated and politically loaded.)

    >>>According to the CIA World Fact Book, India (just like the USA) is a net importer.

    Yes, but the point is that the US has a bias towards fewer barriers and less protectionism. India has the opposite bias. This largely yields a flow of wealth into India from the US.

  382. Salary cap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I earn 60k on an H1B and I know doctors on H1B's. I doubt they earn less than 150K.

    I agree with you that L's aren't good but H1's have so many attention these days...

    Lazy people who blame H1 holder doesn't help either... oh well..

  383. If the malware is put in the USA, by American Programmers, you can get the FBI to put them in prison. Overseas, the programmer could have put that malware in at the orders of his government. You have no recourse.

  384. Re:H1-B jobs: qualified U.S. citizens need not app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens in the private sector as well. Read
    this job listing saying H-1's are PREFERRED over American citizens!

  385. Divide and Conquer by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Dude, your are chaneling your anger at the wrong people. All these poor Indian H1Bs and L1s are programmers like yourself just trying what they can to earn a living.
    I'm by no means a Marxist but this is a classic devide and conquer strategy practiced by the ruling classes to keeps us fighting and bickering among ourselves while ripping the financial benifits of outsourcing/offshoring.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    1. Re:Divide and Conquer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      They may be "just trying to earn a living", but this is OUR country, not theirs, so what right do they have to earn a living at our expense??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Divide and Conquer by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      That implies a sort of right to a job that
      you have over them. Why is this so?

      --

      Considered harmful.
    3. Re:Divide and Conquer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In *my own country*, yeah -- I, as a citizen, should have precedence over non-citizens. Just as in their own country, they should get precedence over non-citizens. What is so difficult about this concept?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Divide and Conquer by TomV · · Score: 1

      Or, as a lot of Indians seem to be saying about Coke and Pepsi at the moment:

      They may be "just trying to earn a living", but this is OUR country, not theirs, so what right do they have to earn a living at our expense??

      The same could be said for people moving from the other end of the country, people commuting from the next city along, people commuting from the other end of town. It's all arbitrary man-made boundaries.

      It's not really a recipe for a comfortable life, is it?

      TomV

    5. Re:Divide and Conquer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      People coming from the other end of the country aren't horning in on entire industries, and displacing entire working populations (putting citizens out of work), the way foreign workers currently are.

      We've been seeing the effects in California for a much longer time due to the leaky southern border. There are now a lot of places (including at least one gov't agency I can think of) where you can't get work if you're not Hispanic, and it's driven the average hourly wage down to single digits for anything that's not tenured or specialty work. Frex, only a few years ago, maids (working for housekeeping companies) and general office workers were making $10-15/hr full-time; now they make $7/hr. with little hope of ever getting a raise, and it's often part-time at that. Explain to me how this is healthy for them or for the U.S. economy??

      And if we don't watch out for our own people -- well, NO ONE ELSE IS GOING TO DO IT FOR US. It's all well and good to be kind to one's global neighbours, but not at the cost of destroying your own economy and putting your own people out of work.

      Britain likewise had this harsh lesson 35 years ago, when they got flooded with East Pakistanis (the instigating situation wasn't quite the same, but the local effect was -- cheap imported labour abruptly displaced a broad swath of native workers). The British economy has never entirely recovered from that.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Divide and Conquer by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      But by doing that you deny certain freedoms
      to your fellow citizens who own the company -
      that is, to hire who they want.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    7. Re:Divide and Conquer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Okay.. so let's fire the managers who make these decisions and replace THEM with cheaper foreign workers. Then let's see how they feel about it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  386. THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY TO THIS IDIOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, as a PWAFB (person with a functioning brain) could see the weakness and stupidity of his argument. A dollar sure as heck can leave our economy, for good, for ever, and that's exactly what's happening now.

    Outsourcing is going to be a hideous catastrophe. If IBM, Accenture, et. al, do all their actual work in India, what's too keep the prime contracts from moving to Indian companies? Remember American IT companies don't CHARGE LESS for products they develop overseas, they just raise profits that way. Why pay $1,000,000 to IBM for a system when an Indian company could do the same work for $300,000. After all a fat cat executive/member of upper management in India probably only needs $75,000 a year instead of $300,000K. "Globalization" and "free trade" (free in name only) are going to leave the world squalid and war torn. Don't believe the neocon lies!
    BTW- this BS about socks costing $20 a pair if they were made in America - NOT TRUE AT ALL. As recently as a decade ago you could probably still find some clothing made in America and it certainly wasn't 10X the price. It's a question of how much profits the middlemen want to reap...not what the consumer is going to pay.

    1. Re:THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY TO THIS IDIOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A dollar sure as heck can leave our economy, for good, for ever...

      No, the he was mostly right there. Yes, some dollars will lost by burning in fires, stolen and burried, centrally or corporately banked, or otherwise never to be seen again. But, on whole, the dollars will make their way back to the economy defined by them. (Which may not be the US, if other nations mark their currency to the dollar.)

      What "Joe IAAE Economist" missed is the fact those dollars need not, and generally ARE NOT, returning as consumption. Much is now used to aquire controlling investments. Not just in the US, either. India can use US dollars to buy control over Europe's industrial base, as long as Europe needs dollars to consume from the US.

      Like a twisted game of multi-player Chess, the carefully chosen assertion of control, across the Globe, will bleed a chosen economy to death. Being the "biggest and badest", the US is surely the only one out there to be "chosen".

      Joe subscribes to the the Universal American Theory of Economics(tm). You see, "Fair Trade" asserts the world is a MARKET for the US -- not, read NOT, a PRODUCER (as they simply are not "capable", net-net). This wrongheadedness is taught in all the Very Best Schools, expounded on by every Corporate Consultant, lobbied as "Gospel" to legislators, and droned on endlessly as such in the US Press. But, all that just don't make it so.

      Of course, where dollars have to end up is utterly pointless (Joe CNBAE). Money is, ultimately, nothing more than a marker for a possesion. We do not buy anything (like Oil) with "money", we buy it with possesions. When we buy a Chinese made Diesel engine, we exchange accept this expendable possesion for something, anything, in the various economies the Chinese would like to posses. If they generally choose to posses things more durable then you, you are screwed.

      Weep not for the US, collectively. They've known full well how to play this game and have keep millions in poverty doing exactly that. Now, various non-US interests (Oil, China, India) are now able and starting to play the same game to the detriment of the US. Oh, well.

      It is a sad fact that the US style system of "Disingenuous Capitalism" economics is every bit as flawed as that of the Soviet Union. It is designed to fail, and can do nothing but.

      Anyway, as for Joe IAAE, Soviet Rubles presumably all "came home" too. Please, enlighten us as to what happened there?

    2. Re:THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY TO THIS IDIOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more short lesson...

      The dollars WILL come, right?

      Ok, when you buy a Chinese Diesel engine someone will, eventually, want to secure an equally valued possesion in exchange for the US dollars that mediated the trade. (Since, money, in and of itself, is slightly less valuable than a pack of Post-It notes.)

      If the US does not produce more than it consumes, what happens? Well, we know the money WILL "come home".

      So, too much money, chasing too few goods?

      Inflation.

      Possibly massive inflation. See the history of S. America for an idea. See also the history of the economic failure in the Soviet Union.

      Inflation ultimately corrects all net, money mediated, differences in durability of possesion exchange. Money buys things, if those things are "used up" (Oil, consumed) they no longer exist as a possesion to be exchanged for the dollars. Remember, by using money you exchanged "anything" for your consumption -- ANYTHING. YOU MUST HAVE CREATED SOMETHING OF VALUE TO ABSORB THAT MONEY WHEN IT FINALLY DOES "COME HOME".

      Now, if you don't outproduce your consumption you end up with all that outstanding money "comming home" to chase fewer goods.

      The US was DESTROYED by Ronald Regan's "Service Economy". "Services" are even more perishable than Oil. NOTHING is less valuable, economically speaking, than a service. A country with only "Services" has nothing, *nothing*, to offer that can absorb all that money "comming home".

      Worse, "Intellectual Services" (Programming, IP) are the exchange value scrapings at the bottom of the "Services" barrel. Yet, these are the Pinacle of the US system today. What value is something that can be learned, bypassed, and effectively duplicated at ZERO cost?

      American business isn't "exploiting the Indian labor market" (as they will claim to their dying day), but rather they are TEACHING them how to PRODUCE low-value consumable goods (programs) the US is willing to exchange for more valuable possesions.

  387. Don't train your replacements. by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    What can I say to all the people complaining about having to train your replacements?

    Don't.

    What are they going to do, fire you?

  388. To those moderators mentioned in the parent post: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't funny.

  389. small world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is I was just interviewed by a reporter for a similar human interest type article. The reporter found an overseas worker willing to discuss the issue from his perspective - turns out the guy was my replacement when I was laid off several months ago. If the article gets published without me getting assaulted by a team of lawyers for NDA violations I'll be sure to post more info.

  390. Why did they ignore team leads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
    I am intrigued by your statement that they ignored team leads. As an Indian working in Canada, I think it is a great opportunity for me to learn from the other side.

    Those Canadians who do not do as the team lead says do so in the following manner:
    1. They find an argument that says logically why they are deviating from the prescription.
    2. They present it in the team meeting using poly-syllabic words.
    3. If they succeed, they privately they say they're happy they didn't have to work in so and so technology because it sucked or because it was written by MS or something similar.

    My understanding is that Indians don't know how to ignore in a communicative way, if you get what I mean, or they don't quite know how to do so in a diplomatic way.

    But I'd still be interested in instances of ignoring of the team lead, if you will be kind enough to tell me, that is.

    -An Indian

  391. Can't work in India heh? by leebrownusa · · Score: 1

    That's free trade at it's best!

  392. Outsource by TaGirl_Keri · · Score: 1

    Rumania anyone? http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103_2-5074725.html My fav units are dead Mavs

    --
    My fav units are dead Mavs
  393. Re:WTF, you guys dont get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    satyap you noob. you should read the article

  394. Not a shock... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    India always wants things both ways... see trade liberalization agreements.

    http://www.economist.com/agenda/displayStory.cfm ?s tory_id=2049618

    1. Re:Not a shock... by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
      First...every country wants it both ways...

      Second...an IT-metaphor for what the US+EU is saying about their agri-industry:
      We will not protect/subsidize microsoft, you do not protect/subsidize your software stars, let 'em slug it out...the best one wins.

      Yeah, right!

    2. Re:Not a shock... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

      I wasn't defending the US, and the US's faults don't justify India's faults. Conversely, I'm tired of hearing that developping countries are blameless in regards to free trade.

    3. Re:Not a shock... by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
      I wasn't defending the US, and the US's faults don't justify India's faults.

      You are right. What i meant to say was that the scenario is similar to a standoff in which both parties have the gun pointed at each other. A free trade agreement would be equivalent to both agreeing to drop their guns at the same time. Sounds fair, right? What if one of the guys is a giant, and the other is a dwarf? In the dwarf opinion, a standoff with guns makes him more of a equal to the giant than a no-guns-only-hands situation.

      In a gist, smaller countries are scared of the larger ones in a free for all. Though i support India's stance, i am sure (though i have not read/heard it yet) that there are countries smaller than India which India is trying to bully. That is the sad reality...i don't think we are going to see an "every body is equal" world anytime in our lifetimes.

      Appreciate your balanced viewpoints.

  395. H1B and L1 Visas Major Threat to Programmers by cybercreek · · Score: 1


    Check out the following web sites:

    http://www.hireamericancitizens.org/protphotos02 .h tml

    http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/itaa.real.html#tth _s Ec2.3.5

    http://www.hireamericancitizens.org/underpay.htm l

    http://www.nomoreh1b.com/

    http://www.cpcsguru.com/Perspectives_on_Offshore _O utsourcing.htm

    http://www.nomoreh1b.com/BankOfAmericaSuicides.a sp x

  396. I'd hate to sound like I have a lot of hatred, but by http101 · · Score: 1

    ...that raghead government in India needs to realize, that as a country who not only governs, but also occupies half the internet, I feel they should allow us to work in the country. We're the only reason their archaic country has flourished. Whatever Swami has to say about it is irrelevant because he has no right to tell us what to do with our money we're paying him to sit on his ass and generate crappy code every day. If we want to put QC agents in the companies there, we had better be able to do so to protect our investment. India, get bent.

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  397. Rich Minners? Oxymoron by cybercreek · · Score: 1

    Who ever heard of a rich West Virginian?

  398. You are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skilled, experienced American engineers are being replaced by unskilled, unexperienced Indian immigrants with often "fake" resumes, hoping to learn how to do the job on the job...

    I have been watching this trend for a while... It is not a matter of replacing something with it's equivilent at a lower price. It is about importing unskilled labor (perpetrating as skilled labor) to replace experienced skilled labor to satisfy internal corporate payroll reduction targets.

    Believe me, the companies that heavily use Indian labor are SUFFERING. The market will work this out of itself, because corporations become less competitive by using these idiots.

  399. Look back in the past by morven2 · · Score: 1

    Yes, certainly, some things are cheaper. But the examples you give; both the clothing and automotive markets were once upon a time totally fed by US manufacturers. I'm pretty sure socks didn't cost the equivalent of modern $20. Being a little bit of a car nut, I know cars have not got any cheaper since then either. According to a quick run through an inflation calculator, my 1967 Ford Thunderbird's $4500 cost new equates to $24,000 now. Try and find a semi-luxury car for $24K ... In fact, American manufacturers RAISED their prices.

    1. Re:Look back in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the workers are being paid less when the labour is shipped offshore, yet the good are still costing roughly the same. Where is the money going? This is the trickle down economy at work...

  400. "Generalizations", you are right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are correct in terming your statements as generalizations, for that's what they are.

    India today is a boiling cauldron of problems, and yet it is moving ahead. The problems date back thousands of years, and yet solutions or workarounds are found. I must question your assertions that Indians cannot find a way and can only do a task if given explicit instructions.

    What you should have said was that some of the Indians you met - for you couldn't have met all Indians and some Indians you met were quite smart, as you admitted - weren't all that good. That's no surprise. Not everyone belongs to the upper echelons in any society. Instead you chose to make generalized statement that all Indians are like that. Some decades ago, your previous generation made the statement that all blacks are inferior and Japs can only copy.

    It is not even logical.

    Coming back to the abundance of problems in India and Indians marching ahead. Consider this, when India became independent in 1947, there was a miniscule middle-class. Now there are 250 million of those who count themselves amongst that category. Imagine, a whole America raised from poverty to reasonable standard of life in 50 or so years.

    If there were no brains, and if there was no capability to find way forward through the muck then how the hell did this happen?

    Quite clearly, your inference is incorrect. It is based on insufficient data and it is prejudiced. You met both kinds of Indians, smart and otherwise and yet you chose to arrive at a conclusion that doesn't take that into account.

    I end with an example. A few years ago, a British consultancy was awarded a contract to suggest ways of cleaning up the "sewer that runs through" Delhi, the river Yamuna. After a few weeks, they returned the monies they were given, packed their bags and went home. They couldn't think of a solution that would work in Indian context, you see.

    We have never concluded from that Modern British are incapable of original thinking.

    (BTW, respective Indian government departments are working to make the water cleaner. They haven't given up).

  401. Re:I'd hate to sound like I have a lot of hatred, by KingOfGondor · · Score: 1

    Why don't you read all the postings before you start muttering crap like this? Many people have already written about work permits for India, and that this guy probably did not apply in the proper manner. Also, where did you get this crap about "We're the only reason their archaic country has flourished" ?

  402. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is indeed a very good point, since we some to be on the subject of "fairness" and all.

  403. H-1B legislation and what you can do by Joney · · Score: 1

    I am a professional member of the IEEE and volunteer member of the IEEE's Congressional Advocacy Recruitment Effort. I will give you an excerpt from a recent email about the USA Jobs Protection Act and the need to reform the visa programs:

    IEEE-USA urges concerned engineers to contact their U.S. Senators and
    Representatives to enlist their support for the USA Jobs Protection Act
    (H.R. 2849 & S.1452) as introduced by Representative Nancy Johnson (R-CT)
    and Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT). If enacted this important legislation would
    plug loopholes and prevent abuses of the controversial H-1B (Specialty
    Occupations) and L-1 (Intra-Company Transfer) temporary visa programs

    Please contact your U.S. Senators and Representatives and ask them to
    co-sponsor H.R. 2849 (in the House) and S. 1452 (in the Senate).

    The USA Jobs Protection Act is sponsored by respected Republicans and
    Democrats in both houses of Congress and, if enacted, will:

    - Prevent employers from using the L-1 visa program to displace
    American workers,
    - Require employers to pay L-1 visa holders prevailing wages,
    - Limit the use of blanket L-1 visa applications,
    - Prohibit leasing of L-1 visa holders to secondary employers,
    - Strengthen the Labor Secretary's authority to investigate abuses of
    L-1 and H-1B visas,
    - Keep the H-1B cap at 65,000, and
    - Expand U.S. worker recruitment and retention requirements to all
    employers of H-1B workers (These requirements currently only apply to
    "H-1B dependent" employers).

    It is a simple matter to search for your representatives and email them to let them know what you think, as well as view the status of current legislation at www.congress.org

    Thanks!
    Joan

    A site I've looked at a little:
    http://www.h1b.info/

  404. Easy to Manipulate Visa forms. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    As a dutchman it's also not possible for me to relocate to the USA. Unless I prove that there's no way my skills can be found in the States.

    It is easy to manipulate the US Visa system. One approach is to put the rate of the lowest allowed programming rate: 32K per year. Few qualified citizens would apply (at least before the dot-com bust).

    The second approach is to put a virtually impossible-to-match LIST of MULTIPLE skills on the application. US inspectors (what little there are) cannot verify a person's experience from India and are too stupid or overworked to verify that the listed skills are actually used on the job.

    The "cannot find qualified citizen" requirement is a toothless tiger.

    Citizens have actually been forced to train their H1B and L1 replacements in order to get their severence check. There was nothing in the law to protect them because they are obviously not going to apply for their own position when the visa workers are submitting applications. The law as written only mentions applications (resumes), not existing employees. Another brilliant congressional loophole.

    I have an H1B co-worker, and he ADMITS that the visa system is screwed up.

  405. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Just make sure that you are willing to accept the consequences. Are you willing to work for $1/hour? There are no skills that you have that an immigrant cannot also learn. Just know what you are accepting. Wages will drop. Thats how it works. Supply and demand is quite real.

    Also, this is not about "hate". This is not about racism or being superior. It's about self preservation. We don't owe it to these people to increase their standard of living by reducing our own. Especially when they won't even let us work in their country.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  406. What exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO lemme see if I have this right. What exactly can Americans do that foreigners can't? And please, dear God, don't say innovate because you'd just be fooling yourself. Let's just offshore everything since, clearly, there is nothing we do better.
    This reminds me of the 70's. Everything Russian was better. Better musicians, better ballet, better sportsman. Oh wait, we kicked their ass in hockey. So much for that.
    When I hear aholes like Larry Ellison (usually good for a few laughts) talk about how "qualified" and "hard-working" his Indian programmers are, I remember the 70's with glee. Can't wait for a decade when American's aren't down on themselves.

  407. Why would anyone want to move to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to move to India, thats where cooties come from!

  408. Cal State Sacramento by heroine · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately a degree from Cal State Sacramento is virtually worthless.

  409. Should have shot the Indian by HarryCallahan · · Score: 1

    and then himself

  410. Stopping H-1B will affect universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If H-1B visas are stopped and no foriegn workers are allowed into US, students seeking MS and PhD degrees in US will stop coming unless the universities offer them funding. They will have no reason to shell out high fees for a degree that fetches no job by law. That would mean that many departments will almost close and many professors will get laid off due to shortage of graduate students. That would affect the standards of universities.

  411. Re:Rich Minners? Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing, when you account for the cost of living in cities (and the stress, but that's another matter), taxation, etc., I wouldn't be surprised running into some wealthy West Virginian's.

    For myself, moving away from the cities was a good thing (Chicago and DC). Although I make far less in terms of actual income, I live in a nicer place, spend less money for basic goods, have more luxeries, spend less time at work, spend a fraction of the time in gridlock, and generally have less stress. I've saved more in the past 2 years than in 7 some years in city life. Quality of life is up, and the public education system where I am is top notch.

    I do miss going out as much as I did, then again, I can go to a movie around here without people generally yelling stuff at the screen. The lack of diverse cuisine in my area sucks, but that's an acceptable tradeoff. Of course, I still have friends living in those cities, which I visit, so it's not horrific.

    To each their own I suppose. At least in West Virginia, you get to see gorgeous purple mountains and the stars--I guess that does't count for many folks.

  412. Supply/Demand? by Phronesis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In WTO-world, corporations can move their jobs across borders but workers cannot follow. This one-sidedness pushes salaries down everywhere, as companies seek the cheapest available labor.

    Maybe I'm slow, but it would seem to me that if workers could chase jobs across borders, the increased supply of labor would drive wages down, not up. That's why the US doesn't open our borders to all workers who want to come here---if everyone migrated to the US, wages would plummet.

  413. How about a lawsuit against the U.S. government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few hundred thousand lawsuits or a class-action lawsuit with a few hundred thousand displaced workers (actually a few million if you include all the other displaced workers in industries besides tech) would get some attention -- hopefully news attention.
    How about creating lists of all them thousands of companies using h1b and h1b type visas -- with real numbers of workers displaced in each company and workers hired on visas with amounts being paid.
    How about hiring a PR(public relations) firm to spread the story.
    How about pushing for legislation that requires companies to give foreign workers the same pay and benefits that an equivalent American worker would get for the same job -- This may sound anti-American, but think about it: The primary reason companies are going overseas for workers is because they are cheaper -- if it costs the same or more for foreign workers, no companies would waste their time with H1b type programs; and if they did, then it would actually be the case where the employee was truly needed.

  414. Its called Capitalism Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build a cheaper mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door.

    Heres an offer, as a developer previously an L1 now on a green card, you can have my job, I am off back to somewhere more amenable to live.

  415. Immigration Lawyers are for H1-B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the story ...A separate report released this week by the American Immigration Law Foundation ... .

    Surprise, surprise.

    Immigration lawyers are for H1-B. That's 'cause
    they soak H1-Bs for lots of money.

    This is yet another reason to scrap the H1-B program. It's a "lawyer tax".

  416. Simply... by tshak · · Score: 1

    well put. No one wants to admit that there's flaws in our implementation of capitolism, it's much easier to blame India.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  417. Re:Oppose H-1Bs and L-1s but Support Outsourcing by Fermier+de+Pomme+de · · Score: 1
    Really? And if a very well paid programmer in India makes 20K/year how much American made product is he going to buy? What is he going to be able to afford, the bumper from a '96 Taurus?

    We really don't manufacture as much in the states as we used to. If you are purchasing cheap to average priced goods you are supporting manufacturing somewhere else.

  418. Here's the solution to the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://members.aol.com/XPUS/

    If there were no other nations except the US, there would be no such thing as an H1B.

    It's just that simple!

  419. We had Firangs in our company by deadmantalking · · Score: 1

    Oh Yes, I work in Mumbai at a place called SEEPZ, which is a zone exclusively set up for software and gems exporters. In my previous company, we had a bunch of Romanians working here, for about 2-3 years before they all emigrated to the US or went back to Europe.
    The TCS people fed Soong some crock and he lapped it up.
    One question: If the people at Slashdot, including the Editors, are such supersmartypants, then how come that they are so paranoid of immigrants? Oh yes, I know, all of you people will jump up and say "No We aint. We just want to keep our jobs!", which to me kinda sounds like the refrain of all the car manufacturers who used to urge your Congress to not allow Japanese cars because its good to "Be American, Buy American"

    Tolerance is a rare thing these days. Everyone claims to be tolerant but how many really are?

    --
    A crank is a little thing that makes revolutions
  420. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>> US workers cannot get jobs in Canada, Europe,

    Actually because of NAFTA the rules are the same for US citizen to work in Canada than the other way around. And many does, I worked with many Americans in all my hight-tech jobs.

    One thing to be said, is that being part of the English Commonwealth (EC) Canadians have *a few* facility when applying for a working visa inside the EC (Australia, India and so on), but not much.

    When I was young many friends used a special visa, you have to be a student, under 21 and a member of the EC. You could then work anywhere in the EC for the next 3 months. It was created to help students pay their summer travelling.

    I also have a EU passport thanks to my dad, so I like my options. Of course I am also a lazy bastard, spending my vacation time in front of the TV, so moving to another country is not for any time soon :{

  421. India is not a bed of roses either!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do sympathize with Soong and thousands of others like him who have lost jobs. I have been through it and know how it feels. But you fail to report the other side of the story which is that for decades the US has been using its economic might and diplomatic strength to create chaos in the markets of developing and underdeveloped countries as a direct result of which, there has been widespread poverty and unemployment in other countries. The US has been during the 70s and 80s pushing for removing restrictions so that they can push American goods to new markets. They used their deep pockets to do advertising blitz and kill the local players and have the people in other countries buy American products. Much of the recent strength of the American economy is a direct result of this. Today if there is a huge disparity between the salaries of an American and say an Indian or a Chinese, it is due to this factor.
    Consider Denim. Jeans became fashion in India around two decades ago. There were a number of local players and no MNCs. Once American companies like Lee and Levi's realized that there was a market in India, they launched their products with big advertisements, the likes of which Indian companies could not compete against. Indian firms who used to produce Jeans had to close down and there were job losses with sob
    stories worse than that of Soong. The Levis used to tout quality and style as their USPs.
    And the funny thing is that the denim used for the Jeans they produced was actually made in India. And, the different new fits that Levis brought out were very ill-suited for the Indian physique. And yet people used to keep buying these Jeans costing twice or thrice the Indian variety. Or for example take the case of softdrinks. During the 80s the govt. of India allowed no foreign players in that market. There were a number of local players who competed with each other. Enter the 90s and Pepsi entered the market (followed by Coke a few years later). The Pepsi launch in India was a mega-event with articles written on from how big the company was to charts with comparison between
    Pepsi, Thums Up (The No: 1 Indian Cola drink) and Coke. When they launched the product, they ran an ad that ran for whole 60 seconds on the National Channel.
    Something equivalent to the Super Bowl ads. These two between them wiped out the entire Indian Soft drink Manufacturers by either forcing them out or buying them. Equally sad story considering that thousands would have lost jobs in the process. And all this was so that they make more money, increase market share and make the 'American stockholders' happy (read richer). Did you guys at that time realize the damage you were causing to the rest of the world to finance your fat salaries? Is it not obvious that Jobs will follow to markets where American goods have gone? How long can American companies
    sustain in a market where one has to pay $40,000/- for a secretary? How long can the company continue to pay $60,000/- for a build manager or for a software engineer. One must consider that 90% of these software engineers do not need to work on rocket science. What they are doing is something which is doable by quite a big % of the world population. Then what sense does it make to pay 10 times the salary for the same?
    Is it sustainable? It was till now because there were new markets like the Middle east, India and China. But with lack of new markets, growth and profits have shrunk and it is no longer possible to pay such huge salaries for such simple work. The Americans worked a lot during the early decades of the 20th century, and that is why this is a great nation. Today it seems like most Americans have become lax and are interested in maximum enjoyment from minimum work. They refuse to stay a minute more than office time. They jump companies for higher pay (including Soong) and then complain if the startup (which obviously cannot sustain the model for long) lays them off. They do not realize that they bring the situation on themselves by selling themselves to the higher bi

  422. I am an Indian and... by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1
    I am not aware of any law like this. We have many people from US, Europe, etc., visit our company in Bangalore on work for various durations of time.

    Speaking about such discrimatory policies, have you heard of the recent policy of US which needs passengers who are transitting via any US airport need to obtain a transit visa! This comes with the discomfort of requiring to plan your visit atleast 6 weeks in advance and a possiblity of getting randomly rejected, not speaking about the huge cost which comes with it.

    --
    The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    1. Re:I am an Indian and... by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Let me second this. I know people from Europe which moved. This is just one company, there are lots of them that will accept 'foreigners'.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:I am an Indian and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually quite a few countries require transit visas. I agree that it is ridiculous. I wasn't aware that we did that.

  423. best and brightest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I doubt these people are the "best and brightest",
    since the best would rather stay in their own
    country were they feel more comfortable, were
    they have their friends, their family, their
    kids, and already have good jobs.


    I mean, if you are one of the best programmers in
    US, would you be willing to relocate in Japan
    for much higher pay? Most people would not.

  424. Working in the EU by jtheory · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's an interesting tidbit for Americans who are considering working in the EU.

    If you have an Irish grandparent (and you can track down the proof that they were born in Ireland), you can have your name entered in the registry of foreign births, and tada! You're an Irish citizen (they do allow dual citizenship with the US).

    Then you can work anywhere in the EU. Plus you can travel with your Irish passport, and (if you can do the accent) reduce your risk of being shot for sport in places that are getting hostile to Americans. Neat, huh? Of course, you do need that Irish grandparent...

    There's a nice summary here, and the relevant page with the Irish Embassy.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  425. People - there's a very very simple answer by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Find out who it is who's outsourcing.

    Sun Microsystems, laying off tons of people and then hiring tons of "guest workers" on the cheap? Publicise it. And the rest of us, refuse to do business with them.

    I have told Sprint there's no way in HELL I will deal with them, because they've laid off tons of USian employees for cheap offshore labour.

    When companies start realising that people aren't going to stand for their fellow peoples losing their jobs, market forces will force them to start hiring American.

    Remember, Nestle were killing children in the 70s with their hard sell of baby formula to Africa. Government? Did little if nothing. But damn, when people stopped buying Nestle EN MASSE in protest, they changed their tune DOUBLEPLUSQUICK.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  426. thank you by westendgirl · · Score: 1
    Thank you for being the first person I've ever heard say that marketers count!

    (I'm a marketer.)

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

  427. give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an entry level programmer in the company mentioned makes about 240 000/year in indian rupees. thats about $5000/year. salaries at higher positions scale similarly and you still think the american guy **really** wanted to come to banglore

    as an aside
    what about HEAVY duties on indian and chinese steel just to keep the local american industry from going bankrupt.
    obviously since the US is a signatory to the WTO they dont levy dumping duty as such but cite "child labour" and "environmental compliance"

    the american MNC i work for in india hires child labour and has a backup electricity generator thats old,unmaintianed and **polluting** go figure

  428. I just want to know what happens when... by TheInternet · · Score: 1

    ... all this software developed as six dollars an hour hits the market. Am I skeptical for thinking it's not going to be written very well?

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas
  429. Non-facts in parent by westendgirl · · Score: 1
    India's profile as a non-originating technology centre is changing. I looked up innovation statistics for various countries. See the UNESCO report here. India's GDP is about 1/13th that of the developed countries, and it's share of published articles is not disproportionate. India now spends 1/4 of what the US spends on R&D per researcher, so one would think the country is well positioned to make strides.

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

  430. Slashdot blue collar workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's highly amusing that IT workers are so upset about jobs being shipped overseas. They sound just like the union auto workers in Detroit in the 80s: blue collar, economically ignorant, and selfish.

    Face it, folks. You're line workers with a college degree, and you behave like it too. Most of you don't understand the basics of business or economics; your skills are inflexible enough that a shifting job market (i.e. India does it better, faster) will leave you croaking. Like the auto workers, the only way to make you better off is by screwing everyone else with higher prices and shoddier product. Go American coders!

    And the economics of it all--no, the fact that some jobs go overseas does not mean that eventually no jobs will exist in the States. Look up the economic law of comparative advantage sometime, and then see how efficiency differentials are compensated for in this thing we call the currency exchange market. If you're in college, take some introductory econ courses; if not, buy a couple intro texts. You'll sound much smarter, and you'll stop worrying about the death of the USA because of cheap workers in India.

    (Thought experiment: why hasn't American unemployment skyrocketed in the past three decades as cheap workers overseas became more available?)

    And keep in mind that 87% of American GDP is LOCALLY sourced. I.e. not imported from brown people overseas. Relax.

  431. Outsourceing... by hughk · · Score: 1
    Your point about time zones I absolutey agree with. Even between the EU and India, five hours still means that messages take a good day for a response.

    You must micromanage. If your spec isn't perfect, then they will deviate and work may have to be redone. They lack good business analysis capability in many areas, so you have to make sure that they can consult with someone.

    I have worked with more Russians than Indians and I would say they are brilliant programmers and mathmaticians but they do need supervision. In our case we *knew* they didn't speak or understand perfect English (and I dumbed down our specs so they could be more easily translated), with India it can be more misleading as some do speak veray good English.

    I don't know about India but in Russia their project management and QA sucked. I had to take charge of both processes on my project. However unlike you with your problems team leading, I had been given some hints to use a different style that worked fine in our environment. Note that Russia is somewhere between the Asian and European mentality whereas India is definitely Asian.

    So bottom line, you want cheap s/w - send me on an expat package to Bangalore or St. Petersburg and factor that into your costs. I reckon about one expat to between ten and twenty locals. You continue to save money, but it is *nowhere* near the level of the ten cents in the dollar that you have been quoted.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  432. Cast the First Stone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    comprehention = comprehension
    obeyance = obedience

  433. You reap what you sow by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

    It is ironic that a continent built on the blood of the 'indogen' and populated by willing and unwilling imigrants has become so hostile to imigration. The USA has about 20% (before T.W.A.T - at least 86Billion less now) of the the worlds wealth, and supports 5% of the worls population. When half the world is exploited to the point of poverty (by Europe too - to my shame) how can you not expect mass imigration. The USA is less than welcoming - to the point of the internment of a Hindu buinessman on suspision of Islamic terrorism - go figure. The guy was held without charge for months before being deported, he lost everything and has obvoius dificulties re-building his life. I do not find it surprising that the Indian diplomatic service are a little less co-operative of late.

    --
    This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  434. Perhaps yes. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is not uncommon for pensioners in rich countries to do exactly that: they sell everything and move to places where life is cheaper (Spain, Greece, Mexico come to mind).

    If you want to do it younger you can always do some black market work to keep you going until you gain permanent resident status...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  435. Oh yes, nobody reads the Economist. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I do. Every week mind you. And they advocate open markets of labour.

    The Mexican President was prepared for that and got a polite no thank you from Bush.

    Common USians, show you are men not mice. Open your labour market, request reciprocity and get ready for the competition.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  436. Not so. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is a well researched fact that immigration brings enormous economic benefits, specially into developped countries with aging, shrinking populations (hint, the econmies that are doing better during the last few years, in spite of eveyrthing, are the UK and US ones. Interestingly they are the ones that receive the most asylum and illegal immigrants).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  437. Simpsons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the episode where all the illegal immigrants are being deported, Apu buys a fake ID and pretends to be an American citizen, including attempting the accent. Not a texan accent, mind, but for an American pretending to be an Indian pretending to be an American, it's a good effort. Or at leat the best I could think of...

  438. Re:Can't work there? Why are they here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you realize that those same arguments were made 100 years ago? Only then it was Italians and the Irish. Then Mexican/Latino. After that it was Asians. Now it is Indians and people from the Middle East. Each generation has their nationality to fear and hate and each generation the fear has proven to be unfounded. Wages have not dropped - they have risen. It may not seem that way now as we come dowm the backside of Mt. Internet but it is true.

    If anything, immigrants often take the jobs that nobody wants so that they can work hard and improve themselves and their children's lives.

    Also note that I am not saying creating a free-for-all. There have to be rules in place and there has to be moderation but the day that we close our borders to immigrants is the day I become an emigrant.

    Most importantly - remember that it is likely that your grandparents or great-grandparents were hated as much as some people hate immigrants now.

  439. Re:I'd hate to sound like I have a lot of hatred, by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

    Open mouth, insert foot. Read before posting please...

    Oh and by the way, more people will take you seriously if you put the racial slurs and social slams away while typing.

  440. Its *not * illegal to work in India by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    It is possible to work in India on a work permit.

    I am an Indian citizen working abroad (not the US currently). Back in '99, I worked in Altanta, USA. A director in my company, an American citizen, had worked in India on a work permit. If I recall correctly, his Indian stint was as a software consultant with Cap Gemini, and his place of work was city of Pune in Maharashtra state in India.

    This website also answers positively to the question: "Do I need a work permit to work in India?".

    So it seems to be possible to work in India. However, for most people, I imagine it would be extremely difficult, given the demand and supply situation.

  441. Bengali in Platforms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bengali, Bengali
    Bengali, Bengali
    No no no
    He does not want to depress you
    Oh no no no no no
    He only wants to impress you
    Oh..

    Bengali in platforms
    He only wants to embrace your culture
    And to be your friend forever
    Forever

    Bengali, Bengali
    Bengali, Bengali
    Oh, shelve your Western plans
    And understand
    That life is hard enough when you belong here

    A silver-studded rim that glistens
    And an ankle-star that ... blinds me
    A lemon sole so very high
    Which only reminds me; to tell you
    Break the news gently
    Break the news to him gently
    "Shelve your plans; shelve your plans, shelve them"

    Bengali, Bengali
    It's the touchy march of time that binds you
    Don't blame me
    Don't hate me
    Just because I'm the one to tell you

    That life is hard enough when you belong here
    That life is hard enough when you belong here
    Oh...
    Shelve your Western plans
    Oh...
    Shelve your Western plans
    'Cause life is hard enough when you belong
    Life is hard enough when you belong here
    Oh...
    Shelve your Western plans
    Oh...
    Shelve your best friends
    'Cause life is hard when you belong here
    Oh...
    Life is hard enough when you belong

  442. Re: great grandfathers of today's Americans by mi · · Score: 1
    My great grandfather moved halfway around the world to sell fruit off of a wagon in Sioux City, Iowa.

    Luckily for him and for you, there were no migration limitations in US then, for there surely were people already selling fruits off wagons in Iowa...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  443. Re:Rich Minners? Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gorgeous purple mountains

    Not to be confused with an engorged purple monster.

  444. Re:The bigger story - liability by satyap · · Score: 1

    Hmm, and when Windows crashes, can you sue Microsoft?

  445. Re:CNN Story: H1-B Visa program may not be that ba by satyap · · Score: 1

    8000=8e3. 500000=5e5. You're off by 2 orders of magnitude, or a factor of 100.

  446. Not without VIsa atleast by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    First, there are people from US working in India already in many companies and it is very much possible to do that. But the company should be willing to sponsor your visa. This chap just decided that no one is sponsoring just because someone told him so. What more can I say. Another thing which I don't understand is that when the whole US manufacturing industry was moved to China, no one said anything, so why now this hue and cry about India? The principals are the same. If you can get something chepaer somewhere else, you will get it from there. Its India today, will be somewhere else tomorrow.

  447. Another point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An article opposing the termination of H1-B program. Study: Skilled Foreign Workers Aid U.S.

  448. Re:Rich Minners? Oxymoron by greenhide · · Score: 1

    I talked to someone from West Virginia. Mining jobs around there are plentiful, but exclusive. That means in some areas that if you want a job, you mine. And there are more people willing to work thant here are jobs, so the starting wage is very, very low -- sometimes less than $10/hour for strip mining.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.