actually dipshit, it is free, but they can't even stick to using someone elses work for free and abiding by the copyright holders license, which states they must leave logo's and links back to his website intack.
so it would appear the mpaa doesn't think their own rules don't apply to them.
sue them for $1000 for each post claiming it's lost revenue. after all theres no telling how much work or job offers this guy has lost due to the lack of exposure from them removing his links. it's the exact same reasoning they use when sueing people for p2p traffic.
"If you're going to ignore research by people with biases, you're going to ignore all research."
i think his point is that even when the results prove them wrong they can manage to put their own spin on them.
also, they have to be really scraping to have to go to RUSSIA to find someone who agree's with them. i mean come one, you can't get more corny then this shit.
even though you don't like it, the facts are that GM crops are THE most tested crops in history, and are perfectly safe to use.
cross pollination? show me an actual example of this happening in the real world.
you've got it all ass about face, they sell GM crops as being PEST RESISTANT, so you can use LESS presticides and save on money.
oh and also, you need to ditch your pc NOW as it's exposing you to have more toxin's then the food you eat is.
every single type of food you eat has had it's genetic's controlled by selective breeding. GM food is no different, it's just quicker and easier to do (and cheaper).
i really hate these kinds of idiots, they will take any tiny tidbit of information and blow it out of purportion and take it out of context to push their own agenda, which is really about anti government and anti corperate.
you will also find, that ALL of these people come from middle class, and have never seen much of the world or actually had to live in poverty. a large motovator for GM food is creating crops that can grow in harsh conditions and provide food to people in africa etc, where they currently go without.
i'm guessing this whole stunt is meant to try sway public opinion so heavily influenced by groklaw, back into sco's favour. it's a really desperate attempt since it's so obviously false and easily proven so. besides i can't see how pj could possibly prove useful in any of sco's claims against IBM. my guess is it's a stall tactic and it'll backfire and have the judge angry about wasting his time.
how can they say it doesn't scale? back in 2000 i was stuck on 56kbps, now i'm sitting on 24mbps, a factor of 300x faster in 7 years. i'd say it scales pretty fucking well. once ftth is wide spread i could be sitting on gbits/sec.
has anyone considered setting up a not for profit consortium that you can donate money to/join that buys shares in these media companys with the stated goal of gaining enough shares to beable to vote on things inside the company? the mere existence of such a thing would scare the shit out of companys, since they are all publicly tradable.
the fucking pope formally acknowlged it you moron, if thats not proof enough that it's a well accepted opinion then your too thick to accept any kind of proof.
thats nice fucktard but this isn't just about parallels it's about vmware as well. thank you for tackling a complete non issue with regards to parallels.
i doubt it contains anything showing him doing something illegal, otherwise he would be all over pleading the 5th and he would be fine. no this just sounds like he's a dick.
i believe there are a few cases where a bonfide memeber of the press has the right to protect their sources sighting danger to their lives or the families, but there certainly isn't anything that protects video evidence of punks running riot in the streets.
and the fact that it's g8 protestors makes me thing even less of them. they are scum, completely devoid of any reason.
seriously, turning up to court isn't a suggestion, it's a requirment when they tell you to. this guy has video of illegal activities and things because he's got a blog he's some kind of pro hax journo and the law doesn't apply to him? i hope the cunt gets raped with a deep heat condom while in jail so he play the victim all the more.
Slashdot Mirror
so it would appear the mpaa doesn't think their own rules don't apply to them.
taste that? it's irony
raising questions ALWAYS changes the facts, thats how science works moron.
try telling someone starving in africa that food isn't scarce. i hope he rips your guts out.
i think his point is that even when the results prove them wrong they can manage to put their own spin on them. also, they have to be really scraping to have to go to RUSSIA to find someone who agree's with them. i mean come one, you can't get more corny then this shit.
even though you don't like it, the facts are that GM crops are THE most tested crops in history, and are perfectly safe to use.
cross pollination? show me an actual example of this happening in the real world. you've got it all ass about face, they sell GM crops as being PEST RESISTANT, so you can use LESS presticides and save on money. oh and also, you need to ditch your pc NOW as it's exposing you to have more toxin's then the food you eat is.
every single type of food you eat has had it's genetic's controlled by selective breeding. GM food is no different, it's just quicker and easier to do (and cheaper). i really hate these kinds of idiots, they will take any tiny tidbit of information and blow it out of purportion and take it out of context to push their own agenda, which is really about anti government and anti corperate. you will also find, that ALL of these people come from middle class, and have never seen much of the world or actually had to live in poverty. a large motovator for GM food is creating crops that can grow in harsh conditions and provide food to people in africa etc, where they currently go without.
i'm guessing this whole stunt is meant to try sway public opinion so heavily influenced by groklaw, back into sco's favour. it's a really desperate attempt since it's so obviously false and easily proven so. besides i can't see how pj could possibly prove useful in any of sco's claims against IBM. my guess is it's a stall tactic and it'll backfire and have the judge angry about wasting his time.
how can they say it doesn't scale? back in 2000 i was stuck on 56kbps, now i'm sitting on 24mbps, a factor of 300x faster in 7 years. i'd say it scales pretty fucking well. once ftth is wide spread i could be sitting on gbits/sec.
what about content patches, are they going to view those as well? this idea is stupid, as is the man proposing it.
has anyone considered setting up a not for profit consortium that you can donate money to/join that buys shares in these media companys with the stated goal of gaining enough shares to beable to vote on things inside the company? the mere existence of such a thing would scare the shit out of companys, since they are all publicly tradable.
it's the lesser of 2 evils. would you preffer a minor inconvience, or have less freedom of speech?
and we are pointing out your own folly, that states must obey the constiution. state law doesn't trumpt the corner stone of american soceity.
i want her to shwo up in court so bad haha, "oh so i don't exist do i?" let the circus continue i say.
the fucking pope formally acknowlged it you moron, if thats not proof enough that it's a well accepted opinion then your too thick to accept any kind of proof.
haha i'm so gld i looked at the address of that link before i clicked it. that's nasty fucker.
i believe the summary said this doesn't operate like the muslix64 crack, which used a stolen key? if so your way off base.
figures from your rectum. p2p/torrents are by far the biggest upstream hogs.
because most epidemics are spread via work places and public area's.
web censorship is every government wet dream. i say we begin implementing something on a technical level that prevents it and mitigates legal attacks
thats nice fucktard but this isn't just about parallels it's about vmware as well. thank you for tackling a complete non issue with regards to parallels.
i doubt it contains anything showing him doing something illegal, otherwise he would be all over pleading the 5th and he would be fine. no this just sounds like he's a dick.
and the fact that it's g8 protestors makes me thing even less of them. they are scum, completely devoid of any reason.
it's about all you can expect from bloggers. bunch tards.
seriously, turning up to court isn't a suggestion, it's a requirment when they tell you to. this guy has video of illegal activities and things because he's got a blog he's some kind of pro hax journo and the law doesn't apply to him? i hope the cunt gets raped with a deep heat condom while in jail so he play the victim all the more.