sorry but i've played this game before. the operators of that drill rig know damn well the heat is on them, and in classic form that are looking to blame management of BP because they know chumps like you will buy into it.
actually it's be more like 60 minutes, but i feel ya. we don't even have a commercial mach 2 service anymore.
just think, if flights were much shorter you could really cram people in. i know i could put up with being squeezed in a packed plane for 60 minutes to get to paris.
that's funny because i find your blind faith in government departments leaves ME speechless.
look at what you are saying. private companys can't do it right but somehow big government will be perfect? have you ever even dealt with a government department before?!?! they are accountable to no one, you have no choice either.
what laws were broken or not enforced in the building of this rig? by all accounts i can see this is just an unfortunate accident, sure the rig could have been designed better, but everyone is an expert in hindsight.
it's unbelievable that you are trying to pin this on republicans. you americans need to wake up to the fact there's more to the world then democrat vs republican.
"Yes, keep in mind that Bush was in office when the plans for this oil rig were put into action."
HOLY FUCK. people like you amaze me the way you still find ways to blame bush atleast in part, for EVERYTHING. whats your logic here, do you think bush was part of the fucking design team for this rig in a secret republican plot to ruin Obama's day?????
I could believe the academic world use OSX, but in most professional occupations you'll be using windows. this is because most professional specialy software is written in windows.
In 10 years of working in the medical and engineering fields, i've seen exactly 1 person use a mac at work.
I would say the best option is to install windows 7 and have them load linux into a vpc so they can experience a unix clone. if they can handle that then if they DO come across a mac down the track it won't be such a shock - they'll know there's more then windows out there.
do the FTC take into account how is it is to switch ad providers though? even if google owned 99.9% of the online ad market, what's stopping someone comming in and under cutting them? it's dead easy to switch out ad words for another ad provider, as long as google wasn't threatening or bullying anyone trying to compete i say more power to them.
fuck me 10 minutes every hour is more then i get. I work a 12 hour days and i'm only entitled to 1 hour, which i normally have to spend at my desk anyway.
i'm pretty sick of this shit about them being low paid just because they get a few bucks a day, how about we compare their pay to other workers pay in the same region? i make much less then someone working in manhattan but no one races around screaming about how low paid i am.
so according to you when MS gives away a free version of it's product so users can try it, it's because they want to "hook" them. let me ask what's your opinion of googles products? to do the same thing, give away free services with a paid option. i suppose you also think the whole shareware scene is also a big scam?
just don't say anything critical of a public offical, make a joke about someones race or gender (unless they are a white male, then it's fine), fly with your laptop or shoes, be part of a muslim group, photograph a public building or dare to say the word fuck on tv.
how are you going to trap 10,000 cow farts? i know they are talking about digesting manure here, but i remmeber reading a rabid anti macdonalds article somewhere about how cow farts are contributing to global warming.
please can we just go back to the good old days when green peace was outraged about cutting down trees and spray painted baby seals blue, which were then eaten by polar bears because they could no longer hide in the snow.
the constant contridictions made by the global warming crowd hurts my head. methane was a bad gas last week?
answer me this. why is a graph of the USA temperatures that i posted unaccpetable because it's supposedly too localised, yet melting pack ice can't also be subject to localised changes? everyone waves their arms about melting in the arctic yet when any skeptic pops up with something localised they get nailed to a cross for it?
Ok so if 10 years is too short term to matter why the hell is the global warming lobby demanding drastic action in an even shorter time frame?!
according to all the brow beating being down temps will just keep rising, at this point i think you need to admit maybe it's not so cut and dry.
your also trying to confuse localised seasonal changes with my graph which is global temps over the last 12 years. so no it's not as bad as your attempting to paint it.
i have to wonder what the effects on the host would be. sounds like a really complex way to generate power rath then just burning the fuel to produce steam etc.
dude, you must be very young to blindly believe experts. let me ask you, how do you know they are "experts"?
let me run this by you. have any of your experts put forward methods of preventing the carbon trading system being ripped off? if you think wall street is full of holes, wait till you try trade thin air
and even if you did, no one has come up with a believable price on CO2. i'll fully admit it would be no easy task, since your dealing with so many unknowns.
the reason top kill is only being used now is because it took longer to implement. BP moved in order of swiftness to fix and safety, not cost.
sorry but i've played this game before. the operators of that drill rig know damn well the heat is on them, and in classic form that are looking to blame management of BP because they know chumps like you will buy into it.
just think, if flights were much shorter you could really cram people in. i know i could put up with being squeezed in a packed plane for 60 minutes to get to paris.
look at what you are saying. private companys can't do it right but somehow big government will be perfect? have you ever even dealt with a government department before?!?! they are accountable to no one, you have no choice either.
it's unbelievable that you are trying to pin this on republicans. you americans need to wake up to the fact there's more to the world then democrat vs republican.
HOLY FUCK. people like you amaze me the way you still find ways to blame bush atleast in part, for EVERYTHING. whats your logic here, do you think bush was part of the fucking design team for this rig in a secret republican plot to ruin Obama's day?????
In 10 years of working in the medical and engineering fields, i've seen exactly 1 person use a mac at work.
I would say the best option is to install windows 7 and have them load linux into a vpc so they can experience a unix clone. if they can handle that then if they DO come across a mac down the track it won't be such a shock - they'll know there's more then windows out there.
do the FTC take into account how is it is to switch ad providers though? even if google owned 99.9% of the online ad market, what's stopping someone comming in and under cutting them? it's dead easy to switch out ad words for another ad provider, as long as google wasn't threatening or bullying anyone trying to compete i say more power to them.
i'm pretty sick of this shit about them being low paid just because they get a few bucks a day, how about we compare their pay to other workers pay in the same region? i make much less then someone working in manhattan but no one races around screaming about how low paid i am.
how america got into this position where a handful of companys have to power to DARE the government to not bail them out is beyond me.
so according to you when MS gives away a free version of it's product so users can try it, it's because they want to "hook" them. let me ask what's your opinion of googles products? to do the same thing, give away free services with a paid option. i suppose you also think the whole shareware scene is also a big scam?
office 2007 is puss.
ironically you just know the people who are most outraged about this will totally google for more information.
just don't say anything critical of a public offical, make a joke about someones race or gender (unless they are a white male, then it's fine), fly with your laptop or shoes, be part of a muslim group, photograph a public building or dare to say the word fuck on tv.
how are you going to trap 10,000 cow farts? i know they are talking about digesting manure here, but i remmeber reading a rabid anti macdonalds article somewhere about how cow farts are contributing to global warming.
the constant contridictions made by the global warming crowd hurts my head. methane was a bad gas last week?
answer me this. why is a graph of the USA temperatures that i posted unaccpetable because it's supposedly too localised, yet melting pack ice can't also be subject to localised changes? everyone waves their arms about melting in the arctic yet when any skeptic pops up with something localised they get nailed to a cross for it?
according to all the brow beating being down temps will just keep rising, at this point i think you need to admit maybe it's not so cut and dry. your also trying to confuse localised seasonal changes with my graph which is global temps over the last 12 years. so no it's not as bad as your attempting to paint it.
price fixing is not free market, nub.
the fact is CO2 is not toxic, it only becomes a problem if it displaces enough O2 for the O2 level to drop below 21%.
american's will be able to run a 40 inch plasma then?
i have to wonder what the effects on the host would be. sounds like a really complex way to generate power rath then just burning the fuel to produce steam etc.
let me run this by you. have any of your experts put forward methods of preventing the carbon trading system being ripped off? if you think wall street is full of holes, wait till you try trade thin air
and even if you did, no one has come up with a believable price on CO2. i'll fully admit it would be no easy task, since your dealing with so many unknowns.
because despite what you've had shoved down your throat for years now, CO2 is NOT toxic or dangerous.