"If you hold your memorial in a public square, your going to get the weirdos."
We agree. Where we differ is I think they should have their asses kicked for being such. They live on the assumed niceness of others so that they may frolic in their Clockwork Orange level of vandalism.
Sorry, but fuck the thugs who think that having something public in reach gives free rein for the destruction thereof.
"2) Online culture is different from real-world culture.
Other than being digital, how? Really. How is it different? That you don't see the face of the commenter? Like you don't see the face of someone on a party line?
Other than you *want* it different, that is. Please be a little more specific than a simple, personal assertion.
"Just like open front gardens are the norm, not the exception in the real world."
Another personal assertion, which due to my personal experience, I feel is incorrect.
"Bullying involves physical force against person or property, or the threat of it."
Says who? From Webster's Unabridged:
bully
1. a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.
No mention of physical force. The rest of your argument falls from this.
Uh no... And your brain isn't thinking that deeply. China actively shuts down access to internet and jails publishers and critics. No. Do some reading, grow the fuck up and quit posting just to be a troll.
One of the things that keeps me at no more than a couple of comments in an AC thread is you can't tell if the AC is pretending to be several people just to create a huge wast of time for you in responding.
We're called the Great Satan because we are successful as a civilization using exactly the quality that their brand of Islam requires be eliminated: individuality in thought.
For no other reason does the Koran, and therefore OB, want people such as those comprising the US exterminated.
At this paucity of specimens and with this frequency (indirect guess) of generation? It's not the millions of years, it's the millions of generations. If you're going to compare fruit flies, then you have to use 1mo=20yr for a scale.
So, do you have reference to numerous examples of species with a 20yr generation and an equivalent population to early hominids which exhibit convergent evolution?
His daughter requires and wears hearing aids, you stupid ass. She's a growing and changing child. You want a professional determining changing conditions. Sorry, stupid, ignorant ass.
"Seriously stop pitching this band aid language as a solve all, it wasn't designed for..."
That's what ya call a straw argument. No one claims it solves all. In fact, anyone claiming one language is a 'solves all' isn't thinking deeply enough.
But his point is good. There is an absolute shit-load of good quality JS code in libraries and it is not quite as simple as simply renaming stuff. A display can be reached using two incompatible approaches making the integration into your application code interesting to say the least.
Another moron who thinks that calling something *art* changes what it is.
But, I sincerely hope this fool gets his wish and his art *is* subpenaed into maybe a hundred cases where he's called as a witness.
Where do people come up with this crap? I own my own damned email server, have for almost ten years. Before that, I had one from my local internet provider.
Each and every thing you mentioned requires a browser/mail app and a connection, nothing more.
Not one single "big provider" is necessary for you to function at any level on the internet (not including purposefully utilizing their products).
By the way, every one of your examples can be done by mail or walk-in as well. What you wrote is simply not true.
"If the only way you can successfully advertise..."
It's not, therefore you have "choice". I don't use their search engine and I don't use any of their other products and never have. Apparently my ability to wander life unimpeded by my lack of "choices" is greater than yours.
I would instead suppose that a child like you has to learn that economics as taught in a sociology class doesn't actually work.
"lock-in caused by network effects".... That was a tell.
"... but it's consistent with how humans understand communication."
Really 'n5vb'? Weil 'Oligonicella' doesn't trust the communications of anyone he/she doesn't actually know to be truthful because, much like the supposed lesbian/Lybian blogger turning out to be some pasty, overweight American guy, you can't tell shit about someone by either their online moniker or the things they write.
"Google is providing a free service"... "the right not to have that dictated to us"
As a fifty year atheist, I can tell you that it would take a discussion with God to convince me.
Anything else is just a matter of how someone figured out how to manipulate energy.
And if anyone wants to put forth the old 'sufficiently advanced aliens' stuff, any friggin' alien that can convince me face to face that it meets the requirements that I logically understand to constitute the minimum basis for God with a capital G makes that argument purely academic and I'll tell God you said so.
Slashdot Mirror
Why, they covering some governmental fuck up the others won't?
"If you hold your memorial in a public square, your going to get the weirdos."
We agree. Where we differ is I think they should have their asses kicked for being such. They live on the assumed niceness of others so that they may frolic in their Clockwork Orange level of vandalism.
Sorry, but fuck the thugs who think that having something public in reach gives free rein for the destruction thereof.
"2) Online culture is different from real-world culture.
Other than being digital, how? Really. How is it different? That you don't see the face of the commenter? Like you don't see the face of someone on a party line?
Other than you *want* it different, that is. Please be a little more specific than a simple, personal assertion.
"Just like open front gardens are the norm, not the exception in the real world."
Another personal assertion, which due to my personal experience, I feel is incorrect.
"Bullying involves physical force against person or property, or the threat of it."
Says who? From Webster's Unabridged:
bully
1. a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.
No mention of physical force. The rest of your argument falls from this.
"Bullying people provides something to the bully, generally some sort of social or financial gain."
The satisfaction of bringing torment to someone ain't enough? You haven't known many bullies.
"In order to be bullied you must first think of yourself as a victim."
No, you simply have to be a target of an incessant asshole.
Uh no... And your brain isn't thinking that deeply. China actively shuts down access to internet and jails publishers and critics. No. Do some reading, grow the fuck up and quit posting just to be a troll.
It would feel like a slightly smoother script-server.
You appear to be criticizing his decision as hazardous beyond where he calculated it, despite his having successfully calculated the risk.
And says me.
One of the things that keeps me at no more than a couple of comments in an AC thread is you can't tell if the AC is pretending to be several people just to create a huge wast of time for you in responding.
"Death by a thousand cuts"... tedious.
No. No it does not.
We're called the Great Satan because we are successful as a civilization using exactly the quality that their brand of Islam requires be eliminated: individuality in thought.
For no other reason does the Koran, and therefore OB, want people such as those comprising the US exterminated.
Well writ.
At this paucity of specimens and with this frequency (indirect guess) of generation? It's not the millions of years, it's the millions of generations. If you're going to compare fruit flies, then you have to use 1mo=20yr for a scale.
So, do you have reference to numerous examples of species with a 20yr generation and an equivalent population to early hominids which exhibit convergent evolution?
His daughter requires and wears hearing aids, you stupid ass. She's a growing and changing child. You want a professional determining changing conditions. Sorry, stupid, ignorant ass.
"Seriously stop pitching this band aid language as a solve all, it wasn't designed for..."
That's what ya call a straw argument. No one claims it solves all. In fact, anyone claiming one language is a 'solves all' isn't thinking deeply enough.
But his point is good. There is an absolute shit-load of good quality JS code in libraries and it is not quite as simple as simply renaming stuff. A display can be reached using two incompatible approaches making the integration into your application code interesting to say the least.
So, we have a language developed for one, single person?
If PHP is passe, then why can you embed it in HTML code via Ice? What would be the point?
Another moron who thinks that calling something *art* changes what it is. But, I sincerely hope this fool gets his wish and his art *is* subpenaed into maybe a hundred cases where he's called as a witness.
What is this language english to which you refer? The oneI speak is called English.
Where do people come up with this crap? I own my own damned email server, have for almost ten years. Before that, I had one from my local internet provider.
Each and every thing you mentioned requires a browser/mail app and a connection, nothing more.
Not one single "big provider" is necessary for you to function at any level on the internet (not including purposefully utilizing their products).
By the way, every one of your examples can be done by mail or walk-in as well. What you wrote is simply not true.
"If the only way you can successfully advertise..."
It's not, therefore you have "choice". I don't use their search engine and I don't use any of their other products and never have. Apparently my ability to wander life unimpeded by my lack of "choices" is greater than yours.
I would instead suppose that a child like you has to learn that economics as taught in a sociology class doesn't actually work.
"lock-in caused by network effects".... That was a tell.
"... but it's consistent with how humans understand communication."
... "the right not to have that dictated to us"
Really 'n5vb'? Weil 'Oligonicella' doesn't trust the communications of anyone he/she doesn't actually know to be truthful because, much like the supposed lesbian/Lybian blogger turning out to be some pasty, overweight American guy, you can't tell shit about someone by either their online moniker or the things they write.
"Google is providing a free service"
One of these things is not like the other.
"That's why your windows desktop is a combination billboard, snooper and pinball machine for marketers."
Wow. Bullshit, just bullshit.
Type misandry.
As a fifty year atheist, I can tell you that it would take a discussion with God to convince me.
Anything else is just a matter of how someone figured out how to manipulate energy.
And if anyone wants to put forth the old 'sufficiently advanced aliens' stuff, any friggin' alien that can convince me face to face that it meets the requirements that I logically understand to constitute the minimum basis for God with a capital G makes that argument purely academic and I'll tell God you said so.