Slashdot Mirror


Wild Parrots Learning To Talk From Escaped Pet Birds

bazzalunatic writes "Be careful what you teach a parrot. Some chatty pet parrots that have escaped back into the wild have taught wild parrots to talk. Seems the phenomenon could be integrated into the flock through generations. From the article: 'The evolution of language could well be passed on through the generations, says Ken. "If the parents are talkers and they produce chicks, their chicks are likely to pick up some of that," he says. This phenomenon is not unique; some lyrebirds in southern Australia still reproduce the sounds of axes and old shutter-box cameras their ancestors once learnt.'" While this doesn't reach the amazing level of Washoe the chimpanzee teaching sign language, it is still interesting and reminiscent of something out of an Alfred Hitchcock movie.

225 comments

  1. So many punch lines ... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they really are pining for the fyords.

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    1. Re:So many punch lines ... by gstrickler · · Score: 2

      There will always be more novices than experts. -- Bjarne Stroustrup

      Stroustrup obviously never worked in a COBOL shop.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    2. Re:So many punch lines ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone want to bet on the number of generations until they're all using variations of "Suck my balls?"

    3. Re:So many punch lines ... by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      Why does this parrot keep going "VOOOM!"

    4. Re:So many punch lines ... by twocentplain · · Score: 1

      Maybe they really are pining for the fyords.

      beautiful plumage, the Norwegian blue.

    5. Re:So many punch lines ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be more novices than experts. -- Bjarne Stroustrup

      Stroustrup obviously never worked in a COBOL shop.

      Which means what? COBOL is an abandoned language, it isn't used except to maintain existing systems built in it which means that there are MILLIONS of novices who have never used COBOL and would have to learn it from an expert (or expert-written guide) if they had to use it. Novice is not the same as "apprentice".

    6. Re:So many punch lines ... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Which means what?

      Almost every COBOL programmer considered themselves the greatest programmer in the world, and none of them were ashamed to tell everyone who would listen.

      Kids these days . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  2. The intrepid young explorerers.. by malkavian · · Score: 1

    Will now be greeted with the endless chants of "Get off my lawn!".

  3. Planet of the Parrots by rjejr · · Score: 2

    Rise of the Planet of the Parrots

    1. Re:Planet of the Parrots by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      Here at Telegraph Hill, I can tell you that is one scary thought!

      (It's also only just around the corner where they can blow up the Golden Gate Bridge, which, if Hollywood has learned me something, it's that the GGB always gets blown up...)

    2. Re:Planet of the Parrots by Setsquare · · Score: 1

      Isn't it the other way round? 5 million years ago intelligent parrots genetically engineered some apes with smart bird characteristics : they walked on 2 legs (like birds), they vocally talked (no other ape species can), feathers were too hard so they settled on a molted appearance. Naturally our ancestors revolted and destroyed their entire civilisation.

  4. Fascinating... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

    You would think that entropy would degrade any language learned pretty quickly, but those lyrebirds seem to demonstrate that sort of behavior sticks rather than fades rapidly.

    Makes me wonder how small a trigger was required to spark human speech evolution. At one time, we probably weren't all that different than these lyrebirds/parrots.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:Fascinating... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1, Funny

      Have you tuned into Fox News lately?

    2. Re:Fascinating... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why, they covering some governmental fuck up the others won't?

    3. Re:Fascinating... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 0

      I guess if I have to explain the "evolved upward from mindlessly repeating stuff" joke, it wasn't that funny in the first place.

    4. Re:Fascinating... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      No, they cover the entire government as a fuck up.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Fascinating... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      This story is really fascinating to me as I just finished up the Hunger Games trilogy. I wonder if Collins got the idea for mockingjays here or it's just a coincidence...

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    6. Re:Fascinating... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      What? Seriously? Entropy? People need to stop using science terms incorrectly.

      We are talking about conditioning here: lather rinse repeat. The other parrots will mimic the sounds the talking parrot makes and they will sound the same. It will take time but, with Cockatoos, not very long.

      Keep thinking about human language. It took A LONG TIME to develop.

      Why are people so dim.....

    7. Re:Fascinating... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Where have you been the past decade? ;)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    8. Re:Fascinating... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Living in a place made of many shades of gray, not just black and white.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Fascinating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was funnier than the credit it received...

    10. Re:Fascinating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break your bubble, but the average simian is far more complicated than a parrot. Certainly parrots are amazing, but a bird's need to fly around limits what kind of development their brains can get up to because of the extreme energy requirement.

    11. Re:Fascinating... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At one time, we probably weren't all that different than these lyrebirds/parrots.

      If you look around Slashdot, it's clear that we haven't really come all that far. Most of what you'll see around here, anyway, is a bunch of bullshit squawking, or just repetition of what the top bird said. I have a parrot, and I am continually amazed at bird intelligence, especially given their brain mass. But they are quite excitable and when they get too much into their bird-brained mentality they are just a big squawkfluff. And observing birds in the wild and otherwise I have come to regard all birds as being like a fisher, a raptor, or a chicken, with occasional wacky outliers like hummingbirds. The chicken of today is hardly the prototype for all those many birds which act like them (e.g. "upland game birds"... but also most of the songbirds are highly reminiscent) but everything is said to taste like chicken, so everything might as well look and act like chicken as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Fascinating... by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      I live in a black & white world and Fox News is always wrong. Is that still the case in your greyscale world?

    13. Re:Fascinating... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      It isn't that simple in my world. You see Fox news often offers opinions, of which there are no "right" or "wrong" ones. I don't just label anything I don't agree with "wrong". But I certainly believe that Fox News definitely has an agenda and a bias. But then again so does every other news source as well. I don't agree with Fox on most things, but I am not going to single them out as the only news channel that operates that way.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:Fascinating... by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      If an "opinion" is based on facts that are entirely made up or just incorrect, that opinion is certainly "wrong." This notion that an idea is impervious to facts merely because it is an "opinion" is not only incorrect, it's fucking stupid.

      What Fox News does is attempt to muddy the waters between opinion and fact so that the dim-witted clowns of the earth will defend outrageous misrepresentations and lies about incontrovertible facts. Clearly this strategy has been incredibly successful.

    15. Re:Fascinating... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you say, however the notion that Fox News is alone in doing this is what I was trying to dispell.

      I think Fox is doing exactly what you claim, but so is MSNBC, CNN, etc. - Fox certainly doesn't have a monopoly on quasi-yellow journalism or not getting all the facts correct. (But they certainly do it well,possibly even the best.) I just try hard not to fall into the trap where things I don't agree with are "wrong" and things I do agree with are "right".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  5. Do they really understand what they are saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are they just parroting back what the teacher is saying?

    1. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Froeschle · · Score: 4, Informative

      They actually know the point of what they are saying. My birds know our names, say thinks like "thank you" when they want something, "night night" when they want their cage covered, "hello" when the phone rings, "water" when they want to be sprayed, and say "don't bark" when my dog barks.

    2. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Even my cat has mastered stuff like that. He knows his name or that it means I want his attention, and "treats" and "food" and "shutup". He also will stand near whatever he wants solved and cry. By that I mean stand near a dirty litter box and cry for it to be cleaned, or food bowl that is empty or closed door. Meaning he at the very least understands that getting my attention when something is wrong can solve it. Which as simple conditioning goes seems pretty reasonable for a cat to get.

      He cannot make new stuff up, but this simple level of communication seems common among animals. I wonder how many humans can't do any more than that anyway.

    3. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You would be surprised. my 3 year old mental experiment cat recently started playing fetch. She would go and get a small cat toy and bring it to you. if you throw it away she goes to get it and brings it back.

      Nobody trained it, it learned it by watching the dog and decided... that looks fun.

      Animals can come up with new solutions. I have seen dogs try something new to get to a bit of food under a table.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good for you! This typically means you have above average intelligence. The average dog can learn a vocabulary of over two hundred words. The average cat somewhat less, but close. Parrots can easily master double that.

      I've had complete conversations with my cat in the past. Did he understand every word? No. Did he understand enough to comprehend the discussion. Yes.

      Many people confuse comprehension with active use. I'm constantly amazed at sites with so many so-called intelligent people, who in the past will rush to assure you these animals are simply mocking and are incapable of comprehension or anything other than brainless, dumb parroting. For anyone who has attempted to learn a second language, its much the same. Its also like speaking to a young child. You can frequently understand more than you can verbalize yourself. Likewise, many young children understand the parent far better than the child itself can communicate back.

      I've even had discussion with people who assured me its impossible for an animal to communicate because, after all, their animal doesn't understand anything. I'm forced to remind them that if they treat their children like dumb animals and only communicate by screaming and beating them, they'll quickly have dumb children which will rival the stupidity of their animals.

      Many animals are surprisingly intelligent and capable of rather rich communication so long as the owner takes time to teach AND LEARN. Commonly cats are thought of as extremely unintelligent. Every time I've encountered this, its always been the owner who has been extremely dumb and unintelligent, incapable of communication. I say this because people rush to forget, or refuse to acknowledge, many animals perform much of their communication with body language. This is especially important for animals like cats. For example, I could tell my cat I wanted to roughly play by turning by body sideways, puffing my body, and slowly progressing toward him. Oddly enough, this is the same language they use with each other and what he used with me. Its funny as hell for a human to do, but it communicates everything to a cat.

      If you own an animal of moderate or higher intelligence and make no effort to both teach it your language and learn theirs, you don't live with a pet - you simply cohabitate with an animal; to which it can make the same claim.

    5. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by eclectus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know a parrot that has put together new phrases to describe objects that he is unfamiliar with. He enjoys having water misted or sprayed lightly on him, and will ask for a 'shower'. However, he dislikes being outside in the rain. whenever he hears or sees rain outside, he proclaims 'bad shower' but was never taught that. he uses the same tonal inflection that he uses when he calls the dog over then says 'bad dog. go lay down'. He can be a jerk sometimes.

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    6. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by residieu · · Score: 1

      We have a cat that likes to play fetch and we don't even have a dog for him to have learned from.

    7. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      he uses the same tonal inflection that he uses when he calls the dog over then says 'bad dog. go lay down'. He can be a jerk sometimes.

      Does the dog listen to the parrot?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    8. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Same here. My male cat will fetch a balled up soda straw wrapper, etc and drop it in your hand, ready for you to throw it again.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    9. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      It seems the cat has conditioned you well.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    10. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Quite true. The same way a baby conditions its mother to change its diaper, etc.

    11. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say this because people rush to forget, or refuse to acknowledge, many animals perform much of their communication with body language. This is especially important for animals like cats. For example, I could tell my cat I wanted to roughly play by turning by body sideways, puffing my body, and slowly progressing toward him. Oddly enough, this is the same language they use with each other and what he used with me. Its funny as hell for a human to do, but it communicates everything to a cat.

      Nice one. My favorite is the slow but strong "eye squinting" move. It's a form of "I'm comfortable with you and feel good in your presence."
      The same move, but turning away while at the peak of the squint is "I feel good about you, but I'm not in the mood to talk."

    12. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Denogh · · Score: 1

      I had a cat that would do that, but only while I was trying to sleep. She would jump up on my chest, drop a jingly cat toy and bat at my face until I threw it for her. If I was dumb enough to throw it, she would repeat the process until I eventually tired of it and stashed the toy in my nightstand.

    13. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      This is especially important for animals like cats. For example, I could tell my cat I wanted to roughly play by turning by body sideways, puffing my body, and slowly progressing toward him. Oddly enough, this is the same language they use with each other and what he used with me. Its funny as hell for a human to do, but it communicates everything to a cat.

      Ha! Me too! Unfortunately, I have nothing on my cat's version of it, which is to pop like a piece of popcorn in the air to about chest level and let out this horrendous "barking" sound that he could only have learned because he was the "tester cat" for dogs at the pound for a while. It's downright demonic, but he sure didn't learn that from me, and he's sure trying to communicate (chase me, or get the laser, or wtf have I been ignored all day?)

    14. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      We need to know this. If that's the case, the two can become symbionts, and I don't have to hire someone when I go on vacation. Parrot orders the dog around, so he's getting fed and watered, and the dog can let itself out. Exercise? We just repeat eclectus's parrot's method, 40 times daily.

    15. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      One of our cats likes to play fetch - usually with something like a rubber band - but when she tires of returning the toy to me she will drop it in my wife's lap as if to say "Your turn now". The other one is bone lazy and likes nothing more than to sit on my shoulder, like a parrot (there! I got back on topic.)

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    16. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      my cat appears to understand quite a lot of verbal communication and has her own tone and pitched responses depending on what i'm trying to communicate.

      normally, when i say "you've already been fed" she has a sulky meow and looks away from me.

      she also has a very specific meow when she greets me, to when she wants to play, when she is hungry, and when she is letting me know she is lying in the middle of the floor so i don't step on her by accident (as in, if i'm not looking, i can tell she is in the middle of the floor by the tone she uses, as its very different to the typical greeting).

      most cats i've had communicate through body language, this is the first cat that doesn't bother with body language and just vocalists what she wants 90% of the time.

    17. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by thunderclap · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. I knew a woman whose parrot would imitate the sound of the front door, followed by "Honey, I'm home" (a perfect imitation of her husband.)

      The parrot would also imitate the sound of a telephone ring, and sometimes someone answering it. It caused much confusion in the household.

    19. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      youtube! please!

    20. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Well, being a cat, he never does it when I want him to. However, not wanting to disappoint, here's a video of him feeding himself.

    21. Re:Do they really understand what they are saying? by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      haha.. that's great, thanks! The most interesting thing my cat does is stare directly at a wall from about 2 inches away.. for hours.

  6. Words, Not Communication by Slider451 · · Score: 2

    Parrots learn words but not language. Associating words with rewards through Pavlovian training is not communication. Clearly spoken gibberish is still gibberish.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why the hell does someone always try to bring Obama into the discussion?

    2. Re:Words, Not Communication by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must be unfamiliar with Alex the Grey Parrot. He could combine abstract concepts like "blue" and "truck" to correctly identify a toy he had never seen before as a "blue truck".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Words, Not Communication by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      I would think the parrots would disagree. They already associate sounds with ideas ("I want sex", "watch out!") In various forms, and words are just sounds with meaning in the same sense. We might train parrots to associate our words with our meanings (pavlovian training), but that isn't stopping them from using our words for their own meanings.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    4. Re:Words, Not Communication by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      To be fair, African Greys are the top of the top.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Words, Not Communication by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      There's been research showing parrots' use of words can be a good deal more sophisticated than Pavolvian conditioning: check out Alex the research parrot. I don't claim this rises to the level of true language as humans use it, but neither do I think it's appropriate to dismiss it as simple stimulus/response.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    6. Re:Words, Not Communication by Manax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Parrots and other birds are trained very poorly via Pavlovian conditioning. That isn't the only type of training, and Model-Rival training works much more effectively on birds (which isn't to say anything about how it works on other animals).

      --
      "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
    7. Re:Words, Not Communication by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Even better than Norwegian Blues?

    8. Re:Words, Not Communication by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Alex was a special case. He had received decades of organized schooling from scientists, who I'd like to think make better teachers than birds.

      You can be sure that the birds in this article are just mimicking sounds.

    9. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the Norwegian Blue. Lovely plumage!

    10. Re:Words, Not Communication by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I stand corrected. Thanks.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    11. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we're hoping for a change?

    12. Re:Words, Not Communication by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Equating sounds with canned meanings falls short of communicating. To rise to the level of language, the birds would need to string multiple words together in a way they had never heard before, and have other birds understand their meaning.

      Some lab animals have come close in the past, but that's not what's happening here.

    13. Re:Words, Not Communication by ATestR · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. We have an African Grey, and while Shredder (name earned from an annoying habit) doesn't have Alex's vocabulary, the words he/she does use are used appropriately. E.g.: The phone rights, and as you pick up, the bird says "Hello" before you do. You head to the stairway to call the kid down for school, and you here the kid's name before you say it. The funny thing is that you can't make the bird say anything... but you can't stop it from repeating words that it wants to say.

      --
      âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    14. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure about that.. Isn't learning nouns pretty closely related to conditioning. When parents point at something and say the word for it, they are essentially presenting a stimulus, while saying a word. After some time, the infant starts thinking of the stimulus when hearing the word, and starts thinking of the word when presented with the stimulus. Isn't that learning by conditioning?

    15. Re:Words, Not Communication by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1
      I speculate wildly, but would it be even remotely possible that if a talking parrot like Alex were released into the wild, found a mate and had chicks, that then the chicks would be taught to use language just as Alex did?
      Wouldn't it be cool that if you were lost in the jungle sometime, you could ask the local parrots for directions?

      I call on Dr. Pepperberg to perform this next phase of the experiment in inter-species communications!

    16. Re:Words, Not Communication by Manax · · Score: 2

      Irene Pepperberg (the linguist that trained Alex, among others) talks about it extensively, and uses it predominantly. Wikipedia has some articles on it, and The Alex Studies (which is a collection of papers on her parrots, how they were trained, what linguistic skills they demonstrated in particular tests) talks about it in significant detail. It's a great book if you're into that sort of thing... ;)

      --
      "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
    17. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can lead a horse to water but the only thing you can make it do is drown. Same with a bird. I think a good throttling would make it shut up in a hurry.

    18. Re:Words, Not Communication by eclectus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or when he asked 'what color Alex?'. He knew many colors, but no one taught him the color grey. That showed comprehension as well as self awareness.

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    19. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parrots learn words but not language.

      Research clearly proves you completely wrong. Period.

      Parrots can not only learn language, they are capable of very complex language, and can even create new words, based on the vocabulary they know and new contexts. Their ability to do so pales in comparison to primates. Nonetheless, they are capable for higher language and communication skills which are frequently only associated with humans and primates.

      I will say, research does indicate not all parrots are capable of such language skills and its thought that its the exception (very intelligent parrots) rather than the rule. Nonetheless, your rigid rule is known to completely wrong.

    20. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell does someone always try to bring Obama into the discussion?

      Obama has nothing to do with talking parrots.

      The parrots don't need a teleprompter.

    21. Re:Words, Not Communication by dwreid · · Score: 1

      Actually that's not true. Some grey parrots in particular have shown the ability to use language, combing words correctly to describe things they have never seen before.

    22. Re:Words, Not Communication by mbone · · Score: 1

      He had received decades of organized schooling from scientists, who I'd like to think make better teachers than birds.

      Why ? I think that Dr Pepperberg would say it took a decade or so just to figure out how to teach him at all, which is a disadvantage the birds wouldn't have.

      Flocks are social constructs, highly organized. They can include birds from other species (show me a human tribe that does that). That alone says that there is some active learning going on.

      More to the point, however, if these flocks can start usefully communicating with the humans that they interact with, there will be very strong evolutionary pressure to improve the communication. That is what I see as the real significance here.

    23. Re:Words, Not Communication by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      then the chicks would be taught to use language just as Alex did?

      I understand Alex had years of instruction. Do African grey chicks stick around with the family unit?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:Words, Not Communication by Megane · · Score: 1

      More to the point, however, if these flocks can start usefully communicating with the humans that they interact with, there will be very strong evolutionary pressure to improve the communication. That is what I see as the real significance here.

      Great. Now instead of pigeons keeping to themselves and waiting for people to throw bread at them, we'll get urban parrots running up to us screeching "Awwwk! Gimme some bread, man!"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    25. Re:Words, Not Communication by smelch · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Dr Pepperberg

      Wait.... really? I thought Dr. Pepper was already Kosher, why did the Jews make their own version?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    26. Re:Words, Not Communication by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Flocks are social constructs, highly organized. They can include birds from other species (show me a human tribe that does that).

      Any tribe with dogs or horses.

    27. Re:Words, Not Communication by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      The concept that humans alone, or only primates have language or self-awareness is simply false. Dolphins, apes/chimps, cats, dogs, and clearly even some birds have (or can learn) language and cognitive skills that clearly demonstrate capacities far beyond what they've been taught. That animals learn human languages more effectively than humans learn animal languages suggests one or more of several things:

      1. That something about the nature of human languages actually promotes abstract thought.
      2. Animals are better students than humans.
      3. That humans are better teachers than animals.

      Ever watch a raccoon figure out how to get into a closed box or can? Ever watch a squirrel figure out how to get food from a squirrel resistant bird feeder? Ever seen a dog accidentally ring the doorbell, then train himself to do it on the first try every time he wants in? Ever see someone have a conversation with a cat, IN CAT LANGUAGE? Ever see a cat or dog recognize images of dogs, cats, or mice on TV? Ever see a cat look in a mirror and groom himself? I've witnessed all of those things.

      It's mighty arrogant of us humans to think we're the only species with language, abstract thought, logic, or self-awareness. There is simply too much evidence to the contrary. Our abilities may be more developed than those of other species, but those abilities are definitely not exclusive to humans.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    28. Re:Words, Not Communication by Tickety-boo · · Score: 1

      Now I've got "Bjorn under a bad sign" stuck in my head. Thanks....

      --
      Reading made Don Quixote a gentleman. Believing what he read made him mad.
    29. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you replying to that mentions grey/

    30. Re:Words, Not Communication by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      My mom has a cat, but that doesn't mean they're on equal footing. (The cat is in charge.)

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    31. Re:Words, Not Communication by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      Less beautiful plumage, more Vooming.

    32. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The conventional wisdom is that African Greys are the best speakers among parrots. But the truth is, there's not nearly enough information to be certain of that.

    33. Re:Words, Not Communication by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Don't forget cats. Cats catch rats.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    34. Re:Words, Not Communication by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I dont suppose you could explain Alex, the infamously descriptive grey parrot?

    35. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not doubting the intelligence of your bird, but the examples you mentioned could be rote memorization. For example, every time you pick up the phone after it rings you say "hello", the bird notices that and is repeating the memory. Not exactly the same as the bird greeting a stranger with the word "hello". Alex the parrot, was able to use words in correct combinations to describe new things it had never seen before, thus eliminating the possibility that it had memorized the correct responses.

    36. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can include birds from other species (show me a human tribe that does that)

      Dogs, cats, birds, rats, mice, hamsters, fish...

    37. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panama Reds blow them all away.

    38. Re:Words, Not Communication by sjames · · Score: 1

      So no true wild bird?

    39. Re:Words, Not Communication by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Sorry to take this a bit offtopic, but you asked for it.
      Working animals have been used throughout history for mutual benefit, and communicating with words (though not language).

      Your main point, though, is agreeable :)

      --
      What?
    40. Re:Words, Not Communication by sjames · · Score: 1

      How does that compare to IT managers repeating buzzwords when they either don't know the meaning or the word is actually meaningless in that context?

    41. Re:Words, Not Communication by Narmi · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should ask Shredder to help you with your spelling.

    42. Re:Words, Not Communication by HermDog · · Score: 1

      Parrots learn words but not language. Associating words with rewards through Pavlovian training is not communication. Clearly spoken gibberish is still gibberish.

      There's no better proof of that than the interwebs.

      --
      JADBP
    43. Re:Words, Not Communication by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      er, if the bird portrays meaning in the noises it makes, that's communication. you're trying to demonstrate the difference between low level communication and complex structured language.

      also, why the requirement to have other birds understand their meaning? bird communicate all the time to each other and often with very clear meaning, just because they don't use "human words" doesn't mean they don't communicate?

    44. Re:Words, Not Communication by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      its exactly the same, but its much easier to dismiss animals as not having similar thought function as humans (unable to think as abstractly as we can, but not completely void of abstract thought either.) so we can justify slaughtering millions a year.

    45. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can include birds from other species (show me a human tribe that does that).

      Any tribe which has dogs, cattle, cats, horses, chicken, or any other form of domestic animal.

    46. Re:Words, Not Communication by Polo · · Score: 1

      Although the wild parrots are most likely learning to mimic the escaped parrots, parrots can indeed learn language, not just sounds.

      I wonder if Alex the famous african grey escaped and taught wild parrots, if he could teach concepts as well as sounds.

    47. Re:Words, Not Communication by Wyvern2005 · · Score: 1

      Parrots learn LANGUAGE..if you are persistent in training. Haven't you ever seen Alex?
          I have a Congo African Grey just like him, and I can guarantee you he's not mimicing...he has whole conversations with me when I don't pay enough attention to him.

      --
      Oops..was I supposed to push that button?
    48. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fairly well known that parrots imitate to fit in. They also know to associate things, such as greeting someone, with certain expressions -- which they do even without being able to imitate human speech. Who's to say they don't have some expression for, say, feathers, or faeces, already; one that'd be substitutable with "down" or "crap".

      That's communication. Though it certainly won't be language as humans use it. But then, a bird's brain is far smaller and less connected than a human's.

      It isn't particularly remarkable either; wild mynah birds have imitated man for millennia. Parrots aren't learning to discuss preening with you or anything.

    49. Re:Words, Not Communication by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I understand Alex had years of instruction. Do African grey chicks stick around with the family unit?

      Not only do they stick with the family unit, but pretty much all parrots tend to stay in their family flock. Parrots are mostly highly territorial. Flocks will take on birds from outside, though, if they look enough like them. Some birds are more accepting than others, with the smaller birds seeming to be more tolerant of other subspecies. Amusingly, the birds' demeanor largely follows their coloring, with the brightest birds being the most feisty. We have a female Sun Conure and she is a horny and inappropriate little thing who you can't scratch behind the head any more because she "presents". Lots of pics of this particular type of parrot cuddling with other parrots, especially the Jenday conures, who look just like them but with very slightly less color variation.

      I just watched a documentary on animal intelligence which had a very good segment on Alex. Unfortunately, if there were a segment on my memory, it would be short and depressing, so I'm not sure what it was called. One thing that struck me is how crap his environment was. He was in this bare, too-small cage in the middle of a lab with no concealment and too few toys. They put way too much emphasis on a sterile environment (as if parrots naturally lived in one) and not enough on comfort. From stuff I'd read about Alex previously it often seemed like he was depressed by his surroundings. We're talking about a very intelligent being here, one who clearly has their own feelings and thoughts, and the way he was treated was repugnant.

      Er, anyway, that was a diversion... point is, Alex had picked himself and that's usually a sign of a bored and lonely parrot. They are social creatures who hang out together and very much spend their time with their parents. One cool piece of media you could watch is The Parrots of Telegraph Hill, which is about one flock of parrots in San Francisco and a man who has been involved with them. They're not talkers but besides being fairly interesting in its own right it also provides some useful insight into parrot flock structure and behavior.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:Words, Not Communication by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Every time one gets hit by a car, you'll have a dozen bird-lawyers harassing you. Our only defense is to teach them no latin.

    51. Re:Words, Not Communication by black+soap · · Score: 1

      I knew a woman with an african gray (actually found it on the street, apparently an escapee), who had been on his own for a while and stopped talking. Besides having an annoying habit of ripping the kitchen to sawdust (caused $10K+ damage), he wasn't confident in his talking, so he would wait until other people were talking before he practiced. As soon as you stopped talking, he would stop. When you start talking again, he would chatter away, or whisper or mumble. This is even more distracting than it sounds.

      He also made a pretty cool "Bong!" noise, that sounded just like a big wood block being struck. Randomly. Whenever he thought it was too quiet.

    52. Re:Words, Not Communication by black+soap · · Score: 1

      It reflects poorly on the IT managers who are only capable of proto-language.

    53. Re:Words, Not Communication by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Where to abstract nouns come in?

    54. Re:Words, Not Communication by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Alex was a special case. He had received decades of organized schooling from scientists, who I'd like to think make better teachers than birds.

      You can be sure that the birds in this article are just mimicking sounds.

      Alex was not a special case, excepting that he was the first to demonstrate that what we were wrong in what we thought the limits were. Dismissing Alex because he got years of education that other birds didn't get avoids the reality of what he represents. That education produces better results in communication and thinking skills isn't really all that surprising, in humans. What Alex demonstrated was that the abilities of non-humans can reach significantly higher levels than we ever thought was possible. Dr. Pepperburg is still working with Alexs flock mates, and produces similar results from them without the "decades" of training. This is not unlike humans, there is certainly a variation in what each individual is ultimately capable of, but if you don't know that a human is capable of math, you don't try to teach them, once know that the bar is higher then you strive for it, and, like human education, as you understand how to communicate with the student more, you can educate them faster. The systematic approach to teaching Parrots, particularly Greys, produces faster results, I'm sure, but that doesn't mean that the birds don't teach each other, they most assuredly do.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    55. Re:Words, Not Communication by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Parrots and other birds are trained very poorly via Pavlovian conditioning. That isn't the only type of training, and Model-Rival training works much more effectively on birds (which isn't to say anything about how it works on other animals).

      I agree - and, although Alex was trained with Model Rival techniques, I prefer operant conditioning with my Macaws and Greys because of speed, each of our guys seem to get the idea faster with a target and click. Considering that I seem to be able to teach the physical behaviors better than verbal ones, I have to admit that I'm missing part of the puzzle.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    56. Re:Words, Not Communication by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Nice. Then they should have ample opportunity to help each other learn. Maybe somebody will get a MacArthur grant to go (out to the wilds to) teach all the parrots of the world how to communicate with humans.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    57. Re:Words, Not Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when he asked 'what color Alex?'. He knew many colors, but no one taught him the color grey. That showed comprehension as well as self awareness.

      When I lived in Brazil as a Christian missionary kid, we had an amazon parrot. His name was Selva - which in portuguese menas forest or woods. He was an evangelist and loved storms. When the wind was blowing and thw limbs swaying, his eyes would get orange/red and he would sing Cristo salva, cristo salva ,salva o pecador. Which means... Christ saves the sinner (Reference is the New Testament book John 3:16 -17). He woul call out to mom "Dona Eleanor!" when people came to the front of the house to visit........ memorie......... Joanna Faith

  7. My birds do this too by Froeschle · · Score: 1

    I have noticed this with my quaker (monk) parrots. I have had sets of two over the past 25 years and what the two birds I have today was actually originally tough to previous birds I once had. It seems that they teach each other much like children teach children's games to one and other.

    1. Re:My birds do this too by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      It seems that [parrots] teach each other much like children teach children's games to one and other [sic].

      Parrots (and even chimps) only mimic. They do not actively teach.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:My birds do this too by mbone · · Score: 1

      Parrots (and even chimps) only mimic. They do not actively teach.

      You obviously don't have much experience here.

    3. Re:My birds do this too by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Parrots (and even chimps) only mimic. They do not actively teach.

      You obviously don't have much experience here.

      He is just parroting what he has heard on the subject.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:My birds do this too by Calydor · · Score: 1

      You know with infallible certainty that the activities being mimicked are not being performed with the exact intention of having them mimicked?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:My birds do this too by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      They've done some very clever tests, so yes.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    6. Re:My birds do this too by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      citation

    7. Re:My birds do this too by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    8. Re:My birds do this too by cusco · · Score: 1

      I don't have experience with birds, but I've seen dogs teach each other things, some of them fairly abstract. One of the oddest was that we taught our beagle to sit on the rug a few feet away while we ate dinner, and then rewarded him with a bite of whatever we were eating. When we brought home our calato (Peruvian hairless dog) he immediately taught her the proper dinner time protocol, we never had to teach her a thing.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  8. Parrots and Washoe by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Parrots have been observed teaching other adult parrots to talk, so I'm not sure what's more amazing about Washoe. Unlike chimps, the wild parrots learned as well.

  9. I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    Have parrots successfully passed the Turing test... this seems like very much the same approach as cleverbot... robottically repeating sounds and phrases that it once heard without any read understanding of meaning

    1. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have parrots successfully passed the Turing test... this seems like very much the same approach as cleverbot... robottically repeating sounds and phrases that it once heard without any read understanding of meaning

      It also sounds disconcertingly similar to most Republicans I've met...

    2. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by mbone · · Score: 1

      People that keep parrots (as I do) tend to be very impressed with their intelligence, although it is different from ours. They tend to have a fine understanding of people's emotional states, are very attentive to fine details, and typically can communicate well. I have no doubt that they understand some words and phrases and are not "parroting" much.

      Still, parrots have been living in flocks a long time, and probably don't need human words to communicate within them. If human language catches on, it will be because they are using it to communicate with humans, and such communication in the wild is likely to be pretty simple (go away, or give me some food, things like that), and there may be an element of "parroting" in that.

      BTW, I am not very impressed with the Turing test as a measure of intelligence. (For example, take a person with mid-level Alzheimer's into a social setting. They may understand nothing of the conversation, but as long as they say the right things at the right time, which they frequently can do, everyone thinks that they are doing just fine.)

    3. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0
      similar to most Republicans I've met

      Republicans pass the Turing test? Evidence please!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by Boronx · · Score: 1

      What if Julian Jaynes is right? Then the mere act of living with humans and learning to communicate as they do may change the way a bird thinks, perhaps even give it a sentience of a sort.

    5. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, those Republicans who just parrot what they've heard. Lincoln was the worst of all....

    6. Re:I'm not a parrot... I'm a unicorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far as I know, nobody has given a parrot the Turing test. However, if you look at Irene Pepperberg's published papers, her experimental design means that the birds she works with are dealing with problems much more complex than the primates in the studies of a couple of decades ago. In addition, Pepperberg's experiment design is much more rigorous.

  10. Washoe is amazing by jgtg32a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of Washoe's caretakers was pregnant and missed work for many weeks after she miscarried. Roger Fouts recounts the following situation:
    "People who should be there for her and aren't are often given the cold shoulder--her way of informing them that she's miffed at them. Washoe greeted Kat [the caretaker] in just this way when she finally returned to work with the chimps. Kat made her apologies to Washoe, then decided to tell her the truth, signing "MY BABY DIED". Washoe stared at her, then looked down. She finally peered into Kat's eyes again and carefully signed "CRY", touching her cheek and drawing her finger down the path a tear would make on a human. (Chimpanzees don't shed tears.) Kat later remarked that that one sign told her more about Washoe and her mental capabilities than all her longer, grammatically perfect sentences."[22]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washoe_%28chimpanzee%29
    Damn, that's incredible

    1. Re:Washoe is amazing by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed the section of the Nim Chimpsky project where they tried to replicate Washoe's success in a scenario that almost sounds like a human classroom. Dismal failure.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    2. Re:Washoe is amazing by UncHellMatt · · Score: 1

      I've read the book by her handler, Roger Fouts, about Washoe and the other chimps he worked with.

      Much as I am a proponent of medical research going forward, I can't help but feel strongly that testing on chimps/great apes is one of the biggest mistakes we could possibly make.

    3. Re:Washoe is amazing by snowgirl · · Score: 0

      No, chimps don't produce tears, but humans do, and the ASL sign is a mimic of a tear coming down the face. The arbitrary nature of the sign means that Washoe would have signed a fake tear no matter what the capabilities of her species is, because otherwise she wouldn't have been signing the sign for "CRY".

      Also, no chimp has learned syntax of language. Yes, they learn some signs, and can then express some limited ideas, but they put them in random orders until their desires are met. "TICKLE ME ME ME TICKLE TICKLE TICKLE ME TICKLE TICKLE ME ME ME." is one particular expression that I'm reminded about reading that they would make.

      I don't doubt that there are people who told their dog/cat that they had a miscarriage, and project a response from the dog that makes them believe that the dog/cat actually understood what happened.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    4. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we ask the stinking apes first?

    5. Re:Washoe is amazing by Rogerborg · · Score: 0

      Damn, that's incredible

      Sure is!

      Say, my cat can do differential calculus, when nobody else is around.

      If you want me to believe your monkey tale, don't call me a liar.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you believe that out of 350+ known expressions, the chimp chose the one appropriate response... by chance?

    7. Re:Washoe is amazing by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the lady telling the chimp of her miscarriage was perceptibly sad or emotional? I have no doubt that she could have told a dog that her baby died, and the dog would have acted noticeably sympathetic (as dogs do). Signing 'cry' may have been simply a recognition of the person's emotional state, rather than an abstract reasoning process ('her baby died... it's sad when babies die... I'll sign 'cry' in sympathy).

    8. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      SchrÃdinger, is that you?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that those other retards who answered to this comment *still* have the same mindset of humans being the oh-so-special superior "chosen ones" that was previously the motivation for:
      - "Earth is the center of the universe!"
      - "Animals don't have feelings!" (Seriously! People thought they were like empty automatons, and not actually really alive.)
      - The "master race".
      - "Black people are just a kind of animal. They are not real people."
      - "Humans are chosen by god!"
      - "There in no life in this universe, except for us!"
      - "Humans are not animals! They are something higher!" (Yes. We. Are. Animals.)
      - "We are the only species who can do X" (And then we found out, we weren't.)

      Everyone repeat after me: We are not special! We are not different! We are just another animal that traded being better (but not as much as we think) in particular skill (brain power) against being good in just about any other skill (our senses are shit, we have no claws, sharp teeth, poison stings, etc, we are weak [a chimpanzee can pull 800kg]... if it weren't for our brain power, we'd be at the losing end of natural selection in nearly every aspect).

    10. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogs and cats are smarter about pregnancy that you obviously think, with your limited, armchair psuedo-psychomological views.

      Animals live in a different sensual world than ours. These rely on scent like we rely on sight. While they may not be able to ponder the state of things, they comprehend pregnancy, childbirth, and lineage, as those things actually DO matter to them as much as eating, drinking, and the smell of poop. Animals can smell the sadness on a person through pheromone output. They can also smell the hormonal imbalance of a miscarriage. In fact, I would challenge you to find a dog that DIDN'T offer its sympathies to an owner that just had a miscarriage.

    11. Re:Washoe is amazing by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      If the woman looked like she was going to cry, "CRY" would have been a natural sign for the chimp to make, regardless of whether she understood the human's emotional state or empathized with it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:Washoe is amazing by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      It would certainly be interesting to know what the response would have been to other short sentences that included the word "died" since that word is so heavily associated with negative emotions. Something where the response of being sad would be unusual like "the poison made all the bad bugs die". It's also hard to tell how much was based on language and how much was based on Washoe reading the caretakers other emotional cues. I don't dispute that this chimp had some amazing abilities that withstood rigorous scientific evaluation but I worry when a disproportionate amount of weight is placed on the biased and emotionally loaded stories like this for which there was no control for.

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    13. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be highly unlikely that the chimp randomly decided at exactly that moment to stop giving her the "cold shoulder" without it having something to do with understanding the human's emotional state and empathizing with it. If she hadn't understood at least that much, you wouldn't have expected her to respond at all.

    14. Re:Washoe is amazing by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      You're dealing with an ideology here: "Animals can't think, noway, nohow." It's pointless to present data or logical arguments to these people. Like creationists, they've already chosen what to believe, and interpret all evidence through the filter of that belief; and like creationism, it's a belief deeply rooted in the idea that humans are something distinct from the rest of nature, which makes it almost impossible to overcome in those who choose it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    15. Re:Washoe is amazing by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I once thought that myself, but I simply couldn't ignore the evidence of animal research showing complex reasoning in a variety of animals, sometimes high-level abstract reasoning. First with chimps, then dolphins and parrots and crows and even some cephalopods.

      On the other hand, it might not have had as much to do with respect for evidence as i would like to think, and more to do with growing up and out of the preconceived notions I'd held on to so dearly as a teen.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    16. Re:Washoe is amazing by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      mod up

    17. Re:Washoe is amazing by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it might not have had as much to do with respect for evidence as i would like to think, and more to do with growing up and out of the preconceived notions I'd held on to so dearly as a teen.

      Fair enough, and it may be that OP is young enough to have that excuse (her .sig certainly lends weight to that hypothesis.) But there are plenty of people who are more than old enough to know better who insist on holding on to such beliefs in the face of all evidence to the contrary. This is a problem not limited to questions of animal intelligence, of course.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    18. Re:Washoe is amazing by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's incredible

      Sure is!

      Say, my cat can do differential calculus, when nobody else is around.

      Hey, that's cool, I got this friend who is terrible at diff calc and is always
      asking for my help... can I borrow your cat so I can get him to leave me alone?

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    19. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, did you see the new planet of the apes movie?

    20. Re:Washoe is amazing by thunderclap · · Score: 0

      You are welcome to believe that. and while I recognize that Parrots, dolphins and apes are possibly sentient, I don't believe we are animals anymore than I believe that my toaster will evolve into a microwave one day.
      Lets see:

      - "Earth is the center of the universe!" (disproven)
      - "Animals don't have feelings!" (disproven and emotion is not required to have self awareness anyway)
      - The "master race". (to what are you referencing? Hitler? The KKK? Storm watch? Chairman Mao? All disproven)
      - "Black people are just a kind of animal. They are not real people." (well if humans are animal then this statement is correct. However, I will disagree)
      - "Humans are chosen by god!" (god = deity. Deity = a being up a higher status than a human. This doesn't require omniscience or other powers. Its could simply be significantly advanced. Eg. The current Thor movie. Odin Allfather is a deity as is Thor. But to them and the frost giants, they are simply Asgardians who happen to live in a different part of the galaxy and travel via a Einstein-Rosen bridge they call Bifrost. The Christian God is believed to have created people. Others chose to believe that they appeared over millions of millennia. I think it takes more faith for the second because their is no scientific proof for either)
      - "There in no life in this universe, except for us!" (unknown. We lack the technology and the economic willpower to determine this)
      - "Humans are not animals! They are something higher!" (Name another animal that can do the same things Humans can do like recording their history, destroying their habitat etc. We are something higher. You choose to turn a blind eye to it.)
      - "We are the only species who can do X" (Name another species who can do X. Literally we are the only species who can do X. And that very X also happens to be lying on the surface of the moon. Name any other animal that has been walking on the moon.)
      Everyone repeat after me: Anonymous Cowards are pussies. And thanks to our brain power, it doesn't matter that a chimp can lift 800kg. I can put a 1 g shaped steel jacked bullet though its chest 50 m and watch the 800 kg crush it like a grape.
      The fact that the parrots are training wild ones to repeat words flies in the face of natural selection. What purpose does, hello or phone ring or 'wanta cracker' or Gym, tan, laundry serve in a rain forest? None. So why is it done?
      Don't assume because you hate the idea of people being created that you are right. Science requires proof and for every proof you can produce I can produce one that will tear a hole in it. You are welcome to be an animal. So go be one. Sell your stuff and go live in the forest for as long as you will last. Us humans will continue to learn grow and figure out about life. Because something has to create something.

    21. Re:Washoe is amazing by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      mod down. Way down. and you can go live with Anon in the forest as well.

    22. Re:Washoe is amazing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it might not have had as much to do with respect for evidence as i would like to think, and more to do with growing up and out of the preconceived notions I'd held on to so dearly as a teen.

      For a lot of people, our "right" to fuck up the world and eat animals is based on the notion that we're somehow different than they are. Admitting that it's nothing more than a matter of degrees and biological oddity is too much for their poor little world views to handle, and they would have to reinvent their concept of who they are if they were to admit that they are not substantially different from the other animals on this mudball.

      I eat animals 'cause I'm an animal-eating animal. And my Sun Conure loves chicken.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could have told you that after watching Planet of the Apes.

    24. Re:Washoe is amazing by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Animals live in a different sensual world than ours. These rely on scent like we rely on sight. While they may not be able to ponder the state of things, they comprehend pregnancy, childbirth, and lineage, as those things actually DO matter to them as much as eating, drinking, and the smell of poop. Animals can smell the sadness on a person through pheromone output. They can also smell the hormonal imbalance of a miscarriage. In fact, I would challenge you to find a dog that DIDN'T offer its sympathies to an owner that just had a miscarriage.

      Right... so the animal didn't respond to the person TELLING the animal that they had a miscarriage. I didn't say that the animal couldn't be aware of a miscarriage, I was saying that there are people who would think their dog/cat can understand language when they told their pet that they miscarried.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    25. Re:Washoe is amazing by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it might not have had as much to do with respect for evidence as i would like to think, and more to do with growing up and out of the preconceived notions I'd held on to so dearly as a teen.

      Fair enough, and it may be that OP is young enough to have that excuse (her .sig certainly lends weight to that hypothesis.) But there are plenty of people who are more than old enough to know better who insist on holding on to such beliefs in the face of all evidence to the contrary. This is a problem not limited to questions of animal intelligence, of course.

      Hudurrr.... she said animals don't use syntax, that means she thinks animals can't think.

      My response was two part: "it doesn't matter that chimps don't produce tears for crying. Humans do, that's what the sign for crying is." If they had been talking about a red car, I don't doubt that Washoe would have pointed to her lips, because that's the sign for "red" even though chimp lips aren't red like human lips are. It's an arbitrary sign, and the original author was mistaking signs for pantomimes. "She's signing a tear falling, but they don't have tears!" v_v you're doing it wrong.

      Next, my comment made the point that animals don't have syntax. That doesn't mean that they can't think. I've personally witnessed one of my cats experiment with water, attempting to understand it. She was an insanely intelligent animal, and could totally think. She could not however use syntax. And no other ape except humans has demonstrated an ability to use syntax. They can think, and they do express emotions and thoughts, but they lack syntax. Not thought, SYNTAX.

      Of course, you're already preconceived to read my comment as "zOMG ANIMALS DON'T THINK!!!" because you're already primed to read it as such, because you're so used to dealing with people who refuse to acknowledge that animals do think. But rather, in the future, maybe you could... you know, actually READ what point(s) a person is trying to make, before hoisting a strawman upon them?

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    26. Re:Washoe is amazing by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      So you believe that out of 350+ known expressions, the chimp chose the one appropriate response... by chance?

      Does "arbitrary" mean "by chance"? No. It doesn't. The sign itself is arbitrary. Yes, Washoe chose an appropriate sign, that's hardly surprising, animals have emotions, too, and some can even impart that information to humans. (We know when dogs are angry, and happy. So, duh, animals have emotions.)

      My point, and whole objection to the quote was the author noting that chimps do not produce tears when sad. Well, who fucking cares if chimps don't produce tears when sad/crying. Humans do, and that's what the sign is. The chimp was simply expressing a sign, regardless of if her physiology supports it or not. She's not going to sign "RED" any different, just because her lips aren't red. The signs themselves are arbitrary choices, and Washoe was constrained by the signs as they are already established, they're not going to invent new ones just to suit chimp physiology.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    27. Re:Washoe is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! Your comment is the dumbest and most pointless comment of the week! Here, take your trophy. BIG SHINING TROPHY

      Come back when you got actual arguments.

  11. I think it is simple what we need to do here, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone go out, buy some parrots, teach them all sorts of language, "lose" them, done.

    Pretty soon, we will have parrots the world over saying "quaack, GET OFF MY LAWN, beowulf cluster quaaaack"

    This. Must. Happen.

    1. Re:I think it is simple what we need to do here, by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Not quaack. Arrrr!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:I think it is simple what we need to do here, by skywhale · · Score: 3, Funny

      Teach them "Help! Help! They've turned me into a parrot!"

      --
      :wq!
    3. Re:I think it is simple what we need to do here, by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Okay, that was funny.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:I think it is simple what we need to do here, by HiThere · · Score: 1

      What about "Here, kitty kitty!".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:I think it is simple what we need to do here, by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Clearly that is a winner, although I am still amused by the thought of a bunch of parrots imitating ducks.

  12. That explains a lot... by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 1

    Wandering in the jungle hearing voices.... "Zoom zoom zoom"
    Parrots and TV commercials don't mix...

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    1. Re:That explains a lot... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Years ago, my optometrist had a parrot that they kept in the office. Eventually, the parrot learned how to simulate the FAX machine and appeared to have great fun making the silly humans run over to the FAX machine when nothing was there.

      So you'll be wandering through the jungle and suddenly hear a FAX machine...

    2. Re:That explains a lot... by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      that's almost exactly like how my reoccurring nightmare starts..

    3. Re:That explains a lot... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wild birds are making camera noises because they've been photographed so much. And in a particularly depressing piece of postmodernism, some of them are actually learning to make chainsaw noises. That one gives me a cold, dark feeling in the pit of my stomach.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. European Starlings by emagery · · Score: 2

    While E.Starlings are not as talented at it as other mimics, they can achieve a somewhat 'bad recording' style mimic of the human voice. They're also the ones notorious for producing large undulating clouds in the sky (consisting of thousands if not, in extreme cases, millions of birds.) Point being, I've always wanted to somehow snag a gigantic flock of these birds and train them all to say something creepy like 'i'll get you' before releasing them back into the wild.

    1. Re:European Starlings by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer "Look out below!"

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:European Starlings by emagery · · Score: 1

      Oh absolutely; in the name of brevity, I just went with the first thing that came to mind.

    3. Re:European Starlings by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I've got some mockingbirds on my property that perfectly mimic my landline phone's ring.

      Annoyed the crap out of me until I just learned to stop running back in the house to answer the phone when I heard it ring.

    4. Re:European Starlings by RogerWilco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a nest of Starlings under the roof as a teenager. When the hatchlings started to move around the neighbourhood, you could hear the sounds of DOOM everywhere, as I had been playing that a lot. ;-)

      There were about 6 of them going "ratatatata Boom Psshhh" all the time. It was funny.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    5. Re:European Starlings by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Teach them to 'hum' Flight of the Valkyries - badly. If i were a bird, and didn't wear pants, that'd be what I'd sing.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    6. Re:European Starlings by dorianh49 · · Score: 1

      Wish I had some mod points (haven't seen them in a long time); that's interesting stuff :)

      --
      Gravity is a contributing factor in nearly 73 percent of all accidents involving falling objects. -Dave Barry
    7. Re:European Starlings by Ksisanth · · Score: 1

      I kept a common starling many years ago that had an impressive vocabulary. If only he'd known he was supposed to have a "'bad recording' style", perhaps his cursing wouldn't have been so distinct. He even had a drawl: "Woll shee-ut!"

    8. Re:European Starlings by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

      To be fair, I only just realised there's a great business opportunity here: for a fee teach the starlings to screech the name of a hat or umbrella company.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    9. Re:European Starlings by operagost · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to train a flock of ravens to say, "nevermore".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:European Starlings by HiThere · · Score: 1

      We've got one that does car alarms. And trucks backing up.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:European Starlings by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Electric weedeater.

      Mockingbirds are also fun because of their audacity. Cats just don't know what to do when the bird attacks them.

    12. Re:European Starlings by bishopBelloc · · Score: 1

      Just because I love the word:
      It's actually an unkindness of ravens. I believe flock is just as accurate, but unkindness is more precise.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_collective_nouns_for_birds

  14. Let's hope... by cobrausn · · Score: 1

    None of these parrots escape from homes that frequently watch Jersey Shore. Future generations will despise us.

    --
    How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
  15. I for one... by stazeii · · Score: 1

    Look forward to our new talking parrot overlords.

  16. I had a giant McCaw that had tourets... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    IT was funny as hell in college when I bought that bird that had problems for almost nothing.... $50.00 for a Blue and Yellow giant McCaw is unheard of and he was a nice bird, never bit hard....

    But it would wear a LOT. "fucking watermelons" was one of it's favorite things to say. It's funny for about 3 months. then the damn thing's non stop talking and swearing get's old. it would assemble strange words together as well. I had that bird for 5 years before I found a zoo that would take him and deal with the problems.

    He loved sitting on people and then sqwuak as loud as possible into the ear, then start swearing at you.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I had a giant McCaw that had tourets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my dad was a kid, he lived in a very small town. Sailors came home from world war 2, and there was a pet parrot aboard ship that came home with one of them. It was a nice bird, but its language was very badly polluted. If he took the bird into a saloon, the owner of the bar would, within half an hour, ask him to take the bird outside. It would whistle at girls, and they would smile. Then it would start talking. After half an hour, even the most surly drunks get tired of the non-stop blue air. He didn't want to buy another bird because he didn't want a second bird learning new words from the first. The bird had to stay home. It was a shame. Nice bird, couldn't take it anywhere. It really wanted company (another bird would be best), but there was no way.

    2. Re:I had a giant McCaw that had tourets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a coworker of mine.

    3. Re:I had a giant McCaw that had tourets... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Stories like this make me glad my bird isn't much of a talker. Sun Conures aren't known for talking and the females even less so (I know, I know.) Even so, she has learned to say "erk you, cracker!" She only uses cracker for actual cracker-like things (e.g. chips qualify) and as an insult, not as a substitute for any other words...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I had a giant McCaw that had tourets... by black+soap · · Score: 1

      I've heard stories of parrots kept in cheap bars in Mexico learning to sing in drunken spanish. Loudly. I'm sure it is amusing for a little while.

  17. No surprise by mbone · · Score: 1

    I keep parrots and have been predicting this for some time. The ability to talk is incredibly advantageous in a world increasingly dominated by people, and so there would be a strong selection effect in its favor. Since they can do it, and since there are birds passing between the wild and the human worlds, I would look for this to spread, especially (as the story says) for birds in city flocks.

    1. Re:No surprise by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > The ability to talk is incredibly advantageous in a
      > world increasingly dominated by people

      I'm skeptical that interacting with humans could increase their odds of survival.

    2. Re:No surprise by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical that interacting with humans could increase their odds of survival.

      "Bobby, listen! That bird just said 'hey pretty lady!' Oh, do give it some food!"

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    3. Re:No surprise by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical that interacting with humans could increase their odds of survival.

      "Bobby, listen! That bird just said 'hey pretty lady!' Oh, do give it some food!"

      Or:

      "Hey, look! These wild parrots can talk! Let's sell tickets to tourists instead of clear cutting the forest to raise cattle!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:No surprise by black+soap · · Score: 1

      If they can manipulate your emotions, cause you to perceive them as smart, cute, or friendly, or if they can even make you feel sorry for them, the interaction may be beneficial to them. Cute and fluffy gets protected.

  18. Video, or it didn't happen. by Shandalar · · Score: 1

    I call {{fact}}.

    1. Re:Video, or it didn't happen. by Wild+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I call {{fact}}. I call {{fact}}.

  19. TinTin by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

    I think one of the TinTin/Kuifje comics already used this as a joke, or otherwise it was an early Suske&Wiske. Which means it's from 1960 or before, so nothing new here.

    --
    RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    1. Re:TinTin by ianare · · Score: 1

      In Red Rackham's Treasure, Haddock's ancestor lived on an island and "taught" the parrots his particular manner of cursing. The parrots keep on repeating the words through the generations, the joke being that as Haddock is walking through the forest he gets insulted by the parrots in the manner of his ancestor. The comic is from the 1940's.

      The article mentions that some birds do imitate human sounds that are no longer heard, as learned by their ancestors and passed on. Presumably Hergé had heard of this happening.

    2. Re:TinTin by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought it was TinTin, but I don't have access to any TinTin books right now to check.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  20. NOOOOOOOO!!!!! by tunapez · · Score: 1

    Rise of The Planet Of The Parrots!

    Laugh it up, talking parrots are everywhere. They have infiltrated our sites and our TVs, spreading misinformation and fanbotism in an attempt to undermine the gullible humans.

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  21. Anecdotal evidence by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0
    Anecdotal evidence refers to evidence from anecdotes. Because of the small sample, there is a larger chance that it may be true but unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise unrepresentative of typical cases.

    Also, anecdotal evidence can be inaccurate, sometimes based on anecdotes, second-hand accounts of events or hearsay.

    Anecdotal evidence, which may itself be true and verifiable, can be used to deduce a conclusion which does not follow from it, usually by generalising from an insufficient amount of evidence. For example "my grandfather smoked like a chimney and died healthy in a car crash at the age of 99" does not disprove the proposition that "smoking markedly increases the probability of cancer and heart disease at a relatively early age". While the evidence is true, it does not warrant the conclusion made from it.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  22. Krrck - Don't tame me, bro. by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

    Krrck - Don't tame me, bro.

    --
    Fandroids hate facts.
  23. Well, that could be very entertaining... by Namlak · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Well, that could be very entertaining... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I just had horrible thoughts of walking through a jungle and hearing the Macarena or Friday.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  24. Language is a virus by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    According to William S. Burroughs (and a Laurie Anderson song inspired by him), language is a virus.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  25. Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone seen the cartoon?? I hope the manbird language doesnt transfer. We'll be hearing "suck my balls" everywhere!!

    1. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-XhQjMauCE

  26. Parrot password database by linear+a · · Score: 1

    Since I use my parrot as my password database (she's pretty good at repeating the password if I give her the account name) I better make sure the next generations don't get away from me. OTOH - it's good to know I have a backup system, of sorts, going for my passwords now.

  27. Northern Mockingbirds sing car alarms all night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I live the mockingbirds have taken up the rotating car alarm sound as a mating call. Can be really annoying when one lonely one perches outside your window and sings all night.

  28. Well duh by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    Birds have been proven (by SCIENCE no less) to be fairly intelligent animals, totally not honoring that silly "bird brain" nonsense. Is this surprising to anyone with a minimum of interest in ornithology?

  29. Birds teach Birds to talk all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cockateil has taught my two quakers, and a parakeet to speak. I'm still working on the look out below, but they do say Poopie right before they excrete.

    Man, only if we could get pigeons to learn to talk (yep in NYC).

    Cheers,

    Bill

  30. Here is the book you read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fouts, Roger (1997). Next of Kin: what chimpanzees have taught me about who we are. William Morrow and Company. ISBN 068814862X.

  31. Wild parrot story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend's mother used to feed the wild parrots outside her house in Australia and every day she'd greet them by saying 'encyclopaedia' to try to teach them to say it. But after 6 months of failure, she took to greeting them with 'hello stupid'.

    Move on a few years, and she went walking in a nearby national park when a flock of parrots flew overhead. Hello stupid!!!

  32. "Project Nim" documentary is in the theaters now by peter303 · · Score: 1

    It contains both original fottage from 30 years ago and recent interviews with participants.
    I was amazed with the parallels with Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
    The Nim Project was designed to replicate/test Washoe's results. But its results were used to repudiate ape language. Both experiments had tantalizing result and major procedural flaws.
    Nim like Washoe could read and manipulate human emotions pretty well. But he could not control his own.

  33. Check out by warrax_666 · · Score: 2

    Check out Clever Hans and then ask yourself why people demand extraordinary evidence.

    Personally, I don't think humans are all that special. We're ruled much more by our lower/base instincts than we like to admit. Most of what appears to ourselves like free will appears (from research) to be post-hoc rationalization rather than actual free will.

    --
    HAND.
    1. Re:Check out by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      this! we are just chemical reactions capable processing input and output, and reasoning is just an illusion.

      Like any other animal we have the hardware capable of doing some basic simulations, the scale, and complexity of the simulation is what changes as far as how "animals think" vs "how humans think", but it's fundamentally the same.
      that does however raise some pretty awkward questions about what consciousness actually is though.

    2. Re:Check out by sznupi · · Score: 1
      Though they hardly demand extraordinary evidence from... themselves. To their smart brain, it's just "obvious" how smart we are... but, go through a list of cognitive biases - this is the primary mode of operation for our brains.

      In the topic of rationalisations: "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts"

      Why do people refuse to admit mistakes - so deeply that they transform their own brains? They're not kidding themselves: they really believe what they have to believe to justify their original thought.
      There are some pretty scary examples in this book. Psychologists who refuse to admit they'd bought into the false memory theories, causing enormous pain. Politicians. Authors. Doctors. Therapists. Alien abduction victims.
      Most terrifying: The justice system operates this way. Once someone is accused of a crime - even under the most bizarre circumstances - the police believe he's guilty of something. Even when the DNA shows someone is innocent, or new evidence reveals the true perpetrator, they hesitate to let the accused person go free.
      ...
      Once we hold a position, say the authors, it's almost impossible to make a change.

      Or: how we merely like to convince ourselves about reliability of our memory, how many myths about it & our minds we tend to believe. Not only textbook cognitive biases; also, say, the myth about "monolithic me" while split-brain patients end up virtually unchanged; there's one localized brain trauma which results in people becoming completely blind without them realizing it; popular harmful BS lies of "we're so important, gods love us, more of us live now than have ever lived!" & simply ignoring 100+ billion dead homo sapiens sapiens (at least we will be similarly ignored very quickly, so there's some "balance"); also myths about how decent and freedom loving people we are (a bit sad how our deep need for Just World gets derailed so easily :/ )
      How, when people get older, they tend to start believing myths about the greatness of their youth (not the least because it makes us feel better when faced with "frustrating" reality of how much better in fact it is "now", for most cases of "now") - the "good old times" known in written forms since antiquity and which give tiresome political results (being essentially at the core of anti-liberalism; though, on the other side, it's not that much better, with progressivism too often forgetting about good stuff the past has to offer)

      What's worse, all this while too many people live in a world of absolute right and wrong. With almost total lack of understanding of risk, statistics. Too stupid to connect their votes with the consequences they suffer.

      Ignoring how a good leader is someone who sometimes makes mistakes; who is not perfect but is able to lead in good direction despite the imperfections. Contrast this with the usual rhetoric when people root for their "new mythical hero" and how they present them and their ideologies as perfection. A total BS right at the core of many political movements.

      People believing their position in life is due to merit and hard work (despite most not ever doing anything which could be called "hard"), not understanding how it's largely an accident of birth, viewing the poor as lazy and unworthy of success (a view which eases acceptance of actions that maintain this relative social order). Perpetrating the myths of "land of opportunity" or "American Dream" while the actual metric of this stuff, social mobility, places the US at the bottom of developed countries (at the top are, popularly disparaged, so-called "nanny states")
      People who will only learn new things if it confirms a pre-existing belief.

      Oh, and some of our most lasting

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Check out by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Most of the time we are hardly in a state which our "conciousness" likes to call "concious" - more in a mode which our "mindful" brain would call "mindlessly doing daily chores" which, I suspect, is what being even fairly "low" animal feels like all the time (instead of merely most of the time). We probably also often experience this when dreaming or not-quite-awake; during intensive physical effort; watching TV; maybe when really drunk, too.

      In fact, together with the last one, I often find some weird shit in chat archive, web history, etc.; supposedly remnants of only parts of my brain being semi-functional, before the entirety of them passes out.
      But, sometimes, I almost suspect it is my cat who does this; using those opportune moments to refine her plans of taking over the world.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  34. Cool backup solution by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    Have Dr. Sbaitso read a hex dump of your backups to your parrot an let him go. You'll have redundant backups forever.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  35. Obama had some by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

    They wore for MSNBC now.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Obama had some by matunos · · Score: 1

      They wore what?

  36. Sorry, but no by CyranoDeBergerac · · Score: 1

    Neither Washoe nor any other non-human primate has learnt sign language in any meaningful way -- not anything that stands up to a bit of critical review. They were certainly smart -- smart enough to learn "If I mimic enough of these signs eventually someone will give me a banana". They were also followed around by credulous 'researchers' who were eager to interpret any hand wave as highly significant, and who in fact so credulous that they didn't notice that most of the time the primates were simply mimicking back to them a gesture that they had just made.

    If you want an assessment of how close they were to using sign language, ask someone for whom sign language is a first language to take a look. Without exception, native signers are unimpressed.

    As far as parrots go, they're not learning to talk, or learning words -- they're learning to imitate sounds. There's no difference, as far as the parrot is concerned, between "polly want a cracker" and a squawk.

    There are lyrebirds near where I live which have learnt to make laser sounds from when there was a laser skirmish being run in the bush. Hearing them make laser sounds at each other is amusing, but no-one ever suggests that they have learnt to play laser skirmish from humans and therefore lyrebirds must have the same game-playing abilities as humans.

    1. Re:Sorry, but no by matunos · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed]

  37. Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were flocks of migrating wild parrots in Los Angeles in the 80s that would chatter away; they had been "taught" by escaped/abandoned pet parrots. They were a common landscape feature. What was even spookier was them mimicking car alarms and sirens.

  38. Teaching parrots... by Polo · · Score: 1

    I met someone once who had a cockatiel that talked, and when they got a new bird (a parakeet), they came to find that the cockatiel had taught the parakeet to talk.

    As far as humans teaching parrots, I found a fascinating way of getting them to learn well is a three-way teaching model.

    It's called the Model/Rival technique where the teacher (model) teaches another person (rival) in front of the bird, and the bird learns very fast.

  39. Aliens? by mmlado · · Score: 1

    Someone should teach a few of them, and after let them go, to say: "we come in peace" and "bring me to your leader". :)

  40. Rude Ruby would shame us all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh dear.

    I really hope parrots that swear like Rude Ruby never escape.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJgfAle6TdY&feature=related

    As a matter of fact this bird had escaped once and was insulting people out and about, hence the owner found his parrot again.

    Who says swearing is no good for you ?

  41. Swearing parrots will embarrass all of us by diddy1234 · · Score: 1

    Oh dear. I really hope parrots that swear like Rude Ruby never escape. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJgfAle6TdY&feature=related As a matter of fact this bird had escaped once and was insulting people out and about, hence the owner found his parrot again. Who says swearing is no good for you ?

  42. African grey parrots are intelligent by maple_shaft · · Score: 2

    I own a grey and have been closely monitoring and researching them for awhile now. Some challenge that they are merely simple birds with amusing mimic capabilities however what is discounted is their highly intelligent behavior developed from their unique evolutionary situations. In the wild monkeys try to steal thier eggs so they learn combinations of shrieking tailored to scare a particular monkey away. I see this behavior with my grey telling my dog to "get down" or "leave it" when he starts sniffing around his cage. They spend a lot of time around watering holes foraging and such. they are able to locate threats from reflections in the water and indicate they can identify their own reflection. Dogs do not have this cognitive ability. Further they are experts at cracking complicated nuts making them incredible puzzle solvers. I have given strange nuts and other puzzles to my bird before and noticed him slowly unravelling and breaking it down. They love to tear things apart. Mine has even figured out how to open his lock and roam free around the house.

  43. Hello Cockie by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    They are not the most obstrperous parrot (that is saved for the rainbow lorikeet) but the Sulphur crested cockatoo pictured are a really great confident friendly parrot. They are a pretty big parrot (about 30 - 40 centemeters beak to tail) long lived and very easy to get attached to and very intelligent. I've heard of these bird living up to 90 years so it's possible for them to out live their owners.

    Australia has an amazing population of parrot species sociable birds and extremely entertaining to watch, sometimes I think they are putting a show on or just showing off. Even wild ones are easy to make friends with they are an australian favourite even though they tend to chew through just about anything (that beak could sever a finger quite efficiently) that they feel like. It's amazing just how sentient these birds are.

    Probably the funniest thing to do is to give one of these guys an unshelled macadamia. They can smell how good the nut is but it's really hard for them to break it. Obviously if they learn to talk they would only ask for something to eat.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  44. This is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they do learn to talk. It would be nice to have someone other than ourselves to talk to. Someone who isn't going to try to eat us.

  45. Sure, it's cute now... by matunos · · Score: 1

    ...but wait until this happens with man-birds!