Slashdot Mirror


5 Years In Prison For Selling Fake Cisco Gear

angry tapir writes "A Virginia woman was sentenced Friday to five years in prison for leading a 'sophisticated' conspiracy to import and sell counterfeit Cisco Systems networking equipment. In addition to the prison time, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia also ordered Chun-Yu Zhao, 43, of Chantilly, Virginia, to pay US$2.7 million restitution and a $17,500 fine."

239 comments

  1. Bruce Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't mess with Bruce Lee.

  2. speculating about the real purpose by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm wondering whether there was a deeper purpose to importing counterfeited equipment. If such could be successfully sold into government operations, it could then be used for backdoors if it had been outfitted with modified ICs designed to support that. That the importer was in Virginia normally would not be too important, but Virginia and Maryland being prime areas for government installations makes it more suspicious, if they were going to pose as a local supplier. Then, by cutting their price on bids below normal competitors, they could steer their equipment into specific departments.

    I think they ought to open up some of those counterfeits, spend some money de-capping some chips, and take a good look at what's really in them.

    1. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe she just wanted to make a quick buck like the thousands of other people selling counterfeit goods. Stop watching CSI.

    2. Re:speculating about the real purpose by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Maryland and Virginia aren't just normal government hubs. They're also the center of military, capital, state department and foreign embassies. If she were selling Cisco routers in Farming Field, Nebraska then I agree no red flags. This is a little too convenient a place to sell such devices.
       

    3. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Zhao was working for the Chinese government.

      I could tell you more but I'd end up in Leavenworth.

    4. Re:speculating about the real purpose by colinrichardday · · Score: 2

      In that case, wouldn't it have been better for them to have used genuine Cisco equipment and eat the price difference?

    5. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Virginia would be the stupidest place to try to slip in modified Cisco routers. They'd be sending backdoor encryption keys to the Chinese, not the NSA, and the NSA would certainly notice when their local hacks stopped working.

    6. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      The idea behind counterfeit equipment is to pass it off as the real thing nine times out of ten. Sure it's possible they are marketing it to someone who knows it's fake but at some point that stuff is getting sold as the real thing.

    7. Re:speculating about the real purpose by nacturation · · Score: 1

      They probably asked for genuine Cisco equipment and awarded the contract to the lowest bidder who, unbeknownst to them, used counterfeit products.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Silvermistshadow · · Score: 0

      I once went there. Of course, that was in a video game, as with a lot of things I've supposedly done or experienced (such as performing a kidney transplant)

      --
      Any comments made by the owner of this signature should be disregarded as irrelevant, uninformed, and idiotic.
    9. Re:speculating about the real purpose by MrQuacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They all work for the Chinese Government....

    10. Re:speculating about the real purpose by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      contracts aren't just rolled up, everything is itemeized, if the equipment shows up noticbaly lower than the other proposals someone will notice. And the lowest price doesnt always win, sometimes if the price a company propses is too low it demonstrates a severe lack of understanding the work to be done.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    11. Re:speculating about the real purpose by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because distribution is always restricted to a 100 mile radius of the vendor's location.

    12. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2

      Make a quick buck? How many small-scale counterfeiters can afford to precisely duplicate a circuit board of that size and a rack cabinet to match the rela goods, then manufacture, populate, stuff and test the board? The parts aren't cheap, and some router chips aren't the kind of thing you order from a distributor. it's not something a momma-poppa shop would do. it takes money and effort. There are far easier goods to counterfeit if profit is the main objective.

    13. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      That Maryland and Virginia are one of the centers of administrative aspects of US government does not mean that it's where the gubmint data centers are...

      For example, much of the Air Force's crunching goes on at Maxwell AFB (and the Gunter Annex) in Alabama.

      If someone or something were to take out Gunter Annex, things would stop , Air Force wise.

      For how long? Who knows. But to say it would be an inconvenience is an understatement.

      Without a doubt, Maxwell and Gutner have a big target on them, high on the list.of targets...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    14. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right. Because if the Chinese wanted to sell altered Cisco routers they would have to sell counterfeit Cisco routers. I mean there's no way the Chinese could just alter the genuine ones. For that they would have to be manufacturing them.

      If you're going to be paranoid because she's Chinese, at least think it through.

    15. Re:speculating about the real purpose by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude industrial espionage between governments is as old as time. My grandfather was stationed in Germany and he used to laugh that if the Soviets wanted to take out the German bases all they'd have to do is send one plane at a time as they were ordered not to shoot at single Soviet planes. Why? Because we had a bounty on any Soviet air tech and we wanted to make sure the pilots knew they could just fly across the border and they'd be safe (and well paid). The Russians got us as well, they paid the Chinese for a dud Sidewinder that got stuck in one of their planes and jumped 10 years on their missile tech. According to the Wiki the copy they made of the sidewinder was so perfect you could mix and match parts and it would work perfectly.

      The Israelis stole the plans for the Mirage from the French, the Chinese paid dirt farmers to dig up pieces of our crashed F117 so they could save years in research on stealth tech. It isn't like they are wanting to go to war with us, they are wanting to save billions in R&D. If they could get those routers into the right areas they could have all our best tech before it even rolls out of prototype stage. think about how much money that would save them in research!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:speculating about the real purpose by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      There was a story about a year ago about the military buying hacked routers. I'd bet this is related.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    17. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0

      My mother was stationed in Germany as an Army cryptographic clerk and she used to tell me a funny story about a German couple who approached her asking for eggs in broken English, so she went to the grocery store and bought them a carton of eggs.

      She later realized the the couple were, of course, trying to obtain information about the Army crypto eggs.

    18. Re:speculating about the real purpose by nacturation · · Score: 1

      In the end, we haven't seen the contract, the bids, nor the RFP so there's no point continuing to argue based on assumptions.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    19. Re:speculating about the real purpose by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Conveniently Russia and NATO subs used exactly the same docking rings on their hatches too, iirc.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    20. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      If you are doing man-in-the middle attacks and access hacks, I suspect that owning the equipment that is being used to request the data in question is about as good as owning the equipment being used to send it from the data center. Might even be more useful if it provided ways to more easily associate the data with specific users.

    21. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Given Cisco's history of federal cooperation, I do have to wonder if the deeper concern was that such equipment _lacked_ the backdoors Cisco provides for "legal" monitoring. Some examples are described at http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/03/hackers-networking-equipment-technology-security-cisco.html.

    22. Re:speculating about the real purpose by dila813 · · Score: 1

      I am sure that they got a hold of a lot of these. She was obviously tied in to the military over there.

    23. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2

      http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles2005/2005721212041.asp

      I remembered hearing about this a while ago and this story brought it back to the front of my mind. Interesting if not surprising.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    24. Re:speculating about the real purpose by mattjb0010 · · Score: 0

      there's no point continuing to argue based on assumptions.

      You must be new here.

    25. Re:speculating about the real purpose by aix+tom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it IS entirely possible that these "counterfeit" things came from the exact same production line made by the exact same people that make the Cisco gear. Only they didn't sell it to Cisco, which then would have slapped their sticker on and sold it for three times the price, but just conterfeitet the sticker and sold it for double.

    26. Re:speculating about the real purpose by microbee · · Score: 1

      What government buys their network infrastructure equipment from small businesses? When you guy a router or switch, you are not just buying the hardware, you are buying services and software upgrades.

    27. Re:speculating about the real purpose by satuon · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how difficult would it be to create such a hacked chip. May be designing it and making it work right would involve significant know-how and effort.

    28. Re:speculating about the real purpose by hedwards · · Score: 2

      At least in theory, Cisco products being produced in China are supposed to be monitored by Cisco to make sure that they conform to whatever specs Cisco is paying for. Whereas if they're just counterfeit products, there's no way that Cisco could catch on to whatever trojans might be installed.

    29. Re:speculating about the real purpose by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      >>The Israelis stole the plans for the Mirage from the French,

      humm... no... the Kfir is a perfectly legal and licensed improvment of the Mirage...

    30. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well, it IS entirely possible that these "counterfeit" things came from the exact same production line made by the exact same people that make the Cisco gear.

      True. We saw a program about fake luxury handbags, and my wife said that even the genuine articles are counterfeit these days.

      And of course if you outsource all your operations to them - just fax through a design every month) - it's easy to order extra parts for the "fourth shift" without you even knowing it.

      In that handbag case, the customs man/cop said the materials looked identical, but there were small errors in the stitching etc. Theory was they were ones that had failed QA and someone decided it's be a shame to waste them...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:speculating about the real purpose by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't explain why the counterfeit Cisco gear sucks so badly or why there are some parts and technological differences from the genuine stuff.

      I work in telephony and when customer's DSPs fail the first quesion is if their stuff is genuine. We don't offer support until they replace them. They should have been smart enough to figure out an offer too good to be true probably isn't.

    32. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Tei · · Score: 1

      Most secrets are boring, and only interesting to very few parties. Decent people already use encryption and assume any information on the network can be heard by a third party. It only takes a secretary to have a spyware to have this inside your office network.

      --

      -Woof woof woof!

    33. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He might not be.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They all work for the Chinese Government....

      Well it beats unemployment

    35. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contracts aren't just rolled up, everything is itemeized, if the equipment shows up noticbaly lower than the other proposals someone will notice. And the lowest price doesnt always win, sometimes if the price a company propses is too low it demonstrates a severe lack of understanding the work to be done.

      Well, even if someone is selling fake stuff, so long as they can pass it off as real, they should be charging almost the same as everyone else. If charging too low a price increases the risk of their company being shut down, then they should be factoring it in to their prices. So, if their customers are sophisticated enough to detect that the equipment is fake, then their price for them should be high. An easy way to determine whether or not customers are likely to detect fakes is whether or not they intend to get support from Cisco...

    36. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Genda · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its worse than that. A company orders 10,000 units of product X. You have to manufacture 11,000 units to account for "spoilage" loss, damage in shipment, and the occasional snatch off the freighter to take home to friends and family. The result is you end up with 800 extra at the end of shipment so you either convince the buyer to also purchase the surplus or you sell them to someone who will put a cheapo label on it and sell at wholesale prices.

      In fact, if you can discover the path of production, its one of the very best ways to get a great deal. I picked up a $1,700 guitar, for $150 and the only difference was minor changes in the scroll work to hide the intended brand, and less expensive hardware. Spent a couple hundred on superior hardware and had an exceptional instrument worth over five times what I paid for it.

      The mistake here was trying to get top dollar as a counterfeit. Now a days with the draconian laws that corporations have gotten passed, its a wonder its not a capital offense.

    37. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Pirow · · Score: 2

      What government buys their network infrastructure equipment from small businesses? When you guy a router or switch, you are not just buying the hardware, you are buying services and software upgrades.



      My last job was working for a small reseller with less than a dozen staff, we sold to the police, schools, colleges and yes, the local government.

      The company I worked for had been about for around 30 years selling electronics, cable and electrical components (spurs, switches, plugs, fuses, circuit breakers etc.), we were already on the approved suppliers lists so when we started selling IT kit somebody must have thought "well we're already buying our fuses from them, we may as well buy our servers from them too". The people signing off the purchases are very rarely the same people installing or using the equipment and there's a lot of bureaucracy involved when it comes to getting a supplier approved it's often easier to start buying switches and routers from that company that's been selling you boxes of fuses and resistors. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a lot of small resellers whose main source of income is the local government.
    38. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be sensitive data centers in Maryland and Virginia, but that shouldn't justify a harsher sentence unless she has actually been convicted of attempting the additional crimes that you think might have occurred (basically espionage).

    39. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You might want to look up the "Assassin's Mace". The nearest definition that we seem to have, is "unconventional warfare". It's economic and political warfare, backed by military might. The Chinese have stated, as clearly as possible, that they intend to dominate the United States economically, politically, and militarily within 20 years. About ten years have passed, and they are well down the economic road, politically not so far, and they are indeed working on the military aspect. They actually have a few modern ships, that might be capable of challenging our own ships, one on one - although there is little evidence that they understand strategy, tactics, and fleet operations as well as we do. Likewise with their air power - they now own craft that are capable, in skilled hands, of challenging our best aircraft. The question is, do they have the skilled pilots to operate those craft? That hurdle passed (or not) the next question is whether they grasp the strategic, and tactical use of those aircraft.

      Somewhat like the old Soviet, China takes a longterm view of things. They plan decades in advance. And, if they fail to accomplish their mission in 20 years, nothing prevents them from setting a new goal 10 or 20 years further into the future.

      Compare that to the United States, where we can't plan 4 years ahead.

      I think that ultimately, China will succeed.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    40. Re:speculating about the real purpose by alfredos · · Score: 1

      Cisco sells packaged services. If they cover the need, then the provider is not relevant.

    41. Re:speculating about the real purpose by LordNacho · · Score: 2

      Here's a technical thing I always wondered: if you capture a silicon chip from someone (missiles would have some of those, right?), how do you go about figuring out how it works, and what it's meant to do? Is there a way to figure out the layout of the dopants, or is it a matter of looking at the external connections and making an educated guess? You won't know what voltage it's meant be used at, whether there's a clock, etc...

    42. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'm not into aviation, really, so I can only guess that both you and GP might be right. How about, Israel first stole the plans for that Mirage (GP doesn't say which model, precisely) and built a prototype (or more) then negotiated with France to license an aircraft which they could demonstrate that they had the capability to build - without a license.

      So, today, yes, that plane is legally licensed. But that doesn't mean that the first craft that Israel produced was properly licensed.

      That's all bullshit guessing - but the guesswork is done with their nuclear weapons program in mind. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    43. Re:speculating about the real purpose by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Really? What was all that diplomatic stink and the court case about then?
      We don't actually care that Israel stole technology from the French becuase the USA did the same with the Boeing vs Airbus industrial espionage carried out by a US government agency.

    44. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comments highlights something I've noticing lately - a deep mistrust of Chinese (and possibly Asians) to almost a feeling of loathing in some case. People always seem to carry the impression that the Asians are out there stealing their technology everyday. Coupled with that, I've seen some atrocious jail times for the defendants have been Asian - some with the Ford/GM thing, some with software etc. Literally, the book being thrown a lot more than normal (I know citation needed but it's just a hunch for me).

      With all the "foreign aid" that China gives the US, I would think Americans would be loving the Chinese.

    45. Re:speculating about the real purpose by heypete · · Score: 1

      Conveniently Russia and NATO subs used exactly the same docking rings on their hatches too, iirc.

      I thought that was intentional, to aid in undersea rescue by a DSRV (and their successor craft).

    46. Re:speculating about the real purpose by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Uhhh...guess again friend. The French had an embargo going against Israel and the Israelis had too much tied into the Mirage design to abandon it, so they had the Mossad steal the plans and used the same engines they were getting from the USA in the F4 Phantom.

      So what you have is a bastardized aircraft, with French plans, Israeli tweaks, and American engines. Sorry to burst your bubble but they stole the plane.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Tech contracts often attract a broad range of bid amounts. What is the difference between one company's promise of support and another company's promise of not needing much support? It could easily be 1000%.

    48. Re:speculating about the real purpose by qubezz · · Score: 2

      Check out this link, and remember, that's just some hobbyists, not a determined nation-state.

    49. Re:speculating about the real purpose by jcarr · · Score: 2

      That's quite an assumption.

    50. Re:speculating about the real purpose by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The lawful backdoors are in the software, not the hardware, so that's not it. If the router doesn't run IOS images from Cisco you're going to get real suspicious real quick.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:speculating about the real purpose by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's also been plenty of cases of the factory that makes the real stuff all day spending a couple extra hours making some unauthorized equipment, usually with inferior components since they are cheaper. e.g. crappy capacitors, under-spec resistors, whatever. And of course, it's folly to assume that one company won't sell your plans to another company which wants them, and then claim industrial espionage later.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    52. Re:speculating about the real purpose by LordNacho · · Score: 2

      Thanks dude. That's pretty cool. I also found this link:

      http://www.edn.com/article/457681-IC_reverse_engineering_a_design_team_perspective.php

      Apparently it's standard for big firms to strip each layer and SEM it. Sounds immensely complicated to me. And even when you have the design, how the heck do you work out what it can do? Instruction set and all that? This might be particularly hard to do if it wasn't something that had a manual, like a missile.

    53. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The ones that have been publicly acknowledged are software based, yes. I see the bug report at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00805e3234.shtm as a typical example of Cisco vulnerability.

      But the IOS comes with the hardware, and that could easily be a modified version. I'm not _assuming_ that the IOS is actually lacks Cisco's unpublished backdoors, but it's another potential motive for Cisco and the US government, to be harsh about counterfeit equipment. And with IOS being closed source, and the backdoors being concealed for so long, it's difficult for a typical network administrator to test.

    54. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need counterfeit cisco gear to own the network, regular cisco gear has plenty of holes already.

    55. Re:speculating about the real purpose by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Mark the equipment as being full cisco retail value, eat the cost somewhere else-- possibly in support contract or whatever.

    56. Re:speculating about the real purpose by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Somewhat like the old Soviet, China takes a longterm view of things. They plan decades in advance. And, if they fail to accomplish their mission in 20 years, nothing prevents them from setting a new goal 10 or 20 years further into the future.

      Oblig. erudite Soviet joke:

      Why is psychoanalysis like a 5-year plan?

      You never get there.

    57. Re:speculating about the real purpose by tibit · · Score: 1

      Modified ICs? It's all run by software anyway. No need to modify any ICs for that. Put a backdoor in the firmware and into the bootloader, and you're set. Short of pulling the flash from the board and reloading it yourself you won't ever know what happened. No need for any hardware mods at all.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    58. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      I'm wondering whether there was a deeper purpose to importing counterfeited equipment. If such could be successfully sold into government operations, it could then be used for backdoors if it had been outfitted with modified ICs designed to support that. That the importer was in Virginia normally would not be too important, but Virginia and Maryland being prime areas for government installations makes it more suspicious, if they were going to pose as a local supplier. Then, by cutting their price on bids below normal competitors, they could steer their equipment into specific departments.

      If espionage was your goal, this was a poor way to do it. You *never* want to give the target any reason to suspect you, selling counterfeits is one way to risk getting caught. Let's assume someone has the skills to put a trap door in the software. Rather than put out fakes, take some of the real stuff, compromise it, and sell it through a front company on the cheap. Your target *thinks* they are getting a good deal, the stuff is real so no one suspects it, and you have your in. After a while - fold the front company - which wouldn't surprise anyone since they probably wondered how you could sell it for so cheap. Lather, Rinse, repeat.

      I'm not saying this was or wasn't an attempt at espionage; but if it was it was rather clumsy and poorly thought out.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    59. Re:speculating about the real purpose by tibit · · Score: 1

      Heck, those are sometimes sold in major stores. Walmart used to sell the Victoria's Secret bras, for example, but with different labeling. I compared them side-by-side and they were the same things that must have come from the same factory, put together by the same group of people.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    60. Re:speculating about the real purpose by swalve · · Score: 1

      The idea is that if you are speccing something like Cisco, HP or Dell, it doesn't matter who you buy it from. If it is genuine, the serial number is your key to getting support. If "Joe's Cisco and Pager" storefront shuts down, they just call Cisco and get what they need.

      The smaller outfits can often provide better prices because they have lower overhead. Or they sell the stuff at cost to get a foot in the door. One of my competitors sells HP printers with a 3 year "warranty". HP only gives one year, and this seller covers the other two years themselves. At that point, their techs are "the printer guy" and people start calling them after the "warranty" expires.

    61. Re:speculating about the real purpose by cavreader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US can torpedo the Chinese economy anytime they want. The US represents 30% of China's export market. Sure it would cause short term damage to the US economy but the US imports nothing from China that can not be obtained from somewhere else or produced domestically. And before anyone mentions China "owning" the US because of their bond and security investments should realize that those ownership claims are vastly exaggerated and losing those investments would damage China more than the US. Chinese and American interests are best served by maintaining stable relationships. I have visited a lot of countries and I was surprised by the Chinese society when I traveled there. I found the people friendly and even though they do have to put up with government restrictions in some areas I did not encounter any overt Chinese repression.

    62. Re:speculating about the real purpose by swalve · · Score: 1

      It goes back (at least) to the US world war II propaganda. It was not kind to the "Nips", and that mindset pervades through generations.

    63. Re:speculating about the real purpose by tibit · · Score: 1

      Remember that military technology is usually at least a decade behind what you'd have on your desktop, computing wise. Usually way more behind than that. A Sidewinder misslie is a design from the late 50s. It predates the Apollo program. To reverse engineer that, you need to know analog circuit design and feedback/control theory, and some dynamics. You don't need to know what a CPU is because there isn't one, and whatever ICs are there, if any, have maybe a couple dozen transistors on them. I'm pretty sure even most modern Sidewinders aren't very complex, circuit-wise. There's no gigahertz or even hundred-megahertz clocks anywhere in that missile. You could debug them with a 250MHz scope, and could probably put most of the control and signal processing into a CPU like Propeller, where you can easily directly interface to analog I/O lines by implementing a sigma-delta ADC/DAC in software.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    64. Re:speculating about the real purpose by queBurro · · Score: 2, Funny

      "although there is little evidence that they understand strategy, tactics, and fleet operations as well as we do", 'the art of war' is more than just a Wesley Snipes film.

      --
      sag
    65. Re:speculating about the real purpose by queBurro · · Score: 0

      but say VS (whoever) has really high QA standards and they refuse 10% of what's offered, so VS get the 1st pick and the knock offs on the market are the slightly damaged/rejected stuff? - that's how I'd do it, same factory/same materials but not quite the same quality

      --
      sag
    66. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I've read 'The Art of War'. Perhaps you could remind me of which chapters specifically apply to naval and to air warfare? I seem to have missed those chapters. Surely, you will grant that naval warfare has enabled weaker nations to defeat stronger nations in the past. And, I'm sure that you will also grant that air power has revolutionized all other forms of warfare. Close in ground support is a force multiplier that can make a single division of infantry equal to ten or more divisions that lack air power.

      So, while the Chinese have in fact "written the book" on several forms of warfare, there is no evidence to date that they grasp the strategic or the tactical use of air and sea power.

      And, to be honest, there is little to demonstrate that they grasp strategic and tactical use of armor. They have no one who is quite comparable to General Erwin Rommel. Blitzkrieg was more than 75% a German invention, with a little contribution from America's General Sherman. (Rommel studied all of he preceding general officers, of course, but he makes special mention of Sherman among his writings. ;^) )

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    67. Re:speculating about the real purpose by queBurro · · Score: 1

      me too (RTFB), so we both know that a 1k+ yo book can't really be that well up on air warfare? the point I was trying to make was that "they wrote the book" (and don't call me Shirley)

      --
      sag
    68. Re:speculating about the real purpose by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In that handbag case, the customs man/cop said the materials looked identical, but there were small errors in the stitching etc. Theory was they were ones that had failed QA and someone decided it's be a shame to waste them...

      It is more or less like that.
      Designer fashion is usually manufactored in developing countries by small "companies" with 50 - 100 "employers".
      The contracts with the lable goes like an auction, all producers bid and bet how much pieces they can craft in lets say 3 weeks. So if I say I make 3000 bags in 3 weeks, the agreement is they take all 3000 ore non at all. The small shops have to buy the raw materials and the design from the lable. Now lets say about 80% of the shops meet their agreed goals and perhaps even exeede in production. Those shops "sell" their product to the lable which sells it as "genuine". The other shops that had the same contracts, the same material and the same designs but did not meet their agreed target don't sell to the lable but to black channels. The very slim variations you find in "genuine" products come from the fact that not all pieces are made in the same factory.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    69. Re:speculating about the real purpose by wizden · · Score: 1

      you know.... well.... I just don't know how to respond to this. You spend too much time on the internet formulating theories. Actually that should read, absorbing other people's theories. Yes, China is doing well right now. It probably is not from an overarching scheme to take over the world. Look at Japan in the eighties. They did well. Maybe China is doing well because they are making some right decisions. The are fucked up in many ways but they seem to be figuring stuff out economically. This is not a bad thing. Jingoistic shit like the tripe you are spewing just doesn't make any sense. Look at how dependent they are on our economy. You might want to look up, "THE FUCKING REAL WORLD AND HOW IT WORKS."

    70. Re:speculating about the real purpose by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In germany it is very common that big lables sell the same product as so called "white lable" product in discount markets. That is mainly done with food like coffee, cocoa, milk but also sweeties and or bread or juices, cheese, sausage etc.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    71. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      I think I would have achieved a much more stable wireless link with a piece of 'white label' cheese than the Belkin router I once had.

    72. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what they want you to believe...
      This issues should have be a civil issue between Cisco and the importers, the government and our tax dollars should never have got involved. Cisco CHOSE to export manufacturing to a country has little concern for IP. Obviously everyone else in the world seems to know the risk when you outsource something to China that you will also be losing control of the manufacturing and/or distribution process. There is just as much a chance of rogue backdoored software in these "illegal" overruns as there is for any piece of Cisco gear going down those same assembly lines.

      If Cisco and the US government was concerned with backdoors, stop buying critical equipment that is made in countries you are worried about monitoring you. As for the US law enforcement and government. Stop wasting my tax dollars to offset Cisco's profits because they took a calculated risk in sending their processes overseas. It was THEIR risk that got them in this mess, why are US citizens paying to get them out of it?

    73. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the supply chain, the end buyer doesn't get to see the exact markup enjoyed by the middle-men. The importer could have sold to a local dealer who then turned around and charged full Cisco list price or could have charged less. Then when the government looks at the line items in the project budget, the hardware is listed as costing full Cisco catalog price. There's no telling at what point in the supply chain the price went from backstreet to full fees.

    74. Re:speculating about the real purpose by modecx · · Score: 1

      Interesting note about private espionage related to what you've said about the sidewinder: L. Ron Hubbard Jr. (son of the cult leader) claimed in a penthouse interview that his father obtained the designs for an infrared seeking missile (perhaps early AIM-9 or AIM-4 variants) through brain washing one of the lead engineers. He then sold it to the Russians, among other bits of information.

      So, who knows. They probably had several information vectors.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    75. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      No. No it does not.

    76. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      No, the US cannot do that, because the US operates on democracy and free trade, and the powers that be can't simply just invoke sanctions on China just because they are getting too powerful. No, the people won't stand for government blocking sale of cheap ipods. And, China is definitely expanding their markets outside of the US..

    77. Re:speculating about the real purpose by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      there is little evidence that they understand strategy, tactics, and fleet operations as well as we do.

      Which implies either that they don't, or that they are better at secrecy.

    78. Re:speculating about the real purpose by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's lingerie. It wears out anyway :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    79. Re:speculating about the real purpose by cavreader · · Score: 1

      The US government can slap tariffs on Chinese imports anytime they feel like it. If China makes any aggressive moves either militarily or economically you can count on it. I never said China did not have non-US markets I said the US represents a sizable portion of theirs. They are facing rising competition from other countries such as Vietnam and India who are able to compete with China on low labor costs. Also as labor costs rise around the world the US has began to see some manufacturing jobs returning to the states because the price advantages corporate PR problems. China has also increased food imports from the US by a factor of 5 over the past 6 years, recorded their first trade deficits in over 15 years, and are struggling with inflation which is raising the cost of their exports faster than their government can correct by artificially manipulating their currency. All this talk of "Power" is 100% BS. People exaggerate a countries "Power" when it suits them. The US or China are not the overlords of creation in the world. It's convenient for most of the world to exaggerate US power so they can have someone to blame for their own incompetence. The US economy is going through a rough patch but it is nothing that has not occurred in the past and the world economy is cyclical in nature if you actually study history.

    80. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without knowing anymore details, I will suspect Cisco, given what they did to an ex-employee: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/06/03/0822244/Judge-Finds-Cisco-US-Authorities-Deceived-Canadian-Courts

    81. Re:speculating about the real purpose by jp102235 · · Score: 1

      mod that sh!t up. I mean, we are all just trying to make a living, I don't think anyone really wants world domination anymore - takes too much time. meh, I could be wrong tho.

      --
      jp
    82. Re:speculating about the real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sometimes you don't need to know each and every function of the chip. if you can just make a copy and have it work exactly the same then you've accomplished the goal, albeit not learning much in the process.

    83. Re:speculating about the real purpose by WNight · · Score: 1

      It's probably pretty easy. I doubt many people fully test the QoS qualities of their new gigabit switch while at the counter. All you need to do is make it look real enough that they think the problem might be on their end long enough for you to move on.

      Put a general purpose computer in it configured to mimic the specific product. Until it fails to deliver under load it'll appear to be the real thing.

    84. Re:speculating about the real purpose by drsquare · · Score: 1

      They actually have a few modern ships, that might be capable of challenging our own ships, one on one - although there is little evidence that they understand strategy, tactics, and fleet operations as well as we do

      On the other hand, when was the last time the US was involved in a naval war with an equivalent power?

  3. More to the story, I'll bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you consider what sort of information travels through networking equipment -- financial and government data, national security information, corporate secrets -- then it's not just a piece of hardware that was being counterfeited. Code on these devices can be extremely complex (I used to work for a firewall manufacturer) and it would be well within the capabilities of a small government to engineer a network device that could secretly send back information to a listening party.

    1. Re:More to the story, I'll bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that all security algorithms assume the man in the middle scenario and don't consider any part of the network secure!

  4. Punishment should fit the crime by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Funny

    She should be sentenced to 5 years of pulling cat6 cable thru 200 year old buildings in Boston; and removing all the old POTS wire.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    1. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Is that with, or without the roaches and rats? I vote with.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by mjwx · · Score: 1

      She should be sentenced to 5 years of pulling cat6 cable thru 200 year old buildings in Boston; and removing all the old POTS wire.

      That would fall under the "cruel and unusual" clause as by the time she's done pulling Cat 6 through, it'll be obsolete.

      Why not just do it right the first time and do it with fibre.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry we signed the Geneva Convention. There's no way that would be legal.

    4. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Which only applies to warfare and prisoners of war. That's why your police are allowed to shoot people with hollow head rounds and the armed forces aren't.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    5. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by Zuriel · · Score: 1

      Cat6e will do 10 gigabit which should be quite adequate for most purposes for quite some time. More importantly, you can plug it into any cheap existing network device and run 100 megabits over it. If you have fibre running through a building, you'll have a network that an awful lot of devices can't easily connect to.

    6. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2

      Is that with, or without the roaches and rats? I vote with.

      I vote by marking a ballot with a felt-tip marker then feeding it into a machine. Are you sure your voting place is legit?

    7. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The "right way" is to install conduits, which are never obsolete.

    8. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Which only applies to warfare and prisoners of war.

      Apparently not if you call them enemy combatants.

    9. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      ...cat6 cable ...removing all the old POTS wire.

      ah, kitchen detail, eh? (cleaning up old pots and lans.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Punishment should fit the crime by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Cat6e will do 10 gigabit which should be quite adequate for most purposes for quite some time.

      Which still makes you victim to a building managed MDF. Speed is far from the only reason to go with fibre, Ethernet cables tend to require a router at the MDF to change a WAN link such as ADSL or Fibre into a LAN link where as Fibre can simply be repeated when your government finally figures out Telco's will never fibre up most homes. Also reliability and longevity are huge reasons to go with Fibre, with Ethernet, how long until you have to rewire the building due to obsolescence/degraded cables? 10, maybe 20 but with Fibre that's forty odd years.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  5. Cisco Compatible by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The irony is that nowadays folks legally sell the same equipment as "Cisco Compatible." She went to jail over a sticker.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Cisco Compatible by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's fraud for you. Almost any typically-legal activity can be a crime if you are lying to the other parties involved about what is going on. In this case, I'm assuming that the sticker she went to jail for raised the margin on the goods in question by a nontrivial amount.

      Now, depending on exactly how "compatible" the stuff being sold is, it could be that the seller is either committing fraud by claiming even compatibility, or committing some flavor of copyright infringement against Cisco; but selling falsely labelled goods will push you across the line from legitimate to criminal almost no matter what the product in question is.

    2. Re:Cisco Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Espeically because whenI buy something Cisco compatible I dont pay cisco proices and get a cisco. I bet her buyers did not know the stuff was not from cisco - and likely paid more than for a clone. Ignoreing all the legal moral implications of copyright law, I rather want to have what I am sold, not someting fake. Especially when I pay for it.

    3. Re:Cisco Compatible by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      It's probably identical equipment, just made on a third shift that is off the books using serial numbers from the first and second shifts and sold as "out of channel" for a discount.

      Or, it may be equipment that is made totally identically (or leaving out "unnecessary" parts or using cheaper parts).

      Worst case, it may be an operation backed by the Chinese government to get back doors into the hardware used in mission critical systems.

    4. Re:Cisco Compatible by Nalez · · Score: 1

      Some of the documents say they operated through the company JDC networking (still up and running, but imageless)

      One thing about this case...
      You can not tell me you look at that website, and think you are getting "cisco compatable" stuff, and not true, 100% Cisco stuff.

    5. Re:Cisco Compatible by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's Chinese for you. They are pathological about faking - even when the same goods could be sold legitimately - even when they have a good product! They'll still make it a counterfeit.

      There's a story I like to tell about stickers. A friend of mine was sourcing some sunglasses. He asks, "Do they have UV protection?" Evidently there's some confusion about translating ultraviolet radiation into Chinese. The translator goes back and forth for a few minutes. Finally the Chinese boss perks up and says, in English, "Oh, yes, we have sticker!" True story.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Cisco Compatible by formfeed · · Score: 1

      Now, depending on exactly how "compatible" the stuff being sold is, it could be that the seller is either committing fraud by claiming even compatibility, or committing some flavor of copyright infringement against Cisco...

      It might be even extremely compatible, in that it might come from the same factory that just makes a few more units after fulfilling Cisco's order...

    7. Re:Cisco Compatible by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      No, she probably went to jail because of the warranty. That's how most counterfeiters get caught these days. The unit stops working as it should, or the unit is dead on arrival. Someone calls Cisco support, expecting to get the warranty and the service they paid for, only to be told their device is a fake, and therefore is not going to be replaced/serviced.

      Then someone calls this lady (since she's the one who originally sold you the device), you end up corresponding with ten different people all bearing different names, but instead, you're only talking to the same lady who's giving you the run around (using her ten different identities), until a couple of weeks later, the email messages you send to her company bounce back to you as the domain is no longer valid, and the phone number you call for support answers with an error message as it has gotten disconnected with no forwarding number given.

    8. Re:Cisco Compatible by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Then someone calls this lady (since she's the one who originally sold you the device), you end up corresponding with ten different people all bearing different names, but instead, you're only talking to the same lady who's giving you the run around (using her ten different identities)...

      Hi, My name Peggy...

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    9. Re:Cisco Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite. The discover card commercials take aim at outsourced customer service "that those other cards have"

      This is more like a pump and dump scam, where they sell you and several other people thousands of dollars in equipment, and once all the checks clear, they disappear and start the same scam again under a different name.

      That's exactly what they do on eBay. They never permanently go away, and they respawn as fast as RMT gold bots in MMO's.

    10. Re:Cisco Compatible by justsayin · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, who the hell would buy Cisco stuff from that site and think it was legit? Certainly not our military or government. All jokes aside this lady made millions with a site like that?
      No way, I say it was a front business for drugs or stolen goods. The Cisco angle was just cover.
      We should hunt down any bone head net admins who bought from them and take away their geek cards.

    11. Re:Cisco Compatible by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The routers are going to need IOS to be functional, and you're going to need IOS to load a newer IOS, so even if there were not a single patent or even design copyright (PCBs etc) then they would still have to illegally distribute Cisco's software code.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Cisco Compatible by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Most /. regulars are familiar with the story of the Cisco plant in China and their extracurricular production. Are there similar stories of other companies and "off the books" production in Chinese factories?

      My employer is currently in the process of setting up manufacturing in China. I'm wondering how bad of an idea this is. Is it a certainty counterfeits will appear in the market, or only a likelihood? Does it help the product has small parts assembled by hand?

    13. Re:Cisco Compatible by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Your employer is, presumably, setting up manufacturing in China because it believes China to have a comparative advantage in manufacturing whatever widget it is that they make.

      Hint, a comparative advantage in manufacturing what you did order is usually also a comparative advantage in manufacturing the same stuff that you didn't order and selling it out the back...

    14. Re:Cisco Compatible by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      IIRC, she was selling fake Cisco-branded SFP GBICS and the like, stuff that has no software of its own.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    15. Re:Cisco Compatible by swalve · · Score: 1

      Isn't that technically gray market, not counterfeit?

  6. Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for being a friend
    Traveled down the road and back again
    Your heart is true, you're a pal and a cosmonaut.

    And if you threw a party
    Invited everyone you ever knew
    You would see the biggest gift would be from me
    And the card attached would say, thank you for being a friend.

    1. Re:Golden Girls! by davetv · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "confidant" not cosmonaut

  7. That seems excessive... by __Paul__ · · Score: 2

    You can get less jail time than that for manslaughter.

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    1. Re:That seems excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't manslaughter imply that it was unintentional? And, there are different levels of manslaughter depending on whether they did all they could to avoid the situation or how unavoidable it was, e.g. stayed within the speed limit, the roads were slippery and the car hydroplaned against their will, etc.

      Whereas this was no accident, she was knowingly and intentionally breaking the law and robbing a company of a substantial number of sales. Five years probably was a bit lenient considering that.

    2. Re:That seems excessive... by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      That's because motive matters a lot in all criminal proceedings ( and rightly so ). Manslaughter is usually a crime you get when you do something wrong, and the consequence is that somebody dies, but you did not intend to cause such severe harm. In the case you linked two people got into an argument, one guy landed a punch, and unfortunately the guy who got hit fell from the punch and hit his head. Most people don't realize that a punch can be so dangerous, so throwing the book on the perpetrator is just stupid.

      Another common situation where a manslaughter charge may be given is when you defend yourself but use excessive force to do so. Say you're outside late, somebody runs up to you from behind, you get scared and grab a nearby blunt object and hit the person to defend yourself. It then turns out that he was just trying to give you your wallet back that you dropped earlier, and your blow was severe enough to kill. That kind of situation could , depending on circumstances, land you a manslaughter conviction, but locking you up for many years would obviously not be appropriate.

      You can't just compare individual cases without knowing the circumstances. We had a case in Sweden some time ago when an elderly couple had moved into a new house and found a marijuana plant left over by the previous tenants. They did not realise what it was, so they simply planted it in their front yard, and eventually police came asking them about it. Technically our law would have them guilty of growing and manufacturing an illegal drug, but fortunately this case was not handled by some insane twat, and hence there was no consequences beyond some questioning with a few amused officers.

    3. Re:That seems excessive... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Another common situation where a manslaughter charge may be given is when you defend yourself but use excessive force to do so. Say you're outside late, somebody runs up to you from behind, you get scared and grab a nearby blunt object and hit the person to defend yourself. It then turns out that he was just trying to give you your wallet back that you dropped earlier, and your blow was severe enough to kill. That kind of situation could , depending on circumstances, land you a manslaughter conviction, but locking you up for many years would obviously not be appropriate.

      Locking you up at all makes no sense.
      The convicted is
      a) Not a danger to society
      b) Not of a criminal state of mind
      c) Not in need of rehabilitation
      d) truly remorseful
      e) Likely more in need of counseling to get over what he did than anything else.

      The victims family likely want to see "justice" but what is justice? Taking 5+ years of another mans life over an accident is just revenge.

      But letting him off scott free seems wrong even to me... but perhaps a few thousands of hours of community service over a period of several years seem more a propos than incarceration to me. Have him do some good to make up for the evil he unintentially inflicted.

    4. Re:That seems excessive... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That link is the "Sure I intentionally punched him in the head, but I didn't expect him to die from it" variety. Which hopefully is as bad as manslughter gets before being called murder.

    5. Re:That seems excessive... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      It's not just falsely labelling some goods, there's the money laundering part and the falsely obtaining citizenship part - both of which probably account for some of that sentence.

      And I'm pretty sure that that lieing on the citizenship part ruling is worse than the 5 years in jail - she gets deported back to China the day she is released from prison (well "released from prison" really just means "custody transfered to ICE" in that case).

    6. Re:That seems excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it just wasn't the re-branding of some cheapo routers...

      http://www.justice.gov/usao/vae/news/2011/05/20110526zhaonr.html

      "In addition to the conspiracy conviction, Zhao was convicted of 15 additional counts, including importation fraud, trafficking in counterfeit goods and labels, false statements to law enforcement, false statements in naturalization and money laundering. She was acquitted on one count of false statements and one count of money laundering. "

    7. Re:That seems excessive... by xstonedogx · · Score: 2

      The convicted is
      a) Not a danger to society

      Except for the part where he overreacts and kills people, he's a great guy!

    8. Re:That seems excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy, you've linked an article in NEW ZEALAND while the story is in the US. In the US you do not get 3 years for manslaughter. 1st degree murder or even felony murder gets you life or death penalty. Per linked article, the guy would have received 10 years to life in US.

    9. Re:That seems excessive... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      b) Not of a criminal state of mind
      c) Not in need of rehabilitation
      d) truly remorseful

      And I think the *27* prior convictions for various other offenses more or less covers the rest...

    10. Re:That seems excessive... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I guess the moral of the story is that she should move to New Zealand the next time she does this. She'll probably get a lighter sentence.

    11. Re:That seems excessive... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The victims family likely want to see "justice" but what is justice? Taking 5+ years of another mans life over an accident is just revenge.

      That's all that people care about anymore. Remember that we live in a post-forgiveness society now; one felony and you are forever shut out of the middle class unless you are lucky enough to find an employer willing to take a chance on you again (good luck with that) or found the next big company. The prison industrial complex is creating an expanding underclass in our society of people who are shut out of any chance at redemption or equal opportunities.

    12. Re:That seems excessive... by 1729 · · Score: 1

      Buddy, you've linked an article in NEW ZEALAND while the story is in the US. In the US you do not get 3 years for manslaughter. 1st degree murder or even felony murder gets you life or death penalty. Per linked article, the guy would have received 10 years to life in US.

      Here's a case in the US from a few years ago, where a similar crime resulted in a 1 year jail sentence:

      http://www.channel3000.com/news/20400719/detail.html

    13. Re:That seems excessive... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Manslaughter is any unnatural death of a person. Suicide is manslaughter. Deliberately causing harm in a manner that results in a death, even if that death wasn't intended, is anywhere from negligent homicide to murder. Though when it's an adult performing emotional abuse against a minor with the intent of causing harm that results in a manslaughter, it's OK by Slashdot standards.

    14. Re:That seems excessive... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Another common situation where a manslaughter charge may be given is when you defend yourself but use excessive force to do so. Say you're outside late, somebody runs up to you from behind, you get scared and grab a nearby blunt object and hit the person to defend yourself. It then turns out that he was just trying to give you your wallet back that you dropped earlier, and your blow was severe enough to kill. That kind of situation could , depending on circumstances, land you a manslaughter conviction, but locking you up for many years would obviously not be appropriate.

      In Oregon that would be Murder II, because using a weapon against an attacker is illegal unless you have legit cause to fear for your life. Just being scared will probably get you off the hook for punching somebody, and if they fall over and bump their head and die it would be left to the D.A.'s discretion. But smashing somebody with a blunt object is a serious offense, and if you injure them significantly, a certain felony. If they die, even accidentally, by your hand while you're committing a crime, that is Murder II.

    15. Re:That seems excessive... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Maybe in whatever jurisdiction you are in. Most other places have things below "negligent homicide" namely voluntary manslaughter which applies to many cases of "deliberately causing harm in a manner that results in a death", and hence your classification range is false. That the link being discussed is such a case should have made that pretty obvious.

    16. Re:That seems excessive... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      "money laundering"

      If money laundering is successful, it doesn't look like a crime has occurred. If it is not successful, can you really say that money laundering has occurred? At best, I'd think you'd have evidence for attempted money laundering...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    17. Re:That seems excessive... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      It's just a name defined by law, and that law doesn't use such a restrictive definition: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1956.html

  8. Good. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Maybe not good enough, though. Who knows what sort of holes that gear may have left on networks, or what sort of issues it may introduce in a mission critical setting. To say nothing of the rampant financial shenanigans and who knows what sort of tax evasion and other little details. No, five years for that sort of ongoing, large-scale fraud isn't enough.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Good. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It very probably was made by the same people on the same line with the same components as the real Cisco gear, it just got a fake serial number and didn't get counted on the books.

      It is no more or less likely to open holes in the network than the gear with an authentic Cisco serial number.

      The wrongdoing was the fraud on a grand scale.

    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that most "counterfeit" goods are actually the real thing but either 1. they weren't in the books/serialed like OP said or 2. they are goods that have failed some bit of quality testing and thus are sold (with often the company's approval) by the factory to get rid of unusable stock.

      Nothing to see here, as usual companies suing others selling items they themselves produced.

  9. Any cooperation from China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they did was take out one dealership it sounds like. Can only imagine the shitstorm that would occur if some US operation was caught manufacturing fake Huawei equipment. As China rises as a global power, at some point, more is going to have to be expected of them to act as a responsible global power, and stop looking the other way. There is a huge asymmetry between the economic might of a rising China, and the global responsibility one would expect the world's second largest economy to exhibit.

    I understand all countries cheat, but to cheat in such a blatantly mickey mouse manner....and not get any sort of official governmental promise to "crack down" is disturbing....and likely indicative of a growing disconnect between Chinese business, and Chinese government.

    1. Re:Any cooperation from China? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The US was as bad or worse at the end of the 1800s. It's all part of a capitalist industrial revolution, we did the same, and rather than learning from history, we get all indignant. No wonder civilizations thousands of years older than ours hate us (and that's not in regards to the Chinese, who do not hate us, but the others who do).

  10. You can take the person out of China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You can take the person out of China... ...but you can't take the Chinese out of the person!

    1. Re:You can take the person out of China... by wisebabo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your racist comment is belied by the fact that in THIS VERY SAME ARTICLE the presiding judge is presumably Chinese himself but sought to impose the maximum(?) penalty.

      It could be that he is not Chinese (maybe Korean or another nationality) but with the name Gerald BRUCE Lee given to him by hopefully well meaning parents, I think it is more than likely he is of Chinese extraction.

    2. Re:You can take the person out of China... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      with the name Gerald BRUCE Lee given to him by hopefully well meaning parents

      How well-meaning could they have been, really, to have named him "Gerald?" :)

    3. Re:You can take the person out of China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, he's black. You know how I know that?

      Because you can look this shit up. Hell, he's notable enough to have a Wikipedia page, although that doesn't list his ethnicity.

  11. Where's Cisco in all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they sitting idly by, or are they assisting in any equipment standards and Q/A with what's being put to market?

    I really have to wonder since, a decade ago, Cisco was THE NAME in networking gear. Every tech. shop I ran across had Cisco gear in their closet. What the hell happened to Management to allow this type of situation to creep into the tech. sector? Or did those Board members cash out of the game, giving their replacements a shop with the blood-stains hidden?

    1. Re:Where's Cisco in all this? by belthize · · Score: 1

      To the extent that they can they do. First they push really hard to force you to buy from authorized retailers. I'm not real thrilled with that but I understand it, secondly if you request the serial upfront you can find it's history. There's not much else they can do. If you insist on buying from a non-authorized retailer you're at
      risk.

      I recently bought a 4510R+E (about $50K with cards) that was claimed to be an overstock item from a non-authorized reseller. The serial was reportedly one shipped to China. That's fairly common for the fake Cisco, they obtain a real one and send back clones with that serial. Needless to say we didn't buy it.

    2. Re:Where's Cisco in all this? by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Cisco gear just isn't that competitive these days. High-performance applications are dominated by names like Mellanox and Chelsio. Cisco is trading on name recognition, but they're somewhere around best of the shit, or shittiest of the best at this point.

  12. The U.S. reached out and 'touched' bin Laden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God bless the USA.

  13. Why is the US govt. playing enforcer for Cisco? by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) has cut its income taxes by $7 billion since 2005 by booking roughly half its worldwide profits at a subsidiary at the foot of the Swiss Alps that employs about 100 peopleâ¦

    Ciscoâ(TM)s techniques cut the effective tax rate on its reported international income to about 5 percent since 2008 by moving profits from roughly $20 billion in annual global sales through the Netherlands, Switzerland and Bermuda, according to its records in four countries. (cite).

    If Cisco wants to book their profits in Bermuda (to circumvent supporting the US justice system, among other things) then they should file their complaints against counterfeiters in Bermuda as well. I'm sick of these freeloaders. There's no legal team at the DOJ spending millions to defend my rights, that I can tell.

    1. Re:Why is the US govt. playing enforcer for Cisco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're assuming Cisco is the only victim? What about the buyers? If this equipment is sub-par and goes into mission critical projects, people might die. This was in Virginia, and if the equipment is sold to a government entity and it has back-doors, secrets might be lost and people might die.

      Five years seems very reasonable to me.

    2. Re:Why is the US govt. playing enforcer for Cisco? by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      Cisco is being protected, yes. But so is the market, from fraudulant participants selling fake goods.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Why is the US govt. playing enforcer for Cisco? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I don't really want fraud to go unpunished. What I want is for greedy, selfish parties to start acknowledging and supporting the system that allows them to thrive.

  14. Wrist slap. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    White-collar crimes like this are barely punished. Five years is a joke considering possible intelligence compromise from doctored gear.

    Want to DETER white-collar criminals? Give them hard time in population where they must struggle to survive and cannot recover when they finally do get out. Destroy them as examples to others.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Wrist slap. by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

      Or do like China, and just sell their organs. That'll teach em!

    2. Re:Wrist slap. by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Continuing with your line of reasoning.. why not set the ultimate example and simply kill on sight?

      People consider an eye for an eye barbarous, and yet an arm for a pinky seems completely acceptable to them.

      The aim of the penal system should not be to make examples of people, it should be to enable people to return to being functional useful members of society.

    3. Re:Wrist slap. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Five years is a joke considering possible intelligence compromise from doctored gear.

      Well, was the gear used to compromise intelligence or not? If it was, that's another (much more serious) crime. If it wasn't then that crime wasn't committed so you don't punish someone for it.

    4. Re:Wrist slap. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes cause we all know just how successful it is to not only destroy peoples lives, but their future any sense of empathy. What you suggest doesn't work, and there is hundreds of years of evidence that it doesn't. The death penalty would be a highly effective measure at deterring crime if anyone gave a rats ass about deterrents. Not a single person considers the consequences of their actions before they commit crimes. Plenty of people have been severely punished for white collar crime. Ken Lay got 30 years, did that stop the bank fraud that caused the economic crash after Enron?

      You're a fool if you think there is such a thing as a deterrent and it's even worse if you think destroying someone will make the world a better place. In fact based on your post you are probably stupid enough to think prison rape does anything at all other than destroy lives.

    5. Re:Wrist slap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **The aim of the penal system should not be to make examples of people, it should be to enable people to return to being functional useful members of society.**

      What planet are you from? There's no prison on the planet that works that way. And i don't think there ever has been. Sure has never been like that in the usa anyway.

      Bad people go in. Worse people come out. And the prison made a profit too.

      That's the way it works here. And will continue to work that way for as long as greed is king.

    6. Re:Wrist slap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are WRONG.

      The purpose is solely punishment. There is no effort to return people
      to "functional" members of society; there is no statutory requirement for such.

    7. Re:Wrist slap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      five years is quite a lot if you can get away with manslaughter for less, a brit soldier just got with less for what amounts to torturing a prisoner to death.

      part of the problem is ciscos fault. dominating with bad documentation and overpriced hardware.

      sure, you could sell counterfeit vw's too but people would notice.

    8. Re:Wrist slap. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The aim of the penal system should not be to make examples of people, it should be to enable people to return to being functional useful members of society.

      The purpose of the justice system is presumably to enact some form of justice, NOT to enact vengeance or to do job retraining or therapy.

    9. Re:Wrist slap. by rgviza · · Score: 1

      the entire deterrent idea fails because criminals either don't think about the consequences before they commit the act, are or stupid enough to think they can get away with it and won't be punished.

      That being said, the death penalty or penal colony isn't intended as a deterrent, it's purpose is to remove dangerous people from society permanently so they don't harm anyone else.

      Both are supremely effective at this purpose. Putting their heads on a spike or rotting bodies in a cage in public is the deterrent part of execution. This hasn't been done for a very long time in most countries because, like you said, deterrents don't work.

      I disagree that destroying them or locking them up permanently doesn't make the world a better place. After all, there's one less criminal out in the world.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    10. Re:Wrist slap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American penal system is privately run by prison contractors. Repeat offenders mean more business in future years.

    11. Re:Wrist slap. by Larryish · · Score: 1

      I think the GP likes it Greek.

  15. A judge can strip someone of their US citizenship? by MisterP · · Score: 1

    "Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [...] also stripped Zhao, from China, of her U.S. citizenship"

    What the hell? I was unaware that there are different classes of citizenship. What if a person born as an American did this?

  16. Question here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    If the gear being sold was an accurate clone of Cisco gear, would you still consider it "fake"?

    If you hear a bit-perfect copy of a piece of music, and it had been downloaded from TPB, would you consider that music "fake"? Would your experience of hearing it be "fake"?

    I'm not saying the stuff that the guy who got convicted sold was a perfect clone of the Cisco gear, but if it were, what would be "fake" about it, and would it matter? Does it matter to the bits that flow through it?

    We're probably closer to the ability to make perfect copies of physical objects than some care to admit. It's worth thinking about what that will mean to the way "fake" is being used here.

    My guess is that most of the world wouldn't care if a perfect copy was fake. That's a problem for the minority of people who obtain wealth through "intellectual property". Because when you start having stronger and stronger laws against something that most people don't care about, you create a disconnect between law and society. Ultimately, that leads to either complete disregard of the law or outright tyranny in order to enforce it. And, as every single tyrant has found, tyrannies cannot last. Eventually, they're going to fall, and when they do, it's usually ugly.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Question here by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not saying the stuff that the guy who got convicted sold was a perfect clone of the Cisco gear, but if it were, what would be "fake" about it, and would it matter? Does it matter to the bits that flow through it?

      Are you serious? When you had a problem with your "Cisco" equipment and called Cisco, do you think they'd help you out with your counterfeit gear?

    2. Re:Question here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with "fake" Cisco gear which probably came off their own lines is that lack of support contract.

      It's more or less like purchasing used equipment without any support contract. I've had to do this in the past, but we made sure to purchase spare used gear. It was still wholly cheaper then purchasing new gear with a support contract.

    3. Re:Question here by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So your stance is that every single company on Earth must manufacture their own goods in secret. They cannot use a 3rd party factory, because the factory can just steal the plans and cut the designer out the equation. They cannot have a brand, because if they work hard to build consumer trust, some seedy knock-off company can just start using their name and logo. They cannot reveal their nifty new discoveries in a trade journal, as the ideas will just be stolen. If an employee leaves, they can take everything they ever designed with them, and never mind the fact that their salary was meant to be payment for those designs. Authors and musicians and movie makers and game makers have to beg for donations, since no one need pay them for their works.

      Your ideas are so poorly thought out, it's almost childlike.

      Intellectual property is a necessity for any modern economy. People could get by without such rules back when occupational choices were farmer, hunter, ditch-digger, and prostitute. But today's society is much improved, and those improvements require us to follow certain rules to maintain.

    4. Re:Question here by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      its called counterfeiting and yes its fake you numbnut

    5. Re:Question here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had a perfect copy of a pile of money...

    6. Re:Question here by erroneus · · Score: 1

      The issue boils down to "licensed or unlicensed copies."

      We have seen stories about "counterfeit Cisco gear imported from China" in the past. Little is said about the likeliness that these were made in the same factories that make the licensed versions of the same. But I have seen examples of piracy (real piracy for-profit) where a CD/DVD duplicator company ran 'after hours operations' which produced more copies than were requested by the customer. Those copies, which were identical to the copies produced under license, were considered illegal and counterfeit.

      To call them "fake" is not quite accurate enough to me as it implies it is not functional in some way which was not likely to be the case.

    7. Re:Question here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Informative

      Intellectual property is a necessity for any modern economy.

      Baloney.

      It has been some years since most of the money made from "intellectual property" actually went to the people who created the innovation or idea. Today, almost ALL of the money made from intellectual property goes to someone who had absolutely nothing to do with creating it. That is a broken system.

      I understand that it's very easy to believe that the way things are is the only way things can be, but it's simply not true.

      And if we're going to keep this extra layer of bureaucracy that is weighing down world economies, we had better figure out a way to actually make it mean something besides an easy way to siphon wealth from the people who make to the people who own.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. It's 10 years.... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..for selling actual Cisco gear.

  18. How they caught them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fake user manuals were written in flawless English.

    1. Re:How they caught them by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an old story about early mauals for Japanese goods. After many complaints, they finally supplied one with perfect english and spelling with the exception of the last words.

      Plinted in english (:

    2. Re:How they caught them by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Plinted in english (:

      Shouldn't that be "Plinted in Engrish"?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  19. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    What the hell? I was unaware that there are different classes of citizenship. What if a person born as an American did this?

    You're given New Jersey residency and forced to live in Trenton.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  20. Bruce Lee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any one else missed this? Hiiiiyaaaaaaaaaaa! NGggggiiiiyaaaaaaaaoooooooooo!

  21. If security is actually the concern, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The network by definition must be seen as insecure, if there are any unencrypted packets containing classified data on those networks we have a lot worse problems than back doors in routers

  22. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes for certain types of treason. But its rare as far as i know.

  23. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible to strip a non native born citizen of their U.S. citizenship if their is evidence they obtained said citizenship through forgery or fraud. It is not possible to strip a native born U.S. citizen of their U.S. citizenship.

  24. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by snl2587 · · Score: 2

    The article mentions that they discovered lies on Zhao's citizenship application, and thus invalidated it.

  25. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says she was convicted of obtaining her U.S. citizenship through fraud.

  26. Nope... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm wondering whether there was a deeper purpose to importing counterfeited equipment. If such could be successfully sold into government operations, it could then be used for backdoors...

    Cisco gear is *made* in China. We're not dealing with pin-heads here, if they wanted to "backdoor" routers, they would at least attempt to "backdoor" the real things with Chinese operatives in Chinese factories where these routers are made, while on Chinese soil...

    This, of course, is one of the great weaknesses of the shift of manufacturing away from US soil, we just don't make things anymore.

    Not long down the road, all those Filipino maids in the rich palazzos, palaces, and chateaus will be replaced with American maids.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Nope... by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Not long down the road, all those Filipino maids in the rich palazzos, palaces, and chateaus will be replaced with American maids.

      Don't worry. The American fast food industry is working hard to prevent just that.

    2. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not long down the road, all those Filipino maids in the rich palazzos, palaces, and chateaus will be replaced with American maids.

      At least they will be maid in America.

    3. Re:Nope... by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Not long down the road, all those Filipino maids in the rich palazzos, palaces, and chateaus will be replaced with American maids.

      Let's replace them by lawyers, as we have too many of them anyway.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    4. Re:Nope... by seigniory · · Score: 1

      Cisco gear is *made* in China. We're not dealing with pin-heads here, if they wanted to "backdoor" routers, they would at least attempt to "backdoor" the real things with Chinese operatives in Chinese factories where these routers are made, while on Chinese soil...

      Nice FUD. Most Cisco gear is assembled in Mexico from parts sourced worldwide.

    5. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...from parts sourced worldwide.

      Like... CHINA?

      In any case, you're full of shit. There are in fact many complete units and sub assemblies ... MAD IN CHINA.

      Idiot.

    6. Re:Nope... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      "maid in america", then?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Nope... by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      Who is to say that they were not "real" CISCO routers that had been modified at the factory.
      CISCO would never want that heard. Since the routers were modified CISCO can say they are counterfeit.
      CISCO happy, Government happy.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    8. Re:Nope... by tokul · · Score: 1

      Not long down the road, all those Filipino maids in the rich palazzos, palaces, and chateaus will be replaced with American maids.

      Why would somebody want fat blonde, when they can get dark exotic beauty

    9. Re:Nope... by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Come on, it's not fair to say we don't make things. http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-01-29/news/27738306_1_gas-egypt-protesters

  27. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    If can be invalidated if fraud was committed on the citizenship application.

    FTA: "Zhao also fraudulently obtained U.S. citizenship based on lies on her citizenship application, the agency said."

  28. I feel sorry for the judge... by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    ... I mean, being named Gerald BRUCE Lee by his parents must have exposed him to quite a bit of mocking as a kid!

    Oh, well maybe it toughened him up (isn't that the premise of the song "A boy named Sue"?). Anyway, as a judge maybe he can take it out on some of his former tormentors!

    By the way, I'm Asian-American (if you haven't guessed by my slashdot name).

  29. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    If they committed some sort of fraud in the context of obtaining their citizenship, that can be grounds to reverse it.

    It would be analogous to somebody claiming to be a citizen by birth; but being discovered to have been born elsewhere.

  30. Given the questions asked by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    a lot of people would probably be telling a "white lie" here and there, on those forms. I have no experience with this, but it's most likely easier to get into heaven than it is to get into the USA, if you answer the questions honestly.

    Without knowing what fraudulent answers she gave, it's not unthinkable that they just revoked her citizenship because she lied about getting a ticket for jaywalking before she entered the USA, or something trivial like that.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Given the questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best question on the visa waiver form is whether you are seeking entry to "engage in immoral activities." Who can go through a single day without doing something that someone considers immoral? For example, working for a globalized corporation, eating meat, not tipping your hair stylist (depriving a person of hard-earned income), tipping your hair stylist (supporting a system that allows the salon owner to under-pay employees), etc.

    2. Re:Given the questions asked by dkf · · Score: 1

      The best question on the visa waiver form is whether you are seeking entry to "engage in immoral activities." Who can go through a single day without doing something that someone considers immoral?

      I believe there's a more closely given definition in the actual legislation, but it's probably rather long for putting on a normal-length form (I found it once online, but can't remember where; IIRC, it mentioned many specific activities such as drug running and prostitution). If you have to know, you're probably running too close to the edge of legality...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:Given the questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, you're just being silly. Same as the person who said:

      I have no experience with this, but it's most likely easier to get into heaven than it is to get into the USA, if you answer the questions honestly.

      Unlike that individual, I do have experience with it, and it was a lot of paperwork (all of which I answered completely honestly), but in the end extremely straightforward. This despite the fact I'd previously had problems and been denied visas after being invalidated out of the visa waiver program.

      I believe you're referring to the question about moral turpitude, which specifically asks if you've been arrested or convicted. There are definitions of what constitutes such a crime; suffice to say that your examples don't count.

      Again, speaking as someone who went through this, it was pretty uneventful in the end. I answered the questions honestly, got asked five or six different questions in my consulate interview (nothing tricky - things like "when were you married?" - "have either you or your wife left the country since you were married?" - "have you and your wife been living together since you were married?". These questions were because I was applying for an immigrant visa on the basis of my marriage to a U.S. citizen by birth>), and that was it. The paperwork to get to that point was arduous, but after all I was applying for permanent residency.

      Everything after that was quick and easy. I went to the next counter where the very charming young lady explained I had the wrong form of birth certificate, told me exactly where to go to get the right form, how much it'd cost, how long it'd take, etc. - she couldn't have been nicer - and to come back the next day once I had it and I'd be in. Done.

      By your examples, you'd think I'd be at risk of getting thrown out of the country if I got a speeding ticket. (FYI, naturalization is taken much more seriously in terms of protections and rights granted than is residency. I am not a naturalized U.S. citizen.) In fact, I did get a speeding ticket about six months after moving here, and I was still on my international driver's license, which annoyed the police officer no end. I got a fine, a lecture, and was sent on my way. That's all.

      They're really not looking to throw people out on the merest whim, so far as I can tell. I've never had a problem with re-entering the country, even after visiting China. Maybe I've been exceptionally lucky, and in fairness I'm a white male from a very innocuous country that is really too small to gravely annoy anyone). But I do have experience in these matters, unlike a lot of the people pontificating on here.

  31. What was her crime ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling Linksys ? They are owned by Cisco...

  32. Chinese Briefly Hijack US Web Traffic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/17/cybersecurity-china-idUSN1615357620101117

    Remember that story?

    This one has something to do with it I'm sure.

    She's being put in jail for a bunch of stuff all of which revolves around fraud. She was misrepresenting her product to customers which to be honest is something most big corps do these days and the majority of it results in civil, not criminal charges. BTW Copyright violations are a civil matter and should stay civil so don't drag that into this as well.

  33. Thats some kung fu judgement being passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Am I the only one?

  34. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She was stripped of her citizenship because she lied on her immigration application, not because she committed a crime.

  35. Fake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the fake gear also have fake bugs?

    If so, does that mean it works better than non-fake gear?

  36. ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very fact that I see a Chinese name in the summary is enough for me to go "Counterfeit", who cares the reason why. They have connections.

    Spend an evening on eBay, you'll find the same pattern... Chinese name, counterfeit items.

  37. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by hrtserpent6 · · Score: 1

    There's more here than meets the eye.

    One of the charges was"obtaining citizenship by fraud". 8 CFR PART 340 allows USCIS to "reopen a naturalization proceeding and revoke naturalization" within 2 years of granting citizenship, if there's reason to believe the application was based on fraudulent information. Under this process, the woman can be "administratively denaturalized", but only after a full course of hearings and other due process.

    I'll bet you dollars to donuts this was part of some bigger deal involving Washington and Beijing. The woman doesn't want to go to Federal prison for 20+ years, Washington doesn't want a diplomatic brouhaha involving a Chinese-born citizen, and Beijing doesn't want to lose face (again). This was a back-door option that worked for everyone.

  38. I may have sold fake Cisco by Pirow · · Score: 3, Informative

    After reading this article, some comments and a bit of research on Google I wouldn't be surprised if I unknowingly bought and sold fake Cisco at my last place of work (who have since gone under).

    It was the only job I've had that involved dealing with "The Channel", despite working in both sales then purchasing there I'm still not too clued up about that side of things (it's boring, as you don't get to play with the things you buy) and I'm still quite niave about what goes on.

    We were a Cisco Select partner who frequently got invited along to our local Cisco offices as they were trying to push us more and more towards Cisco SMB stuff, our customers included local police, local government, schools, colleges and installers. We had accounts with Ingram Micro, Azlan/Computer 2000, Micro P, but we very rarely bought Cisco from them. We usually ended up buying "grey market" stock from brokers which was often cheap enough for us to add our mark up and still undercut the distributors, but the thing I'm really wondering about is the dirt cheap "OEM" GBICs and SFPs we used to buy which we'd normally put at least a 300% mark up on and still be cheap, these were one of the few things that weren't stock dependant, our supplier for them always had a good stock of them and they were always dirt cheap so we always had a reasonable stock of them.

    At the time I never thought about the possibility that anything we sold was counterfeit, but looking back I suspect at the very least the GBICs and SFPs were, none of our customers openly questioned why a small company was being able to undercut the likes of Ingram Micro, with some of our closer customers it was a case of "yeah, it's grey stock, but we pass the savings on to YOU", but most of it was don't ask don't tell.

    We were just a small business wanting to play with the big boys, we'd get pricing support from Cisco for big jobs, but we'd tend to take their quotation, remove the prices, send it to the brokers and say "see what you can do" and they'd pretty much always undercut Cisco so for a struggling company who might go under anyway the gamble of buying "grey stock" that could possibly end up being counterfeit will generally pay off.

    1. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      gee Asia grey market and you think you might have dealt with counterfeit goods? There is a very old saying...

      If its too good to be true, then its probably not.

        Now can I send you an email offering Nike shoes at 120% off the retail price, I swear a 4 year old in Cambodia didn't die making them and they are 100% real, hey I am totally a "broker" ... my card I Photoshopped and emailed to you says so, and yes my name is Greg and I am from the city of Detroit in the great state of Dallas, why do you ask? (I shit you not I was told that by a support tech once)

    2. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by Pirow · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about Asia, I'm in the UK and we got some stock that was destined for mainland Europe, but the majority of the "grey" stock originated from the UK and was destined for the UK. When buying from brokers instead of through official channel partners for certain other things we often got things destined for the EU market (I remember a lot of netgear home routers we received that had been opened and the power supply obviously swapped for a UK power supply), but 99% of the CISCO stuff we bought was destined for the UK anyway.

      Around the time I left the company there was talks of us getting more involved in the broker side of things, basically you get a Cisco partner, make up a fictitious job that requires enough kit to get Ciscos attention, the partner will have a customer who will be in on it which will be who Cisco thinks the kit is destined for, the partner contacts Cisco for price support, if the broker is happy with the price the sale goes ahead (often supported by Cisco Capital Finance), the partner and their customer take their cut, the broker put their markup on it and sells it on below disti price. As the stock was being sold with price support for Cisco for a specific customer, the moment it gets sold on to anybody else it automatically becomes "grey stock".

      The majority of the time the price was good enough for us to undercut the channel price, but certain things were too cheap such as the GBICs and SFPs.

    3. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by JacksonG · · Score: 1

      There's grey and there is grey. As you've already noted a lot of grey market Cisco in the UK channel comes from within the UK or frequently from within Europe. The common market means that if you can get it cheap within one part of the EU you can sell it in another and because of Ciscos channel setup you can frequently exploit promotions or pricing differences to make good money and failing that there is the good old purchase a bulk load of kit at a heavy discount and sell it on piecemeal approach that you describe. Then there is the grey stuff that comes from outside of the EU, typically China, that will quite often be counterfeit. Cisco, however, lumps all this together and calls it grey - probably to try and scare people into buying from channel.

      The SFPs, GBICs etc are a somewhat different story. All these devices actually conform to a standard - the Multi Source Agreement, or MSA, - that was agreed between companies to simplify production etc. However Cisco [and HP for that matter] deliberately chose to check the specific details of the SFP in it's firmware [like serial number/mac address etc] to make sure it is one of theirs and to reject any generic ones - thus breaking the compatibility agreement. As a result there is a huge markup on optical transceivers for Cisco switches and why you can make silly money selling those compatibles that are made in the same factories from the same parts and all they have done is change the firmware to report the appropriate numbers. But since, in my understanding, you can't copyright/patent a number in this context, so long as these devices are not labelled with Ciscos branding there is little they can do to stop it except issuing scare stories about how they invalidate your warranty/will blow up your switch etc.

      --
      I am not a Frog. I am a Free Womble!
    4. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by swalve · · Score: 1

      I work for a similar kind of place. One note: Ingram Micro is almost always going to be expensive. Their deal seems to be "we won't give you a great price, but we will have the equipment in stock and ready to go". Sort of like the Service Merchandise of computer parts.

    5. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by Pirow · · Score: 1

      I'm out of the IT industry now although I'm looking to get back into it (hands on stuff this time), but at the time (just over a year ago) Ingram weren't too bad for us considering our size and the fact that we never paid the bills on time, we managed to get free shipping for all orders so we could drop ship things, they'd often price match within the channel so we mainly used them and Enta. Ingram gave us a decent level of flexibility when it came to paying on time (i.e. not putting our account on hold the day after we were supposed to pay) as there was a bit of a cash flow issue that really limited our bargaining power, Micro-P, Azlan/C2K, Northamber, Westcoast and a few others were always very keen to get our business, but would either not give us the pricing we needed ("start using us and we'll think about it") or wouldn't give us credit based on their past experience with us.

    6. Re:I may have sold fake Cisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      service unsupported-transceiver

  39. He's not chinese... by tebee · · Score: 1

    Well if you'd bothered Googling him you would see he doesn't exactly look Chinese http://www.wcl.american.edu/alumni/dac/lee.cfm

    --
    N.B. this user is far too lazy to write a witty and intelligent sig.
    1. Re:He's not chinese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, everyone knows that someone with a surname of "Lee" simply HAS to be Chinese.

  40. In other words... by StripedCow · · Score: 1

    they pulled the sales equivalent of a man in the middle attack.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  41. Fake or just not authorized??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of Cisco gear is made in China and assembled in Mexico... This gear could be 100% Cisco compatible using the exact same design and specified components. The only difference between this gear and official Cisco equipment may have just been the S/N and hologram sticker.

    You can take a simple $20 flash chip and put Cisco's logo on it, and get $2000. It's the same chip, just authorized & branded by Cisco.

  42. It's a bit more complex by glorybe · · Score: 0

    Property rights have gotten a bit twisted. Musicians often do not get paid when their works are played over the air. The middle men get paid but not the artists. Worse yet the rights extend to absurd periods of time. It is one thing to have an exclusive right to a song for one or two years but now it goes on for lifetimes. In building mechanical products one must constantly be certain to avoid stepping on anyone's patents. It can cause enough complexity to ruin a decent product or make it so expensive that it is not manufactured at all. In the case of software the notion of property rights has allowed all kinds of nonsense law suits to crush small companies who had not violated at all. It is the expense of the legal process and defense that forces the small guy to sell his product to the attacking company. The entire concept of intellectual property needs a complete rework. And in my state the punishments need to be looked at as well. We have many retired folks in Florida and the state went crazy in protecting them from con artists. A bit of fraud can get you charged with greater penalties than a murder. A 175 year sentence for fraud may require the entire sentence to be served whereas a murderer can often be out in 25 years.

  43. But Huawei gets away with it? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    Does Huawei have some special agreement with cisco, then?

    I remember working underneath them, wondering about who they were and what they do (talking about 5 years ago in Belgium, as they had their workforce almost double each week in a small office with people working day and night.)

    The only reply I got from colleagues was "They take cisco hardware and repackage it, they even don't bother to update the references to Cisco in their software."

    As a upside; they couldn't drive. They would hit all our lease-cars. So colleagues would "strategically place" their cars in order to get insurance replace little own mistakes on their costs.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:But Huawei gets away with it? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "They take cisco hardware and repackage it"

      That doesn't really meet the definition of "counterfeit."

  44. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    "Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [...] also stripped Zhao, from China, of her U.S. citizenship"

    What the hell? I was unaware that there are different classes of citizenship. What if a person born as an American did this?

    There aren't. She was convicted of "obtaining citizenship by fraud," which always results in loss of citizenship. Or put another way, if you obtain it by fraud then legally you never had it in the first place, an imaginary person did.

  45. Judge Bruce Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... said "Mistakes are always forgivable, if one has the courage to admit them." He then destroyed a stack of the defendant's counterfeit equipment with a single chop.

  46. Serves him right by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    There should be even harder sentences for those selling real Cisco gear.

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  47. DONT SOUND LIKE NO AMERICAN TO ME !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like one of the red commie bastards !! Hang the horse thief !!

  48. Can you say, "Huawei"? by blahblahwoofwoof · · Score: 1

    I thought you could.

  49. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that would be covered by the "cruel and unusual punishment" idea.

  50. I keep thinking by kelemvor4 · · Score: 0

    If you get caught selling fake cisco equipment you're not going to white collar resort prison. You're going to federal pound me in the ass prison. http://youtu.be/xPcql4FuCK0

  51. Simplest explanation is the most likely by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    The path to counterfeit routers might involve surplus or QA-reject circuit boards, populated with surplus or QA-reject parts, assembled by low-cost electronics workers from the toy industry. The Chinese are unlikely to throw away ANYTHING that can be assembled into a marketable product. My guess is the cheap/counterfeit routers were supposed to end up on the domestic Chinese market, but somebody discovered they could get more for them in the US.

    If the goal was espionage, it would make more sense to retrofit the REAL product so there would be no quality issues. Since any communications worth stealing would probably be encrypted before it hits the router, I think they could get a lot more mileage out of spyware on PCs and laptops.

    1. Re:Simplest explanation is the most likely by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      There have been grey and black market Cisco devices floating around for as long as I've been in IT. This isn't some new amazing thing.

      Plus, it isn't the quality of the product that tips people off, it's when you call Cisco to get your new routers on your support contract and they tell you the serial numbers are invalid.

  52. Soviets duplicating american planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " According to the Wiki [wikipedia.org] the copy they made of the sidewinder was so perfect you could mix and match parts and it would work perfectly.:"

    My friend, that's nothing. In WW2 a B-29 on a mission over Japan made an emergency landing in the USSR. At the time, Japan and the USSR were not at war so the plane had to be interred. The USSR didn't have a good long range bomber so Stalin ordered the airplane designers to duplicate the B-29 EXACTLY. The duplication was so exact that even patched up battle damage was duplicated! Apparently, nobody wanted to alter Stalin's orders in the least.

  53. Wait.. by squidflakes · · Score: 1

    So you're saying these Crisco routers might be fakes? How is one to know? When I loaded the SIO everything looked fine. I got the normal & prompt, typed in en, got to the @ prompt, and starting inputting config.

    OPSF works fine, EYGRT is running, and PGB is passing routes like a champ!

  54. Is she hot? by toxonix · · Score: 0

    "Lee also stripped Zhao, from China, of her U.S. citizenship and ordered her to forfeit four homes in Maryland and northern Virginia, three condominiums in Chantilly, a Porsche Boxster, a Porsche Cayenne, a Mercedes sedan and seven bank accounts containing more than $1.6 million." Daaayauuum! She was doing pretty damn well if you ask me. Or anyone. Who would really care that they weren't getting 100% genuine Cisco equipment (except for maybe Cisco)?

  55. Re:A judge can strip someone of their US citizensh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [...] also stripped Zhao, from China, of her U.S. citizenship"

    What the hell? I was unaware that there are different classes of citizenship. What if a person born as an American did this?

    Then they go to jail longer. The far right wants to tell you that the country is being given away to illegal immigrants when, in fact, US Immigration policies are a lot tougher than they are aware of. In extraordinary cases, even when there are no lies on the citizenship application, the federal government can legally take away a naturalized citizen's citizenship. This is usually reserved for hard core felony convictions (murder, rape, child molestation, drug dealing at the wholesale level, human smuggling, etc, etc) but it can happen. Usually what happens is after the sentence is served, the individual is then deported back to their home country.

  56. it gets better, in _all_ directions... by sznupi · · Score: 1

    One of my favs is the 1st successful US cruise missile, still firmly WW2; it was the V-1, reverse-engineered from bits and pieces (also gathered from early tests in Pomerania, and IIRC even some plans). Strangely absent from popcultural conciousness... what, because the US did the copying? ;p

    Jerrycans history is perhaps the greatest of all. Or maybe the Soviet RPG-7, reverse engineered, made in & used by US forces now? Or maybe Katyusha, copied by Waffen-SS?

    The F117 (US stealth tech in general) also inspired by and building on some Soviet breakthroughs.

    One can also get designers outright (Sikorsky? Von Braun team?); defections were in all directions

    And we can't forget the greatest game of all time, Tetris (even if that's a bit outside og the scope here)

    Generally, not doing it would be just stupid. If there's a successful base design out there, you take and improve from it; trying and aiming to trace the already completed necessary intermediate steps would be foolish. Nobody did it when revving up their tech industries, aiming for a status of industrial powerhouse.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter